text:
Biblical manuscript
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Part of a series on the
Bible
Canons and books
[show]
Tanakh
Torah
Nevi'im
Ketuvim
Christian biblical canons
Hebrew Bible
Old Testament (OT)
New Testament (NT)
Deuterocanon
Antilegomena
Chapters and verses
Apocrypha
Jewish
OT
NT
Authorship and development
[show]
Authorship
Dating
Hebrew canon
Old Testament canon
New Testament canon
Documentary hypothesis
Mosaic authorship
Pauline epistles
Petrine epistles
Johannine works
Translations and manuscripts
[hide]
Samaritan Torah
Dead Sea scrolls
Masoretic Text
Targumim
Peshitta
Septuagint
Vulgate
Gothic Bible
Vetus Latina
Luther Bible
English Bibles
Biblical studies[show]
Archeology
Artifacts
Dating

Historicity
Internal consistency

People
Places
Names
Novum Testamentum Graece
Documentary hypothesis
Synoptic problem
NT textual categories
Biblical criticism
Historical
Textual
Source
Form
Redaction
Canonical
Interpretation[show]
Hermeneutics
Pesher
Midrash
Pardes
Allegorical interpretation
Literalism
Prophecy
Inspiration
Perspectives[show]
Gnostic
Islamic
Qur'anic
Muhammad
Inerrancy
Infallibility
Criticism of the Bible
Outline of Bible-related topics
Bible book Bible portal
v
t
e
A biblical manuscript is any handwritten copy of a portion of the text of the Bible. The word Bible comes from the Greek biblia (books); manuscript comes from Latin manu (hand) and scriptum (written). Biblical manuscripts vary in size from tiny scrolls containing individual verses of the Jewish scriptures (see Tefillin) to huge polyglot codices (multi-lingual books) containing both the Hebrew Bible (Tanakh) and the New Testament, as well as extracanonical works.
The study of biblical manuscripts is important because handwritten copies of books can contain errors. The science of textual criticism attempts to reconstruct the original text of books, especially those published prior to the invention of the printing press.
Contents
[hide]
1 Hebrew Bible (or Tanakh) manuscripts
1.1 Extant Tanakh manuscripts
2 New Testament manuscripts
2.1 Transmission
2.2 Manuscript construction
2.3 Script and other features
2.4 Cataloging
2.4.1 Von Soden
2.4.2 Gregory–Aland
2.5 Dating the New Testament manuscripts
2.5.1 Earliest extant manuscripts
2.6 Textual criticism
2.7 Listings
3 Gallery
4 See also
5 Notes
6 References
7 External links
Hebrew Bible (or Tanakh) manuscripts[edit]
A page from the Aleppo Codex, Deuteronomy
Main article: List of Hebrew Bible manuscripts
The Aleppo Codex (c. 920 CE) and Leningrad Codex (c. 1008 CE) were the oldest Hebrew language manuscripts of the Tanakh. In 1947 the finding of the Dead Sea scrolls at Qumran pushed the manuscript history of the Tanakh back a millennium from the two earliest complete codices. Before this discovery, the earliest extant manuscripts of the Old Testament were in Greek in manuscripts such as Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus. Out of the roughly 800 manuscripts found at Qumran, 220 are from the Tanakh. Every book of the Tanakh is represented except for the Book of Esther; however, most are fragmentary. Notably, there are two scrolls of the Book of Isaiah, one complete (1QIsa), and one around 75% complete (1QIsb). These manuscripts generally date between 150 BCE to 70 CE.[1]
Extant Tanakh manuscripts[edit]
Version
Examples
Language
Date of Composition
Oldest Copy
Silver Scrolls Paleo-Hebrew 587-586 BCE[2] (Amulets with the Priestly Blessing recorded in the Book of Numbers)
Dead Sea Scrolls Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek c. 150 BCE – 70 CE c. 150 BCE – 70 CE (fragments)
Septuagint Codex Vaticanus, Codex Sinaiticus and other earlier papyri Greek 300–100 BCE 2nd century BCE (fragments)
4th century CE (complete)
Peshitta Syriac early 5th century CE
Vulgate Codex Amiatinus Latin early 5th century CE
early 8th century CE (complete)
Masoretic Aleppo Codex, Leningrad Codex and other, incomplete MSS Hebrew c. 100 CE 10th century CE (complete)
Samaritan Pentateuch Samaritan Hebrew 200–100 BCE Oldest extant MSS, c. 11th century CE; oldest MSS available to scholars, 16th century CE
Targum Aramaic 500–1000 CE 5th century CE
Coptic Crosby-Schøyen Codex, British Library MS. Oriental 7594 Coptic 3rd or 4th century CE
New Testament manuscripts[edit]
Folio 41v from Codex Alexandrinus contains the Gospel of Luke with decorative tailpiece.
The New Testament has been preserved in more manuscripts than any other ancient work, having over 5,800 complete or fragmented Greek manuscripts, 10,000 Latin manuscripts and 9,300 manuscripts in various other ancient languages including Syriac, Slavic, Gothic, Ethiopic, Coptic and Armenian. The dates of these manuscripts range from c. 125 (the P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 52 papyrus, oldest copy of John fragments) to the introduction of printing in Germany in the 15th century.
There are more manuscripts that preserve the New Testament than there are for any other ancient writing, the exact form of the text preserved in later manuscripts may not be identical to the form of the text as it existed in antiquity but are agreed by most scholars to be 99.5% identical in content, with the differing .5% attributed to minor variations such as spelling. These variations are not seen to affect the meaning or interpretation of NT scriptures and are usually given reference to as in-page footnotes in most of today's bibles.
