text:
Western Front (World War I)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is about the West European theatre. For the 1915–18 Russian military formation, see Western Front (Russian Empire).
Western Front
Part of World War I

Mark II "female" tank advancing with Canadian infantry at Battle of Vimy Ridge, 1917
Date
4 August 1914 – 11 November 1918
(4 years, 3 months and 1 week)
Location
Belgium, north-eastern France, Alsace-Lorraine (today France) and western Germany
Result
Decisive Entente victory
Armistice of Compiègne, end of World War I
Central Powers' victory on the Eastern Front nullified, fall of the German Empire
Belligerents
Entente Powers:
France
French colonial empire
British Empire
Australia
Bermuda
Canada
India
Newfoundland
New Zealand
Southern Rhodesia
South Africa
United Kingdom
United States (from 1917)
Belgium
Italy (from 1915)
Portugal (from 1916)
Russian Empire (1916–17)
Siam (from 1918)
Brazil (from 1918)
Central Powers:
German Empire
Austria-Hungary
Commanders and leaders
Joseph Joffre
Robert Nivelle
Philippe Pétain
Ferdinand Foch
John French
Douglas Haig
John J. Pershing
Albert I of Belgium
Helmuth von Moltke
Erich von Falkenhayn
Paul von Hindenburg
Erich Ludendorff
Wilhelm Groener
Strength
7,935,000[1]
5,399,563[2]
2,200,000[3]
267,000[4]
Total: ~16,000,000 13,250,000[1]
Casualties and losses
~7,500,000
Breakdown[show]
Casualties by country
4,808,000
2,264,200
286,330
93,100
: 22,120
20,870
4,542[5]
civilian deaths: 534,500
~5,500,000
Breakdown[show]
Casualties by country
5,490,300
17,300
civilian deaths: 424,000[a]
[show]
v
t
e
Western Front
1914
Belgium
Halen
Liège
Dinant
Namur
Frontiers
Charleroi
Mons
Great Retreat
1st Marne
1st Aisne
Antwerp
Race to the Sea
Yser
1st Ypres
Winter operations
1st Artois
1915
1st Champagne
Hartmannswillerkopf
Neuve Chapelle
2nd Ypres
2nd Artois
2nd Champagne
Loos
3rd Artois
1916
Verdun
Somme
1917
Alberich
Nivelle
Arras
2nd Aisne
Hills
Messines
3rd Ypres (Passchendaele)
La Malmaison
1st Cambrai
1918
Spring
Michael
Lys
3rd Aisne
2nd Marne
Hundred Days
Amiens
[show]
v
t
e
Theatres of World War I
European
Western Front
Eastern Front
Italian Front
Balkans
Middle Eastern
Caucasus
Persia
Gallipoli
Mesopotamia
Sinai and Palestine
Arab Revolt
South Arabia
African
South-West Africa
Togoland
Cameroon
East Africa
North Africa
Asian and Pacific theatre
Naval theaters
U-boat
Atlantic Ocean
Mediterranean
The Western Front was the main theatre of war during the First World War. Following the outbreak of war in August 1914, the German Army opened the Western Front by invading Luxembourg and Belgium, then gaining military control of important industrial regions in France. The tide of the advance was dramatically turned with the Battle of the Marne. Following the Race to the Sea, both sides dug in along a meandering line of fortified trenches, stretching from the North Sea to the Swiss frontier with France, which changed little except during early 1917 and in 1918.
Between 1915 and 1917 there were several offensives along this front. The attacks employed massive artillery bombardments and massed infantry advances. Entrenchments, machine gun emplacements, barbed wire and artillery repeatedly inflicted severe casualties during attacks and counter-attacks and no significant advances were made. Among the most costly of these offensives were the Battle of Verdun, in 1916, with a combined 700,000 casualties (estimated), the Battle of the Somme, also in 1916, with more than a million casualties (estimated), and the Battle of Passchendaele (Third Battle of Ypres), in 1917, with 487,000 casualties (estimated).[7][8]
To break the deadlock of trench warfare on the Western Front, both sides tried new military technology, including poison gas, aircraft and tanks. The adoption of better tactics and the cumulative weakening of the armies in the west led to the return of mobility in 1918. The German Spring Offensive of 1918 was made possible by the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk that ended the war of the Central Powers against Russia and Romania on the Eastern Front. Using short, intense "hurricane" bombardments and infiltration tactics, the German armies moved nearly 100 kilometres (60 miles) to the west, the deepest advance by either side since 1914, but the result was indecisive.
The inexorable advance of the Allied armies during the second half of 1918 caused a sudden collapse of the German armies and persuaded the German commanders that defeat was inevitable. The German government surrendered in the Armistice of 11 November 1918, and the terms of peace were settled by the Treaty of Versailles in 1919.
Contents
[hide]
1 1914
1.1 War plans – Battle of the Frontiers
1.2 First Battle of the Marne
1.3 First Battle of Ypres
2 1915
2.1 Gas warfare
2.2 Air warfare
2.3 Spring offensive
2.4 Autumn offensive
3 1916
3.1 Battle of Verdun
3.2 Battle of the Somme
3.3 Hindenburg line
4 1917
4.1 Nivelle Offensive
4.2 American Expeditionary Force
4.3 Flanders offensive
4.4 Battle of Cambrai
5 1918
5.1 German spring offensives
5.2 Allied counter-offensives
6 Aftermath
6.1 Casualties
6.2 Economic costs
7 Notes
8 Footnotes
9 References
10 Further reading
11 External links
1914[edit]
War plans – Battle of the Frontiers[edit]
See also: Schlieffen Plan, Plan XVII, and Battle of the Frontiers
Map of the Western Front and the Race to the Sea, 1914
French bayonet charge
German infantry on the battlefield, 7 August 1914
At the outbreak of the First World War, the German Army, with seven field armies in the west and one in the east, executed a modified version of the Schlieffen Plan, moving quickly through neutral Belgium to attack France, and then turning southwards to encircle the French Army and trap it on the German border.[9] The Western Front was the place where the most powerful military forces in Europe, the German and French armies, met and where the war was decided.[10] Belgian neutrality had been guaranteed by Britain under the Treaty of London, 1839; this caused Britain to join the war at the expiration of its ultimatum at 11 pm GMT on 4 August. Armies under German generals Alexander von Kluck and Karl von Bülow attacked Belgium on 4 August 1914. Luxembourg had been occupied without opposition on 2 August. The first battle in Belgium was the Siege of Liège, which lasted from 5–16 August. Liège was well fortified and surprised the German Army under Bülow with its level of resistance. German heavy artillery was able to demolish the main forts within a few days.[11] Following the fall of Liège, most of the Belgian field army retreated to Antwerp, leaving the garrison of Namur isolated, with the Belgian capital, Brussels, falling to the Germans on 20 August. Although the German army bypassed Antwerp, it remained a threat to their flank. Another siege followed at Namur, lasting from about 20–23 August.[12]
The French deployed five armies on the frontier. The French Plan XVII was intended to bring about the capture of Alsace-Lorraine.[13] On 7 August, the VII Corps attacked Alsace to capture Mulhouse and Colmar. The main offensive was launched on 14 August with the First and Second Armies attacking toward Sarrebourg-Morhange in Lorraine.[14] In keeping with the Schlieffen Plan, the Germans withdrew slowly while inflicting severe losses upon the French. The French Third and Fourth Armies advanced toward the Saar River and attempted to capture Saarburg, attacking Briey and Neufchateau but were repulsed.[15] The French VII Corps captured Mulhouse after a brief engagement on 7 August but German reserve forces engaged them in the Battle of Mulhouse and forced a French retreat.[16]
The German Army swept through Belgium, executing civilians and razing villages. The application of "collective responsibility" against a civilian population further galvanised the allies. Newspapers condemned the German invasion, violence against civilians and destruction of property, which became known as the "Rape of Belgium".[17][b] After marching through Belgium, Luxembourg and the Ardennes, the Germans advanced into northern France in late August, where they met the French Army, under Joseph Joffre, and the divisions of the British Expeditionary Force under Field Marshal Sir John French. A series of engagements known as the Battle of the Frontiers ensued, which included the Battle of Charleroi and the Battle of Mons. In the former battle the French Fifth Army was almost destroyed by the German 2nd and 3rd Armies and the latter delayed the German advance by a day. A general Allied retreat followed, resulting in more clashes at the Battle of Le Cateau, the Siege of Maubeuge and the Battle of St. Quentin (also called the First Battle of Guise).[19]
First Battle of the Marne[edit]
Main article: First Battle of the Marne
The German Army came within 70 km (43 mi) of Paris but at the First Battle of the Marne (6–12 September), French and British troops were able to force a German retreat by exploiting a gap which appeared between the 1st and 2nd Armies, ending the German advance into France.[20] The German Army retreated north of the Aisne River and dug in there, establishing the beginnings of a static western front that was to last for the next three years. Following this German retirement, the opposing forces made reciprocal outflanking manoeuvres, known as the Race for the Sea and quickly extended their trench systems from the Swiss frontier to the North Sea.[21] The territory occupied by Germany held 64 percent of French pig-iron production, 24 percent of its steel manufacturing and 40 percent of the coal industry – dealing a serious blow to French industry.[22]
On the Entente side (those countries opposing the German alliance), the final lines were occupied with the armies of each nation defending a part of the front. From the coast in the north, the primary forces were from Belgium, the British Empire and then France. Following the Battle of the Yser in October, the Belgian army controlled a 35 km (22 mi) length of West Flanders along the coast, known as the Yser Front, along the Yser river and the Yperlee canal, from Nieuwpoort to Boesinghe.[23] Meanwhile, the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) occupied a position on the flank, having previous occupied a more central position.[24]
First Battle of Ypres[edit]
Main article: First Battle of Ypres
