text:
Nuclear fusion
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
For other uses, see Fusion (disambiguation).
This article is about the science behind nuclear fusion. For its use in producing energy, see Fusion power.
The nuclear binding energy curve. The formation of nuclei with masses up to Iron-56 releases energy, while forming those that are heavier requires energy input. This is because the nuclei below Iron-56 have high binding energies, while the heavier ones have lower binding energies, as illustrated above.
Nuclear physics
Nucleus · Nucleons (p, n) · Nuclear matter · Nuclear force · Nuclear structure · Nuclear reaction
Models of the nucleus[show]
Liquid drop · Nuclear shell model · Interacting boson model · Ab initio
Nuclides' classification[show]
Isotopes – equal Z
Isobars – equal A
Isotones – equal N
Isodiaphers – equal N − Z
Isomers – equal all the above
Mirror nuclei – Z ↔ N
Stable · Magic · Even/odd · Halo
Nuclear stability[show]
Binding energy · p–n ratio · Drip line · Island of stability · Valley of stability
Radioactive decay[show]
Alpha α · Beta β (2β, β+) · K/L capture · Isomeric (Gamma γ · Internal conversion) · Spontaneous fission · Cluster decay · Neutron emission · Proton emission
Decay energy · Decay chain · Decay product · Radiogenic nuclide
Nuclear fission[show]
Spontaneous · Products (pair breaking) · Photofission
Capturing processes[show]
electron · neutron (s · r) · proton (p · rp)
High energy processes[show]
Spallation (by cosmic ray) · Photodisintegration
Nucleosynthesis and
nuclear astrophysics[show]
Nuclear fusion
Processes: Stellar · Big Bang · Supernova
Nuclides: Primordial · Cosmogenic · Artificial
High energy nuclear physics[show]
Quark–gluon plasma · RHIC · LHC
Scientists[show]
Alvarez · Becquerel · Bethe · A.Bohr · N.Bohr · Chadwick · Cockcroft · Ir.Curie · Fr.Curie · Pi.Curie · Skłodowska-Curie · Davisson · Fermi · Hahn · Jensen · Lawrence · Mayer · Meitner · Oliphant · Oppenheimer · Proca · Purcell · Rabi · Rutherford · Soddy · Strassmann · Szilárd · Teller · Thomson · Walton · Wigner
v
t
e
The Sun is a main-sequence star, and thus generates its energy by nuclear fusion of hydrogen nuclei into helium. In its core, the Sun fuses 620 million metric tons of hydrogen each second.
In nuclear physics, nuclear fusion is a reaction in which two or more atomic nuclei come close enough to form one or more different atomic nuclei and subatomic particles (neutrons or protons). The difference in mass between the reactants and products is manifested as the release of large amounts of energy. This difference in mass arises due to the difference in atomic "binding energy" between the atomic nuclei before and after the reaction. Fusion is the process that powers active or "main sequence" stars, or other high magnitude stars.
A fusion process that produces a nucleus lighter than iron-56 or nickel-62 will generally yield a net energy release. These elements have the smallest mass per nucleon and the largest binding energy per nucleon, respectively. Fusion of light elements toward these releases energy (an exothermic process), while a fusion producing nuclei heavier than these elements, will result in energy retained by the resulting nucleons, and the resulting reaction is endothermic. The opposite is true for the reverse process, nuclear fission. This means that the lighter elements, such as hydrogen and helium, are in general more fusible; while the heavier elements, such as uranium and plutonium, are more fissionable. The extreme astrophysical event of a supernova can produce enough energy to fuse nuclei into elements heavier than iron.
In 1920, Arthur Eddington suggested hydrogen-helium fusion could be the primary source of stellar energy. Quantum tunneling was discovered by Friedrich Hund, in 1929, and shortly afterwards Robert Atkinson and Fritz Houtermans used the measured masses of light elements to show that large amounts of energy could be released by fusing small nuclei. Building on the early experiments in nuclear transmutation by Ernest Rutherford, laboratory fusion of hydrogen isotopes was accomplished by Mark Oliphant in 1932. In the remainder of that decade, the theory the main cycle of nuclear fusion in stars were worked out by Hans Bethe. Research into fusion for military purposes began in the early 1940s as part of the Manhattan Project. Fusion was accomplished in 1951 with the Greenhouse Item nuclear test. Nuclear fusion on a large scale in an explosion was first carried out on November 1, 1952, in the Ivy Mike hydrogen bomb test.
Research into developing controlled thermonuclear fusion for civil purposes began in earnest in the 1950s, and it continues to this day.
Contents
[hide]
1 Process
2 Nuclear fusion in stars
3 Requirements
4 Methods for achieving fusion
4.1 Thermonuclear fusion
4.2 Inertial confinement fusion
4.3 Inertial electrostatic confinement
4.4 Beam-beam or beam-target fusion
4.5 Muon-catalyzed fusion
4.6 Other principles
5 Important reactions
5.1 Astrophysical reaction chains
5.2 Criteria and candidates for terrestrial reactions
5.3 Neutronicity, confinement requirement, and power density
5.4 Bremsstrahlung losses in quasineutral, isotropic plasmas
6 See also
7 References
8 Further reading
9 External links
Process[edit]
Fusion of deuterium with tritium creating helium-4, freeing a neutron, and releasing 17.59 MeV as kinetic energy of the products while a corresponding amount of mass disappears, in agreement with kinetic E = Δmc2, where Δm is the decrease in the total rest mass of particles.[1]
The release of energy with the fusion of light elements is due to the interplay of two opposing forces: the nuclear force, which combines together protons and neutrons, and the Coulomb force, which causes protons to repel each other. Protons are positively charged and repel each other by the Coulomb force, but they can nonetheless stick together, demonstrating the existence of another, short-range, force referred to as nuclear attraction.[2] Light nuclei (or nuclei smaller than iron and nickel) are sufficiently small and proton-poor allowing the nuclear force to overcome repulsion. This is because the nucleus is sufficiently small that all nucleons feel the short-range attractive force at least as strongly as they feel the infinite-range Coulomb repulsion. Building up nuclei from lighter nuclei by fusion releases the extra energy from the net attraction of particles. For larger nuclei, however, no energy is released, since the nuclear force is short-range and cannot continue to act across longer atomic length scales. Thus, energy is not released with the fusion of such nuclei; instead, energy is required as input for such processes.
Fusion powers stars and produces virtually all elements in a process called nucleosynthesis. The Sun is a main-sequence star, and, as such, generates its energy by nuclear fusion of hydrogen nuclei into helium. In its core, the Sun fuses 610 million metric tons of hydrogen and makes 606 million metric tons of helium each second. The fusion of lighter elements in stars releases energy and the mass that always accompanies it. For example, in the fusion of two hydrogen nuclei to form helium, 0.7% of the mass is carried away in the form of kinetic energy of an alpha particle or other forms of energy, such as electromagnetic radiation.[3]
It takes considerable energy to force nuclei to fuse, even those of the lightest element, hydrogen. When accelerated to high enough speeds, nuclei can overcome this electrostatic repulsion and brought close enough such that the attractive nuclear force is greater than the repulsive Coulomb force. The strong force grows rapidly once the nuclei are close enough, and the fusing nucleons can essentially "fall" into each other and result is fusion and net energy produced. The fusion of lighter nuclei, which creates a heavier nucleus and often a free neutron or proton, generally releases more energy than it takes to force the nuclei together; this is an exothermic process that can produce self-sustaining reactions.
Energy released in most nuclear reactions is much larger than in chemical reactions, because the binding energy that holds a nucleus together is greater than the energy that holds electrons to a nucleus. For example, the ionization energy gained by adding an electron to a hydrogen nucleus is 6982217896002232000♠13.6 eV—less than one-millionth of the 6988281983061712000♠17.6 MeV released in the deuterium–tritium (D–T) reaction shown in the adjacent diagram. The complete conversion of one gram of matter would release 9×1013 joules of energy. Fusion reactions have an energy density many times greater than nuclear fission; the reactions produce far greater energy per unit of mass even though individual fission reactions are generally much more energetic than individual fusion ones, which are themselves millions of times more energetic than chemical reactions. Only direct conversion of mass into energy, such as that caused by the annihilatory collision of matter and antimatter, is more energetic per unit of mass than nuclear fusion.
Research into using fusion for the production of electricity, has been pursued for over 60 years. Successful accomplishment of controlled fusion has been stymied by scientific and technological difficulties; nonetheless, important progress has been made. At present, controlled fusion reactions have been unable to produce break-even (self-sustaining) controlled fusion.[4] The two most advanced approaches are magnetic confinement (toroid designs) and inertial confinement (laser designs).
