text:
Freedom of religion in the United States
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This article's lead section does not adequately summarize key points of its contents. Please consider expanding the lead to provide an accessible overview of all important aspects of the article. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page. (June 2017)
Monument honoring the right to worship, Washington, D.C.
Freedom of religion
Concepts[show]
Religious discrimination
Religious persecution
Separation of church and state
Status by country[show]
Africa
Algeria
Angola
Benin
Botswana
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Central African Republic
Chad
Comoros
DR Congo
Egypt
Mauritania
South Africa
Sudan
Americas
Brazil
Canada
Colombia
Ecuador
Panama
Paraguay
United States
Asia
Afghanistan
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Bangladesh
Bhutan
Brunei
Burma
Cambodia
China
Cyprus
Northern Cyprus
Georgia
India
Indonesia
Japan
Kazakhstan
Laos
Malaysia
Maldives
Mongolia
Nepal
North Korea
Pakistan
Philippines
Russia
Singapore
South Korea
Sri Lanka
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Thailand
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Uzbekistan
Vietnam
Europe
Albania
Andorra
Armenia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Belarus
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Northern Cyprus
France
Georgia
Germany
Italy
Russia
Turkey
United Kingdom
Middle East
Bahrain
Egypt
Iran
Iraq
Israel
Jordan
Kuwait
Lebanon
Oman
Palestinian territories
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Syria
UAE
Yemen
Religious persecution[show]
Traditional African religion
Atheism
Bahá'í
Buddhism
Christianity
Anti-Christian sentiment
Anti-Catholicism
Anti-Mormonism
Anti-Jehovah's Witness
Anti-Orthodoxy
Anti-Protestantism
Falun Gong
Hinduism (Anti-Hinduism)
Islam
Shi'a
Ahmadiyya
Alevism
Ottoman
Sufis
Islamophobia
Judaism
Religious antisemitism
Antisemitism
Anti-Judaism
New religious movements
Christian countercult movement
Neopaganism
Rastafari
Zoroastrianism
Religion portal
v
t
e
In the United States, freedom of religion is a constitutionally protected right provided in the religion clauses of the First Amendment. Freedom of religion is also closely associated with separation of church and state, a concept advocated by Colonial founders such as Roger Williams, William Penn and later founding fathers such as James Madison and Thomas Jefferson.[1][2]
Contents
[hide]
1 Legal and public foundation
1.1 Colonial precedents
1.2 The First Amendment
1.3 The Fourteenth Amendment
1.4 Religious tests
1.5 The "wall of separation"
1.6 Other statements
1.6.1 Inalienable rights
1.6.2 Religious institutions
1.6.3 Freedom of religion restoration
1.6.4 Treaty of Tripoli
2 Supreme Court rulings
2.1 Jehovah's Witnesses
2.2 Lemon test
3 State constitutions
4 In office and at work
4.1 Requirements for holding a public office
4.2 Issues at the workplace
5 Situation of minority groups
5.1 Situation of Catholics
5.2 Situations of the Latter Day Saint movement 1820–90
5.3 Situation of Native Americans
5.4 Situation of atheists
5.4.1 Court cases
5.5 Case studies
6 See also
7 References
8 External links
Legal and public foundation[edit]
The United States Constitution addresses the issue of religion in two places: in the First Amendment, and the Article VI prohibition on religious tests as a condition for holding public office. The First Amendment prohibits the Congress from making a law "respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof". This provision was later expanded to state and local governments, through the Incorporation of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Colonial precedents[edit]
The October 10, 1645, charter of Flushing, Queens, New York, allowed "liberty of conscience, according to the custom and practice of Holland without molestation or disturbance from any magistrate or ecclesiastical minister." However, New Amsterdam Director-General Peter Stuyvesant issued an edict prohibiting the harboring of Quakers. On December 27, 1657, the inhabitants of Flushing approved a protest known as The Flushing Remonstrance. This contained religious arguments even mentioning freedom for "Jews, Turks, and Egyptians," but ended with a forceful declaration that any infringement of the town charter would not be tolerated.
Freedom of religion was first applied as a principle in the founding of the colony of Maryland, also founded by the Catholic Lord Baltimore, in 1634.[3] Fifteen years later (1649), an enactment of religious liberty, the Maryland Toleration Act, drafted by Lord Baltimore, provided: "No person or persons...shall from henceforth be any waies troubled, molested or discountenanced for or in respect of his or her religion nor in the free exercise thereof." The Maryland Toleration Act was repealed with the assistance of Protestant assemblymen and a new law barring Catholics from openly practicing their religion was passed.[4] In 1657, Lord Baltimore regained control after making a deal with the colony's Protestants, and in 1658 the Act was again passed by the colonial assembly. This time, it would last more than thirty years, until 1692,[5] when after Maryland's Protestant Revolution of 1689, freedom of religion was again rescinded.[3][6] In addition in 1704, an Act was passed "to prevent the growth of Popery in this Province", preventing Catholics from holding political office.[6] Full religious toleration would not be restored in Maryland until the American Revolution, when Maryland's Charles Carroll of Carrollton signed the American Declaration of Independence.
Rhode Island (1636), Connecticut (1636), New Jersey, and Pennsylvania (1682), founded by Baptist Roger Williams, Congregationalist Thomas Hooker, and Quaker William Penn, respectively, established the religious freedom in their colonies in direct opposition to the theocratic government which Separatist Congregationalists (Pilgrim Fathers) and Puritans had enforced in Plymouth Colony (1620) and Massachusetts Bay Colony (1628).[7] Having fled religious persecution themselves in England, the leaders of Plymouth and Massachusetts Bay Colony restricted franchise to members of their church only, rigorously enforced their own interpretation of theological law and banished freethinkers such as Roger Williams, who was actually chased out of Salem., as well as banning Quakers and Anabaptists.[8][9][10][11][12] These colonies became safe havens for persecuted religious minorities. Catholics and Jews also had full citizenship and free exercise of their faiths.[13][14][15] Williams, Hooker, Penn, and their friends were firmly convinced that democracy and freedom of conscience were the will of God. Williams gave the most profound theological reason: As faith is the free gift of the Holy Spirit, it cannot be forced upon a person. Therefore, strict separation of church and state has to be kept.[16] Pennsylvania was the only colony that retained unlimited religious freedom until the foundation of the United States. The inseparable connection of democracy, freedom of religion, and the other forms of freedom became the political and legal basis of the new nation. In particular, Baptists and Presbyterians demanded vigorously and successfully the disestablishment of the Anglican and Congregational state churches that had existed in most colonies since the seventeenth century.[17]
The First Amendment[edit]
In the United States, the religious civil liberties are guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
The "Establishment Clause," stating that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion," is generally read to prohibit the Federal government from establishing a national church ("religion") or excessively involving itself in religion, particularly to the benefit of one religion over another. Following the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and through the doctrine of incorporation, this restriction is held to be applicable to state governments as well.
The "Free Exercise Clause" states that Congress cannot "prohibit the free exercise" of religious practices. The Supreme Court of the United States has consistently held, however, that the right to free exercise of religion is not absolute. For example, in the 19th century, some of the members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints traditionally practiced polygamy, yet in Reynolds v. United States (1879), the Supreme Court upheld the criminal conviction of one of these members under a federal law banning polygamy. The Court reasoned that to do otherwise would set precedent for a full range of religious beliefs including those as extreme as human sacrifice. The Court stated that "Laws are made for the government of actions, and while they cannot interfere with mere religious belief and opinions, they may with practices." For example, if one were part of a religion that believed in vampirism, the First Amendment would protect one's belief in vampirism, but not the practice.
The Fourteenth Amendment[edit]
The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees the religious civil rights.[18] Whereas the First Amendment secures the free exercise of religion, section one of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits discrimination, including on the basis of religion, by securing "the equal protection of the laws" for every person:
“ All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction there of, are citizens of the United States and of the State where in they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. ”
Religious tests[edit]
The affirmation or denial of specific religious beliefs had, in the past, been made into qualifications for public office; however, the United States Constitution states that the inauguration of a President may include an "affirmation" of the faithful execution of his duties rather than an "oath" to that effect — this provision was included in order to respect the religious prerogatives of the Quakers, a Protestant Christian denomination that declines the swearing of oaths. The U.S. Constitution also provides that "No religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification of any Office or public Trust under the United States." Several states have language included in their constitutions that requires state office-holders to have particular religious beliefs.[19] These include Arkansas,[20] Maryland,[20] Massachusetts,[21] North Carolina,[21] Pennsylvania,[21] South Carolina,[21] Tennessee,[21] and Texas.[21][22] Some of these beliefs (or oaths) were historically required of jurors and witnesses in court. Even though they are still on the books, these provisions have been rendered unenforceable by U.S. Supreme Court decisions.[19]
With reference to the use of animals, the U.S. Supreme Court decision in the cases of the Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah in 1993 upheld the right of Santeria adherents to practice ritual animal sacrifice with Justice Anthony Kennedy stating in the decision, “religious beliefs need not be acceptable, logical, consistent or comprehensible to others in order to merit First Amendment protection”. (quoted by Justice Kennedy from the opinion by Justice Burger in Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division 450 U.S. 707 (1981))[23] Likewise in Texas in 2009, issues that related to animal sacrifice and animal rights were taken to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Jose Merced, President Templo Yoruba Omo Orisha Texas, Inc., v. City of Euless. The court ruled that the free exercise of religion was meritorious and prevailing and that Merced was entitled under the Texas Religious Freedom and Restoration Act (TRFRA) to an injunction preventing the city of Euless, Texas from enforcing its ordinances that burdened his religious practices relating to the use of animals.[24]
Religious liberty has not prohibited states or the federal government from prohibiting or regulating certain behaviors; i.e. prostitution, gambling, alcohol and certain drugs, although some libertarians interpret religious freedom to extend to these behaviors. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that a right to privacy or a due process right does prevent the government from prohibiting adult access to birth control, pornography, and from outlawing sodomy between consenting adults and early trimester abortions.
The "wall of separation"[edit]
