text:
Hubble Space Telescope
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
"Hubble" redirects here. For other uses, see Hubble (disambiguation).
Hubble Space Telescope
The Hubble Space Telescope as seen from the departing Space Shuttle Atlantis, flying Servicing Mission 4 (STS-125), the fifth and final Hubble mission
Mission type
Astronomy
Operator
NASA · ESA · STScI
COSPAR ID
1990-037B
SATCAT no.
20580
Website
www.nasa.gov/hubble
hubblesite.org
www.spacetelescope.org
Mission duration
Elapsed: 28 years, 3 months, 18 days
Spacecraft properties
Manufacturer
Lockheed (spacecraft)
Perkin-Elmer (optics)
Launch mass
11,110 kg (24,490 lb)[1]
Dimensions
13.2 m × 4.2 m (43.3 ft × 13.8 ft)[1]
Power
2,800 watts
Start of mission
Launch date
April 24, 1990, 12:33:51 (1990-04-24UTC12:33:51) UTC[2]
Rocket
Space Shuttle Discovery (STS-31)
Launch site
Kennedy LC-39B
Deployment date
April 25, 1990[1]
Entered service
May 20, 1990[1]
End of mission
Decay date
estimated 2030–2040[3]
Orbital parameters
Reference system
Geocentric
Regime
Low Earth
Semi-major axis
6,917.5 km (4,298.3 mi)
Eccentricity
0.000287
Perigee
537.4 km (333.9 mi)
Apogee
541.4 km (336.4 mi)
Inclination
28.47°
Period
95.47 minutes 1.35.25.83
RAAN
176.23°
Argument of perigee
82.61°
Mean anomaly
319.41°
Mean motion
15.09 rev/day
Velocity
7.59 km/s (4.72 mi/s)
Epoch
December 26, 2017, 13:18:33 UTC[4]
Revolution no.
31,936
Main telescope
Type
Ritchey–Chrétien reflector
Diameter
2.4 m (7.9 ft)[5]
Focal length
57.6 m (189 ft)[5]
Focal ratio
f/24
Collecting area
4.525 m2 (48.7 sq ft)[5]
Wavelengths
Near-infrared, visible light, ultraviolet
showInstruments
NICMOS
Near Infrared Camera and Multi-Object Spectrometer
ACS
Advanced Camera for Surveys
WFC3
Wide Field Camera 3
COS
Cosmic Origins Spectrograph
STIS
Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph
FGS
Fine Guidance Sensor
The Hubble Space Telescope (HST) is a space telescope that was launched into low Earth orbit in 1990 and remains in operation. Although not the first space telescope, Hubble is one of the largest and most versatile, and is well known as both a vital research tool and a public relations boon for astronomy. The HST is named after the astronomer Edwin Hubble, and is one of NASA's Great Observatories, along with the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory, the Chandra X-ray Observatory, and the Spitzer Space Telescope.[6]
With a 2.4-meter (7.9 ft) mirror, Hubble's four main instruments observe in the near ultraviolet, visible, and near infrared spectra. Hubble's orbit outside the distortion of Earth's atmosphere allows it to take extremely high-resolution images, with substantially lower background light than ground-based telescopes. Hubble has recorded some of the most detailed visible light images ever, allowing a deep view into space and time. Many Hubble observations have led to breakthroughs in astrophysics, such as accurately determining the rate of expansion of the universe.
The HST was built by the United States space agency NASA, with contributions from the European Space Agency. The Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI) selects Hubble's targets and processes the resulting data, while the Goddard Space Flight Center controls the spacecraft.[7]
Space telescopes were proposed as early as 1923. Hubble was funded in the 1970s, with a proposed launch in 1983, but the project was beset by technical delays, budget problems, and the Challenger disaster (1986). When finally launched in 1990, Hubble's main mirror was found to have been ground incorrectly, compromising the telescope's capabilities. The optics were corrected to their intended quality by a servicing mission in 1993.
Hubble is the only telescope designed to be serviced in space by astronauts. After launch by Space Shuttle Discovery in 1990, five subsequent Space Shuttle missions repaired, upgraded, and replaced systems on the telescope, including all five of the main instruments. The fifth mission was initially canceled on safety grounds following the Columbia disaster (2003). However, after spirited public discussion, NASA administrator Mike Griffin approved the fifth servicing mission, completed in 2009. The telescope is operating as of 2018[update], and could last until 2030–2040.[3] Its scientific successor, the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), is scheduled for launch in March 2021.[8]
Contents
1 Conception, design and aim
1.1 Proposals and precursors
1.2 Quest for funding
1.3 Construction and engineering
1.4 Optical Telescope Assembly (OTA)
1.5 Spacecraft systems
1.6 Computer systems and data processing
1.7 Initial instruments
1.8 Ground support
1.9 Challenger disaster, delays, and eventual launch
2 List of Hubble instruments
3 Flawed mirror
3.1 Origin of the problem
3.2 Design of a solution
4 Servicing missions and new instruments
4.1 Servicing Mission 1
4.2 Servicing Mission 2
4.3 Servicing Mission 3A
4.4 Servicing Mission 3B
4.5 Servicing Mission 4
5 Major projects
5.1 Cosmic Assembly Near-infrared Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey
5.2 Frontier Fields program
6 Public use
6.1 Amateur observations
7 Scientific results
7.1 Key projects
7.2 Important discoveries
7.3 Impact on astronomy
7.4 Aerospace engineering
8 Hubble data
8.1 Transmission to Earth
8.2 Color images
8.3 Archives
8.4 Pipeline reduction
8.5 Data analysis
9 Outreach activities
9.1 Celebration images
10 Equipment failures
11 Future
11.1 Orbital decay and controlled reentry
11.2 Possible commercial service missions
11.3 Successors
12 See also
13 References
13.1 Bibliography
14 Further reading
15 External links
Conception, design and aim[edit]
Proposals and precursors[edit]
Astronaut Owen Garriott works next to Skylab's manned solar space observatory, 1973
In 1923, Hermann Oberth—considered a father of modern rocketry, along with Robert H. Goddard and Konstantin Tsiolkovsky—published Die Rakete zu den Planetenräumen ("The Rocket into Planetary Space"), which mentioned how a telescope could be propelled into Earth orbit by a rocket.[9]
The history of the Hubble Space Telescope can be traced back as far as 1946, to the astronomer Lyman Spitzer's paper "Astronomical advantages of an extraterrestrial observatory".[10] In it, he discussed the two main advantages that a space-based observatory would have over ground-based telescopes. First, the angular resolution (the smallest separation at which objects can be clearly distinguished) would be limited only by diffraction, rather than by the turbulence in the atmosphere, which causes stars to twinkle, known to astronomers as seeing. At that time ground-based telescopes were limited to resolutions of 0.5–1.0 arcseconds, compared to a theoretical diffraction-limited resolution of about 0.05 arcsec for a telescope with a mirror 2.5 m (8.2 ft) in diameter. Second, a space-based telescope could observe infrared and ultraviolet light, which are strongly absorbed by the atmosphere.
Spitzer devoted much of his career to pushing for the development of a space telescope. In 1962, a report by the US National Academy of Sciences recommended the development of a space telescope as part of the space program, and in 1965 Spitzer was appointed as head of a committee given the task of defining scientific objectives for a large space telescope.[11]
Space-based astronomy had begun on a very small scale following World War II, as scientists made use of developments that had taken place in rocket technology. The first ultraviolet spectrum of the Sun was obtained in 1946,[12] and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) launched the Orbiting Solar Observatory (OSO) to obtain UV, X-ray, and gamma-ray spectra in 1962.[13] An orbiting solar telescope was launched in 1962 by the United Kingdom as part of the Ariel space program, and in 1966 NASA launched the first Orbiting Astronomical Observatory (OAO) mission. OAO-1's battery failed after three days, terminating the mission. It was followed by OAO-2, which carried out ultraviolet observations of stars and galaxies from its launch in 1968 until 1972, well beyond its original planned lifetime of one year.[14]
The OSO and OAO missions demonstrated the important role space-based observations could play in astronomy, and in 1968, NASA developed firm plans for a space-based reflecting telescope with a mirror 3 m (9.8 ft) in diameter, known provisionally as the Large Orbiting Telescope or Large Space Telescope (LST), with a launch slated for 1979. These plans emphasized the need for manned maintenance missions to the telescope to ensure such a costly program had a lengthy working life, and the concurrent development of plans for the reusable space shuttle indicated that the technology to allow this was soon to become available.[15]
Quest for funding[edit]
The continuing success of the OAO program encouraged increasingly strong consensus within the astronomical community that the LST should be a major goal. In 1970, NASA established two committees, one to plan the engineering side of the space telescope project, and the other to determine the scientific goals of the mission. Once these had been established, the next hurdle for NASA was to obtain funding for the instrument, which would be far more costly than any Earth-based telescope. The U.S. Congress questioned many aspects of the proposed budget for the telescope and forced cuts in the budget for the planning stages, which at the time consisted of very detailed studies of potential instruments and hardware for the telescope. In 1974, public spending cuts led to Congress deleting all funding for the telescope project.[16]
In response a nationwide lobbying effort was coordinated among astronomers. Many astronomers met congressmen and senators in person, and large scale letter-writing campaigns were organized. The National Academy of Sciences published a report emphasizing the need for a space telescope, and eventually the Senate agreed to half of the budget that had originally been approved by Congress.[17]
The funding issues led to something of a reduction in the scale of the project, with the proposed mirror diameter reduced from 3 m to 2.4 m, both to cut costs [18] and to allow a more compact and effective configuration for the telescope hardware. A proposed precursor 1.5 m (4.9 ft) space telescope to test the systems to be used on the main satellite was dropped, and budgetary concerns also prompted collaboration with the European Space Agency. ESA agreed to provide funding and supply one of the first generation instruments for the telescope, as well as the solar cells that would power it, and staff to work on the telescope in the United States, in return for European astronomers being guaranteed at least 15% of the observing time on the telescope.[19] Congress eventually approved funding of US$36 million for 1978, and the design of the LST began in earnest, aiming for a launch date of 1983.[17] In 1983 the telescope was named after Edwin Hubble,[20] who made one of the greatest scientific breakthroughs of the 20th century when he discovered that the universe is expanding.[21]
Construction and engineering[edit]
Grinding of Hubble's primary mirror at Perkin-Elmer, March 1979
Once the Space Telescope project had been given the go-ahead, work on the program was divided among many institutions. Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) was given responsibility for the design, development, and construction of the telescope, while Goddard Space Flight Center was given overall control of the scientific instruments and ground-control center for the mission.[22] MSFC commissioned the optics company Perkin-Elmer to design and build the Optical Telescope Assembly (OTA) and Fine Guidance Sensors for the space telescope. Lockheed was commissioned to construct and integrate the spacecraft in which the telescope would be housed.[23]
Optical Telescope Assembly (OTA)[edit]
Optically, the HST is a Cassegrain reflector of Ritchey–Chrétien design, as are most large professional telescopes. This design, with two hyperbolic mirrors, is known for good imaging performance over a wide field of view, with the disadvantage that the mirrors have shapes that are hard to fabricate and test. The mirror and optical systems of the telescope determine the final performance, and they were designed to exacting specifications. Optical telescopes typically have mirrors polished to an accuracy of about a tenth of the wavelength of visible light, but the Space Telescope was to be used for observations from the visible through the ultraviolet (shorter wavelengths) and was specified to be diffraction limited to take full advantage of the space environment. Therefore, its mirror needed to be polished to an accuracy of 10 nanometers (0.4 microinches), or about 1/65 of the wavelength of red light.[24] On the long wavelength end, the OTA was not designed with optimum IR performance in mind—for example, the mirrors are kept at stable (and warm, about 15 °C) temperatures by heaters. This limits Hubble's performance as an infrared telescope.[25]
The backup mirror, by Kodak; its inner support structure can be seen because it is not coated with a reflective surface
Perkin-Elmer intended to use custom-built and extremely sophisticated computer-controlled polishing machines to grind the mirror to the required shape.[23] However, in case their cutting-edge technology ran into difficulties, NASA demanded that PE sub-contract to Kodak to construct a back-up mirror using traditional mirror-polishing techniques.[26] (The team of Kodak and Itek also bid on the original mirror polishing work. Their bid called for the two companies to double-check each other's work, which would have almost certainly caught the polishing error that later caused such problems.[27]) The Kodak mirror is now on permanent display at the National Air and Space Museum.[28][29] An Itek mirror built as part of the effort is now used in the 2.4 m telescope at the Magdalena Ridge Observatory.[30]
Construction of the Perkin-Elmer mirror began in 1979, starting with a blank manufactured by Corning from their ultra-low expansion glass. To keep the mirror's weight to a minimum it consisted of top and bottom plates, each one inch (25 mm) thick, sandwiching a honeycomb lattice. Perkin-Elmer simulated microgravity by supporting the mirror from the back with 130 rods that exerted varying amounts of force.[31] This ensured that the mirror's final shape would be correct and to specification when finally deployed. Mirror polishing continued until May 1981. NASA reports at the time questioned Perkin-Elmer's managerial structure, and the polishing began to slip behind schedule and over budget. To save money, NASA halted work on the back-up mirror and put the launch date of the telescope back to October 1984.[32] The mirror was completed by the end of 1981; it was washed using 2,400 US gallons (9,100 L) of hot, deionized water and then received a reflective coating of 65 nm-thick (2.6 μin) aluminum and a protective coating of 25 nm-thick (0.98 μin) magnesium fluoride.[25][33]
The OTA, metering truss, and secondary baffle are visible in this image of Hubble during early construction.
Doubts continued to be expressed about Perkin-Elmer's competence on a project of this importance, as their budget and timescale for producing the rest of the OTA continued to inflate. In response to a schedule described as "unsettled and changing daily", NASA postponed the launch date of the telescope until April 1985. Perkin-Elmer's schedules continued to slip at a rate of about one month per quarter, and at times delays reached one day for each day of work. NASA was forced to postpone the launch date until March and then September 1986. By this time, the total project budget had risen to US$1.175 billion.[34]
Spacecraft systems[edit]
The spacecraft in which the telescope and instruments were to be housed was another major engineering challenge. It would have to withstand frequent passages from direct sunlight into the darkness of Earth's shadow, which would cause major changes in temperature, while being stable enough to allow extremely accurate pointing of the telescope. A shroud of multi-layer insulation keeps the temperature within the telescope stable and surrounds a light aluminum shell in which the telescope and instruments sit. Within the shell, a graphite-epoxy frame keeps the working parts of the telescope firmly aligned.[35] Because graphite composites are hygroscopic, there was a risk that water vapor absorbed by the truss while in Lockheed's clean room would later be expressed in the vacuum of space; resulting in the telescope's instruments being covered by ice. To reduce that risk, a nitrogen gas purge was performed before launching the telescope into space.[36]
While construction of the spacecraft in which the telescope and instruments would be housed proceeded somewhat more smoothly than the construction of the OTA, Lockheed still experienced some budget and schedule slippage, and by the summer of 1985, construction of the spacecraft was 30% over budget and three months behind schedule. An MSFC report said that Lockheed tended to rely on NASA directions rather than take their own initiative in the construction.[37]
Computer systems and data processing[edit]
DF-224 in Hubble, before it was replaced in 1999
The two initial, primary computers on the HST were the 1.25 MHz DF-224 system, built by Rockwell Autonetics, which contained three redundant CPUs, and two redundant NSSC-1 (NASA Standard Spacecraft Computer, Model 1) systems, developed by Westinghouse and GSFC using diode–transistor logic (DTL). A co-processor for the DF-224 was added during Servicing Mission 1 in 1993, which consisted of two redundant strings of an Intel-based 80386 processor with an 80387 math co-processor.[38] The DF-224 and its 386 co-processor were replaced by a 25 MHz Intel-based 80486 processor system during Servicing Mission 3A in 1999.[39]
Additionally, some of the science instruments and components had their own embedded microprocessor-based control systems. The MATs (Multiple Access Transponder) components, MAT-1 and MAT-2, utilize Hughes Aircraft CDP1802CD microprocessors.[40] The Wide Field and Planetary Camera (WFPC) also utilized an RCA 1802 microprocessor (or possibly the older 1801 version).[41] The WFPC-1 was replaced by the WFPC-2 during Servicing Mission 1 in 1993, which was then replaced by the Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3) during Servicing Mission 4 in 2009.
Initial instruments[edit]
Exploded view of the Hubble Space Telescope
Main articles: Wide Field and Planetary Camera, Goddard High Resolution Spectrograph, High Speed Photometer, Faint Object Camera, and Faint Object Spectrograph
When launched, the HST carried five scientific instruments: the Wide Field and Planetary Camera (WF/PC), Goddard High Resolution Spectrograph (GHRS), High Speed Photometer (HSP), Faint Object Camera (FOC) and the Faint Object Spectrograph (FOS). WF/PC was a high-resolution imaging device primarily intended for optical observations. It was built by NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and incorporated a set of 48 filters isolating spectral lines of particular astrophysical interest. The instrument contained eight charge-coupled device (CCD) chips divided between two cameras, each using four CCDs. Each CCD has a resolution of 0.64 megapixels.[42] The "wide field camera" (WFC) covered a large angular field at the expense of resolution, while the "planetary camera" (PC) took images at a longer effective focal length than the WF chips, giving it a greater magnification.[43]
The GHRS was a spectrograph designed to operate in the ultraviolet. It was built by the Goddard Space Flight Center and could achieve a spectral resolution of 90,000.[44] Also optimized for ultraviolet observations were the FOC and FOS, which were capable of the highest spatial resolution of any instruments on Hubble. Rather than CCDs these three instruments used photon-counting digicons as their detectors. The FOC was constructed by ESA, while the University of California, San Diego, and Martin Marietta Corporation built the FOS.[43]
The final instrument was the HSP, designed and built at the University of Wisconsin–Madison. It was optimized for visible and ultraviolet light observations of variable stars and other astronomical objects varying in brightness. It could take up to 100,000 measurements per second with a photometric accuracy of about 2% or better.[45]
HST's guidance system can also be used as a scientific instrument. Its three Fine Guidance Sensors (FGS) are primarily used to keep the telescope accurately pointed during an observation, but can also be used to carry out extremely accurate astrometry; measurements accurate to within 0.0003 arcseconds have been achieved.[46]
Ground support[edit]
Hubble Control Center at Goddard Space Flight Center, 1999
Main article: Space Telescope Science Institute
The Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI) is responsible for the scientific operation of the telescope and the delivery of data products to astronomers. STScI is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy (AURA) and is physically located in Baltimore, Maryland on the Homewood campus of Johns Hopkins University, one of the 39 US universities and seven international affiliates that make up the AURA consortium. STScI was established in 1981[47][48] after something of a power struggle between NASA and the scientific community at large. NASA had wanted to keep this function in-house, but scientists wanted it to be based in an academic establishment.[49][50] The Space Telescope European Coordinating Facility (ST-ECF), established at Garching bei München near Munich in 1984, provided similar support for European astronomers until 2011, when these activities were moved to the European Space Astronomy Centre.
Hubble's low orbit means many targets are visible for somewhat less than half of an orbit's elapsed time, since they are blocked from view by the Earth for one-half of each orbit.
One rather complex task that falls to STScI is scheduling observations for the telescope.[51] Hubble is in a low-Earth orbit to enable servicing missions, but this means that most astronomical targets are occulted by the Earth for slightly less than half of each orbit. Observations cannot take place when the telescope passes through the South Atlantic Anomaly due to elevated radiation levels, and there are also sizable exclusion zones around the Sun (precluding observations of Mercury), Moon and Earth. The solar avoidance angle is about 50°, to keep sunlight from illuminating any part of the OTA. Earth and Moon avoidance keeps bright light out of the FGSs, and keeps scattered light from entering the instruments. If the FGSs are turned off, however, the Moon and Earth can be observed. Earth observations were used very early in the program to generate flat-fields for the WFPC1 instrument. There is a so-called continuous viewing zone (CVZ), at roughly 90° to the plane of Hubble's orbit, in which targets are not occulted for long periods. Due to the precession of the orbit, the location of the CVZ moves slowly over a period of eight weeks. Because the limb of the Earth is always within about 30° of regions within the CVZ, the brightness of scattered earthshine may be elevated for long periods during CVZ observations.
Hubble orbits in low Earth orbit at an altitude of approximately 540 kilometers (340 mi) and an inclination of 28.5°.[4] The position along its orbit changes over time in a way that is not accurately predictable. The density of the upper atmosphere varies according to many factors, and this means that Hubble's predicted position for six weeks' time could be in error by up to 4,000 km (2,500 mi). Observation schedules are typically finalized only a few days in advance, as a longer lead time would mean there was a chance that the target would be unobservable by the time it was due to be observed.[52]
Engineering support for HST is provided by NASA and contractor personnel at the Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, 48 km (30 mi) south of the STScI. Hubble's operation is monitored 24 hours per day by four teams of flight controllers who make up Hubble's Flight Operations Team.[51]
Challenger disaster, delays, and eventual launch[edit]
STS-31 lifts off, carrying Hubble into orbit.
Hubble being deployed from Discovery in 1990.
By early 1986, the planned launch date of October that year looked feasible, but the Challenger accident brought the U.S. space program to a halt, grounding the Space Shuttle fleet and forcing the launch of Hubble to be postponed for several years. The telescope had to be kept in a clean room, powered up and purged with nitrogen, until a launch could be rescheduled. This costly situation (about US$6 million per month) pushed the overall costs of the project even higher. This delay did allow time for engineers to perform extensive tests, swap out a possibly failure-prone battery, and make other improvements.[53] Furthermore, the ground software needed to control Hubble was not ready in 1986, and was barely ready by the 1990 launch.[54]
Eventually, following the resumption of shuttle flights in 1988, the launch of the telescope was scheduled for 1990. On April 24, 1990, Space Shuttle Discovery successfully launched the telescope into its planned orbit during the STS-31 mission.[55]
From its original total cost estimate of about US$400 million, the telescope cost about US$4.7 billion by the time of its launch. Hubble's cumulative costs were estimated to be about US$10 billion in 2010, twenty years after launch.[56]
List of Hubble instruments[edit]
Hubble accommodates five science instruments at a given time, plus the Fine Guidance Sensors, which are mainly used for aiming the telescope but are occasionally used for science (astrometry). Early instruments were replaced with more advanced ones during the Shuttle servicing missions. COSTAR was strictly a corrective optics device rather than a true science instrument, but occupied one of the five instrument bays.
Since the final servicing mission in 2009, the four active instruments have been ACS, COS, STIS and WFC3. NICMOS is kept in hibernation, but may be revived if WFC3 were to fail in the future.
Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS; 2002–present)
Cosmic Origins Spectrograph (COS; 2009–present)
Corrective Optics Space Telescope Axial Replacement (COSTAR; 1993–2009)
Faint Object Camera (FOC; 1990–2002)
Faint Object Spectrograph (FOS; 1990–1997)
Fine Guidance Sensor (FGS; 1990–present)
Goddard High Resolution Spectrograph (GHRS/HRS; 1990–1997)
High Speed Photometer (HSP; 1990–1993)
Near Infrared Camera and Multi-Object Spectrometer (NICMOS; 1997–present, hibernating since 2008)
Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS; 1997–present (non-operative 2004–2009))
Wide Field and Planetary Camera (WFPC; 1990–1993)
Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2 (WFPC2; 1993–2009)
Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3; 2009–present)
Of the former instruments, three (COSTAR, FOS and WFPC2) are displayed in the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum. The FOC is in the Dornier museum, Germany. The HSP is in the Space Place at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. The first WFPC was dismantled, and some components were then re-used in WFC3. The current location of GHRS is unclear.
Flawed mirror[edit]
An extract from a WF/PC image shows the light from a star spread over a wide area instead of being concentrated on a few pixels.
Within weeks of the launch of the telescope, the returned images indicated a serious problem with the optical system. Although the first images appeared to be sharper than those of ground-based telescopes, Hubble failed to achieve a final sharp focus and the best image quality obtained was drastically lower than expected. Images of point sources spread out over a radius of more than one arcsecond, instead of having a point spread function (PSF) concentrated within a circle 0.1 arcsec in diameter as had been specified in the design criteria.[57][58]
Analysis of the flawed images showed that the cause of the problem was that the primary mirror had been polished to the wrong shape. Although it was probably the most precisely figured optical mirror ever made, smooth to about 10 nm (0.4 μin),[24] at the perimeter it was too flat by about 2,200 nanometers (2.2 micrometers; 87 microinches).[59] This difference was catastrophic, introducing severe spherical aberration, a flaw in which light reflecting off the edge of a mirror focuses on a different point from the light reflecting off its center.[60]
The effect of the mirror flaw on scientific observations depended on the particular observation—the core of the aberrated PSF was sharp enough to permit high-resolution observations of bright objects, and spectroscopy of point sources was only affected through a sensitivity loss. However, the loss of light to the large, out-of-focus halo severely reduced the usefulness of the telescope for faint objects or high-contrast imaging. This meant that nearly all of the cosmological programs were essentially impossible, since they required observation of exceptionally faint objects.[60] NASA and the telescope became the butt of many jokes, and the project was popularly regarded as a white elephant. For instance, in the 1991 comedy The Naked Gun 2½: The Smell of Fear, Hubble was pictured with Lusitania, the Hindenburg, and the Edsel.[61] Nonetheless, during the first three years of the Hubble mission, before the optical corrections, the telescope still carried out a large number of productive observations of less demanding targets.[62] The error was well characterized and stable, enabling astronomers to partially compensate for the defective mirror by using sophisticated image processing techniques such as deconvolution.[63]
Origin of the problem[edit]
The core of spiral galaxy M100, imaged with Hubble before and after corrective optics.
A commission headed by Lew Allen, director of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, was established to determine how the error could have arisen. The Allen Commission found that a reflective null corrector, a testing device used to achieve a properly shaped non-spherical mirror, had been incorrectly assembled—one lens was out of position by 1.3 mm (0.051 in).[64] During the initial grinding and polishing of the mirror, Perkin-Elmer analyzed its surface with two conventional refractive null correctors. However, for the final manufacturing step (figuring), they switched to the custom-built reflective null corrector, designed explicitly to meet very strict tolerances. The incorrect assembly of the device resulted in the mirror being ground very precisely but to the wrong shape. A few final tests, using the conventional null correctors, correctly reported spherical aberration. But these results were dismissed, thus missing the opportunity to catch the error, because the reflective null corrector was considered more accurate.[65]
The commission blamed the failings primarily on Perkin-Elmer. Relations between NASA and the optics company had been severely strained during the telescope construction, due to frequent schedule slippage and cost overruns. NASA found that Perkin-Elmer did not review or supervise the mirror construction adequately, did not assign its best optical scientists to the project (as it had for the prototype), and in particular did not involve the optical designers in the construction and verification of the mirror. While the commission heavily criticized Perkin-Elmer for these managerial failings, NASA was also criticized for not picking up on the quality control shortcomings, such as relying totally on test results from a single instrument.[66]
Design of a solution[edit]
Some of the Carina nebula by WFC3
The design of the telescope had always incorporated servicing missions, and astronomers immediately began to seek potential solutions to the problem that could be applied at the first servicing mission, scheduled for 1993. While Kodak had ground a back-up mirror for Hubble, it would have been impossible to replace the mirror in orbit, and too expensive and time-consuming to bring the telescope back to Earth for a refit. Instead, the fact that the mirror had been ground so precisely to the wrong shape led to the design of new optical components with exactly the same error but in the opposite sense, to be added to the telescope at the servicing mission, effectively acting as "spectacles" to correct the spherical aberration.[67][68]
The first step was a precise characterization of the error in the main mirror. Working backwards from images of point sources, astronomers determined that the conic constant of the mirror as built was 2999898610000000000♠−1.01390±0.0002, instead of the intended 2999899770000000000♠−1.00230.[69][70] The same number was also derived by analyzing the null corrector used by Perkin-Elmer to figure the mirror, as well as by analyzing interferograms obtained during ground testing of the mirror.[71]
COSTAR being removed in 2009
Because of the way the HST's instruments were designed, two different sets of correctors were required. The design of the Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2, already planned to replace the existing WF/PC, included relay mirrors to direct light onto the four separate charge-coupled device (CCD) chips making up its two cameras. An inverse error built into their surfaces could completely cancel the aberration of the primary. However, the other instruments lacked any intermediate surfaces that could be figured in this way, and so required an external correction device.[72]
The Corrective Optics Space Telescope Axial Replacement (COSTAR) system was designed to correct the spherical aberration for light focused at the FOC, FOS, and GHRS. It consists of two mirrors in the light path with one ground to correct the aberration.[73] To fit the COSTAR system onto the telescope, one of the other instruments had to be removed, and astronomers selected the High Speed Photometer to be sacrificed.[72] By 2002, all of the original instruments requiring COSTAR had been replaced by instruments with their own corrective optics.[74] COSTAR was removed and returned to Earth in 2009 where it is exhibited at the National Air and Space Museum. The area previously used by COSTAR is now occupied by the Cosmic Origins Spectrograph.[75]
Servicing missions and new instruments[edit]
Hubble was designed to accommodate regular servicing and equipment upgrades while in orbit. Instruments and limited life items were designed as orbital replacement units.[76] Five servicing missions (SM 1, 2, 3A, 3B, and 4) were flown by NASA space shuttles, the first in December 1993 and the last in May 2009.[77] Servicing missions were delicate operations that began with maneuvering to intercept the telescope in orbit and carefully retrieving it with the shuttle's mechanical arm. The necessary work was then carried out in multiple tethered spacewalks over a period of four to five days. After a visual inspection of the telescope, astronauts conducted repairs, replaced failed or degraded components, upgraded equipment, and installed new instruments. Once work was completed, the telescope was redeployed, typically after boosting to a higher orbit to address the orbital decay caused by atmospheric drag.[78]
Servicing Mission 1[edit]
Main article: STS-61
Astronauts Musgrave and Hoffman install corrective optics during SM1
After the problems with Hubble's mirror were discovered, the first servicing mission assumed greater importance, as the astronauts would need to do extensive work to install corrective optics. The seven astronauts for the mission were trained to use about a hundred specialized tools.[79] SM1 flew aboard Endeavour in December 1993, and involved installation of several instruments and other equipment over ten days.
Most importantly, the High Speed Photometer was replaced with the COSTAR corrective optics package, and WFPC was replaced with the Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2 (WFPC2) with an internal optical correction system. The solar arrays and their drive electronics were also replaced, as well as four gyroscopes in the telescope pointing system, two electrical control units and other electrical components, and two magnetometers. The onboard computers were upgraded with added coprocessors, and Hubble's orbit was boosted.[59]
On January 13, 1994, NASA declared the mission a complete success and showed the first sharper images.[80] The mission was one of the most complex performed up until that date, involving five long extra-vehicular activity periods. Its success was a boon for NASA, as well as for the astronomers who now had a more capable space telescope.
Servicing Mission 2[edit]
Main article: STS-82
Hubble as seen from Discovery during its second servicing mission
Servicing Mission 2, flown by Discovery in February 1997, replaced the GHRS and the FOS with the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS) and the Near Infrared Camera and Multi-Object Spectrometer (NICMOS), replaced an Engineering and Science Tape Recorder with a new Solid State Recorder, and repaired thermal insulation.[81] NICMOS contained a heat sink of solid nitrogen to reduce the thermal noise from the instrument, but shortly after it was installed, an unexpected thermal expansion resulted in part of the heat sink coming into contact with an optical baffle. This led to an increased warming rate for the instrument and reduced its original expected lifetime of 4.5 years to about 2 years.[82]
Servicing Mission 3A[edit]
Main article: STS-103
Servicing Mission 3A, flown by Discovery, took place in December 1999, and was a split-off from Servicing Mission 3 after three of the six onboard gyroscopes had failed. The fourth failed a few weeks before the mission, rendering the telescope incapable of performing scientific observations. The mission replaced all six gyroscopes, replaced a Fine Guidance Sensor and the computer, installed a Voltage/temperature Improvement Kit (VIK) to prevent battery overcharging, and replaced thermal insulation blankets.[83] The new computer is 20 times faster, with six times more memory, than the DF-224 it replaced. It increases throughput by moving some computing tasks from the ground to the spacecraft and saves money by allowing the use of modern programming languages.[84]
Servicing Mission 3B[edit]
Main article: STS-109
Servicing Mission 3B flown by Columbia in March 2002 saw the installation of a new instrument, with the FOC (which, except for the Fine Guidance Sensors when used for astrometry, was the last of the original instruments) being replaced by the Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS). This meant that COSTAR was no longer required, since all new instruments had built-in correction for the main mirror aberration.[74] The mission also revived NICMOS by installing a closed-cycle cooler[82] and replaced the solar arrays for the second time, providing 30 percent more power.[85]
Servicing Mission 4[edit]
Main article: STS-125
Hubble during SM4
Hubble after release
Plans called for Hubble to be serviced in February 2005, but the Columbia disaster in 2003, in which the orbiter disintegrated on re-entry into the atmosphere, had wide-ranging effects on the Hubble program. NASA Administrator Sean O'Keefe decided that all future shuttle missions had to be able to reach the safe haven of the International Space Station should in-flight problems develop. As no shuttles were capable of reaching both HST and the ISS during the same mission, future crewed service missions were canceled.[86] This decision was assailed by numerous astronomers, who felt that Hubble was valuable enough to merit the human risk.[87] HST's planned successor, the James Webb Telescope (JWST), was not expected to launch until at least 2018. A gap in space-observing capabilities between a decommissioning of Hubble and the commissioning of a successor was of major concern to many astronomers, given the significant scientific impact of HST.[88] The consideration that JWST will not be located in low Earth orbit, and therefore cannot be easily upgraded or repaired in the event of an early failure, only makes these concerns more acute. On the other hand, many astronomers felt strongly that the servicing of Hubble should not take place if the expense were to come from the JWST budget.
In January 2004, O'Keefe said he would review his decision to cancel the final servicing mission to HST due to public outcry and requests from Congress for NASA to look for a way to save it. The National Academy of Sciences convened an official panel, which recommended in July 2004 that the HST should be preserved despite the apparent risks. Their report urged "NASA should take no actions that would preclude a space shuttle servicing mission to the Hubble Space Telescope".[89] In August 2004, O'Keefe asked Goddard Space Flight Center to prepare a detailed proposal for a robotic service mission. These plans were later canceled, the robotic mission being described as "not feasible".[90] In late 2004, several Congressional members, led by Senator Barbara Mikulski, held public hearings and carried on a fight with much public support (including thousands of letters from school children across the country) to get the Bush Administration and NASA to reconsider the decision to drop plans for a Hubble rescue mission.[91]
Nickel–hydrogen battery pack for Hubble
The nomination in April 2005 of a new NASA Administrator with an engineering rather than accounting background, Michael D. Griffin, changed the situation, as Griffin stated he would consider a manned servicing mission.[92] Soon after his appointment Griffin authorized Goddard to proceed with preparations for a manned Hubble maintenance flight, saying he would make the final decision after the next two shuttle missions. In October 2006 Griffin gave the final go-ahead, and the 11-day mission by Atlantis was scheduled for October 2008. Hubble's main data-handling unit failed in September 2008,[93] halting all reporting of scientific data until its back-up was brought online on October 25, 2008.[94] Since a failure of the backup unit would leave the HST helpless, the service mission was postponed to incorporate a replacement for the primary unit.[93]
Servicing Mission 4, flown by Atlantis in May 2009, was the last scheduled shuttle mission for HST.[75][95] SM4 installed the replacement data-handling unit, repaired the ACS and STIS systems, installed improved nickel hydrogen batteries, and replaced other components. SM4 also installed two new observation instruments—Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3) and the Cosmic Origins Spectrograph (COS)[96]—and the Soft Capture and Rendezvous System, which will enable the future rendezvous, capture, and safe disposal of Hubble by either a crewed or robotic mission.[97] Except for the ACS's High Resolution Channel which could not be repaired and was disabled,[98][99][100] the work accomplished during SM4 rendered the telescope fully functional,[75] and it remains so as of 2018[update].[101]
Major projects[edit]
One of Hubble's most famous images, Pillars of Creation, shows stars forming in the Eagle Nebula (2014 image).
Since the start of the program, a number of research projects have been carried out, some of them almost solely with Hubble, others coordinated facilities such as Chandra X-ray Observatory and ESO's Very Large Telescope. Although the Hubble observatory is nearing the end of its life, there are still major projects scheduled for it. One example is the upcoming Frontier Fields program,[102] inspired by the results of Hubble's deep observation of the galaxy cluster Abell 1689.[103]
Cosmic Assembly Near-infrared Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey[edit]
In an August 2013 press release, CANDELS was referred to as "the largest project in the history of Hubble". The survey "aims to explore galactic evolution in the early Universe, and the very first seeds of cosmic structure at less than one billion years after the Big Bang."[104] The CANDELS project site describes the survey's goals as the following:[105]
The Cosmic Assembly Near-IR Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey is designed to document the first third of galactic evolution from z = 8 to 1.5 via deep imaging of more than 250,000 galaxies with WFC3/IR and ACS. It will also find the first Type Ia SNe beyond z > 1.5 and establish their accuracy as standard candles for cosmology. Five premier multi-wavelength sky regions are selected; each has multi-wavelength data from Spitzer and other facilities, and has extensive spectroscopy of the brighter galaxies. The use of five widely separated fields mitigates cosmic variance and yields statistically robust and complete samples of galaxies down to 109 solar masses out to z ~ 8.
Frontier Fields program[edit]
The Frontier Fields program studied MACS0416.1-2403
The program, officially named "Hubble Deep Fields Initiative 2012", is aimed to advance the knowledge of early galaxy formation by studying high-redshift galaxies in blank fields with the help of gravitational lensing to see the "faintest galaxies in the distant universe."[102] The Frontier Fields web page describes the goals of the program being:
to reveal hitherto inaccessible populations of z = 5–10 galaxies that are 10 to 50 times fainter intrinsically than any presently known
to solidify our understanding of the stellar masses and star formation histories of sub-L* galaxies at the earliest times
to provide the first statistically meaningful morphological characterization of star forming galaxies at z > 5
to find z > 8 galaxies stretched out enough by cluster lensing to discern internal structure and/or magnified enough by cluster lensing for spectroscopic follow-up.[106]
Public use[edit]
Star cluster Pismis 24 with nebula
Anyone can apply for time on the telescope; there are no restrictions on nationality or academic affiliation, but funding for analysis is only available to US institutions.[107] Competition for time on the telescope is intense, with about one-fifth of the proposals submitted in each cycle earning time on the schedule.[108][109]
Calls for proposals are issued roughly annually, with time allocated for a cycle lasting about one year. Proposals are divided into several categories; "general observer" proposals are the most common, covering routine observations. "Snapshot observations" are those in which targets require only 45 minutes or less of telescope time, including overheads such as acquiring the target. Snapshot observations are used to fill in gaps in the telescope schedule that cannot be filled by regular GO programs.[110]
Astronomers may make "Target of Opportunity" proposals, in which observations are scheduled if a transient event covered by the proposal occurs during the scheduling cycle. In addition, up to 10% of the telescope time is designated "director's discretionary" (DD) time. Astronomers can apply to use DD time at any time of year, and it is typically awarded for study of unexpected transient phenomena such as supernovae.[111]
Other uses of DD time have included the observations that led to views of the Hubble Deep Field and Hubble Ultra Deep Field, and in the first four cycles of telescope time, observations that were carried out by amateur astronomers.
Public image processing of Hubble data is encouraged as most of the data in the archives has not been processed into color imagery.[112]
Amateur observations[edit]
The HST is sometimes visible from the ground, as in this 10-second exposure.
The first director of STScI, Riccardo Giacconi, announced in 1986 that he intended to devote some of his director discretionary time to allowing amateur astronomers to use the telescope. The total time to be allocated was only a few hours per cycle but excited great interest among amateur astronomers.[113]
Proposals for amateur time were stringently reviewed by a committee of amateur astronomers, and time was awarded only to proposals that were deemed to have genuine scientific merit, did not duplicate proposals made by professionals, and required the unique capabilities of the space telescope. Thirteen amateur astronomers were awarded time on the telescope, with observations being carried out between 1990 and 1997.[114] One such study was "Transition Comets—UV Search for OH". The very first proposal, "A Hubble Space Telescope Study of Posteclipse Brightening and Albedo Changes on Io", was published in Icarus,[115] a journal devoted to solar system studies. A second study from another group of amateurs was also published in Icarus.[116] After that time, however, budget reductions at STScI made the support of work by amateur astronomers untenable, and no additional amateur programs have been carried out.[114][117]
Scientific results[edit]
Key projects[edit]
In the early 1980s, NASA and STScI convened four panels to discuss key projects. These were projects that were both scientifically important and would require significant telescope time, which would be explicitly dedicated to each project. This guaranteed that these particular projects would be completed early, in case the telescope failed sooner than expected. The panels identified three such projects: 1) a study of the nearby intergalactic medium using quasar absorption lines to determine the properties of the intergalactic medium and the gaseous content of galaxies and groups of galaxies;[118] 2) a medium deep survey using the Wide Field Camera to take data whenever one of the other instruments was being used[119] and 3) a project to determine the Hubble constant within ten percent by reducing the errors, both external and internal, in the calibration of the distance scale.[120]
Important discoveries[edit]
Hubble's STIS UV and ACS visible light are combined to reveal Saturn's southern aurora.
Hubble has helped resolve some long-standing problems in astronomy, while also raising new questions. Some results have required new theories to explain them. Among its primary mission targets was to measure distances to Cepheid variable stars more accurately than ever before, and thus constrain the value of the Hubble constant, the measure of the rate at which the universe is expanding, which is also related to its age. Before the launch of HST, estimates of the Hubble constant typically had errors of up to 50%, but Hubble measurements of Cepheid variables in the Virgo Cluster and other distant galaxy clusters provided a measured value with an accuracy of ±10%, which is consistent with other more accurate measurements made since Hubble's launch using other techniques.[121] The estimated age is now about 13.7 billion years, but before the Hubble Telescope scientists predicted an age ranging from 10 to 20 billion years.[122]
While Hubble helped to refine estimates of the age of the universe, it also cast doubt on theories about its future. Astronomers from the High-z Supernova Search Team and the Supernova Cosmology Project used ground-based telescopes and HST to observe distant supernovae and uncovered evidence that, far from decelerating under the influence of gravity, the expansion of the universe may in fact be accelerating. Three members of these two groups have subsequently been awarded Nobel Prizes for their discovery.[123] The cause of this acceleration remains poorly understood;[124] the most common cause attributed is dark energy.[125]
Brown spots mark Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9 impact sites on Jupiter's southern hemisphere. Imaged by Hubble.
The high-resolution spectra and images provided by the HST have been especially well-suited to establishing the prevalence of black holes in the nuclei of nearby galaxies. While it had been hypothesized in the early 1960s that black holes would be found at the centers of some galaxies, and astronomers in the 1980s identified a number of good black hole candidates, work conducted with Hubble shows that black holes are probably common to the centers of all galaxies.[126][127][128] The Hubble programs further established that the masses of the nuclear black holes and properties of the galaxies are closely related. The legacy of the Hubble programs on black holes in galaxies is thus to demonstrate a deep connection between galaxies and their central black holes.
