text:
Roundabout
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is about the road junction. For other uses, see Roundabout (disambiguation).
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (December 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
It has been suggested that Traffic circle be merged into this article. (Discuss) Proposed since March 2018.
Movement within a roundabout in a country where traffic drives on the left. Note the clockwise circulation.
Movement within a roundabout in a country where traffic drives on the right. Note the anticlockwise circulation.
Roundabout in the centre of Colombo, Sri Lanka
A roundabout, also called a traffic circle, road circle, rotary, rotunda or island, is a type of circular intersection or junction in which road traffic flows almost continuously in one direction around a central island.[1]
So-called "modern" roundabouts require entering traffic to give way to traffic already in the circle and optimally observe various design rules to increase safety. Compared to stop signs, traffic signals, and earlier forms of roundabouts, modern roundabouts reduce the likelihood and severity of collisions by reducing traffic speeds and minimizing T-bone and head-on collisions.[2] Variations on the basic concept include integration with tram and/or train lines, two-way flow, higher speeds and many others.
Traffic exiting the roundabout comes from one direction, rather than three, simplifying the pedestrian's visual environment. Traffic moves slowly enough to allow visual engagement with pedestrians, encouraging deference towards them. Other benefits include reduced driver confusion associated with perpendicular junctions and reduced queuing associated with traffic lights. They allow U-turns within the normal flow of traffic, which often are not possible at other forms of junction. Moreover, since vehicles on average spend less time idling at roundabouts than at signalled intersections, using a roundabout potentially leads to less pollution.[3][4] When entering vehicles only need to give way, they do not always perform a full stop; as a result, by keeping a part of their momentum, the engine will produce less work to regain the initial speed, resulting in lower emissions. Research has also shown that slow moving traffic in roundabouts makes less noise than traffic that must stop and start, speed up and brake.[5]
Modern roundabouts are commonplace throughout the world. Half of the world's roundabouts are in France (more than 30,000 as of 2008), although the United Kingdom has more as a proportion of the road than any other country.[6]
Contents
[hide]
1 History
2 Modern roundabout
2.1 Terminology
3 Operation and design
3.1 Islands
3.1.1 Central
3.1.1.1 Art installations
3.1.2 Pedestrian
3.2 Pedestrian crossing
3.3 Bicycles
3.4 Capacity and delays
3.4.1 Capacity modelling
4 Safety
4.1 Vision-impaired pedestrians
5 Types of circular intersections
5.1 Gyratory system
5.2 Smaller, small or mini- roundabouts
5.3 Mini-roundabouts
5.4 Raindrop roundabouts
5.5 Balcony roundabout
5.6 Turbo roundabouts
5.7 Motorways
5.8 Access-controlled roundabouts
5.9 "Magic" roundabouts/ring junctions
5.10 Trams
5.11 Railways
5.12 Hamburger roundabout/throughabout/cut-through
5.13 Bicycle-pedestrian roundabouts
5.14 Traffic circles
6 See also
7 Notes
8 References
9 Sources
10 External links
History[edit]
Circular junctions existed before roundabouts, including the Circus in the city of Bath, Somerset, England, completed in 1768, part of a world heritage site; the 1899 Brautwiesenplatz in Görlitz, Germany;[7] the 1907 Place de l'Étoile around the Arc de Triomphe in Paris; the 1904 Columbus Circle in Manhattan; and several circles within Washington, D.C. The operating and entry characteristics of these circles differ considerably from modern roundabouts.[how?] In 1907, architect John McLaren designed one of the first American roundabouts for both autos and street cars (trams) in the Hanchett Residence Park in what is now San Jose, California.[8] The first British circular junction was built in Letchworth Garden City in 1909. Its centre originally was intended partly as a traffic island for pedestrians.[9][10] It was featured in the film The World's End. In the early 20th century, numerous traffic circles were constructed in the United States, particularly in the northeast.[citation needed] Examples include a circle in Atherton, California.[11]
Widespread use of the modern roundabout began when the UK's Transport Research Laboratory engineers re-engineered circular intersections during the 1960s. Frank Blackmore led the development of the offside priority rule and subsequently invented the mini-roundabout[12][13] to overcome capacity and safety limitations. The design became mandatory in the United Kingdom for all new roundabouts in November 1966. This give-way requirement has been the law in New York state since the 1920s.
In the United States modern roundabouts emerged in the 1990s. Municipalities introducing new roundabouts often are met with some degree of public resistance, just as in the United Kingdom in the 1960s. Surveys show that negative public opinion reverses as drivers gain experience with roundabouts. American confusion at how to enter and especially how to exit a roundabout was the subject of mockery such as featured in the film European Vacation and the television series The Simpsons. By 2011, however, some 3,000 roundabouts had been established, with that number growing steadily.[14][15] A 1998 survey of municipalities found public opinion 68% opposed prior to construction; changing thereafter to 73% in favour.[16] A 2007 survey found public support ranging from 22% to 44% prior to construction, and several years after construction was 57% to 87%.[17] The first modern roundabout in the United States was constructed in Summerlin, Nevada in 1990.[citation needed] This roundabout occasioned dismay from residents, and a local news program said about it, "Even police agree, [roundabouts] can be confusing at times."[18]
As of the beginning of the twenty-first century, roundabouts were in widespread use in Europe. For instance, in 2010 France had more than 30,000 roundabouts.[14]
The United Kingdom's first roundabout (1909) in Letchworth Garden City
National Register of Historic Places plaque on the first traffic circle in the United States, at the intersection of River and Pleasant streets in Yarmouth, Massachusetts
Thomas Circle in Washington, D.C., 1922
Small roundabout in Barzio, Italy
Roundabout signs in Linköping, Sweden
Roundabout under construction in Ystad 2017.
The Hotel Indonesia Roundabout in Jakarta, Indonesia
Modern roundabout[edit]
Road sign examples
Europe (right-hand traffic); in the UK a similar sign, with the arrows reversed, is used at mini roundabouts.
The US and Canada (right-hand traffic); a similar sign is used in Ireland (with directions reversed).
UK (left-hand traffic)
Australia and New Zealand (left-hand traffic)
A "modern roundabout" is a type of looping junction in which road traffic travels in one direction around a central island and priority is given to the circulating flow. Signs usually direct traffic entering the circle to slow and to give way to traffic already on it.[19][20]
Because low speeds are required for traffic entering roundabouts, they are physically designed to slow traffic entering the junction to improve safety, so that the roads typically approach the junction radially; whereas rotaries are frequently designed to try to increase speeds, and thus have roads that enter the traffic circle tangentially.
Because of the requirement for low speeds, roundabouts usually are not used on controlled-access highways, but may be used on lower grades of highway such as limited-access roads. When such roads are redesigned to take advantage of roundabouts, traffic speeds must be reduced via tricks such as curving the approaches.
Terminology[edit]
The word roundabout dates from early 20th century United Kingdom.[1]
In U.S. dictionaries the terms roundabout, traffic circle, road circle and rotary are synonyms.[21]
The U.S. Department of Transportation adopted the term modern roundabout to distinguish those that require entering drivers to give way to others. This article follows that convention and refers to other types as traffic circles or rotaries. Many old traffic circles remain in the northeastern US.[22] Some modern roundabouts are elongated to encompass additional streets, but traffic always flows in a loop.
In Massachusetts older circular intersections are called rotaries and the state enforces that restriction.[clarification needed]
The term traffic circle is not used in the United Kingdom, where most circular junctions meet the technical criteria for modern roundabouts. However, in some parts of the English Midlands, such as in Birmingham, roundabouts are commonly called "islands", which conflicts with the more generic use of the term "island" as a structure to divide traffic flow, and can cause confusion.
In the Channel Islands a third type of roundabout, known as "Filter in Turn", exists. Here approaching drivers neither yield to traffic on the roundabout, as normal, nor have priority over it (Traffic circle), but take it in turns to enter from each. Almost all of Jersey's roundabouts are of this type.[23]
In the Philippines, the term rotunda or rotonda is used in referring to roundabouts.
Operation and design[edit]
This section includes a list of references, but its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations. Please help to improve this section by introducing more precise citations. (December 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
