text:
China–United States relations
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
For relations between the Republic of China and the United States, see Taiwan–United States relations.
China–United States relations

China

United States
Diplomatic Mission
Chinese Embassy, Washington, D.C.
United States Embassy, Beijing
Envoy
Ambassador Cui Tiankai
Ambassador Terry Branstad
Embassy of the United States in China
Embassy of China in the United States
This article is part of a series on the
Politics of the
People's Republic of China
Leadership[show]
Leadership generations
Succession of power
Hu–Wen Administration (2002–2012)
Xi–Li Administration (2012–2017)
Xi Core Administration (zh) (since 2017)
4th Leadership Core: Xi Jinping
19th Central Politburo
13th State Council
Current State leaders
Current provincial leaders
National leaders
Orders of precedence
Paramount leader: Xi Jinping
Communist Party leader: Xi Jinping
Head of state: Xi Jinping
Head of government: Li Keqiang
Congress Chairman: Li Zhanshu
Conference Chairman: Wang Yang
Commander-in-chief: Xi Jinping
Politburo Standing Committee
Related systems
Democratic centralism
Collective leadership
Organization Department
Elections
Civil service
Communist Party[show]
History
Principal leaders
Constitution
Organization
National Party Congress (19th)
Central Committee (19th)
General Secretary (list)
Xi Jinping
Central Politburo (19th)
Standing Committee (list)
Central Secretariat
Top-ranked secretary: Wang Huning
Central Military Commission
Chairman: Xi Jinping
Vice-Chairmen:
Xu Qiliang, Zhang Youxia
National Security Commission
Chairman: Xi Jinping
Vice－Chairmen:
Li Keqiang, Li Zhanshu
Office Chief: Ding Xuexiang
Comprehensively Deepening Reforms Commission
Director: Xi Jinping
Deputy directors:
Li Keqiang, Wang Huning, Han Zheng
Secretary-General: Wang Huning
Financial & Economic Affairs Commission
Director: Xi Jinping
Deputy director: Li Keqiang
Office Chief: Liu He
General Office
Director: Ding Xuexiang
General Secretary's Office (zh)
Chief: Ding Xuexiang
Central Security Bureau
Central Guard Unit
Organization Department
Head: Chen Xi
Central Commission for Discipline Inspection (19th)
Secretary: Zhao Leji
Provincial standing committees
United Front[show]
Political Consultative Conference
National Committee (zh)
Chairman: Wang Yang
Vice-Chairpersons
Top-ranked: Zhang Qingli
Secretary-General: Xia Baolong
Political parties:
CPC (ruling)
United Front Work Department
Head: You Quan
RCCK
CDL
CDNCA
CAPD
CPWDP
CZGP
JS
TDSGL
Federation of Industry and Commerce
People's organizations
Ideology[show]
Marxism–Leninism
Maoism ("Mao Zedong Thought")
Socialism with Chinese characteristics
Deng Xiaoping Theory
Primary stage of socialism
Four Cardinal Principles
Three Represents
Scientific Outlook on Development
Harmonious Socialist Society
Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era
Chinese Dream
Four Comprehensives
Constitution
Law
[show]
Constitution
Previous constitutions
1954
1975
1978
"People's democratic dictatorship" (Article 1)
Constitutional oath of office (Article 27)
Protection of human rights (Article 33)
Freedom of religion (Article 36)
Laws
Legislation Law
Statutes
Crime
Capital offences
Capital punishment
Death sentence with reprieve
Legislative[show]
National People's Congress (13th)
Members
Plenary sessions
Voting results
Presidium
Standing Committee
Chairman: Li Zhanshu
Vice-Chairpersons
Top-ranked: Wang Chen
Secretary-General: Yang Zhenwu (zh)
Special committees
Legislation Law
Elections
Presidency[show]
President (list): Xi Jinping
Presidential spouse: Peng Liyuan
Presidential Office (zh)
Chief: Ding Xuexiang
Vice-President: Wang Qishan
Executive[show]
State Council (Li Keqiang Cabinet II)
Premier (list): Li Keqiang
Vice-Premiers (list)
Han Zheng
Sun Chunlan
Hu Chunhua
Liu He
State Councilors
Wei Fenghe
Wang Yong
Wang Yi
Xiao Jie
Zhao Kezhi
General Office
Secretary-General: Xiao Jie
Deputy Secretary-Generals
Cabinet-level departments
National Development & Reform Commission
Central bank
National Audit Office
State-owned Assets Supervision & Administration Commission
Most Central Enterprises
Military[show]
Central Military Commission (CMC)
Chairman (supreme commander):
Xi Jinping
Vice-Chairmen:
Xu Qiliang
Zhang Youxia
Members:
Wei Fenghe
Li Zuocheng
Miao Hua
Zhang Shengmin
Departments:
Joint Staff (Chief: Li Zuocheng)
Political Work (Director: Miao Hua)
Logistic Support
Equipment Development
Training & Administration
National Defense Mobilization
National armed forces:
People's Liberation Army
Theater commands
People's Armed Police
China Coast Guard
Militia
State Council (Central People's Government)
National Defense Mobilization Commission
Chairman: Li Keqiang
Ministry of National Defense
Minister: Wei Fenghe
Ministry of Veterans Affairs
State Administration for Sci., Tech. & Industry for National Defence
Military history
Armed conflicts
Military modernization
Military reform since 2015
CMC Leading Group for Military Reform
Leader: Xi Jinping
Supervision[show]
Corruption in China
Anti-corruption campaign since 2012
CPC Central Commission for Discipline Inspection (19th)
Secretary: Zhao Leji
Deputy Secretaries
Yang Xiaodu
Zhang Shengmin
Liu Jinguo
Yang Xiaochao
Li Shulei
Xu Lingyi
Xiao Pei
Chen Xiaojiang
Secretary-General: Yang Xiaochao
National Supervisory Commission
Director: Yang Xiaodu
Central Leading Group for Inspection Work
Leader: Zhao Leji
Commission for Discipline Inspection of the Central Military Commission
Secretary: Zhang Shengmin
Independent Commission Against Corruption (Hong Kong)
Commission Against Corruption (Macau)
Judiciary
Law enforcement
[show]
CPC Central Politics and Law Commission
Secretary: Guo Shengkun
Supreme People's Court
President: Zhou Qiang
Supreme People's Procuratorate
Procurator-General: Zhang Jun
State Council
Ministry of Public Security
Minister: Zhao Kezhi
State Immigration Administration (zh)
Ministry of State Security
Minister: Chen Wenqing
Ministry of Justice
Minister: Fu Zhenghua
Bureau of Prison Administration (zh)
Urban Management (chengguan)
Judiciary of Hong Kong
Court of Final Appeal
Department of Justice
Prosecutions Division
Security Bureau
Hong Kong Disciplined Services
Judiciary of Macau
Court of Final Appeal
Public Prosecutions Office
Secretariat for Security
Macau Security Force
Publicity[show]
Central Leading Group for Propaganda and Ideology
Leader: Wang Huning
Central Guidance Commission on Building Spiritual Civilization
Director: Wang Huning
Office Chief: Huang Kunming
Central Publicity (Propaganda) Department
Head: Huang Kunming
General Administration of Press and Publication
National Film Bureau (zh)
State Council Information Office
China Daily
Ministry of Culture and Tourism
State Administration of Radio and Television
China Media Group
China Central Television
China Global Television Network
China National Radio
China Radio International
Xinhua News Agency
Reference News
China News Service
People's Daily
Global Times
China Today
Censorship in China
Radio jamming
Media of China
Internal media
Publishing industry in China
Internet in China
Internet censorship
Great Firewall
Central Cyberspace Affairs Commission
Director: Xi Jinping
Deputy director: Li Keqiang
Cyberspace Administration of China
Director: Xu Lin
Taiwan
Hong Kong
Macau
[show]
Cross-Strait relations
Chinese Civil War
One-China policy
Taiwan independence movement
Anti-Secession Law
Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement
Chinese unification
Central Leading Group for Taiwan Affairs
Leader: Xi Jinping
Deputy Leader: Wang Yang
Taiwan Affairs Office
Director: Zhang Zhijun
Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits
Central Coordination Group for Hong Kong and Macau Affairs
Leader: Han Zheng
HK & Macau Affairs Office
Director: Zhang Xiaoming
Liaison Office in Hong Kong
Liaison Office in Macau
One country, two systems
Special administrative regions
Hong Kong Basic Law
Chief Executive: Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor
Hong Kong SAR Government
Politics of Hong Kong
Independence movement
Mainland & HK CEPA
Macau Basic Law
Chief Executive: Chui Sai On
Macau SAR Government
Politics of Macau
Mainland & Macau CEPA
Foreign relations[hide]
Central Foreign Affairs Commission
Director: Xi Jinping
Deputy Director: Li Keqiang
Secretary-General: Yang Jiechi
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Minister: Wang Yi
Spokespersons
Diplomatic missions
Diplomatic missions in China
Foreign aid to China
Chinese foreign aid
International Development Cooperation Agency (zh)
Ministry of Commerce
Ministry of National Defense
International Military Cooperation Office
NPC Foreign Affairs Committee
CPC International Liaison Department
State Council Information Office
State Administration of Foreign Experts Affairs
Overseas Chinese Affairs Office
Chinese nationality law
Chinese passports (Hong Kong, Macau)
Visa requirements for Chinese citizens (Hong Kong, Macau)
Visa policy of China (Hong Kong, Macau)
State Immigration Administration (zh)
Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence
Panda diplomacy
Beijing Consensus
Shanghai Cooperation Organisation
One Belt One Road Initiative
Silk Road Fund
Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank
BRICS
New Development Bank
China and the United Nations
China and the World Trade Organization
China–United States relations
China–Russia relations
China–European Union relations
China–Africa relations
Related topics[show]
Administrative divisions
Hukou system
Family planning
Ethnic minorities
Other countries
Atlas
v
t
e
China–United States relations, more often known as U.S.–Chinese relations, Chinese–U.S. relations, or Sino-American relations, refers to international relations between the People's Republic of China and the United States of America. The relationship between China and the United States is quite strong yet complex. The United States and China have an extremely extensive economic partnership, a great amount of trade between the two countries necessitates somewhat positive political relations, yet significant issues exist. It is a relationship of economic cooperation, hegemonic rivalry in the Pacific and mutual suspicion over the other's intentions.[1] Therefore, each nation has adopted a wary attitude regarding the other as a potential adversary whilst at the same time being an extremely strong economic partner.[2] It has been described by world leaders and academics as the world's most important bilateral relationship of the century.[3][4]
As of 2018[update], the United States has the world's largest economy and China has the second largest,[citation needed] although China has a larger GDP when measured by PPP.[5] The United States has greater national wealth.
Relations between the two countries have generally been stable with some periods of open conflict, most notably during the Korean War and the Vietnam War. Currently, China and the United States have mutual political, economic, and security interests, including but not limited to the proliferation of nuclear weapons, although there are unresolved concerns relating to the role of democracy in the government in China and human rights in both respective countries. China is the largest foreign creditor of the United States.[6] The two countries remain in dispute over territorial issues in the South China Sea.[7]
Public opinion of the other country tends to fluctuate around 40 to 50 percent favorability. As of 2015, China's public opinion of the U.S. is at 44%, while the United States' public opinion of China is somewhat lower at 38%.[8] The highest recorded favorable opinion of the United States was at 58% (2010) and the lowest at 38% (2007).[9] Conversely, the highest recorded favorable opinion of China was at 52% (2006) and the lowest at 35% (2014).
Relations with China began under George Washington,[10] leading to the 1845 Treaty of Wangxia. The United States was allied to the Republic of China during the Pacific War, but broke off relations with China for 25 years when the communist government took over, until Richard Nixon's 1972 visit to China. Since Nixon, every successive U.S. president has toured China. Relations with China have strained under Barack Obama's Asia pivot strategy, U.S. support for Japan in the Senkaku Islands dispute, as well as Donald Trump's threats to classify the country as a "currency manipulator" as part of a potential trade war.[11][12]
As of April 2017, ongoing maritime disputes in the South China Sea have strained relations between the two.[13][14] America has conducted freedom of navigation patrols in the region to underscore the US' position that the artificial islands constructed by China are located in international waters.[15][16]
Contents
[hide]
1 Leaders of China and the United States from 1950–present
2 The Qing Dynasty and the United States
2.1 Old China Trade
2.2 Opium Wars
2.3 Taiwan
2.4 The Burlingame Treaty and the Chinese Exclusion Act
2.5 Searching for the China market
2.6 The Boxer Rebellion
2.7 Open Door Policy
3 The Republic of China and the United States
3.1 1911–1937
3.2 World War II
3.3 Civil War in Mainland China
3.4 Cold War relations
3.5 Termination of diplomatic relations
4 The People's Republic of China and the United States
4.1 Origins of the People's Republic of China
4.2 Korean War
4.3 Vietnam War
4.4 Relations frozen
4.5 Rapprochement
4.6 Liaison Office (1973–1978)
4.7 Normalization
4.7.1 Taiwan issue
4.8 Tiananmen protests to 9/11 attacks (1989–2001)
4.9 George W. Bush's tenure (2001–2009)
4.10 Obama's tenure (2009–2017)
4.11 Trump's tenure (2017–)
5 Economic relations
5.1 Currency dispute
5.2 Chinese perspective on the US economy
6 Important issues
6.1 Military spending and planning
6.2 Human rights
6.3 Influence in Asia
6.4 Cyberwarfare
7 See also
8 References
9 Further reading
9.1 Historical
9.2 Recent
9.3 Primary sources
9.4 China White Paper 1949
9.5 See also
10 External links
10.1 Website of diplomatic missions
10.2 U.S. State Department
10.3 Other links
10.4 Videos
Leaders of China and the United States from 1950–present[edit]
The Qing Dynasty and the United States[edit]
The American Garden at the Thirteen Factories in Canton, 1844–45
In 1784 the United States attempted to send a consul to China, but he was not received by the Chinese government. Formal diplomatic relations between the United States and the Chinese Empire began June 16, 1844 as the countries engaged in the negotiations which led to the Treaty of Wangxia.[10]
Old China Trade[edit]
Main articles: Old China Trade, Canton System, Maritime fur trade, Levant Company, and History of opium in China
An example of a Chinese-made lap desk from the early 1800s. Lap desks such as these were especially popular among American merchants, who used them to write letters or conduct business during their lengthy voyages at sea.
Coins, ginseng, and furs, and more prominently tea, cotton, silk, lacquerware, porcelain, and furniture were once traded as commodities between the two countries.
Opium Wars[edit]
Main articles: First Opium War and Second Opium War
After the Treaty of Nanking at the end of the First Opium War in 1842, many Chinese ports were forced to open to foreign trade, which threatened American trade in the region.[17] President John Tyler, however, secured the 1844 Treaty of Wanghia, which gave Americans the right of extraterritoriality, and placed American trade on par with British trade. This treaty effectively ended the era of the Old China Trade, giving to the rise of the United States as an emergent power. During the Second Opium War, American and Qing forces briefly clashed at the Battle of the Barrier Forts, the first instance of military engagement between the United States and China.
After China's defeat in the Second Opium War, the then emperor of China, Xianfeng, fled Beijing. His brother Yixin, the Prince Gong, ratified the Treaty of Tientsin in the Convention of Peking on October 18, 1860. This treaty stipulated, among other terms, that along with Britain, France, and Russia, the United States would have the right to station administrative offices in Beijing, which was closed prior to the war.
Taiwan[edit]
Some Americans advocated for the annexation of Taiwan from China.[18][19][20] Aboriginals on Taiwan often attacked and massacred shipwrecked Western sailors.[21][22][23][24] In 1867, during the Rover incident, Taiwanese aborigines attacked shipwrecked American sailors, killing the entire crew.[25] They subsequently skirmished against and defeated a retaliatory expedition by the American military and killed another American during the battle.[26][27] (For the current issues facing Taiwan, see below)
The Burlingame Treaty and the Chinese Exclusion Act[edit]
Main articles: Burlingame Treaty and Chinese Exclusion Act
The first page of the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882
In 1868, the Qing government appointed Anson Burlingame as their emissary to the United States. Burlingame toured the country to build support for equitable treatment for China and for Chinese emigrants. The 1868 Burlingame Treaty embodied these principles. In 1871, the Chinese Educational Mission brought the first of two groups of 120 Chinese boys to study in the United States. They were led by Yung Wing, the first Chinese man to graduate from an American university.
During the California Gold Rush and the construction of the transcontinental railroad, large numbers of Chinese emigrated to the U.S., spurring animosity from American citizens. After being forcibly driven from the mines, most Chinese settled in Chinatowns in cities such as San Francisco, taking up low-end wage labor, such as restaurant and cleaning work. With the post-Civil War economy in decline by the 1870s, anti-Chinese animosity became politicized by labor leader Denis Kearney and his party, as well as by the California governor John Bigler. Both blamed Chinese coolies for depressed wage levels.
In the first significant restriction on free immigration in U.S. history, Congress passed the Chinese Exclusion Act on May 6, 1882, following revisions made in 1880 to the Burlingame Treaty. Those revisions allowed the United States to suspend immigration, and Congress acted quickly to implement the suspension of Chinese immigration and exclude Chinese skilled and unskilled laborers from entering the country for ten years, under penalty of imprisonment and deportation. The ban was renewed a number of times, lasting for over 60 years.
Searching for the China market[edit]
The American China Development Company, founded in 1895 by industrialists J.P. Morgan and Andrew Carnegie, sought to provide the American capital and management that would generate a rapid industrialization of China. It started building the Hankow-Canton Railroad, to link central and southern China. It only managed to finish 30 miles of line. Americans soon grew disillusioned, and sold out to a rival Belgian syndicate.[28] On the whole, the American dream of getting rich by investing in China or selling to hundreds of millions of Chinese was almost always a failure. Standard Oil did succeed in selling kerosene to the China market, but few others made a profit.[29]
The Boxer Rebellion[edit]
Main article: Boxer Rebellion
US troops in China during the Boxer Rebellion in 1900
In 1899, a movement of Chinese nationalists calling themselves the Society of Right and Harmonious Fists started a violent revolt in China, referred to by Westerners as the Boxer Rebellion, against foreign influence in trade, politics, religion, and technology. The campaigns took place from November 1899 to September 7, 1901, during the final years of Manchu rule in China under the Qing dynasty.[30]
The uprising began as an anti-foreign, anti-imperialist, peasant-based movement in northern China, in response to foreign westerners seizing land from locals, concession grabbing, and granting immunity to criminals who converted to Catholicism. The insurgents attacked foreigners, who were building railroads and violating Feng shui, and Christians, who were held responsible for the foreign domination of China. In June 1900, the Boxers entered Peking, and ransacked the area around the Foreign Legations. On June 21, in response to the Western attack on the Chinese Dagu Forts, Empress Dowager Cixi declared war against all Western powers. Diplomats, foreign civilians, soldiers, and Chinese Christians were besieged during the Siege of the International Legations for 55 days. A coalition called the Eight-Nation Alliance comprising Austria-Hungary, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, Britain and the United States rushed 20,000 troops to their rescue. The multinational forces were initially defeated by a Chinese Muslim army at the Battle of Langfang, but the second attempt in the Gaselee Expedition was successful due to internal rivalries among the Chinese forces.
