text:
Papal infallibility
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This article has an unclear citation style. The references used may be made clearer with a different or consistent style of citation and footnoting. (July 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Pope Pius IX (1846–1878), during whose pontificate the doctrine of papal infallibility was dogmatically defined by the First Vatican Council.
Papal infallibility is a dogma of the Catholic Church that states that, in virtue of the promise of Jesus to Peter, the Pope is preserved from the possibility of error "when, in the exercise of his office as shepherd and teacher of all Christians, in virtue of his supreme apostolic authority, he defines a doctrine concerning faith or morals to be held by the whole Church."[1][2]
This doctrine was defined dogmatically at the First Ecumenical Council of the Vatican of 1869–1870, but had been defended before that, existing already in medieval theology and being the majority opinion at the time of the Counter-Reformation.[3]
According to Catholic theology, there are several concepts important to the understanding of infallible, divine revelation: Sacred Scripture, Sacred Tradition, and the Sacred Magisterium. The infallible teachings of the Pope are part of the Sacred Magisterium, which also consists of ecumenical councils and the "ordinary and universal magisterium." In Catholic theology, papal infallibility is one of the channels of the infallibility of the Church. The infallible teachings of the Pope must be based on, or at least not contradict, Sacred Tradition or Sacred Scripture.
The doctrine of infallibility relies on one of the cornerstones of Catholic dogma: that of Petrine supremacy of the pope, and his authority as the ruling agent who decides what are accepted as formal beliefs in the Roman Catholic Church.[4] The use of this power is referred to as speaking ex cathedra.[5] The solemn declaration of papal infallibility by Vatican I took place on 18 July 1870. Since that time, the only example of an ex cathedra decree took place in 1950, when Pope Pius XII defined the Assumption of Mary as an article of faith.[6] Prior to the solemn definition of 1870, there were other decrees which fit the definition of ex cathedra, for example, Pope Boniface VIII in the bull Unam Sanctam of 1302,[7][8][9] and Pope Pius IX in the Papal constitution Ineffabilis Deus of 1854.[10][11]
Contents
[hide]
1 Nature of infallibility
2 Conditions for teachings being declared infallible
3 Ex cathedra
4 Scripture and primacy of Peter
5 Primacy of the Roman pontiff
6 Theological history
6.1 Ecumenical councils
6.2 Middle Ages
6.3 Post-Counter-Reformation
6.4 Dogmatic definition of 1870
6.5 Lumen gentium
7 Instances of infallible declarations
8 Denial by Catholics
9 Objections
10 Positions of some other churches
10.1 Eastern Orthodoxy
10.2 Anglican churches
10.3 Methodism
10.4 Reformed churches
10.5 Evangelical churches
11 Claim that the Vatican was to dogmatize papal temporal power
12 Bismarck's reaction
13 Non-Christian equivalents
14 See also
15 References and notes
16 Bibliography
17 External links
Nature of infallibility[edit]
The church teaches that infallibility is a charism entrusted by Christ to the whole church, whereby the Pope, as "head of the college of bishops," enjoys papal infallibility.[12] This charism is the supreme degree of participating in Christ's divine authority,[13] which, in the New Covenant, so as to safeguard the faithful from defection and guarantee the profession of faith, ensures the faithful abide in the truth.[12] The church further teaches that divine assistance is also given to the Pope when he exercises his ordinary Magisterium.[14]
Conditions for teachings being declared infallible[edit]
As with all charisms, the church teaches that the charism of papal infallibility must be properly discerned, though only by the Church's leaders.[15][16] The way to know if something a pope says is infallible or not is to discern if they are ex cathedra teachings. Also considered infallible are the teachings of the whole body of bishops of the Church, especially but not only in an ecumenical council[17] (see Infallibility of the Church).
According to the teaching of the First Vatican Council and Catholic tradition, the conditions required for ex cathedra papal teaching are as follows:
the Roman Pontiff
speaks ex cathedra,
that is, when, (in the discharge of his office as shepherd and teacher of all Christians, and by virtue of his supreme apostolic authority,)
he defines
a doctrine
concerning faith or morals
to be held by the whole Church [18][19][20]
For a teaching by a pope or ecumenical council to be recognized as infallible, the teaching must:
Be a decision of the supreme teaching authority of the Church (the Pope alone or with the College of Bishops)
Concern a doctrine of faith or morals
Bind the universal Church
Be proposed as something to hold firmly and immutably
The terminology of a definitive decree usually makes clear that this last condition is fulfilled, as through a formula such as "By the authority of Our Lord Jesus Christ and of the Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul, and by Our own authority, We declare, pronounce and define the doctrine . . . to be revealed by God and as such to be firmly and immutably held by all the faithful," or through an accompanying anathema stating that anyone who deliberately dissents is outside the Catholic Church.[21]
For example, in 1950, with Munificentissimus Deus, Pope Pius XII's infallible definition regarding the Assumption of Mary, there are attached these words:
Hence if anyone, which God forbid, should dare willfully to deny or to call into doubt that which We have defined, let him know that he has fallen away completely from the divine and Catholic Faith.
In July 2005 Pope Benedict XVI stated during an impromptu address to priests in Aosta that: "The Pope is not an oracle; he is infallible in very rare situations, as we know."[22] Pope John XXIII once remarked: "I am only infallible if I speak infallibly but I shall never do that, so I am not infallible."[23] A doctrine proposed by a pope as his own opinion, not solemnly proclaimed as a doctrine of the Church, may be rejected as false, even if it is on a matter of faith and morals, and even more any view he expresses on other matters. A well-known example of a personal opinion on a matter of faith and morals that was taught by a pope but rejected by the Church is the view that Pope John XXII expressed on when the dead can reach the beatific vision.[24] The limitation on the pope's infallibility "on other matters" is frequently illustrated by Cardinal James Gibbons's recounting how the pope mistakenly called him Jibbons.[25]
Catholic theologians in general hold that the canonization of a saint by a pope is infallible teaching that the person canonized is definitely in heaven with God. A decree of canonization commands that the person be venerated by the whole Church as a saint, while beatification merely permits it.[26][27]
Ex cathedra[edit]
"Ex cathedra" redirects here. For the early music ensemble, see Ex Cathedra. For the 2009 film, see Ex Cathedra (film).
The only ex cathedra application of papal infallibility since its solemn declaration has been for the Marian Dogma of Assumption in 1950. Painting of the Assumption, Rubens, 1626
See also: Dogma in the Catholic Church
"Cathedra" and "sedes" are Latin words for a chair, the symbol of the teacher in the ancient world; the "chair" is still used metaphorically as the office of a university professor, and to the "see" of a bishop (from "sedes"). The pope is said to occupy the "chair of Peter" or the "Holy See", since Catholics hold that the pope is the successor of Peter. Also, Catholics hold that Peter had a special role among the apostles as the preserver of unity, and that the pope therefore holds the role of spokesman for the whole church among the bishops, whom Catholics hold to be the successors of the apostles.
The doctrine of papal infallibility, the Latin phrase ex cathedra (literally, "from the chair") was proclaimed by Pius IX in 1870 as meaning "when, in the exercise of his office as shepherd and teacher of all Christians, in virtue of his supreme apostolic authority, [the Bishop of Rome] defines a doctrine concerning faith or morals to be held by the whole Church."[2]
The response demanded from believers has been characterized as "assent" in the case of ex cathedra declarations of the popes and "due respect" with regard to their other declarations.[28]
Scripture and primacy of Peter[edit]
On the basis of Mark 3:16, 9:2, Luke 24:34 and 1 Corinthians 15:5, the Catechism of the Catholic Church describes Peter as holding first place among the apostles. It speaks of Peter as the rock on which, because of Peter's faith, Christ said in Matthew 16:18 he would build his Church, which he declared would be victorious over the powers of death. In Luke 22:32, Jesus gave Peter the mission to keep his faith after every lapse and to strengthen his brothers in it. The Catechism of the Catholic Church sees the power of the keys that Jesus promised to Peter alone in Matthew 16:19 as signifying authority to govern the house of God, that is, the Church, an authority that Jesus after his resurrection confirmed for Peter by instructing him in John 21:15–17 to feed Christ's sheep. The power to bind and loose, conferred on all the apostles jointly and to Peter in particular (Matthew 16:19) is seen in the Catechism of the Catholic Church as authority to absolve sins, to pronounce judgments on doctrine and to make decisions on Church discipline.[29]
Primacy of the Roman pontiff[edit]
Main article: Primacy of the Bishop of Rome
Supporters of the pope outside the United Nations in 2008 with a banner quoting Matthew 16
Doctrine-based religions evolve their theologies over time, and Catholicism is no exception: its theology did not spring instantly and fully formed within the bosom of the earliest Church.
The doctrine of the Primacy of the Roman Bishops, like other Church teachings and institutions, has gone through a development. Thus the establishment of the Primacy recorded in the Gospels has gradually been more clearly recognised and its implications developed. Clear indications of the consciousness of the Primacy of the Roman bishops, and of the recognition of the Primacy by the other churches appear at the end of the 1st century. L. Ott[30]
Pope St. Clement of Rome, c. 99, stated in a letter to the Corinthians: "Indeed you will give joy and gladness to us, if having become obedient to what we have written through the Holy Spirit, you will cut out the unlawful application of your zeal according to the exhortation which we have made in this epistle concerning peace and union." (Denziger §41, emphasis added)
St. Clement of Alexandria wrote on the primacy of Peter c. 200: "the blessed Peter, the chosen, the pre-eminent, the first among the disciples, for whom alone with Himself the Savior paid the tribute..." (Jurgens §436).
The existence of an ecclesiastical hierarchy is emphasized by St. Stephan I, 251, in a letter to the bishop of Antioch: "Therefore did not that famous defender of the Gospel [Novatian] know that there ought to be one bishop in the Catholic Church [of the city of Rome]? It did not lie hidden from him..." (Denziger §45).
St. Julius I, in 341 wrote to the Antiochenes: "Or do you not know that it is the custom to write to us first, and that here what is just is decided?" (Denziger §57a, emphasis added).
Catholicism holds that an understanding among the apostles was written down in what became the scriptures, and rapidly became the living custom of the Church, and that from there, a clearer theology could unfold.
St. Siricius wrote to Himerius in 385: "To your inquiry we do not deny a legal reply, because we, upon whom greater zeal for the Christian religion is incumbent than upon the whole body, out of consideration for our office do not have the liberty to dissimulate, nor to remain silent. We carry the weight of all who are burdened; nay rather the blessed apostle PETER bears these in us, who, as we trust, protects us in all matters of his administration, and guards his heirs" (Denziger §87, emphasis in original).
Many of the Church Fathers spoke of ecumenical councils and the Bishop of Rome as possessing a reliable authority to teach the content of scripture and tradition.
Theological history[edit]
Pope Leo XIII, as Bishop of Rome and successor of the Apostle Peter, represented as guiding the ship of God's Church (painting by Friedrich Stummel in Kevelaer Shrine 1903).[31]