The fundamental principle of modern roundabouts is that entering drivers give way to traffic within the roundabout without the use of traffic signals. Traffic circles typically require circling drivers to give way to entering traffic. Generally, exiting directly from the inner lane of a multi-lane roundabout is permitted, given that the intersecting road has as many lanes as the roundabout. By contrast, exiting from the inner lane of a traffic circle is usually not permitted without first merging to the circle's outside lane.
Vehicles circulate around the central island in one direction at speeds of 25–40 km/h (15–25 mph). Direction is determined by whether traffic drives on the right- or left-hand side of the road. In left-hand traffic countries the circulation is clockwise; in others, it is anticlockwise.
Multi-lane roundabouts are typically less than 75 metres (250 ft) in diameter;[24] traffic circles and roundabout interchanges may be considerably larger. Roundabouts are roughly the same size as signalled intersections with the same capacity.
Islands[edit]
Roundabout at Leiden University Medical Center in the Netherlands, with modern art animals on the central island, and an apron that can be used by large trucks
Modern roundabouts feature a central island and sometimes pedestrian islands at each entry or exit.
Central[edit]
A fountain dominates this roundabout in Aix-en-Provence, France
The central island may be surrounded by an apron that is high enough to discourage drivers from crossing over it, but low enough to allow unusually wide/long vehicles to navigate the intersection (truck apron). The island may provide a visual barrier across the intersection to the drivers entering it. The barrier assists entering drivers into focusing only on the traffic approaching them in the path of the circle. Otherwise, vehicles anywhere in the circle cause entering drivers to stop outside the roundabout, waiting for the vehicles (even on the opposite side) to pass by them. This interferes with traffic flow, unnecessarily reducing the number of circling cars. The barrier may be a landscaped mound, a raised wall, a tree or tall shrubs. Road signage or flagpoles may be planted at the top of a landscaped mound.
Some communities use the island for monuments, the display of large public art or for a fountain. Pedestrians may be prohibited from crossing the circling lane(s). Access to the central island requires an underpass or overpass for safety.
Art installations[edit]
Roundabouts have attracted art installations around the world:
Bend, Oregon (United States); Bend’s Roundabout sculptures were honored by Americans for the Arts as among the 37 most innovative approaches to Public Art in the country.[25][26]
Fuerteventura, Canary Islands (Spain); Local government displayed sculptures at several roundabouts.[27]
Many countries in Europe (France first,[28] but also Germany,[29] Austria,[29] Italy,[30] Spain,[31] and others[29]) show the widespread use of roundabouts as art installations.[32][33]
An inventory of roundabouts in France, made by Marc Lescuyer, listed 3,328 roundabouts with artistic decor early in 2010.[32][34]
The Minerva Roundabout in Guadalajara, Mexico is one of the city's most famous monuments. It features the goddess Minerva standing on a pedestal, surrounded by a large fountain, with an inscription saying "Justice, wisdom and strength guard this loyal city".
The Garces Memorial Circle in Bakersfield, California contains a statue to Father Francisco Garces.
Pedestrian[edit]
This roundabout in Shanghai, China, has a pedestrian bridge in the form of another, raised roundabout.
For larger roundabouts, pedestrian islands at each entry/exit encourage drivers to slow and prepare to enter the circle. They also provide a refuge where pedestrians may pause mid-crossing.
Pedestrian crossing[edit]
Crosswalks at each entry/exit may be located at least one full car length outside the circle. The extra space allows an exiting vehicle to stop for a pedestrian without obstructing through traffic. Each crosswalk may traverse a pedestrian island for protection that also forces drivers to slow and begin to change direction, encouraging slower, safer speeds. On the island, the crosswalk may become diagonal, to direct the gaze of those crossing into exiting traffic.
Bicycles[edit]
Physically separated bikeways best protect cyclists.[35][35][36][37] Less optimally, terminating cycle lanes well before roundabout entrances require cyclists to merge into the stream of motor traffic, but keeps cyclists in full view of drivers, at some cost in motor vehicle speed. Cyclists may also be permitted to use the crosswalks.
Traditional cycle lanes increase vehicle/bicycle collisions. When exiting, a motorist must look ahead to avoid colliding with another vehicle or with pedestrians on a crosswalk. As the intersection curves away from the exit, the path of an exiting vehicle is relatively straight, and so the motorist may often not slow substantially. To give way to a cyclist on the outside, requires the exiting motorist to look toward the rear, to the perimeter. Other vehicles can obstruct the driver's view in this direction, complicating the motorist's task. The more frequent requirements for motorists to slow or stop reduce traffic flow. A 1992 study[38] found that the risk to cyclists is high in all such intersections, but much higher when the junction has a marked bicycle lane or sidepath around its perimeter.[39][40] Cycle lanes were installed at St. John's roundabout in Newbury, Berkshire, England and at Museum Road, Portsmouth, England. The cycle lanes at Museum Road were replaced by a narrowed carriageway to encourage lane sharing, while the St. John's roundabout retains perimeter cycle lanes.
The roundabout at the Brown Road/202 interchange adopts a U.S.-recommended design.[41] On-street pavement markings direct cyclists to enter the sidewalk at the end of the bike lane. Cyclists who choose to travel on the wide sidewalk, cross roundabout arms perpendicularly, well outside the circle. A pedestrian island allows pedestrians and cyclists to cross one lane at a time.
The Hovenring bicycle roundabout in the Netherlands is an innovative design, completely separating bicycles from vehicular traffic.
Cycle lanes on St. John's roundabout in Newbury, Berkshire, England.
Pavement markings invite cyclists to enter sidewalk on approach to roundabout in Mesa, Arizona. Cyclists are still permitted to use the roundabout like any other vehicle.
Cyclists can choose to ride on the sidewalk on far right, or in main lanes of this roundabout in Mesa, Arizona.
Capacity and delays[edit]
Traffic approaching Chiverton Cross roundabout in Cornwall, UK
The capacity of a roundabout varies based on entry angle, lane width, and the number of entry and circulating lanes. As with other types of junctions, operational performance depends heavily on the flow volumes from various approaches. A single-lane roundabout can handle approximately 20,000–26,000 vehicles per day, while a two-lane design supports 40,000 to 50,000.[36]
Under many traffic conditions, a roundabout operates with less delay than signalised or all-way stop approaches. Roundabouts do not stop all entering vehicles, reducing both individual and queuing delays. Throughput further improves because drivers proceed when traffic is clear without waiting for a signal to change.
Roundabouts can increase delays in locations where traffic would otherwise often not be required to stop. For example, at the junction of a high-volume and a low-volume road, traffic on the busier road would stop only when cross traffic was present, otherwise not having to slow for the roundabout. When the volumes on the roadways are relatively equal, a roundabout can reduce delays, because half of the time a full stop would be required. Dedicated left turn signals (in countries where traffic drives on the right) further reduce throughput.
Roundabouts can reduce delays for pedestrians compared to traffic signals, because pedestrians are able to cross during any safe gap rather than waiting for a signal. During peak flows when large gaps are infrequent, the slower speed of traffic entering and exiting can still allow crossing, despite the smaller gaps.
Studies of roundabouts that replaced stop signs and/or traffic signals found that vehicle delays were reduced 13–89 percent and the proportion of vehicles that stopped was reduced 14–56 percent. Delays on major approaches increased as vehicles slowed to enter the roundabouts.[4]
Roundabouts have been found to reduce carbon monoxide emissions by 15–45 percent, nitrous oxide emissions by 21–44 percent, carbon dioxide emissions by 23–37 percent and hydrocarbon emissions by 0–42 percent. Fuel consumption was reduced by an estimated 23–34 percent.[4]
Capacity modelling[edit]
Major research on roundabout capacity has been carried out in multiple countries. Software can help calculate capacity, delay and queues. Packages include ARCADY, Rodel, Highway Capacity Software and Sidra Intersection. ARCADY and Rodel are based on the Transport Research Laboratory mathematical model. The TRL approach is derived from empirical models based on geometric parameters and observed driver behaviour with regard to lane choice. Sidra Intersection software includes roundabout capacity models developed in Australia and the US.
Research on Australian roundabouts was conducted in the 1980s at the Australian Road Research Board (ARRB).[42] Its analytical capacity and performance models differ from the TRL model significantly, following a lane-based gap-acceptance theory including geometric parameters.