The Chinese government was forced to indemnify the victims and make many additional concessions. Subsequent reforms implemented after the rebellion contributed to the end of the Qing dynasty and the establishment of the modern Chinese Republic. The United States played a secondary but significant role in suppressing the Boxer Rebellion, largely due to the presence of US ships and troops deployed in the Philippines since the American conquest of the Spanish–American and Philippine–American War. Within the United States Armed Forces, the suppression of the Boxer Rebellion was known as the China Relief Expedition.
The Chinese paid indemnities to each of the powers. The U.S. used its $11 million share to promote cultural and educational exchanges and help China modernize. A number of schools were established in China, such as Tsinghua College in Peking.[31][32]
With national attention focused on the Boxers, American Protestants made missions to China a high priority. They supported 500 missionaries in 1890, more than 2000 in 1914, and 8300 in 1920. By 1927 they opened 16 American universities, six medical schools, and four theology schools, together with 265 middle schools and a large number of elementary schools.The number of converts was not large, but the educational influence was dramatic.[33]
Open Door Policy[edit]
Main article: Open Door Policy
"Putting his foot down" Uncle Sam in 1899 demands Open Door while major powers plan to cut up China for themselves; Germany, Italy, England, Austria, Russia & France are represented by Wilhelm II, Umberto I, John Bull, Franz Joseph I (in rear) Uncle Sam, Nicholas II, and Emile Loubet. Punch Aug 23, 1899 by J. S. Pughe
In the 1890s the major world powers (France, Britain, Germany, Japan, and Russia) began carving out spheres of influence for themselves in China, which was then under the Qing dynasty. The United States demanded this practice to end so that all nations could trade on an equal footing. In 1899, U.S. Secretary of State John Hay sent diplomatic letters to these nations, asking them to guarantee the territorial and administrative integrity of China and to not interfere with the free use of treaty ports within their respective spheres of influence.[34] The major powers evaded commitment, saying they could not agree to anything until the other powers had consented first. Hay took this as acceptance of his proposal, which came to be known as the Open Door Policy.[35]
While respected internationally, the Open Door Policy was ignored by Russia and Japan when they encroached in Manchuria. The U.S. protested Russia's actions. Japan and Russia fought the Russo-Japanese War in 1904, in which the U.S. mediated a peace. Japan also presented a further challenge to the policy with its Twenty-One Demands in 1915 made on the then-Republic of China. Japan also made secret treaties with the Allied Powers promising Japan the German territories in China. In 1931, Japan invaded and occupied Manchuria. The United States along with other countries condemned the action, leading to U.S. support for China in its war with Japan after 1937.[36]
Residence of China's envoy Wu Tingfang
The Republic of China and the United States[edit]
1911–1937[edit]
After the Xinhai Revolution in 1911, the United States government recognized the Republic of China (ROC) government as the sole and legitimate government of China despite a number of governments ruling various parts of China. China was reunified by a single government, led by the Kuomintang (KMT) in 1928. The first winner of the Nobel Prize in Literature for writing about China was an American, born in the United States but raised in China, Pearl S. Buck, whose 1938 Nobel lecture was titled The Chinese Novel.[37]
Starting in the 1870s, American missionaries began developing educational institutions in China. They discovered the demand for Western education was much stronger, and much more elite, than the demand for Christianity. Programs were set up to fund Chinese students In American colleges.[38]
World War II[edit]
Chiang Kai-shek, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and Winston Churchill at the Cairo Conference in 1943.
The outbreak of the Second Sino-Japanese War in 1937 saw aid flow into the Republic of China, from the United States under President Franklin D. Roosevelt. A series of Neutrality Acts had been passed in the US with the support of isolationists who forbade American aid to countries at war. Because the Second Sino-Japanese War was undeclared, however, Roosevelt denied that a state of war existed in China and proceeded to send aid to Chiang.
American public sympathy for the Chinese was aroused by reports from missionaries, novelists such as Pearl S. Buck, and Time Magazine of Japanese brutality in China, including reports surrounding the Nanking Massacre, also known as the 'Rape of Nanking'. Japanese-American relations were further soured by the USS Panay incident during the bombing of Nanjing, in which a gunboat of the US Navy was accidentally sunk by Japanese aircraft. Roosevelt demanded an apology and compensation from the Japanese, which was received, but relations between the two countries continued to deteriorate.[39] American public opinion overwhelmingly favored China and denounced Japan.[40]
The United States formally declared war on Japan in December 1941 following the Japanese surprise attack on Pearl Harbor. The Roosevelt administration gave massive amounts of aid to Chiang's beleaguered government, now headquartered in Chungking. Madame Chiang Kai-shek,[41] who had been educated in the United States, addressed the US Congress and toured the country to rally support for China. Congress amended the Chinese Exclusion Act and Roosevelt moved to end the unequal treaties by establishing the Treaty for Relinquishment of Extraterritorial Rights in China. However, the perception that Chiang's government was unable to effectively resist the Japanese or that he preferred to focus more on defeating the Communists grew. China Hands such as Joseph "Vinegar Joe" Stilwell—who spoke fluent Mandarin Chinese—argued that it was in American interest to establish communication with the Communists to prepare for a land-based counteroffensive invasion of Japan. The Dixie Mission, which began in 1943, was the first official American contact with the Communists. Other Americans, such as Claire Lee Chennault, argued for air power and supported Chiang's position. In 1944, successfully demanded that Stilwell be recalled. General Albert Coady Wedemeyer replaced Stilwell, and Patrick J. Hurley became ambassador.[42][43]
Civil War in Mainland China[edit]
After World War II ended in 1945, the hostility between the Republic of China and the Communist Party of China exploded into open civil war. The KMT lost effective control of mainland China in the Chinese Civil War in 1949. In the China White Paper in August 1949 drafted by the US State Department that the United States was announcing the hands-off policy to the ROC in Taiwan to the upcoming military attacks from the People's Liberation Army. Chinese Military forces under Chiang Kai-shek went to the island of Taiwan to accept the surrender of Japanese troops, thus beginning the military occupation of Taiwan. American general George Marshall spent most of the years 1946 in China trying to broker a truce between the Republic of China and the Communist Party of China in 1946, but he failed.[44]
In February 1948, Marshall, now the Secretary of State, testified to Congress in secret session that he had realized from the start that the Nationalists could never defeat the Communists in the field, so some sort of negotiated settlement was necessary or else the United States would have to fight the war. He warned:
any large-scale United States effort to assist the Chinese Government to oppose the Communists would most probably degenerate into a direct U.S. undertaking and responsibility, involving the commitment of sizable forces and resources over an indefinite period. Such a dissipation of U.S. resources would inevitably play into the hands of the Russians, or would provoke a reaction which would possibly, even probably, we to another Spanish type of revolution or general hostilities....the cost of an all-out effort to see Communist forces resisted and destroyed in China...would clearly be out of all proportion to the results to be obtained.[45]
The Kuomintang (Nationalist) cause declined until 1949, when the Communists emerged victorious and drove the Nationalists from the Chinese mainland onto Taiwan and other islands. Mao Zedong established the People's Republic of China in mainland China, while Taiwan and other islands are still regarded by China as being under the Republic of China rule to this day, although Taiwan considers itself to be independent.[46][47][48][49]
Cold War relations[edit]
After the Korean War broke out, the Truman administration resumed economic and military aid to the ROC and neutralized Taiwan Strait by United States Seventh Fleet to stop a Communist invasion of Formosa. Until the US formally recognized China in 1979, Washington provided ROC with financial grants based on the Foreign Assistance Act,[50] Mutual Security Act and Act for International Development enacted by the US Congress. A separate Sino-American Mutual Defense Treaty was signed between the two governments of US and ROC in 1954 and lasted until 1979.
Eisenhower, Soong Mei-ling, and Chinese president Chiang Kai-shek in Taiwan. 1960.
With President Chiang Kai-shek, the U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower waved hands to crowds during his visit to Taipei, Taiwan in June 1960.
The U.S. State Department's official position in 1959 was:
That the provisional capital of the Republic of China has been at Taipei, Taiwan (Formosa) since December 1949; that the Government of the Republic of China exercises authority over the island; that the sovereignty of Formosa has not been transferred to China; and that Formosa is not a part of China as a country, at least not as yet, and not until and unless appropriate treaties are hereafter entered into. Formosa may be said to be a territory or an area occupied and administered by the Government of the Republic of China, but is not officially recognized as being a part of the Republic of China.[51]
Termination of diplomatic relations[edit]
See also: Taiwan–United States relations
On January 1, 1979, the United States changed its diplomatic recognition of China from Taipei to Beijing. In the U.S.-PRC Three Communiqués that announced the change, the United States acknowledges that all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China. Since then, the ROC has often been referred to as 'Taiwan' to avoid confusion.
Meanwhile, the U.S. negotiated with Taiwan on what the change meant. Trade continued and the U.S. provided military security.[52]
The People's Republic of China and the United States[edit]
Origins of the People's Republic of China[edit]
The United States did not formally recognize the People's Republic of China (PRC) for 30 years after its founding. Instead, the US maintained diplomatic relations with the Republic of China government on Taiwan, recognizing it as the sole legitimate government of China.
However, the Taiwan-based Republic of China government did not trust the United States. An enemy of the Chiang family, K. C. Wu, was removed from his position as governor of Taiwan by Chiang Ching-kuo and fled to America in 1953. Chiang Kai-shek, president of the Republic of China, suspected that the American CIA was engineering a coup with Sun Li-jen, an American-educated Chinese man who attended the Virginia Military Institute, with the goal of making Taiwan an independent state. Chiang placed Sun under house arrest in 1955.[53][54]
Chiang Ching-kuo, educated in the Soviet Union, initiated Soviet-style military organization in the Republic of China military, reorganizing and Sovietizing the political officer corps and surveillance. Kuomintang party activities were propagated throughout the military. Sun Li-jen opposed this action.[55]
As the People's Liberation Army moved south to complete the conquest of mainland China in 1949, the American embassy followed Chiang Kai-shek's Republic of China government to Taipei, while US consular officials remained in mainland China. However, the People's Republic of China was hostile to the American presence, and all US personnel were withdrawn from the mainland in early 1950.[citation needed] In December 1950, the People's Republic seized all American assets and properties, totaling $196.8 million, after the US had frozen Chinese assets in America following the PRC's entry into the Korean War in November.[56]
Korean War[edit]
Main article: Korean War
Truman administration announced on January 5, 1950, that the United States would not become involved in any dispute about Taiwan Strait, and that he would not intervene in the event of an attack by the PRC,[57] but these plans were quickly undone when the Korean War began on 25 June with the invasion of the US-backed Republic of Korea by the communist Democratic People's Republic of Korea. A US-led international coalition of troops drove the North Korean forces from the South. In response to the Soviet-backed North Korean invasion of South Korea, the United Nations Security Council was convened and passed UNSC Resolution 82, declaring war on North Korea unanimously. The resolution was adopted mainly because the Soviet Union, a veto-wielding power, had been boycotting UN proceedings since January, in protest that the Republic of China and not the People's Republic of China held a permanent seat on the council.[58]
The American-led allied forces pushed the invading Korean People's Army back into North Korea, past the North-South border at the 38th parallel and began to approach the Yalu River on the China-North Korea border. Chinese warnings for the UN forces to not venture too close to their border were ignored, and in November 1950, a massive Chinese counterattack was launched. The Chinese army struck in the west along the Chongchon River and completely overran several South Korean divisions, successfully landing a heavy blow to the flank of the remaining forces. The defeat of the US Eighth Army resulted in the longest retreat of any American military unit in history.[59] Both sides sustained heavy casualties before the allied forces were able to push Chinese forces back, near the original division. In late March 1951, after the Chinese army had moved large numbers of new forces near the Korean border, US bomb loading pits at Kadena Air Base in Okinawa were made operational. On April 5, the US Joint Chiefs of Staff released orders for immediate retaliatory attacks using nuclear weapons against Manchurian bases to prevent new Chinese troops from entering the battles or bombing attacks originating from those bases. On the same day, Truman gave his approval for transfer of nine Mark IV nuclear capsules "to the Air Force's Ninth Bomb Group, the designated carrier of the weapons,"[this quote needs a citation] signing an order to use them against Chinese and Korean targets.[citation needed] Two years of continued fighting ended in a stalemate, until the Korean Armistice Agreement was signed on July 27, 1953. Since then, a divided Korea has become an important factor in US-China relations. Also, the entry of China in the Korean War caused a major change in US policy from minimal support of the Nationalist government in Taiwan to Taiwan as protected by the United States.
Vietnam War[edit]
Main article: Vietnam War
The People's Republic of China provided resources and training to North Vietnam, and in the summer of 1962, Chairman Mao Zedong agreed to supply Hanoi with 90,000 rifles and guns free of charge. After the launch of the America's Operation "Rolling Thunder", China sent anti-aircraft units and engineering battalions to North Vietnam to repair the damage caused by American bombing, rebuild roads and railroads, and perform other engineering work, freeing additional hundreds of thousands North Vietnamese army units for combat in American supported South Vietnam. The United States lost 58,159 troops in the Vietnam War.
The Chinese presence in North Vietnam was well-known to US officials, and can explain a number of factors surrounding American strategy in the conflict.[citation needed] In particular, President Johnson and Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara ruled out the possibility of a ground invasion of North Vietnam early on, for fear of repeating the Korean War but now with a thermonuclear-armed China. However, it is unclear exactly what Beijing's reaction to a US invasion of North Vietnam would have been—Mao Zedong reportedly told journalist Edgar Snow in 1965 that China had no intention of fighting to save the Hanoi regime and would not engage the US military unless it crossed into Chinese territory. On other occasions, Mao expressed confidence that the People's Liberation Army could take on the US again, much like it did in Korea. Whatever Chinese plans might have been, the Johnson Administration was unwilling to tempt fate and so ground troops never crossed into North Vietnam.
Relations frozen[edit]
The United States continued to work to prevent the PRC from taking China's seat in the United Nations and encouraged its allies not to deal with the PRC. The United States placed an embargo on trading with the PRC, and encouraged allies to follow it. The PRC developed nuclear weapons in 1964 and, as later declassified documents revealed, President Lyndon B. Johnson considered preemptive attacks to halt its nuclear program. He ultimately decided the measure carried too much risk and it was abandoned.
For most of the 22 years between 1949 and 1971, Sino-US relations were uniformly hostile, with Mao Zedong frequently referring to the United States as "the most dangerous imperialist power",[this quote needs a citation] and the U.S. frequently attacked by Chinese propaganda. President Kennedy believed that US policy towards China was "nonsensical",[this quote needs a citation] and he considered reestablishing diplomatic ties in his second term.[citation needed] However, Kennedy's assassination in late 1963, followed by the Vietnam War and Cultural Revolution, ended any possibility of normalized relations with Beijing for years.
Despite this official non-recognition, the United States and the People's Republic of China held 136 meetings at the ambassadorial level beginning in 1954 and continuing until 1970, first in Geneva and in 1958–1970 in Warsaw.[60]
The Cultural Revolution brought about near-complete isolation of China from the outside world and vocal denunciations of both U.S. imperialism and Soviet revisionism.
Beginning in 1967, the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission established the China Claims Program, in which American citizens could denominate the sum total of their lost assets and property following the Communist seizure of foreign property in 1950. American companies were reluctant to invest in China despite (future Chairman) Deng Xiaoping's reassurances of a stable business environment.[61]
Rapprochement[edit]
The end of the 1960s brought a period of transformation. For China, when American president Johnson decided to wind down the Vietnam war in 1968, it gave China an impression that the US had no interest of expanding in Asia anymore while the USSR became a more serious threat as it intervened in Czechoslovakia to displace a communist government and might well interfere in China.[62]
This became an especially important concern for the People's Republic of China after the Sino-Soviet border conflict of 1969. The PRC was diplomatically isolated and the leadership came to believe that improved relations with the United States would be a useful counterbalance to the Soviet threat. Zhou Enlai, the Premier of China, was at the forefront of this effort with the committed backing of Chairman Mao Zedong. In 1969, the United States initiated measures to relax trade restrictions and other impediments to bilateral contact, to which China responded. However, this rapprochement process was stalled by the Vietnam War where China was supporting the enemies of the United States. Communication between Chinese and American leaders, however, was conducted with Pakistan and Poland as intermediaries.
Henry Kissinger, shown here with Zhou Enlai and Mao Zedong, made two secret trips to the PRC in 1971 before Nixon's groundbreaking visit in 1972.
In the United States, academics such as John K. Fairbank and A. Doak Barnett pointed to the need to deal realistically with the Beijing government, while organizations such as the National Committee on United States–China Relations sponsored debates to promote public awareness. Many saw the specter of Communist China behind communist movements in Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos, but a growing number concluded that if the PRC would align with the US it would mean a major redistribution of global power against the Soviets. Mainland China's market of nearly one billion consumers appealed to American business. Senator J. William Fulbright, Chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, held a series of hearings on the matter.[63]
