text:
Max Weber
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
For other people named Max Weber, see Max Weber (disambiguation).
Max Weber
Weber in 1894
Born
Maximilian Karl Emil Weber
(1864-04-21)21 April 1864
Erfurt, Province of Saxony, Prussia
Died
14 June 1920(1920-06-14) (aged 56)
Munich, Bavaria, Germany
Nationality
Prussia (1864–1871)
German Empire (1871–1918)
Weimar Republic (1918–1920)
Alma mater
University of Berlin
University of Heidelberg
Known for
Weberian bureaucracy
Disenchantment · Ideal type
Iron cage · Life chances
Methodological individualism
Monopoly on violence
Protestant work ethic
Rationalisation · Social action
Three-component stratification
Tripartite classification of authority
Verstehen
Scientific career
Fields
Economics
sociology
history
law
politics
philosophy
Institutions
Universities of Berlin
Freiburg
Heidelberg
Vienna
Munich
Doctoral advisor
Levin Goldschmidt
Influences
Hermann Baumgarten[1]
Immanuel Kant · Friedrich Nietzsche
· Wilhelm Dilthey
Heinrich Rickert · Georg Simmel
Werner Sombart[2]
Influenced
Karl Jaspers · Georg Simmel
Talcott Parsons · Ludwig von Mises
György Lukács · Theodor W. Adorno
Carl Schmitt · Jürgen Habermas
Joseph Schumpeter · C. Wright Mills
Cornelius Castoriadis · Ludwig Lachmann · Karl Polanyi
Maximilian Karl Emil "Max" Weber (/ˈveɪbər/;[4] German: [ˈmaks ˈveːbɐ]; 21 April 1864 – 14 June 1920) was a German sociologist, philosopher, jurist, and political economist. His ideas profoundly influenced social theory and social research.[5] Weber is often cited, with Émile Durkheim and Karl Marx, as among the three founders of sociology.[6][7][8][9][10] Weber was a key proponent of methodological antipositivism, arguing for the study of social action through interpretive (rather than purely empiricist) means, based on understanding the purpose and meaning that individuals attach to their own actions. Unlike Durkheim, he did not believe in monocausality and rather proposed that for any outcome there can be multiple causes.[11]
Weber's main intellectual concern was understanding the processes of rationalisation, secularisation, and "disenchantment" that he associated with the rise of capitalism and modernity.[12] He saw these as the result of a new way of thinking about the world.[13] Weber is best known for his thesis combining economic sociology and the sociology of religion, elaborated in his book The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, in which he proposed that ascetic Protestantism was one of the major "elective affinities" associated with the rise in the Western world of market-driven capitalism and the rational-legal nation-state. He argued that it was in the basic tenets of Protestantism to boost capitalism. Thus, it can be said that the spirit of capitalism is inherent to Protestant religious values.
Against Marx's historical materialism, Weber emphasised the importance of cultural influences embedded in religion as a means for understanding the genesis of capitalism.[14] The Protestant Ethic formed the earliest part in Weber's broader investigations into world religion; he went on to examine the religions of China, the religions of India and ancient Judaism, with particular regard to their differing economic consequences and conditions of social stratification.[a] In another major work, "Politics as a Vocation", Weber defined the state as an entity that successfully claims a "monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory". He was also the first to categorise social authority into distinct forms, which he labelled as charismatic, traditional, and rational-legal. His analysis of bureaucracy emphasised that modern state institutions are increasingly based on rational-legal authority.
Weber also made a variety of other contributions in economic history, as well as economic theory and methodology. Weber's analysis of modernity and rationalisation significantly influenced the critical theory associated with the Frankfurt School. After the First World War, Max Weber was among the founders of the liberal German Democratic Party. He also ran unsuccessfully for a seat in parliament and served as advisor to the committee that drafted the ill-fated democratic Weimar Constitution of 1919. After contracting Spanish flu, he died of pneumonia in 1920, aged 56.[6]
Contents
[hide]
1 Biography
1.1 Early life and family background
1.2 Education
1.3 Early work
1.4 Later work
1.5 Political involvements
1.6 Last years
2 Max Weber's thought
2.1 Max Weber's bureaucratic model (rational-legal model)
2.2 Inspirations
2.3 Methodology
2.4 Rationalisation
2.5 Sociology of religion
2.5.1 The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism
2.5.2 The Religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism
2.5.3 The Religion of India: The Sociology of Hinduism and Buddhism
2.5.4 Ancient Judaism
2.5.5 Economy and Society
2.5.6 Theodicy of fortune and misfortune
2.6 Politics and government
2.6.1 Social stratification
2.7 Study of the city
2.8 Economics
2.8.1 Methodological individualism
2.8.2 Marginalism and psychophysics
2.8.3 Economic history
2.8.4 Economic calculation
3 Legacy
4 Critical responses to Weber
5 Works
6 See also
7 References
7.1 Sources
8 Further reading
9 External links
Biography[edit]
Early life and family background[edit]
Karl Emil Maximilian Weber was born in 1864, in Erfurt, Province of Saxony, Prussia.[6] He was the oldest of the seven children of Max Weber Sr., a wealthy and prominent civil servant and member of the National Liberal Party, and his wife Helene (Fallenstein), who partly descended from French Huguenot immigrants and held strong moral absolutist ideas.[6]
Weber Sr.'s involvement in public life immersed his home in both politics and academia, as his salon welcomed many prominent scholars and public figures.[6] The young Weber and his brother Alfred, who also became a sociologist and economist, thrived in this intellectual atmosphere. Weber's 1876 Christmas presents to his parents, when he was thirteen years old, were two historical essays entitled "About the course of German history, with special reference to the positions of the Emperor and the Pope", and "About the Roman Imperial period from Constantine to the migration of nations".[15] In class, bored and unimpressed with the teachers—who in turn resented what they perceived as a disrespectful attitude—he secretly read all forty volumes of Goethe,[16][17] and it has been recently argued that this was an important influence on his thought and methodology.[18] Before entering the university, he would read many other classical works.[17] Over time, Weber would also be significantly affected by the marital tension between his father, "a man who enjoyed earthly pleasures", and his mother, a devout Calvinist "who sought to lead an ascetic life".[19][20]