The collision of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 with Jupiter in 1994 was fortuitously timed for astronomers, coming just a few months after Servicing Mission 1 had restored Hubble's optical performance. Hubble images of the planet were sharper than any taken since the passage of Voyager 2 in 1979, and were crucial in studying the dynamics of the collision of a comet with Jupiter, an event believed to occur once every few centuries.
Other discoveries made with Hubble data include proto-planetary disks (proplyds) in the Orion Nebula;[129] evidence for the presence of extrasolar planets around Sun-like stars;[130] and the optical counterparts of the still-mysterious gamma-ray bursts.[131] HST has also been used to study objects in the outer reaches of the Solar System, including the dwarf planets Pluto[132] and Eris.[133]
Hubble Extreme Deep Field image of space in the constellation Fornax
A unique window on the Universe enabled by Hubble are the Hubble Deep Field, Hubble Ultra-Deep Field, and Hubble Extreme Deep Field images, which used Hubble's unmatched sensitivity at visible wavelengths to create images of small patches of sky that are the deepest ever obtained at optical wavelengths. The images reveal galaxies billions of light years away, and have generated a wealth of scientific papers, providing a new window on the early Universe. The Wide Field Camera 3 improved the view of these fields in the infrared and ultraviolet, supporting the discovery of some of the most distant objects yet discovered, such as MACS0647-JD.
The non-standard object SCP 06F6 was discovered by the Hubble Space Telescope in February 2006.[134][135] During June and July 2012, US astronomers using Hubble discovered a tiny fifth moon moving around icy Pluto.[136]
In March 2015, researchers announced that measurements of aurorae around Ganymede revealed that the moon has a subsurface ocean. Using Hubble to study the motion of its aurorae, the researchers determined that a large saltwater ocean was helping to suppress the interaction between Jupiter's magnetic field and that of Ganymede. The ocean is estimated to be 100 km (60 mi) deep, trapped beneath a 150 km (90 mi) ice crust.[137][138]
Hubble and ALMA image of MACS J1149.5+2223.[139]
On December 11, 2015, Hubble captured an image of the first-ever predicted reappearance of a supernova, dubbed "Refsdal", which was calculated using different mass models of a galaxy cluster whose gravity is warping the supernova's light. The supernova was previously seen in November 2014 behind galaxy cluster MACS J1149.5+2223 as part of Hubble's Frontier Fields program. Astronomers spotted four separate images of the supernova in an arrangement known as an Einstein Cross. The light from the cluster has taken about five billion years to reach Earth, though the supernova exploded some 10 billion years ago. The detection of Refsdal's reappearance served as a unique opportunity for astronomers to test their models of how mass, especially dark matter, is distributed within this galaxy cluster.[140]
On March 3, 2016, researchers using Hubble data announced the discovery of the farthest known galaxy to date: GN-z11. The Hubble observations occurred on February 11, 2015, and April 3, 2015, as part of the CANDELS/GOODS-North surveys.[141][142]
Impact on astronomy[edit]
Evolution of detecting the early Universe
Many objective measures show the positive impact of Hubble data on astronomy. Over 15,000 papers based on Hubble data have been published in peer-reviewed journals,[143] and countless more have appeared in conference proceedings. Looking at papers several years after their publication, about one-third of all astronomy papers have no citations, while only 2% of papers based on Hubble data have no citations. On average, a paper based on Hubble data receives about twice as many citations as papers based on non-Hubble data. Of the 200 papers published each year that receive the most citations, about 10% are based on Hubble data.[144]
Although the HST has clearly helped astronomical research, its financial cost has been large. A study on the relative astronomical benefits of different sizes of telescopes found that while papers based on HST data generate 15 times as many citations as a 4 m (13 ft) ground-based telescope such as the William Herschel Telescope, the HST costs about 100 times as much to build and maintain.[145]
Deciding between building ground- versus space-based telescopes is complex. Even before Hubble was launched, specialized ground-based techniques such as aperture masking interferometry had obtained higher-resolution optical and infrared images than Hubble would achieve, though restricted to targets about 108 times brighter than the faintest targets observed by Hubble.[146][147] Since then, advances in adaptive optics have extended the high-resolution imaging capabilities of ground-based telescopes to the infrared imaging of faint objects. The usefulness of adaptive optics versus HST observations depends strongly on the particular details of the research questions being asked. In the visible bands, adaptive optics can only correct a relatively small field of view, whereas HST can conduct high-resolution optical imaging over a wide field. Only a small fraction of astronomical objects are accessible to high-resolution ground-based imaging; in contrast Hubble can perform high-resolution observations of any part of the night sky, and on objects that are extremely faint.
Aerospace engineering[edit]
In addition to its scientific results, Hubble has also made significant contributions to aerospace engineering, in particular the performance of systems in low Earth orbit. These insights result from Hubble's long lifetime on orbit, extensive instrumentation, and return of assemblies to the Earth where they can be studied in detail. In particular, Hubble has contributed to studies of the behavior of graphite composite structures in vacuum, optical contamination from residual gas and human servicing, radiation damage to electronics and sensors, and the long term behavior of multi-layer insulation.[148] One lesson learned was that gyros assembled using pressurized oxygen to deliver suspension fluid were prone to failure due to electric wire corrosion. Gyros are now assembled using pressurized nitrogen.[149]
Hubble data[edit]
Hubble precision stellar distance measurement has been extended 10 times further into the Milky Way.[150]
Transmission to Earth[edit]
Hubble data was initially stored on the spacecraft. When launched, the storage facilities were old-fashioned reel-to-reel tape recorders, but these were replaced by solid state data storage facilities during servicing missions 2 and 3A. About twice daily, the Hubble Space Telescope radios data to a satellite in the geosynchronous Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System (TDRSS), which then downlinks the science data to one of two 60-foot (18-meter) diameter high-gain microwave antennas located at the White Sands Test Facility in White Sands, New Mexico.[151] From there they are sent to the Space Telescope Operations Control Center at Goddard Space Flight Center, and finally to the Space Telescope Science Institute for archiving.[151] Each week, HST downlinks approximately 140 gigabits of data.[1]
Color images[edit]
Data analysis of a spectrum reveals the chemistry of hidden clouds
All images from Hubble are monochromatic grayscale, taken through a variety of filters, each passing specific wavelengths of light, and incorporated in each camera. Color images are created by combining separate monochrome images taken through different filters. This process can also create false-color versions of images including infrared and ultraviolet channels, where infrared is typically rendered as a deep red and ultraviolet is rendered as a deep blue.[152][153][154]
Archives[edit]
All Hubble data is eventually made available via the Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes at STScI,[155] CADC[156] and ESA/ESAC.[157] Data is usually proprietary—available only to the principal investigator (PI) and astronomers designated by the PI—for six months after being taken. The PI can apply to the director of the STScI to extend or reduce the proprietary period in some circumstances.[158]
Observations made on Director's Discretionary Time are exempt from the proprietary period, and are released to the public immediately. Calibration data such as flat fields and dark frames are also publicly available straight away. All data in the archive is in the FITS format, which is suitable for astronomical analysis but not for public use.[159] The Hubble Heritage Project processes and releases to the public a small selection of the most striking images in JPEG and TIFF formats.[160]
Pipeline reduction[edit]
Astronomical data taken with CCDs must undergo several calibration steps before they are suitable for astronomical analysis. STScI has developed sophisticated software that automatically calibrates data when they are requested from the archive using the best calibration files available. This 'on-the-fly' processing means that large data requests can take a day or more to be processed and returned. The process by which data is calibrated automatically is known as 'pipeline reduction', and is increasingly common at major observatories. Astronomers may if they wish retrieve the calibration files themselves and run the pipeline reduction software locally. This may be desirable when calibration files other than those selected automatically need to be used.[161]
Data analysis[edit]
Hubble data can be analyzed using many different packages. STScI maintains the custom-made Space Telescope Science Data Analysis System (STSDAS) software, which contains all the programs needed to run pipeline reduction on raw data files, as well as many other astronomical image processing tools, tailored to the requirements of Hubble data. The software runs as a module of IRAF, a popular astronomical data reduction program.[162]
Outreach activities[edit]
It has always been important for the Space Telescope to capture the public's imagination, given the considerable contribution of taxpayers to its construction and operational costs.[163] After the difficult early years when the faulty mirror severely dented Hubble's reputation with the public, the first servicing mission allowed its rehabilitation as the corrected optics produced numerous remarkable images.
In 2001, NASA polled internet users to find out what they would most like Hubble to observe; they overwhelmingly selected the Horsehead Nebula.
Several initiatives have helped to keep the public informed about Hubble activities. In the United States, outreach efforts are coordinated by the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI) Office for Public Outreach, which was established in 2000 to ensure that U.S. taxpayers saw the benefits of their investment in the space telescope program. To that end, STScI operates the HubbleSite.org website. The Hubble Heritage Project, operating out of the STScI, provides the public with high-quality images of the most interesting and striking objects observed. The Heritage team is composed of amateur and professional astronomers, as well as people with backgrounds outside astronomy, and emphasizes the aesthetic nature of Hubble images. The Heritage Project is granted a small amount of time to observe objects which, for scientific reasons, may not have images taken at enough wavelengths to construct a full-color image.[160]
Since 1999, the leading Hubble outreach group in Europe has been the Hubble European Space Agency Information Centre (HEIC).[164] This office was established at the Space Telescope European Coordinating Facility in Munich, Germany. HEIC's mission is to fulfill HST outreach and education tasks for the European Space Agency. The work is centered on the production of news and photo releases that highlight interesting Hubble results and images. These are often European in origin, and so increase awareness of both ESA's Hubble share (15%) and the contribution of European scientists to the observatory. ESA produces educational material, including a videocast series called Hubblecast designed to share world-class scientific news with the public.[165]
The Hubble Space Telescope has won two Space Achievement Awards from the Space Foundation, for its outreach activities, in 2001 and 2010.[166]
There is a replica of the Hubble Space Telescope on the courthouse lawn in Marshfield, Missouri, the hometown of namesake Edwin P. Hubble.
Celebration images[edit]
Further information: List of Hubble anniversary images
A pillar of gas and dust in the Carina Nebula. This Wide Field Camera 3 image, dubbed Mystic Mountain, was released in 2010 to commemorate Hubble's 20th anniversary in space.
The Hubble Space Telescope celebrated its 20th anniversary in space on April 24, 2010. To commemorate the occasion, NASA, ESA, and the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI) released an image from the Carina Nebula.[167]
To commemorate Hubble's 25th anniversary in space on April 24, 2015, STScI released images of the Westerlund 2 cluster, located about 20,000 light-years (6,100 pc) away in the constellation Carina, through its Hubble 25 website.[168] The European Space Agency created a dedicated 25th anniversary page on its website.[169] In April 2016, a special celebratory image of the Bubble Nebula was released for Hubble's 26th "birthday".[170]
Equipment failures[edit]
Hubble views the Fomalhaut system. This false-color image was taken in October 2004 and July 2006 with the Advanced Camera for Surveys
Past servicing missions have exchanged old instruments for new ones, both avoiding failure and making possible new types of science. Without servicing missions, all of the instruments will eventually fail. In August 2004, the power system of the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS) failed, rendering the instrument inoperable. The electronics had originally been fully redundant, but the first set of electronics failed in May 2001.[171] This power supply was fixed during Servicing Mission 4 in May 2009.
Similarly, the Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) main camera primary electronics failed in June 2006, and the power supply for the backup electronics failed on January 27, 2007.[172] Only the instrument's Solar Blind Channel (SBC) was operable using the side-1 electronics. A new power supply for the wide angle channel was added during SM 4, but quick tests revealed this did not help the high resolution channel.[173] The Wide Field Channel (WFC) was returned to service by STS-125 in May 2009 but the High Resolution Channel (HRC) remains offline.[174]
HST uses gyroscopes to detect and measure any rotations so it can stabilize itself in orbit and point accurately and steadily at astronomical targets. Normally, three gyroscopes are required for operation; observations are still possible with two, but the area of sky that can be viewed would be somewhat restricted, and observations requiring very accurate pointing are more difficult.[175] There are further contingency plans for observations with just one gyro,[176] but if all gyros fail, continued scientific observations will not be possible. In 2005, it was decided to switch to two-gyroscope mode for regular telescope operations as a means of extending the lifetime of the mission. The switch to this mode was made in August 2005, leaving Hubble with two gyroscopes in use, two on backup, and two inoperable.[177] One more gyro failed in 2007.[178] By the time of the final repair mission in May 2009, during which all six gyros were replaced (with two new pairs and one refurbished pair), only three gyros were still working. Engineers determined that the gyro failures were caused by corrosion of electric wires powering the motor that was initiated by oxygen-pressurized air used to deliver the thick suspending fluid.[149] The new gyro models were assembled using pressurized nitrogen[149] and they should be much more reliable.[179]
Future[edit]
Orbital decay and controlled reentry[edit]
Illustration of the Soft Capture Mechanism (SCM) installed on Hubble
Hubble orbits the Earth in the extremely tenuous upper atmosphere, and over time its orbit decays due to drag. If it is not re-boosted, it will re-enter the Earth's atmosphere within some decades, with the exact date depending on how active the Sun is and its impact on the upper atmosphere. If Hubble were to descend in a completely uncontrolled re-entry, parts of the main mirror and its support structure would probably survive, leaving the potential for damage or even human fatalities.[180] In 2013, deputy project manager James Jeletic projected that Hubble could survive into the 2020s.[3] Based on solar activity and atmospheric drag, or lack thereof, a natural atmospheric reentry for Hubble will occur between 2028 and 2040.[3][181] In June 2016, NASA extended the service contract for Hubble until June 2021.[182]
NASA's original plan for safely de-orbiting Hubble was to retrieve it using a space shuttle. Hubble would then have most likely been displayed in the Smithsonian Institution. This is no longer possible since the space shuttle fleet has been retired, and would have been unlikely in any case due to the cost of the mission and risk to the crew. Instead, NASA considered adding an external propulsion module to allow controlled re-entry.[183] Ultimately NASA installed the Soft Capture and Rendezvous System, to enable deorbit by either a crewed or robotic mission.[97]
Possible commercial service missions[edit]
As of 2017[update], the Trump Administration is considering a proposal by the Sierra Nevada Corporation to use a manned version of its Dream Chaser spacecraft to service Hubble some time in the 2020s both as a continuation of its scientific capabilities and as insurance against any malfunctions in the to-be-launched James Webb Space Telescope.[184]
Successors[edit]
Further information: James Webb Space Telescope
Visible spectrum range
Color
Wavelength
violet 380–450 nm
blue 450–475 nm
cyan 476–495 nm
green 495–570 nm
yellow 570–590 nm
orange 590–620 nm
red 620–750 nm
There is no direct replacement to Hubble as an ultraviolet and visible light space telescope, because near-term space telescopes do not duplicate Hubble's wavelength coverage (near-ultraviolet to near-infrared wavelengths), instead concentrating on the farther infrared bands. These bands are preferred for studying high redshift and low-temperature objects, objects generally older and farther away in the universe. These wavelengths are also difficult or impossible to study from the ground, justifying the expense of a space-based telescope. Large ground-based telescopes can image some of the same wavelengths as Hubble, sometimes challenge HST in terms of resolution by using adaptive optics (AO), have much larger light-gathering power, and can be upgraded more easily, but cannot yet match Hubble's excellent resolution over a wide field of view with the very dark background of space.
Plans for a Hubble successor materialized as the Next Generation Space Telescope project, which culminated in plans for the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the formal successor of Hubble.[185] Very different from a scaled-up Hubble, it is designed to operate colder and farther away from the Earth at the L2 Lagrangian point, where thermal and optical interference from the Earth and Moon are lessened. It is not engineered to be fully serviceable (such as replaceable instruments), but the design includes a docking ring to enable visits from other spacecraft.[186] A main scientific goal of JWST is to observe the most distant objects in the universe, beyond the reach of existing instruments. It is expected to detect stars in the early Universe approximately 280 million years older than stars HST now detects.[187] The telescope is an international collaboration between NASA, the European Space Agency, and the Canadian Space Agency since 1996,[188] and is planned for launch on an Ariane 5 rocket.[189] Although JWST is primarily an infrared instrument, its coverage extends down to 600 nm wavelength light, or roughly orange in the visible spectrum. A typical human eye can see to about 750 nm wavelength light, so there is some overlap with the longest visible wavelength bands, including orange and red light.
Hubble and JWST mirrors (4.5 m2 and 25 m2 respectively)
A complementary telescope, looking at even longer wavelengths than Hubble or JWST, was the European Space Agency's Herschel Space Observatory, launched on May 14, 2009. Like JWST, Herschel was not designed to be serviced after launch, and had a mirror substantially larger than Hubble's, but observed only in the far infrared and submillimeter. It needed helium coolant, of which it ran out on April 29, 2013.
Selected space telescopes and instruments[190]
Name
Year
Wavelength
Aperture
Human eye — 0.39–0.75 μm 0.01 m
Spitzer 2003 3–180 μm 0.85 m
Hubble STIS 1997 0.115–1.03 μm 2.4 m
Hubble WFC3 2009 0.2–1.7 μm 2.4 m
Herschel 2009 55–672 μm 3.5 m
JWST Planned 0.6–28.5 μm 6.5 m
Further concepts for advanced 21st-century space telescopes include the Advanced Technology Large-Aperture Space Telescope,[191] a conceptualized 8 to 16.8 meters (310 to 660 inches) optical space telescope that if realized could be a more direct successor to HST, with the ability to observe and photograph astronomical objects in the visible, ultraviolet, and infrared wavelengths, with substantially better resolution than Hubble or the Spitzer Space telescope. This effort is being planned for the 2025–2035 time frame.
Existing ground-based telescopes, and various proposed Extremely Large Telescopes, can exceed the HST in terms of sheer light-gathering power and diffraction limit due to larger mirrors, but other factors affect telescopes. In some cases, they may be able to match or beat Hubble in resolution by using adaptive optics (AO). However, AO on large ground-based reflectors will not make Hubble and other space telescopes obsolete. Most AO systems sharpen the view over a very narrow field—Lucky Cam, for example, produces crisp images just 10" to 20" wide, whereas Hubble's cameras produce crisp images across a 2½' (150") field. Furthermore, space telescopes can study the universe across the entire electromagnetic spectrum, most of which is blocked by Earth's atmosphere. Finally, the background sky is darker in space than on the ground, because air absorbs solar energy during the day and then releases it at night, producing a faint—but nevertheless discernible—airglow that washes out low-contrast astronomical objects.[192]
See also[edit]
Astronomy portal
Spaceflight portal
List of largest optical reflecting telescopes
List of largest infrared telescopes
List of space telescopes
Hubble (2010 documentary)
References[edit]
^ Jump up to: a b c d e "Hubble Essentials: Quick Facts". HubbleSite.org. Archived from the original on July 6, 2016.
Jump up ^ Ryba, Jeanne. "STS-31". NASA. Archived from the original on May 7, 2017. Retrieved May 7, 2017.
^ Jump up to: a b c d Harwood, William (May 30, 2013). "Four years after final service call, Hubble Space Telescope going strong". CBS News. Retrieved June 3, 2013.
^ Jump up to: a b "Hubble Space Telescope – Orbit". Heavens Above. December 26, 2017. Retrieved December 26, 2017.
^ Jump up to: a b c Nelson, Buddy; et al. (2009). "Hubble Space Telescope: Servicing Mission 4 Media Reference Guide" (PDF). NASA/Lockheed Martin. p. 1-5.
Jump up ^ Canright, Shelley. "NASA's Great Observatories". NASA. Retrieved April 26, 2008.
Jump up ^ "Hubble Essentials". Hubblesite.org. Retrieved March 3, 2016.
Jump up ^ "NASA Completes Webb Telescope Review, Commits to Launch in Early 2021". NASA. June 27, 2018. Retrieved June 28, 2018.
Jump up ^ Oberth, Hermann (1923). Die Rakete zu den Planetenräumen. R. Oldenbourg-Verlay. p. 85.
Jump up ^ Spitzer, Lyman Jr., "Report to Project Rand: Astronomical Advantages of an Extra-Terrestrial Observatory", reprinted in NASA SP-2001-4407: Exploring the Unknown, Chapter 3, Document III-1, p. 546.
Jump up ^ "About Lyman Spitzer, Jr". Caltech. Archived from the original on March 27, 2008. Retrieved April 26, 2008.
Jump up ^ Baum, WA; Johnson, FS; Oberly, JJ; Rockwood, CC; et al. (November 1946). "Solar Ultraviolet Spectrum to 88 Kilometers". Phys. Rev. American Physical Society. 70 (9–10): 781–782. Bibcode:1946PhRv...70..781B. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.70.781.
Jump up ^ "The First Orbiting Solar Observatory". heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. June 26, 2003. Retrieved September 25, 2011.
Jump up ^ "OAO". NASA. Archived from the original on September 16, 2008. Retrieved April 26, 2008.
Jump up ^ Spitzer 1979, p. 32.
Jump up ^ Spitzer 1979, pp. 33-34.
^ Jump up to: a b Spitzer 1979, p. 34.
Jump up ^ Andersen, Geoff (2007). The telescope: its history, technology, and future. Princeton University Press. p. 116. ISBN 0-691-12979-7.
Jump up ^ "Memorandum of Understanding Between The European Space Agency and The United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration", reprinted in NASA SP-2001-4407: Exploring the Unknown, Chapter 3, Document III-29, p. 671.
Jump up ^ Okolski, Gabriel. "A Chronology of the Hubble Space Telescope". NASA. Retrieved April 26, 2008.
Jump up ^ "The Path to Hubble Space Telescope". NASA. Archived from the original on May 24, 2008. Retrieved April 26, 2008.
Jump up ^ Dunar & Waring 1999, pp. 487-488.
^ Jump up to: a b Dunar & Waring 1999, p. 489.
^ Jump up to: a b Waldrop, MM (August 17, 1990). "Hubble: The Case of the Single-Point Failure" (PDF). Science Magazine. 249 (4970): 735–736. Bibcode:1990Sci...249..735W. doi:10.1126/science.249.4970.735. Retrieved April 26, 2008.
^ Jump up to: a b Robberto, M.; Sivaramakrishnan, A.; Bacinski, J. J.; Calzetti, D.; et al. (2000). Breckinridge, James B; Jakobsen, Peter, eds. "The Performance of HST as an Infrared Telescope" (PDF). Proc. SPIE. UV, Optical, and IR Space Telescopes and Instruments. 4013: 386–393. doi:10.1117/12.394037.
Jump up ^ Allen et al., pp. 3-4.