Research on U.S. roundabouts sponsored by the Transportation Research Board (TRB) and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) culminated in a capacity model that was included in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Edition 6[43] and the TRB-FHWA Roundabout Informational Guide (NCHRP Report 672).[44] The HCM Edition 6 model is based on lane-based gap-acceptance theory. A recent NCHRP survey of US state transport agencies found that Sidra Intersection is the most widely used software tool in the US for roundabout analysis.[45]
Safety[edit]
A comparison of possible collision points on a roundabout versus a traditional intersection
Small modern roundabout in the United States, where vehicles are driven on the right
Roundabout in the United States with separated side lanes. Vehicles entering the roundabout give way to vehicles in the roundabout. As of March 2009 the road at upper left carries 10,400 vehicles per weekday.[citation needed]
A typical trunk road roundabout in the UK at Carland Cross on the A30 in Cornwall. There is a free-flow lane for the A30 towards Bodmin (nearest the camera).
Statistically, modern roundabouts are safer for drivers and pedestrians than both traffic circles and traditional intersections.[46] Roundabouts are safer than both traffic circles and junctions—experiencing 39% fewer vehicle collisions, 76% fewer injuries and 90% fewer serious injuries and fatalities (according to a study of a sampling of roundabouts in the United States, when compared with the junctions they replaced).[47] Some larger roundabouts take foot and bicycle traffic through underpasses or alternate routes. Clearwater Beach, Florida's multi-lane roundabout has reduced its previously high cyclist death rate to zero since its construction.[citation needed]
At junctions with stop signs or traffic lights, the most serious accidents are right-angle, left-turn or head-on collisions where vehicles move fast and collide at high impact angles, e.g. head-on. Roundabouts virtually eliminate those types of crashes. Instead, most crashes are glancing blows at low angles of impact.[48][49]
An analysis[50] of the New Zealand national crash database[51] for the period 1996–2000 shows that 26% of cyclists reported injury crashes happened at roundabouts, compared to 6% at traffic signals and 13% at priority controlled junctions. The New Zealand researchers propose that low vehicle speeds, circulatory lane markings and mountable centre aprons for trucks can reduce the problem.[52]
The most common roundabout crash type for cyclists, according to the New Zealand study, involves a motor vehicle entering the roundabout and colliding with a cyclist who already is travelling around the roundabout (50%+ of cyclist/roundabout crashes in New Zealand fall into this category). The next most common crash type involves motorists leaving the roundabout colliding with cyclists who are continuing farther around the perimeter. Designs that have marked perimeter cycle lanes were found to be even less safe, suggesting that in roundabouts, cyclists should occupy a vehicle lane or a separate path rather than a special lane. The researchers advised that drivers be forbidden from overtaking cyclists (as well as other vehicles) while in the circle.[citation needed]
Vision-impaired pedestrians[edit]
Poorly-designed walkways increase risks for the vision-impaired, because it is more difficult than at a signalised intersection to audibly detect whether there is a sufficient gap in traffic to cross safely. At a signalised intersection, traffic comes to a stop, and an audible sound can be generated to indicate that it is time to cross.[53]
This issue has led to a conflict in the United States between the vision-impaired and civil engineering communities.[where?] One solution is to provide manually-operated pedestrian crossing signals at each entry. This increases construction and operation costs, and requires some way to disrupt traffic long enough for the pedestrian to cross (such as a HAWK beacon) that defeats the purpose of the roundabout. Signalisation also increases delays for most pedestrians during periods of light traffic, since pedestrians need to wait for a signal to change before (legally) crossing.[54]
Signalised pedestrian crossings are normally used on large-diameter roundabout interchanges rather than small-diameter modern roundabouts.
Types of circular intersections[edit]
Large roundabouts such as those used at motorway junctions typically have two to six lanes and may include traffic lights to regulate flow.
Some roundabouts have a divider, or subsidiary deflection island, by means of which is provided a "free flow" segregated left (or right) turn lane (for the UK see Design Manual for Roads and Bridges TD 51/03) between traffic moving between two adjacent roads, and traffic within the roundabout, enabling drivers to bypass the roundabout.
Gyratory system[edit]
The term "gyratory" (for example, Hanger Lane gyratory) is sometimes used in the United Kingdom for a large circular intersection with non-standard lane markings or priority arrangements, or when there are significant lengths of carriageway between the entry arms, or when buildings occupy the central island.[55]
In the 21st century several of the gyratory systems in London have been removed, including Tottenham Hale[56] and Elephant & Castle.
Smaller, small or mini- roundabouts[edit]
As the overall or external size of a roundabout (in the UK referred to as the Inscribed Circle Diameter – ICD) is reduced, so the maximum practicable (and prescribed) diameter for the central island is also reduced, whilst the width of the circulatory carriageway increases (due to the greater width of vehicle swept path at smaller turning radii). In most cases this results in it being too easy – certainly when traffic is light relative to capacity – for drivers to traverse the roundabout at relatively high speed, with scant regard for road markings or the potential dangers to self or conflicts with other road users. To mitigate this risk, a proportion of the circulatory carriageway – an annulus around the central island – is segregated from general use by demarcation lines and differentiated from the outer annulus of carriageway by a combination of slightly raised surface, adverse crossfall, contrasting colours and textures and demarcating lines. The effect of this is to discourage drivers from taking a more direct path through the roundabout, their line of least resistance being more tightly curved (and therefore slower) but more bearable. The inner annulus provides for the trailing axles of longer or articulated vehicles to sweep across the inner annulus, which is therefore known as an over-run area (in UK usage), truck apron, or mountable apron.
The smaller the roundabout, the more such mitigation measures are likely to be abused – the less effective they will be. In the UK the minimum size for roundabouts with raised islands is 28 metre diameter ICD with a 4-metre diameter island. This threshold being driven primarily by vehicle geometry – which is globally relatively consistent – rather than driver behaviour, it is adopted in other jurisdictions too. Below this minimum size, the mini-roundabout prevails.
Mini-roundabouts[edit]
After developing the offside priority rule, Frank Blackmore, of the UK's Transport Research Laboratory, turned his attention to the possibility of a roundabout that could be built at sites lacking room for a conventional roundabout.[57]
A mini-roundabout in the United Kingdom, where a painted white circle is used for the centre. The arrows show the direction of traffic flow.
Mini-roundabouts can be a painted circle or a low dome but must be fully traversable by vehicles. The idea is to allow motorists to drive over them in the absence of other traffic, but the practice is dangerous if other cars are present. Once the practice is established it may be difficult to discourage. Mini-roundabouts use the same right-of-way rules as standard roundabouts, but produce different driver behaviour. Mini-roundabouts are sometimes grouped in pairs (a double mini-roundabout) or in "chains", simplifying navigation of otherwise awkward junctions. In some countries road signs distinguish mini-roundabouts from larger ones.
Mini-roundabouts are common in the UK, Ireland and Hong Kong (particularly on Hong Kong Island), as well as Irapuato in Mexico. Kemptville, Ontario, had the record for the most roundabouts in Ontario (with a record of three on one highway) until they recently began to become more prominent throughout many cities of the province at major intersections.
In the UK and also in other jurisdictions that have adopted mini-roundabouts, to drive across the central disc or dome when it is practicable to avoid it is an offence. Vehicles are required to treat the painted circle as if it were a solid island and drive around it.[58] Some local authorities paint double white lines around the circle to indicate this, but these require permission from the Secretary of State for Transport. The central dome also must be able to be overrun by larger vehicles.
In the UK – and also in other highway jurisdictions – the maximum size for a mini roundabout is 28 metre ICD (inscribed circle diameter).
Raindrop roundabouts[edit]
Main article: Dogbone interchange
A hybrid raindrop roundabout in Zagreb, Croatia, 45°48′33″N 15°59′55″E / 45.809296°N 15.998648°E / 45.809296; 15.998648. These two roundabouts are more akin to a "magic roundabout" since the left turns need not drive through both of them.
Raindrop roundabout at an Interstate interchange in North Carolina,
35°14′42″N 82°12′23″W / 35.244944°N 82.206289°W / 35.244944; -82.206289
