Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
task_id
stringlengths
36
64
origin
imagewidth (px)
1.02k
1.02k
ours
imagewidth (px)
1.04k
1.04k
leader
imagewidth (px)
1.04k
1.04k
winner
stringclasses
3 values
ours_penalty
float64
3
6
leader_penalty
float64
3
6
gen_time
float64
14.5
31.9
ours_ply_size_mb
float64
2.05
93.2
issues
stringlengths
78
429
0034f67a5a3e1fa3a785dcf12f0e4806de3665879c3b7adb45c02e95e46e3616
draw
4
4
19.031828
7.29
First model has minor shape differences and some detail inconsistencies; second model has moderate issues with overall style and detail accuracy compared to the reference image.
02449b777d8325a7f7e2042b2ee32ba0d1b4f49a09ffa1b1ec9f2cbd0067ae93
draw
6
6
20.366092
50.41
First model has similar flower type but lacks natural background and has inconsistent lighting/shading. Second model has different flower structure, added pots, and less natural appearance.
03bf36122dc1da98a0fa45008c539a4899eec2cf7b659aff5c50fbbf9193d1d2
draw
3
3
27.556912
66.31
Both models have minor shape differences and slight variations in texture/lighting compared to the prompt, but overall match the chair type and basic elements (armchair, throw blanket, pillow, wooden legs)
0581411a50cf5d7f30ab67e9d53ebbe793aadf3b2441c3ca402325326a3db86f
draw
4
4
19.332809
19.91
First model has minor shape differences and slight detail variations; second model has more significant style and detail changes, particularly in the center element and stem base.
08716ba11520bf19be5fe52ab460dc5eebb88cc1fc6ec6ae467d6f15f31b6012
draw
4
5
21.011679
20.62
First model has minor shape differences and missing small details; second model has moderate issues with box design and overall style matching
08fca7169c278423c67ecaca8a226c7b5ea4d33d78ba7f81d50a322ed96df312
draw
6
5
28.49171
80.1
Both models have some shape differences from the prompt, with moderate issues in button placement, screen content details, and overall form matching. Neither matches perfectly but are somewhat related to the prompt.
0d1c433bf80c45138f3d795b61a08300b63590a6305b65ac945d46df70e80528
ours
4
6
17.804632
21.8
First model has some shape differences in the bowl and dragonfly details, second model is completely unrelated (no bowl, different style)
0e9b8aa1b7c508a02a4a8427fb5d1808fc20978c0ccfc0565a42548f196f5031
draw
4
4
22.328682
50.13
Both models have minor shape differences in the pot and food item, with some details not matching the prompt's specific textures and proportions. The color tone and lighting also differ from the original prompt.
11a138bc419e5e61e904389c6bb5bcb9fede49a7873ad37316667f96abc9212e
draw
4
4
22.443802
24.16
First model has better shape similarity but color details differ; second model has more significant color and detail differences
11a5f80d11d5fa36989b603419b6135b215cbb1d4d0966942652efae9b104143
draw
4
5
15.952216
19.81
First model has better color matching but lacks some detailed elements; second model has different color scheme and missing details
11d30908bf1c6b65318373412b8a0a345cbbb1635dd53e523e245ca93a6ae08b
leader
5
3
21.548241
41.06
First model has different lighting and background, second model has closer color match but some detail differences
124417db16e4b1b349178621cc957bdc1983431cb019b44ae7d8515a7f6242f0
draw
5
5
14.497773
10.54
First model has some shape differences and missing texture details; second model has major style and structural issues, with incorrect hanging mechanism and overall appearance
14f80504c56effdd9bca0a1b6e5227c0083bde89fc874d5c45dc3390cf01e3ce
draw
5
5
18.078848
11.93
First model has some shape differences and missing details; second model has major structural issues, not matching the original tube shape
16ade48e2ea97d78f97543e81c65f98f0190889163344d82ea6f2341d081561b
leader
5
3
18.108313
33.33
First model has distorted shape and poor structural integrity; second model has better structure but simplified details
16c601301eb9677e98f04de0478b3d69e1ada51574cfd51d7e86029a3f81936e
draw
4
4
18.093074
14.66
First model has better shape similarity but lacks detail precision; second model has moderate style deviation and missing small details
1855c5592cfc3b8556c9c67a2c216bb7fd83826b8333520818ad774611872f49
