Datasets:

yuri1996
/

round_14_v2.3.0

task_id stringlengths 36 64	winner stringclasses 3 values	ours_penalty float64 3 8	leader_penalty float64 3 6	gen_time float64 19.9 31.4	ours_ply_size_mb float64 1.95 83.5	issues stringlengths 73 373
0034f67a5a3e1fa3a785dcf12f0e4806de3665879c3b7adb45c02e95e46e3616	leader	7	3	22.241306	7.59	First model is a violin-like instrument with poor detail and wrong shape; second model closely matches the prompt with similar wood texture, beaded edge, and overall form
02449b777d8325a7f7e2042b2ee32ba0d1b4f49a09ffa1b1ec9f2cbd0067ae93	draw	6	6	26.800225	50.67	First model has similar flower type but lacks background context and has simplified structure. Second model has different flower structure, added pots, and altered color tones. Both have moderate to major issues with prompt adherence.
03bf36122dc1da98a0fa45008c539a4899eec2cf7b659aff5c50fbbf9193d1d2	draw	3	3	26.81935	49.65	Both models have minor shape differences and slight variations in texture/finish compared to the prompt, but overall match the general style and elements (chair with throw and pillow) of the prompt.
0581411a50cf5d7f30ab67e9d53ebbe793aadf3b2441c3ca402325326a3db86f	draw	5	4	24.386231	20.53	Both models have significant issues with the flower structure, petal shapes, and mouth details. The first model has jagged petals and mismatched mouth shapes, while the second has different mouth designs and petal textures. Neither matches the prompt's flower structure and mouth details precisely.
08716ba11520bf19be5fe52ab460dc5eebb88cc1fc6ec6ae467d6f15f31b6012	draw	6	5	24.065578	19.36	Both models have some shape differences from the prompt, with box details and horn positioning not matching exactly. The first model has boxes with different textures and horn details, while the second has different horn shapes and box decorations. Both have moderate deviations from the prompt's specific design elements.
08fca7169c278423c67ecaca8a226c7b5ea4d33d78ba7f81d50a322ed96df312	leader	6	4	23.049256	62.53	First model has major shape and detail issues, second has moderate issues
0d1c433bf80c45138f3d795b61a08300b63590a6305b65ac945d46df70e80528	draw	6	6	21.392317	20.16	First model has bowl but missing detailed dragonfly; second model has dragonfly but missing bowl context
0e9b8aa1b7c508a02a4a8427fb5d1808fc20978c0ccfc0565a42548f196f5031	draw	3	3	23.952627	50.93	Both models have minor shape differences in the pot and food item compared to the prompt. The pot's color and shape are close but not perfect, and the food item has slight variations in texture and positioning.
11a138bc419e5e61e904389c6bb5bcb9fede49a7873ad37316667f96abc9212e	leader	5	3	22.534069	35.34	First model has poor color matching and detail quality, second model has better color but still lacks some texture details
11a5f80d11d5fa36989b603419b6135b215cbb1d4d0966942652efae9b104143	leader	6	3	21.062893	19.06	First model has poor rendering quality with transparency issues and lacks detailed elements. Second model has better structure but still misses some details from the prompt.
11d30908bf1c6b65318373412b8a0a345cbbb1635dd53e523e245ca93a6ae08b	leader	5	3	22.634359	40.45	First model has minor shape differences and lacks the detailed internal pattern of the prompt; second model has better shape match but still lacks the specific internal pattern detail of the prompt
124417db16e4b1b349178621cc957bdc1983431cb019b44ae7d8515a7f6242f0	draw	5	5	30.045211	10.65	First model has some shape differences and missing texture details; second model has major structural and style issues with the hanging mechanism and overall form
14f80504c56effdd9bca0a1b6e5227c0083bde89fc874d5c45dc3390cf01e3ce	leader	5	3	24.040995	24.07	First model has wrong shape and missing network pattern details; second model has closer shape but still lacks precise network pattern details
16ade48e2ea97d78f97543e81c65f98f0190889163344d82ea6f2341d081561b	leader	5	3	19.903752	39.29	First model has fragmented appearance with multiple panels, while second model has more cohesive stained glass structure. Both maintain forest theme but first has more artistic fragmentation issues, second has better adherence to stained glass form.