Richard M. Nixon mentioned in his inaugural address that the two countries were entering an era of negotiation after an era of confrontation. Although Nixon during his 1960 presidential campaign had vociferously supported Chiang Kai-Shek, by the second half of the decade, he increasingly began to speak of there "being no reason to leave China angry and isolated". Nixon's election as president in 1968 was initially met with hostility by Beijing—an editorial in the People's Daily denounced him as "a chieftain whom the capitalist world had turned to out of desperation".[64] Nixon believed it was in the American national interest to forge a relationship with China, even though there were enormous differences between the two countries.[65] He was assisted in this by his National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger. Domestic politics also entered into Nixon's thinking, as the boost from a successful courting of the PRC could help him in the 1972 American presidential election. He also worried that one of the Democrats would preempt him and go to the PRC before he had the opportunity.
In 1971, an unexpectedly friendly encounter between the American and Chinese ping-pong athletes called Glenn Cowan and Zhuang Zedong in Japan opened the way for a visit to China, which Chairman Mao personally approved.[66] In April 1971, the athletes became the first Americans to officially visit China since the communist takeover. The smooth acceptance of this so-called "ping-pong diplomacy" gave confidence to both sides. In July 1971, Henry Kissinger feigned illness while on a trip to Pakistan and did not appear in public for a day. He was actually on a top-secret mission to Beijing to negotiate with Zhou Enlai.
Kissinger and his aides did not receive a warm welcome in Beijing, and the hotel they stayed in was equipped with pamphlets excoriating US imperialism. However, the meeting with Zhou Enlai was productive, and the Chinese premier expressed his hope for improved Sino-US relations. He commented that the US had intentionally isolated China, not vice versa, and any initiative to restore diplomatic ties had to come from the American side. Zhou spoke of the late President Kennedy's plans to restore relations with China and told Kissinger "We are willing to wait as long as we need to. If these negotiations fail, in time another Kennedy or another Nixon will come along."[this quote needs a citation]
On July 15, 1971, President Richard Nixon revealed the mission to the world and that he had accepted an invitation to visit the PRC.[67]
This announcement[68] caused immediate shock around the world. In the United States, some hard-line anti-communists (most notably Arizona Senator Barry Goldwater) denounced the decision, but most public opinion supported the move and Nixon saw the jump in the polls he had been hoping for. Since Nixon had sterling anti-communist credentials he was all but immune to being called "soft on communism." Nixon and his aides wanted to ensure that press coverage offered dramatic imagery.[69] Nixon was particularly eager for strong news coverage.
President Nixon and First Lady Pat Nixon walk with the American delegation and their Chinese hosts on the Great Wall of China.
President Nixon and Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai toast during Nixon's 1972 visit to China
Within the PRC there was also opposition from left-wing elements. This effort was allegedly led by Lin Biao, head of the military, who died in a mysterious plane crash over Mongolia while trying to defect to the Soviet Union. His death silenced most internal dissent over the visit.
Internationally, reactions varied. In the communist world, the Soviets were very concerned that two major enemies seemed to have resolved their differences, and the new world alignment contributed significantly to the policy of détente. Romania's president Nicolai Ceausescu praised the US initiative as a "move for world peace".[this quote needs a citation] Several communist regimes, including Cuba, Albania, and North Vietnam, accused China of "capitulationism to the imperialists".[this quote needs a citation] North Korea proclaimed that it was the reverse and that the US had been forced to capitulate to China, having failed to isolate it.
America's European allies and Canada were pleased by the initiative, especially since many of them had already recognized the PRC. In Asia, the reaction was far more mixed. Japan was annoyed that it had not been told of the announcement until fifteen minutes before it had been made, and feared that the Americans were abandoning them in favor of the PRC. A short time later, Japan also recognized the PRC and committed to substantial trade with the continental power. South Korea and South Vietnam were both concerned that peace between the United States and the PRC could mean an end to American support for them against their communist enemies. Throughout the period of rapprochement, both countries had to be regularly assured that they would not be abandoned.
From February 21 to February 28, 1972, President Nixon traveled to Beijing, Hangzhou, and Shanghai. At the conclusion of his trip, the US and the PRC issued the Shanghai Communiqué, a statement of their respective foreign policy views. In the Communiqué, both nations pledged to work toward the full normalization of diplomatic relations. This did not lead to immediate recognition of the People's Republic of China but 'liaison offices' were established in Beijing and Washington.[70] The US acknowledged the PRC position that all Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait maintain that there is only one China and that Taiwan is part of China. The statement enabled the US and PRC to temporarily set aside the issue of Taiwan and open trade and communication. Also, the US and China both agreed to take action against 'any country' that is to establish 'hegemony' in the Asia-Pacific. On several issues, such as the ongoing conflicts in Korea, Vietnam, and Israel, the US and China were unable to reach a common understanding.[70]
Most major anti-US propaganda disappeared in China after the Nixon visit; although there was still occasional criticism of US imperialism, the Soviet Union had definitively become China's arch-foe in the 1970s.
The rapprochement with the United States benefited the PRC immensely and greatly increased its security for the rest of the Cold War. It has been argued that the United States, on the other hand, saw fewer benefits than it had hoped for, inasmuch as China continued to back America's enemies in Hanoi and Pyongyang. Eventually, however, the PRC's suspicion of Vietnam's motives led to a break in Sino-Vietnamese cooperation and, upon the Vietnamese invasion of Cambodia in 1979, the Sino-Vietnamese War. Both China and the United States backed combatants in Africa against Soviet and Cuban-supported movements. The economic benefits of normalization were slow as it would take decades for American products to penetrate the vast Chinese market. While Nixon's China policy is regarded by many as the highlight of his presidency, others such as William Bundy have argued that it provided very little benefit to the United States.[citation needed]
Liaison Office (1973–1978)[edit]
President Gerald Ford makes remarks at a Reciprocal Dinner in Beijing on December 4, 1975.
In May 1973, in an effort to build toward formal diplomatic relations, the US and the PRC established the United States Liaison Office (USLO) in Beijing and a counterpart PRC office in Washington. In 1973 to 1978, such distinguished Americans as David K. E. Bruce, George H. W. Bush, Thomas S. Gates, Jr., and Leonard Woodcock served as chiefs of the USLO with the personal rank of ambassador. China made clear that it considered the Soviet Union its chief adversary, and urged the United States to be powerful, thereby distracting Moscow. Liaison officer George Bush concluded, "China keeps wanting us to be strong, wanting us to defend Europe, wanting us to increase our defense budgets, etc."[71] Bush concluded that American engagement was essential to support markets, allies, and stability in Asia and around the world.[72]
President Gerald Ford visited the PRC in 1975 and reaffirmed American interest in normalizing relations with Beijing. Shortly after taking office in 1977, President Jimmy Carter again reaffirmed the goals of the Shanghai Communiqué. Secretary of State Cyrus Vance, Carter's National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski, and senior staff member of the National Security Council Michel Oksenberg encouraged Carter to seek full diplomatic and trade relations with China. Although Brzezinski sought to quickly establish a security relationship with Beijing to counter the Soviet Union, Carter sided with Vance in believing that such a deal would threaten existing U.S.-Soviet relations, including the SALT II negotiations. Thus, the administration decided to cautiously pursue political normalization and not military relations.[73] Vance, Brzezinski, and Oksenberg traveled to Beijing in early 1978 to work with Leonard Woodcock, then head of the liaison office, to lay the groundwork to do so. The United States and the People's Republic of China announced on December 15, 1978 that the two governments would establish diplomatic relations on January 1, 1979.
Normalization[edit]
Jimmy Carter, Zbigniew Brzezinski, and other U.S. officials meet in the White House Cabinet Room with Deng Xiaoping, 29 January 1979
In the Joint Communiqué on the Establishment of Diplomatic Relations, dated January 1, 1979, the United States transferred diplomatic recognition from Taipei to Beijing. The US reiterated the Shanghai Communiqué's acknowledgment of the Chinese position that there is only one China and that Taiwan is a part of China; Beijing acknowledged that the American people would continue to carry on commercial, cultural, and other unofficial contacts with the people of Taiwan.[74]
Much like the Nixon visit to Beijing six years earlier, the formal establishment of Sino-US ties met with a mixed response from many countries. Taiwan, although fully expecting this step, nonetheless expressed disappointment at having not been consulted first. The reaction of the communist world was similar to 1972, with the Soviet Union and its allies in Eastern Europe mostly being noncommittal, Romania welcoming the move, and Cuba and Albania being strongly against it. North Korea issued a statement congratulating "our brotherly neighbors for ending long-hostile relations with the US".[this quote needs a citation]
Vice Premier Deng Xiaoping's January 1979 visit to Washington initiated a series of important, high-level exchanges which continued until the spring of 1989. This resulted in many bilateral agreements, especially in the fields of scientific, technological, and cultural interchange, as well as trade relations. Since early 1979, the United States and the PRC have initiated hundreds of joint research projects and cooperative programs under the Agreement on Cooperation in Science and Technology, the largest bilateral program.[75]
On March 1, 1979, the two countries formally established embassies in each other's capitals. In 1979, outstanding private claims were resolved and a bilateral trade agreement was completed. Vice President Walter Mondale reciprocated Vice Premier Deng's visit with an August 1979 trip to China. This visit led to agreements in September 1980 on maritime affairs, civil aviation links, and textile matters, as well as a bilateral consular convention.
Sino-US military cooperation also began in 1979; American arms sales to China were initiated, and in 1981 it was revealed that a joint Sino-US listening post had been operated in Xinjiang, near the Soviet border. Chinese demands for advanced technology from the US were not always met, in part due to opposition from Congressmen who either distrusted technology transfer to a communist nation out of principle, or concern that there was no guarantee that such technology would not end up in the hands of unfriendly third parties. In 1983, the US State Department changed its classification of China to "a friendly, developing nation",[this quote needs a citation] thereby increasing the amount of technology and armaments that could be sold. The skepticism of some US Congressmen was not entirely unmerited as China during the 1980s continued to sell arms to Iran and other states that were openly hostile to American interests.
Deng Xiaoping with US President Jimmy Carter
As a consequence of high-level and working-level contacts initiated in 1980, New York City and Beijing become sister cities, US dialogue with the PRC broadened to cover a wide range of issues, including global and regional strategic problems, political-military questions, including arms control, UN, and other multilateral organization affairs, and international narcotics matters.[76]
High-level exchanges continued to be a significant means for developing US-PRC relations in the 1980s. President Ronald Reagan and Premier Zhao Ziyang made reciprocal visits in 1984. Reagan's visit to Beijing went well, however a speech he made criticizing the Soviet Union and praising capitalism, democracy, and freedom of religion was not aired on Chinese state TV. In July 1985, President Li Xiannian traveled to the United States, the first such visit by a PRC head of state. Vice President Bush visited the PRC in October 1985 and opened the US Consulate General in Chengdu, the US's fourth consular post in the PRC. Further exchanges of cabinet-level officials occurred between 1985 and 1989, capped by President Bush's visit to Beijing in February 1989.
Shortly after being elected president in 1980, Ronald Reagan made a speech criticizing the PRC and welcoming restoration of ties with Taiwan. These remarks aroused initial panic in Beijing, but Reagan's advisers quickly apologized for his comments, and the president-elect soon retracted them.
Reagan's first two years in office saw some deterioration in Sino-US relations due to the president's vociferous anti-communism, as well as the inability of the two nations to come to a common understanding over the Korean standoff, the Israel-Palestine conflict, or the Falkland War. In 1982, Deng Xiaoping, in a reiteration of Mao Zedong's "Three Worlds" theory, criticized both the US and Soviet Union for imperialism. In 1983, there were quarrels over a Chinese tennis player, Hu Na, who defected to the US, and over an incident where an Olympic parade float in New York City displayed the flag of Taiwan rather than the PRC's flag.
In the period before the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989, a growing number of cultural exchange activities gave the American and Chinese peoples broad exposure to each other's cultural, artistic, and educational achievements. Numerous mainland Chinese professional and official delegations visited the United States each month. Many of these exchanges continued after the suppression of the Tiananmen protests.[77]
Taiwan issue[edit]
Since the renewal of Sino-American relations in early 1979, the Taiwan issue remained a major source of contention. After the announcement of the intention to establish diplomatic relations with Mainland China (PRC) on 15 December 1978, the Republic of China (Taiwan) immediately condemned the United States, leading to rampant protests in both Taiwan and in the US.[78] In April of 1979, the US Congress signed into law the Taiwan Relations Act,[79] permitting unofficial relations with Taiwan to flourish, on the one hand, yet the right of the USA to provide Taiwan with arms of a defensive character, on the other. The expanding relationship that followed normalization was threatened in 1981 by PRC objections to the level of US arms sales to the Republic of China on Taiwan. Secretary of State Alexander Haig visited China in June 1981 in an effort to resolve Chinese concerns about America's unofficial relations with Taiwan. Vice President Bush visited the PRC in May 1982. Eight months of negotiations produced the US-PRC Joint Communiqué of August 17, 1982. In this third communiqué, the US stated its intention to gradually reduce the level of arms sales to the Republic of China, and the PRC described as a fundamental policy their effort to strive for a peaceful resolution to the Taiwan question. China's Ambassador to Washington, in an interview with CGTN in April of 2018, is quoted as saying that Sino-American relations hinge largely upon the US-PRC Joint Communiqué signed between the two parties and where the USA had agreed not to challenge the PRC's sovereignty over the island of Taiwan, but to respect China's "anti-secession law," until such time that Taiwan will be reunified with the Mainland.[80]
Tiananmen protests to 9/11 attacks (1989–2001)[edit]
Bill Clinton and Jiang Zemin holding a joint press conference at the White House, October 29, 1997.
Following China's violent suppression of political protests in June 1989, the US and other governments enacted a number of measures against China's violation of human rights. The US suspended high-level official exchanges with the PRC and weapons exports from the US to the PRC. The US also imposed a number of economic sanctions. In the summer of 1990, at the G7 Houston summit, the West called for renewed political and economic reforms in mainland China, particularly in the field of human rights.[81]
Tiananmen event disrupted the US-China trade relationship, and US investors' interest in mainland China dropped dramatically. Tourist traffic fell off sharply.[82] The Bush administration denounced the repression and suspended certain trade and investment programs on June 5 and 20, 1989, however Congress was responsible for imposing many of these actions, and the White House itself took a far less critical attitude of Beijing, repeatedly expressing hope that the two countries could maintain normalized relations.[83] Some sanctions were legislated while others were executive actions. Examples include:
The US Trade and Development Agency (TDA): new activities in mainland China were suspended from June 1989 until January 2001, when President Bill Clinton lifted this suspension.
Overseas Private Insurance Corporation (OPIC): new activities have been suspended since June 1989.
Development Bank Lending/International Monetary Fund (IMF) Credits: the United States does not support development bank lending and will not support IMF credits to the PRC except for projects that address basic human needs.
Munitions List Exports: subject to certain exceptions, no licenses may be issued for the export of any defense article on the US Munitions List. This restriction may be waived upon a presidential national interest determination.
Arms Imports – import of defense articles from the PRC was banned after the imposition of the ban on arms exports to the PRC. The import ban was subsequently waived by the Administration and reimposed on May 26, 1994. It covers all items on the BATFE' Munitions Import List. During this critical period, J. Stapleton Roy, a career US Foreign Service Officer, served as ambassador to Beijing.[84]
After Tiananmen Square, Sino-US relations deteriorated sharply, falling to their worst since the 1960s, with Beijing accusing the US of "a decades-long conspiracy to subvert Chinese socialism".[this quote needs a citation] The 2-1/2 years from 1989 to 1992 also witnessed a revival of hard-line Maoist ideologies and increased paranoia by the PRC as communist regimes collapsed in Eastern Europe. Nonetheless, China continued to seek foreign business and investment.
Sino-US military ties and arms sales were abruptly terminated in 1989 and as of 2017 have never been restored.
In 1996, the PRC conducted military exercises in the Taiwan Strait in an apparent effort to intimidate the Republic of China electorate before the pending presidential elections, triggering the Third Taiwan Strait Crisis. The United States dispatched two aircraft carrier battle groups to the region. Subsequently, tensions in the Taiwan Strait diminished and relations between the US and the PRC improved, with increased high-level exchanges and progress on numerous bilateral issues, including human rights, nuclear proliferation, and trade. China's paramount leader Jiang Zemin visited the United States in the fall of 1997, the first state visit to the US by a PRC president since 1985. In connection with that visit, the two sides came to a consensus on implementation of their 1985 agreement on Peaceful Nuclear Cooperation, as well as a number of other issues.[85] President Clinton visited the PRC in June 1998. He traveled extensively in mainland China, and had direct interaction with the Chinese people, including live speeches and a radio show which allowed the President to convey a sense of American ideals and values. President Clinton was criticized by some, however, for failing to pay adequate attention to human rights abuses in mainland China.[86]