draw
4
5
25.180615
57.71
First model has minor shape and detail differences; second model has more significant style and structural differences
1b000364de44fc77208d95f6d155799f86a0def3cf6fee08a5fd4d985971c07d
leader
5
3
21.029006
27.46
First model has stylized, simplified shape with minor details missing; second model has closer resemblance but still lacks some lighting details from prompt
1c548e3ed10a49f79e5df838136ae2a28b503a0d4c5bb3c71fedba0fb197f087
draw
3
3
19.684191
28.25
Both models have minor shape differences and slight variations in bow placement compared to the prompt, but overall match the general style and structure of a top hat with bow.
1e29dc9e121266792cac3d62f1d6353fac10fea2ad57215d677d86c11f813615
leader
6
4
16.565418
25.1
First model has distorted shapes and incorrect gem appearance; second model has better structure but still lacks precise gem details matching the prompt
1f310cbf91cae354910c44c8a3ae402f010f222e8961e3a89fc0e84582128853
draw
4
4
18.131996
29.89
First model has minor shape differences and some detail inconsistencies; second model has more significant issues with style and details
1fde24c1fa597076c7ac343480ef30010c7306223f229276615c802270b839ed
draw
4
5
17.236998
35.02
First model has minor shape differences and text variations; second model has more significant style and detail issues
203a8159ddbeab2a86a2a819f1b7c2ea24adb90e08ea89db63370eddc92947e3
draw
3
4
24.948648
54.39
First model has minor shape differences and lighting variations; second model has more significant detail differences and style variations
2229cf5f-955c-4bc2-91c3-df9255a1c01d
draw
5
6
19.396346
21.12
First model has similar gem shape but different setting details and band texture; second model has completely different gem cut and setting style, less similar to original prompt
22de4efc4723f624b92889e8c79c9b4fb903e8a6b5907c9f0727ede8f2ccab47
draw
6
6
19.122975
44.74
First model has similar color scheme but different panel shapes and less realistic texture; second model has completely different panel patterns and less accurate shape matching
22f497b84d9d8a3426bac9b7496af80a9c31deb0fda9c10c9e9833dea507ad1c
draw
6
6
21.931272
42.79
First model has some shape differences and missing details compared to prompt; second model has major issues with overall structure and object similarity
24553772-96b9-4c11-a880-56d125634a7a
draw
4
4
18.929245
34.24
First model has minor shape differences and missing small architectural details compared to prompt. Second model has more significant issues with overall structure and style matching.
282c299a1c43900c834d6fac46725fd58812ce8db538df628752eb8452ae0a00
draw
4
3
19.42916
29.66
Both models have minor shape differences and slightly altered details compared to the prompt, but overall structure and color scheme match reasonably well
2ce24d6b8dd9f244bfd4c0851dd8f03184d93b0dc7bafc22feabb8c8adef523b
draw
4
3
23.903373
46.84
Both models have minor shape differences and some texture variations compared to the prompt, with some details not matching exactly
2ed72b6b9c9b345b17eca522a2584c99018da0f03990817ec082e8babe26291f
draw
5
5
15.678696
12.44
First model has some shape similarities but has exaggerated features and different proportions. Second model has major structural differences and doesn't match the prompt's style/ details.
33532e138e69ddba7c5e762eed4bedb6b3fcd1a55302cd784c823d8d76d705f2
draw
5
5
20.213162
12.82
First model has some shape differences and missing small details compared to prompt; second model has more significant issues with style and missing details
33827979d7e59540146de3bd1d75e2e1bee4d532e1a61f2426689a0f37baa943
draw
4
4
17.216405
18.49
First model has minor shape differences and some detail variations; second model has more significant style and structural differences, with altered shape and details
364f2e60a97f04ff4292f98b65e765c5bfbfd61615da2ff56ff9fbad4380f625
ours
4
6
18.441418
32.99
First model has some shape differences and lighting issues; second model has major shape and detail problems, doesn't match the original's crispy texture and arrangement
37ca201e96add2bac00fa0ee34a36e0643f287da1e46eb336d6df4f42c708610
