{"issue":{"user":{"id":162442,"login":"Spyhawk","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Spyhawk","gravatar_id":"2e3baf92315e19f03f90ce5a2062d912","avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/2e3baf92315e19f03f90ce5a2062d912?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png"},"milestone":{"creator":{"id":162442,"login":"Spyhawk","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Spyhawk","gravatar_id":"2e3baf92315e19f03f90ce5a2062d912","avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/2e3baf92315e19f03f90ce5a2062d912?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png"},"title":"2.4.x - maintenance","open_issues":1,"created_at":"2011-08-28T10:16:08Z","state":"open","due_on":null,"closed_issues":12,"number":5,"description":"","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Spyhawk/pacaur/milestones/5"},"title":"timezone not taken into account when upgrading devel package","created_at":"2011-11-10T12:29:57Z","updated_at":"2011-12-22T17:12:02Z","labels":[{"name":"bug","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Spyhawk/pacaur/labels/bug","color":"e10c02"},{"name":"wontfix","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Spyhawk/pacaur/labels/wontfix","color":"444444"}],"state":"closed","id":2197361,"html_url":"https://github.com/Spyhawk/pacaur/issues/45","closed_at":"2011-12-22T17:12:02Z","pull_request":{"patch_url":null,"html_url":null,"diff_url":null},"number":45,"body":"From https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49145\r\n\r\n```\r\nI am not sure if this can be considered a bug, but pacaur updated the\r\ngit version of a package, dated in the AUR as 2011-11-10, but in my\r\ntimezone (EST), it's 2011-11-09, so after I run the upgrade, pacaur\r\nstill prompts me to update because it doesn't take into account the\r\ntimezone difference. (The package is clipodder, by the way.) Can this\r\nbe fixed, or is this something that can't be helped?\r\n```\r\n\r\nInteresting \"bug\". Probably nothing that can be done in an simple and efficient way (apart from moving to far Eastern :]), but maybe someone can come up with a good idea?","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Spyhawk/pacaur/issues/45","comments":3,"assignee":null},"comment":{"user":{"id":162442,"login":"Spyhawk","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Spyhawk","gravatar_id":"2e3baf92315e19f03f90ce5a2062d912","avatar_url":"https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/2e3baf92315e19f03f90ce5a2062d912?d=https://a248.e.akamai.net/assets.github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png"},"created_at":"2011-12-22T17:12:02Z","updated_at":"2011-12-22T17:12:02Z","id":3251557,"body":"Closing as \"wontfix\". No proper easy fix and there are no valid reason to change default behavior only to fix 1% of the cases. Hopefully someone might provide a solution in the future.","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Spyhawk/pacaur/issues/comments/3251557"},"action":"created"}