{"issue":{"state":"open","pull_request":{"diff_url":null,"html_url":null,"patch_url":null},"user":{"avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/db894f5d91f50a5a59b4ac8690eb7975?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png","gravatar_id":"db894f5d91f50a5a59b4ac8690eb7975","url":"https://api.github.com/users/igravious","login":"igravious","id":109220},"milestone":null,"assignee":null,"updated_at":"2011-11-07T08:41:18Z","labels":[],"comments":3,"closed_at":null,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/camping/camping/issues/47","body":"See here:\r\n\r\n[Using method_missing and respond_to? to create dynamic methods] (http://technicalpickles.com/posts/using-method_missing-and-respond_to-to-create-dynamic-methods/)\r\n\r\nThis is not a bug in Camping, I'm just throwing this out there.","html_url":"https://github.com/camping/camping/issues/47","title":"Perhaps Camping could implement respond_to? if it implements method_missing","number":47,"id":2112275,"created_at":"2011-11-01T16:40:37Z"},"action":"created","comment":{"user":{"avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/b397b498cc02503a2d86c86176f7fd3e?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png","gravatar_id":"b397b498cc02503a2d86c86176f7fd3e","url":"https://api.github.com/users/judofyr","login":"judofyr","id":499},"updated_at":"2011-11-07T08:41:17Z","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/camping/camping/issues/comments/2651133","body":"Ah, that one. Well, that's kinda tricky. `App.something(:Foo)` will always return *something*. I guess we could just `def respond_to?;true end`, but I'm not quite sure if it's worth the trouble.","id":2651133,"created_at":"2011-11-07T08:41:17Z"}}