draw
4
3
19.614373
11.38
Both models have minor shape differences and slightly different texture details compared to the prompt. The first model has more pronounced texture details, while the second has smoother texture. Both have the basic shape and handle structure, but not perfect match to the prompt's detailed texture and lighting.
38987a28c7b616879a23f7e08ac732df474b9e90684393521f765c04ed0b0fe6
draw
3
3
21.126041
18.56
Both models have similar shape but lack the detailed texture and environmental context (like the scattered debris and background elements) from the original prompt. The color tone and some small details differ slightly.
3a0d4173e8316a33298c124eacbba9b20ca3cfed5f6307ee3bc945ab644ab1e1
draw
4
4
20.332588
16
First model has minor shape differences and some detail variations; second model has more significant style and detail differences, with altered umbrella shape and handle design
3aff357f2c9bc317c083c24d896cdc32f43dd78f0831c3a359f67d08771d23de
draw
4
4
31.865321
84.62
First model has minor shape differences and some detail variations; second model has more significant style and structural differences
3df9aac28adfa792e385c45498f7464601e572aaeeaf965ecd96e327f26569e2
draw
5
5
17.073278
14.49
Both models have some issues with matching the prompt. The first model has different positioning of the figurine and some texture differences. The second model has similar issues with figurine positioning and overall detail matching. Both lack the specific aged appearance and exact design details of the original prompt image.
3e743f77623f822d1f1f0264f823576aa8a20bd7344ba0dce92ef8ac63a82547
draw
6
5
24.555928
61.97
Both models have some issues with the glass ball clarity, tree details, and base texture. The first model has less defined tree details and the second has some extra elements. Both lack the sharp clarity and specific details of the original prompt.
3f48598320210ac8659a36fd57bccddba1bc5acbab93ac579a0587321088aa84
draw
3
4
19.537339
22.31
First model has minor detail differences (floral engravings less defined), second model has moderate style/color issues, both have some detail variations from prompt
4024d0d716bab965da116c926ce66d038effa6491958e34b61aa503fdf91ee59
draw
4
4
16.093968
18.83
First model has better detail matching the prompt, second model has moderate issues with decorative elements and material consistency
4265649c1aaeccc53febeeba273dd30e98a57271e3db940e0ac5652e3e33bd30
draw
4
3
17.941601
8.51
Both models have similar umbrella structure but show variations in pattern details and shading. Some views have slightly different umbrella shape and pattern consistency compared to the prompt.
449de7f2e694785e0879713b2b4ce3330941e7bd607d8ff0d67ac5b326aacee8
draw
5
4
18.787515
45.07
Both models have moderate issues with the image prompt. They lack the detailed wood grain texture, the specific arrangement of the pipes, and the overall lighting/ambience matching the original image. The first model has some shape differences and the second has different pipe designs and keyboard appearance.
44ff32bf-1a77-4e7e-b45a-d8778393748a
draw
4
3
17.274109
3.33
Both models have minor issues with detail accuracy and style consistency compared to the prompt. Some decorative elements appear slightly simplified or altered, and lighting/texture quality differs from the prompt's high-quality rendering.
4593ab1c-a4fa-48a7-93c0-f17c57fa2af5
draw
4
4
19.69981
21.35
First model has minor shape differences and missing small details compared to prompt; second model has moderate issues with style and significant details missing
48fb4b27684ae9b4af97387ad0379a4312538bfee3af6ed3253eecb6a5b93d4f
draw
6
6
28.852571
85.89
First model has some shape differences and less precise faceting; second model has major structural issues with overall form and faceting accuracy
4a46caa383a05ffe10f5ce524096cbd8c0c9916fc621f36a9731583d637846c4
draw
6
6
20.17996
36.75
First model has different head shape, eye style, and overall design details. Second model has more significant deviations in structure, proportions, and detail matching.
4e9106249bc34ce0ebc0429b6329293a3d9177332f7ba2e9cae930727289cac5
