{"issue":{"state":"open","pull_request":{"diff_url":null,"html_url":null,"patch_url":null},"milestone":null,"user":{"avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d65ac2da2ebe806f33a3016271f3c022?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png","gravatar_id":"d65ac2da2ebe806f33a3016271f3c022","url":"https://api.github.com/users/clarencen","login":"clarencen","id":1194435},"assignee":null,"updated_at":"2011-11-14T22:37:12Z","labels":[],"closed_at":null,"comments":0,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/clarencen/lshift/issues/19","body":"We should consider naming the primary key of all externalizable entities in a consistent fashion (e.g. the PK of a Pair is currently called pairKey).","html_url":"https://github.com/clarencen/lshift/issues/19","title":"Consistent entity ids","number":19,"id":2237027,"created_at":"2011-11-14T22:37:12Z"},"action":"opened"}