text:
Chaos theory
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
For other uses, see Chaos theory (disambiguation) and Chaos (disambiguation).
A plot of the Lorenz attractor for values r = 28, σ = 10, b = 8/3
A double-rod pendulum animation showing chaotic behavior. Starting the pendulum from a slightly different initial condition would result in a completely different trajectory. The double-rod pendulum is one of the simplest dynamical systems with chaotic solutions.
Chaos theory is a branch of mathematics focusing on the behavior of dynamical systems that are highly sensitive to initial conditions. 'Chaos' is an interdisciplinary theory stating that within the apparent randomness of chaotic complex systems, there are underlying patterns, constant feedback loops, repetition, self-similarity, fractals, self-organization, and reliance on programming at the initial point known as sensitive dependence on initial conditions. The butterfly effect describes how a small change in one state of a deterministic nonlinear system can result in large differences in a later state, e.g. a butterfly flapping its wings in China can cause a hurricane in Texas.[1]
Small differences in initial conditions, such as those due to rounding errors in numerical computation, yield widely diverging outcomes for such dynamical systems, rendering long-term prediction of their behavior impossible in general.[2][3] This happens even though these systems are deterministic, meaning that their future behavior is fully determined by their initial conditions, with no random elements involved.[4] In other words, the deterministic nature of these systems does not make them predictable.[5][6] This behavior is known as deterministic chaos, or simply chaos. The theory was summarized by Edward Lorenz as:[7]
Chaos: When the present determines the future, but the approximate present does not approximately determine the future.
Chaotic behavior exists in many natural systems, such as weather and climate.[8][9] It also occurs spontaneously in some systems with artificial components, such as road traffic.[10] This behavior can be studied through analysis of a chaotic mathematical model, or through analytical techniques such as recurrence plots and Poincaré maps. Chaos theory has applications in several disciplines, including meteorology, anthropology,[11][12] sociology, physics,[13] environmental science, computer science, engineering, economics, biology, ecology, and philosophy. The theory formed the basis for such fields of study as complex dynamical systems, edge of chaos theory, and self-assembly processes.
Contents
1 Introduction
2 Chaotic dynamics
2.1 Chaos as a spontaneous breakdown of topological supersymmetry
2.2 Sensitivity to initial conditions
2.3 Topological mixing
2.4 Density of periodic orbits
2.5 Strange attractors
2.6 Minimum complexity of a chaotic system
2.7 Jerk systems
3 Spontaneous order
4 History
5 Applications
5.1 Cryptography
5.2 Robotics
5.3 Biology
5.4 Other areas
6 See also
7 References
8 Scientific literature
8.1 Articles
8.2 Textbooks
8.3 Semitechnical and popular works
9 External links
Introduction[edit]
Chaos theory concerns deterministic systems whose behavior can in principle be predicted. Chaotic systems are predictable for a while and then 'appear' to become random.[3] The amount of time that the behavior of a chaotic system can be effectively predicted depends on three things: How much uncertainty can be tolerated in the forecast, how accurately its current state can be measured, and a time scale depending on the dynamics of the system, called the Lyapunov time. Some examples of Lyapunov times are: chaotic electrical circuits, about 1 millisecond; weather systems, a few days (unproven); the solar system, 50 million years. In chaotic systems, the uncertainty in a forecast increases exponentially with elapsed time. Hence, mathematically, doubling the forecast time more than squares the proportional uncertainty in the forecast. This means, in practice, a meaningful prediction cannot be made over an interval of more than two or three times the Lyapunov time. When meaningful predictions cannot be made, the system appears random.[14]
Chaotic dynamics[edit]
The map defined by x → 4 x (1 – x) and y → (x + y) mod 1 displays sensitivity to initial x positions. Here, two series of x and y values diverge markedly over time from a tiny initial difference. Note, however, that the y coordinate is defined modulo one at each step, so the square region is actually depicting a cylinder, and the two points are closer than they look.
In common usage, "chaos" means "a state of disorder".[15] However, in chaos theory, the term is defined more precisely. Although no universally accepted mathematical definition of chaos exists, a commonly used definition originally formulated by Robert L. Devaney says that, to classify a dynamical system as chaotic, it must have these properties:[16]
it must be sensitive to initial conditions
it must be topologically mixing
it must have dense periodic orbits
In some cases, the last two properties in the above have been shown to actually imply sensitivity to initial conditions.[17][18] In these cases, while it is often the most practically significant property, "sensitivity to initial conditions" need not be stated in the definition.
If attention is restricted to intervals, the second property implies the other two.[19] An alternative, and in general weaker, definition of chaos uses only the first two properties in the above list.[20]
Chaos as a spontaneous breakdown of topological supersymmetry[edit]
Main article: Supersymmetric theory of stochastic dynamics
In continuous time dynamical systems, chaos is the phenomenon of the spontaneous breakdown of topological supersymmetry which is an intrinsic property of evolution operators of all stochastic and deterministic (partial) differential equations.[21][22] This picture of dynamical chaos works not only for deterministic models but also for models with external noise, which is an important generalization from the physical point of view because in reality all dynamical systems experience influence from their stochastic environments. Within this picture, the long-range dynamical behavior associated with chaotic dynamics, e.g., the butterfly effect, is a consequence of the Goldstone's theorem in the application to the spontaneous topological supersymmetry breaking.
Sensitivity to initial conditions[edit]
Main article: Butterfly effect
Lorenz equations used to generate plots for the y variable. The initial conditions for x and z were kept the same but those for y were changed between 1.001, 1.0001 and 1.00001. The values for ρ {\displaystyle \rho } , σ {\displaystyle \sigma } and β {\displaystyle \beta } were 45.92, 16 and 4 respectively. As can be seen, even the slightest difference in initial values causes significant changes after about 12 seconds of evolution in the three cases. This is an example of sensitive dependence on initial conditions.
Sensitivity to initial conditions means that each point in a chaotic system is arbitrarily closely approximated by other points with significantly different future paths, or trajectories. Thus, an arbitrarily small change, or perturbation, of the current trajectory may lead to significantly different future behavior.
Sensitivity to initial conditions is popularly known as the "butterfly effect", so-called because of the title of a paper given by Edward Lorenz in 1972 to the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Washington, D.C., entitled Predictability: Does the Flap of a Butterfly's Wings in Brazil set off a Tornado in Texas?. The flapping wing represents a small change in the initial condition of the system, which causes a chain of events that prevents the predictability of large-scale phenomena. Had the butterfly not flapped its wings, the trajectory of the overall system would have been vastly different.
A consequence of sensitivity to initial conditions is that if we start with a limited amount of information about the system (as is usually the case in practice), then beyond a certain time the system is no longer predictable. This is most prevalent in the case of weather, which is generally predictable only about a week ahead.[23] Of course, this does not mean that we cannot say anything about events far in the future; some restrictions on the system are present. With weather, we know that the temperature will not naturally reach 100 °C or fall to −130 °C on earth (during the current geologic era), but we can't say exactly what day will have the hottest temperature of the year.
In more mathematical terms, the Lyapunov exponent measures the sensitivity to initial conditions. Given two starting trajectories in the phase space that are infinitesimally close, with initial separation δ Z 0 {\displaystyle \delta \mathbf {Z} _{0}} , the two trajectories end up diverging at a rate given by
| δ Z ( t ) | ≈ e λ t | δ Z 0 | , {\displaystyle |\delta \mathbf {Z} (t)|\approx e^{\lambda t}|\delta \mathbf {Z} _{0}|,}
where t is the time and λ is the Lyapunov exponent. The rate of separation depends on the orientation of the initial separation vector, so a whole spectrum of Lyapunov exponents exist. The number of Lyapunov exponents is equal to the number of dimensions of the phase space, though it is common to just refer to the largest one. For example, the maximal Lyapunov exponent (MLE) is most often used because it determines the overall predictability of the system. A positive MLE is usually taken as an indication that the system is chaotic.
Also, other properties relate to sensitivity of initial conditions, such as measure-theoretical mixing (as discussed in ergodic theory) and properties of a K-system.[6]
Topological mixing[edit]
Six iterations of a set of states [ x , y ] {\displaystyle [x,y]} passed through the logistic map. (a) the blue plot (legend 1) shows the first iterate (initial condition), which essentially forms a circle. Animation shows the first to the sixth iteration of the circular initial conditions. It can be seen that mixing occurs as we progress in iterations. The sixth iteration shows that the points are almost completely scattered in the phase space. Had we progressed further in iterations, the mixing would have been homogeneous and irreversible. The logistic map has equation x k + 1 = 4 x k ( 1 − x k ) {\displaystyle x_{k+1}=4x_{k}(1-x_{k})} . To expand the state-space of the logistic map into two dimensions, a second state, y {\displaystyle y} , was created as y k + 1 = x k + y k {\displaystyle y_{k+1}=x_{k}+y_{k}} , if x k + y k < 1 {\displaystyle x_{k}+y_{k}<1} and y k + 1 = x k + y k − 1 {\displaystyle y_{k+1}=x_{k}+y_{k}-1} otherwise.
The map defined by x → 4 x (1 – x) and y → (x + y) mod 1 also displays topological mixing. Here, the blue region is transformed by the dynamics first to the purple region, then to the pink and red regions, and eventually to a cloud of vertical lines scattered across the space.
Topological mixing (or topological transitivity) means that the system evolves over time so that any given region or open set of its phase space eventually overlaps with any other given region. This mathematical concept of "mixing" corresponds to the standard intuition, and the mixing of colored dyes or fluids is an example of a chaotic system.
Topological mixing is often omitted from popular accounts of chaos, which equate chaos with only sensitivity to initial conditions. However, sensitive dependence on initial conditions alone does not give chaos. For example, consider the simple dynamical system produced by repeatedly doubling an initial value. This system has sensitive dependence on initial conditions everywhere, since any pair of nearby points eventually becomes widely separated. However, this example has no topological mixing, and therefore has no chaos. Indeed, it has extremely simple behavior: all points except 0 tend to positive or negative infinity.
Density of periodic orbits[edit]
For a chaotic system to have dense periodic orbits means that every point in the space is approached arbitrarily closely by periodic orbits.[24] The one-dimensional logistic map defined by x → 4 x (1 – x) is one of the simplest systems with density of periodic orbits. For example, 5 − 5 8 {\displaystyle {\tfrac {5-{\sqrt {5}}}{8}}} → 5 + 5 8 {\displaystyle {\tfrac {5+{\sqrt {5}}}{8}}} → 5 − 5 8 {\displaystyle {\tfrac {5-{\sqrt {5}}}{8}}} (or approximately 0.3454915 → 0.9045085 → 0.3454915) is an (unstable) orbit of period 2, and similar orbits exist for periods 4, 8, 16, etc. (indeed, for all the periods specified by Sharkovskii's theorem).[25]
Sharkovskii's theorem is the basis of the Li and Yorke[26] (1975) proof that any continuous one-dimensional system that exhibits a regular cycle of period three will also display regular cycles of every other length, as well as completely chaotic orbits.
Strange attractors[edit]
The Lorenz attractor displays chaotic behavior. These two plots demonstrate sensitive dependence on initial conditions within the region of phase space occupied by the attractor.
Some dynamical systems, like the one-dimensional logistic map defined by x → 4 x (1 – x), are chaotic everywhere, but in many cases chaotic behavior is found only in a subset of phase space. The cases of most interest arise when the chaotic behavior takes place on an attractor, since then a large set of initial conditions leads to orbits that converge to this chaotic region.[27]
An easy way to visualize a chaotic attractor is to start with a point in the basin of attraction of the attractor, and then simply plot its subsequent orbit. Because of the topological transitivity condition, this is likely to produce a picture of the entire final attractor, and indeed both orbits shown in the figure on the right give a picture of the general shape of the Lorenz attractor. This attractor results from a simple three-dimensional model of the Lorenz weather system. The Lorenz attractor is perhaps one of the best-known chaotic system diagrams, probably because it was not only one of the first, but it is also one of the most complex and as such gives rise to a very interesting pattern that, with a little imagination, looks like the wings of a butterfly.
Unlike fixed-point attractors and limit cycles, the attractors that arise from chaotic systems, known as strange attractors, have great detail and complexity. Strange attractors occur in both continuous dynamical systems (such as the Lorenz system) and in some discrete systems (such as the Hénon map). Other discrete dynamical systems have a repelling structure called a Julia set, which forms at the boundary between basins of attraction of fixed points. Julia sets can be thought of as strange repellers. Both strange attractors and Julia sets typically have a fractal structure, and the fractal dimension can be calculated for them.
Minimum complexity of a chaotic system[edit]
Bifurcation diagram of the logistic map x → r x (1 – x). Each vertical slice shows the attractor for a specific value of r. The diagram displays period-doubling as r increases, eventually producing chaos.
