text:
Gang Beasts
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Gang Beasts
Storefront logo of Gang Beasts
Developer(s)
Boneloaf
Publisher(s)
Double Fine Presents
Engine
Unity
Platform(s)
Microsoft Windows
macOS
Linux
PlayStation 4
Release
WW: 12 December 2017
Genre(s)
Beat 'em up, party
Mode(s)
Single-player, multiplayer
Gang Beasts is a multiplayer beat 'em up party game developed by Boneloaf and published by Double Fine Presents.[1] The game released for Microsoft Windows, macOS, Linux, and PlayStation 4 on 12 December 2017, following an early access period for the PC platforms that began in August 2014.[2][3]
Contents
[hide]
1 Gameplay
2 Reception
3 References
4 External links
Gameplay[edit]
Gang Beasts is a multiplayer beat 'em up party game with gelatinous characters, melee fight sequences, and hazardous environments, set in the fictional metropolis of Beef City. At initial release it contained 8 multiplayer stages. The core gameplay involves using various physical abilities such as punching or kicking an opponent until they are "knocked out", and then attempting to toss them over one of the stage hazards. Opponents that have been knocked down are not completely defenseless however, as they can fight back to be released.[4]
Reception[edit]
This section needs expansion with: specific snippets from the sources and separate each source per WP:OVERCITE. You can help by adding to it. (August 2017)
Reception
Aggregate score
Aggregator
Score
Metacritic PS4: 67/100[5]
Review scores
Publication
Score
Destructoid 6/10[6]
PC Gamer (US) 64/100[7]
Hardcore Gamer 4/5[8]
Shacknews 6/10[9]
Already in its freeware alpha state, as well as upon Steam Early Access release, the game was met with positive response from critics and fans.[10][11][12][13][14][15]
Outside of early access, Gang Beasts received mixed reviews from critics on both the PC and PlayStation 4 versions of the game. On Metacritic, the game holds a score of 67/100 for the PlayStation 4 version based on 8 reviews, indicating "mixed or average reviews."[5]
The game was nominated for "Excellence in Multiplayer" at the 2018 SXSW Gaming Awards,[16][17] and for "Multiplayer" at the upcoming 14th British Academy Games Awards.[18]
References[edit]
Jump up ^ Rice, Greg (18 August 2014). "Double Fine Presents: Gang Beasts". Double Fine Productions. Retrieved 27 December 2015.
Jump up ^ "Gang Beasts FAQ". Gang Beasts. Retrieved 23 December 2016.
Jump up ^ Spafford, James (28 November 2017). "Hilarious mulitplayer brawler Gang Beasts gets a confirmed PS4 release date". PlayStation Blog Europe. Retrieved 28 November 2017.
Jump up ^ Smith, Graham (3 May 2016). "Gang Beasts Grapples With Online Multiplayer Beta". Rock, Paper, Shotgun. Gamer Network. Retrieved 1 March 2017.
^ Jump up to: a b "Gang Beasts for PlayStation 4 Reviews". Metacritic. CBS Interactive. Retrieved 26 December 2017.
Jump up ^ Moyse, Chris (20 December 2017). "Review: Gang Beasts". Destructoid. Enthusiast Gaming. Retrieved 26 December 2017.
Jump up ^ Schilling, Chris (21 December 2017). "Gang Beasts review". PC Gamer. Future US. Retrieved 26 December 2017.
Jump up ^ Robertson, Tyler (19 December 2017). "Review: Gang Beasts". Hardcore Gamer. Retrieved 26 December 2017.
Jump up ^ Mejia, Ozzie (18 December 2017). "Gang Beasts Review: Royal Fumble". Shacknews. Gamerhub Content Network. Retrieved 26 December 2017.
Jump up ^ Bramwell, Tom (10 September 2014). "Gang Beasts Early Access review". Eurogamer. Gamer Network. Retrieved 8 January 2016.
Jump up ^ Smith, Adam (4 April 2014). "Hands On: Gang Beasts". Rock, Paper, Shotgun. Gamer Network. Retrieved 8 January 2016.
Jump up ^ Labbe, Mark (31 August 2015). "PAX Prime 2015: Gang Beasts Hands-On Preview – Goofy Brawler". PlayStation LifeStyle. CraveOnline. Retrieved 8 January 2016.
Jump up ^ Stuart, Keith (21 July 2014). "Gang Beasts – probably the funniest fighting game ever made". The Guardian. Guardian News and Media. Retrieved 8 January 2016.
Jump up ^ Conditt, Jessica (19 August 2014). "Burn, crush your jelly pals in Gang Beasts from Double Fine". Engadget. AOL Tech. Retrieved 8 January 2016.
Jump up ^ Hansen, Steve (2 September 2014). "Gang Beasts out on Steam, fight your friends like a drunk on skates". Destructoid. Enthusiast Gaming. Retrieved 8 January 2016.
Jump up ^ McNeill, Andrew (31 January 2018). "Here Are Your 2018 SXSW Gaming Awards Finalists!". SXSW. Retrieved 1 February 2018.
Jump up ^ IGN Studios (17 March 2018). "2018 SXSW Gaming Awards Winners Revealed". IGN. Retrieved 18 March 2018.
Jump up ^ deAlessandri, Marie (15 March 2018). "Hellblade: Senua's Sacrifice at forefront of BAFTA Games Awards nominations". The Market for Computer & Video Games. Retrieved 16 March 2018.
External links[edit]
Official website
[hide]
v
t
e
Double Fine Productions
Games
Psychonauts
Psychonauts
Psychonauts in the Rhombus of Ruin
Psychonauts 2
Costume Quest
Costume Quest
Costume Quest 2
Happy Action
Double Fine Happy Action Theater
Kinect Party
Amnesia Fortnight
Amnesia Fortnight 2012
Amnesia Fortnight 2014
Stand-alone titles
Brütal Legend
Stacking
Iron Brigade
Sesame Street: Once Upon a Monster
The Cave
Dropchord
Broken Age
Hack 'n' Slash
Spacebase DF-9
Massive Chalice
Headlander
Free and freemium
Epic Saga: Extreme Fighter
My Game About Me: Olympic Challenge
Tasha's Game
Host Master and the Conquest of Humor
Middle Manager of Justice
Host Master Deux: Quest for Identity
Related
Tim Schafer
LucasArts adventure games
2 Player Productions

This beat 'em up video game article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
v
t
e
This party video game article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
v
t
e
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gang_Beasts&oldid=832579476"
Categories:
Double Fine Productions
Linux games
MacOS games
Party video games
PlayStation 4 games
PlayStation VR games
Unity (game engine) games
2017 video games
Windows games
Early access video games
3D beat 'em ups
Beat 'em up stubs
Party video game stubs
Hidden categories:
Use dmy dates from December 2015
Articles using Infobox video game using locally defined parameters
Articles using Wikidata infoboxes with locally defined images
Articles to be expanded from August 2017
All articles to be expanded
Articles using small message boxes
Articles using Video game reviews template in single platform mode
Official website different in Wikidata and Wikipedia
All stub articles
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
Languages
Français
Italiano
Русский
Edit links
This page was last edited on 26 March 2018, at 20:44.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

key: html

type: local

value: div

attrs: id class

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

value: a

attrs: id class lang

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

values: jump-to-nav mw-jump

value: th

value: tr

value: img

attrs: alt src width height srcset data-file-width data-file-height

attrs: href class

value: td

attrs: colspan style

attrs: href title

attrs: href class title

values:
/wiki/Double_Fine_Presents
mw-redirect
Double Fine Presents

values: width:22em;float: right; width: 22em; font-size: 90%; text-align: left; border-spacing: 3px;

values: plainlinks metadata ambox mbox-small-left ambox-content

values: background:transparent;padding:0em;margin:0em 1em 1em 1em;text-align:center;float:right;clear:right;width:23em

values:
nofollow
http://gangbeasts.game/faq/
external text

values:
/wiki/Guardian_News_and_Media
mw-redirect
Guardian News and Media

values:
nofollow
external text
http://gangbeasts.game

values: nowraplinks collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner

values: position: absolute; right: 15px; display: none;

values:
metadata plainlinks stub
presentation
background:transparent

values:
/wiki/Party_video_game
mw-redirect
Party video game

values: Category:Use dmy dates from December 2015

values: Category:Articles using Infobox video game using locally defined parameters

values: Category:Articles using Wikidata infoboxes with locally defined images

values: Category:Articles to be expanded from August 2017

values: Category:Articles using small message boxes

values: Category:Articles using Video game reviews template in single platform mode