From 19 October until 22 November, the German forces made their final breakthrough attempt of 1914 during the First Battle of Ypres, which ended in a mutually-costly stalemate.[25] After the battle, Erich von Falkenhayn judged that it was no longer possible for Germany to win the war by purely military means and on 18 November 1914 he called for a diplomatic solution. The Chancellor, Theobald von Bethmann-Hollweg, Generalfeldmarschall Paul von Hindenburg, commanding Ober Ost (Eastern Front high command), and Hindenburg's deputy, Erich Ludendorff, continued to believe that victory was achievable through decisive battles. During the Lodz offensive in Poland (11–25 November), Falkenhayn hoped that the Russians would be made amenable to peace overtures. In his discussions with Bethmann-Hollweg, Falkenhayn viewed Germany and Russia as having no insoluble conflict and that the real enemies of Germany were France and Britain. A peace with only a few annexations of territory also seemed possible with France and that with Russia and France out of the war by negotiated settlements, Germany could concentrate on Britain and fight a long war with the resources of Europe at its disposal. Hindenburg and Ludendorff continued to believe that Russia could be defeated by a series of battles which cumulatively would have a decisive effect, after which Germany could finish off France and Britain.[26]
1915[edit]
Map of the Western Front, 1915–16
Between the coast and the Vosges was a westward bulge in the trench line, named the Noyon salient for the captured French town at the maximum point of advance near Compiègne. Joffre's plan for 1915 was to attack the salient on both flanks to cut it off.[27] The Fourth Army had attacked in Champagne from 20 December 1914 – 17 March 1915 but the French were not able to attack in Artois at the same time. The Tenth Army formed the northern attack force and was to attack eastwards into the Douai plain across a 16-kilometre (9.9 mi) front between Loos and Arras.[28] On 10 March, as part of the larger offensive in the Artois region, the British Army fought the Battle of Neuve Chapelle to capture Aubers Ridge. The assault was made by four divisions along a 2 mi (3.2 km) front. Preceded by a surprise bombardment lasting only 35 minutes, the initial assault made rapid progress and the village was captured within four hours. The advance then slowed because of supply and communication difficulties. The Germans brought up reserves and counter-attacked, forestalling the attempt to capture the ridge. Since the British had used about one-third of their supply of artillery ammunition, General Sir John French blamed the failure on the shortage of ammunition, despite the early success.[29][30]
Gas warfare[edit]
Main article: Chemical weapons in World War I
All sides had signed the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907, which prohibited the use of chemical weapons in warfare. In 1914, there had been small-scale attempts by both the French and Germans to use various tear gases, which were not strictly prohibited by the early treaties but which were also ineffective.[31] The first use of more lethal chemical weapons was against the French near the Belgian town of Ypres.[32]
Despite the German plans to maintain the stalemate with the French and British, Albrecht, Duke of Württemberg, commander of the 4th Army planned an offensive at Ypres, site of the First Battle of Ypres in November 1914. The Second Battle of Ypres, April 1915, was intended to divert attention from offensives in the Eastern Front and disrupt Franco-British planning. After a two-day bombardment, the Germans released a cloud of 168 long tons (171 t) of chlorine gas onto the battlefield. Though primarily a powerful irritant, it can asphyxiate in high concentrations or prolonged exposure. Being heavier than air, the gas crept across no man's land and drifted into the French trenches.[33] The green-yellow cloud started killing some defenders and those in the rear fled in panic, creating an undefended 3.7-mile (6 km) gap in the Allied line. The Germans were unprepared for the level of their success and lacked sufficient reserves to exploit the opening. Canadian troops on the right drew back their left flank and halted the German advance.[34] The gas attack was repeated two days later and caused a 3.1 mi (5 km) withdrawal of the Franco-British line but the opportunity had been lost.[35]
The success of this attack would not be repeated, as the Allies countered by introducing gas masks and other countermeasures. An example of the success of these measures came a year later, on 27 April in the Gas attacks at Hulluch 40 km (25 mi) to the south of Ypres, where the 16th (Irish) Division withstood several German gas attacks.[36] The British retaliated, developing their own chlorine gas and using it at the Battle of Loos in September 1915. Fickle winds and inexperience led to more British casualties from the gas than German.[37] French, British and German forces all escalated the use of gas attacks through the rest of the war, developing the more deadly phosgene gas in 1915, then the infamous mustard gas in 1917, which could linger for days and could kill slowly and painfully. Countermeasures also improved and the stalemate continued.[38]
Air warfare[edit]
Specialised aeroplanes for aerial combat were introduced in 1915. Aircraft were already in use for scouting and on 1 April, the French pilot Roland Garros became the first to shoot down an enemy aircraft by using a machine-gun that shot forward through the propeller blades. This was achieved by crudely reinforcing the blades to deflect bullets.[39] Several weeks later Garros force-landed behind German lines. His aeroplane was captured and sent to Dutch engineer Anthony Fokker, who soon produced a significant improvement, the interrupter gear, in which the machine gun is synchronised with the propeller so it fires in the intervals when the blades of the propeller are out of the line of fire. This advance was quickly ushered into service, in the Fokker E.I (Eindecker, or monoplane, Mark 1), the first single seat fighter aircraft to combine a reasonable maximum speed with an effective armament. Max Immelmann scored the first confirmed kill in an Eindecker on 1 August.[40] Both sides developed improved weapons, engines, airframes and materials, until the end of the war. It also inaugurated the cult of the ace, the most famous being Manfred von Richthofen (the Red Baron). Contrary to the myth, anti-aircraft fire claimed more kills than fighters.[41]
Spring offensive[edit]
Ruins of Carency after it was recaptured by France
The final Entente offensive of the spring was the Second Battle of Artois, an offensive to capture Vimy Ridge and advance into the Douai plain. The French Tenth Army attacked on 9 May after a six-day bombardment and advanced 5 kilometres (3 mi) to capture Vimy Ridge. German reinforcements counter-attacked and pushed the French back towards their starting points because French reserves had been held back and the success of the attack had come as a surprise. By 15 May the advance had been stopped, although the fighting continued until 18 June.[42] In May the German Army captured a French document at La Ville-aux-Bois describing a new system of defence. Rather than relying on a heavily fortified front line, the defence was to be arranged in a series of echelons. The front line would be a thinly manned series of outposts, reinforced by a series of strongpoints and a sheltered reserve. If a slope was available, troops were deployed along the rear side for protection. The defence became fully integrated with command of artillery at the divisional level. Members of the German high command viewed this new scheme with some favour and it later became the basis of an elastic defence in depth doctrine against Entente attacks.[43][44]
During the autumn of 1915, the "Fokker Scourge" began to have an effect on the battlefront as Allied reconnaissance aircraft were nearly driven from the skies. These reconnaissance planes were used to direct gunnery and photograph enemy fortifications but now the Allies were nearly blinded by German fighters.[45] However, the impact of German air superiority was diminished by their primarily defensive doctrine in which they tended to remain over their own lines, rather than fighting over Allied held territory.[46]
Autumn offensive[edit]
In September 1915 the Entente allies launched another offensive, with the French Third Battle of Artois, Second Battle of Champagne and the British at Loos. The French had spent the summer preparing for this action, with the British assuming control of more of the front to release French troops for the attack. The bombardment, which had been carefully targeted by means of aerial photography,[47] began on 22 September. The main French assault was launched on 25 September and, at first, made good progress in spite of surviving wire entanglements and machine gun posts. Rather than retreating, the Germans adopted a new defence-in-depth scheme that consisted of a series of defensive zones and positions with a depth of up to 8.0 km (5 mi).[48]
On 25 September, the British began the Battle of Loos, part of the Third Battle of Artois, which was meant to supplement the larger Champagne attack. The attack was preceded by a four-day artillery bombardment of 250,000 shells and a release of 5,100 cylinders of chlorine gas.[49][50] The attack involved two corps in the main assault and two corps performing diversionary attacks at Ypres. The British suffered heavy losses, especially due to machine gun fire during the attack and made only limited gains before they ran out of shells. A renewal of the attack on 13 October fared little better.[51] In December, French was replaced by General Douglas Haig as commander of the British forces.[52]
1916[edit]
German soldier on the Western Front in 1916
Falkenhayn believed that a breakthrough might no longer be possible and instead focused on forcing a French defeat by inflicting massive casualties.[53] His new goal was to "bleed France white".[54] As such, he adopted two new strategies. The first was the use of unrestricted submarine warfare to cut off Allied supplies arriving from overseas.[55] The second would be attacks against the French army intended to inflict maximum casualties; Falkenhayn planned to attack a position from which the French could not retreat, for reasons of strategy and national pride and thus trap the French. The town of Verdun was chosen for this because it was an important stronghold, surrounded by a ring of forts, that lay near the German lines and because it guarded the direct route to Paris.[56]