16c601301eb9677e98f04de0478b3d69e1ada51574cfd51d7e86029a3f81936e	leader	6.5	3	24.210949	12.14	First model has poor texture and shape accuracy, second model has better shape but still lacks detail precision
1855c5592cfc3b8556c9c67a2c216bb7fd83826b8333520818ad774611872f49	draw	4	5	25.320074	61.1	First model has minor shape differences and missing small details; second model has more significant style and detail issues
1b000364de44fc77208d95f6d155799f86a0def3cf6fee08a5fd4d985971c07d	leader	7.5	3	22.136967	25.05	First model has artistic/watercolor style with distorted proportions and missing detailed features; second model has better shape but still lacks the specific lighting and detail of the prompt image
1c548e3ed10a49f79e5df838136ae2a28b503a0d4c5bb3c71fedba0fb197f087	draw	4	3	24.119007	21.03	Both models have minor shape differences and inconsistent bow placement compared to the prompt, but overall match the general top hat concept
1e29dc9e121266792cac3d62f1d6353fac10fea2ad57215d677d86c11f813615	leader	8	4	21.14235	26.95	First model has major issues with detail and realism, second model has minor issues with some details
1f310cbf91cae354910c44c8a3ae402f010f222e8961e3a89fc0e84582128853	draw	4	3	24.434721	26.1	Both models have minor shape differences and slightly different details compared to the prompt image. The first model has some issues with the roof structure and wheel design, while the second model has similar issues with the roof and some details. Both models generally match the prompt but have minor deviations.
1fde24c1fa597076c7ac343480ef30010c7306223f229276615c802270b839ed	draw	5	5	25.809197	39.78	Both models have moderate issues with matching the prompt. They generally resemble a stand mixer but have noticeable differences in shape, detail accuracy, and text elements. Bowl reflections and overall proportions are not perfectly matched to the reference image.
203a8159ddbeab2a86a2a819f1b7c2ea24adb90e08ea89db63370eddc92947e3	leader	5	3	27.139417	46.38	First model has black marks, second has better shape but first has more issues
2229cf5f-955c-4bc2-91c3-df9255a1c01d	leader	7.5	3	23.992323	15.1	First model has poor rendering quality, wrong gem shape, missing gold details and gem clarity. Second model has better quality but gem shape differs, missing some gold details.
22de4efc4723f624b92889e8c79c9b4fb903e8a6b5907c9f0727ede8f2ccab47	leader	6	4	22.147909	33.21	First model has distorted panel shapes and less defined texture; second model has closer panel structure but still some distortion
22f497b84d9d8a3426bac9b7496af80a9c31deb0fda9c10c9e9833dea507ad1c	draw	6	5	23.820166	48.02	Both models have moderate issues. They generally match the teal bookshelf structure but have significant differences in book arrangement, object details, and overall style compared to the prompt image. Some shelves and objects are missing or altered, and the overall aesthetic doesn't fully match the prompt's detailed arrangement.
24553772-96b9-4c11-a880-56d125634a7a	draw	5	4	21.58802	32.89	Both models have moderate issues with style and detail matching the original prompt. The first model has some shape differences and the second has significant detail variations, though both maintain the general structure of the original building.
282c299a1c43900c834d6fac46725fd58812ce8db538df628752eb8452ae0a00	draw	5	4	24.546945	26.31	Both models have moderate issues with style and detail accuracy compared to the prompt. They lack the precision of the original's mechanical details and text markings, with some shape variations and simplified textures.