values: Category:Official website different in Wikidata and Wikipedia

values: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

values: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

values: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

values: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

values:
/wiki/Gang_Beasts
View the content page [ctrl-alt-c]
c

values: Discussion about the content page [ctrl-alt-t]

values: p-namespaces navigation vectorTabs p-namespaces-label

values:
p-variants
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-variants-label

values: Past revisions of this page [ctrl-alt-h]

values: p-views navigation vectorTabs p-views-label

values:
p-cactions
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-cactions-label

values:
mw-wiki-logo
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page

values:
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page [ctrl-alt-z]
z

values: Featured content – the best of Wikipedia

values: Find background information on current events

values:
/wiki/Special:Random
Load a random article [ctrl-alt-x]
x

values: portal navigation p-navigation p-navigation-label

values: Guidance on how to use and edit Wikipedia

values: About the project, what you can do, where to find things

values: A list of recent changes in the wiki [ctrl-alt-r]

values: portal navigation p-interaction p-interaction-label

values: List of all English Wikipedia pages containing links to this page [ctrl-alt-j]

values: Recent changes in pages linked from this page [ctrl-alt-k]

values:
/wiki/Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard
Upload files [ctrl-alt-u]
u

values: A list of all special pages [ctrl-alt-q]

values: Permanent link to this revision of the page

values: Link to connected data repository item [ctrl-alt-g]

values: Printable version of this page [ctrl-alt-p]

values: /static/images/wikimedia-button-1.5x.png 1.5x, /static/images/wikimedia-button-2x.png 2x

values: /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_132x47.png 1.5x, /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_176x62.png 2x

values:
suggestions
display: none; font-size: 13px;

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Gang_Beasts rootpage-Gang_Beasts skin-vector action-view


text:
Mickey's 50
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article does not cite any sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (June 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
"Mickey's 50"
The Wonderful World of Disney episode
Episode no.
Season 25
Episode 9
Directed by
Mike Jittlov
Phil May
Written by
Phil May
Produced by
Ron Miller
Featured music
Richard Bowden
Will Schaefer
Original air date
November 19, 1978 (1978-11-19)
Running time
90 minutes
Episode chronology
← Previous
"The Boatniks" Next →
"Christmas at Walt Disney World"
List of Walt Disney anthology television series episodes
Mickey's 50 is a 1978 television special honouring the 50-year anniversary of the debut of Walt Disney's animated character Mickey Mouse. The show aired on NBC on November 19, 1978, one day after Mickey's official birthday, as a special 90-minute edition of The Wonderful World of Disney.
Contents
1 Summary
2 List of special guests
3 See also
4 References
5 External links
Summary[edit]
This show covers the history and career of Mickey Mouse from his humble beginnings in the first Disney sound cartoon Steamboat Willie to his popularity in the 1930s, his presence on television through The Mickey Mouse Club, and his role as the official host of Disneyland and Walt Disney World. Also covered are his relationships with his co-stars, including his girlfriend Minnie Mouse and his nemesis Peg-Leg Pete, and how his success helped build Walt Disney Productions into the entertainment empire it is today.
Throughout the show, a variety of special guest stars and celebrities appear to introduce various anecdotes about Mickey's career and to wish him a happy birthday. Also shown is a three-part live-action/stop-motion short film by Mike Jittlov revolving around a man (played by Jittlov himself) who is tormented by his vast collection of Mickey merchandise. The show closes with a performance of the original song "(The Whole World Wants to Wish You) Happy Birthday Mickey Mouse".
List of special guests[edit]
Jack Albertson
Edward Asner
Anne Bancroft
Edgar Bergen
Ken Berry
Jacqueline Bisset
Mel Brooks
Carol Burnett
Red Buttons
Ruth Buzzi
Dyan Cannon
Karen and Richard Carpenter
Johnny Carson
Chewbacca
Hans Conried
Dick Clark
Susan Clark
Bette Davis
Phyllis Diller
Dale Evans
Sally Field
Gerald Ford
Jodie Foster
Kermit the Frog
Annette Funicello
Eva Gabor
Steve Garvey
Elliott Gould
Rev. Billy Graham
Buddy Hackett
Goldie Hawn
Helen Hayes
Sterling Holloway
Bob Hope
Bruce Jenner
Elton John
Dean Jones
Shirley Jones
Gene Kelly
Christopher Lee
R2-D2
Rich Little
Roger Miller
Anne Murray
Joe Namath
Willie Nelson
Gary Owens
Gregory Peck
Peter Sellers
Doc Severinsen
O. J. Simpson
Helen Reddy
Burt Reynolds
Kenny Rogers
Roy Rogers
Mickey Rooney
Ronnie Schell
Shields and Yarnell
Peter Strauss
James Stewart
Dick Van Patten
Jan-Michael Vincent
Barbara Walters
Raquel Welch
Lawrence Welk
Henry Winkler
Jonathan Winters
Jo Anne Worley
See also[edit]
Mickey's 60th Birthday, a 1988 special honoring Mickey Mouse's 60th birthday.
References[edit]
External links[edit]
"Mickey's 50" on IMDb
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mickey%27s_50&oldid=820441298"
Categories:
1978 American television episodes
Mickey Mouse
Walt Disney anthology television series episodes
Disney television specials
1978 in American television
1978 television specials
Hidden categories:
Articles lacking sources from June 2017
All articles lacking sources
Pages using infobox television episode with incorrectly formatted episode list
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
Languages
Add links
This page was last edited on 14 January 2018, at 19:36 (UTC).
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

attrs: class href

values: mw-jump-link #mw-head

values: mw-jump-link #p-search

value: b

values: Help:Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup/1

value: span

value: i

value: small

values: plainlinks metadata ambox ambox-content ambox-Unreferenced

values: text-align:center;font-size:125%;font-weight:bold;font-weight: normal; background: #CCCCFF; padding: 0.25em 1em; line-height: normal;

values: text-align:center;font-weight: bold; font-size: 110%

values: text-align:center;background: #CCCCFF; padding: 0.25em 1em; line-height: 1.5em;

values: width: 50%; padding: 0.2em 0.1em 0.2em 0; text-align: center;

values: width: 50%; padding: 0.2em 0 0.2em 0.1em; text-align: center;

values: checkbox button toctogglecheckbox toctogglecheckbox display:none

values:
/wiki/Edward_Asner
mw-redirect
Edward Asner

values:
/wiki/Bruce_Jenner
mw-redirect
Bruce Jenner

values: -moz-column-width: 15em; -webkit-column-width: 15em; column-width: 15em;

values:
nofollow
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0206141/
external text

values: Category:1978 American television episodes

values: Category:Walt Disney anthology television series episodes

values: Category:Articles lacking sources from June 2017

values: Category:Pages using infobox television episode with incorrectly formatted episode list

values: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

values: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

values: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

values: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

values:
/wiki/Mickey%27s_50
View the content page [ctrl-alt-c]
c

values: Discussion about the content page (page does not exist) [ctrl-alt-t]

values: p-namespaces navigation vectorTabs p-namespaces-label

values:
p-variants
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-variants-label

values: Past revisions of this page [ctrl-alt-h]

values: p-views navigation vectorTabs p-views-label

values:
p-cactions
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-cactions-label

values:
mw-wiki-logo
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page

values:
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page [ctrl-alt-z]
z

values: Featured content – the best of Wikipedia

values: Find background information on current events

values:
/wiki/Special:Random
Load a random article [ctrl-alt-x]
x

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Mickey_s_50 rootpage-Mickey_s_50 skin-vector action-view