Falkenhayn limited the size of the front to 5–6 kilometres (3–4 mi) to concentrate artillery firepower and to prevent a breakthrough from a counter-offensive. He also kept tight control of the main reserve, feeding in just enough troops to keep the battle going.[57] In preparation for their attack, the Germans had amassed a concentration of aircraft near the fortress. In the opening phase, they swept the air space of French aircraft, which allowed German artillery-observation aircraft and bombers to operate without interference. In May, the French countered by deploying escadrilles de chasse with superior Nieuport fighters and the air over Verdun turned into a battlefield as both sides fought for air superiority.[58]
Battle of Verdun[edit]
Main article: Battle of Verdun
French soldiers observing enemy movements
The Battle of Verdun began on 21 February 1916 after a nine-day delay due to snow and blizzards. After a massive eight-hour artillery bombardment, the Germans did not expect much resistance as they slowly advanced on Verdun and its forts.[59] Sporadic French resistance was encountered. The Germans took Fort Douaumont and then reinforcements halted the German advance by 28 February.[60]
The Germans turned their focus to Le Mort Homme on the west bank of the Meuse which blocked the route to French artillery emplacements, from which the French fired across the river. After some of the most intense fighting of the campaign, the hill was taken by the Germans in late May. After a change in French command at Verdun from the defensive-minded Philippe Pétain to the offensive-minded Robert Nivelle, the French attempted to re-capture Fort Douaumont on 22 May but were easily repulsed. The Germans captured Fort Vaux on 7 June and with the aid of diphosgene gas, came within 1 kilometre (1,100 yd) of the last ridge before Verdun before being contained on 23 June.[61]
Over the summer, the French slowly advanced. With the development of the rolling barrage, the French recaptured Fort Vaux in November and by December 1916 they had pushed the Germans back 2.1 kilometres (1.3 mi) from Fort Douaumont, in the process rotating 42 divisions through the battle. The Battle of Verdun—also known as the 'Mincing Machine of Verdun' or 'Meuse Mill'[62]—became a symbol of French determination and self-sacrifice.[63]
Battle of the Somme[edit]
Main article: Battle of the Somme
British infantry advance near Ginchy. Photo by Ernest Brooks.
In the spring, Allied commanders had been concerned about the ability of the French Army to withstand the enormous losses at Verdun. The original plans for an attack around the River Somme were modified to let the British make the main effort. This would serve to relieve pressure on the French, as well as the Russians who had also suffered great losses. On 1 July, after a week of heavy rain, British divisions in Picardy began the Battle of the Somme with the Battle of Albert, supported by five French divisions on their right flank. The attack had been preceded by seven days of heavy artillery bombardment. The experienced French forces were successful in advancing but the British artillery cover had neither blasted away barbed wire, nor destroyed German trenches as effectively as was planned. They suffered the greatest number of casualties (killed, wounded and missing) in a single day in the history of the British Army, about 57,000.[64]
The Verdun lesson learnt, the Allies' tactical aim became the achievement of air superiority and until September, German aircraft were swept from the skies over the Somme. The success of the Allied air offensive caused a reorganisation of the German air arm and both sides began using large formations of aircraft rather than relying on individual combat.[65] After regrouping, the battle continued throughout July and August, with some success for the British despite the reinforcement of the German lines. By August, General Haig had concluded that a breakthrough was unlikely and instead, switched tactics to a series of small unit actions.[66] The effect was to straighten out the front line, which was thought necessary in preparation for a massive artillery bombardment with a major push.[67]
The final phase of the battle of the Somme saw the first use of the tank on the battlefield.[68] The Allies prepared an attack that would involve 13 British and Imperial divisions and four French corps. The attack made early progress, advancing 3,200–4,100 metres (3,500–4,500 yd) in places but the tanks had little effect due to their lack of numbers and mechanical unreliability.[69] The final phase of the battle took place in October and early November, again producing limited gains with heavy loss of life. All told, the Somme battle had made penetrations of only 8 kilometres (5 mi) and failed to reach the original objectives. The British had suffered about 420,000 casualties and the French around 200,000. It is estimated that the Germans lost 465,000, although this figure is controversial.[70]
The Somme led directly to major new developments in infantry organisation and tactics; despite the terrible losses of 1 July, some divisions had managed to achieve their objectives with minimal casualties. In examining the reasons behind losses and achievements, once the British war economy produced sufficient equipment and weapons, the army made the platoon the basic tactical unit, similar to the French and German armies. At the time of the Somme, British senior commanders insisted that the company (120 men) was the smallest unit of manoeuvre; less than a year later, the section of ten men would be so.[71]
Hindenburg line[edit]
Main article: Hindenburg Line
The Hindenburg Line at Bullecourt seen from the air.
In August 1916 the German leadership along the western front had changed as Falkenhayn resigned and was replaced by Hindenburg and Ludendorff. The new leaders soon recognised that the battles of Verdun and the Somme had depleted the offensive capabilities of the German Army. They decided that the German Army in the west would go over to the strategic defensive for most of 1917, while the Central powers would attack elsewhere.[72]
During the Somme battle and through the winter months, the Germans created a fortification behind the Noyon Salient that would be called the Hindenburg Line, using the defensive principles elaborated since the defensive battles of 1915, including the use of Eingreif divisions.[73] This was intended to shorten the German front, freeing 10 divisions for other duties. This line of fortifications ran from Arras south to St Quentin and shortened the front by about 50 kilometres (30 mi).[72] British long-range reconnaissance aircraft first spotted the construction of the Hindenburg Line in November 1916.[74]
1917[edit]
Main articles: Hindenburg Line and Tactical development on the Western Front in 1917
Map of the Western Front, 1917
The Hindenburg Line was built between 2[75] and 50 kilometres (30 mi) behind the German front line. On 25 February German forces began retreating to the line and the withdrawal was completed on 5 April, leaving behind a devastated territory to be occupied by the Allies. This withdrawal negated the French strategy of attacking both flanks of the Noyon salient, as it no longer existed.[76] However, offensive advances by the British continued as the High Command claimed, with some justice, that this withdrawal resulted from the casualties the Germans received during the Battles of the Somme and Verdun, despite the Allies suffering greater losses.[77]
Meanwhile, on 6 April the United States declared war on Germany. In early 1915, following the sinking of the Lusitania, Germany had stopped its unrestricted submarine warfare in the Atlantic because of concerns of drawing the United States into the conflict. With the growing discontent of the German public due to the food shortages, however, the government resumed unrestricted submarine warfare in February 1917. They had calculated that a successful submarine and warship siege of Britain would force that country out of the war within six months, while American forces would take a year to become a serious factor on the Western Front. The submarine and surface ships had a long period of success before Britain resorted to the convoy system, bringing a large reduction in shipping losses.[78]
British Army on the Western Front (August, 1917)
By 1917, the size of the British Army on the Western Front had grown to two-thirds the total numbers in the French forces.[22] In April 1917 the BEF began the Battle of Arras.[79] The Canadian Corps and the 5th Division, attacked German lines at Vimy Ridge, capturing the heights and the First Army to the south achieved the deepest advance since trench warfare began. Later attacks were confronted by German reinforcements defending the area using the lessons learned on the Somme in 1916. British attacks were contained and, according to Gary Sheffield, a greater rate of daily loss was inflicted on the British than in "any other major battle".[80]
During the winter of 1916–1917, German air tactics had been improved, a fighter training school was opened at Valenciennes and better aircraft with twin guns were introduced. The result was near disastrous losses for Allied air power, particularly for the British, Portuguese, Belgians and Australians who were struggling with outmoded aircraft, poor training and weak tactics. As a result, the Allied air successes over the Somme would not be repeated and heavy losses were inflicted by the Germans. During their attack at Arras, the British lost 316 air crews and the Canadians lost 114 compared to 44 lost by the Germans.[81] This became known to the Royal Flying Corps as Bloody April.[82]
Nivelle Offensive[edit]
Main articles: Battle of Arras (1917) and Nivelle Offensive