Relations were damaged for a time by the United States bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade in May 1999, which was stated by the White House to be miscoordination between intelligence and the military, although which some Chinese believed to be deliberate. In any case, Beijing for several days was rocked by massive anti-US demonstrations. By the end of 1999, relations began to gradually improve. In October 1999, the two countries reached an agreement on compensation for families of those who were victims, as well as payments for damages to respective diplomatic properties in Belgrade and China. Sino-US relations in 1999 were also damaged by accusations that a Chinese-American scientist at the Los Alamos National Laboratory had given US nuclear secrets to Beijing.
In April 2001, a PRC J-8 fighter jet collided with a US EP-3 reconnaissance aircraft flying south of the PRC in what became known as the Hainan Island incident. The EP-3 was able to make an emergency landing on PRC's Hainan Island despite extensive damage; the PRC aircraft crashed with the loss of its pilot, Wang Wei. The crew were detained by the PLA after destroying all classified documents pertaining to the aircraft's operation. It was widely believed that the EP-3 recon aircraft was conducting a spying mission on the PLA before the collision, which however took place over international waters. Following extensive negotiations resulting in the "letter of the two sorries," the crew of the EP-3 was released from imprisonment and allowed to leave the PRC eleven days later. The US aircraft was returned by Beijing three months later in pieces, after which the relationship between the US and the PRC gradually improved once more.
George W. Bush's tenure (2001–2009)[edit]
Presidents George W. Bush, and Hu Jintao with first ladies Laura Bush, and Liu Yongqing wave from the White House in April 2006.
Sino–American relations improved following the September 11 terrorist attacks. Two PRC citizens died in the attacks on the World Trade Center.[87] Chinese companies and individuals sent expressions of condolences to their American counterparts. The PRC, itself troubled by Muslim separatists in Xinjiang, offered strong public support for the War on Terror. The PRC voted in favor of UNSCR 1373, publicly supported the coalition campaign in Afghanistan,[88] and contributed $150 million of bilateral assistance to Afghan reconstruction following the defeat of the Taliban. Shortly after 9/11, the US and PRC also commenced a counterterrorism dialogue. The third round of that dialogue was held in Beijing in February 2003.
In the United States, the terrorist attacks greatly changed the nature of discourse. It was no longer plausible to argue, as the Blue Team had earlier asserted, that the PRC was the primary security threat to the United States, and the need to focus on the Middle East and the War on Terror made the avoidance of potential distractions in East Asia a priority for the United States.
There were initial fears among the PRC leadership that the war on terrorism would lead to an anti-PRC effort by the US, especially as the US began establishing bases in Central Asian countries like Uzbekistan and Tajikistan and renewed efforts against Iraq. Because of setbacks in America's Iraq campaign, these fears have largely subsided. The application of American power in Iraq and continuing efforts by the United States to cooperate with the PRC has significantly reduced the popular anti-Americanism that had developed in the mid-1990s.
US and Chinese officials celebrate the opening of 3 US Food and Drug Administration offices in China focused on product safety in 2008
The PRC and the US have also worked closely on regional issues, including those pertaining to North Korea and its nuclear weapons program. The People's Republic of China has stressed its opposition to North Korea's decision to withdraw from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, its concerns over North Korea's nuclear capabilities, and its desire for a non-nuclear Korean Peninsula. It also voted to refer North Korea's noncompliance with its International Atomic Energy Agency obligations to the UN Security Council.
Taiwan remains a volatile issue, but one that remains under control. The United States policy toward Taiwan has involved emphasizing the Four Noes and One Without. On occasion the United States has rebuked Republic of China President Chen Shui-bian for provocative pro-independence rhetoric. However, in 2005, the PRC passed the Anti-Secession Law which stated that the PRC would be prepared to resort to "non-peaceful means" if Taiwan declared formal independence. Many critics of the PRC, such as the Blue Team, argue that the PRC was trying to take advantage of the US war in Iraq to assert its claims on Republic of China's territory. In 2008, Taiwan voters elected Ma Ying-jeou. Ma, representing the Kuomintang, campaigned on a platform that included rapprochement with mainland China. His election has significant implications for the future of cross-strait relations.[89]
China's paramount leader Hu Jintao visited the United States in April 2006.[90] Clark Randt, U.S. Ambassador to China from 2001 to 2008 examined "The State of U.S.-China Relations in a 2008 lecture at the USC U.S.-China Institute.[91]
Obama's tenure (2009–2017)[edit]
Chinese Vice Premier Wang Qishan, center, holds the autographed basketball given to him by President Barack Obama following their Oval Office meeting Tuesday, July 28, 2009, to discuss the outcomes of the first US–China Strategic and Economic Dialogue. Looking on at left is Chinese State Councilor Dai Bingguo.[92]
The 2008 US presidential election centered on issues of war and economic recession, but candidates Barack Obama and John McCain also spoke extensively regarding US policy toward China.[93] Both favored cooperation with China on major issues, but they differed with regard to trade policy. Obama expressed concern that the value of China's currency was being deliberately set low to benefit China's exporters. McCain argued that free trade was crucial and was having a transformative effect in China. Still, McCain noted that while China might have shared interests with the US, it did not share American values.[94]
Barack Obama's presidency has fostered hopes for increased co-operation and heightened levels of friendship between the two nations. On November 8, 2008, Hu Jintao and Barack Obama shared a phone conversation in which the Chinese President congratulated Obama on his election victory. During the conversation both parties agreed that the development of US-China relations is not only in the interest of both nations, but also in the interests of the world.[95][96][97]
Other organizations within China also held positive reactions to the election of Barack Obama, particularly with his commitment to revising American climate change policy. Greenpeace published an article detailing how Obama's victory would spell positive change for investment in the green jobs sector as part of a response to the financial crisis gripping the world at the time of Obama's inauguration.[98] A number of organizations, including the US Departments of Energy and Commerce, NGOs such as the Council on Foreign Relations and the Brookings Institution, and universities, have been working with Chinese counterparts to discuss ways to address climate change. Both US and Chinese governments have addressed the economic downturn with massive stimulus initiatives. The Chinese have expressed concern that "Buy American" components of the US plan discriminate against foreign producers, including those in China.[99]
As the two most influential and powerful countries in the world, there have been increasingly strong suggestions within American political circles of creating a G-2 (Chimerica) relationship for the United States and China to work out solutions to global problems together.[100]
Obama meets with Wen Jiabao and members of the Chinese delegation after a bilateral meeting at the United Nations in New York City.
The Strategic Economic Dialogue initiated by then-US President Bush and Chinese President Hu and led by US Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Chinese Vice Premier Wu Yi in 2006 has been broadened by the Obama administration. Now called the U.S.–China Strategic and Economic Dialogue, it is led by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and US Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner for the United States and Vice Premier Wang Qishan and Chinese State Councilor Dai Bingguo for China. The focus of the first set of meetings in July 2009 was in response to the economic crisis, finding ways to cooperate to stem global warming and addressing issues such as the proliferation of nuclear weapons and humanitarian crises.[101]
US President Barack Obama visited China on November 15–18, 2009 to discuss economic worries, concerns over nuclear weapon proliferation, and the need for action against climate change.[102] The USC US-China Institute produced a digest of press comments on this visit and on earlier presidential trips.[103]
In January 2010, the US proposed a $6.4 billion arms sale to the Republic of China. In response, the PRC threatened to impose sanctions on US companies supplying arms to Taiwan and suspend cooperation on certain regional and international issues.[104]
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry speaks with Chinese leader Xi Jinping, July 10, 2014.
On February 19, 2010, President Obama met with the Dalai Lama, accused by China of "fomenting unrest in Tibet." After the meeting, China summoned the US ambassador to China, Jon Huntsman,[105] but Time has described the Chinese reaction as "muted," speculating that it could be because "the meeting came during the Chinese New Year... when most officials are on leave." Some activists criticized Obama for the relatively low profile of the visit.[106]
In 2012, the PRC criticized Obama's new defense strategy, which was widely viewed[by whom?] as aiming to isolate China in the East Asian region.[107] Obama is looking to increase US military influence in the area with a rotating presence of forces in friendly countries.[108]
In March 2012, China suddenly began cutting back its purchases of oil from Iran, along with some signs on sensitive security issues like Syria and North Korea, showed some coordination with the Obama administration.[109]
In March 2013, the US and China agreed to impose stricter sanctions on North Korea for conducting nuclear tests, which sets the stage for UN Security Council vote. Such accord might signal a new level of cooperation between the US and China.[110]
President Barack Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping in September 2015
In an effort to build a "new model" of relations, President Obama met President Xi Jinping for two days of meetings, between 6 June and 8 June 2013, at the Sunnylands estate in Rancho Mirage, California.[111] The summit was considered "the most important meeting between an American president and a Chinese leader in 40 years, since Nixon and Mao," according to Joseph Nye, a political scientist at Harvard University.[112] The leaders concretely agreed to combat climate change and also found strong mutual interest in curtailing North Korea's nuclear program.[112] However, the leaders remained sharply divided over cyber espionage and U.S. arms sales to Taiwan. Xi was dismissive of American complaints about cyber security.[113] Tom Donilon, the outgoing U.S. National Security Adviser, stated that cyber security "is now at the center of the relationship," adding that if China's leaders were unaware of this fact, they know now.[113]
Relations between the military leadership of the two nations improved in 2013. General Qi said that over the long term the shared interests of the two would outweigh their differences.[citation needed]
Obama has supported the One-China policy.[114] In 2014, President Obama stated that "We recognize Tibet as part of the People's Republic of China. We are not in favor of independence."[115]
In May 2015, U.S. Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter warned China to halt its rapid island-building in the South China Sea.[116]
President Obama hosted President Xi Jinping of the People's Republic of China for a bilateral meeting on the margins of the Nuclear Security Summit on March 31, 2016.[117]
Trump's tenure (2017–)[edit]
See also: Foreign policy of Donald Trump § China and Taiwan, and Trump tariffs
Secretary of State Rex Tillerson shakes hands with President Xi Jinping upon arrival in Beijing, March 19, 2017.
President-elect Donald Trump's telephone conversation with Tsai Ing-wen, President of the Republic of China, on 2 December 2016, the first such contact with Taiwan by a U.S. president-elect or president since 1979, provoked the People's Republic of China to lodge a diplomatic protest ("stern representations").[118][119] Trump went on to clarify his move by telling the Fox News, "I fully understand the 'one China' policy, but I don't know why we have to be bound by a 'one China' policy unless we make a deal with China having to do with other things, including trade."[119]
On Donald Trump's inauguration day, an official from the People's Liberation Army wrote on the official website that the US's military build-up in Asia, and its push to arm South Korea with the THAAD missile-defense system were provocative "hot spots getting closer to ignition" and that the chances of war had become "more real".[120][121]
On 23 January, speaking about China's claims to sovereignty over the Spratly Islands in the South China Sea, White House spokesman Sean Spicer said, "It's a question of if those islands are in fact in international waters and not part of China proper, then yeah, we're going to make sure that we defend international territories from being taken over by one country."[122]
President Donald Trump arrives in China in November 2017
On 4 January, on a visit to Japan, U.S. Defense Secretary James Mattis reaffirmed Washington's commitment under the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between the United States and Japan to defending Japan, including the Senkaku Islands (the East China Sea) that are claimed by China.[123]
On 9 February, Trump spoke with China's leader Xi Jinping over the phone discussing a wide range of issues; Trump was said to have re-iterated the United States' commitment to the status quo 'one-China' policy.[124]
President Xi Jinping reiterated before President Trump, in a telephone conversation held between the two men on 3 July 2017, that "China-US relations have made great progress in recent days, but they have also been affected by some negative factors."[125] By "negative factors," Geng Shuan, a Chinese government spokesmen, explained in a televised briefing: "Under the pretext of navigational freedom, the American side once again sent military vessels into the Chinese territorial waters of Xisha (Paracel) Islands. It has violated Chinese and international law, infringed upon Chinese sovereignty, and disrupted order, peace and security of the relevant waters and put in jeopardy facilities and personnel on the relevant Chinese islands. It is a serious political and military provocation. The Chinese side is strongly dissatisfied with and firmly opposed to the relevant actions by the US."[125]
On 8 November 2017, President Trump visited Beijing as part of the Asian tour. The main theme of the meeting emphasized the issues regarding the de-nucleariziation on the Korean peninsula in addition to the stabilization of China–United States relations. President Trump reiterated the importance of trade development between the two countries and reaffirmed the American support for the One-China policy.[citation needed] However, according to the latest U.S. National Security Act from 18 December 2017, the ships of U.S. Navy can call at the ports of Taiwan. This fact breaks "One-China" law, consider the Chinese government. Chinese Ambassador to the US Lee Kexin said that "the day when any US warship will enter the port of Taiwan Kaohsiung, the CPLA forces will unite China".[126]
On 13 March 2018, the out-going US Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson, said: "Much work remains to establish a clear view of the nature of our future relationship with China, how shall we deal with one-another over the next fifty years, and ensure a period of prosperity for all of our peoples, free of conflict between two very powerful nations."[127]
China enforced punitive tariffs on 128 categories of American goods on April 1, 2018 in retaliation for the Trump Administration’s national-security levies on steel and aluminum imports the previous month.The Chinese Government’s response is measured, affecting $3 billion in annual trade or about 2% of U.S. goods exports to China.
Economic relations[edit]
This article needs to be updated. Please update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (May 2010)
Imports and exports between China and the United States. US census.gov data.
The PRC and the US resumed trade relations in 1972 and 1973. Direct investment by the US in mainland China covers a wide range of manufacturing sectors, several large hotel projects, restaurant chains, and petrochemicals. US companies have entered agreements establishing more than 20,000 equity joint ventures, contractual joint ventures, and wholly foreign-owned enterprises in mainland China. More than 100 US-based multinationals have projects in mainland China, some with multiple investments. Cumulative US investment in mainland China is valued at $48 billion. The US trade deficit with mainland China exceeded $350 billion in 2006 and was the United States' largest bilateral trade deficit.[128] Some of the factors that influence the U.S. trade deficit with mainland China include:
US Import Valuation Overcounts China: there has been a shift of low-end assembly industries to mainland China from newly industrialized countries in Asia. Mainland China has increasingly become the last link in a long chain of value-added production. Because US trade data attributes the full value of a product to the final assembler, mainland Chinese value added is overcounted.
US demand for labor-intensive goods exceeds domestic output: the PRC has restrictive trade practices in mainland China, which include a wide array of barriers to foreign goods and services, often aimed at protecting state-owned enterprises. These practices include high tariffs, lack of transparency, requiring firms to obtain special permission to import goods, inconsistent application of laws and regulations, and leveraging technology from foreign firms in return for market access. Mainland China's accession to the World Trade Organization is meant to help address these barriers.
The undervaluation of the Renminbi relative to the United States dollar.[129]
Beginning in 2006, the US and China agreed to hold regular high-level talks about economic issues and other mutual concerns by establishing the Strategic Economic Dialogue, which meets biannually. Five meetings have been held, the most recent in December 2008. Economic nationalism seems to be rising in both countries, a point the leaders of the two delegations noted in their opening presentations.[130][131][132] The United States and China have also established the high-level US-China Senior Dialogue to discuss international political issues and work out resolutions.
The first round of the U.S.–China Strategic and Economic Dialogue was held in Washington, D.C., from 27 to 28 July 2009
In September 2009 a trade dispute emerged between China and the United States, which came after the US imposed tariffs of 35 percent on Chinese tire imports. The Chinese commerce minister accused the United States of a "grave act of trade protectionism,"[133] while a USTR spokesperson said the tariff "was taken precisely in accordance with the law and our international trade agreements."[133] Additional issues were raised by both sides in subsequent months.[134][135]
When a country joins the World Trade Organization they commit to keep their Tariffs beneath the bound rate, which is generally around 39 percent. China's reaction is due to the fact that nations usually keep their Tariffs at an average of 9 percent, but when the U.S raised their Tariff on Chinese imported tires to 35 percent, it was still below the average bound rate.[136]
Pascal Lamy cautioned: "The statistical bias created by attributing commercial value to the last country of origin perverts the true economic dimension of the bilateral trade imbalances. This affects the political debate, and leads to misguided perceptions. Take the bilateral deficit between China and the US. A series of estimates based on true domestic content can cut the overall deficit – which was $252bn in November 2010 – by half, if not more."[137]