Klaus Schatz asserts that "it is impossible to fix a single author or era as the starting point" for the doctrine of papal infallibility. Others such as Brian Tierney have argued that the doctrine of papal infallibility was first proposed by Peter Olivi in the Middle Ages. Schatz and others see the roots of the doctrine as going much further back to the early days of Christianity.
Brian Tierney argued that the 13th-century Franciscan priest Peter Olivi was the first person to attribute infallibility to the pope.[32] Tierney's idea was accepted by August Bernhard Hasler, and by Gregory Lee Jackson,[33] It was rejected by James Heft,[34] and by John V. Kruse.[35] Klaus Schatz says Olivi by no means played the key role assigned to him by Tierney, who failed to acknowledge the work of earlier canonists and theologians, and that the crucial advance in the teaching came only in the 15th century, two centuries after Olivi; and he declares that, "It is impossible to fix a single author or era as the starting point."[36] Ulrich Horst criticized the Tierney view for the same reasons.[37] In his Protestant evaluation of the ecumenical issue of papal infallibility, Mark E. Powell rejects Tierney's theory about 13th-century Olivi, saying that the doctrine of papal infallibility defined at Vatican I had its origins in the 14th century – he refers in particular to Bishop Guido Terreni – and was itself part of a long development of papal claims.[38]
Schatz points to "...the special esteem given to the Roman church community [that] was always associated with fidelity in the faith and preservation of the paradosis (the faith as handed down)." Schatz differentiates between the later doctrine of "infallibility of the papal magisterium" and the Hormisdas formula in 519, which asserted that, "The Roman church has never erred (and will never err)." He emphasizes that Hormisdas formula was not meant to apply so much to, "...individual dogmatic definitions but to the whole of the faith as handed down and the tradition of Peter preserved intact by the Roman Church." Specifically, Schatz argues that the Hormisdas formula does not exclude the possibility of individual popes become heretics because the formula refers "...primarily to the Roman tradition as such and not exclusively to the person of the pope."[39]
Ecumenical councils[edit]
The 12th-century Decretum Gratiani contained the declaration by Pope Gregory I (590–604) that the first four ecumenical councils were to be revered "...like the four gospels," because they had been "established by universal consent," and also Gratian's assertion that, "The holy Roman Church imparts authority to the sacred canons but is not bound by them." Commentators on the Decretum, known as the Decretists, generally concluded that a pope could change the disciplinary decrees of the ecumenical councils but was bound by their pronouncements on articles of faith, in which field the authority of a general council was higher than that of an individual pope. Unlike those who propounded the 15th-century conciliarist theories, they understood an ecumenical council as necessarily involving the pope, and meant that the pope plus the other bishops was greater than a pope acting alone.[40]
Middle Ages[edit]
Several medieval theologians discussed the infallibility of the pope when defining matters of faith and morals, including Thomas Aquinas.
The Dictatus papae have been attributed to Pope Gregory VII (1073–1085) in the year 1075, but some have argued that they are later than 1087.[41] They assert that no one can judge the pope (Proposition 19) and that "the Roman church has never erred; nor will it err to all eternity, the Scripture bearing witness" (Proposition 22). This is seen as a further step in advancing the idea that "...had been part of church history and debate as far back as 519 when the notion of the Bishop of Rome as the preserver of apostolic truth was set forth in the Formula of Hormisdas."[42]
In the early years of the 14th century, the Franciscan Order found itself in open conflict about the form of poverty to observe, with the Spirituals (so called because associated with the Age of the Spirit that Joachim of Fiore had said would begin in 1260)[43] pitched against the Conventual Franciscans.[44] The Spirituals, who in the 13th century were led by the Joachimist Peter Olivi, adopted extremist positions that eventually discredited the notion of apostolic poverty and led to its condemnation by Pope John XXII.[45] This pope determined to suppress what he considered to be the excesses of the Spirituals, who contended eagerly for the view that Christ and his apostles had possessed absolutely nothing, either separately or jointly.[46] In March 1322, he commissioned experts to examine the idea of poverty based on belief that Christ and the apostles owned nothing. The experts disagreed among themselves, but the majority condemned the idea on the grounds that it would condemn the Church's right to have possessions.[43] The Franciscan chapter held in Perugia in May 1322 declared on the contrary: "To say or assert that Christ, in showing the way of perfection, and the Apostles, in following that way and setting an example to others who wished to lead the perfect life, possessed nothing either severally or in common, either by right of ownership and dominium or by personal right, we corporately and unanimously declare to be not heretical, but true and catholic."[43] One argument used by them was that John XXII's predecessors had declared the absolute poverty of Christ to be an article of faith and that therefore no pope could declare the contrary. Appeal was made in particular to the 14 August 1279 bull Exiit qui seminat, in which Pope Nicholas III stated that renunciation of ownership of all things "...both individually but also in common, for God's sake, is meritorious and holy; Christ, also, showing the way of perfection, taught it by word and confirmed it by example, and the first founders of the Church militant, as they had drawn it from the fountainhead itself, distributed it through the channels of their teaching and life to those wishing to live perfectly."[36][47]
By the bull Ad conditorem canonum of 8 December of the same year,[48] John XXII, declaring it ridiculous to pretend that every scrap of food given to the friars and eaten by them belonged to the pope, forced them to accept ownership by ending the arrangement according to which all property given to the Franciscans was vested in the Holy See, which granted the friars the mere use of it. He thus demolished the fictitious structure that gave the appearance of absolute poverty to the life of the Franciscan friars,[49] a structure that "...absolved the Franciscans from the moral burden of legal ownership, and enabled them to practise apostolic poverty without the inconvenience of actual poverty."[50] This document was concerned with disciplinary rather than doctrinal matters, but leaders of the Franciscans reacted with insistence on the irreformability of doctrinal papal decrees, with special reference to Exiit. A year later, John XXII issued the short 12 November 1323 bull Cum inter nonnullos,[51] which declared "erroneous and heretical" the doctrine that Christ and his apostles had no possessions whatever.[36][46]
The next year, the Pope responded to continued criticisms with the bull Quia quorundam of 10 November 1324,[52] He denied the major premise of an argument of his adversaries, "What the Roman pontiffs have once defined in faith and morals with the key of knowledge stands so immutably that it is not permitted to a successor to revoke it."[53] He declared that there was no contradiction between his own statements and those of his predecessors; that it could not be inferred from the words of the 1279 bull that Christ and the apostles had nothing: "indeed, it can be inferred rather that the Gospel life lived by Christ and the Apostles did not exclude some possessions in common, since living 'without property' does not require that those living thus should have nothing in common"; that there were many things in the Franciscan rule "...which Christ neither taught nor confirmed by his example," and that there was neither merit nor truth in pretending Christ and the apostles had no rights in law.
In his book on the First Vatican Council, August Hasler wrote, "John XXII didn't want to hear about his own infallibility. He viewed it as an improper restriction of his rights as a sovereign, and in the bull Qui quorundam (1324) condemned the Franciscan doctrine of papal infallibility as the work of the devil."[54]
Brian Tierney has summed up his view of the part played by John XXII as follows:
Pope John XXII strongly resented the imputation of infallibility to his office – or at any rate to his predecessors. The theory of irreformability proposed by his adversaries was a 'pestiferous doctrine', he declared; and at first he seemed inclined to dismiss the whole idea as 'pernicious audacity'. However, through some uncharacteristic streak of caution or through sheer good luck (or bad luck) the actual terms he used in condemning the Franciscan position left a way open for later theologians to re-formulate the doctrine of infallibility in different language.[55]
In 1330, the Carmelite bishop Guido Terreni described the pope's charism of infallibility in terms very similar to those that the First Vatican Council was to use in 1870.
Post-Counter-Reformation[edit]
In the period following the Counter-Reformation the Dominican school of theology at the Roman College of Saint Thomas in Rome, the future Pontifical University of Saint Thomas Aquinas, Angelicum was active in defending the doctrine of Papal infallibility. Vincentius Ferre (+1682), Regent of College of St. Thomas from 1654 to 1672.[56] writes in his De Fide in defense of Papal Infallibility that Christ said "I have prayed for thee, Peter; sufficiently showing that the infallibility was not promised to the Church as apart from (seorsum) the head, but promised to the head, that from him it should be derived to the Church."[57] Dominic Gravina, professor of theology at the College of St. Thomas in Rome wrote concerning Papal infallibility: "To the Pontiff, as one (person) and alone, it was given to be the head," and again, "The Roman Pontiff for the time being is one, therefore he alone has infallibility."[58] Vincenzo Maria Gatti, also a professor of theology at the College of st. Thomas defended papal infallibility says of Christ's words "I have prayed for thee," etc., that "indefectibility is promised to Peter apart from (seorsum) the Church, or from the Apostles; but it is not promised to the Apostles, or to the Church. apart (seorsum) the head, or with the head," adding "Therefore Peter, even apart from (seorsum) the Church, is infallible."[59]
Dogmatic definition of 1870[edit]
Painting to commemorate the dogma of papal infallibility (Voorschoten, 1870). Right to left: Pope Pius IX, Christ and Thomas Aquinas
The infallibility of the pope was formally defined in 1870, although the tradition behind this view goes back much further. In the conclusion of the fourth chapter of its Dogmatic Constitution on the Church Pastor aeternus, the First Vatican Council declared the following, with bishops Aloisio Riccio and Edward Fitzgerald dissenting:[60]
We teach and define that it is a dogma Divinely revealed that the Roman pontiff when he speaks ex cathedra, that is when in discharge of the office of pastor and doctor of all Christians, by virtue of his supreme Apostolic authority, he defines a doctrine regarding faith or morals to be held by the universal Church, by the Divine assistance promised to him in Blessed Peter, is possessed of that infallibility with which the Divine Redeemer willed that his Church should be endowed in defining doctrine regarding faith or morals, and that therefore such definitions of the Roman pontiff are of themselves and not from the consent of the Church irreformable.
So then, should anyone, which God forbid, have the temerity to reject this definition of ours: let him be anathema. (see Denziger §1839).
—  Vatican Council, Sess. IV, Const. de Ecclesiâ Christi, Chapter iv
According to Catholic theology, this is an infallible dogmatic definition by an ecumenical council. Because the 1870 definition is not seen by Catholics as a creation of the Church, but as the dogmatic revelation of a truth about the papal magisterium, papal teachings made prior to the 1870 proclamation can, if they meet the criteria set out in the dogmatic definition, be considered infallible. Ineffabilis Deus is an example of this.