The same month, the French Commander-in-Chief, General Robert Nivelle, ordered a new offensive against the German trenches, promising that it would end the war within 48 hours. The 16 April attack, dubbed the Nivelle Offensive (also known as the Second Battle of the Aisne, after the area where the offensive took place), would be 1.2 million men strong, preceded by a week-long artillery bombardment and accompanied by tanks. The offensive proceeded poorly as the French troops, with the help of two Russian brigades, had to negotiate rough, upward-sloping terrain in extremely bad weather.[83] Planning had been dislocated by the voluntary German withdrawal to the Hindenburg Line. Secrecy had been compromised and German aircraft gained air superiority, making reconnaissance difficult and in places, the creeping barrage moved too fast for the French troops.[84] Within a week the French suffered 120,000 casualties. Despite the casualties and his promise to halt the offensive if it did not produce a breakthrough, Nivelle ordered the attack to continue into May.[79]
On 3 May the weary French 2nd Colonial Division, veterans of the Battle of Verdun, refused orders, arriving drunk and without their weapons. Lacking the means to punish an entire division, its officers did not immediately implement harsh measures against the mutineers. Mutinies occurred in 54 French divisions and 20,000 men deserted. Other Allied forces attacked but suffered massive casualties.[85] Appeals to patriotism and duty followed, as did mass arrests and trials. The French soldiers returned to defend their trenches but refused to participate in further offensive action.[86] On 15 May Nivelle was removed from command, replaced by Pétain who immediately stopped the offensive.[87] The French would go on the defensive for the following months to avoid high casualties and to restore confidence in the French High Command, while the British assumed greater responsibility.[88]
American Expeditionary Force[edit]
On 25 June the first US troops began to arrive in France, forming the American Expeditionary Force. However, the American units did not enter the trenches in divisional strength until October. The incoming troops required training and equipment before they could join in the effort, and for several months American units were relegated to support efforts.[89] In spite of this, however, their presence provided a much-needed boost to Allied morale, with the promise of further reinforcements that could tip the manpower balance towards the Allies.[90]
Flanders offensive[edit]
Main articles: Battle of Messines (1917) and Third Battle of Ypres
Two British soldiers run toward a bunker past the bodies of two German soldiers
In June, the British launched an offensive in Flanders, in part to take pressure off the French armies on the Aisne, after the French part of the Nivelle Offensive failed to achieve the strategic victory that had been planned and French troops began to mutiny.[88] The offensive began on 7 June, with a British attack on Messines Ridge, south of Ypres, to retake the ground lost in the First and Second battles in 1914. Since 1915 specialist Royal Engineer tunnelling companies had been digging tunnels under the ridge, and about 500 t (490 long tons) of explosives had been planted in 21 mines under the German defences.[91] Following several weeks of bombardment, the explosives in 19 of these mines were detonated, killing up to 7,000 German troops. The infantry advance that followed relied on three creeping barrages which the British infantry followed to capture the plateau and the east side of the ridge in one day. German counter-attacks were defeated and the southern flank of the Gheluvelt plateau was protected from German observation.[92]
On 11 July 1917, during Unternehmen Strandfest (Operation Beachparty) at Nieuport on the coast, the Germans introduced a new weapon into the war when they fired a powerful blistering agent Sulfur mustard (Yellow Cross) gas. The artillery deployment allowed heavy concentrations of the gas to be used on selected targets. Mustard gas was persistent and could contaminate an area for days, denying it to the British, an additional demoralising factor. The Allies increased production of gas for chemical warfare but took until late 1918 to copy the Germans and begin using mustard gas.[93]
From 31 July to 10 November the Third Battle of Ypres included the First Battle of Passchendaele and culminated in the Second Battle of Passchendaele.[94] The battle had the original aim of capturing the ridges east of Ypres then advancing to Roulers and Thourout to close the main rail line supplying the German garrisons on the Western front north of Ypres. If successful the northern armies were then to capture the German submarine bases on the Belgian coast. It was later restricted to advancing the British Army onto the ridges around Ypres, as the unusually wet weather slowed British progress. The Canadian Corps relieved the II ANZAC Corps and took the village of Passchendaele on 6 November,[95] despite rain, mud and many casualties. The offensive was costly in manpower for both sides for relatively little gain of ground against determined German resistance but the ground captured was of great tactical importance. In the drier periods, the British advance was inexorable and during the unusually wet August and in the Autumn rains that began in early October, the Germans achieved only costly defensive successes, which led the German commanders in early October to begin preparations for a general retreat. Both sides lost a combined total of over a half million men during this offensive.[96] The battle has become a byword among some British revisionist historians for bloody and futile slaughter, whilst the Germans called Passchendaele "the greatest martyrdom of the war".[97]
Battle of Cambrai[edit]
Main article: Battle of Cambrai
On 20 November the British launched the first massed tank attack and the first attack using predicted artillery-fire (aiming artillery without firing the guns to obtain target data) at the Battle of Cambrai.[98] The Allies attacked with 324 tanks (with one-third held in reserve) and twelve divisions, advancing behind a hurricane bombardment, against two German divisions. The machines carried fascines on their fronts to bridge trenches and the 13 ft (4 m) German tank traps. Special "grapnel tanks" towed hooks to pull away the German barbed wire. The attack was a great success for the British, who penetrated further in six hours than at the Third Ypres in four months, at a cost of only 4,000 British casualties.[99] The advance produced an awkward salient and a surprise German counter-offensive began on 30 November, which drove back the British in the south and failed in the north. Despite the reversal, the attack was seen as a success by the Allies, proving that tanks could overcome trench defences. The Germans realised that the use of tanks by the Allies posed a new threat to any defensive strategy they might mount. The battle had also seen the first mass use of German stosstruppen on the Western front in the attack, who used infantry infiltration tactics to penetrate British defences, bypassing resistance and quickly advancing into the British rear.[100]
1918[edit]
Map of the final German offensives, 1918
German tank in Roye, 21 March 1918
Following the successful Allied attack and penetration of the German defences at Cambrai, Ludendorff and Hindenburg determined that the only opportunity for German victory lay in a decisive attack along the Western front during the spring, before American manpower became overwhelming. On 3 March 1918, the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk was signed and Russia withdrew from the war. This would now have a dramatic effect on the conflict as 33 divisions were released from the Eastern Front for deployment to the west. The Germans occupied almost as much Russian territory under the provisions of the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk as they did in the Second World War but this considerably restricted their troop redeployment. The Germans achieved an advantage of 192 divisions in the west to the 178 Allied divisions, which allowed Germany to pull veteran units from the line and retrain them as sturmtruppen (40 infantry and 3 cavalry divisions were retained for German occupation duties in the east).[101]
The Allies lacked unity of command and suffered from morale and manpower problems, the British and French armies were severely depleted and not in a position to attack in the first half of the year, while the majority of the newly arrived American troops were still training, with just six complete divisions in the line.[102] Ludendorff decided on an offensive strategy beginning with a big attack against the British on the Somme, to separate them from the French and drive them back to the channel ports.[103][104] The attack would combine the new storm troop tactics with over 700 aircraft,[105] tanks and a carefully planned artillery barrage that would include gas attacks.[106][107]
German spring offensives[edit]
Main article: Spring Offensive
Operation Michael, the first of the German Spring Offensives, very nearly succeeded in driving the Allied armies apart, advancing to within shelling distance of Paris for the first time since 1914.[108] As a result of the battle, the Allies agreed on unity of command. General Ferdinand Foch was appointed commander of all Allied forces in France. The unified Allies were better able to respond to each of the German drives and the offensive turned into a battle of attrition.[109] In May, the American divisions also began to play an increasing role, winning their first victory in the Battle of Cantigny. By summer, between 250,000 and 300,000 American soldiers were arriving every month.[110] A total of 2.1 million American troops would be deployed on this front before the war came to an end.[111] The rapidly increasing American presence served as a counter for the large numbers of redeployed German forces.[110]
Allied counter-offensives[edit]
Main articles: Second Battle of the Marne, Hundred Days Offensive, and Armistice of 11 November 1918