2ce24d6b8dd9f244bfd4c0851dd8f03184d93b0dc7bafc22feabb8c8adef523b	leader	5	3	25.516046	42.21	First model has simplified, less detailed weaving and smoother surfaces; second model has better detail matching the prompt but some proportions differ
2ed72b6b9c9b345b17eca522a2584c99018da0f03990817ec082e8babe26291f	leader	5	3	22.625764	12.32	First model has significant detail differences (missing components, different antenna design), second model has closer match but still has some stylistic differences
33532e138e69ddba7c5e762eed4bedb6b3fcd1a55302cd784c823d8d76d705f2	leader	6	3	23.155981	10.93	First model has poor texture and detail quality, second model has better detail but some structural differences
33827979d7e59540146de3bd1d75e2e1bee4d532e1a61f2426689a0f37baa943	draw	5	4	24.058867	21.53	Both models have moderate issues with shape accuracy and detail matching the original prompt. The first model has some shape differences and the second has style variations that don't fully match the original's delicate, translucent structure.
364f2e60a97f04ff4292f98b65e765c5bfbfd61615da2ff56ff9fbad4380f625	draw	6	5	24.664457	21.88	Both models have moderate issues. They generally match the fried banana shape but lack the detailed texture, color consistency, and proper arrangement of the original image. Some models show transparency or incorrect lighting effects.
37ca201e96add2bac00fa0ee34a36e0643f287da1e46eb336d6df4f42c708610	leader	5	3	23.020687	7.71	First model has wrong color (dark gray instead of silver), missing handle details, and incorrect texture. Second model has closer color match but still has some shape and handle details issues.
38987a28c7b616879a23f7e08ac732df474b9e90684393521f765c04ed0b0fe6	draw	5	4	24.136681	20.32	Both models have some shape differences from the prompt, with the first model having extra handles and the second having a different spout shape. Both lack the detailed texture and aged appearance of the original copper pot, and the background elements are missing.
3a0d4173e8316a33298c124eacbba9b20ca3cfed5f6307ee3bc945ab644ab1e1	leader	6	3	23.354784	12.04	First model has wrong color scheme, missing detailed patterns, and incorrect handle shape. Second model has closer color match but still has some shape differences and missing details compared to prompt.
3aff357f2c9bc317c083c24d896cdc32f43dd78f0831c3a359f67d08771d23de	draw	4	4	25.335914	54.12	First model has minor shape differences and lighting variations; second model has more significant structural differences and style deviations
3df9aac28adfa792e385c45498f7464601e572aaeeaf965ecd96e327f26569e2	leader	6	4	30.429737	9.04	First model has poor texture quality, missing detailed inscriptions, and incorrect color tone. Second model has better detail but still lacks some intricate texturing and precise shape matching.
3e743f77623f822d1f1f0264f823576aa8a20bd7344ba0dce92ef8ac63a82547	draw	6	5	24.115418	57.36	Both models have some deviations from the prompt. First model has different glass clarity, tree details, and base texture. Second model has different crown style, glass texture, and tree decorations. Both lack the sharp detail and realistic glass appearance of the prompt image.
3f48598320210ac8659a36fd57bccddba1bc5acbab93ac579a0587321088aa84	draw	4	4	24.2772	26.42	First model has minor shape differences and detail variations; second model has more significant style and detail issues, with less accurate floral engravings and different base appearance
4024d0d716bab965da116c926ce66d038effa6491958e34b61aa503fdf91ee59	leader	5	3	24.071863	24.17	First model has minor detail issues (missing decorative elements, less polished finish), second model has closer match but still lacks some decorative details compared to prompt
4265649c1aaeccc53febeeba273dd30e98a57271e3db940e0ac5652e3e33bd30	leader	5	3	22.724557	8.21	First model has wrong style/color (solid black instead of zebra pattern), second model has partial match with zebra pattern but still has issues with details and style consistency
449de7f2e694785e0879713b2b4ce3330941e7bd607d8ff0d67ac5b326aacee8	draw	5	5	23.560153	49.09	First model has minor shape differences and missing small decorative details; second model has more significant style and detail issues, with different pipe arrangement and keyboard appearance
44ff32bf-1a77-4e7e-b45a-d8778393748a	draw	5	4	28.93716	2.79	Both models have moderate issues with detail accuracy and style consistency compared to the prompt. They lack the intricate engravings and ornate design elements visible in the original prompt image. The first model has simpler details and less texture variation, while the second model has some improved details but still doesn't match the prompt's level of craftsmanship.