text:
Land grabbing
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Land grabbing is the contentious issue of large-scale land acquisitions: the buying or leasing of large pieces of land by domestic and transnational companies, governments, and individuals. While used broadly throughout history, land grabbing as used in the 21st century primarily refers to large-scale land acquisitions following the 2007-2008 world food price crisis.[1] Obtaining water resources is usually critical to the land acquisitions, so it has also led to an associated trend of water grabbing.[2] By prompting food security fears within the developed world and new found economic opportunities for agricultural investors, the food price crisis caused a dramatic spike in large-scale agricultural investments, primarily foreign, in the Global South for the purpose of industrial food and biofuels production. Although hailed by investors, economists and some developing countries as a new pathway towards agricultural development, investment in land in the 21st century has been criticized by some non-governmental organizations and commentators as having a negative impact on local communities. International law is implicated when attempting to regulate these transactions.[3]
Contents
[hide]
1 Definition
2 Situation in the 21st century
2.1 Land Area
2.2 Land Value
2.3 Land destinations
2.4 Land origins
2.5 Other deals
3 Target countries
3.1 Responses
4 Types of land investment
4.1 Food
4.2 Biofuels
5 Criticism
5.1 Land insecurity
5.2 Local consultation and compensation
5.3 Displacement
5.4 Employment
5.5 Government negotiations
5.6 Environmental impact
5.7 Neocolonialism
6 Laws and Regulations Concerning Reporting of Foreign Investment in Land
6.1 Extraterritorial obligations of states over overseas businesses
6.2 Other relevant international Principles, Guidelines and Instruments
7 Information issues
8 Notable cases
9 List of land grabbings of EU countries
10 See also
11 References
12 External links
Definition[edit]
The term "land grabbing" is defined as very large-scale land acquisitions, either buying or leasing.[citation needed] The size of the land deal is multiples of 1,000 square kilometres (390 sq mi) or 100,000 hectares (250,000 acres) and thus much larger than in the past.[4] The term is itself controversial. In 2011, Borras, Hall and others wrote that "the phrase 'global land grab' has become a catch-all to describe and analyze the current trend towards large scale (trans)national commercial land transactions."[1] Ruth Hall wrote elsewhere that the "term 'land grabbing', while effective as activist terminology, obscures vast differences in the legality, structure, and outcomes of commercial land deals and deflects attention from the roles of domestic elites and governments as partners, intermediaries, and beneficiaries."[5]
In Portuguese, Land Grabbing is translated as "grilagem": "Much is said about grilagem and the term may be curious ... document aged by the action of insects [6] ... However, for those who live in the interior of the country, the expression effectively reveals a dark, heavy, violent meaning, involving abuses and arbitrary actions against the former occupants, occasionally with forced loss of possession by the taking of land " [7] The term grilagem applies to irregular procedures and / or illegal private landholding with violence in the countryside, exploitation of wealth, environmental damage and the threat to sovereignty[8], given their gigantic proportions.
Situation in the 21st century[edit]
Land Area[edit]
The Overseas Development Institute reported in January 2013, that with limited data available in general and existing data associated with NGOs interested in generating media attention in particular, the scale of global land trade may have been exaggerated. They found the figures below provide a variety of estimates, all in the tens of millions of hectares.[9]
The International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) estimated in 2009 between 15 and 20 million hectares of farmland in developing countries had changed hands since 2006.[4]
As of January 2013[update] the Land Portal’s Land Matrix data totalled 49 million hectares of deals globally, although only 26 million hectares of these are transnational.[citation needed]
A 2011 World Bank report by Klaus Deininger reported 56 million hectares worldwide.[10]
Friis & Reenberg (2012) reported in 2012 between 51 and 63 million hectares in Africa alone.[citation needed]
The GRAIN database[11] published in January 2012, quantified 35 million hectares, although when stripping out more developed economies such as Australia, New Zealand, Poland, Russia, Ukraine and Romania, the amount in the GRAIN database reduces to 25 million hectares.[9][page needed]
Between 1990 and 2011, in the West Bank (Palestine) 195 km2 of land was expropriated by Israel, without compensation for the local owners, and allocated to immigrants for new settlements and for the establishment of mostly large farms. Water for the local population became extremely sparse.[12] In 2016, as a part of a permanent process 300 acres of land were added.[13]
Most seem to arrive at a ballpark of 20-60 million hectares. Given that total global farmland takes up just over 4 billion hectares,[14][page needed] these acquisitions could equate to around 1 per cent of global farmland. However, in practice, land acquired may not have previously been used as farmland, it may be covered by forests, which also equate to about 4 billion hectares worldwide, so transnational land acquisitions may have a significant role in ongoing deforestation.[9][page needed]
The researchers thought that a sizeable number of deals remain questionable in terms of size and whether they have been finalised and implemented. The land database often relies on one or two media sources and may not track whether the investments take place, or whether the full quantity reported takes place. For example, a number of deals in the GRAIN database[11] appear to have stalled including -
1 million hectares taken between US firms Arc Cap and Nile Trading and Development Inc in Sudan
A 400,000 hectare deal between China and Colombia that seems to have stalled
The 325,000 hectare investment by Agrisol in Tanzania
A 324,000 hectare purchase of land by the UAE in Pakistan
A suspended 320,000 hectare purchase by Chinese investors in Argentina.[9][page needed]
The researchers claim these are only those that have been checked, and already amount to nearly 10 per cent of the GRAIN database transnational land acquisitions. Deals are reported that use the estimate of the full extent of land that the firm expects to use. For example,
Indian investment in Tanzania is reported at 300,000 hectares, currently operating on just 1,000 hectares
Olam International’s investment in Gabon reported at 300,000 hectares, currently operating on just 50,000
Three investments amounting to 600,000 hectares in Liberia, with Equatorial Palm Oil’s deal reported at 169,000 hectares, despite their plans to reach just 50,000 by 2020.[9][page needed]
Land Value[edit]
The researchers found that in terms of value of transnational land acquisitions, it is even harder to come across figures. Media reports usually just give information on the area and not on the value of the land transaction. Investment estimates, rather than the price of purchase are occasionally given[9][page needed]
They found a number of reports in land databases are not acquisitions, but are long-term leases, where a fee is paid or a certain proportion of the produce goes to domestic markets. For example:[9][page needed]
An Indian investment in Ethiopia, where price per hectare ranged from $1.20 to $8 per hectare per year on 311,000 hectares
Indian investors paid $4 per hectare per year on 100,000 hectares.
Prince Bandar Bin Sultan of Saudi Arabia was reported to be paying $125,000 per year for 105,000 hectares in South Sudan, less than $1 per year on a 25-year lease.
A South Korean investor in Peru was reported to be paying $0.80 per hectare.
The estimated value has been calculated for IFPRI’s 2009 data to be 15 to 20 million hectares of farmland in developing countries, worth about $20 billion-$30 billion.[4]
Researchers discovered global investment funds are reported to have sizeable funds available for transnational land investments.
One estimate suggests “$100 billion waiting to be invested by 120 investment groups” while already “Saudi Arabia has spent $800 million on overseas farms”.[15] In 2011, a farm consultancy HighQuest told Reuters “Private capital investment in farming in expected to more than double to around $5-$7 billion in the next couple of years from an estimated $2.5-$3 billion invested in the last couple of years”.[16]
There is significant uncertainty around the value of transnational land acquisitions, particularly given leasing arrangements. Given the quantity of land and the size of investment funds operating in the area, it is likely that the value will be in the tens of billions of dollars.[9][page needed]
Land destinations[edit]
Researchers used the Land Portal’s Land Matrix database of 49 billion hectares of land deals, and found that Asia is a big centre of activity with Indonesia and Malaysia counting for a quarter of international deals by hectares. India contributes a further 10 per cent of land deals. The majority of investment is in the production of palm oil and other biofuels.[9][page needed]
They determined that the Land Portal also reports investments made by investors within their home country and after stripping these out found only 26 million hectares of transnational land acquisitions which strips out a lot of the Asian investments. The largest destination countries include
Brazil with 11 per cent by land area
Sudan with 10 per cent
Madagascar, the Philippines and Ethiopia with 8 per cent each
Mozambique with 7 per cent
Indonesia with 6 per cent.
[9]
They found the reason seems to be biofuels expansion with exceptions in Sudan and Ethiopia, which sees a trend towards growth of food from Middle Eastern and Indian investors. Represented in the media as the norm they seem to be more the exception.[9]
Land origins[edit]
The researchers found a mixed picture in terms of the origins of investors. According to the Land Portal, the United Kingdom is the biggest country of origin followed by the United States, India, the UAE, South Africa, Canada and Malaysia, with China a much smaller player. The GRAIN database[11] says:
United States, the UAE and China all constitute around 12 per cent of deals
India with 8 per cent
Egypt and the UK with 6 per cent
South Korea with 5 per cent
South Africa, Saudi Arabia, Singapore and Malaysia all with 4 per cent.
Both the Land Portal and the GRAIN database show that the UK and the US are major players in transnational land acquisitions. This is agribusiness firms, as well as investment funds, investing mostly in sugar cane, jatropha or palm oil. This trend has clearly been driven by the biofuels targets in the EU and US, and greater vertical integration in agribusiness in general.[9]
The smaller trend is the picture of Middle Eastern investors or State-backed Chinese investments. While the UAE has done some significant deals by size, some driven by food deals, with Saudi Arabia a smaller number, this is not the dominant trend. While this aspect of land trade has gathered lots of media attention, it is not by any means a comprehensive story.[9]
Other deals[edit]