draw
3
3
19.417338
21.36
Both models have minor shape differences and slight detail variations compared to the prompt, but overall match the general form and components (wooden body with light-colored elements)
4f0bdbaa6affcb59438400cfd2d8be5f661e51f313673e4f44205e15a5c0165a
draw
3
3
19.125801
29.14
Both models generally match the prompt but have slight variations in texture details, lighting, and color consistency with the original prompt's green glass vase with speckled texture. Some views show minor shape differences and lighting variations.
525fbbdb868e86a55d2cae129d03ba345392e8ffdbe7ba6ca99ff1ecdc3cb984
draw
5
4
21.661966
26.54
Both models have some deviations from the original prompt. First model has visible skin tones and specific clothing details not matching the prompt's simplicity. Second model has different draping style and face details. Both lack the prompt's minimalist approach with solid blue fabric and lack of visible skin/undergarments.
55db1e0e8eb100747a50611d1897d3a8fc4d05e8bc6a2bd3586a43cdcb1a8616
draw
5
4
16.020584
12.37
Both models have moderate issues with style and details. The first model has some shape differences and lighting issues, while the second model has some stylistic variations and missing details compared to the prompt.
5806f9f3a8e69b8336a61f98fc0327e98749e8f50cfc00ac6ea7427e2db5cf8b
leader
6
4
18.744847
31.7
First model has incorrect lighting/color matching, laser effects inconsistent; second model has simplified details but closer shape match
582b5fa7c5b21b3baf09bf58599e7b4082d21874be3afb3beb6a936a26cc0ffc
draw
4
5
18.875993
11.4
First model has minor shape differences and less detailed texture; second model has moderate issues with overall form and detail accuracy
5a5fbe25dd2291f41fcd4a1e2a2f066cf7d7475edcc602650ecff4bfadbc8028
draw
4
4
22.475462
26.61
First model has similar color scheme but slightly different shape and texture details; second model has different shape and some missing details, less accurate to original prompt
5aa3a22ae7830606ad5038ea1c7273995d7cd534f883b98fd3402e526ab79391
ours
3
5
22.314931
35.3
First model has minor shape differences and lighting issues; second model has major color and structural deviations
5eaf242b81d934958f083ecc80e5eb718e47760646755c0180e640b1401f14f8
leader
6
4
22.091357
44.08
First model has poor lighting and detail quality, second model has better adherence but still lacks some flower details and precise structure matching
69847a5d5949d8ce2877b864e7b9ad32ffc7e90b546414d5b79572f0a6669cad
draw
3
4
18.75616
34.53
First model has minor shape differences and texture variations; second model has more significant color and detail issues, with less accurate shape representation
6b042c50676b622a978dca8a732a26f8d56a35c8fbf74a4d4a4fcaa7afd886dc
draw
6
5
17.700007
16.63
Both models have significant text and detail discrepancies with the prompt. Text is distorted, style doesn't match, and some details are missing. The leather texture and overall appearance are somewhat similar but not matching the prompt's specific elements.
6e1fa873a0f08a0e1079b858ed64cc40c9dee2c96833edb07fb1522a976dd2e6
draw
3
3
20.577247
20.15
Both models have minor shape differences and slight detail variations compared to the prompt, but overall match the general form of the teapot with the long spout, rounded body, and lid with knob. The metallic finish is generally captured, though lighting and shading have some differences.
70010d16816f40ee956f3e2c396e03fadb5f4982d6c9356f35573d068de44611
draw
5
5
24.487762
56.53
First model has better color matching but shape is less accurate; second model has significant color deviation and less detail fidelity
7171ad88e62858e96cbcd9f6cf1cad5c89f1bfb818f5d208ceacd24e489adb34
ours
3
5
20.286035
13.61
First model has minor shape differences and missing small details; second model has moderate issues with style and significant details missing
71bc1ac0c0eb9bd1be4a7150a602ad7727947ed1c5248aba711d47690ea14e3a
draw
5
6
30.653046
93.17
First model has some detail differences (gem arrangement, box structure), second model has major structural and decorative differences from original prompt
