{"issue":{"created_at":"2011-11-30T19:34:33Z","state":"open","updated_at":"2011-12-09T02:03:40Z","comments":1,"user":{"gravatar_id":"c45b21d940a6c5b78da7205268b60604","id":202653,"url":"https://api.github.com/users/tmaiaroto","avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/c45b21d940a6c5b78da7205268b60604?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png","login":"tmaiaroto"},"body":"When creating an li3 console command extension (class extends \\ltihium\\console\\Command), the console always outputs a singular version of the class name under the \"USAGE\" section.\r\n\r\nSo for example: class Users extends \\lithium\\console\\Command { ...\r\nWhich may set up some fixture data or perform other console tasks...When going to run: li3 users\r\n(not specifying a method/command)\r\nThe console will return under the \"USAGE\" section all the commands available but will look like: li3 user <command> instead of: li3 users <command>\r\n\r\nIt's a display thing only. You can of course still run: li3 users <command> just fine. Of course running li3 user <command> will result in a \"Command `User` not found.\" error. So it's just a visual mislead.","assignee":null,"id":2406118,"labels":[],"pull_request":{"patch_url":null,"html_url":null,"diff_url":null},"number":203,"title":"li3 Console \"USAGE\" Section Outputs Singular Class Names Only","closed_at":null,"html_url":"https://github.com/UnionOfRAD/lithium/issues/203","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/UnionOfRAD/lithium/issues/203","milestone":null},"action":"created","comment":{"created_at":"2011-12-09T02:03:40Z","updated_at":"2011-12-09T02:03:40Z","user":{"gravatar_id":"5207d52c41c1cadc4f1887e89b4f870b","id":438456,"url":"https://api.github.com/users/masom","avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/5207d52c41c1cadc4f1887e89b4f870b?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png","login":"masom"},"body":"Ah nice one :) Jumping on it.","id":3074492,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/UnionOfRAD/lithium/issues/comments/3074492"}}