{"comment":{"created_at":"2011-10-08T06:03:06Z","body":"interesting it seems similar to https://github.com/everzet/capifony/pull/53","updated_at":"2011-10-08T06:03:06Z","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/everzet/capifony/issues/comments/2330649","id":2330649,"user":{"avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/ab2a6b877dd41427c660a3d6a170cc71?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png","url":"https://api.github.com/users/cordoval","id":328359,"login":"cordoval"}},"action":"created","issue":{"number":61,"created_at":"2011-10-07T19:26:01Z","pull_request":{"diff_url":"https://github.com/everzet/capifony/pull/61.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/everzet/capifony/pull/61.patch","html_url":"https://github.com/everzet/capifony/pull/61"},"body":"I think that the default `vendors:update` command should call\r\n\r\n    bin/vendors install\r\n\r\nand not\r\n\r\n    bin/vendors install --reinstall\r\n\r\nThe first one does not try to remove each vendor path before changing current HEAD (which is obviously much faster). I think it should be the default behavior.\r\n\r\nDo you want to keep a `vendors:reinstall` command?","comments":3,"title":"Add vendors:reinstall and update vendors:update","updated_at":"2011-10-08T06:03:06Z","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/everzet/capifony/issues/61","id":1847809,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"closed_at":null,"user":{"avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/9fc0da8dfa4c69ea9f9e15513b6d3d9a?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png","url":"https://api.github.com/users/mbontemps","id":231249,"login":"mbontemps"},"html_url":"https://github.com/everzet/capifony/issues/61","labels":[],"state":"open"},"legacy":{"issue_id":1847809,"comment_id":2330649}}