Workable designs for a toroidal reactor that theoretically will deliver ten times more fusion energy than the amount needed to heat plasma to the required temperatures are in development (see ITER). The ITER facility is expected to finish its construction phase in 2019. It will start commissioning the reactor that same year and initiate plasma experiments in 2020, but is not expected to begin full deuterium-tritium fusion until 2027.[5]
The US National Ignition Facility, which uses laser-driven inertial confinement fusion, was designed with a goal of break-even fusion; the first large-scale laser target experiments were performed in June 2009 and ignition experiments began in early 2011.[6][7]
Nuclear fusion in stars[edit]
The proton-proton chain dominates in stars the size of the Sun or smaller.
The CNO cycle dominates in stars heavier than the Sun.
An important fusion process is the stellar nucleosynthesis that powers stars and the Sun. In the 20th century, it was recognized that the energy released from nuclear fusion reactions accounted for the longevity of stellar heat and light. The fusion of nuclei in a star, starting from its initial hydrogen and helium abundance, provides that energy and synthesizes new nuclei as a byproduct of the fusion process. Different reaction chains are involved, depending on the mass of the star (and therefore the pressure and temperature in its core).
Around 1920, Arthur Eddington anticipated the discovery and mechanism of nuclear fusion processes in stars, in his paper The Internal Constitution of the Stars.[8][9] At that time, the source of stellar energy was a complete mystery; Eddington correctly speculated that the source was fusion of hydrogen into helium, liberating enormous energy according to Einstein's equation E = mc2. This was a particularly remarkable development since at that time fusion and thermonuclear energy, and even that stars are largely composed of hydrogen (see metallicity), had not yet been discovered. Eddington's paper, based on knowledge at the time, reasoned that:
The leading theory of stellar energy, the contraction hypothesis, should cause stars' rotation to visibly speed up due to conservation of angular momentum. But observations of Cepheid variable stars showed this was not happening.
The only other known plausible source of energy was conversion of matter to energy; Einstein had shown some years earlier that a small amount of matter was equivalent to a large amount of energy.
Francis Aston had also recently shown that the mass of a helium atom was about 0.8% less than the mass of the four hydrogen atoms which would, combined, form a helium atom, suggesting that if such a combination could happen, it would release considerable energy as a byproduct.
If a star contained just 5% of fusible hydrogen, it would suffice to explain how stars got their energy. (We now know that most 'ordinary' stars contain far more than 5% hydrogen)
Further elements might also be fused, and other scientists had speculated that stars were the "crucible" in which light elements combined to create heavy elements, but without more accurate measurements of their atomic masses nothing more could be said at the time.
All of these speculations were proven correct in the following decades.
The primary source of solar energy, and similar size stars, is the fusion of hydrogen to form helium (the proton-proton chain reaction), which occurs at a solar-core temperature of 14 million kelvin. The net result is the fusion of four protons into one alpha particle, with the release of two positrons, two neutrinos (which changes two of the protons into neutrons), and energy. In heavier stars, the CNO cycle and other processes are more important. As a star uses up a substantial fraction of its hydrogen, it begins to synthesize heavier elements. The heaviest elements are synthesized by fusion that occurs as a more massive star undergoes a violent supernova at the end of its life, a process known as supernova nucleosynthesis.
Requirements[edit]
A substantial energy barrier of electrostatic forces must be overcome before fusion can occur. At large distances, two naked nuclei repel one another because of the repulsive electrostatic force between their positively charged protons. If two nuclei can be brought close enough together, however, the electrostatic repulsion can be overcome by the quantum effect in which nuclei can tunnel through coulomb forces.
When a nucleon such as a proton or neutron is added to a nucleus, the nuclear force attracts it to all the other nucleons of the nucleus (if the atom is small enough), but primarily to its immediate neighbours due to the short range of the force. The nucleons in the interior of a nucleus have more neighboring nucleons than those on the surface. Since smaller nuclei have a larger surface area-to-volume ratio, the binding energy per nucleon due to the nuclear force generally increases with the size of the nucleus but approaches a limiting value corresponding to that of a nucleus with a diameter of about four nucleons. It is important to keep in mind that nucleons are quantum objects. So, for example, since two neutrons in a nucleus are identical to each other, the goal of distinguishing one from the other, such as which one is in the interior and which is on the surface, is in fact meaningless, and the inclusion of quantum mechanics is therefore necessary for proper calculations.
The electrostatic force, on the other hand, is an inverse-square force, so a proton added to a nucleus will feel an electrostatic repulsion from all the other protons in the nucleus. The electrostatic energy per nucleon due to the electrostatic force thus increases without limit as nuclei atomic number grows.
The electrostatic force between the positively charged nuclei is repulsive, but when the separation is small enough, the quantum effect will tunnel through the wall. Therefore, the prerequisite for fusion is that the two nuclei be brought close enough together for a long enough time for quantum tunnelling to act.
The net result of the opposing electrostatic and strong nuclear forces is that the binding energy per nucleon generally increases with increasing size, up to the elements iron and nickel, and then decreases for heavier nuclei. Eventually, the binding energy becomes negative and very heavy nuclei (all with more than 208 nucleons, corresponding to a diameter of about 6 nucleons) are not stable. The four most tightly bound nuclei, in decreasing order of binding energy per nucleon, are 62
Ni
, 58
Fe
, 56
Fe
, and 60
Ni
.[10] Even though the nickel isotope, 62
Ni
, is more stable, the iron isotope 56
Fe
is an order of magnitude more common. This is due to the fact that there is no easy way for stars to create 62
Ni
through the alpha process.
An exception to this general trend is the helium-4 nucleus, whose binding energy is higher than that of lithium, the next heaviest element. This is because protons and neutrons are fermions, which according to the Pauli exclusion principle cannot exist in the same nucleus in exactly the same state. Each proton or neutron's energy state in a nucleus can accommodate both a spin up particle and a spin down particle. Helium-4 has an anomalously large binding energy because its nucleus consists of two protons and two neutrons, so all four of its nucleons can be in the ground state. Any additional nucleons would have to go into higher energy states. Indeed, the helium-4 nucleus is so tightly bound that it is commonly treated as a single particle in nuclear physics, namely, the alpha particle.
The situation is similar if two nuclei are brought together. As they approach each other, all the protons in one nucleus repel all the protons in the other. Not until the two nuclei actually come close enough for long enough so the strong nuclear force can take over (by way of tunneling) is the repulsive electrostatic force overcome. Consequently, even when the final energy state is lower, there is a large energy barrier that must first be overcome. It is called the Coulomb barrier.
The Coulomb barrier is smallest for isotopes of hydrogen, as their nuclei contain only a single positive charge. A diproton is not stable, so neutrons must also be involved, ideally in such a way that a helium nucleus, with its extremely tight binding, is one of the products.
Using deuterium-tritium fuel, the resulting energy barrier is about 0.1 MeV. In comparison, the energy needed to remove an electron from hydrogen is 13.6 eV, about 7500 times less energy. The (intermediate) result of the fusion is an unstable 5He nucleus, which immediately ejects a neutron with 14.1 MeV. The recoil energy of the remaining 4He nucleus is 3.5 MeV, so the total energy liberated is 17.6 MeV. This is many times more than what was needed to overcome the energy barrier.
The fusion reaction rate increases rapidly with temperature until it maximizes and then gradually drops off. The DT rate peaks at a lower temperature (about 70 keV, or 800 million kelvin) and at a higher value than other reactions commonly considered for fusion energy.
The reaction cross section σ is a measure of the probability of a fusion reaction as a function of the relative velocity of the two reactant nuclei. If the reactants have a distribution of velocities, e.g. a thermal distribution, then it is useful to perform an average over the distributions of the product of cross section and velocity. This average is called the 'reactivity', denoted <σv>. The reaction rate (fusions per volume per time) is <σv> times the product of the reactant number densities:
f = n 1 n 2 ⟨ σ v ⟩ . {\displaystyle f=n_{1}n_{2}\langle \sigma v\rangle .}
If a species of nuclei is reacting with a nucleus like itself, such as the DD reaction, then the product n 1 n 2 {\displaystyle n_{1}n_{2}} must be replaced by ( 1 / 2 ) n 2 {\displaystyle (1/2)n^{2}} .
⟨ σ v ⟩ {\displaystyle \langle \sigma v\rangle } increases from virtually zero at room temperatures up to meaningful magnitudes at temperatures of 10–100 keV. At these temperatures, well above typical ionization energies (13.6 eV in the hydrogen case), the fusion reactants exist in a plasma state.
The significance of ⟨ σ v ⟩ {\displaystyle \langle \sigma v\rangle } as a function of temperature in a device with a particular energy confinement time is found by considering the Lawson criterion. This is an extremely challenging barrier to overcome on Earth, which explains why fusion research has taken many years to reach the current advanced technical state.[11]
Methods for achieving fusion[edit]
Main article: Fusion power
Thermonuclear fusion[edit]
Main article: Thermonuclear fusion
If matter is sufficiently heated (hence being plasma), fusion reactions may occur due to collisions with extreme thermal kinetic energies of the particles. Thermonuclear weapons produce what amounts to an uncontrolled release fusion energy. Controlled thermonuclear fusion energy has yet to be achieved.
Inertial confinement fusion[edit]
Main article: Inertial confinement fusion
Inertial confinement fusion (ICF) is a method aimed at releasing fusion energy by heating and compressing a fuel target, typically a pellet containing deuterium and tritium.
Inertial electrostatic confinement[edit]
Main article: Inertial electrostatic confinement
Inertial electrostatic confinement is a set of devices that use an electric field to heat ions to fusion conditions. The most well known is the fusor. Starting in 1999, a number of amateurs have been able to do amateur fusion using these homemade devices.[12][13][14][15] Other IEC devices include: the Polywell, MIX POPS[16] and Marble concepts.[17]
Beam-beam or beam-target fusion[edit]
If the energy to initiate the reaction comes from accelerating one of the nuclei, the process is called beam-target fusion; if both nuclei are accelerated, it is beam-beam fusion.
Accelerator-based light-ion fusion is a technique using particle accelerators to achieve particle kinetic energies sufficient to induce light-ion fusion reactions. Accelerating light ions is relatively easy, and can be done in an efficient manner—requiring only a vacuum tube, a pair of electrodes, and a high-voltage transformer; fusion can be observed with as little as 10 kV between the electrodes. The key problem with accelerator-based fusion (and with cold targets in general) is that fusion cross sections are many orders of magnitude lower than Coulomb interaction cross sections. Therefore, the vast majority of ions expend their energy emitting bremsstrahlung radiation and the ionization of atoms of the target. Devices referred to as sealed-tube neutron generators are particularly relevant to this discussion. These small devices are miniature particle accelerators filled with deuterium and tritium gas in an arrangement that allows ions of those nuclei to be accelerated against hydride targets, also containing deuterium and tritium, where fusion takes place, releasing a flux of neutrons. Hundreds of neutron generators are produced annually for use in the petroleum industry where they are used in measurement equipment for locating and mapping oil reserves.
Muon-catalyzed fusion[edit]
Muon-catalyzed fusion is a fusion process that occurs at ordinary temperatures. It was studied in detail by Steven Jones in the early 1980s. Net energy production from this reaction has been unsuccessful because of the high energy required to create muons, their short 2.2 µs half-life, and the high chance that a muon will bind to the new alpha particle and thus stop catalyzing fusion.[18]
Other principles[edit]
The Tokamak à configuration variable, research fusion reactor, at the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (Switzerland).
Some other confinement principles have been investigated.
Antimatter-initialized fusion uses small amounts of antimatter to trigger a tiny fusion explosion. This has been studied primarily in the context of making nuclear pulse propulsion, and pure fusion bombs feasible. This is not near becoming a practical power source, due to the cost of manufacturing antimatter alone.
Pyroelectric fusion was reported in April 2005 by a team at UCLA. The scientists used a pyroelectric crystal heated from −34 to 7 °C (−29 to 45 °F), combined with a tungsten needle to produce an electric field of about 25 gigavolts per meter to ionize and accelerate deuterium nuclei into an erbium deuteride target. At the estimated energy levels,[19] the D-D fusion reaction may occur, producing helium-3 and a 2.45 MeV neutron. Although it makes a useful neutron generator, the apparatus is not intended for power generation since it requires far more energy than it produces.[20][21][22][23]
Hybrid nuclear fusion-fission (hybrid nuclear power) is a proposed means of generating power by use of a combination of nuclear fusion and fission processes. The concept dates to the 1950s, and was briefly advocated by Hans Bethe during the 1970s, but largely remained unexplored until a revival of interest in 2009, due to the delays in the realization of pure fusion.[24] Project PACER, carried out at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) in the mid-1970s, explored the possibility of a fusion power system that would involve exploding small hydrogen bombs (fusion bombs) inside an underground cavity. As an energy source, the system is the only fusion power system that could be demonstrated to work using existing technology. However it would also require a large, continuous supply of nuclear bombs, making the economics of such a system rather questionable.
Important reactions[edit]
Astrophysical reaction chains[edit]
At the temperatures and densities in stellar cores the rates of fusion reactions are notoriously slow. For example, at solar core temperature (T ≈ 15 MK) and density (160 g/cm3), the energy release rate is only 276 μW/cm3—about a quarter of the volumetric rate at which a resting human body generates heat.[25] Thus, reproduction of stellar core conditions in a lab for nuclear fusion power production is completely impractical. Because nuclear reaction rates depend on density as well as temperature and most fusion schemes operate at relatively low densities, those methods are strongly dependent on higher temperatures. The fusion rate as a function of temperature (exp(−E/kT)), leads to the need to achieve temperatures in terrestrial reactors 10–100 times higher temperatures than in stellar interiors: T ≈ 0.1–1.0×109 K.
Criteria and candidates for terrestrial reactions[edit]
Main article: Fusion power § Fuels
In artificial fusion, the primary fuel is not constrained to be protons and higher temperatures can be used, so reactions with larger cross-sections are chosen. Another concern is the production of neutrons, which activate the reactor structure radiologically, but also have the advantages of allowing volumetric extraction of the fusion energy and tritium breeding. Reactions that release no neutrons are referred to as aneutronic.
To be a useful energy source, a fusion reaction must satisfy several criteria. It must:
Be exothermic
This limits the reactants to the low Z (number of protons) side of the curve of binding energy. It also makes helium 4
He
the most common product because of its extraordinarily tight binding, although 3
He
and 3
H
also show up.
Involve low atomic number (Z) nuclei
This is because the electrostatic repulsion that must be overcome before the nuclei are close enough to fuse is directly related to the number of protons it contains - its atomic number.[citation needed]
Have two reactants
At anything less than stellar densities, three body collisions are too improbable. In inertial confinement, both stellar densities and temperatures are exceeded to compensate for the shortcomings of the third parameter of the Lawson criterion, ICF's very short confinement time.
Have two or more products
This allows simultaneous conservation of energy and momentum without relying on the electromagnetic force.
Conserve both protons and neutrons
The cross sections for the weak interaction are too small.
Few reactions meet these criteria. The following are those with the largest cross sections:[26]
(1) 2
1D
+ 3
1T
→ 4
2He
( 3.5 MeV ) + n0 ( 14.1 MeV )
(2i) 2
1D
+ 2
1D
→ 3
1T
( 1.01 MeV ) + p+ ( 3.02 MeV ) 50%
(2ii) → 3
2He
( 0.82 MeV ) + n0 ( 2.45 MeV ) 50%
(3) 2
1D
+ 3
2He
→ 4
2He
( 3.6 MeV ) + p+ ( 14.7 MeV )
(4) 3
1T
+ 3
1T
→ 4
2He
+ 2 n0 + 11.3 MeV
(5) 3
2He
+ 3
2He
→ 4
2He
+ 2 p+ + 12.9 MeV
(6i) 3
2He
+ 3
1T
→ 4
2He
+ p+ + n0 + 12.1 MeV 57%
(6ii) → 4
2He
( 4.8 MeV ) + 2
1D
( 9.5 MeV ) 43%
(7i) 2
1D
+ 6
3Li
→ 2 4
2He
+ 22.4 MeV
(7ii) → 3
2He
+ 4
2He
+ n0 + 2.56 MeV
(7iii) → 7
3Li
+ p+ + 5.0 MeV
(7iv) → 7
4Be
+ n0 + 3.4 MeV
(8) p+ + 6
3Li
→ 4
2He
( 1.7 MeV ) + 3
2He
( 2.3 MeV )
(9) 3
2He
+ 6
3Li
→ 2 4
2He
+ p+ + 16.9 MeV
(10) p+ + 11
5B
→ 3 4
2He
+ 8.7 MeV
Nucleosynthesis
Stellar nucleosynthesis
Big Bang nucleosynthesis
Supernova nucleosynthesis
Cosmic ray spallation
Related topics
Astrophysics
Nuclear fusion
R-process
S-process
Nuclear fission
v
t
e
