text:
Y-Δ transform
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is about the mathematical technique. For the device which transforms three-phase electric power without a neutral wire into three-phase power with a neutral wire, see delta-wye transformer. For the application in statistical mechanics see, see Yang–Baxter equation. For the regional airline brand name for Delta Air Lines, see Delta Connection.
The Y-Δ transform, also written wye-delta and also known by many other names, is a mathematical technique to simplify the analysis of an electrical network. The name derives from the shapes of the circuit diagrams, which look respectively like the letter Y and the Greek capital letter Δ. This circuit transformation theory was published by Arthur Edwin Kennelly in 1899.[1] It is widely used in analysis of three-phase electric power circuits.
The Y-Δ transform can be considered a special case of the star-mesh transform for three resistors. In mathematics, the Y-Δ transform plays an important role in theory of circular planar graphs.[2]
Contents
[hide]
1 Names
2 Basic Y-Δ transformation
2.1 Equations for the transformation from Δ to Y
2.2 Equations for the transformation from Y to Δ
3 A proof of the existence and uniqueness of the transformation
4 Simplification of networks
5 Graph theory
6 Demonstration
6.1 Δ-load to Y-load transformation equations
6.2 Y-load to Δ-load transformation equations
7 See also
8 Notes
9 References
10 External links
Names[edit]
Illustration of the transform in its T-Π representation.
The Y-Δ transform is known by a variety of other names, mostly based upon the two shapes involved, listed in either order. The Y, spelled out as wye, can also be called T or star; the Δ, spelled out as delta, can also be called triangle, Π (spelled out as pi), or mesh. Thus, common names for the transformation include wye-delta or delta-wye, star-delta, star-mesh, or T-Π.
Basic Y-Δ transformation[edit]
Δ and Y circuits with the labels which are used in this article.
The transformation is used to establish equivalence for networks with three terminals. Where three elements terminate at a common node and none are sources, the node is eliminated by transforming the impedances. For equivalence, the impedance between any pair of terminals must be the same for both networks. The equations given here are valid for complex as well as real impedances.
Equations for the transformation from Δ to Y[edit]
The general idea is to compute the impedance R y {\displaystyle R_{y}} at a terminal node of the Y circuit with impedances R ′ {\displaystyle R'} , R ″ {\displaystyle R''} to adjacent nodes in the Δ circuit by
R y = R ′ R ″ ∑ R Δ {\displaystyle R_{y}={\frac {R'R''}{\sum R_{\Delta }}}}
where R Δ {\displaystyle R_{\Delta }} are all impedances in the Δ circuit. This yields the specific formulae
R 1 = R b R c R a + R b + R c R 2 = R a R c R a + R b + R c R 3 = R a R b R a + R b + R c {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}R_{1}&={\frac {R_{b}R_{c}}{R_{a}+R_{b}+R_{c}}}\\R_{2}&={\frac {R_{a}R_{c}}{R_{a}+R_{b}+R_{c}}}\\R_{3}&={\frac {R_{a}R_{b}}{R_{a}+R_{b}+R_{c}}}\end{aligned}}}
Equations for the transformation from Y to Δ[edit]
The general idea is to compute an impedance R Δ {\displaystyle R_{\Delta }} in the Δ circuit by
R Δ = R P R o p p o s i t e {\displaystyle R_{\Delta }={\frac {R_{P}}{R_{\mathrm {opposite} }}}}
where R P = R 1 R 2 + R 2 R 3 + R 3 R 1 {\displaystyle R_{P}=R_{1}R_{2}+R_{2}R_{3}+R_{3}R_{1}} is the sum of the products of all pairs of impedances in the Y circuit and R o p p o s i t e {\displaystyle R_{\mathrm {opposite} }} is the impedance of the node in the Y circuit which is opposite the edge with R Δ {\displaystyle R_{\Delta }} . The formula for the individual edges are thus