Thomas Jefferson wrote that the First Amendment erected a "wall of separation between church and state" likely borrowing the language from Roger Williams, founder of the First Baptist Church in America and the Colony of Rhode Island, who used the phrase in his 1644 book, The Bloody Tenent of Persecution.[25] James Madison, often regarded as the "Father of the Bill of Rights",[26] also often wrote of the "perfect separation",[27] "line of separation",[28] "strongly guarded as is the separation between religion and government in the Constitution of the United States",[29] and "total separation of the church from the state".[30] Controversy rages in the United States between those who wish to restrict government involvement with religious institutions and remove religious references from government institutions and property, and those who wish to loosen such prohibitions. Advocates for stronger separation of church and state emphasize the plurality of faiths and non-faiths in the country, and what they see as broad guarantees of the federal Constitution. Their opponents emphasize what they see as the largely Christian heritage and history of the nation (often citing the references to "Nature's God" and the "Creator" of men in the Declaration of Independence). Some more socially conservative Christian sects, such as the Christian Reconstructionist movement, oppose the concept of a "wall of separation" and prefer a closer relationship between church and state.
Problems also arise in U.S. public schools concerning the teaching and display of religious issues. In various counties, school choice and school vouchers have been put forward as solutions to accommodate variety in beliefs and freedom of religion, by allowing individual school boards to choose between a secular, religious or multi-faith vocation, and allowing parents free choice among these schools. Critics of American voucher programs claim that they take funds away from public schools, and that the amount of funds given by vouchers is not enough to help many middle and working class parents.
U.S. judges often ordered alcoholic defendants to attend Alcoholics Anonymous or face imprisonment. However, in 1999, a federal appeals court ruled this unconstitutional because the A.A. program relies on submission to a "Higher Power".[31]
Thomas Jefferson also played a large role in the formation of freedom of religion. He created the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, which has since been incorporated into the Virginia State Constitution.
Other statements[edit]
Inalienable rights[edit]
The United States of America was established on foundational principles by the Declaration of Independence:[32]
We hold these truths to be self-evident: That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed;
(based on Thomas Jefferson's draft.)[33]
Religious institutions[edit]
In 1944, a joint committee of the Federal Council of Churches of Christ in America and the Foreign Missions Conference formulated a “Statement on Religious Liberty”
“Religious Liberty shall be interpreted to include freedom to worship according to conscience and to bring up children in the faith of their parents; freedom for the individual to change his religion; freedom to preach, educate, publish and carry on missionary activities; and freedom to organize with others, and to acquire and hold property, for these purposes.”[34]
Freedom of religion restoration[edit]
Following increasing government involvement in religious matters, Congress passed the 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act.[35] A number of states then passed corresponding acts (e.g., Missouri passed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act).[36]
Treaty of Tripoli[edit]
Signed on November 4, 1796, the Treaty of Tripoli was a document that included the following statement:
As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen [Muslims]; and as the said States never entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mahometan [Mohammedan] nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.
This treaty was submitted to the Senate and was ratified unanimously on June 7, 1797, and then signed by President John Adams on June 10, 1797. In accordance with Article VI of the Constitution, on that date this treaty became incorporated as part of "the supreme Law of the Land".
Supreme Court rulings[edit]
Jehovah's Witnesses[edit]
Since the 1940s, the Jehovah's Witnesses have often invoked the First Amendment's freedom of religion clauses to protect their ability to engage in the proselytizing (or preaching) that is central to their faith. This series of litigation has helped to define civil liberties case law in the United States and Canada.
In the United States of America and several other countries, the legal struggles of the Jehovah's Witnesses have yielded some of the most important judicial decisions regarding freedom of religion, press and speech. In the United States, many Supreme Court cases involving Jehovah's Witnesses are now landmark decisions of First Amendment law. Of the 72 cases involving the Jehovah's Witnesses that have been brought before the U.S. Supreme Court, the Court has ruled in favor of them 47 times. Even the cases that the Jehovah's Witnesses lost helped the U.S. to more clearly define the limits of First Amendment rights. Former Supreme Court Justice Harlan Stone jokingly suggested "The Jehovah's Witnesses ought to have an endowment in view of the aid which they give in solving the legal problems of civil liberties." "Like it or not," observed American author and editor Irving Dilliard, "Jehovah's Witnesses have done more to help preserve our freedoms than any other religious group."
Professor C. S. Braden wrote: "They have performed a signal service to democracy by their fight to preserve their civil rights, for in their struggle they have done much to secure those rights for every minority group in America."[37]
"The cases that the Witnesses were involved in formed the bedrock of 1st Amendment protections for all citizens," said Paul Polidoro, a lawyer who argued the Watchtower Society's case before the Supreme Court in February 2002. "These cases were a good vehicle for the courts to address the protections that were to be accorded free speech, the free press and free exercise of religion. In addition, the cases marked the emergence of individual rights as an issue within the U.S. court system.
Before the Jehovah’s Witnesses brought several dozen cases before the U.S. Supreme Court during the 1930s and 1940s, the Court had handled few cases contesting laws that restricted freedom of speech and freedom of religion. Until then, the First Amendment had only been applied to Congress and the federal government.
However, the cases brought before the Court by the Jehovah's Witnesses allowed the Court to consider a range of issues: mandatory flag salute, sedition, free speech, literature distribution and military draft law. These cases proved to be pivotal moments in the formation of constitutional law. Jehovah’s Witnesses’ court victories have strengthened rights including the protection of religious conduct from federal and state interference, the right to abstain from patriotic rituals and military service and the right to engage in public discourse.
During the World War II era, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Jehovah's Witnesses in several landmark cases that helped pave the way for the modern civil rights movement. In all, Jehovah's Witnesses brought 23 separate First Amendment actions before the U.S. Supreme Court between 1938 and 1946.
Lemon test[edit]
The Supreme Court has consistently held fast to the rule of strict separation of church and state when matters of prayer are involved. In Engel v. Vitale (1962) the Court ruled that government-imposed nondenominational prayer in public school was unconstitutional. In Lee v. Weisman (1992), the Court ruled prayer established by a school principal at a middle school graduation was also unconstitutional, and in Santa Fe Independent School Dist. v. Doe (2000) it ruled that school officials may not directly impose student-led prayer during high school football games nor establish an official student election process for the purpose of indirectly establishing such prayer. The distinction between force of government and individual liberty is the cornerstone of such cases. Each case restricts acts by government designed to establish prayer while explicitly or implicitly affirming students' individual freedom to pray.
The Court has therefore tried to determine a way to deal with church/state questions. In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Court created a three-part test for laws dealing with religious establishment. This determined that a law was constitutional if it:
Had a secular purpose
Neither advanced nor inhibited religion
Did not foster an excessive government entanglement with religion.
Some examples of where inhibiting religion has been struck down:
In Widmar v. Vincent, 454 U.S. 263 (1981), the Court ruled that a Missouri law prohibiting religious groups from using state university grounds and buildings for religious worship was unconstitutional. As a result, Congress decided in 1984 that this should apply to secondary and primary schools as well, passing the Equal Access Act, which prevents public schools from discriminating against students based on "religious, political, philosophical or other content of the speech at such meetings". In Board of Education of Westside Community Schools v. Mergens, 496 U.S. 226, 236 (1990), the Court upheld this law when it ruled that a school board's refusal to allow a Christian Bible club to meet in a public high school classroom violated the act.
In Good News Club v. Milford Central School, 533 U.S. 98 (2001), the Court ruled that religious groups must be allowed to use public schools after hours if the same access is granted to other community groups.
In Rosenberger v. Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia, 515 U.S. 819 (1995), the Supreme Court found that the University of Virginia was unconstitutionally withholding funds from a religious student magazine.
State constitutions[edit]
A Christian flag displayed alongside the flag of the USA next to the pulpit in a church in California. Note the eagle and cross finials on the flag poles.
Under the doctrine of Incorporation, the first amendment has been made applicable to the states. Therefore, the states must guarantee the freedom of religion in the same way the federal government must.
Many states have freedom of religion established in their constitution, though the exact legal consequences of this right vary for historical and cultural reasons. Most states interpret "freedom of religion" as including the freedom of long-established religious communities to remain intact and not be destroyed. By extension, democracies interpret "freedom of religion" as the right of each individual to freely choose to convert from one religion to another, mix religions, or abandon religion altogether.
In office and at work[edit]
Requirements for holding a public office[edit]
Main article: Oath of Office § United States
The no religious test clause of the U.S. constitution states that "no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States." Although it has become tradition for US presidents to end their Presidential Oath with "so help me God", this is not required by the Constitution. The same applies to the Vice President, the House of Representatives, the Senate, the members of the Cabinet, and all other civil and military officers and federal employees, who can either make an affirmation or take an oath ending with "so help me God."[38]
See also: Oath of office of the President of the United States, United States Uniformed Services Oath of Office, and Oath of enlistment
Some state constitutions in the US require belief in God or a Supreme Being as a prerequisite for holding public office or being a witness in court. This applies to Arkansas,[39] Maryland,[40] Mississippi,[41] North Carolina,[42] where the requirement was challenged and overturned in Voswinkel v. Hunt (1979),[citation needed] South Carolina,[43] Tennessee,[44] and Texas,[45] debatably.[46] A unanimous 1961 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Torcaso v. Watkins held that the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the federal Constitution override these state requirements,[47] so they are not enforced.
Issues at the workplace[edit]
Problems sometimes arise in the workplace concerning religious observance when a private employer discharges an employee for failure to report to work on what the employee considers a holy day or a day of rest. In the United States, the view that has generally prevailed is that firing for any cause in general renders a former employee ineligible for unemployment compensation, but that this is no longer the case if the 'cause' is religious in nature, especially an employee's unwillingness to work during Jewish Shabbat, Christian Sabbath, or Muslim jumu'ah.
