{"shas":[["8b924afda67bddbabd23138ea0d0af7ac6c408fd","7d956a6104bb41ca5c78fe7ac803d07753e701a9@akkartik.com","586 - no we still need elambda because macro params can hide the caller's params\n\nSo we have two different kinds of special-cases now, for primFuncs and for\nelambda. Just a matter of time before I discover a macro use-case that needs\nto poke at caller's lexical scope, and then ilambda will have to return as\nwell.\n\nThe fig leaf is that inlining alone doesn't need two separate special-cases\nfor primFuncs and ilambda.","Kartik K. Agaram"],["391fbee646ced4ceb6345875ce28bf9da6c13459","7d956a6104bb41ca5c78fe7ac803d07753e701a9@akkartik.com","587","Kartik K. Agaram"]],"ref":"refs/heads/unstable","size":2,"head":"391fbee646ced4ceb6345875ce28bf9da6c13459","push_id":39337426}