The difficulty is in where the manuscripts are coming from. Often, especially in monasteries, a manuscript cache is little more than a former manuscript recycling center where imperfect and incomplete copies of manuscripts were stored while the monastery or scriptorium decided what to do with them.[3] There were several options. The first was to simply "wash" the manuscript and reuse it. This was very common in the ancient world and even up into the Middle Ages; such reused manuscripts are called palimpsests. The most famous palimpsest is probably the Archimedes Palimpsest. If this was not done within a short period of time after the papyri was made, then washing it was less likely since the papyri might deteriorate and thus be unusable. When washing was no longer an option, the second choice was burning: since they contained the words of Christ, they were thought to have had a level of sanctity,[3] and burning them was considered more reverent than simply throwing them into a garbage pit (although that was not unheard of as in the case of Oxyrhynchus 840). The third option was simply to leave them in what has become known as a manuscript gravesite. When scholars come across manuscript caches, for example that at Saint Catherine's Monastery in the Sinai (source of the Codex Sinaiticus), or Saint Sabbas Monastery outside Bethlehem, they are not finding libraries, but storehouses of rejected texts[3] (sometimes kept in boxes or back shelves in libraries due to space constraints). These texts were unacceptable because of their scribal errors and contain corrections inside the lines[4] possibly evidence that monastery scribes were comparing them to what must have been a master text. In addition, texts thought to be complete and correct but which had deteriorated due to heavy usage or had missing folios would also be placed in these caches. Once in a cache, insects and humidity would often contribute to the continued deterioration of the documents.[3]
Complete and correctly copied texts would usually be immediately placed in use and thus usually would wear out fairly quickly, requiring repeated recopying. Further, because manuscript copying was highly costly when it required a scribe's attention for extended periods, a manuscript might only be made when commissioned, in which case the size of the parchment, script used, any illustrations (thus raising the effective cost), whether it was one book or a collection of several, etc. would be determined by the one commissioning the work. The idea of stocking extra copies would probably have been considered at best wasteful and unnecessary since the form and presentation of a manuscript were more often than not customized to the aesthetic tastes of the buyer. This is part of the reason why scholars are more likely to find incomplete, and at times conflicting, segments of manuscripts than complete and largely consistent works.[3]
Distribution of Greek manuscripts by century[5]
New Testament manuscripts Lectionaries
Century Papyri Uncials Minuscules Uncials Minuscules
2nd 2 - - - -
2nd/3rd 5 1 - - -
3rd 28 2 - - -
3rd/4th 8 2 - - -
4th 14 14 - 1 -
4th/5th 8 8 - - -
5th 2 36 - 1 -
5th/6th 4 10 - - -
6th 7 51 - 3 -
6th/7th 5 5 - 1 -
7th 8 28 - 4 -
7th/8th 3 4 - - -
8th 2 29 - 22 -
8th/9th - 4 - 5 -
9th - 53 13 113 5
9th/10th - 1 4 - 1
10th - 17 124 108 38
10th/11th - 3 8 3 4
11th - 1 429 15 227
11th/12th - - 33 - 13
12th - - 555 6 486
12th/13th - - 26 - 17
13th - - 547 4 394
13th/14th - - 28 - 17
14th - - 511 - 308
14th/15th - - 8 - 2
15th - - 241 - 171
15th/16th - - 4 - 2
16th - - 136 - 194
Transmission[edit]
The task of copying manuscripts was generally done by scribes who were trained professionals in the arts of writing and bookmaking. Some manuscripts were also proofread, and scholars closely examining a text can sometimes find the original and corrections found in certain manuscripts. In the 6th century, a special room devoted to the practice of manuscript writing and illumination called the scriptorium came into use, typically inside medieval European monasteries. Sometimes a group of scribes would make copies at the same time as one individual read from the text.[6]
Manuscript construction[edit]
An important issue with manuscripts is preservation. The earliest New Testament manuscripts were written on papyrus, made from a reed that grew abundantly in the Nile Delta. This tradition continued as late as the 8th century.[7] Papyrus eventually becomes brittle and deteriorates with age. The dry climate of Egypt allowed some papyrus manuscripts to be partially preserved, but, with the exception of P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 77, no New Testament papyrus manuscript is complete; many consist only of a single fragmented page.[8] Beginning in the fourth century, parchment (also called vellum) began to be a common medium for New Testament manuscripts.[9] It wasn't until the twelfth century that paper (made from cotton or plant fibers), which was invented in first-century China, began to gain popularity in biblical manuscripts.[10]
Of the 476 non-Christian manuscripts dated to the second century, 97% of the manuscripts are in the form of scrolls; however, eight Christian manuscripts are codices. In fact, most New Testament manuscripts are codices. The adaptation of the codex form in non-Christian text did not become dominant until the fourth and fifth centuries, showing a preference for that form amongst early Christians.[11] The considerable length of some New Testament books (such as the Pauline epistles), and the New Testament itself, was not suited to the limited space available on a single scroll; in contrast a codex could be expanded to hundreds of pages.
The beginning of the Gospel of Mark from the Book of Durrow.
Script and other features[edit]
The handwriting found in New Testament manuscripts varies. One way of classifying handwriting is by formality: book-hand vs. cursive. More formal, literary Greek works were often written in a distinctive style of even, capital letters called book-hand. Less formal writing consisted of cursive letters which could be written quickly. Another way of dividing handwriting is between uncial script (or majuscule) and minuscule. The uncial letters were a consistent height between the baseline and the cap height, while the minuscule letters had ascenders and descenders that moved past the baseline and cap height. Generally speaking, the majuscules are earlier than the minuscules, with a dividing line roughly in the 11th century.[12]