Max Weber and his brothers, Alfred and Karl, in 1879
Education[edit]
In 1882 Weber enrolled in the University of Heidelberg as a law student.[21] After a year of military service, he transferred to the University of Berlin.[16] After his first few years as a student, during which he spent much time "drinking beer and fencing", Weber would increasingly take his mother's side in family arguments and grew estranged from his father.[19][20][22] Simultaneously with his studies, he worked as a junior lawyer.[16] In 1886 Weber passed the examination for Referendar, comparable to the bar association examination in the British and American legal systems. Throughout the late 1880s, Weber continued his study of law and history.[16] He earned his law doctorate in 1889 by writing a dissertation on legal history titled The history of commercial partnerships in the Middle Ages. This work was used as part of a longer work On the History of Trading Companies in the Middle Ages, based on South-European Sources, published in the same year.[23] Two years later, Weber completed his Habilitationsschrift, Roman Agrarian History and its Significance for Public and Private Law, working with August Meitzen.[24][25] Having thus become a Privatdozent, Weber joined the University of Berlin's faculty, lecturing and consulting for the government.[26]
Early work[edit]
In the years between the completion of his dissertation and habilitation, Weber took an interest in contemporary social policy. In 1888 he joined the Verein für Socialpolitik,[27] a new professional association of German economists affiliated with the historical school, who saw the role of economics primarily as finding solutions to the social problems of the age and who pioneered large scale statistical studies of economic issues. He also involved himself in politics, joining the left-leaning Evangelical Social Congress.[28] In 1890 the Verein established a research program to examine "the Polish question" or Ostflucht: the influx of Polish farm workers into eastern Germany as local labourers migrated to Germany's rapidly industrialising cities.[6] Weber was put in charge of the study and wrote a large part of the final report,[6][27] which generated considerable attention and controversy and marked the beginning of Weber's renown as a social scientist.[6] From 1893 to 1899 Weber was a member of the Alldeutscher Verband (Pan-German League), an organization that campaigned against the influx of the Polish workers; the degree of Weber's support for the Germanisation of Poles and similar nationalist policies is still debated by modern scholars.[29][30] In some of his work, in particular his provocative lecture on "The Nation State and Economic Policy" delivered in 1895, Weber criticises the immigration of Poles and blames the Junker class for perpetuating Slavic immigration to serve their selfish interests.[31]
Max Weber and his wife Marianne in 1894
Also in 1893 he married his distant cousin Marianne Schnitger, later a feminist activist and author in her own right,[6][32] who was instrumental in collecting and publishing Weber's journal articles as books after his death, while her biography of him is an important source for understanding Weber's life.[33][34] They would have no children and it is usually acknowledged that their marriage was never consummated.[22] The marriage granted long-awaited financial independence to Weber, allowing him to finally leave his parents' household.[20] The couple moved to Freiburg in 1894, where Weber was appointed professor of economics at the university,[25][26] before accepting the same position at the University of Heidelberg in 1896.[25][26] There Weber became a central figure in the so-called "Weber Circle", composed of other intellectuals such as his wife Marianne, Georg Jellinek, Ernst Troeltsch, Werner Sombart and Robert Michels.[6] Weber also remained active in the Verein and the Evangelical Social Congress.[6] His research in that period was focused on economics and legal history.[35]
In 1897 Max Weber Sr. died two months after a severe quarrel with his son that was never resolved.[6][36] After this, Weber became increasingly prone to depression, nervousness and insomnia, making it difficult for him to fulfill his duties as a professor.[16][25] His condition forced him to reduce his teaching and eventually leave his course unfinished in the autumn of 1899. After spending months in a sanatorium during the summer and autumn of 1900, Weber and his wife travelled to Italy at the end of the year and did not return to Heidelberg until April 1902. He would again withdraw from teaching in 1903 and not return to it till 1919. Weber's ordeal with mental illness was carefully described in a personal chronology that was destroyed by his wife. This chronicle was supposedly destroyed because Marianne Weber feared that Max Weber's work would be discredited by the Nazis if his experience with mental illness were widely known.[6][37]
Later work[edit]
After Weber's immense productivity in the early 1890s, he did not publish any papers between early 1898 and late 1902, finally resigning his professorship in late 1903. Freed from those obligations, in that year he accepted a position as associate editor of the Archives for Social Science and Social Welfare,[38] where he worked with his colleagues Edgar Jaffé (de) and Werner Sombart.[6][39] His new interests would lie in more fundamental issues of social sciences; his works from this latter period are of primary interest to modern scholars.[35] In 1904, Weber began to publish some of his most seminal papers in this journal, notably his essay The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, which became his most famous work[40] and laid the foundations for his later research on the impact of cultures and religions on the development of economic systems.[41] This essay was the only one of his works from that period that was published as a book during his lifetime. Some other of his works written in the first one and a half decades of the 20th century—published posthumously and dedicated primarily from the fields of sociology of religion, economic and legal sociology—are also recognised as among his most important intellectual contributions.[6]
