{"comment":{"created_at":"2011-10-11T16:49:02Z","body":"Forgot to say that there should be 2 \"flags\":\r\n  SiteInputSEMapping\r\n  SiteOutputSEMapping\r\n","updated_at":"2011-10-11T16:49:02Z","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DIRACGrid/DIRAC/issues/comments/2368085","id":2368085,"user":{"avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/5ae4855aa9d3c6685bd9f450814f9af6?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png","url":"https://api.github.com/users/fstagni","id":785576,"login":"fstagni"}},"action":"created","issue":{"number":230,"created_at":"2011-10-11T16:48:13Z","pull_request":{"diff_url":null,"patch_url":null,"html_url":null},"body":"The CS is used to specify the association of SEs to sites. For LHCb, we have seen in the current reprocessing that this association has to be done at different places in the CS. This is not handy. This task follow the proposal to revise the way this association is done. The local SEs are also defined at least at \"Resources/SiteLocalSEMapping\"\r\n\r\nThere should be:\r\n- 1 geographical association \r\n- an association for all the non-close SEs, in the \"operation\" section. This can be dependent from the setup.\r\n\r\nThe code has to be reviewed to see what can be changed. \r\n\r\nNot at urgent task, should go into one of the v6rx release.","comments":1,"title":"Association of SEs to sites/srm interfaces","updated_at":"2011-10-11T16:49:02Z","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/DIRACGrid/DIRAC/issues/230","id":1878422,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"closed_at":null,"user":{"avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/5ae4855aa9d3c6685bd9f450814f9af6?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png","url":"https://api.github.com/users/fstagni","id":785576,"login":"fstagni"},"html_url":"https://github.com/DIRACGrid/DIRAC/issues/230","labels":[],"state":"open"},"legacy":{"issue_id":1878422,"comment_id":2368085}}