{"issue":{"state":"open","pull_request":{"diff_url":"https://github.com/clawpack/pyclaw/pull/83.diff","html_url":"https://github.com/clawpack/pyclaw/pull/83","patch_url":"https://github.com/clawpack/pyclaw/pull/83.patch"},"milestone":null,"user":{"avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/61f1da65fc2ab1e57b811524fd9980bc?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png","gravatar_id":"61f1da65fc2ab1e57b811524fd9980bc","url":"https://api.github.com/users/gradylemoine","login":"gradylemoine","id":965199},"labels":[],"assignee":null,"updated_at":"2011-11-14T06:17:26Z","comments":2,"closed_at":null,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/clawpack/pyclaw/issues/83","body":"I've updated the 3D fortran code to use forall constructs where applicable, and rearranged some do loops where I didn't think I could use a forall.  I get about a 5% performance improvement on my laptop.  (See also the discussion on claw-dev.)  Results from David's acoustics test code are unchanged.","html_url":"https://github.com/clawpack/pyclaw/issues/83","number":83,"title":"3D fortran updated with forall constructs","id":2223930,"created_at":"2011-11-13T23:47:54Z"},"action":"created","comment":{"user":{"avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/9b677b20743558e863eca9bbd86f5d0c?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png","gravatar_id":"9b677b20743558e863eca9bbd86f5d0c","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ketch","login":"ketch","id":697763},"updated_at":"2011-11-14T06:17:26Z","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/clawpack/pyclaw/issues/comments/2727080","body":"Nice work, Grady!  I can tell you put a lot of thought into this.","id":2727080,"created_at":"2011-11-14T06:17:26Z"}}