These roundabouts do not form a complete circle and have a raindrop or teardrop shape. They appear at U.S. Interstate interchanges to provide a free-flowing left turn to the on-ramps and eliminating the need for turn signals and lanes. Since the entry and exit slip roads are one-way, a complete circle is unnecessary. This means that drivers entering the roundabout from the bridge do not need to give way, and that prevents queuing on narrow, two-lane bridges. These roundabouts have been used at dumbbell roundabout junctions, replacing traffic signals that are inefficient without a turning lane. Several junctions along Interstate 70 near Avon, Colorado use teardrop roundabouts.[59]
Balcony roundabout[edit]
A balcony roundabout is just an elevated roundabout. They are constructed in such a way that vulnerable road users can go underneath the roundabout and choose the direction they want to go. Footpaths and cycle paths along the different roads connect to the square under the roundabout. Vulnerable road users do not interfere with other traffic on the roundabout, making them much safer for them.
Turbo roundabouts[edit]
A much applied Dutch turbo roundabout design
In the Netherlands, Belgium, the United Kingdom, Spain, Poland, Hungary, Slovenia, the Czech Republic, and Macedonia a relatively new type of two-lane roundabout designs is emerging, called "turbo roundabouts". These designs require motorists to choose their direction before entering the roundabout, thereby eliminating many conflicting paths and choices on the roundabout itself, such that traffic safety is increased, as well as speed and capacity. These designs, seen from above, typically result in a spiralling flow of traffic, giving them the collective name of turbo roundabouts. As a minor drawback turbo roundabouts are often marked out such that a U-turn by means of the roundabout is not possible for drivers approaching on certain arms.
Several variations of turbo roundabouts exist. They are frequently designed for the intersection of a major road crossing a road with less traffic.
An early application of the principle was a six-arm and therefore relatively large (and fast) non-circular roundabout at Stairfoot, Barnsley, South Yorkshire, which was given spiral marking about 1984. At that time the method was considered experimental and needed special consents from central authorities. The turbo roundabout was formally developed in 1996 in the Netherlands by Lambertus Fortuijn, a researcher from the Delft University of Technology.[60] Similar roundabouts, with spiralling lane markings, have been used for many years in the UK e.g. the A176/A127 (eastbound) at Basildon, Essex (51°33′41″N 0°27′11″E / 51.561399°N 0.452934°E / 51.561399; 0.452934). However it was not until 1997 that the UK's national highway authorities published guidance (DMRB TA-78/97) that in effect endorsed use of spiral markings in certain circumstances.
Turbo roundabouts can be built with raised lane separators (common in the Netherlands[61]) or with lane markings only. The use of raised lane separators prevents road users from switching (thereby reducing conflicts) but can make maneuvering for large vehicles more difficult.
According to simulations, a two-lane roundabout with three exits should offer 12–20% greater traffic flow than a conventional, three-lane roundabout of the same size. The reason is reduced weaving that makes entering and exiting more predictable. Because there are only ten points of conflict (compared with 8 for a conventional single lane roundabout, or between 32 and 64 with traffic signal control), this design is often safer as well. Research and experiments show that traffic accidents are reduced by 72% on turbo roundabouts compared to multi-lane roundabouts, which have 12 points of conflict.[62] Research at Windesheim University also shows that turbo roundabouts reduce accidents including casualties by some 75% when compared to regular intersections, and by 61% compared to single-lane roundabouts.[63] The same research made it very clear that it is safer for cyclists not to have priority over motor vehicles on the roundabout, than to have it.[63] At least 70 have been built in the Netherlands, while many turbos (or similar, lane splitting designs) can be found in southeast Asia.[64] Multi-lane roundabouts in the United States of America are typically required to be striped with spiral markings,[65] as most states follow the federal Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices.
Motorways[edit]
See also: Roundabout interchange
Motorway junction with roundabout in the Czech Republic 50°08′21″N 15°47′21″E / 50.13923°N 15.789149°E / 50.13923; 15.789149
Roundabouts are generally not appropriate for placement on motorway or freeway mainlines because the purpose of such facilities is to provide for uninterrupted traffic flow. However, roundabouts are often used for the junction between the slip roads (ramps in North America) and the intersecting road. A single roundabout, grade separated from the mainlines, may be used to create a roundabout interchange. This type of junction is common in the UK and Ireland. Alternatively, separate roundabouts also may be used at the slip road intersections of a diamond interchange to create what often is referred to as a "dumbbell interchange", which is increasingly common in both Europe and North America due to its reduced need for wide or multiple bridges.
An additional use of roundabouts for high-speed junctions is the 3-level stacked roundabout—this is a roundabout interchange where both of the roadway mainlines are grade separated. In the United Kingdom, the M25/A3, M8/M73 and A1(M)/M18 interchanges are examples of this type. These junctions, however, have less capacity than a full free-flow interchange. A similar design to this is the three-level diamond interchange.
Most junctions on Dublin's M50 motorway C-road were built using a standard roundabout interchange. The traffic volume of several of these junctions increased to a level higher than the capacity such roundabouts can accommodate, and in turn have been converted into partially or fully free flowing interchanges. One example is the Red Cow interchange. In Northern Ireland, the junction between the M1 and M12 (Craigavon connector motorway) is via a standard roundabout with a raised centre, three onslips and three offslips, and two lanes.
In the city of Malmö, Sweden, a roundabout connects two motorways, E22 from Lund, and the Inner ring road.
In the Netherlands, A6 motorway and A7 motorway cross near Joure using a roundabout. The junction between the A200 and the A9 uses a 3-level stacked roundabout. Near Eindhoven (the Leenderheide junction), the junction for the A2 uses a roundabout. An overpass was built for the A67 from Antwerp to Germany.
Rotary interchanges operate with traffic circles rather than roundabouts. Rotary interchanges are common in New England, particularly in the state of Massachusetts, but a European example of a rotary interchange may be found in Hinwil, Switzerland.
Access-controlled roundabouts[edit]
A major signal-controlled roundabout interchange in central Bristol, England. Vehicles drive on the left, and vehicles in the roundabout are stopped by traffic lights to allow other vehicles to enter, while an underpass permits straight-through traffic to bypass the roundabout entirely.
Some bridges on Beijing's Second Ring Road are controlled by traffic lights. While it may appear to defy the logic of roundabouts, it works well to control traffic flow on bridges, which are two viaducts creating a roundabout suspended over the ring road.
Signal controlled roundabouts are common in the United Kingdom, Ireland and Spain (mostly the city of Valencia), where they have been introduced in an attempt to alleviate traffic problems at over-capacity roundabout junctions or to prevent some flows of traffic dominating others (around the M50 in Dublin for example). The Cherry Street roundabout in Kowloon, Hong Kong is also one such example.
"Magic" roundabouts/ring junctions[edit]
"Magic roundabouts" direct traffic in both directions around the central island. They are officially known as "ring junctions". The first magic roundabout was constructed in 1972 in Swindon, designed by Frank Blackmore,[66] inventor of the mini-roundabout. The roundabout joins five roads and consists of a two-way road around the central island, with five mini-roundabouts meeting the incoming roads.
The name derives from the popular children's television series, The Magic Roundabout, and is considered "magic" because traffic flows in both clockwise and anticlockwise directions. This is achieved by surrounding the main island with one smaller roundabout per entry/exit street. This pattern directs traffic in the usual clockwise manner around each mini-roundabout. Exiting the mini-roundabouts, traffic may proceed around the central island either clockwise (via the outer loop), or anticlockwise (the inner loop). The arrangement offers multiple paths between feeder roads. Drivers typically choose the shorter, most fluid route. Although the safety record is good,[67] many drivers find this system intimidating, and some drivers go to great lengths to avoid them.[68][69][70]
Similar systems are found in the Moor End roundabout in Hemel Hempstead (Hertfordshire), which has six intersections; in High Wycombe (Buckinghamshire),[71] the Denham Roundabout in Denham (Buckinghamshire), the Greenstead Roundabout in Colchester (Essex), "The Egg" in Tamworth (Staffordshire) and the Hatton Cross Roundabout in London.[72]
Churchbridge Junction in Staffordshire is a magic gyratory. This type of junction is similar to a magic roundabout, except that the constituent roundabouts are connected by longer lengths of roadway.[73]
Line drawing of the roundabout "Magic Roundabout" at Hemel Hempstead illustrating the concept and the reverse (anticlockwise) flow of the inner lane
The Swindon Magic Roundabout
Trams[edit]