Other estimates of the scope of land acquisition, published in September 2010 by the World Bank, showed that over 460,000 square kilometres (180,000 sq mi) or 46,000,000 hectares (110,000,000 acres) in large-scale farmland acquisitions or negotiations were announced between October 2008 and August 2009 alone, with two-thirds of demanded land concentrated in Sub-Saharan Africa.[17] Of the World Bank’s 464 examined acquisitions, only 203 included land area in their reports, implying that the actual total land covered could more than double the World Bank’s reported 46 million ha. The most recent estimate of the scale, based on evidence presented in April 2011 at an international conference convened by the Land Deal Politics Initiative, estimated the area of land deals at over 80 million ha.[18]
Of these deals, the median size is 40,000 hectares (99,000 acres), with one-quarter over 200,000 ha and one-quarter under 10,000 ha.[17] 37% of projects deal with food crops, 21% with cash crops, and 21% with biofuels.[17] This points to the vast diversity of investors and projects involved with land acquisitions: the land sizes, crop types, and investors involved vary wildly between agreements. Of these projects, 30% were still in an exploratory stage, with 70% approved but in varying stages of development. 18% had not started yet, 30% were in initial development stages, and 21% had started farming.[17] The strikingly low proportion of projects that had initiated farming signifies the difficulties inherent in large-scale agricultural production in the developing world.
Investment in land often takes the form of long-term leases, as opposed to outright purchases, of land. These leases often range between 25 and 99 years.[17] Such leases are usually undertaken between national or district governments and investors. Because the majority of land in Africa is categorized as “non-private" as a result of government policies on public land ownership and a lack of active titling, governments own or control most of the land that is available for purchase or lease.[19] Purchases are much less common than leases due to a number of countries’ constitutional bans on outright sales of land to foreigners.
The methods surrounding the negotiation, approval, and follow-up of contracts between investors and governments have attracted significant criticism for their opacity and complexity. The negotiation and approval processes have been closed in most cases, with little public disclosure both during and after the finalization of a deal. The approval process, in particular, can be cumbersome: It varies from approval by a simple district-level office to approval by multiple national-level government offices and is very subjective and discretionary.[17] In Ethiopia, companies must first obtain an investment license from the central government, identify appropriate land on the district level and negotiate with local leaders, then develop a contract with the regional investment office. Afterwards, the government will undertake a project feasibility study and capital verification process, and finally a lease agreement will be signed and land will be transferred to the investor.[20] In Tanzania, even though the Tanzania Investment Centre facilitates investments, an investor must obtain approval from the TIC, the Ministry of Agriculture, the Ministry of Lands and Housing Development, and the Ministry of Environment, among which communication is oftentimes intermittent.[20]
Target countries[edit]
One common thread among governments has been the theme of development: Target governments tout the benefits of agricultural development, job creation, cash crop production, and infrastructure provision as drivers towards economic development and eventually modernization. Many companies have promised to build irrigation, roads, and in some cases hospitals and schools to carry out their investment projects. In return for a below-market-rate $10/ha annual payment for land, Saudi Star promised "to bring clinics, schools, better roads and electricity supplies to Gambella.”[21] Governments also count new job creation as a significant feature of land acquisitions.
The issue of agricultural development is a significant driving factor, within the larger umbrella of development, in target governments' agreement to investment by outsiders. The Ethiopian government's acceptance of cash crop-based land acquisitions reflects its belief that switching to cash crop production would be even more beneficial for food security than having local farmers produce crops by themselves.[22] Implicit in the characterization of African agriculture as "underdeveloped" is the rejection of local communities' traditional methods of harvesting as an inadequate form of food production.
On a smaller scale, some deals can be traced to a personal stake in the project or possibly due to corruption or rent-seeking. Given the ad hoc, decentralized, and unorganized approval processes across countries for such transactions, the potential for lapses in governance and openings for corruption are extremely high. In many countries, the World Bank has noted that investors are often better off learning how to navigate the bureaucracies and potentially pay off corrupt officers of governments rather than developing viable, sustainable business plans.[17]
Responses[edit]
Since 2010 Brazil enforces in a stricter way a long-existing law that limits the size of farmland properties foreigners may purchase, having halted a large part of projected foreign land purchases.[23]
In Argentina, as of September 2011, a projected law is discussed in parliament that would restrict the size of land foreign entities can acquire to 1000 hectare.[24]
Types of land investment[edit]
Investors can be generally broken down into three types: agribusinesses, governments, and speculative investors. Governments and companies in Gulf States have been very prominent along with East Asian companies. Many European- and American-owned investment vehicles and agricultural producers have initiated investments as well. These actors have been motivated by a number of factors, including cheap land, potential for improving agricultural production, and rising food and biofuel prices. Building on these motivations, investments can be broken down into three main categories: food, biofuel, and speculative investment. Forestry also contributes to a significant amount of large-scale land acquisition, as do several other processes: Zoomers[25] mentions drivers such as the creation of protected areas and nature reserves, residential migration, large-scale tourist complexes and the creation of Special Economic Zones, particularly in Asian countries.
Food[edit]
Food-driven investments, which comprise roughly 37% of land investments worldwide, are undertaken primarily by two sets of actors: agribusinesses trying to expand their holdings and react to market incentives, and government-backed investments, especially from the Gulf states, as a result of fears surrounding national food security.[17]
Agricultural sector companies most often view investment in land as an opportunity to leverage their significant monetary resources and market access to take advantage of underused land, diversify their holdings, and vertically integrate their production systems. The World Bank identifies three areas in which multinational companies can leverage economies of scale: access to cheap international rather than domestic financial markets, risk-reducing diversification of holdings, and greater ability to address infrastructural roadblocks.[17] In the past few decades, multinationals have shied away from direct involvement in relatively unprofitable primary production, instead focusing on inputs and processing and distribution.[26] When the food price crisis hit, risk was transferred from primary production to the price-sensitive processing and distribution fields, and returns became concentrated in primary production. This has incentivized agribusinesses to vertically integrate to reduce supplier risk that has been heightened by the ongoing food price volatility.[20] These companies hold mixed attitudes towards food imports and exports: While some concentrate on food exports, others focus on domestic markets first.
While company-originated investments have originated from a wide range of countries, government-backed investments have originated primarily from the food-insecure Gulf States. Examples of such government-backed investments include the government of Qatar’s attempt to secure land in the Tana River Delta and the Saudi government's King Abdullah Initiative.[27][28] Additionally, sovereign wealth funds acting as the investments arms of governments have initiated a number of agreements in Sub-Saharan Africa. Since the population of the Gulf states is set to double from 30 million in 2000 to 60 million in 2030, their reliance on food imports is set to increase from the current level of 60% of consumption.[29] The director general of the Arab Organisation for Agricultural Development echoed the sentiment of many Gulf leaders in proclaiming, “the whole Arab World needs of cereal, sugar, fodder and other essential foodstuffs could be met by Sudan alone.”[20]
Biofuels[edit]
Biofuel production, currently comprising 21% of total land investments, has played a significant, if at times unclear, role. The use and popularity of biofuels has grown over the past decade, corresponding with rising oil prices and increased environmental awareness. The total area under biofuel crops more than doubled between 2004 and 2008, expanding to 36 million ha by 2008.[30] This rise in popularity culminated in EU Directive 2009/28/EC in April 2009, which set 10% mandatory targets for renewable energy use, primarily biofuels, out of the total consumption of fuel for transport, by 2020.[31] Taken as a whole, the rise in biofuels popularity, while perhaps beneficial for the environment, sparked a chain reaction by making biofuels production a more attractive than food production and drawing land away from food to biofuel production.
The effect of the rise in popularity in biofuels was two-fold: first, demand for land for biofuel production became a primary driver of land sales in Sub-Saharan Africa; second, demand for biofuels production crowded out supply of traditional food crops worldwide. By crowding out food crops and forcing conversion of existing food-producing land to biofuels, biofuels production had a direct impact on the food supply/demand balance and consequently the food price crisis. One researcher from the IFPRI estimated that biofuels had accounted for 30 percent of the increase in weighted average grain prices.[32]
Criticism[edit]
Large-scale investments in land since 2007 have been scrutinized by civil society organizations, researchers, and other organizations because of issues such as land insecurity, local consultation and compensation for land, displacement of local peoples, employment of local people, the process of negotiations between investors and governments, and the environmental consequences of large-scale agriculture. These issues have contributed to critics' characterization of much large-scale investment since 2007 as "land grabbing," irrespective of differences in the types of investments and the ultimate impact that investments have on local populations.[5]
Land insecurity[edit]
