text:
Discontinued Bose headphones
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
For a list of current Bose headphones, see Bose headphones.
This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. No cleanup reason has been specified. Please help improve this article if you can. (December 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
This is a list of headphone products sold by the Bose Corporation that have been discontinued.
Contents
1 Timeline of Bose headphones
2 Previous noise reducing headphones
2.1 Bose QuietComfort Headphones
2.2 Bose QuietComfort 2 Headphones
2.3 Bose QuietComfort 2 Headphones "Second Edition"
3 Previous TriPort headphones
3.1 Bose Around-Ear (AE) Headphones
3.2 On-Ear headphones
3.3 Bose In-Ear (IE) Headphones
3.3.1 IE v2
3.3.2 IE v3
4 Previous Mobile Headphones
4.1 Bose Mobile In-Ear (MIE) Headphones
4.2 Bluetooth Headset
5 Previous Aviation headsets
5.1 Bose Aviation Headset Series I
5.2 Bose Aviation Headset Series II
5.3 Bose Aviation Headset X "Magellan"
5.4 Bose Aviation Headset X "Explorer"
6 Awards
7 Criticisms
7.1 QuietComfort Headphones (QC1)
7.2 QuietComfort 2 Headphones (QC2)
8 References
Timeline of Bose headphones
[
view
talk
edit
]
Some names have been abbreviated and at times full names have been shortened to save space
("QC" = QuietComfort; "SE" = Second Edition;"IE" = In-Ear; "MIE" = Mobile In-Ear)
("AE" = Around-Ear; "OE" = On-Ear; "BH" = Bluetooth headset)
Sources: Bose owners guides[1]
Previous noise reducing headphones[edit]
Bose QuietComfort Headphones[edit]
Bose QuietComfort Headphones
The Bose QuietComfort Headphones (also now known as the QC1) were the first consumer level headphones released by the company in 2000.[2]
The Bose QuietComfort Headphones came with
an external noise controlling mechanism, which enables the control of both volume and background noise cancellation
Bose's patented Acoustic Noise Cancellation Technology
Active Equalization requiring power to improve the sound quality and counteract the effects of active noise cancelling
A carry case
Bose QuietComfort 2 Headphones[edit]
Bose QuietComfort 2 Headphones
To address some of the concerns with the QuietComfort Headphones, in 2003, Bose released their successor, the Bose QuietComfort 2 Headphones (also now known as the QC2). Like their predecessor, the QuietComfort 2 Headphones retailed at a suggested price of 299 USD in the US and approximately 480 USD in Europe (£275).
Changes from the original QuietComfort Headphones include:
TriPort headphone technology giving improved bass and treble
Lower noise floor
Improved acoustics
Removal of the battery box
On-off switch on the right earcup
Collapsible one-wire attenuator to control the noise cancellation level (from two levels)
Use of only one AAA battery inside the right earcup, instead of two AA batteries in the former battery box
Foldable form-factor
Smaller carrying case
Single cord that can be detached if the user doesn't want to listen to music
Champagne coloured cups (rather than the matte silver of the subsequent second edition)
There is a trade-in program for previous owners wishing to upgrade to the QuietComfort headphones.
Connector: 3.5 mm (1/8 inch) stereo mini plug, ¼ inch adapter and two prong airline adaptor
Cord length: 6 feet (11 feet with included 5-foot extension cable)
Headphone dimensions: 7.75"h x 6.5"w x 1.63"d
Carry case dimensions: 8.25"h x 7.5"w x 2"d
Weight: 6.9 ounces, with cables included
Frequency Response: 20 Hz to 18 kHz
Operating temperature: 0°C to +40°C
Storage temperature: −30°C to +70°C
Battery: One AAA alkaline battery
Battery life: 30 to 40 hours of use
Cup rotation: vertical axis ±20°; horizontal axis +45° / −5°; storage position 90°
Warranty: 1 year
Price: $ 299 USD; £ 275.00 GBP; € 399.00
[3]
Bose QuietComfort 2 Headphones "Second Edition"[edit]
Bose QuietComfort 2 Second Edition Headphones
The Bose QuietComfort 2 Second Edition was introduced in August 2005. The earcup color was changed to silver, "acoustic equalization" was added, and the earcups incorporated magnetic pads.
The QC2 is powered by a single AAA battery inside the right earcup with a built-in attenuator. The cord can be detached at the user's discretion for stand-alone noise cancellation.
JAL provides Bose QuietComfort 2 Headphones for use by passengers in premium flight classes on some long-haul flights.[4]
A cellphone adapter was made available to users for the second edition and QC3 headphones.[5][6]
Previous TriPort headphones[edit]
Bose Around-Ear (AE) Headphones[edit]
Bose Around-Ear (AE) headphones
Introduced in 2002[7] and originally called the 'TriPort headphones', they were renamed the 'Bose Around-Ear (AE) Headphones' in October 2006. The Bose Around-Ear headphones don't have active noise cancellation (as opposed to the QuietComfort 2 headphones). For a short time, the Bose Around-Ear headphones were also sold with a Bose-badged CD player as a part of the company's 'TriPort CD Music System'.
A New York Times reviewer commented that "the research effort paid off: the [Bose Around-Ear Headphone] has very full sound and works equally well with all types of music," but judged a competitor's headset, priced at a lower price of the Around-Ear's, to be "just as comfortable and just as light, and the sound it produced was just as full and clear."[8] The competitive product was a Sennheiser HD 497, which "like the Bose [Around-Ear Headphones]... deliberately leaks some frequencies to balance the sound." However, the reviewer notes that the HD 497 are bigger than the AE.
A few months after the release of the Apple iPhone in 2007, Bose redesigned the AE's headphone plug to make it iPhone compatible
On-Ear headphones[edit]
The Bose On-Ear headphones were introduced on October 12, 2006. These are similar to the Bose QuietComfort 3 Headphones, but without active noise cancellation. The cord is detachable; both 43 and 16-inch cords are available.[9] Shortly after the release of the iPhone in 2007 Bose redesigned the OE's headphone plug on the detachable cords to make it iPhone compatible. In 2008, the Red Dot Award for product design was awarded to Bose On-Ear Headphones.[10]
Bose In-Ear (IE) Headphones[edit]
3 versions of the Bose In-Ear (IE) headphones
The Bose In-Ear headphones were introduced on October 12, 2006 as the company's first earbud product. Three eartips of different sizes are included. Bose claims that the IE's silicone tips are shaped to fit the ear's natural curves more closely.[11]
The TriPort airducts in this product consist of two air ducts in the large grille, and one "stand-alone" air duct on top of each earbud.[11]
After customer complaints stating that the "silicone ear tips become detached under certain conditions" and that the "stability of the headphones during certain activities, such as exercise, could be improved", Bose set up a website to send redesigned ear tips and a new clip and the lanyard for free.[12][13][14]
IE v2[edit]
On March 15, 2007 Bose redesigned the headphones which fixed many of the issues with the silicone ear tip stability. The cord for the redesigned headphones is now black and white to signify the change.[14][15]
IE v3[edit]
Shortly after the release of the iPhone, on October 11, 2007, Bose redesigned the IE's for a 3rd time. They made the headphone plug iPhone-compatible and removed the circuit board from the headphone plug and moved it up the cord. Bose also included a shirt clip and a lanyard on this revision as well for stability during active use.
Sometime before Christmas of 2008 Bose added a hologram to the back of the circuit board, and other distinctive features, to aid in the identification of counterfeits.[16][17][18][19] A new plastic carton has a window to show the hologram on the back of the circuit board of the In-Ear Headphones for easy detection of genuine Bose products.
Previous Mobile Headphones[edit]
Bose Mobile In-Ear (MIE) Headphones[edit]
On July 16, 2009 Bose released a mobile version of their In-Ear headsets. It features an in-line microphone and control to navigate music remotely on select cellphones/music players, and answer/end button for calls and includes 2.5mm cellphone adapters.
Bluetooth Headset[edit]
On November 1, 2010, Bose released its first wireless Bluetooth headset.[20] It has technology that will allow a user to move between a quiet and loud environment, without having to change volume controls. The headset has a special design that allows its built-in mic to selectively sense a user’s voice, and acoustically reject the background sounds that interfere with it — so that the caller is heard more, and distractions are heard less. The headset also comes with Bose StayHear tips for a comfy and secure fit without the need for an ear hook. The headset also has a sliding on/off switch for answering calls or turning the device on and off. Finally, the Bose Bluetooth headset comes with a protective case and 3 ear-tips.[21]
Previous Aviation headsets[edit]
Bose Aviation Headset Series I[edit]
The Bose Series I Aviation Headset is introduced in 1989 as the first commercially available Active Noise Cancellation headset specially designed for pilots, also used by the United States Air Force.
Initially, the Bose Aviation Family were not to be sold to civilian markets, since this is considered to Bose as a military application.
Although the Aviation Headset used active noise reduction technology, the headphones relied more upon the clamping force of the headphones and other passive noise reducing technology. Also Bose used a 9-pin connection instead of the commonly used 6-pin comm. connection.
The Aviation Headset includes:
Active equalization - Clean full sound quality that enhances intelligibility of radio and intercom audio and enables natural sounding music reproduction
Acoustic noise cancellation - reduces noise over the full range of the human hearing
Integrated boom detaches, to be worn on either the right or left earcup.
Portable carry case for headphone and accessories
There is an installed control module that will allow the headphones to be permanently installed in the aircraft thus eliminating the need for battery power.
Series I aviation headsets are distinguished by the clear windows on the earcups or by noting that the on/off switch and volume control are located on the separate control module.
Weight: 18 ounces
Battery: NiCa battery
Battery life: 8 hours of use
Shielded: No
Warranty: 2 years
Price: $995 USD
Bose Aviation Headset Series II[edit]