hideThis section has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
This section includes a list of references, but its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations. Please help to improve this section by introducing more precise citations. (December 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
This section may be too long to read and navigate comfortably. Please consider splitting content into sub-articles, condensing it, or adding or removing subheadings. (July 2015)
(Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Tram roundabouts, which are found in many countries, merge roundabouts for individual vehicles with tram lines. Large areas are needed for tram roundabouts that include a junction between tram lines. Such systems often contain tram stops.
Tram rails usually cross roundabouts in the center. This requires traffic lights or special signalling granting the trams priority. However, there are also roundabouts where trams and cars use the same lane. Some roundabouts have a tram stop on their island.
In inner Melbourne, particularly in the inner suburban area of South Melbourne, where the tram network is extensive, tram tracks always pass through the central island, with drivers required to give way to vehicles approaching from their right and to trams approaching from right-angles.
The Haymarket roundabout between Royal Parade and Elizabeth Street contains a tram-stop, pedestrian crossings, three entering tram lines, traffic signals to stop vehicular traffic at each crossing point when a tram is due, service roads and a pedestrian crossing.
Brussels tram roundabouts employ multiple configurations. At the Barrière de St-Gilles/Bareel St-Gillis, tram tracks form a circle in the carriageway, while Verboekhoven and Altitude Cent/Hoogte Honderd have reserved tram tracks inside the roundabout. At Place Stéphanie/Stefaniaplein, they go straight through the center, with a slip track up the Chaussée de Charleroi/Charleroisesteenweg, while at Montgomery they tunnel underneath.
In Dublin, Ireland, the Red Cow interchange at the N7/M50 junction is grade-separated and is signal-controlled with secondary lanes (separate from the main roundabout) for those making left turns. The junction, the busiest in Ireland, had tram lines added to it with the opening of the Luas system in 2004. The tracks pass across one carriageway of the N7, and across the southern M50 sliproads. Trams pass every five minutes at rush hour. The roundabout was replaced with a grade-separated free flowing junction.
Gothenburg, Sweden has a tram roundabout and tram stop at Korsvägen (the Crossroad). It carries heavy car traffic and about one tram or bus per minute passes in several directions. This is further complicated by separated rights-of-way for trams and buses and the fact that it is one of the busiest interchanges in the city. Another one is located at Mariaplan in the inner suburb of Majorna. The trams makes a right turn, giving the roundabout an odd design.
In Warsaw, trams typically cross straight through roundabouts, and have junctions in the center of them. In Wrocław, Poland, trams pass through the Powstańców Śląskich Roundabout, stopping in the roundabout (north-headed track).
The Silesian tram network in Poland has two tram roundabouts. In the city centre of Katowice, the tram line passes through the center of the Ziętka Roundabout in a north-south alignment, with a tram stop in the center of the circle.[a] In Będzin, unusually, the tram junction itself forms a circular roundabout, with trams going around the circle; there are tram stops immediately outside the roundabout on each branch.
In Vítězné náměstí (Victory Square) in Prague, Czech Republic, a tramway crosses the carriage way of the roundabout at three places. Entering as well as leaving trams give way to vehicles. In the years 1932–42 trams circulated much like vehicles.[74]
In Kiev, Ukraine an interchange of two "fast tram" lines is below a roundabout.
Oslo, Norway also has many roundabouts with tram tracks passing through; for example at Bislett, Frogner plass, Sinsen, Solli plass, Carl Berners plass and Storo.
In Wolverhampton, England, the Midland Metro tram passes through the centre of a roundabout on approach to its terminus at St. Georges. This also happens in New Addington on the Tramlink on Old Lodge Lane at the junction to King Henry's Drive.
In Sheffield, England the Sheffield Supertram systems crosses two major roundabouts. At the Brook Hill roundabout near Sheffield University, the tramway passes underneath the roundabout in a subway, while at Park Square in the city centre it travels above the roundabout on bridges and viaducts with a junction in the central island.
In Salt Lake City, Utah a light rail line on the south side of the University of Utah crosses a roundabout where Guardsman Way meets South Campus Drive. Like virtually all rail crossings in the United States, both crossings in the circle are equipped with boom barriers.
In Kassel, Germany, Lines 4 and 8 pass through the center of the roundabout at Platz der Deutschen Einheit. The tram stops are in the center of the roundabout. Roundabout traffic is controlled by traffic lights. Pedestrian access is via subway and street level crossings at the lights.
In Bremen, Germany, tram lines 8 and 6 pass through the center of the roundabout "Am Stern" east of the main railway station. They enter from the west and exit in a northeastern direction thus making a slight bend within the roundabout. Both stations are situated on the north-eastern edge of the roundabout. Traffic is controlled by two-colour traffic lights inside the roundabout.
In Antalya, Turkey, there are four tram roundabouts; while the tram line is grade-separated from two of them, named Anadolu and Çallı.[citation needed]
Railways[edit]
In Jensen Beach, Florida, the main line of the Florida East Coast Railway running north-south bisects the two-lane roundabout at the junction of Jensen Beach Boulevard running east–west. It hosts three other roads and the service entrance to a large shopping plaza. Boom barriers line the railway crossings. The landscaped central island bisected by the tracks was originally curbed/kerbed, but 18-wheelers had trouble negotiating the roundabout, so the curbs were replaced with painted concrete strips. The roundabout was built in the early 2000s and improved traffic flow, although long freight trains often cause delays.[75][76]
Two roundabouts in the Melbourne metropolitan area, Highett, Victoria[77] and Brighton,[78] have heavy rail crossing the roundabout and through the inner circle. Boom barriers protect the railway from oncoming traffic at the appropriate points in the roundabout.
At the Driescher Kreisel[79] in Bergisch Gladbach, Germany, a railway serving a nearby paper factory crosses a roundabout located next to a shopping centre and pedestrian zone. The flow of traffic and pedestrians is governed by 14 barriers, 22 traffic lights and 8 loudspeakers. The barriers close three times daily for 7 minutes to allow trains to pass.
In New Zealand's South Island, two roundabouts join major roads where a railway cuts through. One is at the intersection between State Highway 1 (as Sinclair Street and Main Street from the east) and Main Street (from the west), Park Terrace and Redwood Street in the city of Blenheim. Here the Main North Line bisects the roundabout and separates Park Terrace and Main Street eastbound from the rest of the roundabout.[80] The other roundabout is located at Kumara Junction on the West Coast, where the Hokitika Branch separates State Highway 6 southbound from SH 6 northbound and SH 73.[81] Both roundabouts are controlled by flashing red lights, with additional boom barriers at the Blenheim roundabout.
Hamburger roundabout/throughabout/cut-through[edit]
These resemble a typical roundabout but are signalised and have a straight-through section of carriageway for one of the major routes. The hamburger name derives from the fact that the plan view resembles the cross-section through a hamburger. The United Kingdom has examples on the A580 East Lancashire Road in St Helens, on Haydock Island in Merseyside[82] (which also features the M6 passing overhead), and on the Astley/Boothstown border.[83] More examples are the A6003 at Kettering, the A538 near Manchester Airport, the "Showcase" junction on A329 at Winnersh, Berkshire[84] and the A63/A1079 Mytongate junction in Hull. Examples also exist in Bracknell, Hull,[85] Bramcote in Nottinghamshire and Reading, as well as on the N2/M50 intersection in Dublin, Ireland. In Perth, Western Australia, one is found at the intersection of The Strand, Morley and Alexander Drives.[86] Throughabouts are very common in Spain, where they are called raquetas (Spanish for "[tennis] racket") or glorieta/rotonda partida ("split roundabout").[87]
A more advanced and safer version of a hamburger roundabout is a roundabout interchange, separating the straight roadway and using underpasses or overpasses to cross the roundabout itself.
Throughabout
Throughabout road sign in the Netherlands 51°51′02″N 5°49′54″E / 51.850517°N 5.831576°E / 51.850517; 5.831576
Bicycle-pedestrian roundabouts[edit]
This old traffic circle became a modern roundabout in Levane, Tuscany
The same features that make roundabouts attractive for roadway junctions led to their use at junctions of multi-use trails. The University of California, Davis[88] and Stanford University, as well as the Cape Cod and Old Colony rail trails have bicycle-pedestrian roundabouts.
Roundabouts are used on off-road bicycle trails in Florida, Colorado, Alaska, and Wisconsin.[89][90][91]
An elevated roundabout is located in Eindhoven, serving pedestrian and bicycle traffic only, above the main conventional roadway intersection. It is known as the Hovenring.