After reports in August 2010[update] that soldiers who refused to attend a Christian band's concert at a Virginia military base were essentially punished by being banished to their barracks and told to clean them up, an Army spokesman said that an investigation was underway and "If something like that were to have happened, it would be contrary to Army policy."[48][49]
Situation of minority groups[edit]
Situation of Catholics[edit]
Main article: Anti-Catholicism in the United States
Famous 1876 editorial cartoon by Thomas Nast showing bishops as crocodiles attacking public schools, with the connivance of Irish Catholic politicians
John Higham described anti-Catholicism as "the most luxuriant, tenacious tradition of paranoiac agitation in American history".[50] Anti-Catholicism which was prominent in the United Kingdom was exported to the United States. Two types of anti-Catholic rhetoric existed in colonial society. The first, derived from the heritage of the Protestant Reformation and the religious wars of the 16th century, consisted of the "Anti-Christ" and the "Whore of Babylon" variety and dominated Anti-Catholic thought until the late 17th century. The second was a more secular variety which focused on the supposed intrigue of the Catholics intent on extending medieval despotism worldwide.[51]
Historian Arthur Schlesinger Sr. has called Anti-Catholicism "the deepest-held bias in the history of the American people."[52]
Rev. Branford Clarke illustration in Heroes of the Fiery Cross 1928 by Bishop Alma White Published by the Pillar of Fire Church in Zarephath, NJ
Because many of the British colonists, such as the Puritans and Congregationalists, were fleeing religious persecution by the Church of England, much of early American religious culture exhibited the more extreme anti-Catholic bias of these Protestant denominations. Monsignor John Tracy Ellis wrote that a "universal anti-Catholic bias was brought to Jamestown in 1607 and vigorously cultivated in all the thirteen colonies from Massachusetts to Georgia."[53] Colonial charters and laws contained specific proscriptions against Roman Catholics. Monsignor Ellis noted that a common hatred of the Roman Catholic Church could unite Anglican clerics and Puritan ministers despite their differences and conflicts.
Some of America's Founding Fathers held anti-clerical beliefs. For example, in 1788, John Jay urged the New York Legislature to require office-holders to renounce foreign authorities "in all matters ecclesiastical as well as civil."[54] Thomas Jefferson wrote: "History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government,"[55] and, "In every country and in every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot, abetting his abuses in return for protection to his own."[56]
Some states devised loyalty oaths designed to exclude Catholics from state and local office.[57] The public support for American independence and the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution by prominent American Catholics like Charles Carroll of Carrollton, the only Catholic signer of the Declaration of Independence, and his second cousins, Bishop John Carroll and Daniel Carroll, allowed Roman Catholics to be included in the constitutional protections of civil and religious liberty.[58]
Anti-Catholic animus in the United States reached a peak in the 19th century when the Protestant population became alarmed by the influx of Catholic immigrants. Some American Protestants, having an increased interest in prophecies regarding the end of time, claimed that the Catholic Church was the Whore of Babylon in the Book of Revelation.[59] The resulting "nativist" movement, which achieved prominence in the 1840s, was whipped into a frenzy of anti-Catholicism that led to mob violence, the burning of Catholic property, and the killing of Catholics.[60] This violence was fed by claims that Catholics were destroying the culture of the United States. The nativist movement found expression in a national political movement called the Know-Nothing Party of the 1850s, which (unsuccessfully) ran former president Millard Fillmore as its presidential candidate in 1856.
The founder of the Know-Nothing movement, Lewis C. Levin, based his political career entirely on anti-Catholicism, and served three terms in the U.S. House of Representatives (1845–1851), after which he campaigned for Fillmore and other "nativist" candidates.
After 1875 many states passed constitutional provisions, called "Blaine Amendments, forbidding tax money be used to fund parochial schools.[61][62] In 2002, the United States Supreme Court partially vitiated these amendments, when they ruled that vouchers were constitutional if tax dollars followed a child to a school, even if it were religious.[63]
Anti-Catholicism was widespread in the 1920s; anti-Catholics, including the Ku Klux Klan, believed that Catholicism was incompatible with democracy and that parochial schools encouraged separatism and kept Catholics from becoming loyal Americans. The Catholics responded to such prejudices by repeatedly asserting their rights as American citizens and by arguing that they, not the nativists (anti-Catholics), were true patriots since they believed in the right to freedom of religion.[64]
The 1928 presidential campaign of Al Smith was a rallying point for the Klan and the tide of anti-Catholicism in the U.S. The Catholic Church of the Little Flower was first built in 1925 in Royal Oak, Michigan, a largely Protestant area. Two weeks after it opened, the Ku Klux Klan burned a cross in front of the church.[65] The church burned down in a fire in 1936.[66] In response, the church built a fireproof crucifixion tower, as a "cross they could not burn".[67]
In 1922, the voters of Oregon passed an initiative amending Oregon Law Section 5259, the Compulsory Education Act. The law unofficially became known as the Oregon School Law. The citizens' initiative was primarily aimed at eliminating parochial schools, including Catholic schools.[68] The law caused outraged Catholics to organize locally and nationally for the right to send their children to Catholic schools. In Pierce v. Society of Sisters (1925), the United States Supreme Court declared the Oregon's Compulsory Education Act unconstitutional in a ruling that has been called "the Magna Carta of the parochial school system."
In 1928, Al Smith became the first Roman Catholic to gain a major party's nomination for president, and his religion became an issue during the campaign. Many Protestants feared that Smith would take orders from church leaders in Rome in making decisions affecting the country.
A key factor that hurt John F. Kennedy in his 1960 campaign for the presidency of the United States was the widespread prejudice against his Roman Catholic religion; some Protestants, including Norman Vincent Peale, believed that, if he were elected president, Kennedy would have to take orders from the pope in Rome.[69] To address fears that his Roman Catholicism would impact his decision-making, John F. Kennedy famously told the Greater Houston Ministerial Association on September 12, 1960, "I am not the Catholic candidate for President. I am the Democratic Party's candidate for President who also happens to be a Catholic. I do not speak for my Church on public matters — and the Church does not speak for me."[70] He promised to respect the separation of church and state and not to allow Catholic officials to dictate public policy to him. Kennedy also raised the question of whether one-quarter of Americans were relegated to second-class citizenship just because they were Catholic.
Kennedy went on to win the national popular vote over Richard Nixon by just one tenth of one percentage point (0.1%) – the closest popular-vote margin of the 20th century. In the electoral college, Kennedy's victory was larger, as he took 303 electoral votes to Nixon's 219 (269 were needed to win). The New York Times, summarizing the discussion late in November, spoke of a “narrow consensus” among the experts that Kennedy had won more than he lost as a result of his Catholicism,[71] as Catholics flocked to Kennedy to demonstrate their group solidarity in demanding political equality.
In 2011, The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops argued that the Obama Administration put an undue burden upon Catholics and forced them to violate their right to freedom of religion as part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
Situations of the Latter Day Saint movement 1820–90[edit]
Main article: Anti-Mormonism
Historically, the Latter Day Saint movement, which is often called Mormonism, has been the victim of religious violence beginning with reports by founder Joseph Smith immediately after his First Vision 1820[72] and continuing as the movement grew and migrated from its inception in western New York to Ohio, Missouri, and Illinois. The violence culminated when Smith was assassinated by a mob of 200 men in Carthage Jail in 1844. Joseph Smith had surrendered himself previously to the authorities, who failed to protect him. As a result of the violence they were faced with in the East, the Mormon pioneers, led by Brigham Young, migrated westwards and eventually founded Salt Lake City, and many other communities along the Mormon Corridor.
Smith and his followers experienced relatively low levels of persecution in New York and Ohio,[73][clarification needed] although one incident involved church members being tarred and feathered.[74] They would eventually move on to Missouri, where some of the worst atrocities against Mormons would take place. Smith declared the area around Independence, Missouri to be the site of Zion, inspiring a massive influx of Mormon converts. Locals, alarmed by rumors of the strange, new religion (including rumors of polygamy),[citation needed] attempted to drive the Mormons out. This resulted in the 1838 Mormon War, the Haun's Mill massacre, and the issue of the Missouri Executive Order 44 by Governor Lilburn Boggs, which ordered "... Mormons must be treated as enemies, and must be exterminated or driven from the state ...".[75] The majority of Mormons would flee to Illinois, where they were received warmly by the village of Commerce, Illinois. The Mormons quickly expanded the town and renamed it Nauvoo, which was one of the largest cities in Illinois at the time.[76] The economic, political, and religious dominance of the Mormons (Smith was mayor of the city and commander of the local militia, the Nauvoo Legion) inspired mobs to attack the city, and Smith was arrested for ordering the destruction of an anti-Mormon newspaper, the Nauvoo Expositor, although he acted with the consent of the city council.[77] He was imprisoned, along with his brother Hyrum Smith, at Carthage Jail, where they were attacked by a mob and murdered.
After a succession crisis, most of the Mormons united under Brigham Young, who organized an evacuation from Nauvoo and from the United States itself after the federal government refused to protect the Mormons.[78] Young and an eventual 50,000–70,000 would cross the Great Plains to settle in the Salt Lake Valley and the surrounding area. After the events of the Mexican–American War, the area became a United States territory. Young immediately petitioned for the addition of the State of Deseret, but the federal government declined. Instead, Congress carved out the much smaller Utah Territory. Over the next 46 years, several actions of the federal government were directed at Mormons, specifically to curtail the practice of polygamy and to reduce their political and economic power. These included the Utah War, Morrill Anti-Bigamy Act, Poland Act, Edmunds Act, and Edmunds–Tucker Act. In 1890, LDS Church president Wilford Woodruff issued the Manifesto, ending polygamy.
With the concept of plural marriage, from 1830 to 1890 the Mormon faith allowed its members to practice polygamy; after 1843 this was limited to polygyny (one man could have several wives). The notion of polygamy was not only generally disdained by most of Joseph Smith's contemporaries,[79] it is also contrary to the traditional Christian understanding of marriage. After 1844 the United States government passed legislation aimed specifically at the Mormon practice of polygamy until The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) officially renounced it. In the case of Reynolds v. United States, the U.S. supreme court concluded that "religious duty" was not a suitable defense to an indictment for polygamy; therefore, a law against polygamy is not legally considered to discriminate against a religion that endorses polygamy. When their appeals to the courts and lawmakers were exhausted and once church leaders were satisfied that God had accepted what they saw as their sacrifice for the principle, the prophet leader of the church announced that he had received inspiration that God had accepted their obedience and rescinded the commandment for plural marriage. In 1890, an official declaration was issued by the church prohibiting further plural marriages.[80] Utah was admitted to the Union on January 4, 1896.