The earliest manuscripts had negligible punctuation and breathing marks. The manuscripts also lacked word spacing, so words, sentences, and paragraphs would be a continuous string of letters (scriptio continua), often with line breaks in the middle of words. Bookmaking was an expensive endeavor, and one way to reduce the number of pages used was to save space. Another method employed was to abbreviate frequent words, such as the nomina sacra. Yet another method involved the palimpsest, a manuscript which recycled an older manuscript. Scholars using careful examination can sometimes determine what was originally written on the material of a document before it was erased to make way for a new text (for example Codex Ephraemi Rescriptus and the Syriac Sinaiticus).
The original New Testament books did not have titles, section headings, or verse and chapter divisions. These were developed over the years as "helps for readers". The Eusebian Canons were an early system of division written in the margin of many manuscripts. The Eusebian Canons are a series of tables that grouped parallel stories among the gospels. Starting in the fifth century, subject headings (κεφαλαία) were used.
Manuscripts became more ornate over the centuries, which developed into a rich illuminated manuscript tradition, including the famous Irish Gospel Books, the Book of Kells and the Book of Durrow.
Cataloging[edit]
A page from the Sinope Gospels. The miniature at the bottom shows Jesus healing the blind.
Desiderius Erasmus compiled the first printed edition of the Greek New Testament in 1516, basing his work on several manuscripts because he did not have a single complete work and because each manuscript had small errors. In the 18th century, Johann Jakob Wettstein was one of the first biblical scholars to start cataloging biblical manuscripts. He divided the manuscripts based on the writing used (uncial, minuscule) or format (lectionaries) and based on content (Gospels, Pauline letters, Acts + General epistles, and Revelation). He assigned the uncials letters and minuscules and lectionaries numbers for each grouping of content, which resulted in manuscripts being assigned the same letter or number.[13]
For manuscripts that contained the whole New Testament, such as Codex Alexandrinus (A) and Codex Ephraemi Rescriptus (C), the letters corresponded across content groupings. For significant early manuscripts such as Codex Vaticanus Graecus 1209 (B), which did not contain Revelation, the letter B was also assigned to a later 10th-century manuscript of Revelation, thus creating confusion. Constantin von Tischendorf found one of the earliest, nearly complete copies of the Bible, Codex Sinaiticus, over a century after Wettstein's cataloging system was introduced. Because he felt the manuscript was so important, Von Tischendorf assigned it the Hebrew letter aleph (א). Eventually enough uncials were found that all the letters in the Latin alphabet had been used, and scholars moved on to first the Greek alphabet, and eventually started reusing characters by adding a superscript. Confusion also existed in the minuscules, where up to seven different manuscripts could have the same number or a single manuscript of the complete New Testament could have 4 different numbers to describe the different content groupings.[14]
Von Soden[edit]
Hermann, Freiherr von Soden published a complex cataloging system for manuscripts in 1902-10.[15] He grouped the manuscripts based on content, assigning them a Greek prefix: δ for the complete New Testament, ε for the Gospels, and α for the remaining parts. This grouping was flawed because some manuscripts grouped in δ did not contain Revelation, and many manuscripts grouped in α contained either the general epistles or the Pauline epistles, but not both. After the Greek prefix, Von Soden assigned a numeral that roughly corresponded to a date (for example δ1-δ49 were from before the 10th century, δ150-δ249 for the 11th century). This system proved to be problematic when manuscripts were re-dated, or when more manuscripts were discovered than the number of spaces allocated to a certain century.[16]
Gregory–Aland[edit]
Caspar René Gregory published another cataloging system in 1908 in Die griechischen Handschriften des Neuen Testaments, which is the system still in use today. Gregory divided the manuscripts into four groupings: papyri, uncials, minuscules, and lectionaries. This division is partially arbitrary. The first grouping is based on the physical material (papyrus) used in the manuscripts. The second two divisions are based on script: uncial and minuscule. The last grouping is based on content: lectionary. Most of the papyrus manuscripts and the lectionaries before the year 1000 are written in uncial script. There is some consistency in that the majority of the papyri are very early because parchment began to replace papyrus in the 4th century (although the latest papyri dates to the 8th century). Similarly, the majority of the uncials date to before the 11th century, and the majority of the minuscules to after.[17]
