{"issue":{"created_at":"2011-12-03T16:53:57Z","state":"open","updated_at":"2011-12-03T16:53:57Z","comments":0,"user":{"gravatar_id":"7e4f8fe42b4ee671d83a97171f7de80c","id":1111045,"url":"https://api.github.com/users/FranckCo","avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/7e4f8fe42b4ee671d83a97171f7de80c?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png","login":"FranckCo"},"body":"How strictly do we stick to the Dublin Core ?\r\nShould we introduce a property to represent links between coverages (eg broader or narrower) ?","assignee":null,"number":6,"id":2438032,"pull_request":{"patch_url":null,"html_url":null,"diff_url":null},"labels":[],"title":"Improve coverage modelization","closed_at":null,"html_url":"https://github.com/FranckCo/DDIOnto/issues/6","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/FranckCo/DDIOnto/issues/6","milestone":null},"action":"opened"}