In early 2012, a dispute over rare earth minerals was brought into the light between the two countries. President Obama made an announcement that the United States would be one of a few countries to file a dispute with China. Amongst the United States, Japan and other Western European countries would also be filing disputes as well. This is simply just one of few disputes between the United States and China. It is believed by many experts, including Chris Isidore, a writer for CNN Money, that "any one of the disputes could damage the economies of both countries as well as the relationship between them."[138] The dispute was filed, and China was charged with putting unfair restrictions on the exportation of rare earth minerals. These minerals were crucial and in high demand by all countries. President Obama believed the United States should have those minerals in the United States whereas China disagreed. China denied all of the said charges brought forth "saying its rules are defensible on grounds of environmental and economic sustainability, and suggests there would be consequences if the United States presses the case." It is important to understand the relationship between the United States and China, especially economically. There is not one without the other. China's state news agency commented that "past experiences have shown that policymakers in Washington should treat such issues with more prudence, because maintaining sound China-U.S. trade relations is in the fundamental interests of both sides"[138]
Currency dispute[edit]
Main article: Renminbi currency value
From 2003 to 2014, China was a major currency manipulator. Economist C. Fred Bergsten, writing for the Peterson Institute for International Economics, wrote that "During this 'decade of manipulation,' China bought more than $300 billion annually to resist upward movement of its currency by artificially keeping the exchange rate of the dollar strong and the renminbi's exchange rate weak. China's competitive position was thus strengthened by as much as 30 to 40 percent at the peak of the intervention. Currency manipulation explained most of China's large trade surpluses, which reached a staggering 10 percent of its entire GDP in 2007."[139] During this period, China's currency manipulation was a point of conflict with the United States. Domestic leaders within the United States pressured the Obama administration to take a hard-line stance against China and compel them to raise the value of their currency, and legislation was introduced to the United States Congress calling on the President to impose tariffs on Chinese imports until China properly values its currency.[133][140]
Since 2014, the situation changed dramatically, as China stopped artificially deflating its currency,[139][141] as the growth in the Chinese economy slowed and Chinese investors made more investments outside the country, leading to a drop in the yuan's value in relation to the dollar, as well as a decline in China's reserves.[141]
Chinese perspective on the US economy[edit]
China is a major creditor and the second largest foreign holder of US public debt[142] and has been critical of US deficits and fiscal policy,[143] advising for policies that maintain the purchasing value of the dollar[144][145] although it had little few options other than to continue to buy United States Treasury bonds.[143] China condemned the US monetary policy of quantitative easing,[143][146][147] responding to S&P's downgrade of U.S. credit rating, and advised the United States not to continue with the accumulation of debt, concluding with the statement that America cannot continue to borrow to solve financial problems.[148][149][150]
Important issues[edit]
Military spending and planning[edit]
Main articles: Military budget of China and Military budget of the United States
The PRC's military budget is often mentioned as a threat by many, including the Blue Team.[citation needed] The PRC's investment in its military is growing rapidly. The United States, along with independent analysts, remains convinced that the PRC conceals the real extent of its military spending.[151][152] According to the PRC government, China spent $45 billion on defense in 2007.[153] In contrast, the United States had a $623-billion budget for the military in 2008, $123 billion more than the combined military budgets of all other countries in the world.[154] Some very broad US estimates maintain that the PRC military spends between $85 billion and $125 billion. According to official figures, the PRC spent $123 million on defense per day in 2007. In comparison, the US spent $1.7 billion ($1,660 million) per day that year.[155]
General Xu Caihou of the People's Liberation Army and U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates at the Pentagon
The concerns over the Chinese military budget may come from US worries that the PRC is attempting to threaten its neighbors or challenge the United States. Concerns have been raised that China is developing a large naval base near the South China Sea and has diverted resources from the People's Liberation Army Ground Force to the People's Liberation Army Navy and to air force and missile development.[156][153][157]
Andrew Scobell wrote that under President Hu, objective civilian control and oversight of the PLA appears to be weakly applied.[158]
On October 27, 2009, American Defense Secretary Robert Gates praised the steps China has taken to increase transparency of defense spending.[159] In June 2010, however, he said that the Chinese military was resisting efforts to improve military-to-military relations with the United States.[160] Gates has also said that the United States will "assert freedom of navigation" in response to Chinese complaints about United States Navy deployments in international waters near China.[161] Admiral Michael Mullen has said that the United States seeks closer military ties to China, but will continue to operate in the western Pacific.[162]
A recent report stated that five of six US Air Force bases in the area are potentially vulnerable to Chinese missiles and called for increased defenses.[163]
Meanwhile, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists wrote in a 2010 report that the Chinese continue to invest in modernization of their nuclear forces because they perceive that their deterrent force is vulnerable to American capabilities and that further improvement in American missile defenses will drive further Chinese spending in this area.[164]
Chinese defense minister Liang Guanglie has said that China is 20 years behind the United States in military technology.[165]
Territorial claims in the South China Sea
The International Institute for Strategic Studies in a 2011 report argued that if spending trends continue China will achieve military equality with the United States in 15–20 years.[166]
China and the United States have been described as engaging in a race of military technology. Expansion and development of new weapons by China has been seen as so threatening as to cause planning for withdrawal of US forces from close proximity to China, dispersal of US bases in the region, and development of various new weapon systems.[citation needed][original research?] China is also developing capacity for attacking satellites and for cyberwarfare.[167]
In 2012, it was reported that the United States would invite a team of senior Chinese logisticians to discuss the possibility of a first-ever logistics cooperation agreement between the two countries.[168]
Professor James R. Holmes, Chinese specialist at the U.S. Naval War College, has said that China's investments towards a potential future conflict are closer to those of the United States than may first appear, because the Chinese understate their spending, the internal price structures of the two countries are different, and the Chinese only need to concentrate on projecting military force a short distance from their own shores. The balance may shift to the advantage of the Chinese very quickly if they continue double digit yearly growth while the Americans and their allies cut back.[169]
In line with power transition theory, the idea that "wars tend to break out...when the upward trajectory of a rising power comes close to intersecting the downward trajectory of a declining power," some have argued that conflict between China, an emerging power, and the United States, the reigning superpower, is all but inevitable.[170]
Human rights[edit]
This article contains weasel words: vague phrasing that often accompanies biased or unverifiable information. Such statements should be clarified or removed. (September 2014)
Wikinews has related news: China 'furious' at U.S. over Dalai Lama award
Civil rights activist Chen Guangcheng (left) with former United States ambassador to China Gary Locke (center) and former Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Kurt M. Campbell (right) at the U.S. Embassy in Beijing on 1 May 2012
China Daily published a cartoon of a shadowed Statue of Liberty holding a tape recorder and microphone instead of a tablet and torch
Pro-Tibetan protesters come into contact with pro-Chinese protesters in San Francisco
Main articles: Human rights in China and Human Rights Record of the United States
In 2003, the United States declared that despite some positive momentum that year and greater signs that the People's Republic of China was willing to engage with the US and others on human rights, there was still serious backsliding. China has acknowledged in principle the importance of protection of human rights and has claimed to have taken steps to bring its own human rights practices into conformity with international norms. Among these steps are the signing of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in October 1997, ratified in March 2001, and signing of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights in October 1998, which has not yet been ratified. In 2002, China released a significant number of political and religious prisoners and agreed to interact with United Nations experts on torture, arbitrary detention, and religion. However, international human rights groups assert that there has been virtually no movement on these promises,[citation needed] with more people being arrested for similar offences since. Such groups maintain that China still has a long way to go in instituting the kind of fundamental systemic change that will protect the rights and liberties of all its citizens in mainland China. The US State Department publishes an annual report on human rights around the world, which includes an evaluation of China's human rights record.[171][172]
In a decision that was criticized by human rights groups, the State Department did not list China as one of the world's worst human rights violators in its 2007 report of human rights practices in countries and regions outside the United States.[173] However, the then-assistant secretary of the State Department's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor Jonathan D. Farrar stated that China's overall human rights record in 2007 remained poor.[173]
Since 1998, China has annually published a White Paper detailing the human rights abuses by the United States[174][175][176] and since 2005 has also published a White Paper on its own political system and democratic progress.[177][178]
On February 27, 2014[179] the United States released its China report on human rights practices for 2013 which, according to its executive summary, described the PRC as an authoritarian state and a place in which repression and coercion were routine.[180] On February 28, 2014, China published a report on human rights in the United States citing surveillance on its own citizens, mistreatment of inmates, gun violence, and homelessness despite having a vibrant economy as important issues.[179]
Influence in Asia[edit]
China's economic rise has led to some geo-political friction between the US and China in the East Asian region.[181] For example, in response to China's response to the Bombardment of Yeonpyeong by North Korea, "Washington is moving to redefine its relationship with South Korea and Japan, potentially creating an anti-China bloc in Northeast Asia that officials say they don't want but may need."[182] For its part, the Chinese government fears a US Encirclement Conspiracy.[183][better source needed]
China and the US have recently led competing efforts to gain influence in Asian trade and development. In 2015, China led the creation of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, with the goal of financing projects which would spur the development of the lower-tier Asian economies, thus facilitating improved economic ties across the region. It has been suggested that the United States considered the AIIB to be a challenge to the US-backed Asian Development Bank and the World Bank, and sees the Chinese effort as an attempt to set the global economic agenda on terms formulated by the government in Beijing.[184] The Obama administration led an effort to enact the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, a multilateral trade pact between a number of Pacific Rim countries, which excluded China. According to the US Trade Representative, the agreement was designed to “promote economic growth; support the creation and retention of jobs; enhance innovation, productivity and competitiveness; raise living standards; reduce poverty in the signatories' countries; and promote transparency, good governance, and enhanced labor and environmental protections."[185] The deal was placed on hold after the US withdrew from the agreement on 23 January 2017.[186] These efforts are among the attempts by both the US and China to increase their influence over the Asia-Pacific by strengthening their economic ties within the region.
According to an article published on Jura Gentium, Journal of Philosophy of International Law and Global Politics, there is a "new Sphere of Influence 2"[187] shaped mainly by China and the US. Even on social media, if the Western, Japanese and South Korean events and daily life are linked through Facebook, Chinese and American habits and customs are disconnected lacking in social media sharing.[citation needed][original research?] This strategy to avoid American influences through social networks is preserved[neutrality is disputed] by the Chinese government.
In response to increased American drone strikes against militants on Pakistan's border areas during the Obama administration, the PRC has offered additional fighter jets to Pakistan.[188][better source needed]
Countries in Southeast Asia have responded to Chinese claims for sea areas by seeking closer relations with the United States.[189] American Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has said that in spite of budget pressures, the United States will expand its influence in the region, in order to counter China's military buildup.[190]
On 7 June 2013, Denny Roy, a senior fellow at the East–West Center in Honolulu, argued in The Diplomat that the United States and China must stop striving for trust and instead emphasize verification.[191] "The argument that trust leads to peace is built on the premise that the suspicions between China and the U.S. are unfounded and would evaporate with more and deeper dialogue. Unfortunately, however, at least some of these suspicions are all too warranted."[191] Whether international law should govern regional affairs in Asia; whether China should be allowed to make expansive sovereignty claims; and what the future strategic roles of South Korea and Japan should be, are issues that, according to Roy, are irreconcilable between China and the U.S.[191] Strategic trust, therefore, is not attainable. "The two countries should strive to manage their inevitable bilateral strategic tensions by reaching agreements where both see a benefit and where compliance is measurable. . . for these inherent rivals and potential adversaries, the emphasis belongs on 'verify,' not 'trust.'"[191]
In the context of US-China relations, a potential application of MAR would be the U.S. pledging not to move its forces into North Korea in the event of a regime collapse, which could be followed by a commitment from China not to move its troops to the DMZ in such an event.
Cyberwarfare[edit]
In 2014, Chinese hackers hacked the computer system of the Office of Personnel Management,[192] resulting in the theft of approximately 22 million personnel records handled by the office.[193] FBI Director James Comey stated: "It is a very big deal from a national security perspective and from a counterintelligence perspective. It’s a treasure trove of information about everybody who has worked for, tried to work for, or works for the United States government."[193]
See also[edit]
China portal
United States portal
International relations portal
General
Air route authority between the United States and China
Chimerica
China containment policy
China Lobby
Chinese Century
Chinese espionage in the United States
Group of Two
Quadrilateral Security Dialogue
Strategic Economic Dialogue
U.S.–China Strategic and Economic Dialogue
History
1996 United States campaign finance controversy
Chinatowns in the United States
Cox Report
Hainan Island incident
Hu Na incident
Nixon in China
Permanent normal trade relations
Ping-pong diplomacy
Red Chinese Battle Plan
United States-China Economic and Security Review Commission
U.S. immigration policy toward the People's Republic of China
References[edit]
Jump up ^ Simandan, D., 2018. Wisdom and foresight in Chinese thought: sensing the immediate future. Journal of Futures Studies. 22(3), pp. 35-50. https://doi.org/10.6531/JFS.2018.22(3).00A35
Jump up ^ Woon, C.Y., 2018. China’s Contingencies: Critical Geopolitics, Chinese Exceptionalism and the Uses of History. Geopolitics, 23(1), pp.67-95.
Jump up ^ "Clinton seeks stronger Asia ties". BBC News. February 16, 2009. Retrieved April 7, 2010.
Jump up ^ "USC US-China Institute: Ambassador Clark Randt on "The Crucial Relationship"". China.usc.edu. Archived from the original on March 31, 2009. Retrieved December 2, 2010.
Jump up ^ "World Economic Outlook". International Monetary Fund. International Monetary Fund. Retrieved October 12, 2014.
Jump up ^ "China reclaims title as biggest foreign holder of US debt". Financial Times. August 16, 2017. Retrieved 2017-09-11.
Jump up ^ Fisher, Max (2016-07-14). "The South China Sea: Explaining the Dispute". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2017-03-11.
Jump up ^ "Opinion of China". Global Attitudes & Trends. Pew Research Center. Retrieved 30 November 2016.
Jump up ^ "China's opinion of the United States". Pew Research Center. Retrieved 19 May 2015.
^ Jump up to: a b "A GUIDE TO THE UNITED STATES' HISTORY OF RECOGNITION, DIPLOMATIC, AND CONSULAR RELATIONS, BY COUNTRY, SINCE 1776: CHINA". history.state.gov. U.S. Department of State. Retrieved May 2, 2015. Mutual Recognition, 1844. Formal recognition by the United States of the Empire of China, and by the Empire of China of the United States, came on or about June 16, 1844, when U.S. Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary Caleb Cushing presented his credentials and met with Chinese official Qiying to discuss treaty negotiations. Prior to this, the United States had dispatched consuls to Guangzhou as early as 1784—the first was Samuel Shaw, the supercargo on the Empress of China—but these had never been formally received by Chinese officials as state representatives. The two countries had acknowledged each other's existence before 1844, but the negotiations and treaty of that year marked the first recognition under international law.
Jump up ^ Cai, Jane (15 January 2017). "Will Trump's assault on Chinese currency trigger a full-blown trade war?". CNBC. Retrieved 31 January 2017.
Jump up ^ "Trump's Chinese Currency Manipulation". Wall Street Journal. 2016-12-07. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved 2017-03-11.
Jump up ^ CNBC.com, Clay Dillow, special to (4 April 2017). "Military nightmare scenario brewing in the East China Sea".
Jump up ^ Farley, Robert. "A War Between the U.S. and China Would Be World War III (And Might Be Hard to Shut Off)". The National Interest.
Jump up ^ Michael Green, Bonnie Glaser & Gregory Poling, The U.S. Asserts Freedom of Navigation in the South China Sea, Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative/Center for Strategic and International Studies (October 27, 2015).
Jump up ^ "US Navy carries out third FONOP in South China Sea". The Interpreter. Lowy Institute for International Policy. May 10, 2016.
Jump up ^ "English language text of the Treaty of Nanking". China.usc.edu. 1964-10-16. Retrieved 2010-12-02.
Jump up ^ Leonard H. D. Gordon (2009). Confrontation Over Taiwan: Nineteenth-Century China and the Powers. Lexington Books. p. 32. ISBN 978-0-7391-1869-6.
Jump up ^ Shiyuan Hao (15 December 2015). How the Communist Party of China Manages the Issue of Nationality: An Evolving Topic. Springer. p. 165. ISBN 978-3-662-48462-3.
Jump up ^ Cultural Identity and the Making of Modern Taiwanese Painting During the Japanese Colonial Period (1895--1945). ProQuest. 2008. p. 34. ISBN 978-0-549-98647-8.