4593ab1c-a4fa-48a7-93c0-f17c57fa2af5	leader	6	3	23.717654	19.89	First model has black artifacts and simplified structure; second model has better structure but still has minor shape differences
48fb4b27684ae9b4af97387ad0379a4312538bfee3af6ed3253eecb6a5b93d4f	leader	6	4	21.728799	31.92	First model has incorrect shape with open structure, second model has better shape but still lacks precision in faceting details compared to prompt
4a46caa383a05ffe10f5ce524096cbd8c0c9916fc621f36a9731583d637846c4	leader	6	3	21.654623	32.71	First model has transparency issues and simplified details; second model has closer match but some detail differences
4e9106249bc34ce0ebc0429b6329293a3d9177332f7ba2e9cae930727289cac5	draw	4	3	23.851275	14.65	Both models have similar overall shape but show minor differences in detail placement and texture precision compared to the prompt. The wooden texture and overall form are recognizable but not perfect matches.
4f0bdbaa6affcb59438400cfd2d8be5f661e51f313673e4f44205e15a5c0165a	draw	4	3	21.118558	26.18	Both models generally match the prompt but have slight variations in texture, lighting, and shape details. Some have different shading patterns and subtle shape differences from the original prompt.
525fbbdb868e86a55d2cae129d03ba345392e8ffdbe7ba6ca99ff1ecdc3cb984	draw	4	4	23.6422	13.66	First model has minor shape differences and background issues; second model has moderate style and detail differences
55db1e0e8eb100747a50611d1897d3a8fc4d05e8bc6a2bd3586a43cdcb1a8616	draw	5	4	22.882076	9.69	Both models have moderate issues with style and details. The first model has some shape differences and missing small details, while the second model has wrong style elements and significant details missing compared to the prompt.
5806f9f3a8e69b8336a61f98fc0327e98749e8f50cfc00ac6ea7427e2db5cf8b	leader	6	4	23.711856	17.48	First model has poor lighting and detail quality, second model has better detail but lacks laser beams from prompt
582b5fa7c5b21b3baf09bf58599e7b4082d21874be3afb3beb6a936a26cc0ffc	draw	5	5	22.962141	9.9	Both models have moderate issues with texture detail, color accuracy, and pose fidelity compared to the prompt image. They lack the fine scale details, specific color gradients, and the naturalistic lighting/reflection seen in the reference image.
5a5fbe25dd2291f41fcd4a1e2a2f066cf7d7475edcc602650ecff4bfadbc8028	leader	5	3	23.771292	12.57	First model has wrong style (too smooth, no fabric texture), second model has better shape but still lacks fabric details and background context
5aa3a22ae7830606ad5038ea1c7273995d7cd534f883b98fd3402e526ab79391	draw	6	6	24.735855	33.05	First model has distorted shape and feather positioning; second model has simplified structure and missing details
5eaf242b81d934958f083ecc80e5eb718e47760646755c0180e640b1401f14f8	leader	6	4	24.177611	30.46	First model has significant visual quality issues with low detail and poor rendering. Second model has better detail but some elements don't match the prompt's specific flower types and arrangement.
69847a5d5949d8ce2877b864e7b9ad32ffc7e90b546414d5b79572f0a6669cad	draw	5	4	23.747243	14.23	Both models have similar star-like shapes with pink color and white dots, but they lack the detailed texture and lighting quality of the original prompt image. The first model has less defined details and the second has different shading and texture.