Also in 1904, he visited the United States and participated in the Congress of Arts and Sciences held in connection with the World's Fair (Louisiana Purchase Exposition) in St. Louis. A monument to his visit was placed at the home of relatives whom Weber visited in Mt. Airy, North Carolina.[42]
Despite his partial recovery evident in America, Weber felt that he was unable to resume regular teaching at that time and continued on as a private scholar, helped by an inheritance in 1907.[26][38] In 1909, disappointed with the Verein, he co-founded the German Sociological Association (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Soziologie, or DGS) and served as its first treasurer.[6] He would, however, resign from the DGS in 1912.[6] In 1912, Weber tried to organise a left-wing political party to combine social-democrats and liberals. This attempt was unsuccessful, in part because many liberals feared social-democratic revolutionary ideals.[43]
Political involvements[edit]
Max Weber (foreground) in 1917 with Ernst Toller (facing)
At the outbreak of World War I, Weber, aged 50, volunteered for service and was appointed as a reserve officer and put in charge of organizing the army hospitals in Heidelberg, a role he fulfilled until the end of 1915.[38][44] Weber's views on the war and the expansion of the German empire changed during the course of the conflict.[43][44][45] Early on he supported the nationalist rhetoric and the war effort, though with some hesitation as he viewed the war as a necessity to fulfill German duty as a leading state power. In time, however, Weber became one of the most prominent critics of German expansionism and of the Kaiser's war policies.[6] He publicly attacked the Belgian annexation policy and unrestricted submarine warfare and later supported calls for constitutional reform, democratisation and universal suffrage.[6]
Weber joined the worker and soldier council of Heidelberg in 1918. He then served in the German delegation to the Paris Peace Conference and as advisor to the Confidential Committee for Constitutional Reform, which drafted the Weimar Constitution.[38] Motivated by his understanding of the American model, he advocated a strong, popularly elected presidency as a constitutional counterbalance to the power of the professional bureaucracy.[6] More controversially, he also defended the provisions for emergency presidential powers that became Article 48 of the Weimar Constitution. These provisions were later used by Adolf Hitler to subvert the rest of the constitution and institute rule by decree, allowing his regime to suppress opposition and gain dictatorial powers.[46]
Weber also ran, unsuccessfully, for a parliamentary seat, as a member of the liberal German Democratic Party, which he had co-founded.[6][47] He opposed both the leftist German Revolution of 1918–1919 and the ratification of the Treaty of Versailles, principled positions that defied the political alignments in Germany at that time,[6] and which may have prevented Friedrich Ebert, the new social-democratic President of Germany, from appointing Weber as minister or ambassador.[44] Weber commanded widespread respect but relatively little influence.[6] Weber's role in German politics remains controversial to this day.
In Weber's critique of the left, he complained of the leaders of the leftist Spartacus League—which was led by Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg and controlled the city government of Berlin while Weber was campaigning for his party—"We have this [German] revolution to thank for the fact that we cannot send a single division against the Poles. All we see is dirt, muck, dung, and horse-play—nothing else. Liebknecht belongs in the madhouse and Rosa Luxemburg in the zoological gardens.” [48] Weber was at the same time critical of the Versailles Treaty, which he believed unjustly assigned "war guilt" to Germany when it came to World War I. Weber believed that many countries were guilty of starting World War I, not just Germany. In making this case, Weber argued that “In the case of this war there is one, and only one power that desired it under all circumstances through its own will and, according to their political goals required: Russia. …It never crossed [my] mind that a German invasion of Belgium [in 1914] was nothing but an innocent act on the part of the Germans."[49]
Later that same month, in January 1919, after Weber and Weber's party were defeated for election, Weber delivered one of his greatest academic lectures, Politics as a Vocation, which reflected on the inherent violence and dishonesty he saw among politicians—a profession in which only recently Weber was so personally active. About the nature of politicians, he concluded that, "In nine out of ten cases they are windbags puffed up with hot air about themselves. They are not in touch with reality, and they do not feel the burden they need to shoulder; they just intoxicate themselves with romantic sensations."[50]
Last years[edit]
Weber's grave in Heidelberg
Frustrated with politics, Weber resumed teaching during this time, first at the University of Vienna, then, after 1919, at the University of Munich.[6][26][38] His lectures from that period were collected into major works, such as the General Economic History, Science as a Vocation and Politics as a Vocation.[6] In Munich, he headed the first German university institute of sociology, but never held a professorial position in sociology. Many colleagues and students in Munich attacked his response to the German Revolution and some right-wing students held protests in front of his home.[43] Max Weber contracted the Spanish flu and died of pneumonia in Munich on 14 June 1920.[6] At the time of his death, Weber had not finished writing his magnum opus on sociological theory: Economy and Society. His widow Marianne helped prepare it for its publication in 1921–22.
Max Weber's thought[edit]
Max Weber's bureaucratic theory or model is sometimes also known as the "rational-legal" model. The model tries to explain bureaucracy from a rational point of view via nine main characteristics or principles; these are as follows:[51]
Max Weber's bureaucratic model (rational-legal model)[edit]
Weber wrote that the modern bureaucracy in both the public and private sector relies on the following principles.
"First, it is based on the general principle of precisely defined and organized across-the-board competencies of the various offices. These competencies are underpinned by rules, laws, or administrative regulations."[52] For Weber, this means[53]
A rigid division of labor is established that clearly identifies regular tasks and duties of the particular bureaucratic system.