Jump up ^ "Losing Bid Offered 2 Tests on Hubble". The New York Times. Associated Press. July 28, 1990. Retrieved April 26, 2008.
Jump up ^ Goddard Space Flight Center (September 21, 2001). "Hubble Space Telescope Stand-in Gets Starring Role" (Press release). Archived from the original on February 26, 2008. Retrieved April 26, 2008.
Jump up ^ "Backup Mirror, Hubble Space Telescope". National Air and Space Museum. Archived from the original on November 2, 2012. Retrieved November 4, 2012.
Jump up ^ Magdalena Ridge Observatory (January 1, 2008). 2.4m Observatory Technical Note (PDF) (Technical report). 1.6. p. 2. Retrieved January 21, 2013.
Jump up ^ McCarthy, Daniel J.; Facey, Terence A. (1982). Design and fabrication of the NASA 2.4-meter space telescope. Proc. SPIE 0330, Optical Systems Engineering II. International Society for Optics and Photonics. pp. 139–143. doi:10.1117/12.934268.
Jump up ^ Dunar & Waring 1999, p. 496.
Jump up ^ Ghitelman, David (1987). The Space Telescope. New York: Michael Friedman. p. 32. ISBN 0831779713.
Jump up ^ Dunar & Waring 1999, p. 504.
Jump up ^ "Hubble Space Telescope Systems". Goddard Space Flight Center. Archived from the original on March 17, 2003. Retrieved April 26, 2008.
Jump up ^ Ghitelman, David (1987). The Space Telescope. New York: Michael Friedman Publishing. p. 50.
Jump up ^ Dunar & Waring 1999, p. 508.
Jump up ^ "Co-Processor" (PDF). NASA Facts. NASA. June 1993. NF-193.
Jump up ^ "Hubble Space Telescope Servicing Mission 3A: New Advanced Computer" (PDF). NASA Facts. NASA. 1999. FS-1999-06-009-GSFC.
Jump up ^ Xapsos, M. A.; Stauffer, C.; Jordan, T.; Poivey, C.; et al. (December 2014). "How Long Can the Hubble Space Telescope Operate Reliably? – A Total Dose Perspective" (PDF). IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 61 (6): 3356–3362. Bibcode:2014ITNS...61.3356X. doi:10.1109/TNS.2014.2360827.
Jump up ^ Afshari, A. (January 1993). "Hubble Space Telescope's Wide Field/Planetary Camera" (PDF). Shutterbug. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 6, 2016.
Jump up ^ "WFPC2". STScI. Retrieved May 18, 2012.
^ Jump up to: a b Hall, Donald NB (ed) (1982). The Space Telescope Observatory (Technical report). NASA. CP-2244. CS1 maint: Extra text: authors list (link) 40 MB PDF file.
Jump up ^ Brandt, JC, Heap, SR, Beaver, EA, Boggess, A, et al. (1994). "The Goddard High Resolution Spectrograph: Instrument, goals, and science results". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 106: 890–908. Bibcode:1994PASP..106..890B. doi:10.1086/133457.
Jump up ^ Bless, RC; Walter, LE; White RL (1992). High Speed Photometer Instrument Handbook v 3.0. STSci.
Jump up ^ Benedict, G. Fritz; McArthur, Barbara E. (2005). DW Kurtz, ed. High-precision stellar parallaxes from Hubble Space Telescope fine guidance sensors. IAU Colloquium #196. Transits of Venus: New Views of the Solar System and Galaxy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 333–346. Bibcode:2005tvnv.conf..333B. doi:10.1017/S1743921305001511.
Jump up ^ Edmondson, Frank K. (1997). AURA and Its US National Observatories. Cambridge University Press. p. 244. ISBN 9780521553452.
Jump up ^ "About AURA". AURA. Retrieved November 6, 2012.
Jump up ^ Dunar & Waring 1999, pp. 486-487.
Jump up ^ Roman, Nancy Grace. "Exploring the Universe: Space-Based Astronomy and Astrophysics", in NASA SP-2001-4407: Exploring the Unknown (PDF). NASA. Chapter 3, p. 536.
^ Jump up to: a b "Team Hubble". STScI. Retrieved November 6, 2012.
Jump up ^ Strolger & Rose 2017, p. 46.
Jump up ^ Tatarewicz 1998, p. 371.
Jump up ^ Wilford, John (April 9, 1990). "Telescope Is Set to Peer at Space and Time". The New York Times. Retrieved January 19, 2009.
Jump up ^ "STS-31". NASA. Retrieved April 26, 2008.
Jump up ^ "James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) Independent Comprehensive Review Panel (ICRP) Final Report" (PDF). NASA. p. 32. Retrieved September 4, 2012.
Jump up ^ Burrows, Christopher J.; Holtzman, Jon A.; Faber, S. M.; Bely, Pierre Y.; et al. (March 10, 1991). "The imaging performance of the Hubble Space Telescope". Astrophysical Journal Letters. 369: L21–L25. Bibcode:1991ApJ...369L..21B. doi:10.1086/185950.
Jump up ^ Heyer, Biretta; et al. (2004). "WFPC2 Instrument Handbook". 9.0. Baltimore: STScI. Chapter 5.1. Retrieved April 26, 2008.
^ Jump up to: a b "Servicing Mission 1". NASA. Archived from the original on April 20, 2008. Retrieved March 28, 2016.
^ Jump up to: a b Tatarewicz 1998, p. 375.
Jump up ^ "The Naked Gun 2½: The Smell of Fear". Internet Movie Database. Retrieved April 26, 2008.
Jump up ^ Goodwin, Irwin; Cioffi, Denis F. (1994). "Hubble repair improves vision and helps restore NASA's image". Physics Today. 47 (3): 42. Bibcode:1994PhT....47c..42G. doi:10.1063/1.2808434.
Jump up ^ Dunar & Waring 1999, pp. 514-515.
Jump up ^ Allen et al., p. 7-1: The spacing of the field lens in the corrector was to have been done by laser measurements off the end of an invar bar. Instead of illuminating the end of the bar, however, the laser in fact was reflected from a worn spot on a black-anodized metal cap placed over the end of the bar to isolate its center (visible through a hole in the cap). The technician who performed the test noted an unexpected gap between the field lens and its supporting structure in the corrector and filled it in with an ordinary metal washer.
Jump up ^ Dunar & Waring 1999, p. 512: "the firm's optical operations personnel dismissed the evidence as itself flawed. They believed the other two null correctors were less accurate than the reflective null corrector and so could not verify its reliability. Since they assumed the perfection of the mirror and reflective null corrector, they rejected falsifying information from independent tests, believed no problems existed, and reported only good news."
Jump up ^ Allen et al. 1990, p. 10-1.
Jump up ^ Chaisson, Eric (1994). The Hubble Wars; Astrophysics Meets Astropolitics in the Two-Billion-Dollar Struggle Over the Hubble Space Telescope. Harper Collins. ISBN 0-06-017114-6, p. 184.
Jump up ^ Fisher, Arthur (October 1990). "The Trouble with Hubble". Popular Science: 100. Retrieved November 8, 2012.
Jump up ^ Litvac, M. M. (1991). Image inversion analysis of the HST OTA (Hubble Space Telescope Optical Telescope Assembly), phase A (Technical report). TRW, Inc. Space and Technology Group. Bibcode:1991trw..rept.....L.
Jump up ^ Redding, David C.; Sirlin, S.; Boden, A.; Mo, J.; Hanisch, B.; Furey, L. (July 1995). "Optical Prescription of the HST" (PDF). NASA JPL. hdl:2014/31621. Archived from the original (pdf) on May 1, 2015.
Jump up ^ Allen et al. 1990, pp. E-1.
^ Jump up to: a b Tatarewicz 1998, p. 376.
Jump up ^ Jedrzejewski, RI; Hartig, G; Jakobsen, P; Ford, HC (1994). "In-orbit performance of the COSTAR-corrected Faint Object Camera". Astrophysical Journal Letters. 435: L7–L10. Bibcode:1994ApJ...435L...7J. doi:10.1086/187581.
^ Jump up to: a b "HST". STScI. Corrective Optics Space Telescope Axial Replacement. Retrieved November 4, 2012.
^ Jump up to: a b c "Hubble Essentials". STScI. Retrieved November 8, 2012.
Jump up ^ Orbital Replacement Units HST
Jump up ^ Treat, Jason; Scalamogna, Anna; Conant, Eve (2015). "The Secret to Hubble's Success". National Geographic. Retrieved April 25, 2015.
Jump up ^ Overbye, Jason; Corum, Jonathan; Drakeford, Jason (April 24, 2015). "Hubble Reflects the Cosmos". The New York Times. Retrieved April 25, 2015.
Jump up ^ Tatarewicz 1998, pp. 384-387.
Jump up ^ Trauger, J. T.; Ballester, G. E.; Burrows, C. J.; Casertano, S.; et al. (1994). "The on-orbit performance of WFPC2". Astrophysical Journal Letters. 435: L3–L6. Bibcode:1994ApJ...435L...3T. doi:10.1086/187580.
Jump up ^ "Servicing Mission 2". NASA. Archived from the original on April 19, 2008. Retrieved April 26, 2008.
^ Jump up to: a b "NICMOS Thermal History". STScI. Retrieved April 26, 2008.
Jump up ^ "Servicing Mission 3A Overview". NASA. Retrieved April 26, 2008.
Jump up ^ Lockheed Martin Missiles and Space. Hubble Space Telescope Servicing Mission 3A Media Reference Guide (PDF) (Technical report). NASA. pp. 5–9 and Section 7.1.1. Retrieved April 27, 2008.
Jump up ^ "Servicing Mission 3". NASA. Archived from the original on April 7, 2008. Retrieved April 26, 2008.
Jump up ^ "Servicing Mission 4 Cancelled". STScI. January 16, 2004. Archived from the original on May 30, 2012. Retrieved April 28, 2008.
Jump up ^ "Assessment of Options for Extending the Life of the Hubble Space Telescope: Final Report". The National Academies. 2005. Chapter 7, "Given the intrinsic value of a serviced Hubble, and the high likelihood of success for a shuttle servicing mission, the committee judges that such a mission is worth the risk."
Jump up ^ "2004 Annual Report" (PDF). Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee. March 15, 2004. Section 3.1 – The Scientific Impact of the HST SM4 Cancellation. Retrieved November 5, 2012.
Jump up ^ Warren E. Leary (July 14, 2004). "Panel Urges NASA to Save Hubble Space Telescope". The New York Times. Retrieved November 8, 2012.
Jump up ^ Gugliotta, Guy (April 12, 2005). "Nominee Backs a Review Of NASA's Hubble Decision". The Washington Post. Retrieved January 10, 2007.
Jump up ^ "Mikulski Vows To Fight For Hubble" (Press release). Barbara Mikulski. February 7, 2005. Archived from the original on April 30, 2008. Retrieved April 26, 2008.
Jump up ^ Boyle, Alan (October 31, 2006). "NASA gives green light to Hubble rescue". MSNBC. Retrieved January 10, 2007.
^ Jump up to: a b Cowen, Ron (September 29, 2008). "Hubble suddenly quiet". ScienceNews. Retrieved November 8, 2012.
Jump up ^ Courtland, Rachel (October 28, 2008). "Hubble re-opens an eye". New Scientist. Archived from the original on October 29, 2008. Retrieved October 29, 2008.
Jump up ^ "NASA Sets Target Shuttle Launch Date for Hubble Servicing Mission". NASA. December 4, 2008. Retrieved December 5, 2008.
Jump up ^ "Hubble Opens New Eyes on the Universe". NASA. September 9, 2009. Retrieved May 28, 2012.
^ Jump up to: a b "The Soft Capture and Rendezvous System". NASA. Retrieved May 20, 2009.
Jump up ^ Overbye, Dennis (September 9, 2009). "After Hubble Repair, New Images From Space". The New York Times. Retrieved August 1, 2015.
Jump up ^ Overbye, Dennis (May 17, 2009). "After a Yank, 'Surgery' on Hubble Optics". The New York Times. Retrieved August 1, 2015.
Jump up ^ "Repair of the Advanced Camera for Surveys". SpaceTelescope.org. Retrieved August 1, 2015.
Jump up ^ "This week on HST". Space Telescope Science Institute. January 2, 2017. Retrieved January 23, 2017.
^ Jump up to: a b "Hubble Deep Fields Initiative 2012 Science Working Group Report" (PDF). STScI.edu. 2012. Retrieved June 29, 2015.
Jump up ^ "New Hubble image of galaxy cluster Abell 1689". SpaceTelescope.org. September 12, 2013. heic1317. Retrieved October 4, 2013.
Jump up ^ "Hubble explores the origins of modern galaxies". SpaceTelescope.org. August 15, 2013. heic1315. Retrieved October 4, 2013.
Jump up ^ "Survey Description". CANDELS at UCOLick.org. Archived from the original on October 20, 2013. Retrieved October 4, 2013.
Jump up ^ "Hubble Space Telescope: Frontier Fields". STScI.edu. Retrieved October 4, 2013.
Jump up ^ Strolger & Rose 2017, p. 11.
Jump up ^ "HST Overview". NASA. June 21, 2010. Mission Operations and Observations. Retrieved November 4, 2012.
Jump up ^ "Team Hubble". STScI. Retrieved November 5, 2012. Each year more than 1,000 proposals are reviewed and approximately 200 are selected.
Jump up ^ Strolger & Rose 2017, p. 21.
Jump up ^ Strolger & Rose 2017, p. 37.
Jump up ^ "Hubble Image Processors: Raiders of the Hubble Archive". Hubblesite.org. Retrieved November 23, 2016.
Jump up ^ "Amateur Astronomers Will Use NASA's Hubble Space Telescope". STScI. September 10, 1992. Retrieved April 26, 2008.
^ Jump up to: a b O'Meara, Stephen J. (June 1997). Aguirre, Edwin L., ed. "The Demise of the HST Amateur Program" (PDF). Sky & Telescope. 96 (6): 97. Bibcode:1997S&T....93f..97O. [permanent dead link]
Jump up ^ Secosky, James J.; Potter, Michael (September 1994). "A Hubble Space Telescope Study of Posteclipse Brightening and Albedo Changes on Io". Icarus. 111 (1): 73–78. Bibcode:1994Icar..111...73S. doi:10.1006/icar.1994.1134.
Jump up ^ Storrs, Alex; Weiss, Ben; Zellner, Ben; Burleson, Win; et al. (February 1999). "Imaging Observations of Asteroids with Hubble Space Telescope" (PDF). Icarus. 137 (2): 260–268. Bibcode:1999Icar..137..260S. doi:10.1006/icar.1999.6047. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 25, 2012.
Jump up ^ Walthert, Matthew (April 24, 2015). "Open Mic Night at the Hubble Telescope". Motherboard. Retrieved April 25, 2015.
Jump up ^ Bahcall, JN; Bergeron, J; Boksenberg, A; Hartig, GF; Jannuzi, BT; Kirhakos, S; Sargent, WLW; Savage, BD; et al. (1993). "The Hubble Space Telescope Quasar Absorption Line Key Project. I. First Observational Results, Including Lyman-Alpha and Lyman-Limit Systems". The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 87: 1–43. Bibcode:1993ApJS...87....1B. doi:10.1086/191797. ISSN 0067-0049.
Jump up ^ Ostrander, EJ; Nichol, RC; Ratnatunga, KU; Griffiths, RE (1998). "The Hubble Space Telescope Medium Deep Survey Cluster Sample: Methodology and Data". The Astronomical Journal. 116 (6): 2644–2658. arXiv:astro-ph/9808304  . Bibcode:1998AJ....116.2644O. doi:10.1086/300627.
Jump up ^ Huchra, John. "The Hubble Constant". Retrieved January 11, 2011.
Jump up ^ Freedman, W. L.; Madore, B. F.; Gibson, B.K.; Ferrarese, L.; Kelson, D. D.; Sakai, S.; Mould, J. R.; Kennicutt, R. C. Jr.; et al. (2001). "Final Results from the Hubble Space Telescope Key Project to Measure the Hubble Constant". The Astrophysical Journal. 553 (1): 47–72. arXiv:astro-ph/0012376  . Bibcode:2001ApJ...553...47F. doi:10.1086/320638. Preprint available here.
Jump up ^ Palmer, Roxanne (April 24, 2015). "25 of the Greatest Hubble Telescope Discoveries From the Past 25 Years". World Science Festival. Archived from the original on March 6, 2016. Retrieved February 23, 2016.
Jump up ^ Weinberg, Steven (2008). Cosmology. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780198526827.
Jump up ^ Clifton, Timothy; Ferreira, Pedro G (March 23, 2009). "Does Dark Energy Really Exist?". Scientific American. Retrieved June 16, 2009.
Jump up ^ Seife, Charles (June 20, 2003). "Dark Energy Tiptoes Toward the Spotlight". Science. 300 (5627): 1896–1897. doi:10.1126/science.300.5627.1896. PMID 12817137.
Jump up ^ "Hubble Confirms Existence of Massive Black Hole at Heart of Active Galaxy". Goddard Space Flight Center. May 25, 1994. Retrieved April 26, 2008.
Jump up ^ Gebhardt, K; Bender, R; Bower, G; Dressler, A; et al. (2000). "A Relationship between Nuclear Black Hole Mass and Galaxy Velocity Dispersion". The Astrophysical Journal. 539 (1): L13–L16. arXiv:astro-ph/0006289  . Bibcode:2000ApJ...539L..13G. doi:10.1086/312840. CS1 maint: Explicit use of et al. (link)
Jump up ^ Ferrarese, Laura; Merritt, David (2000). "A Fundamental Relationship between Supermassive Black Holes and their Host Galaxies". The Astrophysical Journal. 539 (1): L9–L12. arXiv:astro-ph/0006053  . Bibcode:2000ApJ...539L...9F. doi:10.1086/312838.
Jump up ^ "Hubble Confirms Abundance of Protoplanetary Disks around Newborn Stars". STScI. June 13, 1994. Retrieved April 26, 2008.
Jump up ^ "Hubble Finds Extrasolar Planets Far Across Galaxy". NASA. October 4, 2006. Retrieved April 26, 2008.
Jump up ^ "Autopsy of an Explosion". NASA. March 26, 1999. Archived from the original on April 15, 2008. Retrieved April 26, 2008.
Jump up ^ Nemiroff, R.; Bonnell, J., eds. (March 11, 1996). "Hubble Telescope Maps Pluto". Astronomy Picture of the Day. NASA. Retrieved April 26, 2008.
Jump up ^ "Astronomers Measure Mass of Largest Dwarf Planet" (Press release). STScI. June 14, 2007. Retrieved April 26, 2008.
Jump up ^ Brumfiel, Geoff (September 19, 2008). "How they wonder what you are". Nature News. doi:10.1038/news.2008.1122. Retrieved November 4, 2012.
Jump up ^ Gänsicke, BT; Levan, AJ; Marsh, TR; Wheatley, PJ (2009). "SCP06F6: A carbon-rich extragalactic transient at redshift z~0.14?". The Astrophysical Journal. 697 (1): L129–L132. arXiv:0809.2562  . Bibcode:2009ApJ...697L.129G. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/L129.
Jump up ^ "Hubble discovers fifth and tiniest Pluto moon". The Indian Express. July 12, 2012. Archived from the original on January 26, 2013.
Jump up ^ "NASA's Hubble Observations Suggest Underground Ocean on Jupiter's Largest Moon" (Press release). Space Telescope Science Institute. March 12, 2015. Retrieved March 13, 2015.
Jump up ^ Saur, Joachim; Duling, Stefan; Roth, Lorenz; Jia, Xianzhe; et al. (March 2015). "The search for a subsurface ocean in Ganymede with Hubble Space Telescope observations of its auroral ovals". Journal of Geophysical Research. 120: 1715–1737. Bibcode:2015JGRA..120.1715S. doi:10.1002/2014JA020778.
Jump up ^ "ALMA and VLT Find Evidence for Stars Forming Just 250 Million Years After Big Bang". www.eso.org. Retrieved May 18, 2018.
Jump up ^ "Caught in the act: Hubble captures first-ever predicted exploding star". Spacetelescope.org. December 16, 2015. Retrieved December 19, 2015.
Jump up ^ "Hubble Team Breaks Cosmic Distance Record". HubbleSite.org. March 3, 2016. STScI-2016-07. Retrieved March 3, 2016.
Jump up ^ Klotz, Irene (March 3, 2016). "Hubble Spies Most Distant, Oldest Galaxy Ever". Discovery News. Retrieved March 3, 2016.
Jump up ^ "HST Publication Statistics". STScI. Retrieved December 26, 2017.
Jump up ^ Meylan, Georges; Madrid, Juan; Macchetto, Duccio (Spring 2003). "Hubble Science Metrics" (PDF). Newsletter. Space Telescope Science Institute. 20 (2).
Jump up ^ Benn, CR; Sánchez, SF (2001). "Scientific Impact of Large Telescopes". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 113 (781): 385–396. arXiv:astro-ph/0010304  . Bibcode:2001PASP..113..385B. doi:10.1086/319325.
Jump up ^ Haniff, CA; Mackay, CD; Titterington, DJ; Sivia, D; et al. (August 1987). "The first images from optical aperture synthesis". Nature. 328 (6132): 694–696. Bibcode:1987Natur.328..694H. doi:10.1038/328694a0.
Jump up ^ Buscher, DF; Baldwin, JE; Warner, PJ; Haniff, CA (July 1990). "Detection of a bright feature on the surface of Betelgeuse". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 245: 7. Bibcode:1990MNRAS.245P...7B.
Jump up ^ Lallo, Matthew D. (January 2012). "Experience with the Hubble Space Telescope: 20 years of an archetype". Optical Engineering. 51 (1). 011011. arXiv:1203.0002  . Bibcode:2012OptEn..51a1011L. doi:10.1117/1.OE.51.1.011011.
^ Jump up to: a b c "Gyroscopes". ESA. Retrieved June 9, 2012.
Jump up ^ "Hubble stretches the stellar tape measure ten times further". ESA/Hubble Images. Retrieved April 12, 2014.
^ Jump up to: a b "Team Hubble". STScI. Data Management. Retrieved November 5, 2012.
Jump up ^ Rosen, Raphael (July 24, 2013). "The Secret Science of the Hubble Space Telescope's Amazing Images". Space.com. Retrieved July 26, 2013.
Jump up ^ Iconic Space Images Are Actually Black-and-White. National Geographic. March 15, 2015. Retrieved March 27, 2015.
Jump up ^ Hester, Jeff (July 1, 2008). "How Hubble Sees". Nova ScienceNow. PBS. Retrieved August 17, 2015.
Jump up ^ "The Hubble Telescope". STScI. Retrieved April 26, 2008.
Jump up ^ "CADC's Hubble Space Telescope Archive". CADC. Retrieved April 26, 2008.
Jump up ^ "European HST Archive at ESA/ESAC". ESA/ESAC. Archived from the original on May 25, 2013. Retrieved February 14, 2013.
Jump up ^ Strolger & Rose 2017, p. 53.
Jump up ^ Rose 2017, p. 69.
^ Jump up to: a b "The Hubble Heritage Project". STScI. Retrieved November 5, 2012.
Jump up ^ Rose 2017, pp. 67-69.
Jump up ^ Rose 2017, pp. 68-69.
Jump up ^ "National Aeronautics and Space Administration 2003 Strategic Plan" (PDF). NASA. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 16, 2012. Retrieved November 5, 2012.
Jump up ^ "The European Homepage For The NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope". European Space Agency. Retrieved April 26, 2008.
Jump up ^ "Hubblecast". European Space Agency. Retrieved April 26, 2015.
Jump up ^ "Historic Hubble Space Telescope Repair Mission Team Honored by the Space Foundation with 2010 Space Achievement Award" (Press release). 26th National Space Symposium. March 29, 2010. Archived from the original on March 6, 2012. Retrieved November 5, 2012.
Jump up ^ "Starry-Eyed Hubble Celebrates 20 Years of Awe and Discovery" (Press release). Space Telescope Science Institute. April 22, 2010. Retrieved November 4, 2012.
Jump up ^ "25th Anniversary Image: Westerlund 2". Space Telescope Science Institute. Retrieved April 24, 2015.
Jump up ^ "Celebrating 25 years of the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope". European Space Agency. Retrieved April 24, 2015.
Jump up ^ "Hubble captures birthday bubble". SpaceTelescope.org. European Space Agency. April 21, 2016. Retrieved December 15, 2016.
Jump up ^ "Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph". STScI. Retrieved April 26, 2008.
Jump up ^ "Engineers Investigate Issue on One of Hubble's Science Instruments". NASA. January 29, 2007. Retrieved April 26, 2008.
Jump up ^ "Advanced Camera for Surveys". STScI. Retrieved May 21, 2009.
Jump up ^ Harwood, William (May 17, 2009). "Part of camera in newly repaired instrument revived". Spaceflight Now. Archived from the original on May 20, 2009. Retrieved May 17, 2009.
Jump up ^ Sembach, KR, et al. (2004). HST Two-Gyro Handbook. Version 1.0. Baltimore: STScI.
Jump up ^ "NASA Hubble Space Telescope Daily Report # 4537". SpaceRef. January 31, 2008. Retrieved January 6, 2009.
Jump up ^ "NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope Begins Two-Gyro Science Operations". SpaceRef. September 1, 2005. Retrieved January 9, 2009.
Jump up ^ Hecht, Jeff (September 6, 2007). "Hubble telescope loses another gyroscope". New Scientist. Retrieved January 6, 2009.
Jump up ^ Harwood, William (October 30, 2008). "Endeavour to go Nov. 14; Hubble slips deeper into '09". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved January 6, 2009.
Jump up ^ Whitehouse, David (January 17, 2004). "Why Hubble is being dropped". BBC News. Retrieved January 10, 2007.
Jump up ^ Wall, Mike (April 24, 2015). "How Will the Hubble Space Telescope Die?". Space.com. Retrieved May 16, 2017.
Jump up ^ Northon, Karen (June 23, 2016). "NASA Extends Hubble Space Telescope Science Operations Contract" (Press release). NASA. Retrieved June 26, 2016.
Jump up ^ Cowing, Keith (July 22, 2005). "NASA Considering Deletion of Hubble Deorbit Module". SpaceRef. Retrieved January 10, 2007.
Jump up ^ Bennett, Jay (February 14, 2017). "A New Spaceship Could Fly Astronauts to the Hubble Space Telescope for Repairs". Popular Mechanics. Retrieved February 15, 2017.
Jump up ^ Matson, John (May 8, 2009). "Last Dance with the Shuttle: What's in Store for the Final Hubble Servicing Mission". Scientific American. Retrieved May 18, 2009.
Jump up ^ Berger, Brian (May 23, 2007). "NASA Adds Docking Capability For Next Space Observatory". Space.com. Retrieved June 4, 2012.
Jump up ^ "NASA's Hubble Finds Most Distant Galaxy Candidate Ever Seen in Universe" (Press release). NASA. January 26, 2011. Retrieved June 4, 2012. Visual representation.
Jump up ^ "ESA JWST Timeline". Sci.esa.int. June 30, 2003. Archived from the original on May 15, 2016. Retrieved June 4, 2012.
Jump up ^ "About Webb's Launch". NASA. Retrieved November 4, 2006.
Jump up ^ "JPL: Herschel Space Observatory: Related Missions". Herschel.jpl.nasa.gov. Retrieved June 4, 2012.
Jump up ^ "What Will Astronomy Be Like in 35 Years?". Astronomy. August 2008.
Jump up ^ Tresch Fienberg, Richard (September 14, 2007). "Sharpening the 200-Inch". Sky & Telescope. Retrieved July 1, 2008.
Bibliography[edit]
Strolger, Louis-Gregory; Rose, Susan, eds. (January 2017). "Hubble Space Telescope Call for Proposals for Cycle 25" (PDF). Space Telescope Science Institute.
Rose, Susan, ed. (December 2011). "Hubble Space Telescope Primer for Cycle 25" (PDF). Space Telescope Science Institute. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 2, 2013. Retrieved October 5, 2014.
Allen, Lew; Angel, Roger; Mangus, John D.; Rodney, George A.; et al. (November 1990). The Hubble Space Telescope Optical Systems Failure Report. NASA. Bibcode:1990STIN...9112437. NASA TM-103443. The definitive report on the error in the Hubble mirror.
Dunar, Andrew J.; Waring, Stephen P. (1999). "The Hubble Space Telescope" (PDF). Power to Explore: History of Marshall Space Flight Center 1960–1990. NASA. ISBN 0-16-058992-4. Covers the development of the telescope.
Logsdon, John M.; Snyder, Amy Paige; Launius, Roger D.; Garber, Stephen J.; Newport, Regan Anne, eds. (2001). Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in the History of the U.S. Civil Space Program. Volume V: Exploring the Cosmos (PDF). NASA History Series. NASA. ISBN 978-0-16-061774-4. NASA SP-2001-4407. Contains many of the primary documents such as Spitzer's 1946 article, the Wood's Hole report on STScI autonomy, and the ESA memorandum of understanding. Also includes other NASA astronomy programs.
Spitzer, Lyman S. (March 1979). "History of the Space Telescope". Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society. 20: 29–36. Bibcode:1979QJRAS..20...29S. Covers the early history of precursors and proposals.
Tatarewicz, Joseph N. (1998). "The Hubble Space Telescope Servicing Mission". In Mack, Pamela E. From Engineering Science to Big Science. NASA History Series. NASA. ISBN 978-0-16-049640-0. NASA SP-1998-4219. A detailed account of the first servicing mission.
Further reading[edit]
Bahcall, John N.; Barish, Barry C.; Hewitt, Jacqueline N.; McKee, Christopher F.; et al. (August 2003). "Report of the HST-JWST Transition Panel" (PDF). NASA.
Pearce, Rohan (March 29, 2012). "What went wrong with the Hubble Space Telescope (and what managers can learn from it)". Techworld. Retrieved March 30, 2012.
Zimmerman, Robert F. (2010). The Universe in a Mirror: The Saga of the Hubble Space Telescope and the Visionaries Who Built It. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-14635-5.
External links[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Hubble Space Telescope.
Listen to this article (info/dl)