R a = R 1 R 2 + R 2 R 3 + R 3 R 1 R 1 R b = R 1 R 2 + R 2 R 3 + R 3 R 1 R 2 R c = R 1 R 2 + R 2 R 3 + R 3 R 1 R 3 {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}R_{a}&={\frac {R_{1}R_{2}+R_{2}R_{3}+R_{3}R_{1}}{R_{1}}}\\R_{b}&={\frac {R_{1}R_{2}+R_{2}R_{3}+R_{3}R_{1}}{R_{2}}}\\R_{c}&={\frac {R_{1}R_{2}+R_{2}R_{3}+R_{3}R_{1}}{R_{3}}}\end{aligned}}}
Or, if using admittance instead of resistance:
Y a = Y 3 Y 2 ∑ Y Y Y b = Y 3 Y 1 ∑ Y Y Y c = Y 1 Y 2 ∑ Y Y {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}Y_{a}={\frac {Y_{3}Y_{2}}{\sum Y_{Y}}}\\Y_{b}={\frac {Y_{3}Y_{1}}{\sum Y_{Y}}}\\Y_{c}={\frac {Y_{1}Y_{2}}{\sum Y_{Y}}}\end{aligned}}}
Note that the general formula in Y to Δ using admittance is similar to Δ to Y using resistance.
A proof of the existence and uniqueness of the transformation[edit]
The feasibility of the transformation can be shown as a consequence of the superposition theorem for electric circuits. A short proof, rather than one derived as a corollary of the more general star-mesh transform, can be given as follows. The equivalence lies in the statement that for any external voltages ( V 1 , V 2 {\displaystyle V_{1},V_{2}} and V 3 {\displaystyle V_{3}} ) applying at the three nodes ( N 1 , N 2 {\displaystyle N_{1},N_{2}} and N 3 {\displaystyle N_{3}} ), the corresponding currents ( I 1 , I 2 {\displaystyle I_{1},I_{2}} and I 3 {\displaystyle I_{3}} ) are exactly the same for both the Y and Δ circuit, and vice versa. In this proof, we start with given external currents at the nodes. According to the superposition theorem, the voltages can be obtained by studying the superposition of the resulting voltages at the nodes of the following three problems applied at the three nodes with current:
(1) ( I 1 − I 2 ) / 3 , − ( I 1 − I 2 ) / 3 , 0 {\displaystyle (I_{1}-I_{2})/3,-(I_{1}-I_{2})/3,0}
(2) 0 , ( I 2 − I 3 ) / 3 , − ( I 2 − I 3 ) / 3 {\displaystyle 0,(I_{2}-I_{3})/3,-(I_{2}-I_{3})/3} and
(3) − ( I 3 − I 1 ) / 3 , 0 , ( I 3 − I 1 ) / 3 {\displaystyle -(I_{3}-I_{1})/3,0,(I_{3}-I_{1})/3}
The equivalence can be readily shown by using Kirchhoff's circuit laws that I 1 + I 2 + I 3 = 0 {\displaystyle I_{1}+I_{2}+I_{3}=0} . Now each problem is relatively simple, since it involves only one single ideal current source. To obtain exactly the same outcome voltages at the nodes for each problem, the equivalent resistances in the two circuits must be the same, this can be easily found by using the basic rules of series and parallel circuits:
R 3 + R 1 = ( R c + R a ) R b R a + R b + R c , {\displaystyle R_{3}+R_{1}={\frac {(R_{c}+R_{a})R_{b}}{R_{a}+R_{b}+R_{c}}},} R 3 R 1 = R a R c . {\displaystyle {\frac {R_{3}}{R_{1}}}={\frac {R_{a}}{R_{c}}}.}
Though usually six equations are more than enough to express three variables ( R 1 , R 2 , R 3 {\displaystyle R_{1},R_{2},R_{3}} ) in term of the other three variables( R a , R b , R c {\displaystyle R_{a},R_{b},R_{c}} ), here it is straightforward to show that these equations indeed lead to the above designed expressions. In fact, the superposition theorem establishes the relation between the values of the resistances, the uniqueness theorem guarantees the uniqueness of such solution.
Simplification of networks[edit]
Resistive networks between two terminals can theoretically be simplified to a single equivalent resistor (more generally, the same is true of impedance). Series and parallel transforms are basic tools for doing so, but for complex networks such as the bridge illustrated here, they do not suffice.
The Y-Δ transform can be used to eliminate one node at a time and produce a network that can be further simplified, as shown.