Regulations describe firmly established chains of command and the duties and capacity to coerce others to comply.
Hiring people with particular, certified qualifications supports regular and continuous execution of the assigned duties.
Weber notes that these three aspects "...constitute the essence of bureaucratic administration...in the public sector. In the private sector, these three aspects constitute the essence of a bureaucratic management of a private company."[54]
Main principles (characteristics):
Specialized roles
Recruitment based on merit (e.g., tested through open competition)
Uniform principles of placement, promotion, and transfer in an administrative system
Careerism with systematic salary structure
Hierarchy, responsibility and accountability
Subjection of official conduct to strict rules of discipline and control
Supremacy of abstract rules
Impersonal authority (e.g., office bearer does not bring the office with him)
Political neutrality
Merits: As Weber noted, real bureaucracy is less optimal and effective than his ideal-type model. Each of Weber's principles can degenerate—and more so, when they are used to analyze the individual level in an organization. But, when implemented in a group setting in an organization, some form of efficiency and effectiveness can be achieved, especially with regard to better output. This is especially true when the Bureaucratic model emphasizes qualification (merits), specialization of job-scope (labour), hierarchy of power, rules and discipline.[55]
Demerits: However, competencies, efficiency and effectiveness can be unclear and contradictory, especially when dealing with oversimplified matters. In a dehumanized bureaucracy, inflexible in distributing the job-scope, with every worker having to specialize from day one without rotating tasks for fear of decreasing output, tasks are often routine and can contribute to boredom. Thus, employees can sometimes feel that they are not part of the organization's work vision and missions. Consequently, they do not have any sense of belonging in the long term. Furthermore, this type of organization tends to invite exploitation and underestimate the potential of the employees, as creativity of the workers is brushed aside in favour of strict adherence to rules, regulations and procedures.[51]
Inspirations[edit]
Weber's thinking was strongly influenced by German idealism, and particularly by neo-Kantianism, which he had been exposed to through Heinrich Rickert, his professorial colleague at the University of Freiburg.[6] Especially important to Weber's work is the neo-Kantian belief that reality is essentially chaotic and incomprehensible, with all rational order deriving from the way the human mind focuses attention on certain aspects of reality and organises the resulting perceptions.[6] Weber's opinions regarding the methodology of the social sciences show parallels with the work of contemporary neo-Kantian philosopher and pioneering sociologist Georg Simmel.[56]
Weber was also influenced by Kantian ethics, which he nonetheless came to think of as obsolete in a modern age lacking in religious certainties. In this last respect, the influence of Friedrich Nietzsche's philosophy is evident.[6] According to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, the "deep tension between the Kantian moral imperatives and a Nietzschean diagnosis of the modern cultural world is apparently what gives such a darkly tragic and agnostic shade to Weber's ethical worldview".[6] Another major influence in Weber's life was the writings of Karl Marx and the workings of socialist thought in academia and active politics. While Weber shares some of Marx's consternation with bureaucratic systems and maligns them as being capable of advancing their own logic to the detriment of human freedom and autonomy, Weber views conflict as perpetual and inevitable and does not host the spirit of a materially available utopia.[57] Though the influence of his mother's Calvinist religiosity is evident throughout Weber's life and work, and though he maintained a deep, lifelong interest in the study of religions, Weber was open about the fact that he was personally irreligious.[58][59]
As a political economist and economic historian, Weber belonged to the "youngest" German historical school of economics, represented by academics such as Gustav von Schmoller and his student Werner Sombart. But, even though Weber's research interests were very much in line with that school, his views on methodology and the theory of value diverged significantly from those of other German historicists and were closer, in fact, to those of Carl Menger and the Austrian School, the traditional rivals of the historical school.[60][61] (See section on Economics.)
Methodology[edit]
A page from the typescript of the sociology of law within Economy and Society
Unlike some other classical figures (Comte, Durkheim) Weber did not attempt, consciously, to create any specific set of rules governing social sciences in general, or sociology in particular.[6] In comparison with Durkheim and Marx, Weber was more focused on individuals and culture and this is clear in his methodology.[16] Whereas Durkheim focused on the society, Weber concentrated on the individuals and their actions (see structure and action discussion) and whereas Marx argued for the primacy of the material world over the world of ideas, Weber valued ideas as motivating actions of individuals, at least in the big picture.[16][62][63]
Sociology, for Max Weber, is:
... a science which attempts the interpretive understanding of social action in order thereby to arrive at a causal explanation of its course and effects.
—  Max Weber[64]
Weber was concerned with the question of objectivity and subjectivity.[6] Weber distinguished social action from social behavior, noting that social action must be understood through how individuals subjectively relate to one another.[6][65] Study of social action through interpretive means (Verstehen) must be based upon understanding the subjective meaning and purpose that individuals attach to their actions.[6][35] Social actions may have easily identifiable and objective means, but much more subjective ends and the understanding of those ends by a scientist is subject to yet another layer of subjective understanding (that of the scientist).[6] Weber noted that the importance of subjectivity in social sciences makes creation of fool-proof, universal laws much more difficult than in natural sciences and that the amount of objective knowledge that social sciences may achieve is precariously limited.[6] Overall, Weber supported the goal of objective science, but he noted that it is an unreachable goal—although one definitely worth striving for.[6]
There is no absolutely "objective" scientific analysis of culture.... All knowledge of cultural reality ... is always knowledge from particular points of view.... an "objective" analysis of cultural events, which proceeds according to the thesis that the ideal of science is the reduction of empirical reality to "laws", is meaningless ... [because] ... the knowledge of social laws is not knowledge of social reality but is rather one of the various aids used by our minds for attaining this end.