Gregory assigned the papyri a prefix of P, often written in blackletter script ( P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} n), with a superscript numeral. The uncials were given a prefix of the number 0, and the established letters for the major manuscripts were retained for redundancy (e.g. Codex Claromontanus is assigned both 06 and D). The minuscules were given plain numbers, and the lectionaries were prefixed with l often written in script (ℓ). Kurt Aland continued Gregory's cataloging work through the 1950s and beyond. Because of this, the numbering system is often referred to as "Gregory-Aland numbers". The most recent manuscripts added to each grouping are P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 131, 0323, 2928, and ℓ 2463.[18] Due to the cataloging heritage and because some manuscripts which were initially numbered separately were discovered to be from the same codex, there is some redundancy in the list (i.e. the Magdalen papyrus has both the numbers of P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 64 and P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 67).[19]
The majority of New Testament textual criticism deals with Greek manuscripts because scholars believe the original books of the New Testament were written in Greek. The text of the New Testament is also found both translated in manuscripts of many different languages (called versions) and quoted in manuscripts of the writings of the Church Fathers. In the critical apparatus of the Novum Testamentum Graece, a series of abbreviations and prefixes designate different language versions (it for Old Latin, lowercase letters for individual Old Latin manuscripts, vg for Vulgate, lat for Latin, sys for Sinaitic Palimpsest, syc for Curetonian Gospels, syp for the Peshitta, co for Coptic, ac for Akhmimic, bo for Bohairic, sa for Sahidic, arm for Armenian, geo for Georgian, got for Gothic, aeth for Ethiopic, and slav for Old Church Slavonic).[20]
Dating the New Testament manuscripts[edit]
An illustration of a European scribe at work
The New Testament books appear to have been completed within the 1st century. The original manuscripts of the New Testament books have not survived. The autographs were lost or destroyed a long time ago. What survives are copies of the original. Generally speaking, these copies were made centuries after the originals from other copies rather than from the autograph. Paleography, a science of dating manuscripts by typological analysis of their scripts, is the most precise and objective means known for determining the age of a manuscript. Script groups belong typologically to their generation; and changes can be noted with great accuracy over relatively short periods of time. Dating of manuscript material by a radiocarbon dating test requires that a small part of the material be destroyed in the process; it is less accurate than dating from paleography.[21] Both radiocarbon and paleographical dating only give a range of possible dates, and it is still debated just how narrow this range might be. Dates established by radiocarbon dating can present a range of 10 to over 100 years. Similarly, dates established by paleography can present a range of 25 to over 125 years.[22]
Earliest extant manuscripts[edit]
The earliest manuscript of a New Testament text is a business-card-sized fragment from the Gospel of John, Rylands Library Papyrus P52, which may be as early as the first half of the 2nd century. The first complete copies of single New Testament books appear around 200, and the earliest complete copy of the New Testament, the Codex Sinaiticus dates to the 4th century.[23] The following table lists the earliest extant manuscript witnesses for the books of the New Testament.
Book
Earliest extant
manuscripts
Date
Condition
Matthew
P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 1, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 19, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 21, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 25, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 37, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 45, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 53, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 64, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 67, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 70, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 77, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 101, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 103, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 104[24]
c. 150–250 (2nd–3rd century)
Large fragments
Mark
P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 45
c. 250 (3rd century)
Large fragments
Luke
P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 4, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 69, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 75, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 45
c. 175–250 (2nd–3rd century)
Large fragments
John
P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 5, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 6, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 22, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 28, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 39, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 45, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 52, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 66, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 75, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 80, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 90, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 95, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 106
c. 125–250 (2nd–3rd century)
Large fragments
Acts
P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 29, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 38, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 45, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 48, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 53, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 74, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 91
Early 3rd century[25]
Large fragments
Romans