Transformation of a bridge resistor network, using the Y-Δ transform to eliminate node D, yields an equivalent network that may readily be simplified further.
The reverse transformation, Δ-Y, which adds a node, is often handy to pave the way for further simplification as well.
Transformation of a bridge resistor network, using the Δ-Y transform, also yields an equivalent network that may readily be simplified further.
Every two-terminal network represented by a planar graph can be reduced to a single equivalent resistor by a sequence of series, parallel, Y-Δ, and Δ-Y transformations.[3] However, there are non-planar networks that cannot be simplified using these transformations, such as a regular square grid wrapped around a torus, or any member of the Petersen family.
Graph theory[edit]
In graph theory, the Y-Δ transform means replacing a Y subgraph of a graph with the equivalent Δ subgraph. The transform preserves the number of edges in a graph, but not the number of vertices or the number of cycles. Two graphs are said to be Y-Δ equivalent if one can be obtained from the other by a series of Y-Δ transforms in either direction. For example, the Petersen family is a Y-Δ equivalence class.
Demonstration[edit]
Δ-load to Y-load transformation equations[edit]
Δ and Y circuits with the labels that are used in this article.
To relate { R a , R b , R c } {\displaystyle \{R_{a},R_{b},R_{c}\}} from Δ to { R 1 , R 2 , R 3 } {\displaystyle \{R_{1},R_{2},R_{3}\}} from Y, the impedance between two corresponding nodes is compared. The impedance in either configuration is determined as if one of the nodes is disconnected from the circuit.
The impedance between N1 and N2 with N3 disconnected in Δ:
R Δ ( N 1 , N 2 ) = R c ∥ ( R a + R b ) = 1 1 R c + 1 R a + R b = R c ( R a + R b ) R a + R b + R c {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}R_{\Delta }(N_{1},N_{2})&=R_{c}\parallel (R_{a}+R_{b})\\&={\frac {1}{{\frac {1}{R_{c}}}+{\frac {1}{R_{a}+R_{b}}}}}\\&={\frac {R_{c}(R_{a}+R_{b})}{R_{a}+R_{b}+R_{c}}}\end{aligned}}}
To simplify, let R T {\displaystyle R_{T}} be the sum of { R a , R b , R c } {\displaystyle \{R_{a},R_{b},R_{c}\}} .
R T = R a + R b + R c {\displaystyle R_{T}=R_{a}+R_{b}+R_{c}}
Thus,
R Δ ( N 1 , N 2 ) = R c ( R a + R b ) R T {\displaystyle R_{\Delta }(N_{1},N_{2})={\frac {R_{c}(R_{a}+R_{b})}{R_{T}}}}
The corresponding impedance between N1 and N2 in Y is simple:
R Y ( N 1 , N 2 ) = R 1 + R 2 {\displaystyle R_{Y}(N_{1},N_{2})=R_{1}+R_{2}}
hence:
R 1 + R 2 = R c ( R a + R b ) R T {\displaystyle R_{1}+R_{2}={\frac {R_{c}(R_{a}+R_{b})}{R_{T}}}} (1)
Repeating for R ( N 2 , N 3 ) {\displaystyle R(N_{2},N_{3})} :
R 2 + R 3 = R a ( R b + R c ) R T {\displaystyle R_{2}+R_{3}={\frac {R_{a}(R_{b}+R_{c})}{R_{T}}}} (2)
and for R ( N 1 , N 3 ) {\displaystyle R(N_{1},N_{3})} :
R 1 + R 3 = R b ( R a + R c ) R T . {\displaystyle R_{1}+R_{3}={\frac {R_{b}(R_{a}+R_{c})}{R_{T}}}.} (3)
From here, the values of { R 1 , R 2 , R 3 } {\displaystyle \{R_{1},R_{2},R_{3}\}} can be determined by linear combination (addition and/or subtraction).
For example, adding (1) and (3), then subtracting (2) yields
R 1 + R 2 + R 1 + R 3 − R 2 − R 3 = R c ( R a + R b ) R T + R b ( R a + R c ) R T − R a ( R b + R c ) R T {\displaystyle R_{1}+R_{2}+R_{1}+R_{3}-R_{2}-R_{3}={\frac {R_{c}(R_{a}+R_{b})}{R_{T}}}+{\frac {R_{b}(R_{a}+R_{c})}{R_{T}}}-{\frac {R_{a}(R_{b}+R_{c})}{R_{T}}}}
2 R 1 = 2 R b R c R T {\displaystyle 2R_{1}={\frac {2R_{b}R_{c}}{R_{T}}}}
thus,
R 1 = R b R c R T . {\displaystyle R_{1}={\frac {R_{b}R_{c}}{R_{T}}}.}
where R T = R a + R b + R c {\displaystyle R_{T}=R_{a}+R_{b}+R_{c}}
For completeness:
R 1 = R b R c R T {\displaystyle R_{1}={\frac {R_{b}R_{c}}{R_{T}}}} (4)