The Bose Series II Aviation Headset is introduced in 1995 with improvements for the aviation industry, earning the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association’s (AOPA) “Product of the Year” award.
Reducing noise is important for intelligibility. U.S. Air Force tests, achieved intelligibility scores of 95% at 115 dB—compared to 80% for conventional headsets.[22]
Changes from Series I to II are
Volume was put on the headbands.
On/off buttons were put on the headband.
Individual left and right volume controls
Relied less on passive noise reduction than its predecessor.
Now using the more commonly found 6-pin comm connection
There is an installed control module that will allow the headphones to be permanently installed in the aircraft thus eliminating the need for battery power.
Series II aviation headsets are distinguished by the dual volume controls and on/off switch located on the headset itself.
Weight: 22 ounces
Battery: Six AA alkaline batteries
Battery life: 12 – 16 hours of use
Shielded: No
Warranty: 2 years
Price: $995.00 USD
Bose Aviation Headset X "Magellan"[edit]
The Bose Aviation Headset X (Pronounced ten not the letter X), released in 1998, designed for pilots also used by the United States Air Force.
The TriPort speakers were introduced with the release of the Aviation X headsets. With their introduction not only was the sound quality improved over its predecessor, but due to its design the weight of the headphones was reduced. The TriPort speakers leave more space inside the ear cups for passive attenuation and allows for reduced headband force. This is mainly since the porting technology diminished the need for more passive noise reducing techniques such as clamping force and extra padding. But these headphones do have more passive noise reduction than the QC2’s giving them better noise reducing abilities with the same active noise reduction technology.
Reducing noise is important for intelligibility. U.S. Air Force tests on their previous Bose Acoustic Noise Cancelling headsets achieved intelligibility scores of 95% at 115 dB—compared to 80% for conventional headsets. The Bose Aviation Headset X offers even more noise reduction.[22]
The Improvements over the Series II include
TriPort speaker technology giving a lower bass, a lighter weight, and significantly reduced clamping force.
Redesigned boom microphone - for increased loudness and improved pivot design for more accurate positioning of the boom near the pilot's mouth
Low battery life indicator - flashes red when less than 5 hours of battery life remain.
Improved immunity from electro-magnetic interference (EMI) - reduces noise prevalent in larger business jets and military applications.
Ability to use with a helicopter with an additional adaptor.[23]
There is an installed control module that will allow the headphones to be permanently installed in the aircraft thus eliminating the need for battery power.
The Bose Aviation Headset X costs $995. Keep in mind that the Bose Aviation X was designed to be more of a military and/or aviational application and cannot be used to create and/or listen to music, although it's possible to obtain the Bose Aviation X through civilian channels, mainly through Bose-owned outlets.
Aviation Headset X was voted #1 by Professional Pilot Magazine’s headset preference survey 5 years in a Row from 2000 to 2005 (Headset Preference Survey, 12/05)
Sensitivity/Sound pressure level: 90 dB/mW
Impedance: 162 ohms Monaural; 320 ohms Stereo
Battery: One 9V battery
Battery life: 20 hours of use
Dimensions: (4.5 to 5.7)"h (4.8 to 6.3)"w
Weight: 12 ounces or 340 grams
Frequency response: 15 Hz to 15 kHz
Shielded: Yes
Warranty: 2 years
Price: $995 USD
[24]
Bose Aviation Headset X "Explorer"[edit]
The original Bose Aviation Headset X ("ten")[25] was released in 1998. This was Bose's first product using "triport" technology, and according to Bose was lighter in weight, used less headband force, had better sound, and better noise reduction than Bose's previous aviation headset.
Aviation Headset X was voted #1 by Professional Pilot magazine's headset preference survey five years in a row from 2000 to 2005.[26]
The July 2003 "Explorer" model added improvements in the "down cable" assembly (including the boom microphone and battery pack).[27]
Bose offers an accessory for this model which allows the headphone to be permanently installed in the aircraft and eliminates the need for battery power, and offers trade-up programs for earlier models.[23]
Awards[edit]
2002 Red Dot award for product design on the QuietComfort 1[28]
2004 Red Dot award for product design on the QuietComfort 2[29]
Criticisms[edit]
Consumer reactions to different headphones and earbuds do vary, since audio products tend to perform differently for a wide variety of reasons. The performance of headphones depends greatly on a variety of factors, including musical genre, the recording medium (whether vinyl, CD, DVD, compressed audio file, etc.) and playback equipment.
QuietComfort Headphones (QC1)[edit]
Frequent cracking of the headband and earcups. Users had issues with the headband and earcup construction.
Excessive "hissing". Users claimed that there was significant audible hissing when the noise cancellation capability was turned on.
Lack of collapsibility. The QuietComfort Headphones were not collapsible.
"Two-corded syndrome". Unlike most modern full-sized noise-cancelling headphones, the Bose QuietComfort Headphones used two cords (one on each earcup). Because the cords were very long, it was very easy to tangle items in or trip over the cord, causing damage to either the headband or the earcup.
Battery-powered noise attenuation pack. The headphones required an external noise-cancellation control device, considered unwieldy by many users.
Battery usage. This product required 2 AAA batteries.
No detachable cable. The Bose QuietComfort headphones were permanently attached to the stereo cord. If a user wished to use the noise cancellation feature without listening to music, there would be a stereo jack dangling from his or her head.
QuietComfort 2 Headphones (QC2)[edit]
Noise cancellation had to be active for any input/output to be present. When the battery died, so did the sound.
Dependent noise cancellation. The headphones cannot be used with the noise cancellation turned off.
Vulnerability to electrostatic noise. The QuietComfort 2 Headphones are prone to radio frequency interference arising from other radio-emitting devices operating in the immediate vicinity.
Durability. Users complained about the use of significant amounts of plastic in the headphones' construction.
References[edit]
Jump up ^ Bose Owner's Guides for Headphones and Headsets. Retrieved November 15, 2009.
Jump up ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2007-11-10. Retrieved 2008-01-31.
Jump up ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2006-03-27. Retrieved 2006-06-13.
Jump up ^ "JAL International Flights - In-flight Entertainment (First Class)". Japan Airlines website. Retrieved 2008-02-01.
Jump up ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2008-05-09. Retrieved 2009-08-23.
Jump up ^ [1][dead link]
Jump up ^ "Can the science of acoustics reduce the roar of an airplane engine?". Bose Corporation. Archived from the original on 2012-03-04. Retrieved 2006-08-06.
Jump up ^ Austen, Ian (2002-10-31). "When Headphones Measure Up to the Music". The New York Times. Retrieved 2010-12-25.
Jump up ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2010-02-25. Retrieved 2010-03-01.
Jump up ^ "online-exhibition | Red Dot Award: Product Design". En.red-dot.org. Retrieved 2016-11-06.
^ Jump up to: a b "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2010-12-21. Retrieved 2010-11-10.
Jump up ^ "archive.org - Complimentary Silicone Tips and Stability Enhancement Kit for Bose In-Ear Headphones". Bose website. Archived from the original on 2008-03-04. Retrieved 2009-09-23.
Jump up ^ "BOSE: Customer Service Never Sounded So Sweet – Consumerist". Consumerist.com. 2007-09-23. Retrieved 2016-11-06.
^ Jump up to: a b Berger, Ivan (2007-03-22). "Hang on to the Beat With Earbuds That Stay Put". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-02-01.
Jump up ^ Akhtar, Iyaz (2007-03-08). "Bose upgrades in-ear headphones with free accessories - CNET". News.cnet.com. Retrieved 2016-11-06.
Jump up ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2010-12-22. Retrieved 2010-11-10.
Jump up ^ "fakeheadphones.com". fakeheadphones.com. Retrieved 2016-11-06.
Jump up ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2010-07-16. Retrieved 2010-11-10.
Jump up ^ Identifying Fake Bose headphones. YouTube. 2009-03-30. Retrieved 2009-09-23.
Jump up ^ "Top 10 Best Bluetooth Headphones In 2016 Reviews". Top10bestpro.com. 2016-10-24. Retrieved 2016-11-06.
Jump up ^ "Bose Bluetooth Headset Automatically Adapts to Both Quiet and Noisy Environments". Chipchick.com. Retrieved 2016-11-06.
^ Jump up to: a b [2]
^ Jump up to: a b "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2006-06-23. Retrieved 2006-06-13.
Jump up ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2006-03-12. Retrieved 2006-03-12.
Jump up ^ "The Bose Aviation Headset X". AVWeb. Retrieved 2008-02-01.
Jump up ^ "Headset Preference Survey". Professional Pilot: 82. December 2005.
Jump up ^ "Doug's 2003 Bose X Active Noise Reduction Headset Review". Doug's Domain: Doug Vetter ATP/CFI. Archived from the original on 2008-05-13. Retrieved 2008-02-01.
Jump up ^ "online-exhibition | Red Dot Award: Product Design". En.red-dot.org. Retrieved 2016-11-06.
Jump up ^ "Red Dot Design Award: product design". En.red-dot.org. Retrieved 2016-11-06.
hide
v
t
e
Bose Corporation
Stereo Speakers
Stereo speaker packages
SoundDocks
SoundLinks
Wave systems
Computer speakers
Headphones and headsets
Discontinued headphones and headsets
Home Theater
5.1 systems
2.1 systems
Televisions
Soundbars
Surround sound speaker packages
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discontinued_Bose_headphones&oldid=851552432"
Categories:
Bose Corporation
Headphones
Noise reduction
Hidden categories:
Pages using Timeline
All articles with dead external links
Articles with dead external links from November 2016
Articles needing cleanup from December 2009
All pages needing cleanup
Cleanup tagged articles without a reason field from December 2009
Wikipedia pages needing cleanup from December 2009
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
Languages
Add links
This page was last edited on 23 July 2018, at 02:41 (UTC).
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