—  Max Weber, "Objectivity" in Social Science, 1904[66]
The principle of methodological individualism, which holds that social scientists should seek to understand collectivities (such as nations, cultures, governments, churches, corporations, etc.) solely as the result and the context of the actions of individual persons, can be traced to Weber, particularly to the first chapter of Economy and Society, in which he argues that only individuals "can be treated as agents in a course of subjectively understandable action".[61][65] In other words, Weber argued that social phenomena can be understood scientifically only to the extent that they are captured by models of the behaviour of purposeful individuals—models that Weber called "ideal types"—from which actual historical events necessarily deviate due to accidental and irrational factors.[61] The analytical constructs of an ideal type never exist in reality, but provide objective benchmarks against which real-life constructs can be measured.[67]
We know of no scientifically ascertainable ideals. To be sure, that makes our efforts more arduous than in the past, since we are expected to create our ideals from within our breast in the very age of subjectivist culture.
—  Max Weber, 1909[68]
Weber's methodology was developed in the context of a wider debate about methodology of social sciences, the Methodenstreit.[35] Weber's position was close to historicism, as he understood social actions as being heavily tied to particular historical contexts and its analysis required the understanding of subjective motivations of individuals (social actors).[35] Thus Weber's methodology emphasises the use of comparative historical analysis.[69] Therefore, Weber was more interested in explaining how a certain outcome was the result of various historical processes rather than predicting an outcome of those processes in the future.[63]
Rationalisation[edit]
Many scholars have described rationalisation and the question of individual freedom in an increasingly rational society, as the main theme of Weber's work.[6][70][71][72] This theme was situated in the larger context of the relationship between psychological motivations, cultural values and beliefs (primarily, religion) and the structure of the society (usually determined by the economy).[63]
By rationalisation, Weber understood first, the individual cost-benefit calculation, second, the wider bureaucratic organisation of the organisations and finally, in the more general sense as the opposite of understanding the reality through mystery and magic (disenchantment).[72]
The fate of our times is characterised by rationalisation and intellectualisation and, above all, by the "disenchantment of the world"
—  Max Weber[73]
Weber began his studies of the subject in The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, in which he argued that the redefinition of the connection between work and piety in Protestantism and especially in ascetic Protestant denominations, particularly Calvinism, shifted human effort towards rational efforts aimed at achieving economic gain.[74][75] In Protestant religion, Christian piety towards God was expressed through one's secular vocation (secularisation of calling).[75] The rational roots of this doctrine, he argued, soon grew incompatible with and larger than the religious and so the latter were eventually discarded.[76]
Weber continued his investigation into this matter in later works, notably in his studies on bureaucracy and on the classification of legitimate authority into three types—rational-legal, traditional and charismatic—of which the rational-legal (through bureaucracy) is the dominant one in the modern world.[6] In these works Weber described what he saw as society's movement towards rationalisation.[6] Similarly, rationalisation could be seen in the economy, with the development of highly rational and calculating capitalism.[6] Weber also saw rationalisation as one of the main factors setting the European West apart from the rest of the world.[6] Rationalisation relied on deep changes in ethics, religion, psychology and culture; changes that first took place in the Western civilisation.[6]
What Weber depicted was not only the secularisation of Western culture, but also and especially the development of modern societies from the viewpoint of rationalisation. The new structures of society were marked by the differentiation of the two functionally intermeshing systems that had taken shape around the organisational cores of the capitalist enterprise and the bureaucratic state apparatus. Weber understood this process as the institutionalisation of purposive-rational economic and administrative action. To the degree that everyday life was affected by this cultural and societal rationalisation, traditional forms of life—which in the early modern period were differentiated primarily according to one's trade—were dissolved.
—  Jürgen Habermas, Modernity's Consciousness of Time, 1990 [1985][12]
Features of rationalisation include increasing knowledge, growing impersonality and enhanced control of social and material life.[6] Weber was ambivalent towards rationalisation; while admitting it was responsible for many advances, in particular, freeing humans from traditional, restrictive and illogical social guidelines, he also criticised it for dehumanising individuals as "cogs in the machine" and curtailing their freedom, trapping them in the bureaucratic iron cage of rationality and bureaucracy.[6][70][77][78] Related to rationalisation is the process of disenchantment, in which the world is becoming more explained and less mystical, moving from polytheistic religions to monotheistic ones and finally to the Godless science of modernity.[6] Those processes affect all of society, removing "sublime values... from public life" and making art less creative.[79]
In a dystopian critique of rationalisation, Weber notes that modern society is a product of an individualistic drive of the Reformation, yet at the same time, the society created in this process is less and less welcoming of individualism.[6]
How is it at all possible to salvage any remnants of "individual" freedom of movement in any sense given this all-powerful trend?
