{"issue":{"created_at":"2011-06-29T00:15:19Z","state":"closed","updated_at":"2011-11-25T15:01:38Z","user":{"gravatar_id":"3158c969e5c43e681b03abe4c8d0b33c","id":563066,"url":"https://api.github.com/users/hlindberg","login":"hlindberg","avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/3158c969e5c43e681b03abe4c8d0b33c?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png"},"comments":4,"body":"When there is an ambiguity, geppetto suggest using a fully qualified resource name such as `::file` instead of just `file` (assuming there was also a definition or class visible with the same relative name).\r\n\r\nUnfortunately, the puppet runtime does not handle absolute/fully qualified type names. \r\n\r\nIIRC, there is a puppet issue for this - look it up (or report one).\r\n\r\nAlso consider not suggesting the non working fix...","assignee":null,"id":1134034,"number":123,"pull_request":{"patch_url":null,"html_url":null,"diff_url":null},"labels":[{"name":"worksforme","color":"444444","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cloudsmith/geppetto/labels/worksforme"}],"title":"quickfix for ambiguity suggests using :: which does not work in puppet","closed_at":"2011-11-25T15:01:38Z","html_url":"https://github.com/cloudsmith/geppetto/issues/123","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cloudsmith/geppetto/issues/123","milestone":null},"action":"closed"}