Jump up ^ Harris Inwood Martin (1949). The Japanese Demand for Formosa in the Treaty of Shimonoseki, 1895. Stanford Univ. p. 23.
Jump up ^ Ronald Stone Anderson (1946). Formosa Under the Japanese: A Record of Fifty Years' Occupation ... Stanford University. p. 63.
Jump up ^ Andrew Jonah Grad (1942). Formosa Today: An Analysis of the Economic Development and Strategic Importance of Japan's Tropical Colony. AMS Press. p. 16. ISBN 978-0-404-59526-5.
Jump up ^ John Fisher; Antony Best (2011). On the Fringes of Diplomacy: Influences on British Foreign Policy, 1800-1945. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. p. 185. ISBN 978-1-4094-0120-9.
Jump up ^ Japan Weekly Mail. Jappan Meru Shinbunsha. 1874. p. 263.
Jump up ^ The Nation. J.H. Richards. 1889. pp. 256–.
Jump up ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2016-09-13. Retrieved 2016-08-25. http://michaelturton.blogspot.com/2010/12/rover-incident-of-1867.html http://michaelturton.blogspot.com/2010_12_01_archive.html "Search Results THE PIRATES OF FORMOSA. – Official Reports of the Engagement of The United States Naval Forces with the Savages of the Isle". The New York Times. WASHINGTON. August 23, 1867. "THE PIRATES OF FORMOSA.; Official Reports of the Engagement of the United States Naval Forces with the Savages of the Isle". The New York Times. August 24, 1867. "EUROPEAN INTELLIGENCE.; Garibaldi at Sienna Preparing to March Upon Rome Rumored Resignation of Omar Pasha as Turkish Commander in Crete Adjustment of the Difficulties Between Prussia and Denmark Bombardment of the Island of Formosa by American Ships of War CHINA Conflict Between United States Ships-of-War and the Pirates of the Island of Formosa Mexican Dollars Coined During the Reigh of Maximilian Uncurrent ITALY Garibaldi at Sienna Preparing for the Attack on Rome PRUSSIA Prebable Settlement of the Difficulties Between Prussia and Denmark CANDIA Rumored Resignation of Omar Pasha as Commander of the Turkish Forces Who Case of the Ship Anna Kimball Satisfactorily Settied IRELAND Sentence of the Fenian Capt. Moriarty Marine Disaster Attitude of the French and Italian Governments Toward the Garibaldians The Mission of Gen. Dumont from a French Point of View The Interference of France in the Affairs of Schleswig JAVA The Terrible Earthquake in the Island The Approaching Visit of Francis Joseph of Austria – Movements of the Emperor Napo". The New York Times. LONDON. August 14, 1867. "NEWS OF THE DAY.; EUROPE. GENERAL. LOCAL". The New York Times. August 24, 1867. "The American Fleet in Chinese Waters—Avenging National Insults". The New York Times. August 15, 1867.
Jump up ^ William R. Braisted, "The United States and the American China Development Company," Far Eastern Quarterly 11 (1952): 147–65.
Jump up ^ Paul A. Varg, "The Myth of the China Market, 1890–1914," American Historical Review (1968) 73#3 pp. 742–58 in JSTOR
Jump up ^ Robert A. Bickers, Robert A. Bickers, The Scramble for China: Foreign Devils in the Qing Empire, 1800–1914 (London: Allen Lane, 2011)
Jump up ^ Michael H. Hunt, "The American Remission of the Boxer Indemnity: A Reappraisal," Journal of Asian Studies 31 (Spring 1972): 539–59.
Jump up ^ Madeline Y. Hsu, "Chinese and American Collaborations through Educational Exchange during the Era of Exclusion, 1872–1955," Pacific Historical Review (2014) 83#2 pp. 314–32 in JSTOR
Jump up ^ Varg (1980) p 102.
Jump up ^ "Text of the first Open Door note, to Germany". China.usc.edu. 1964-10-16. Retrieved 2010-12-02.
Jump up ^ Yoneyuki Sugita, "The Rise of an American Principle in China: A Reinterpretation of the First Open Door Notes toward China" in Richard J. Jensen, Jon Thares Davidann, and Yoneyuki Sugita, eds. Trans-Pacific relations: America, Europe, and Asia in the twentieth century (Greenwood, 2003). ISBN 978-0-275-97714-6. pp. 3–20
Jump up ^ Youli Sun and You-Li Sun, China and the Origins of the Pacific War, 1931–1941 (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1993.)
Jump up ^ Pearl S. Buck (1938), The Chinese Novel: Lecture Delivered before the Swedish Academy at Stockholm, December 12, 1938, by Pearl S. Buck.
Jump up ^ Madeline Y. Hsu, "Chinese and American Collaborations through Educational Exchange during the Era of Exclusion, 1872–1955." Pacific Historical Review 83.2 (2014): 314–332.
Jump up ^ Hamilton Darby Perry, The Panay Incident: Prelude to Pearl Harbor (1969).
Jump up ^ Quincy Wright and Carl J. Nelson. "American attitudes toward Japan and China, 1937–38." Public Opinion Quarterly 3#1 (1939): 46–62. in JSTOR
Jump up ^ Laura Tyson Li, Madame Chiang Kai-Shek : China's Eternal First Lady (New York: Atlantic Monthly Press, 2006).
Jump up ^ Michael Schaller, The US Crusade in China, 1938–1945 (1979).
Jump up ^ Herbert Feis, The China Tangle: The American Effort in China from Pearl Harbor to the Marshall Mission (1953)
Jump up ^ Forrest C. Pogue, George C. Marshall. vol 4. Statesman: 1945–1959 (1987) pp. 51–143.
Jump up ^ George Marshall testimony to the House Foreign Affairs Committee, 20 February 1948, in Sharon Ritenour Stevens and Mark A. Stoler, eds. (2012). The Papers of George Catlett Marshall: "The Whole World Hangs in the Balance," January 8, 1947 – September 30, 1949. Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 379. ISBN 978-1-4214-0792-0. CS1 maint: Extra text: authors list (link)
Jump up ^ Edward L. Dreyer. China at War 1901–1949 (1995) pp 312–61.
Jump up ^ Bert Cochran, Harry Truman and the crisis presidency (1973) pp. 291–310.
Jump up ^ William W. Stueck, The road to confrontation: American policy toward China and Korea, 1947–1950 (U of North Carolina Press, 1981) online.
Jump up ^ For the historiography see Gregg Brazinsky, "The Birth of a Rivalry: Sino‐American Relations during the Truman Administration" in Daniel S. Margolies, ed., A Companion to Harry S. Truman (2012): 484–97.
Jump up ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2013-04-03. Retrieved 2013-05-30.
Jump up ^ Sheng v. Rogers, District of Columbia Circuit Court, 1959-10-06, retrieved 2010-02-27
Jump up ^ Dennis Van Vranken Hickey, "America's Two-point Policy and the Future of Taiwan." Asian Survey (1988): 881–96. in JSTOR
Jump up ^ Peter R. Moody (1977). Opposition and dissent in contemporary China. Hoover Press. p. 302. ISBN 0-8179-6771-0.
Jump up ^ Nançy Bernkopf Tucker (1983). Patterns in the dust: Chinese-American relations and the recognition controversy, 1949–1950. Columbia University Press. p. 181. ISBN 0-231-05362-2.
Jump up ^ Jay Taylor (2000). The Generalissimo's son: Chiang Ching-kuo and the revolutions in China and Taiwan. Harvard University Press. p. 195. ISBN 0-674-00287-3.
Jump up ^ Charles Ford Redick, "The Jurisprudence of the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission: Chinese Claims." The American Journal of International Law, vol. 67, no. 4 (Oct. 1973) p. 728
Jump up ^ "Harry S Truman, "Statement on Formosa," January 5, 1950". University of Southern California. Retrieved 2017-05-07.
Jump up ^ Malkasian, Carter (2001). The Korean War: Essential Histories. Osprey Publishing. p. 16.
Jump up ^ Cohen, Eliot A; Gooch, John (2005). Military Misfortunes: The Anatomy of Failure in War. Free Press. pp. 165–95. ISBN 0-7432-8082-2.
Jump up ^ Steven M. Goldstein, "Dialogue of the Deaf?: The Sino-American Ambassadorial-Level Talks, 1955–1970." in Robert S. Ross; Changbin Jiang (2001). Re-examining the Cold War: U.S.-China Diplomacy, 1954–1973. Harvard Univ Asia Center. pp. 200–37.
Jump up ^ Pamela G. Hollie "Thaw in China-U.S. Ties May Unfreeze ’49 Assets." New York Times. 1/10/1979. p. D1
Jump up ^ Dunbabin, J.P.D. (1996). International relations since 1945 ([Nachdr.]. ed.). London [u.a.]: Longman. p. 255. ISBN 0-582-49365-X.
Jump up ^ Goh, Evelyn, Constructing the US Rapprochement with China, 1961–1974: From 'Red Menace' to 'Tacit Ally' , Cambridge University Press, 2005
Jump up ^ Leffler, edited by Melvyn P.; Westad, Odd Arne (2010). The Cambridge history of the Cold War (1. publ. ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p. 373. ISBN 978-0-521-83720-0. CS1 maint: Extra text: authors list (link)
Jump up ^ Dube, Clayton. "Getting to Beijing: Kissinger's Secret 1971 Trip". USC US-China Institute. Retrieved 24 July 2011.
Jump up ^ Dube, Clayton. "Sports diplomacy and back channel negotiations". "Talking Points, July 22 – August 3, 2011". USC US-China Institute. Retrieved 24 July 2011.
Jump up ^ Magaret MacMillan, Nixon and Mao: The Week That Changed The World (2008)
Jump up ^ Nixon, Richard. "Announcement of the President's Trip to China". US-China documents collection. USC US-China Institute. Retrieved 24 July 2011.
Jump up ^ See "Getting to know you: The US and China shake the world" and "The Week that Changed the World" for recordings, documents, and interviews.
^ Jump up to: a b Dunbabin, J.P.D. (1996). International relations since 1945 ([Nachdr.]. ed.). London [u.a.]: Longman. p. 258. ISBN 0-582-49365-X.
Jump up ^ Jeffrey A. Engel, ed. (2011). The China Diary of George H. W. Bush: The Making of a Global President. Princeton UP. p. 356. CS1 maint: Extra text: authors list (link)
Jump up ^ Jon Meacham (2015). Destiny and Power: The American Odyssey of George Herbert Walker Bush. p. 219.
Jump up ^ Vance, Cyrus (1983). Hard Choices. Simon and Schuster. pp. 78–79.
Jump up ^ Jim Mann, About face: A history of America's curious relationship with China, from Nixon to Clinton (1999).
Jump up ^ "US-China Institute :: news & features :: china in u.s. campaign politics: part 6 of election '08 and the challenge of china". China.usc.edu. 1964-10-16. Retrieved 2010-12-02.
Jump up ^ Michel Oksenberg, "Reconsiderations: A Decade of Sino-American Relations." Foreign Affairs 61.1 (1982): 190.
Jump up ^ Robert Suettinger, Beyond Tiananmen: The Politics of US-China Relations, 1989–2000 (Brookings Institution Press, 2004).
Jump up ^ Steven M. Goldstein, and Randall Schriver, "An Uncertain Relationship: The United States, Taiwan and the Taiwan Relations Act." China Quarterly 165 (2001): 147–72. online
Jump up ^ ss text
Jump up ^ Dialogue: Interview with China's Ambassador to the US, CGTV, 4 April 2018 (minutes: 16:22–20:13).
Jump up ^ Robert Suettinger, Beyond Tiananmen: The Politics of US-China Relations, 1989–2000 (Brookings Institution Press, 2004.)
Jump up ^ Wesley S. Roehl, "Travel agent attitudes toward China after Tiananmen Square." Journal of Travel Research 29.2 (1990): 16–22.
Jump up ^ David Skidmore and William Gates. "After Tiananmen: The struggle over US policy toward China in the Bush administration." Presidential Studies Quarterly (1997): 514–39. in JSTOR
Jump up ^ "The Future of U.S. – China Relations".
Jump up ^ U.Hawaii, 1997
Jump up ^ Eckholm
Jump up ^ Chi Wang (2008). George W. Bush and China: Policies, Problems, and Partnerships. Lexington Books.
Jump up ^ "U.S. State Department – China (03/03)". state.gov. Retrieved 2011-06-06.
Jump up ^ "US-China Institute :: news & features :: usci symposium explores the taiwan vote". China.usc.edu. Retrieved 2010-12-02.
Jump up ^ "Text of Pres. Bush's welcome". China.usc.edu. Retrieved 2010-12-02.
Jump up ^ "Click here for a streaming video version of the lecture". China.usc.edu. Retrieved 2010-12-02.
Jump up ^ "Details and video from the meeting". China.usc.edu. Retrieved 2010-12-02.
Jump up ^ Video and documents: Obama and China [1]; McCain and China [2].
Jump up ^ The Economist 8 June 2013
Jump up ^ "President Hu Jintao and US President-elect Barack Obama Discuss over Telephone – Hunan Government". Enghunan.gov.cn. 2008-11-09. Archived from the original on 2011-07-21. Retrieved 2010-12-02.
Jump up ^ "No call from Obama seen as slight to India". Asiaone.com. 2008-11-11. Retrieved 2010-12-02.
Jump up ^ Asia News Network – Xchange Tool https://web.archive.org/web/20110615161849/http://www.asianewsnet.net/news.php?id=2540&sec=1. Archived from the original on 2011-06-15. Missing or empty |title= (help)
Jump up ^ "Barack Obama – can he fix the economy by fixing the environment? | Greenpeace East Asia". Greenpeace.org. 2008-11-19. Retrieved 2010-12-02.
Jump up ^ "US-China Institute :: news & features :: making american policy toward china – scholars and policy makers on economics, security, and climate change". China.usc.edu. Retrieved 2010-12-02.
Jump up ^ Boston Study Group on Middle East Peace. "Foreign Policy Association: Resource Library: Viewpoints: Moving the G-2 Forward". Fpa.org. Retrieved 2010-12-02.
Jump up ^ "US-China Institute :: news & features :: economic crisis, looming environmental threats, and growing nuclear weapons worries – all in a day's work at the strategic and economic dialogue ä¸ç¾Žæˆ˜ç•¥ä¸Žç»?æµŽå¯¹è¯?". China.usc.edu. Retrieved 2010-12-02.
Jump up ^ The aims and challenges of the trip were summarized by the USC US-China Institute: [3], [4].
Jump up ^ "Instant Analysis: Reporting on US Presidents in China". China.usc.edu. Retrieved 2010-12-02.
Jump up ^ "China hits back at US over Taiwan weapons sale". BBC News. 2010-01-30. Retrieved 2010-12-02.
Jump up ^ Macartney, Jane (2010-02-19). "China summons US Ambassador over Dalai Lama's meeting with Obama". London: The Times. Retrieved 2010-07-12.
Jump up ^ Ramzy, Austin (2010-02-19). "In China, Muted Reaction to Dalai Lama's Visit". Time magazine. Retrieved 2010-07-12.
Jump up ^ Lee, Mj. "China fires at new U.S. defense plan." Politico, 9 January 2012.
Jump up ^ Whitlock, Craig. "Philippines may allow greater U.S. military presence in reaction to China's rise." Washington Post, January 25, 2012.
Jump up ^ Mark Landler and Steven Lee Myers (26 April 2012). "U.S. Sees Positive Signs From China on Security Issues". The New York Times. Retrieved 9 November 2012.
Jump up ^ "China-U.S. Accord Sets UN Vote on North Korea Sanctions". Bloomberg.
Jump up ^ Calmes, Jackie and Steven Lee Myers (8 June 2013). "U.S. and China Move Closer on North Korea, but Not on Cyberespionage". The New York Times. Retrieved 11 June 2013.
^ Jump up to: a b Sanger, David E. (9 June 2013). "Obama and Xi Try to Avoid a Cold War Mentality". The New York Times.
^ Jump up to: a b McGregor, Richard (10 June 2013). "Obama-Xi summit presented as a walk in the park". Financial Times. Retrieved 11 June 2013.
Jump up ^ "White House: no change to 'one China' policy after Trump call with Taiwan". Reuters. 2 December 2016.
Jump up ^ "Remarks by President Obama and President Xi Jinping in Joint Press Conference". 23 November 2014.
Jump up ^ "Defense secretary's warning to China: U.S. military won’t change operations". The Washington Post. 27 May 2015.
Jump up ^ "Statement by the Press Secretary on Bilateral Meeting with President Xi Jinping of the People's Republic of China". 24 March 2016.
Jump up ^ "China lodges protest after Trump call with Taiwan president". 4 December 2016 – via Reuters.
^ Jump up to: a b "Trump says U.S. not necessarily bound by 'one China' policy". 12 December 2016 – via Reuters.
Jump up ^ "Chinese military official warns that war with US under Trump is becoming a 'practical reality'".
Jump up ^ "China 'steps up preparedness for possible military conflict with US'".
Jump up ^ "China says will protect South China Sea sovereignty". 24 January 2017 – via Reuters.
Jump up ^ CNN, Brad Lendon,. "Mattis: US will defend Japanese islands claimed by China".
Jump up ^ "Trump climbdown on 'One China' threats". 10 February 2017 – via www.bbc.com.
^ Jump up to: a b Bodeen, Christopher (3 July 2017). "China's Xi warns Trump of 'negative factors' hurting US ties". Associated Press. Retrieved 5 July 2017.
Jump up ^ [5]
Jump up ^ Tillerson speaks out after being fired, CNN (13 March 2018), s.v. 6:20
Jump up ^ Graph showing US-China trade [6]; source [7]
Jump up ^ "''World Economic Outlook Database, April 2007''". Imf.org. 2006-09-14. Retrieved 2010-12-02.
Jump up ^ "Wu Yi opens the Third China-US Strategic Economic Dialogue, 2007".
Jump up ^ "U.S. Treasury Sec. Henry Paulson opens Strategic Economic Dialogue, Dec. 2007".
Jump up ^ "Tensions over Trade: Part 2 of Election '08 and the Challenge of China".
^ Jump up to: a b c "Obama's Tire Tariff Draws Beijing's Ire". Bloomberb Businessweek. 2010-09-13.
Jump up ^ "Statistics on world trade, list of US-China WTO complaints". China.usc.edu. Retrieved 2010-12-02.
Jump up ^ China slaps deposits/tariffs on US steel exports; US politicians rant about China [8]
Jump up ^ "Trade and Tariffs" (PDF). World Trade Organization. 2015.
Jump up ^ Lamy, Pascal (24 January 2011). "'Made in China' tells us little about global trade". FT.com. Retrieved 7 July 2012.
^ Jump up to: a b Isidore, Chris (March 13, 2012). "U.S. vs. China: The trade battles". CNN Money.
^ Jump up to: a b C. Fred Bergsten, China is No Longer Manipulating its Currency, Peterson Institute for International Economics (November 18, 2016).
Jump up ^ "House panel cranks up pressure on China currency". Reuters. 2010-09-24.
^ Jump up to: a b Paul Wiseman, Fact check: Does China manipulate its currency?, Associated Press (December 29, 2016).
Jump up ^ "Foreign Holdings of Treasuries as of May, 2011".
^ Jump up to: a b c Barboza, David (2011-08-06). "China Condemns U.S. "Addiction to Debts"". The New York Times.
Jump up ^ Foster, Peter (2009-03-13). "Chinese premier Wen Jiabao worried about US debt". The Daily Telegraph. London.
Jump up ^ "Update: China calls for global cooperation on debt risks". Reuters. 2011-08-05.
Jump up ^ Kurt Brouwer. "China & the U.S. debt addiction". Marketwatch.
Jump up ^ [9]
Jump up ^ Jamieson, Alastair (2011-08-06). "China Calls for New Global Reserve Currency". The Daily Telegraph. London.
Jump up ^ Pierson, David (2011-08-06). "China Chastises U.S. Over Debt". Los Angeles Times.
Jump up ^ Fred E. Jandt (2012). An Introduction to Intercultural Communication: Identities in a Global Community. SAGE. p. 103.
Jump up ^ [10] Archived December 6, 2004, at the Wayback Machine.
Jump up ^ "Rumsfeld questions China spending". BBC News. October 18, 2005. Retrieved April 7, 2010.
^ Jump up to: a b "china's military spends hundreds of millions of dollars". China.usc.edu. Retrieved 2010-12-02.
Jump up ^ John Pike. "World Wide Military Expenditures". Globalsecurity.org. Retrieved 2010-12-02.
Jump up ^ "china's military spends hundreds of millions of dollars". China.usc.edu. Archived from the original on February 2, 2009. Retrieved 2010-12-02.
Jump up ^ Harding, Thomas (May 1, 2008). "Chinese nuclear submarine base". The Daily Telegraph. London. Retrieved April 7, 2010.
Jump up ^ SIPRI military expenditure database Archived November 29, 2006, at the Wayback Machine.
Jump up ^ "Is There a Civil-Military Gap in China's Peaceful Rise?" (PDF). Carlisle.army.mil. Retrieved 2010-12-02.
Jump up ^ Luce, Dan De (2009-10-26). "Time to end 'on-again-off-again' US-China ties: Pentagon". Google.com. Retrieved 2010-12-02.
Jump up ^ Entous, Adam (2010-06-03). "Gates says China's PLA may be trying to thwart ties". Reuters.com. Retrieved 2010-12-02.
Jump up ^ Miles, Donna. "Gates Cites Encouraging Trends Regarding Iran, China." "American Forces Press Service", 8 November 2010
Jump up ^ Pessin, Al. "US Wants Better Military Ties to China, But Will Continue Pacific Operations." Voice of America, 1 Dec 2010.
Jump up ^ Capaccio, Tony. "Chinese Missiles Could Close U.S. Bases in Attack, Report Says." Bloomberg, 11 November 2010
Jump up ^ Robert S. Norris and Hans M. Kristensen "Chinese nuclear forces, 2010." Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
Jump up ^ Minnick, Wendell. "PLA 20 Years Behind U.S. Military: Chinese DM." Defense News, 7 June 2011.
Jump up ^ "East-West military gap rapidly shrinking: report", By Peter Apps, Reuters, Tue Mar 8, 2011 https://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/08/us-world-military-idUSTRE7273UB20110308.
Jump up ^ China Takes Aim at U.S. Naval Might, JULIAN E. BARNES, NATHAN HODGE, and JEREMY PAGE, Wall Street Journal, JANUARY 4, 2012 https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970204397704577074631582060996
Jump up ^ Miles, Donna. "U.S., China to Consider Sharing Resources during Joint Missions." Archived July 14, 2012, at the Wayback Machine. American Forces Press Service, 12 October 2012.
Jump up ^ James R. Holmes, The Diplomat. "What to Make of China's Defense Spending Increase - The Diplomat". The Diplomat.
Jump up ^ Kagan, Robert (2012). The World America Made. New York: Knopf. p. 90.
Jump up ^ "U.S. Department of State, 2007 Human Rights in China, March 11, 2008".
Jump up ^ "U.S. Department of State, 2008 Human Rights in China, February 25, 2009".
^ Jump up to: a b Cooper, Helen (March 12, 2008). "U.S. Drops China From List of Top 10 Violators of Rights". NYT.
Jump up ^ "2002 PRC White Paper on US Human Rights Abuses". china.org.cn. 2002-03-11. Retrieved 2010-12-02.
Jump up ^ "PRC State Council, Human Rights Record of the United States in 2007, March 13, 2008".
Jump up ^ "PRC State Council, Human Rights Record of the United States in 2008, February 27, 2009".
Jump up ^ 2005/10/19 (2005-10-19). "China issues 1st white paper on democracy(10/19/05)". China-embassy.org. Retrieved 2010-12-02.