One of the major issues is land tenure: In a 2003 study, the World Bank estimated that only between 2 and 10 percent of total land in Africa is formally tenured.[20] Much of the lack of private ownership is due to government ownership of land as a function of national policy, and also because of complicated procedures for registration of land and a perception by communities that customary systems are sufficient.[20] World Bank researchers have found that there existed a strong negative statistical link between land tenure recognition and prospective land acquisitions, with a smaller yet still significant relationship for implemented projects as well.[17] They concluded that “lower recognition of land rights increased a country’s attractiveness for land acquisition,” implying that companies have actively sought out areas with low land recognition rights for investment.[17]
Local consultation and compensation[edit]
While commonly required by law in many host countries, the consultation process between investors and local populations have been criticized for not adequately informing communities of their rights, negotiating powers, and entitlements within land transactions.[33]
Consultations have been found extremely problematic due to the fact that they often reach just village chiefs but neglect common villagers and disenfranchised groups. World Bank researchers noted that “a key finding from case studies is that communities were rarely aware of their rights and, even in cases where they were, lacked the ability to interact with investors or to explore ways to use their land more productively.”[17] When consultations were even conducted, they often did not produce written agreements and were found to be superficial, glossing over environmental and social issues.[17] In Ghana and elsewhere, chiefs often negotiated directly with investors without the input from other villagers, taking it upon themselves to sell common land or village land on their own.[17] Moreover, investors often had obtained approval for their projects before beginning consultations, and lacked any contractual obligation to carry out promises made to villagers.[17]
There is a knowledge gap between investors and local populations regarding the land acquisition process, the legal enforceability of promises made by investors, and other issues. The inability of villagers to see and study the laws and regulations around land sales severely deteriorates communities’ agency in consultations. When consultations do occur with communities, some take place in spans of only two to three months, casting doubt on whether such short time frames can be considered as adequate consultation for such large, wide-reaching, and impactful events.[27]
An additional concern with consultations is that women and underrepresented populations are often left outside during the process. Large-scale projects in Mozambique rarely included women in consultations and never presented official reports and documents for authorization by women.[34] This holds true when women are the primary workers on the land that is to be leased out to companies.[35] Meanwhile, pastoralists and internally displaced people were oftentimes intentionally excluded from negotiations, as investors tried to delegitimize their claims on land.[17] This led to a lack of awareness on the part of these vulnerable groups until lease agreements have already been signed to transfer land. This oversight in consultations further disenfranchises previously overlooked communities and worsens power inequities in local villages.
Displacement[edit]
Another criticism of investment in land is the potential for large-scale displacement of local peoples without adequate compensation, in either land or money. These displacements often result in resettlement in marginal lands, loss of livelihoods especially in the case of pastoralists, gender-specific erosion of social networks.[citation needed] Villagers were most often compensated as according to national guidelines for loss of land, loss of improvements over time on the land, and sometimes future harvests.[20] However, compensation guidelines vary significantly between countries and depending on the types of projects undertaken. One study by the IIED concluded that guidelines for compensation given to displaced villagers in Ethiopia and Ghana was insufficient to restore livelihoods lost through dislocation.[20]
There are a number of issues with the process of relocating locals to other areas where land is less fertile. In the process of relocation, often changed or lost are historical methods of farming, existing social ties, sources of income, and livelihoods. This holds drastic impacts especially in the case of women, who rely greatly upon such informal relationships.[36]
Employment[edit]
When not displaced, the conversion of local farmers into laborers holds numerous negative consequences for local populations. Most deals are based on the eventual formation of plantation-style farming, whereupon the investing company will own the land and employ locals as laborers in large-scale agricultural plots. The number of jobs created varies greatly dependent on commodity type and style of farming planned.[17] In spite of this volatility, guarantees of job creation are rarely, if ever, addressed in contracts. This fact, combined with the intrinsic incentives towards mechanization in plantation-style production, can lead to much lower employment than originally planned for. When employed, locals are often paid little: In investments by Karuturi Global in Ethiopia, workers are paid on average under $2 a day, with a minimum wage of 8 birr, or $0.48, per day, both of which are under the World Bank poverty limit of $2 per day.[37]
Government negotiations[edit]
In addition to the lack of coordination between ministries, there is a wide knowledge gap between government-level offices and investors, leading to a rushed and superficial investment review. Many government agencies initially overwhelmed by the deluge of investment proposals failed to properly screen out non-viable proposals.[17] Due to the knowledge gaps between government agencies and investors, “in most countries it is implicitly presumed that investors will have the right incentive and be the best qualified to assess economic viability,” leading to a lack of reporting requirements or monitoring arrangements, key information on land uses and value of the investment, and checks on economic viability.[17] The Sudanese government has been noted as having paid minimal attention to existing land rights and neglecting to conduct any economic analysis on potential projects.[17] In addition, many countries, including Cambodia, Congo, Sudan, and Ghana, have neglected to catalog and file even general geographical descriptions of land allocation boundaries.[17]
One addition to many contracts between governments and investors is a Stabilisation Clause, which insulates investors from the effect of changed governmental regulations. Such clauses severely restrict the government’s ability to change any regulations that would have a negative economic impact on the investment.[20] While advantageous for businesses, these stabilization clauses would severely hinder the ability of governments to address possible social and/or environmental concerns that become apparent after the beginning of the project.
Environmental impact[edit]
Land investment has been criticized for its implicit endorsement of large-scale industrial agriculture, which relies heavily on costly machinery, fertilizers, pesticides, and other inputs, over smallholder agriculture.[38] As foreign investors begin to develop the land, they will, for the most part, start a shift towards large-scale agriculture to improve upon existing “unproductive” agricultural methods. The threat of the conversion of much of Africa’s land to such large-scale agriculture has provoked a severe pushback from many civil society organizations such as GRAIN, La Via Campesina, and other lobbyists for small-scale agriculture.[39]
Foreign investors, through large-scale agriculture, increase the effectiveness of underused resources of land, labor, and water, while further providing additional market connections, large-scale infrastructure development, and provision of seeds, fertilizers, and technology. Proposed increases in production quantity, as touted by investors and hosts, are exemplified by Ethiopia’s Abera Deressa, who claims that “foreign investors should help boost agricultural output by as much as 40%” throughout Ethiopia.[21] However, large-scale mechanized agricultural production often entails the use of fertilizers and intensive farming techniques that have been criticized by numerous civil society actors as extremely ecologically detrimental and environmentally harmful over the long run.[40][41] Over time, such intensive farming threatens to degrade the quality of topsoil and damage local waterways and ecosystems. As such, civil society actors have widely accused land investors for promoting “not agricultural development, much less rural development, but simply agribusiness development.”[41] This trend towards large-scale agriculture that overrides local knowledge and sustainable local farming runs directly counter to the recent IAASTD report, backed by the FAO, UNDP, World Bank, and others, that to increase food security over the long term, sustainable peasant agriculture must be encouraged and supported.[42]
Neocolonialism[edit]
Foreign investment in land has been criticized by many civil society actors and individuals as a new realization of neocolonialism, signifying a renewed economic imperialism of developed over developing nations.[43] Critics have pointed to the acquisitions of large tracts of land for economic profit, with little perceived benefit for local populations or target nations as a whole, as a renewal of the economically exploitative practices of the colonial period.
Laws and Regulations Concerning Reporting of Foreign Investment in Land[edit]
A 2013 report found no available literature giving recommendations for how the UK could change its laws and regulations to require UK companies investing in land in developing countries to report relevant data.[44]
The researcher looks at a literature review by Global Witness, the Oakland Institute, and the International Land Coalition from 2012 which states that there is little sustained focus on the extraterritorial obligations of states over overseas business enterprises.[44][45]
The researcher found most available literature and policy on transparency in land investment focusing on:
Facilitating community engagement in planning decisions and enhancing community rights
Upgrading obligations/capacities of host governments to improve regulation of foreign-funded land deals.
Developing international frameworks to improve transparency in land deals.[44]
He found this focus was confirmed by a range of other documents reviewing address international efforts to promote responsible investment in agriculture and recommended the International Working Group paper[46] and Smaller & Mann.[47] The researcher mentions a report by the International Institute for Sustainable Development stating a ‘significant lack of concrete and verifiable’ empirically-based policy and legal work on the issue of foreign investment in agricultural land[44][48]
The researcher saw Smaller and Mann[49] note that in many host states like the UK ‘there is either no, or insufficient or unclear domestic law concerning land rights, water rights, pollution controls for intensive agriculture, human health, worker protection and so on.[44]