In July, Foch began the Second Battle of the Marne, a counter-offensive against the Marne salient which was eliminated by August. The Battle of Amiens began two days later, with Franco-British forces spearheaded by Australian and Canadian troops, along with 600 tanks and 800 aircraft.[112] Hindenburg named 8 August as the "Black Day of the German army".[113] The Italian 2nd Corps, commanded by General Alberico Albricci, also participated in the operations around Reims.[114] German manpower had been severely depleted after four years of war and its economy and society were under great internal strain. The Allies fielded 216 divisions against 197 German divisions.[115] The Hundred Days Offensive beginning in August proved the final straw and following this string of military defeats, German troops began to surrender in large numbers.[116] As the Allied forces advanced, Prince Maximilian of Baden was appointed as Chancellor of Germany in October to negotiate an armistice. Ludendorff was forced out and fled to Sweden.[116] The German retreat continued and the German Revolution put a new government in power. The Armistice of Compiègne was quickly signed, stopping hostilities on the Western Front on 11 November 1918, later known as Armistice Day.[117] The German Imperial Monarchy collapsed when General Groener, the successor to Ludendorff, backed the moderate Social Democratic Government under Friedrich Ebert, to forestall a revolution like those in Russia the previous year.[118]
Aftermath[edit]
Main article: Aftermath of World War I
Military Casualties
Western Front 1914–1918[119][120][c]
Nationality
Killed
Wounded
P.O.W.
France 1,300,000 c. 3,000,000 508,000
UK 512,600 1,528,500 223,600
Belgium 38,200 44,700 10,200
Australia 48,900 130,900 —
Canada 56,400 149,700 —
New Zealand 12,900 34,800 —
South Africa 3,250 8,720 2,220
India 6,670 15,750 1,090
Portugal 1,690 13,750 6,680
USA 51,800 230,100 4,430
Italy (Total 20,870)
Allies 2,032,410+ 5,156,920+ —
Germany 1,493,000 3,116,000 774,000
Austria-Hungary 3,200 c. 10,000 4,100
Central Powers 1,496,200 3,216,000 778,100
Grand Total 3,258,610 8,372,920 —
The war along the Western Front led the German government and its allies to sue for peace in spite of German success elsewhere. As a result, the terms of the peace were dictated by France, Britain and the United States, during the 1919 Paris Peace Conference. The result was the Treaty of Versailles, signed in June 1919 by a delegation of the new German government.[121] The terms of the treaty constrained Germany as an economic and military power. The Versailles treaty returned the border provinces of Alsace-Lorraine to France, thus limiting the coal required by German industry. The Saar, which formed the west bank of the Rhine, would be demilitarised and controlled by Britain and France, while the Kiel Canal opened to international traffic. The treaty also drastically reshaped Eastern Europe. It severely limited the German armed forces by restricting the size of the army to 100,000 and disallowing a navy or air force. The navy was sailed to Scapa Flow under the terms of surrender but was later scuttled, under the order of German admirals, as a reaction to the treaty.[122]
Casualties[edit]
Main article: Casualties of World War I
The war in the trenches of the Western Front left tens of thousands of maimed soldiers and war widows. The unprecedented loss of life had a lasting effect on popular attitudes toward war, resulting later in an Allied reluctance to pursue an aggressive policy toward Adolf Hitler.[123] Belgium suffered 30,000 civilian dead and France 40,000 (including 3,000 merchant sailors).[124] The British lost 16,829 civilian dead, 1,260 civilians were killed in air and naval attacks, 908 civilians were killed at sea and there were 14,661 merchant marine deaths.[125][126] Another 62,000 Belgian, 107,000 British and 300,000 French civilians died due to war-related causes.[127]
Economic costs[edit]
See also: French war planning 1920–1940
Germany in 1919 was bankrupt, the people living in a state of semi-starvation and having no commerce with the remainder of the world. The Allies occupied the Rhine cities of Cologne, Koblenz and Mainz, with restoration dependent on payment of reparations. In Germany a Stab-in-the-back myth (Dolchstoßlegende) was propagated by Hindenburg, Ludendorff and other defeated generals, that the defeat was not the fault of the 'good core' of the army but due to certain left-wing groups within Germany who signed a disastrous armistice; this would later be exploited by nationalists and the Nazi party propaganda to excuse the overthrow of the Weimar Republic in 1930 and the imposition of the Nazi dictatorship after March 1933.[128]
France lost more casualties relative to its population than any other great power and the industrial north-east of the country was devastated by the war. The provinces overrun by Germany had produced 40 percent of French coal and 58 percent of its steel output.[129] Once it was clear that Germany was going to be defeated, Ludendorff had ordered the destruction of the mines in France and Belgium.[130] His goal was to cripple the industries of Germany's main European rival. To prevent similar German attacks in the future, France later built a massive series of fortifications along the German border known as the Maginot Line.[131]
Notes[edit]
Jump up ^ 424,000 German civilians died due to war-related causes, ~1,000 in air raids.[6]
Jump up ^ A modern author uses the term only in the narrower sense of describing the war crimes committed by the Germans during this period.[18]
Jump up ^ German casualties from "Reichsarchiv 1918". Appendix F additionally breaks down the German killed figures (per the Reichsarchiv) as: 829,400 killed in action; 300,000 died of wounds; 364,000 missing reclassified as dead.[120]
Footnotes[edit]
^ Jump up to: a b ILO 1925, p. 29.
Jump up ^ SWO 1922, p. 742.
Jump up ^ Ayres 1919, p. 105.
Jump up ^ Hosch 2010, p. 219.
Jump up ^ Maurel, Henri. "The Volunteers of the Russian Expeditionary Corps in the Moroccan Division during the Second Battle of Marne". Archived from the original on 19 January 2008. Retrieved 18 January 2017.
Jump up ^ Grebler & Winkler 1940, p. 78.
Jump up ^ Liddle 1997, pp. 45–58.
Jump up ^ Edmonds 1991, pp. 361–363.
Jump up ^ Hamilton & Herwig 2003, p. 159.
Jump up ^ Stevenson 2005, pp. 44–45.
Jump up ^ Griffith 2004, p. 9.
Jump up ^ Griffiths 1986, pp. 22–24, 25–26.
Jump up ^ Hamilton & Herwig 2003, p. 254.
Jump up ^ Griffiths 2003, p. 30.
Jump up ^ Griffiths 1986, pp. 29–30.
Jump up ^ Smith, Audoin-Rouzeau & Becker 2003, p. 33.
Jump up ^ Horne & Kramer 2001, pp. 1–608.
Jump up ^ Zuckerman 2004, p. 23.
Jump up ^ Terraine 2002, pp. 78–175.
Jump up ^ Strachan 2001, pp. 242–262.
Jump up ^ Griffiths 1986, pp. 31–37.
^ Jump up to: a b Kennedy 1989, pp. 265–6.
Jump up ^ Barton, Doyle & Vandewalle 2005, p. 17.
Jump up ^ Baldwin 1962, p. 27.
Jump up ^ Strachan 2001, pp. 273–278.
Jump up ^ Foley 2005, pp. 105–110.
Jump up ^ Fuller 1992, p. 165.
Jump up ^ Neiberg 2008, p. 110.
Jump up ^ Lyons 2000, p. 112.
Jump up ^ Fuller 1992, pp. 166–7.
Jump up ^ Richter 1994, p. 7.
Jump up ^ Doughty 2005, pp. 148–151.
Jump up ^ Fuller 1992, pp. 172–3.
Jump up ^ Sheldon 2012, pp. 81–95.
Jump up ^ Sheldon 2012, pp. 95–121.
Jump up ^ Jones 2002, pp. 22–23.
Jump up ^ Richter 1994, pp. 69–73, 88.
Jump up ^ Richter 1994, pp. 182–183, 210–211.
Jump up ^ Spick 2002, pp. 326–327.
Jump up ^ Wise 1981, pp. 349–350.
Jump up ^ Granatstein & Morton 2003, p. 40.
Jump up ^ Smith, Audoin-Rouzeau & Becker 2003, pp. 79–80.
Jump up ^ Herwig 1997, p. 165.
Jump up ^ Lupfer 1981, pp. 1–36.
Jump up ^ Campbell 1981, pp. 26–27.
Jump up ^ Griffith 1994, pp. 155–156.
Jump up ^ Bailey 2004, p. 245.
Jump up ^ Samuels 1995, pp. 168–171.
Jump up ^ Palazzo 2000, p. 66.
Jump up ^ Hartesveldt 2005, p. 17.
Jump up ^ Warner 2000, pp. 4–31.
Jump up ^ Wiest 2005, p. xvii.
Jump up ^ Lyons 2000, p. 141.
Jump up ^ Knox 2007, p. 153.
Jump up ^ Hull 2005, pp. 295–296.
Jump up ^ Foley 2005, pp. 207–208.
Jump up ^ Marshall 1964, pp. 236–7.
Jump up ^ Campbell 1981, p. 40.
Jump up ^ Lyons 2000, p. 143.
Jump up ^ Martin 2001, pp. 28–83.
Jump up ^ Jones & Hook 2007, pp. 23–24.
Jump up ^ Foley 2005, p. 224.
Jump up ^ Jackson 2001, p. 28.
Jump up ^ Griffiths 1986, pp. 71–72.
Jump up ^ Campbell 1981, p. 42.
Jump up ^ Baldwin 1962, p. 79.
Jump up ^ Rawson 2014, pp. 140–158.
Jump up ^ Miles 1992, pp. 245–249.
Jump up ^ Prior & Wilson 2005, pp. 280–281.
Jump up ^ Watson 2008, p. 11.
Jump up ^ Corkerry 2001, p. 88.
^ Jump up to: a b Herwig 1997, pp. 246–252.
Jump up ^ Wynne 1976, p. 290.
Jump up ^ Dockrill & French 1996, p. 68.
Jump up ^ Marshall 1964, pp. 288–9.
Jump up ^ Baldwin 1962, p. 99.
Jump up ^ Neiberg 2004, p. 46.
Jump up ^ Griffiths 1986, pp. 144–5.
^ Jump up to: a b Baldwin 1962, pp. 99–100.
Jump up ^ Sheffield 2014, Chapter 7.
Jump up ^ Campbell 1981, p. 71.
Jump up ^ Hart 2005, pp. 11–13.
Jump up ^ Cockfield 1999, pp. 91–114.
Jump up ^ Uffindell 2015, p. 26.
Jump up ^ Lyons 2000, p. 243.
Jump up ^ Marshall 1964, p. 292.
Jump up ^ Neiberg 2003, p. 53.
^ Jump up to: a b Baldwin 1962, pp. 101–102.
Jump up ^ Griffiths 1986, p. 124.
Jump up ^ Baldwin 1962, p. 144.
Jump up ^ Bostyn 2002, p. 227.
Jump up ^ Edmonds 1991, p. 87.
Jump up ^ Sheldon 2007, pp. 35–36, 39.
Jump up ^ Liddle 2013, p. 112.
Jump up ^ Baldwin 1962, p. 103.
Jump up ^ Sheffield 2002, p. 216.
Jump up ^ Sheldon 2007, pp. vi, 316.
Jump up ^ Miles 1991, pp. 13–15, 32–35.
Jump up ^ Miles 1991, p. 88.
Jump up ^ Miles 1991, pp. 176–248.
Jump up ^ Herwig 1997, pp. 393–397,400–401.
Jump up ^ Baldwin 1962, pp. 139–140.
Jump up ^ Baldwin 1962, p. 140.
Jump up ^ Carlyon 2006, p. 543.
Jump up ^ Murphy 2005, p. 69.
Jump up ^ Baldwin 1962, pp. 140–141.
Jump up ^ Carlyon 2006, pp. 544–545.
Jump up ^ Marshall 1964, pp. 353–357.
Jump up ^ Baldwin 1962, pp. 141–143.
^ Jump up to: a b Baldwin 1962, p. 146.
Jump up ^ Tucker & Roberts 2005, p. 1254.
Jump up ^ Ekins 2010, p. 24.
Jump up ^ Griffiths 1986, pp. 155–156.
Jump up ^ Edmonds 1994, pp. 2, 31, 242, 245–246.
Jump up ^ Kennedy 1989, pp. 266–302.
^ Jump up to: a b Herwig 1997, pp. 426–428.
Jump up ^ Griffiths 1986, p. 163.
Jump up ^ Herwig 1997, p. 446.
Jump up ^ Ellis 2001, p. 270.
^ Jump up to: a b Churchill 1938, p. 558.
Jump up ^ Carlyon 2006, pp. 743 & 760.
Jump up ^ Massie 2004, p. 787.
Jump up ^ Adamthwaite 1989, pp. 25–26.
Jump up ^ Grey 1991, p. 292.
Jump up ^ ASB 1922, p. 100.
Jump up ^ Ellis 1993, p. 269.
Jump up ^ Hersch 1927, pp. 47–61.
Jump up ^ Herwig 1996, pp. 87–127.
Jump up ^ Chickering & Förster 2000, p. 297.
Jump up ^ Marshall 1964, p. 460.