Situation of Native Americans[edit]
The situation of Native Americans in the United States has been problematic since the initial European colonization of the Americas. Aside from the general issues in the relations between Europeans and Native Americans, there has been a historic suppression of Native American religions as well as some current charges of religious discrimination against Native Americans by the U.S. government, that need to be considered.
With the practice of the Americanization of Native Americans, Native American children were sent to Christian boarding schools where they were forced to worship as Christians and traditional customs were banned.[81] Until the Freedom of Religion Act 1978, "spiritual leaders [of Native Americans] ran the risk of jail sentences of up to 30 years for simply practicing their rituals."[82] The traditional indigenous Sun Dance was illegal from the 1880s (Canada) or 1904 (USA) to the 1980s.
Continuing charges of religious discrimination have largely centered on the eagle feather law, the use of ceremonial peyote, and the repatriation of Native American human remains and cultural and religious objects:
The eagle feather law, which governs the possession and religious use of eagle feathers, was written with the intention to protect then dwindling eagle populations on one hand while still protecting traditional Native American spiritual and religious customs, to which the use of eagle feather is central, on the other hand. As a result, the possession of eagle feathers is restricted to ethnic Native Americans, a policy that is seen as controversial for several reasons.
Peyote, a spineless cactus found in the desert southwest and Mexico, is commonly used in certain traditions of Native American religion and spirituality, most notably in the Native American Church. Prior to the passage of the American Indian Religious Freedom Act (AIRFA) in 1978, and as amended in 1994, the religious use of peyote was not afforded legal protection. This resulted in the arrest of many Native Americans and non-Native Americans participating in traditional indigenous religion and spirituality.
Native Americans often hold strong personal and spiritual connections to their ancestors and often believe that their remains should rest undisturbed. This has often placed Native Americans at odds with archaeologists who have often dug on Native American burial grounds and other sites considered sacred, often removing artifacts and human remains – an act considered sacrilegious by many Native Americans. For years, Native American communities decried the removal of ancestral human remains and cultural and religious objects, charging that such activities are acts of genocide, religious persecution, and discrimination. Many Native Americans called on the government, museums, and private collectors for the return of remains and sensitive objects for reburial. The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), which gained passage in 1990, established a means for Native Americans to request the return or "repatriation" of human remains and other sensitive cultural, religious, and funerary items held by federal agencies and federally assisted museums and institutions.
Situation of atheists[edit]
Further information: Discrimination against atheists in the United States
See also: Religion in the United States § Agnosticism, atheism, and humanism
A 2006 study at the University of Minnesota showed atheists to be the most distrusted minority among Americans. In the study, sociologists Penny Edgell, Joseph Gerties and Douglas Hartmann conducted a survey of American public opinion on attitudes towards different groups. 40% of respondents characterized atheists as a group that "does not at all agree with my vision of American society", putting atheists well ahead of every other group, with the next highest being Muslims (26%) and homosexuals (23%). When participants were asked whether they agreed with the statement, "I would disapprove if my child wanted to marry a member of this group," atheists again led minorities, with 48% disapproval, followed by Muslims (34%) and African-Americans (27%).[83][84] Joe Foley, co-chairman for Campus Atheists and Secular Humanists, commented on the results, "I know atheists aren't studied that much as a sociological group, but I guess atheists are one of the last groups remaining that it's still socially acceptable to hate."[85] A University of British Columbia study conducted in the United States found that believers distrust atheists as much as they distrust rapists. The study also showed that atheists have lower employment prospects.[86][87]
Several private organizations, the most notable being the Boy Scouts of America, do not allow atheist members.[88] However, this policy has come under fire by organizations who assert that the Boy Scouts of America do benefit from taxpayer money and thus cannot be called a truly private organization, and thus must admit atheists, and others currently barred from membership. An organization called Scouting for All, founded by Eagle Scout Steven Cozza, is at the forefront of the movement.
Court cases[edit]
In the 1994 case[89] Board of Education of Kiryas Joel Village School District v. Grumet, Supreme Court Justice David Souter wrote in the opinion for the Court that: "government should not prefer one religion to another, or religion to irreligion".[90] Everson v. Board of Education established that "neither a state nor the Federal Government can pass laws which aid one religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion over another". This applies the Establishment Clause to the states as well as the federal government.[91] However, several state constitutions make the protection of persons from religious discrimination conditional on their acknowledgment of the existence of a deity, making freedom of religion in those states inapplicable to atheists.[19][20][21] These state constitutional clauses have not been tested. Civil rights cases are typically brought in federal courts, so such state provisions are mainly of symbolic importance.
In Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow, after atheist Michael Newdow challenged the phrase "under God" in the United States Pledge of Allegiance, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals found the phrase unconstitutional. Although the decision was stayed pending the outcome of an appeal, there was the prospect that the pledge would cease to be legally usable without modification in schools in the western United States, over which the Ninth Circuit has jurisdiction. This resulted in political furor, and both houses of Congress passed resolutions condemning the decision, unanimously.[92] On June 26, a Republican-dominated group of 100–150 congressmen stood outside the capital and recited the pledge, showing how much they disagreed with the decision.[92] The Supreme Court subsequently reversed the decision, ruling that Newdow did not have standing to bring his case, thus disposing of the case without ruling on the constitutionality of the pledge.
Case studies[edit]
The Eagle Feather Law, which governs the possession and religious use of eagle feathers, was officially written to protect then dwindling eagle populations while still protecting traditional Native American spiritual and religious customs, of which the use of eagles are central. The Eagle Feather Law later met charges of promoting racial and religious discrimination due to the law’s provision authorizing the possession of eagle feathers to members of only one ethnic group, Native Americans, and forbidding Native Americans from including non-Native Americans in indigenous customs involving eagle feathers—a common modern practice dating back to the early 16th century.
Charges of religious and racial discrimination have also been found in the education system. In a recent example, the dormitory policies at Boston University and The University of South Dakota were charged with racial and religious discrimination when they forbade a university dormitory resident from smudging while praying. The policy at The University of South Dakota was later changed to permit students to pray while living in the university dorms.
In 2004, a case involving five Ohio prison inmates (two followers of Asatru (a modern form of Norse paganism), a minister of the Church of Jesus Christ Christian, a Wiccan witch (neopaganism), and a Satanist protesting denial of access to ceremonial items and opportunities for group worship was brought before the Supreme Court.[93] The Boston Globe reports on the 2005 decision of Cutter v. Wilkinson[94] in favour of the claimants as a notable case. Among the denied objects was instructions for runic writing requested by an Asatruar.[95] Inmates of the "Intensive Management Unit" at Washington State Penitentiary who are adherents of Asatru in 2001 were deprived of their Thor's Hammer medallions.[96] In 2007, a federal judge confirmed that Asatru adherents in US prisons have the right to possess a Thor’s Hammer pendant. An inmate sued the Virginia Department of Corrections after he was denied it while members of other religions were allowed their medallions.[97]
See also[edit]
Entheogenic use of cannabis
Establishment Clause of the First Amendment
First Amendment to the United States Constitution
Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment
History of religion in the United States
Human rights and the United States
International Religious Freedom Act of 1998
Nihang, a Sikh order who carry weapons and use cannabis as part of their religious duties
Religion in the United States
Religious affiliations of United States Presidents
Religious discrimination in the United States
Separation of church and state in the United States
Sherbert v. Verner
State Religious Freedom Restoration Acts
Status of religious freedom by country
United States religious history
References[edit]
Jump up ^ Jefferson, Thomas (1802-01-01). "Jefferson's Letter to the Danbury Baptists". U.S. Library of Congress. Retrieved 2006-11-30.
Jump up ^ "The State Becomes the Church: Jefferson and Madison". U.S. Library of Congress. Retrieved 2015-02-17.
^ Jump up to: a b Zimmerman, Mark, Symbol of Enduring Freedom, p. 19, Columbia Magazine, March 2010
Jump up ^ Brugger, Robert J. (1988). Maryland: A Middle Temperament. , p 21, Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 0-8018-3399-X.
Jump up ^ Finkelman, Paul, Maryland Toleration Act, The Encyclopedia of American Civil Liberties, New York: CRC Press. ISBN 0-415-94342-6.
^ Jump up to: a b Roark, Elisabeth Louise, p.78, Artists of colonial America Retrieved February 22, 2010
Jump up ^ Encylclopedia Britannica, https://www.britannica.com/place/Massachusetts-Bay-Colony
Jump up ^ Allen Weinstein and David Rubel (2002), The Story of America: Freedom and Crisis from Settlement to Superpower, DK Publishing, Inc., New York, N.Y., ISBN 0-7894-8903-1, pp. 58-63
Jump up ^ Christopher Fennell (1998), Plymouth Colony Legal Structure (http://www.histarch.uiuc.edu/plymouth/ccflaw.html)
Jump up ^ Hanover Historical Texts Project (http://history.hanover.edu/texts/masslib.html)
Jump up ^ M. Schmidt, Pilgerväter, in Die Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart, 3. Auflage, Band V (1961), Tübingen (Germany), col. 384
Jump up ^ M. Schmidt, Hooker, Thomas, in Die Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart, 3. Auflage, Band III (1958), col. 449
Jump up ^ Clifton E. Olmstead (1960), History of Religion in the United States, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs,74-75, 99-105, 113-115
Jump up ^ Edwin S. Gaustad (1999), Liberty of Conscience: Roger Williams in America, Judson Press, Valley Forge
Jump up ^ Hans Fantel (1974), William Penn: Apostel of Dissent, William Morrow & Co., New York, N.Y., ISBN 0-688-00310-9
Jump up ^ Heinrich Bornkamm, Toleranz. In der Geschichte des Christentums, in Die Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart, 3. Auflage, Band VI (1962), col. 943
