original_problem stringlengths 162 931 | original_solution stringclasses 6
values | augmented_problem stringlengths 281 1.35k | augmented_solution stringclasses 68
values | distractor_metadata dict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Problem: Statement: Claim: Children should not be allowed to inherit vast wealth as this damages them and society.
Perspective: Inherited wealth demotivates the recipients so that they put less effort into training, education and social skills.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? If the persp... | A | Problem: Statement: Claim: Children should not be allowed to inherit vast wealth as this damages them and society.
Perspective: Inherited wealth demotivates the recipients so that they put less effort into training, education and social skills.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? If the persp... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic true/false sub-question was fused into the original evaluative prompt, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid letting the unrelated computation affect the main judgement.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Domestic intelligence agencies have a legitimate role to play in democracy.
Perspective: The government does not have the right to spy on its citizens.
Rule: If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining.
Question: Does... | undermine | Problem: Statement: Claim: Domestic intelligence agencies have a legitimate role to play in democracy.
Perspective: The government does not have the right to spy on its citizens.
Rule: If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining.
Separately, co... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem about whether monitoring communications to prevent terrorism is compatible with the perspective is fused into the main problem, requiring the solver to separate and solve two judgments independently.",
"name": "Compositional und... |
Statement: Claim: Should Turkey Be Accepted In The EU.
Perspective: As a matter of precedent, Turkey should be allowed into the EU.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option.
(A) Support
(B) Undermine | A | Statement: Claim: Should Turkey Be Accepted In The EU.
Perspective: As a matter of precedent, Turkey should be allowed into the EU.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option.
(A) Support
(B) Undermine
Separately, as an independent sub-problem, indicate whether the perspective's j... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent sub-question about the nature of the justification (legal/historical vs economic) into the original question, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and not let the additional identification task affect the main support/undermine ju... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Arming the police is a good idea. Perspective: arming police will not help violence. Respond with either the single word support or undermine. | undermine | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Arming the police is a good idea. Perspective: arming police will not help violence. Additionally, as a separate internal check, determine whether the perspective contains an explicit negation (for example the word 'not' or 'no'); you... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "A separate sub-task (checking for explicit negation) is fused into the main classification task, requiring the solver to separate the two reasoning steps.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate — in... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law. Perspective: There are economic advantages for states to approve gay marriages. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer must be either support or undermine. | support | Problem: Statement: Claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law. Perspective: There are economic advantages for states to approve gay marriages. As a separate, unrelated sub-problem, estimate the immediate one-time increase in wedding-related spending if a ... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (estimating one-time wedding spending) was fused into the original classification task, forcing the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid letting the added calculation distract from the main stance classification.",
... |
Problem: Statement: Task: Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law. Perspective: Legalizing gay marriage is a stepping stone toward disgusting and harmful marriage practices such as incestu... | B | Problem: Statement: Task: Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law. Perspective: Legalizing gay marriage is a stepping stone toward disgusting and harmful marriage practices such as incestu... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (identifying the rhetorical tactic) was fused into the main classification task so the solver must separate the two tasks and not conflate them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase... |
Statement: Claim: The use of child performers should be banned. Perspective: Being a performer can make the child physically vulnerable. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with a single word: support or undermine | support | Statement: Claim: The use of child performers should be banned. Perspective: Being a performer can make the child physically vulnerable. Separately, as an unrelated exercise, determine whether the sentence 'School uniforms reduce bullying' is a factual claim or a value judgment. Determine whether the perspective suppor... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, unrelated classification task (about whether 'School uniforms reduce bullying' is factual or a value judgment) is fused into the original prompt, forcing the solver to separate two subtasks.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: UK should have a second Brexit referendum before leaving the EU. Perspective: The referendum is inconsistent with the UK's tradition of representative democracy EU membersh. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports (B) under... | B | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: UK should have a second Brexit referendum before leaving the EU. Perspective: The referendum is inconsistent with the UK's tradition of representative democracy EU membersh. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports (B) under... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (a separate classification about whether the perspective targets direct or representative democracy) was fused into the original question, forcing the solver to separate and answer two tasks independently.",
"name": "Composition... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Everyone Should Automatically Be Opted into an Organ Donation Scheme.
Perspective: Some just don’t bother to register as a donor, even if they support the cause.
Question: Based only on the claim and the perspective above, does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Answer with a sin... | support | Problem: Statement: Claim: Everyone Should Automatically Be Opted into an Organ Donation Scheme.
Perspective: Some just don’t bother to register as a donor, even if they support the cause.
Extra sub-problem (independent): Suppose a country currently has 35% of adults registered as organ donors. If switching to an opt-o... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent quantitative sub-problem (a small math scenario about donor percentages under opt-out) is fused into the text, requiring the solver to separate the extra calculation from the main evaluative question.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"... |
Problem: Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Marriage is an outdated institution.
Perspective: Those who are observant religiously think that marriage is important.
Choose the best option:
(A) Supports
(B) Undermines
(C) Both supports and undermines
(D) Neither supports... | B | Problem: Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Marriage is an outdated institution.
Perspective: Those who are observant religiously think that marriage is important.