For reactions with two products, the energy is divided between them in inverse proportion to their masses, as shown. In most reactions with three products, the distribution of energy varies. For reactions that can result in more than one set of products, the branching ratios are given.
Some reaction candidates can be eliminated at once. The D-6Li reaction has no advantage compared to p+-11
5B
because it is roughly as difficult to burn but produces substantially more neutrons through 2
1D
-2
1D
side reactions. There is also a p+-7
3Li
reaction, but the cross section is far too low, except possibly when Ti > 1 MeV, but at such high temperatures an endothermic, direct neutron-producing reaction also becomes very significant. Finally there is also a p+-9
4Be
reaction, which is not only difficult to burn, but 9
4Be
can be easily induced to split into two alpha particles and a neutron.
In addition to the fusion reactions, the following reactions with neutrons are important in order to "breed" tritium in "dry" fusion bombs and some proposed fusion reactors:
n0 + 6
3Li
→ 3
1T
+ 4
2He
+ 4.784 MeV
n0 + 7
3Li
→ 3
1T
+ 4
2He
+ n0 – 2.467 MeV
The latter of the two equations was unknown when the U.S. conducted the Castle Bravo fusion bomb test in 1954. Being just the second fusion bomb ever tested (and the first to use lithium), the designers of the Castle Bravo "Shrimp" had understood the usefulness of Lithium-6 in tritium production, but had failed to recognize that Lithium-7 fission would greatly increase the yield of the bomb. While Li-7 has a small neutron cross-section for low neutron energies, it has a higher cross section above 5 MeV.[27] The 15 Mt yield was 150% greater than the predicted 6 Mt and caused unexpected exposure to fallout.
To evaluate the usefulness of these reactions, in addition to the reactants, the products, and the energy released, one needs to know something about the cross section. Any given fusion device has a maximum plasma pressure it can sustain, and an economical device would always operate near this maximum. Given this pressure, the largest fusion output is obtained when the temperature is chosen so that <σv>/T2 is a maximum. This is also the temperature at which the value of the triple product nTτ required for ignition is a minimum, since that required value is inversely proportional to <σv>/T2 (see Lawson criterion). (A plasma is "ignited" if the fusion reactions produce enough power to maintain the temperature without external heating.) This optimum temperature and the value of <σv>/T2 at that temperature is given for a few of these reactions in the following table.
fuel
T [keV]
<σv>/T2 [m3/s/keV2]
2
1D
-3
1T
13.6 1.24×10−24
2
1D
-2
1D
15 1.28×10−26
2
1D
-3
2He
58 2.24×10−26
p+-6
3Li
66 1.46×10−27
p+-11
5B
123 3.01×10−27
Note that many of the reactions form chains. For instance, a reactor fueled with 3
1T
and 3
2He
creates some 2
1D
, which is then possible to use in the 2
1D
-3
2He
reaction if the energies are "right". An elegant idea is to combine the reactions (8) and (9). The 3
2He
from reaction (8) can react with 6
3Li
in reaction (9) before completely thermalizing. This produces an energetic proton, which in turn undergoes reaction (8) before thermalizing. Detailed analysis shows that this idea would not work well,[citation needed] but it is a good example of a case where the usual assumption of a Maxwellian plasma is not appropriate.
Neutronicity, confinement requirement, and power density[edit]
The only man-made fusion device to achieve ignition to date is the hydrogen bomb.[citation needed] The detonation of the first device, codenamed Ivy Mike, occurred in 1952 and is shown here.
Any of the reactions above can in principle be the basis of fusion power production. In addition to the temperature and cross section discussed above, we must consider the total energy of the fusion products Efus, the energy of the charged fusion products Ech, and the atomic number Z of the non-hydrogenic reactant.
Specification of the 2
1D
-2
1D
reaction entails some difficulties, though. To begin with, one must average over the two branches (2i) and (2ii). More difficult is to decide how to treat the 3
1T
and 3
2He
products. 3
1T
burns so well in a deuterium plasma that it is almost impossible to extract from the plasma. The 2
1D
-3
2He
reaction is optimized at a much higher temperature, so the burnup at the optimum 2
1D
-2
1D
temperature may be low. Therefore, it seems reasonable to assume the 3
1T
but not the 3
2He
gets burned up and adds its energy to the net reaction, which means the total reaction would be the sum of (2i), (2ii), and (1):
5 2
1D
→ 4
2He
+ 2 n0 + 3
2He
+ p+, Efus = 4.03+17.6+3.27 = 24.9 MeV, Ech = 4.03+3.5+0.82 = 8.35 MeV.
For calculating the power of a reactor (in which the reaction rate is determined by the D-D step), we count the 2
1D
-2
1D
fusion energy per D-D reaction as Efus = (4.03 MeV + 17.6 MeV)×50% + (3.27 MeV)×50% = 12.5 MeV and the energy in charged particles as Ech = (4.03 MeV + 3.5 MeV)×50% + (0.82 MeV)×50% = 4.2 MeV. (Note: if the tritium ion reacts with a deuteron while it still has a large kinetic energy, then the kinetic energy of the helium-4 produced may be quite different from 3.5 MeV,[28] so this calculation of energy in charged particles is only an approximation of the average.) The amount of energy per deuteron consumed is 2/5 of this, or 5.0 MeV (a specific energy of about 225 million MJ per kilogram of deuterium).
Another unique aspect of the 2
1D
-2
1D
reaction is that there is only one reactant, which must be taken into account when calculating the reaction rate.
With this choice, we tabulate parameters for four of the most important reactions
fuel
Z
Efus [MeV]
Ech [MeV]
neutronicity
2
1D
-3
1T
1 17.6 3.5 0.80
2
1D
-2
1D
1 12.5 4.2 0.66
2
1D
-3
2He
2 18.3 18.3 ≈0.05
p+-11
5B
5 8.7 8.7 ≈0.001
The last column is the neutronicity of the reaction, the fraction of the fusion energy released as neutrons. This is an important indicator of the magnitude of the problems associated with neutrons like radiation damage, biological shielding, remote handling, and safety. For the first two reactions it is calculated as (Efus-Ech)/Efus. For the last two reactions, where this calculation would give zero, the values quoted are rough estimates based on side reactions that produce neutrons in a plasma in thermal equilibrium.
Of course, the reactants should also be mixed in the optimal proportions. This is the case when each reactant ion plus its associated electrons accounts for half the pressure. Assuming that the total pressure is fixed, this means that density of the non-hydrogenic ion is smaller than that of the hydrogenic ion by a factor 2/(Z+1). Therefore, the rate for these reactions is reduced by the same factor, on top of any differences in the values of <σv>/T2. On the other hand, because the 2
1D
-2
1D
reaction has only one reactant, its rate is twice as high as when the fuel is divided between two different hydrogenic species, thus creating a more efficient reaction.
Thus there is a "penalty" of (2/(Z+1)) for non-hydrogenic fuels arising from the fact that they require more electrons, which take up pressure without participating in the fusion reaction. (It is usually a good assumption that the electron temperature will be nearly equal to the ion temperature. Some authors, however discuss the possibility that the electrons could be maintained substantially colder than the ions. In such a case, known as a "hot ion mode", the "penalty" would not apply.) There is at the same time a "bonus" of a factor 2 for 2
1D
-2
1D
because each ion can react with any of the other ions, not just a fraction of them.
We can now compare these reactions in the following table.
fuel
<σv>/T2
penalty/bonus
reactivity
Lawson criterion
power density (W/m3/kPa2)
relation of power density
2
1D
-3
1T
1.24×10−24 1 1 1 34 1
2
1D
-2
1D
1.28×10−26 2 48 30 0.5 68
2
1D
-3
2He
2.24×10−26 2/3 83 16 0.43 80
p+-6
3Li
1.46×10−27 1/2 1700 0.005 6800
p+-11
5B
3.01×10−27 1/3 1240 500 0.014 2500
The maximum value of <σv>/T2 is taken from a previous table. The "penalty/bonus" factor is that related to a non-hydrogenic reactant or a single-species reaction. The values in the column "reactivity" are found by dividing 1.24×10−24 by the product of the second and third columns. It indicates the factor by which the other reactions occur more slowly than the 2
1D
-3
1T
reaction under comparable conditions. The column "Lawson criterion" weights these results with Ech and gives an indication of how much more difficult it is to achieve ignition with these reactions, relative to the difficulty for the 2
1D
-3
1T
reaction. The last column is labeled "power density" and weights the practical reactivity with Efus. It indicates how much lower the fusion power density of the other reactions is compared to the 2
1D
-3
1T
reaction and can be considered a measure of the economic potential.
Bremsstrahlung losses in quasineutral, isotropic plasmas[edit]
The ions undergoing fusion in many systems will essentially never occur alone but will be mixed with electrons that in aggregate neutralize the ions' bulk electrical charge and form a plasma. The electrons will generally have a temperature comparable to or greater than that of the ions, so they will collide with the ions and emit x-ray radiation of 10–30 keV energy, a process known as Bremsstrahlung.
The huge size of the Sun and stars means that the x-rays produced in this process will not escape and will deposit their energy back into the plasma. They are said to be opaque to x-rays. But any terrestrial fusion reactor will be optically thin for x-rays of this energy range. X-rays are difficult to reflect but they are effectively absorbed (and converted into heat) in less than mm thickness of stainless steel (which is part of a reactor's shield). This means the bremsstrahlung process is carrying energy out of the plasma, cooling it.