This audio file was created from a revision of the article "Hubble Space Telescope" dated 2006-05-29, and does not reflect subsequent edits to the article. (Audio help)
More spoken articles
Hubble Space Telescope at NASA.gov
Hubblesite.org, a Hubble outreach site by Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI)
Spacetelescope.org, a Hubble outreach site by ESA
The Hubble Heritage Project and Hubble archives by STScI
Hubble archives by ESA
Hubble archives by CADC
Hubble current position by N2YO.com
show
v
t
e
Hubble Space Telescope
Current instruments
Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS)
Cosmic Origins Spectrograph (COS)
Fine Guidance Sensor (FGS)
Near Infrared Camera and Multi-Object Spectrometer (NICMOS)
Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS)
Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3)

Previous instruments
Corrective Optics Space Telescope Axial Replacement (COSTAR)
Faint Object Camera (FOC)
Faint Object Spectrograph (FOS)
Goddard High Resolution Spectrograph (GHRS/HRS)
High Speed Photometer (HSP)
Wide Field and Planetary Camera (WFPC)
Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2 (WFPC2)
Space Shuttle missions
Launch: STS-31 (1990, Discovery)
Servicing: STS-61 (1993, Endeavour)
STS-82 (1997, Discovery)
STS-103 (1999, Discovery)
STS-109 (2002, Columbia)
STS-125 (2009, Atlantis)
Special fields and images
Pillars of Creation (1995)
Hubble Deep Field (1995)
Hubble Deep Field South (1998)
Hubble Ultra-Deep Field (2003–04)
Extended Groth Strip (2004–05)
SWEEPS (2006)
Mystic Mountain (2010)
Hubble eXtreme Deep Field (2012)
Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey
Anniversaries
Related
Hubble (2010 documentary)
Edwin Hubble
show
v
t
e
Space observatories
Operating
AGILE (2007)
AMS-02 (2011)
ASTERIA (2017)
Astrosat (2015)
CALET (2015)
Chandra (AXAF) (1999)
DAMPE (2015)
Fermi (2008)
Gaia (2013)
HXMT (Insight) (2017)
Hinode (Solar-B) (2006)
HiRISE (2005)
Hisaki (SPRINT-A) (2013)
Hubble (1990)
INTEGRAL (2002)
IBEX (2008)
IRIS (2013)
ISS-CREAM (2017)
Kepler (2009)
MAXI (2009)
Mikhailo Lomonosov (2016)
MOST (2003)
NCLE (2018)
NEOSSat (2013)
NICER (2017)
NuSTAR (2012)
Odin (2001)
R/HESSI (2002)
SDO (2010)
SOHO (1995)
SOLAR (2008)
Spektr-R (2011)
Spitzer (2003)
Swift (2004)
TESS (2018)
TUGSAT-1 (2013)
UniBRITE-1 (2013)
WISE (2009)
XMM-Newton (1999)
Planned
Mini-EUSO (2018)
Stars-AO (2018)
CHEOPS (2019)
ILO-1 (2019)
iWF-MAXI (2019)
Public Telescope (PST) (2019)
Solar Orbiter (SolO) (2019)
Spektr-RG (2019)
Astro-1 Telescope (2020)
Nano-JASMINE (2020)
ORBIS (2020)
Euclid (2021)
IXPE (2021)
James Webb (JWST) (2021)
LORD (2021)
Spektr-UV (2021)
SVOM (2021)
XRISM (2021)
Space Solar Telescope (2022)
Xuntian (2022)
K-EUSO (2023)
Solar-C (2023)
WFIRST (2025+)
PLATO (2026)
Spektr-M (2026+)
ARIEL (2028)
ATHENA (2028)
LISA (2034)
Proposed
Arcus
AstroSat-2
EXCEDE
Fresnel Imager
FOCAL
HabEx
Hibari
Hypertelescope
JEM-EUSO
LiteBIRD
LUCI
LUVOIR
ATLAST
HDST
Lynx
NEOCam
New Worlds Mission
NRO donation to NASA
OST
PhoENiX
Small-JASMINE
Sentinel
Solar-D
SPHEREx
SPICA
THEIA
THESEUS
Retired
Akari (Astro-F) (2006–11)
ALEXIS (1993–2005)
ATM (1973–74)
ASCA (Astro-D) (1993–2000)
Astro-1 (1990)
BBXRT
HUT
Astro-2 (HUT) (1995)
Astron (1983–89)
ANS (1974–76)
BeppoSAX (1996–2003)
CHIPSat (2003–08)
Compton (CGRO) (1991–2000)
CoRoT (2006–13)
Cos-B (1975–82)
COBE (1989–93)
EPOCh (2008)
EPOXI (2010)
EXOSAT (1983–86)
EUVE (1992–2001)
FUSE (1999–2007)
Kvant-1 (1987–2001)
GALEX (2003–13)
Gamma (1990–92)
Ginga (Astro-C) (1987–91)
Granat (1989–98)
Hakucho (CORSA-b) (1979–85)
HALCA (MUSES-B) (1997–2005)
HEAO-1 (1977–79)
Herschel (2009–13)
Hinotori (Astro-A) (1981–91)
HEAO-2 (Einstein Obs.) (1978–82)
HEAO-3 (1979–81)
HETE-2 (2000–07?)
Hipparcos (1989–93)
IUE (1978–96)
IRAS (1983)
IRTS (1995–96)
ISO (1996–98)
IXAE (1996–2004)
Kristall (1990–2001)
LEGRI (1997–2002)
LISA Pathfinder (2015–17)
MSX (1996–97)
OAO-2 (1968–73)
OAO-3 (Copernicus) (1972–81)
Orion 1 (1971)
Orion 2 (1973)
PAMELA (2006–16)
Planck (2009–13)
RELIKT-1 (1983–84)
ROSAT (1990–99)
RXTE (1995–2012)
SAMPEX (1992–2004)
SAS-B (1972–73)
SAS-C (1975–79)
Suzaku (Astro-EII) (2005–15)
Taiyo (SRATS) (1975–80)
Tenma (Astro-B) (1983–1985)
Uhuru (1970–73)
WMAP (2001–10)
Yokoh (Solar-A) (1991–2001)
Hibernating
(Mission completed)
SWAS (1998–2005)
TRACE (1998–2010)
Lost
OAO-1 (1966)
OAO-B (1970)
CORSA (1976)
ABRIXAS (1999)
HETE-1 (1996)
WIRE (1999)
Astro-E (2000)
Tsubame (2014–?)
Hitomi (Astro-H) (2016)
Cancelled
Astro-G
Constellation-X
Darwin
Destiny
EChO
Eddington
FAME
FINESSE
GEMS
IXO
JDEM
LOFT
SIM & SIMlite
SNAP
TAUVEX
TPF
XEUS
XIPE
See also
Great Observatories program
List of space telescopes
List of proposed space observatories
List of X-ray space telescopes
Category
show
v
t
e
Exoplanet search projects
Exoplanetology
Exoplanet
Ground-based
AAPS
APF
CORALIE
EAPSNet
ELODIE
EPICS
ESPRESSO
FINDS Exo-Earths
Geneva
HARPS
HARPS-N
GPI
HATNet
HEK
HiCIAO
HIRES
KELT
LCES
Magellan
MARVELS
MASCARA
MEarth
MicroFUN
MINERVA
Australis
MOA
N2K
NGTS
NESSI
OGLE
OPSP
PlanetPol
Project 1640
PARAS
SEEDS
SETI
SOPHIE
SPECULOOS
SPHERE
SuperWASP
Systemic
TrES
XO Telescope
ZIMPOL/CHEOPS

