{"issue":{"created_at":"2011-12-08T07:09:12Z","state":"closed","updated_at":"2011-12-08T07:35:06Z","comments":2,"user":{"gravatar_id":"9a650496e173b546d6994f4d3763ff73","id":306655,"url":"https://api.github.com/users/nottombrown","avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/9a650496e173b546d6994f4d3763ff73?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png","login":"nottombrown"},"body":"Removed the related TODO.","assignee":null,"id":2484457,"labels":[],"pull_request":{"patch_url":"https://github.com/SolidStage/backbrace/pull/1.patch","html_url":"https://github.com/SolidStage/backbrace/pull/1","diff_url":"https://github.com/SolidStage/backbrace/pull/1.diff"},"number":1,"title":"Moved to coffeescript style closures","html_url":"https://github.com/SolidStage/backbrace/issues/1","closed_at":"2011-12-08T07:18:46Z","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SolidStage/backbrace/issues/1","milestone":null},"action":"created","comment":{"created_at":"2011-12-08T07:35:06Z","updated_at":"2011-12-08T07:35:06Z","user":{"gravatar_id":"9a650496e173b546d6994f4d3763ff73","id":306655,"url":"https://api.github.com/users/nottombrown","avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/9a650496e173b546d6994f4d3763ff73?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png","login":"nottombrown"},"body":"Yep, good point. Let me know if the new one works.\n\nOn Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Kevin Kelley <\nreply@reply.github.com\n> wrote:\n\n> Hey---seems like these commits should be squashed, since the first one is\n> bad and the second is a fix for it.  Would you mind doing that and opening\n> a new pull request?  You might have to do it on another local branch, since\n> github will already have heard about the unsquashed commits.\n>\n> ---\n> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:\n> https://github.com/SolidStage/backbrace/pull/1#issuecomment-3058773\n>\n\n\n\n-- \nTom Brown - @nottombrown","id":3058899,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SolidStage/backbrace/issues/comments/3058899"}}