key: html

type: local

value: div

attrs: id class

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

value: a

attrs: id class lang

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

attrs: class href

values: mw-jump-link #mw-head

values: mw-jump-link #p-search

attrs: href title

values:
note
hatnote navigation-not-searchable

value: td

value: b

value: span

value: i

value: small

values: plainlinks metadata ambox ambox-style ambox-Cleanup

values:
/wiki/Bose_(company)
mw-redirect
Bose (company)

values: checkbox button toctogglecheckbox toctogglecheckbox display:none

values: Template talk:Timeline of Bose headphones

values:
text-align: right;
plainlinks hlist navbar

values: padding: 3px;text-align: left; border: 1px solid silver

values: Edit section: Previous noise reducing headphones

values: Edit section: Bose QuietComfort Headphones

values: Edit section: Bose QuietComfort 2 Headphones "Second Edition"

values: Edit section: Previous TriPort headphones

values: Edit section: Bose Around-Ear (AE) Headphones

values:
/wiki/Apple_iPhone
mw-redirect
Apple iPhone

values: Edit section: Bose In-Ear (IE) Headphones

values: Edit section: Previous Mobile Headphones

values: Edit section: Bose Mobile In-Ear (MIE) Headphones

values: Edit section: Previous Aviation headsets

values: Edit section: Bose Aviation Headset Series II

values: Edit section: Bose Aviation Headset X "Magellan"

values:
/wiki/Sound_pressure_level
mw-redirect
Sound pressure level

values:
/wiki/PP3_battery
mw-redirect
PP3 battery

values: Edit section: Bose Aviation Headset X "Explorer"

values: Edit section: QuietComfort Headphones (QC1)

values: Edit section: QuietComfort 2 Headphones (QC2)

values:
/wiki/Radio_frequency_interference
mw-redirect
Radio frequency interference

values:
nofollow
external autonumber
http://www.bose.com/phones

values: -moz-column-width: 30em; -webkit-column-width: 30em; column-width: 30em; list-style-type: decimal;

values: nowraplinks collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner mw-collapsible mw-made-collapsible

values: Category:All articles with dead external links

values: Category:Articles with dead external links from November 2016

values: Category:Articles needing cleanup from December 2009

values: Category:Cleanup tagged articles without a reason field from December 2009

values: Category:Wikipedia pages needing cleanup from December 2009

values: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

values: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

values: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

values: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

values:
/wiki/Discontinued_Bose_headphones
View the content page [ctrl-alt-c]
c

values: Discussion about the content page [ctrl-alt-t]

values: p-namespaces navigation vectorTabs p-namespaces-label

values:
p-variants
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-variants-label

values: Past revisions of this page [ctrl-alt-h]

values: p-views navigation vectorTabs p-views-label

values:
p-cactions
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-cactions-label

values:
mw-wiki-logo
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page

values:
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page [ctrl-alt-z]
z

values: Featured content – the best of Wikipedia

values: Find background information on current events

values:
/wiki/Special:Random
Load a random article [ctrl-alt-x]
x

values: portal navigation p-navigation p-navigation-label

values: Guidance on how to use and edit Wikipedia

values: About the project, what you can do, where to find things

values: A list of recent changes in the wiki [ctrl-alt-r]

values: portal navigation p-interaction p-interaction-label

values: List of all English Wikipedia pages containing links to this page [ctrl-alt-j]

values: Recent changes in pages linked from this page [ctrl-alt-k]

values:
/wiki/Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard
Upload files [ctrl-alt-u]
u

values: A list of all special pages [ctrl-alt-q]

values: Permanent link to this revision of the page

values: Link to connected data repository item [ctrl-alt-g]

values: Printable version of this page [ctrl-alt-p]

values: /static/images/wikimedia-button-1.5x.png 1.5x, /static/images/wikimedia-button-2x.png 2x

values: /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_132x47.png 1.5x, /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_176x62.png 2x

values:
suggestions
display: none; font-size: 13px;

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Discontinued_Bose_headphones rootpage-Discontinued_Bose_headphones skin-vector action-view