7811aa32454d6f1cf9ef5ff2a6958d94140e20c33c2fae079debfd26809c3539
leader
5
3
16.598966
15.42
First model has inconsistent lighting and some shape variations; second model has closer match but still has some lighting/texture differences
78eef3555870d070d454d48893f45d9d1d932da566a4c0bfb4701037d761eaed
draw
4
5
18.915704
10.9
First model has better detail matching the prompt's metallic texture and lighting, second model has less detail and different color tones. Both have minor shape differences but first is closer.
7976c38065b686a9d704de5b957e2acddf12c6a77979713f245262354ae776f2
draw
3
4
28.024655
66.73
First model has minor shape differences and slightly different texture details; second model has more significant style differences and less accurate detail matching
79dba7120244f263228580c4069f51578a30f97304cc2f93c7b7c0666e9eb6b6
draw
5
5
20.609678
43.39
First model has some detail variations (e.g. unicorn position, floral patterns), second model has major structural and detail inconsistencies with prompt
7c7df949fd112c9a3b33311bcfa387160927231a5aa41cb3a0064618d1abe87e
draw
4
4
25.390001
57.1
First model has minor differences in book arrangement and shelf details; second model has more significant style and detail differences, with altered shelf angles and book arrangements
854c1449-39a1-4846-8af4-d6ebe8d4f619
draw
4
4
20.268848
27.12
First model has some shape differences and missing small details; second model has more significant issues with style and details
8916afced891fe7c446c3e06d522c9ddff2605fffff84b578ba0dea1f4495730
draw
3
4
20.376436
42.82
First model has better shape similarity but second has more significant detail differences. Both have minor shape variations and missing small texture details compared to the prompt.
89e1b8998cc50f9be2f55127b09effa9030e523bec6d65b72f74d4c4db06099b
draw
4
4
22.044502
27.3
First model has minor shape differences and slight detail variations; second model has more noticeable style and detail differences, particularly in color consistency and facial features
8a08215ae9ee2976fbddabdca5bc5046c9c8b9dc5829a336cf3bcba249fc00f5
draw
5
4
18.707994
36.46
Both models have some shape differences from the original prompt, with moderate issues in style and detail matching. Details like facial features, horn structure, and body proportions show noticeable deviations.
8dbd97f96c4d02a66fac4a71ae0d6377459b3400dca489574454a5bbecb57154
draw
4
4
19.628498
40.32
First model has minor shape differences and slightly different fruit placement; second model has more significant detail issues and less accurate representation of the original's texture and fruit arrangement
92036f3abc8c73b3d2185d7afec12ab838bf0d50910b31c0c1d4f4114442d004
ours
3
5
20.267839
41.06
First model has minor shape differences and some environmental elements don't match perfectly; second model has more significant style and detail issues compared to the prompt
92b6f4511409351316f198024d3b849b9d86d469a6549722e70e0c0cee504916
draw
4
4
22.027085
38.4
First model has minor shape differences and slightly different leaf details; second model has more significant detail loss and less realistic flower structure
9878bf40b07cfc675cc42f91cfd4d911c3856c8e2258e19f7c0f7536320c0b64
draw
6
6
20.921627
30.69
First model has some color variations (red roof instead of natural wood), second model has major structural differences and simplified details. Both lack the detailed wood texture and specific decorative elements of the prompt.
988209beaf8802e7b01184b774fdbbc2b17bcac96dd102343e6bad1527504ee9
draw
5
4
16.302859
16.52
Both models have some issues with basket texture, flower arrangement, and overall style matching the prompt. The first model has different basket colors and textures, while the second has variations in basket appearance and flower positioning. Neither perfectly matches the prompt's detailed texture and arrangement.
9892e6f5c8dc0ccb7b453f21860dc2be3f7be0157c5add3c1943c65e1b278f44
draw
5
4
23.821257
46.8
Both models have similar color scheme but differ in detail complexity, head design, and mechanical structure. First model has more detailed facial features and smoother surface, second has simpler design with different joint structures. Neither perfectly matches the original prompt's level of detail and specific design elements.