R 2 = R a R c R T {\displaystyle R_{2}={\frac {R_{a}R_{c}}{R_{T}}}} (5)

R 3 = R a R b R T {\displaystyle R_{3}={\frac {R_{a}R_{b}}{R_{T}}}} (6)
Y-load to Δ-load transformation equations[edit]
Let
R T = R a + R b + R c {\displaystyle R_{T}=R_{a}+R_{b}+R_{c}} .
We can write the Δ to Y equations as
R 1 = R b R c R T {\displaystyle R_{1}={\frac {R_{b}R_{c}}{R_{T}}}} (1)

R 2 = R a R c R T {\displaystyle R_{2}={\frac {R_{a}R_{c}}{R_{T}}}} (2)

R 3 = R a R b R T . {\displaystyle R_{3}={\frac {R_{a}R_{b}}{R_{T}}}.} (3)
Multiplying the pairs of equations yields
R 1 R 2 = R a R b R c 2 R T 2 {\displaystyle R_{1}R_{2}={\frac {R_{a}R_{b}R_{c}^{2}}{R_{T}^{2}}}} (4)

R 1 R 3 = R a R b 2 R c R T 2 {\displaystyle R_{1}R_{3}={\frac {R_{a}R_{b}^{2}R_{c}}{R_{T}^{2}}}} (5)

R 2 R 3 = R a 2 R b R c R T 2 {\displaystyle R_{2}R_{3}={\frac {R_{a}^{2}R_{b}R_{c}}{R_{T}^{2}}}} (6)
and the sum of these equations is
R 1 R 2 + R 1 R 3 + R 2 R 3 = R a R b R c 2 + R a R b 2 R c + R a 2 R b R c R T 2 {\displaystyle R_{1}R_{2}+R_{1}R_{3}+R_{2}R_{3}={\frac {R_{a}R_{b}R_{c}^{2}+R_{a}R_{b}^{2}R_{c}+R_{a}^{2}R_{b}R_{c}}{R_{T}^{2}}}} (7)
Factor R a R b R c {\displaystyle R_{a}R_{b}R_{c}} from the right side, leaving R T {\displaystyle R_{T}} in the numerator, canceling with an R T {\displaystyle R_{T}} in the denominator.
R 1 R 2 + R 1 R 3 + R 2 R 3 = ( R a R b R c ) ( R a + R b + R c ) R T 2 {\displaystyle R_{1}R_{2}+R_{1}R_{3}+R_{2}R_{3}={\frac {(R_{a}R_{b}R_{c})(R_{a}+R_{b}+R_{c})}{R_{T}^{2}}}}
R 1 R 2 + R 1 R 3 + R 2 R 3 = R a R b R c R T {\displaystyle R_{1}R_{2}+R_{1}R_{3}+R_{2}R_{3}={\frac {R_{a}R_{b}R_{c}}{R_{T}}}} (8)
Note the similarity between (8) and {(1),(2),(3)}
Divide (8) by (1)
R 1 R 2 + R 1 R 3 + R 2 R 3 R 1 = R a R b R c R T R T R b R c , {\displaystyle {\frac {R_{1}R_{2}+R_{1}R_{3}+R_{2}R_{3}}{R_{1}}}={\frac {R_{a}R_{b}R_{c}}{R_{T}}}{\frac {R_{T}}{R_{b}R_{c}}},}
R 1 R 2 + R 1 R 3 + R 2 R 3 R 1 = R a , {\displaystyle {\frac {R_{1}R_{2}+R_{1}R_{3}+R_{2}R_{3}}{R_{1}}}=R_{a},}
which is the equation for R a {\displaystyle R_{a}} . Dividing (8) by (2) or (3) (expressions for R 2 {\displaystyle R_{2}} or R 3 {\displaystyle R_{3}} ) gives the remaining equations.
See also[edit]
Star-mesh transform
Analysis of resistive circuits
Electrical network, three-phase power, polyphase systems for examples of Y and Δ connections
AC motor for a discussion of the Y-Δ starting technique
Notes[edit]
Jump up ^ A.E. Kennelly, "Equivalence of triangles and three-pointed stars in conducting networks", Electrical World and Engineer, vol. 34, pp. 413–414, 1899.
Jump up ^ E.B. Curtis, D. Ingerman, J.A. Morrow, Circular planar graphs and resistor networks, Linear Algebra and its Applications, vol. 238, pp. 115–150, 1998.
Jump up ^ Klaus Truemper. On the delta-wye reduction for planar graphs. J. Graph Theory 13(2):141–148, 1989.
References[edit]
William Stevenson, Elements of Power System Analysis 3rd ed., McGraw Hill, New York, 1975, ISBN 0-07-061285-4
External links[edit]
Star-Triangle Conversion: Knowledge on resistive networks and resistors
Calculator of Star-Triangle transform
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Y-Δ_transform&oldid=808475212"
Categories:
Electrical circuits
Electric power
Graph operations
Circuit theorems
Three-phase AC power
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
Languages
বাংলা
Català
Čeština
Deutsch
Español
فارسی
Français
한국어
हिन्दी
Hrvatski
Italiano
עברית
Nederlands
日本語
Polski
Português
Русский
සිංහල
Suomi
中文
Edit links
This page was last edited on 3 November 2017, at 02:31.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