Discrete chaotic systems, such as the logistic map, can exhibit strange attractors whatever their dimensionality. In contrast, for continuous dynamical systems, the Poincaré–Bendixson theorem shows that a strange attractor can only arise in three or more dimensions. Finite-dimensional linear systems are never chaotic; for a dynamical system to display chaotic behavior, it must be either nonlinear or infinite-dimensional.
The Poincaré–Bendixson theorem states that a two-dimensional differential equation has very regular behavior. The Lorenz attractor discussed below is generated by a system of three differential equations such as:
d x d t = σ y − σ x , d y d t = ρ x − x z − y , d z d t = x y − β z . {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\frac {\mathrm {d} x}{\mathrm {d} t}}&=\sigma y-\sigma x,\\{\frac {\mathrm {d} y}{\mathrm {d} t}}&=\rho x-xz-y,\\{\frac {\mathrm {d} z}{\mathrm {d} t}}&=xy-\beta z.\end{aligned}}}
where x {\displaystyle x} , y {\displaystyle y} , and z {\displaystyle z} make up the system state, t {\displaystyle t} is time, and σ {\displaystyle \sigma } , ρ {\displaystyle \rho } , β {\displaystyle \beta } are the system parameters. Five of the terms on the right hand side are linear, while two are quadratic; a total of seven terms. Another well-known chaotic attractor is generated by the Rössler equations, which have only one nonlinear term out of seven. Sprott[28] found a three-dimensional system with just five terms, that had only one nonlinear term, which exhibits chaos for certain parameter values. Zhang and Heidel[29][30] showed that, at least for dissipative and conservative quadratic systems, three-dimensional quadratic systems with only three or four terms on the right-hand side cannot exhibit chaotic behavior. The reason is, simply put, that solutions to such systems are asymptotic to a two-dimensional surface and therefore solutions are well behaved.
While the Poincaré–Bendixson theorem shows that a continuous dynamical system on the Euclidean plane cannot be chaotic, two-dimensional continuous systems with non-Euclidean geometry can exhibit chaotic behavior.[31] Perhaps surprisingly, chaos may occur also in linear systems, provided they are infinite dimensional.[32] A theory of linear chaos is being developed in a branch of mathematical analysis known as functional analysis.
Jerk systems[edit]
In physics, jerk is the third derivative of position, with respect to time. As such, differential equations of the form
J ( x . . . , x ¨ , x ˙ , x ) = 0 {\displaystyle J\left({\overset {...}{x}},{\ddot {x}},{\dot {x}},x\right)=0}
are sometimes called Jerk equations. It has been shown that a jerk equation, which is equivalent to a system of three first order, ordinary, non-linear differential equations, is in a certain sense the minimal setting for solutions showing chaotic behaviour. This motivates mathematical interest in jerk systems. Systems involving a fourth or higher derivative are called accordingly hyperjerk systems.[33]
A jerk system's behavior is described by a jerk equation, and for certain jerk equations, simple electronic circuits can model solutions. These circuits are known as jerk circuits.
One of the most interesting properties of jerk circuits is the possibility of chaotic behavior. In fact, certain well-known chaotic systems, such as the Lorenz attractor and the Rössler map, are conventionally described as a system of three first-order differential equations that can combine into a single (although rather complicated) jerk equation. Nonlinear jerk systems are in a sense minimally complex systems to show chaotic behaviour; there is no chaotic system involving only two first-order, ordinary differential equations (the system resulting in an equation of second order only).
An example of a jerk equation with nonlinearity in the magnitude of x {\displaystyle x} is:
d 3 x d t 3 + A d 2 x d t 2 + d x d t − | x | + 1 = 0. {\displaystyle {\frac {\mathrm {d} ^{3}x}{\mathrm {d} t^{3}}}+A{\frac {\mathrm {d} ^{2}x}{\mathrm {d} t^{2}}}+{\frac {\mathrm {d} x}{\mathrm {d} t}}-|x|+1=0.}
Here, A is an adjustable parameter. This equation has a chaotic solution for A=3/5 and can be implemented with the following jerk circuit; the required nonlinearity is brought about by the two diodes:
In the above circuit, all resistors are of equal value, except R A = R / A = 5 R / 3 {\displaystyle R_{A}=R/A=5R/3} , and all capacitors are of equal size. The dominant frequency is 1 / 2 π R C {\displaystyle 1/2\pi RC} . The output of op amp 0 will correspond to the x variable, the output of 1 corresponds to the first derivative of x and the output of 2 corresponds to the second derivative.
Spontaneous order[edit]
Under the right conditions, chaos spontaneously evolves into a lockstep pattern. In the Kuramoto model, four conditions suffice to produce synchronization in a chaotic system. Examples include the coupled oscillation of Christiaan Huygens' pendulums, fireflies, neurons, the London Millennium Bridge resonance, and large arrays of Josephson junctions.[34]
History[edit]
Barnsley fern created using the chaos game. Natural forms (ferns, clouds, mountains, etc.) may be recreated through an iterated function system (IFS).
An early proponent of chaos theory was Henri Poincaré. In the 1880s, while studying the three-body problem, he found that there can be orbits that are nonperiodic, and yet not forever increasing nor approaching a fixed point.[35][36][37] In 1898 Jacques Hadamard published an influential study of the chaotic motion of a free particle gliding frictionlessly on a surface of constant negative curvature, called "Hadamard's billiards".[38] Hadamard was able to show that all trajectories are unstable, in that all particle trajectories diverge exponentially from one another, with a positive Lyapunov exponent.
Chaos theory began in the field of ergodic theory. Later studies, also on the topic of nonlinear differential equations, were carried out by George David Birkhoff,[39] Andrey Nikolaevich Kolmogorov,[40][41][42] Mary Lucy Cartwright and John Edensor Littlewood,[43] and Stephen Smale.[44] Except for Smale, these studies were all directly inspired by physics: the three-body problem in the case of Birkhoff, turbulence and astronomical problems in the case of Kolmogorov, and radio engineering in the case of Cartwright and Littlewood.[citation needed] Although chaotic planetary motion had not been observed, experimentalists had encountered turbulence in fluid motion and nonperiodic oscillation in radio circuits without the benefit of a theory to explain what they were seeing.
Despite initial insights in the first half of the twentieth century, chaos theory became formalized as such only after mid-century, when it first became evident to some scientists that linear theory, the prevailing system theory at that time, simply could not explain the observed behavior of certain experiments like that of the logistic map. What had been attributed to measure imprecision and simple "noise" was considered by chaos theorists as a full component of the studied systems.
The main catalyst for the development of chaos theory was the electronic computer. Much of the mathematics of chaos theory involves the repeated iteration of simple mathematical formulas, which would be impractical to do by hand. Electronic computers made these repeated calculations practical, while figures and images made it possible to visualize these systems. As a graduate student in Chihiro Hayashi's laboratory at Kyoto University, Yoshisuke Ueda was experimenting with analog computers and noticed, on November 27, 1961, what he called "randomly transitional phenomena". Yet his advisor did not agree with his conclusions at the time, and did not allow him to report his findings until 1970.[45][46]
Turbulence in the tip vortex from an airplane wing. Studies of the critical point beyond which a system creates turbulence were important for chaos theory, analyzed for example by the Soviet physicist Lev Landau, who developed the Landau-Hopf theory of turbulence. David Ruelle and Floris Takens later predicted, against Landau, that fluid turbulence could develop through a strange attractor, a main concept of chaos theory.
Edward Lorenz was an early pioneer of the theory. His interest in chaos came about accidentally through his work on weather prediction in 1961.[8] Lorenz was using a simple digital computer, a Royal McBee LGP-30, to run his weather simulation. He wanted to see a sequence of data again, and to save time he started the simulation in the middle of its course. He did this by entering a printout of the data that corresponded to conditions in the middle of the original simulation. To his surprise, the weather the machine began to predict was completely different from the previous calculation. Lorenz tracked this down to the computer printout. The computer worked with 6-digit precision, but the printout rounded variables off to a 3-digit number, so a value like 0.506127 printed as 0.506. This difference is tiny, and the consensus at the time would have been that it should have no practical effect. However, Lorenz discovered that small changes in initial conditions produced large changes in long-term outcome.[47] Lorenz's discovery, which gave its name to Lorenz attractors, showed that even detailed atmospheric modelling cannot, in general, make precise long-term weather predictions.
In 1963, Benoit Mandelbrot found recurring patterns at every scale in data on cotton prices.[48] Beforehand he had studied information theory and concluded noise was patterned like a Cantor set: on any scale the proportion of noise-containing periods to error-free periods was a constant – thus errors were inevitable and must be planned for by incorporating redundancy.[49] Mandelbrot described both the "Noah effect" (in which sudden discontinuous changes can occur) and the "Joseph effect" (in which persistence of a value can occur for a while, yet suddenly change afterwards).[50][51] This challenged the idea that changes in price were normally distributed. In 1967, he published "How long is the coast of Britain? Statistical self-similarity and fractional dimension", showing that a coastline's length varies with the scale of the measuring instrument, resembles itself at all scales, and is infinite in length for an infinitesimally small measuring device.[52] Arguing that a ball of twine appears as a point when viewed from far away (0-dimensional), a ball when viewed from fairly near (3-dimensional), or a curved strand (1-dimensional), he argued that the dimensions of an object are relative to the observer and may be fractional. An object whose irregularity is constant over different scales ("self-similarity") is a fractal (examples include the Menger sponge, the Sierpiński gasket, and the Koch curve or snowflake, which is infinitely long yet encloses a finite space and has a fractal dimension of circa 1.2619). In 1982 Mandelbrot published The Fractal Geometry of Nature, which became a classic of chaos theory.[53] Biological systems such as the branching of the circulatory and bronchial systems proved to fit a fractal model.[54]
In December 1977, the New York Academy of Sciences organized the first symposium on chaos, attended by David Ruelle, Robert May, James A. Yorke (coiner of the term "chaos" as used in mathematics), Robert Shaw, and the meteorologist Edward Lorenz. The following year, independently Pierre Coullet and Charles Tresser with the article "Iterations d'endomorphismes et groupe de renormalisation" and Mitchell Feigenbaum with the article "Quantitative Universality for a Class of Nonlinear Transformations" described logistic maps.[55][56] They notably discovered the universality in chaos, permitting the application of chaos theory to many different phenomena.
In 1979, Albert J. Libchaber, during a symposium organized in Aspen by Pierre Hohenberg, presented his experimental observation of the bifurcation cascade that leads to chaos and turbulence in Rayleigh–Bénard convection systems. He was awarded the Wolf Prize in Physics in 1986 along with Mitchell J. Feigenbaum for their inspiring achievements.[57]
In 1986, the New York Academy of Sciences co-organized with the National Institute of Mental Health and the Office of Naval Research the first important conference on chaos in biology and medicine. There, Bernardo Huberman presented a mathematical model of the eye tracking disorder among schizophrenics.[58] This led to a renewal of physiology in the 1980s through the application of chaos theory, for example, in the study of pathological cardiac cycles.
In 1987, Per Bak, Chao Tang and Kurt Wiesenfeld published a paper in Physical Review Letters[59] describing for the first time self-organized criticality (SOC), considered one of the mechanisms by which complexity arises in nature.
Alongside largely lab-based approaches such as the Bak–Tang–Wiesenfeld sandpile, many other investigations have focused on large-scale natural or social systems that are known (or suspected) to display scale-invariant behavior. Although these approaches were not always welcomed (at least initially) by specialists in the subjects examined, SOC has nevertheless become established as a strong candidate for explaining a number of natural phenomena, including earthquakes, (which, long before SOC was discovered, were known as a source of scale-invariant behavior such as the Gutenberg–Richter law describing the statistical distribution of earthquake sizes, and the Omori law[60] describing the frequency of aftershocks), solar flares, fluctuations in economic systems such as financial markets (references to SOC are common in econophysics), landscape formation, forest fires, landslides, epidemics, and biological evolution (where SOC has been invoked, for example, as the dynamical mechanism behind the theory of "punctuated equilibria" put forward by Niles Eldredge and Stephen Jay Gould). Given the implications of a scale-free distribution of event sizes, some researchers have suggested that another phenomenon that should be considered an example of SOC is the occurrence of wars. These investigations of SOC have included both attempts at modelling (either developing new models or adapting existing ones to the specifics of a given natural system), and extensive data analysis to determine the existence and/or characteristics of natural scaling laws.
In the same year, James Gleick published Chaos: Making a New Science, which became a best-seller and introduced the general principles of chaos theory as well as its history to the broad public, though his history under-emphasized important Soviet contributions.[citation needed][61] Initially the domain of a few, isolated individuals, chaos theory progressively emerged as a transdisciplinary and institutional discipline, mainly under the name of nonlinear systems analysis. Alluding to Thomas Kuhn's concept of a paradigm shift exposed in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962), many "chaologists" (as some described themselves) claimed that this new theory was an example of such a shift, a thesis upheld by Gleick.