The ratio of fusion power produced to x-ray radiation lost to walls is an important figure of merit. This ratio is generally maximized at a much higher temperature than that which maximizes the power density (see the previous subsection). The following table shows estimates of the optimum temperature and the power ratio at that temperature for several reactions.
fuel
Ti (keV)
Pfusion/PBremsstrahlung
2
1D
-3
1T
50 140
2
1D
-2
1D
500 2.9
2
1D
-3
2He
100 5.3
3
2He
-3
2He
1000 0.72
p+-6
3Li
800 0.21
p+-11
5B
300 0.57
The actual ratios of fusion to Bremsstrahlung power will likely be significantly lower for several reasons. For one, the calculation assumes that the energy of the fusion products is transmitted completely to the fuel ions, which then lose energy to the electrons by collisions, which in turn lose energy by Bremsstrahlung. However, because the fusion products move much faster than the fuel ions, they will give up a significant fraction of their energy directly to the electrons. Secondly, the ions in the plasma are assumed to be purely fuel ions. In practice, there will be a significant proportion of impurity ions, which will then lower the ratio. In particular, the fusion products themselves must remain in the plasma until they have given up their energy, and will remain some time after that in any proposed confinement scheme. Finally, all channels of energy loss other than Bremsstrahlung have been neglected. The last two factors are related. On theoretical and experimental grounds, particle and energy confinement seem to be closely related. In a confinement scheme that does a good job of retaining energy, fusion products will build up. If the fusion products are efficiently ejected, then energy confinement will be poor, too.
The temperatures maximizing the fusion power compared to the Bremsstrahlung are in every case higher than the temperature that maximizes the power density and minimizes the required value of the fusion triple product. This will not change the optimum operating point for 2
1D
-3
1T
very much because the Bremsstrahlung fraction is low, but it will push the other fuels into regimes where the power density relative to 2
1D
-3
1T
is even lower and the required confinement even more difficult to achieve. For 2
1D
-2
1D
and 2
1D
-3
2He
, Bremsstrahlung losses will be a serious, possibly prohibitive problem. For 3
2He
-3
2He
, p+-6
3Li
and p+-11
5B
the Bremsstrahlung losses appear to make a fusion reactor using these fuels with a quasineutral, isotropic plasma impossible. Some ways out of this dilemma are considered—and rejected—in fundamental limitations on plasma fusion systems not in thermodynamic equilibrium.[29][30] This limitation does not apply to non-neutral and anisotropic plasmas; however, these have their own challenges to contend with.
See also[edit]
Nuclear technology portal
Physics portal
Energy portal
Cold fusion
Hybrid fusion/fission
Aneutronic fusion
CNO cycle
Direct energy conversion
Inertial electrostatic confinement
Focus fusion
Fusenet
Fusion power
Fusion rocket
Helium-3
Impulse generator
ITER
Joint European Torus
List of fusion experiments
List of plasma (physics) articles
National Ignition Facility
Nuclear fission
Nuclear physics
Nuclear reactor
Nucleosynthesis
Neutron generator
Neutron source
Periodic table
Polywell
Proton-proton chain
Pulsed power
Teller–Ulam design
Thermonuclear fusion
Timeline of nuclear fusion
Triple-alpha process
References[edit]
Jump up ^ Shultis, J.K. & Faw, R.E. (2002). Fundamentals of nuclear science and engineering. CRC Press. p. 151. ISBN 0-8247-0834-2.
Jump up ^ Physics Flexbook. Ck12.org. Retrieved on 2012-12-19.
Jump up ^ Bethe, Hans A. "The Hydrogen Bomb", Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, April 1950, p. 99.
Jump up ^ "Progress in Fusion". ITER. Retrieved 2010-02-15.
Jump up ^ "ITER – the way to new energy". ITER. 2014. Archived from the original on 22 September 2012.
Jump up ^ Moses, E. I. (2009). "The National Ignition Facility: Ushering in a new age for high energy density science". Phys. Plasmas. 16: 041006. Bibcode:2009PhPl...16d1006M. doi:10.1063/1.3116505.
Jump up ^ Kramer, David (March 2011). "DOE looks again at inertial fusion as potential clean-energy source". Physics Today. 64 (3): 26. Bibcode:2011PhT....64c..26K. doi:10.1063/1.3563814.
Jump up ^ The Internal Constitution of the Stars A. S. Eddington The Scientific Monthly Vol. 11, No. 4 (Oct., 1920), pp. 297-303 JSTOR 6491
Jump up ^ Eddington, A. S. (1916). "On the radiative equilibrium of the stars". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 77: 16–35. Bibcode:1916MNRAS..77...16E. doi:10.1093/mnras/77.1.16.
Jump up ^ The Most Tightly Bound Nuclei. Hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu. Retrieved on 2011-08-17.
Jump up ^ What Is The Lawson Criteria, Or How to Make Fusion Power Viable
Jump up ^ "Fusor Forums • Index page". Fusor.net. Retrieved 2014-08-24.
Jump up ^ "Build a Nuclear Fusion Reactor? No Problem". Clhsonline.net. 2012-03-23. Retrieved 2014-08-24.
Jump up ^ "Extreme DIY: Building a homemade nuclear reactor in NYC". BBC News. Retrieved 30 October 2014.
Jump up ^ Schechner, Sam (2008-08-18). "Nuclear Ambitions: Amateur Scientists Get a Reaction From Fusion – WSJ". Online.wsj.com. Retrieved 2014-08-24.
Jump up ^ Park J, Nebel RA, Stange S, Murali SK (2005). "Experimental Observation of a Periodically Oscillating Plasma Sphere in a Gridded Inertial Electrostatic Confinement Device". Phys Rev Lett. 95 (1): 015003. Bibcode:2005PhRvL..95a5003P. PMID 16090625. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.015003.
Jump up ^ "The Multiple Ambipolar Recirculating Beam Line Experiment" Poster presentation, 2011 US-Japan IEC conference, Dr. Alex Klein
Jump up ^ Jones, S.E. (1986). "Muon-Catalysed Fusion Revisited". Nature. 321 (6066): 127–133. Bibcode:1986Natur.321..127J. doi:10.1038/321127a0.
Jump up ^ Supplementary methods for "Observation of nuclear fusion driven by a pyroelectric crystal". Main article Naranjo, B.; Gimzewski, J.K.; Putterman, S. (2005). "Observation of nuclear fusion driven by a pyroelectric crystal". Nature. 434 (7037): 1115–1117. Bibcode:2005Natur.434.1115N. PMID 15858570. doi:10.1038/nature03575.
Jump up ^ UCLA Crystal Fusion. Rodan.physics.ucla.edu. Retrieved on 2011-08-17. Archived 8 June 2015 at the Wayback Machine.
Jump up ^ Schewe, Phil & Stein, Ben (2005). "Pyrofusion: A Room-Temperature, Palm-Sized Nuclear Fusion Device". Physics News Update. 729 (1). Archived from the original on 12 November 2013.
Jump up ^ Coming in out of the cold: nuclear fusion, for real. Christiansciencemonitor.com (2005-06-06). Retrieved on 2011-08-17.
Jump up ^ Nuclear fusion on the desktop ... really!. MSNBC (2005-04-27). Retrieved on 2011-08-17.
Jump up ^ Gerstner, E. (2009). "Nuclear energy: The hybrid returns". Nature. 460 (7251): 25–8. PMID 19571861. doi:10.1038/460025a.
Jump up ^ FusEdWeb | Fusion Education. Fusedweb.pppl.gov (1998-11-09). Retrieved on 2011-08-17.[dead link]
Jump up ^ M. Kikuchi, K. Lackner & M. Q. Tran (2012). Fusion Physics. International Atomic Energy Agency. p. 22. ISBN 9789201304100.
Jump up ^ Subsection 4.7.4c. Kayelaby.npl.co.uk. Retrieved on 2012-12-19.
Jump up ^ A momentum and energy balance shows that if the tritium has an energy of ET (and using relative masses of 1, 3, and 4 for the neutron, tritium, and helium) then the energy of the helium can be anything from [(12ET)1/2−(5×17.6MeV+2×ET)1/2]2/25 to [(12ET)1/2+(5×17.6MeV+2×ET)1/2]2/25. For ET=1.01 MeV this gives a range from 1.44&nbsp:MeV to 6.73 MeV.
Jump up ^ Rider, Todd Harrison (1995). "Fundamental Limitations on Plasma Fusion Systems not in Thermodynamic Equilibrium". Dissertation Abstracts International. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, PhD Thesis. 56-07: 3820. Bibcode:1995PhDT........45R.
Jump up ^ Rostoker, Norman; Binderbauer, Michl and Qerushi, Artan. Fundamental limitations on plasma fusion systems not in thermodynamic equilibrium[dead link]. fusion.ps.uci.edu
Further reading[edit]
"What is Nuclear Fusion?". NuclearFiles.org.
S. Atzeni; J. Meyer-ter-Vehn (2004). "Nuclear fusion reactions". The Physics of Inertial Fusion (PDF). University of Oxford Press. ISBN 978-0-19-856264-1. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 January 2005.
G. Brumfiel (22 May 2006). "Chaos could keep fusion under control". Nature. doi:10.1038/news060522-2.
R.W. Bussard (9 November 2006). "Should Google Go Nuclear? Clean, Cheap, Nuclear Power". Google TechTalks. Archived from the original on 26 April 2007.
A. Wenisch; R. Kromp; D. Reinberger (November 2007). "Science or Fiction: Is there a Future for Nuclear?" (PDF). Austrian Institute of Ecology.
W.J. Nuttall (September 2008). "Fusion as an Energy Source: Challenges and Opportunities" (PDF). Institute of Physics Report. Institute of Physics.
M. Kikuchi, K. Lackner & M. Q. Tran (2012). Fusion Physics. International Atomic Energy Agency. p. 22. ISBN 9789201304100.
External links[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Nuclear fusion.
NuclearFiles.org—A repository of documents related to nuclear power.
Annotated bibliography for nuclear fusion from the Alsos Digital Library for Nuclear Issues
NRL Fusion Formulary
Organizations
Fusion for Energy website
ITER (International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor) website