P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 27, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 40, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 46
c. 175–225 (2nd–3rd century)
Fragments
1 Corinthians
P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 14, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 15, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 46
c. 175–225 (2nd–3rd century)
Fragments
2 Corinthians
P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 46
c. 175–225 (2nd–3rd century)
Fragments
Galatians
P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 46
c. 175–225 (2nd–3rd century)
Fragments
Ephesians
P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 46, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 49
c. 175–225 (2nd–3rd century)
Fragments
Philippians
P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 16, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 46
c. 175–225 (2nd–3rd century)
Fragments
Colossians
P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 46
c. 175–225 (2nd–3rd century)
Fragments
1 Thessalonians
P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 30, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 46, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 65
c. 175–225 (2nd–3rd century)
Fragments
2 Thessalonians
P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 30
Early 3rd century
Fragments
1 Timothy
א
c. 350 (4th century)
Complete
2 Timothy
א
c. 350 (4th century)
Complete
Titus
P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 32
c. 200 (late 2nd – early 3rd century)
Fragment
Philemon
P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 87
3rd century
Fragment
Hebrews
P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 12, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 13, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 17, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 46
c. 175–225 (2nd–3rd century)
Fragments
James
P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 20, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 23, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 100
3rd Century
Fragments
1 Peter
P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 81,[24] P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 72
c. 300 (late 3rd – early 4th century)
Fragments
2 Peter
P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 72
c. 300 (late 3rd – early 4th century)
Fragments
1 John
P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 9
3rd century
Fragment
2 John
א
c. 350 (4th century)
Complete
3 John
א
c. 350 (4th century)
Complete
Jude
P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 72, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 78
c. 300 (late 3rd – early 4th century)
Fragments
Revelation
P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 18, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 24, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 47, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 98, P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 115
c. 150–250 (2nd-3rd century)
Fragment
Textual criticism[edit]
Main article: Textual Criticism
Further information: Textual variants in the New Testament and List of Bible verses not included in modern translations
None of the original documents of the New Testament is extant and the existing copies differ from one another. The textual critic seeks to ascertain from the divergent copies which form of the text should be regarded as most conforming to the original.[26] The New Testament has been preserved in three major manuscript traditions: the 4th-century-CE Alexandrian text-type, the Western text-type, and the Byzantine text-type, which includes over 80% of all manuscripts, the majority comparatively very late in the tradition.
Since the mid-19th century, eclecticism, in which there is no a priori bias to a single manuscript, has been the dominant method of editing the Greek text of the New Testament (currently, the United Bible Society, 4th ed. and Nestle-Aland, 27th ed.). In textual criticism, eclecticism is the practice of examining a wide number of text witnesses and selecting the variant that seems best. The result of the process is a text with readings drawn from many witnesses. In a purely eclectic approach, no single witness is theoretically favored. Instead, the critic forms opinions about individual witnesses, relying on both external and internal evidence. Even so, the oldest manuscripts, being of the Alexandrian text-type, are the most favored, and the critical text has an Alexandrian disposition.[27] Modern translations of the New Testament are based on these copies.
Textual scholar Bart D. Ehrman writes: "It is true, of course, that the New Testament is abundantly attested in the manuscripts produced through the ages, but most of these manuscripts are many centuries removed from the originals, and none of them perfectly accurate. They all contain mistakes - altogether many thousands of mistakes. It is not an easy task to reconstruct the original words of the New Testament...."[28] In reference to the textual evidence for the New Testament, Bruce M. Metzger wrote,
In evaluating the significance of these statistics...one should consider, by way of contrast, the number of manuscripts which preserve the text of the ancient classics. Homer's Iliad...is preserved by 457 papyri, 2 uncial manuscripts, and 188 minuscule manuscripts. Among the tragedians the witnesses to Euripides are the most abundant; his extant works are preserved in 54 papyri and 276 parchment manuscripts, almost all of the later dating from the Byzantine period...the time between the composition of the books of the New Testament and the earliest extant copies is relatively brief. Instead of the lapse of a millennium or more, as is the case of not a few classical authors, several papyrus manuscripts of portions of the New Testament are extant which were copies within a century or so after the composition of the original documents.[29][30]