The availability of cheaper, more powerful computers broadens the applicability of chaos theory. Currently, chaos theory remains an active area of research,[62] involving many different disciplines (mathematics, topology, physics,[63] social systems, population modeling, biology, meteorology, astrophysics, information theory, computational neuroscience, etc.).
Applications[edit]
A conus textile shell, similar in appearance to Rule 30, a cellular automaton with chaotic behaviour.[64]
Chaos theory was born from observing weather patterns, but it has become applicable to a variety of other situations. Some areas benefiting from chaos theory today are geology, mathematics, microbiology, biology, computer science, economics,[65][66][67] engineering,[68] finance,[69][70] algorithmic trading,[71][72][73] meteorology, philosophy, anthropology,[11][12] physics,[74][75][76] politics, population dynamics,[77] psychology,[10] and robotics. A few categories are listed below with examples, but this is by no means a comprehensive list as new applications are appearing.
Cryptography[edit]
Chaos theory has been used for many years in cryptography. In the past few decades, chaos and nonlinear dynamics have been used in the design of hundreds of cryptographic primitives. These algorithms include image encryption algorithms, hash functions, secure pseudo-random number generators, stream ciphers, watermarking and steganography.[78] The majority of these algorithms are based on uni-modal chaotic maps and a big portion of these algorithms use the control parameters and the initial condition of the chaotic maps as their keys.[79] From a wider perspective, without loss of generality, the similarities between the chaotic maps and the cryptographic systems is the main motivation for the design of chaos based cryptographic algorithms.[78] One type of encryption, secret key or symmetric key, relies on diffusion and confusion, which is modeled well by chaos theory.[80] Another type of computing, DNA computing, when paired with chaos theory, offers a way to encrypt images and other information.[81] Many of the DNA-Chaos cryptographic algorithms are proven to be either not secure, or the technique applied is suggested to be not efficient.[82][83][84]
Robotics[edit]
Robotics is another area that has recently benefited from chaos theory. Instead of robots acting in a trial-and-error type of refinement to interact with their environment, chaos theory has been used to build a predictive model.[85] Chaotic dynamics have been exhibited by passive walking biped robots.[86]
Biology[edit]
For over a hundred years, biologists have been keeping track of populations of different species with population models. Most models are continuous, but recently scientists have been able to implement chaotic models in certain populations.[87] For example, a study on models of Canadian lynx showed there was chaotic behavior in the population growth.[88] Chaos can also be found in ecological systems, such as hydrology. While a chaotic model for hydrology has its shortcomings, there is still much to learn from looking at the data through the lens of chaos theory.[89] Another biological application is found in cardiotocography. Fetal surveillance is a delicate balance of obtaining accurate information while being as noninvasive as possible. Better models of warning signs of fetal hypoxia can be obtained through chaotic modeling.[90]
Other areas[edit]
In chemistry, predicting gas solubility is essential to manufacturing polymers, but models using particle swarm optimization (PSO) tend to converge to the wrong points. An improved version of PSO has been created by introducing chaos, which keeps the simulations from getting stuck.[91] In celestial mechanics, especially when observing asteroids, applying chaos theory leads to better predictions about when these objects will approach Earth and other planets.[92] Four of the five moons of Pluto rotate chaotically. In quantum physics and electrical engineering, the study of large arrays of Josephson junctions benefitted greatly from chaos theory.[93] Closer to home, coal mines have always been dangerous places where frequent natural gas leaks cause many deaths. Until recently, there was no reliable way to predict when they would occur. But these gas leaks have chaotic tendencies that, when properly modeled, can be predicted fairly accurately.[94]
Chaos theory can be applied outside of the natural sciences, but historically nearly all such studies have suffered from lack of reproducibility; poor external validity; and/or inattention to cross-validation, resulting in poor predictive accuracy (if out-of-sample prediction has even been attempted). Glass [95] and Mandell and Selz [96] have found that no EEG study has as yet indicated the presence of strange attractors or other signs of chaotic behavior.
Researchers have continued to apply chaos theory to psychology. For example, in modeling group behavior in which heterogeneous members may behave as if sharing to different degrees what in Wilfred Bion's theory is a basic assumption, researchers have found that the group dynamic is the result of the individual dynamics of the members: each individual reproduces the group dynamics in a different scale, and the chaotic behavior of the group is reflected in each member.[97]
Redington and Reidbord (1992) attempted to demonstrate that the human heart could display chaotic traits. They monitored the changes in between-heartbeat intervals for a single psychotherapy patient as she moved through periods of varying emotional intensity during a therapy session. Results were admittedly inconclusive. Not only were there ambiguities in the various plots the authors produced to purportedly show evidence of chaotic dynamics (spectral analysis, phase trajectory, and autocorrelation plots), but when they attempted to compute a Lyapunov exponent as more definitive confirmation of chaotic behavior, the authors found they could not reliably do so.[98]
In their 1995 paper, Metcalf and Allen [99] maintained that they uncovered in animal behavior a pattern of period doubling leading to chaos. The authors examined a well-known response called schedule-induced polydipsia, by which an animal deprived of food for certain lengths of time will drink unusual amounts of water when the food is at last presented. The control parameter (r) operating here was the length of the interval between feedings, once resumed. The authors were careful to test a large number of animals and to include many replications, and they designed their experiment so as to rule out the likelihood that changes in response patterns were caused by different starting places for r.
Time series and first delay plots provide the best support for the claims made, showing a fairly clear march from periodicity to irregularity as the feeding times were increased. The various phase trajectory plots and spectral analyses, on the other hand, do not match up well enough with the other graphs or with the overall theory to lead inexorably to a chaotic diagnosis. For example, the phase trajectories do not show a definite progression towards greater and greater complexity (and away from periodicity); the process seems quite muddied. Also, where Metcalf and Allen saw periods of two and six in their spectral plots, there is room for alternate interpretations. All of this ambiguity necessitate some serpentine, post-hoc explanation to show that results fit a chaotic model.
By adapting a model of career counseling to include a chaotic interpretation of the relationship between employees and the job market, Aniundson and Bright found that better suggestions can be made to people struggling with career decisions.[100] Modern organizations are increasingly seen as open complex adaptive systems with fundamental natural nonlinear structures, subject to internal and external forces that may contribute chaos. For instance, team building and group development is increasingly being researched as an inherently unpredictable system, as the uncertainty of different individuals meeting for the first time makes the trajectory of the team unknowable.[101]
Some say the chaos metaphor—used in verbal theories—grounded on mathematical models and psychological aspects of human behavior provides helpful insights to describing the complexity of small work groups, that go beyond the metaphor itself.[102]
It is possible that economic models can also be improved through an application of chaos theory, but predicting the health of an economic system and what factors influence it most is an extremely complex task.[103] Economic and financial systems are fundamentally different from those in the classical natural sciences since the former are inherently stochastic in nature, as they result from the interactions of people, and thus pure deterministic models are unlikely to provide accurate representations of the data. The empirical literature that tests for chaos in economics and finance presents very mixed results, in part due to confusion between specific tests for chaos and more general tests for non-linear relationships.[104]
Traffic forecasting may benefit from applications of chaos theory. Better predictions of when traffic will occur would allow measures to be taken to disperse it before it would have occurred. Combining chaos theory principles with a few other methods has led to a more accurate short-term prediction model (see the plot of the BML traffic model at right).[105]
Chaos theory has been applied to environmental water cycle data (aka hydrological data), such as rainfall and streamflow.[106] These studies have yielded controversial results, because the methods for detecting a chaotic signature are often relatively subjective. Early studies tended to "succeed" in finding chaos, whereas subsequent studies and meta-analyses called those studies into question and provided explanations for why these datasets are not likely to have low-dimension chaotic dynamics.[107]
See also[edit]
Systems science portal
Mathematics portal
Examples of chaotic systems
Advected contours
Arnold's cat map
Bouncing ball dynamics
Chua's circuit
Cliodynamics
Coupled map lattice
Double pendulum
Duffing equation
Dynamical billiards
Economic bubble
Gaspard-Rice system
Hénon map
Horseshoe map
List of chaotic maps
Logistic map
Rössler attractor
Standard map
Swinging Atwood's machine
Tilt A Whirl
Other related topics
Amplitude death
Anosov diffeomorphism
Bifurcation theory
Butterfly effect
Catastrophe theory
Causality
Chaos theory in organizational development
Chaos machine
Chaotic mixing
Chaotic scattering
Complexity
Control of chaos
Determinism
Edge of chaos
Emergence
Fractal
Julia set
Mandelbrot set
Kolmogorov–Arnold–Moser theorem
Ill-conditioning
Ill-posedness
Nonlinear system
Patterns in nature
Predictability
Quantum chaos
Santa Fe Institute
Synchronization of chaos
Unintended consequence
People
Ralph Abraham
Michael Berry
Leon O. Chua
Ivar Ekeland
Doyne Farmer
Mitchell Feigenbaum
Martin Gutzwiller
Brosl Hasslacher
Michel Hénon
Andrey Nikolaevich Kolmogorov
Edward Lorenz
Aleksandr Lyapunov
Ian Malcolm (Jurassic Park character)
Benoit Mandelbrot
Norman Packard
Henri Poincaré
Otto Rössler
David Ruelle
Oleksandr Mikolaiovich Sharkovsky
Robert Shaw
Floris Takens
James A. Yorke
George M. Zaslavsky
References[edit]
Jump up ^ Boeing (2015). "Chaos Theory and the Logistic Map". Retrieved 2015-07-16.
Jump up ^ Kellert, Stephen H. (1993). In the Wake of Chaos: Unpredictable Order in Dynamical Systems. University of Chicago Press. p. 32. ISBN 978-0-226-42976-2.
^ Jump up to: a b Boeing, G. (2016). "Visual Analysis of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems: Chaos, Fractals, Self-Similarity and the Limits of Prediction". Systems. 4 (4): 37. doi:10.3390/systems4040037. Retrieved 2016-12-02.
Jump up ^ Kellert 1993, p. 56
Jump up ^ Kellert 1993, p. 62
^ Jump up to: a b Werndl, Charlotte (2009). "What are the New Implications of Chaos for Unpredictability?". The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 60 (1): 195–220. arXiv:1310.1576  . doi:10.1093/bjps/axn053.
Jump up ^ Danforth, Christopher M. (April 2013). "Chaos in an Atmosphere Hanging on a Wall". Mathematics of Planet Earth 2013. Retrieved 12 June 2018.
^ Jump up to: a b Lorenz, Edward N. (1963). "Deterministic non-periodic flow". Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences. 20 (2): 130–141. Bibcode:1963JAtS...20..130L. doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0130:DNF>2.0.CO;2.
Jump up ^ Ivancevic, Vladimir G.; Tijana T. Ivancevic (2008). Complex nonlinearity: chaos, phase transitions, topology change, and path integrals. Springer. ISBN 978-3-540-79356-4.
^ Jump up to: a b Safonov, Leonid A.; Tomer, Elad; Strygin, Vadim V.; Ashkenazy, Yosef; Havlin, Shlomo (2002). "Multifractal chaotic attractors in a system of delay-differential equations modeling road traffic". Chaos: an Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science. 12 (4): 1006. Bibcode:2002Chaos..12.1006S. doi:10.1063/1.1507903. ISSN 1054-1500.
^ Jump up to: a b Mosko M.S., Damon F.H. (Eds.) (2005). On the order of chaos. Social anthropology and the science of chaos. Oxford: Berghahn Books. CS1 maint: Extra text: authors list (link)
^ Jump up to: a b Trnka R., Lorencova R. (2016). Quantum anthropology: Man, cultures, and groups in a quantum perspective. Prague: Charles University Karolinum Press.
Jump up ^ Hubler, A (1989). "Adaptive control of chaotic systems". Swiss Physical Society. Helvetica Physica Acta 62: 339–342.
Jump up ^ Sync: The Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order, Steven Strogatz, Hyperion, New York, 2003, pages 189–190.
Jump up ^ Definition of chaos at Wiktionary;
Jump up ^ Hasselblatt, Boris; Anatole Katok (2003). A First Course in Dynamics: With a Panorama of Recent Developments. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-58750-1.
Jump up ^ Elaydi, Saber N. (1999). Discrete Chaos. Chapman & Hall/CRC. p. 117. ISBN 978-1-58488-002-8.
Jump up ^ Basener, William F. (2006). Topology and its applications. Wiley. p. 42. ISBN 978-0-471-68755-9.
Jump up ^ Vellekoop, Michel; Berglund, Raoul (April 1994). "On Intervals, Transitivity = Chaos". The American Mathematical Monthly. 101 (4): 353–5. doi:10.2307/2975629. JSTOR 2975629.
Jump up ^ Medio, Alfredo; Lines, Marji (2001). Nonlinear Dynamics: A Primer. Cambridge University Press. p. 165. ISBN 978-0-521-55874-7.
Jump up ^ Ovchinnikov, I.V. (March 2016). "Introduction to Supersymmetric Theory of Stochastics". Entropy. 18 (4): 108. arXiv:1511.03393  . Bibcode:2016Entrp..18..108O. doi:10.3390/e18040108.
Jump up ^ Ovchinnikov, I.V.; Schwartz, R. N.; Wang, K. L. (2016). "Topological supersymmetry breaking: Definition and stochastic generalization of chaos and the limit of applicability of statistics". Modern Physics Letters B. 30 (8): 1650086. arXiv:1404.4076  . Bibcode:2016MPLB...3050086O. doi:10.1142/S021798491650086X.
Jump up ^ Watts, Robert G. (2007). Global Warming and the Future of the Earth. Morgan & Claypool. p. 17.
Jump up ^ Devaney 2003