A British Prime Minister, William Ewart Gladstone, publicly attacked Vatican I, stating that Roman Catholics had "...forfeited their moral and mental freedom." He published a pamphlet called The Vatican Decrees in their Bearing on Civil Allegiance in which he described the Catholic Church as "an Asian monarchy: nothing but one giddy height of despotism, and one dead level of religious subservience." He further claimed that the Pope wanted to destroy the rule of law and replace it with arbitrary tyranny, and then to hide these "...crimes against liberty beneath a suffocating cloud of incense."[61] Cardinal Newman famously responded with his Letter to the Duke of Norfolk. In the letter he argues that conscience, which is supreme, is not in conflict with papal infallibility – though he toasts, "I shall drink to the Pope if you please – still, to conscience first and to the Pope afterwards."[62] He stated later that, "The Vatican Council left the Pope just as it found him," satisfied that the definition was very moderate, and specific in regards to what specifically can be declared as infallible.[63]
Lumen gentium[edit]
The dogmatic constitution Lumen gentium of the Second Vatican Ecumenical Council, which was also a document on the Church itself, explicitly reaffirmed the definition of papal infallibility, so as to avoid any doubts, expressing this in the following words:
This Sacred Council, following closely in the footsteps of the First Vatican Council, with that Council teaches and declares that Jesus Christ, the eternal Shepherd, established His holy Church, having sent forth the apostles as He Himself had been sent by the Father;(136) and He willed that their successors, namely the bishops, should be shepherds in His Church even to the consummation of the world. And in order that the episcopate itself might be one and undivided, He placed Blessed Peter over the other apostles, and instituted in him a permanent and visible source and foundation of unity of faith and communion. And all this teaching about the institution, the perpetuity, the meaning and reason for the sacred primacy of the Roman Pontiff and of his infallible magisterium, this Sacred Council again proposes to be firmly believed by all the faithful.
Instances of infallible declarations[edit]
The Catholic Church does not teach that the pope is infallible in everything he says; official invocation of papal infallibility is – apart from canonizations of saints – extremely rare. And those are usually regarded as not of divine faith, as they depend on facts that post-date New Testament revelation.
Catholic theologians agree that both Pope Pius IX's 1854 definition of the dogma of the Immaculate Conception of Mary and Pope Pius XII's 1950 definition of the dogma of the Assumption of Mary are instances of papal infallibility, a fact confirmed by the Church's magisterium.[64] However, theologians disagree about what other documents qualify.
Regarding historical papal documents, Catholic theologian and church historian Klaus Schatz made a thorough study, published in 1985, that identified the following list of ex cathedra documents (see Creative Fidelity: Weighing and Interpreting Documents of the Magisterium, by Francis A. Sullivan, chapter 6):
Tome to Flavian, Pope Leo I, 449, on the two natures in Christ, received by the Council of Chalcedon;
Letter of Pope Agatho, 680, on the two wills of Christ, received by the Third Council of Constantinople;
Benedictus Deus, Pope Benedict XII, 1336, on the beatific vision of the just after death rather than only just prior to final judgment;[65]
Cum occasione, Pope Innocent X, 1653, condemning five propositions of Jansen as heretical;
Auctorem fidei, Pope Pius VI, 1794, condemning seven Jansenist propositions of the Synod of Pistoia as heretical;
Ineffabilis Deus, Pope Pius IX, 1854, defining the Immaculate Conception;
Munificentissimus Deus, Pope Pius XII, 1950, defining the Assumption of Mary.
There is no complete list of papal statements considered infallible. A 1998 commentary on Ad Tuendam Fidem issued by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith published on L'Osservatore Romano in July 1998[66] listed a number of instances of infallible pronouncements by popes and by ecumenical councils, but explicitly stated (at no. 11) that this was not meant to be a complete list.
One of the documents mentioned is Pope John Paul II's apostolic letter Ordinatio Sacerdotalis on reserving priestly ordination to men alone,[67] which the Congregation earlier stated to be infallible, although not taught ex cathedra (i.e., although not a teaching of the extraordinary magisterium), clarifying that the content of this letter has been taught infallibly by the ordinary and universal magisterium.[68] This was confirmed in a commentary by the same Congregation[66] and in commentaries by Cardinals Joseph Ratzinger[69] and Tarcisio Bertone.[70] Many eminent theologians dispute that this is truly infallible, including Nicholas Lash, an ex-priest and Emeritus Professor of Divinity at the University of Cambridge.[71] The Catholic Theological Society of America in a report, "Tradition and the Ordination of Women", concluded that Ordinatio Sacerdotalis is mistaken with regard to its claims on the authority of this teaching and its grounds in Tradition.[72]
As well as popes, ecumenical councils have made pronouncements that the Church considers infallible.
Denial by Catholics[edit]
Examples of Catholics who before the First Vatican Council disbelieved in papal infallibility are French abbé François-Philippe Mesenguy (1677–1763), who wrote a catechism denying the infallibility of the pope,[73] and the German Felix Blau (1754–1798), who as professor at the University of Mainz criticized infallibility.[74]
In 1822, Bishop Baine declared: "In England and Ireland I do not believe that any Catholic maintains the Infallibility of the Pope."[75]
A 1989–1992 survey of young people of the 15 to 25 age group (81% of whom were Catholics, 84% were younger than 19, and 62% were male) chiefly from the United States, but also from Austria, Canada, Ecuador, France, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Peru, Spain and Switzerland, found that 36.9% affirmed that, "The Pope has the authority to speak with infallibility," 36.9% (exactly the same proportion) denied it, and 26.2% said they didn't know.[76]
In addition, before 1870, belief in papal infallibility was not a defined requirement of Catholic faith. The Church therefore accepted the oath required of Catholics in Ireland from 1793 for admittance to certain positions and stated that, "It is not an article of the Catholic Faith, neither am I thereby required to believe or profess that the Pope is infallible."[75] The Irish bishops repeated their acceptance in a 25 January 1826 pastoral address to the Catholic clergy and laity in Ireland, stating: "The Catholics of Ireland not only do not believe, but they declare upon oath ... that it is not an article of the Catholic faith, neither are they required to believe, that the Pope is infallible, and that they do not hold themselves 'bound to obey any order in its own nature immoral', though the Pope or any ecclesiastical power should issue or direct such an order; but, on the contrary, that it would be sinful in them to pay any respect or obedience thereto."[77]
In the Declaration and Protestation signed by the English Catholic Dissenters in 1789, the year of the French Revolution,[78] the signatories state:[79]
We have also been accused of holding, as a Principle of our Religion, That implicit Obedience is due from us to the Orders and Decrees of Popes and General Councils; and that therefore if the Pope, or any General Council, should, for the Good of the Church, command us to take up Arms against the Government, or by any means to subvert the Laws and Liberties of this Country, or to exterminate Persons of a different Persuasion from us, we (it is asserted by our Accusers) hold ourselves bound to obey such Orders or Decrees, on pain of eternal Fire:
Whereas we positively deny, That we owe any such Obedience to the Pope and General Council, or to either of them; and we believe that no Act that is in itself immoral or dishonest can ever be justified by or under Colour that it is done either for the Good of the Church, or in Obedience to any ecclesiastical Power whatever. We acknowledge no Infallibility in the Pope, and we neither apprehend nor believe, that our Disobedience to any such Orders or Decrees (should any such be given or made) could subject us to any Punishment whatever.
Sparrow Simpson remarked that, "All works reprinted since 1870 have been altered into conformity with Vatican ideas. In some cases the process of reducing to conformity was begun at an earlier date. It is therefore with works printed before 1870 that we are now concerned." He therefore cites editions prior to that date.[80]
In his theological works published in 1829, Professor Delahogue asserted that the doctrine that the Roman Pontiff, even when he speaks ex cathedra, is possessed of the gift of inerrancy or is superior to General Councils may be denied without loss of faith or risk of heresy or schism.[81]
In his 1829 study On the Church, Delahogue stated: "Ultramontane theologians attribute infallibility to the Bishop of Rome considered in this aspect and when he speaks, as the saying is, ex cathedra. This is denied by others, in particular by Gallicans."[82]
The 1830 edition of Berrington and Kirk's Faith of Catholics stated: "Papal definitions or decrees, in whatever form pronounced, taken exclusively from a General Council or acceptance of the Church, oblige no one under pain of heresy to an interior assent."[80]
The 1860 edition of Keenan's Catechism in use in Catholic schools in England, Scotland and Wales attributed to Protestants the idea that Catholics were obliged to believe in papal infallibility:
(Q.) Must not Catholics believe the Pope himself to be infallible?
(A.) This is a Protestant invention: it is no article of the Catholic faith: no decision of his can oblige under pain of heresy, unless it be received and enforced by the teaching body, that is by the bishops of the Church.
Sparrow Simpson quotes also from the 1895 revision:
(Q.) But some Catholics before the Vatican Council denied the Infallibility of the Pope, which was also formerly impugned in this very Catechism.
(A.) Yes; but they did so under the usual reservation – 'in so far as they could then grasp the mind of the Church, and subject to her future definitions' ...[83]
In 1861, Professor Murray of the major Irish Catholic seminary of Maynooth wrote that those who genuinely deny the infallibility of the pope "are by no means or only in the least degree (unless indeed some other ground be shown) to be considered alien from the Catholic Faith."[84]
Critical works such as Roman Catholic Opposition to Papal Infallibility (1909) by W. J. Sparrow Simpson have thus documented opposition to the definition of the dogma during the First Vatican Council even by those who believed in its teaching but felt that defining it was not opportune.[85]
Following the 1869–1870 First Vatican Council, dissent arose among a few Catholics, almost exclusively German, Austrian, and Swiss, over the definition of papal infallibility. The dissenters, while holding the General Councils of the Church infallible, were unwilling to accept the dogma of papal infallibility, and thus a schism arose between them and the Church, resulting in the formation of communities in schism with Rome, which became known as the Old Catholic Churches. The vast majority of Catholics accepted the definition.[86]
Before the First Vatican Council, John Henry Newman, while personally convinced, as a matter of theological opinion, of papal infallibility, opposed its definition as dogma, fearing that the definition might be expressed in over-broad terms open to misunderstanding. He was pleased with the moderate tone of the actual definition, which "affirmed the pope's infallibility only within a strictly limited province: the doctrine of faith and morals initially given to the apostolic Church and handed down in Scripture and tradition."[86]
A few present-day Catholics, such as Hans Küng, author of Infallible? An Inquiry, and historian Garry Wills, author of Papal Sin, refuse to accept papal infallibility as a matter of faith. Küng has been sanctioned by the Church by being excluded from teaching Catholic theology. Brian Tierney agrees with Küng, whom he cites, and concludes: "There is no convincing evidence that papal infallibility formed any part of the theological or canonical tradition of the church before the thirteenth century; the doctrine was invented in the first place by a few dissident Franciscans because it suited their convenience to invent it; eventually, but only after much initial reluctance, it was accepted by the papacy because it suited the convenience of the popes to accept it."[87] Garth Hallett, "drawing on a previous study of Wittgenstein's treatment of word meaning," argued that the dogma of infallibility is neither true nor false but meaningless; in practice, he claims, the dogma seems to have no practical use and to have succumbed to the sense that it is irrelevant.[88]
