text:
History of the United Kingdom during the First World War
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is about the effect of the war on civilian and military life in the United Kingdom, 1914–18. For information on the engagements in which its armed forces fought, see First World War.
See also: Timeline of the United Kingdom home front during the First World War
Britain in the First World War
1914 – 1918 (1919)
British First World War propaganda poster
Preceded by
Edwardian era
Followed by
Interwar Britain
Monarch(s)
George V
Leader(s)
Civil[show]
H. H. Asquith
David Lloyd George
Army[show]
William Robertson
John French
Douglas Haig
Royal Navy[show]
Jackie Fisher
Henry Jackson
John Jellicoe
Rosslyn Wemyss
RNAS & RFC[show]
David Henderson
Frederick Sykes
Hugh Trenchard
Godfrey Paine
Timeline of the United Kingdom
during the First World War
1914
1915
1916
1917
1918
Periods in English history
[hide]
Prehistoric Britain until c. 43
Roman Britain c. 43–410
Anglo-Saxon c. 500–1066
Norman 1066–1154
Plantagenet 1154–1485
Tudor 1485–1603
Elizabethan
1558–1603
Stuart 1603–1714
Jacobean
1603–1625
Caroline
1625–1649
(Interregnum)
1649–1660
Restoration
1660–1714
Georgian 1714–1837
Regency
1811–1837
Victorian 1837–1901
Edwardian 1901–1914
First World War 1914–1918
Interwar Britain 1918–1939
Second World War 1939–1945
See also
Political history (1945–present)
Social history (1945–present)
Timeline
v
t
e
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland was one of the Allied Powers during the First World War of 1914–1918, fighting against the Central Powers (the German Empire,[1] the Austro-Hungarian Empire,[2] the Ottoman Empire[3] and the Kingdom of Bulgaria[4]). The state's armed forces were reorganised—the war marked the founding of the Royal Air Force, for example—and increased in size because of the introduction, in January 1916, of conscription for the first time in the country's history as well as the raising of what was, at the time, the largest all-volunteer army in history, known as Kitchener's Army, of more than 2,000,000 men.[5]:504 The outbreak of war has generally been regarded as a socially unifying event,[6] although this view has been challenged by more recent scholarship. In any case, responses in Great Britain in 1914 were similar to those amongst populations across Europe.[7]
On the eve of war, there was serious domestic unrest in the UK (amongst the labour and suffrage movements and especially in Ireland) but much of the population rapidly rallied behind the government. Significant sacrifices were made in the name of defeating the Empire's enemies and many of those who could not fight contributed to philanthropic and humanitarian causes. Fearing food shortages and labour shortfalls, the government passed legislation such as the Defence of the Realm Act 1914, to give it new powers. The war saw a move away from the idea of "business as usual" under Prime Minister H. H. Asquith,[8] and towards a state of total war (complete state intervention in public affairs) under the premiership of David Lloyd George;[9] the first time this had been seen in Britain. The war also witnessed the first aerial bombardments of cities in Britain.
Newspapers played an important role in maintaining popular support for the war.[10] Large quantities of propaganda were produced by the government under the guidance of such journalists as Charles Masterman and newspaper owners such as Lord Beaverbrook. By adapting to the changing demographics of the workforce (or the "dilution of labour", as it was termed), war-related industries grew rapidly, and production increased, as concessions were quickly made to trade unions.[11] In that regard, the war is also credited by some with drawing women into mainstream employment for the first time.[12] Debates continue about the impact the war had on women's emancipation, given that a large number of women were granted the vote for the first time in 1918. The experience of individual women during the war varied; much depended on locality, age, marital status and occupation.[13][14]
The civilian death rate rose due to food shortages and Spanish Flu, which hit the country in 1918.[15] Military deaths are estimated to have exceeded 850,000.[16] The Empire reached its zenith at the conclusion of peace negotiations.[17] However, the war heightened not only imperial loyalties but also individual national identities in the Dominions (Canada, Newfoundland, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa) and India. Irish nationalists after 1916 moved from collaboration with London to demands for immediate independence (see Easter Rising), a move given great impetus by the Conscription Crisis of 1918.[18]
Military historians continue to debate matters of tactics and strategy. However, in terms of memory of the war, historian Adrian Gregory argues that:
"The verdict of popular culture is more or less unanimous. The First World War was stupid, tragic and futile. The stupidity of the war has been a theme of growing strength since the 1920s. From Robert Graves, through 'Oh! What a Lovely War' to 'Blackadder Goes Forth,' the criminal idiocy of the British High Command has become an article of faith."[19]
Contents
[hide]
1 Government
1.1 Asquith as Prime Minister
1.2 Lloyd George as Prime Minister
1.3 Collapse of the Liberal Party
1.4 Finance
2 Monarchy
3 Defence of the Realm Act
4 Armed forces
4.1 Army
4.2 Royal Navy
4.3 British air services
5 Recruitment and conscription
5.1 Conscription Crisis of 1918
5.2 Conscientious objectors
6 Naval and air raids
6.1 Naval raids
6.2 Bombardment of Yarmouth and Lowestoft
6.3 Air raids
7 Media
7.1 Propaganda
7.2 Newspapers
7.3 News magazines
7.4 Music
7.5 War poets
8 Economy
8.1 Rationing
8.2 Industry
8.3 Labour
8.4 Energy
9 Social change
10 Regional conditions
11 Casualties
12 Legacy and memory
13 See also
14 References
15 External links
16 Further reading
17 Surveys, primary sources
17.1 Politics
17.2 Empire
17.3 Economics
17.4 Propaganda and popular culture
17.5 Year books
17.6 Women, family and society
17.7 Historiography and memory
Government[edit]
Further information: Causes of World War I
H. H. Asquith (c. 1915), Prime Minister at the beginning of the war
Asquith as Prime Minister[edit]
Main article: Asquith coalition ministry
On 4 August, the King took Britain (and his Empire) into the Great War with H. H. Asquith of the Liberal Party as Prime Minister. Britain's reasons for declaring war were complex.
The ostensible reason given was that Britain was required to safeguard Belgium's neutrality under the 1839 Treaty of London. The German invasion of Belgium was, therefore, the casus belli and, importantly, legitimized and galvanized popular support for the war.
Strategic risk posed by German control of the Belgian and ultimately French coast was considered unacceptable. German guarantees of post-war behaviour were cast into doubt by her blasé treatment of Belgian neutrality. However, the Treaty of London had not committed Britain on her own to safeguard Belgium's neutrality. Moreover, naval war planning demonstrated that Britain herself would have violated Belgian neutrality by blockading her ports (to prevent imported goods passing to Germany) in the event of war with Germany.
Rather Britain's relationship with her Entente partners, both France and Russia, were equally significant factors. The Foreign Secretary Edward Grey argued that the secret naval agreements with France (although they had not been approved by the Cabinet) created a moral obligation vis a vis Britain and France. What is more, in the event that Britain abandoned its Entente friends, it was feared that if Germany won the war, or the Entente won without British support, then, either way, Britain would be left without any friends. This would have left both Britain and her Empire vulnerable to attack.
British Foreign office mandarin Eyre Crowe said:
"Should the war come, and England stand aside, one of two things must happen. (a) Either Germany and Austria win, crush France and humiliate Russia. What will be the position of a friendless England? (b) Or France and Russia win. What would be their attitude towards England? What about India and the Mediterranean?"[20]:544
The Liberal Party might have survived a short war, but the totality of the Great War called for strong measures that the Party had long rejected. The result was the permanent destruction of ability of the Liberal Party to lead a government. Historian Robert Blake explains the dilemma:
the Liberals were traditionally the party of freedom of speech, conscience and trade. They were against jingoism, heavy armaments and compulsion....Liberals were neither wholehearted nor unanimous about conscription, censorship, the Defence of the Realm Act, severity toward aliens and pacifists, direction of labour and industry. The Conservatives... had no such misgivings.[21]
Blake further notes that it was the Liberals, not the Conservatives who needed the moral outrage of Belgium to justify going to war, while the Conservatives called for intervention from the start of the crisis on the grounds of realpolitik and the balance of power.[22]
Asquith's Liberal government was brought down in May 1915, due in particular to a crisis in inadequate artillery shell production. the protest resignation of Jackie Fisher, and the humiliating failure of the Gallipoli Campaign against Turkey. Reluctant to face doom in an election, Asquith formed a new coalition government on 25 May, with the majority of the new cabinet coming from his own Liberal party and the Unionist (Conservative) party, along with a token Labour representation. The new government lasted a year and a half, and was the last time Liberals controlled the government.[23]
Lloyd George as Prime Minister[edit]
Main article: Lloyd George ministry
This coalition government lasted until 1916, when the Unionists became dissatisfied with Asquith and the Liberals' conduct of affairs, particularly over the Battle of the Somme.[24] Asquith's opponents now took control, led by Bonar Law (leader of the Conservatives), Sir Edward Carson (leader of the Ulster Unionists), and David Lloyd George (then a minister in the cabinet). Law, who had few allies outside his own party, lacked sufficient support to form a new coalition; the Liberal Lloyd George, on the other hand, enjoyed much wider support and duly formed a majority-Conservative coalition government with Lloyd George Liberals and Labour. Asquith was still the party head but he and his followers moved to the opposition benches in Parliament.[25]
Lloyd George immediately set about transforming the British war effort, taking firm control of both military and domestic policy.[26][27] In the first 235 days of its existence, the War Cabinet met 200 times.[9] Its creation marked the transition to a state of total war—the idea that every man, woman and child should play his or her part in the war effort. Moreover, it was decided that members of the government should be the men who controlled the war effort, primarily utilising the power they had been given under the Defence of the Realm Act.[9] For the first time, the government could react quickly, without endless bureaucracy to tie it down, and with up-to-date statistics on such matters as the state of the merchant navy and farm production.[9] The policy marked a distinct shift away from Asquith's initial policy of laissez-faire,[8] which had been characterised by Winston Churchill's declaration of "business as usual" in November 1914.[28] The success of Lloyd George's government can also be attributed to a general lack of desire for an election, and the practical absence of dissent that this brought about.[29]
David Lloyd George (c. 1920), prime minister at the end of the war
In rapid succession in spring 1918 came a series of military and political crises.[30] The Germans, having moved troops from the Eastern front and retrained them in new tactics, now had more soldiers on the Western Front than the Allies. On 21 March 1918 Germany launched a full scale Spring Offensive against the British and French lines, hoping for victory on the battlefield before United States troops arrived in large numbers. The Allied armies fell back 40 miles in confusion, and facing defeat London realized it needed more troops to fight a mobile war. Lloyd George found half a million soldiers and rushed them to France, asked American President Woodrow Wilson for immediate help, and agreed to the appointment of the French Marshal Foch as commander in chief on the Western Front, so that Allied forces could be coordinated to handle the German offensive.[31]
Despite strong warnings that it was a bad idea, the War Cabinet decided to impose conscription on Ireland in 1918. The main reason was that labour in Britain demanded it as the price for cutting back on exemptions for certain workers. Labour wanted the principle established that no one was exempt, but it did not demand that conscription should actually take place in Ireland. The proposal was enacted, but never enforced. The Roman Catholic bishops for the first time entered the fray, calling for open resistance to compulsory military service, while the majority of Irish nationalists moved to supporting the intransigent Sinn Féin movement (away from the constitutional Irish National Party). This proved a decisive moment, marking the end of Irish willingness to stay inside the Union.[32][33]
On 7 May 1918, a senior army officer on active duty, Major-General Sir Frederick Maurice, prompted a second crisis when he went public with allegations that Lloyd George had lied to Parliament on military matters. Asquith, the Liberal leader in the House, took up the allegations and attacked Lloyd George (also a Liberal). While Asquith's presentation was poor, Lloyd George vigorously defended his position, treating the debate as a vote of confidence. He won over the House with a powerful refutation of Maurice's allegations. The main results were to strengthen Lloyd George, weaken Asquith, end public criticism of overall strategy, and strengthen civilian control of the military.[34][35] Meanwhile, the German offensive stalled and was ultimately reversed. Victory came on 11 November 1918.[36]
Historian George H. Cassar has evaluated Lloyd George's legacy as a war leader:
After all that has been said and done, what are we to make of Lloyd George’s legacy as a war leader? On the home front he achieved varied results in tackling difficult, and in some instances, unprecedented problems. It would be hard to have improved on his dealings with labour and the program to increase homegrown food, but in the sectors of manpower, price control and food distribution he adopted the same approach as his predecessor, taking action only in response to the changing nature of the conflict. In the vital area of national morale, while he did not have the technical advantages of Churchill, his personal conduct damaged his ability to do more to inspire the nation. All things considered, it is unlikely that any of his political contemporaries could have handled matters at home as effectively as he did, although it can be argued that if someone else had been in charge, the difference would not have been sufficient to change the final outcome. In his conduct of the war he did advance the cause of the Entente significantly in some ways, but in determining strategy, one of the most important tasks for which a prime minister must be responsible, he was undeniably a failure. To sum up, while Lord George's contributions outweighed his mistakes, the margin is too narrow, in my opinion, to include him In the pantheon of Britain's outstanding war leaders.[37]
Collapse of the Liberal Party[edit]
In the general election of 1918, Lloyd George, "the Man Who Won the War", led his coalition into another khaki election and won a sweeping victory over the Asquithian Liberals and the newly emerging Labour Party. Lloyd George and the Conservative leader Bonar Law wrote a joint letter of support to candidates to indicate they were considered the official Coalition candidates – this "coupon", as it became known, was issued to opponents of many sitting Liberal MPs, devastating the incumbents.[38] Asquith and most of his Liberal colleagues lost their seats. Lloyd George was increasingly under the influence of the rejuvenated Conservative party. The Liberal party never recovered.[39]
Finance[edit]
Before the war, the government spent 13 percent of gross national product (GNP); in 1918 it spent 59 percent of GNP. The war was financed by borrowing large sums at home and abroad, by new taxes, and by inflation. It was implicitly financed by postponing maintenance and repair, and cancelling unneeded projects.[40] The government avoided indirect taxes because they raised the cost of living, and caused discontent among the working class. In 1913-14, indirect taxes on tobacco and alcohol yielded £75 million, while direct taxes yielded £88 million, including an income tax of £44 million and estate duties of £22 million. That is, 54 percent of revenue came from direct taxes; by 1918, direct taxes were 80 percent of revenue.[41] There was a strong emphasis on being "fair" and being "scientific." The public generally supported the heavy new taxes, with minimal complaints. The Treasury rejected proposals for a stiff capital levy, which the Labour Party wanted to use to weaken the capitalists. Instead, there was an excess profits tax, of 50 percent of profits above the normal prewar level; the rate was raised to 80 percent in 1917.[42][43] Excise taxes were added on luxury imports such as automobiles, clocks and watches. There was no sales tax or value added tax. The main increase in revenue came from income tax, which in 1915 went up to 3s. 6d in the pound (17.5%), and individual exemptions were lowered. The income tax rate grew to 5s in the pound (25%) in 1916, and 6s (30%) in 1918. Altogether, taxes provided at most 30 percent of national expenditure, with the rest from borrowing. The national debt soared from £625 million to £7,800 million. Government bonds typically paid five percent. Inflation escalated so that the pound in 1919 purchased only a third of the basket it had purchased it 1914. Wages were laggard, and the poor and retired were especially hard hit.[44][45]
Monarchy[edit]
"A good riddance"
A 1917 Punch cartoon depicts King George sweeping away his German titles.
Further information: George V § First World War
The British Royal Family faced a serious problem during the First World War because of its blood ties to the ruling family of Germany, Britain's prime adversary in the war. Before the war, the British royal family had been known as the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. In 1910, George V became King on the death of his father, King Edward VII, and remained king throughout the war. He was the first cousin of the German Kaiser Wilhelm II, who came to symbolise all the horrors of the war. Queen Mary, although British like her mother, was the daughter of the Duke of Teck, a descendant of the German Royal House of Württemberg. During the war H. G. Wells wrote about Britain's "alien and uninspiring court", and George famously replied: "I may be uninspiring, but I'll be damned if I'm alien."[46]
On 17 July 1917, to appease British nationalist feelings, King George issued an Order in Council that changed the name of the British Royal Family to the House of Windsor. He specifically adopted Windsor as the surname for all descendants of Queen Victoria then living in Britain, excluding women who married into other families and their descendants.[47] He and his relatives who were British subjects relinquished the use of all German titles and styles, and adopted English surnames. George compensated several of his male relatives by creating them British peers. Thus, his cousin, Prince Louis of Battenberg, became the Marquess of Milford Haven, while his brother-in-law, the Duke of Teck, became the Marquess of Cambridge. Others, such as Princess Marie Louise of Schleswig-Holstein and Princess Helena Victoria of Schleswig-Holstein, simply stopped using their territorial designations. The system for titling members of the royal family was also simplified.[48] Relatives of the British royal family who fought on the German side were simply cut off; their British peerages were suspended by a 1919 Order in Council under the provisions of the Titles Deprivation Act 1917.[49]
King George V (right) with his first cousin Tsar Nicholas II, Berlin, 1913
Developments in Russia posed another set of issues for the monarchy. Tsar Nicholas II of Russia was King George's first cousin and the two monarchs looked very much alike.[50] When Nicholas was overthrown in the Russian Revolution of 1917, the liberal Russian Government asked that the tsar and his family be given asylum in Britain. The cabinet agreed but the king was worried that public opinion was hostile and said no. It is likely the tsar would have refused to leave Russia in any case. He remained and in 1918 he and his family were ordered killed by Lenin, the Bolshevik leader.[51][52]
The Prince of Wales – the future Edward VIII – was keen to participate in the war but the government refused to allow it, citing the immense harm that would occur if the heir to the throne were captured.[53] Despite this, Edward witnessed trench warfare at first hand and attempted to visit the front line as often as he could, for which he was awarded the Military Cross in 1916. His role in the war, although limited, led to his great popularity among veterans of the conflict.[54][55]
King George V and his son the Prince of Wales visiting the Grand Fleet in 1918. From left to right: Admiral David Beatty, RN; Rear Admiral Hugh Rodman, USN; King George V; Prince of Wales; Vice Admiral William S. Sims, USN
Other members of the royal family were similarly involved. Prince Albert, Duke of York (later George VI), was commissioned in the Royal Navy and saw action as a turret officer aboard HMS Collingwood at the battle of Jutland but saw no further action in the war, largely because of ill health.[56] Princess Mary, the King's only daughter, visited hospitals and welfare organisations with her mother, assisting with projects to give comfort to British servicemen and assistance to their families. One of these projects was Princess Mary's Christmas Gift Fund, through which £162,000 worth of gifts was sent to all British soldiers and sailors for Christmas 1914.[57] She took an active role in promoting the Girl Guide movement, the Voluntary Aid Detachment (VAD), the Land Girls and in 1918, she took a nursing course and went to work at Great Ormond Street Hospital.[58]
Defence of the Realm Act[edit]
Main article: Defence of the Realm Act 1914
The first Defence of the Realm Act (DORA) was passed on 8 August 1914, during the early weeks of the war,[59] though in the next few months its provisions were extended.[60] It gave the government wide-ranging powers,[60] such as the ability to requisition buildings or land needed for the war effort.[61] Some of the things the British public were prohibited from doing included loitering under railway bridges,[62] feeding wild animals[63] and discussing naval and military matters.[64] British Summer Time was also introduced.[65] Alcoholic beverages were now to be watered down, pub closing times were brought forward from 12.30 am to 10 pm, and, from August 1916, Londoners were no longer able to whistle for a cab between 10 pm and 7 am.[65] It has been criticised for both its strength and its use of the death penalty as a deterrent[66] – although the act itself did not refer to the death penalty, it made provision for civilians breaking these rules to be tried in army courts martial, where the maximum penalty was death.[67]
Armed forces[edit]
Army[edit]
August 1914: London army volunteers await their pay at St. Martin-in-the-Fields
The British Army during World War I was small in size when compared to the other major European powers. In 1914, the British had a small, largely urban English, volunteer force[68] of 400,000 soldiers, almost half of whom were posted overseas to garrison the British Empire. (In August 1914, 74 of the 157 infantry battalions and 12 of the 31 cavalry regiments were posted overseas.[5]:504) This total included the Regular Army and reservists in the Territorial Force.[5]:504 Together they formed the British Expeditionary Force (BEF),[69] for service in France and became known as the Old Contemptibles. The mass of volunteers in 1914–1915, popularly known as Kitchener's Army, was destined to go into action at the battle of the Somme.[5]:504 In January 1916, conscription was introduced, and by the end of 1918, the army had reached its peak of strength of four million men.[5]:504
Royal Navy[edit]
Further information: Naval warfare of World War I
Ships of the 2nd Battle Squadron of the Royal Navy's Grand Fleet
The Royal Navy at the start of the war was the largest navy in the world due, for the most part, to the Naval Defence Act 1889 and the two-power standard which called for the navy to maintain a number of battleships such as their strength was at least equal to the combined strength of the next two largest navies in the world, which at that point were France and Russia.[70]
The major part of the Royal Navy's strength was deployed at home in the Grand Fleet, with the primary aim of drawing the German High Seas Fleet into an engagement. No decisive victory ever came. The Royal Navy and the German Imperial Navy did come into contact, notably in the Battle of Heligoland Bight, and at the Battle of Jutland.[71] In view of their inferior numbers and firepower, the Germans devised a plan to draw part of the British fleet into a trap and put it into effect at Jutland in May 1916, but the result was inconclusive. In August 1916, the High Seas Fleet tried a similar enticement operation and was "lucky to escape annihilation".[72] The lessons learned by the Royal Navy at Jutland made it a more effective force in the future.[72]
In 1914, the navy had also formed the 63rd (Royal Naval) Division from reservists, and this served extensively in the Mediterranean and on the Western Front.[73] Almost half of the Royal Navy casualties during the War were sustained by this division, fighting on land and not at sea.[71]
British air services[edit]
Further information: Royal Flying Corps and Royal Naval Air Service
Royal Flying Corps recruitment poster
At the start of the war, the Royal Flying Corps (RFC), commanded by David Henderson, was sent to France and was first used for aerial spotting in September 1914, but only became efficient when they perfected the use of wireless communication at Aubers Ridge on 9 May 1915. Aerial photography was attempted during 1914, but again only became effective the next year. In 1915 Hugh Trenchard replaced Henderson and the RFC adopted an aggressive posture. By 1918, photographic images could be taken from 15,000 feet (4,600 m), and interpreted by over 3,000 personnel. Planes did not carry parachutes until 1918, though they had been available since before the war.[74] On 17 August 1917, General Jan Smuts presented a report to the War Council on the future of air power. Because of its potential for the 'devastation of enemy lands and the destruction of industrial and populous centres on a vast scale', he recommended a new air service be formed that would be on a level with the army and navy. The formation of the new service however would make the under utilised men and machines of the Royal Naval Air Service (RNAS) available for action across the Western Front, as well as ending the inter-service rivalries that at times had adversely affected aircraft procurement. On 1 April 1918, the RFC and the RNAS were amalgamated to form a new service, the Royal Air Force (RAF).[75]
Recruitment and conscription[edit]
Main article: Recruitment to the British Army during the First World War
Poster by the Parliamentary Recruiting Committee, featuring St. George and the Dragon.
Particularly in the early stages of the war, many men, for a wide variety of reasons, decided to "join up" to the armed forces—by 5 September 1914, over 225,000 had signed up to fight for what became known as Kitchener's Army.[76] Over the course of the war, a number of factors contributed to recruitment rates, including patriotism, the work of the Parliamentary Recruiting Committee in producing posters, dwindling alternative employment opportunities, and an eagerness for adventure to escape humdrum routine.[76] Pals battalions, where whole battalions were raised from a small geographic area or employer, also proved popular. Higher recruitment rates were seen in Wales and Scotland, though in the case of the Welsh and Irish, political tensions tended to "put something of a blight upon enlistment".[76]
A 1914 poster shows a Scottish soldier in Belgium, in response to Germany describing the Treaty of London, which protected Belgium's independence and neutrality, as a "scrap of paper" when they invaded in August 1914.[77]
Recruitment remained fairly steady through 1914 and early 1915, but fell dramatically during the later years, especially after the Somme campaign, which resulted in 500,000 casualties. As a result, conscription was introduced for the first time in January 1916 for single men, and extended in May–June to all men aged 18 to 41 across England, Wales and Scotland, by way of the Military Service Acts.[76][78]