Jump up ^ Alexander 2003, p. 180.
References[edit]
Adamthwaite, Anthony P. (1989). The Making of the Second World War. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-90716-3.
Alexander, Martin S. (2003). The Republic in Danger: General Maurice Gamelin and the Politics of French Defence, 1933–1940. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-52429-2.
Annuaire statistique de la Belgique et du Congo Belge 1915–1919 [Statistical Yearbook of Belgium and the Belgian Congo 1915–1919]. no OCLC. Bruxelles. 1922.
Ayres, L. P. (1 August 1919). The War with Germany: A Statistical Summary (2nd [online] ed.). Washington, DC: United States War Department, General Staff. OCLC 869902118. Retrieved 4 March 2017.
Bailey, Jonathan B. A. (2004). Field Artillery and Firepower. AUSA Institute of Land Warfare book (2nd ed.). Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-59114-029-0.
Baldwin, Hanson (1962). World War I: An Outline History. London: Hutchinson. OCLC 988365.
Barton, Peter; Doyle, Peter; Vandewalle, Johan (2005). Beneath Flanders Fields: The Tunnellers' War, 1914–1918. McGill-Queen's University Press. ISBN 978-0-7735-2949-6.
Bostyn, Franky (2002). "Zero Hour: Historical Note on the British Underground War in Flanders, 1915–17". In Doyle, Peter; Bennett, Matthew R. Fields of Battle: Terrain in Military History. Springer. ISBN 978-1-4020-0433-9.
Campbell, Christopher (1981). Aces and Aircraft of World War I. Dorset: Blandford Press. ISBN 978-0-7137-0954-4.
Carlyon, Les (2006). The Great War. Sydney, New South Wales: MacMillan Australia. ISBN 978-1-4050-3799-0.
Chickering, Roger; Förster, Stig (2000). Great War, Total War: Combat and Mobilization on the Western Front, 1914–1918. London: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-77352-2.
Churchill, W. S. (1938). The World Crisis. 1923–1931 (2nd Odhams ed.). London: Thornton Butterworth. OCLC 4945014.
Cockfield, Jamie H. (1999). With Snow on Their Boots: The Tragic Odyssey of the Russian Expeditionary Force in France During World War I. Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-312-22082-2.
Corkerry, S., ed. (2001) [1917]. Instructions for the Training of Divisions for Offensive Action, Instructions for the Training of Platoons for Offensive Action (1917) (repr. ed.). Milton Keynes: Military Press. ISBN 978-0-85420-250-8.
Dockrill, Michael L.; French, David (1996). Strategy and Intelligence: British Policy During the First World War. Continuum. ISBN 978-1-85285-099-9.
Doughty, R. A. (2005). Pyrrhic Victory: French Strategy and Operations in the Great War. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. ISBN 978-0-674-01880-8.
Edmonds, J. E. (1991) [1948]. Military Operations France and Belgium, 1917: 7 June – 10 November. Messines and Third Ypres (Passchendaele). History of the Great War Based on Official Documents by Direction of the Historical Section of the Committee of Imperial Defence. II. Nashville, TN: Imperial War Museum and Battery Press. ISBN 978-0-89839-166-4.
Edmonds, J. E. (1994) [1939]. Military Operations France and Belgium, 1918 May–July: The German Diversion Offensives and the First Allied Counter-Offensive. History of the Great War Based on Official Documents By Direction of the Historical Section of the Committee of Imperial Defence. III (Imperial War Museum and Battery Press ed.). London: Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-89839-211-1.
Ekins, Ashley (2010). 1918: Year of Victory: The End of the Great War and the Shaping of History. Exisle. ISBN 978-1-921497-42-1.
Ellis, John (1993). The World War I Databook. London: Aurum Press. ISBN 978-1-85410-766-4.
Ellis, John (2001). The World War I Databook. London: Aurum Press. ISBN 978-1-85410-766-4.
Foley, R. T. (2007) [2005]. German Strategy and the Path to Verdun: Erich von Falkenhayn and the Development of Attrition, 1870–1916. Cambridge: CUP. ISBN 978-0-521-04436-3.
Fuller, John F. C. (1992). The Conduct of War, 1789–1961: A Study of the Impact of the French, Industrial and Russian Revolutions on War and its Conduct. New York: Da Capo Press. ISBN 978-0-306-80467-0.
Granatstein, Jack; Morton, Desmond (2003). Canada and the Two World Wars. Toronto: Key Porter. ISBN 978-1-55263-509-4.
Grebler, L.; Winkler, W. (1940). The Cost of the World War to Germany and to Austria-Hungary. Economic and Social History of the World War. Supplementary. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press for Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: Division of Economics and History. OCLC 254453292.
Gray, Randal (1991). Chronicle of the First World War: 1917–21. II. Oxford/New York: Facts on File. ISBN 978-0-8160-2139-0.
Griffith, Paddy (2004). Fortifications of the Western Front 1914–18. Oxford: Osprey. ISBN 978-1-84176-760-4.
Griffith, Paddy (1994). Battle Tactics of the Western Front: The British Army's Art of Attack 1916–18. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-06663-0.
Griffiths, William R. (1986). Griess, Thomas E., ed. The Great War. Wayne, NJ: Avery. ISBN 978-0-89529-312-1.
Griffiths, William R. (2003). The Great War. Square One. ISBN 978-0-7570-0158-1.
Hamilton, Richard F.; Herwig, Holger H., eds. (2003). The Origins of World War I. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-81735-6.
Hart, Peter (2005). Bloody April: Slaughter in the Skies over Arras, 1917. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. ISBN 978-0-297-84621-5.
Hartesveldt, Fred R. van (2005). The Battles of the British Expeditionary Forces, 1914–1915: Historiography and Annotated Bibliography. Bibliographies of Battles and Leader. Greenwood. ISBN 978-0-313-30625-9.
Hersch, L. (1927). no issn. "La mortalité causée par la guerre mondiale, Metron-" [Causes of Death in the First World War]. The International Review of Statistics. VII.
Herwig, Holger H. (1997). The First World War: Germany and Austria-Hungary, 1914–1918. London: St. Martin's Press. ISBN 978-0-340-67753-7.
Herwig, Holger (1996). "Patriotic Self-Censorship in Germany After the Great War". In Wilson, Keith. Forging the Collective Memory. Berghahn Books. ISBN 978-1-57181-862-1.
Horne, John N.; Kramer, Alan (2001). German Atrocities, 1914: A History of Denial. Newhaven, CT: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-08975-2.
Hosch, William, ed. (2010). World War I: People, Politics, and Power. New York: Britannica Educational. ISBN 978-1-615-30048-8.
Hull, Isabel V. (2005). Absolute Destruction: Military Culture and the Practices of War in Imperial Germany. London: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-84193-1.
Jackson, J. (2001). France: The Dark Years, 1940–1944. London: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-820706-1.
Jones, Simon (2002). World War I Gas Warfare Tactics and Equipment. Oxford: Osprey. ISBN 978-1-84603-151-9.
Jones, Simon; Hook, Richard (2007). World War I Gas Warfare Tactics and Equipment. Oxford: Osprey. ISBN 978-1-84603-151-9.
Kennedy, Paul (1989). The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers. Vintage Books. ISBN 978-0-679-72019-5.
Knox, MacGregor (2007). To the Threshold of Power, 1922/33: Origins and Dynamics of the Fascist and National Socialist Dictatorships. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-87860-9.
Les tués et les disparus [The Dead and the Missing]. International Labour Office: Enquête sur la production. Rapport général [Survey of production. General Report]. Tome 4. Part II. Paris et al.: Berger-Levrault, 1923–25. OCLC 6445561.
Liddle, Peter (2013). Passchendaele in Perspective: The Third Battle of Ypres. London: Leo Cooper. ISBN 978-1-47381-708-1.
Liddle, P. H. (1997). Passchendaele in Perspective: The Third Battle of Ypres. Barnsley: Pen & Sword. ISBN 978-0-85052-588-5.
Lupfer, Timothy T. (July 1981). The Dynamics of Doctrine, The Changes in German Tactical Doctrine During the First World War (PDF). Leavenworth Papers. Fort Leavenworth, KS: US Army Command and General Staff College. OCLC 784236109.
Lyons, Michael J. (2000). World War I: A Short History (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-0-13-020551-3.
Marshall, Samuel L. A. (1964). The American Heritage History of World War I. American Heritage: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-517-38555-5.
Martin, William (2001). Verdun 1916: They Shall Not Pass. Oxford: Osprey. ISBN 978-1-85532-993-5.
Massie, Robert K. (2004). Castles of Steel: Britain, Germany, and the Winning of the Great War at Sea. New York: Ballantine Books. ISBN 978-0-345-40878-5.
Miles, W. (1992) [1938]. Military Operations France and Belgium, 1916: 2nd July 1916 to the End of the Battles of the Somme. History of the Great War Based on Official Documents by Direction of the Historical Section of the Committee of Imperial Defence. II (Imperial War Museum and Battery Press ed.). London: Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-901627-76-6.
Miles, W. (1991) [1991]. Military Operations France and Belgium 1917: The Battle of Cambrai. History of the Great War Based on Official Documents by Direction of the Historical Section of the Committee of Imperial Defence. III (Imperial War Museum & Battery Press ed.). HMSO. ISBN 978-0-89839-162-6.
Murphy, Justin (2005). Military Aircraft, Origins to 1918: An illustrated History of their Impact. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1-85109-488-2.
Neiberg, Michael S. (2003). Foch: Supreme Allied Commander in the Great War. Dulles: Potomac Books. ISBN 9781574885514.
Neiberg, Michael (2004). Warfare and Society in Europe: 1898 to the Present. New York and London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-41532-718-3.
Neiberg, Michael (2008). The Western Front 1914–1916: The History of World War I: From the Schlieffen Plan to Verdun and the Somme. London: Amber Books. ISBN 978-1-90662-612-9.
Palazzo, Albert (2000). Seeking Victory on the Western Front: The British Army and Chemical Warfare in World War I. University of Nebraska Press. ISBN 978-0-8032-8774-7.
Prior, Robin; Wilson, Trevor (2005). The Somme. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-10694-7.
Rawson, Andrw (2014). The Somme Campaign. Barnsley: Pen & Sword. ISBN 978-1-78303-051-4.
Richter, D. (1994). Chemical Soldiers: British Gas Warfare in World War I. London: Leo Cooper. ISBN 978-0-85052-388-1.