Traffic circles[edit]
Main article: Traffic circle
Traffic circles are typically larger, operate at higher speeds and often give priority to entering traffic. They may control entering traffic by stop signs or traffic lights. Many older traffic circles allow entry at higher speeds without deflection, or require a stop and a 90-degree turn to enter.
Many traffic circles have been converted to modern roundabouts, including the former Kingston traffic circle in New York and several in New Jersey.[92][93] Others have been converted to signalised intersections, such as the Drum Hill Rotary in Chelmsford, Massachusetts, which is now six lanes wide and controlled by four separate intersections.[94]
See also[edit]
Complete streets
Level of service
Rotary
Roundabout Appreciation Society
Roundabout dog
Traffic circle
Notes[edit]
Jump up ^ There is also a branch line immediately north of the roundabout going west, and an additional tram stop on that branch.
References[edit]
^ Jump up to: a b The New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, Volume 2, Clarendon Press, Oxford (1993), page 2632
Jump up ^ "Roundabout Benefits". Washington State Department of Transportation. Retrieved 12 July 2014.
Jump up ^ Hesch, Maxine. "Quantitatively Determining the Emissions Reduction Benefits of the Replacement of a Signalized Intersection by a Roundabout" (PDF). New York State Department of Transportation. Retrieved 6 October 2013.
^ Jump up to: a b c "Q&As".
Jump up ^ "Roundabout Rules of the Road". Archived from the original on 9 January 2014. Retrieved 12 January 2014.
Jump up ^ "B. Guichet - Roundabout Crashes in France".
Jump up ^ "Was alles in Görlitz erfunden wurde - Alles-Lausitz.de". Alles-Lausitz.de (in German). Retrieved 2017-06-05.
Jump up ^ http://twofeet.weebly.com/walking-blog/the-five-circles-of-hanchett-park The Five Circles of Hanchett Park, 7 June 2014
Jump up ^ BBC News (2 November 2004). "Roundabout Magic". Retrieved 13 May 2007.
Jump up ^ Letchworth Garden City Heritage Foundation. "Sign of the Times". Archived from the original on 16 October 2006. Retrieved 14 December 2006.
Jump up ^ Google. "Atherton, Ca." (Map). Google Maps. Google.
Jump up ^ "Frank Blackmore: traffic engineer and inventor of the mini-roundabout". The Times. London. 14 June 2008. Retrieved 15 June 2008.
Jump up ^ Ourston Roundabout Engineering, Inc (13 January 2010). "Leif Ourston receives Frank Blackmore Award". Ourston.com. Archived from the original on 29 October 2013. Retrieved 7 October 2013.
^ Jump up to: a b Keh, Andreh (18 November 2010). "European Import Has Cars Spinning. Heads, Too". The New York Times. Retrieved 19 November 2010.
Jump up ^ Tom Geoghegan (2011-07-01). "Is the British roundabout conquering the US?". BBC website. Retrieved 2011-07-01.
Jump up ^ Modern Roundabout Practice in the United States
Jump up ^ Retting, Richard A.; Kyrychenko, Sergey Y.; McCartt, Anne T. (2007). "Long-Term Trends in Public Opinion Following Construction of Roundabouts". Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2019: 219–24.
Jump up ^ Roselli, Dayna (18 April 2007). "Roundabouts". lasvegasnow.com. Archived from the original on 26 March 2012. Retrieved 14 October 2014.
Jump up ^ "Roundabouts: an informational guide" (PDF). web.archive.org/web/19970126084901/http://www.tfhrc.gov:80/. Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center. 16 November 2017. Archived from the original on 12 January 2009. Retrieved 5 December 2017. CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link)
Jump up ^ "What lane should I use on a roundabout?". AXA.ie. AXA. 16 November 2017. Retrieved 16 November 2017.
Jump up ^ American Heritage Archived 26 December 2013 at the Wayback Machine. ("roundabout: Chiefly British A traffic circle."), Random House ("roundabout: Chiefly Brit. See traffic circle."), Merriam-Webster("roundabout, noun: British: rotary 2"; "rotary 2 : a road junction formed around a central circle about which traffic moves in one direction only—called also circle, traffic circle)Macmillan "roundabout: a circular area where three or more roads meet that you have to drive around in one direction in order to get onto another road. The American word is traffic circle or rotary.", [1] ("roundabout: UK (US traffic circle)), Concise Oxford(rotary: N. Amer. a traffic roundabout.)
Jump up ^ U.S. Department of Transportation 2013, para 1.5.
Jump up ^ https://www.gov.je/Travel/Motoring/LearnerNewDrivers/Cars/Pages/TheoryTests.aspx
Jump up ^ Kittleson & Associates. "Kansas Roundabout Guide: A Supplement to FHWA's Roundabouts: An Informational Guide" (PDF). Kansas Department of Transportation. Retrieved 26 August 2009.
Jump up ^ "Art In Public Places, Bend, Oregon". Art in Public Places. Retrieved 2 November 2013.
Jump up ^ "Pillar of art" (PDF). Art in Public Places. Retrieved 2 November 2013.
Jump up ^ "Fuerteventura, art on the roads: roundabouts as galleries". Roberto Alborghetti. Retrieved 2 November 2013.
Jump up ^ Google. "Photographs of French roundabouts" (Map). Google Maps. Google.
^ Jump up to: a b c Google. "Roundabout photographs from The Netherlands, Belgium, Germany and Austria" (Map). Google Maps. Google.
Jump up ^ Google. "Roundabout photographs from Italy" (Map). Google Maps. Google.
Jump up ^ Google. "Roundabout photographs from Spain" (Map). Google Maps. Google.
^ Jump up to: a b "Unusual road roundabouts: artistic, and otherwise. A collection of more than 2000 photographs, by almost 200 amateur photographers, from all over the world". Panoramio: Roundabouts. www.panoramio.com. Retrieved 2 November 2013.
Jump up ^ "Roundabout / Kreisverkehr – streets with a roundabout / Straßen mit einem Kreisverkehr" (in English and German). www.flickr.com. Retrieved 2 November 2013.
Jump up ^ "Inventory of French roundabouts" (in French). Marc Lescuyer. Archived from the original on 11 November 2008. Retrieved 1 January 2010.
^ Jump up to: a b SWOV Factsheet: Roundabouts
^ Jump up to: a b "Modern Roundabouts, an Informational Guide". Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology. Retrieved 15 September 2015.
Jump up ^ "FHWA - MUTCD - 2003 Edition Chapter 3B2".
Jump up ^ R. Schnüll, J. Lange, I. Fabian, M. Kölle, F. Schütte, D. Alrutz, H.W. Fechtel, J. Stellmacher-Hein, T. Brückner, H. Meyhöfer: Sicherung von Radfahrern an städtischen Knotenpunkten [Safeguarding bicyclists in Urban Intersections], Bericht der Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen zum Forschungsprojekt 8952, 1992
Jump up ^ Vortragsfolien Radverkehr Scroll to the section labelled "Kreisverkehr". A translation of the text reads: Graphic from Sicherung von Radfahrern an städtischen Knotenpunkten [Safeguarding cyclists in Urban Intersections], (BASt, 1992). Accident numbers in large circular junctions with different bicycle facilities show: 1. Why there should be no pathways or bike lanes at these junctions; 2. Even when cyclists use the roadway, their risk is relatively high at these junctions.
Jump up ^ Maycock, G., and Hall, R. D. (1984). "Accidents at 4-Arm Roundabouts." TRRL1120, Transport and Road Research Laboratory (TRRL), Crowthorne, England.
Jump up ^ "Overview".
Jump up ^ Taylor, M.P., Barton, E.V., Bliss, J. and O'Brien, A.P. (1993). Effectiveness Audit of ARRB Intersection Capacity Research. Research Report ARR 242. ARRB Transport Research Ltd, Vermont South, Australia. Archived from the original on 27 February 2016. CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
Jump up ^ TRB (2016). Highway Capacity Manual, Sixth Edition: A Guide for Multimodal Mobility Analysis. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, USA.
Jump up ^ TRB. Roundabouts: An Informational Guide. NCHRP Report 672. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., USA, in cooperation with US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration.
Jump up ^ TRB (2016). "Roundabout Practice, A Synthesis of Highway Practice". National Cooperative Highway Research Program, NCHRP SYNTHESIS 488. Washington DC, USA.
Jump up ^ Shashi S. Nambisan; Venu Parimi (March 2007). "A Comparative Evaluation of the Safety Performance of Roundabouts and Traditional Intersection Controls". Institute of Transportation Engineers. Missing or empty |url= (help)
Jump up ^ Status Report
Jump up ^ Richtmeyer, Richard (6 January 2008). "Safer Roundabouts Sprouting Up All Over New York, Nation". Associated Press. Archived from the original on 15 December 2012. Retrieved 10 January 2008.
Jump up ^ "Topic Overview".
Jump up ^ Wilke, A. and Koorey, G. (2001). How Safe are Roundabouts for Cyclists? In TranSafe Issue 5, April 2001. Wellington, NZ. PDF Archived 15 October 2008 at the Wayback Machine.
Jump up ^ "Crash analysis system". Retrieved 29 November 2007.
Jump up ^ Campbell, D., Jurisich, I., Dunn, R. 2006. Improved multi-lane roundabout designs for cyclists. Land Transport New Zealand Research Report 287. 140 pp. PDF
Jump up ^ Pedestrian Access to Modern Roundabouts: Design and Operational Issues for Pedestrians who are Blind retrieved 6/26/2010 access-board.gov Archived 31 March 2012 at the Wayback Machine.
Jump up ^ Bill Baranowski, P.E., Pedestrian Crosswalk Signals at Roundabouts: Where are they Applicable?
Jump up ^ "History of Roundabouts". Retrieved 29 November 2007.
Jump up ^ Transport for London https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/media/press-releases/2014/november/tottenham-hale-improvement-works-complete
Jump up ^ Rhodes, Belinda (21 June 2008). "Frank Blackmore Determined, maverick traffic engineer who invented the mini-roundabout". The Guardian. Retrieved 7 October 2013.