—  Max Weber[6]
Sociology of religion[edit]
Weber's work in the field of sociology of religion started with the essay The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism and continued with the analysis of The Religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism, The Religion of India: The Sociology of Hinduism and Buddhism and Ancient Judaism. His work on other religions was interrupted by his sudden death in 1920, which prevented him from following Ancient Judaism with studies of early Christianity and Islam.[80] His three main themes in the essays were the effect of religious ideas on economic activities, the relation between social stratification and religious ideas and the distinguishable characteristics of Western civilisation.[81]
Weber saw religion as one of the core forces in society.[69] His goal was to find reasons for the different development paths of the cultures of the Occident and the Orient, although without judging or valuing them, like some of the contemporary thinkers who followed the social Darwinist paradigm; Weber wanted primarily to explain the distinctive elements of the Western civilisation.[81] In the analysis of his findings, Weber maintained that Calvinist (and more widely, Protestant) religious ideas had had a major impact on the social innovation and development of the economic system of the West, but noted that they were not the only factors in this development. Other notable factors mentioned by Weber included the rationalism of scientific pursuit, merging observation with mathematics, science of scholarship and jurisprudence, rational systematisation and bureaucratisation of government administration and economic enterprise.[81] In the end, the study of the sociology of religion, according to Weber, focused on one distinguishing part of the Western culture, the decline of beliefs in magic, or what he referred to as "disenchantment of the world".[81]
Weber also proposed a socioevolutionary model of religious change, showing that in general, societies have moved from magic to polytheism, then to pantheism, monotheism and finally, ethical monotheism.[82] According to Weber, this evolution occurred as the growing economic stability allowed professionalisation and the evolution of ever more sophisticated priesthood.[83] As societies grew more complex and encompassed different groups, a hierarchy of gods developed and as power in the society became more centralised, the concept of a single, universal God became more popular and desirable.[84]
The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism[edit]
Main article: The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism
Cover of a German edition of The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism
Weber's essay The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism is his most famous work.[40] It is argued[by whom?] that this work should not be viewed as a detailed study of Protestantism, but rather as an introduction into Weber's later works, especially his studies of interaction between various religious ideas and economic behaviour as part of the rationalisation of the economic system.[85] In The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, Weber put forward the thesis that Calvinist ethic and ideas influenced the development of capitalism.[85] He noted the post-Reformation shift of Europe's economic centre away from Catholic countries such as France, Spain and Italy, and toward Protestant countries such as the Netherlands, England, Scotland and Germany. Weber also noted that societies having more Protestants were those with a more highly developed capitalist economy.[86] Similarly, in societies with different religions, most successful business leaders were Protestant.[85] Weber thus argued that Roman Catholicism impeded the development of the capitalist economy in the West, as did other religions such as Confucianism and Buddhism elsewhere in the world.[85]
The development of the concept of the calling quickly gave to the modern entrepreneur a fabulously clear conscience—and also industrious workers; he gave to his employees as the wages of their ascetic devotion to the calling and of co-operation in his ruthless exploitation of them through capitalism the prospect of eternal salvation.
—  Max Weber[75]
Christian religious devotion had historically been accompanied by rejection of mundane affairs, including economic pursuit.[87] Weber showed that certain types of Protestantism—notably Calvinism—were supportive of rational pursuit of economic gain and worldly activities dedicated to it, seeing them as endowed with moral and spiritual significance.[74] Weber argued that there were many reasons to look for the origins of modern capitalism in the religious ideas of the Reformation.[88] In particular, the Protestant ethic (or more specifically, Calvinist ethic) motivated the believers to work hard, be successful in business and reinvest their profits in further development rather than frivolous pleasures.[85] The notion of calling meant that each individual had to take action as an indication of their salvation; just being a member of the Church was not enough.[75] Predestination also reduced agonising over economic inequality and further, it meant that a material wealth could be taken as a sign of salvation in the afterlife.[85][89] The believers thus justified pursuit of profit with religion, as instead of being fuelled by morally suspect greed or ambition, their actions were motivated by a highly moral and respected philosophy.[85] This Weber called the "spirit of capitalism": it was the Protestant religious ideology that was behind—and inevitably led to—the capitalist economic system.[85] This theory is often viewed as a reversal of Marx's thesis that the economic "base" of society determines all other aspects of it.[74]
Weber abandoned research into Protestantism because his colleague Ernst Troeltsch, a professional theologian, had begun work on the book The Social Teachings of the Christian Churches and Sects. Another reason for Weber's decision was that Troeltsch's work already achieved what he desired in that area: laying the groundwork for a comparative analysis of religion and society.[90]
The phrase "work ethic" used in modern commentary is a derivative of the "Protestant ethic" discussed by Weber. It was adopted when the idea of the Protestant ethic was generalised to apply to the Japanese people, Jews and other non-Christians and thus lost its religious connotations.[91]
The Religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism[edit]
Main article: The Religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism
The Religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism was Weber's second major work on the sociology of religion. Hans H. Gerth edited and translated this text into English, with an introduction by C. K. Wang.[92] Weber focused on those aspects of Chinese society that were different from those of Western Europe, especially those aspects that contrasted with Puritanism. His work also questioned why capitalism did not develop in China.[93] He focused on the issues of Chinese urban development, Chinese patrimonialism and officialdom and Chinese religion and philosophy (primarily, Confucianism and Taoism), as the areas in which Chinese development differed most distinctively from the European route.[93]
According to Weber, Confucianism and Puritanism are mutually exclusive types of rational thought, each attempting to prescribe a way of life based on religious dogma.[94] Notably, they both valued self-control and restraint and did not oppose accumulation of wealth.[94] However, to both those qualities were just means to the final goal and here they were divided by a key difference.[89] Confucianism's goal was "a cultured status position", while Puritanism's goal was to create individuals who are "tools of God".[94] The intensity of belief and enthusiasm for action were rare in Confucianism, but common in Protestantism.[94] Actively working for wealth was unbecoming a proper Confucian.[89] Therefore, Weber states that it was this difference in social attitudes and mentality, shaped by the respective, dominant religions, that contributed to the development of capitalism in the West and the absence of it in China.[94]