Separately, as an independent subtask, count the number of words in the Perspective sentence (this subtas... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent subtask (word-counting the Perspective sentence) is fused into the main inference problem, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid using the auxiliary result when answering the main question.",
"name": "Compositional unders... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Basic income tax should be abolished. Perspective: Income tax is not the best way to redistribute wealth or pay for public goods. Choose one of two answers exactly support or undermine | support | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Basic income tax should be abolished. Perspective: Income tax is not the best way to redistribute wealth or pay for public goods. Choose one of two answers exactly support or undermine. Separately, as an independent judgment (do not l... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, contextually related sub-problem about whether a progressive tax necessarily reduces inequality is fused into the original task, forcing the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid conflating their answers.",
"name": "Compositional unde... |
Statement: Given the claim: Junk Food Should Be Banned. And the perspective: The sale of "junk food" items provide vital financial assistance to schools. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support or undermine. | undermine | Statement: Given the claim: Junk Food Should Be Banned. And the perspective: The sale of "junk food" items provide vital financial assistance to schools. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support or undermine. Separately (as an independent subtask), state whether the... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent grammatical-correctness sub-problem into the main judgment task, forcing the solver to separate and answer two different questions.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate — like... |
Statement: Claim: All nations have a right to nuclear weapons. Perspective: No country has an inherent right to invade or use aggression against another. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | support | Statement: Claim: All nations have a right to nuclear weapons. Perspective: No country has an inherent right to invade or use aggression against another. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Additionally (separate task): classify the perspective statement as normative (a claim about what ... | support
Additional classification (separate): normative — it prescribes a moral/legal principle about what countries ought not to do (no inherent right to use aggression). | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-question (classify the perspective as normative or descriptive) was fused into the original problem, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and answer them independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"est... |
Statement: Claim: Global Warming is not an issue. Perspective: Because people are losing lives and our climate is changing. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer must be either support or undermine. | undermine | Statement: Claim: Global Warming is not an issue. Perspective: Because people are losing lives and our climate is changing. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer must be either support or undermine. Additionally, consider this separate example for context: Claim: Reducing screen tim... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, self-contained sub-problem (a second claim/perspective pair) was fused into the original task so the solver must separate the two evaluations and not conflate them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty... |
Statement: Claim: We must ban negative advertising in political campaigns. Perspective: Negative campaigns reduce diversity. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with exactly one of the words: support or undermine | support | Statement: Claim: We must ban negative advertising in political campaigns. Perspective: Negative campaigns reduce diversity. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with exactly one of the words: support or undermine. Separately, as an independent subtask, classify the sentence 'Negat... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent classification sub-problem into the main prompt so the solver must separate and solve two tasks independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate — the extra independent jud... |
Statement: Given the claim: "Voting should be compulsory in the UK." and the perspective: "People forced to vote are unlikely to vote intelligently." Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Options: (A) supports (B) undermines | B | Statement: Given the claim: "Voting should be compulsory in the UK." and the perspective: "People forced to vote are unlikely to vote intelligently." Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Options: (A) supports (B) undermines
Separately (independently of the above), consider this sub-quest... | B
For the independent sub-question: No. | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent yes/no sub-problem is fused into the original judgement task, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid conflating them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "moderate — likely... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: We should expand NATO. Perspective: NATO development was important for international stability. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with exactly one of: support or undermine | support | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: We should expand NATO. Perspective: NATO development was important for international stability. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. As an independent aside, suppose three small neutral countries X, Y, and Z join NATO; would the tota... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent, trivial sub-problem (counting membership change) into the main prompt so the solver must separate the unrelated task from the main reasoning about support/undermine.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_dif... |
Statement: Claim: Forced marriage should be banned.
Perspective: The state should not be allowed to intrude in such personal matters.
Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support or undermine. | undermine | Statement: Claim: Forced marriage should be banned.
Perspective: The state should not be allowed to intrude in such personal matters.
Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support or undermine.
Separately (independent sub-problem): Claim B: The state should be allowed t... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, related sub-question (Claim B about minimum marriage age) is fused into the prompt so the solver must separate the two tasks and not let the new question affect the judgment on the original claim.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
... |
Statement: Claim: The American Jobs Act should pass.
Perspective: The American Jobs Act Will Help the Long Term Unemployed.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option:
(A) supports
(B) undermines
(C) both supports and undermines
(D) neither supports nor undermines
(E) insufficient ... | A | Statement: Claim: The American Jobs Act should pass.
Perspective: The American Jobs Act Will Help the Long Term Unemployed.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option:
(A) supports
(B) undermines
(C) both supports and undermines
(D) neither supports nor undermines
(E) insufficient ... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, similar-format sub-problem about budget effects is appended, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and not conflate their conclusions.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate... |
Statement: Claim: Golf is a Sport. Perspective: If you can compete in golf with a handicap, then it is not a sport. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports the claim (B) undermines the claim | B | Statement: Claim: Golf is a Sport. Perspective: If you can compete in golf with a handicap, then it is not a sport. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports the claim (B) undermines the claim
Separately, consider an independent sub-problem: Statement: Darts is a Sport. Perspective:... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, structurally similar sub-problem (about darts) is fused into the original problem so the solver must separate two parallel evaluations and avoid conflating them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_in... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Studies show that vegetarians are up to 40% less likely to develop cancer than meat eaters.
Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | support | Problem: Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian.
Perspective: Studies show that vegetarians are up to 40% less likely to develop cancer than meat eaters.
Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Separately (this is an unrelated sub-problem and should not affect your judgment about t... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent probability calculation task was fused into the original claim-evaluation problem, requiring the solver to separate the two sub-problems and not let the extra calculation affect the claim judgement.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
... |
Statement: Claim: Speed limits should be reduced.
Perspective: Government have illegitimate reasons behind lowering the speed limit.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) Supports (B) Undermines | B | Statement: Claim: Speed limits should be reduced.
Perspective: Government have illegitimate reasons behind lowering the speed limit.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) Supports (B) Undermines
Separately (independent subtask): As an unrelated calculation about driving that sh... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent quantitative sub-problem about average speed is fused into the policy judgement task, forcing the solver to separate and solve two unrelated components.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "... |
Statement: Claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
Perspective: Legalizing gay marriage will not harm the institution of marriage, and same-sex marriages may even be more stable than heterosexual marriages.
Question: Does the perspective support or und... | support | Statement: Claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
Perspective: Legalizing gay marriage will not harm the institution of marriage, and same-sex marriages may even be more stable than heterosexual marriages. Separately, as an independent sub-problem, co... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent legal-competence sub-problem (EU jurisdiction to harmonize marriage laws) was fused into the original task, requiring the solver to separate the stability/impact argument from a jurisdictional question.",
"name": "Compositional understandin... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Positive Discrimination Towards Women in Society Is Justified.