9923a943b8a628ee3a16ca4111f5010e876e90b4f491e2cbd8a036f0bd4cb750
draw
4
3
16.096205
9.39
Slight shape differences and minor detail variations between models and prompt
99b7192fd902db75f393fda95ce3f811278636a6df92f6c691dc819890771116
draw
4
4
18.354734
29.57
First model has minor shape differences and missing small details; second model has moderate issues with style and significant details missing
9b22fb789fbc3d9e7cd50e4cc21300bcfac60930735d4653d97dfd6d9316ef84
draw
4
4
19.369936
9.33
First model has minor shape differences and some detail variations; second model has more significant style and detail differences
9c515261c35590822a4ff6f1fe5781aa55da3453bb8be5904aa2f0b1bf0fd0a8
draw
5
4
17.568664
21.14
Both models have some shape differences from the prompt, with altered lantern structure, glass panel shapes, and overall proportions. The first model has more color variations and the second has different structural details, both showing moderate deviations from the original prompt's specific lantern design.
9c6df3b2c14e9a312d3236417e1aea3aab531b70c487edfd1eeeee2fabbc79d2
leader
5
3
17.702515
39.34
First model has exaggerated details and stylized elements not matching original; second model has closer shape but still lacks some original details
9dbc68f175b56e60ae95f9511fb94546bbf4b49c0f5b7e5bf5b607cb38b19bc1
draw
6
5
16.332466
7.97
Both models have some shape differences from the prompt, with less detailed glass transparency and altered metallic textures. The rope/knot details are simplified, and the overall lighting/contrast doesn't match the prompt's realistic style.
a4d44ab3b65677ae3e2194f4d9fe32a7d76ae039d5fc6fb684dd78a2fbf0adf9
draw
4
4
21.713432
31.95
First model has minor shape differences and lighting variations; second model has more significant detail issues and color inconsistencies
a60c5b2c3dafb223d0ecbd408995e8bb346960822148f78b30c106b1375e1ad6
leader
5
3
17.803495
32.32
First model has more varied tulip colors and different ground texture; second model has simpler tulip arrangement and less detail, both have simplified style compared to prompt's photorealistic look
a77062a2d0222debdbd68d33e96865cda4df9ac6a18d9f0a507033a9c79002e0
draw
5
4
16.316907
25.15
Both models have some shape differences from the prompt, with variations in the eagle's posture, ship details, and overall style. Details like the eagle's wing position, ship structure, and texture matching are not perfect, but they're still recognizable as the same concept.
aacb989d16471a364824ac145d8b06fa273e3a8ac0af3ed6ea78e1656777d830
draw
4
3
18.945982
27.56
Both models have minor shape differences and some small detail variations compared to the prompt, but overall match the DeLorean design with gull-wing doors and general shape. Details like wheel design, interior visibility, and specific color shading differ slightly.
ab455629abc3223b6b448253da59120dccdceccf123354ceadd5a904e2bed8d3
draw
5
4
19.416589
34.76
Both models have moderate issues with style and detail accuracy compared to the prompt. They lack the fine detail and smooth finish of the reference, with some shape differences in hair and drapery.
ab506d408112974e5ba8f2a6dcae249e7c2674b6e60f0dff4053a9ddc28fbd33
draw
3
3
17.654604
19.29
Both models have similar shape but some flower details and color variations differ from the prompt. Some flowers appear less defined or have different arrangements.
accbba278390739a94975fe2a61c53e7b30e6fa17cb8e8b9bb7bc572a5fb8d44
draw
5
5
23.667025
54.31
First model has some shape differences and missing detailed textures; second model has major structural changes with circular element replacing original design, both have style deviations from prompt
acd3d46a7d9b6cfbc7337bbfc6a785524933994f198df4d4c6211721d33846c6
draw
3
3
19.420994
11.58
Both models have minor shape differences and slight detail variations compared to the prompt, but overall match the cylindrical component with threaded ends and central opening structure.
aebc379c6b12425cd01b6ddd3f6adc644c2ad09b27300f48f2d9f7d1ccb65f8a