Jump up ^ Robert Middlekauff (2005), The Glorious Cause: The American Revolution, 1763-1789, Revised and Expanded Edition, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-516247-9, p. 635
Jump up ^ For the distinction between religious civil liberties and religious civil rights, see e.g.: Religious discrimination. A neglected issue. A consultation sponsored by the United States Commission on Civil Rights, Washington D.C., April 9–11, 1979. Preface
^ Jump up to: a b c "Religious Discrimination in U.S. State Constitutions". Ontario consultants on religious tolerance. Retrieved 2012-12-03.
^ Jump up to: a b c "Quotation, Overview, and the Constitutions of Arkansas & Maryland". Ontario consultants on religious tolerance. Retrieved 2012-12-03.
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g "Religious discrimination in state constitutions : Constitutions of Massachusetts, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee & Texas". Ontario consultants on religious tolerance. Retrieved 2012-12-03.
Jump up ^ For instance in Texas an official may be "excluded from holding office" if he/she does not "acknowledge the existence of a Supreme Being." (i.e. God)Texas Legislature Online Archived 2007-08-10 at the Wayback Machine.
Jump up ^ "Criminal Law and Procedure By Daniel E. Hall – Cengage Learning, July 2008 – p. 266 [1]
Jump up ^ Merced, President Templo Yoruba Omo Orisha Texas, Inc., v. City of Euless ". Full text of the opinion courtesy of Findlaw.com.
Jump up ^ Feldman, Noah (2005). Divided by God. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, pg. 24
Jump up ^ Wood, 2006b.
Jump up ^ Letter to Edward Livingston, July 10, 1822
Jump up ^ letter to Rev Jasper Adams spring 1832
Jump up ^ Detached Memoranda, 1820
Jump up ^ letter to Robert Walsh, March 2, 1819
Jump up ^ Warner v. Orange County Department of Probation , 827 F.Supp., 261 (United States District Court, S.D. New York July 29, 1993). ; Warner v. Orange County Department of Probation, United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, Docket No. 95-7055, April 19, 1999.
Jump up ^ "Declaration of Independence : July 4, 1776". The Avalon Project at Yale Law School. Retrieved 2007-04-18.
Jump up ^ https://jeffersonpapers.princeton.edu/selected-documents/jefferson%E2%80%99s-%E2%80%9Coriginal-rough-draught%E2%80%9D-declaration-independence-0
Jump up ^ V. Norskov Olsen (1996). Christian Faith & Religious Freedom. TEACH Services, Inc. p. 72. ISBN 978-1-57258-118-0.
Jump up ^ "USC 42, Chapter 21B: Religious Freedom Restoration". United States Code. Retrieved 2007-04-18.
Jump up ^ "Religious freedom restoration act". State of Missouri. Retrieved 2007-04-18.
Jump up ^ Braden, C.S. These Also Believe. ISBN 0-02-514360-3.
Jump up ^ 5 U.S.C. § 3331, Oath of Office;
^ 28 U.S.C. § 453, Oaths of justices and judges
^ 10 U.S.C. § 502, Enlistment Oath
Jump up ^ "§ 1. Atheists disqualified from holding office or testifying as witness".
Jump up ^ "Maryland Constitution – Declaration of Rights". , Article 36 and 37
Jump up ^ Mississippi State Constitution: Article 14, Section 265, “No person who denies the existence of a Supreme Being shall hold any office in this state.”
Jump up ^ Article Vi, Sec. 7 and 8
Jump up ^ "S.C. Constitution Article VI Officers – www.scstatehouse.net-LPITS".
Jump up ^ "Tennessee Constitution – Article Ix. Disqualifications – Hosted By Tncrimlaw".
Jump up ^ The Texas Constitution: Article I – Bill of Rights "Sec. 4. RELIGIOUS TESTS. No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office, or public trust, in this State; nor shall any one be excluded from holding office on account of his religious sentiments, provided he acknowledge the existence of a Supreme Being."
Jump up ^ In the Supreme Court of the United States
Jump up ^ "FindLaw for Legal Professionals – Case Law, Federal and State Resources, Forms, and Code".
Jump up ^ AP: Troops: Skipping Christian concert got us punished
Jump up ^ SF Gate: Troops: Skipping Christian concert got us punished
Jump up ^ Jenkins, Philip (1 April 2003). The New Anti-Catholicism: The Last Acceptable Prejudice. Oxford University Press. p. 23. ISBN 0-19-515480-0.
Jump up ^ Mannard, Joseph G. (1981). American Anti-Catholicism and its Literature. Archived from the original on 2009-10-25.
Jump up ^ "The Coming Catholic Church". By David Gibson. HarperCollins: Published 2004.
Jump up ^ Ellis, 1956 & American Catholicism
Jump up ^ Annotation
Jump up ^ Letter to Alexander von Humboldt, December 6, 1813
Jump up ^ Letter to Horatio G. Spafford, March 17, 1814
Jump up ^ Morison, Samuel Eliot (1972). The Oxford History of the American People. New York City: Mentor. p. 361. ISBN 0-451-62600-1.
Jump up ^ Breidenbach, Michael D. (2013), 'Conciliarism and American Religious Liberty' (Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Cambridge)
Jump up ^ Bilhartz, Terry D. (1986). Urban Religion and the Second Great Awakening. Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press. p. 115. ISBN 0-8386-3227-0.
Jump up ^ Jimmy Akin (2001-03-01). "The History of Anti-Catholicism". This Rock. Catholic Answers. Archived from the original on 2008-09-07. Retrieved 2008-11-10.
Jump up ^ What are Blaine Amendments?, blaineamendments.org Archived 2002-10-04 at the Wayback Machine..
Jump up ^ Tony Mauro, High court agrees to settle Part II of voucher battle Archived December 29, 2003, at Archive.is, May 20, 2003, First Amendment Center Online.
Jump up ^ Bush, Jeb (March 4, 2009). "WILL PUBLIC SCHOOLS SUFFER UNDER VOUCHERS? NO: Choice forces educators to improve". The Atlanta Constitution-Journal.
Jump up ^ Dumenil (1991)
Jump up ^ Shannon, William V. (1989) [1963]. The American Irish: a political and social portrait. p. 298. ISBN 978-0-87023-689-1. OCLC 19670135.
Jump up ^ Hutting, Albert M. (1998) [1936]. Shrine of the Little Flower. Royal Oak, MI: Radio League of the Little Flower. OCLC 32783964.
Jump up ^ Levin, Doron P. (25 May 1992). "Royal Oak Journal; Bitter Memories of Anti-Semitism Live On in Michigan Parish". New York Times.
Jump up ^ Howard, J. Paul. "Cross-Border Reflections, Parents’ Right to Direct Their Childrens’ Education Under the U.S. and Canadian Constitutions" Archived October 29, 2008, at the Wayback Machine., Education Canada, v41 n2 p36-37 Sum 2001.
Jump up ^ The first modern campaign: Kennedy, Nixon, and the election of 1960, Gary Donaldson, p.107
Jump up ^ Kennedy, John F. (2002-06-18). "Address to the Greater Houston Ministerial Association". American Rhetoric. Archived from the original on 2016-08-02. Retrieved 2007-09-17.
Jump up ^ New York Times, November 20, 1960, Section 4, p. E5
Jump up ^ Joseph Smith – History 1:20–25
Jump up ^ The historian Fawn M. Brodie (No Man Knows My History, 119) speculated that one of John Johnson's sons, Eli, meant to punish Smith by having him castrated for an intimacy with his sister, Nancy Marinda Johnson. However, historian Richard Lyman Bushman states that this hypothesis failed, partly because Eli was John Johnson's brother, not his son. Bushman feels a more probable motivation is recorded by Symonds Ryder, a participant in the event, who felt Smith was plotting to take property from members of the community and a company of citizens violently warned Smith that they would not accept those actions.
Jump up ^ Smith, Joseph; Smith, Joseph Jr; Roberts, B. H. (2004). History of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints: History of Joseph Smith the Prophet Part One. Kessinger Publishing. p. 412. ISBN 978-1-4179-7571-6. ;
Tucker, Ruth A. (2004). Another Gospel: Cults, Alternative Religions, and the New Age Movement (illustrated ed.). Zondervan. p. 60. ISBN 978-0-310-25937-4. .
Jump up ^ Governor Boggs' order of extermination. University of Northern Colorado. October 27, 1838. Archived from the original on April 5, 2005. Retrieved 2008-12-01.
Bagley, Will (2004). Blood of the Prophets. University of Oklahoma Press. pp. 11–12. ISBN 0-8061-3639-1.
Jump up ^ Arrington, Leonard J; Bitton, Davis (March 1, 1992). The Mormon Experience: A History of the Latter-day Saints (2 ed.). Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press. ISBN 0-252-06236-1. Page 69.
Jump up ^ "The Destruction of the "Nauvoo Expositor"—Proceedings of the Nauvoo City Council and Mayor". BYU.
Jump up ^ Smith, Joseph Fielding (1946–1949). "Church History and Modern Revelation". 4. Deseret Book: 167–173.
Jump up ^ In 1854 the Republican party referred to polygamy in its platform as one of the "twin relics of barbarism" (in addition to slavery). see: History of civil marriage in the U.S.
Jump up ^ Wardle, Lynn D; Nolan, Laurence C. (2002). Fundamental Principles of Family Law. Wm. S. Hein Publishing. p. 80. ISBN 978-0-8377-3828-4. .
Jump up ^ Soul Wound: The Legacy of Native American Schools Archived 2006-02-08 at the Wayback Machine. -Andrea Smith writing for Amnesty International Magazine on the historic government policy of forcing over 100,000 Native American children to attend Christian boarding schools, and the subsequent social reverberations of "widespread sexual and physical abuse" suffered at the hands of school administrators.
Jump up ^ http://www.religioustolerance.org – Native American Spirituality
Jump up ^ "Hostility to Atheism – The Last Socially Acceptable Prejudice?".
Jump up ^ Penny Edgell; Joseph Gerteis; Douglas Hartmann (April 2006). "Atheists As "Other": Moral Boundaries and Cultural Membership in American Society". American Sociological Review. 71 (2): 211–234. doi:10.1177/000312240607100203.
Jump up ^ "Survey: U.S. trust lowest for atheists".
Jump up ^ Gervais, Will M.; Shariff, Azim F.; Norenzayan, Ara (2011). "Do You Believe in Atheists? Distrust Is Central to Anti-Atheist Prejudice" (PDF). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 101 (6): 1189–1206. PMID 22059841. doi:10.1037/a0025882. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 11, 2012. Retrieved April 22, 2012.
Jump up ^ http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/religion/story/2011-12-10/religion-atheism/51777612/1
Jump up ^ Downey, Margaret (June–July 2004). "Discrimination against atheists: the facts". Free Inquiry. 24 (4): 41–43.
Jump up ^ "FindLaw".
Jump up ^ "Cornell Law".
Jump up ^ "About Atheism".
^ Jump up to: a b "CNN". 2002-06-27. Archived from the original on 2009-07-07. Retrieved 2010-05-02.
Jump up ^ NY Times: Justices Will Hear 2 Church-State Cases
Jump up ^ (03-9877) 544 U.S. 709 (2005)
Jump up ^ The Boston Globe: Court upholds law on prisoners' religious rights
Jump up ^ Walla Walla's Suppression of Religious Freedom[unreliable source?]
Jump up ^ First Amendment Center: Va. inmate can challenge denial of Thor's Hammer Archived 2010-10-30 at the Wayback Machine.
External links[edit]
ACLU President Nadine Strossen on freedom of religion
Eugene Volokh (May 23, 2006). "FREEDOM OF EXPRESSIVE ASSOCIATION AND GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIES" (PDF). Stanford Law Review. UCLA. 58: 1919–1968.
[hide]
v
t
e
Freedom of religion in North America
Sovereign states
Antigua and Barbuda
Bahamas
Barbados
Belize
Canada
Costa Rica
Cuba
Dominica
Dominican Republic
El Salvador
Grenada
Guatemala
Haiti
Honduras
Jamaica
Mexico
Nicaragua
Panama
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Trinidad and Tobago
United States
Dependencies and
other territories
Anguilla
Aruba
Bermuda
Bonaire
British Virgin Islands
Cayman Islands
Curaçao
Greenland
Guadeloupe
Martinique
Montserrat
Puerto Rico
Saint Barthélemy
Saint Martin
Saint Pierre and Miquelon
Saba
Sint Eustatius
Sint Maarten
Turks and Caicos Islands
United States Virgin Islands
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Freedom_of_religion_in_the_United_States&oldid=805675794"
Categories:
Religion and society in the United States
Freedom of religion by country
Freedom of expression in the United States
St. Mary's County, Maryland
Freedom of religion in the United States
Hidden categories:
Webarchive template wayback links
Webarchive template archiveis links
All articles lacking reliable references
Articles lacking reliable references from July 2007
Wikipedia introduction cleanup from June 2017
All pages needing cleanup
Articles covered by WikiProject Wikify from June 2017
All articles covered by WikiProject Wikify
All articles with unsourced statements
Articles with unsourced statements from February 2009
Articles containing potentially dated statements from August 2010
All articles containing potentially dated statements
Wikipedia articles needing clarification from February 2009
Articles with unsourced statements from December 2007
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
Languages
Deutsch
Bahasa Indonesia
Edit links
This page was last edited on 16 October 2017, at 22:35.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