Jump up ^ Alligood, Sauer & Yorke 1997
Jump up ^ Li, T.Y.; Yorke, J.A. (1975). "Period Three Implies Chaos" (PDF). American Mathematical Monthly. 82 (10): 985–92. Bibcode:1975AmMM...82..985L. doi:10.2307/2318254. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-12-29.
Jump up ^ Strelioff, Christopher; et., al. (2006). "Medium-Term Prediction of Chaos". Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (4): 044101. Bibcode:2006PhRvL..96d4101S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.044101. PMID 16486826.
Jump up ^ Sprott, J.C. (1997). "Simplest dissipative chaotic flow". Physics Letters A. 228 (4–5): 271–274. Bibcode:1997PhLA..228..271S. doi:10.1016/S0375-9601(97)00088-1.
Jump up ^ Fu, Z.; Heidel, J. (1997). "Non-chaotic behaviour in three-dimensional quadratic systems". Nonlinearity. 10 (5): 1289–1303. Bibcode:1997Nonli..10.1289F. doi:10.1088/0951-7715/10/5/014.
Jump up ^ Heidel, J.; Fu, Z. (1999). "Nonchaotic behaviour in three-dimensional quadratic systems II. The conservative case". Nonlinearity. 12 (3): 617–633. Bibcode:1999Nonli..12..617H. doi:10.1088/0951-7715/12/3/012.
Jump up ^ Rosario, Pedro (2006). Underdetermination of Science: Part I. Lulu.com. ISBN 978-1411693913.
Jump up ^ Bonet, J.; Martínez-Giménez, F.; Peris, A. (2001). "A Banach space which admits no chaotic operator". Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society. 33 (2): 196–8. doi:10.1112/blms/33.2.196.
Jump up ^ K. E. Chlouverakis and J. C. Sprott, Chaos Solitons & Fractals 28, 739–746 (2005), Chaotic Hyperjerk Systems, http://sprott.physics.wisc.edu/pubs/paper297.htm
Jump up ^ Steven Strogatz, Sync: The Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order, Hyperion, 2003.
Jump up ^ Poincaré, Jules Henri (1890). "Sur le problème des trois corps et les équations de la dynamique. Divergence des séries de M. Lindstedt". Acta Mathematica. 13: 1–270. doi:10.1007/BF02392506.
Jump up ^ Poincaré, J. Henri (2017). The three-body problem and the equations of dynamics : Poincaré's foundational work on dynamical systems theory. Popp, Bruce D. (Translator). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. ISBN 9783319528984. OCLC 987302273.
Jump up ^ Diacu, Florin; Holmes, Philip (1996). Celestial Encounters: The Origins of Chaos and Stability. Princeton University Press.
Jump up ^ Hadamard, Jacques (1898). "Les surfaces à courbures opposées et leurs lignes géodesiques". Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées. 4: 27–73.
Jump up ^ George D. Birkhoff, Dynamical Systems, vol. 9 of the American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications (Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society, 1927)
Jump up ^ Kolmogorov, Andrey Nikolaevich (1941). "Local structure of turbulence in an incompressible fluid for very large Reynolds numbers". Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR. 30 (4): 301–5. Bibcode:1941DoSSR..30..301K. Reprinted in: Kolmogorov, A. N. (1991). "The Local Structure of Turbulence in Incompressible Viscous Fluid for Very Large Reynolds Numbers". Proceedings of the Royal Society A. 434 (1890): 9–13. Bibcode:1991RSPSA.434....9K. doi:10.1098/rspa.1991.0075.
Jump up ^ Kolmogorov, A. N. (1941). "On degeneration of isotropic turbulence in an incompressible viscous liquid". Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR. 31 (6): 538–540. Reprinted in: Kolmogorov, A. N. (1991). "Dissipation of Energy in the Locally Isotropic Turbulence". Proceedings of the Royal Society A. 434 (1890): 15–17. Bibcode:1991RSPSA.434...15K. doi:10.1098/rspa.1991.0076.
Jump up ^ Kolmogorov, A. N. (1954). "Preservation of conditionally periodic movements with small change in the Hamiltonian function". Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR. Lecture Notes in Physics. 98: 527–530. Bibcode:1979LNP....93...51K. doi:10.1007/BFb0021737. ISBN 978-3-540-09120-2. See also Kolmogorov–Arnold–Moser theorem
Jump up ^ Cartwright, Mary L.; Littlewood, John E. (1945). "On non-linear differential equations of the second order, I: The equation y" + k(1−y2)y' + y = bλkcos(λt + a), k large". Journal of the London Mathematical Society. 20 (3): 180–9. doi:10.1112/jlms/s1-20.3.180. See also: Van der Pol oscillator
Jump up ^ Smale, Stephen (January 1960). "Morse inequalities for a dynamical system". Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society. 66: 43–49. doi:10.1090/S0002-9904-1960-10386-2.
Jump up ^ Abraham & Ueda 2001, See Chapters 3 and 4
Jump up ^ Sprott 2003, p. 89
Jump up ^ Gleick, James (1987). Chaos: Making a New Science. London: Cardinal. p. 17. ISBN 978-0-434-29554-8.
Jump up ^ Mandelbrot, Benoît (1963). "The variation of certain speculative prices". Journal of Business. 36 (4): 394–419. doi:10.1086/294632. JSTOR 2350970.
Jump up ^ Berger J.M.; Mandelbrot B. (1963). "A new model for error clustering in telephone circuits". IBM Journal of Research and Development. 7 (3): 224–236. doi:10.1147/rd.73.0224.
Jump up ^ Mandelbrot, B. (1977). The Fractal Geometry of Nature. New York: Freeman. p. 248.
Jump up ^ See also: Mandelbrot, Benoît B.; Hudson, Richard L. (2004). The (Mis)behavior of Markets: A Fractal View of Risk, Ruin, and Reward. New York: Basic Books. p. 201.
Jump up ^ Mandelbrot, Benoît (5 May 1967). "How Long Is the Coast of Britain? Statistical Self-Similarity and Fractional Dimension". Science. 156 (3775): 636–8. Bibcode:1967Sci...156..636M. doi:10.1126/science.156.3775.636. PMID 17837158.
Jump up ^ Mandelbrot, B. (1982). The Fractal Geometry of Nature. New York: Macmillan. ISBN 978-0716711865.
Jump up ^ Buldyrev, S.V.; Goldberger, A.L.; Havlin, S.; Peng, C.K.; Stanley, H.E. (1994). "Fractals in Biology and Medicine: From DNA to the Heartbeat". In Bunde, Armin; Havlin, Shlomo. Fractals in Science. Springer. pp. 49–89. ISBN 978-3-540-56220-7.
Jump up ^ Feigenbaum, Mitchell (July 1978). "Quantitative universality for a class of nonlinear transformations". Journal of Statistical Physics. 19 (1): 25–52. Bibcode:1978JSP....19...25F. doi:10.1007/BF01020332.
Jump up ^ Coullet, Pierre, and Charles Tresser. "Iterations d'endomorphismes et groupe de renormalisation." Le Journal de Physique Colloques 39.C5 (1978): C5-25
Jump up ^ "The Wolf Prize in Physics in 1986".
Jump up ^ Huberman, B.A. (July 1987). "A Model for Dysfunctions in Smooth Pursuit Eye Movement". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 504 Perspectives in Biological Dynamics and Theoretical Medicine: 260–273. Bibcode:1987NYASA.504..260H. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1987.tb48737.x.
Jump up ^ Bak, Per; Tang, Chao; Wiesenfeld, Kurt; Tang; Wiesenfeld (27 July 1987). "Self-organized criticality: An explanation of the 1/f noise". Physical Review Letters. 59 (4): 381–4. Bibcode:1987PhRvL..59..381B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.381. CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link) However, the conclusions of this article have been subject to dispute. "?". Archived from the original on 2007-12-14. . See especially: Laurson, Lasse; Alava, Mikko J.; Zapperi, Stefano (15 September 2005). "Letter: Power spectra of self-organized critical sand piles". Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment. 0511. L001.
Jump up ^ Omori, F. (1894). "On the aftershocks of earthquakes". Journal of the College of Science, Imperial University of Tokyo. 7: 111–200.
Jump up ^ Gleick, James (August 26, 2008). Chaos: Making a New Science. Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0143113454.
Jump up ^ Motter, A. E.; Campbell, D. K. (2013). "Chaos at fifty". Phys. Today. 66 (5): 27–33. arXiv:1306.5777  . Bibcode:2013PhT....66e..27M. doi:10.1063/pt.3.1977.
Jump up ^ Hubler, A.; Foster, G.; Phelps, K. (2007). "Managing chaos: Thinking out of the box". Complexity. 12 (3): 10. Bibcode:2007Cmplx..12c..10H. doi:10.1002/cplx.20159.
Jump up ^ Stephen Coombes (February 2009). "The Geometry and Pigmentation of Seashells" (PDF). www.maths.nottingham.ac.uk. University of Nottingham. Retrieved 2013-04-10.
Jump up ^ Kyrtsou C.; Labys W. (2006). "Evidence for chaotic dependence between US inflation and commodity prices". Journal of Macroeconomics. 28 (1): 256–266. doi:10.1016/j.jmacro.2005.10.019.
Jump up ^ Kyrtsou C., Labys W.; Labys (2007). "Detecting positive feedback in multivariate time series: the case of metal prices and US inflation". Physica A. 377 (1): 227–229. Bibcode:2007PhyA..377..227K. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2006.11.002.
Jump up ^ Kyrtsou, C.; Vorlow, C. (2005). "Complex dynamics in macroeconomics: A novel approach". In Diebolt, C.; Kyrtsou, C. New Trends in Macroeconomics. Springer Verlag.
Jump up ^ Applying Chaos Theory to Embedded Applications
Jump up ^ Hristu-Varsakelis, D.; Kyrtsou, C. (2008). "Evidence for nonlinear asymmetric causality in US inflation, metal and stock returns". Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society. 2008: 1–7. doi:10.1155/2008/138547. 138547.
Jump up ^ Kyrtsou, C.; M. Terraza, (2003). "Is it possible to study chaotic and ARCH behaviour jointly? Application of a noisy Mackey-Glass equation with heteroskedastic errors to the Paris Stock Exchange returns series". Computational Economics. 21 (3): 257–276. doi:10.1023/A:1023939610962.
Jump up ^ Williams, Bill Williams, Justine (2004). Trading chaos : maximize profits with proven technical techniques (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley. ISBN 9780471463085.
Jump up ^ Peters, Edgar E. (1994). Fractal market analysis : applying chaos theory to investment and economics (2. print. ed.). New York u.a.: Wiley. ISBN 978-0471585244.
Jump up ^ Peters, / Edgar E. (1996). Chaos and order in the capital markets : a new view of cycles, prices, and market volatility (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0471139386.
Jump up ^ Hubler, A.; Phelps, K. (2007). "Guiding a self-adjusting system through chaos". Complexity. 13 (2): 62. Bibcode:2007Cmplx..13b..62W. doi:10.1002/cplx.20204.
Jump up ^ Gerig, A. (2007). "Chaos in a one-dimensional compressible flow". Physical Review E. 75 (4): 045202. arXiv:nlin/0701050  . Bibcode:2007PhRvE..75d5202G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.75.045202.
Jump up ^ Wotherspoon, T.; Hubler, A. (2009). "Adaptation to the Edge of Chaos in the Self-Adjusting Logistic Map". The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 113 (1): 19–22. Bibcode:2009JPCA..113...19W. doi:10.1021/jp804420g. PMID 19072712.
Jump up ^ Dilão, R.; Domingos, T. (2001). "Periodic and Quasi-Periodic Behavior in Resource Dependent Age Structured Population Models". Bulletin of Mathematical Biology. 63 (2): 207–230. doi:10.1006/bulm.2000.0213. PMID 11276524.
^ Jump up to: a b Akhavan, A.; Samsudin, A.; Akhshani, A. (2011-10-01). "A symmetric image encryption scheme based on combination of nonlinear chaotic maps". Journal of the Franklin Institute. 348 (8): 1797–1813. doi:10.1016/j.jfranklin.2011.05.001.
Jump up ^ Behnia, S.; Akhshani, A.; Mahmodi, H.; Akhavan, A. (2008-01-01). "A novel algorithm for image encryption based on mixture of chaotic maps". Chaos, Solitons & Fractals. 35 (2): 408–419. Bibcode:2008CSF....35..408B. doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2006.05.011.
Jump up ^ Wang, Xingyuan; Zhao, Jianfeng (2012). "An improved key agreement protocol based on chaos". Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 15 (12): 4052–4057. Bibcode:2010CNSNS..15.4052W. doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2010.02.014.
Jump up ^ Babaei, Majid (2013). "A novel text and image encryption method based on chaos theory and DNA computing". Natural Computing. an International Journal. 12 (1): 101–107. doi:10.1007/s11047-012-9334-9.
Jump up ^ Akhavan, A.; Samsudin, A.; Akhshani, A. (2017-10-01). "Cryptanalysis of an image encryption algorithm based on DNA encoding". Optics & Laser Technology. 95: 94–99. Bibcode:2017OptLT..95...94A. doi:10.1016/j.optlastec.2017.04.022.
Jump up ^ Xu, Ming (2017-06-01). "Cryptanalysis of an Image Encryption Algorithm Based on DNA Sequence Operation and Hyper-chaotic System". 3D Research. 8 (2): 15. Bibcode:2017TDR.....8..126X. doi:10.1007/s13319-017-0126-y. ISSN 2092-6731.
Jump up ^ Liu, Yuansheng; Tang, Jie; Xie, Tao (2014-08-01). "Cryptanalyzing a RGB image encryption algorithm based on DNA encoding and chaos map". Optics & Laser Technology. 60: 111–115. arXiv:1307.4279  . Bibcode:2014OptLT..60..111L. doi:10.1016/j.optlastec.2014.01.015.
Jump up ^ Nehmzow, Ulrich; Keith Walker (Dec 2005). "Quantitative description of robot–environment interaction using chaos theory" (PDF). Robotics and Autonomous Systems. 53 (3–4): 177–193. doi:10.1016/j.robot.2005.09.009.
Jump up ^ Goswami, Ambarish; Thuilot, Benoit; Espiau, Bernard (1998). "A Study of the Passive Gait of a Compass-Like Biped Robot: Symmetry and Chaos". The International Journal of Robotics Research. 17 (12): 1282–1301. doi:10.1177/027836499801701202.
Jump up ^ Eduardo, Liz; Ruiz-Herrera, Alfonso (2012). "Chaos in discrete structured population models". SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems. 11 (4): 1200–1214. doi:10.1137/120868980.
Jump up ^ Lai, Dejian (1996). "Comparison study of AR models on the Canadian lynx data: a close look at BDS statistic". Computational Statistics \& Data Analysis. 22 (4): 409–423. doi:10.1016/0167-9473(95)00056-9.
Jump up ^ Sivakumar, B (31 January 2000). "Chaos theory in hydrology: important issues and interpretations". Journal of Hydrology. 227 (1–4): 1–20. Bibcode:2000JHyd..227....1S. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00186-9.
Jump up ^ Bozóki, Zsolt (February 1997). "Chaos theory and power spectrum analysis in computerized cardiotocography". European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 71 (2): 163–168. doi:10.1016/s0301-2115(96)02628-0.
Jump up ^ Li, Mengshan; Xingyuan Huanga; Hesheng Liua; Bingxiang Liub; Yan Wub; Aihua Xiongc; Tianwen Dong (25 October 2013). "Prediction of gas solubility in polymers by back propagation artificial neural network based on self-adaptive particle swarm optimization algorithm and chaos theory". Fluid Phase Equilibria. 356: 11–17. doi:10.1016/j.fluid.2013.07.017.
Jump up ^ Morbidelli, A. (2001). "Chaotic diffusion in celestial mechanics". Regular & Chaotic Dynamics. 6 (4): 339–353. doi:10.1070/rd2001v006n04abeh000182.
Jump up ^ Steven Strogatz, Sync: The Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order, Hyperion, 2003
Jump up ^ Dingqi, Li; Yuanping Chenga; Lei Wanga; Haifeng Wanga; Liang Wanga; Hongxing Zhou (May 2011). "Prediction method for risks of coal and gas outbursts based on spatial chaos theory using gas desorption index of drill cuttings". Mining Science and Technology. 21 (3): 439–443.
Jump up ^ Glass, L (1997). "Dynamical disease: The impact of nonlinear dynamics and chaos on cardiology and medicine". In Grebogi, C; Yorke, J. A. The impact of chaos on science and society. United Nations University Press.
Jump up ^ Mandell, A. J.; Selz, K. A. (1997). "Is the EEG a strange attractor?". In Grebogi, C; Yorke, J. A. The impact of chaos on science and society. United Nations University Press.