Catholic priest August Bernhard Hasler (d. 3 July 1980) wrote a detailed analysis of the First Vatican Council, presenting the passage of the infallibility definition as orchestrated.[54] Roger O'Toole described Hasler's work as follows:[89]
It weakens or demolishes the claim that papal infallibility was already a universally accepted truth, and that its formal definition merely made de jure what had long been acknowledged de facto.
It emphasizes the extent of resistance to the definition, particularly in France and Germany.
It clarifies the 'inopportunist' position as largely a polite fiction and notes how it was used by Infallibilists to trivialize the nature of the opposition to papal claims.
It indicates the extent to which 'spontaneous popular demand' for the definition was, in fact, carefully orchestrated.
It underlines the personal involvement of the pope who, despite his coy disclaimers, appears as the prime mover and driving force behind the Infallibilist campaign.
It details the lengths to which the papacy was prepared to go in wringing formal 'submissions' from the minority even after their defeat in the Council.
It offers insight into the ideological basis of the dogma in European political conservatism, monarchism and counter-revolution.
It establishes the doctrine as a key contributing element in the present 'crisis' of the Roman Catholic Church.
Mark E. Powell, in his examination of the topic from a Protestant point of view, writes: "August Hasler portrays Pius IX as an uneducated, abusive megalomaniac, and Vatican I as a council that was not free. Hasler, though, is engaged in heated polemic and obviously exaggerates his picture of Pius IX. Accounts like Hasler's, which paint Pius IX and Vatican I in the most negative terms, are adequately refuted by the testimony of participants at Vatican I."[90]
Objections[edit]
Those opposed to papal infallibility such as Geisler and MacKenzie[91] say that it is contrary to Scripture and to the teaching of the early Church.[92]:480ff
On linguistic grounds and their understanding that Peter's authority was shared, James Robert White[93] and others say that Matthew 16:18 does not refer to Peter as the Rock. They argue that in this passage Peter is in the second person ("you"), but that "this rock," being in the third person, refers to Christ, the subject of Peter's truth confession in verse 16, and the revelation referred to in verse 17, who is explicitly affirmed to be the foundation of the church.[94] White cites Catholic authorities such as John Chrysostom and St. Augustine of Hippo as supporting this understanding, with Augustine stating, "On this rock, therefore, He said, which thou hast confessed. I will build my Church. For the Rock (petra) is Christ; and on this foundation was Peter himself built."[95]
They understand "keys" in the Matthean passage and its authority as primarily or exclusively pertaining to the gospel.[96]
They see the prayer of Jesus for Peter, that his faith fail not (Luke 22:32) as not promising infallibility to a papal office, which they hold to be a late and novel doctrine.[92]:479
While recognizing Peter's significant role in the early church, and his initial brethren-type leadership, they contend that the Book of Acts manifests him as inferior to the apostle Paul in his level of contribution and influence, with Paul becoming the dominant focus in the Biblical records of the early church, and the writer of most of the New Testament (receiving direct revelation), and having authority to publicly reprove Peter. (Gal. 2:11–14)
Geisler and MacKenzie also see the absence of any reference by Peter referring to himself distinctively, such as the chief of apostles, and instead only as "an apostle" or "an elder" (1 Pet. 1:1; 5:1) as weighing against Peter being the supreme and infallible head of the church universal, and indicating he would not accept such titles as Holy Father.
They say that the revelatory function connected to the office of the high priest Caiaphas, (Jn. 11:49–52) does not establish a precedent for Petrine infallibility, since (among other reasons) they infer from Revelation 22:18 that there is no new revelation after the time of the New Testament, as held also by Catholics.[91]
Likewise, they hold that no Jewish infallible magisterium existed, but the faith yet endured, and that the Roman Catholic doctrine on infallibility is a new invention.[97][98]
They see the promise of papal infallibly as violated by certain popes who spoke heresy (as recognized, they say, by the Roman church itself) under conditions that, they argue, fit the criteria for infallibility.[99][100]
They say that at the Council of Jerusalem Peter was not looked to as the infallible head of the church, with James exercising the more decisive leadership, and providing the definitive sentence;[101] and that he is not seen elsewhere as the final and universal arbiter about any doctrinal dispute about faith in the life of the church.[102]
They hold as unwarranted on scriptural and historical grounds the idea that monarchical leadership by an infallible pope is needed or has existed; that the infallible authority is the scriptures rather than an infallible head.[103][104] and that church leadership in the New Testament is understood as being that of bishops and elders, denoting the same office, rather than an infallible pope.[105][106] (Titus 1:5–7)
They argue further that the doctrine of papal infallibility lacked universal or widespread support in the bulk of church history,[92]:486ff and that substantial opposition to it existed within the Catholic Church, even at the time of its official institution, saying that this testifies to its lack of scriptural and historical warrant.[107][108][109]
Chapter 7 of Lytton Strachey's biography of Cardinal Manning includes a discussion of papal infallibility and some possible objections.[110]
Positions of some other churches[edit]
Eastern Orthodoxy[edit]
The dogma of papal infallibility is rejected by Eastern Orthodoxy. Orthodox Christians hold that the Holy Spirit will not allow the whole Body of Orthodox Christians to fall into error[111] but leave open the question of how this will be ensured in any specific case. Eastern Orthodoxy considers that the first seven ecumenical councils were infallible as accurate witnesses to the truth of the gospel, not so much on account of their institutional structure as on account of their reception by the Christian faithful.
Additionally, Orthodox Christians do not believe that any individual bishop is infallible or that the idea of papal infallibility was taught during the first centuries of Christianity. Orthodox historians often point to the condemnation of Pope Honorius I as a heretic by the Sixth Ecumenical council as a significant indication. However, it is debated whether Honorius' letter to Sergius met (in retrospect) the criteria set forth at Vatican I. Other Orthodox scholars[112] argue that past papal statements that appear to meet the conditions set forth at Vatican I for infallible status presented teachings in faith and morals are now acknowledged as problematic.
Anglican churches[edit]
The Church of England and its sister churches in the Anglican Communion reject papal infallibility, a rejection given expression in the Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion (1571):
XIX. Of the Church. The visible Church of Christ is a congregation of faithful men, in which the pure Word of God is preached, and the Sacraments be duly ministered according to Christ's ordinance, in all those things that of necessity are requisite to the same. As the Church of Jerusalem, Alexandria, and Antioch, have erred, so also the Church of Rome hath erred, not only in their living and manner of Ceremonies, but also in matters of Faith.
XXI. Of the Authority of General Councils. General Councils may not be gathered together without the commandment and will of Princes. And when they be gathered together, (forasmuch as they be an assembly of men, whereof all be not governed with the Spirit and Word of God,) they may err, and sometimes have erred, even in things pertaining unto God. Wherefore things ordained by them as necessary to salvation have neither strength nor authority, unless it may be declared that they be taken out of holy Scripture.
Methodism[edit]
John Wesley amended the Anglican Articles of Religion for use by Methodists, particularly those in America. The Methodist Articles omit the express provisions in the Anglican articles concerning the errors of the Church of Rome and the authority of councils, but retain Article V, which implicitly pertains to the Roman Catholic idea of papal authority as capable of defining articles of faith on matters not clearly derived from Scripture:
V. Of the Sufficiency of the Holy Scriptures for Salvation. The Holy Scripture containeth all things necessary to salvation; so that whatsoever is not read therein, nor may be proved thereby, is not to be required of any man that it should be believed as an article of faith, or be thought requisite or necessary to salvation...
Reformed churches[edit]
Presbyterian and Reformed churches reject papal infallibility. The Westminster Confession of Faith,[113] which was intended in 1646 to replace the Thirty-Nine Articles, goes so far as to label the Roman pontiff "Antichrist"; it contains the following statements:
(Chapter one) IX. The infallible rule of interpretation of Scripture is the Scripture itself: and therefore, when there is a question about the true and full sense of any Scripture (which is not manifold, but one), it must be searched and known by other places that speak more clearly.
(Chapter one) X. The supreme judge by which all controversies of religion are to be determined, and all decrees of councils, opinions of ancient writers, doctrines of men, and private spirits, are to be examined, and in whose sentence we are to rest, can be no other but the Holy Spirit speaking in the Scripture.
(Chapter Twenty-Five) VI. There is no other head of the Church but the Lord Jesus Christ. Nor can the Pope of Rome, in any sense, be head thereof; but is that Antichrist, that man of sin, and son of perdition, that exalts himself, in the Church, against Christ and all that is called God.
Evangelical churches[edit]
Evangelical churches do not believe in papal infallibility for reasons similar to those of Methodist and Reformed Christians. Evangelicals believe that the Bible alone is infallible or inerrant.[114] Most evangelical churches and ministries have statements of doctrine that explicitly say that the Bible, composed of the Hebrew Scriptures and the New Testament, is the sole rule for faith and practice. Most of these statements, however, are articles of faith that evangelicals affirm in a positive way, and contain no reference to the papacy or other beliefs that are not part of evangelical doctrine.
Claim that the Vatican was to dogmatize papal temporal power[edit]
[further explanation needed]
According to Raffaele De Cesare:
The first idea of convening an Ecumenical Council in Rome to elevate the temporal power into a dogma, originated in the third centenary of the Council of Trent, which took place in that city in December, 1863, and was attended by a number of Austrian and Hungarian prelates.[115]
However, following the Austro-Prussian War, Austria had recognized the Kingdom of Italy. Consequently, because of this and other substantial political changes: "The Civiltà Cattolica suggested that the papal infallibility should be substituted for the dogma of temporal power..."[116]
Moritz Busch's Bismarck: Some secret pages of his history, Vol. II, Macmillan (1898) contains the following entry for 3 March 1872 in pp. 43–44.
Bucher brings me from upstairs instructions and material for a Rome despatch for the Kölnische Zeitung. It runs as follows: "Rumours have already been circulated on various occasions to the effect that the Pope intends to leave Rome. According to the latest of these the Council, which was adjourned in the summer, will be reopened at another place, some persons mentioning Malta and others Trient. [...] Doubtless the main object of this gathering will be to elicit from the assembled fathers a strong declaration in favour of the necessity of the Temporal Power. Obviously a secondary object of this Parliament of Bishops, convoked away from Rome, would be to demonstrate to Europe that the Vatican does not enjoy the necessary liberty, although the Act of Guarantee proves that the Italian Government, in its desire for reconciliation and its readiness to meet the wishes of the Curia, has actually done everything that lies in its power."