The Religion of India: The Sociology of Hinduism and Buddhism[edit]
Main article: The Religion of India: The Sociology of Hinduism and Buddhism
The Religion of India: The Sociology of Hinduism and Buddhism was Weber's third major work on the sociology of religion. In this work he deals with the structure of Indian society, with the orthodox doctrines of Hinduism and the heterodox doctrines of Buddhism, with modifications brought by the influence of popular religiosity and finally with the impact of religious beliefs on the secular ethic of Indian society.[95] In Weber's view, Hinduism in India, like Confucianism in China, was a barrier for capitalism.[89] The Indian caste system made it very difficult for individuals to advance in the society beyond their caste.[89] Activity, including economic activity, was seen as unimportant in the context of the advancement of the soul.[89]
Weber ended his research of society and religion in India by bringing in insights from his previous work on China to discuss similarities of the Asian belief systems.[96] He notes that the beliefs saw the meaning of life as otherworldly mystical experience.[96] The social world is fundamentally divided between the educated elite, following the guidance of a prophet or wise man and the uneducated masses whose beliefs are centered on magic.[96] In Asia, there was no Messianic prophecy to give plan and meaning to the everyday life of educated and uneducated alike.[96] Weber juxtaposed such Messianic prophecies (also called ethical prophecies), notably from the Near East region to the exemplary prophecies found on the Asiatic mainland, focused more on reaching to the educated elites and enlightening them on the proper ways to live one's life, usually with little emphasis on hard work and the material world.[96][97] It was those differences that prevented the countries of the Occident from following the paths of the earlier Chinese and Indian civilisations. His next work, Ancient Judaism was an attempt to prove this theory.[96]
Ancient Judaism[edit]
Main article: Ancient Judaism (book)
In Ancient Judaism, his fourth major work on the sociology of religion, Weber attempted to explain the factors that resulted in the early differences between Oriental and Occidental religiosity.[98] He contrasted the innerworldly asceticism developed by Western Christianity with mystical contemplation of the kind developed in India.[98] Weber noted that some aspects of Christianity sought to conquer and change the world, rather than withdraw from its imperfections.[98] This fundamental characteristic of Christianity (when compared to Far Eastern religions) stems originally from ancient Jewish prophecy.[99]
Weber claimed that Judaism not only fathered Christianity and Islam, but was crucial to the rise of the modern Occidental state; Judaism's influence was as important as Hellenistic and Roman cultures.
Weber's premature death in 1920 prevented him from following his planned analysis of Psalms, the Book of Job, Talmudic Jewry, early Christianity and Islam.
Economy and Society[edit]
Main article: Economy and Society
Weber's magnum opus Economy and Society is a collection of his essays that he was working on at the time of his death in 1920. After his death, the final organization and editing of the book fell to his widow Marianne Weber. The final German form published in 1921 reflected very much Marianne Weber's work and intellectual commitment. Beginning in 1956, the German jurist Johannes Wincklemann began editing and organizing the German edition of Economy and Society based on his study of the papers that Weber left at his death.
English versions of Economy and Society were published as a collected volume in 1968 as edited by Gunther Roth and Claus Wittich. As a result of the various editions in German and English, there are differences between the organization of the different volumes.
Economy and Society includes a wide range of essays dealing with Weber's views regarding Sociology, Social Philosophy, Politics, Social Stratification, World Religion, Diplomacy, and other subjects. The book is typically published in a two volume set in both German and English, and is more than 1000 pages long.
Theodicy of fortune and misfortune[edit]
The theodicy of fortune and misfortune within sociology is the theory, as Weber suggested, of how "members of different social classes adopt different belief systems, or theodices, to explain their social situation".[100]
The concept of theodicy was expanded mainly with the thought of Weber and his addition of ethical considerations to the subject of religion. There is this ethical part of religion, including, "...(1) soteriology and (2) theodicy. These mean, respectively, how people understand themselves to be capable of a correct relationship with supernatural powers, and how to explain evil—or why bad things seem to happen to those who seem to be good people."[101] There is a separation of different theodicies with regard to class. "Theodicies of misfortune tend to the belief that wealth and other manifestations of privilege are indications or signs of evil.... In contrast, theodicies of fortune emphasise the notion that privileges are a blessing and are deserved."[101] Weber also writes that, "The affluent embrace good fortune theodicies, which emphasise that prosperity is a blessing of God...[while] theodices of misfortune emphasise that affluence is a sign of evil and that suffering in this world will be rewarded in the next."[100] Thus these two distinctions can be applied not only to class structure within society but denomination and racial segregation within religion.
Weber defines the importance of societal class within religion by examining the difference between the two theodicies and to what class structures they apply. The concept of "work ethic" is attached to the theodicy of fortune; thus, because of the Protestant "work ethic", there was a contribution of higher class outcomes and more education among Protestants.[102] Those without the work ethic clung to the theodicy of misfortune, believing wealth and happiness were granted in the afterlife. Another example of how this belief of religious theodicy influences class, is that those of lower status, the poor, cling to deep religiousness and faith as a way to comfort themselves and provide hope for a more prosperous future, while those of higher status cling to the sacraments or actions that prove their right of possessing greater wealth.[100]
These two theodicies can be found in the denominational segregation within the religious community. The main division can be seen between the mainline Protestant and evangelical denominations and their relation to the class into which their particular theodicy pertains. For example, mainline churches, with their upper class congregations, "...promote[d] order, stability, and conservatism, and in so doing proved to be a powerful source of legitimation of the status quo and of existing disparities in the distribution of wealth and power," because much of the wealth of the church comes from the congregation.[103] In contrast, Pentecostal churches adopted the theodicy of misfortune. They instead "advocated change intended to advance the cause of justice and fairness".[103] Thus the learned and upper class religious churches who preach the theodicy of fortune, ultimately support capitalism and corporation, while the churches who adopted the theodicy of misfortune, instead preached equality and fairness.