Samuels, Martin (1995). Command or Control? Command, Training and Tactics in the British and German Armies, 1888–1918. Psychology Press. ISBN 978-0-7146-4570-4.
Sheffield, Gary (2002) [2001]. Forgotten Victory: The First World War: Myths and Realities (Reprinted ed.). London: Headline Book Publishing. ISBN 978-0-7472-7157-4.
Sheffield, Gary (2014). Command and Morale: The British Army on the Western Front 1914–1918 (eBook ed.). Barnsley, South Yorkshire: Praetorian Press. ISBN 978-1-47383-466-8.
Sheldon, J. (2007). The German Army at Passchendaele. London: Pen and Sword Books. ISBN 978-1-84415-564-4.
Sheldon, J. (2012). The German Army on the Western Front 1915. Barnsley: Pen and Sword Military. ISBN 978-1-84884-466-7.
Smith, Leonard V.; Audoin-Rouzeau, Stéphane; Becker, Annette (2003). France and the Great War, 1914–1918. New Approaches to European History. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-66631-2.
Spick, Mike (2002). The Illustrated Directory of Fighters. Zenith Imprint. ISBN 978-0-7603-1343-5.
Statistics of the Military Effort of the British Empire During the Great War 1914–1920. London: HMSO. 1922. OCLC 924169428. Retrieved 4 March 2017.
Stevenson, D. (2005) [2004]. 1914 1918: The History of the First World War (pbk. Penguin ed.). London: Allen Lane. ISBN 978-0-14-026817-1.
Strachan, H. (2001). The First World War: To Arms. I. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-926191-8.
Terraine, John (2002). Mons: The Retreat to Victory. London: Wordsworth Editions. ISBN 978-1-84022-243-2.
Tucker, Spencer C.; Roberts, Priscilla Mary (2005). Encyclopedia of World War I. Santa Barbara: ABC-Clio. ISBN 1-85109-420-2.
Uffindell, Andrew (2015). The Nivelle Offensive and the Battle of the Aisne 1917: A Battlefield Guide to the Chemin des Dames. Barsnley: Pen and Sword. ISBN 978-1-78303-034-7.
Warner, Philip (2000). The Battle of Loos. Wordsworth Military History. London: Wordsworth Editions. ISBN 978-1-84022-229-6.
Wiest, Andrew A. (2005). Haig: The Evolution of a Commander. London: Brassey's. ISBN 978-1-57488-684-9.
Watson, Alexander (2008). Enduring the Great War: Combat, Morale and Collapse in the German and British Armies, 1914–1918. Cambridge military histories. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-88101-2.
Wise, S. F. (1981). Canadian Airmen and the First World War. The Official History of the Royal Canadian Air Force. I. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. ISBN 978-0-8020-2379-7.
Wynne, G. C. (1976) [1939]. If Germany Attacks: The Battle in Depth in the West (Greenwood Press, NY ed.). London: Faber & Faber. ISBN 978-0-8371-5029-1.
Zuckerman, Larry (2004). The Rape of Belgium: The Untold Story of World War I. New York: New York University Press. ISBN 978-0-8147-9704-4.
Further reading[edit]
Books
Gleason, Arthur (1917). Our Part in the Great War. Burt: University of California. OCLC 12893987.
Skinner, H. T.; Stacke, H. Fitz M. (1922). Principal Events 1914–1918. History of the Great War based on Official Documents by Direction of the Committee of Imperial Defence. London: HMSO. OCLC 17673086. Retrieved 3 March 2017.
Journals
Bailey, George (2005). "Modern Project Management and the Lessons from the Study of the Transformation of the British Expeditionary Force in the Great War". Management Decision. 43 (1): 56–71. doi:10.1108/00251740510572489.
Heller, Charles E. (September 1984). "Chemical Warfare in World War I: The American Experience, 1917–1918". Fort Leavenworth, KS: US Army Command and General Staff College. OCLC 463454950. Retrieved 4 March 2017.
External links[edit]
Library resources about
Western Front (World War I)
Resources in your library
Resources in other libraries
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Western Front theatre of World War I.
Krause, Jonathan: Western Front , in: 1914-1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War.
The Western Front Museum
Articles on the Western Front in Lorraine & Alsace at Battlefields Europe
'That Contemptible Little Army' by E. Alexander Powell. The British Army Seen by an American Journalist in 1916
Watch clips from the Australian War Memorial's collection of films made on the Western Front 1917–1918 on the National Film and Sound Archive's australianscreen online
[show]
v
t
e
World War I
Home fronts
Theatres
European
Balkans
Western Front
Eastern Front
Italian Front
Middle Eastern
Gallipoli
Sinai and Palestine
Caucasus
Persia
Mesopotamia
South Arabia
African
South West
East
Kamerun
Togoland
North
Asian and Pacific
Tsingtao
German New Guinea and Samoa
At sea
North Atlantic U-boat campaign
Mediterranean
North Sea
Baltic
Indian, Pacific and South Atlantic Oceans
Papeete
Madras
Penang
Cocos
Coronel
Falkland Islands
Más a Tierra
Principal
participants
(people)
Entente powers
Belgium
Brazil
China
France
French Empire
Greece
Italy
Japan
Montenegro
Portuguese Empire
Romania
Russia
Russian Empire
Russian Republic
Serbia
United Kingdom
British Empire
United States
Central Powers
Germany
Austria-Hungary
Ottoman Empire
Bulgaria
Timeline
Pre-War conflicts
Scramble for Africa (1880–1914)
Russo-Japanese War (1905)
First Moroccan (Tangier) Crisis (1905–06)
Agadir Crisis (1911)
Italo-Turkish War (1911–12)
French conquest of Morocco (1911–12)
First Balkan War (1912–13)
Second Balkan War (1913)
Prelude
Origins
Sarajevo assassination
Anti-Serb riots in Sarajevo
July Crisis
Autumn 1914
Battle of the Frontiers
Battle of Cer
First Battle of the Marne
Siege of Tsingtao
Battle of Tannenberg
Battle of Galicia
Battle of the Masurian Lakes
Battle of Kolubara
Battle of Sarikamish
Race to the Sea
First Battle of Ypres
1915
Second Battle of the Masurian Lakes
Second Battle of Ypres
Battle of Gallipoli
Second Battle of Artois
Battles of the Isonzo
Gorlice–Tarnów Offensive
Great Retreat
Second Battle of Champagne
Kosovo Offensive
Siege of Kut
Battle of Loos
1916
Erzurum Offensive
Battle of Verdun
Lake Naroch Offensive
Battle of Asiago
Battle of Jutland
Battle of the Somme
first day
Brusilov Offensive
Baranovichi Offensive
Battle of Romani
Monastir Offensive
Battle of Transylvania
1917
Capture of Baghdad
First Battle of Gaza
Zimmermann Telegram
Second Battle of Arras
Second Battle of the Aisne
Kerensky Offensive
Third Battle of Ypres (Passchendaele)
Battle of Mărășești
Battle of Caporetto
Southern Palestine Offensive
Battle of Cambrai
Armistice of Erzincan
1918
Operation Faustschlag
Treaty of Brest-Litovsk
Spring Offensive
Battle of Goychay
Battle of Aghsu
Battle of Kyurdamir
Second Battle of the Marne
Battle of Baku
Hundred Days Offensive
Vardar Offensive
Battle of Megiddo
Third Transjordan attack
Meuse-Argonne Offensive
Battle of Vittorio Veneto
Battle of Aleppo
Armistice of Salonica
Armistice of Mudros
Armistice of Villa Giusti
Armistice with Germany
Other conflicts
Mexican Revolution (1910–20)
Somaliland Campaign (1910–20)
Libyan resistance movement (1911–43)
Maritz Rebellion (1914–15)
Zaian War (1914–21)
Indo-German Conspiracy (1914–19)
Senussi Campaign (1915–16)
Volta-Bani War (1915–17)
Easter Rising (1916)
Anglo-Egyptian Darfur Expedition (1916)
Kaocen Revolt (1916–17)
Central Asian Revolt (1916-17)
Russian Revolution (1917)
Finnish Civil War (1918)
Post-War conflicts
Russian Civil War (1917–21)
Ukrainian–Soviet War (1917–21)
Armenian–Azerbaijani War (1918–20)
Georgian–Armenian War (1918)
German Revolution (1918–19)
Revolutions and interventions in Hungary (1918–20)
Hungarian–Romanian War (1918–19)
Greater Poland Uprising (1918–19)
Estonian War of Independence (1918–20)
Latvian War of Independence (1918–20)
Lithuanian Wars of Independence (1918–20)
Third Anglo-Afghan War (1919)
Egyptian Revolution (1919)
Polish–Ukrainian War (1918–19)
Polish–Soviet War (1919–21)
Irish War of Independence (1919–21)
Turkish War of Independence
Greco-Turkish War (1919–22)
Turkish–Armenian War (1920)
Iraqi revolt (1920)
Polish–Lithuanian War (1920)
Vlora War (1920)
Franco-Syrian War (1920)
Soviet–Georgian War (1921)
Irish Civil War (1922–23)
Aspects
Opposition
Pacifism
Anti-war movement
Deployment
Schlieffen Plan (German)
Plan XVII (French)
Warfare
Military engagements
Naval warfare
Convoy system
Air warfare
Cryptography
Room 40
Horse use
Poison gas
Railways
Strategic bombing
Technology
Trench warfare
Total war
Christmas truce
Last surviving veterans
Civilian impact
Atrocities
Prisoners
Casualties
Economic history
1918 flu pandemic
Destruction of Kalisz
Rape of Belgium
German occupation of Belgium
German occupation of Luxembourg
German occupation of northeastern France
Ober Ost
Ottoman people
Armenian Genocide
Assyrian genocide
Pontic Greek genocide
Urkun (Kyrgyzstan)
Blockade of Germany
Women
Australia
Popular culture
German prisoners of war in the United States
Agreements
Partition of the Ottoman Empire
Sykes–Picot Agreement
Agreement of Saint-Jean-de-Maurienne
French-Armenian Agreement
Damascus Protocol
Paris Peace Conference
Venizelos–Tittoni agreement
Treaties
Treaty of Brest-Litovsk
Treaty of Lausanne
Treaty of London
Treaty of Neuilly
Treaty of St. Germain
Treaty of Sèvres
Treaty of Trianon
Treaty of Versailles
Consequences
Aftermath
"Fourteen Points"
League of Nations
World War I memorials
Centenary
outbreak
Category
Portal
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Western_Front_(World_War_I)&oldid=843634087"
Categories:
Western Front (World War I)
Austria-Hungary in World War I
Military history of Belgium during World War I
British Empire in World War I
France in World War I
German Empire in World War I
Italy in World War I
Portugal in World War I
United Kingdom in World War I
United States in World War I
Military campaigns and theatres of World War I involving Australia
World War I
Campaigns and theatres of World War I
Hidden categories:
EngvarB from March 2017
Use dmy dates from July 2013
CS1: Julian–Gregorian uncertainty
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
In other projects
Wikimedia Commons
Languages
العربية
Беларуская
Беларуская (тарашкевіца)
Български
Català
Čeština
Dansk
Deutsch
Eesti
Español
Esperanto
Français
한국어
Hrvatski
Bahasa Indonesia
Italiano
עברית
Lietuvių
Magyar
Македонски
Nederlands
日本語
Norsk
Polski
Português
Română
Русский
Simple English
Slovenščina
Српски / srpski
Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски
Suomi
Svenska
ไทย
Türkçe
Українська
Tiếng Việt
中文
29 more
Edit links
This page was last edited on 30 May 2018, at 12:27.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

