{"issue":{"title":"maxswp < swp","user":{"login":"robertomeda","id":917389,"url":"https://api.github.com/users/robertomeda","avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/7e0cd1c5a0742cd40a729d15cc68635e?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png","gravatar_id":"7e0cd1c5a0742cd40a729d15cc68635e"},"created_at":"2011-12-28T09:06:15Z","milestone":null,"labels":[],"state":"open","updated_at":"2011-12-28T09:06:15Z","id":2669949,"pull_request":{"patch_url":null,"html_url":null,"diff_url":null},"closed_at":null,"html_url":"https://github.com/openlava/openlava/issues/9","body":"Hi \r\n\r\nI noticed swp reported by lsload is equal to maxswp+1 , reported by lshosts:\r\n(openlava project 1.0, Dec 16 2011)\r\n\r\n<pre>\r\n# lsload\r\nHOST_NAME status r15s r1m r15m ut pg ls it tmp swp mem\r\nmyhost ok 0.0 0.0 0.0 1% 0.0 0 1318 65G 8192M 4463M\r\n\r\n# lshosts\r\nHOST_NAME type model cpuf ncpus maxmem maxswp server RESOURCES\r\nmyhost LINUX64 DEFAULT 1.0 4 5966M 8191M Yes (linux)\r\n</pre>\r\nMight it be a different approximation (trunc vs round)?\r\n\r\nHere's the swap reported by proc:\r\n<pre>\r\nFilename Type Size Used Priority\r\n/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-swap partition 8388600 0 -1\r\n</pre>\r\n\r\nand:\r\n8388600/1024=8191.9921875\r\n\r\n/have/a/nice/openlava/day","number":9,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openlava/openlava/issues/9","comments":0,"assignee":null},"action":"opened"}