text:
Potential London NFL franchise
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: References section contains footnotes, which should be in the prose and not there. Please help improve this article if you can. (September 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
The London NFL franchise is a hypothetical National Football League (NFL) American football team based in London, England; formed as a new expansion team, or by relocating one of the existing 32 NFL teams currently based in the United States. Should the league establish a team in London, it would become the first of the major professional sports leagues in the United States and Canada to establish a franchise outside either of those two countries.
A London NFL franchise would be intended to grow the league's revenues and provide further access to the United Kingdom and European markets. However, the agreement of league owners is needed to undertake an expansion or relocation, and a London franchise would face financial, legal and logistical challenges. Possible home stadia for the London team include one or more of Wembley Stadium, Twickenham Stadium or Tottenham Hotspur F.C.'s new stadium in White Hart Lane, Tottenham.
The NFL is aiming to establish a London franchise by around 2021, and has the active support of the UK government. Since 2007, the league has held multiple regular season games in London each season as part of the NFL International Series, allowing the league to test solutions to some of the challenges facing a hypothetical London franchise.
Contents
[hide]
1 Background
2 Target date
3 Mechanics
3.1 Expansion franchise
3.2 Shared franchise
3.3 Relocating a franchise
3.3.1 Jacksonville Jaguars
3.3.2 Franchises with market knowledge
3.3.3 Franchises with short leases
3.3.4 Oakland Raiders
3.3.5 Weaker franchises
3.4 Multiple franchises
4 Potential stadiums
4.1 Wembley Stadium
4.2 Northumberland Park
4.3 Twickenham Stadium
4.4 Multiple stadiums
5 Issues
5.1 Logistics
5.2 Off-season and training camp
5.3 Fanbase
5.4 Broadcaster
5.5 League schedule
5.6 Competitiveness
5.7 Tax
5.8 Visas
5.9 European Union law
5.10 Collective bargaining agreement
6 See also
7 References
Background[edit]
Although American football in the United Kingdom has historically been a niche sport, British interest in the NFL peaked in the 1980s, in which time London hosted some pre-season games; during the 1990s, the city hosted the London Monarchs in the league's developmental Europe League.[1] However, as all NFL Europe franchises outside Germany and the Netherlands, the Monarchs were ultimately relocated due to lack of public interest. Popular interest waned with the growth of soccer's Premier League in the 1990s, although it grew again from 2007 following the establishment of the International Series. It also led to steady increases in actual participation in amateur games.[1]
Target date[edit]
Reporting on unnamed sources who attended a 2012 meeting of the NFL's International Committee, CBS stated that while league/owner discussions of a possible London team had previously generally been regarded as a "more a far-off concept than near-term possibility", the mood had now palpably shifted to one of "when, not if", with the NFL planning for a London team within 10 years, earlier than some team owners had anticipated. It was believed that because other issues such as the CBA renegotiation had been resolved, creating a London franchise was now being treated as a focal point of the NFL's desire to expand globally.[2] Speaking in 2015, Mark Waller firmed up this view, explaining "[The NFL] have always said that we felt that we started in 2007 with the [International Series] games and we felt it was a 15 year process so that would give us years ’21, ’22 and that feels sort of right – five or six years."[3] By the start of 2016 he was even more confident, stating "I think we're on track to deliver [a franchise by 2022]. I fundamentally believe we will deliver that".[4] He has also said he would feel he would have personally failed in his role if it does not happen by 2022.[5] Waller is clear however that there is no specific timetable, and it would only happen "when we're ready" and there was real certainty everything needed was in place.[6] In both 2014 and 2015 the Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne confirmed he was in talks with the NFL over the arrangements for setting up a London franchise, and that it could be achieved "in the next few years, maybe four or five years time."[3][7] The 2022 timeline was still on target as of September 2017, with the league noting that the groundwork in London was ready for such a team, and that the 2022 date was chosen because it coincided with the league's collective bargaining agreement and television contracts expiring.[8]
Mechanics[edit]
An affirmative vote of three-quarters of the owners of the NFL's 32 clubs is required before a new team can be created (known as expansion) or before an existing team is allowed to move to a new market (known as relocation), i.e. 24 or more clubs would have to approve of the decision.[9][10]
According to The Guardian, as of 2015 it was "well-known" that a London franchise was a goal of the NFL commissioner Roger Goodell, although "he tends to avoid specifics on the process to make that happen".[11] The NFL's Executive Vice President International Mark Waller is more specific, expressing the goal as "to build a fanbase that would be able to support a franchise".[3] According to Atlanta Falcons owner Arthur Blank speaking in 2014, "The approach that the international committee and the commissioner have taken is, "Let's do London right, and then move from there to potentially somewhere else"."[12]
Expansion franchise[edit]
In the opinion of former NFL executive Jim Bailey, the NFL would probably prefer to create a London-based franchise through the expansion route, since that would offer them more control over the process.[13] According to CBS however, as of 2012 the club owners were generally satisfied with the league's 32 team model, and would prefer a relocation.[2] According to the Associated Press, the 32 team model is seen as advantageous as it offers "competitively balanced schedules and division alignments".[9] CBS also argued that expansion teams generally struggle "for quite some time", suggesting a relocated team would be the better option from the standpoint of competitiveness.[2]
Speaking in 2012, Commissioner Goodell responded positively to the prospect of creating new teams through expansion "in the foreseeable future".[9] It has been speculated that the current (2012) US market was saturated, and so it was unlikely that an expansion team within the US would generate the NFL's desired growth without a fundamental change in their funding model, such as the introduction of pay-per-view TV, which was also seen as unlikely since the league's current broadcasting contracts run to 2022.[9]
Long term, it has been suggested that in order to create substantial growth it seeks, the NFL could create a new division from expansion teams based in Europe and Asia.[9][12]
Shared franchise[edit]
According to NFL.com, one possible way to achieve a London franchise in a way that overcomes the various issues facing a London operation, which has been considered by team owners and NFL executives, is the possibility of a shared franchise, with the team playing four home games in London and four in the US, although this was not considered ideal as it could potentially weaken the appeal given the split fanbase and ultimately not achieve critical mass, in addition it would be unlikely to be attractive to London fans if it were assumed in that scenario that any such team would always play its post-season games in its US base. Speaking in 2015, Waller stated "we've never had real discussions about a shared market".[14]
Relocating a franchise[edit]
Jacksonville Jaguars[edit]
As the designated home team for the International Series, the Jacksonville Jaguars are often mentioned as the most likely existing NFL team to relocate to London, leaving their current home of EverBank Field in Florida.[2][15] It is often pointed out in support that current Jaguars owner Shahid Khan is himself based in London, and also owns London soccer club Fulham F.C. While Khan admits the move has been a success in terms of improving the finances and profile of what was a small and struggling franchise, he has nonetheless been reluctant to commit to a move, preferring the current arrangement.[16][17] On March 27, 2017, it was reported by City A.M. that the Jaguars are in discussion to build a permanent training facility near Wembley Stadium.[citation needed] If done, the team would be the first NFL franchise to have a training facility built outside of the U.S.
Franchises with market knowledge[edit]
As well as the Jacksonville Jaguars, the fact that some other existing franchises have owners with knowledge of the British market due to also owning United Kingdom based sports teams, such as the Glazer family's ownership of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers based in Tampa, Florida and soccer club Manchester United leads to them being suggested as potential relocation candidates. Up until their move to Los Angeles was announced in January 2016, this also included the former St. Louis Rams owned by soccer club Arsenal F.C.'s majority shareholder, Stan Kroenke.[5]
Franchises with short leases[edit]
The fact that the Jacksonville Jaguars have a short term lease on its stadium is also often used to support media speculation that the franchise may be the one to relocate to London. This was also the case for the former St. Louis Rams and San Diego Chargers until their respective moves to Los Angeles in 2016 and 2017 (even so, although the Rams will own their stadium and are almost certain to stay in Los Angeles for the long-term, the Chargers will be leasing a stadium and have not yet established a fan base, leaving open the possibility for another relocation), and the Oakland Raiders until relocation to Las Vegas was approved in 2017.[5]
The most immediate likely candidate for relocation is the Carolina Panthers. The Panthers' lease on Bank of America Stadium expires after the 2018 season, and owner Jerry Richardson, already in declining health and planning to sell the team after his death, was forced to put the team up for sale in December 2017 following accusations of paying hush money for objectionable conduct. Like the Raiders, the timing of these developments is less than ideal since the league does not intend to put a team in London on such short notice.
Oakland Raiders[edit]
It had been suggested that while the Raiders may have appeared to be the most likely candidate due to their lack of prospects in comparison with teams like the Chargers, their need for a solution may have actually been too urgent to be a viable option for London.[18]
Following the Rams move to Los Angeles, a comment by Raiders owner Mark Davis that "The world is a possibility for Raider Nation" was interpreted by some as indicating London was a consideration. Some argued it was their next best option compared to other US markets, for various reasons, and they could have used temporary homes until the move. The name London Raiders may have to be purchased, as it is already in use in ice hockey.[19] Davis's current plan is to keep his team in Oakland in the near term, then move to a stadium set to begin construction in the near future in Las Vegas, Nevada, a move that was approved by NFL owners in 2017 and thereby eliminated the Raiders from the pool of London candidates.[20]
Weaker franchises[edit]
As happened with the Buffalo Bills in 2014, even franchises with relatively long lease agreements but which are otherwise seen as struggling in their own market, are often named by the media as potential candidates for relocation to London, on the basis that those advocating relocation to a more lucrative market would be offering more money than those proposing to stay put. In the specific case of the Bills, it was however suggested that the NFL would oppose relocation since they were the only NFL team which played in New York state (the New York Jets and New York Giants being located in a shared stadium in New Jersey).[21] Another problem in moving the Bills is that the team has been non-competitive for over a decade; the Bills went without a playoff berth from 1999 to 2017, a factor in the failure of the Bills' previous international effort, the Bills Toronto Series. The Bills' lease, which is effectively unbreakable in the short-term, has an exit window in 2019 and expires in 2022, coincidentally the same year as the NFL's target for a London franchise.
Countering one reason often cited as why the Jaguars would move, their low attendances, it has been argued that there are other franchises such as the Buccaneers with even lower attendances and less potential for growth in their own market in comparison.[22]
Multiple franchises[edit]
Given the size of London, it has even been suggested by Atlanta Falcons owner Arthur Blank that there could ultimately be more than one franchise located in London, although not before a team in another European country.[12]
Potential stadiums[edit]
Wembley Stadium[edit]
Wembley Stadium, England's national soccer stadium, was rebuilt and re-opened in 2007, and was the first venue for International Series games in that same year. It was built with locker rooms which are twice the size usually found in soccer venues, which allows them to accommodate a 53-man NFL roster.[1]