draw
6
5
17.413964
13.26
Both models have significant issues with candle colors (mix of blue/teal and white), flame details, and overall structure compared to the prompt. The prompt shows a candelabra with blue candles and golden structure, while the generated models have mixed candle colors, different flame styles, and some structural variations.
afd25f32172975ac089bf170a52a6fea54fd6270042ad3c392fcd5d16dd1da1d
draw
5
5
18.206141
21.73
Both models have moderate issues with style and details. The first model has more detailed base elements and better texture matching, while the second has some shape differences in clothing and base elements. Neither perfectly matches the original prompt's level of detail and style.
b110ed3a3548f903076d10ed37efd1117e153cb0248215db63c8c27eb31f0144
draw
6
5
20.623729
20.66
Both models have similar color schemes but differ in patch patterns, shape details, and basket appearance. They match the general hot air balloon concept but have moderate deviations from the original prompt's specific visual details.
b57421b571110de4bc492bce2481407f7740fc4242178a232f0dc34246bc1df4
draw
4
4
17.932284
16.52
First model has better color matching and puzzle piece details but has slight shape variations. Second model has more significant style differences with less detail matching.
b8a0a728fa4a2f2b7160fa0f5a8df2dbb0d53b338010ce310d1d3e1625d1de92
leader
5
3
20.674996
16.16
First model has minor shape differences and missing environmental context matching the prompt's neon-lit environment. Second model has closer shape match but still lacks environmental context and some details from the prompt.
ba495014c7920c09602f1ecc0c75c051f005dcb6a8bbf132d07ede2ee43b9e32
draw
4
4
19.703057
38.69
First model has minor shape differences and some detail variations; second model has more significant style and detail differences
bce2d1db387cfd5acf13509c542fe3cd722b31a11980419487b502f830cd4a44
draw
4
5
25.750016
57.92
First model has minor shape differences and some detail variations; second model has more significant style and detail issues, with altered box structure and bird position
bde166eae9a467e70699be378dfd90814e7fa9637899667631fd2729fb7bdf47
draw
4
4
19.379476
6.95
Both models have similar structure but differ in detail quality, lighting, and specific design elements from the prompt. They lack the polished, high-quality rendering and specific mechanical details of the reference image.
be94887e8e032e46d4bbd2f2024382c94b103450d42bf7b9ce9eb28198be507c
draw
4
4
20.879869
21.5
First model has better detail matching the reference, second has more significant deviations in shape and details
c1abfbc5fb9bc7f6d31a03986d730328e1757e24a12f27824fc77ef17ff51578
draw
5
4
21.840709
61.31
Both models have moderate issues with the prompt adherence. The first model has better color representation of the crystals but lacks the detailed texture of the outer shell. The second model has more accurate crystal shapes but still lacks the detailed texture of the outer shell and has some color variations. Both models have significant details missing in terms of texture and lighting precision compared to the prompt image.
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
YAML Metadata Warning: empty or missing yaml metadata in repo card (https://huggingface.co/docs/hub/datasets-cards)

Benchmark Results: v2.5.0

Overview

  • Round: 14
  • Test Name: v2.5.0
  • Timestamp: 2026-01-17 16:41:29

Summary

Metric Value
Total Tasks 128
Total Judged 128
Skipped 0
Gen Failed 0
Render Failed 0
Judge Failed 0

Results

Result Count
🏆 WINS 6
🤝 DRAWS 111
❌ LOSSES 11

Performance

Metric Value
Win Rate 4.7%
Margin -3.9%
Avg Gen Time 20.35s

Methodology

  • Judge Model: thudm/glm-4.1v-9b-thinking (via OpenRouter)
  • Position-Balanced: 2 passes with swapped order to avoid position bias
  • Penalty Scale: 0 (perfect) to 10 (completely wrong)
  • Winner: Lower average penalty wins (draw if difference ≤ 1)

Files

  • benchmark_v2.5.0.json - Full benchmark results
  • */ours.png - Our rendered 3D models
  • */leader.png - Leader's rendered 3D models
  • */origin.png - Original prompt images
Downloads last month
21