Perspective: It does not address the underlying issues.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option.
(A) Supports
(B) Undermines
Solution: B | B | Problem: Statement: Claim: Positive Discrimination Towards Women in Society Is Justified.
Perspective: It does not address the underlying issues.
Question 1: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option.
(A) Supports
(B) Undermines
[Separate task — compositional subproblem fused in:] Question... | Question 1: B
Reason: The perspective argues that positive discrimination fails to tackle root causes; this criticizes the effectiveness of the measure and therefore undermines the claim that it is justified.
Question 2: C (Practical concern about effectiveness) | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification subtask is fused into the original judgment problem, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid letting the added classification alter the main entailment decision.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: All drugs should be decriminalised.
Perspective: Why is it legitimate for the government to ban drugs
Task: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. 'Supporting' means the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view; 'Undermining' means it coul... | support | Problem: Statement: Claim: All drugs should be decriminalised.
Perspective: Why is it legitimate for the government to ban drugs
Task: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. 'Supporting' means the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view; 'Undermining' means it coul... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classify sentence type as interrogative or declarative) is fused into the main task so the solver must separate and solve two tasks independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_incre... |
Statement: Given the claim and the perspective below, decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Teachers Should Have The Right To Punish Pupils Physically If The Parents Consent. Perspective: Allowing children to be hit sends the message that it is OK to treat children in this way. Choose ... | B | Statement: Given the claim and the perspective below, decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Teachers Should Have The Right To Punish Pupils Physically If The Parents Consent. Perspective: Allowing children to be hit sends the message that it is OK to treat children in this way. Also co... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic subproblem (computing a percentage from survey counts) is fused into the decision task, forcing the solver to separate and handle two distinct reasoning threads.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_dif... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: The world should go vegan.
Perspective: The risk of heart disease is reduced in people who adhere to a vegetarian diet.
Choose one:
(A) Supports the claim
(B) Undermines the claim | A | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: The world should go vegan.
Perspective: The risk of heart disease is reduced in people who adhere to a vegetarian diet. As a separate, independent task, also state whether this perspective's wording is describing a correlation or asse... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent sub-problem (classify whether the perspective expresses correlation or causation) into the main problem, forcing the solver to separate two tasks and avoid conflating them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimat... |
Statement: Claim: The US should immediately close Guantanamo Bay. Perspective: Release is not the Solution. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | undermine | Statement: Claim: The US should immediately close Guantanamo Bay. Perspective: Release is not the Solution. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. As a separate, independent subtask (do not conflate with the first): indicate whether the perspective frames the issue primarily as a national s... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent secondary question (about whether the perspective frames the issue as security vs. civil liberties) was fused into the original task, forcing the solver to separate and answer two sub-problems independently.",
"name": "Compositional underst... |
Statement: Claim: Prostitution Should Be Legal. Perspective: Legalization has benefits for society. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? | support | Statement: Claim: Prostitution Should Be Legal. Perspective: Legalization has benefits for society. The perspective also contains an additional, independent empirical assertion: "Some studies report a 12% reduction in crime following decriminalization of certain activities." Question: Does the perspective support or un... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent empirical sub-claim about crime reduction after decriminalization is fused into the perspective, requiring the solver to separate the unrelated sub-problem from the main evaluative task.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Eliminate All Nuclear Weapons.
Perspective: countries have the right to self defense with nuclear weapons, even when they lack capacity in conventional weapons
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim?
Solution: undermine | undermine | Problem: Statement: Claim: Eliminate All Nuclear Weapons.
Perspective: countries have the right to self defense with nuclear weapons, even when they lack capacity in conventional weapons. A separate but related scenario to consider: some coastal states with no navy argue they should be allowed to arm civilian merchant ... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (whether civilian vessels may be armed against piracy) is fused into the main problem about nuclear weapons, forcing the solver to separate two distinct lines of reasoning.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"e... |
Statement: Claim: 16 year olds should be able to vote at presidental elections.
Perspective: 16 year olds are informed enough to cast a vote.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option. | A | Statement: Claim: 16 year olds should be able to vote at presidental elections.
Perspective: 16 year olds are informed enough to cast a vote. Additionally, consider this related but separate question: would the same reasoning support lowering the voting age for local school board elections to 13? Treat that as an indep... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-question (about lowering the voting age for local school board elections to 13) is fused into the main problem, forcing the solver to separate the two issues and not conflate their answers.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
... |
Statement: Claim: Wind power should be a primary focus of future energy supply. Perspective: Animal habitats are threatened by the turbines used in wind power. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | undermine | Statement: Claim: Wind power should be a primary focus of future energy supply. Perspective: Animal habitats are threatened by the turbines used in wind power. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Separately, consider this related but independent question: Claim: Community solar initiatives ... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, related sub-problem (about community solar participation and costs) is fused into the original prompt so the solver must separate and solve two distinct judgments.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_... |
Statement: Claim: We have to teach creationism in schools.
Perspective: Freedom of speech should apply to teachers as much as anyone else.
Task: Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, classify it as supporting. If it wou... | support | Statement: Claim: We have to teach creationism in schools.
Perspective: Freedom of speech should apply to teachers as much as anyone else.
Task: Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, classify it as supporting. If it wou... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, plausible sub-problem was appended so the solver must separate the main evaluation from a second evaluation and solve both independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate — inc... |
Statement: Claim: All Americans should have the right (be entitled) to health care.
Perspective: Health care for all might cost more in taxes.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Answer with a single word: support or undermine | undermine | Statement: Claim: All Americans should have the right (be entitled) to health care.
