{"issue":{"state":"open","created_at":"2011-11-29T20:29:05Z","updated_at":"2011-11-29T20:29:10Z","user":{"gravatar_id":"256406243346b9253f8610fb1d1e05f6","id":1215373,"url":"https://api.github.com/users/importer","avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/256406243346b9253f8610fb1d1e05f6?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png","login":"importer"},"comments":4,"body":"Leo, I'm thinking that empty completed password fields are confusing, as the user really doesn't know if the field is empty and needs completing, or already has a password filled in.\nFor instance in a module I require the user to enter a mailserver password once in a BE settings page, and its stored in the database.\nOn reviewing the settings page later, has he already entered the password?\nThoughts?\n\nRelated issues: #3019\n\n--- _Originally created by ramjet on March 2nd, 2011, at 03:08pm (ID 2902)_","assignee":{"gravatar_id":"87d2e5aefadcb310f9155df28c2b3582","id":1192057,"url":"https://api.github.com/users/leofeyer","avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/87d2e5aefadcb310f9155df28c2b3582?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png","login":"leofeyer"},"id":2392338,"number":2902,"pull_request":{"patch_url":null,"html_url":null,"diff_url":null},"labels":[{"name":"backend","color":"e6e6e6","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/contao/import/labels/backend"},{"name":"Feature","color":"4183c4","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/contao/import/labels/Feature"}],"title":"Password and Confirmation fields to show *********** when filled?","closed_at":null,"html_url":"https://github.com/contao/import/issues/2902","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/contao/import/issues/2902","milestone":{"state":"open","created_at":"2011-11-29T15:29:54Z","due_on":null,"closed_issues":87,"creator":{"gravatar_id":"87d2e5aefadcb310f9155df28c2b3582","id":1192057,"url":"https://api.github.com/users/leofeyer","avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/87d2e5aefadcb310f9155df28c2b3582?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png","login":"leofeyer"},"number":32,"description":"Contao 2.10.0 (minor release)","title":"2.10.0","open_issues":1,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/contao/import/milestones/32"}},"action":"created","comment":{"created_at":"2011-11-29T20:29:09Z","updated_at":"2011-11-29T20:29:09Z","user":{"gravatar_id":"1c0dba2e2d4914062d95c1f45099537b","id":357895,"url":"https://api.github.com/users/fbender","avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/1c0dba2e2d4914062d95c1f45099537b?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png","login":"fbender"},"body":"In the implementation, it would be nicer to use the placeholder attribute of HTML5. The value of the placeholder attribute won't be sent to the server (thus a server side check isn't necessary) and will be grayed out (better UI) and a single click will empty the field (better UX – compared to the current status where you at least need to double-click the field to select the text). Browsers not implementing the placeholder attribute (which all major browser do) will behave as before and don't need special handling on the server side; additionally, there are scripts (even one in the MooTools forge) which enable non-capable browsers to behave as if they support placeholder.\n\n--- _Originally created on May 7th, 2011, at 03:43pm_","id":2946308,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/contao/import/issues/comments/2946308"}}