values: jump-to-nav mw-jump

values: Talk:Freedom of religion in the United States

value: i

value: tbody

value: table

attrs: class role

values: plainlinks metadata ambox ambox-content ambox-lead_too_short

values: font-size: 105%; padding: 0.2em 0px 0.4em; text-align: center; display: none;

values: Freedom of religion in the Central African Republic

values:
/wiki/Freedom_of_religion_in_Comoros
mw-redirect
Freedom of religion in Comoros

values: Freedom of religion in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

values:
/wiki/Freedom_of_religion_in_Burma
mw-redirect
Freedom of religion in Burma

values:
/wiki/Freedom_of_religion_in_Georgia
mw-redirect
Freedom of religion in Georgia

values: Freedom of religion in the United Kingdom

values:
/wiki/Freedom_of_religion_in_Israel
mw-redirect
Freedom of religion in Israel

values:
/wiki/Freedom_of_religion_in_Palestine
mw-redirect
Freedom of religion in Palestine

values: Freedom of religion in the United Arab Emirates

values: float:right;clear:right;width:22.0em;margin:0 0 1.0em 1.0em;background:#f9f9f9;border:1px solid #aaa;padding:0.2em;border-spacing:0.4em 0;text-align:center;line-height:1.4em;font-size:88%;border-collapse:collapse; border-spacing:0px; border:none; width:100%; margin:0px; font-size:100%; clear:none; float:none

values: Persecution of traditional African religion

values:
/wiki/Anti-Christian_sentiment
mw-redirect
Anti-Christian sentiment

values:
/wiki/Persecution_of_Ottoman_Muslims
mw-redirect
Persecution of Ottoman Muslims

values: Religious discrimination against Neopagans

values: padding:0.3em 0.4em 0.3em;font-weight:bold;border-top: 1px solid #aaa; border-bottom: 1px solid #aaa;border-top:1px solid #aaa;border-bottom:1px solid #aaa;

values: Template talk:Status of religious freedom

values: First Amendment to the United States Constitution

values:
/wiki/Roger_Williams_(theologian)
mw-redirect
Roger Williams (theologian)

values: Edit section: Legal and public foundation

values:
/wiki/Constitution_of_the_United_States
mw-redirect
Constitution of the United States

values:
/wiki/No_religious_test_clause
mw-redirect
No religious test clause

values:
/wiki/Incorporation_(Bill_of_Rights)
mw-redirect
Incorporation (Bill of Rights)

values: Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

values:
/wiki/Pilgrim_Fathers
mw-redirect
Pilgrim Fathers

values:
/wiki/State_churches
mw-redirect
State churches

values: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

values: width: 20px; vertical-align: top; border: none; color: #B2B7F2; font-size: 40px; font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-weight: bold; line-height: .6em; text-align: left; padding: 10px 10px;

values: vertical-align: top; border: none; padding: 4px 10px;

values: width: 20px; vertical-align: bottom; border: none; color: #B2B7F2; font-size: 40px; font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-weight: bold; line-height: .6em; text-align: right; padding: 10px 10px;

values: margin:auto; border-collapse: collapse; border: none; background-color: transparent; width: auto;

values: Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah

values: List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 450

values:
/wiki/5th_U.S._Circuit_Court_of_Appeals
mw-redirect
5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

values:
/wiki/United_States_Supreme_Court
mw-redirect
United States Supreme Court

values:
/wiki/Wall_of_separation
mw-redirect
Wall of separation

values:
/wiki/The_Bloody_Tenent_of_Persecution
mw-redirect
The Bloody Tenent of Persecution

values: United States Declaration of Independence

values:
/wiki/School_vouchers
mw-redirect
School vouchers

values:
/wiki/United_States_of_America
mw-redirect
United States of America

values: Foreign Missions Conference (page does not exist)

values: Edit section: Freedom of religion restoration

values: Article Six of the United States Constitution

values:
/wiki/Freedom_of_press
mw-redirect
Freedom of press

values: Supreme Court cases involving Jehovah's Witnesses by country

values:
/wiki/Harlan_Stone
mw-redirect
Harlan Stone

values:
/wiki/Jehovah%E2%80%99s_Witnesses
mw-redirect
Jehovah’s Witnesses

values: Santa Fe Independent School Dist. v. Doe

values: Good News Club v. Milford Central School

values:
/wiki/Religious_communities
mw-redirect
Religious communities

values: Edit section: Requirements for holding a public office

values:
/wiki/Oath_of_Office#United_States
mw-redirect
Oath of Office

values: Oath of office of the President of the United States

values: Article Two of the United States Constitution

values:
/wiki/U.S._Vice_President
mw-redirect
U.S. Vice President

values:
/wiki/United_States_Cabinet
mw-redirect
United States Cabinet

values: United States Uniformed Services Oath of Office

values:
/wiki/Oath_of_enlistment
mw-redirect
Oath of enlistment

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (February 2009)

values:
noprint Inline-Template Template-Fact
white-space:nowrap;

values:
plainlinks noprint asof-tag update
display:none;

values: Edit section: Situation of minority groups

values:
/wiki/Arthur_Schlesinger_Sr.
mw-redirect
Arthur Schlesinger Sr.