Perspective: Health care for all might cost more in taxes. As a separate, unrelated subtask for the same exam, determine whether 91 is a prime number.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Answer with a single w... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (is 91 prime?) is fused into the item so the solver must separate the unrelated subtask from the main argument evaluation.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "moderat... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18. Perspective: Society should make it easier for all young people to receive an education. Return exactly one word: support or undermine | support | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18. Perspective: Society should make it easier for all young people to receive an education. Additionally, as a separate sub-task (do not include this in your one-w... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent classification sub-task (normative vs descriptive) into the main instruction so the solver must separate the two tasks and not let the extra task change the main judgement.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimat... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: It is time to stop buying bottled water. Perspective: Bottled water is important for travelers to avoid illnesss. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | undermine | Problem: Statement: Claim: It is time to stop buying bottled water. Perspective: Bottled water is important for travelers to avoid illnesss. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. As a separate task (do not conflate with the main judgement), also identify any obvious typos in the perspectiv... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-task (identify typos and correct spelling) was fused into the original entailment/judgement task, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and not let the auxiliary task influence the main inference.",
"name": "Compositional under... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Religion In Itself Is A Purely Positive Force In The World.
Perspective: Religion's Net Impact On The World Is A Positive One.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option.
(A) supports the claim
(B) undermines the claim
Solution: A | A | Problem: Statement: Claim: Religion In Itself Is A Purely Positive Force In The World.
Perspective: Religion's Net Impact On The World Is A Positive One.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option.
(A) supports the claim
(B) undermines the claim
Additionally (this is an indep... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (13+7>20) was fused into the prompt so the solver must separate two tasks and avoid conflating them with the main semantic judgment.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase"... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
Perspective: Testing is needed for really new drugs.
Choose the best option:
(A) The perspective supports the claim
(B) The perspective undermines the claim
(C) The perspective is neutral or... | B | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned.
Perspective: Testing is needed for really new drugs.
Choose the best option:
(A) The perspective supports the claim
(B) The perspective undermines the claim
(C) The perspective is neutral or... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic true/false sub-problem is appended, forcing the solver to separate two distinct tasks and avoid conflating them with the main reasoning about support/undermine.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_diff... |
Statement: Claim: Fast Food Advertising Should Be Banned.
Perspective: Marketing aimed at children should be subject to strict regulations.
Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer must be exactly one of the words: support or undermine | support | Statement: Claim: Fast Food Advertising Should Be Banned.
Perspective: Marketing aimed at children should be subject to strict regulations. As a separate issue, consider whether implementing mandatory calorie labeling on fast-food menus is likely to reduce teenagers' overall calorie intake; this is an independent point... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (about calorie labeling effectiveness) was fused into the main problem so the solver must separate and ignore it when judging whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: "Religious freedom abroad should be one of the primary foreign policy concerns for any country." Perspective: "Religion does not motivate foreign policy." Choose the best option: (A) supports the claim (B) undermines the claim (C) Oth... | B | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: "Religious freedom abroad should be one of the primary foreign policy concerns for any country." Perspective: "Religion does not motivate foreign policy." Choose the best option: (A) supports the claim (B) undermines the claim (C) Oth... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent subtask (a labeling question about absoluteness vs. qualification) is fused into the main classification problem, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and not let the secondary labeling alter the main support/undermine judgment.",
... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with exactly one word: support or undermine.
Claim: The U.S. Should Ban The Use of Cluster Bombs.
Perspective: This House Believes That the U.S. Should Ban The Use of Cluster Bombs. | support | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with exactly one word: support or undermine.
Claim: The U.S. Should Ban The Use of Cluster Bombs.
Perspective: This House Believes That the U.S. Should Ban The Use of Cluster Bombs.
Additionally, as a separate independent subtask (... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification subtask is fused into the main problem, forcing the solver to separate and solve two tasks independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate — the extra independent... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Fast Food Advertising Should Be Banned.
Perspective: There are alternative methods of distributing the toys.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option.
(A) supports
(B) undermines
(C) neither
(D) both
(E) unsure
(F) supports but only partially
(G) underm... | B | Problem: Statement: Claim: Fast Food Advertising Should Be Banned.
Perspective: There are alternative methods of distributing the toys.
Separate sub-problem (independent): In a survey of 100 parents about preferred toy distribution methods, 30 preferred mail delivery, 50 preferred in-store pickup, and 20 preferred scho... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, small quantitative sub-problem (a percentage calculation from a survey) is fused into the original inference task, requiring the solver to separate and solve two distinct problems.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"esti... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: All nations should ban bullfighting. Perspective: Bullfighting should be treated like other forms of animal torture.
Solution: support | support | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: All nations should ban bullfighting. Perspective: Bullfighting should be treated like other forms of animal torture. Additionally, as a separate task (do not let this affect your judgment on the main question), count the number of wor... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent sub-problem (a word-count task) into the original classification task so the solver must separate the two tasks and not let the simple counting subtask interfere with the support/undermine judgment.",
"name": "Compositional understand... |
Statement: Claim: Deny Organs to Non-Donors.
Perspective: People may have valid religious reasons not to donate organs.
Task: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining. | undermine | Statement: Claim: Deny Organs to Non-Donors.
Perspective: People may have valid religious reasons not to donate organs.
Task: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining.
Sepa... | Main claim (Deny Organs to Non-Donors): undermine.
Independent sub-problem (Prioritize recipients who pay higher fee): undermine. | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, plausibly related sub-problem (about prioritizing paying recipients) is fused into the original prompt so the solver must separate and solve two evaluations independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_dif... |
Statement: Claim: The UN should be reformed or replaced. Perspective: The UN has performed a valuable service in preventing wars and in peacekeeping. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | support | Statement: Claim: The UN should be reformed or replaced. Perspective: The UN has performed a valuable service in preventing wars and in peacekeeping. Additionally, separately assess whether the perspective attributes the UN's peacekeeping successes to the organization's institutional design or to the voluntary cooperat... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (attribution of peacekeeping success to design vs member cooperation) is fused into the original task, requiring the solver to separate the two judgments and avoid conflating them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
... |
Statement: Claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
Perspective: Tablets increase the number of excuses available for students not doing their schoolwork.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Answer with a single word: support or undermine | undermine | Statement: Claim: Tablets should replace textbooks in K-12 schools.