Biblical scholar Gary Habermas adds, "What is usually meant is that the New Testament has far more manuscript evidence from a far earlier period than other classical works. There are just under 6000 NT manuscripts, with copies of most of the NT dating from just 100 years or so after its writing. Classical sources almost always have fewer than 20 copies each and usually date from 700-1400 years after the composition of the work. In this regard, the classics are not as well attested. While this doesn't guarantee truthfulness, it means that it is much easier to reconstruct the New Testament text. Regarding genre, the Gospels are usually taken today to be examples of Roman biographies."[31]
Every year, several New Testament manuscripts handwritten in the original Greek format are discovered. The latest substantial find was in 2008, when 47 new manuscripts were discovered in Albania; at least 17 of them unknown to Western scholars.[32] When comparing one manuscript to another, with the exception of the smallest fragments, no two copies agree completely throughout. There has been an estimate of 400,000 variations among all these manuscripts (from the 2nd to 15th century) which is more than there are words in the New Testament. This is less significant than may appear since it is a comparison across linguistic boundaries. More important estimates focus on comparing texts within languages. Those variations are considerably fewer. The vast majority of these are accidental errors made by scribes, and are easily identified as such: an omitted word, a duplicate line, a misspelling, a rearrangement of words. Some variations involve apparently intentional changes, which often make more difficult a determination of whether they were corrections from better exemplars, harmonizations between readings, or ideologically motivated.[33] Palaeography is the study of ancient writing, and textual criticism is the study of manuscripts in order to reconstruct a probable original text.
Listings[edit]
List of New Testament papyri
List of New Testament uncials
List of New Testament minuscules
List of New Testament lectionaries
List of New Testament Latin manuscripts
Gallery[edit]
This section contains what may be an unencyclopedic or excessive gallery of images. Galleries containing indiscriminate images of the article subject are discouraged; please improve or remove the section accordingly. (March 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Fragments of the Dead Sea scrolls on display at the Archeological Museum, Amman
P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 52 is the oldest known manuscript fragment of the New Testament, containing a portion of the Gospel of John
P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 46 is the earliest (nearly) complete manuscript of the Epistles written by Paul in the new testament.
P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 45 is a manuscript of Gospels and Acts. It contains the earliest known text of Mark. Scholars find it hard to read it because of its fragmentary state.
P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 87 is the earliest known manuscript of Philemon.
P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 37 is a fragment of the Gospel of Matthew containing nomina sacra.
P {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {P}}} 1 is an early third century fragment of the Gospel of Matthew.
Codex Sinaiticus (c. 350) contains the oldest complete copy of the New Testament, as well as most of the Greek Old Testament, known as the Septuagint
Codex Vaticanus Graecus 1209 is one of the best available Greek manuscripts of almost the entire bible.
P. Chester Beatty VI showing portions of Deuteronomy
Uncial 0308 is a fragment of the Book of Revelation.
The first page of the Gothic language Codex Argenteus
folio 5r of the Codex Amiatinus, manuscript of Vulgate
See also[edit]
Bible portal
Dating the Bible
Biblical criticism
Textual criticism
Categories of New Testament manuscripts
Alexandrian text-type
Byzantine text-type
Caesarean text-type
Western text-type
List of major textual variants in the New Testament
Higher Criticism
Manuscript culture
Nag Hammadi library
Fifty Bibles of Constantine
List of Hebrew Bible manuscripts
List of illuminated manuscripts
Notes[edit]
Jump up ^ F. F. Bruce. "The Last Thirty Years". Story of the Bible. ed. Frederic G. Kenyon Retrieved June 19, 2007
Jump up ^ Barkay, G., A.G. Vaughn, M.J. Lundberg and B. Zuckerman, "The Amulets from Ketef Hinnom: A New Edition and Evaluation," Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 334 (2004): 41-71. (An innovation in the report was the simultaneous publication of an accompanying "digital article," a CD version of the article and the images).
^ Jump up to: a b c d e Ehrman 2005
Jump up ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2008-12-31. Retrieved 2008-12-31.
Jump up ^ Aland, p 81
Jump up ^ "Seid". Retrieved 4 October 2014.
Jump up ^ Metzger 2005, pp.3f
Jump up ^ "Waltz". Retrieved 4 October 2014.
Jump up ^ Metzger 2005, pp.3-10
Jump up ^ Aland 1995, p. 77
Jump up ^ "Seid". Retrieved 4 October 2014.
Jump up ^ Metzger 2005, pp. 17-18, 20
Jump up ^ Aland 1995, p. 72
Jump up ^ Aland 1995, pp. 72-73
Jump up ^ Hermann von Soden, Die Schriften des Neuen Testaments, in ihrer ältesten erreichbaren Textgestalt hergestellt auf Grund ihrer Textgeschichte 4 vols., Berlin: Glaue, 1902-1910.
Jump up ^ Aland 1995, pp. 40-41
Jump up ^ Aland 1995, pp. 73-77
Jump up ^ New Testament Virtual Manuscript Room at the University of Münster website
Jump up ^ Aland 1995, pp. 73f
Jump up ^ NA27 1996, pp. 64*-76*