Bismarck's reaction[edit]
According to F.B.M. Hollyday, Chancellor Otto von Bismarck feared that Pius IX and future popes would use the infallibility dogma as a weapon for promoting a potential "papal desire for international political hegemony":
Bismarck's attention was also riveted by fear of what he believed to be the desire of the international Catholic church to control national Germany by means of the papal claim of infallibility, announced in 1870. If, as has been argued, there was no papal desire for international political hegemony and Bismarck's resistance to it may be described as shadowboxing, many statesmen of the time were of the chancellor's persuasion. The result was the Kulturkampf, which, with its largely Prussian measures, complemented by similar actions in several other German states, sought to curb the clerical danger by legislation restricting the Catholic church's political power. [F.B.M. Hollyday, Bismarck, (Great Lives Observed, Prentice-Hall (1970) p. 6]
One example of the Catholic church's political actions, to add to the many that had occurred down the centuries, had already occurred in Italy on 29 February 1868, when the Sacred Penitentiary issued the decree Non Expedit, which declared that a Catholic should be "neither elector nor elected" in the Kingdom of Italy.[117][118] The principal motive of this decree was that the oath taken by deputies might be interpreted as an approval of the spoliation of the Holy See, as Pius IX declared in an audience of 11 October 1874.[118] Only in 1888 was the decree declared to be an absolute prohibition rather than an admonition meant for one particular occasion.[118][119][relevant? – discuss]
In 1872 Bismarck attempted to reach an understanding with other European governments, whereby future papal elections would be manipulated. He proposed that European governments should agree beforehand on unsuitable papal candidates, and then instruct their national cardinals to vote in the appropriate manner. This plan was circulated in ["Bismarck's confidential diplomatic circular to German representatives abroad," Berlin, 14 May 1872, as translated in: F.B.M. Hollyday, Bismarck, (Great Lives Observed, Prentice-Hall (1970) pp. 42–44], in which Bismarck wrote:
The concordats already concluded at the beginning of the century produced direct and, to some extent, intimate relations between the Pope and governments, but, above all, the Vatican Council, and both its most important statements about infallibility and about the jurisdiction of the Pope, also entirely altered his position in relation to the governments. Their interest in the election of the Pope increased to the greatest degree--but with that their right to concern themselves with it was also given a much firmer basis. For, by these decisions, the Pope has come into the position of assuming episcopal rights in every single diocese and of substituting papal for episcopal power. Episcopal has merged into papal jurisdiction; the Pope no longer exercises, as heretofore, individual stipulated special privileges, but the entire plenitude of episcopal rights rests in his hands. In principle, he has taken the place of each individual bishop, and, in practice, at every single moment, it is up to him alone to put himself in the former's position in relation to the governments. Further the bishops are only his tools, his officials without responsibility. In relation to the governments, they have become officials of a foreign sovereign, and, to be sure, a sovereign who, by virtue of his infallibility, is a completely absolute one – more so than any absolute monarch in the world. Before the governments concede such a position to a new Pope and grant him the exercise of such rights, they must ask themselves whether the election and person chosen offer the guarantees they are justified in demanding against the misuse of such rights. [p. 43]
When this scheme did not materialize, Bismarck accelerated his Kulturkampf against the Catholic Church in Germany.[citation needed]
Non-Christian equivalents[edit]
Islam stated the infallibility of the prophets and of tradition, but did not point a particular authority in present time as infallible. However, concepts of infallibility developed in some contemporary fundamentalist Islamic movements. In Judaism, the doctrine of Da'as Torah has grown some ideas regarding the infallibility of leading Ultra-Orthodox rabbis. These are far from being consented by all or even most of the Orthodox Jews, let alone others.
The Baha'i religion ascribes various forms or degrees of infallibility to Baha'u'llah, Abdul-Baha, Shoghi Effendi, and to the Universal House of Justice.
See also[edit]
Book: Criticism of the Catholic Church
Catholicism portal
Absolute monarchy
Da'as Torah
Lord Acton – opposed the doctrine
Papal supremacy
Primacy of the Roman Pontiff
Syllabus of Errors – an encyclical issued by the Holy See under Pope Pius IX on December 8, 1864.
Quanta cura another encyclical issued by the Holy See under Pope Pius IX on December 8, 1864.
Sola scriptura
Three-Chapter Controversy
Union of Utrecht (Old Catholic)
References and notes[edit]
Jump up ^ "Infallibility means more than exemption from actual error; it means exemption from the possibility of error," P. J. Toner, Infallibility, Catholic Encyclopedia, 1910
^ Jump up to: a b "Pius IX Vatican I". Ewtn.com. Retrieved 2016-12-21.
Jump up ^ Brian Gogan. "The Common Corps of Christendom: Ecclesiological Themes in the Writings of ..." Books.google.com. p. 33. Retrieved 2016-12-22.
Jump up ^ Erwin Fahlbusch et al. The encyclopedia of Christianity Eradman Books ISBN 0-8028-2416-1
Jump up ^ Wilhelm, Joseph and Thomas Scannell. Manual of Catholic Theology. Volume 1, Part 1. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co. Ltd. 1906. pp. 94–100
Jump up ^ Encyclopedia of Catholicism by Frank K. Flinn, J. Gordon Melton 207 ISBN 0-8160-5455-X p. 267
Jump up ^ "We declare, say, define, and pronounce that it is absolutely necessary for the salvation of every human creature to be subject to the Roman Pontiff."
Jump up ^ Manning, Henry Cardinal. Vatican Decrees in their Bearing on Civil Allegiance. London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1875. pp. 57, et. seq.: "But it is also true that these relations have been declared by the Church in acts and decrees of infallible authority. Such, for instance, is the bull of Boniface VIII., Unam Sanctam. As this has become the text and centre of the whole controversy at this moment, we will fully treat of it. This bull, then, was beyond all doubt an act ex cathedra... Whatever definition, therefore, is to be found in this bull is to be received as of faith."
Jump up ^ Fisher, George Parker. History of Christian Doctrine. Edinburgh: T&T Clark. 1896. p. 543
Jump up ^ "We declare, pronounce, and define that the doctrine which holds that the most Blessed Virgin Mary, in the first instance of her conception, by a singular grace and privilege granted by Almighty God, in view of the merits of Jesus Christ, the Savior of the human race, was preserved free from all stain of original sin, is a doctrine revealed by God and therefore to be believed firmly and constantly by all the faithful."
Jump up ^ MacArthur, John F., Jr. Charismatic Chaos. Grand Rapids: Zondervan. 1992. p. 90
^ Jump up to: a b "Catechism of the Catholic Church - Christ's Faithful - Hierarchy, Laity, Consecrated Life". Vatican.va. 20 February 1946. Archived from the original on 6 September 2010. Retrieved 21 December 2016.
Jump up ^ "Catechism of the Catholic Church - The Church, Mother and Teacher". Vatican.va. Retrieved 2016-12-21.
Jump up ^ "Catechism of the Catholic Church - Christ's Faithful - Hierarchy, Laity, Consecrated Life". Vatican.va. 20 February 1946. Archived from the original on 6 September 2010. Retrieved 21 December 2016.
Jump up ^ Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith's Letter “Iuvenescit Ecclesia”, 9 Finally, conciliar teaching constantly recognizes the essential role of pastors in the discernment of the charisms and their ordered exercise within the ecclesial communion.[27]...Footnote [27] Cf. Second Vatican Ecumenical Council, Dogmatic Constitution Lumen Gentium, 12: “judgment as to their genuinity and proper use belongs to those who are appointed leaders in the Church, to whose special competence it belongs, not indeed to extinguish the Spirit, but to test all things and hold fast to that which is good (cf. 1 Ts 5:12 and 19-21)”. Although this refers immediately to the discernment of extraordinary gifts, by analogy, what is stated here applies generically for every charism.
Jump up ^ "Catechism of the Catholic Church – The Church – People of God, Body of Christ, Temple of the Holy Spirit". Vatican.va. Retrieved 2016-12-21. It is in this sense that discernment of charisms is always necessary. No charism is exempt from being referred and submitted to the Church's shepherds. "Their office [is] not indeed to extinguish the Spirit, but to test all things and hold fast to what is good," (LG 12; cf. 30; 1 Thess 5:12, 19–21; John Paul II, Christifideles Laici, 24.) so that all the diverse and complementary charisms work together "for the common good." (1 Cor 12:7.)
Jump up ^ "Catechism of the Catholic Church". Vatican.va. 20 February 1946. Archived from the original on 29 April 2011. Retrieved 21 December 2016.
Jump up ^ "Pius IX Vatican I". Ewtn.com. Retrieved 2016-12-22.
Jump up ^ Fr. Christopher Phillips (16 June 2010). "Pastor Aeternus – The Anglo-Catholic". Theanglocatholic.com. Archived from the original on 23 December 2016. Retrieved 22 December 2016.
Jump up ^ "Papal Infallibility and the Canonization of Saints". Catholicplanet.com. Retrieved 2016-12-22.
Jump up ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 23 October 2013. Retrieved 7 November 2011.
Jump up ^ "Pope Has No Easy "Recipe" for Church Crisis." Zenit, 29 July 2005, retrieved 8 July 2009, zenit.org
Jump up ^ Sean, Michael (2010-11-12). "The 'straight arrow' theologian and the pope | National Catholic Reporter". Ncronline.org. Retrieved 2016-12-22.
Jump up ^ Hans Schwartz (2000). Eschatology. Eerdmans. p. 298. ISBN 978-0-8028-4733-1.
Jump up ^ "The Authority of the Popes". Catholic Front. Retrieved 14 February 2017.
Jump up ^ "Catholic Encyclopedia: Beatification and Canonization". Newadvent.org. Retrieved 2016-12-22.
Jump up ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 11 April 2013. Retrieved 22 April 2013.
Jump up ^ "Christian Teaching Authority and the Christian's Response". Vatican2voice.org. 1968-08-30. Retrieved 2016-12-21.
Jump up ^ "Catechism of the Catholic Church". Vatican.va. 1964-01-05. Retrieved 2016-12-21.
Jump up ^ Ludwig Ott, Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma, Bk. IV, Pt. 2, Ch. 2, §6.
Jump up ^ Die katholischen Missionen, September 1903
Jump up ^ Tierney, Brian (1 January 1988). "Origins of papal infallibility, 1150–1350: a study on the concepts of infallibility, sovereignty and tradition in the Middle Ages". Brill Archive. Retrieved 21 December 2016 – via Google Books.
Jump up ^ Gregory Lee Jackson, Catholic, Lutheran, Protestant (Self-published 2007 ISBN 978-0-615-16635-3), p. 185
Jump up ^ "Heft disagrees with Tierney's thesis that the roots of papal infallibility extend only to Olivi" (John V. Kruse, "Reevaluating The Origins of Papal Infallibility" (Saint Louis University 2005), p. 2)
Jump up ^ Kruse's conclusions on the basis of papal bulls of the time give uncertain results about the existence in them of the notion of papal infallibility (Abstract of John V. Kruse, "Reevaluating The Origins of Papal Infallibility" (Saint Louis University 2005)
^ Jump up to: a b c Klaus Schatz (1996). Papal Primacy. Collegeville, Minnesota: Liturgical Press. pp. 117–18. ISBN 978-0-8146-5522-1.
Jump up ^ Horst, Ulrich (1 January 1982). "Unfehlbarkeit und Geschichte: Studien zur Unfehlbarkeitsdiskussion von Melchior Cano bis zum I. Vatikanischen Konzil". Matthias-Grünewald-Verlag. Retrieved 21 December 2016 – via Google Books.
Jump up ^ Mark E. Powell (2009-01-27). Papal Infallibility: A Protestant Evaluation of an Ecumenical Issue. Books.google.com. p. 34. ISBN 9780802862846. Retrieved 2016-12-22.
Jump up ^ Klaus Schatz (January 1996). Papal primacy: from its origins to the present. Liturgical Press. pp. 118–. ISBN 978-0-8146-5522-1. Retrieved 7 October 2011.
Jump up ^ Tierney, Brian (1972). Origins of papal infallibility, 1150–1350: a study on the concepts of infallibility, sovereignty and tradition in the Middle Ages. Brill Archive. pp. 46–47.
Jump up ^ Dictatus Papae 1090; cf. Miller, M. C., (2005), Power and the Holy in the Age of the Investiture Conflict: A Brief History with Documents, (Bedford; New York), pp. 81–83.
