{"action":"opened","issue":{"number":12,"created_at":"2011-10-18T15:52:18Z","pull_request":{"diff_url":null,"patch_url":null,"html_url":null},"body":"Within the PopartEditorUtils the hasMain check checks the actual code, whether he has the extension set. This leads to the assumption that the extension is not as hitherto handled a variable declaration, but indeed as unmodifiable as the DSL interpreter class! Is it so or is the method just wrong?\r\n{code from line 483}\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\tList<String> popartLanguageExtensionsFromStore = getPopartLanguageExtensionsFromStore();\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\tfor (String extension : popartLanguageExtensionsFromStore) {\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\tif (line.trim().contains(extension + \"(name:\")) {\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\treturn true;\r\n\t\t\t\t\t}\r\n\t\t\t\t}\r\n\t\t\t\t\r\n{code}","comments":0,"title":"How important is the dsl definition extension","updated_at":"2011-10-18T15:52:18Z","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/stg-tud/tigerseyeplugin/issues/12","id":1951595,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"closed_at":null,"user":{"gravatar_id":"06c30a6fe0431c6ed7306a7d70674c88","avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/06c30a6fe0431c6ed7306a7d70674c88?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png","url":"https://api.github.com/users/leoroos","id":988230,"login":"leoroos"},"html_url":"https://github.com/stg-tud/tigerseyeplugin/issues/12","labels":[],"state":"open"},"legacy":{"number":12,"action":"opened","issue":1951595}}