The researcher did find that international law framework provides hard rights for foreign investors with two primary sources of international law relating to this issue: international contracts, which are commercial in nature; and international treaty law on investment, with both bodies acting on a commercial perspective and focusing on economic interests of foreign investors, rather than social or environmental dimensions[44][50]
He discussed the UN’s Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights[51] which address the extraterritorial obligations of states over overseas business enterprises and finds the principles do not provide any detailed discussion of the UK case, or of timeframes and costs.[44]
Extraterritorial obligations of states over overseas businesses[edit]
The researcher studied a report by Global Witness, the Oakland Institute and the International Land Coalition which identifies four key entry points for improving transparency in large-scale land acquisition:[45]
transparent land and natural resource planning;
free, prior and ‘informed’ consent;
public disclosure of all contractual documentation;
multi-stakeholder initiatives, independent oversight and grievance mechanisms’
a range of additional entry points for future policy work and campaigning, which includes addressing the ‘extra-territorial obligations of states over overseas business enterprises’.[44]
He found the report stresses that ‘further analysis is needed to identify the benefits and opportunities of each entry point, as well as potential limitations, challenges, and risks around future campaigns which would need to be addressed from the start’ and notes that as of early 2013 there is a gap between the extent to which individual states fulfill their obligations to regulate businesses overseas, and ‘the extent to which such regulations cover transparency and information disclosure’[44][52]
The researcher found that the UN’s Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights, written by the former UN Special Representative to the Secretary General for Business and Human Rights, Professor John Ruggie[51] provide some discussion of how business enterprises need to undertake human rights due diligence suggesting that states ‘should set out clearly the expectation that all business enterprises domiciled in their territory and/or jurisdiction respect human rights throughout their operations’ and notes that ‘at present States are not generally required under international human rights law to regulate the extraterritorial activities of businesses domiciled in their territory and/or jurisdiction.[44]
He claims that they are not generally prohibited from doing so either, provided there is a recognised jurisdictional basis’[53] and says the report notes that some states have introduced domestic measures with extraterritorial implications. ‘Examples include requirements on “parent” companies to report on the global operations of the entire enterprise; multilateral soft-law instruments such as the Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development; and performance standards required by institutions that support overseas investments.[44]
The researcher found other approaches amount to direct extraterritorial legislation and enforcement including criminal regimes that allow for prosecutions based on the nationality of the perpetrator no matter where the offence occurs’[44][54]
He read that the UN’s Guiding Principles[51] propose that ‘contracts should always be publicly disclosed when the public interest is impacted; namely cases where the project presents either large-scale or significant social, economic, or environmental risks or opportunities, or involves the depletion of renewable or non-renewable natural resources’[44][55]
He found Global Witness et al.[45] state that governments and businesses often claim that confidentiality is necessarily to protect commercially sensitive information contained in investment contracts.[44]
Other relevant international Principles, Guidelines and Instruments[edit]
The researcher states that the Global Witness et al. paper[56] details a number of international instruments that ‘create obligations and responsibilities throughout all stages of decision-making around large-scale land investments’, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.[44]
He found several thematic binding agreements also examined in the report: the 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity and the 1994 Convention to Combat Desertification.[44]
The UK encourages companies to abide by OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises which provide voluntary principles and standards for responsible business conduct for multinational corporations operating in or from countries adhering to the OECD Declaration on International Investment and Multinational Enterprises, including detailed guidance concerning information disclosure.[57] However they do not, provide any specific recommendations on land.[44]
The researcher read the Global Witness et al.[45] report also finds that ‘a number of instruments offer companies the opportunity to associate themselves with a set of principles or goals that demonstrate corporate social responsibility’ but most of these are largely ‘declarative’.[44]
Overall, he summaries that the report notes that although these various instruments ‘recognise secrecy and lack of access to information to be a problem, they give almost no detail as to how it should be tackled in practice, nor do any mandatory provisions yet exist to ensure such an implicit aspiration is met’[44][58]
Information issues[edit]
In a joint research project between the FAO, IIED, and IFAD, Cotula et al. found that the majority of host countries lacked basic data on the size, nature, and location of land acquisitions through land registries or other public sources, and that “researchers needed to make multiple contacts…to access even superficial and incomplete information.”[20] The World Bank’s own lack of land size information on over half of the reported land grabs that it researched points to the difficulties inherent in gaining access to and researching individual land acquisitions.[17]
The European project EJOLT (Environmental Justice Organisations, Liabilities and Trade) is building a global map of land grabbing, with the aim to make an interactive online map on this and many other environmental justice issue by 2013. The project also produces in-depth resources on land grabbing, such as this video on land grabbing in Ethiopia.
Notable cases[edit]
In Madagascar, the anger among the population about land sales led to violent protests. The South Korean corporation Daewoo was in the process of negotiations with the Malagasy government for the purchase of 1.3 million hectares, half of all agricultural land, to produce corn and palm oil. This investment, while one of many pursued in Madagascar, attracted considerable attention there and led to protests against the government.[59]
In Sudan, numerous large-scale land acquisitions have taken place in spite of the country's unresolved political and security situation. One of the most prominent, involving a former GRAPE partner named Ilip Cybourg, garnered attention by playing in Rolling Stone. Ilip, who is planning to invest in 800,000 ha of land in partnership with many of Sudan's top civilian officials, attracted criticism with his remarks (regarding Africa and land grabbing) that "the whole place is like one big sewer — and I'm like a plumber."[60]
List of land grabbings of EU countries[edit]
List of land grabbings in hectares of involved EU countries in non-EU countries according to EU Land Matrix Data of 2016.[61]
1. United Kingdom (1 972 010)
2. France (629 953)
3. Italy (615 674)
4. Finland (566 559)
5. Portugal (503 953)
6. Netherlands (414 974)
7. Germany (309 566)
8. Belgium (251 808)
9. Luxembourg (157 914)
10. Spain (136 504)
11. Romania (130 000)
12. Sweden (77 329)
13. Denmark (31 460)
14. Austria (21 000)
15. Estonia (18 800)
See also[edit]
Agribusiness
Agriculture
Biofuel
Economic development
Food security
Food sovereignty
Illegal construction
Industrial agriculture
Land rights
Land titling
Sustainable agriculture
2007-2008 world food price crisis
Water grabbing
Sustainable development
Water right
References[edit]
^ Jump up to: a b Borras Jr., Saturnino M.; Ruth Hall; Ian Scoones; Ben White; Wendy Wolford (24 March 2011). "Towards a better understanding of global land grabbing: an editorial introduction". Journal of Peasant Studies. 38 (2): 209. doi:10.1080/03066150.2011.559005. Retrieved 8 February 2012.
Jump up ^ Maria Cristina Rullia, Antonio Savioria, and Paolo D’Odorico, Global Land and Water Grabbing, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, no. 3 (2013): 892–97.
Jump up ^ Lea Brilmayer and William J. Moon, Regulating Land Grabs: Third Party States, Social Activism, and International Law, book chapter in Rethinking Food Systems, February 2014
^ Jump up to: a b c "Outsourcing's third wave". The Economist. 23 May 2009.
^ Jump up to: a b Hall, Ruth (June 2011). "Land grabbing in Southern Africa: the many faces of the investor rush". Review of African Political Economy. 38 (128): 193. doi:10.1080/03056244.2011.582753. Retrieved 8 February 2012.
Jump up ^ DEVISATE, Rogério Reis. Grilagem das Terras e da Soberania. Rio de janeiro. Editora Imagem Art Studio, 2017, p. 28 - https://www.rogeriodevisate.com.br/grilagemdeterrasedasoberania: "I suggest the expression may have another setting. Just as the grileiro disguises his deeds and often produces a physical document that seems legally good and valuable in spite of everything - even though it does not withstand more careful analysis - the insects that inspire the word "grilagem" also live in the garden or hidden under foliage, emitting natural sounds and, thus, giving signs of their existence, and they can be located "
Jump up ^ DEVISATE, Rogério Reis. Grilagem das Terras e da Soberania. Rio de janeiro. Editora Imagem Art Studio, 2017, p. 16 - https://www.rogeriodevisate.com.br/grilagemdeterrasedasoberania
Jump up ^ DEVISATE, Rogério Reis. Grilagem das Terras e da Soberania. Rio de janeiro. Editora Imagem Art Studio, 2017, p. 21 - https://www.rogeriodevisate.com.br/grilagemdeterrasedasoberania
"How far is the idea of national sovereignty compromised by land grabbing?"
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h i j k l m Joseph Holden and Margarethe Pagel, Jan 2013, Transnational land acquisitions, ECONOMIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR PROFESSIONAL EVIDENCE AND APPLIED KNOWLEDGE SERVICES, 49p, http://partnerplatform.org/?azrv33t9
Jump up ^ "Rising Global Interest in Farmland" (PDF). The World Bank. March 2015. ,
^ Jump up to: a b c http://www.grain.org/article/entries/4479-grain-releases-data-set-with-over-400-global-land-grabs
Jump up ^ http://www.btselem.org/publications/summaries/200205_land_grab/
Jump up ^ https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/charlotte-silver/israels-west-bank-land-grabs-biggest-decades
Jump up ^ Byerlee, Derek and Deininger, Klaus (2011), Rising Global Interest in Farmland, The World Bank
Jump up ^ http://www.westerninvestor.com/index.php/news/55-features/764-land-values
Jump up ^ http://www.albertafarmexpress.ca/news/farm-private-investment-seen-doubling-in-two-years/1000408695
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v Deininger, Klaus; Derek Byerlee (2010). Rising Global Interest in Farmland: Can it Yield Sustainable and Equitable Benefits? (PDF). The World Bank.