Jump up ^ Dal Forno, Arianna; Merlone, Ugo (2013). "Nonlinear dynamics in work groups with Bion's basic assumptions". Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences. 17 (2): 295–315. ISSN 1090-0578.
Jump up ^ Redington, D. J.; Reidbord, S. P. (1992). "Chaotic dynamics in autonomic nervous system activity of a patient during a psychotherapy session". Biological Psychiatry. 31 (10): 993–1007. PMID 1511082.
Jump up ^ Metcalf, B. R.; Allen, J. D. (1995). "In search of chaos in schedule-induced polydipsia". In Abraham, F. D.; Gilgen, A. R. Chaos theory in psychology. Greenwood Press.
Jump up ^ Pryor, Robert G. L.; Norman E. Aniundson; Jim E. H. Bright (June 2008). "Probabilities and Possibilities: The Strategic Counseling Implications of the Chaos Theory of Careers". The Career Development Quarterly. 56 (4): 309–318. doi:10.1002/j.2161-0045.2008.tb00096.x.
Jump up ^ Thompson, Jamie; Johnstone, James; Banks, Curt (2018). "An examination of initiation rituals in a UK sporting institution and the impact on group development". European Sport Management Quarterly: 1–19. doi:10.1080/16184742.2018.1439984.
Jump up ^ Dal Forno, Arianna; Merlone, Ugo (2013). "Chaotic Dynamics in Organization Theory". In Bischi, Gian Italo; Chiarella, Carl; Shusko, Irina. Global Analysis of Dynamic Models in Economics and Finance. Springer-Verlag. pp. 185–204. ISBN 978-3-642-29503-4.
Jump up ^ Juárez, Fernando (2011). "Applying the theory of chaos and a complex model of health to establish relations among financial indicators". Procedia Computer Science. 3: 982–986. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.161.
Jump up ^ Brooks, Chris (1998). "Chaos in foreign exchange markets: a sceptical view". Computational Economics. 11 (3): 265–281. doi:10.1023/A:1008650024944. ISSN 1572-9974.
Jump up ^ Wang, Jin; Qixin Shi (February 2013). "Short-term traffic speed forecasting hybrid model based on Chaos–Wavelet Analysis-Support Vector Machine theory". Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 27: 219–232. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2012.08.004.
Jump up ^ "Dr. Gregory B. Pasternack – Watershed Hydrology, Geomorphology, and Ecohydraulics :: Chaos in Hydrology". pasternack.ucdavis.edu. Retrieved 2017-06-12.
Jump up ^ Pasternack, Gregory B. (1999-11-01). "Does the river run wild? Assessing chaos in hydrological systems". Advances in Water Resources. 23 (3): 253–260. Bibcode:1999AdWR...23..253P. doi:10.1016/s0309-1708(99)00008-1.
Scientific literature[edit]
Articles[edit]
Sharkovskii, A.N. (1964). "Co-existence of cycles of a continuous mapping of the line into itself". Ukrainian Math. J. 16: 61–71.
Li, T.Y.; Yorke, J.A. (1975). "Period Three Implies Chaos" (PDF). American Mathematical Monthly. 82 (10): 985–92. Bibcode:1975AmMM...82..985L. doi:10.2307/2318254.
Alemansour, Hamed; Miandoab, Ehsan Maani; Pishkenari, Hossein Nejat (March 2017). "Effect of size on the chaotic behavior of nano resonators". Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation. 44: 495–505. Bibcode:2017CNSNS..44..495A. doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2016.09.010.
Crutchfield; Tucker; Morrison; J.D.; Packard; N.H.; Shaw; R.S (December 1986). "Chaos". Scientific American. 255 (6): 38–49 (bibliography p.136). Bibcode:1986SciAm.255d..38T. Online version (Note: the volume and page citation cited for the online text differ from that cited here. The citation here is from a photocopy, which is consistent with other citations found online that don't provide article views. The online content is identical to the hardcopy text. Citation variations are related to country of publication).
Kolyada, S.F. (2004). "Li-Yorke sensitivity and other concepts of chaos". Ukrainian Math. J. 56 (8): 1242–57. doi:10.1007/s11253-005-0055-4.
Day, R.H.; Pavlov, O.V. (2004). "Computing Economic Chaos". Computational Economics. 23 (4): 289–301. doi:10.1023/B:CSEM.0000026787.81469.1f. SSRN 806124  .
Strelioff, C.; Hübler, A. (2006). "Medium-Term Prediction of Chaos" (PDF). Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (4): 044101. Bibcode:2006PhRvL..96d4101S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.044101. PMID 16486826. 044101. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-04-26.
Hübler, A.; Foster, G.; Phelps, K. (2007). "Managing Chaos: Thinking out of the Box" (PDF). Complexity. 12 (3): 10–13. Bibcode:2007Cmplx..12c..10H. doi:10.1002/cplx.20159.
Motter, Adilson E.; Campbell, David K. (2013). "Chaos at 50". Physics Today. 66 (5): 27. arXiv:1306.5777  . Bibcode:2013PhT....66e..27M. doi:10.1063/PT.3.1977.
Boeing, G. (2016). "Visual Analysis of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems: Chaos, Fractals, Self-Similarity and the Limits of Prediction". Systems. 4 (4): 37. doi:10.3390/systems4040037.
Textbooks[edit]
Alligood, K.T.; Sauer, T.; Yorke, J.A. (1997). Chaos: an introduction to dynamical systems. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-0-387-94677-1.
Baker, G. L. (1996). Chaos, Scattering and Statistical Mechanics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-39511-3.
Badii, R.; Politi A. (1997). Complexity: hierarchical structures and scaling in physics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-66385-4.
Bunde; Havlin, Shlomo, eds. (1996). Fractals and Disordered Systems. Springer. ISBN 978-3642848704. and Bunde; Havlin, Shlomo, eds. (1994). Fractals in Science. Springer. ISBN 978-3-540-56220-7.
Collet, Pierre, and Eckmann, Jean-Pierre (1980). Iterated Maps on the Interval as Dynamical Systems. Birkhauser. ISBN 978-0-8176-4926-5. CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
Devaney, Robert L. (2003). An Introduction to Chaotic Dynamical Systems (2nd ed.). Westview Press. ISBN 978-0-8133-4085-2.
Feldman, D. P. (2012). Chaos and Fractals: An Elementary Introduction. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-956644-0.
Gollub, J. P.; Baker, G. L. (1996). Chaotic dynamics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-47685-0.
Guckenheimer, John; Holmes, Philip (1983). Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-0-387-90819-9.
Gulick, Denny (1992). Encounters with Chaos. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-025203-5.
Gutzwiller, Martin (1990). Chaos in Classical and Quantum Mechanics. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-0-387-97173-5.
Hoover, William Graham (2001) [1999]. Time Reversibility, Computer Simulation, and Chaos. World Scientific. ISBN 978-981-02-4073-8.
Kautz, Richard (2011). Chaos: The Science of Predictable Random Motion. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-959458-0.
Kiel, L. Douglas; Elliott, Euel W. (1997). Chaos Theory in the Social Sciences. Perseus Publishing. ISBN 978-0-472-08472-2.
Moon, Francis (1990). Chaotic and Fractal Dynamics. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-0-471-54571-2.
Ott, Edward (2002). Chaos in Dynamical Systems. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-01084-9.
Strogatz, Steven (2000). Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos. Perseus Publishing. ISBN 978-0-7382-0453-6.
Sprott, Julien Clinton (2003). Chaos and Time-Series Analysis. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-850840-3.
Tél, Tamás; Gruiz, Márton (2006). Chaotic dynamics: An introduction based on classical mechanics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-83912-9.
Teschl, Gerald (2012). Ordinary Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems. Providence: American Mathematical Society. ISBN 978-0-8218-8328-0.
Thompson JM, Stewart HB (2001). Nonlinear Dynamics And Chaos. John Wiley and Sons Ltd. ISBN 978-0-471-87645-8.
Tufillaro; Reilly (1992). An experimental approach to nonlinear dynamics and chaos. Addison-Wesley. ISBN 978-0-201-55441-0.
Wiggins, Stephen (2003). Introduction to Applied Dynamical Systems and Chaos. Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-00177-7.
Zaslavsky, George M. (2005). Hamiltonian Chaos and Fractional Dynamics. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-852604-9.
Semitechnical and popular works[edit]
Christophe Letellier, Chaos in Nature, World Scientific Publishing Company, 2012, ISBN 978-981-4374-42-2.
Abraham, Ralph H.; Ueda, Yoshisuke, eds. (2000). The Chaos Avant-Garde: Memoirs of the Early Days of Chaos Theory. World Scientific. ISBN 978-981-238-647-2.
Barnsley, Michael F. (2000). Fractals Everywhere. Morgan Kaufmann. ISBN 978-0-12-079069-2.
Bird, Richard J. (2003). Chaos and Life: Complexit and Order in Evolution and Thought. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-12662-5.
John Briggs and David Peat, Turbulent Mirror: : An Illustrated Guide to Chaos Theory and the Science of Wholeness, Harper Perennial 1990, 224 pp.
John Briggs and David Peat, Seven Life Lessons of Chaos: Spiritual Wisdom from the Science of Change, Harper Perennial 2000, 224 pp.
Cunningham, Lawrence A. (1994). "From Random Walks to Chaotic Crashes: The Linear Genealogy of the Efficient Capital Market Hypothesis". George Washington Law Review. 62: 546.
Predrag Cvitanović, Universality in Chaos, Adam Hilger 1989, 648 pp.
Leon Glass and Michael C. Mackey, From Clocks to Chaos: The Rhythms of Life, Princeton University Press 1988, 272 pp.
James Gleick, Chaos: Making a New Science, New York: Penguin, 1988. 368 pp.
John Gribbin. Deep Simplicity. Penguin Press Science. Penguin Books.
L Douglas Kiel, Euel W Elliott (ed.), Chaos Theory in the Social Sciences: Foundations and Applications, University of Michigan Press, 1997, 360 pp.
Arvind Kumar, Chaos, Fractals and Self-Organisation; New Perspectives on Complexity in Nature , National Book Trust, 2003.
Hans Lauwerier, Fractals, Princeton University Press, 1991.
Edward Lorenz, The Essence of Chaos, University of Washington Press, 1996.
Alan Marshall (2002) The Unity of Nature: Wholeness and Disintegration in Ecology and Science, Imperial College Press: London
David Peak and Michael Frame, Chaos Under Control: The Art and Science of Complexity, Freeman, 1994.
Heinz-Otto Peitgen and Dietmar Saupe (Eds.), The Science of Fractal Images, Springer 1988, 312 pp.
Clifford A. Pickover, Computers, Pattern, Chaos, and Beauty: Graphics from an Unseen World , St Martins Pr 1991.
Clifford A. Pickover, Chaos in Wonderland: Visual Adventures in a Fractal World, St Martins Pr 1994.
Ilya Prigogine and Isabelle Stengers, Order Out of Chaos, Bantam 1984.
Heinz-Otto Peitgen and P. H. Richter, The Beauty of Fractals : Images of Complex Dynamical Systems, Springer 1986, 211 pp.
David Ruelle, Chance and Chaos, Princeton University Press 1993.
Ivars Peterson, Newton's Clock: Chaos in the Solar System, Freeman, 1993.
Ian Roulstone; John Norbury (2013). Invisible in the Storm: the role of mathematics in understanding weather. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0691152721.
David Ruelle, Chaotic Evolution and Strange Attractors, Cambridge University Press, 1989.
Manfred Schroeder, Fractals, Chaos, and Power Laws, Freeman, 1991.
Peter Smith, Explaining Chaos, Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Ian Stewart, Does God Play Dice?: The Mathematics of Chaos , Blackwell Publishers, 1990.
Steven Strogatz, Sync: The emerging science of spontaneous order, Hyperion, 2003.
Yoshisuke Ueda, The Road To Chaos, Aerial Pr, 1993.
M. Mitchell Waldrop, Complexity : The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos, Simon & Schuster, 1992.
Antonio Sawaya, Financial Time Series Analysis : Chaos and Neurodynamics Approach, Lambert, 2012.
External links[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Chaos theory.
Hazewinkel, Michiel, ed. (2001) [1994], "Chaos", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, Springer Science+Business Media B.V. / Kluwer Academic Publishers, ISBN 978-1-55608-010-4
Nonlinear Dynamics Research Group with Animations in Flash
The Chaos group at the University of Maryland
The Chaos Hypertextbook. An introductory primer on chaos and fractals
ChaosBook.org An advanced graduate textbook on chaos (no fractals)
Society for Chaos Theory in Psychology & Life Sciences
Nonlinear Dynamics Research Group at CSDC, Florence Italy
Interactive live chaotic pendulum experiment, allows users to interact and sample data from a real working damped driven chaotic pendulum
Nonlinear dynamics: how science comprehends chaos, talk presented by Sunny Auyang, 1998.
Nonlinear Dynamics. Models of bifurcation and chaos by Elmer G. Wiens
Gleick's Chaos (excerpt)
Systems Analysis, Modelling and Prediction Group at the University of Oxford
A page about the Mackey-Glass equation
High Anxieties — The Mathematics of Chaos (2008) BBC documentary directed by David Malone
The chaos theory of evolution – article published in Newscientist featuring similarities of evolution and non-linear systems including fractal nature of life and chaos.
Jos Leys, Étienne Ghys et Aurélien Alvarez, Chaos, A Mathematical Adventure. Nine films about dynamical systems, the butterfly effect and chaos theory, intended for a wide audience.
"Chaos Theory", BBC Radio 4 discussion with Susan Greenfield, David Papineau & Neil Johnson (In Our Time, May 16, 2002)
show
v
t
e
Systems science
Systems types
Anatomical
Art
Biological
Complex
Complex adaptive
Conceptual
Coupled human–environment
Database
Dynamical
Ecological
Economic
Energy
Formal
Holarchic
Information
Legal
Measurement
Metric
Multi-agent
Nervous
Nonlinear
Operating
Physical
Planetary
Political
Sensory
Social
Star
Writing
Concepts
Doubling time
Leverage points
Limiting factor
Negative feedback
Positive feedback
Theoretical fields
Chaos theory
Complex systems
Control theory
Cybernetics
Earth system science
Living systems
Sociotechnical system
Systemics
Urban metabolism
World-systems theory
Analysis
Biology
Dynamics
Ecology
Engineering
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Psychology
Theory
Thinking
Systems scientists
Alexander Bogdanov
Russell L. Ackoff
William Ross Ashby
Ruzena Bajcsy
Béla H. Bánáthy
Gregory Bateson
Anthony Stafford Beer
Richard E. Bellman
Ludwig von Bertalanffy
Margaret Boden
Kenneth E. Boulding
Murray Bowen
Kathleen Carley
Mary Cartwright
C. West Churchman
Manfred Clynes
George Dantzig
Edsger W. Dijkstra
Heinz von Foerster
Stephanie Forrest
Jay Wright Forrester
Barbara Grosz
Charles A S Hall
Lydia Kavraki
James J. Kay
Faina M. Kirillova
George Klir
Allenna Leonard
Edward Norton Lorenz
Niklas Luhmann
Humberto Maturana
Margaret Mead
Donella Meadows
Mihajlo D. Mesarovic
James Grier Miller
Radhika Nagpal
Howard T. Odum
Talcott Parsons
Ilya Prigogine
Qian Xuesen
Anatol Rapoport
Peter Senge
Claude Shannon
Katia Sycara
Francisco Varela
Manuela M. Veloso
Kevin Warwick
Norbert Wiener
Jennifer Wilby
Anthony Wilden
Applications
Systems theory in anthropology
Systems theory in archaeology
Systems theory in political science
Organizations
List
Principia Cybernetica
Category
Portal
Commons
show
v
t
e
Chaos theory
Chaos theory
Anosov diffeomorphism
Bifurcation theory
Butterfly effect
Chaos theory in organizational development
Complexity
Control of chaos
Dynamical system
Edge of chaos
Fractal
Predictability
Quantum chaos
Santa Fe Institute
Synchronization of chaos
Unintended consequences