Space missions
Past
SWEEPS using HST (2006)
CoRoT (2006–13)
EPOXI using Deep Impact (2008–13)
Current
MOST (2003–present)
Kepler (2009–present)
detected exoplanets
Gaia (2013–present)
ASTERIA (2017–present)
TESS (2018–present)
Planned
CHEOPS (2019)
James Webb Space Telescope (2021)
PLATO (2026)
WFIRST (mid-2020s)
Proposed
ATLAST
EXCEDE
FINESSE
HabEx
HDST
LUVOIR
New Worlds Mission
OST
PEGASE
Cancelled
Darwin
EChO
Eddington
Space Interferometry Mission
Terrestrial Planet Finder
Detection methods
Discoveries of exoplanets
List of exoplanets
full
nearest
show
v
t
e
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Main articles
Robert H. Goddard
GSFC History
Facilities
Wallops Flight Facility (WFF)
Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS)
Independent Verification and Validation Facility (IV&V)
Spacecraft Magnetic Test Facility
Columbia Scientific Balloon Facility (CSBF)
Notable missions
and programs
James Webb Space Telescope (JWST)
Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE)
Space Network
Near Earth Network
Landsat program
Getaway Special
Compton Gamma Ray Observatory (CGRO)
Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer (RXTE)
Explorers program
Hitchhiker Program
Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO)
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO)
Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO)
Hubble Space Telescope (HST)
Tracking and Data Relay Satellite (TDRS)
People
Leadership
Christopher Scolese (Director)
George Morrow (Deputy Director)
Christyl Johnson (Deputy Director, Technology and Research Investments)
Colleen Hartman (Deputy Director, Science, Operations and Performance)
Notable scientists
and engineers
David Louis Band
Robert Bindschadler
Fred Espenak
Gene Carl Feldman
Orlando Figueroa
James Hansen
Marc Kuchner
Lissette Martinez
John C. Mather
show
v
t
e
European human spaceflight
General
European Astronaut Corps
ISS contribution
ISS research
Facilities
European Astronaut Centre
Columbus Control Centre
Oberpfaffenhofen
Concordia Station
Earth-based research
AMASE
Concordia winterovers
Euro-MARS
European Space Camp
MARS-500
MELiSSA
Zero-G Airbus A310
Spacecraft used
Active
Soyuz-MS
Planned and proposed
DC4EU
Orion (Orion Service Module)
Skylon
Retired and cancelled
CSTS
Hermes
Soyuz-TM
Soyuz-TMA
Soyuz TMA-M
Space Shuttle
Mission highlights
Space stations
Mir
Euromir
Interkosmos
International Space Station
ELIPS programme
Modules
Columbus
Cupola
Harmony
Tranquility
Other
European Retrievable Carrier
Hubble Space Telescope
Faint Object Camera
Multi-Purpose Logistics Module
Spacelab
Deutschland-1
Deutschland-2
Tethered Satellite System
European Space Agency
show
v
t
e
NASA
Policy and history
History
NACA (1915)
National Aeronautics and Space Act (1958)
Space Task Group (1958)
Paine (1986)
Rogers (1986)
Ride (1987)
Space Exploration Initiative (1989)
Augustine (1990)
U.S. National Space Policy (1996)
CFUSAI (2002)
CAIB (2003)
Vision for Space Exploration (2004)
Aldridge (2004)
Augustine (2009)
General
Space Race
Administrator and Deputy Administrator
Chief Scientist
Astronaut Corps
Budget
Spin-off technologies
NASA TV
NASA Social
Launch Services Program
Apollo 15 postage stamp incident
Kennedy Space Center
Vehicle Assembly Building
Launch Complex 39
Launch Control Center
Johnson Space Center
Mission Control
Lunar Sample Laboratory
Robotic programs
Past
Hitchhiker
Mariner
Mariner Mark II
MESUR
Mars Surveyor '98
New Millennium
Lunar Orbiter
Pioneer
Planetary Observer
Ranger
Surveyor
Viking
Project Prometheus
Mars Scout
Current
Living With a Star
Lunar Precursor Robotic Program
Earth Observing System
Great Observatories program
Explorer
Small explorer
Voyager
Discovery
New Frontiers
Mars Exploration Rover
Human spaceflight
programs
Past
X-15 (suborbital)
Mercury
Gemini
Apollo
Apollo–Soyuz Test Project (with the Soviet space program)
Skylab
Space Shuttle
Shuttle–Mir (with Roscosmos State Corporation)
Constellation
Current
International Space Station
Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS)
Commercial Crew Development (CCDev)
Orion
Individual featured
missions
(human and robotic)
Past
COBE
Apollo 11
Mercury 3
Mercury-Atlas 6
Magellan
Pioneer 10
Pioneer 11
Galileo
GALEX
GRAIL
WMAP
Space Shuttle
Sojourner rover
Spirit rover
LADEE
MESSENGER
Aquarius
Cassini
Currently
operating
MRO
2001 Mars Odyssey
Dawn
New Horizons
Kepler
International Space Station
Hubble Space Telescope
Spitzer
RHESSI
Swift
THEMIS
Mars Exploration Rover
Curiosity rover
timeline
Opportunity rover
observed
GOES 14
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter
GOES 15
Van Allen Probes
SDO
Juno
Mars Science Laboratory
timeline
NuSTAR
Voyager 1/2
WISE
MAVEN
MMS
OSIRIS-REx
Future
JPSS
James Webb Space Telescope
WFIRST
InSight
Mars 2020
NISAR
Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite
Europa Clipper
Communications
and navigation
Canberra
Deep Space Atomic Clock
Deep Space Network (Goldstone
Madrid
Near Earth Network
Space Flight Operations Facility)
Space Network
NASA lists
Astronauts
by name
by year
Apollo astronauts
List of NASA aircraft
List of NASA missions
unmanned missions
List of NASA contractors
List of United States rockets
List of NASA cancellations
List of Space Shuttle missions
crews
NASA images
and artwork
Earthrise
The Blue Marble
Family Portrait
Pale Blue Dot
Pillars of Creation
Mystic Mountain
Solar System Family Portrait
The Day the Earth Smiled
Fallen Astronaut
Lunar plaques
Pioneer plaques
Voyager Golden Record
NASA insignia
Gemini and Apollo medallions
Mission patches
Category
show
v
t
e
European Space Agency
Spaceports
Guiana Space Centre
Esrange
Launch vehicles
Ariane 5
Arianespace Soyuz
Vega
Facilities
ESOC
ESTEC
ESRIN
EAC
ESAC
ECSAT
CDF
ST-ECF
Communications
ESTRACK
European Data Relay System
Programmes
Aurora
Copernicus
Sentinel
Cosmic Vision
CryoSat
EGNOS
ELIPS
ExoMars
FLPP
Galileo
LPP
SSA
Predecessors
ELDO
ESRO
Related topics
Arianespace
ESA Television
EUMETSAT
European Space Camp
GEWEX
Planetary Science Archive
hide
Projects and missions
Science
Solar physics
ISEE-2 (1977–87)
Ulysses (1990–2009)
SOHO (1995–present)
Cluster II (2000–present)
Solar Orbiter (2019)
Lagrange (2020s)
Planetary science
Giotto (1985–92)
Huygens (1997–2005)
SMART-1 (2003–06)
Mars Express (2003–present)
Rosetta/Philae (2004–16)
Venus Express (2005–14)
ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter (2016–present)
BepiColombo (2018)
ExoMars rover (2020)
Jupiter Icy Moons Explorer (2022)
Astronomy and
cosmology
Cos-B (1975–82)
IUE (1978–96)
EXOSAT (1983–86)
Hipparcos (1989–93)
Hubble (1990–present)
Eureca (1992–93)
ISO (1995–98)
XMM-Newton (1999–present)
INTEGRAL (2002–present)
CoRoT (2006–13)
Planck (2009–13)
Herschel (2009–13)
Gaia (2013–present)
CHEOPS (2019)
Euclid (2021)
James Webb (2021)
PLATO (2026)
ARIEL (2028)
ATHENA (2028)
LISA (2034)
Earth observation
Meteosat First Generation (1977–97)
ERS-1 (1991–2000)
ERS-2 (1995–2011)
Meteosat Second Generation (2002–present)
Envisat (2002–12)
Double Star (2003–07)
MetOp (2006–present)
GOCE (2009–13)
SMOS (2009–present)
CryoSat-2 (2010–present)
Swarm (2013–present)
Sentinel-1 / 1A / 1B (2014–present)
Sentinel-2 / 2A / 2B (2015–present)
Sentinel-3 / 3A / 3B (2016–present)
Sentinel-5 Precursor (2017)
ADM-Aeolus (2018)
EarthCARE (2019)
Meteosat Third Generation (Sentinel-4) (2019)
BIOMASS (2021)
MetOp-SG-A (2021)
SMILE (2021)
MetOp-SG-B (2022)
FLEX (2022)
ISS spaceflight
ISS contribution (1998–present)
Columbus (2008–present)
Jules Verne (2008)
Cupola (2010–present)
Johannes Kepler (2011)
Edoardo Amaldi (2012)
Albert Einstein (2013)
Georges Lemaître (2014)
European Robotic Arm (2018)
Telecommunications
GEOS 2 (1978)
Olympus-1 (1989–93)
Artemis (2001–present)
GIOVE-A (2005–present)
GIOVE-B (2008–present)
HYLAS-1 (2010–present)
Galileo IOV (2011–present)
Galileo FOC (2014–present)
European Data Relay System (2016–present)
Technology
demonstrators
ARD (1998)
PROBA-1 (2001–present)
YES2 (2007)
PROBA-2 (2009–present)
PROBA-V (2013–present)
IXV (2015)
LISA Pathfinder (2015–17)
OPS-SAT (2018)
Lunar Lander (2018)
PROBA-3 (2020)
AIDA (2023)
Cancelled and proposed
ALTIUS
Columbus Man-Tended Free Flyer
CSTS
Darwin Mission
Don Quijote
e.Deorbit
EChO
Eddington
EnVision
EXPERT
Hermes
Hopper
LOFT
Luna 27
Marco Polo
MarcoPolo-R
Mars sample return mission
ODINUS
PRIDE
SPICA
STE-QUEST
THESEUS
THOR
XIPE
Failed
Cluster
CryoSat-1
GEOS 1
Future missions in italics
Category
Commons
Wikinews
WikiProject
show
v
t
e
← 1989 · Orbital launches in 1990 · 1991 →
Skynet 4A · JCSAT-2 | STS-32 (Leasat 5) | Kosmos 2055 | Kosmos 2056 | SPOT-2 · UoSAT-3 · UoSAT-4 · Pacsat · DOVE · Webersat · LUSat | Molniya-3 No.53L | Hiten · Hagoromo | USA-50) | Kosmos 2057 | Kosmos 2058 | Zhongxing 3 | Kosmos 2059 | Momo 1b · Orizuru · Fuju 1b | Soyuz TM-9 | USA-51 · USA-52 | Gran' No.35L | Superbird B · BS 2x | Nadezhda No.405 | Okean-O1 No.5 | STS-36 (USA-53) | Progress M-3 | Intelsat 603 | Kosmos 2060 | Kosmos 2061 | Kosmos 2062 | USA-54 | Kosmos 2063 | Ofek-2 | Unnamed | Pegsat · USA-55 | Kosmos 2064 · Kosmos 2065 · Kosmos 2066 · Kosmos 2067 · Kosmos 2068 · Kosmos 2069 · Kosmos 2070 · Kosmos 2071 | AsiaSat 1 | USA-56 · USA-57 · USA-58 | Foton No.6L | Kosmos 2072 | Palapa B2R | Kosmos 2073 | Kosmos 2074 | STS-31 (Hubble) | Kosmos 2075 | Molniya-1 No.71 | Kosmos 2076 | Progress 42 | Kosmos 2077 | MacSat 1 · MacSat 2 | Kosmos 2078 | Kosmos 2079 · Kosmos 2080 · Kosmos 2081 | Kosmos 2082 | Resurs-F1 No.50 | Kristall | ROSAT | USA-59 · USA-60 · USA-61 · USA-62 | INSAT-1D | Molniya 3 No.47L | Kosmos 2083 | Gorizont No.30L | Kosmos 2084 | Intelsat 604 | Meteor-2 No.23 | Unnamed | Gamma | Badr-1 · Optus-MFS | Resurs-F2 No.5 | Kosmos 2085 | Kosmos 2086 | TDF-2 · DFS Kopernikus 2 | Kosmos 2087 | CRRES | Kosmos 2088 | Soyuz TM-10 | USA-63 | Kosmos 2089 | Kosmos 2090 · Kosmos 2091 · Kosmos 2092 · Kosmos 2093 · Kosmos 2094 · Kosmos 2095 | Ekran-M No.14L | Molniya-1T No.68 | Progress M-4 | Resurs-F1 No.49 | Marco Polo 2 | Kosmos 2096 | Kosmos 2097 | Yuri 3a | Kosmos 2098 | Skynet 4C · Eutelsat II F-1 | Kosmos 2099 | Fengyun I-02 · Qiqiuweixing 1 · Qiqiuweixing 2 | Resurs-F1 No.51 | Kosmos 2100 | Molniya-3 No.54L | Progress M-5 | Meteor-2 No.25 | Kosmos 2101 | USA-64 | Unnamed | FSW-1 No.3 | STS-41 (Ulysses) | SBS 6 · Westar 6S | Kosmos 2102 | Inmarsat-2F1 | Gorizont No.32L | USA-65 | Kosmos 2103 | STS-38 (USA-67 · Prowler) | Kosmos 2104 | Kosmos 2105 | Satcom C1 · GStar 4 | Molniya 1T No.70 | Gorizont No.33L | USA-66 | Kosmos 2106 | USA-68 | STS-35 | Soyuz TM-11 | Kosmos 2107 | Kosmos 2108 | Kosmos 2109 · Kosmos 2110 · Kosmos 2111 | Kosmos 2112 | Gran' No.37L | Kosmos 2113 | Kosmos 2114 · Kosmos 2115 · Kosmos 2116 · Kosmos 2117 · Kosmos 2118 · Kosmos 2119 | Kosmos 2120 | Globus No.12
Payloads are separated by bullets ( · ), launches by pipes ( | ). Manned flights are indicated in bold text. Uncatalogued launch failures are listed in italics. Payloads deployed from other spacecraft are denoted in (brackets).
Authority control
WorldCat Identities
GND: 4260288-9
ISNI: 0000 0001 2214 8100
LCCN: n91011423
NLA: 35793914
VIAF: 121711981
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hubble_Space_Telescope&oldid=852524649"
Categories:
Hubble Space Telescope
Space observatories
Great Observatories program
Ultraviolet telescopes
European Space Agency satellites
NASA satellites
Artificial satellites orbiting Earth
Edwin Hubble
Lockheed Corporation
Space accidents and incidents
Space science experiments
Spacecraft launched by the Space Shuttle
Spacecraft launched in 1990
Space accidents and incidents in the United States
Hidden categories:
Pages using Timeline
CS1 maint: Extra text: authors list
All articles with dead external links
Articles with dead external links from September 2017
Articles with permanently dead external links
CS1 maint: Explicit use of et al.
Wikipedia indefinitely move-protected pages
Use mdy dates from May 2018
Use American English from March 2018
All Wikipedia articles written in American English
Articles containing potentially dated statements from 2018
All articles containing potentially dated statements
Articles containing German-language text
Articles containing potentially dated statements from 2017
Spoken articles
Articles with hAudio microformats
Featured articles
Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers
Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers
Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers
Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers
Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
In other projects
Wikimedia Commons
Languages
Afrikaans
Alemannisch
العربية
Asturianu
Azərbaycanca
تۆرکجه
বাংলা
Bân-lâm-gú
Беларуская
Български
Bosanski
Brezhoneg
Català
Čeština
Cymraeg
Dansk
Deutsch
Eesti
Ελληνικά
Español
Esperanto
Euskara
فارسی
Français
Gaeilge
Gaelg
Galego
贛語
한국어
Հայերեն
हिन्दी
Hrvatski
Ido
Bahasa Indonesia
Íslenska
Italiano
עברית
Basa Jawa
ಕನ್ನಡ
ქართული
Қазақша
Kurdî
Latina
Latviešu
Lëtzebuergesch
Lietuvių
Limburgs
Magyar
Македонски
മലയാളം
मराठी
მარგალური
Bahasa Melayu
Mirandés
Монгол
မြန်မာဘာသာ
Nederlands
日本語
Nordfriisk
Norsk
Norsk nynorsk
Occitan
ਪੰਜਾਬੀ
پنجابی
پښتو
Patois
Polski
Português
Română
Русский
Scots
Seeltersk
Shqip
Sicilianu
Simple English
Slovenčina
Slovenščina
کوردی
Српски / srpski
Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски
Suomi
Svenska
Tagalog
தமிழ்
తెలుగు
ไทย
Türkçe
Українська
اردو
Tiếng Việt
West-Vlams
吴语
Yorùbá
粵語
中文
Lingua Franca Nova
87 more
Edit links
This page was last edited on 29 July 2018, at 15:58 (UTC).
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