CCFE (Culham Centre for Fusion Energy) website
JET (Joint European Torus) website
Naka Fusion Institute at JAEA (Japan Atomic Energy Agency) website
[show]
v
t
e
Fusion power
Core topics
Nuclear fusion
Timeline
List of experiments
Nuclear power
Nuclear reactor
Atomic nucleus
Fusion energy gain factor
Lawson criterion
Magnetohydrodynamics
Neutron
Plasma
[show]
v
t
e
Nuclear fusion processes and methods
By confinement
Gravitational
Alpha process
Triple-alpha process
Proton-proton chain
Helium flash
CNO cycle
Lithium burning
Carbon-burning
Neon-burning
Oxygen-burning
Silicon-burning
S-process
R-process
Fusor
Nova
remnants
Magnetic
Tokamak
Spherical tokamak
Stellarator
Spheromak
Reversed field pinch
Field-reversed configuration
Levitated dipole
Z-pinch
Dense plasma focus
Inertial
Laser-driven
Fusor
Polywell
Bubble (acoustic)
H-bomb
Pure fusion weapon
Electrostatic
RF accelerator-driven heavy-ion
Magnetized inertial
Magnetized Liner Inertial Fusion
Magnetized-target
Spatial
Big Bang nucleosynthesis (BBN)
Big Crunch nucleosynthesis (BCN; hypothetical)
Other forms
Muon-catalyzed
Pyroelectric
Migma
[show]
v
t
e
Fusion experimental devices by confinement method
Magnetic
Tokamak
International
ITER
DEMO
PROTO
Americas
STOR-M
MEDUSA-CR
Alcator C-Mod
DIII-D
UCLA ET
LTX
NSTX-U
Pegasus
PBX-M
TEXT
TFTR
ETE
Asia and Australia
LT-1
CT-6
CFETR
EAST
HL-1(M)
HL-2A
HT-6(B, M)
HT-7(U)
KT-5
SUNIST
ADITYA
SST-1
IR-T1
JT-60
QUEST
KTM
GLAST
KSTAR
KDEMO
Europe
JET
COMPASS
GOLEM
TJ-I
Tore Supra
TFR
ASDEX Upgrade
TEXTOR
FTU
IGNITOR
RTP
ISTTOK
T-3
T-4
T-10
T-15
TCV
START
MAST
MAST-U
Stellarator
Americas
ATF
CAT
HSX
NCSX
QPS
SCR-1
Asia and Australia
H-1NF
Lingyun
CHS
Heliotron J
LHD
TU-Heliac
Europe
UST-1
UST-2
TJ-IU
TJ-II
TJ-K
WEGA
Wendelstein 7-AS
Wendelstein 7-X
Uragan-1
Uragan-2 (Uragan-2M)
Uragan-3 (Uragan-3M)
L-2M
RFP
RFX
TPE-RX
EXTRAP T2R
MST
Other
MTF
LDX
SSPX
MFTF
MCX
Polywell
Dense plasma focus
ZETA
Inertial
Laser
Americas
NIF
OMEGA
Nova
Nike
Shiva
Argus
Cyclops
Janus
Long path
Laser Inertial Fusion Energy
Asia
SG-I
SG-II
SG-III
SG-IV
GEKKO XII
Europe
HiPER
Asterix IV (PALS)
LMJ
LULI2000
ISKRA
Vulcan
Non-laser
Qiangguang-1
PTS
Z machine
PACER
International Fusion Materials Irradiation Facility
[show]
v
t
e
Nuclear technology
Science
Chemistry
Engineering
Physics
Atomic nucleus
Fission
Fusion
Radiation
ionizing
braking
Fuel
Tritium
Deuterium
Helium-3
Fertile material
Fissile material
Isotope separation
Nuclear material
Uranium
enriched
depleted
Plutonium
Thorium
Neutron
Activation
Capture
Poison
Cross section
Generator
Radiation
Reflector
Temperature
Thermal
Fast
Fusion
Power
by country
Power plant
Economics
Multi-Mission Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator
Accidents and incidents
Policy
Fusion
Radioisotope thermoelectric (RTG)
Propulsion
rocket
Safety and security
Medicine
Imaging
RadBall
Scintigraphy
Single-photon emission (SPECT)
Positron-emission tomography (PET)
Therapy
Fast-neutron
Neutron capture therapy of cancer
Targeted alpha-particle
Proton-beam
Tomotherapy
Brachytherapy
Radiation therapy
Radiosurgery
Radiopharmacology
Weapons
Topics
Arms race
Delivery
Design
Disarmament
Ethics
Explosion
effects
History
Proliferation
Testing
high-altitude
underground
Warfare
Yield
TNTe
Lists
States with nuclear weapons
Tests
United States
WMD treaties
Weapon-free zones
Weapons
Waste
Products
Actinide
Reprocessed uranium
Reactor-grade plutonium
Minor actinide
Activation
Fission
LLFP
Actinide chemistry
Disposal
Fuel cycle
High-level (HLW)
Low-level (LLW)
Repository
Reprocessing
Spent fuel
pool
cask
Transmutation
Debate
Nuclear power
Nuclear weapons
Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future
Anti-nuclear movement
Uranium mining
Nuclear power phase-out
[hide]
Nuclear reactors
[show]
Fission
Moderator
Light water
Aqueous homogeneous
Boiling
BWR
ABWR
ESBWR
Kerena
Pressurized
ACPR-1000
AP1000
APR-1400
APR+
APWR
ATMEA1
CAP1400
CPR-1000
EPR
HPR-1000
VVER
many others
Supercritical (SCWR)
Natural fission
Heavy water
Pressurized (PHWR)
CANDU
CANDU 6
CANDU 9
EC6
AFCR
ACR-1000
AHWR
Steam-generating (SGHWR)
WR-1
Graphite
by coolant
Water
H2O
RBMK
EGP-6
Gas
CO2
Uranium Naturel Graphite Gaz (UNGG)
Magnox
Advanced gas-cooled (AGR)
He
Ultra-high-temperature experiment (UHTREX)
Pebble-bed (PBMR) (HTR-PM)
Gas-turbine modular-helium (GTMHR)
Very-high-temperature (VHTR)
Molten-salt
Fluorides
Fuji MSR
Liquid-fluoride thorium reactor (LFTR)
Molten-Salt Reactor Experiment (MSRE)
Integral Molten Salt Reactor (IMSR)
None
(fast-neutron)
Breeder (FBR)
Integral (IFR)
Liquid-metal-cooled (LMFR)
Small sealed transportable autonomous (SSTAR)
Traveling-wave (TWR)
Energy Multiplier Module (EM2)
Reduced-moderation (RMWR)
Fast Breeder Test Reactor (FBTR)
Dual fluid reactor (DFR)
Generation IV
Sodium (SFR)
BN-600
BN-800
BN-1200
PFBR
CEFR
Lead (LFR)
Helium gas (GFR)
Others
Organically moderated and cooled reactor
Aircraft Reactor Experiment
[show]
Fusion
by confinement
Magnetic
Field-reversed configuration
Levitated dipole
Reversed field pinch
Spheromak
Stellarator
Tokamak
Inertial
Bubble (acoustic)
Fusor
electrostatic
Laser-driven
Magnetized-target
Z-pinch
Other
Dense plasma focus
Migma
Muon-catalyzed
Polywell
Pyroelectric
Category
Portal
Commons
[show]
v
t
e
Radiation (physics and health)
Main articles
Non-ionizing radiation
Acoustic radiation force
Infrared
Light
Microwave
Radio waves
Ultraviolet
Ionizing radiation
Alpha particle
Background radiation
Beta particle
Cosmic ray
Gamma ray
Nuclear fission
Nuclear fusion
Radioactive decay
Nuclear reactors
Nuclear weapons
Particle accelerators
Radioactive materials
X-ray
Earth's radiation balance
Electromagnetic radiation
Thermal radiation
Gravitational Radiation
Radiation and health
Health physics
Dosimetry
Electromagnetic radiation and health
Laser safety
Lasers and aviation safety
Medical radiography
Mobile phone radiation and health
Radiation poisoning
Radiation Protection
Radiation therapy
Radioactivity in the life sciences
Radioactive contamination
Radiobiology
Biological dose units and quantities
Wireless electronic devices and health
Radiation Heat-transfer
Related articles
Half-life
Nuclear physics
Radioactive source
Radiation hardening
List of civilian radiation accidents
1996 Costa Rica accident
1987 Goiânia accident
1984 Moroccan accident
1990 Zaragoza accident
See also: the categories Radiation effects, Radioactivity, Radiobiology, and Radiation protection.
[show]
v
t
e
Energy
Fundamental concepts
Energetics
Energy
Units
Energy system
Energy transformation
Mass
Mass–energy equivalence
Power
Thermodynamics
Laws of thermodynamics
Exergy
Forms
Kinetic
Potential
Mechanical
Electric
Magnetic
Gravitational
Chemical
Ionization
Nuclear
Chromodynamic
Elastic
Mechanical wave
Sound wave
Radiant
Rest
Thermal
Energy carriers
Enthalpy
Fuel
fossil fuel
Heat
Work
Electricity
Battery
Capacitor
Primary energy
Fossil fuel
Coal
Petroleum
Natural gas
Gravitational energy
Nuclear fuel
Natural uranium
Radiant energy
Solar
Wind
Bioenergy
Hydropower
Marine energy
Geothermal
Energy system
components
Energy engineering
Oil refinery
Fossil-fuel power station
Cogeneration
Integrated gasification combined cycle
Nuclear power
Nuclear power plant
Radioisotope thermoelectric generator
Solar power
Photovoltaic system
Concentrated solar power
Solar thermal energy
Solar power tower
Solar furnace
Wind power
Wind farm
High-altitude wind power
Hydropower
Hydroelectricity
Wave farm
Tidal power
Biomass
Geothermal power
Use and
supply
Energy consumption
World energy consumption
Energy security
Energy conservation
Efficient energy use
Transport
Agriculture
Renewable energy
Sustainable energy
Energy policy
Energy development
Worldwide energy supply
South America
USA
Mexico
Canada
Europe
Asia
Africa
Australia
Misc.
Jevons's paradox
Carbon footprint
Authority control
LCCN: sh85092995
GND: 4030323-8
BNF: cb11977891b (data)
NDL: 00564769
BNE: XX553775
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nuclear_fusion&oldid=807520320"
Categories:
Nuclear fusion
Concepts in physics
Energy conversion
Nuclear chemistry
Nuclear physics
Hidden categories:
Webarchive template wayback links
All articles with dead external links
Articles with dead external links from April 2017
Articles with dead external links from August 2017
Use dmy dates from January 2012
All articles with unsourced statements
Articles with unsourced statements from November 2015
Articles with unsourced statements from April 2010
Articles with unsourced statements from October 2014
Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers
Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers
Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
In other projects
Wikimedia Commons
Languages
Afrikaans
العربية
Aragonés
Asturianu
Avañe'ẽ
বাংলা
Bân-lâm-gú
Беларуская
Български
Bosanski
Català
Čeština
Cymraeg
Dansk
Deutsch
Eesti
Ελληνικά
Español
Esperanto
Euskara
فارسی
Français
Frysk
Gaeilge
Galego
한국어
Հայերեն
हिन्दी
Hrvatski
Bahasa Indonesia
Íslenska
Italiano
עברית
Basa Jawa
ಕನ್ನಡ
Қазақша
Kreyòl ayisyen
Latina
Latviešu
Lietuvių
Limburgs
Magyar
Македонски
മലയാളം
Bahasa Melayu
Nederlands
नेपाली
日本語
Norsk
Norsk nynorsk
Occitan
Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча
ਪੰਜਾਬੀ
پنجابی
Piemontèis
Polski
Português
Română
Русский
Scots
Seeltersk
Sicilianu
සිංහල
Simple English
Slovenčina
Slovenščina
کوردی
Српски / srpski
Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски
Basa Sunda
Suomi
Svenska
தமிழ்
Татарча/tatarça
ไทย
Türkçe
Українська
Tiếng Việt
Winaray
粵語
Zazaki
中文
Edit links
This page was last edited on 28 October 2017, at 14:02.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

