{"issue":{"pull_request":{"diff_url":null,"html_url":null,"patch_url":null},"state":"open","milestone":{"state":"open","open_issues":6,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/netty/netty/milestones/2","due_on":null,"title":"4.0.0.Alpha1","description":null,"number":2,"creator":{"avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/9bd0a2752ec49d888172ed1effd521d8?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png","gravatar_id":"9bd0a2752ec49d888172ed1effd521d8","url":"https://api.github.com/users/trustin","login":"trustin","id":173918},"closed_issues":0,"created_at":"2011-11-16T13:42:54Z"},"user":{"avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/9bd0a2752ec49d888172ed1effd521d8?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png","gravatar_id":"9bd0a2752ec49d888172ed1effd521d8","url":"https://api.github.com/users/trustin","login":"trustin","id":173918},"labels":[{"name":"improvement","color":"0b02e1","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/netty/netty/labels/improvement"}],"updated_at":"2011-11-17T22:12:08Z","assignee":null,"closed_at":null,"comments":6,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/netty/netty/issues/64","body":"We don't need to support JBoss Logging anymore in Netty 4.  It means we can simply using widely adopted logging framework and get rid of our thin logging layer.  There are two candidates:\r\n\r\n* `java.util.logging`\r\n* SLF4J\r\n\r\nSLF4J has much nicer API, but it's somewhat difficult to configure for a novice.  `java.util.logging`'s API is pretty ugly, but it will let us continue being a zero-dependency library.  What do you prefer and why?  I'm leaning toward `java.util.logging` because of zero dependency is so attractive and we do not log very much.\r\n","html_url":"https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/64","title":"Use java.util.logging or SLF4J","number":64,"id":2266618,"created_at":"2011-11-17T09:03:06Z"},"action":"created","comment":{"user":{"avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/9bd0a2752ec49d888172ed1effd521d8?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png","gravatar_id":"9bd0a2752ec49d888172ed1effd521d8","url":"https://api.github.com/users/trustin","login":"trustin","id":173918},"updated_at":"2011-11-17T22:12:08Z","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/netty/netty/issues/comments/2782840","body":"SLF4J provides jul-to-slf4j bridge but it incurs serious performance impact according to SLF4J website.  Considering that many people prefers SLF4J or other logging framework / facade than JUL, we should not switch to JUL.\r\n\r\nSo, they question is, should we switch to SLf4J or just modernize our logging layer?  Zero dependency is a very attractive factor, so I'm leaning toward the latter.","id":2782840,"created_at":"2011-11-17T22:12:08Z"}}