6b042c50676b622a978dca8a732a26f8d56a35c8fbf74a4d4a4fcaa7afd886dc	draw	6	6	31.391798	18.26	First model has text variations and inconsistent details; second model has major text and structural issues
6e1fa873a0f08a0e1079b858ed64cc40c9dee2c96833edb07fb1522a976dd2e6	draw	4	3	23.561522	14.66	Both models generally match the prompt but have minor shape differences and some detail variations. The teapot shape is recognizable but not identical in proportions and details.
70010d16816f40ee956f3e2c396e03fadb5f4982d6c9356f35573d068de44611	leader	6	4	24.93038	35.85	First model has poor texture detail and shape accuracy; second model has better shape but still lacks fine texture details compared to prompt
7171ad88e62858e96cbcd9f6cf1cad5c89f1bfb818f5d208ceacd24e489adb34	leader	6	4	24.189874	14.15	First model has poor texture and detail, second model has better shape but still lacks fine details and realistic pearl appearance
71bc1ac0c0eb9bd1be4a7150a602ad7727947ed1c5248aba711d47690ea14e3a	draw	5	6	24.281705	81.07	First model has some detail differences (crystal arrangement, box structure), second model has major structural and decorative deviations from original prompt
7811aa32454d6f1cf9ef5ff2a6958d94140e20c33c2fae079debfd26809c3539	draw	4	3	30.217476	15.44	Both models have similar shape but differ in lighting/shading details and base appearance. Some minor details like bottle texture and base design don't match the original prompt exactly.
78eef3555870d070d454d48893f45d9d1d932da566a4c0bfb4701037d761eaed	draw	6	5	22.681828	7.7	Both models have moderate issues with style and details. They lack the detailed texture, lighting, and specific design elements (like the cockpit window shape, panel details, and overall weathering) of the original prompt image. The first model has more shape differences, while the second has different proportions and missing details.
7976c38065b686a9d704de5b957e2acddf12c6a77979713f245262354ae776f2	leader	5	3	25.622253	43.49	First model has moderate issues with texture and detail accuracy, second has minor issues with overall shape and detail matching
79dba7120244f263228580c4069f51578a30f97304cc2f93c7b7c0666e9eb6b6	draw	5	5	25.227154	36.27	First model has some detail variations (e.g. unicorn features, floral patterns), second model has major structural and detail deviations from original prompt
7c7df949fd112c9a3b33311bcfa387160927231a5aa41cb3a0064618d1abe87e	draw	6	6	27.857017	59.28	First model has some shape differences and book arrangement issues; second model has major structural and style deviations
854c1449-39a1-4846-8af4-d6ebe8d4f619	draw	4	4	24.166295	25.85	First model has some shape differences and missing small details; second model has more significant issues with style and details
8916afced891fe7c446c3e06d522c9ddff2605fffff84b578ba0dea1f4495730	leader	5	3	23.980595	25.32	First model has black elements and different structural details; second model has closer match but still has some detail differences
89e1b8998cc50f9be2f55127b09effa9030e523bec6d65b72f74d4c4db06099b	draw	4	4	24.654331	27.51	First model has minor shape differences and slight detail variations; second model has more noticeable style and detail differences
8a08215ae9ee2976fbddabdca5bc5046c9c8b9dc5829a336cf3bcba249fc00f5	leader	5	3	24.863442	29.59	First model has poor detail and transparency issues; second model has better detail but some stylistic differences
8dbd97f96c4d02a66fac4a71ae0d6377459b3400dca489574454a5bbecb57154	draw	4	4	21.869955	24.2	First model has minor shape differences and some detail variations; second model has more significant style and detail issues, with less accurate representation of the original's texture and decoration placement
92036f3abc8c73b3d2185d7afec12ab838bf0d50910b31c0c1d4f4114442d004	ours	4	6	21.998691	35.9	First model has some shape differences and missing environmental details; second model has major architectural style deviations and missing environmental elements
92b6f4511409351316f198024d3b849b9d86d469a6549722e70e0c0cee504916	leader	5	3	20.822686	21.67	First model has significant texture and detail issues, second model is closer but still has some detail differences
9878bf40b07cfc675cc42f91cfd4d911c3856c8e2258e19f7c0f7536320c0b64	draw	6	5	24.793933	37.66	Both models have moderate issues. They generally match the structure but have significant detail differences in book arrangement, decorative elements, and overall style. Some elements like the central decorative piece and book colors don't match the prompt as closely as needed.
