{"commits":[{"author":{"name":"Squeeks","email":"2c812e211eb5ad901cb2dc90f89c3635b846235c@gmail.com"},"sha":"d7040f0bec60a811d991ac2838ce6931fcfc6a8a","message":"Adding basic support for signed certificate messages\n\nLike the previous, signed block commit many of the same things\napply: we don't touch and of the crypto apart from attempting\nto take it out from it's base64 state.","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/squeeks/glossy/commits/d7040f0bec60a811d991ac2838ce6931fcfc6a8a"},{"author":{"name":"Squeeks","email":"2c812e211eb5ad901cb2dc90f89c3635b846235c@gmail.com"},"sha":"7b2ec4c323611c826b710d824be0b8ce5c125f6d","message":"Adding human readable key blob type names","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/squeeks/glossy/commits/7b2ec4c323611c826b710d824be0b8ce5c125f6d"},{"author":{"name":"Squeeks","email":"2c812e211eb5ad901cb2dc90f89c3635b846235c@gmail.com"},"sha":"5aa265ee263b7bd5e2dc10e6da0190b05f758394","message":"Enabling auto handling of signed blocks and certs\n\nI am somewhat divided by this commit, although it preserves all data it parses,\nit ends up making a object that's huge and too full of redundancy. I may end up\n\"replacing\" all of SDDATA with our parsed signed block instead of this.","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/squeeks/glossy/commits/5aa265ee263b7bd5e2dc10e6da0190b05f758394"},{"author":{"name":"Squeeks","email":"2c812e211eb5ad901cb2dc90f89c3635b846235c@gmail.com"},"sha":"5ecfec1afbcae1137058ae18401a860ed6d5b402","message":"Updating README","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/squeeks/glossy/commits/5ecfec1afbcae1137058ae18401a860ed6d5b402"},{"author":{"name":"Squeeks","email":"2c812e211eb5ad901cb2dc90f89c3635b846235c@gmail.com"},"sha":"c07b2720f82f9a63e432bb01952472c9ae39acb8","message":"Version 0.0.8","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/squeeks/glossy/commits/c07b2720f82f9a63e432bb01952472c9ae39acb8"}],"ref":"refs/heads/master","head":"c07b2720f82f9a63e432bb01952472c9ae39acb8","push_id":51612486,"size":5}