key: html

type: local

value: div

attrs: id class

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

value: a

attrs: id class lang

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

values: jump-to-nav mw-jump

attrs: href title

attrs: role class

values:
note
hatnote navigation-not-searchable

value: b

attrs: href class title

values: /wiki/%CE%94 mw-redirect Δ

values:
/wiki/Arthur_Edwin_Kennelly
mw-redirect
Arthur Edwin Kennelly

value: sup

values: Circular planar graph (page does not exist)

values: Edit section: Equations for the transformation from Δ to Y

values: vertical-align: -1.005ex; width:2.831ex; height:2.843ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.338ex; width:2.467ex; height:2.509ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.338ex; width:2.926ex; height:2.509ex;

values: vertical-align: -2.671ex; width:13.011ex; height:6.343ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.671ex; width:3.383ex; height:2.509ex;

attrs: columnalign rowspacing columnspacing displaystyle

values: right left right left right left right left right left right left

values: 0em 2em 0em 2em 0em 2em 0em 2em 0em 2em 0em

values: vertical-align: -7.991ex; margin-bottom: -0.18ex; width:21.564ex; height:17.509ex;

values:
\begin{align}
  R_1 &= \frac{R_bR_c}{R_a + R_b + R_c} \\
  R_2 &= \frac{R_aR_c}{R_a + R_b + R_c} \\
  R_3 &= \frac{R_aR_b}{R_a + R_b + R_c}
\end{align}

values: Edit section: Equations for the transformation from Y to Δ

values: vertical-align: -2.671ex; width:15.341ex; height:6.176ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.671ex; width:29.075ex; height:2.509ex;

values: vertical-align: -1.005ex; width:8.013ex; height:2.843ex;

values: vertical-align: -7.989ex; margin-bottom: -0.183ex; width:30.298ex; height:17.509ex;

values: vertical-align: -8.838ex; width:12.873ex; height:18.843ex;

values: Edit section: A proof of the existence and uniqueness of the transformation

values: vertical-align: -0.671ex; width:5.899ex; height:2.509ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.671ex; width:2.427ex; height:2.509ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.671ex; width:6.921ex; height:2.509ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.671ex; width:2.938ex; height:2.509ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.671ex; width:5.235ex; height:2.509ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.671ex; width:2.095ex; height:2.509ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.838ex; width:27.515ex; height:2.843ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.671ex; width:16.269ex; height:2.509ex;

values: vertical-align: -2.338ex; width:27.156ex; height:6.176ex;

values: vertical-align: -2.338ex; width:11.158ex; height:5.843ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.671ex; width:10.597ex; height:2.509ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.671ex; width:10.418ex; height:2.509ex;