Jump up ^ "White Paper on China's Political System, 2007". China.usc.edu. Retrieved 2010-12-02.
^ Jump up to: a b "China issues report on U.S. human rights - Xinhua - English.news.cn".
Jump up ^ "Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2013: China (includes Tibet, Hong Kong, and Macau)". U.S. Department of State.
Jump up ^ New York Times, 2010 Sept. 22, "U.S. Influence in Asia Revives Amid China's Disputes," https://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/23/world/asia/23china.html?_r=1&ref=global-home
Jump up ^ Pomfret, John. "U.S. steps up pressure on China to rein in North Korea." Washington Post, 6 December 2010.
Jump up ^ Lam, Willy Wo-Lap. "Beijing's Alarm Over New 'US Encirclement Conspiracy'." Jamestown Foundation, 12 April 2005
Jump up ^ Perlez, Jane. "China Creates a World Bank of Its Own, and the U.S. Balks". The New York Times. Retrieved 11 May 2017.
Jump up ^ "Summary of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement". USTR. 4 October 2015. Retrieved 16 October 2015.
Jump up ^ "Trump executive order pulls out of TPP trade deal". BBC News. Retrieved 23 January 2017. Mr Trump's executive order on TPP is seen as mainly symbolic since the deal was never ratified by a divided US Congress.
Jump up ^ Peccia, T., 2014, "The Theory of the Globe Scrambled by Social Networks: A New Sphere of Influence 2.0", Jura Gentium - Rivista di Filosofia del Diritto Internazionale e della Politica Globale, Sezione "L'Afghanistan Contemporaneo", http://www.juragentium.org/topics/wlgo/en/peccia.htm
Jump up ^ Donald, David. "Report: China To Provide JF-17s to Pakistan." AINonline, 6 June 2011.
Jump up ^ Slavin, Erik. "China's claim on sea leads Asian neighbors to strengthen ties with U.S." Stars and Stripes, 27 June 2011.
Jump up ^ Entous, Adam. "Pentagon Will Add to Asia Operations." Wall Street Journal, 26 October 2011.
^ Jump up to: a b c d Roy, Denny (7 June 2013). "U.S.-China Relations: Stop Striving For "Trust"". The Diplomat. Retrieved 20 June 2013.
Jump up ^ Correspondent, Evan Perez, CNN Justice. "FBI arrests Chinese national connected to malware used in OPM data breach". CNN.
^ Jump up to: a b "Hacks of OPM databases compromised 22.1 million people, federal authorities say". The Washington Post. July 9, 2015.
Further reading[edit]
Historical[edit]
Brazinsky, Gregg. "The Birth of a Rivalry: Sino‐American Relations during the Truman Administration" in Daniel S. Margolies, ed., A Companion to Harry S. Truman (2012): 484–97.
Chang, Gordon H. Fateful Ties: A History of America's Preoccupation with China. (Harvard UP, 2015).
Chang, Gordon H. Friends and Enemies: The United States, China, and the Soviet Union, 1948–1972 (Stanford UP, 1990).
Cohen, Warren I. America's Response to China: A History of Sino-American Relations (5th ed. 2010)
Dulles, Foster Rhea. China and America: The Story of Their Relations Since 1784 (1981), general survey
Fairbank, John K. China Perceived (1974)
Feis, Herbert. The China Tangle (1967), diplomacy during World War II
Foot, Rosemary. The Practice of Power: US Relations with China since 1949 (1995).
Gedalecia, David. "Letters From the Middle Kingdom: The Origins of America's China Policy," Prologue, 34.4 (Winter, 2002), pp. 260–73.
Greene, Naomi. From Fu Manchu to Kung Fu Panda: Images of China in American Film (University of Hawai'i Press; 2014) 288 pp.; explores the changing image of China and the Chinese in the American cultural imagination, beginning with D.W. Griffiths's "Broken Blossoms"(1919).
Haddad, John R. America’s First Adventure in China: Trade, Treaties, Opium, and Salvation (2013) covers 1784 to 1868.
Isaacs, Harold R. Scratches on Our Minds (1958)
Johnson, Kendall A. The New Middle Kingdom: China and the Early American Romance of Free Trade (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2017).
Latourette, Kenneth Scott. The history of early relations between the United States and China, 1784–1844 (1917) online
Li, Jing. China's America: The Chinese View the United States, 1900–2000. (State University of New York Press, 2011)
Mackerras, Colin. "China and the Australia-US Relationship: A Historical Perspective." Asian Survey (2014) 54#2 pp: 223–46.
MacMillan, Margaret. Nixon and Mao: the week that changed the world (2008).
Madsen, Richard. China and the American Dream (1994)
Mann, James. About Face: A History of America's Curious Relationship with China, from Nixon to Clinton (2000).
Oksenberg, Michel and Robert B. Oxnam, eds. Dragon and Eagle (1978),
Pederson, William D. ed. A Companion to Franklin D. Roosevelt (2011) online pp 590–611, covers American diplomacy in WW2
Peraino, Kevin. A Force So Swift: Mao, Truman, and the Birth of Modern China, 1949 (2017), focus on U.S. policy in 1949 online review
Pomfret, John. The Beautiful Country and the Middle Kingdom: America and China, 1776 to the Present (2016) review
Riccards, Michael P. The Presidency and the Middle Kingdom (2000)
Rose, Robert S. et al. Re-examining the Cold War: U.S.-China Diplomacy, 1954–1973 (2002)
Song, Yuwu, ed. Encyclopedia of Chinese-American Relations (McFarland, 2006)
Spence, Jonathan D. To Change China (1980)
Sutter, Robert G. U.S.-Chinese Relations: Perilous Past, Pragmatic Present (2010).
Sutter, Robert G. Historical Dictionary of United States-China Relations (2005).
Tuchman, Barbara. Stilwell and the American Experience in China, 1911–1945 (1971)
Varg, Paul A. "Sino‐American Relations Past and Present." Diplomatic History 4.2 (1980): 101–112. online
Wang, Dong. The United States and China: A History from the Eighteenth Century to the Present (2013)
Recent[edit]
Blanchard, Jean-Marc F., and Simon Shen, eds. Conflict and Cooperation in Sino-US Relations: Change and Continuity, Causes and Cures (Routledge, 2015)
Brazinsky, Gregg A. Winning the Third World: Sino-American Rivalry during the Cold War (U of North Carolina Press, 2017); four online reviews & author response
Davis, Samuel R. Out flying the eagle: China's drive for domestic economic innovation and its impact on US-China relations (MA thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, 2014) Pdf.
Etzioni, Amitai. "Avoiding War With China: Two Nations, One World." (University of Virginia Press, 2017) ISBN 9780813940045
Foot, Rosemary; Walter, Andrew (2012). China, the United States, and Global Order. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521725194.
Friedberg, Aaron L. (2011). A Contest for Supremacy: China, America, and the Struggle for Mastery in Asia. W.W. Norton. ISBN 9780393068283.
Goldstein, Avery (Spring 2013). "First things first: the pressing danger of crisis instability in US-China relations". International Security. MIT Press. 37 (4): 49–89. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00114. Pdf.
Mann, Jim. About face: A history of America's curious relationship with China, from Nixon to Clinton (Knopf, 1999)
Men, Jing, and Wei Shen, eds. The EU, the US and China - Towards a New International Order? (2014) ISBN 1781003467
Roach, Stephen S. Unbalanced: the codependency of America and China (Yale UP, 2015).
Roberts, Priscilla. "New Perspectives on Cold War History from China," Diplomatic History 41:2 (April 2017) online
Shambaugh, David, ed. (2012). Tangled Titans: The United States and China. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1442219700.
Schoen, Douglas E. and Melik Kaylan. Return to Winter: Russia, China, and the New Cold War Against America (2015)
Steinberg, James, and Michael E. OHanlon, eds. Strategic Reassurance and Resolve: US-China Relations in the Twenty-First Century (Princeton UP, 2014)
Wang, Dong. "Grand Strategy, Power Politics, and China’s Policy toward the United States in the 1960s," Diplomatic History 42:1 (April 2017): 265–287;
Wheeler, Norton. Role of American NGOs in China's Modernization: Invited Influence (Routledge, 2014) 240 pp. online review
Xia, Yafeng and Zhi Liang. "China’s Diplomacy toward the United States in the Twentieth Century: A Survey of the Literature," Diplomatic History 42:1 (April 2017): 241–264.
Yan, Xuetong (Autumn 2010). "The instability of China–US relations". The Chinese Journal of International Politics. Oxford Journals. 3 (3): 263–92. doi:10.1093/cjip/poq009.
Zhang, Biwu. Chinese Perceptions of the U.S.: An Exploration of China's Foreign Policy Motivations (Lexington Books; 2012) 266 pages; Chinese views of America's power, politics, and economics, as well as the country as a source of threat or opportunity.
Zhao, Quansheng (December 2005). "America's response to the rise of China and Sino‐US relations". Asian Journal of Political Science. Taylor and Francis. 13 (2): 1–27. doi:10.1080/02185370508434256.
Primary sources[edit]
Jeffrey A. Engel, ed. (2011), The China Diary of George H. W. Bush: The Making of a Global President, Princeton UP, ISBN 1400829615, JSTOR j.ctt7stg8 CS1 maint: Extra text: authors list (link)
China White Paper 1949[edit]
Lyman Van Slyke, ed. The China White Paper: August 1949 (1967: 2 vol. Stanford U.P.); 1124 pp.; copy of official U.S. Department of State. China White Paper: 1949 vol 1 online at Google; online vol 1 pdf; vol 1 consists of history; vol 2 consists of primary sources and is not online; see library holdings via World Cat
excerpts appear in Barton Bernstein and Allen J. Matusow, eds. The Truman Administration: A Documentary History (1966) pp. 299–355
See also[edit]
Sino-U.S. Competition and U.S. Security: How Do We Assess the Military Balance? by Daniel Blumenthal (NBR Analysis, 2010)
Power Constrained: Sources of Mutual Strategic Suspicion in U.S.-China Relations by David M. Lampton (NBR Analysis, 2010)
Federation of American Scientists et al. (2006). Chinese Nuclear Forces and U.S. Nuclear War Planning
China and Ballistic Missile Defense: 1955 to 2002 and beyond – analysis by Brad Roberts, IFRI Proliferation Papers n°10, 2004
External links[edit]
Website of diplomatic missions[edit]
Embassy of China in the United States(in English)(in simplified Chinese)
Consulate General of China in New York(in English)(in simplified Chinese)
Consulate General of China in Los Angeles(in English)(in simplified Chinese)(in traditional Chinese)
Consulate General of China in Chicago(in English)(in simplified Chinese)(in traditional Chinese)
Consulate General of China in San Francisco(in English)(in simplified Chinese)
Consulate General of China in Houston(in English)(in simplified Chinese)
Embassy of the United States in China(in English)(in simplified Chinese)
Consulate General of the United States in Shanghai(in English)(in simplified Chinese)
Consulate General of the United States in Guangzhou(in English)(in simplified Chinese)
Consulate General of the United States in Hong Kong(in English)(in traditional Chinese)
Consulate General of the United States in Shenyang(in English)(in simplified Chinese)
Consulate General of the United States in Wuhan(in English)(in simplified Chinese)
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Relations of China and the United States.
Links to scholarly articles in The Journal of American-East Asian Relations
U.S. State Department[edit]
History of China–U.S. relations Foreign Relations Series
1964–1968
1969–1972
1973–1976, ePub Supplement
1977–1980
Other links[edit]
USC U.S.-China Institute – see Resources section for extensive documents collection and book reviews
Documentary history of the background to the 1971 Kissinger trip to China
"Getting to Know You: The US and China Shake the World, 1971 and 1972 (documents, recordings, and images)
Assignment: China – The Week that Changed the World
Remembering ping pong diplomacy, 40th anniversary rematch
"Election '08 and the Challenge of China" – web documentary
"Nixon's Fully Declassified Trip to China in 1972" – Provided by the National Security Archive.
"Ping Pong Diplomacy".
America and Taiwan, 1943–2004.
"China-U.S. Joint Statement October 29, 1997." University of Hawaii. 10 Apr. 2006
Eckholm, Erik. "Clinton Urged to Meet Top China Dissident." New York Times 20 June 1998: A3. Historical New York Times. Proquest. DuBois Library, UMass Amherst. 10 Apr. 2006.
Bunton, T. S., and Kathleen J. Michels. "2005 REPORT TO CONGRESS OF THE U.S.-CHINA ECONOMIC AND SECURITY REVIEW COMMISSION." USCC 2005 Annual Report Page. U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission.
Five Years of China's WTO Membership. EU and US Perspectives on China's Compliance with Transparency Commitments and the Transitional Review Mechanism, Legal Issues of Economic Integration, Kluwer Law International, Volume 33, Number 3, pp. 263–304, 2006, by Farah Paolo
Original text based from the State Department Background Note: China.
Rumsfeld questions China spending; October 18, 2005 – BBC News article about China's military spending.
China – RAND Corporation study concerning China's military spending, which argues that China's spending is higher than official figures.
Video and text of presentations and agreements signed at the 27–28 July 2009 Strategic and Economic Dialogue meetings in Washington, DC
Word Spy – Chimerica
Videos[edit]
China and the United States from the Dean Peter Krogh Foreign Affairs Digital Archives
Common Ground Between China and US? from the Dean Peter Krogh Foreign Affairs Digital Archives
Relations Between China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the US from the Dean Peter Krogh Foreign Affairs Digital Archives
[show]
v
t
e
Foreign relations of China
[show]
Bilateral relations
Africa
Algeria
Angola
Benin
Botswana
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Central African Republic
Chad
Comoros
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Congo, Republic of the
Djibouti
Egypt
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Ivory Coast
Kenya
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Madagascar
Malawi
Mali
Mauritania
Mauritius
Morocco
Mozambique
Namibia
Niger
Nigeria
Rwanda
São Tomé and Príncipe
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Somalia
South Africa
South Sudan
Sudan
Tanzania
Togo
Tunisia
Uganda
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Americas
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Bahamas
Barbados
Bolivia
Brazil
Canada
Chile
Cuba
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Grenada
Jamaica
Mexico
Panama
Peru
Suriname
Trinidad and Tobago
United States
Uruguay
Venezuela
Asia
Afghanistan
Armenia
Bangladesh
Bhutan
Brunei
Cambodia
East Timor
Georgia
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Israel
Japan
Kazakhstan
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Malaysia
Maldives
Mongolia
Myanmar
Nepal
North Korea
Pakistan
Palestine
Philippines
Russia
Saudi Arabia
Singapore
South Korea
Sri Lanka
Syria
Tajikistan
Thailand
United Arab Emirates
Vietnam
Yemen
Europe
Albania
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Iceland
Ireland
Italy
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Moldova
Montenegro
Netherlands
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Russia
Serbia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Turkey
Ukraine
United Kingdom
Vatican City
Oceania
Australia
Fiji
Kiribati
Micronesia
New Zealand
Niue
Papua New Guinea
Samoa
Tonga
Vanuatu
[show]
Multilateral relations
Bangladesh–China–India–Myanmar Forum for Regional Cooperation
BIMSTEC
Africa
Arab League
BRICS
Caribbean
China–Japan–South Korea
European Union
Latin America
China and the United Nations
Oceania
Third World
Arctic policy of China
China and the Antarctic
[show]
Diplomacy
Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Foreign Minister)
Diplomatic missions of China / in China
Taiwan Issue
Cross-Strait relations
Stadium diplomacy
Panda diplomacy
Theater diplomacy
Nine-Dash Line
String of Pearls
Belt and Road Initiative
Confucius Institute
Treaties
Shanghai Cooperation Organisation
Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership
[show]
v
t
e
Foreign relations of the United States
[hide]
Bilateral relations
Africa
East
Burundi
Comoros
Djibouti
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Kenya
Madagascar
Malawi
Mauritius
Mozambique
Rwanda
Seychelles
Somalia
South Sudan
Tanzania
Uganda
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Middle
Angola
Cameroon
Central African Republic
Chad
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Republic of the Congo
Equatorial Guinea
Gabon
São Tomé and Príncipe
North
Algeria
Egypt
Libya
Morocco
Sudan
Tunisia
Southern
Botswana
Lesotho
Namibia
South Africa
Swaziland
West
Benin
Burkina Faso
Cape Verde
Ivory Coast
The Gambia
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Liberia
Mali
Mauritania
Niger
Nigeria
Senegal
Sierra Leone
Togo
Americas
Caribbean
Antigua and Barbuda
Aruba
Barbados
Cayman Islands
Cuba
Dominica
Dominican Republic
Grenada
Haiti
Jamaica
St. Kitts and Nevis
St. Lucia
St. Vincent and the Grenadines
Trinidad and Tobago
Central
Belize
Costa Rica
El Salvador
Guatemala
Honduras
Nicaragua
Panama
Northern
Bermuda
Canada
trade relations
Mexico
South
Argentina
Bolivia
Brazil
Chile
Colombia
Ecuador
Guyana
Paraguay
Peru
Suriname
Uruguay
Venezuela
Asia
Central
Kazakhstan
Kyrgyzstan
Tajikistan
Turkmenistan
Uzbekistan
East
China
Hong Kong
Japan
Macau
Mongolia
North Korea
South Korea
Taiwan
South
Afghanistan
Bangladesh
Bhutan
India
Maldives
Nepal
Pakistan (military relations)
Sri Lanka
Southeast
Brunei
Cambodia
East Timor
Indonesia
Laos
Myanmar
Malaysia
Philippines
Singapore
Thailand
Vietnam
West
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Bahrain
Cyprus
Georgia
Iran
Iraq
Israel
military relations
Jordan
Kuwait
Lebanon
Oman
Palestine
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Syria
Turkey
United Arab Emirates
Yemen
Europe
East
Belarus
Bulgaria
Czech Republic
Hungary
Moldova
Poland
Romania
Russia
Slovakia
Ukraine
North
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
Iceland
Ireland
Latvia
Lithuania
Norway
Sweden
United Kingdom
South
Andorra
Albania
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Croatia
Greece
Italy
Kosovo
Macedonia
Malta
Montenegro
Portugal
San Marino
Serbia
Slovenia
Spain
Vatican City
West
Austria
Belgium
France
Germany
Liechtenstein
Luxembourg
Monaco
Netherlands
Switzerland
Oceania
Australia
Fiji
Kiribati
Marshall Islands
Micronesia
Nauru
New Zealand
Palau
Papua New Guinea
Samoa
Solomon Islands
Tonga
Tuvalu
Vanuatu
Former states
Kingdom of Hawaii
Republic of Texas
Russian Empire
Soviet Union
[show]
Multilateral relations
Arab League
European Union
Latin America
United Nations
Third Border Initiative
International organizations
[show]
Doctrines, policies, concepts
Presidential
doctrines
Proclamation of Neutrality
Monroe
Roosevelt Corollary
Good Neighbor policy
Truman
Eisenhower
Kennedy
Johnson
Nixon
Carter
Reagan
Clinton
Bush
Obama
Other doctrines
Lodge Corollary
Stimson
Kirkpatrick
Weinberger
Powell
Rumsfeld
Wolfowitz
Policies and
concepts
Blowback
Containment
Domino theory
Non-interventionism
Progressive realism
Rollback
Special Relationship
Taiwan Relations Act (Taiwan Travel Act)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=China–United_States_relations&oldid=843521785"
Categories:
China–United States relations
Bilateral relations of the United States
Bilateral relations of China
Hidden categories:
CS1: Julian–Gregorian uncertainty
CS1 maint: Extra text: authors list
Pages with citations lacking titles
Pages with citations having bare URLs
Webarchive template wayback links
Interlanguage link template link number
Articles containing potentially dated statements from 2018
All articles containing potentially dated statements
All articles with unsourced statements
Articles with unsourced statements from March 2018
Articles with unsourced statements from September 2014
Articles with unsourced quotes
Articles with unsourced statements from February 2017
Articles with unsourced statements from February 2015
Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from October 2014
Articles with unsourced statements from October 2015
Articles with unsourced statements from December 2017
Wikipedia articles in need of updating from May 2010
All Wikipedia articles in need of updating
Articles with unsourced statements from September 2009
All articles that may contain original research
Articles that may contain original research from October 2015
Articles with weasel words from September 2014
Articles with unsourced statements from February 2014
All articles lacking reliable references
Articles lacking reliable references from August 2014
All articles with minor POV problems
Articles with minor POV problems from October 2015
Articles with simplified Chinese-language external links
Articles with traditional Chinese-language external links
Commons category with local link different than on Wikidata
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
In other projects
Wikimedia Commons
Wikiquote
Languages
العربية
Deutsch
Español
فارسی
Français
한국어
Հայերեն
Bahasa Indonesia
Italiano
עברית
Magyar
Bahasa Melayu
日本語
Português
Русский
Shqip
Svenska
Türkçe
Українська
中文
11 more
Edit links
This page was last edited on 29 May 2018, at 17:53.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