Chaotic maps
(list)
Arnold tongue
Arnold's cat map
Baker's map
Complex quadratic map
Complex squaring map
Coupled map lattice
Double pendulum
Double scroll attractor
Duffing equation
Duffing map
Dyadic transformation
Dynamical billiards
outer
Exponential map
Gauss map
Gingerbreadman map
Hénon map
Horseshoe map
Ikeda map
Interval exchange map
Kaplan–Yorke map
Logistic map
Lorenz system
Multiscroll attractor
Rabinovich–Fabrikant equations
Rössler attractor
Standard map
Swinging Atwood's machine
Tent map
Tinkerbell map
Van der Pol oscillator
Zaslavskii map
Chaos systems
Bouncing ball dynamics
Chua's circuit
Economic bubble
FPUT problem
Tilt-A-Whirl
Chaos theorists
Michael Berry
Mary Cartwright
Leon O. Chua
Mitchell Feigenbaum
Celso Grebogi
Martin Gutzwiller
Brosl Hasslacher
Michel Hénon
Svetlana Jitomirskaya
Sofia Kovalevskaya
Bryna Kra
Edward Norton Lorenz
Aleksandr Lyapunov
Benoît Mandelbrot
Hee Oh
Edward Ott
Henri Poincaré
Mary Rees
Otto Rössler
David Ruelle
Caroline Series
Oleksandr Mykolayovych Sharkovsky
Nina Snaith
Floris Takens
Audrey Terras
Mary Tsingou
Amie Wilkinson
James A. Yorke
Lai-Sang Young
show
v
t
e
Patterns in nature
Patterns
Crack
Dune
Foam
Meander
Phyllotaxis
Soap bubble
Symmetry
in crystals
Quasicrystals
in flowers
in biology
Tessellation
Vortex street
Wave
Widmanstätten pattern
Causes
Pattern formation
Biology
Natural selection
Camouflage
Mimicry
Sexual selection
Mathematics
Chaos theory
Fractal
Logarithmic spiral
Physics
Crystal
Fluid dynamics
Plateau's laws
Self-organization
People
Plato
Pythagoras
Empedocles
Fibonacci
Liber Abaci
Adolf Zeising
Ernst Haeckel
Joseph Plateau
Wilson Bentley
D'Arcy Wentworth Thompson
On Growth and Form
Alan Turing
The Chemical Basis of Morphogenesis
Aristid Lindenmayer
Benoît Mandelbrot
How Long Is the Coast of Britain? Statistical Self-Similarity and Fractional Dimension
Related
Pattern recognition
Emergence
Mathematics and art
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chaos_theory&oldid=856924950"
Categories:
Chaos theory
Complex systems theory
Computational fields of study
Hidden categories:
CS1 maint: Extra text: authors list
CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list
All articles with unsourced statements
Articles with unsourced statements from July 2008
Articles with unsourced statements from May 2016
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
In other projects
Wikimedia Commons
Wikiquote
Languages
Afrikaans
العربية
Asturianu
Azərbaycanca
বাংলা
Башҡортса
Български
Català
Чӑвашла
Čeština
Dansk
Deitsch
Deutsch
Ελληνικά
Español
Esperanto
Euskara
فارسی
Français
Gaeilge
Galego
贛語
한국어
हिन्दी
Hrvatski
Bahasa Indonesia
Italiano
עברית
Kapampangan
Lietuvių
Magyar
മലയാളം
मराठी
Bahasa Melayu
Nederlands
日本語
Norsk
Norsk nynorsk
ਪੰਜਾਬੀ
Patois
Polski
Português
Română
Русский
Scots
Sicilianu
Simple English
Slovenčina
Slovenščina
کوردی
Српски / srpski
Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски
Suomi
Svenska
தமிழ்
ไทย
Türkçe
Українська
اردو
Tiếng Việt
吴语
粵語
中文
54 more
Edit links
This page was last edited on 28 August 2018, at 12:21 (UTC).
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