Jump up ^ "Christianity: Papal infallibility". BBC. Retrieved 2016-12-22.
^ Jump up to: a b c "History of the Franciscan Movement (3)". Christusrex.org. 2001-12-30. Retrieved 2016-12-22.
Jump up ^ Brooke, The Image of St Francis, p. 100
Jump up ^ Philip D. Krey et al., Nicholas of Lyra: The Senses of Scripture (Brill 2000 ISBN 978-90-04-11295-7), p. 240.
^ Jump up to: a b Christopher Kleinhenz (2003). Medieval Italy: An Encyclopedia. 1. Routledge. p. 373. ISBN 978-0-415-93930-0.
Jump up ^ English translation 1; cf. English translation 2 and another translation in Rosalind B. Brooke, The Image of St Francis (Cambridge University Press 2006 ISBN 978-0-521-78291-3), p. 98
Jump up ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 12 January 2012. Retrieved 12 October 2011.
Jump up ^ Brooke, pp. 100–01
Jump up ^ "06.10.24, Nold, Pope John XXII and his Franciscan Cardinal". Scholarworks.iu.edu. Retrieved 2016-12-22.
Jump up ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 12 January 2012. Retrieved 12 October 2011.
Jump up ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 12 January 2012. Retrieved 11 October 2011.
Jump up ^ Tierney, Brian (1 January 1988). "Origins of papal infallibility, 1150–1350: a study on the concepts of infallibility, sovereignty and tradition in the Middle Ages". Brill Archive. Retrieved 21 December 2016 – via Google Books.
^ Jump up to: a b Hasler, A. B., (1981) How the Pope Became Infallible: Pius IX and the Politics of Persuasion (Doubleday; Garden City, NY), pp. 36–37
Jump up ^ Tierney, Brian (1 January 1988). "Origins of papal infallibility, 1150–1350: a study on the concepts of infallibility, sovereignty and tradition in the Middle Ages". Brill Archive. Retrieved 21 December 2016 – via Google Books.
Jump up ^ Remigius Coulon, Ferre: Vincent, in: Dictionary of Catholic Theology, ed. by A. Vacant, E. Mangenor and E. Amann, Vol 5/2, Paris 1913, 2176–77.
Jump up ^ Henry Edward Manning (1871). De Fide, quaest. xii, apud Rocaberti, tom. xx, p. 388, quoted in The Vatican Council and Its Definitions: Pastoral Letter to the Clergy. p. 105. Retrieved 2013-02-17. Ferre also writes:"The exposition of certain Paris (doctors) is of no avail, who affirm that Christ only promised that the faith should not fail of the Church founded upon Peter; and not that it should not fail in the successors of Peter taken apart from (seorsum) the Church"
Jump up ^ Henry Edward Manning (1871). The Vatican Council and Its Definitions: A Pastoral Letter to the Clergy. Books.google.com. p. 105. Retrieved 2016-12-22.
Jump up ^ Henry Edward Manning (1871). Gatti, Institutiones Apologetico-Polemicae, apud Bianchi de Constitutione Monarchica Ecclesiae, 124, Rome 1870, quoted in The Vatican Council and Its Definitions: Pastoral Letter to the Clergy. Books.google.com. Retrieved 2013-02-17.
Jump up ^ "Catholic Encyclopedia: Vatican Council". Newadvent.org. 1912-10-01. Retrieved 2016-12-22.
Jump up ^ Philip Magnus, Gladstone: A Biography (London: John Murray, 1963), pp. 235–36.
Jump up ^ Letter to the Duke of Norfolk in The Genius of John Henry Newman: Selections from His Writings. Ed. I. Ker. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.
Jump up ^ Stanley Jaki in Newman's Challenge p. 170
Jump up ^ John Paul II (24 March 1993). "General Audience Address of 24 March 1993". Archived from the original on 10 August 2011.
Jump up ^ "Benedictus Deus". Papalencyclicals.net. Retrieved 2017-09-15.
^ Jump up to: a b Ratzinger, Cardinal Joseph; Bertone, Cardinal Tarcisio. "Doctrinal Commentary on the Concluding Formula of the Professio Fidei".
Jump up ^ Pope John Paul II (22 May 1994). "Ordinatio sacerdotalis". Archived from the original on 18 January 2012.
Jump up ^ "Responsum ad propositum dubium concerning the teaching contained in "Ordinatio Sacerdotalis"". Vatican.va. 1995-10-28. Retrieved 2016-12-22.
Jump up ^ Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger. "Concerning the Reply of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith on the Teaching Contained in the Apostolic Letter "Ordinatio Sacerdotalis"". Catholicculture.org. Retrieved 2016-12-22.
Jump up ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 9 October 2007. Retrieved 10 November 2007.
Jump up ^ Letter to The Tablet, 16 June 2012
Jump up ^ Theologians Assess ‘Ordinatio Sacerdotalis’
Jump up ^ L. Lehner, Michael Printy (editors), eds. (2010). A Companion to the Catholic Enlightenment in Europe. Brill. p. 428. ISBN 978-90-04-18351-3. CS1 maint: Uses editors parameter (link)
Jump up ^ Lehner and Printy, Companion 2010, p. 151
^ Jump up to: a b "Roman Catholic opposition to papal infallibility". Archive.org. 2010-07-21. Retrieved 2016-12-22.
Jump up ^ "University of Dayton". Campus.udayton.edu. Retrieved 2016-12-22.
Jump up ^ Gladstone, Vatican Decrees, vol. xliii, ed. 1875, quoted in Sparrow Simpson, pp. 101–02
Jump up ^ Included in pp. 14–30
Jump up ^ Paragraphs 7–8 of the document
^ Jump up to: a b Sparrow Simpson, p. 106
Jump up ^ Sparrow Simpson, p. 107
Jump up ^ "Romano pontifici sub hoc ultimo respectu considerato, et ubi loquitur, ut dicunt, ex cathedra, infallibilitatem attribuunt Ultramontani theologi, quibus alii, et Galli speciatim, contradicunt" G. Finch, The Romish Controversy (British Society for Promoting the Religious Principles of the Reformation, London 1850), vol. II, p. 846
Jump up ^ Sparrow Simpson, pp. 111–12
Jump up ^ Sparrow Simpson, pp. 115–16
Jump up ^ "Roman Catholic opposition to papal infallibility". Archive.org. 2010-07-21. Retrieved 2016-12-22.
^ Jump up to: a b "Theological Studies – A journal of academic theology" (PDF). Ts.mu.edu. 2016-11-30. Retrieved 2016-12-22.
Jump up ^ Tierney, Origins of Papal Infallibility, 1150–1350 (Brill 1972), p. 281
Jump up ^ Darkness and Light: The Analysis of Doctrinal Statements (Paulist Press, 1975), and see Germain Grisez, "Note. Infallibility and Contraception: A Reply to Garth Hallett" in Theological Studies 47 (1986)
Jump up ^ Roger O'Toole, Review of "How the Pope Became Infallible: Pius IX and the Politics of Persuasion" by August Bernhard Hasler; Peter Heinegg, Sociological Analysis, Vol. 43, No. 1. (Spring, 1982), pp. 86–88, at p. 87.
Jump up ^ Mark E. Powell (2009-01-27). Papal Infallibility: A Protestant Evaluation of an Ecumenical Issue. Books.google.com. p. 23. ISBN 9780802862846. Retrieved 2016-12-22.
^ Jump up to: a b What Think Ye of Rome? Part Four: The Catholic-Protestant Debate on Papal Infallibility, Christian Research Journal, Fall 1994, p. 24
^ Jump up to: a b c Treat, John Harvey; Butler, G. H. Houghton (1888). The Catholic faith, or, Doctrines of the Church of Rome contrary to Scripture and the teaching of the primitive church. Bishop Welles Brotherhood. Retrieved 17 July 2011.
Jump up ^ James Robert White, Answers to Catholic Claims, 104–98; Crowne Publications, Southbridge, MA: 1990
Jump up ^ petra: Rm. 8:33; 1 Cor. 10:4; 1 Pet. 2:8; lithos: Mat. 21:42; Mk.12:10–11; Lk. 20:17–18; Act. 4:11; Rm. 9:33; Eph. 2:20; 1 Pet. 2:4–8; cf. Dt. 32:4, Is. 28:16; Ephesians 2:20 speaks of the church as "built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets"
Jump up ^ Augustine, On the Gospel of John Tractate 12435, The Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers Series I, Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1983, 7:450, as cited in White, Answers to Catholic Claims, p. 106
Jump up ^ John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion, p. 1105; Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1960
Jump up ^ "Alpha and Omega Ministries, The Christian Apologetics Ministry of James R. White". Vintage.aomin.org. Retrieved 2016-12-22.
Jump up ^ "Alpha and Omega Ministries, The Christian Apologetics Ministry of James R. White". Vintage.aomin.org. Retrieved 2016-12-22.
Jump up ^ Richard Frederick Littledale, Plain reasons against joining the Church of Rome, pp. 157–59.
Jump up ^ E. J. V. Huiginn, From Rome to Protestantism, The Forum, Volume 5, p. 111
Jump up ^ F. F. Bruce, Peter, Stephen, James and John, 86ff; Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1979
Jump up ^ Peter De Rosa, Vicars of Christ: the Dark Side of the Papacy
Jump up ^ E.J.V. Huiginn, From Rome to Protestantism, The Forum, Volume 5, pp. 111–13
Jump up ^ "Alpha and Omega Ministries, The Christian Apologetics Ministry of James R. White". Vintage.aomin.org. Retrieved 2016-12-21.
Jump up ^ "Alpha and Omega Ministries, The Christian Apologetics Ministry of James R. White". Vintage.aomin.org. Retrieved 2016-12-21.
Jump up ^ [1][dead link]
Jump up ^ Harold O. J. Brown, Protest of a Troubled Protestant, New Rochelle, NY: Arlington House, 1969; p. 122
Jump up ^ Williston Walker, A History of the Christian Church, 3d ed. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1970; p. 67
Jump up ^ E.J.V. Huiginn, From Rome to Protestantism, The Forum, Volume 5, pp. 109–10
Jump up ^ "Eminent Victorians/Cardinal Manning - Wikisource, the free online library". En.wikisource.org. Retrieved 2016-12-21.
Jump up ^ Encyclical of the Eastern Patriarchs of 1848
Jump up ^ Cleenewerck, Laurent. His Broken Body: Understanding and Healing the Schism between the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Churches. pp. 301–30 [self-published source]
Jump up ^ "The Westminster Confession of Faith (1646)". Reformed.org. Retrieved 2016-12-22.
Jump up ^ Timothy Larsen; Daniel J. Trier (2007). The Cambridge Companion to Evangelical Theology. New York: Cambridge University Press. p. 38. ISBN 978-0-521-60974-6.
Jump up ^ De Cesare, Raffaele (1909). The Last Days of Papal Rome. Archibald Constable & Co. p. 422.
Jump up ^ De Cesare, Raffaele (1909). The Last Days of Papal Rome. Archibald Constable & Co. p. 423.
Jump up ^ "non expedit | Roman Catholicism". Britannica.com. Retrieved 2016-12-22.
^ Jump up to: a b c "Catholic Encyclopedia: Non Expedit". Newadvent.org. Retrieved 2016-12-22.
Jump up ^ "non expedit". Sapere.it. 2011-06-22. Retrieved 2016-12-22.
Bibliography[edit]
Bermejo, Luis (1990). Infallibility on Trial: Church, Conciliarity and Communion. imprimi potest by Julian Fernandes, Provincial of India. ISBN 0-87061-190-9.
Chirico, Peter. Infallibility: The Crossroads of Doctrine. ISBN 0-89453-296-0.
De Cesare, Raffaele (1909). The Last Days of Papal Rome. London: Archibald Constable & Co.
Gaillardetz, Richard. By What Authority?: A Primer on Scripture, the Magisterium, and the Sense of the Faithful. ISBN 0-8146-2872-9.
Hasler, Bernhard (1981). How the Pope became infallible: Pius IX and the Politics of Persuasion. Translation of Hasler, Bernhard (1979). Wie der Papst unfehlbar wurde : Macht und Ohnmacht eines Dogmas, (in German). R. Piper & Co. Verlag.
Küng, Hans. Infallible?: An inquiry. ISBN 0-385-18483-2.
Lio, Ermenegildo. Humanae vitae e infallibilità: Paolo VI, il Concilio e Giovanni Paolo II (Teologia e filosofia) (in Italian). ISBN 88-209-1528-6.
McClory, Robert. Power and the Papacy: The People and Politics Behind the Doctrine of Infallibility. ISBN 0-7648-0141-4.
O'Connor, James. The Gift of Infallibility: The Official Relatio on Infallibility of Bishop Vincent Gasser at Vatican Council I. ISBN 0-8198-3042-9.
Powell, Mark E. Papal Infallibility: A Protestant Evaluation of an Ecumenical Issue. ISBN 978-0-8028-6284-6.
Sullivan, Francis. Creative Fidelity: Weighing and Interpreting Documents of the Magisterium. ISBN 1-59244-208-0.
Sullivan, Francis. The Magisterium: Teaching Authority in the Catholic Church. ISBN 1-59244-060-6.
Tierney, Brian. Origins of Papal Infallibility, 1150–1350: A Study on the Concepts of Infallibility, Sovereignty and Tradition in the Middle Ages. ISBN 90-04-08884-9.
Harkianakis, Stylianos (2008). The Infallibility of the Church in Orthodox Theology. Sydney: St Andrew's Orthodox Press.
External links[edit]
"The Historical Origins of Papal Infallibility | Heft | Proceedings of the Catholic Theological Society of America". Ejournals.bc.edu. Retrieved 2016-12-22.
Bishop Joseph Fessler (1813–1872)
The true and the false infallibility of the Popes. (1871)
Catechism of the Catholic Church on infallibility (Holy See official website)
"Infallibility". Catholic Encyclopedia. 1913.
"Infallibility". Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). 1911.
Reynolds, Francis J., ed. (1921). "Infallibility". Collier's New Encyclopedia. New York: P.F. Collier & Son Company.
Catholicregister.org News article from the Catholic Register on Rethinking Papal Infallibilty.
[show]
v
t
e
Infallible declarations of the Catholic Church
Popes
Tome of Leo (449)
Benedictus Deus (1336)
Cum occasione (1653)
Auctorem fidei (1794)
Ineffabilis Deus (1854)
Apostolicae curae (1896)
Munificentissimus Deus (1950)
Ordinatio sacerdotalis (1994)
Evangelium vitae (1995)
Ad tuendam fidem (1998)
Ecumenical
councils
Nicaea I (325)
Constantinople I (381)
Ephesus (431)