values: Edit section: Simplification of networks

values: Edit section: Δ-load to Y-load transformation equations

values: vertical-align: -0.838ex; width:12.764ex; height:2.843ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.838ex; width:12.943ex; height:2.843ex;

values: vertical-align: -7.838ex; width:31.468ex; height:16.843ex;

values:
\begin{align}
  R_\Delta(N_1, N_2) &= R_c \parallel (R_a + R_b) \\
                     &= \frac{1}{\frac{1}{R_c} + \frac{1}{R_a + R_b}} \\
                     &= \frac{R_c(R_a + R_b)}{R_a + R_b + R_c}
\end{align}

values: vertical-align: -0.671ex; width:3.171ex; height:2.509ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.671ex; width:20.311ex; height:2.509ex;

values: vertical-align: -2.338ex; width:29.089ex; height:6.176ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.838ex; width:23.651ex; height:2.843ex;

values: vertical-align: -2.338ex; width:25.478ex; height:6.176ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.838ex; width:10.526ex; height:2.843ex;

values: vertical-align: -2.338ex; width:26.136ex; height:6.176ex;

values: vertical-align: -2.338ex; width:81.621ex; height:6.176ex;

values: vertical-align: -2.338ex; width:14.572ex; height:5.843ex;

values: vertical-align: -2.338ex; width:12.884ex; height:5.843ex;

values: vertical-align: -2.338ex; width:12.227ex; height:5.843ex;

values: vertical-align: -2.338ex; width:12.391ex; height:5.843ex;

values: vertical-align: -2.338ex; width:12.384ex; height:5.843ex;

values: Edit section: Y-load to Δ-load transformation equations

values: vertical-align: -2.338ex; width:13.042ex; height:5.843ex;

values: vertical-align: -3.005ex; width:18.057ex; height:6.843ex;

values: vertical-align: -3.005ex; width:18.063ex; height:7.176ex;

values: vertical-align: -3.005ex; width:17.946ex; height:6.843ex;

values: vertical-align: -3.005ex; width:57.579ex; height:7.176ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.671ex; width:8.329ex; height:2.509ex;

values: vertical-align: -3.005ex; width:52.684ex; height:6.843ex;

values: vertical-align: -2.338ex; width:34.993ex; height:5.843ex;

values: vertical-align: -2.338ex; width:42.768ex; height:5.843ex;

values: vertical-align: -2.338ex; width:30.204ex; height:5.843ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.671ex; width:2.884ex; height:2.509ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.671ex; width:2.836ex; height:2.509ex;

values:
/wiki/Analysis_of_resistive_circuits
mw-redirect
Analysis of resistive circuits

values:
catlinks mw-normal-catlinks
catlinks mw-normal-catlinks
interface

values: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

values: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

values: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

values: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

values:
/wiki/Y-%CE%94_transform
View the content page [ctrl-alt-c]
c

values: Discussion about the content page [ctrl-alt-t]

values: p-namespaces navigation vectorTabs p-namespaces-label

values:
p-variants
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-variants-label

values: Past revisions of this page [ctrl-alt-h]

values: p-views navigation vectorTabs p-views-label

values:
p-cactions
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-cactions-label

values:
mw-wiki-logo
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page

values:
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page [ctrl-alt-z]
z

values: Featured content – the best of Wikipedia

values: Find background information on current events

values:
/wiki/Special:Random
Load a random article [ctrl-alt-x]
x

values: portal navigation p-navigation p-navigation-label

values: Guidance on how to use and edit Wikipedia

values: About the project, what you can do, where to find things

values: A list of recent changes in the wiki [ctrl-alt-r]

values: portal navigation p-interaction p-interaction-label

values: List of all English Wikipedia pages containing links to this page [ctrl-alt-j]

values: Y-Δ রূপান্তর – Bangla

values: تبدیل ستاره-مثلث – Persian

values: स्टार-डेल्टा परिवर्तन – Hindi

values: Pretvorba spoja otpornika zvijezda - trokut – Croatian

values: Trasformazioni stella-triangolo – Italian

values: התמרת כוכב משולש – Hebrew

values: Transfiguracja (elektrotechnika) – Polish

values: Преобразование треугольник-звезда – Russian

values: Y-Δ පරිණාමනය – Sinhala

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Y-Δ_transform rootpage-Y-Δ_transform vector-experimental-print-styles vector-nav-directionality skin-vector action-view