Wembley is expected to remain the exclusive venue until at least the second game of the 2016 programme (October 23). The stadium's owners, the Football Association, are reportedly interested in using Wembley as the base of a London team, but it has been suggested by the Telegraph that they may struggle to accommodate a full programme of NFL games, as well as hosting the England national football team. Another potential issue is the natural grass pitch (following the first International Series game, the pitch was upgraded to a partly artificial Desso surface[1]) – England team manager Roy Hodgson having previously complained about the state of the surface after just two International Series games,[15] claiming one player injured their ankle in 2014 because of the cut-up pitch.[23] The issue of NFL markings still being partly visible during soccer matches has also been criticised in the media.[23]
To test the implications of a full season at Wembley, the NFL scheduled two International Series games over two weekends, followed by an England soccer game, to see how the surface copes.[5] Due to the debt incurred in building it, the BBC commented that maximising the number of other events staged at Wembley is vital to the FA's financial health, believing the benefit of the consistent revenue stream of 8 NFL games a year would not escape their attention. Although mindful of the calendar, according to the stadium's managing director speaking in 2013, "Football [(soccer)] is our priority but yes, I'm absolutely confident that if Roger Goodell wanted to have a franchise here, we could absolutely deliver on it."[24]
One possible method of accommodating the full schedule of an NFL franchise that the FA is investigating (as of 2014), is playing some home England fixtures at other football stadiums around the country, something which had not been done since the stadium had been reopened. A 10-year restriction on having to play all home games at Wembley expires in 2017, although Wembley would remain the home of the team.[25] Supporting the idea, the BBC contrasted the low attendances of some England soccer friendlies at Wembley, which reached a record low of 40,181 in 2014, surpassing the previous record of 48,876 in 2011, with the 80,000 crowds for the 2014 three game International Series.[26]
Northumberland Park[edit]
On July 8, 2015 it was announced that the NFL had agreed to stage a minimum of two games a season for a ten-year period at soccer club Tottenham Hotspur's new stadium in Northumberland Park, which is due to open in 2018. This was interpreted as boosting the chances of an eventual London franchise.[27][28] As a result of the deal, the stadium is to be specifically designed for both American and English versions of football. It has a retractable natural grass pitch over an artificial surface to be used for NFL (which should allow both soccer and NFL games to be played on the same weekend[28]), and with locker rooms of sufficient size to accommodate the 53-man size of an NFL team roster. Its proposed capacity of 61,000 was described a being more appropriate for the day to day requirements of an NFL franchise than Wembley's 84,000.[11][28] It has been suggested the design will also eliminate the issue at Wembley whereby the lowest 5,000 seats cannot be used because spectator's view of the pitch is obstructed by the various officials, coaches and players who stand on the sidelines during an NFL game.[29] The architect, Populous, has previously designed 14 NFL stadiums.[28]
Twickenham Stadium[edit]
On November 3, 2015, the NFL also announced it had reached a deal with the Rugby Football Union to host a minimum of three games in three years at Twickenham Stadium, home of the England national rugby team, beginning from the 2016 International Series. The deal is designed to be flexible, i.e. it could involve two fixtures in one year and none the next.[30] The deal also includes an option to add two more games in the same period.[31]
Multiple stadiums[edit]
To resolve some of the issues, it has also been suggested a London franchise may use more than one of the suggested venues as their home stadium.[15]
Issues[edit]
A number of issues need to be resolved before a London franchise can be set up; speaking in 2015 Waller stated "We feel very comfortable from a fan perspective, from a sponsor and a stadium perspective now, that we have all of the right things in place. The one thing that we’ve got to do more work on is how would it work from a team operational standpoint?"[6]
Logistics[edit]
Speaking after talks with the UK government, Dan Marino argued that probably the biggest challenge facing a London franchise is the physical logistics of moving the staff and equipment across the Atlantic for every away game. To overcome this, he speculated that the NFL might follow the example of other sports like basketball and baseball, where some teams play away games in back to back series of three or four games, allowing the team to stay in the US for this part of their schedule.[3] It has been noted that this approach may be problematic as it requires players to spend multiple weeks at a time away from home (whether home is in the US or London), something they would not have to do in a US based franchise. The NFL's use of a salary cap would also make using financial incentives to overcome this problematic.[32] For the 2018 season, the league aims to test the concept of one of the teams playing back-to-back games in London.[8]
Off-season and training camp[edit]
As well as the issue of a home stadium facility, the league has also been considering where a London franchise would hold their training camp, which begins in late July and normally involves several players not yet formally signed to the club. Similarly, another issue is whether or not it would have a base in the US for the off-season period, the gap between whenever their season ends until the start of the following training camp, in which the club will normally hold several meetings regarding staff and player contracts.[1]
As of 2014 the NFL had investigated the possibility of a London team establishing a permanent base in conjunction with a Premier League soccer club, but it was considered unlikely for reasons of infrastructure and scheduling.[1] The league has also considered establishing a secondary base, probably in the Southeastern United States, for the London club to use for circumstances when returning to London is impractical.[8]
Fanbase[edit]
The NFL has set a target of reaching a total of 6 million "avid fans" in the UK before they will consider a London franchise viable, and surveys the UK annually to assess this figure; an avid fan being defined by the NFL as someone who says they're "extremely interested" in the NFL or that it is their favourite sport. Speaking during the 2015 International Series, Waller stated "We’re currently at four million, we were at about 2.3 million when the International Series started [in 2007]. We’re on track to reach that six million target by 2020."[33] Speaking at the start of 2016, he said "The fan base is big enough and passionate enough that it can support a franchise".[4]
It has been suggested that a significant stumbling block to creating the necessary fanbase is ironically the success of the NFL in promoting itself in the UK in the past. Many fans had been drawn into the NFL when the game was popularized in the 1980s, leading to evidence of support for all of the NFL's 32 teams in UK based fans, many of whom would be unlikely to support a London team as a first resort, i.e. being unlikely to consider them anything other than their favorite second team at best, and a potential rival at worst. As a result, while wishing to retain the support of anyone for a London team on a second favorite basis, the NFL's UK operation has been focussing on growing the fan base by reaching out to younger fans without an established allegiance, and others who are entirely new to the sport.[1][11] The NFL's UK operation has pointed to the success of the 1995 expansion team the Carolina Panthers having grown a fanbase in a previously untapped market to support the idea that a London team could do the same.[1]
In an attempt to gauge support for a London team, from the 2015 season the dates and times of the International Series games were adjusted to make them more closely resemble the home fixtures of a London team, as opposed to casting them as one off special events being timed in a fashion more convenient for a US audience.[11]
As of the 2014 International Series, 9 out of 10 tickets for the games were bought by people who live within three hours' travel of London, with 33,000 people choosing to buy a package ticket for all three games.[5] That number had risen to 40,000 repeat customers for the four-game package in 2017.[8]
The league has been encouraged by the fact that the International Series games were still attracting over 80,000 fans for a game like the Detroit Lions versus the Kansas City Chiefs on October 31, 2015, the teams which had the 24th and 31st best records in the NFL at game time, leading The Telegraph to observe that Middlesbrough vs Brentford would be the equivalent English soccer fixture on the day (based on their positions in the Football League Championship).[34]
Broadcaster[edit]
The increasing sums being paid by Sky Sports to broadcast an increasing number of NFL games in the UK is often cited as evidence a London franchise is inevitable, with The Guardian arguing it would be "mutually profitable" for both the NFL and any eventual broadcaster given the domestic rights to the game.[5][11] As of 2014, NFL has increased from being the 18th most watched sport on the Sky during the soccer season (August to May), to the 6th.[1]
League schedule[edit]
The NFL and others have also recognised that the current arrangement of giving all teams that play an International Series game the following week off (a bye-week) as being impractical if a London franchise was created, leading to the need to either change the schedule, or persuade teams to play UK and US fixtures in adjacent weeks.[5] The arrangement practised by the University of Hawaii football team, separated from the U.S. mainland by about 3,900 km/2,400 miles, has been suggested as the model to follow for playing blocks of two to three games, home and away.[1]
While still retaining the bye-week, as a test of the logistics, the first game of the 2015 International Series was the first time teams only travelled to London for the weekend, having previously spent a whole week in the UK.[14]
Competitiveness[edit]
The NFL is mindful of avoiding the perception that any potential London franchise was being established simply to increase the profile and revenue of the league; any team based in London must be competitive and be able to win the Super Bowl.[5]
The scheduling of the first back-to-back weekend fixtures in the 2015 International Series was also a test of a potential London franchise on competitiveness.[14] One potential issue affecting competition that has been identified (by an NFL team owner) is what happens should a London franchise reach the post-season, which could possibly involve a long trip for a west coast based team to London, and then back to the US for the next weekend.[14] In addition to the travel, it is believed this also presents a challenge in terms of potentially leaving away teams only a week to plan a foreign trip (in contrast to teams knowing the regular season schedule months in advance).[1]
While the International Series fixtures have tested the effect on personal of travelling east from the USA to the UK and the playing a game within a few days, because of the bye-week it has yet to be established what the effect is when travelling the other way. It has been suggested this may be tested by scheduling one team to play back to back weekends in the International Series (as the notional home and away team).[14]
Another issue considered is whether or not a London team would have an unfair competitive advantage compared to US based teams, due to the extra distances away teams would have to travel to play them.[1]
Tax[edit]
As of 2013, players appearing in International Series games were subject to UK tax on their income and endorsements on a pro rata basis. If expanded to a full slate of regular season games, it has been suggested that unless the government granted exemptions to attract the NFL, which have been applied to some but not all sports/athletes, then the difference between the UK and US tax codes would be sufficient to dissuade players who are free agents from signing for a London franchise.[13] The talks between the Chancellor and the NFL from 2014 onwards were interpreted by the media as a willingness to offer support in the form of promises of tax exemptions.[7]
Visas[edit]
As of 2013, players appearing in International Series games were admitted on temporary working visas, a situation which would not be possible for players working a full home schedule, which would require visas to be issued by a UK government recognised governing body for the sport. Although the British version of the game is administered by the British American Football Association (BAFA), it is not recognised by the UK government for visa purposes. In order to clear these obstacles, it has been suggested the NFL would either have to create its own governing body in the UK, or work through BAFA after they gain approval. Although not expected to fail, it has been speculated that approval of the governing body could be conditional on restrictions being placed on the activities of the NFL in the UK that would not apply to US teams, depending on the government's view of how the visas benefit sport in the country. Analogies have been drawn to soccer, where players from outside the European Union must be shown to be bringing something "special and different", and teams are required to comprise a minimum number of EU citizens. Individual visas may still also be denied due to issues such as criminal convictions.[13]