Chalcedon (451)
Constantinople II (553)
Constantinople III (680–681)
Nicaea II (787)
Constantinople IV (869–870)
Lateran I (1123)
Lateran II (1139)
Lateran III (1179)
Lateran IV (1215)
Lyon I (1245)
Lyon II (1274)
Vienne (1311–1312)
Constance (1414–1418)
Basel/Florence (1431–1445)
Lateran V (1512/1517)
Trent (1545–63)
Vatican I (1869–1870)
Vatican II (1962–1965)
Catholicism portal
[show]
v
t
e
Popes of the Catholic Church
List of popes
graphical
canonised
Papal names
Tombs
extant
non-extant
Antipope
Pope emeritus
Papal resignation
Pope-elect
1st–4th centuries
During the Roman Empire (until 493)
including under Constantine (312–337)
Peter
Linus
Anacletus
Clement I
Evaristus
Alexander I
Sixtus I
Telesphorus
Hyginus
Pius I
Anicetus
Soter
Eleutherius
Victor I
Zephyrinus
Callixtus I
Urban I
Pontian
Anterus
Fabian
Cornelius
Lucius I
Stephen I
Sixtus II
Dionysius
Felix I
Eutychian
Caius
Marcellinus
Marcellus I
Eusebius
Miltiades
Sylvester I
Mark
Julius I
Liberius
Damasus I
Siricius
Anastasius I
5th–8th centuries
Ostrogothic Papacy (493–537)
Byzantine Papacy (537–752)
Frankish Papacy (756–857)
Innocent I
Zosimus
Boniface I
Celestine I
Sixtus III
Leo I
Hilarius
Simplicius
Felix III
Gelasius I
Anastasius II
Symmachus
Hormisdas
John I
Felix IV
Boniface II
John II
Agapetus I
Silverius
Vigilius
Pelagius I
John III
Benedict I
Pelagius II
Gregory I
Sabinian
Boniface III
Boniface IV
Adeodatus I
Boniface V
Honorius I
Severinus
John IV
Theodore I
Martin I
Eugene I
Vitalian
Adeodatus II
Donus
Agatho
Leo II
Benedict II
John V
Conon
Sergius I
John VI
John VII
Sisinnius
Constantine
Gregory II
Gregory III
Zachary
Stephen II
Paul I
Stephen III
Adrian I
Leo III
9th–12th centuries
Papal selection before 1059
Saeculum obscurum (904–964)
Crescentii era (974–1012)
Tusculan Papacy (1012–1044/1048)
Imperial Papacy (1048–1257)
Stephen IV
Paschal I
Eugene II
Valentine
Gregory IV
Sergius II
Leo IV
Benedict III
Nicholas I
Adrian II
John VIII
Marinus I
Adrian III
Stephen V
Formosus
Boniface VI
Stephen VI
Romanus
Theodore II
John IX
Benedict IV
Leo V
Sergius III
Anastasius III
Lando
John X
Leo VI
Stephen VII
John XI
Leo VII
Stephen VIII
Marinus II
Agapetus II
John XII
Benedict V
Leo VIII
John XIII
Benedict VI
Benedict VII
John XIV
John XV
Gregory V
Sylvester II
John XVII
John XVIII
Sergius IV
Benedict VIII
John XIX
Benedict IX
Sylvester III
Benedict IX
Gregory VI
Clement II
Benedict IX
Damasus II
Leo IX
Victor II
Stephen IX
Nicholas II
Alexander II
Gregory VII
Victor III
Urban II
Paschal II
Gelasius II
Callixtus II
Honorius II
Innocent II
Celestine II
Lucius II
Eugene III
Anastasius IV
Adrian IV
Alexander III
Lucius III
Urban III
Gregory VIII
Clement III
Celestine III
Innocent III
13th–16th centuries
Viterbo (1257–1281)
Orvieto (1262–1297)
Perugia (1228–1304)
Avignon Papacy (1309–1378)
Western Schism (1378–1417)
Renaissance Papacy (1417–1534)
Reformation Papacy (1534–1585)
Baroque Papacy (1585–1689)
Honorius III
Gregory IX
Celestine IV
Innocent IV
Alexander IV
Urban IV
Clement IV
Gregory X
Innocent V
Adrian V
John XXI
Nicholas III
Martin IV
Honorius IV
Nicholas IV
Celestine V
Boniface VIII
Benedict XI
Clement V
John XXII
Benedict XII
Clement VI
Innocent VI
Urban V
Gregory XI
Urban VI
Boniface IX
Innocent VII
Gregory XII
Martin V
Eugene IV
Nicholas V
Callixtus III
Pius II
Paul II
Sixtus IV
Innocent VIII
Alexander VI
Pius III
Julius II
Leo X
Adrian VI
Clement VII
Paul III
Julius III
Marcellus II
Paul IV
Pius IV
Pius V
Gregory XIII
Sixtus V
Urban VII
Gregory XIV
Innocent IX
Clement VIII
17th–20th centuries
Revolutionary Papacy (1775–1848)
Roman Question (1870–1929)
Vatican City (1929–present)
World War II (1939–1945)
Cold War (1945–1991)
Leo XI
Paul V
Gregory XV
Urban VIII
Innocent X
Alexander VII
Clement IX
Clement X
Innocent XI
Alexander VIII
Innocent XII
Clement XI
Innocent XIII
Benedict XIII
Clement XII
Benedict XIV
Clement XIII
Clement XIV
Pius VI
Pius VII
Leo XII
Pius VIII
Gregory XVI
Pius IX
Leo XIII
Pius X
Benedict XV
Pius XI
Pius XII
John XXIII
Paul VI
John Paul I
John Paul II
21st century
Benedict XVI
Francis
History of the papacy
Antiquity and Early
Middle Ages
During the Roman Empire (until 493)
Under Constantine (312–337)
Ostrogothic Papacy (493–537)
Byzantine Papacy (537–752)
Frankish Papacy (756–857)
Saeculum obscurum (904–964)
Crescentii era (974–1012)
High and Late
Middle Ages
Tusculan Papacy (1012–1044 / 1048)
Imperial Papacy (1048–1257)
Wandering Papacy
Viterbo, 1257–1281
Orvieto, 1262–1297
Perugia, 1228–1304
Avignon Papacy (1309–1378)
Western Schism (1378–1417)
Early Modern and
Modern Era
Renaissance Papacy (1417–1534)
Reformation Papacy (1534–1585)
Baroque Papacy (1585–1689)
Revolutionary Papacy (1775–1848)
Roman Question (1870–1929)
Vatican City (1929–present)
WWII (1939–1945)
Book
Category
Pope portal
Catholicism portal
[show]
v
t
e
History of the Catholic Church
General
History of the Catholic Church
By country or region
History of the Papacy
Timeline of the Catholic Church
Catholic ecumenical councils
History of the Roman Curia
Catholic Church art
Religious institutes
Christian monasticism
Papal States
Role of Christianity in civilization
Church beginnings,
Great Church
Jesus
John the Baptist
Apostles
Peter
John
Paul
Saint Stephen
Great Commission
Council of Jerusalem
Apostolic Age
Apostolic Fathers
Ignatius of Antioch
Irenaeus
Pope Victor I
Tertullian
Constantine to
Pope Gregory I
Constantine the Great and Christianity
Arianism
Archbasilica of St. John Lateran
First Council of Nicaea
Pope Sylvester I
First Council of Constantinople
Biblical canon
Jerome
Vulgate
Council of Ephesus
Council of Chalcedon
Benedict of Nursia
Second Council of Constantinople
Pope Gregory I
Gregorian chant
Early Middle Ages
Third Council of Constantinople
Saint Boniface
Byzantine Iconoclasm
Second Council of Nicaea
Charlemagne
Pope Leo III
Fourth Council of Constantinople
East–West Schism
High Middle Ages
Pope Urban II
Investiture Controversy
Crusades
First Council of the Lateran
Second Council of the Lateran
Third Council of the Lateran
Pope Innocent III
Latin Empire
Francis of Assisi
Fourth Council of the Lateran
Inquisition
First Council of Lyon
Second Council of Lyon
Bernard of Clairvaux
Thomas Aquinas
Late Middle Ages
Pope Boniface VIII
Avignon Papacy
Pope Clement V
Council of Vienne
Knights Templar
Catherine of Siena
Pope Alexander VI
Reformation
Counter-Reformation
Reformation
Counter-Reformation
Thomas More
Pope Leo X
Society of Jesus
Ignatius of Loyola
Francis Xavier
Dissolution of the Monasteries
Council of Trent
Pope Pius V
Tridentine Mass
Teresa of Ávila
John of the Cross
Philip Neri
Robert Bellarmine
Baroque Period to the
French Revolution
Pope Innocent XI
Pope Benedict XIV
Suppression of the Society of Jesus
Anti-clericalism
Pope Pius VI
Shimabara Rebellion
Edict of Nantes
Dechristianization of France during the French Revolution
19th century
Pope Pius VII
Pope Pius IX
Dogma of the Immaculate Conception of the Virgin Mary
Our Lady of La Salette
Our Lady of Lourdes
First Vatican Council
Papal infallibility
Pope Leo XIII
Mary of the Divine Heart
Prayer of Consecration to the Sacred Heart
Rerum novarum
20th century
Pope Pius X
Our Lady of Fátima
Persecutions of the Catholic Church and Pius XII
Pope Pius XII
Pope Pius XII Consecration to the Immaculate Heart of Mary
Dogma of the Assumption of the Virgin Mary
Lateran Treaty
Pope John XXIII
Second Vatican Council
Pope Paul VI
Pope John Paul I
Pope John Paul II
World Youth Day
1995
2000
21st century
Catholic Church sexual abuse cases
Pope Benedict XVI
World Youth Day
2002
2005
2008
2011
2013
2016
Pope Francis
Pope portal
Vatican City portal
Catholicism portal
[show]
v
t
e
Catholic Church
Index
Outline
History
(Timeline)
Jesus
Holy Family
Mary
Joseph
Apostles
Early Christianity
History of the papacy
Ecumenical councils
Missions
Great Schism of East
Crusades
Great Schism of West
Protestant Reformation
Council of Trent
Counter-Reformation
Catholic Church by country
Vatican City
index
outline
Second Vatican Council
Hierarchy
(Precedence)
Pope (List)
Pope Francis (2013–present)
conclave
inauguration
theology
canonizations
visits
Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI (2005–2013)
Roman Curia
College of Cardinals
Cardinal
List
Patriarchate
Episcopal conference
Patriarch
Major archbishop
Primate
Metropolitan
Archbishop
Diocesan bishop
Coadjutor bishop
Auxiliary bishop
Titular bishop
Bishop emeritus
Abbot
Abbess
Superior general
Provincial superior
Grand Master
Prior (-ess)
Priest
Brother
Friar
Sister
Monk
Nun
Hermit
Master of novices
Novice
Oblate
Postulant
Laity
Theology
Body and soul
Bible
Catechism
Divine grace
Dogma
Ecclesiology
Four Marks of the Church
Original sin
List
Salvation
Sermon on the Mount
Ten Commandments
Trinity
Worship
Mariology
Assumption
History
Immaculate Conception
Mariology of the popes
Mariology of the saints
Mother of God
Perpetual virginity
Veneration
Philosophy
Natural law
Moral theology
Personalism
Social teaching
Philosophers
Sacraments
Baptism
Confirmation
Eucharist
Penance
Anointing of the Sick
Last rites
Holy orders
Matrimony
Saints
Mary
Apostles
Archangels
Confessors
Disciples
Doctors of the Church
Evangelists
Church Fathers
Martyrs
Patriarchs
Prophets
Virgins
Doctors
of the
Church
Gregory the Great
Ambrose
Augustine of Hippo
Jerome
John Chrysostom
Basil of Caesarea
Gregory of Nazianzus
Athanasius of Alexandria
Cyril of Alexandria
Cyril of Jerusalem
John of Damascus
Bede the Venerable
Ephrem the Syrian
Thomas Aquinas
Bonaventure
Anselm of Canterbury
Isidore of Seville
Peter Chrysologus
Leo the Great
Peter Damian
Bernard of Clairvaux
Hilary of Poitiers
Alphonsus Liguori
Francis de Sales
Peter Canisius
John of the Cross
Robert Bellarmine
Albertus Magnus
Anthony of Padua
Lawrence of Brindisi
Teresa of Ávila
Catherine of Siena
Thérèse of Lisieux
John of Ávila
Hildegard of Bingen
Gregory of Narek
Institutes,
orders,
and societies
Assumptionists
Annonciades
Augustinians
Basilians
Benedictines
Bethlehemites
Blue nuns
Camaldoleses
Camillians
Carmelites
Carthusians
Cistercians
Clarisses
Conceptionists
Crosiers
Dominicans
Franciscans
Good Shepherd Sisters
Hieronymites
Jesuits
Mercedarians
Minims
Olivetans
Oratorians
Piarists
Premonstratensians
Redemptorists
Servites
Theatines
Trappists
Trinitarians
Visitandines
Associations
of the faithful
International Federation of Catholic Parochial Youth Movements
International Federation of Catholic Universities
International Kolping Society
Schoenstatt Apostolic Movement
International Union of Catholic Esperantists
Community of Sant'Egidio
Charities
Aid to the Church in Need
Caritas Internationalis
Catholic Home Missions
Catholic Relief Services
CIDSE
Particular
churches
(By country)
Latin Church
Eastern Catholic Churches: Albanian
Armenian
Belarusian
Bulgarian
Chaldean
Coptic
Croatian and Serbian
Eritrean
Ethiopian
Georgian
Greek
Hungarian
Italo-Albanian
Macedonian
Maronite
Melkite
Romanian
Russian
Ruthenian
Slovak
Syriac
Syro-Malabar
Syro-Malankara
Ukrainian
Liturgical rites
Alexandrian
Antiochian
Armenian
Byzantine
East Syrian
Latin
Anglican Use
Ambrosian
Mozarabic
Roman
West Syrian
Catholicism portal
Pope portal
Vatican City portal
Book
Name
Media
Category
Templates
WikiProject
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Papal_infallibility&oldid=826941378"
Categories:
Pope Pius IX
Catholic theology and doctrine
Holy See
Catholic terminology
Dogmatism
Papal primacy
Hidden categories:
CS1: Julian–Gregorian uncertainty
CS1 maint: Uses editors parameter
All articles with dead external links
Articles with dead external links from December 2016
Wikipedia references cleanup from July 2017
All articles needing references cleanup
Articles covered by WikiProject Wikify from July 2017
All articles covered by WikiProject Wikify
Use dmy dates from December 2014
Wikipedia articles needing clarification from July 2012
Wikipedia articles that may have off-topic sections
All articles with unsourced statements
Articles with unsourced statements from August 2013
CS1 German-language sources (de)
CS1 Italian-language sources (it)
Articles incorporating a citation from the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia with Wikisource reference
Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference
Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from Collier's Encyclopedia
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
Languages
العربية
Català
Čeština
Cymraeg
Dansk
Deutsch
Eesti
Ελληνικά
Español
Esperanto
فارسی
Français
한국어
Hrvatski
Bahasa Indonesia
Italiano
ქართული
Lietuvių
Magyar
മലയാളം
Nederlands
日本語
Norsk
Polski
Português
Română
Русский
Slovenščina
Српски / srpski
Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски
Svenska
தமிழ்
Türkçe
Українська
中文
26 more
Edit links
This page was last edited on 21 February 2018, at 21:19.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