values:
/wiki/Pillar_of_Fire_Church
mw-redirect
Pillar of Fire Church

values:
/wiki/Zarephath,_NJ
mw-redirect
Zarephath, NJ

values:
/wiki/New_York_Legislature
mw-redirect
New York Legislature

values:
/wiki/Know-Nothing_Party
mw-redirect
Know-Nothing Party

values:
/wiki/Lewis_C._Levin
mw-redirect
Lewis C. Levin

values:
/wiki/Blaine_Amendments
mw-redirect
Blaine Amendments

values: United States presidential election, 1928

values:
/wiki/1960_U.S._Presidential_election
mw-redirect
1960 U.S. Presidential election

values:
/wiki/Richard_M._Nixon
mw-redirect
Richard M. Nixon

values: United States Conference of Catholic Bishops

values:
/wiki/Obama_Administration
mw-redirect
Obama Administration

values: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

values: Edit section: Situations of the Latter Day Saint movement 1820–90

values: The text near this tag may need clarification or removal of jargon. (February 2009)

values:
noprint Inline-Template
margin-left:0.1em; white-space:nowrap;

values:
/wiki/Tarred_and_feathered
mw-redirect
Tarred and feathered

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (December 2007)

values: Organized incorporated territories of the United States

values:
/wiki/Christian_views_of_marriage
mw-redirect
Christian views of marriage

values: Edit section: Situation of Native Americans

values:
/wiki/Native_American_boarding_schools
mw-redirect
Native American boarding schools

values: Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act

values: Discrimination against atheists in the United States

values: Boy Scouts of America membership controversies

values:
/wiki/Civil_rights
mw-redirect
Civil rights

values: Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow

values:
/wiki/Pledge_of_Allegiance
mw-redirect
Pledge of Allegiance

values:
/wiki/Ninth_Circuit_Court_of_Appeals
mw-redirect
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

values:
/wiki/Eagle_Feather_Law
mw-redirect
Eagle Feather Law

values:
/wiki/Norse_paganism
mw-redirect
Norse paganism

values:
/wiki/Church_of_Jesus_Christ_Christian
mw-redirect
Church of Jesus Christ Christian

values:
/wiki/Boston_Globe
mw-redirect
Boston Globe

values:
/wiki/Thor%27s_Hammer
mw-redirect
Thor's Hammer

values:
/wiki/Entheogenic_use_of_cannabis
mw-redirect
Entheogenic use of cannabis

values: Establishment Clause of the First Amendment

values: Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment

values: History of religion in the United States

values: International Religious Freedom Act of 1998

values: Religious affiliations of United States Presidents

values: Religious discrimination in the United States

values: Separation of church and state in the United States

values: State Religious Freedom Restoration Acts

values:
/wiki/United_States_religious_history
mw-redirect
United States religious history

values: div-col columns column-count column-count-2

values: -moz-column-count: 2; -webkit-column-count: 2; column-count: 2;

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.blaineamendments.org

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/19670135

values:
/wiki/Royal_Oak,_MI
mw-redirect
Royal Oak, MI

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/32783964

values:
/wiki/New_York_Times
mw-redirect
New York Times

values:
/wiki/Richard_Lyman_Bushman
mw-redirect
Richard Lyman Bushman

values:
nofollow
external free
http://www.religioustolerance.org

values:
/wiki/PubMed_Identifier
mw-redirect
PubMed Identifier

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22059841

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1037%2Fa0025882

values: The material near this tag may rely on an unreliable source. (July 2007)

values: -moz-column-width: 30em; -webkit-column-width: 30em; column-width: 30em; list-style-type: decimal;

values: wikinews:ACLU President Strossen on religion, drugs, guns and impeaching George Bush

values: Freedom of religion in Antigua and Barbuda (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in the Bahamas (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in Barbados (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in Belize (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in Costa Rica (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in Cuba (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in Dominica (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in the Dominican Republic (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in El Salvador (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in Grenada (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in Guatemala (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in Haiti (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in Honduras (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in Jamaica (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in Mexico (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in Nicaragua (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in Saint Kitts and Nevis (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in Saint Lucia (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in Trinidad and Tobago (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in Anguilla (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in Aruba (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in Bermuda (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in Bonaire (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in the British Virgin Islands (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in the Cayman Islands (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in Curaçao (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in Greenland (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in Guadeloupe (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in Martinique (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in Montserrat (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in Puerto Rico (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in Saint Barthélemy (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in the Collectivity of Saint Martin (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in Saint Pierre and Miquelon (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in Saba (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in Sint Eustatius (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in Sint Maarten (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in the Turks and Caicos Islands (page does not exist)

values: Freedom of religion in the United States Virgin Islands (page does not exist)

values: nowraplinks collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner

values: Category:Religion and society in the United States

values: Category:Freedom of expression in the United States

values: Category:Freedom of religion in the United States

values: Category:Webarchive template wayback links

values: Category:Webarchive template archiveis links

values: Category:All articles lacking reliable references

values: Category:Articles lacking reliable references from July 2007

values: Category:Wikipedia introduction cleanup from June 2017

values: Category:Articles covered by WikiProject Wikify from June 2017

values: Category:All articles covered by WikiProject Wikify

values: Category:All articles with unsourced statements

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from February 2009

values: Category:Articles containing potentially dated statements from August 2010

values: Category:All articles containing potentially dated statements

values: Category:Wikipedia articles needing clarification from February 2009

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from December 2007

values: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

values: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

values: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

values: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

values: Discussion about the content page [ctrl-alt-t]

values: p-namespaces navigation vectorTabs p-namespaces-label

values:
p-variants
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-variants-label

values: Past revisions of this page [ctrl-alt-h]

values: p-views navigation vectorTabs p-views-label

values:
p-cactions
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-cactions-label

values:
mw-wiki-logo
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page

values:
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page [ctrl-alt-z]
z

values: Featured content – the best of Wikipedia

values: Find background information on current events

values: portal navigation p-navigation p-navigation-label

values: Guidance on how to use and edit Wikipedia

values: About the project, what you can do, where to find things

values: A list of recent changes in the wiki [ctrl-alt-r]

values: portal navigation p-interaction p-interaction-label

values: List of all English Wikipedia pages containing links to this page [ctrl-alt-j]

values: Recent changes in pages linked from this page [ctrl-alt-k]

values:
/wiki/Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard
Upload files [ctrl-alt-u]
u

values: A list of all special pages [ctrl-alt-q]

values: Permanent link to this revision of the page

values: Link to connected data repository item [ctrl-alt-g]

values: Printable version of this page [ctrl-alt-p]

values:
uls-settings-trigger
Language settings
0
button
true

values: Religionsfreiheit in den Vereinigten Staaten – German

values: Kebebasan Beragama di Amerika Serikat – Indonesian

values:
suggestions
display: none; font-size: 13px;

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Freedom_of_religion_in_the_United_States rootpage-Freedom_of_religion_in_the_United_States vector-experimental-print-styles vector-nav-directionality skin-vector action-view