European Union law[edit]
As a member of the European Union (EU), much of the UK's laws are based on EU law. It has been suggested that the NFL's use of a draft system and a minimum age limit on players would come into conflict with the EU's laws regarding freedom of movement for workers and competition. Citing sports lawyer Andrew Nixon, ESPN suggested in 2013 that while the draft may be permissible for the same reasons it is in the US, the age restriction had no US analogy, and so how it would be interpreted by the European Commission would be difficult to predict. The impact of the Bosman ruling on players contracts is also unclear. It also argued that while the UK government would have more interest in making adjustments to accommodate a London team, the EU as a whole would have less to gain by adjusting its laws. A suggested workaround of the team being based in the US and simply flying in for games, Nixon said this was "not something that has been done before and it is untested".[13]
On June 23, 2016, the UK voted to leave the EU. A spokesperson for the NFL said that it was working closely with its UK offices and "monitoring" the situation closely.[35] Nonetheless, some speculation has led to keep NFL owners on alert if the UK goes into a recession following an exit from the EU.[36]
Collective bargaining agreement[edit]
Many aspects of NFL players' benefits and conditions are set down by the National Football League collective bargaining agreement, negotiated by the National Football League Players Association (NFLPA), which could potentially impact the establishment of a London franchise.[37][38] Last negotiated in 2011, the current version runs until the 2020 season.
Speaking in September 2014, George Atallah, the NFLPA assistant executive director of external affairs, said of the issue that "A permanent team in London would require collective bargaining between the league and the players’ union and the NFL have not got to the point where they have said we want to raise it." and "Most players enjoy the experience of going over to London and from our perspective a team based in the UK could be viable – but only if the working conditions and health and safety aspects are satisfactory".[38] This followed a 2013 comment that "Expanding to London by definition is a change in working conditions, placing the conversation squarely in the context of collective bargaining".[13]
NBC Sports has speculated that "It's possible that the NFLPA simply will never agree to a London move. If [they] realize that any of them could be traded to the London team, or could have a London-based team as their only option for ongoing NFL employment via free agency, keeping a team out of London would keep that from ever happening."[37]
See also[edit]
List of National Football League games played outside the United States
References[edit]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [37] [38]
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h i j k l m The MMQB (October 2, 2014). "Why London? And Can It Work?".
^ Jump up to: a b c d e CBS (October 28, 2012). "NFL's move to London could come soon; Jags a target".
^ Jump up to: a b c d e Business Reporter (October 2, 2015). "George Osborne backs drive for NFL franchise in London".
^ Jump up to: a b c BBC News (January 20, 2016). "NFL plans permanent UK-based franchise 'in six years'".
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h i BBC News (September 27, 2014). "NFL Wembley: Seven years until London Jaguars? Rams? Raiders?".
^ Jump up to: a b c NBC (September 25, 2015). "Before putting an NFL team in London, league wants to check logistics".
^ Jump up to: a b c The Telegraph (October 22, 2014). "London-based NFL team receives boost with Chancellor confirming he has held talks over a Wembley franchise".
^ Jump up to: a b c d Breer, Albert (September 21, 2017). Game Plan: NFL Believes London is Ready for Team; 2022 Target is Doable. SI.com. Retrieved October 1, 2017.
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f "Vikings in limbo and expansion not on NFL's radar". Associated Press (via NFL.com). May 5, 2012.
^ Jump up to: a b "Three NFL teams apply to move to Los Angeles area". Reuters. January 5, 2016.
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f The Guardian (August 4, 2015). "How close are we to a London Jaguars NFL franchise?".
^ Jump up to: a b c d NBC (June 2, 2014). "Arthur Blank sees "maybe more than one" NFL team in London".
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f ESPN (September 25, 2013). "NFL in London raises legal issues".
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f NFL.com (October 2, 2015). "London team by 2022? NFL continues to forge forward in U.K".
^ Jump up to: a b c d The Telegraph (January 2, 2015). "NFL eye Tottenham's new ground as home for London-based American Football franchise".
^ Jump up to: a b BBC News (October 24, 2015). "NFL: Jacksonville Jaguars' Shahid Khan not sold on London move".
^ Jump up to: a b BBC News (October 22, 2015). "NFL extends Wembley deal to play two games a year until 2020".
^ Jump up to: a b Metro (January 14, 2016). "What does the Rams move to LA from St Louis mean for London's NFL franchise hopes?".
Jump up ^ "San Antonio, London … Raiders headed elsewhere". Retrieved December 21, 2017.
Jump up ^ "Raiders owner Mark Davis reveals new details on potential Las Vegas move". CBSSports.com. Retrieved October 18, 2016.
^ Jump up to: a b SBNation (June 2, 2014). "Buffalo Bills face potential move with upcoming sale".
^ Jump up to: a b CBS (June 5, 2013). "Why not London Bucs? Don't assume Jaguars are moving".
^ Jump up to: a b c The Telegraph (November 6, 2014). "Roy Hodgson fears NFL game will spoil Wembley pitch ahead of Euro 2016 qualifer against Slovenia".
^ Jump up to: a b BBC News (September 24, 2013). "Why the NFL matters to Wembley Stadium's financial future".
^ Jump up to: a b The Guardian (October 8, 2014). "England could hit the road as FA mulls idea of Wembley NFL franchise".
^ Jump up to: a b BBC News (October 9, 2014). "England could play games around country if Wembley gets NFL team".
^ Jump up to: a b BBC News (July 8, 2015). "Tottenham Hotspur will host NFL matches at new stadium".
^ Jump up to: a b c d e Business Insider (July 8, 2015). "The NFL just got closer to putting a team in London".
^ Jump up to: a b The Telegraph (July 8, 2015). "Tottenham sign deal with NFL to stage American Football matches at new 61,000-seater stadium".
^ Jump up to: a b The Telegraph (November 3, 2015). "Twickenham agrees deal to stage NFL games".
^ Jump up to: a b BBC News (November 3, 2015). "NFL to play at Twickenham as three-year deal is announced".
^ Jump up to: a b The Guardian (September 28, 2014). "London looks increasingly likely to get NFL franchise but could it work?".
^ Jump up to: a b The Telegraph (October 24, 2015). "London NFL team needs two million extra fans".
^ Jump up to: a b The Telegraph (October 31, 2015). "NFL expansion to London is 'extraordinary', says Leiweke".
Jump up ^ "NFL 'monitoring' UK situation after Brexit vote". June 24, 2016. Retrieved December 21, 2017.
Jump up ^ Barrabi, Thomas (June 24, 2016). "Will Brexit Bench NFL, NBA In The United Kingdom?". Retrieved December 21, 2017.
^ Jump up to: a b c NBC Sports (October 2, 2013). "NFLPA believes it can block a move to London".
^ Jump up to: a b c The Observer (September 27, 2014). "London NFL franchise remains some way off, players' union says".
[show]
v
t
e
National Football League (2017)
AFC
East North South West
Buffalo Bills
Miami Dolphins
New England Patriots
New York Jets
Baltimore Ravens
Cincinnati Bengals
Cleveland Browns
Pittsburgh Steelers
Houston Texans
Indianapolis Colts
Jacksonville Jaguars
Tennessee Titans
Denver Broncos
Kansas City Chiefs
Los Angeles Chargers
Oakland Raiders
NFC
East North South West
Dallas Cowboys
New York Giants
Philadelphia Eagles
Washington Redskins
Chicago Bears
Detroit Lions
Green Bay Packers
Minnesota Vikings
Atlanta Falcons
Carolina Panthers
New Orleans Saints
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Arizona Cardinals
Los Angeles Rams
San Francisco 49ers
Seattle Seahawks
Seasons
Seasons (by team)
Preseason
Hall of Fame Game
American Bowl
Regular season
Kickoff game
Monday Night Football
International Series
Thanksgiving games
Christmas games
Playoffs
Streaks
Droughts
AFC Championship
NFC Championship
Super Bowl
champions
quarterbacks
Pro Bowl
History
League history
Executive history
Championship history
AFL Championship (1960–1969)
NFL Championship (1920–1969)
Playoff Bowl
Other
Owners
Officials
Properties
Stadiums (chronology)
Timeline
Defunct franchises
Franchise moves and mergers
Los Angeles team history
Records
individual
team
Super Bowl
All time win–loss
Last undefeated
Awards
All-Pro
Numbers (retired)
Hall of Fame
Lore
Nicknames
AFL
Merger
International
Foreign players
London
Toronto
Bills Series
List of games played outside the U.S.
Media
TV
NFL Network
Radio
Management Council
Competition Committee
Collective Bargaining Agreement
NFLPA
Player conduct
Suspensions
Player misconduct
Combine
Draft
Training camp
Rivalries
NFL Foundation
Tied games
Canceled games
Lockouts
Controversies
Cheerleading
Mascots
Color Rush
[show]
v
t
e
American football in the United Kingdom
British American Football Association
List of American football teams in the United Kingdom
GB Lions
BAFA National Leagues
BritBowl
Boston Trophy
British Universities American Football League
BAFANL Premiership
NFC Premiership
East Kilbride Pirates
Edinburgh Wolves
Lancashire Wolverines
Merseyside Nighthawks
Sheffield Giants
Tamworth Phoenix
SFC Premiership
Bristol Aztecs
Bury Saints
Farnham Knights
London Blitz
London Warriors
BAFANL Division 1
NFC North
Doncaster Mustangs
Manchester Titans
Newcastle Vikings
West Coast Trojans
Yorkshire Rams
NFC South
Birmingham Bulls
Coventry Jets
Leicester Falcons
Nottingham Caesars
Sandwell Steelers
SFC Central
Ouse Valley Eagles
Oxford Saints
Solent Thrashers
South Wales Warriors
Sussex Thunder
SFC East
Cambridgeshire Cats
Colchester Gladiators
Kent Exiles
London Hornets
London Olympians
BAFANL Division 2
NFC North
Aberdeen Roughnecks
Clyde Valley Blackhawks
Dumfries Hunters
Glasgow Tigers
NFC Central
Carlisle Sentinels
Gateshead Senators
Knottingley Raiders
Leeds Bobcats
Morecambe Bay Storm
Northumberland Lightning
Walney Terriers
NFC South
Chester Romans
Crewe Railroaders
Halton Spartans
Humber Warhawks
Lincolnshire Bombers
Shropshire Revolution
Staffordshire Surge
SFC West
Bristol Apache
Cornish Sharks
Jurassic Coast Raptors
Swindon Storm
Torbay Trojans
Worcestershire Black Knights
SFC South
Berkshire Renegades
Bournemouth Bobcats
Hastings Conquerors
Hertfordshire Cheetahs
Maidstone Pumas
Portsmouth Dreadnoughts
SFC East
East Essex Sabres
East Kent Mavericks
Essex Spartans
Ipswich Cardinals
London Blitz B
Wembley Stallions
Associate Teams
Burnley Tornados
Colburn Black Cats
Dunfermline Kings
Farnham Knights B
Highland Wildcats
Inverclyde Phoenix
Kings Lynn Patriots
Northants Knights
Norwich Devils
Redditch Arrows
Somerset Wyverns
Welwyn Hatfield Mosquitos
Defunct/Inactive Teams
DC Presidents
Dundee Hurricanes
Gloucester Centurions
BUCS Premiership
North
Derby Braves
Durham Saints
Loughborough Students
NTU Renegades
Stirling Clansmen
South
Bath Killer Bees
Birmingham Lions
Hertfordshire Hurricanes
Kingston Cougars
Swansea Titans
BUCS Division 1A
North
Glasgow Tigers
Hull Sharks
Newcastle Raiders
Northumbria Mustangs
Sunderland Spartans
North West
Leeds Beckett Carnegie
Manchester Tyrants
Sheffield Sabres
Sheffield Hallam Warriors
UCLAN Rams
Midlands
LMJU Fury
Nottingham Students
Staffordshire Stallions
Warwick Wolves
Worcester Royals
South
Brighton Tsunami
Portsmouth Destroyers
Reading Knights
Surrey Stingers
Sussex Saxons
South West
Cardiff Cobras
Exeter Demons
Oxford Lancers
Solent Redhawks
UWE Bullets
South East
Cambridge Pythons
Imperial Immortals
Kent Falcons
Royal Holloway Bears
UEA Pirates
BUCS Division 2A
Borders
Edinburgh Napier Knights
Edinburgh Predators
Heriot-Watt
Lancaster Bombers
Teesside Cougars
UWS Pyros
York Centurions
North
Bangor Muddogs
Bradford Bears
Chester Legion
Edge Hill Vikings
Keele Crusaders
Leeds Gryphons
Liverpool Raptors
Midlands
Coventry Jets
DMU Falcons
Huddersfield Hawks
Leicester Longhorns
Lincoln Colonials
MMU Eagles
Northampton Nemesis
South
BNU Buccaneers
Brunel Burners
Chichester Spitfires
City Sentinels
KCL Regents
Southampton Stags
South West
Bath Spa Bulldogs
Bournemouth Bobcats
Bristol Barracuda
Gloucestershire Gladiators
OBU Panthers
Plymouth Blitz
Aberystwyth Tarannau
South East
ARU Rhinos
Canterbury Chargers
Essex Blades
Greenwich Mariners
QMBL Vipers
UEL Phoenix
Westminster Dragons
British American Football Referees' Association
British American Football League
National Football League in the UK
NFL International Series
American Bowl
London Monarchs
Scottish Claymores
Potential London NFL franchise
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Potential_London_NFL_franchise&oldid=818071184"
Categories:
American football in London
Proposed sports teams
National Football League
Hidden categories:
Use mdy dates from September 2017
Articles needing cleanup from September 2016
All pages needing cleanup
Cleanup tagged articles with a reason field from September 2016
Wikipedia pages needing cleanup from September 2016
All articles with unsourced statements
Articles with unsourced statements from October 2017
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
Languages
Add links
This page was last edited on 1 January 2018, at 10:15.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