values: jump-to-nav mw-jump

values:
note
hatnote navigation-not-searchable

value: caption

values: Map indicating locations of China and USA

value: td

attrs: colspan style

value: tr

value: th

values: width:50%; text-align:center; border-left:thin solid lightgrey;

values: text-align:center; border-left:thin solid lightgrey;

values: List of ambassadors of China to the United States

values: List of ambassadors of the United States to China

values: National Emblem of the People's Republic of China (2).svg

values: Leadership of the People's Republic of China

values: Succession of power in the People's Republic of China

values: Xi Jinping Core Administration (page does not exist)

values:
noprint
font-size:85%; font-style: normal;

values: 19th Politburo of the Communist Party of China

values: List of leaders of the People's Republic of China

values: List of current Chinese provincial leaders

values: List of national leaders of the People's Republic of China

values: List of Presidents of the People's Republic of China

values: List of premiers of the People's Republic of China

values: Chairman of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress

values: Chairman of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference

values: Supreme Military Command of the People's Republic of China

values: Historical membership of the Politburo Standing Committee

values: Organization Department of the Communist Party of China

values: Civil Service of the People's Republic of China

values: font-size: 105%; padding: 0.2em 0px 0.4em; text-align: left; display: none;

values: Constitution of the Communist Party of China

values: Organization of the Communist Party of China

values: National Congress of the Communist Party of China

values: 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China

values: Central Committee of the Communist Party of China

values: 19th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China

values: General Secretary of the Communist Party of China

values: Politburo of the Communist Party of China

values: Politburo Standing Committee of the Communist Party of China

values: Secretariat of the Communist Party of China

values: Chairman of the Central Military Commission

values: Vice Chairman of the Central Military Commission

values: National Security Commission of the Communist Party of China

values: Chairman of the National Security Commission of the Communist Party of China

values: Central Comprehensively Deepening Reforms Commission

values: Central Financial and Economic Affairs Commission

values: General Office of the Communist Party of China

values: Office of the General Secretary of the Communist Party of China (page does not exist)

values: zh:中国共产党中央委员会总书记办公室

values: Central Security Bureau of the Communist Party of China

values: Central Commission for Discipline Inspection

values: 19th Central Commission for Discipline Inspection

values: Secretary of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection

values: Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference

values: National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference

values: zh:中国人民政治协商会议全国委员会

values: Vice Chairperson of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference

values: Secretary-General of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference

values: The Revolutionary Committee of the Chinese Kuomintang

values: China Democratic National Construction Association

values: China Association for Promoting Democracy

values: Chinese Peasants' and Workers' Democratic Party

values: Taiwan Democratic Self-Government League

values: All-China Federation of Industry and Commerce

values: Ideology of the Communist Party of China

values: Constitution of the People's Republic of China

values: Constitutional history of the People's Republic of China

values: 1954 Constitution of the People's Republic of China

values: 1975 Constitution of the People's Republic of China

values: 1978 Constitution of the People's Republic of China

values: Legislation Law of the People's Republic of China

values: List of members of the National People's Congress

values: List of voting results of the National People's Congress of China

values: Presidium of the National People's Congress

values: Standing Committee of the National People's Congress

values: Vice Chairperson of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress

values: Secretary-General of the National People's Congress

values: Special committee of the National People's Congress

values: President of the People's Republic of China

values: Office of the President of the People's Republic of China (page does not exist)

values: zh:中华人民共和国主席办公室

values: Vice President of the People's Republic of China

values: State Council of the People's Republic of China

values: Premier of the People's Republic of China

values: Vice Premier of the People's Republic of China

values: List of vice premiers of the People's Republic of China

values: Deputy Secretary-General of the State Council

values: Ministries of the People's Republic of China

values: National Development and Reform Commission

values: State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission

values: List of state-owned enterprises of China

values: Joint Staff Department of the Central Military Commission

values: Political Work Department of the Central Military Commission

values: Logistic Support Department of the Central Military Commission

values: Equipment Development Department of the Central Military Commission

values: Training and Administration Department of the Central Military Commission

values: National Defense Mobilization Department of the Central Military Commission

values:
/wiki/File:China_Emblem_PLA.svg
image
Emblem of the People's Liberation Arm

values: Theater commands of the People's Liberation Army

values: Cap insignia of the Chinese People's Armed Police Force

values: National Defense Mobilization Commission

values: Ministry of National Defense of the People's Republic of China

values: Ministry of Veterans Affairs of the People's Republic of China

values: State Administration for Science, Technology and Industry for National Defence

values: List of wars involving the People's Republic of China

values: Modernization of the People's Liberation Army

values: 2015 People's Republic of China military reform

values: Central Leading Group for Military Reform

values: Anti-corruption campaign under Xi Jinping

values: Deputy Secretary of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection

values: Secretary General of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection

values: Central Leading Group for Inspection Work

values: Independent Commission Against Corruption (Hong Kong)

values: Central Political and Legal Affairs Commission

values: State Immigration Administration (page does not exist)

values: Ministry of Justice of the People's Republic of China

values: Ministry of Justice Bureau of Prison Administration (page does not exist)

values: City Urban Administrative and Law Enforcement Bureau

values: Public Prosecutions Office (Macau) (page does not exist)

values: Propaganda in the People's Republic of China

values: Central Leading Group for Propaganda and Ideology

values: Central Guidance Commission on Building Spiritual Civilization

values: Publicity Department of the Communist Party of China

values: General Administration of Press and Publication

values: National Film Bureau (page does not exist)

values: Ministry of Culture and Tourism of the People's Republic of China

values: State Administration of Radio and Television

values: Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement

values: Central Leading Group for Taiwan Affairs

values: Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits

values: Central Coordination Group for Hong Kong and Macau Affairs

values: Liaison Office of the Central People's Government in the Macao Special Administrative Region

values: Mainland and Hong Kong Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement

values:
/wiki/Macau_Basic_Law
mw-redirect
Macau Basic Law

values: Mainland and Macau Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement

values: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China

values: Foreign Minister of the People's Republic of China

values: List of Foreign Ministry Spokespersons of the People's Republic of China

values: International Development Cooperation Agency (China) (page does not exist)

values: zh:国家国际发展合作署

values: Ministry of Commerce of the People's Republic of China

values: Office for International Military Cooperation of the Central Military Commission

values: National People's Congress Foreign Affairs Committee

values: International Liaison Department of the Communist Party of China

values: State Administration of Foreign Experts Affairs

values: Nationality law of the People's Republic of China

values: Hong Kong Special Administrative Region passport

values: Macao Special Administrative Region passport

values: Visa requirements for Chinese citizens of Hong Kong

values: Visa requirements for Chinese citizens of Macau

values: padding:0.3em 0.4em 0.3em;font-weight:bold;border-top: 1px solid #aaa; border-bottom: 1px solid #aaa;

values: float:right;clear:right;width:22.0em;margin:0 0 1.0em 1.0em;background:#f9f9f9;border:1px solid #aaa;padding:0.2em;border-spacing:0.4em 0;text-align:center;line-height:1.4em;font-size:88%

values: plainlinks noexcerpt noprint asof-tag update

values: Reliable source needed for 2018 statistics (March 2018)

values:
noprint Inline-Template Template-Fact
white-space:nowrap;

values: East Asian foreign policy of the Barack Obama administration

values: Edit section: Leaders of China and the United States from 1950–present

values: Edit section: The Qing Dynasty and the United States

values:
/wiki/Prince_Gong_(Qing_dynasty)
mw-redirect
Prince Gong (Qing dynasty)

values: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland

values:
/wiki/Taiwanese_aborigines
mw-redirect
Taiwanese aborigines

values: Edit section: The Burlingame Treaty and the Chinese Exclusion Act

values: Edit section: Searching for the China market

values:
/wiki/Battle_of_Dagu_Forts_(1900)
mw-redirect
Battle of Dagu Forts (1900)

values: Edit section: The Republic of China and the United States

values:
/wiki/Republic_of_China_(1912-49)
mw-redirect
Republic of China (1912-49)

values:
/wiki/Neutrality_Acts_of_1930s
mw-redirect
Neutrality Acts of 1930s

values: United States declaration of war upon Japan

values: Edit section: Civil War in Mainland China

values: United States Agency for International Development

values: Edit section: Termination of diplomatic relations

values: Edit section: The People's Republic of China and the United States

values: Edit section: Origins of the People's Republic of China

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (September 2014)

values: United Nations Security Council Resolution 82

values: United Nations Security Council veto power

values: The text near this tag needs citation. (April 2018)

values: Chairman of the Communist Party of China

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (February 2017)

values: National Committee on United States–China Relations

values: United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations

values: National Security Advisor (United States)

values: United States presidential election, 1972

values:
/wiki/Nicolai_Ceausescu
mw-redirect
Nicolai Ceausescu

values:
/wiki/1972_Nixon_visit_to_China
mw-redirect
1972 Nixon visit to China

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (February 2015)

values: Edit section: Liaison Office (1973–1978)

values: United States Liaison Office (page does not exist)

values:
/wiki/Thomas_S._Gates,_Jr.
mw-redirect
Thomas S. Gates, Jr.

values: Joint Communiqué on the Establishment of Diplomatic Relations

values: Edit section: Tiananmen protests to 9/11 attacks (1989–2001)

values:
/wiki/G7_(major_advanced_economies)
mw-redirect
G7 (major advanced economies)

values: United States Trade and Development Agency

values: Overseas Private Insurance Corporation (page does not exist)

values: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives

values: Munitions Import List (page does not exist)

values: Republic of China presidential election, 1996

values: United States bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade

values: Edit section: George W. Bush's tenure (2001–2009)

values: United Nations Security Council Resolution 1373

values: North Korea and weapons of mass destruction

values: Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons

values: Edit section: Obama's tenure (2009–2017)

values: U.S.–China Strategic and Economic Dialogue

values: United States presidential election, 2008

values:
/wiki/Jon_Huntsman,_Jr.
mw-redirect
Jon Huntsman, Jr.

values: The material near this tag may use weasel words or too-vague attribution. (October 2014)

values: Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch

values:
/wiki/Rancho_Mirage
mw-redirect
Rancho Mirage

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (October 2015)

values:
/wiki/Ashton_Carter
mw-redirect
Ashton Carter

values: Territorial disputes in the South China Sea

values:
/wiki/James_Mattis
mw-redirect
James Mattis

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (December 2017)

values:
/wiki/Trump_Administration
mw-redirect
Trump Administration

values: plainlinks metadata ambox ambox-content ambox-Update

values: Office of the United States Trade Representative

values:
/wiki/Currency_manipulation
mw-redirect
Currency manipulation

values: Peterson Institute for International Economics

values: Edit section: Chinese perspective on the US economy

values: Edit section: Military spending and planning

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (September 2009)

values: International Institute for Strategic Studies

values: The material near this tag possibly contains original research. (October 2015)

values: plainlinks metadata ambox ambox-content ambox-Weasel

values: wikinews:China 'furious' at U.S. over Dalai Lama award

values:
/wiki/United_States_Ambassador_to_China
mw-redirect
United States Ambassador to China

values: Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs

values: Human Rights Record of the United States

values: International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

values: International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (February 2014)

values: United States' Country Reports on Human Rights Practices

values: Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor

values: This claim needs references to better sources. (August 2014)

values: noprint Inline-Template noprint noexcerpt Template-Fact

values:
/wiki/US_Trade_Representative
mw-redirect
US Trade Representative

values: This statement is possibly biased. (October 2015)

values: United States Office of Personnel Management

values: Office of Personnel Management data breach

values: display:table-cell;padding:0.2em 0.2em 0.2em 0.3em;vertical-align:middle

values: margin:0.5em 0 0.5em 1em;border:solid #aaa 1px

values: Air route authority between the United States and China

values: 1996 United States campaign finance controversy

values: United States-China Economic and Security Review Commission

values: U.S. immigration policy toward the People's Republic of China

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/issn/0362-4331

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/issn/0099-9660

values: Center for Strategic and International Studies

values:
nofollow
external text
https://www.jstor.org/stable/1870670

values:
nofollow
external text
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2744741

values: Category:CS1 maint: Extra text: authors list

values:
nofollow
external text
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2644592

values:
nofollow
external text
https://www.jstor.org/stable/27551766

values:
/wiki/American_Forces_Press_Service
mw-redirect
American Forces Press Service

values:
/wiki/Washington_Post
mw-redirect
Washington Post

values: -moz-column-width: 30em; -webkit-column-width: 30em; column-width: 30em; list-style-type: decimal;

values:
nofollow
external text
https://www.jstor.org/stable/24911230

values:
nofollow
external text
https://dx.doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00114

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1162%2FISEC_a_00114

values:
nofollow
external text
https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poq009

values: The Chinese Journal of International Politics

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1093%2Fcjip%2Fpoq009

values:
/wiki/Taylor_and_Francis
mw-redirect
Taylor and Francis

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7stg8

values: Edit section: Website of diplomatic missions

values:
nofollow
http://www.china-embassy.org/eng/
external text

values:
nofollow
http://newyork.china-consulate.org/eng/
external text

values:
nofollow
http://www.chinaconsulatesf.org/eng/
external text

values:
nofollow
http://houston.china-consulate.org/eng/
external text

values:
nofollow
http://shanghai.usembassy-china.org.cn/
external text

values:
nofollow
http://hongkong.usconsulate.gov/
external text

values:
nofollow
http://shenyang.usembassy-china.org.cn/
external text

values:
nofollow
http://wuhan.usembassy-china.org.cn/
external text

values: border-collapse: collapse; padding: 0; border: 0; background:transparent; width:100%;

values: commons:Category:Relations of China and the United States

values:
/wiki/Foreign_Relations_Series
mw-redirect
Foreign Relations Series

values:
nofollow
http://china.usc.edu/
external text

values:
/wiki/UMass_Amherst
mw-redirect
UMass Amherst

values: width: 50%;text-align: left; vertical-align: top;

values:
nofollow
http://www.rand.org/hot_topics/china/
external text

values: border-collapse: collapse; padding: 0; border: 0; background:transparent; width:90%;

values: Template talk:Foreign relations of China

values: Central African Republic–China relations

values: China–Democratic Republic of the Congo relations

values: China–Federated States of Micronesia relations

values: nowraplinks collapsible collapsed navbox-subgroup

values:
navbox-image
3
width:1px;padding:0px 0px 0px 2px

values: Bangladesh–China–India–Myanmar Forum for Regional Cooperation

values: Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation

values: China–Japan–South Korea trilateral summit

values:
/wiki/Belt_and_Road_Initiative
mw-redirect
Belt and Road Initiative

values: Category:Treaties of the People's Republic of China

values: Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership

values: nowraplinks collapsible collapsed navbox-inner

values: Template:Foreign relations of the United States

values: Template talk:Foreign relations of the United States

values: Central African Republic–United States relations

values: Democratic Republic of the Congo–United States relations

values: Republic of the Congo–United States relations

values: Equatorial Guinea–United States relations

values: São Tomé and Príncipe–United States relations

values: Antigua and Barbuda–United States relations

values: Dominican Republic–United States relations

values: Saint Kitts and Nevis–United States relations

values: Saint Vincent and the Grenadines–United States relations

values: Trinidad and Tobago–United States relations

values: Pakistan–United States military relations

values: United Arab Emirates–United States relations

values: Bosnia and Herzegovina–United States relations

values: Republic of Macedonia–United States relations

values: Marshall Islands–United States relations

values: Federated States of Micronesia–United States relations

values: Papua New Guinea–United States relations

values: Kingdom of Hawaii–United States relations

values: Republic of Texas–United States relations

values: nowraplinks collapsible uncollapsed navbox-subgroup

values: Great Seal of the United States (obverse).svg

values: International organization membership of the United States

values: Category:Bilateral relations of the United States

values: Category:Pages with citations lacking titles

values: Category:Pages with citations having bare URLs

values: Category:Webarchive template wayback links

values: Category:Interlanguage link template link number

values: Category:Articles containing potentially dated statements from 2018

values: Category:All articles containing potentially dated statements

values: Category:All articles with unsourced statements

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from March 2018

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from September 2014

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from February 2017

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from February 2015

values: Category:Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from October 2014

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from October 2015

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from December 2017

values: Category:Wikipedia articles in need of updating from May 2010

values: Category:All Wikipedia articles in need of updating

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from September 2009

values: Category:All articles that may contain original research

values: Category:Articles that may contain original research from October 2015

values: Category:Articles with weasel words from September 2014

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from February 2014

values: Category:All articles lacking reliable references

values: Category:Articles lacking reliable references from August 2014

values: Category:All articles with minor POV problems

values: Category:Articles with minor POV problems from October 2015

values: Category:Articles with simplified Chinese-language external links

values: Category:Articles with traditional Chinese-language external links

values: Category:Commons category with local link different than on Wikidata

values: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

values: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

values: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

values: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

values: Discussion about the content page [ctrl-alt-t]

values: p-namespaces navigation vectorTabs p-namespaces-label

values:
p-variants
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-variants-label

values: Past revisions of this page [ctrl-alt-h]

values: p-views navigation vectorTabs p-views-label

values:
p-cactions
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-cactions-label

values:
mw-wiki-logo
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page

values:
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page [ctrl-alt-z]
z

values: Featured content – the best of Wikipedia

values: Find background information on current events

values:
/wiki/Special:Random
Load a random article [ctrl-alt-x]
x

values: portal navigation p-navigation p-navigation-label

values: Guidance on how to use and edit Wikipedia

values: About the project, what you can do, where to find things

values: A list of recent changes in the wiki [ctrl-alt-r]

values: portal navigation p-interaction p-interaction-label

values: List of all English Wikipedia pages containing links to this page [ctrl-alt-j]

values: Recent changes in pages linked from this page [ctrl-alt-k]

values:
/wiki/Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard
Upload files [ctrl-alt-u]
u

values: A list of all special pages [ctrl-alt-q]

values: portal navigation p-wikibase-otherprojects p-wikibase-otherprojects-label

values: العلاقات الأمريكية الصينية – Arabic

values: Relaciones entre China y Estados Unidos – Spanish

values: روابط ایالات متحده آمریکا - چین – Persian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-fa
display: none;

values: Relations entre la Chine et les États-Unis – French

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ko
display: none;

values: Ամերիկա-չինական հարաբերություններ – Armenian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-hy
display: none;

values: Hubungan Amerika Serikat dengan Tiongkok – Indonesian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-it
display: none;

values: יחסי ארצות הברית-סין – Hebrew

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-hu
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ja
display: none;

values: Relações entre China e Estados Unidos – Portuguese

values: Американо-китайские отношения – Russian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sq
display: none;

values: Relationer mellan Kina och USA – Swedish

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sv
display: none;

values: Amerika Birleşik Devletleri-Çin ilişkileri – Turkish

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-tr
display: none;

values: Американо-китайські відносини – Ukrainian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-uk
display: none;

values: /static/images/wikimedia-button-1.5x.png 1.5x, /static/images/wikimedia-button-2x.png 2x

values: /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_132x47.png 1.5x, /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_176x62.png 2x

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-China–United_States_relations rootpage-China–United_States_relations skin-vector action-view