Jump up ^ "Britannica Online: Types of manuscript errors". Retrieved 4 October 2014.
Jump up ^ F. V. Greifenhagen, Egypt on the Pentateuch's Ideological Map.
Jump up ^ Ehrman 2004, pp. 479-480
^ Jump up to: a b Willker, Wieland (17 April 2008). "Complete List of Greek NT Papyri". Archived from the original on 12 March 2014.
Jump up ^ Philip W. Comfort and David P. Barrett. The Text of the Earliest New Testament Greek Manuscripts. Wheaton, Illinois: Tyndale House Publishers Incorporated, 2001, p. 65.
Jump up ^ Bruce M. Metzger, The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration.
Jump up ^ Aland, B. 1994: 138
Jump up ^ The New Testament: An Historical Introduction To The Early Christian Writings, Bart Ehrman p. 449
Jump up ^ The Text Of The New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption & Restoration, 1992, Third Enlarged Edition, Bruce Metzger, p. 33-35
Jump up ^ As a footnote to his comments, Metzger also said, "Lest, however, the wrong impression be conveyed from the statistics given above regarding the total number of Greek manuscripts of the New Testament, it should be pointed out that most of the papyri are relatively fragmentary and that only about fifty manuscripts (of which the Codex Sinaiticus is the only Uncial manuscript) contain the entire New Testament." The Text Of The New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption & Restoration, 1992, Third Enlarged Edition, Bruce Metzger, p. 34
Jump up ^ [Quoted from http://www.garyhabermas.com/qa/qa_index.htm]
Jump up ^ Michelle A Vu, "NT scholar on discovery of giant trove of Bible manuscripts," Christianity Today, April 21, 2008
Jump up ^ Ehrman 2004, pp.480f
References[edit]
Aland, Kurt; Barbara Aland (1995). The Text of The New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism. Translated by Erroll F. Rhodes (2nd ed.). Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. pp. 40f, 72f. ISBN 0-8028-4098-1.
Ehrman, Bart D. (2004). The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings. New York: Oxford. pp. 480f. ISBN 0-19-515462-2.
Metzger, Bruce M. The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption and Restoration, Oxford University Press, 2005. ISBN 0-19-516667-1
Nestle-Aland Novum Testamentum Graece rv. 27 (2006) Hendrickson Publishers, ISBN 1-59856-172-3
Seid, Timothy W. "Interpreting Ancient Manuscripts". Interpreting Ancient Manuscripts Web - Earlham School of Religion. Retrieved 2007-06-19.
Waltz, Robert. "An Introduction to New Testament Textual Criticism". A Site Inspired By: The Encyclopedia of New Testament Textual Criticism. Archived from the original on 18 June 2007. Retrieved 2007-06-19.
Wilson, Robert Dick. (1929) 'The Textual Criticism of the Old Testament', The Princeton Theological Review 27: pp. 40f.
External links[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Bible manuscripts.
Look up manuscript in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
Michael D. Marlowe's Bible Research site
Micheal W. Palmer's Greek-Language.com Manuscripts page
TextCrit.com: Eusebian Canon in Codex A
Biblical Manuscripts Project
Fragment of Psalms at the Heidelberger Papyrus-Sammlung
Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). "Manuscripts of the Bible". Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
Contantinus Siamakis, Oldest Manuscript of the Bible
[hide]
v
t
e
Books of the Bible
Principal
divisions
Hebrew Bible/
Old Testament Protocanon
Genesis
Exodus
Leviticus
Numbers
Deuteronomy
Joshua
Judges
Ruth
1–2 Samuel
1–2 Kings
1–2 Chronicles
Ezra
Nehemiah
Esther
Job
Psalms
Proverbs
Ecclesiastes
Song
Isaiah
Jeremiah
Lamentations
Ezekiel
Daniel
Hosea
Joel
Amos
Obadiah
Jonah
Micah
Nahum
Habakkuk
Zephaniah
Haggai
Zechariah
Malachi
Deuterocanon
and Apocrypha
Catholic
Orthodox
Tobit
Judith
Additions to Esther
1 Maccabees
2 Maccabees
Wisdom
Sirach
Baruch / Letter of Jeremiah
Additions to Daniel (Susanna
Song of the Three Children
Bel and the Dragon)
Orthodox only
1 Esdras
2 Esdras
Prayer of Manasseh
Psalm 151
3 Maccabees
4 Maccabees
Odes
Tewahedo Orthodox
Enoch
Jubilees
1, 2, and 3 Meqabyan
Paralipomena of Baruch
Broader canon
Syriac
Letter of Baruch
2 Baruch
Psalms 152–155
New Testament
Matthew
Mark
Luke
John
Acts
Romans
1 Corinthians
2 Corinthians
Galatians
Ephesians
Philippians
Colossians
1 Thessalonians
2 Thessalonians
1 Timothy
2 Timothy
Titus
Philemon
Hebrews
James
1 Peter
2 Peter
1 John
2 John
3 John
Jude
Revelation
Subdivisions
Chapters and verses
Pentateuch
Wisdom
Major / Minor prophets
Gospels (Synoptic)
Epistles (Pauline
Johannine
Pastoral
Catholic)
Apocalyptic literature
Development
Old Testament canon
New Testament canon
Antilegomena
Jewish canon
Christian canon
Manuscripts
Dead Sea Scrolls
Samaritan Pentateuch
Septuagint
Targum
Diatessaron
Muratorian fragment
Peshitta
Vetus Latina
Masoretic Text
New Testament manuscript categories
New Testament papyri
New Testament uncials
See also
Biblical canon
Authorship
English Bible translations
Other books referenced in the Bible
Pseudepigrapha (list)
New Testament apocrypha
Studies
Synod of Hippo
Textual criticism
Category
Portal
WikiProject
Book
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Biblical_manuscript&oldid=800165641"
Categories:
Biblical manuscripts
Scribes
Textual scholarship
Hidden categories:
Articles incorporating a citation from the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia with Wikisource reference
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
In other projects
Wikimedia Commons
Languages
العربية
Български
Català
Deutsch
Español
فارسی
Français
Hrvatski
Bahasa Indonesia
Interlingua
Nederlands
Português
Русский
Simple English
Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски
Suomi
اردو
中文
Edit links
This page was last edited on 11 September 2017, at 21:29.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