values: jump-to-nav mw-jump

value: img

attrs: alt src width height srcset data-file-width data-file-height

value: tr

values: plainlinks metadata ambox ambox-style ambox-Cleanup

values: National Football League franchise moves and mergers

values: Major professional sports leagues in the United States and Canada

values: Mark Waller (American football executive) (page does not exist)

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (October 2017)

values:
noprint Inline-Template Template-Fact
white-space:nowrap;

values: Edit section: Franchises with market knowledge

values:
/wiki/St._Louis_Rams
mw-redirect
St. Louis Rams

values: Edit section: Franchises with short leases

values: List of National Football League franchise post-season droughts

values:
/wiki/Football_Association
mw-redirect
Football Association

values: Edit section: Off-season and training camp

values: Training camp (National Football League)

values:
/wiki/Football_League_Championship
mw-redirect
Football League Championship

values:
/wiki/Continental_United_States
mw-redirect
Continental United States

values: Freedom of movement for workers in the European Union

values: United Kingdom European Union membership referendum, 2016

values: Edit section: Collective bargaining agreement

values: National Football League Players Association

values:
row
navbox-group
width:1%;background-color: #FFA7A7;

values: border-left:2px solid #fdfdfd;font-weight:bold;background-color: #FFA7A7;

values: border-left:2px solid #fdfdfd;padding:0px;background-color: #FFCCCC; text-align: center;;;;width:25%;

values:
row
navbox-group
width:1%;background-color: #B7D0FF;

values: border-left:2px solid #fdfdfd;font-weight:bold;background-color: #B7D0FF;

values: border-left:2px solid #fdfdfd;padding:0px;background-color: #D0E7FF; text-align: center;;;;width:25%;

values: List of National Football League seasons

values: Lists of National Football League team seasons

values: National Football League Christmas games

values: List of NFL franchise post-season streaks

values: List of NFL franchise post-season droughts

values: List of quarterbacks with multiple Super Bowl starts

values: History of the National Football League championship

values: List of National Football League officials

values: List of current National Football League stadiums

values: Chronology of home stadiums for current National Football League teams

values: Timeline of the National Football League

values: List of defunct National Football League franchises

values: History of the National Football League in Los Angeles

values: List of National Football League records (individual)

values: List of National Football League records (team)

values: List of last undefeated NFL teams by season

values: National Football League uniform numbers

values: List of National Football League retired numbers

values: Foreign players in the National Football League

values: Category:National Football League on the radio

values: National Football League Management Council

values: List of suspensions in the National Football League

values: National Football League player conduct policy

values: List of National Football League mascots

values: nowraplinks collapsible collapsed navbox-inner

values: Great Britain national American football team

values: British Universities American Football League

values:
/wiki/Merseyside_Nighthawks
mw-redirect
Merseyside Nighthawks

values:
/wiki/Bristol_Apache
mw-redirect
Bristol Apache

values:
/wiki/University_of_the_West_of_England
mw-redirect
University of the West of England

values:
/wiki/Edinburgh_University
mw-redirect
Edinburgh University

values:
/wiki/Brunel_University
mw-redirect
Brunel University

values:
/wiki/Chichester_University
mw-redirect
Chichester University

values:
/wiki/City_University_London
mw-redirect
City University London

values:
/wiki/University_of_Plymouth
mw-redirect
University of Plymouth

values:
/wiki/University_of_Aberystwyth
mw-redirect
University of Aberystwyth

values: British American Football Referees' Association

values: nowraplinks hlist collapsible collapsed navbox-inner

values: Category:Use mdy dates from September 2017

values: Category:Articles needing cleanup from September 2016

values: Category:Cleanup tagged articles with a reason field from September 2016

values: Category:Wikipedia pages needing cleanup from September 2016

values: Category:All articles with unsourced statements

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from October 2017

values: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

values: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

values: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

values: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

values:
/wiki/Potential_London_NFL_franchise
View the content page [ctrl-alt-c]
c

values: Discussion about the content page [ctrl-alt-t]

values: p-namespaces navigation vectorTabs p-namespaces-label

values:
p-variants
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-variants-label

values: Past revisions of this page [ctrl-alt-h]

values: p-views navigation vectorTabs p-views-label

values:
p-cactions
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-cactions-label

values:
mw-wiki-logo
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page

values:
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page [ctrl-alt-z]
z

values: Featured content – the best of Wikipedia

values: Find background information on current events

values:
/wiki/Special:Random
Load a random article [ctrl-alt-x]
x

values:
uls-settings-trigger
Language settings
0
button
true

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Potential_London_NFL_franchise rootpage-Potential_London_NFL_franchise skin-vector action-view


