{"issue":{"state":"open","pull_request":{"diff_url":null,"html_url":null,"patch_url":null},"milestone":null,"user":{"avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d1588981e0248aaa0174906c99df180e?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png","gravatar_id":"d1588981e0248aaa0174906c99df180e","url":"https://api.github.com/users/petdance","login":"petdance","id":41100},"assignee":{"avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d1588981e0248aaa0174906c99df180e?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png","gravatar_id":"d1588981e0248aaa0174906c99df180e","url":"https://api.github.com/users/petdance","login":"petdance","id":41100},"labels":[],"updated_at":"2011-11-01T04:25:31Z","closed_at":null,"comments":0,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/petdance/scratch/issues/269","body":"Some proposed GSoC projects may require creating new runcores with dynpmcs. Currently that is not possible but from the following conversation on #parrot, it seems that the groundwork is there:\r\n\r\n{{{\r\ndukeleto> whiteknight: what stands in the way up pluggable runcores right now?\r\nwhiteknight>\tjust hasn't been implemented, to my understanding\r\n                        cotto and chromatic have done all the necessary encapsulation and prettification wok\r\nchromatic> \tWe needed pluggable runcores to make the profiling runcore work, but we didn't need \r\n                        dynloadable runcores so we didn't implement that.\r\nwhiteknight>\tright, there wasn't a use-case until now\r\n}}}","html_url":"https://github.com/petdance/scratch/issues/269","title":"Dynloadable runcores","number":269,"id":2105115,"created_at":"2011-11-01T04:25:31Z"},"action":"opened"}