values: This is a featured article. Click here for more information.

values: mw-indicator-featured-star mw-indicator

values: mw-indicator-spoken-icon mw-indicator

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

values: mw-jump-link #mw-head

values: mw-jump-link #p-search

attrs: href class title

values:
/wiki/Hubble_(disambiguation)
mw-disambig
Hubble (disambiguation)

attrs: role class

values:
note
hatnote navigation-not-searchable

value: p

value: caption

values:
/wiki/File:HST-SM4.jpeg
image
The Hubble Space Telescope in orbit

values: padding:0.1em 0;line-height:1.2em;padding: 2px 0;

values:
/wiki/Space_observatory
mw-redirect
Space observatory

values:
nofollow
external text
https://www.nasa.gov/hubble

values:
nofollow
http://hubblesite.org/
external text

values:
nofollow
https://www.spacetelescope.org/
external text

values:
/wiki/Semi-major_axis
mw-redirect
Semi-major axis

values:
/wiki/Visible_light
mw-redirect
Visible light

values: Near Infrared Camera and Multi-Object Spectrometer

values:
/wiki/Fine_Guidance_Sensor
mw-redirect
Fine Guidance Sensor

values: collapsible collapsed mw-collapsible mw-collapsed mw-made-collapsible

values:
/wiki/Near_ultraviolet
mw-redirect
Near ultraviolet

values:
/wiki/Near_infrared
mw-redirect
Near infrared

values:
/wiki/Earth%27s_atmosphere
mw-redirect
Earth's atmosphere

values: plainlinks noexcerpt noprint asof-tag update

values: checkbox button toctogglecheckbox toctogglecheckbox display:none

values: Edit section: Conception, design and aim

values:
/wiki/Public_spending
mw-redirect
Public spending

values:
/wiki/Expanding_universe
mw-redirect
Expanding universe

values: Edit section: Construction and engineering

values: Edit section: Optical Telescope Assembly (OTA)

values:
/wiki/SI_prefix#Non-metric_units
mw-redirect
SI prefix

values:
/wiki/Corning_Incorporated
mw-redirect
Corning Incorporated

values:
/wiki/Deionized_water
mw-redirect
Deionized water

values: Edit section: Computer systems and data processing

values:
/wiki/Exploded_view
mw-redirect
Exploded view

values:
/wiki/Filter_(optics)
mw-redirect
Filter (optics)

values:
/wiki/Martin_Marietta_Corporation
mw-redirect
Martin Marietta Corporation

values: Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy

values:
/wiki/Baltimore,_Maryland
mw-redirect
Baltimore, Maryland

values: Space Telescope European Coordinating Facility

values: Edit section: Challenger disaster, delays, and eventual launch

values: Edit section: List of Hubble instruments

values: Corrective Optics Space Telescope Axial Replacement

values:
/wiki/Image_processing
mw-redirect
Image processing

values: Edit section: Servicing missions and new instruments

values: float: right; clear: right; margin: 0 0 1em 1em; padding: 3px;