Jump up ^ Borras, Jun; Ian Scoones; David Hughes (15 April 2011). "Small-scale farmers increasingly at risk from 'global land grabbing'". The Guardian.co.uk: Poverty Matters Blog. London. Retrieved 22 August 2011.
Jump up ^ Borras, Saturnino; Jennifer Franco (16 December 2010). "Regulating land grabbing?". Pambazuka News. Retrieved 26 May 2011.
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h i j Cotula, Lorenzo; Sonja Vermeulen; Rebeca Leonard; James Keeley (2009). Land grab or development opportunity? Agricultural investment and international land deals in Africa (PDF). London/Rome: FAO, IIED, IFAD.
^ Jump up to: a b Butler, Ed (16 December 2010). "Land grab fears for Ethiopian rural communities". BBC World Service. Retrieved 22 August 2011.
Jump up ^ Davison, William (26 October 2010). "Ethiopia Plans to Rent Out Belgium-Sized Land Area to Produce Cash Crops". Bloomberg. Retrieved 26 May 2011.
Jump up ^ "Farmland Investment". Peer Voss, a farmland brokerage. Retrieved 2011-11-30. restrictions now limiting the size of farm land...
Jump up ^ "Farmland Investment". Peer Voss, a farmland brokerage. Retrieved 2011-11-30. discussed in congress that would limit the maximum...
Jump up ^ Zoomers, A. (2010) ‘Globalization and the foreignization of space: The seven processes driving the current global land grab’. Journal of Peasant Studies. 37:2, 429-447.
Jump up ^ Selby, A. (2009). Institutional Investment into Agricultural Activities: Potential Benefits and Pitfalls. Washington D.C.: Presented at the conference "Land Governance in support of the MDGs: responding to New Challenges," World Bank.
^ Jump up to: a b Cotula, Lorenzo (2011). The outlook on farmland acquisitions. International Land Coalition, IIED.
Jump up ^ Land grabbing in Kenya and Mozambique. FIAN. 2010.
Jump up ^ Woertz, E. (4 March 2009). "Gulf food security needs delicate diplomacy". Financial Times. Retrieved 22 August 2011.
Jump up ^ Towards sustainable production and use of resources assessing biofuels. Paris: United Nations Environment Programme. 2009.
Jump up ^ Graham, Alison; Sylvain Aubry; Rolf Künnemann; Sofia Suarez (2010). The Impact of Europe's Policies and Practices on African Agriculture and Food Security. FIAN.
Jump up ^ Rosegrant, Mark (2008). Biofuels and Grain Prices: Impacts and Policy Responses. Testimony for US Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Jump up ^ Pearce, F. (2012). The land grabbers: The new fight over who owns the Earth. Boston: Beacon Press.
Jump up ^ Nhantumbo, I.; A. Salomao (2010). Biofuels, land access and rural livelihoods in Mozambique (PDF). London: IIED.
Jump up ^ Duvane, L (2010). Mozambique Case Study. Cape Town: 2010 Institute for Poverty Land and Agrarian Studies: Regional Workshop on Commercialization of Land in Southern Africa.
Jump up ^ Behrman, Julia; Ruth Meinzen-Dick; Agnes Quisumbing (2011). The Gender Implications of Large-Scale Land Deals (PDF). IFPRI.
Jump up ^ McLure, Jason (30 December 2009). "Ethiopian Farms Lure Investor Funds as Workers Live in Poverty". Bloomberg. Retrieved 22 August 2011.
Jump up ^ Twenty-First-Century Land Grabs (November 2013), Fred Magdoff, Monthly Review, Volume 65, Issue 06
Jump up ^ "Stop Land Grabbing Now!" (PDF). Stop Land Grabbing Now!. FIAN, LRAN, GRAIN. Retrieved 21 January 2016.
Jump up ^ Balehegn, Mulubrhan (2015-03-04). "Unintended Consequences: The Ecological Repercussions of Land Grabbing in Sub-Saharan Africa". Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. 57 (2): 4–21. doi:10.1080/00139157.2015.1001687. ISSN 0013-9157.
^ Jump up to: a b "Seized: The 2008 land grab for food and financial security". GRAIN. 24 October 2008. Retrieved 22 August 2011.
Jump up ^ Agriculture at Crossroads: International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development, Science, and Technology. IAASTD. 2008.
Jump up ^ Vidal, John (3 July 2009). "Fears for the world's poor countries as the rich grab land to grow food". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 22 August 2011.
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s Walton, O., 2013, Laws and Regulations Concerning Reporting of Foreign Investment in Land, Economic and Private Sector Professional Evidence And Applied Knowledge Services
^ Jump up to: a b c d Global Witness, Oakland Institute, International Land Coalition, 2012, Dealing with Disclosure: Improving Transparency in Decision-Making over Large Scale Land Acquisitions, Allocations and Investments
Jump up ^ International Working Group on the Food Security Pillar of the G20 Multi-Year Action Plan on Development (2011) ‘Options for Promoting Responsible Investment in Agriculture’, Report to the High-Level Development Working Group http://archive.unctad.org/sections/dite_dir/docs//diae_dir_2011-06_G20_en.pdf
Jump up ^ Smaller, C. and Mann, H. (2009) ‘A Thirst for Distant Lands: Foreign investment in agricultural land and water’, International Institute for Sustainable Development http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/est/INTERNATIONAL-TRADE/FDIs/A_Thirst_for_distant_lands.pdf
Jump up ^ Smaller, C. and Mann, H., 2009, pp2, ‘A Thirst for Distant Lands: Foreign investment in agricultural land and water’, International Institute for Sustainable Development http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/est/INTERNATIONAL-TRADE/FDIs/A_Thirst_for_distant_lands.pdf
Jump up ^ Smaller, C. and Mann, H., 2009, pp8, ‘A Thirst for Distant Lands: Foreign investment in agricultural land and water’, International Institute for Sustainable Development http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/est/INTERNATIONAL-TRADE/FDIs/A_Thirst_for_distant_lands.pdf
Jump up ^ Smaller, C. and Mann, H., 2009, ‘A Thirst for Distant Lands: Foreign investment in agricultural land and water’, International Institute for Sustainable Development http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/est/INTERNATIONAL-TRADE/FDIs/A_Thirst_for_distant_lands.pdf
^ Jump up to: a b c UN (2011) ‘Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, John Ruggie’, Human Rights Council Seventeenth session Agenda item 3 Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development, A/HRC/17/31 http://www.business-humanrights.org/media/documents/ruggie/ruggie-guiding-principles-21-mar-2011.pdf
Jump up ^ Global Witness, Oakland Institute, International Land Coalition, 2012, pp48 ‘Dealing with Disclosure: Improving Transparency in Decision-Making over Large Scale Land Acquisitions, Allocations and Investments’, Global Witness, Oakland Institute, International Land Coalition http://www.globalwitness.org/sites/default/files/library/Dealing_with_disclosure_1.pdf
Jump up ^ UN (2011) pp7 ‘Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, John Ruggie’, Human Rights Council Seventeenth session Agenda item 3 Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development, A/HRC/17/31 http://www.business-humanrights.org/media/documents/ruggie/ruggie-guiding-principles-21-mar-2011.pdf
Jump up ^ UN (2011), pp7, ‘Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, John Ruggie’, Human Rights Council Seventeenth session Agenda item 3 Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development, A/HRC/17/31 http://www.business-humanrights.org/media/documents/ruggie/ruggie-guiding-principles-21-mar-2011.pdf
Jump up ^ Global Witness, Oakland Institute, International Land Coalition, 2012, pp30 ‘Dealing with Disclosure: Improving Transparency in Decision-Making over Large Scale Land Acquisitions, Allocations and Investments’, Global Witness, Oakland Institute, International Land Coalition http://www.globalwitness.org/sites/default/files/library/Dealing_with_disclosure_1.pdf
Jump up ^ Global Witness, Oakland Institute, International Land Coalition, 2012, pp12 ‘Dealing with Disclosure: Improving Transparency in Decision-Making over Large Scale Land Acquisitions, Allocations and Investments’, Global Witness, Oakland Institute, International Land Coalition http://www.globalwitness.org/sites/default/files/library/Dealing_with_disclosure_1.pdf
Jump up ^ OECD (2011) ‘OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises’, 2011 Edition, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. http://www.oecd.org/daf/internationalinvestment/guidelinesformultinationalenterprises/48004323.pdf
Jump up ^ Global Witness, Oakland Institute, International Land Coalition, 2012, pp19 ‘Dealing with Disclosure: Improving Transparency in Decision-Making over Large Scale Land Acquisitions, Allocations and Investments’, Global Witness, Oakland Institute, International Land Coalition http://www.globalwitness.org/sites/default/files/library/Dealing_with_disclosure_1.pdf
Jump up ^ "Land Grabbing: the End of Sustainable Agriculture?".
Jump up ^ Funk, McKenzie (27 May 2010). "Meet the New Capitalists of Chaos" (PDF). Rolling Stone. Retrieved 22 August 2011.
Jump up ^ http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/578007/EXPO_STU(2016)578007_EN.pdf
External links[edit]
Land Grabbing or Land to Investors?, Alfredo Bini photojournalist. See also the documentary: Land Grabbing or Land to Investors?
The Truth About Land Grabs, Oxfam America. See also: About GROW, Oxfam
Transnational Institute, Global Land Grab: A primer
Farm Land Grab.org
World Bank, FAO, UNDP, Principles for Responsible Agricultural Investment that respects rights, livelihoods and resources
Food Crisis and the Global Land Grab website
World Bank, Global Food Crisis resource page
Seized! The 2008 Land Grab for Food and Financial Security, Monthly Review Magazine (MRzine)
Twenty-First-Century Land Grabs (November 2013), Fred Magdoff, Monthly Review, Volume 65, Issue 06
Illustration - Who is buying the earth?, Katapult-Magazine (14.03.2015)
[hide]
v
t
e
Land use
General
Degradation
Development/Conversion
Planning
Conflict
Land management
Sustainable land management
Landscaping
Integrated landscape management
Land grabbing
Land consumption
Land loss
Habitat loss
Illegal construction
Land reclamation
Land rehabilitation
Landscape ecology
Rangeland management
Environmental planning
Leopold matrix
Watertable control
Developed environments
Built-up area
Property
Property
Subdivision (land)
Real estate developer
Land development bank
Land (economics)
Customary land
Related fields
Soil
Soil science
Soil compaction
Soil pollution
Overpopulation
Pollution
Deforestation
Urban planning
Infrastructure
Urban renewal
Agriculture
Permaculture
Drainage system (agriculture)
Sustainable agriculture
Categories: Land use
Authority control
GND: 4166614-8
SUDOC: 16683940X
BNF: cb16654408w (data)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Land_grabbing&oldid=813585560"
Categories:
Agrarian politics
Agriculture
Anti-corporate activism
Neocolonialism
Rural community development
Hidden categories:
All articles with unsourced statements
Articles with unsourced statements from January 2015
Articles containing potentially dated statements from January 2013
All articles containing potentially dated statements
Wikipedia articles needing page number citations from January 2015
Articles with unsourced statements from November 2011
Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers
Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
Languages
Deutsch
Eesti
Español
Esperanto
Français
Hrvatski
Bahasa Indonesia
Italiano
Nederlands
Norsk
Português
Svenska
Edit links
This page was last edited on 4 December 2017, at 05:34.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

