{"comment":{"created_at":"2011-10-20T12:06:49Z","body":"What do you do when the first load of the manifest is in the last microsecond of the minute, such that the second load is in the next minute?","updated_at":"2011-10-20T12:06:49Z","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TiddlySpace/tiddlyspace/issues/comments/2467756","id":2467756,"user":{"avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/0c8a56d012e5a2cabe00f28b5f68ce83?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png","gravatar_id":"0c8a56d012e5a2cabe00f28b5f68ce83","url":"https://api.github.com/users/cdent","id":34498,"login":"cdent"}},"action":"created","issue":{"number":819,"created_at":"2011-10-20T11:42:13Z","pull_request":{"diff_url":null,"patch_url":null,"html_url":null},"body":"Open http://jon.tiddlyspace.com/takenote with the console open\r\n\r\nObserve the error right at the end:\r\nApplication Cache Error event: Manifest changed during update, scheduling retry\r\n\r\nAs a result no html applications on tiddlyspace can make use of manifests\r\n\r\nI've confirmed via watching http transactions that the cache manifest is requested at the beginning and the end of the load event.\r\nIt notices that both versions are different (due to the repudiator)\r\n\r\nWhat we probably want to do is instead of using random numbers use a time stamp to the nearest minute (suggestion).","comments":1,"title":"Application Cache Error event (manifests again)","updated_at":"2011-10-20T12:06:49Z","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TiddlySpace/tiddlyspace/issues/819","id":2003870,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"closed_at":null,"user":{"avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/45b0863bddc42c3bbb08284d1863ad95?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png","gravatar_id":"45b0863bddc42c3bbb08284d1863ad95","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jdlrobson","id":148752,"login":"jdlrobson"},"html_url":"https://github.com/TiddlySpace/tiddlyspace/issues/819","labels":[],"state":"open"},"legacy":{"issue_id":2003870,"comment_id":2467756}}