Urban centres, with their poverty and unemployment were favourite recruiting grounds of the regular British army. Dundee, where the female dominated jute industry limited male employment had one of the highest proportion of reservists and serving soldiers than almost any other British city.[79] Concern for their families' standard of living made men hesitate to enlist; voluntary enlistment rates went up after the government guaranteed a weekly stipend for life to the survivors of men who were killed or disabled.[80] After the introduction of conscription from January 1916 every part of the country was affected.
The policy of relying on volunteers had sharply reduced the capacity of heavy industry to produce the munitions needed for the war. Historian R. J. Q. Adams reports that 19% of the men in the iron and steel industry entered the Army, 22% of the miners, 20% in the engineering trades, 24% in the electrical industries, 16% among small arms craftsmen, and 24% of the men who had been engaged in making high explosives.[81] In response critical industries were prioritised over the army ("reserved occupations"), including munitions, food production and merchant shipping.[76]
Conscription Crisis of 1918[edit]
Main article: Conscription Crisis of 1918
In April 1918 legislation was brought forward which allowed for extension of conscription to Ireland.[76] Though this ultimately never materialised, the effect was "disastrous".[76] Despite significant numbers volunteering for Irish regiments,[76] the idea of enforced conscription proved unpopular. The reaction was based particularly on the fact that implementation of conscription in Ireland was linked to a pledged "measure of self-government in Ireland".[82] The linking of conscription and Home Rule in this way outraged the Irish parties at Westminster, who walked out in protest and returned to Ireland to organise opposition.[83] As a result, a general strike was called, and on 23 April 1918, work was stopped in railways, docks, factories, mills, theatres, cinemas, trams, public services, shipyards, newspapers, shops, and even official munitions factories. The strike was described as "complete and entire, an unprecedented event outside the continental countries".[84] Ultimately the effect was a total loss of interest in Home Rule and of popular support for the nationalist Irish Party who were defeated outright by the separatist republican Sinn Féin party in the December 1918 Irish general election, one of the precursors of the Anglo-Irish War.
Conscientious objectors[edit]
Further information: Conscientious objector § United Kingdom
The conscription legislation introduced the right to refuse military service, allowing for conscientious objectors to be absolutely exempted, to perform alternative civilian service, or to serve as a non-combatant in the army, according to the extent to which they could convince a Military Service Tribunal of the quality of their objection.[85] Around 16,500 men were recorded as conscientious objectors,[76] with Quakers playing a large role.[citation needed] 4,500 objectors were sent to work on farms to undertake "work of national importance", 7,000 were ordered non-combatant duties as stretcher bearers, but 6,000 were forced into the army, and when they refused orders, they were sent to prison, as in the case of the Richmond Sixteen.[86] Some 843 conscientious objectors spent more than two years in prison; ten died while there, seventeen were initially given the death penalty (but received life imprisonment) and 142 were imprisoned on life sentences.[87] Conscientious objectors who were deemed not to have made any useful contribution were disenfranchised for five years after the war.[85]
Naval and air raids[edit]
German bombardments were concentrated on the east coast of England
At the start of the First World War, for the first time since the Napoleonic Wars, the population of the British Isles was in danger of attack from naval raids. The country also came under attack from air raids by zeppelins and fixed-wing aircraft, another first.[5]:709[88]
Naval raids[edit]
Main articles: Raid on Yarmouth and Raid on Scarborough, Hartlepool and Whitby
The Raid on Yarmouth, which took place in November 1914, was an attack by the German Navy on the British North Sea port and town of Great Yarmouth. Little damage was done to the town itself, since shells only landed on the beach once German ships laying mines offshore were interrupted by British destroyers. One British submarine was sunk by a mine as it attempted to leave harbour and attack the German ships, while one German armoured cruiser was sunk after striking two mines outside its own home port.[89]
British propaganda fuelled by the German raid on Scarborough
In December 1914, the German navy carried out attacks on the British coastal towns of Scarborough, Hartlepool and Whitby. The attack resulted in 137 fatalities and 593 casualties,[90] many of which were civilians. The attack made the German navy very unpopular with the British public, as an attack against British civilians in their homes. Likewise, the British Royal Navy was criticised for failing to prevent the raid.[91][92]
Bombardment of Yarmouth and Lowestoft[edit]
Main article: Bombardment of Yarmouth and Lowestoft
In April 1916 a German battlecruiser squadron with accompanying cruisers and destroyers bombarded the coastal ports of Yarmouth and Lowestoft. Although the ports had some military importance, the main aim of the raid was to entice out defending ships which could then be picked off either by the battlecruiser squadron or by the full High Seas Fleet, which was stationed at sea ready to intervene if an opportunity presented itself. The result was inconclusive: nearby Royal Navy units were too small to intervene so largely kept clear of the German battlecruisers, and the German ships withdrew before the first British fast response battlecruiser squadron or the Grand Fleet could arrive.[93]
British propaganda poster from 1915, drawing on the fear of zeppelin attacks to aid recruitment
Air raids[edit]
Further information: Zeppelins in World War I
German zeppelins bombed towns on the east coast, starting on 19 January 1915 with Great Yarmouth.[94] London was also hit later in the same year, on 31 May.[94] Propaganda supporting the British war effort often used these raids to their advantage: one recruitment poster claimed: "It is far better to face the bullets than to be killed at home by a bomb" (see image). The reaction from the public, however, was mixed; whilst 10,000 visited Scarborough to view the damage there, London theatres reported having fewer visitors during periods of "Zeppelin weather"—dark, fine nights.[94]
Throughout 1917 Germany began to deploy increasing numbers of fixed-wing bombers, the Gotha G.IV's first target being Folkestone on 25 May 1917, following this attack the number of airship raids decreased rapidly in favour of raids by fixed wing aircraft,[94] before Zeppelin raids were called off entirely. In total, Zeppelins dropped 6,000 bombs, resulting in 556 dead and 1,357 wounded.[95] Soon after the raid on Folkestone, the bombers began raids on London: one daylight raid on 13 June 1917 by 14 Gothas caused 162 deaths in the East End of London.[94] In response to this new threat, Major General Edward Bailey Ashmore, a RFC pilot who later commanded an artillery division in Belgium, was appointed to devise an improved system of detection, communication and control,[96] The system, called the Metropolitan Observation Service, encompassed the London Air Defence Area and would later extend eastwards towards the Kentish and Essex coasts. The Metropolitan Observation Service was fully operational until the late summer of 1918 (the last German bombing raid taking place on 19 May 1918).[97] During the war, the Germans carried out 51 airship raids and 52 fixed-wing bomber raids on England, which together dropped 280 tons of bombs. The casualties amounted to 1,413 killed, and 3,409 wounded.[98] The success of anti-air defence measures was limited; of the 397 aircraft that had taken part in raids, only 24 Gothas were shot down (though 37 more were lost in accidents), despite an estimated rate of 14,540 anti-air rounds per aircraft. Anti-zeppelin defences were more successful, with 17 shot down and 21 lost in accidents.[94]
Media[edit]
Propaganda[edit]
Main article: British propaganda during World War I
A world map showing territory that "Germany Wants" by Edward Stanford. 1917. Close reading of the quoted material shows that the map is misleading: it implies that Germany plans to annex all the territory in red, but this is only the case for a small fraction of it.
Propaganda and censorship were closely linked during the war.[99] The need to maintain morale and counter German propaganda was recognised early in the war and the War Propaganda Bureau was established under the leadership of Charles Masterman in September 1914.[99] The Bureau enlisted eminent writers such as H G Wells, Arthur Conan Doyle, Rudyard Kipling as well as newspaper editors. Until its abolition in 1917, the department published 300 books and pamphlets in 21 languages, distributed over 4,000 propaganda photographs every week, and circulated maps, cartoons, and lantern slides to the media.[100] Masterman also commissioned films about the war such as The Battle of the Somme, which appeared in August 1916, while the battle was still in progress as a morale-booster and in general it met with a favourable reception. The Times reported on 22 August 1916 that "Crowded audiences ... were interested and thrilled to have the realities of war brought so vividly before them, and if women had sometimes to shut their eyes to escape for a moment from the tragedy of the toll of battle which the film presents, opinion seems to be general that it was wise that the people at home should have this glimpse of what our soldiers are doing and daring and suffering in Picardy".[101]
Newspapers[edit]
Newspapers during the war were subject to the Defence of the Realm Act, which eventually had two regulations restricting what they could publish:[102] Regulation 18, which prohibited the leakage of sensitive military information, troop and shipping movements; and Regulation 27, which made it an offence to "spread false reports", "spread reports that were likely to prejudice recruiting", "undermine public confidence in banks or currency" or cause "disaffection to His Majesty".[102] Where the official Press Bureau failed (it had no statutory powers until April 1916), the newspaper editors and owners operated a ruthless self-censorship.[10] Having worked for government, press barons Viscount Rothermere,[103] Baron Beaverbrook (in a sea of controversy),[104] and Viscount Northcliffe[105] all received titles. For these reasons, it has been concluded that censorship, which at its height suppressed only socialist journals (and briefly the right wing The Globe) had less effect on the British press than the reductions in advertising revenues and cost increases which they also faced during the war.[10] One major loophole in the official censorship lay with parliamentary privilege, when anything said in Parliament could be reported freely.[102] The most infamous act of censorship in the early days of the war was the sinking of HMS Audacious in October 1914, when the press was directed not to report on the loss, despite the sinking being observed by passengers on the liner RMS Olympic and quickly reported in the American press.[106]
The most popular papers of the period included dailies such as The Times, The Daily Telegraph and The Morning Post, weekly newspapers such as The Graphic and periodicals like John Bull, which claimed a weekly circulation of 900,000.[107] The public demand for news of the war was reflected in the increased sales of newspapers. After the German Navy raid on Hartlepool and Scarborough, the Daily Mail devoted three full pages to the raid and the Evening News reported that The Times had sold out by a quarter past nine in the morning, even with inflated prices.[108] The Daily Mail itself increased in circulation from 800,000 a day in 1914 to 1.5 million by 1916.[10]
News magazines[edit]
The public's thirst for news and information was in part satisfied by news magazines, which were dedicated to reporting the war. They included amongst others The War Illustrated, The Illustrated War News, and The War Pictorial, and were lavishly filled with photographs and illustrations, regardless of their target audience. Magazines were produced for all classes, and ranged both in price and tone. Many otherwise famous writers contributed towards these publications, of which H.G. Wells, Arthur Conan Doyle and Rudyard Kipling were three examples. Editorial guidelines varied; in cheaper publications especially it was considered more important to create a sense of patriotism than to relay up-to-the-minutes news of developments of the front. Stories of German atrocities were commonplace.[109]
Music[edit]
On 13 August 1914, the Irish regiment the Connaught Rangers were witnessed singing "It's a Long Way to Tipperary" as they marched through Boulogne by the Daily Mail correspondent George Curnock, who reported the event in that newspaper on 18 August 1914. The song was then picked up by other units of the British Army. In November 1914, it was sung in a pantomime by the well-known music hall singer Florrie Forde, which helped contribute to its worldwide popularity.[110] Another song from 1916, which became very popular as a music hall and marching song, boosting British morale despite the horrors of that war, was "Pack Up Your Troubles in Your Old Kit-Bag".[111]
War poets[edit]
Further information: War poetry during World War I
There was also a notable group of war poets who wrote about their own experiences of war, which caught the public attention. Some died on active service, most famously Rupert Brooke, Isaac Rosenberg, and Wilfred Owen, while some, such as Siegfried Sassoon survived. Themes of the poems included the youth (or naivety) of the soldiers, and the dignified manner in which they fought and died.[citation needed] This is evident in lines such as "They fell with their faces to the foe", from the "Ode of Remembrance" taken from Laurence Binyon's For the Fallen, which was first published in The Times in September 1914.[112] Female poets such as Vera Brittain also wrote from the home front, to lament the losses of brothers and lovers fighting on the front.[113]
Economy[edit]
Main article: Economic history of World War I § British Empire
On the whole the British successfully managed the economics of the war. There had been no prewar plan for mobilization of economic resources. Controls were imposed slowly, as one urgent need followed another.[114] With the City of London the world's financial capital, it was possible to handle finances smoothly; in all Britain spent 4 million pounds everyday on the war effort.[115]