Perspective: Tablets increase the number of excuses available for students not doing their schoolwork.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Answer with a single word: support or undermine.
Separately, as a second sub-problem,... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Appended an independent, similar sub-problem (about smartphones) so the solver must separate the two tasks and not conflate their answers.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate — introduces a secon... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Gay couples should be allowed to marry. Perspective: Same-sex marriage may have a lower divorce rate than heterosexual marriage proving once and for all that gay marriage is good for the institution of marriage. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Use this rule... | support | Problem: Statement: Claim: Gay couples should be allowed to marry. Perspective: Same-sex marriage may have a lower divorce rate than heterosexual marriage proving once and for all that gay marriage is good for the institution of marriage. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Use this rule... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem was fused into the original judgement task, requiring the reader to separate and solve two distinct tasks.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate — the extra in... |
Statement: Claim: Drones Should Be Used to Take Out Enemy Combatants. Perspective: Drone strikes are often not targeting high value targets. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) Supports the claim (B) Undermines the claim | B | Statement: Claim: Drones Should Be Used to Take Out Enemy Combatants. Perspective: Drone strikes are often not targeting high value targets. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) Supports the claim (B) Undermines the claim
Separately, as an independent sub-task, indicate whether the pers... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent secondary question is fused into the original prompt, requiring the solver to separate the two sub-problems and answer them independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate — the... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Widen the East African Community.
Perspective: Conflicts and insecurity in the region will be resolved.
Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option.
(A) Supports the claim
(B) Undermines the claim
(C) Both supports and undermines
(D) Neither supports nor... | A | Problem: Statement: Claim: Widen the East African Community.
Perspective: Conflicts and insecurity in the region will be resolved.
Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option.
(A) Supports the claim
(B) Undermines the claim
(C) Both supports and undermines
(D) Neither supports nor... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent factual true/false subtask is fused into the prompt alongside the original claim-support classification, requiring the solver to separate and answer two tasks independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_di... |
Statement: Claim: Ghana’s ban on smoking in public places is a model for Africa. Perspective: It isn't necessary to ban smoking. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | undermine | Statement: Claim: Ghana’s ban on smoking in public places is a model for Africa. Perspective: It isn't necessary to ban smoking. Additionally, consider this separate, independent claim: "Smoking bans in public places reduce overall national smoking prevalence." Separate Perspective: "Bans only shift smoking into privat... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (a second claim with its own perspective) is fused into the main problem so the solver must separate and evaluate each claim independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "M... |
Statement: Claim: People should have a right to private education. Perspective: Private schools are financially good for the state. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer must be either support or undermine. | support | Statement: Claim: People should have a right to private education. Perspective: Private schools are financially good for the state. Additionally, consider a separate, independent pair: Statement: Claim: People should have a right to public healthcare. Perspective: Public healthcare is a major ongoing expense for govern... | support; undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (a separate claim/perspective pair about public healthcare) is fused into the original task, requiring the solver to separate the two pairs and produce two independent judgments in sequence.",
"name": "Compositional understandin... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: permit the use of performance enhancing drugs in professional sports.
Perspective: Sports will become even more dangerous for athletes if they are allowed to take performance enhancing drugs.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Respond with exactly one word: support... | undermine | Problem: Statement: Claim: permit the use of performance enhancing drugs in professional sports.
Perspective: Sports will become even more dangerous for athletes if they are allowed to take performance enhancing drugs.
Compositional subtask (separate from the main judgment): evaluate whether the perspective's reasoning... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classify the perspective as empirical vs. normative) was fused into the original prompt so a solver must separate the two tasks and not let the extra classification affect the main support/undermine judgment.",
"name": "Composi... |
Statement: Classify whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: We should build new nuclear power plants.
Perspective: Nuclear energy will not change carbon emissions in the atmosphere.
Respond with either support or undermine | support | Statement: Classify whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: We should build new nuclear power plants.
Perspective: Nuclear energy will not change carbon emissions in the atmosphere.
Additionally, as a separate and independent task, indicate whether the sentence "Nuclear energy will not change c... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent sub-problem (classify whether the perspective is causal vs descriptive) into the main problem so the solver must separate and solve two tasks independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_in... |
Statement: Claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
Perspective: Restricting violent video games will have no correlation to a reduction in societal crime.
Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with exactly one word: support or undermine | undermine | Statement: Claim: Violent video games cause violent crime.
Perspective: Restricting violent video games will have no correlation to a reduction in societal crime.
Additionally, decide whether the following unrelated statement is true or false: 'A lack of observed correlation between two variables in observational data ... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent true/false sub-question about correlation vs causation is fused into the main labeling task, forcing the solver to separate and handle two reasoning tasks.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase"... |
Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
Perspective: The penalty of death is a crime deterrent.
Question: Based on the perspective, does it support or undermine the claim? | support | Statement: Claim: We should allow death penalty for the worst of the worst criminals.
Perspective: The penalty of death is a crime deterrent. Separate sub-problem (unrelated): On a courthouse whiteboard someone wrote the arithmetic 14 - 5 = ? and a clerk asked a trainee to compute it.
Question: Based on the perspective... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, unrelated arithmetic sub-problem was fused into the prompt to force the solver to separate two tasks (stance classification and simple arithmetic) and avoid mixing them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_diffi... |
Statement: Claim: You have nothing to worry about surveillance if you have done nothing wrong. Perspective: Power trips can be had by agencies. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines | B | Statement: Claim: You have nothing to worry about surveillance if you have done nothing wrong. Perspective: Power trips can be had by agencies. Additionally, in a separate independent sub-problem, suppose an audit finds that 3 of 5 agencies exhibiting 'power trip' behavior collected 1,200 irrelevant records each while ... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem was fused into the original question so the solver must separate the tasks: compute an average for the audit scenario while also evaluating the logical relationship between the claim and perspective.",
"name": "Compos... |
Statement: Claim: The US and its allies were justified in taking military action against Iraq following Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait.
