{"comment":{"created_at":"2011-10-11T13:17:35Z","body":"I hear ya -- I like the consistency of passing in exactly what's going to go through to ARel, however.","updated_at":"2011-10-11T13:17:35Z","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ernie/squeel/issues/comments/2361181","id":2361181,"user":{"avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/9ad63cede8dd7a29d7870de00d55a31b?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ernie","id":14947,"login":"ernie"}},"action":"created","issue":{"number":62,"created_at":"2011-09-19T18:18:45Z","pull_request":{"diff_url":null,"patch_url":null,"html_url":null},"body":"Syntactic sugar: It would be nice if this worked...\r\n\r\n  relation.where{position.in(1, 2)}\r\n\r\ninstead of having to do...\r\n\r\n  relation.where{position.in([1, 2])}\r\n\r\nYeah, Squeel makes me spoiled enough to ask for this.\r\n","comments":1,"title":"[Feature] Call Array.wrap on .in arguments","updated_at":"2011-10-11T13:17:35Z","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ernie/squeel/issues/62","id":1680737,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"closed_at":"2011-10-11T13:17:35Z","user":{"avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/b8aca816cb8646a855175f64bdfa2838?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jaylevitt","id":11246,"login":"jaylevitt"},"html_url":"https://github.com/ernie/squeel/issues/62","labels":[],"state":"closed"},"legacy":{"issue_id":1680737,"comment_id":2361181}}