The economy (in terms of GDP) grew about 14% from 1914 to 1918 despite the absence of so many men in the services; by contrast the German economy shrank 27%. The War saw a decline of civilian consumption, with a major reallocation to munitions. The government share of GDP soared from 8% in 1913 to 38% in 1918 (compared to 50% in 1943).[116][117] The war forced Britain to use up its financial reserves and borrow large sums from private and government creditors in the United States.[118] Shipments of American raw materials and food allowed Britain to feed itself and its army while maintaining his productivity. The financing was generally successful,[119] as the City's strong financial position minimized the damaging effects of inflation, as opposed to much worse conditions in Germany.[120] Overall consumer consumption declined 18% from 1914 to 1919.[121] Women were available and many entered munitions factories and took other home front jobs vacated by men.[122][123]
Scotland specialized in providing manpower, ships, machinery, food (particularly fish) and money. Its shipbuilding industry expanding by a third.[124]
Rationing[edit]
Main article: Rationing in the United Kingdom
A British government wartime leaflet detailing the consequences of breaking the rationing laws
In line with its "business as usual" policy, the government was initially reluctant to try to control the food markets.[125] It fought off efforts to try to introduce minimum prices in cereal production, though relenting in the area of controlling of essential imports (sugar, meat and grains). When it did introduce changes, they were only limited in their effect. In 1916, it became illegal to consume more than two courses whilst lunching in a public eating place or more than three for dinner; fines were introduced for members of the public found feeding the pigeons or stray animals.[63]
In January 1917, Germany started using U-boats (submarines) in order to sink Allied and later neutral ships bringing food to the country in an attempt to starve Britain into surrender under their unrestricted submarine warfare programme. One response to this threat was to introduce voluntary rationing in February 1917,[63] a scheme said to have been endorsed by the King and Queen themselves.[126] Bread was subsidised from September that year; prompted by local authorities taking matters into their own hands, compulsory rationing was introduced in stages between December 1917 and February 1918,[63] as Britain's supply of wheat stores decreased to just six weeks worth.[127] It is said to have in the most part benefited the health of the country,[63] through the 'levelling of consumption of essential foodstuffs'.[128] To assist with rationing, ration books were introduced on 15 July 1918 for butter, margarine, lard, meat, and sugar.[129] During the war, average calorific intake decreased only three percent, but protein intake six percent.[63]
Industry[edit]
Forging steel shell cases
Total British production fell by ten percent over the course of the war; there were, however, increases in certain industries such as steel.[11] Although Britain faced a highly contentious Shell Crisis of 1915 With severe shortages of artillery shells reported from the Western Front. In 1915, a powerful new Ministry of Munitions under David Lloyd George was formed to control munitions production.[130][131]
The Government's policy, according to historian and Conservative politician J. A. R. Marriott, was that:
no private interest was to be permitted to obstruct the service, or imperil the safety, of the State. Trade Union regulations must be suspended; employers' profits must be limited, skilled men must fight, if not in the trenches, in the factories; man-power must be economize by the dilution of labour and the employment of women; Private factories must pass under the control of the State, and new national factories be set up. Results justified the new policy: the output was prodigious; the goods were at last delivered.[132]
By April 1915, just two million rounds of shells had been sent to France; by the end of the war the figure had reached 187 million,[133] and a year's worth of pre-war production of light munitions could be completed in just four days by 1918. Aircraft production in 1914 provided employment for 60,000 men and women; by 1918 British firms employed over 347,000.[11]
Labour[edit]
Industrial production of munitions was a central feature of the war, and with a third of the men in the labour force moved into the military, demand was very high for industrial labour. Large numbers of women were employed temporarily.[134] Most trade unions gave strong support to the war effort, cutting back on strikes and restrictive practices. However the coal miners and engineers were less enthusiastic.[135] Trade unions were encouraged as membership grew from 4.1 million in 1914 to 6.5 million in 1918, peaking at 8.3 million in 1920 before relapsing to 5.4 million in 1923.[136] Membership soared from 4.1 million in 1914 to 6.5 million in 1918, peaking at 8.3 million in 1920 before relapsing to 5.4 million in 1923.[136] In 1914, 65% of union members had been associated with the Trades Union Congress (TUC) rising to 77% in 1920. Women were grudgingly admitted to the trade unions. Looking at a union of unskilled workers, Cathy Hunt concludes its regard for women workers, "was at best inconsistent and at worst aimed almost entirely at improving and protecting working conditions for its male members."[137] Labour's prestige had never been higher, and it systematically placed its leaders into Parliament.[138]
The Munitions of War Act 1915 followed the Shell Crisis of 1915 when supplies of material to the front became a political issue. The Act forbade strikes and lockouts and replaced them with compulsory arbitration. It set up a system of controlling war industries, and established munitions tribunals that were special courts to enforce good working practices. It suspended, for the duration, restrictive practices by trade unions. It tried to control labour mobility between jobs. The courts ruled the definition of munitions was broad enough to include textile workers and dock workers. The 1915 act was repealed in 1919, but similar legislation took effect during the Second World War.[139][140][141]
It was only as late as December 1917 that a War Cabinet Committee on Manpower was established, and the British government refrained from introducing compulsory labour direction (though 388 men were moved as part of the voluntary National Service Scheme). Belgian refugees became workers, though they were often seen as "job stealers". Likewise, the use of Irish workers, because they were exempt from conscription, was another source of resentment.[142] Worried about the impact of the dilution of labour caused by bringing external groups into the main labour pool, workers in some areas turned to strike action. The efficiency of major industries improved markedly during the war. For example, the Singer Clydebank sewing machine factory received over 5000 government contracts, and made 303 million artillery shells, shell components, fuzes, and airplane parts, as well as grenades, rifle parts, and 361,000 horseshoes. Its labour force of 14,000 was about 70 percent female at war's end.[143]
Energy[edit]
Energy was a critical factor for the British war effort. Most of the energy supplies came from coal mines in Britain, where the issue was labour supply. Critical however was the flow of oil for ships, lorries and industrial use. There were no oil wells in Britain so everything was imported. The U.S. pumped two-thirds of the world's oil. In 1917, total British consumption was 827 million barrels, of which 85 percent was supplied by the United States, and 6 percent by Mexico.[144] The great issue in 1917 was how many tankers would survive the German u-boats. Convoys and the construction of new tankers solved the German threat, while tight government controls guaranteed that all essential needs were covered. An Inter-Allied Petroleum Conference allocated American supplies to Britain, France and Italy.[145]
Fuel oil for the Royal Navy was the highest priority. In 1917, the Royal Navy consumed 12,500 tons a month, but had a supply of 30,000 tons a month from the Anglo-Persian Oil Company, using their oil wells in Persia.[146]
Social change[edit]
Main article: Women's roles in the World Wars § World War I
Variously throughout the war, serious shortage of able-bodied men ("manpower") occurred in the country, and women were required to take on many of the traditional male roles, particularly in the area of arms manufacture; though this was only significant in the later years of the war, since unemployed men were often prioritised by employers.[12] Women both found work in the munitions factories (as "munitionettes") despite initial trade union opposition, which directly helped the war effort, but also in the Civil Service, where they took men's jobs, releasing them for the front. The number of women employed by the service increased from 33,000 in 1911 to over 102,000 by 1921.[147] The overall increase in female employment is estimated at 1.4 million, from 5.9 to 7.3 million,[12] and female trade union membership increased from 357,000 in 1914 to over a million by 1918—an increase of 160 percent.[147] Beckett suggests that most of these were working class women going into work at a younger age than they would otherwise have done, or married women returning to work.[12] This taken together with the fact that only 23 percent of women in the munitions industry were actually doing men's jobs, would limit substantially the overall impact of the war on the long-term prospects of the working woman.[12]
First World War poster
When the government targeted women early in the war focussed on extending their existing roles – helping with Belgian refugees, for example—but also on improving recruitment rates amongst men. They did this both through the so-called "Order of the White Feather" and through the promise of home comforts for the men while they were at the front. In February 1916, groups were set up and a campaign started to get women to help in agriculture and in March 1917, the Women's Land Army was set up. One goal was to attract middle-class women who would act as models for patriotic engagement in nontraditional duties. However the uniform of the Women's Land Army included male overalls and trousers, which sparked debate on the propriety of such cross-dressing. The government responded with rhetoric that explicitly feminized the new roles.[148] In 1918, the Board of Trade estimated that there were 148,000 women in agricultural employment, though a figure of nearly 260,000 has also been suggested.[12]
The war also caused a split in the British suffragette movement, with the mainstream, represented by Emmeline Pankhurst and her daughter Christabel's Women's Social and Political Union, calling a 'ceasefire' in their campaign for the duration of the war. In contrast, more radical suffragettes, like the Women's Suffrage Federation run by Emmeline's other daughter, Sylvia, continued their (at times violent) struggle. Women were also allowed to join the armed forces in a non-combatant role[12] and by the end of the War 80,000 women had joined the armed forces in auxiliary roles such as nursing and cooking.[149]
Following the war, millions of returning soldiers were still not entitled to vote.[150] This posed another dilemma for politicians since they could be seen to be withholding the vote from the very men who had just fought to preserve the British democratic political system. The Representation of the People Act 1918 attempted to solve the problem, enfranchising all adult males as long as they were over 21 years old and were resident householders.[150] It also gave the vote to women over 30 who met minimum property qualifications. The enfranchisement of this latter group was accepted as recognition of the contribution made by women defence workers,[150] though the actual feelings of members of parliament (MPs) at the time is questioned.[12] In the same year the Parliament (Qualification of Women) Act 1918 allowed women over 21 to stand as MPs.[151]
The new coalition government of 1918 charged itself with the task of creating a "land fit for heroes", from a speech given in Wolverhampton by David Lloyd George on 23 November 1918, where he stated "What is our task? To make Britain a fit country for heroes to live in."[152] More generally, the war has been credited, both during and after the conflict, with removing some of the social barriers that had pervaded Victorian and Edwardian Britain.[6]
Regional conditions[edit]
The War had a profound influence upon rural areas, as the U-boat blockade required the government to take full control of the food chain, as well as agricultural labour. Cereal production was a high priority, and the Corn Production Act 1917 guaranteed prices, regulated wage rates, and required farmers to meet efficiency standards. The government campaigned heavily for turning marginal land into cropland.[153][154][155] The Women's Land Army brought in 23,000 young women from the towns and cities to milk cows, pick fruit and otherwise replace the men who joined the services.[156] More extensive use of tractors and machinery also replaced farm labourers. However, there was a shortage of both men and horses on the land by late 1915. County War Agricultural Executive Committees reported that the continued removal of men was undercutting food production because of the farmers' belief that operating a farm required a set number of men and horses.[157]
Kenneth Morgan argues that, "the overwhelming mass of the Welsh people cast aside their political and industrial divisions and threw themselves into the war with gusto." Intellectuals and ministers actively promoted the war spirit. With 280,000 men enrolled in the services (14% of the population), the proportionate effort in Wales outstripped both England and Scotland.[158] However Adrian Gregory points out that the Welsh coal miners, while officially supporting the war effort, refused the government request to cut short their vacation time. After some debate, the miners agreed to extend the working day.[159]
Scotland's distinctive characteristics have attracted significant attention from scholars.[160] Daniel Coetzee shows it supported the war effort with widespread enthusiasm.[161]
Casualties[edit]
See also: World War I casualties
Poster for a fundraising event in support of Welsh troops by Frank Brangwyn
In the post war publication Statistics of the Military Effort of the British Empire During the Great War 1914–1920 (The War Office, March 1922), the official report lists 908,371 'soldiers' as being either killed in action, dying of wounds, dying as prisoners of war or missing in action in the World War. (This is broken down into Britain and its colonies 704,121; British India 64,449; Canada 56,639; Australia 59,330; New Zealand 16,711; South Africa 7,121.)[15] Listed separately were the Royal Navy (including the Royal Naval Air Service until 31 March 1918) war dead and missing of 32,287 and the Merchant Navy war dead of 14,661.[15] The figures for the Royal Flying Corps and the nascent Royal Air Force were not given in the War Office report.[15]