key: html

type: local

value: div

attrs: id class

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

value: a

attrs: id class lang

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

values: jump-to-nav mw-jump

values:
/wiki/Fusion_(disambiguation)
mw-redirect mw-disambig
Fusion (disambiguation)

values:
note
hatnote navigation-not-searchable

attrs: href title

value: img

attrs: alt src width height class srcset data-file-width data-file-height

attrs: href class

value: th

value: tr

attrs: alt src width height srcset data-file-width data-file-height

values:
/wiki/Nuclear_model
mw-redirect
Nuclear model

values: font-size: 105%; padding: 0.2em 0px 0.4em; text-align: center; display: none;

values:
/wiki/Neutron_excess
mw-redirect
Neutron excess

values:
/wiki/Stable_isotope
mw-redirect
Stable isotope

values:
/wiki/Proton%E2%80%93neutron_ratio
mw-redirect
Proton–neutron ratio

values:
/wiki/Isomeric_transition
mw-redirect
Isomeric transition

values:
/wiki/Le%C3%B3_Szil%C3%A1rd
mw-redirect
Leó Szilárd

values: float:right;clear:right;width:22.0em;margin:0 0 1.0em 1.0em;background:#f9f9f9;border:1px solid #aaa;padding:0.2em;border-spacing:0.4em 0;text-align:center;line-height:1.4em;font-size:88%

values:
/wiki/Main-sequence_star
mw-redirect
Main-sequence star

values:
/wiki/Helium_fusion
mw-redirect
Helium fusion

values:
/wiki/Uranium_235
mw-redirect
Uranium 235

values:
/wiki/Plutonium_239
mw-redirect
Plutonium 239

values:
/wiki/Quantum_tunneling
mw-redirect
Quantum tunneling

values:
/wiki/Hydrogen_bomb
mw-redirect
Hydrogen bomb

values:
/wiki/Coulomb_force
mw-redirect
Coulomb force

values:
/wiki/Strong_force
mw-redirect
Strong force

values:
/wiki/Free_neutron
mw-redirect
Free neutron

values:
/wiki/Mass-energy_equivalence
mw-redirect
Mass-energy equivalence

values:
/wiki/Proton-proton_chain
mw-redirect
Proton-proton chain

values: Contraction hypothesis (page does not exist)

values:
/wiki/Conservation_of_angular_momentum
mw-redirect
Conservation of angular momentum

values:
/wiki/Electrostatic_force
mw-redirect
Electrostatic force

values:
/wiki/Quantum_physics
mw-redirect
Quantum physics

values:
/wiki/Inverse_square_law
mw-redirect
Inverse square law

values: vertical-align: -0.838ex; width:14.297ex; height:2.843ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.671ex; width:4.934ex; height:2.009ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.838ex; width:7.816ex; height:3.176ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.838ex; width:4.308ex; height:2.843ex;

values:
/wiki/Plasma_physics
mw-redirect
Plasma physics

values:
/wiki/Confinement_time
mw-redirect
Confinement time

values: Edit section: Methods for achieving fusion

values:
/wiki/Fusion_energy
mw-redirect
Fusion energy

values: Edit section: Inertial confinement fusion

values: Edit section: Inertial electrostatic confinement

values: Edit section: Beam-beam or beam-target fusion

values: École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

values: Antimatter catalyzed nuclear pulse propulsion

values:
/wiki/Pure_fusion_bomb
mw-redirect
Pure fusion bomb

values:
/wiki/Nuclear_fusion_reactions
mw-redirect
Nuclear fusion reactions

values:
/wiki/Nuclear_fusion-fission_hybrid
mw-redirect
Nuclear fusion-fission hybrid

values:
/wiki/Electrical_power_industry
mw-redirect
Electrical power industry

values: Edit section: Astrophysical reaction chains

values: Edit section: Criteria and candidates for terrestrial reactions

values: This implies a relationship between atomic number (Z) and activation energy (in addition to its relation to binding energy), which isn't established/cited here. (November 2015)

values:
noprint Inline-Template Template-Fact
white-space:nowrap;

values:
/wiki/Electron_volt
mw-redirect
Electron volt

values: padding:0.2em 0.4em 0.2em;font-size:145%;line-height:1.2em;border-bottom: 2px solid #ccf

values: padding:0.1em;background:#f2f2f2; border-top: 2px solid #ccf; border-bottom: 2px solid #ccf

values: text-align:right;font-size:115%;border-top: 2px solid #ccf

values: float:right;clear:right;width:auto;margin:0 0 1.0em 1.0em;background:#f9f9f9;border:1px solid #aaa;padding:0.2em;border-spacing:0.4em 0;text-align:center;line-height:1.4em;font-size:88%;background:#f2f2f2

values:
/wiki/Fusion_gain_factor
mw-redirect
Fusion gain factor

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (April 2010)

values: Edit section: Neutronicity, confinement requirement, and power density

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (October 2014)

values: Edit section: Bremsstrahlung losses in quasineutral, isotropic plasmas

values:
/wiki/Electrical_charge
mw-redirect
Electrical charge

values: display:table-cell;padding:0.2em 0.2em 0.2em 0.3em;vertical-align:middle

values: margin:0.5em 0 0.5em 1em;border:solid #aaa 1px

values:
/wiki/Focus_fusion
mw-redirect
Focus fusion

values:
/wiki/List_of_plasma_(physics)_articles
mw-redirect
List of plasma (physics) articles

values:
/wiki/Teller%E2%80%93Ulam_design
mw-redirect
Teller–Ulam design

values: div-col columns column-count column-count-2

values: -moz-column-count: 2; -webkit-column-count: 2; column-count: 2;