Perspective: The Coalition had a high probability of success.
Question: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support or undermine. | support | Statement: Claim: The US and its allies were justified in taking military action against Iraq following Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait.
Perspective: The Coalition had a high probability of success.
As a separate logistical sub-problem (unrelated to the claim assessment), suppose the Coalition needed to transport 1,200 metri... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent logistical arithmetic sub-problem was fused into the main political-judgement question, forcing the solver to separate and handle two distinct tasks (policy evaluation vs. numeric logistics).",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
... |
Statement: Claim: The United States should use the electoral college in presidential elections. Perspective: With the electoral college in place, it weakens people's incentives for voting. Does this perspective support or undermine the claim? | undermine | Statement: Claim: The United States should use the electoral college in presidential elections. Perspective: With the electoral college in place, it weakens people's incentives for voting. (Aside — separately, classify whether this perspective is primarily an empirical claim about voter behavior or a normative claim ab... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-task (classifying the perspective as empirical vs normative) was fused into the main problem, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and not let the aside change the support/undermine judgment.",
"name": "Compositional understan... |
Statement: Claim: College education is worth it.
Perspective: Attending college is a great way to network.
Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with either support or undermine. | support | Statement: Claim: College education is worth it.
Perspective: Attending college is a great way to network.
Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with either support or undermine. As a separate, independent subtask (do not let this affect your main judgment), identify whether the wo... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (word-class identification) is fused into the original judgment task so the solver must separate the two tasks and not let the auxiliary classification influence the main support/undermine decision.",
"name": "Compositional unde... |
Statement: Claim: social networking sites should be banned at the workplaces. Perspective: The public has a reliable source of essential public health and safety information through their social media accounts. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with a single word: support or und... | undermine | Statement: Claim: social networking sites should be banned at the workplaces. Perspective: The public has a reliable source of essential public health and safety information through their social media accounts. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with a single word: support or und... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem was fused into the original classification task, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid letting the unrelated calculation influence the main judgement.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Democracy Is the Best Form of Government.
Perspective: Promoting democracy promotes peace.
Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Return exactly one of the words: support or undermine
Solution: support | support | Problem: Statement: Claim: Democracy Is the Best Form of Government.
Perspective: Promoting democracy promotes peace.
Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Return exactly one of the words: support or undermine.
As an independent subtask (do not include this in your final answer and do not ... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (judging descriptive vs. prescriptive usage of a phrase) is fused into the main problem so the solver must separate the two tasks and not let the secondary task change the main judgment.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
... |
Statement: Claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
Perspective: A proper marriage is between two heterosexual people of different genders.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option.
(A) Support
(B) Undermine | B | Statement: Claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law.
Perspective: A proper marriage is between two heterosexual people of different genders. Separately, consider whether the perspective distinguishes the word "marriage" from state-recognized "civil union... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent sub-question about whether the perspective distinguishes the label 'marriage' from legally equivalent civil unions, requiring the solver to separate the sub-problem from the main judgment.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining.
Claim: Africans are worse off due to natural resources.
Perspective: Conflict is ... | A | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining.
Claim: Africans are worse off due to natural resources.
Perspective: Conflict is ... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classify whether the perspective sentence is causal vs. descriptive) was fused into the original judgement task, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid conflating them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law. Perspective: Gay marriage is contrary to the word of God and is incompatible with the beliefs, sacred texts, and traditions of many religious groups. Determine whether the perspective supports... | undermine | Problem: Statement: Claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law. Perspective: Gay marriage is contrary to the word of God and is incompatible with the beliefs, sacred texts, and traditions of many religious groups. Additionally, in a separate evaluation (tr... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classify whether the perspective appeals to religious authority and/or tradition) was fused into the original task, requiring the solver to separate and address two distinct evaluations.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: We must ban negative advertising in political campaigns. Perspective: Negative campaigning creates voter apathy and prevents accurate reporting of candidates’ policies and ideologies. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) Supports (B) Undermines | A | Problem: Statement: Claim: We must ban negative advertising in political campaigns. Perspective: Negative campaigning creates voter apathy and prevents accurate reporting of candidates’ policies and ideologies. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) Supports (B) Undermines. Separ... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, separate claim/perspective question about public transit was fused into the original problem, forcing the solver to separate two distinct sub-problems and avoid conflating evidence between them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: The United States should maintain its embargo against Cuba.
Perspective: The embargo prevents the people of Cuba from joining the digital age by cutting them off from technology, and restricts the electronic flow of information to the island.
Task: Decide whether the perspective supports or u... | B | Problem: Statement: Claim: The United States should maintain its embargo against Cuba.
Perspective: The embargo prevents the people of Cuba from joining the digital age by cutting them off from technology, and restricts the electronic flow of information to the island. Separately, as an independent subtask, indicate wh... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (identifying whether blame is placed on the U.S. embargo or internal Cuban censorship) is fused into the main classification task, requiring the solver to separate and answer two distinct questions.",
"name": "Compositional unde... |
Statement: Claim: The use of animals as objects of sport and entertainment should be banned.
Perspective: Using animals in sport demeans humans.
Question: Based on the claim and the perspective, determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support or undermine. | support | Statement: Claim: The use of animals as objects of sport and entertainment should be banned.
Perspective: Using animals in sport demeans humans. Also consider a separate, independent example for comparison: Claim2: The use of animals in cultural parades preserves tradition. Perspective2: Using animals in parades is exp... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent second claim-perspective pair is fused into the same prompt, forcing the solver to separate the two sub-problems and focus only on the original pair.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Mod... |
Statement: Claim: Tennessee is correct to protect teachers who wish to explore the merits of creationism.
Perspective: Teachers shouldn't teach whatever they want.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines | B | Statement: Claim: Tennessee is correct to protect teachers who wish to explore the merits of creationism.
Perspective: Teachers shouldn't teach whatever they want.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines
Additionally, as a separate and independent task, in... | Main question: B (undermines).