A second publication, Casualties and Medical Statistics (1931), the final volume of the Official Medical History of the War, gives British Empire Army losses by cause of death.[16] The total losses in combat from 1914 to 1918 were 876,084, which included 418,361 killed, 167,172 died of wounds, 113,173 died of disease or injury, 161,046 missing presumed dead and 16,332 died as a prisoner of war.[16]
The Commonwealth War Graves Commission lists 888,246 war dead from the UK and colonies (excluding the dominions, which are listed separately). This figure includes identified burials and those commemorated by name on memorials; there are an additional 187,644 unidentified burials from the Commonwealth (then Empire) as a whole.[162]
The civilian death rate exceeded the prewar level by 292,000, which included 109,000 deaths due to food shortages and 183,577 from Spanish Flu.[15] The 1922 War Office report detailed the deaths of 1,260 civilians and 310 military personnel due to air and sea bombardment the home islands.[163] Losses at sea were 908 civilians and 63 fisherman killed by U-boat attacks.[164]
With a population of 4.8 million in 1911, Scotland sent 690,000 men to the war, of whom 74,000 died in combat or from disease, and 150,000 were seriously wounded.[165][166] At times Scottish troops made up large proportions of the active combatants, and suffered corresponding loses, as at the Battle of Loos, where there were three full Scots divisions and other Scottish units.[79] Thus, although Scots were only 10 per cent of the British population, they made up 15 per cent of the national armed forces and eventually accounted for 20 per cent of the dead.[167] Some areas, like the thinly populated Island of Lewis and Harris suffered some of the highest proportional losses of any part of Britain.[79] Clydeside shipyards and the engineering shops of west-central Scotland became the most significant centre of shipbuilding and arms production in the Empire. In the Lowlands, particularly Glasgow, poor working and living conditions led to industrial and political unrest.[167]
Legacy and memory[edit]
The extent of the British Empire in 1898
The extent of the British Empire in 1914
The extent of the British Empire in 1921
The horrors of the Western Front as well as Gallipoli and Mesopotamia were seared into the collective consciousness of the twentieth century. To a large extent the understanding of the war in popular culture focused on the first day of the Battle of the Somme. Historian A. J. P. Taylor argued, "The Somme set the picture by which future generations saw the First World War: brave helpless soldiers; blundering obstinate generals; nothing achieved."[168]
Images of trench warfare became iconic symbols of human suffering and endurance. The post-war world had many veterans who were maimed or damaged by shell shock. In 1921 1,187,450 men were in receipt of pensions for war disabilities, with a fifth of these having suffered serious loss of limbs or eyesight, paralysis or lunacy.[169]
The war was a major economic catastrophe as Britain went from being the world's largest overseas investor to being its biggest debtor, with interest payments consuming around 40 percent of the national budget.[170] Inflation more than doubled between 1914 and its peak in 1920, while the value of the Pound Sterling fell by 61.2 percent. Reparations in the form of free German coal depressed the local industry, precipitating the 1926 General Strike.[170] During the war British private investments abroad were sold, raising £550 million. However, £250 million new investment also took place during the war. The net financial loss was therefore approximately £300 million; less than two years investment compared to the pre-war average rate and more than replaced by 1928.[171] Material loss was "slight": the most significant being 40 percent of the British merchant fleet sunk by German U-boats. Most of this was replaced in 1918 and all immediately after the war.[172] The military historian Correlli Barnett has argued that "in objective truth the Great War in no way inflicted crippling economic damage on Britain" but that the war only "crippled the British psychologically" (emphasis in original).[173]
Less concrete changes include the growing assertiveness of the Dominions within the British Empire. Battles such as Gallipoli for Australia and New Zealand,[174] and Vimy Ridge for Canada led to increased national pride and a greater reluctance to remain subordinate to London.[18] These battles were often portrayed favourably in these nations' propaganda as symbolic of their power during the war.[18][174] The war released pent-up indigenous nationalism, as populations tried to take advantage of the precedent set by the introduction of self-determination in eastern Europe. Britain was to face unrest in Ireland (1919–21), India (1919), Egypt (1919–23), Palestine (1920–21) and Iraq (1920) at a time when they were supposed to be demilitarising.[17] Nevertheless, Britain's only territorial loss came in Ireland,[17] where the delay in finding a resolution to the home rule issue, along with the 1916 Easter Rising and a failed attempt to introduce conscription in Ireland, increased support for separatist radicals, and led indirectly to the outbreak of the Irish War of Independence in 1919.[175]
Further change came in 1919. With the Treaty of Versailles, London took charge of an additional 1,800,000 square miles (4,700,000 km2) and 13 million new subjects.[176] The colonies of Germany and the Ottoman Empire were distributed to the Allied powers (and to Australia, New Zealand and South Africa) as League of Nations mandates, with the United Kingdom at least gaining control of Palestine and Transjordan, Iraq, parts of Cameroon and Togo, and Tanganyika.[177] Indeed, the British Empire reached its territorial peak after the settlement.[17]
See also[edit]
World War I portal
Diplomatic history of World War I
References[edit]
Jump up ^ "Foreign Office, "A State of War," August 4, 1914, Supplement to the London Gazette no. 28861 (August 5, 1914): 6161".
Jump up ^ "Foreign Office, Notice of State of War Between Great Britain and Austria-Hungary, August 12, 1914, Supplement to the London Gazette no. 28868 (August 13, 1914): 6375" (PDF).
Jump up ^ "Foreign Office, Notice of State of War Between Great Britain and Turkey, November 5, 1914, London Gazette no. 28965 (November 6, 1914): 9011".
Jump up ^ "Foreign Office, Notice of State of War Between Great Britain and Bulgaria, October 15, 1915, London Gazette no. 29333 (October 19, 1915): 10257–58".
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f Tucker, Spencer C.; Roberts, Priscilla (2005). The Encyclopedia of World War I: A Political, Social, and Military History. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 1-85109-420-2.
^ Jump up to: a b "The war and the changing face of British society". National Archives. Retrieved 16 May 2009.
Jump up ^ Gregory (2008); Pennell (2012)
^ Jump up to: a b Baker (1921) p 21
^ Jump up to: a b c d Trueman, Chris. "Total war". History Learning Site. Archived from the original on 30 May 2015. Retrieved 25 April 2016.
^ Jump up to: a b c d Beckett (2007), pp 394–395
^ Jump up to: a b c Beckett (2007), pp 341–343
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h Beckett (2007), pp 455–460
Jump up ^ Braybon (1990)
Jump up ^ Braybon (2005)
^ Jump up to: a b c d e The War Office (1992), p. 339
^ Jump up to: a b c Mitchell (1931), p 12
^ Jump up to: a b c d Beckett (2007), p 564
^ Jump up to: a b c Pierce (1992), p 5
Jump up ^ Adrian Gregory (2008). The Last Great War: British Society and the First World War. Cambridge UP. p. 10. ISBN 9781107650862.
Jump up ^ Clark, Christopher. The Sleepwalkers: How Europe Went to War in 1914. HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-06-219922-5.
Jump up ^ Robert Blake, The Decline of Power: 1915-1964 (1985), p.3
Jump up ^ Blake, The Decline of Power (1985), p.3
Jump up ^ Barry McGill, "Asquith's Predicament, 1914-1918." Journal of Modern History 39.3 (1967): 283-303. in JSTOR
Jump up ^ Barry McGill, "Asquith's Predicament, 1914–1918," Journal of Modern History (1967) 39#3 pp. 283–303 in JSTOR
Jump up ^ John M. McEwen, "The Struggle for Mastery in Britain: Lloyd George versus Asquith, December 1916." Journal of British Studies 18#1 (1978): 131-156.
Jump up ^ John Grigg, Lloyd George: War Leader 1916–1918 (2002) vol 4 pp 1–30
Jump up ^ A. J. P. Taylor, English History, 1914–1945 (1965) pp 73–99
Jump up ^ The Oxford Library of Words and Phrases. Oxford University Press. 1981. p. 71.
Jump up ^ Beckett (2007), pp 499–500
Jump up ^ A. J. P. Taylor, English History, 1914–1945 (1965) pp 100–106
Jump up ^ John Grigg, Lloyd George: War Leader 1916–1918 (2002) vol 4 pp 478–83
Jump up ^ Alan J. Ward, "Lloyd George and the 1918 Irish Conscription Crisis," Historical Journal (1974) 17#1 pp. 107–129 in JSTOR
Jump up ^ Grigg, Lloyd George vol 4 pp 465–88
Jump up ^ John Gooch, "The Maurice Debate 1918," Journal of Contemporary History (1968) 3#4 pp. 211–228 in JSTOR
Jump up ^ John Grigg, Lloyd George: War leader, 1916–1918 (London: Penguin, 2002), pp 489–512
Jump up ^ A. J. P. Taylor, English History, 1914–1945 (1965) pp 108–11
Jump up ^ George H. Cassar, Lloyd George at War, 1916-1918 (2009) p 351 online at JSTOR
Jump up ^ Trevor Wilson, "The Coupon and the British General Election of 1918," Journal of Modern History, (1964) 36#1 pp. 28–42 in JSTOR
Jump up ^ Wilson, The Downfall of the Liberal Party: 1914–1935 (1966) pp 135–85
Jump up ^ Martin Horn, Britain, France, and the financing of the First World War (2002).
Jump up ^ Peter Dewey, War and progress: Britain 1914-1945 (1997) pp 28-31.
Jump up ^ Anthony J. Arnold, "‘A paradise for profiteers’? The importance and treatment of profits during the First World War." Accounting History Review 24#2-3 (2014): 61-81.
Jump up ^ Mark Billings and Lynne Oats, "Innovation and pragmatism in tax design: Excess Profits Duty in the UK during the First World War." Accounting History Review 24#2-3 (2014): 83-101.
Jump up ^ A. J. P. Taylor, English History 1914-1945 (1965) pp 40 – 41.
Jump up ^ M. J. Daunton, "How to Pay for the War: State, Society and Taxation in Britain, 1917–24," English Historical Review (1996) 111# 443 pp. 882–919
Jump up ^ Nicolson (1952), p 308
Jump up ^ "The Royal Family name". Official web site of the British monarchy. Archived from the original on 15 February 2009. Retrieved 8 May 2009.
Jump up ^ Nicolson (195), p 310
Jump up ^ "Titles Deprivation Act 1917". office of public sector information. Retrieved 17 May 2009.
Jump up ^ At George's wedding in 1893, The Times claimed that the crowd may have confused Nicholas with George, because their beards and uniforms made them look alike (The Times 7 July 1893, p 5)
Jump up ^ Nicolson (1952), p 301
Jump up ^ Andrew Roberts (2000). The House of Windsor. U of California Press. p. 30.
Jump up ^ Roberts (2000), p 41
Jump up ^ Ziegler (1991), p 111
Jump up ^ Duke of Windsor (1998), p 140
Jump up ^ Bradford (1989), pp 55–76
Jump up ^ Imperial War Museum. "Princess Mary's Gift to the Troops, Christmas 1914". archive.iwm.org.uk. Retrieved 7 April 2013.
Jump up ^ Thornton-Cook (1977), p.229
Jump up ^ Beckett (2007), Chronology
^ Jump up to: a b Beckett (2007), p 348
Jump up ^ FitzRoy, Almeric William, Clerk of the Privy Council (14 August 1914). "Part 1: General Regulations" (PDF). The London Gazette (28870). p. 3. It shall be lawful for the competent naval or military authority ... (a) to take possession of any land ... (b) to take possession of any buildings or other property CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
Jump up ^ FitzRoy, Almeric William, Clerk of the Privy Council (14 August 1914). "Part 2: Regulations specially designed to prevent persons communicating with the enemy ..." (PDF). The London Gazette (28870). p. 4. No person shall trespass on any railway, or loiter under or near any bridge, viaduct, or culvert, over which a railway passes. CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f Beckett (2007), pp 380–382
Jump up ^ FitzRoy, Almeric William, Clerk of the Privy Council (14 August 1914). "Part 2: Regulations specially designed to prevent persons communicating with the enemy ..." (PDF). The London Gazette (28870). p. 4. No person shall ... communicate any information with respect to the movement or disposition of any of the forces, ships, or war materials ... or with respect to the plans of any naval or military operations CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
^ Jump up to: a b Beckett (2007), p 383
Jump up ^ "Treachery Bill". Hansard. Retrieved 13 May 2009.
Jump up ^ "British Army: Courts Martial: First World War, 1914–1918". National Archives. Retrieved 16 May 2009.
Jump up ^ Beckett (2007), p 289
Jump up ^ Chandler (2003), p 211
Jump up ^ Sondhaus (2001), p 161
^ Jump up to: a b "The First World War and the Inter-war years 1914–1939". Royal Navy. Retrieved 14 May 2009.
^ Jump up to: a b "Battle of Jutland 1916". Royal Navy. Retrieved 21 May 2009.
Jump up ^ "The First World War and the Inter-war years 1914–1939". MOD UK, Royal Navy. Retrieved 21 May 2009.
Jump up ^ Beckett (2007), p 254
Jump up ^ "The Royal Air Force History". Royal Air Force. Retrieved 27 August 2009.
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h i Beckett (2007), pp 291–5
Jump up ^ Te Papa (the Museum of New Zealand)'s description of the poster.
Jump up ^ Professor Hew Strachan. "Britain and World War One, 1901–1918". BBC History. Retrieved 13 May 2009.
^ Jump up to: a b c B. Lenman and J., Mackie, A History of Scotland (Penguin, 1991)
Jump up ^ D. Coetzee, "A life and death decision: the influence of trends in fertility, nuptiality and family economies on voluntary enlistment in Scotland, August 1914 to December 1915", Family and Community History, November 2005, vol. 8 (2), pp. 77–89.
Jump up ^ R. J. Q. Adams, "Delivering the Goods: Reappaising the Ministry of Munitions: 1915–1916." Albion: A Quarterly Journal Concerned with British Studies (1975) 7#3 pp: 232–244 at p. 238 in JSTOR
Jump up ^ Adams (1999), p 266
Jump up ^ Alan J., Ward (1974). Lloyd George and the 1918 Irish Conscription Crisis. The Historical Journal, Vol. XVII, no. 1.
Jump up ^ Cahill, Liam (1990). Forgotten Revolution: Limerick Soviet, 1919. O'Brien Press. ISBN 978-0-86278-194-1.
^ Jump up to: a b Taylor (2001), p 116
Jump up ^ Silence in castle to honour First World War conscientious objectors dated 25 June 2013 at thenorthernecho.co.uk, accessed 19 October 2014