attrs: class href

values: mw-jump-link #mw-head

values: mw-jump-link #p-search

attrs: href class title

values:
/wiki/Chaos_theory_(disambiguation)
mw-redirect mw-disambig
Chaos theory (disambiguation)

values:
/wiki/Chaos_(disambiguation)
mw-redirect mw-disambig
Chaos (disambiguation)

attrs: role class

values:
note
hatnote navigation-not-searchable

attrs: alt src width height class srcset data-file-width data-file-height

values:
/wiki/Lorenz_attractor
mw-redirect
Lorenz attractor

attrs: class style

attrs: alt src width height class data-file-width data-file-height

values:
/wiki/Initial_conditions
mw-redirect
Initial conditions

values:
/wiki/Chaotic_complex_system
mw-redirect
Chaotic complex system

values:
/wiki/Feedback_loops
mw-redirect
Feedback loops

values:
/wiki/Edward_Lorenz
mw-redirect
Edward Lorenz

values:
/wiki/Road_traffic
mw-redirect
Road traffic

values:
/wiki/Dynamical_systems
mw-redirect
Dynamical systems

values: checkbox button toctogglecheckbox toctogglecheckbox display:none

values:
/wiki/Topological_mixing
mw-redirect
Topological mixing

values:
/wiki/Periodic_orbit
mw-redirect
Periodic orbit

values: Edit section: Chaos as a spontaneous breakdown of topological supersymmetry

values: Supersymmetric theory of stochastic dynamics

values:
/wiki/Goldstone%27s_theorem
mw-redirect
Goldstone's theorem

values: Edit section: Sensitivity to initial conditions

values: vertical-align: -0.838ex; width:1.202ex; height:2.176ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.338ex; width:1.33ex; height:1.676ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.671ex; width:1.332ex; height:2.509ex;

values: American Association for the Advancement of Science

values:
/wiki/Geologic_era
mw-redirect
Geologic era

values: vertical-align: -0.671ex; width:3.737ex; height:2.676ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.838ex; width:18.269ex; height:3.176ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.838ex; width:4.813ex; height:2.843ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.838ex; width:19.429ex; height:2.843ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.671ex; width:1.155ex; height:2.009ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.671ex; width:14.914ex; height:2.343ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.671ex; width:11.748ex; height:2.509ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.671ex; width:18.917ex; height:2.509ex;

values: Edit section: Density of periodic orbits

values:
/wiki/Periodic_orbits
mw-redirect
Periodic orbits

values: {\displaystyle {\tfrac {5-{\sqrt {5}}}{8}}}

values: vertical-align: -1.338ex; width:5.128ex; height:4.343ex;

values: {\displaystyle {\tfrac {5+{\sqrt {5}}}{8}}}

values:
/wiki/Basin_of_attraction
mw-redirect
Basin of attraction

values:
/wiki/Strange_attractor
mw-redirect
Strange attractor

values: Edit section: Minimum complexity of a chaotic system

values:
/wiki/Continuous_function_(topology)
mw-redirect
Continuous function (topology)

attrs: columnalign rowspacing columnspacing displaystyle

values: right left right left right left right left right left right left

values: 0em 2em 0em 2em 0em 2em 0em 2em 0em 2em 0em

values: vertical-align: -7.671ex; width:19.741ex; height:16.509ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.338ex; width:1.088ex; height:1.676ex;