key: html

type: local

value: div

attrs: id class

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

value: a

attrs: id class lang

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

values: jump-to-nav mw-jump

attrs: href title

attrs: role class

values:
note
hatnote navigation-not-searchable

value: th

attrs: class colspan style

value: tr

value: td

attrs: colspan style

value: img

attrs: alt src width height srcset data-file-width data-file-height

values: Canadian tank and soldiers Vimy 1917.jpg

attrs: href class

attrs: alt src width height class srcset data-file-width data-file-height

values: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland

values:
/wiki/Douglas_Haig
mw-redirect
Douglas Haig

values: font-size: 105%; background: transparent; text-align: left;

values: list-style: none none; margin-left: 0px; text-align: left; font-size: 105%; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; line-height: inherit; display: none;

values:
NavFrame collapsed
border: none; padding: 0;
NavFrame1

values:
NavFrame collapsed
border: none; padding: 0;
NavFrame2

values: Template:Campaignbox Western Front (World War I)

values: Template talk:Campaignbox Western Front (World War I)

values: nowraplinks collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner

values:
/wiki/South-West_Africa_campaign
mw-redirect
South-West Africa campaign

values: Military operations in North Africa during World War I

values: Asian and Pacific theatre of World War I

values: Naval warfare in the Mediterranean during World War I

values:
/wiki/First_World_War
mw-redirect
First World War

values:
/wiki/Third_Republic_of_France
mw-redirect
Third Republic of France

values: Treaty of Brest-Litovsk (Russia–Central Powers)

values:
/wiki/Hurricane_bombardment
mw-redirect
Hurricane bombardment

values: Edit section: War plans – Battle of the Frontiers

values:
/wiki/Namur_(city)
mw-redirect
Namur (city)

values: British Expeditionary Force (World War I)

values:
/wiki/Field_Marshal
mw-redirect
Field Marshal

values:
/wiki/Aisne_River
mw-redirect
Aisne River

values:
/wiki/Race_for_the_Sea
mw-redirect
Race for the Sea

values:
/wiki/Vosges_Mountains
mw-redirect
Vosges Mountains

values:
/wiki/Salients,_re-entrants_and_pockets
mw-redirect
Salients, re-entrants and pockets

values:
/wiki/Military_reserves
mw-redirect
Military reserves

values:
/wiki/Chemical_weapons
mw-redirect
Chemical weapons

values:
/wiki/Mustard_gas
mw-redirect
Mustard gas

values:
/wiki/Antiaircraft_warfare
mw-redirect
Antiaircraft warfare

values:
/wiki/Air_superiority
mw-redirect
Air superiority

values:
/wiki/River_Somme
mw-redirect
River Somme

values:
/wiki/Military_unit
mw-redirect
Military unit

values: Tactical development on the Western Front in 1917

values:
/wiki/Aircrew_member
mw-redirect
Aircrew member

values:
/wiki/French_Army_Mutinies
mw-redirect
French Army Mutinies

values: Edit section: American Expeditionary Force

values:
/wiki/Third_Battle_of_Ypres
mw-redirect
Third Battle of Ypres

values:
/wiki/German_Revolution
mw-redirect
German Revolution

values:
/wiki/Wilhelm_II_of_Germany
mw-redirect
Wilhelm II of Germany

values:
wikitable
float: right; margin-left: 1em;

values:
/wiki/Saar_(League_of_Nations)
mw-redirect
Saar (League of Nations)

values: Scuttling of the German fleet in Scapa Flow

values:
/wiki/Casualties_of_World_War_I
mw-redirect
Casualties of World War I

values:
reflist mw-references-wrap
list-style-type: lower-alpha;

values: -moz-column-width: 20em; -webkit-column-width: 20em; column-width: 20em; list-style-type: decimal;

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/869902118

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/988365

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/4945014

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/254453292

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/6445561

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/784236109

values:
/wiki/Samuel_Lyman_Atwood_Marshall
mw-redirect
Samuel Lyman Atwood Marshall

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/924169428

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/12893987

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/17673086

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/463454950

values:
plainlist
padding:0 0.1em 0.4em;text-align:left;

values: float:right;clear:right;width:auto;margin:0 0 1.0em 1.0em;background:#f9f9f9;border:1px solid #aaa;padding:0.2em;border-spacing:0.4em 0;text-align:center;line-height:1.4em;font-size:88%

values: commons:Category:Western Front theatre of World War I

values:
nofollow
http://www.westernfront.nl/
external text

values:
nofollow
http://aso.gov.au/
external text

values:
navbox-abovebelow hlist
2
background-color:#DCDCDC;

values: Military history of Italy during World War I

values: History of the United Kingdom during the First World War

values: Defeat and dissolution of the Ottoman Empire

values: Assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria

values:
/wiki/Battle_of_Aghsu
mw-redirect
Battle of Aghsu

values: Battle of Kyurdamir (page does not exist)

values: Revolutions and interventions in Hungary (1918–20)

values: List of military engagements of World War I

values: List of last World War I veterans by country

values: German occupation of Belgium during World War I

values: German occupation of Luxembourg during World War I

values: German occupation of north-east France during World War I

values: German prisoners of war in the United States

values: Centenary of the outbreak of World War I

values: nowraplinks collapsible collapsed navbox-inner

values: Category:Military history of Belgium during World War I

values: Category:Military campaigns and theatres of World War I involving Australia

values: Category:Campaigns and theatres of World War I

values: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

values: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

values: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

values: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

values:
/wiki/Western_Front_(World_War_I)
View the content page [ctrl-alt-c]
c

values: Discussion about the content page [ctrl-alt-t]

values: p-namespaces navigation vectorTabs p-namespaces-label

values: A list of recent changes in the wiki [ctrl-alt-r]

values: portal navigation p-interaction p-interaction-label

values: List of all English Wikipedia pages containing links to this page [ctrl-alt-j]

values: Recent changes in pages linked from this page [ctrl-alt-k]

values:
/wiki/Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard
Upload files [ctrl-alt-u]
u

values: A list of all special pages [ctrl-alt-q]

values: Permanent link to this revision of the page

values: Link to connected data repository item [ctrl-alt-g]

values: Printable version of this page [ctrl-alt-p]

values: portal navigation p-wikibase-otherprojects p-wikibase-otherprojects-label

values: الجبهة الغربية (الحرب العالمية الأولى) – Arabic

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-ar badge-Q17437796 badge-featuredarticle

values: Заходні фронт Першай сусветнай вайны – Belarusian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-be
display: none;

values: Заходні фронт (Першая сусьветная вайна) – Belarusian (Taraškievica orthography)

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-be-x-old badge-Q17437796 badge-featuredarticle

values: Западен фронт (Първа световна война) – Bulgarian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-bg
display: none;

values: Front occidental (Primera Guerra Mundial) – Catalan

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ca
display: none;

values: Západní fronta (první světová válka) – Czech

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-cs
display: none;

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-da badge-Q17437798 badge-goodarticle

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-de
display: none;

values: Läänerinne (Esimene maailmasõda) – Estonian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-et
display: none;

values: Frente Occidental (Primera Guerra Mundial) – Spanish

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-es
display: none;

values: Okcidenta Fronto (Unua Mondmilito) – Esperanto

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-eo
display: none;

values: Front de l'Ouest (Première Guerre mondiale) – French

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-fr
display: none;

values: 서부 전선 (제1차 세계 대전) – Korean

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ko
display: none;

values: Zapadno bojište (Prvi svjetski rat) – Croatian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-hr
display: none;

values: Front Barat (Perang Dunia I) – Indonesian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-id
display: none;

values: Fronte occidentale (1914-1918) – Italian

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-it badge-Q17437796 badge-featuredarticle

values: החזית המערבית במלחמת העולם הראשונה – Hebrew

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-he
display: none;

values: Vakarų frontas (Pirmasis pasaulinis karas) – Lithuanian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-lt
display: none;

values: Nyugati front (első világháború) – Hungarian

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-hu badge-Q17437796 badge-featuredarticle

values: Западен фронт во Првата светска војна – Macedonian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-mk
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-nl
display: none;

values: 西部戦線 (第一次世界大戦) – Japanese

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ja
display: none;

values: Vestfronten (første verdenskrig) – Norwegian

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-no badge-Q17437798 badge-goodarticle

values: Front zachodni (I wojna światowa) – Polish

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-pl
display: none;

values: Frente Ocidental (Primeira Guerra Mundial) – Portuguese

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-pt badge-Q17437796 badge-featuredarticle

values: Frontul de vest (Primul Război Mondial) – Romanian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ro
display: none;

values: Западный фронт Первой мировой войны – Russian

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-ru badge-Q17437798 badge-goodarticle

values: Western Front (World War I) – Simple English

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-simple
display: none;

values: Zahodna fronta (prva svetovna vojna) – Slovenian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sl
display: none;

values: Западни фронт у Првом светском рату – Serbian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sr
display: none;

values: Zapadni front (Prvi svjetski rat) – Serbo-Croatian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sh
display: none;

values: Länsirintama (ensimmäinen maailmansota) – Finnish

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-fi
display: none;

values: Västfronten under första världskriget – Swedish

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-sv badge-Q17559452 badge-recommendedarticle

values: แนวรบด้านตะวันตก (สงครามโลกครั้งที่หนึ่ง) – Thai

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-th
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-tr
display: none;

values: Західний фронт (Перша світова війна) – Ukrainian

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-uk badge-Q17437798 badge-goodarticle

values: Mặt trận phía Tây (Thế chiến thứ nhất) – Vietnamese

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-vi
display: none;

values: 西方戰線 (第一次世界大戰) – Chinese

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-zh
display: none;

values: All languages (initial selection from common choices by you and others)

values: /static/images/wikimedia-button-1.5x.png 1.5x, /static/images/wikimedia-button-2x.png 2x

values: /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_132x47.png 1.5x, /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_176x62.png 2x

values:
suggestions
display: none; font-size: 13px;

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Western_Front_World_War_I rootpage-Western_Front_World_War_I skin-vector action-view