Jump up ^ Beckett (2007), p 507
Jump up ^ Corbett Julian. "Yorkshire Coast Raid, 15–16 December 1914". Official History of the War, Naval Operations Vol. II. Retrieved 26 May 2009.
Jump up ^ Massie (2004), pp 309–311
Jump up ^ His Majesty's stationery Office (1922), pp 674–677
Jump up ^ "Damage by German Raids". UK Parliament "Hansard". Retrieved 13 May 2009.
Jump up ^ "German Attacks on Unfortified Towns". UK Parliament "Hansard". Retrieved 13 May 2009.
Jump up ^ Tucker, Wood & Murphy (2005), P.193
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f Beckett (2007), pp 258–261
Jump up ^ Powers (1976), pp 50–51
Jump up ^ Bourne (2001), p 10
Jump up ^ Bourne (2001), p 20
Jump up ^ "Air Raids". National Archives. Retrieved 17 May 2009.
^ Jump up to: a b "Espionage, propaganda and censorship". National Archives. Retrieved 17 May 2009.
Jump up ^ D. G. Wright, "The Great War, Government Propaganda and English 'Men Of Letters' 1914-16." Literature and History 7 (1978): 70+.
Jump up ^ 'War's Realities on the Cinema', The Times, London, 22 August, 1916, p 3
^ Jump up to: a b c Paddock (2004), p 22
Jump up ^ "No. 31427". The London Gazette. 1 July 1919. p. 8221.
Jump up ^ McCreery (2005), pp 26–27
Jump up ^ "No. 30533". The London Gazette. 19 February 1918. p. 2212.
Jump up ^ Paddock (2004), p 24
Jump up ^ Paddock (2004), p 16
Jump up ^ Paddock (2004), p 34
Jump up ^ "War Weeklies". Time. 25 September 1939. Retrieved 12 June 2009.
Jump up ^ Cryer (2009), p 188
Jump up ^ Shepherd (2003), p 390
Jump up ^ The Times on 21 September 1914.
Jump up ^ Singh, Anita (13 February 2009). "Vera Brittain to be subject for film". London: Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 18 May 2009.
Jump up ^ William Ashworth, An Economic History of England, 1870–1939 (1960) pp 265–84.
Jump up ^ Tom Kington. "Recruited by MI5: the name's Mussolini. Benito Mussolini".
Jump up ^ David Stevenson (2011). With Our Backs to the Wall: Victory and Defeat in 1918. Harvard U.P. p. 370. ISBN 9780674062269.
Jump up ^ Niall Ferguson, The Pity of War (1998) p 249
Jump up ^ Steven Lobell, "The Political Economy of War Mobilization: From Britain's Limited Liability to a Continental Commitment," International Politics (2006) 43#3 pp 283–304
Jump up ^ M. J. Daunton, "How to Pay for the War: State, Society and Taxation in Britain, 1917–24," English Historical Review (1996) 111# 443 pp. 882–919 in JSTOR
Jump up ^ T. Balderston, "War finance and inflation in Britain and Germany, 1914–1918," Economic History Review (1989) 42#2 p p 222–244. in JSTOR
Jump up ^ B.R. Mitchell, Abstract of British Historical Statistics (1962) p 371
Jump up ^ Gail Braybon, Women Workers in the First World War: The British Experience (1990)
Jump up ^ G. R. Searle, A New England?: Peace and War, 1886-1918 (OUP, 2005) pp. 777-793.
Jump up ^ Adrian Gregory (2008). The Last Great War: British Society and the First World War. Cambridge U.P. ISBN 9780521728836.
Jump up ^ Samuel J. Hurwitz (1949). State Intervention in Great Britain: Study of Economic Control and Social Response, 1914–1919. pp. 12–29. ISBN 9781136931864.
Jump up ^ Condell & Liddiard (1987), p 18
Jump up ^ Morrow (2005), p 202
Jump up ^ Beckett attributes this quotation (page 382) to Margaret Barnett, but does not give further details.
Jump up ^ Palmer (1992), pp 355–356
Jump up ^ Bentley Gilbert, David Lloyd George: Organizer of Victory 1912–1916 (1992), pp 209–50
Jump up ^ John Grigg, Lloyd George: From Peace to War 1912–1916 (1985) pp 223–56
Jump up ^ J. A. R. Marriott, Modern England: 1885-1945 (4th ed. 1948) p. 376
Jump up ^ "The war and the changing face of British society". The National Archives. Retrieved 16 May 2009.
Jump up ^ John N. Horne, Labour at war: France and Britain, 1914-1918 (1991).
Jump up ^ G. R. Searle, A New England?: Peace and War, 1886-1918 (2005) pp. 819-821
^ Jump up to: a b B. R. Mitchell, Abstract of British Historical Statistics (1962) p 68
Jump up ^ Cathy Hunt, "'Her Heart and Soul were with The Labour Movement': Using a Local Study to Highlight the Work Of Women Organizers Employed by the Workers' Union in Britain From the First World War to 1931." Labour History Review 70.2 (2005): 167-184, quote p 180.
Jump up ^ David Swift, "Patriotic labour in the era of the great war" (PhD. Dissertation University of Central Lancashire, 2014) online Detailed bibliography on pp 220-35.
Jump up ^ F. M. Leventhal, ed. Twentieth-Century Britain: An Encyclopedia (1995) p 78-80.
Jump up ^ Beckett (2007), p 369
Jump up ^ Gerry R. Rubin, "Law, War and Economy: The Munitions Acts 1915-17 and Corporatism in Context." Journal of Law and Society 11.3 (1984): 317-333.
Jump up ^ Beckett (2007), p 366
Jump up ^ Robert Bruce Davies, Peacefully working to conquer the world (Arno Press, 19760 p 170
Jump up ^ Harold F. Williamson, The American Petroleum Industry: the Age of Energy 1899–1959 (1963) 2:267
Jump up ^ Daniel Yergin, The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money and Power (1991) pp 176–77
Jump up ^ Ronald W. Ferrier; J. H. Bamberg (1982). The History of the British Petroleum Company: Volume 1, The Developing Years, 1901–1932. Cambridge UP. pp. A–13. ISBN 9780521246477.
^ Jump up to: a b Professor Joanna Bourke. "Women on the Home Front in World War One". Retrieved 13 May 2009.
Jump up ^ Susan R. Grayzel, "Nostalgia, Gender, and The Countryside: Placing the 'Land Girl' in First World War Britain," Rural History (1999) 10#2 pp 155–170.
Jump up ^ Professor Joanna Bourke. "Women and the Military during World War One". Retrieved 13 May 2009.
^ Jump up to: a b c Fraser (1918)
Jump up ^ Law (1997), p 115
Jump up ^ The Times, 25 November 1918.
Jump up ^ Pamela Horn, Rural Life in England in the First World War (St. Martin's Press, 1984)
Jump up ^ Peter E. Dewey, "British Farming Profits and Government Policy During the First World War." Economic History Review (1984) 37#3 pp: 373–390.
Jump up ^ Peter E. Dewey, British Agriculture in the First World War (1989)
Jump up ^ Bonnie White, The Women's Land Army in First World War Britain (2014)
Jump up ^ Bonnie White, "Feeding the war effort: agricultural experiences in First World War Devon, 1914–17," Agricultural History Review (2010) 58#1 pp 95–112.
Jump up ^ Kenneth O. Morgan (1981). Rebirth of a Nation: Wales, 1880–1980. Oxford UP. pp. 159–60. ISBN 9780198217367.
Jump up ^ Adrian Gregory (2008). The Last Great War: British Society and the First World War. Cambridge UP. ISBN 9781107650862. ch 1
Jump up ^ C. M. M. Macdonald and E. W. McFarland, eds, Scotland and the Great War (Edinburgh: Tuckwell Press, 1999)
Jump up ^ Daniel Coetzee, "Measures of enthusiasm: new avenues in quantifying variations in voluntary enlistment in Scotland, August 1914 – December 1915", Local Population Studies, Spring 2005, Issue 74, pp. 16–35.
Jump up ^ Commonwealth War Graves Commission Annual Report 2010-2011 Archived 4 November 2015 at the Wayback Machine., page 45.
Jump up ^ Gilbert (1994), pp 674–678
Jump up ^ Gilbert (1994), p 78
Jump up ^ I. F. W. Beckett and K. R. Simpson, eds. A Nation in Arms: a Social Study of the British Army in the First World War (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1985) p. 11.
Jump up ^ R. A. Houston and W. W. Knox, eds, The New Penguin History of Scotland (London: Penguin, 2001), p. 426.
^ Jump up to: a b J. Buchanan, Scotland (Langenscheidt, 3rd edn., 2003), p. 49.
Jump up ^ Brian Bond (2002). The Unquiet Western Front: Britain's Role in Literature and History. Cambridge UP. pp. 62–63. ISBN 9781139434096.
Jump up ^ Chris Wrigley, "The Impact of the First World War," in Chris Wrigley, ed., A Companion to Early Twentieth-Century Britain (2003) pp 502, 512
^ Jump up to: a b "Inflation value of the Pound" (PDF). House of Commons. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 February 2006. Retrieved 16 May 2009.
Jump up ^ Taylor (2001), p 123
Jump up ^ Taylor (2001), p 122
Jump up ^ Barnett (2002), pp 424–426
^ Jump up to: a b Beaumont (1995), pp 125–148
Jump up ^ Hennessey (1998), p 220
Jump up ^ Ferguson (2004), p 315
Jump up ^ Olson (1996), p 658
External links[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to United Kingdom in World War I.
Badsey, Stephen: Great Britain, in: 1914-1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War.
Johnson, Matthew: Governments, Parliaments and Parties (Great Britain and Ireland) , in: 1914-1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War.
Wrigley, Chris: Labour, Labour Movements, Trade Unions and Strikes (Great Britain and Ireland) , in: 1914-1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War.
Pennell, Catriona: Making Sense of the War (Great Britain and Ireland) , in: 1914-1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War.
Monger, David: Press/Journalism (Great Britain and Ireland) , in: 1914-1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War.
Noakes, Lucy: Women's Mobilization for War (Great Britain and Ireland) , in: 1914-1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War.
Monger, David: Propaganda at Home (Great Britain and Ireland) , in: 1914-1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War.
Meyer, Jessica: Subjectivity and Emotions (Great Britain and Ireland) , in: 1914-1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War.
Millman, Brock: War Aims and War Aims Discussions (Great Britain and Ireland) , in: 1914-1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War.
Horn, Martin: War Finance (Great Britain and Ireland) , in: 1914-1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War.
Sheffield City Council Libraries and Archives: "Sources for the Study of World War I in Sheffield" website — research guide links.
Further reading[edit]
Encyclopædia Britannica (12th ed. 1922) comprises the 11th edition plus three new volumes 30-31-32 that cover events since 1911 with very thorough coverage of the war as well as every country and colony. Included also in 13th edition (1926) partly online
Beckett, Ian F.W. (2007). The Great war (2 ed.). Longman. ISBN 1-4058-1252-4. Available on Google books.
Beckett, Ian F.W. The Home Front, 1914–1918: How Britain Survived the Great War (2006) excerpt and text search
Chandler, David (2003). The Oxford History of the British Army. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-280311-5.
The Cambridge History of the First World War Volume 3: Civil Society (2014) online
Ferguson, Niall (1999). The Pity of War. Penguin Books. ISBN 0-14-027523-1.
Gilbert, Martin (1994). Atlas of World War I. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-521077-8.
Surveys, primary sources[edit]
Gooch, G. P. Recent Revelations Of European Diplomancy (1940), pp 343–429 summarizes published memoirs by main participants
Marriott, J. A. R. Modern England, 1885-1945 A History Of My Own Times (4th ed. 1949) pp 347–456 online free
Massie, Robert (2004). Castles of Steel: Britain, Germany, and the Winning of the Great War at Sea. London: Jonathan Cape. ISBN 0-224-04092-8.
Mitchell, T.J. (1931). Casualties and Medical Statistics of the Great War. London: Reprinted by Battery Press (1997). ISBN 0-89839-263-2.
Palmer, Alan; Palmer, Veronica (1992). The Chronology of British History. London: Century Ltd. ISBN 0-7126-5616-2.
Powers, Barry D (1976). Strategy without slide-rule: British air strategy, 1914–1939. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 0-85664-219-3.
Searle, G. R. A New England?: Peace and War, 1886-1918 (New Oxford History of England, Oxford University Press, 2005) pp 663–838..
Somervell, D.C. The Reign of King George V, (1936) pp 101–202; wide-ranging survey. online free
Taylor, A. J. P. (2001). English History 1914–1945 (The Oxford History of England). New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-280140-6.
Turner, John, ed. Britain and the First World War (1988)
The War Office (1922). Statistics of the Military Effort of the British Empire During the Great War 1914–1920. Reprinted by Naval & Military Press. ISBN 1-84734-682-0.
His Majesty's stationery Office (H.M.S.O.) (1922). Statistics of the Military Effort of the British Empire During the Great War, 1914–1920.
Wilson, Trevor. The Myriad Faces of War: Britain and the Great War 1914–1918 (1989) excerpt and text search 864pp; covers both the homefront and the battlefields
Winter, Jay, and Jean-Louis Robert, eds. Capital Cities at War: Paris, London, Berlin 1914–1919 (2 vol. 1999, 2007), 30 chapters 1200pp; comprehensive coverage by scholars vol 1 excerpt; vol 2 excerpt and text search
Politics[edit]
Adams, R. J. Q. (1999). Bonar Law. Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0-8047-3716-6. Available on Google books.
Bourne, J M (2001). Who's who in World War One. Routledge. ISBN 0-415-14179-6.
Bradford, Sarah (1989). King George VI. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. ISBN 0-297-79667-4.
Gilbert, Bentley Brinkerhoff. David Lloyd George: Organizer of Victory 1912–1916 (1992)
Grieves, Keith. The politics of manpower, 1914-18 (Manchester UP, 1988).
Grigg, John. Lloyd George: From Peace to War 1912–1916 (1985)
Grigg, John. Lloyd George: War Leader 1916–1918 (2002)
Hennessey, Thomas (1998). Dividing Ireland, World War I and Partition, The Irish Convention and Conscription. Routledge. ISBN 0-415-17420-1.
McEwen, John M. "The Struggle for Mastery in Britain: Lloyd George versus Asquith, December 1916." Journal of British Studies 18#1 (1978): 131-156.
McGill, Barry. "Asquith's Predicament, 1914-1918." Journal of Modern History 39.3 (1967): 283-303. in JSTOR
Martin, Ged. "Asquith, the Maurice Debate and the Historians." Australian Journal of Politics & History 31.3 (1985): 435-444.
Nicolson, Sir Harold (1952). King George the Fifth: His Life and Reign. London: Constable and Co. ISBN 978-0-09-453181-9.
Paddock, Troy R E (2004). A call to arms: propaganda, public opinion, and newspapers in the Great War. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 0-275-97383-2.
Pennell, Catriona (2012). A Kingdom United: Popular Responses to the Outbreak of the First World War in Britain and Ireland. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-959058-2.
Pope-Hennessy, James (1959). Queen Mary. London: George Allen and Unwin, Ltd. ISBN 1-84212-032-8.
Pugh, Martin D. "Asquith, Bonar Law and the First Coalition." Historical Journal 17#4 (1974): 813-836. in JSTOR
Robbins, Keith. The Abolition of War: The" Peace Movement" in Britain, 1914-1919 (U of Wales Press, 1976).
Roberts, Andrew (2000). The House of Windsor. London: Cassell and Co. ISBN 0-520-22803-0.
Rose, Kenneth (1983). King George V. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. ISBN 0-297-78245-2.
Thornton-Cook, Elsie (1977). Royal Marys, Princess Mary and Her Predecessors. Ayer Publishing. ISBN 0-8369-0940-2.
Turner, John. British Politics and the Great War: Coalition and Conflict 1915–1918 (1992)