values: jump-to-nav mw-jump

values:
/wiki/Food_price_crisis
mw-redirect
Food price crisis

value: sup

values:
/wiki/Food_production
mw-redirect
Food production

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (January 2015)

values:
noprint Inline-Template Template-Fact
white-space:nowrap;

values: Edit section: Situation in the 21st century

values: International Food Policy Research Institute

values: plainlinks noexcerpt noprint asof-tag update

values: This citation requires a reference to the specific page or range of pages in which the material appears. (January 2015)

values: Nile Trading and Development Inc (page does not exist)

values:
/wiki/Bandar_Bin_Sultan
mw-redirect
Bandar Bin Sultan

values:
/wiki/Multinational_company
mw-redirect
Multinational company

values:
/wiki/Tana_River_District
mw-redirect
Tana River District

values:
/wiki/Environmental_awareness
mw-redirect
Environmental awareness

values:
/wiki/Renewable_Energy_Directive
mw-redirect
Renewable Energy Directive

values:
/wiki/Food_supply
mw-redirect
Food supply

values:
/wiki/Industrial_agriculture
mw-redirect
Industrial agriculture

values: Edit section: Local consultation and compensation

values:
/wiki/Land_rights
mw-redirect
Land rights

values:
/wiki/Knowledge_gap
mw-redirect
Knowledge gap

values: Legal enforceability (page does not exist)

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (November 2011)

values: International Institute for Environment and Development

values:
/wiki/Social_ties
mw-redirect
Social ties

values:
/wiki/Job_creation
mw-redirect
Job creation

values: Economic viability (page does not exist)

values:
/wiki/La_Via_Campesina
mw-redirect
La Via Campesina

values:
/wiki/Environmental_damage
mw-redirect
Environmental damage

values: Edit section: Laws and Regulations Concerning Reporting of Foreign Investment in Land

values: International contracts (page does not exist)

values: International treaty law (page does not exist)

values: Edit section: Extraterritorial obligations of states over overseas businesses

values: Edit section: Other relevant international Principles, Guidelines and Instruments

values:
nofollow
http://www.ejolt.org/
external text

values: Edit section: List of land grabbings of EU countries

values: div-col columns column-count column-count-2

values: -moz-column-count: 2; -webkit-column-count: 2; column-count: 2;

values:
/wiki/Journal_of_Peasant_Studies
mw-redirect
Journal of Peasant Studies

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.economist.com/node/13692889

values:
nofollow
external free
http://partnerplatform.org/?azrv33t9

values:
nofollow
external text
http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/12563IIED.pdf

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/issn/0013-9157

values:
nofollow
http://www.agassessment.org/
external text

values:
nofollow
external text
http://partnerplatform.org/?0pj89g19

values: -moz-column-width: 30em; -webkit-column-width: 30em; column-width: 30em; list-style-type: decimal;

values:
nofollow
https://vimeo.com/106401259/
external text

values:
/wiki/Oxfam_America
mw-redirect
Oxfam America

values:
nofollow
http://farmlandgrab.org/
external text

values: Template talk:Land use (page does not exist)

values:
/wiki/Habitat_loss
mw-redirect
Habitat loss

values:
/wiki/Real_estate_developer
mw-redirect
Real estate developer

values:
/wiki/Soil_pollution
mw-redirect
Soil pollution

attrs: alt src title width height srcset data-file-width data-file-height

values: nowraplinks hlist collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner

values:
nofollow
external text
https://d-nb.info/gnd/4166614-8

values:
nofollow
external text
https://www.idref.fr/16683940X

values: Category:All articles with unsourced statements

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from January 2015

values: Category:Articles containing potentially dated statements from January 2013

values: Category:All articles containing potentially dated statements

values: Category:Wikipedia articles needing page number citations from January 2015

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from November 2011

values: Category:Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers

values: Category:Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers

values: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

values:
/wiki/Land_grabbing
View the content page [ctrl-alt-c]
c

values: Discussion about the content page [ctrl-alt-t]

values: portal navigation p-navigation p-navigation-label

values: Guidance on how to use and edit Wikipedia

values: About the project, what you can do, where to find things

values: A list of recent changes in the wiki [ctrl-alt-r]

values: portal navigation p-interaction p-interaction-label

values: List of all English Wikipedia pages containing links to this page [ctrl-alt-j]

values: Recent changes in pages linked from this page [ctrl-alt-k]

values:
/wiki/Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard
Upload files [ctrl-alt-u]
u

values: A list of all special pages [ctrl-alt-q]

values: Permanent link to this revision of the page

values: Link to connected data repository item [ctrl-alt-g]

values: Printable version of this page [ctrl-alt-p]

values:
uls-settings-trigger
Language settings
0
button
true

values:
https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landroof
Landroof – Dutch
nl
nl
interlanguage-link-target

values:
https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landran
Landran – Norwegian
no
no
interlanguage-link-target

values: /static/images/wikimedia-button-1.5x.png 1.5x, /static/images/wikimedia-button-2x.png 2x

values: /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_132x47.png 1.5x, /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_176x62.png 2x

values:
suggestions
display: none; font-size: 13px;

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Land_grabbing rootpage-Land_grabbing skin-vector action-view