988209beaf8802e7b01184b774fdbbc2b17bcac96dd102343e6bad1527504ee9	draw	3	3	23.173187	16.28	Both models generally match the prompt but have minor issues. The basket texture and flower arrangement have slight variations from the original image. Some details like basket weave pattern and flower positioning aren't perfectly matched.
9892e6f5c8dc0ccb7b453f21860dc2be3f7be0157c5add3c1943c65e1b278f44	leader	5	3	23.056528	47.45	First model has lower detail and less accurate shape matching, second model has closer detail but still some differences in proportions and specific features
9923a943b8a628ee3a16ca4111f5010e876e90b4f491e2cbd8a036f0bd4cb750	draw	4	3	30.209045	9.42	Slight shape differences and minor detail variations in the 3D models compared to the prompt image
99b7192fd902db75f393fda95ce3f811278636a6df92f6c691dc819890771116	leader	6	3	24.056248	21.84	First model has semi-transparent elements and simplified structure; second model has more accurate metal framework but still has some detail differences
9b22fb789fbc3d9e7cd50e4cc21300bcfac60930735d4653d97dfd6d9316ef84	leader	5	3	29.666498	11.36	First model has minor shape differences and some detail issues; second model has closer match but still has some detail differences
9c515261c35590822a4ff6f1fe5781aa55da3453bb8be5904aa2f0b1bf0fd0a8	draw	5	4	21.331814	25.99	Both models have some shape differences from the prompt, with minor detail issues and style variations. The first model has different lighting and color tones, while the second has some structural differences in the lantern design.
9c6df3b2c14e9a312d3236417e1aea3aab531b70c487edfd1eeeee2fabbc79d2	draw	5	4	23.86354	20.53	Both models have moderate issues with style and detail matching the prompt. The first model has some shape differences and the second has significant detail variations, though both maintain the general L-shape and color scheme.
9dbc68f175b56e60ae95f9511fb94546bbf4b49c0f5b7e5bf5b607cb38b19bc1	draw	6	5	29.362092	7.79	Both models have some shape differences from the prompt, with less realistic glass texture, altered proportions, and simplified details. The rope/knot structure is less detailed, and the overall lighting/texture quality doesn't match the prompt's photorealistic style.
a4d44ab3b65677ae3e2194f4d9fe32a7d76ae039d5fc6fb684dd78a2fbf0adf9	draw	5	4	21.870481	32.23	Both models have similar but not perfect matches. They have the general shape of a beer glass with foam, but there are differences in glass texture, foam consistency, and lighting. Some details like the exact glass shape and foam texture don't match the reference image precisely.
a60c5b2c3dafb223d0ecbd408995e8bb346960822148f78b30c106b1375e1ad6	leader	6	3	24.435176	21.23	First model has artistic, abstract rendering with poor detail matching; second model has better detail but still lacks background field context
a77062a2d0222debdbd68d33e96865cda4df9ac6a18d9f0a507033a9c79002e0	draw	5	4	24.096264	25.39	Both models have some shape differences from the prompt, with minor detail issues and some style variations. The eagle's position, ship details, and overall aesthetic don't perfectly match the prompt's wooden texture and specific design elements.