Ziegler, Philip (1991). King Edward VIII: The official biography. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. ISBN 0-7509-2747-X.
Empire[edit]
Beaumont, Broken Nation: Australians in the Great War (2014)
Beaumont, Joan (1995). Australia's War, 1914–1918. St Leonards: Allen & Unwin. ISBN 1-86373-461-9.
Fogarty, Richard S., and David Killingray. "Demobilization in British and French Africa at the End of the First World War." Journal of Contemporary History (2015) 50#1 pp: 100–123.
McCreery, Christopher (2005). The Order of Canada. University of Toronto Press. ISBN 0-8020-3940-5. Available on Google books.
Olson, James (1996). Historical Dictionary of the British Empire. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 0-313-29366-X.
Morrow, John Howard (2005). The Great War: An Imperial History. Routledge. ISBN 0-415-20440-2.
Pierce, John (Spring 1992). "Constructing Memory: The Vimy Memorial" (PDF). Canadian Military History. 1 (1–2): 5–14. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 March 2009. Retrieved 17 May 2009.
Economics[edit]
Adams, R. J. Q. "Delivering the Goods: Reappaising the Ministry of Munitions: 1915–1916." Albion: A Quarterly Journal Concerned with British Studies (1975) 7#3 pp: 232–244 in JSTOR
Adams, R. J. Q. Arms and the Wizard: Lloyd George and the Ministry of Munitions. (1978)
Ashworth, William. An Economic History of England, 1870–1939 (1960)
Baker, Charles Whiting (1921). Government control and operation of industry in Great Britain and the United States during the World War. New York: Oxford University Press. Retrieved 18 May 2009. As available from Archive.org.
Barnett, Margaret. British food policy during the First World War (Routledge, 2014)
Barnett, Correlli (2002). The Collapse of British Power. Pan books. ISBN 0-330-49181-4.
Hancock, W.K. and M. M. Gowing. British War Economy (1949) pp 3–40
Hurwitz, Samuel J. (1949). State Intervention in Great Britain: Study of Economic Control and Social Response, 1914–1919. Routledge. ISBN 9781136931864.
Whetham, Edith H. The Agrarian History of England and Wales: Volume VIII: 1914–39 (Cambridge University Press, 1978), pp 70–123
Propaganda and popular culture[edit]
Bell, Stuart. "‘Soldiers of Christ arise’: Religious Nationalism in the East Midlands during World War I." Midland History 39.2 (2014): 219–235.
Field, Clive. "Keeping the Spiritual Home Fires Burning: Religious Belonging in Britain during the First World War." War & Society 33.4 (2014): 244–268.
Goebel, Stefan and White, Jerry. "London and the First World War". London Journal 41:3 (2016): 1–20, <URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03058034.2016.1216758>
Green, Leanne. "Advertising war: Picturing Belgium in First World War publicity." Media, War & Conflict 7.3 (2014): 309–325.
Haste, Cate. Keep the home fires burning: Propaganda in the First World War (Lane, Allen, 1977)
Hynes, Samuel. A war imagined: the First World War and English culture (2011)
Kennedy, Kate. "‘A music of grief’: classical music and the First World War." International Affairs 90.2 (2014): 379–395.
Lasswell, Harold D.. Propaganda Technique in World War I. (1927)
Lonsdale, Sarah. "“Roast Seagull and other Quaint Bird Dishes” The development of features and “lifestyle” journalism in British newspapers during the First World War." Journalism Studies (2014): 1–16.
Millman, Brock. Managing Domestic Dissent in First World War Britain (Routledge, 2014)
Monger, David. Patriotism and Propaganda in First World War Britain: The National War Aims Committee and Civilian Morale (2013) online edition
O'Prey, Paul. "Poetry of the First World War: Dispelling the Myths." The RUSI Journal 159.4 (2014): 102–105.
Wilkinson, Alan. The Church of England and the First World War (Lutterworth Press, 2014)
Williams, Vanessa. "'Welded in a single mass': Memory and Community in London’s Concert Halls during the First World War." Journal of Musicological Research 3.1–3 (2014): 27–38.
Year books[edit]
Annual Register 1915, ighly detailed political history of UK and British Empire
Annual Register 1916
Annual Register 1917
Annual Register 1918
Annual Register 1919
Women, family and society[edit]
Braybon, Gail (1990). Women Workers in the First World War: The British Experience. London: Routledge.
Condell, Diana; Liddiard, Jean (1987). Working for victory?: images of women in the First World War, 1914–18. Routledge. ISBN 0-7102-0974-6. Available on Google books.
Grayzel, Susan R. Women's identities at war: gender, motherhood, and politics in Britain and France during the First World War . UNC Press Books, 1999.
Gregory, Adrian (2008). The Last Great War: British Society and the First World War. Cambridge.
Law, Cheryl (1997). Suffrage and power: the women's movement, 1918–1928. I.B. Tauris. ISBN 1-86064-201-2. Available on Google books.
Marwick, Arthur (1965) The Deluge: British Society and the First World War ISBN 0-393-00523-2
Peel, Mrs. C.S. (Dorothy Constance) (1929) How We Lived Then, 1914–1918: a Sketch of Social and Domestic Life in England during the War, London: Bodley Head
Shields, Rosemary, and Linda Shields. "Dame Maud McCarthy (1859–1949): Matron-in-Chief, British Expeditionary Forces France and Flanders, First World War." Journal of medical biography (2015): 0967772013480610.
Historiography and memory[edit]
Bond, Brian, ed. The First World War and British Military History (Oxford UP, 1991) DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198222996.001.0001 online. 11 topical essays by experts.
Braybon, Gail (2005). Evidence, History and the Great War: Historians and the Impact of 14–18. Berghahn Books. ISBN 978-1-57181-801-0.
Elton, G.R. Modern Historians on British History 1485-1945: A Critical Bibliography 1945-1969 (1969), annotated guide to 1000 history books on every major topic, plus book reviews and major scholarly articles. online
Gaffney, Angela. Aftermath: Remembering the Great War in Wales (1998)
Korte, Barbara and Ann-Marie Einhaus. "Short-Term Memories: The First World War in British Short Stories, 1914–39," Literature & History (2009) 18#1 pp 54–67.
McCartney, Helen B. "The First World War soldier and his contemporary image in Britain," International Affairs (2014) 90#2 pp 299–315.
Wolford, Scott. "Teaching the First World War in 'Real Time'" (2015). online
[show]
v
t
e
History of World War I by region and country
Africa
Angola
East Africa
Egypt
Liberia
Morocco
South Africa
South West Africa
Southern Rhodesia
North America
Canada
United States
South America
Brazil
Asia
Caucasus
India
Iran
Iraq
Japan
Levant
Siam
Vietnam
Yemen
Europe
Austria-Hungary
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Estonia
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Luxembourg
Poland
Ottoman Empire
Portugal
Romania
Russia
Serbia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Ukraine
United Kingdom
Oceania
Australia
New Zealand
[show]
v
t
e
World War I
Home fronts
Theatres
European
Balkans
Western Front
Eastern Front
Italian Front
Middle Eastern
Gallipoli
Sinai and Palestine
Caucasus
Persia
Mesopotamia
South Arabia
African
South West
East
Kamerun
Togoland
North
Asian and Pacific
Tsingtao
German New Guinea and Samoa
At sea
North Atlantic U-boat campaign
Mediterranean
North Sea
Baltic
Indian, Pacific and South Atlantic Oceans
Papeete
Madras
Penang
Cocos
Coronel
Falkland Islands
Más a Tierra
Principal
participants
(people)
Entente powers
Belgium
Brazil
China
France
French Empire
Greece
Italy
Japan
Montenegro
Portuguese Empire
Romania
Russia
Russian Empire
Russian Republic
Serbia
United Kingdom
British Empire
United States
Central Powers
Germany
Austria-Hungary
Ottoman Empire
Bulgaria
Timeline
Pre-War conflicts
Scramble for Africa (1880–1914)
Russo-Japanese War (1905)
First Moroccan (Tangier) Crisis (1905–06)
Agadir Crisis (1911)
Italo-Turkish War (1911–12)
French conquest of Morocco (1911–12)
First Balkan War (1912–13)
Second Balkan War (1913)
Prelude
Origins
Sarajevo assassination
Anti-Serb riots in Sarajevo
July Crisis
Autumn 1914
Battle of the Frontiers
Battle of Cer
First Battle of the Marne
Siege of Tsingtao
Battle of Tannenberg
Battle of Galicia
Battle of the Masurian Lakes
Battle of Kolubara
Battle of Sarikamish
Race to the Sea
First Battle of Ypres
1915
Second Battle of the Masurian Lakes
Second Battle of Ypres
Battle of Gallipoli
Second Battle of Artois
Battles of the Isonzo
Gorlice–Tarnów Offensive
Great Retreat
Second Battle of Champagne
Kosovo Offensive
Siege of Kut
Battle of Loos
1916
Erzurum Offensive
Battle of Verdun
Lake Naroch Offensive
Battle of Asiago
Battle of Jutland
Battle of the Somme
first day
Brusilov Offensive
Baranovichi Offensive
Battle of Romani
Monastir Offensive
Battle of Transylvania
1917
Capture of Baghdad
First Battle of Gaza
Zimmermann Telegram
Second Battle of Arras
Second Battle of the Aisne
Kerensky Offensive
Third Battle of Ypres (Passchendaele)
Battle of Mărășești
Battle of Caporetto
Southern Palestine Offensive
Battle of Cambrai
Armistice of Erzincan
1918
Operation Faustschlag
Treaty of Brest-Litovsk
Spring Offensive
Second Battle of the Marne
Battle of Baku
Hundred Days Offensive
Vardar Offensive
Battle of Megiddo
Third Transjordan attack
Meuse-Argonne Offensive
Battle of Vittorio Veneto
Battle of Aleppo
Armistice of Salonica
Armistice of Mudros
Armistice of Villa Giusti
Armistice with Germany
Other conflicts
Mexican Revolution (1910–20)
Somaliland Campaign (1910–20)
Libyan resistance movement (1911–43)
Maritz Rebellion (1914–15)
Zaian War (1914–21)
Indo-German Conspiracy (1914–19)
Senussi Campaign (1915–16)
Volta-Bani War (1915–17)
Easter Rising (1916)
Anglo-Egyptian Darfur Expedition (1916)
Kaocen Revolt (1916–17)
Central Asian Revolt (1916-17)
Russian Revolution (1917)
Finnish Civil War (1918)
Post-War conflicts
Russian Civil War (1917–21)
Ukrainian–Soviet War (1917–21)
Armenian–Azerbaijani War (1918–20)
Georgian–Armenian War (1918)
German Revolution (1918–19)
Revolutions and interventions in Hungary (1918–20)
Hungarian–Romanian War (1918–19)
Greater Poland Uprising (1918–19)
Estonian War of Independence (1918–20)
Latvian War of Independence (1918–20)
Lithuanian Wars of Independence (1918–20)
Third Anglo-Afghan War (1919)
Egyptian Revolution (1919)
Polish–Ukrainian War (1918–19)
Polish–Soviet War (1919–21)
Irish War of Independence (1919–21)
Turkish War of Independence
Greco-Turkish War (1919–22)
Turkish–Armenian War (1920)
Iraqi revolt (1920)
Polish–Lithuanian War (1920)
Vlora War (1920)
Franco-Syrian War (1920)
Soviet–Georgian War (1921)
Irish Civil War (1922–23)
Aspects
Opposition
Pacifism
Anti-war movement
Deployment
Schlieffen Plan (German)
Plan XVII (French)
Warfare
Military engagements
Naval warfare
Convoy system
Air warfare
Cryptography
Room 40
Horse use
Poison gas
Railways
Strategic bombing
Technology
Trench warfare
Total war
Christmas truce
Last surviving veterans
Civilian impact
Atrocities
Prisoners
Casualties
Economic history
1918 flu pandemic
Destruction of Kalisz
Rape of Belgium
German occupation of Belgium
German occupation of Luxembourg
German occupation of northeastern France
Ober Ost
Ottoman people
Armenian Genocide
Assyrian genocide
Pontic Greek genocide
Urkun (Kyrgyzstan)
Blockade of Germany
Women
Australia
Popular culture
German prisoners of war in the United States
Agreements
Partition of the Ottoman Empire
Sykes–Picot Agreement
Agreement of Saint-Jean-de-Maurienne
French-Armenian Agreement
Damascus Protocol
Paris Peace Conference
Venizelos–Tittoni agreement
Treaties
Treaty of Brest-Litovsk
Treaty of Lausanne
Treaty of London
Treaty of Neuilly
Treaty of St. Germain
Treaty of Sèvres
Treaty of Trianon
Treaty of Versailles
Consequences
Aftermath
"Fourteen Points"
League of Nations
World War I memorials
Centenary
outbreak
Category
Portal
[show]
v
t
e
United Kingdom articles
History
Chronology
Formation
Georgian era
Victorian era
Edwardian era
First World War
Interwar
Second World War
UK since 1945 (social history)
By topic
Economic
Empire
Maritime
Military
Geography
Administrative
Countries of the United Kingdom
Crown dependencies
Overseas territories
City status
Towns
Former colonies
Physical
British Isles
terminology
Great Britain
Coastline
Geology
Northern Ireland
Lakes and lochs
Mountains
Rivers
Volcanoes
Resources
Energy/Renewable energy
Biodiesel
Coal
Geothermal
Hydraulic frac.
Hydroelectricity
Marine
North Sea oil
Solar
Wind
Food
Agriculture
Fishing
English
Scottish
Hunting
Materials
Flora
Forestry
Mining
Politics
Constitution
Courts
Elections
Foreign relations
History
Human rights
Intersex
LGBT
Transgender
Judiciary
Law
Law enforcement
Legislation
Monarchy
monarchs
Nationality
Parliament
House of Commons
House of Lords
Political parties
Government
Cabinet
list
Civil service
Departments
Prime Minister
list
Military
Royal Navy
Army
Royal Air Force
Weapons of mass destruction
Economy
Banks
Bank of England
Budget
Economic geography
Manufacturing
Pound (currency)
Stock Exchanges (London Exchange)
Taxation
Telecommunications
Tourism
Transport
British Rail
Society
Affordability of housing
Crime
Demography
Drug policy
Education
Ethnic groups
Health care
Immigration
Innovation
Languages
Poverty
Food banks
Prostitution
Public holidays
Social care
Social structure
Culture
Art
Cinema
Cuisine
Identity
Literature
Media
television
Music
Religion
Sport
Symbols
Theatre
[show]
Countries of the United Kingdom
England
History
social
timeline
Geography
Politics
Law
Economy
tourism
Education
Health care
Culture
Religion
Symbols
Northern Ireland
History
Geography
Politics
Assembly
Executive
First Minister and deputy
Law
Economy
tourism
Education
Health care
Culture
Religion
Symbols
Scotland
History
timeline
Geography
Politics
Parliament
Government
First Minister
Law
Economy
tourism
Education
Health care
Culture
Religion
Symbols
Wales
History
Geography
Welsh Government
Politics
Assembly
First Minister
Law
Economy
tourism
Education
Health care
Culture
Religion
Symbols
Outline
Index
Book
Category
Portal
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_the_United_Kingdom_during_the_First_World_War&oldid=826747869"
Categories:
United Kingdom in World War I
British Empire in World War I
1910s in the United Kingdom
Military history of the United Kingdom during World War I
World War I by country
20th century in the United Kingdom
Hidden categories:
CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list
CS1: Julian–Gregorian uncertainty
Webarchive template wayback links
Use British English from September 2017
Use dmy dates from April 2017
All articles with unsourced statements
Articles with unsourced statements from August 2009
Good articles
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
In other projects
Wikimedia Commons
Languages
العربية
Беларуская
Español
Հայերեն
Русский
Suomi
Türkçe
Українська
Yorùbá
中文
Edit links
This page was last edited on 20 February 2018, at 20:12.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