key: html

type: local

value: div

attrs: id class

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

attrs: id class style

value: a

attrs: id class lang

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

values: jump-to-nav mw-jump

attrs: href title

value: td

value: tr

value: th

value: img

attrs: alt src width height srcset data-file-width data-file-height

attrs: href class title

values:
/wiki/File:Bible.malmesbury.arp.jpg
image
The Malmesbury Bible

value: ul

values: font-size: 105%; padding: 0.2em 0px 0.4em; text-align: center; display: none;

values: Development of the Christian biblical canon

values: List of artifacts in biblical archaeology

values: List of biblical figures identified in extra-biblical sources

values: float:right;clear:right;width:22.0em;margin:0 0 1.0em 1.0em;background:#f9f9f9;border:1px solid #aaa;padding:0.2em;border-spacing:0.4em 0;text-align:center;line-height:1.4em;font-size:88%;border-collapse:collapse; border-spacing:0px; border:none; width:100%; margin:0px; font-size:100%; clear:none; float:none

values:
/wiki/Gnosticism_and_the_New_Testament
mw-redirect
Gnosticism and the New Testament

attrs: alt src width height class srcset data-file-width data-file-height

values: padding:0.3em 0.4em 0.3em;font-weight:bold;border-top: 1px solid #aaa; border-bottom: 1px solid #aaa;

values: Edit section: Hebrew Bible (or Tanakh) manuscripts

values:
/wiki/Dead_Sea_scrolls
mw-redirect
Dead Sea scrolls

values: List of the Coptic New Testament manuscripts

values: British Library MS. Oriental 7594 (page does not exist)

values:
/wiki/Ge%27ez_language
mw-redirect
Ge'ez language

values: vertical-align: -0.838ex; width:1.935ex; height:2.676ex;

values:
/wiki/Oxyrhynchus_840
mw-redirect
Oxyrhynchus 840

values:
/wiki/New_Testament_papyrus
mw-redirect
New Testament papyrus

values:
/wiki/List_of_New_Testament_minuscules
mw-redirect
List of New Testament minuscules

values: wikt:κεφαλαία

values:
/wiki/Desiderius_Erasmus
mw-redirect
Desiderius Erasmus

values:
/wiki/General_epistles
mw-redirect
General epistles

values:
/wiki/Codex_Vaticanus_Graecus_1209
mw-redirect
Codex Vaticanus Graecus 1209

values:
/wiki/Sinaitic_Palimpsest
mw-redirect
Sinaitic Palimpsest

values: Edit section: Dating the New Testament manuscripts

values: Edit section: Earliest extant manuscripts

values:
/wiki/1_Corinthians
mw-redirect
1 Corinthians

values:
/wiki/2_Corinthians
mw-redirect
2 Corinthians

values:
/wiki/1_Thessalonians
mw-redirect
1 Thessalonians

values:
/wiki/2_Thessalonians
mw-redirect
2 Thessalonians

values:
/wiki/Textual_Criticism
mw-redirect
Textual Criticism

values:
plainlinks metadata ambox ambox-style
presentation

values: display:table-cell;padding:0.2em 0.2em 0.2em 0.3em;vertical-align:middle

values: margin:0.5em 0 0.5em 1em;border:solid #aaa 1px

values:
/wiki/Higher_Criticism
mw-redirect
Higher Criticism

values:
nofollow
http://www.codexsinaiticus.org/en/
external text

values:
nofollow
external text
http://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/liste

values:
/wiki/Bruce_Metzger
mw-redirect
Bruce Metzger

values: -moz-column-width: 30em; -webkit-column-width: 30em; column-width: 30em; list-style-type: decimal;

values: International Standard Book Number (identifier)

values:
nofollow
external text
http://alpha.reltech.org/BibleMSS.html

values: wikisource:Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Manuscripts of the Bible

values: The Prayer of Azariah and Song of the Three Holy Children

values:
/wiki/Minor_prophet
mw-redirect
Minor prophet

values: Non-canonical books referenced in the Bible

values: nowraplinks hlist collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner

values: Category:Articles incorporating a citation from the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia with Wikisource reference

values: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

values: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

values: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

values: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

values:
/wiki/Biblical_manuscript
View the content page [ctrl-alt-c]
c

values: Discussion about the content page [ctrl-alt-t]

values: p-namespaces navigation vectorTabs p-namespaces-label

values:
p-variants
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-variants-label

values: Past revisions of this page [ctrl-alt-h]

values: p-views navigation vectorTabs p-views-label

values:
p-cactions
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-cactions-label

values:
mw-wiki-logo
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page

values:
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page [ctrl-alt-z]
z

values: Featured content – the best of Wikipedia

values: Find background information on current events

values:
/wiki/Special:Random
Load a random article [ctrl-alt-x]
x

values: portal navigation p-navigation p-navigation-label

values: Guidance on how to use and edit Wikipedia

values: About the project, what you can do, where to find things

values: A list of recent changes in the wiki [ctrl-alt-r]

values: portal navigation p-interaction p-interaction-label

values: List of all English Wikipedia pages containing links to this page [ctrl-alt-j]

values: Recent changes in pages linked from this page [ctrl-alt-k]

values:
/wiki/Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard
Upload files [ctrl-alt-u]
u

values: A list of all special pages [ctrl-alt-q]

values: Permanent link to this revision of the page

values: Link to connected data repository item [ctrl-alt-g]

values: Printable version of this page [ctrl-alt-p]

values: portal navigation p-wikibase-otherprojects p-wikibase-otherprojects-label

values:
uls-settings-trigger
Language settings
0
button
true

values: مخطوطات الكتاب المقدس – Arabic

values: Библейски ръкопис – Bulgarian

values: Katalogisierung biblischer Handschriften – German

values: دست‌نوشته‌های کتاب مقدس – Persian

values: Рукописи Библии – Russian

values: بائبلی مخطوطات – Urdu

values: /static/images/wikimedia-button-1.5x.png 1.5x, /static/images/wikimedia-button-2x.png 2x

values: /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_132x47.png 1.5x, /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_176x62.png 2x

values:
suggestions
display: none; font-size: 13px;

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Biblical_manuscript rootpage-Biblical_manuscript skin-vector action-view