aacb989d16471a364824ac145d8b06fa273e3a8ac0af3ed6ea78e1656777d830	draw	4	3	23.913227	24.46	Both models have minor shape differences and some missing small details compared to the prompt, but overall match the DeLorean style and general features
ab455629abc3223b6b448253da59120dccdceccf123354ceadd5a904e2bed8d3	leader	5	3	22.514415	35.09	First model has simplified features and less detailed drapery; second model has closer resemblance but still lacks some fine details of the original prompt's sculpture
ab506d408112974e5ba8f2a6dcae249e7c2674b6e60f0dff4053a9ddc28fbd33	draw	5	4	21.437758	22.58	Both models have similar shape but differ in flower details, color intensity, and pattern consistency with the prompt. Some flowers appear less defined, and color matching isn't perfect.
accbba278390739a94975fe2a61c53e7b30e6fa17cb8e8b9bb7bc572a5fb8d44	draw	5	5	26.512599	42.71	First model has some shape differences and missing detailed textures; second model has major structural changes with circular elements not in prompt
acd3d46a7d9b6cfbc7337bbfc6a785524933994f198df4d4c6211721d33846c6	draw	4	3	23.886552	14.15	Both models have minor shape differences and some details don't match exactly, but overall structure and basic features align with the prompt
aebc379c6b12425cd01b6ddd3f6adc644c2ad09b27300f48f2d9f7d1ccb65f8a	draw	6	5	23.404858	12.53	Both models have some shape differences from the original prompt, with variations in candle counts, flame appearance, and candelabra structure. Details like the gold texture and overall proportions are not perfectly matched.
afd25f32172975ac089bf170a52a6fea54fd6270042ad3c392fcd5d16dd1da1d	draw	6	5	30.071151	10.84	Both models have moderate issues with style and details. The first model has more varied textures and lighting issues, while the second has different proportions and base details. Neither fully matches the original prompt's level of detail and style.
b110ed3a3548f903076d10ed37efd1117e153cb0248215db63c8c27eb31f0144	draw	5	4	21.3846	18.84	Both models have color schemes similar to the prompt but lack the detailed patchwork texture and specific shape precision of the original. The first model has softer colors and less defined patches, while the second has different patch arrangements and less accurate color matching.
b57421b571110de4bc492bce2481407f7740fc4242178a232f0dc34246bc1df4	draw	5	4	23.426979	13.76	Both models have rainbow manes/tails but lack the puzzle piece structure and lighting quality of the original prompt. First model has transparency issues and second has different proportions.
b8a0a728fa4a2f2b7160fa0f5a8df2dbb0d53b338010ce310d1d3e1625d1de92	leader	5	3	23.503853	9.93	First model has wrong style (not matching the sleek futuristic design), second model has closer match but still lacks the neon lighting and futuristic environment details
ba495014c7920c09602f1ecc0c75c051f005dcb6a8bbf132d07ede2ee43b9e32	leader	5	3	23.650212	22.41	First model has poor texture quality and missing detailed patterns; second model has better detail but some proportions differ
bce2d1db387cfd5acf13509c542fe3cd722b31a11980419487b502f830cd4a44	leader	5	3	24.970141	35.45	First model has issues with texture quality and some details, second model has closer match but still has some detail differences
bde166eae9a467e70699be378dfd90814e7fa9637899667631fd2729fb7bdf47	draw	3	3	22.640404	6.69	Both models have similar overall structure but show minor shape differences in body proportions, head details, and some mechanical elements. Details like the head shape, body contours, and specific mechanical joints differ slightly from the prompt image.
be94887e8e032e46d4bbd2f2024382c94b103450d42bf7b9ce9eb28198be507c	leader	5	3	23.429192	13.24	First model has lower detail and some shape inaccuracies; second model has closer match but still lacks some details compared to prompt
c1abfbc5fb9bc7f6d31a03986d730328e1757e24a12f27824fc77ef17ff51578	draw	6	5	27.797486	54.45	Both models have moderate issues. The first model has simplified crystal shapes and less detail, while the second has different crystal arrangements and less texture. Both lack the detailed, realistic appearance of the original prompt.