attrs: alt src width height srcset data-file-width data-file-height

values: This is a good article. Follow the link for more information.

attrs: class id

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

values: jump-to-nav mw-jump

values:
/wiki/First_World_War
mw-redirect
First World War

attrs: role class

values:
note
hatnote navigation-not-searchable

value: caption

attrs: colspan style

values: text-align:center;padding-top: 0.4em; padding-bottom: 0.4em; border-bottom: 1px solid #aaa; font-weight: bold;

values: A man sits in an armchair, a girl on his knee. The caption reads: 'Daddy, what did YOU do in the Great War?'

values: font-size: 105%; background: transparent; text-align: left;

values: list-style: none none; margin-left: 0px; text-align: left; font-size: 105%; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; line-height: inherit; display: none;

values:
NavFrame collapsed
border: none; padding: 0;
NavFrame1

values:
NavFrame collapsed
border: none; padding: 0;
NavFrame2

values:
NavFrame collapsed
border: none; padding: 0;
NavFrame3

values:
NavFrame collapsed
border: none; padding: 0;
NavFrame4

values: float:right;clear:right;width:22.0em;margin:0 0 1.0em 1.0em;background:#f9f9f9;border:1px solid #aaa;padding:0.2em;border-spacing:0.4em 0;text-align:center;line-height:1.4em;font-size:88%

values:
/wiki/Plantagenet_era
mw-redirect
Plantagenet era

values:
row
font-weight:normal; padding-left: 2em;

values: Political history of the United Kingdom (1945–present)

values: Social history of the United Kingdom (1945–present)

values: font-size:105%;padding:0.2em 0 0.4em;text-align:center;text-align:left; padding-bottom:0;

values: padding:0 0.1em 0.4em;text-align:left; padding-bottom:0;

values: padding:0.3em 0.4em 0.3em;font-weight:bold;border-top: 1px solid #aaa; border-bottom: 1px solid #aaa;

values: Template talk:Periods in English history

values: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland

values:
/wiki/Austro-Hungarian_Empire
mw-redirect
Austro-Hungarian Empire

values: German strategic bombing during World War I

values:
/wiki/1918_UK_general_election
mw-redirect
1918 UK general election

values:
/wiki/Spanish_Flu
mw-redirect
Spanish Flu

values:
/wiki/Irish_nationalists
mw-redirect
Irish nationalists

values: Head of a white-haired gentleman with prominent eyebrows and a firm expression, wearing a wingtip collar

values: Edward Grey, 1st Viscount Grey of Fallodon

values:
/wiki/Defence_of_the_Realm_Act
mw-redirect
Defence of the Realm Act

values: Edit section: Lloyd George as Prime Minister

values:
/wiki/Sir_Edward_Carson
mw-redirect
Sir Edward Carson

values:
/wiki/Ulster_Unionists
mw-redirect
Ulster Unionists

values: Head and shoulders of a middle-aged gentleman with a bushy moustache

values:
/wiki/Irish_National_Party
mw-redirect
Irish National Party

values: Edit section: Collapse of the Liberal Party

values:
/wiki/The_Coalition_Coupon
mw-redirect
The Coalition Coupon

values: A man, wearing a crown and holding a broom, sweeps away a collection of other crowns

values:
/wiki/Cousin_chart
mw-redirect
Cousin chart

values:
/wiki/William_II,_German_Emperor
mw-redirect
William II, German Emperor

values:
/wiki/Rulers_of_W%C3%BCrttemberg
mw-redirect
Rulers of Württemberg

values:
/wiki/British_Royal_Family
mw-redirect
British Royal Family

values:
/wiki/Victoria_of_the_United_Kingdom
mw-redirect
Victoria of the United Kingdom

values: Louis Mountbatten, 1st Marquess of Milford Haven

values: Adolphus Cambridge, 1st Marquess of Cambridge

values: Princess Marie Louise of Schleswig-Holstein

values: Princess Helena Victoria of Schleswig-Holstein

values: Two look-alike men. Both wear beards and are in full military regalia festooned with medals—one uniform dark, the other white.

values:
/wiki/Russian_Revolution_of_1917
mw-redirect
Russian Revolution of 1917

values: Five men, all in immaculate naval dress, stand on deck.

values:
/wiki/William_S._Sims
mw-redirect
William S. Sims

values: Mary, Princess Royal and Countess of Harewood

values:
/wiki/Girlguiding_UK
mw-redirect
Girlguiding UK

values:
/wiki/British_government
mw-redirect
British government

values:
/wiki/Death_penalty
mw-redirect
Death penalty

values:
/wiki/Court_martial
mw-redirect
Court martial

values: A large throng of people congregate, surrounded by police officers. Approximately half wear peaked caps; the rest wear boaters. Some smile, the rest look pensive.

values:
/wiki/St._Martin-in-the-Fields
mw-redirect
St. Martin-in-the-Fields

values: British Expeditionary Force (World War I)

values:
/wiki/Old_Contemptibles
mw-redirect
Old Contemptibles

values:
/wiki/French_navy#19th_century_revival
mw-redirect
French navy

values:
/wiki/British_Grand_Fleet
mw-redirect
British Grand Fleet

values:
/wiki/Kaiserliche_Marine
mw-redirect
Kaiserliche Marine

values:
/wiki/Battle_of_Heligoland_(1914)
mw-redirect
Battle of Heligoland (1914)

values: A poster reads "ROYAL FLYING CORPS", "MILITARY WING", "VACANCIES EXIST", information about pay, "GOD SAVE THE KING".

values:
/wiki/Aubers_Ridge
mw-redirect
Aubers Ridge

values:
/wiki/Hugh_Trenchard
mw-redirect
Hugh Trenchard

values: Edit section: Recruitment and conscription

values: Recruitment to the British Army during the First World War

values:
/wiki/St._George_and_the_Dragon
mw-redirect
St. George and the Dragon

values:
/wiki/Pals_battalions
mw-redirect
Pals battalions

values: Edit section: Conscription Crisis of 1918

values:
/wiki/Ireland_in_World_War_I
mw-redirect
Ireland in World War I

values:
/wiki/Anglo-Irish_War
mw-redirect
Anglo-Irish War

values:
/wiki/Civilian_service
mw-redirect
Civilian service

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (August 2009)

values:
noprint Inline-Template Template-Fact
white-space:nowrap;

values: A map of England, with towns bombarded during the war marked. All are in the east.

values: Raid on Scarborough, Hartlepool and Whitby

values: Britannia stands in front of a group of men holding various armaments, looking out over a scene of burning houses. The caption reads "REMEMBER SCARBOROUGH!", "ENLIST NOW".

values: Edit section: Bombardment of Yarmouth and Lowestoft

values: Poster: picture of Zeppelin illuminated by searchlight over silhouetted London skyline; headline: "IT IS FAR BETTER TO FACE THE BULLETS THAN TO BE KILLED AT HOME BY A BOMB"

values:
/wiki/Imperial_Germany
mw-redirect
Imperial Germany

values:
/wiki/War_Propaganda_Bureau
mw-redirect
War Propaganda Bureau

values:
/wiki/Press_baron
mw-redirect
Press baron

values: Harold Harmsworth, 1st Viscount Rothermere

values: Alfred Harmsworth, 1st Viscount Northcliffe

values:
/wiki/Evening_News_(London)
mw-redirect
Evening News (London)

values:
/wiki/Marching_song
mw-redirect
Marching song

values: Pack Up Your Troubles in Your Old Kit-Bag

values: A document says "DEFENCE OF THE REALM", "MINISTRY OF FOOD", "BREACHES OF THE RATIONING ORDER", "The undermentioned convictions have been recently obtained", and a list of various offences committed and the punishments handed out.

values: Workers stand around a large forge, where a shell burns red-hot.

values:
/wiki/Ministry_of_Munitions
mw-redirect
Ministry of Munitions

values:
/wiki/J._A._R._Marriott
mw-redirect
J. A. R. Marriott

values:
/wiki/Her_Majesty%27s_Civil_Service
mw-redirect
Her Majesty's Civil Service

values:
/wiki/Women%27s_Suffrage_Federation
mw-redirect
Women's Suffrage Federation

values: Parliament (Qualification of Women) Act 1918

values:
/wiki/Merchant_Navy
mw-redirect
Merchant Navy

values: A map showing various areas highlighted, including Great Britain, Canada, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand

values: The same map, with additional areas coloured (see text)

values:
/wiki/UK_General_Strike_1926
mw-redirect
UK General Strike 1926

values:
/wiki/British_Dominions
mw-redirect
British Dominions

values:
/wiki/Battle_of_Gallipoli
mw-redirect
Battle of Gallipoli

values:
/wiki/British_Mandate_of_Palestine
mw-redirect
British Mandate of Palestine

values:
/wiki/British_Mandate_of_Mesopotamia
mw-redirect
British Mandate of Mesopotamia

values: display:table-cell;padding:0.2em 0.2em 0.2em 0.3em;vertical-align:middle

values: margin:0.5em 0 0.5em 1em;border:solid #aaa 1px

values:
/wiki/Chris_Clark_(historian)
mw-redirect
Chris Clark (historian)

values:
nofollow
external text
https://www.jstor.org/stable/1876582

values:
nofollow
external text
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2638335

values:
nofollow
external text
https://www.jstor.org/stable/259859

values:
nofollow
external text
https://www.jstor.org/stable/1874424

values: Category:CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list

values: Albion: A Quarterly Journal Concerned with British Studies

values:
nofollow
external text
https://www.jstor.org/stable/4048178

values:
nofollow
external text
https://www.jstor.org/stable/577566

values:
nofollow
external text
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2596203

values: -moz-column-width: 30em; -webkit-column-width: 30em; column-width: 30em; list-style-type: decimal;

values: commons:Category:United Kingdom in World War I

values:
/wiki/G._P._Gooch
mw-redirect
G. P. Gooch

values:
/wiki/Robert_Massie
mw-redirect
Robert Massie

values:
/wiki/His_Majesty%27s_stationery_Office
mw-redirect
His Majesty's stationery Office

values:
/wiki/John_Grigg_(writer)
mw-redirect
John Grigg (writer)

values:
/wiki/Historical_Journal
mw-redirect
Historical Journal

values:
nofollow
external text
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2638558

values: Edit section: Propaganda and popular culture

values:
/wiki/Harold_D._Lasswell
mw-redirect
Harold D. Lasswell

values: South African Overseas Expeditionary Force

values: Military history of Canada during World War I

values: German occupation of Estonia during World War I

values: Military history of Italy during World War I

values: German occupation of Luxembourg during World War I

values: History of the Ottoman Empire during World War I

values: Military history of Australia during World War I

values: Military history of New Zealand during World War I

values: nowraplinks collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner

values:
navbox-abovebelow hlist
2
background-color:#DCDCDC;

values: Military operations in North Africa during World War I

values: Asian and Pacific theatre of World War I

values: Naval warfare in the Mediterranean during World War I

values: Defeat and dissolution of the Ottoman Empire

values: Assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria

values: Treaty of Brest-Litovsk (Russia–Central Powers)

values: Revolutions and interventions in Hungary (1918–20)

values: List of military engagements of World War I

values: List of last World War I veterans by country

values: German occupation of Belgium during World War I

values: German occupation of north-east France during World War I

values: German prisoners of war in the United States

values: Centenary of the outbreak of World War I

values: nowraplinks collapsible collapsed navbox-inner

values: History of the formation of the United Kingdom

values: Administrative geography of the United Kingdom

values: List of countries that gained independence from the United Kingdom

values: List of lakes and lochs in the United Kingdom

values: List of mountains and hills of the United Kingdom

values: List of renewable resources produced and traded by the United Kingdom

values: Hydraulic fracturing in the United Kingdom

values:
/wiki/British_food
mw-redirect
British food

values:
/wiki/Fishing_in_Scotland
mw-redirect
Fishing in Scotland

values: Hunting and shooting in the United Kingdom

values: List of the vascular plants of Britain and Ireland

values: History of the foreign relations of the United Kingdom

values: Transgender rights in the United Kingdom

values:
/wiki/Judiciary_of_the_United_Kingdom
mw-redirect
Judiciary of the United Kingdom

values: List of political parties in the United Kingdom

values: Departments of the United Kingdom Government

values: List of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom

values: United Kingdom and weapons of mass destruction

values:
/wiki/United_Kingdom_budget
mw-redirect
United Kingdom budget

values: Economic geography of the United Kingdom

values: List of stock exchanges in the United Kingdom, the British Crown Dependencies and United Kingdom Overseas Territories

values: Telecommunications in the United Kingdom

values: Affordability of housing in the United Kingdom

values:
/wiki/Healthcare_in_the_United_Kingdom
mw-redirect
Healthcare in the United Kingdom

values: Immigration to the United Kingdom since 1922

values: List of British innovations and discoveries

values: Symbols of the United Kingdom, the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man

values:
/wiki/Social_history_of_England
mw-redirect
Social history of England

values: First Minister and deputy First Minister

values: Health and Social Care in Northern Ireland

values: nowraplinks collapsible collapsed navbox-subgroup

values: Index of United Kingdom-related articles

values: nowraplinks hlist collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner

values: Category:Military history of the United Kingdom during World War I

values: Category:20th century in the United Kingdom

values: Category:Webarchive template wayback links

values: Category:Use British English from September 2017

values: Category:All articles with unsourced statements

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from August 2009

values: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

values: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

values: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

values: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

values: Discussion about the content page [ctrl-alt-t]

values: p-namespaces navigation vectorTabs p-namespaces-label

values:
p-variants
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-variants-label

values: Past revisions of this page [ctrl-alt-h]

values: p-views navigation vectorTabs p-views-label

values:
p-cactions
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-cactions-label

values:
mw-wiki-logo
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page

values:
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page [ctrl-alt-z]
z

values: Featured content – the best of Wikipedia

values: Find background information on current events

values:
/wiki/Special:Random
Load a random article [ctrl-alt-x]
x

values: portal navigation p-wikibase-otherprojects p-wikibase-otherprojects-label

values: بريطانيا خلال الحرب العالمية الاولي – Arabic

values: Вялікабрытанія ў Першай сусветнай вайне – Belarusian

values: Reino Unido en la Primera Guerra Mundial – Spanish

values: Մեծ Բրիտանիան Առաջին համաշխարհային պատերազմում – Armenian

values: Великобритания в Первой мировой войне – Russian

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-ru badge-Q17437798 badge-goodarticle

values: Iso-Britannia ensimmäisessä maailmansodassa – Finnish

values: I. Dünya Savaşı'nda Birleşik Krallık – Turkish

values: Велика Британія в Першій світовій війні – Ukrainian

values: Ìtàn ilẹ̀ Brítánì nígbà Ogun Àgbáyé Àkọ́kọ́ – Yoruba

values: 第一次世界大战中的英国 – Chinese

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-History_of_the_United_Kingdom_during_the_First_World_War rootpage-History_of_the_United_Kingdom_during_the_First_World_War skin-vector action-view