{"shas":[["ca8179f982940d7ceb3124570dfd67e2cb9ec1fa","b274abc493535ae88cb3a0742f63e38c9241d67c@gmail.com","revert 2130: subs-based evalf behavior\n\n    The issue 2130 test is now failing again as was added\n    as an XFAIL test.\n\n    Tweaking of _eval_nseries and the transfor methods was needed to\n    make them watch for an unbounded result. (In _eval_nseries, == was\n    also replaced with 'is' where appropriate and an unused import\n    of oo was removed.)\n\n    Tests were added with reference to the original issues\n    in which the NaN behavior was introduced and then discussed\n    about why it should be removed.","Chris Smith"],["1b39329b48ba325c40f370c1657c23c5832ab3f0","13ec3c7bab52575f3a0cda6406c76269cc13b041@gmail.com","1100: return NaN rather than self in _eval_interval\n\n    When computing the value of self at A or B, if NaN was returned\n    then the original expression was being returned. Nothing is\n    checking for this condition so it lead to confusing results.\n    Now a NaN is returned.","Saptarshi Mandal"],["c55cd978dc15acf5df79646d9b57cf8738e29886","b274abc493535ae88cb3a0742f63e38c9241d67c@gmail.com","Pow._eval_is_real returns less None\n\n    For b**e, if it is know that b and/or e are not real and not None\n    (which returns immediately when encountered) then they must be\n    imaginary and there are some conditions where a True or a False\n    can be given. The tests added were confirmed with the new assumption\n    system and the differences (indicating errors in the new system) were\n    noted in issue 2324.","Chris Smith"],["b4de0cf6fa66e57ed38df5e99ae023bfd1b8a9db","b274abc493535ae88cb3a0742f63e38c9241d67c@gmail.com","Pow._eval_is_bounded gives True for nonzero base.\n\n    For b**e, if it is know that b and e are bounded then the result is\n    bounded if the e is non-negative (current behavior); it will also be\n    bounded if b is non-zero. One only gets an unbounded result when dividing\n    by zero.","Chris Smith"],["9f844c856531dbb4299364f8bb94a40dc4e7df13","b274abc493535ae88cb3a0742f63e38c9241d67c@gmail.com","zoo arithmetic (foo*zoo, foo+zoo)\n\n        Changed Add and Mul to make foo+zoo and foo*zoo return zoo\n        when appropriate.\n\n            zoo + foo -> zoo\n            zoo * foo -> zoo\n\n        Most of this is handled in the flatten routines rather than\n        giving zoo __add__, etc.. functions.","Chris Smith"],["09e072c1e5f239feb4945f7c82dcf37e15ef02eb","13ec3c7bab52575f3a0cda6406c76269cc13b041@gmail.com","2111: log, tan and cot return zoo\n\n    log(0), cot(0), tan(n*pi/2) and cot(n*pi) (where n is an integer) all\n    return complex infinity.\n\n    Chris Smith (smichr@gmail.com) changed a failing solvers.py test.","Saptarshi Mandal"],["2393f7b14c300e72a146c25cc89760d27cb8b4ad","b274abc493535ae88cb3a0742f63e38c9241d67c@gmail.com","1023: oo + bounded -> oo; oo + imaginary -> zoo","Chris Smith"],["ff417f018203a24f70a24ae17315d4fdb56cf4b2","13ec3c7bab52575f3a0cda6406c76269cc13b041@gmail.com","log(zoo) and log(-zoo) returns zoo.","Saptarshi Mandal"],["80f76f5d23e90156f9c2691abffb6520e81583f1","13ec3c7bab52575f3a0cda6406c76269cc13b041@gmail.com","Fixed behaviour of hyperbolic and inverse hyperbolic trigonometric\nfunctions wrt zoo.\n\nThe current behaviour is the same as that of Mathematica.","Saptarshi Mandal"],["4571bcce7290abf152914aa321c2926fffcfb029","13ec3c7bab52575f3a0cda6406c76269cc13b041@gmail.com","Corrected behaviour of acosh for values at infinities.","Saptarshi Mandal"],["d9bb82aa68a956a9d7f0ce92c0b2d8db49f7aa7b","13ec3c7bab52575f3a0cda6406c76269cc13b041@gmail.com","Fixed behaviour of atanh at infinities.","Saptarshi Mandal"],["b3a9dddb12d1e48e5ab8ad2cebbe197b4abdee40","13ec3c7bab52575f3a0cda6406c76269cc13b041@gmail.com","issue 652: Fixed failing tests for acosh.","Saptarshi Mandal"],["ca2784d3ddaf2240fb9dfe010003544319c85acf","13ec3c7bab52575f3a0cda6406c76269cc13b041@gmail.com","issue 652: Fixed some more failing asinh tests.","Saptarshi Mandal"],["e94c1f80fcf237241e3eb93f2bb7f4a60dfaf544","13ec3c7bab52575f3a0cda6406c76269cc13b041@gmail.com","issue 652: Fixed some atanh tests","Saptarshi Mandal"],["befe8ddf2af5750ba3c02389b8290acce5e39dbf","13ec3c7bab52575f3a0cda6406c76269cc13b041@gmail.com","issue 652: Fixed some tests for acoth.","Saptarshi Mandal"],["0eb44d44793d498113286ab9b4ef1558377e46bd","b274abc493535ae88cb3a0742f63e38c9241d67c@gmail.com","oo + nonneg or real, small number -> oo\n\n    Similarily, -oo + nonpositive or real, small number -> -oo\n\n    oo + I is retained as a way to indicate an infinity directed off the\n    real axis.\n\n    One limit test needed to be XFAILed and the reason why is noted.\n\n    Tests where the left and right hand sides are the same are\n    not testing anything. A few of these were removed like\n    oo == oo and oo + 1 == oo + 1.","Chris Smith"],["f090f92f51c8abf4eb11e708a73c25acfbafd417","b274abc493535ae88cb3a0742f63e38c9241d67c@gmail.com","fix xfail limit with expanded heuristic processing of Pow","Chris Smith"],["1873c0761895c221b049059c50480075b333bed3","b274abc493535ae88cb3a0742f63e38c9241d67c@gmail.com","2323: log.is_zero test\n\n    log(a) should not return True or False if `a` cannot be determined\n    to be 1. Additional conditions indicating that `a` is not 1 were\n    added along with an attempt to expand any numerical `a` in case\n    it is hiding a 1. evalf() is not used since this would result\n    in an approximate answer.","Chris Smith"],["62667871b2b6ab8e7235e5b20e8307dc594ad619","4e51c28eba28c1534bcc4a6bd2cccd314d8bf749@gmail.com","Added a test for issue #1001","Mateusz Paprocki"],["3dfdf17f01318b4ba5e58bbc75170dcc798b0978","7ad6f2e9b818e1205d2345ebad99449e257d29e3@gmail.com","Merged pull request #271 from mattpap/test_issue_1001.\n\nAdded a test for issue #1001","Vinzent Steinberg"]],"repo":"renatocoutinho/sympy","actor":"renatocoutinho","ref":"refs/heads/master","size":22,"head":"73845710a2a4f2a7398271576bfcd99d29babcc1","actor_gravatar":"eaece83d30282b7e8d8f61f34612d1f7","push_id":30293326}