Additional classification (separate task): Prescriptive (expresses a normative recommendation). | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent sub-problem (classify the sentence as prescriptive or descriptive) into the original argumentative relation question, requiring the solver to separate and solve the two tasks independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Supporting means the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view; undermining means it could not. Claim: The niqab and other face coverings in schools must be banned. Perspective: I... | support | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Supporting means the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view; undermining means it could not. Claim: The niqab and other face coverings in schools must be banned. Perspective: I... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification subtask (fact vs. opinion) was fused into the main prompt so the solver must separate the two tasks and not let the secondary task influence the primary label decision.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"es... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Sikh school pupils should be allowed to carry ceremonial daggers. Perspective: It is a potential weapon. Options: (A) supports (B) undermines | B | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Sikh school pupils should be allowed to carry ceremonial daggers. Perspective: It is a potential weapon. Options: (A) supports (B) undermines. Additionally, indicate whether the perspective is primarily a factual claim or an opinion, ... | B; Opinion — expresses a safety concern rather than an established fact. | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (classify the perspective as factual claim or opinion and justify briefly) is fused into the original task, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and answer both.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"es... |
Statement: Given the claim: Increased taxes are good for America. And the perspective: Changing the wealth around to help income disparity. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose the best option from (A) through (J). Options: (A) Supports the claim, (B) Undermines the claim, (C) Neut... | A | Statement: Given the claim: Increased taxes are good for America. And the perspective: Changing the wealth around to help income disparity. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose the best option from (A) through (J). Options: (A) Supports the claim, (B) Undermines the claim, (C) Neut... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, unrelated sub-problem (a simple percentage calculation) was fused into the original judgment task so the solver must separate the two tasks and not let the unrelated math question affect the claim/perspective inference.",
"name": "Composit... |
Statement: Claim: Strict parenting works best. Perspective: Kids deserve some freedom. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with exactly one word: support or undermine | undermine | Statement: Claim: Strict parenting works best. Perspective: Kids deserve some freedom. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. As a separate, independent subtask, also determine whether the perspective sentence contains more than three words. Respond with exactly one word: support or undermi... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent counting subtask (does the perspective sentence contain more than three words?) is fused into the main judgment task, forcing the solver to separate tasks and avoid mixing outputs.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estim... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
Perspective: Making school uniforms mandatory creates a sense of equality since everyone will be wearing the same clothes.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim?
Options:
(A) Supports the claim
(B) Undermines the claim
Solution: A | A | Problem: Statement: Claim: School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory.
Perspective: Making school uniforms mandatory creates a sense of equality since everyone will be wearing the same clothes.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim?
Options:
(A) Supports the claim
(B) Undermines the claim
Separately, ... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent annotation subtask was fused into the original classification problem so a solver must separate the two tasks (support/undermine decision vs. clause-type classification).",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_diffi... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Reality TV shows are an important part of popular culture today. Perspective: Reality TV is disgusting. Answer with either support or undermine. | undermine | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Reality TV shows are an important part of popular culture today. Perspective: Reality TV is disgusting. (As a separate, independent labeling task for dataset bookkeeping, indicate whether the single-word evaluation 'disgusting' contai... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-task (counting consonants vs vowels in the word 'disgusting') was fused into the main instruction, forcing the solver to separate and solve two tasks independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficu... |
Statement: You will be given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Gay couples should be allowed to marry.
Perspective: The concept of "traditional marriage" has changed over time, and the definition of marriage as always being between one man and one wo... | A | Statement: You will be given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: Gay couples should be allowed to marry.
Perspective: The concept of "traditional marriage" has changed over time, and the definition of marriage as always being between one man and one wo... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-question was fused into the original judgement task, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and not let the unrelated computation influence the main inference.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"est... |
Statement: Claim: Disclose previous convictions in court.
Perspective: Allowing this motion would lead to a miscarriage of justice.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Respond with a single word: support or undermine. | undermine | Statement: Claim: Disclose previous convictions in court.
Perspective: Allowing this motion would lead to a miscarriage of justice.
Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Respond with a single word: support or undermine.
[Separate administrative sub-problem — unrelated to the reasoning above, i... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, unrelated sub-problem (a simple fraction calculation about disclosed convictions) is fused into the main legal reasoning task so the solver must separate the two tasks and ignore the distractor when producing the required single-word judgment.",... |
Statement: Determine whether the following perspective supports or undermines the claim. Support if the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view; otherwise undermines. Claim: Social networking sites are good for our society. Perspective: Social media facilitates political change. | support | Statement: Determine whether the following perspective supports or undermines the claim. Support if the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view; otherwise undermines. Claim: Social networking sites are good for our society. Perspective: Social media facilitates political change. Separately (in... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent second sub-problem (about local event groups and face-to-face interaction) is fused into the original task, requiring the solver to separate and evaluate two claims/perspectives independently.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
... |
Statement: Claim: We must negotiate with terrorists. Perspective: Negotiations cannot take place while innocents are being threatened. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. | undermine | Statement: Claim: We must negotiate with terrorists. Perspective: Negotiations cannot take place while innocents are being threatened. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. As an additional, separate sub-task (which does not change the relationship you're asked to judge), classify whether ... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent classification sub-problem (normative vs. empirical reading) into the original task so the solver must separate the two tasks and not let the extra judgment alter the support/undermine decision.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"... |
Statement: Claim: We should be investing in public transport. Perspective: it is the only way to stop our lazy nation from driving. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose between the options below: (A) support (B) undermine | A | Statement: Claim: We should be investing in public transport. Perspective: it is the only way to stop our lazy nation from driving. Separately, a recent commuter survey reported that 70% of respondents drove daily while 30% used public transport; if you pick one respondent at random, what is the probability they drive?... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent numeric sub-problem (a simple probability question from a survey) was fused into the original inference question, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and ignore the unrelated calculation when judging support.",
"name": "Compositi... |
Statement: Claim: Basic income tax should be abolished. Perspective: Balancing governmental problems for society. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one:
(A) supports
(B) undermines | B | Statement: Claim: Basic income tax should be abolished. Perspective: Balancing governmental problems for society. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one:
(A) supports
(B) undermines
Separately, as an independent subtask, decide whether the following assertion is true or false (t... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, plausibly related subtask (a true/false question about balanced budgets) is fused into the original problem so the solver must separate the two tasks and avoid letting the side question affect the main judgment.",
"name": "Compositional un... |
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: More gun control laws should be enacted. Perspective: More gun control laws are needed in protecting women from domestic abusers and stalkers. | support | Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: More gun control laws should be enacted. Perspective: More gun control laws are needed in protecting women from domestic abusers and stalkers. (Separate, unrelated verification: without affecting your main judgment, indicate whether t... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic verification sub-problem was fused into the original judgement task, requiring the solver to separate the unrelated check from the main inference.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increas... |
Statement: Claim: It is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech. Perspective: Freedoms are not earned or deserved they are given to all people equally and no one should determine which agendas are too extreme to receive this protection. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the ... | B | Statement: Claim: It is sometimes right for the government to restrict freedom of speech. Perspective: Freedoms are not earned or deserved they are given to all people equally and no one should determine which agendas are too extreme to receive this protection. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the ... | B
Separate sub-question answer: deontological
Explanation: The perspective argues that freedoms are intrinsic and should not be limited by judgments of extremity, which directly undermines the claim that restrictions are sometimes right (so main answer is B). The extra sub-question's correct label is 'deontological' be... | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent classification sub-question (moral theory label) is fused into the main question, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and not let the auxiliary classification affect the primary supports/undermines judgement.",
"name": "Compositi... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Compensation should be paid for those who have had their culture appropriated.