values:
/wiki/Space_shuttle
mw-redirect
Space shuttle

values:
/wiki/Photovoltaic_module
mw-redirect
Photovoltaic module

values:
/wiki/Extra-vehicular_activity
mw-redirect
Extra-vehicular activity

values:
/wiki/Thermal_noise
mw-redirect
Thermal noise

values:
/wiki/Columbia_disaster
mw-redirect
Columbia disaster

values:
/wiki/James_Webb_Telescope
mw-redirect
James Webb Telescope

values: Edit section: Cosmic Assembly Near-infrared Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey

values: Color image of galaxy cluster MCS J0416.1–2403, studied by the Hubble Frontier Fields program

values:
/wiki/Galaxy_formation
mw-redirect
Galaxy formation

values:
/wiki/Gravitational_lensing
mw-redirect
Gravitational lensing

values:
/wiki/Hubble_constant
mw-redirect
Hubble constant

values:
/wiki/High-z_Supernova_Search_Team
mw-redirect
High-z Supernova Search Team

values:
/wiki/Comet_Shoemaker-Levy_9
mw-redirect
Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9

values:
/wiki/Extrasolar_planet
mw-redirect
Extrasolar planet

values:
/wiki/Hubble_Extreme_Deep_Field
mw-redirect
Hubble Extreme Deep Field

values: Depiction of progress in the detection of the early Universe

values:
/wiki/Timeline_of_the_Big_Bang
mw-redirect
Timeline of the Big Bang

values: Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System

values:
/wiki/Canadian_Astronomy_Data_Centre
mw-redirect
Canadian Astronomy Data Centre

values:
/wiki/Tagged_Image_File_Format
mw-redirect
Tagged Image File Format

values: Hubble European Space Agency Information Centre

values:
/wiki/Bubble_Nebula
mw-redirect
Bubble Nebula

values: Edit section: Orbital decay and controlled reentry

values: Edit section: Possible commercial service missions

values:
/wiki/Trump_Administration
mw-redirect
Trump Administration

values:
/wiki/Orange_(color)
mw-redirect
Orange (color)

values:
/wiki/Submillimeter_astronomy
mw-redirect
Submillimeter astronomy

values: Advanced Technology Large-Aperture Space Telescope

values:
/wiki/Spitzer_Space_telescope
mw-redirect
Spitzer Space telescope

values:
/wiki/Extremely_Large_Telescopes
mw-redirect
Extremely Large Telescopes

values: display:table-cell;padding:0.2em 0.2em 0.2em 0.3em;vertical-align:middle

values: margin:0.5em 0 0.5em 1em;border:solid #aaa 1px

values: List of largest optical reflecting telescopes

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.70.781

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1126/science.249.4970.735

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1117/12.394037

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1117/12.934268

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2014.2360827

values:
nofollow
external text
http://hdl.handle.net/2060/19820025420

values: Category:CS1 maint: Extra text: authors list

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1086/133457

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.aura-astronomy.org/about.asp

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1086/185950

values:
nofollow
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0102510/
external text

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1063/1.2808434

values:
nofollow
external text
//hdl.handle.net/2014%2F31621

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1086/187581

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1086/187580

values:
nofollow
external text
http://hubble.nasa.gov/missions/sm2.php

values:
nofollow
external text
http://sm3a.gsfc.nasa.gov/overview.html

values:
nofollow
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15489217/
external text

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.stsci.edu/hst/HST_overview

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1006/icar.1994.1134

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1006/icar.1999.6047

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1086/191797

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/issn/0067-0049

values:
nofollow
external text
//arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9808304

attrs: alt src title width height srcset data-file-width data-file-height

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1086/300627

values:
nofollow
external text
//arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0012376

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1086/320638

values:
nofollow
external text
https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0012376

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1126/science.300.5627.1896

values:
/wiki/PubMed_Identifier
mw-redirect
PubMed Identifier

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12817137

values:
nofollow
external text
//arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0006289

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1086/312840

values: Category:CS1 maint: Explicit use of et al.

values:
nofollow
external text
//arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0006053

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1086/312838

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1038/news.2008.1122

values:
nofollow
external text
//arxiv.org/abs/0809.2562

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020778

values:
/wiki/Discovery_News
mw-redirect
Discovery News

values:
nofollow
external text
//arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0010304

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1086/319325

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1038/328694a0

values:
nofollow
external text
//arxiv.org/abs/1203.0002

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.51.1.011011

values:
nofollow
external text
http://archive.stsci.edu/hst

values:
nofollow
http://cadcwww.dao.nrc.ca/hst/
external text

values:
nofollow
http://www.spacetelescope.org/
external text

values:
nofollow
external text
http://hubble25th.org/images/27

values:
nofollow
http://www.stsci.edu/instruments/stis/
external text

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.stsci.edu/hst/acs

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.jwst.nasa.gov/launch.html

values: -moz-column-width: 30em; -webkit-column-width: 30em; column-width: 30em; list-style-type: decimal;

values: position: absolute; top: 0px; left: 100px; right: 0px; bottom: 0px; height: 0px; width: 0px;

values: left: 50%; top: 50%; margin-left: -35px; margin-top: -27.5px;

values:
mwPlayerContainer k-player videoHolder
width: 200px; position: relative;

values:
float: left; margin-left: 5px;
floatnone

values:
/wiki/Wikipedia:Media_help
mw-redirect
Wikipedia:Media help

values: font-size: xx-small; line-height: 1.6em; margin-left: 60px;

values:
nofollow
http://www.nasa.gov/hubble/
external text

values:
nofollow
http://heritage.stsci.edu/
external text

values:
nofollow
http://archive.stsci.edu/hst/
external text

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/hst

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.n2yo.com/?s=20580

values:
navbox-image
5
width:1px;padding:0px 0px 0px 2px

values: Sagittarius Window Eclipsing Extrasolar Planet Search

values:
/wiki/Hubble_eXtreme_Deep_Field
mw-redirect
Hubble eXtreme Deep Field

values: nowraplinks hlist collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner mw-collapsible mw-made-collapsible mw-collapsed

values: Cosmic Ray Energetics and Mass Experiment

values: Near Earth Object Surveillance Satellite

values: Neutron Star Interior Composition Explorer

values: Reuven Ramaty High Energy Solar Spectroscopic Imager

values: Orbiting Binary Black Hole Investigation Satellite

values:
/wiki/Lunar_Orbital_Radio_Detector
mw-redirect
Lunar Orbital Radio Detector

values: Advanced Telescope for High Energy Astrophysics

values: Exoplanetary Circumstellar Environments and Disk Explorer

values: Hibari (satellite) (page does not exist)

values: 2012 National Reconnaissance Office space telescope donation to NASA

values: Telescope for Habitable Exoplanets and Interstellar/Intergalactic Astronomy

values: Array of Low Energy X-ray Imaging Sensors

values: Advanced Satellite for Cosmology and Astrophysics

values:
/wiki/Indian_Remote_Sensing
mw-redirect
Indian Remote Sensing

values: Solar Anomalous and Magnetospheric Particle Explorer

values: Tsubame (satellite) (page does not exist)

values:
/wiki/Dark_Energy_Space_Telescope
mw-redirect
Dark Energy Space Telescope

values: Fast Infrared Exoplanet Spectroscopy Survey Explorer

values:
/wiki/Supernova/Acceleration_Probe
mw-redirect
Supernova/Acceleration Probe

values: Swiss 1.2-metre Leonhard Euler Telescope

values: Fiber-optic Improved Next-generation Doppler Search for Exo-Earths

values: High Accuracy Radial Velocity Planet Searcher

values: Miniature Exoplanet Radial Velocity Array

values: Microlensing Observations in Astrophysics

values: New Mexico Exoplanet Spectroscopic Survey Instrument

values: Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment

values: PRL Advanced Radial-velocity All-sky Search

values: Strategic Explorations of Exoplanets and Disks with Subaru

values: Search for extraterrestrial intelligence

values: Spectro-Polarimetric High-Contrast Exoplanet Research

values: Systemic (amateur extrasolar planet search project)

values:
navbox-image
2
width:1px;padding:0px 0px 0px 2px

values: List of exoplanets discovered using the Kepler spacecraft

values: History of the Goddard Space Flight Center

values: Independent Verification and Validation Facility

values:
/wiki/Explorers_program
mw-redirect
Explorers program

values: nowraplinks collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner mw-collapsible mw-made-collapsible mw-collapsed

values: Template talk:European human spaceflight

values: European contribution to the International Space Station

values: ESA Scientific Research on the International Space Station

values: Columbus Control Center at DLR Oberpfaffenhoffen (8182061318).jpg

values: ISS-50 Thomas Pesquet and Shane Kimbrough in the Cupola (1).jpg

values:
/wiki/Soyuz_TMA-M
mw-redirect
Soyuz TMA-M

values: European Programme for Life and Physical Sciences in Space

values:
/wiki/Tethered_Satellite_System
mw-redirect
Tethered Satellite System

values:
row
navbox-group
text-align: center;;width:1%

values:
row
navbox-group
width:1%;text-align: center;

values: National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics

values: Advisory Committee on the Future of the United States Space Program

values: Commission on the Future of the United States Aerospace Industry

values: President's Commission on Implementation of United States Space Exploration Policy

values: Review of United States Human Space Flight Plans Committee

values: List of Administrators and Deputy Administrators of NASA

values:
/wiki/NASA_spin-off_technologies
mw-redirect
NASA spin-off technologies

values: Christopher C. Kraft Jr. Mission Control Center

values:
navbox-image
7
width:1px;padding:0px 0px 0px 2px

values: Commercial Orbital Transportation Services

values: Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory

values: Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer

values: List of surface features of Mars seen by Opportunity

values: Space Communications and Navigation Program

values: Canberra Deep Space Communication Complex

values: Goldstone Deep Space Communications Complex

values: Madrid Deep Space Communications Complex

values: NASA space-flown Gemini and Apollo medallions

values: European Space Research and Technology Centre

values: European Centre for Space Applications and Telecommunications

values:
/wiki/Sentinel_(satellite)
mw-redirect
Sentinel (satellite)

values: European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service

values: European Launcher Development Organisation

values: Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment

values: List of European Space Agency programs and missions

values:
row
navbox-group
width:7.0em;text-align: center;

values: Gravity Field and Steady-State Ocean Circulation Explorer

values:
/wiki/Meteosat_Third_Generation
mw-redirect
Meteosat Third Generation

values: Solar wind Magnetosphere Ionosphere Link Explorer

values: nowraplinks collapsible expanded navbox-subgroup mw-collapsible mw-made-collapsible

values:
/wiki/Mars_sample_return_mission
mw-redirect
Mars sample return mission

values: Programme for Reusable In-orbit Demonstrator in Europe

values: Turbulence Heating Observer (page does not exist)

values: Hagoromo (spacecraft) (page does not exist)

values: Orizuru (satellite) (page does not exist)

values: April 1990 Soyuz-U launch failure (page does not exist)

values: July 1990 Soyuz-U launch failure (page does not exist)

values: October 1990 Zenit-2 launch failure (page does not exist)

attrs: alt src width height style srcset data-file-width data-file-height

values:
nofollow
external text
https://d-nb.info/gnd/4260288-9

values:
nofollow
external text
http://isni.org/isni/0000000122148100

values:
nofollow
external text
https://nla.gov.au/anbd.aut-an35793914

values:
nofollow
external text
https://viaf.org/viaf/121711981

values: Category:European Space Agency satellites

values: Category:Artificial satellites orbiting Earth

values: Category:Spacecraft launched by the Space Shuttle

values: Category:Space accidents and incidents in the United States

values: Category:All articles with dead external links

values: Category:Articles with dead external links from September 2017

values: Category:Articles with permanently dead external links

values: Category:Wikipedia indefinitely move-protected pages

values: Category:Use American English from March 2018

values: Category:All Wikipedia articles written in American English

values: Category:Articles containing potentially dated statements from 2018

values: Category:All articles containing potentially dated statements

values: Category:Articles containing German-language text

values: Category:Articles containing potentially dated statements from 2017

values: Category:Articles with hAudio microformats

values: Category:Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers

values: Category:Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers

values: Category:Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers

values: Category:Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers

values: Category:Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers

values: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

values: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

values: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

values: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

values:
/wiki/Hubble_Space_Telescope
View the content page [ctrl-alt-c]
c

values: Discussion about the content page [ctrl-alt-t]

values: p-namespaces navigation vectorTabs p-namespaces-label

values:
p-variants
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-variants-label

values: Past revisions of this page [ctrl-alt-h]

values: p-views navigation vectorTabs p-views-label

values: A list of recent changes in the wiki [ctrl-alt-r]

values: portal navigation p-interaction p-interaction-label

values: List of all English Wikipedia pages containing links to this page [ctrl-alt-j]

values: Recent changes in pages linked from this page [ctrl-alt-k]

values:
/wiki/Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard
Upload files [ctrl-alt-u]
u

values: A list of all special pages [ctrl-alt-q]

values: Permanent link to this revision of the page

values: Link to connected data repository item [ctrl-alt-g]

values: Printable version of this page [ctrl-alt-p]

values: portal navigation p-wikibase-otherprojects p-wikibase-otherprojects-label

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-af badge-Q17437796 badge-featuredarticle

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-als
display: none;

values: مرصد هابل الفضائي – Arabic

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-ar badge-Q17437796 badge-featuredarticle

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ast
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-az
display: none;

values: هابل فضایی تلسکوپو – South Azerbaijani

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-azb
display: none;

values: হাবল স্পেস টেলিস্কোপ – Bangla

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-bn
display: none;

values: Hubble Thài-khong Tiàu-kiàⁿ – Chinese (Min Nan)

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-zh-min-nan
display: none;

values: Хабл (тэлескоп) – Belarusian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-be
display: none;

values: Хъбъл (космически телескоп) – Bulgarian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-bg
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-bs
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-br
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ca
display: none;

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-cs badge-Q17437798 badge-goodarticle

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-cy
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-da
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-et
display: none;

values: Διαστημικό τηλεσκόπιο Χαμπλ – Greek

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-el
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-es
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-eo
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-eu
display: none;

values: تلسکوپ فضایی هابل – Persian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-fa
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-fr
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ga
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-gv
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-gl
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-gan
display: none;

values: 허블 우주망원경 – Korean

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ko
display: none;

values: Հաբլ (աստղադիտակ) – Armenian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-hy
display: none;

values: हबल अंतरिक्ष दूरदर्शी – Hindi

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-hi
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-hr
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-io
display: none;

values: Teleskop luar angkasa Hubble – Indonesian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-id
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-is
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-it
display: none;

values: טלסקופ החלל האבל – Hebrew

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-he badge-Q17437796 badge-featuredarticle

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-jv
display: none;

values: ಹಬಲ್ ದೂರದರ್ಶಕ – Kannada

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-kn
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ka
display: none;

values: Хаббл телескопы – Kazakh

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-kk badge-Q17437796 badge-featuredarticle

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ku
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-la
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-lv
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-lb
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-lt
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-li
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-hu
display: none;

values: Хабл (вселенски телескоп) – Macedonian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-mk
display: none;

values: ഹബിൾ ബഹിരാകാശ ദൂരദർശിനി – Malayalam

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-ml badge-Q17437796 badge-featuredarticle

values: हबल दुर्बीण – Marathi

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-mr
display: none;

values: ჰაბლიშ კოსმოსური ტელესკოპი – Mingrelian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-xmf
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ms
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-mwl
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-mn
display: none;

values: ဟပ်ဘယ် အာကာသ တယ်လီစကုပ် – Burmese

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-my
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-nl
display: none;

values: ハッブル宇宙望遠鏡 – Japanese

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ja
display: none;

values: Wrålrüm-teleskoop Hubble – Northern Frisian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-frr
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-no
display: none;

values: Romteleskopet Hubble – Norwegian Nynorsk

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-nn
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-oc
display: none;

values: ਹਬਲ ਆਕਾਸ਼ ਦੂਰਬੀਨ – Punjabi

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-pa
display: none;

values: ہبل خلائی ٹیلیسکوپ – Western Punjabi

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-pnb
display: none;

values: هبل تشیال لروین – Pashto

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ps
display: none;

values: Obl Spies Teliskuop – Jamaican Creole English

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-jam
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-pl
display: none;

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-pt badge-Q17437798 badge-goodarticle

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-ro badge-Q17437796 badge-featuredarticle

values: Хаббл (телескоп) – Russian

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-ru badge-Q17437796 badge-featuredarticle

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sco
display: none;

values: Hubble Waareldruumte-Teleskoop – Saterland Frisian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-stq
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sq
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-scn
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-simple
display: none;

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-sk badge-Q17437798 badge-goodarticle

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sl
display: none;

values: تەلیسکۆبی ھەبڵ – Central Kurdish

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ckb
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sr
display: none;

values: Hubbleov svemirski teleskop – Serbo-Croatian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sh
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-fi
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sv
display: none;

values: Teleskopyong Pangkalawakang Hubble – Tagalog

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-tl
display: none;

values: ஹபிள் விண்வெளித் தொலைநோக்கி – Tamil

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ta
display: none;

values: హబుల్ టెలీస్కోపు – Telugu

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-te
display: none;

values: กล้องโทรทรรศน์อวกาศฮับเบิล – Thai

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-th badge-Q17437796 badge-featuredarticle

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-tr
display: none;

values: Габбл (телескоп) – Ukrainian

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-uk badge-Q17437798 badge-goodarticle

values: ہبل خلائی دوربین – Urdu

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ur
display: none;

values: Kính viễn vọng không gian Hubble – Vietnamese

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-vi
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-vls
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-wuu
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-yo
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-zh-yue
display: none;

values: 哈勃空间望远镜 – Chinese

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-zh
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-lfn
display: none;

values: All languages (initial selection from common choices by you and others)

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Hubble_Space_Telescope rootpage-Hubble_Space_Telescope skin-vector action-view