{"issue":{"created_at":"2011-12-05T17:43:26Z","state":"closed","updated_at":"2011-12-05T19:09:28Z","comments":3,"user":{"gravatar_id":"b4eae72c3e897da6d49f019a43beec12","id":590374,"url":"https://api.github.com/users/jussiry","login":"jussiry","avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/b4eae72c3e897da6d49f019a43beec12?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png"},"body":"How about returning the following results when [].some and [].none are called without parameters:\r\n\r\n```javascript\r\n[].some()   // false\r\n[0].some()  // true\r\n[].none()   // true\r\n[0].none()  // false\r\n```\r\n\r\nThis way we could use .some() and .none() instead of the traditional and more tedious:  ```[0].length > 0```","assignee":null,"labels":[],"id":2452183,"number":71,"pull_request":{"patch_url":null,"html_url":null,"diff_url":null},"title":"[...].some() and [...].none() without parameters","closed_at":"2011-12-05T19:09:28Z","html_url":"https://github.com/andrewplummer/Sugar/issues/71","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/andrewplummer/Sugar/issues/71","milestone":null},"action":"closed"}