values: jump-to-nav mw-jump

value: b

value: small

value: tr

value: tbody

value: table

attrs: class role

values: plainlinks metadata ambox ambox-style ambox-citation_style

values:
/wiki/Sacred_Scripture
mw-redirect
Sacred Scripture

values:
/wiki/Sacred_Tradition
mw-redirect
Sacred Tradition

values:
/wiki/Ecumenical_councils
mw-redirect
Ecumenical councils

values:
/wiki/Article_of_faith
mw-redirect
Article of faith

values:
/wiki/Unam_Sanctam
mw-redirect
Unam Sanctam

values: Edit section: Conditions for teachings being declared infallible

values:
/wiki/Apostle_(Christian)
mw-redirect
Apostle (Christian)

values:
/wiki/Pluralis_majestatis
mw-redirect
Pluralis majestatis

values: Edit section: Scripture and primacy of Peter

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.esvbible.org/Mark+3:16

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.esvbible.org/Mark+9:2

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.esvbible.org/Luke+24:34

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.esvbible.org/Matthew+16:18

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.esvbible.org/Luke+22:32

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.esvbible.org/Matthew+16:19

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.esvbible.org/John+21:15

values: Edit section: Primacy of the Roman pontiff

values:
/wiki/Primacy_of_the_Bishop_of_Rome
mw-redirect
Primacy of the Bishop of Rome

values:
/wiki/Clement_of_Rome
mw-redirect
Clement of Rome

values:
/wiki/Apostle_Peter
mw-redirect
Apostle Peter

values:
/wiki/Peter_Olivi
mw-redirect
Peter Olivi

values:
/wiki/Gratian_(jurist)
mw-redirect
Gratian (jurist)

values:
/wiki/Conventual_Franciscans
mw-redirect
Conventual Franciscans

values:
/wiki/Guido_Terreni
mw-redirect
Guido Terreni

values: Pontifical University of Saint Thomas Aquinas

values: Edit section: Dogmatic definition of 1870

values:
/wiki/Dogmatic_definition
mw-redirect
Dogmatic definition

values: Edit section: Instances of infallible declarations

values:
/wiki/Tome_of_Leo
mw-redirect
Tome of Leo

values:
/wiki/Christian_heresy
mw-redirect
Christian heresy

values:
/wiki/Ad_Tuendam_Fidem
mw-redirect
Ad Tuendam Fidem

values: Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith

values:
/wiki/Apostolic_letter
mw-redirect
Apostolic letter

values:
/wiki/Holy_Orders
mw-redirect
Holy Orders

values:
/wiki/Magisterial_infallibility
mw-redirect
Magisterial infallibility

values:
/wiki/Schism_(religion)
mw-redirect
Schism (religion)

values:
/wiki/Book_of_Acts
mw-redirect
Book of Acts

values:
/wiki/Apostle_Paul
mw-redirect
Apostle Paul

values: Edit section: Positions of some other churches

values:
/wiki/Holy_Spirit_(Christianity)
mw-redirect
Holy Spirit (Christianity)

values:
/wiki/Thirty-Nine_Articles
mw-redirect
Thirty-Nine Articles

values:
/wiki/Reformed_churches
mw-redirect
Reformed churches

values: Edit section: Claim that the Vatican was to dogmatize papal temporal power

values: The text near this tag needs further explanation. (July 2012)

values:
/wiki/Sacred_Penitentiary
mw-redirect
Sacred Penitentiary

values: The paragraph near this tag may contain information that is not relevant to the article's main topic. (August 2013)

values: There must be sources that say this. (August 2013)

values:
noprint Inline-Template Template-Fact
margin-left:0.1em; white-space:nowrap;

values:
/wiki/Baha%27i_religion
mw-redirect
Baha'i religion

values: display:table-cell;padding:0.2em 0.2em 0.2em 0.3em;vertical-align:middle

values: margin:0.5em 0 0.5em 1em;border:solid #aaa 1px

values:
/wiki/Primacy_of_the_Roman_Pontiff
mw-redirect
Primacy of the Roman Pontiff

values:
/wiki/Philip_D._Krey
mw-redirect
Philip D. Krey

values: Category:CS1 maint: Uses editors parameter

values:
nofollow
external text
http://vintage.aomin.org/Porvaz.html

values:
nofollow
external text
http://vintage.aomin.org/credenda.html

values:
nofollow
external autonumber
http://vintage.aomin.org/Presbyters.htm

values: This reference citation appears to be to a self-published source. (June 2015)

values: Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh Edition

values: s:Collier's New Encyclopedia (1921)/Infallibility

values: col navbox-title 3 background-color:gold

values:
/wiki/Ordinatio_sacerdotalis
mw-redirect
Ordinatio sacerdotalis

values:
navbox-image
2
width:1px;padding:0px 0px 0px 2px

values: Fourth Council of Constantinople (Roman Catholic)

values:
navbox-abovebelow hlist
3
background-color:gold

values: nowraplinks collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner

values:
col
navbox-title
3
background-color: gold

values:
/wiki/Pope_emeritus
mw-redirect
Pope emeritus

values:
/wiki/Papal_resignation
mw-redirect
Papal resignation

values:
navbox-abovebelow
3
background-color: gold

values:
row
navbox-group
background-color: gold;width:1%

values:
navbox-image
7
width:1px;padding:0px 0px 0px 2px

values:
/wiki/Baroque_Papacy
mw-redirect
Baroque Papacy

attrs: alt src title width height srcset data-file-width data-file-height

values: nowraplinks hlist collapsible collapsed navbox-inner

values: Template talk:History of the Catholic Church

values: Category:History of the Catholic Church by country

values:
navbox-image
11
width:1px;padding:0px 0px 0px 2px

values: Fourth Council of Constantinople (Catholic Church)

values: Prayer of Consecration to the Sacred Heart

values: Persecutions of the Catholic Church and Pius XII

values:
navbox-abovebelow hlist
3
background-color: gold

values: nowraplinks hlist collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner

values: Order of precedence in the Catholic Church

values: List of saints canonized by Pope Francis

values: List of pastoral visits of Pope Francis outside Italy

values:
/wiki/Pope_Emeritus
mw-redirect
Pope Emeritus

values: Veneration of Mary in the Catholic Church

values:
/wiki/Catholic_philosophy
mw-redirect
Catholic philosophy

values:
/wiki/Personalism_(Catholic)
mw-redirect
Personalism (Catholic)

values: List of Catholic philosophers and theologians

values:
/wiki/Baptism_(Catholic_Church)
mw-redirect
Baptism (Catholic Church)

values: Anointing of the Sick in the Catholic Church

values:
/wiki/Saint_(Catholic)
mw-redirect
Saint (Catholic)

values: Order of the Annunciation of the Blessed Virgin Mary

values: Canons Regular of the Order of the Holy Cross

values: Congregation of Our Lady of Charity of the Good Shepherd

values: Order of the Blessed Virgin Mary of Mercy

values: Directory of International Associations of the Faithful

values: International Federation of Catholic Universities

values:
/wiki/International_Kolping_Society
mw-redirect
International Kolping Society

values: International Union of Catholic Esperantists

values:
/wiki/Particular_church
mw-redirect
Particular church

values: Greek Catholic Church of Croatia and Serbia

values:
/wiki/Catholic_liturgical_rites
mw-redirect
Catholic liturgical rites

values:
/wiki/Name_of_the_Catholic_Church
mw-redirect
Name of the Catholic Church

values: Category:All articles with dead external links

values: Category:Articles with dead external links from December 2016

values: Category:Wikipedia references cleanup from July 2017

values: Category:All articles needing references cleanup

values: Category:Articles covered by WikiProject Wikify from July 2017

values: Category:All articles covered by WikiProject Wikify

values: Category:Use dmy dates from December 2014

values: Category:Wikipedia articles needing clarification from July 2012

values: Category:Wikipedia articles that may have off-topic sections

values: Category:All articles with unsourced statements

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from August 2013

values: Category:CS1 German-language sources (de)

values: Category:CS1 Italian-language sources (it)

values: Category:Articles incorporating a citation from the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia with Wikisource reference

values: Category:Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference

values: Category:Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from Collier's Encyclopedia

values: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

values: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

values: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

values: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

values:
/wiki/Papal_infallibility
View the content page [ctrl-alt-c]
c

values: Discussion about the content page [ctrl-alt-t]

values: p-namespaces navigation vectorTabs p-namespaces-label

values:
p-variants
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-variants-label

values: Past revisions of this page [ctrl-alt-h]

values: p-views navigation vectorTabs p-views-label

values:
p-cactions
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-cactions-label

values:
mw-wiki-logo
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page

values:
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page [ctrl-alt-z]
z

values: Featured content – the best of Wikipedia

values: Find background information on current events

values:
/wiki/Special:Random
Load a random article [ctrl-alt-x]
x

values: portal navigation p-navigation p-navigation-label

values: Guidance on how to use and edit Wikipedia

values: About the project, what you can do, where to find things

values: A list of recent changes in the wiki [ctrl-alt-r]

values: portal navigation p-interaction p-interaction-label

values: List of all English Wikipedia pages containing links to this page [ctrl-alt-j]

values: Recent changes in pages linked from this page [ctrl-alt-k]

values:
/wiki/Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard
Upload files [ctrl-alt-u]
u

values: A list of all special pages [ctrl-alt-q]

values: Permanent link to this revision of the page

values: Link to connected data repository item [ctrl-alt-g]

values: Printable version of this page [ctrl-alt-p]

values: عصمة بابوية – Arabic

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ca
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-cs
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-cy
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-da
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-et
display: none;

values: Αλάθητο του Πάπα – Greek

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-el
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-eo
display: none;

values: عصمت پاپی – Persian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-fa
display: none;

values: 교황 무류성 – Korean

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ko
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-hr
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-it
display: none;

values: პაპის უცდომელობა – Georgian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ka
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-lt
display: none;

values: മാർപ്പാപ്പയുടെ തെറ്റാവരം – Malayalam

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ml
display: none;

values: Непогрешимость папы римского – Russian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sl
display: none;

values: Папска непогрешивост – Serbian

values: திருத்தந்தையின் தவறா வரம் – Tamil

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ta
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-tr
display: none;

values: Догмат про непомильність Папи – Ukrainian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-uk
display: none;

values: /static/images/wikimedia-button-1.5x.png 1.5x, /static/images/wikimedia-button-2x.png 2x

values: /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_132x47.png 1.5x, /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_176x62.png 2x

values:
suggestions
display: none; font-size: 13px;

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Papal_infallibility rootpage-Papal_infallibility skin-vector action-view