text:
Midnight at the Oasis
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
"Midnight at the Oasis"
Single by Maria Muldaur
from the album Maria Muldaur
B-side
"Any Old Time"
Released
February 1974
Format
7" 45rpm
Recorded
1973
Genre
Soft rock[1]
Length
3:49
Label
Reprise
Songwriter(s)
David Nichtern
Producer(s)
Lenny Waronker, Joe Boyd
"Midnight at the Oasis" is a 1973 song written by David Nichtern. It was recorded by the singer Maria Muldaur for her self-titled album and is her best-known recording, peaking at #6 on the Billboard Hot 100 and #21 in the UK Singles Chart in the spring of 1974. Billboard ranked it as the No. 13 song for 1974.[2] It was also nominated for both Record of the Year and Song of the Year at the 17th Annual Grammy Awards, held in 1975. In Canada, the song reached #2 in the RPM magazine singles charts and #45 in the year-end chart.
Contents
[hide]
1 Description
2 Personnel
3 Chart performance
3.1 Weekly charts
3.2 Year-end charts
4 Brand New Heavies version
4.1 Track listing
4.1.1 UK CD Single
4.1.2 UK CD Single BNHCD 05
4.2 Personnel
5 Other covers
6 Remix version
7 In popular culture
8 References
9 External links
Description[edit]
The song is a saucy, teasing offer of a desert love affair, in a fantasy setting that owes more to Rudolph Valentino sheik movies than to real Middle Eastern deserts. AllMusic reviewer Matthew Greenwald describes the song as "so sensual and evocative that it was probably one of the most replayed records of the era and also may be responsible for the most pregnancies from a record during the mid-'70s".[3] Some of the lyrics are doubtlessly suggestive (such as: "let's slip off to a sand dune ... and kick up a little dust"; "you won't need no camel ... when I take you for a ride") But the tone is playful throughout. "Midnight" features a 1970s-defining instrumental bridge, particularly memorable for the guitar work of Amos Garrett.[4]
The lyric "Cactus is our friend" is used several times in the song, but Cacti are actually New World plants, native to North America, South America and the West Indies, and are not naturally found on the Arabian Peninsula.
In 2008 Muldaur recalled that she wanted to add the song to her album as an "afterthought" at the last minute. She has acknowledged that people do approach her at her concerts or events and claim that, because of this song, sexual encounters, such as loss of virginity and pregnancy, have ensued.[5]
Personnel[edit]
[6]
Maria Muldaur - vocals
David Nichtern - acoustic guitar
Mark T. Jordan - piano
Greg Prestopino - voices
Freebo - bass
Amos Garrett - bass, guitar, vocals, guitar solo
Jim Keltner - drums
Jim Gordon - drums
Nick DeCaro - string arrangements
Chart performance[edit]
Weekly charts[edit]
Chart (1974)
Peak
position
Australia 10
Canada RPM Top Singles[7] 2
Canada RPM Adult Contemporary[8] 1
UK 21
US Billboard Hot 100 6
US Billboard Adult Contemporary[9] 7
US Cash Box Top 100 5
Year-end charts[edit]
Chart (1974)
Rank
Australia 81
Canada RPM Top Singles[10] 45
US Billboard Hot 100[11] 13
Brand New Heavies version[edit]
"Midnight at the Oasis"
Single by The Brand New Heavies
from the album Brother Sister
Released
1994
Format
CD
7 inch vinyl
Recorded
March 1994
Genre
Acid jazz–Funk
Label
FFRR, Delicious Vinyl
Songwriter(s)
David Nichtern
The Brand New Heavies singles chronology
"Back To Love"
(1994) "Midnight at the Oasis"
(1994) "Spend Some Time"
(1994)
"Back To Love"
(1994) "Midnight at the Oasis"
(1994) "Spend Some Time"
(1994)
A version of this song was recorded by the group Brand New Heavies, attributed to "Brand New Heavies featuring N'Dea Davenport".[12] This version reached #13 in the UK in 1994 and was their biggest hit up until the departure of Davenport, when Sometimes made #11.
Track listing[edit]
UK CD Single[edit]
"Midnight at the Oasis" (Radio Version) - (3:48)
"Midnight at the Oasis" (Rogers Brand New Radio Anthem) - (4:35)
UK CD Single BNHCD 05[edit]
"Midnight at the Oasis" (Radio Version) - (3:48)
"Midnight at the Oasis" (Extended Version)
"Midnight at the Oasis" (Opaz 7" Version)
"Midnight at the Oasis" (Roger's Brand New Radio Anthem) - (4:35)
Personnel[edit]
Simon Bartholomew
N'Dea Davenport - Vocals
Jan Kincaid
Richard Stilgoe
Andrew Levy
Other covers[edit]
Jazz versions of this song have been recorded by Hubert Laws on The Chicago Theme and by Freddie Hubbard on the live album Gleam and the studio album Liquid Love.
Percy Faith recorded a lush easy listening version in 1974 on one of his last albums, Chinatown Feat. the Entertainer, which featured the guitar work of Larry Carlton. This recording became a mainstay of Beautiful Music radio playlists for the duration of that format's existence.
In 1975 a cover version of the song appeared on the album Dust Yourself Off by the funk band Pleasure.
The 1978 album Betty Wright Live, by Betty Wright, includes a medley version "Clean Up Woman" that includes parts of "Midnight at the Oasis".
In 1986 the Sun City Girls released a version of the song on their album Midnight Cowboys from Ipanema.
In 1993 American jazz vocalist Steve Oliver released a version of the song on his album First View.
In 1994 the Brand New Heavies' album Brother Sister included "Midnight at the Oasis" with vocals by N'Dea Davenport.
In 1995 That Dog released a version of the song on the album Spirit of '73: Rock for Choice.
Jazz guitarist Martin Taylor included an instrumental version on his 2000 album Kiss and Tell with support from saxophonist Kirk Whalum.
Actress and Broadway singer Valarie Pettiford of UPN's Half & Half remade the song on her 2004 album Hear My Soul.
The song is sampled by SWV on their song "When This Feeling" from their 1996 album New Beginning.
Renee Olstead sings the song on her 2004 self-titled album.
Marina Prior recorded the song for her 2012 album Both Sides Now
Remix version[edit]
In 2004, Muldaur's original version was featured in the CD "What Is Hip: Remix Project 1", a compilation of pop songs remixed for the clubs. The single is billed as the "Cuica Remix", with the track extended from its 3:49 recording to 4:49, incorporating portions of the background vocal, strings, and instrumental break with semi-chilled out Ibiza-themed elements.
In popular culture[edit]
An instrumental version was used in the 1975 movie White Line Fever, as was another David Nichtern song, "Drifting and Dreaming of You".
It was performed in American Pie at the prom.
In the short lived Jenny McCarthy Show on MTV an entire skit revolved around people buried up to their necks like a garden of human lettuce heads being forced to sing this song on command by their deranged captor.
The song is sung by the lounge act at the hotel in Sofia Coppola's film Lost in Translation.
The American multiracial female R&B duo Harem took their name and the concept for their self-titled 1995 album from the song.[citation needed]
In Christopher Guest's 1997 film Waiting For Guffman, the characters Ron (Fred Willard) and Sheila (Catherine O'Hara) audition for the play Red, White and Blaine with a comically inept performance of the song.
On the November 18, 2000 episode of Saturday Night Live (season 26, episode 6), during the "Rap Street" segment, Tom Green (as MC Kevin Gustafson) performs a rap on top of this song.[13]
In the 2002 film, The First $20 Million Is Always the Hardest, Adam Garcia's character, Andy, plays this song while sitting on the floor of his room and Rosario Dawson's character, Alisa, comes in singing and dancing.
In 2007's Whisper, where character Roxanne (Sarah Wayne Callies) lulls the kidnapped boy, David Sandborn (Blake Woodruff) to sleep.
In Gex 3: Deep Cover Gecko, Gex parodies the song playing in the level Tut TV.
The song is used as the closing theme to The King's Court after Cleveland Cavaliers games and The 10th Inning after Cleveland Indians games (both hosted by Greg Brinda) on WKNR AM 850 in Cleveland.
In 2005, Howling Pig Smelly Soaps & Other Stuff of Seattle, Wash. began selling soap and other products with a scent called "Midnight at the Oasis", inspired by the song.
In the Gilmore Girls episode "Eight O'Clock at the Oasis", a cuckoo-type clock (in Dwight's house) is featured that plays "Midnight at the Oasis" on the hour.
In the episode "Undertow" from The Wire, the song plays as Beatrice "Beadie" Russell meets with an old boyfriend in a diner. Since "The Wire" primarily used source cues as a soundtrack/music score, the usage of this song is equivalent to an inclusion in the soundtrack.
In the Heroes episode "Acceptance" in 2009, the song is playing in the background of the flashback sequence when young Nathan Petrelli is playing with his toy airplane.
The song was frequently used as bumper music on Coast to Coast AM with Art Bell.
References[edit]
Jump up ^ Fontenot, Robert (February 21, 2016). "The 10 Ickiest Soft-Rock Hits of the '70s". About.com. Archived from the original on May 7, 2016.
Jump up ^ Billboard Year-End Hot 100 singles of 1974
Jump up ^ Greenwald, Matthew. "Song Review: Midnight at the Oasis, Maria Muldaur". AllMusic. Retrieved 2007-03-18.
Jump up ^ "Amos Garrett". Homespun Video. Retrieved 2007-03-18.
Jump up ^ Maria Muldaur (4 of 8) - Midnight at the Oasis on YouTube from Living Legends (January 8, 2008)
Jump up ^ [1]
Jump up ^ http://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/discover/films-videos-sound-recordings/rpm/Pages/image.aspx?Image=nlc008388.5034a&URLjpg=http%3a%2f%2fwww.collectionscanada.gc.ca%2fobj%2f028020%2ff4%2fnlc008388.5034a.gif&Ecopy=nlc008388.5034a
Jump up ^ http://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/discover/films-videos-sound-recordings/rpm/Pages/image.aspx?Image=nlc008388.5045&URLjpg=http%3a%2f%2fwww.collectionscanada.gc.ca%2fobj%2f028020%2ff4%2fnlc008388.5045.gif&Ecopy=nlc008388.5045
Jump up ^ http://www.billboard.com/charts/adult-contemporary/1974-05-04
Jump up ^ http://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/discover/films-videos-sound-recordings/rpm/Pages/image.aspx?Image=nlc008388.3893a&URLjpg=http%3a%2f%2fwww.collectionscanada.gc.ca%2fobj%2f028020%2ff4%2fnlc008388.3893a.gif&Ecopy=nlc008388.3893a
Jump up ^ http://www.musicoutfitters.com/topsongs/1974.htm
Jump up ^ http://www.everyhit.com
Jump up ^ http://snltranscripts.jt.org/00/00frapstreet.phtml
External links[edit]
Lyrics of this song at MetroLyrics
Listen to "Midnight at the Oasis" on YouTube
All Music Guide
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Midnight_at_the_Oasis&oldid=802914416"
Categories:
1973 songs
1974 singles
American soft rock songs
Delicious Vinyl singles
FFRR Records singles
Reprise Records singles
Songs about sexuality
Song recordings produced by Lenny Waronker
Hidden categories:
Articles with hAudio microformats
All articles with unsourced statements
Articles with unsourced statements from May 2016
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
Languages
Add links
This page was last edited on 29 September 2017, at 08:00.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view

key: html

type: local

value: div

attrs: id class

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

attrs: id class style

value: a

attrs: id class lang

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

values: jump-to-nav mw-jump

value: th

attrs: colspan class style

value: tr

value: img

attrs: alt src width height srcset data-file-width data-file-height

values: "Midnight at the Oasis" Single by Maria Muldaur.jpg

attrs: href class

value: td

attrs: colspan style

attrs: href title

values:
/wiki/Record_of_the_Year
mw-redirect
Record of the Year

values: div-col columns column-count column-count-2

values: -moz-column-count: 2; -webkit-column-count: 2; column-count: 2;

values:
left
headerSort
0
columnheader button
Sort ascending

values:
text-align:center;
headerSort
0
columnheader button
Sort ascending

values: border-collapse: collapse; padding: 0; border: 0; background:transparent; width:100%;

values: width: 33%; text-align: center; vertical-align: top; padding: .2em .1em .2em 0;

values: width: 33%; text-align: center; vertical-align: top; padding:.2em .1em;

values: width: 33%; text-align: center; vertical-align: top; padding: .2em 0 .2em .1em;

values: background: transparent; width: 100%; min-width: 100%; border-collapse: collapse;

values: width:33%; padding:.2em .1em .2em 0; text-align: center;

values: width:33%; padding:.2em .1em; text-align: center;

values: width:33%; padding:.2em 0 .2em .1em; text-align: center;

values:
/wiki/Brand_New_Heavies
mw-redirect
Brand New Heavies

values:
/wiki/Beautiful_Music
mw-redirect
Beautiful Music

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (May 2016)

values:
noprint Inline-Template Template-Fact
white-space:nowrap;

values:
/wiki/Waiting_For_Guffman
mw-redirect
Waiting For Guffman

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.allmusic.com/song/t4239463

values:
nofollow
external free
http://www.everyhit.com

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.allmusic.com/song/t2626511

values: Category:Song recordings produced by Lenny Waronker

values: Category:Articles with hAudio microformats

values: Category:All articles with unsourced statements

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from May 2016

values: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

values: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

values: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

values: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

values:
/wiki/Midnight_at_the_Oasis
View the content page [ctrl-alt-c]
c

values: Discussion about the content page [ctrl-alt-t]

values: p-namespaces navigation vectorTabs p-namespaces-label

values:
p-variants
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-variants-label

values: Past revisions of this page [ctrl-alt-h]

values: p-views navigation vectorTabs p-views-label

values:
p-cactions
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-cactions-label

values:
mw-wiki-logo
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page

values:
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page [ctrl-alt-z]
z

values: Featured content – the best of Wikipedia

values: Find background information on current events

values:
/wiki/Special:Random
Load a random article [ctrl-alt-x]
x

values: portal navigation p-navigation p-navigation-label

values: /static/images/wikimedia-button-1.5x.png 1.5x, /static/images/wikimedia-button-2x.png 2x

values: /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_132x47.png 1.5x, /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_176x62.png 2x

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Midnight_at_the_Oasis rootpage-Midnight_at_the_Oasis vector-nav-directionality skin-vector action-view