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.iter.org/sci/beyonditer

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.iter.org/proj/iterandbeyond

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1063%2F1.3116505

values:
/wiki/Inertial_fusion
mw-redirect
Inertial fusion

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1063%2F1.3563814

values:
nofollow
external text
https://www.jstor.org/stable/6491

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1093%2Fmnras%2F77.1.16

values:
nofollow
http://www.fusor.net/board/
external text

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10385853

values:
/wiki/PubMed_Identifier
mw-redirect
PubMed Identifier

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16090625

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1038%2F321127a0

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15858570

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1038%2Fnature03575

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/7654627

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19571861

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1038%2F460025a

values: -moz-column-width: 35em; -webkit-column-width: 35em; column-width: 35em; list-style-type: decimal;

values:
/wiki/University_of_Oxford_Press
mw-redirect
University of Oxford Press

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1038%2Fnews060522-2

values:
/wiki/Robert_Bussard
mw-redirect
Robert Bussard

values: Austrian Institute of Ecology (page does not exist)

values:
nofollow
http://www.nuclearfiles.org/
external text

values:
nofollow
http://fusionforenergy.europa.eu/
external text

values:
nofollow
http://www.iter.org/
external text

values:
nofollow
http://www.fusion.org.uk/
external text

values:
nofollow
http://www.jet.efda.org/
external text

values: nowraplinks collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner

values: Plasma Physics Laboratory (Saskatchewan)

values: National Spherical Torus Experiment Upgrade

values: Princeton Beta Experiment-Modified (page does not exist)

values: Texas Experimental Tokamak (page does not exist)

values: Q-shu University Experiment with Steady State Spherical Tokamak (page does not exist)

values: Kazakhstan Tokamak for Material testing (page does not exist)

values: Rijnhuizen Tokamak Project (page does not exist)

values: Advanced Toroidal Facility (page does not exist)

values: Compact Auburn Torsatron (page does not exist)

values: Quasi-Poloidal Stellarator (page does not exist)

values: Lingyun (stellarator) (page does not exist)

values: Compact Helical System (page does not exist)

values: WEGA (stellarator) (page does not exist)

values: Maryland Centrifugal Experiment (page does not exist)

values: Primary Test Stand (page does not exist)

values:
/wiki/PACER_(fusion)
mw-redirect
PACER (fusion)

values: International Fusion Materials Irradiation Facility

values:
/wiki/Thermal_neutron
mw-redirect
Thermal neutron

values:
/wiki/Fast_neutron
mw-redirect
Fast neutron

values:
/wiki/Fusion_neutron
mw-redirect
Fusion neutron

values: Multi-Mission Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator

values: Nuclear and radiation accidents and incidents

values: Single-photon emission computed tomography

values: List of nuclear weapons tests of the United States

values: List of weapons of mass destruction treaties

values: Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future

values: Economic Simplified Boiling Water Reactor

values:
/wiki/Kerena_boiling_water_reactor
mw-redirect
Kerena boiling water reactor

values:
/wiki/Heavy-water_reactor
mw-redirect
Heavy-water reactor

values:
/wiki/Advanced_gas-cooled_reactor
mw-redirect
Advanced gas-cooled reactor

values:
/wiki/Fast_breeder_reactor
mw-redirect
Fast breeder reactor

values: Small, sealed, transportable, autonomous reactor

values: Organically moderated and cooled reactor

values: nowraplinks collapsible autocollapse navbox-subgroup

values: nowraplinks collapsible expanded navbox-subgroup

values: nowraplinks hlist collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner

values:
/wiki/Earth%27s_radiation_balance
mw-redirect
Earth's radiation balance

values:
/wiki/Gravitational_Radiation
mw-redirect
Gravitational Radiation

values:
/wiki/Medical_radiography
mw-redirect
Medical radiography

values:
/wiki/Radiation_poisoning
mw-redirect
Radiation poisoning

values:
/wiki/Radiation_Protection
mw-redirect
Radiation Protection

values: 1996 San Juan de Dios radiotherapy accident

values: 1990 Clinic of Zaragoza radiotherapy accident

values:
/wiki/Electric_energy
mw-redirect
Electric energy

values:
/wiki/Chromodynamic_energy
mw-redirect
Chromodynamic energy

values:
/wiki/Rest_energy
mw-redirect
Rest energy

values:
/wiki/Wind_energy
mw-redirect
Wind energy

values:
/wiki/Fossil-fuel_power_station
mw-redirect
Fossil-fuel power station

values:
/wiki/Energy_in_Canada
mw-redirect
Energy in Canada

values:
/wiki/Jevons%27s_paradox
mw-redirect
Jevons's paradox

values:
nofollow
external text
https://d-nb.info/gnd/4030323-8

values: Category:Webarchive template wayback links

values: Category:All articles with dead external links

values: Category:Articles with dead external links from April 2017

values: Category:Articles with dead external links from August 2017

values: Category:Use dmy dates from January 2012

values: Category:All articles with unsourced statements

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from November 2015

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from April 2010

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from October 2014

values: Category:Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers

values: Category:Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers

values: Category:Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers

values: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

values: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

values: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

values: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

values:
/wiki/Nuclear_fusion
View the content page [ctrl-alt-c]
c

values: Discussion about the content page [ctrl-alt-t]

values: p-namespaces navigation vectorTabs p-namespaces-label

values:
p-variants
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-variants-label

values: Past revisions of this page [ctrl-alt-h]

values: p-views navigation vectorTabs p-views-label

values:
p-cactions
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-cactions-label

values:
mw-wiki-logo
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page

values:
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page [ctrl-alt-z]
z

values: Featured content – the best of Wikipedia

values: Find background information on current events

values:
/wiki/Special:Random
Load a random article [ctrl-alt-x]
x

values: portal navigation p-navigation p-navigation-label

values: Guidance on how to use and edit Wikipedia

values: About the project, what you can do, where to find things

values: A list of recent changes in the wiki [ctrl-alt-r]

values: portal navigation p-interaction p-interaction-label

values: List of all English Wikipedia pages containing links to this page [ctrl-alt-j]

values: Recent changes in pages linked from this page [ctrl-alt-k]

values:
/wiki/Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard
Upload files [ctrl-alt-u]
u

values: A list of all special pages [ctrl-alt-q]

values: Permanent link to this revision of the page

values: Link to connected data repository item [ctrl-alt-g]

values: Printable version of this page [ctrl-alt-p]

values: portal navigation p-wikibase-otherprojects p-wikibase-otherprojects-label

values:
uls-settings-trigger
Language settings
0
button
true

values:
https://af.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kernfusie
Kernfusie – Afrikaans
af
af
interlanguage-link-target

values: اندماج نووي – Arabic

values: কেন্দ্রীণ সংযোজন – Bangla

values: Тэрмаядзерная рэакцыя – Belarusian

values: Термоядрен синтез – Bulgarian

values: Πυρηνική σύντηξη – Greek

values:
https://eo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuzio
Fuzio – Esperanto
eo
eo
interlanguage-link-target

values: همجوشی هسته‌ای – Persian

values: Ջերմամիջուկային ռեակցիա – Armenian

values: नाभिकीय संलयन – Hindi

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-hr badge-Q17437796 badge-featuredarticle

values: היתוך גרעיני – Hebrew

values: ಬೈಜಿಕ ಸಂಲಯನ – Kannada

values: Термоядролық реакциялар – Kazakh

values:
https://ht.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fizyon
Fizyon – Haitian Creole
ht
ht
interlanguage-link-target

values:
https://li.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kernfusie
Kernfusie – Limburgish
li
li
interlanguage-link-target

values: Нуклеарна фузија – Macedonian

values: അണുസംയോജനം – Malayalam

values:
https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kernfusie
Kernfusie – Dutch
nl
nl
interlanguage-link-target

values: नाभिकीय संलयन – Nepali

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-no badge-Q17437798 badge-goodarticle

values: ਨਿਊਕਲੀ ਮੇਲ – Punjabi

values: Термоядерная реакция – Russian

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-stq badge-Q17437796 badge-featuredarticle

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-scn badge-Q17437796 badge-featuredarticle

values: න්‍යෂ්ටික විලයනය – Sinhala

values:
https://sh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuzija
Fuzija – Serbo-Croatian
sh
sh
interlanguage-link-target

values:
https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion
Fusion – Swedish
sv
sv
interlanguage-link-target

values: அணுக்கரு இணைவு – Tamil

values: Термотөш реакциясе – Tatar

values: การหลอมนิวเคลียส – Thai

values: Ядерний синтез – Ukrainian

values: /static/images/wikimedia-button-1.5x.png 1.5x, /static/images/wikimedia-button-2x.png 2x

values: /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_132x47.png 1.5x, /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_176x62.png 2x

values:
suggestions
display: none; font-size: 13px;

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Nuclear_fusion rootpage-Nuclear_fusion vector-experimental-print-styles vector-nav-directionality skin-vector action-view