Jump up ^ "The Highway Code – Roundabouts". Retrieved 14 May 2009. Section 188, referring to Road Traffic Act 1988, Section 36, and Traffic Signs Regulations & General Directions 2002, Regulations 10(1) & 16(1)
Jump up ^ Google. "Teardrop roundabout in Avon, Co." (Map). Google Maps. Google.
Jump up ^ "Turborotonde en turboplein: ontwerp, capaciteit en veiligheid" [Turbo Roundabout and Turbo Circle; Design, Capacity and Safety] (in Dutch). Delft University of Technology. 8 January 2013. Retrieved 16 October 2014.
Jump up ^ https://www.crow.nl/publicaties/turborotondes
Jump up ^ "Benefits of Turboroundabouts". Transoft Solutions Inc. 2014. Retrieved 16 October 2014.
^ Jump up to: a b Vos, Christiaan (2016-01-31). "Effecten realisatie turborotonde onderzocht" [Effects research of turbo roundabouts]. Verkeer - Verkeersveiligheid - Vorm (Traffic, Safety, Form) (in Dutch). Dirk de Baan. Archived from the original on 2017-01-28. Retrieved 2017-01-28.
Jump up ^ Isaak Yperman; Ben Immers (2003). "Capacity of a turbo-roundabout determined by micro-simulation" (PDF). Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department of Civil Engineering – Transportation Planning and Highway Engineering. Archived from the original (pdf) on 2003.
Jump up ^ "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways – Part 3: Markings" (pdf). U.S. Department of Transportation – Federal Highway Administration. 2003.
Jump up ^ "Frank Blackmore: traffic engineer and inventor of the mini-roundabout". The Times. London. 14 June 2008. Retrieved 15 June 2008.
Jump up ^ "In Depth: The Magic Roundabout". CBRD. 22 November 2005. Archived from the original on 7 January 2012. Retrieved 12 January 2012.
Jump up ^ Brits vote on the best and worst roundabouts, Easier.com. 20 December 2005, retrieved 18 January 2008
Jump up ^ "World's worst junctions".
Jump up ^ 10 Scariest Junctions in the UK, BBC, 27 November 2009.
Jump up ^ Google. "High Wycombe" (Map). Google Maps. Google.
Jump up ^ Google. "Hatton Cross" (Map). Google Maps. Google.
Jump up ^ "SABRE: Magic Gyratory". 8 November 2013. Retrieved 8 November 2013.
Jump up ^ Vítězné náměstí, Prague trams fun web
Jump up ^ Google (15 January 2012). "Roundabout" (Map). Google Maps. Google. Retrieved 15 January 2012.
Jump up ^ "Jensen Beach Roundabouts Charrette".
Jump up ^ "145.039044269836,-37.9447586507931". Australia Mapsearch.
Jump up ^ "144.9930580000&,-37.9200150000". Australia Mapsearch.
Jump up ^ Der Driescher Kreisel Archived 27 September 2011 at the Wayback Machine.
Jump up ^ Google (15 January 2012). "Blenheim Roundabout" (Map). Google Maps. Google. Retrieved 15 January 2012.
Jump up ^ Google (15 January 2012). "Kumara Junction Roundabout" (Map). Google Maps. Google. Retrieved 15 January 2012.
Jump up ^ Google. "Haydock Island in Merseyside" (Map). Google Maps. Google.
Jump up ^ Google. Astley/Boothstown border "Roundabout" Check |mapurl= value (help) (Map). Google Maps. Google.
Jump up ^ Google. "Winnersh, Berkshire" (Map). Google Maps. Google.
Jump up ^ Google. "Mytongate on the A63 in Hull" (Map). Google Maps. Google.
Jump up ^ Google. "Morley and Alexander Drive" (Map). Google Maps. Google.
Jump up ^ "Cómo circular en una Glorieta Partida (raqueta)". Autoescuela Miguel Blog (in Spanish). Retrieved 17 October 2014. Explanation in the website of a driving school
Jump up ^ Google. "Davis, Ca." (Map). Google Maps. Google.
Jump up ^ Shaw, Jeffrey and Moler, Steve, Bicyclist- and Pedestrian-Only Roundabouts, Public Roads magazine, January/February 2009
Jump up ^ "Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology-- - Federal Highway Administration".
Jump up ^ "Bicycle roundabout sits at intersection of 3 bike paths". The Capital Times.
Jump up ^ New Jersey roundabouts[permanent dead link]
Jump up ^ Capuzzo, Jill P. (25 November 2007). "A Shift, but for Some Drivers, a Vicious Circle". The New York Times. Retrieved 27 March 2010.
Jump up ^ Google. "Drum Hill Rotary" (Map). Google Maps. Google.
Sources[edit]
U.S. Department of Transportation (2013). "Roundabouts: an Informational Guide" (PDF).
External links[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Roundabouts.
City of Carmel, Indiana, USA, Roundabouts page (showing raindrop roundabouts or dogbone interchanges)
Video of Highway Roundabout in Canada
TRL, The UK's Transport research Laboratory
Modern Roundabouts – Geocoded National Database
Mini-roundabouts – Getting them Right
Turbo Roundabout Simulation
Roundabout Benefits from the Washington State Department of Transportation
Highway Roundabouts from the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario
Roundabouts Now
Benefits of a Turboroundabout
Proceedings from the Transportation Research Board Standing Committee on Roundabouts (ANB75)
show
v
t
e
Streets and roadways
Types of road
Limited-access
Freeway / Motorway
Dual carriageway / Divided highway / Expressway
Elevated highway
By country
Australia
Brazil
Canada
China
Croatia
Czech Republic
Germany
Greece
Hong Kong
India
Ireland
Italy
Pakistan
Portugal
Spain
United Kingdom
United States
Main roads
Arterial road
Collector road
County highway
Express-collector setup
Farm-to-market road
Highway
Link road
Two-lane expressway
2+1 road
2+2 road
Parkway
Super two
Trunk road
Highway systems by country
Local roads
Alley
Backroad
Bicycle boulevard
Boulevard
Country lane
Dead end
Driveway
Frontage road
Green lane
Main street
Primitive road
Road
Side road
Single carriageway
Single-track road
Street
Sunken lane
Other terms
Channelization
Concurrency
Detour
Hierarchy of roads
Private highway
Route number
Special route
Business route
Street hierarchy
Toll road
Road junctions
Interchanges
(grade-separated)
Cloverleaf
Diamond
Free-flow
Directional T
Diverging diamond
Parclo
Raindrop
Roundabout
Single-point urban (SPUI)
Stack
Three-level diamond
Trumpet
Intersections
(at-grade)
3-way junction
Bowtie
Box junction
Continuous flow
Hook turn
Jughandle
Michigan left
Offset T-intersection
Protected intersection
Quadrant roadway
Right-in/right-out (RIRO)
Roundabout
Seagull intersection
Split intersection
Superstreet
Texas U-turn
Traffic circle
Turnaround
Surfaces
Asphalt concrete
Bioasphalt
Brick
Chipseal
Cobblestone
Concrete
Reinforced concrete
Corduroy
Crocodile cracking
Crushed stone
Diamond grinding of pavement
Dirt
Full depth recycling
Glassphalt
Gravel
Ice
Macadam
Pavement milling
Permeable
Plank
Rubberized asphalt
Sealcoat
Sett
Stamped asphalt
Tarmac
Texture
Road hazards
Aquaplaning
Black ice
Bleeding
Crosswind
Dead Man's Curve
Expansion joint
Fog
Ford
Hairpin turn
Level crossing
Manhole cover
Oil spill
Oversize load
Pothole
Road debris
Road slipperiness
Road train
Roadkill
Rockfall
Rut
Speed bump
Storm drain
Washboarding
Washout
Whiteout
Space and time allocation
Barrier transfer machine
Bicycle lane
Climbing lane
Complete streets
Contraflow lane
Contraflow lane reversal
High-occupancy toll lane
High-occupancy vehicle lane
Lane
Living street
Managed lane
Median / Central reservation
Motorcycle lane
Passing lane
Pedestrian crossing
Pedestrian zone
Refuge island
Reversible lane
Road diet
Road verge
Runaway truck ramp
Shared space
Sidewalk / Pavement
Shoulder
Street running railway
Traffic calming
Traffic directionality
Traffic island
Traffic lanes
Traffic signal preemption
Unused highway
Wide outside lane
Woonerf
Demarcation
Bollard
Botts' dots
Cable barrier
Cat's eye (road)
Concrete step barrier
Constant-slope barrier
Curb
F-Shape barrier
Guard rail
Jersey barrier
Kassel kerb
Noise barrier
Raised pavement marker
Road surface marking
Rumble strip
Traffic barrier
Traffic cone
Structures
Bridge
Causeway
Overpass / Flyover
Underpass / Tunnel
Glossary of road transport terms
Road types by features
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Roundabout&oldid=847030107"
Categories:
Roundabouts and traffic circles
Road junction types
Hidden categories:
CS1 German-language sources (de)
CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown
Webarchive template wayback links
CS1 French-language sources (fr)
CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list
Pages using web citations with no URL
CS1 Dutch-language sources (nl)
Pages with URL errors
CS1 Spanish-language sources (es)
All articles with dead external links
Articles with dead external links from December 2017
Articles with permanently dead external links
Use dmy dates from August 2010
Articles needing additional references from December 2013
All articles needing additional references
Use British English from January 2017
Articles to be merged from March 2018
All articles to be merged
Wikipedia articles needing clarification from June 2015
All articles with unsourced statements
Articles with unsourced statements from January 2017
Articles with unsourced statements from June 2015
Wikipedia articles needing clarification from March 2014
Articles lacking in-text citations from December 2013
All articles lacking in-text citations
Articles with unsourced statements from June 2018
Articles with unsourced statements from December 2013
Articles with unsourced statements from October 2011
Vague or ambiguous geographic scope from September 2015
Articles that may be too long from July 2015
Articles with multiple maintenance issues
Articles with unsourced statements from August 2015
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
In other projects
Wikimedia Commons
Languages
Български
Català
Čeština
Cymraeg
Dansk
Deutsch
Español
Esperanto
Euskara
فارسی
Français
한국어
Bahasa Indonesia
Íslenska
Italiano
עברית
Latina
Lëtzebuergesch
Lietuvių
Magyar
Македонски
Nederlands
日本語
Norsk
Norsk nynorsk
Polski
Português
Română
Русский
Shqip
Simple English
Slovenčina
Slovenščina
Suomi
Svenska
Tagalog
தமிழ்
Türkçe
Українська
粵語
中文
32 more
Edit links
This page was last edited on 22 June 2018, at 12:34 (UTC).
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