values:
/wiki/State_space_representation
mw-redirect
State space representation

values: vertical-align: -0.338ex; width:0.84ex; height:2.009ex;

values:
/wiki/R%C3%B6ssler_map
mw-redirect
Rössler map

values:
/wiki/Plane_(mathematics)
mw-redirect
Plane (mathematics)

values: vertical-align: -1.005ex; width:16.712ex; height:3.176ex;

values: vertical-align: -2.171ex; width:34.282ex; height:6.009ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.838ex; width:19.347ex; height:2.843ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.838ex; width:8.35ex; height:2.843ex;

values:
/wiki/Coupled_oscillation
mw-redirect
Coupled oscillation

values:
/wiki/London_Millennium_Bridge
mw-redirect
London Millennium Bridge

values:
/wiki/Josephson_junctions
mw-redirect
Josephson junctions

values:
/wiki/Hadamard%27s_billiards
mw-redirect
Hadamard's billiards

values:
/wiki/Differential_equations
mw-redirect
Differential equations

values:
/wiki/Andrey_Nikolaevich_Kolmogorov
mw-redirect
Andrey Nikolaevich Kolmogorov

values:
/wiki/Mary_Lucy_Cartwright
mw-redirect
Mary Lucy Cartwright

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (July 2008)

values:
noprint Inline-Template Template-Fact
white-space:nowrap;

values:
/wiki/Linear_theory
mw-redirect
Linear theory

values:
/wiki/Soviet_physicists
mw-redirect
Soviet physicists

values:
/wiki/Landau-Hopf_theory_of_turbulence
mw-redirect
Landau-Hopf theory of turbulence

values:
/wiki/Fluid_turbulence
mw-redirect
Fluid turbulence

values:
/wiki/Sierpi%C5%84ski_gasket
mw-redirect
Sierpiński gasket

values:
/wiki/Mitchell_J._Feigenbaum
mw-redirect
Mitchell J. Feigenbaum

values: Eye tracking disorder (page does not exist)

values: Landscape formation (page does not exist)

values:
/wiki/Forest_fire
mw-redirect
Forest fire

values:
/wiki/Biological_evolution
mw-redirect
Biological evolution

values: No reason given for soviet under-emphasis (May 2016)

values:
/wiki/Social_systems
mw-redirect
Social systems

values:
/wiki/Symmetric_key
mw-redirect
Symmetric key

values:
/wiki/Diffusion_and_confusion
mw-redirect
Diffusion and confusion

values:
/wiki/Quantum_physics
mw-redirect
Quantum physics

values: The red cars and blue cars take turns to move; the red ones only move upwards, and the blue ones move rightwards. Every time, all the cars of the same colour try to move one step if there is no car in front of it. Here, the model has self-organized in a somewhat geometric pattern where there are some traffic jams and some areas where cars can move at top speed.

values: display:table-cell;padding:0.2em 0.2em 0.2em 0.3em;vertical-align:middle

values: margin:0.5em 0 0.5em 1em;border:solid #aaa 1px

values:
/wiki/Bouncing_ball_dynamics
mw-redirect
Bouncing ball dynamics

values:
/wiki/Tilt_A_Whirl
mw-redirect
Tilt A Whirl

values: -moz-column-width: 18em; -webkit-column-width: 18em; column-width: 18em;

values: Chaos theory in organizational development

values:
/wiki/Unintended_consequence
mw-redirect
Unintended consequence

values:
/wiki/Doyne_Farmer
mw-redirect
Doyne Farmer

values:
/wiki/Oleksandr_Mikolaiovich_Sharkovsky
mw-redirect
Oleksandr Mikolaiovich Sharkovsky

values:
/wiki/George_M._Zaslavsky
mw-redirect
George M. Zaslavsky

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.3390/systems4040037

values:
nofollow
external text
//arxiv.org/abs/1310.1576

attrs: alt src title width height srcset data-file-width data-file-height

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axn053

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1063/1.1507903

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/issn/1054-1500

values: Category:CS1 maint: Extra text: authors list

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.2307/2975629

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/2975629

values:
nofollow
external text
//arxiv.org/abs/1511.03393

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.3390/e18040108

values:
nofollow
external text
//arxiv.org/abs/1404.4076

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1142/S021798491650086X

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.2307/2318254

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.044101

values:
/wiki/PubMed_Identifier
mw-redirect
PubMed Identifier

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16486826

values:
/wiki/Physics_Letters_A
mw-redirect
Physics Letters A

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1112/blms/33.2.196

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1007/BF02392506

values:
nofollow
external text
https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/987302273

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/987302273

values:
/wiki/Doklady_Akademii_Nauk_SSSR
mw-redirect
Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1991.0075

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1991.0076

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1007/BFb0021737

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1112/jlms/s1-20.3.180

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1086/294632

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/2350970

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1147/rd.73.0224

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1126/science.156.3775.636

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17837158

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1007/BF01020332

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.381

values: Category:CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list

values:
nofollow
external text
//arxiv.org/abs/1306.5777

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1063/pt.3.1977

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1002/cplx.20159

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2005.10.019

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2006.11.002

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1155/2008/138547

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1023/A%3A1023939610962

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1002/cplx.20204

values:
nofollow
external text
//arxiv.org/abs/nlin/0701050

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.75.045202

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1021/jp804420g

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19072712

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1006/bulm.2000.0213

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11276524

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2006.05.011

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2010.02.014

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1007/s13319-017-0126-y

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/issn/2092-6731

values:
nofollow
external text
//arxiv.org/abs/1307.4279

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2005.09.009

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1137/120868980

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2013.07.017

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/issn/1090-0578

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1511082

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.161

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1023/A%3A1008650024944

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/issn/1572-9974

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2012.08.004

values: -moz-column-width: 30em; -webkit-column-width: 30em; column-width: 30em; list-style-type: decimal;

values:
/wiki/Oleksandr_Mykolaiovych_Sharkovsky
mw-redirect
Oleksandr Mykolaiovych Sharkovsky

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2016.09.010

values:
nofollow
external text
//ssrn.com/abstract=806124

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.1977

values:
nofollow
external text
http://chaos.coa.edu/index.html

values:
/wiki/William_G_Hoover
mw-redirect
William G Hoover

values: Nicholas Tufillaro (page does not exist)

values: Edit section: Semitechnical and popular works

values: Christophe Letellier (page does not exist)

values: Michael F. Barnsley (page does not exist)

values:
nofollow
http://www.chaos.umd.edu/
external text

values:
nofollow
http://hypertextbook.com/chaos/
external text

values:
nofollow
http://chaosbook.org/
external text

values:
nofollow
http://www.societyforchaostheory.org/
external text

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.around.com/chaos.html

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.chaos-math.org/en

values:
/wiki/Sensory_system
mw-redirect
Sensory system

values:
/wiki/Complex_systems
mw-redirect
Complex systems

values:
/wiki/Systems_thinking
mw-redirect
Systems thinking

values:
/wiki/William_Ross_Ashby
mw-redirect
William Ross Ashby

values:
/wiki/Anthony_Stafford_Beer
mw-redirect
Anthony Stafford Beer

values:
/wiki/Charles_A_S_Hall
mw-redirect
Charles A S Hall

values: nowraplinks hlist collapsible collapsed navbox-inner mw-collapsible mw-collapsed mw-made-collapsible

values:
/wiki/File:C%C3%B4ne_textileII.png
image
Conus textile shell

values:
/wiki/File:Circle_map_bifurcation.jpeg
image
Circle map with black Arnold tongues

values:
navbox-image
4
width:1px;padding:0px 0px 0px 2px

values:
/wiki/Double_scroll_attractor
mw-redirect
Double scroll attractor

values: Exponential map (discrete dynamical systems)

values: nowraplinks collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner mw-collapsible mw-made-collapsible mw-collapsed

values: Template talk:Patterns in nature (page does not exist)

values: nowraplinks hlist collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner mw-collapsible mw-made-collapsible mw-collapsed

values: Category:All articles with unsourced statements

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from July 2008

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from May 2016

values: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

values: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

values: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

values: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

values:
/wiki/Chaos_theory
View the content page [ctrl-alt-c]
c

values: Discussion about the content page [ctrl-alt-t]

values: p-namespaces navigation vectorTabs p-namespaces-label

values:
p-variants
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-variants-label

values: Past revisions of this page [ctrl-alt-h]

values: p-views navigation vectorTabs p-views-label

values:
p-cactions
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-cactions-label

values:
mw-wiki-logo
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page

values:
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page [ctrl-alt-z]
z

values: Featured content – the best of Wikipedia

values: Find background information on current events

values: portal navigation p-wikibase-otherprojects p-wikibase-otherprojects-label

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-af
display: none;

values: نظرية فوضى الكون – Arabic

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ast
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-az
display: none;

values: বিশৃঙ্খলা তত্ত্ব – Bangla

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-bn
display: none;

values: Хаос теорияһы – Bashkir

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ba
display: none;

values: Теория на хаоса – Bulgarian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-bg
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ca
display: none;

values: Хаос теорийĕ – Chuvash

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-cv
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-cs
display: none;

values:
https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaosteori
Kaosteori – Danish
da
da
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-da
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-pdc
display: none;

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-de badge-Q17437798 badge-goodarticle

values: Θεωρία του χάους – Greek

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-el
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-eo
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-eu
display: none;

values: نظریه آشوب – Persian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-fa
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-fr
display: none;

values:
https://ga.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anord
Anord – Irish
ga
ga
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ga
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-gl
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-gan
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ko
display: none;

values: अक्रम सिद्धान्त – Hindi

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-hr
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-it
display: none;

values: תורת הכאוס – Hebrew

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-he
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-pam
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-lt
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-hu
display: none;

values: കയോസ് സിദ്ധാന്തം – Malayalam

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ml
display: none;

values: कोलाहल – Marathi

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-mr
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-nl
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ja
display: none;

values:
https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaosteori
Kaosteori – Norwegian
no
no
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-no
display: none;

values:
https://nn.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaosteori
Kaosteori – Norwegian Nynorsk
nn
nn
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-nn
display: none;

values: ਘੜਮੱਸ ਸਿਧਾਂਤ – Punjabi

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-pa
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-jam
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-pl
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-pt
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ro
display: none;

values: Теория хаоса – Russian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sco
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-scn
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-simple
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sk
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sl
display: none;

values: بیردۆزی شێواوی – Central Kurdish

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ckb
display: none;

values: Теорија хаоса – Serbian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sr
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sh
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-fi
display: none;

values:
https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaosteori
Kaosteori – Swedish
sv
sv
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sv
display: none;

values: ஒழுங்கின்மை கோட்பாடு – Tamil

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ta
display: none;

values: ทฤษฎีความอลวน – Thai

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-th
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-tr
display: none;

values: Теорія хаосу – Ukrainian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-uk
display: none;

values: نظریۂ شواش – Urdu

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-vi
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-wuu
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-zh-yue
display: none;

values: All languages (initial selection from common choices by you and others)

values: /static/images/wikimedia-button-1.5x.png 1.5x, /static/images/wikimedia-button-2x.png 2x

values: /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_132x47.png 1.5x, /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_176x62.png 2x

values:
suggestions
display: none; font-size: 13px;

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Chaos_theory rootpage-Chaos_theory skin-vector action-view