Perspective: Compensation rights a wrong.
Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is... | A | Problem: Statement: Claim: Compensation should be paid for those who have had their culture appropriated.
Perspective: Compensation rights a wrong. Separately (independent subtask): Determine whether the sentence 'Compensation rights a wrong.' is grammatically correct; if it is not, provide a minimal grammatical correc... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent grammaticality subtask is fused into the main judgment task so the solver must separate the two subtasks and not let the correction influence the support/undermine decision.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_di... |
Statement: Claim: Drones Should Be Used to Take Out Enemy Combatants. Perspective: Not enough legal oversight prevents the accountability resulting from secret drone strikes. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? (A) Supports (B) Undermines | B | Statement: Claim: Drones Should Be Used to Take Out Enemy Combatants. Perspective: Not enough legal oversight prevents the accountability resulting from secret drone strikes. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? (A) Supports (B) Undermines. Separately, as an independent verification task, dete... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (is 14 divisible by 7?) was fused into the main task, requiring the solver to separate and solve two unrelated subtasks.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate:... |
Problem: Statement: Claim: Homework is a waste of time.
Perspective: Too much homework can be harmful.
Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with exactly one of: support or undermine. | support | Problem: Statement: Claim: Homework is a waste of time.
Perspective: Too much homework can be harmful.
Additionally, as a separate and independent task, indicate whether the perspective sentence "Too much homework can be harmful." should be classified as a factual claim or an evaluative (value) judgment — this second t... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "Fused an independent classification sub-task (is the perspective factual or evaluative) into the original problem so the solver must separate the two tasks and not confuse them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_in... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: The age of consent laws should be lowered.
Perspective: Lowering the age of consent will open the door to more criminal problems.
Choose the single best option:
(A) Supports the claim
(B) Und... | B | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.
Claim: The age of consent laws should be lowered.
Perspective: Lowering the age of consent will open the door to more criminal problems.
Separately, based only on the perspective above, decide wheth... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent, small sub-question (a truth-evaluation of a related but opposite sentence) is fused into the original problem, forcing the solver to separate two tasks and avoid contaminating the primary inference.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: School vouchers should be encouraged. Perspective: School vouchers improve education in general by making public schools compete with private schools for students in a free market. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with ... | support | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: School vouchers should be encouraged. Perspective: School vouchers improve education in general by making public schools compete with private schools for students in a free market. As a separate, unrelated subtask, briefly consider whether the general statement... | support | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-problem (evaluating the universal truth of 'competition always improves quality') is fused into the main problem so the solver must separate the tasks and not conflate their answers.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
... |
Statement: Given the claim: The US and its allies were justified in taking military action against Iraq following Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait. And the perspective: The US' intentions were wrong. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Options: (A) supports (B) undermines | B | Statement: Given the claim: The US and its allies were justified in taking military action against Iraq following Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait. And the perspective: The US' intentions were wrong. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Options: (A) supports (B) undermines. Separately, as an ind... | B | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent factual sub-question about UN sanctions/resolutions was fused into the main evaluation task, requiring the solver to separate the two parts and not let the factual subtask influence the judgement about whether the perspective supports or undermin... |
Statement: Given the claim: "Wikileaks is not and has never been a non-profit organization." And the perspective: "Wikileaks is not accountable". Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option: (A) supports (B) undermines | A | Statement: Given the claim: "Wikileaks is not and has never been a non-profit organization." And the perspective: "Wikileaks is not accountable". Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option: (A) supports (B) undermines. Separately (as an independent sub-problem that should not ... | A | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent yes/no sub-question about logical equivalence is fused into the main problem, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid conflating them.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_increase": "m... |
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Developing nations should place restrictions on rural-urban migration. Perspective: It is practically impossible to control people's movement.
Solution: undermine | undermine | Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Developing nations should place restrictions on rural-urban migration. Perspective: It is practically impossible to control people's movement. Additionally, in a separate sentence, classify whethe... | undermine | {
"distractor_types_used": [
{
"description": "An independent sub-question (classify the perspective as empirical or normative) is fused into the main task, forcing the solver to separate and answer two distinct subtasks.",
"name": "Compositional understanding"
}
],
"estimated_difficulty_incre... |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 13