attrs: class href

values: mw-jump-link #mw-head

values: mw-jump-link #p-search

attrs: href class title

values:
/wiki/Roundabout_(disambiguation)
mw-disambig
Roundabout (disambiguation)

attrs: role class

values:
note
hatnote navigation-not-searchable

value: p

attrs: alt src width height srcset data-file-width data-file-height

value: td

value: b

values: Help:Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup/1

value: span

value: small

values: plainlinks metadata ambox ambox-content ambox-Refimprove

values:
plainlinks metadata ambox ambox-move
presentation

values:
/wiki/Right-_and_left-hand_traffic
mw-redirect
Right- and left-hand traffic

values:
/wiki/Place_de_l%27%C3%89toile
mw-redirect
Place de l'Étoile

values: Please clarify the following statement or statements with a good explanation from a reliable source. (June 2015)

values: Shasta/Hanchett Park, San Jose, California

values:
/wiki/Letchworth_Garden_City
mw-redirect
Letchworth Garden City

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (January 2017)

values:
noprint Inline-Template Template-Fact
white-space:nowrap;

values:
/wiki/Statistical_survey
mw-redirect
Statistical survey

values:
/wiki/European_Vacation
mw-redirect
European Vacation

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (June 2015)

values:
/wiki/Jakarta,_Indonesia
mw-redirect
Jakarta, Indonesia

values:
/wiki/Controlled-access_highways
mw-redirect
Controlled-access highways

values:
/wiki/U.S._Department_of_Transportation
mw-redirect
U.S. Department of Transportation

values: The text near this tag may need clarification or removal of jargon. (March 2014)

values:
noprint Inline-Template
margin-left:0.1em; white-space:nowrap;

values: Wikipedia:WikiProject Fact and Reference Check

values: plainlinks metadata ambox ambox-style ambox-More_footnotes

values:
/wiki/Left-hand_traffic
mw-redirect
Left-hand traffic

values:
/wiki/Guadalajara,_Mexico
mw-redirect
Guadalajara, Mexico

values:
/wiki/Francisco_Garces
mw-redirect
Francisco Garces

values:
/wiki/Pedestrian_island
mw-redirect
Pedestrian island

values: Pavement markings indicate sidewalk riding is legal.

values: Cyclist rides through main lane of roundabout

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (June 2018)

values:
/wiki/Clearwater_Beach,_Florida
mw-redirect
Clearwater Beach, Florida

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (December 2013)

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (October 2011)

values: Edit section: Vision-impaired pedestrians

values: The geographic scope near this tag is ambiguous. (September 2015)

values: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names)

values: Edit section: Types of circular intersections

values: Edit section: Smaller, small or mini- roundabouts

values:
/wiki/Irapuato,_Guanajuato
mw-redirect
Irapuato, Guanajuato

values:
/wiki/Kemptville,_Ontario
mw-redirect
Kemptville, Ontario

values:
/wiki/Dogbone_interchange
mw-redirect
Dogbone interchange

values: Maps, aerial photos, and other data for this location

values: Windesheim University of Applied Sciences

values: Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

values:
/wiki/Dumbbell_interchange
mw-redirect
Dumbbell interchange

values:
/wiki/M8_motorway_(Great_Britain)
mw-redirect
M8 motorway (Great Britain)

values: A200 (Netherlands) (page does not exist)

values: Edit section: Access-controlled roundabouts

values:
/wiki/2nd_Ring_Road_(Beijing)
mw-redirect
2nd Ring Road (Beijing)

values: Edit section: "Magic" roundabouts/ring junctions

values:
/wiki/The_Egg_(roundabout)
mw-redirect
The Egg (roundabout)

values:
/wiki/Hatton_Cross
mw-redirect
Hatton Cross

values: plainlinks metadata ambox ambox-style ambox-very_long

values:
mw-collapsible mw-made-collapsible
width:95%; margin: 0.2em 0;

values: plainlinks metadata ambox ambox-content ambox-multiple_issues compact-ambox

values:
/wiki/Gothenburg_tram
mw-redirect
Gothenburg tram

values:
/wiki/Oslo_Tramway
mw-redirect
Oslo Tramway

values:
/wiki/Midland_Metro
mw-redirect
Midland Metro

values:
/wiki/Railway_station
mw-redirect
Railway station

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (August 2015)

values:
/wiki/Curb_(road)
mw-redirect
Curb (road)

values:
/wiki/Kumara_Junction
mw-redirect
Kumara Junction

values:
/wiki/Hokitika_Branch
mw-redirect
Hokitika Branch

values: Edit section: Hamburger roundabout/throughabout/cut-through

values: Edit section: Bicycle-pedestrian roundabouts

values:
/wiki/Rotary_(intersection)
mw-redirect
Rotary (intersection)

values:
reflist mw-references-wrap
list-style-type: lower-alpha;

values:
nofollow
http://www.tfhrc.gov:80/
external free

values: Category:CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown

values: Category:CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.tfhrc.gov/safety/00068.htm

values: -moz-column-width: 30em; -webkit-column-width: 30em; column-width: 30em; list-style-type: decimal;

values:
nofollow
http://www.trl.co.uk/
external text

values:
nofollow
http://roundabouts.kittelson.com/
external text

values:
nofollow
external text
http://roundaboutsnow.com/roundabouts

values:
nofollow
http://teachamerica.com/
external text

values: Category:Limited-access roads by country

values:
/wiki/Junction_(road)
mw-redirect
Junction (road)

values:
/wiki/Raindrop_interchange
mw-redirect
Raindrop interchange

values:
/wiki/Bicycle_lane
mw-redirect
Bicycle lane

values:
/wiki/Traffic_lanes
mw-redirect
Traffic lanes

values: nowraplinks hlist collapsible collapsed navbox-inner mw-collapsible mw-collapsed mw-made-collapsible

values: Category:Roundabouts and traffic circles

values: Category:CS1 German-language sources (de)

values: Category:Webarchive template wayback links

values: Category:CS1 French-language sources (fr)

values: Category:Pages using web citations with no URL

values: Category:CS1 Dutch-language sources (nl)

values: Category:CS1 Spanish-language sources (es)

values: Category:All articles with dead external links

values: Category:Articles with dead external links from December 2017

values: Category:Articles with permanently dead external links

values: Category:Articles needing additional references from December 2013

values: Category:All articles needing additional references

values: Category:Use British English from January 2017

values: Category:Articles to be merged from March 2018

values: Category:Wikipedia articles needing clarification from June 2015

values: Category:All articles with unsourced statements

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from January 2017

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from June 2015

values: Category:Wikipedia articles needing clarification from March 2014

values: Category:Articles lacking in-text citations from December 2013

values: Category:All articles lacking in-text citations

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from June 2018

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from December 2013

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from October 2011

values: Category:Vague or ambiguous geographic scope from September 2015

values: Category:Articles that may be too long from July 2015

values: Category:Articles with multiple maintenance issues

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from August 2015

values: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

values: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

values: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

values: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

values:
/wiki/Roundabout
View the content page [ctrl-alt-c]
c

values: Discussion about the content page [ctrl-alt-t]

values: p-namespaces navigation vectorTabs p-namespaces-label

values:
p-variants
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-variants-label

values: Past revisions of this page [ctrl-alt-h]

values: p-views navigation vectorTabs p-views-label

values:
p-cactions
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-cactions-label

values:
mw-wiki-logo
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page

values:
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page [ctrl-alt-z]
z

values: Featured content – the best of Wikipedia

values: Find background information on current events

values:
/wiki/Special:Random
Load a random article [ctrl-alt-x]
x

values: portal navigation p-navigation p-navigation-label

values: Guidance on how to use and edit Wikipedia

values: About the project, what you can do, where to find things

values: A list of recent changes in the wiki [ctrl-alt-r]

values: portal navigation p-interaction p-interaction-label

values: List of all English Wikipedia pages containing links to this page [ctrl-alt-j]

values: Recent changes in pages linked from this page [ctrl-alt-k]

values:
/wiki/Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard
Upload files [ctrl-alt-u]
u

values: A list of all special pages [ctrl-alt-q]

values: Permanent link to this revision of the page

values: Link to connected data repository item [ctrl-alt-g]

values: Кръгово движение – Bulgarian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-bg
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-cs
display: none;

values:
https://cy.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cylchfan
Cylchfan – Welsh
cy
cy
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-cy
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-da
display: none;

values:
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotonda
Rotonda – Spanish
es
es
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-eu
display: none;

values: 회전교차로 – Korean

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ko
display: none;

values:
https://is.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hringtorg
Hringtorg – Icelandic
is
is
interlanguage-link-target

values:
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotatoria
Rotatoria – Italian
it
it
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-it
display: none;

values: מעגל תנועה – Hebrew

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-he
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-la
display: none;

values: Intersection à sens giratoire obligatoire – Luxembourgish

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-lb
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-hu
display: none;

values: Раскружница – Macedonian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-mk
display: none;

values: ラウンドアバウト – Japanese

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-no
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-nn
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ro
display: none;

values: Круговой перекрёсток – Russian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sq
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sk
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sl
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sv
display: none;

values:
https://tl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotonda
Rotonda – Tagalog
tl
tl
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-tl
display: none;

values: சுற்றுச்சந்தி – Tamil

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-tr
display: none;

values: Кругове перехрестя – Ukrainian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-uk
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-zh-yue
display: none;

values: All languages (initial selection from common choices by you and others)

values:
suggestions
display: none; font-size: 13px;

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Roundabout rootpage-Roundabout skin-vector action-view