text:
Juan Pablo Di Pace
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Juan Pablo Di Pace
Born
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Occupation
Actor, singer, director
Years active
2005–present
Juan Pablo Di Pace is an Argentinian actor, singer and director. Di Pace began his career in the United Kingdom, performing in a number of musicals and appearing in films like Survival Island (2005) and Mamma Mia! (2008). He later moved to Spain, starring in several television series from 2009 to 2013. In 2014, Di Pace began starring as Nicolas Treviño in the TNT drama series Dallas. Starting in 2016, he played the role of Kimmy Gibbler's estranged husband, Fernando, on Fuller House, the sequel series to Full House.
Contents
1 Life and career
2 Filmography
2.1 Film
2.2 Television
3 References
4 External links
Life and career[edit]
Di Pace was born in Buenos Aires, Argentina and moved to Spain when he was 12. He lived in London for 10 years.[1] He speaks fluent Spanish, Italian and English. At the age of 17 he was awarded a scholarship to attend the United World College of the Adriatic in Duino, Trieste, Italy, and later studied theatre at the London Studio Centre. Prior to joining the big screen, he appeared in the London musical Chicago and fronted posters for the production shown all over the United Kingdom. He also played the role of Danny Zuko in the Trieste production of Grease in Italy, partly directed by Di Pace. For two years, he was Tony Manero in the 2009-2010 Spanish production of Saturday Night Fever in Madrid, produced by Stage Entertainment, which won him critical acclaim by the European press. In 2011-12 he starred in the original Spanish production of Más de cien mentiras produced by Drive Entertainment.[2]
Di Pace has made several appearances on British television, such as BBC One comedy The Catherine Tate Show, BBC One film Aftersun, BBC One series New Tricks and BBC Scotland soap River City, which he joined in 2005 playing the character of Luca Rossi.[3] His on-screen debut was in the 2005 film Survival Island.[4] He is also featured in Mamma Mia! (2008).
Upon moving to Spain he played regular roles in TV series such as Supercharly, Angel o Demonio, Los Hombres de Paco, 90-60-90, and El Don de Alba. In 2011 he starred in the final season of Física o Química,. Di Pace also starred in the video for the 2004 Eric Prydz hit "Call On Me". In the video, he is the only man amongst a group of women in an aerobics class. He also directed and starred in the sequel What a Feeling by Hughes Corporation in 2006, which is loosely based on dance sequences from Flashdance and Dirty Dancing. In 2008 he directed a music video for Katie Melua, in which he appears opposite his sister, María Victoria Di Pace.[citation needed] In 2009 he appeared on the videoclip "Time Is Running Out" by Muse.
In 2013, Di Pace was cast as series regular billionaire businessman Nicolas Treviño for season 3 of the TNT drama series Dallas.[5][6][7] In 2016, Di Pace appears in a recurring role as Fernando, the fiancé/ex-husband of Kimmy Gibbler on the Netflix series Fuller House.[8] Starting in Season 2 he was promoted from recurring to main cast member.
In 2018, he was announced as one of the celebrities to compete on season 27 of Dancing with the Stars, being paired with the professional dancer Cheryl Burke.[9] They received the first perfect score of the season (30/30) in Week 3 for a samba. They also received a second perfect score in week 6 (30/30) during the special Halloween episode while performing a jive.
Filmography[edit]
Film[edit]
Year
Title
Role
Notes
2005 Survival Island Manuel Alternate title: Three
2006 Piccadilly Jim Ben Uncredited
2008 Mamma Mia! Petros
2009 Tutti intorno a Linda
2014 Fuera de foco Marcos
2016 After the Reality Dunkin
Television[edit]
Year
Title
Role
Notes
2005 New Tricks Antonio Episode: "Fluke of Luck"
2005 Mile High Vito Garcia Episode: "2.23"
2005–06 River City Luca Rossi Recurring role (2 episodes)
2006 Aftersun Felipe TV Movie
2006 The Catherine Tate Show Salsa Dancer Episode: "1951-2006"
2009 Los hombres de Paco Carlo Episode: "Todos los planes de Lucas Fernández"
2010 Supercharly Recurring role (5 episodes)
2011 Ángel o demonio Episode: "El demonio de los celos"
2011 Física o Química Xavi López Recurring role (7 episodes)
2013 El don de Alba Víctor Recurring role (4 episodes)
2013 Camp Miguel Santos Recurring role (5 episodes)
2013 Rubenesque Hernandez TV Movie
2014 Dallas Nicolas Treviño Main cast (15 episodes)
2015 A.D. The Bible Continues Jesus Christ Recurring role (5 episodes)
2015 Tango Americano Tango singer TV Miniseries
2016 Rosewood Antonio Espada Episode: "Silkworms y Silencio"
2016–present Fuller House Fernando Hernandez-Guerrero-Fernandez-Guerrero Main cast (38 episodes)
2017 Angie Tribeca Ricardo Vasquez Episode: "Welcome Back, Blotter"
2017 Carlos Gardel the King of Tango Carlos Gardel Main role (in production)
2018 Dancing with the Stars Himself Season 27 contestant
References[edit]
Jump up ^ Gonzalez, Maricela. "'Dallas': Josh Henderson and EP Cynthia Cidre preview a wild season 3 | Inside TV | EW.com". Insidetv.ew.com. Retrieved 2014-02-25.
Jump up ^ "Entrevista Juan Pablo Di Pace - Más De 100 Mentiras". YouTube. 2011-11-14. Retrieved 2014-02-25.
Jump up ^ Paul English. "From River City to Dallas: Former Shieldinch star Juan Pablo Di Pace set for starring role in oil barons' soap". Daily Record. Retrieved 2013-10-31.
Jump up ^ Jonathan Trout Updated 24 April 2006 (2006-04-24). "Movies - review - Three". BBC. Retrieved 2013-10-31.
Jump up ^ "'Dallas': Juan Pablo di Pace Joins Season 3". Hollywoodreporter.com. 2011-11-17. Retrieved 2013-10-31.
Jump up ^ Andreeva, Nellie (1970-01-01). "TNT's 'Falling Skies' & 'Dallas' Add Regulars". Deadline.com. Retrieved 2013-10-31.
Jump up ^ ' + data.results.personName + '. "'Dallas' Season 3: 'Camp's' Juan Pablo Di Pace takes on the Ewings - Zap2it". Blog.zap2it.com. Retrieved 2013-10-31.
Jump up ^ Fuller House Adds Dallas Troublemaker Juan Pablo Di Pace as Kimmy's Ex
Jump up ^ Murphy, Desiree (September 12, 2018). "'Dancing With the Stars' Season 27 Cast Revealed -- Meet the Celebs and Their Pro Partners!". Entertainment Tonight. Retrieved September 12, 2018.
External links[edit]
Juan Pablo Di Pace on IMDb
Juan Pablo Di Pace on Twitter
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Juan_Pablo_Di_Pace&oldid=866417156"
Categories:
Argentine male television actors
Living people
Argentine male soap opera actors
Argentine male film actors
Argentine male models
Argentine people of Italian descent
Male actors from Buenos Aires
21st-century Argentine male actors
People educated at a United World College
Dancing with the Stars participants
Participants in American reality television series
Hidden categories:
Articles with hCards
All articles with unsourced statements
Articles with unsourced statements from July 2009
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
Languages
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Polski
Русский
Edit links
This page was last edited on 30 October 2018, at 05:30 (UTC).
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

values: mw-jump-link #mw-head

values: mw-jump-link #p-search

value: th

attrs: colspan style

value: tbody

value: table

attrs: class style

values:
/wiki/Kimmy_Gibbler
mw-redirect
Kimmy Gibbler

values: checkbox button toctogglecheckbox toctogglecheckbox display:none

values:
/wiki/Los_Hombres_de_Paco
mw-redirect
Los Hombres de Paco

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (July 2009)

values:
noprint Inline-Template Template-Fact
white-space:nowrap;

values:
headerSort
0
columnheader button
Sort ascending

values:
/wiki/Jesus_Christ
mw-redirect
Jesus Christ

values: -moz-column-width: 25em; -webkit-column-width: 25em; column-width: 25em; list-style-type: decimal;

values:
nofollow
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1591620/
external text

values:
nofollow
external text
https://twitter.com/juanpablodipace

attrs: alt src width height style srcset data-file-width data-file-height

values: Category:Argentine male television actors

values: Category:Argentine male soap opera actors

values: Category:Argentine people of Italian descent

values: Category:21st-century Argentine male actors

values: Category:People educated at a United World College

values: Category:Dancing with the Stars participants

values: Category:Participants in American reality television series

values: Category:All articles with unsourced statements

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from July 2009

values: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

values: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

values:
/wiki/Juan_Pablo_Di_Pace
View the content page [ctrl-alt-c]
c

values: portal navigation p-navigation p-navigation-label

values: Guidance on how to use and edit Wikipedia

values: About the project, what you can do, where to find things

values: A list of recent changes in the wiki [ctrl-alt-r]

values: portal navigation p-interaction p-interaction-label

values: List of all English Wikipedia pages containing links to this page [ctrl-alt-j]

values: Recent changes in pages linked from this page [ctrl-alt-k]

values:
/wiki/Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard
Upload files [ctrl-alt-u]
u

values: A list of all special pages [ctrl-alt-q]

values: Permanent link to this revision of the page

values: Link to connected data repository item [ctrl-alt-g]

values: Printable version of this page [ctrl-alt-p]

values: Ди Паче, Хуан Пабло – Russian

values: /static/images/wikimedia-button-1.5x.png 1.5x, /static/images/wikimedia-button-2x.png 2x

values: /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_132x47.png 1.5x, /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_176x62.png 2x

values:
suggestions
display: none; font-size: 13px;

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Juan_Pablo_Di_Pace rootpage-Juan_Pablo_Di_Pace skin-vector action-view