Politics and government[edit]
See also: Weber and German politics
In political sociology, one of Weber's most influential contributions is his "Politics as a Vocation" (Politik als Beruf) essay. Therein, Weber unveils the definition of the state as that entity that possesses a monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force.[104][105][106] Weber wrote that politics is the sharing of state's power between various groups, and political leaders are those who wield this power.[105] A politician must not be a man of the "true Christian ethic", understood by Weber as being the ethic of the Sermon on the Mount, that is to say, the injunction to turn the other cheek.[107] An adherent of such an ethic ought rather to be understood as a saint, for it is only saints, according to Weber, that can appropriately follow it.[107] The political realm is no realm for saints; a politician ought to marry the ethic of attitude and the ethic of responsibility ("Verantwortungsethik vs Gesinnungsethik"[108]) and must possess both a passion for his vocation and the capacity to distance himself from the subject of his exertions (the governed).[107]
Weber distinguished three ideal types of political leadership (alternatively referred to as three types of domination, legitimisation or authority):[51][109]
charismatic domination (familial and religious),
traditional domination (patriarchs, patrimonialism, feudalism) and
legal domination (modern law and state, bureaucracy).[110]
In his view, every historical relation between rulers and ruled contained such elements and they can be analysed on the basis of this tripartite distinction.[111] He notes that the instability of charismatic authority forces it to "routinise" into a more structured form of authority.[77] In a pure type of traditional rule, sufficient resistance to a ruler can lead to a "traditional revolution". The move towards a rational-legal structure of authority, utilising a bureaucratic structure, is inevitable in the end.[112] Thus this theory can be sometimes viewed as part of the social evolutionism theory. This ties to his broader concept of rationalisation by suggesting the inevitability of a move in this direction.[77]
Bureaucratic administration means fundamentally domination through knowledge.
—  Max Weber[113]
Weber described many ideal types of public administration and government in his masterpiece Economy and Society (1922). His critical study of the bureaucratisation of society became one of the most enduring parts of his work.[77][113] It was Weber who began the studies of bureaucracy and whose works led to the popularisation of this term.[114] Many aspects of modern public administration go back to him and a classic, hierarchically organised civil service of the Continental type is called "Weberian civil service".[115] As the most efficient and rational way of organising, bureaucratisation for Weber was the key part of the rational-legal authority and furthermore, he saw it as the key process in the ongoing rationalisation of the Western society.[77][113]
Weber listed several preconditions for the emergence of the bureaucracy:[116] The growth in space and population being administered, the growth in complexity of the administrative tasks being carried out and the existence of a monetary economy—these resulted in a need for a more efficient administrative system.[116] Development of communication and transportation technologies made more efficient administration possible (and popularly requested) and democratisation and rationalisation of culture resulted in demands that the new system treat everybody equally.[116]
Weber's ideal bureaucracy is characterised by hierarchical organisation, by delineated lines of authority in a fixed area of activity, by action taken (and recorded) on the basis of written rules, by bureaucratic officials needing expert training, by rules being implemented neutrally and by career advancement depending on technical qualifications judged by organisations, not by individuals.[113][116]
The decisive reason for the advance of the bureaucratic organisation has always been its purely technical superiority over any other form of organisation.
—  Max Weber[115]
While recognising bureaucracy as the most efficient form of organisation and even indispensable for the modern state, Weber also saw it as a threat to individual freedoms and the ongoing bureaucratisation as leading to a "polar night of icy darkness", in which increasing rationalisation of human life traps individuals in the aforementioned "iron cage" of bureaucratic, rule-based, rational control.[113][117] To counteract bureaucrats, the system needs entrepreneurs and politicians.[113]
Social stratification[edit]
Weber also formulated a three-component theory of stratification, with social class, social status and political party as conceptually distinct elements.[118] The three-component theory of stratification is in contrast to Karl Marx simpler theory of social class that ties all social stratification to what people own. In Weber's theory, issues of honour and prestige are important. This distinction is most clearly described in Weber's essay Classes, Staende, Parties, which was first published in his book Economy and Society.[119] The three components of Weber's theory are:
Social Class based on economically determined relationship to the market (owner, renter, employee, etc.)
Status (or in German Stand), which is based on non-economic qualities like honour, prestige and religion
Party, which refers to affiliations in the political domain
All three dimensions have consequences for what Weber called "life chances" (opportunities to improve one's life).[118]
Weber scholars maintain a sharp distinction between the terms status and class, even though, in casual use, people tend to use them interchangeably.[120]
Study of the city[edit]
As part of his overarching effort to understand the unique development of the Western world, Weber produced a detailed general study of the city as the characteristic locus of the social and economic relations, political arrangements, and ideas that eventually came to define the West. This resulted in a monograph, The City, which he probably compiled from research he conducted in 1911–13. It was published posthumously in 1921, and 1924, was incorporated into the second part of his Economy and Society, as chapter XVI, "The City (Non-legitimate Domination)".
According to Weber, the city as a politically autonomous organisation of people living in close proximity, employed in a variety of specialised trades, and physically separated from the surrounding countryside, only fully developed in the West and to a great extent shaped its cultural evolution:
The origin of a rational and inner-worldly ethic is associated in the Occident with the appearance of thinkers and prophets [...] who developed in a social context that was alien to the Asiatic cultures. This context consisted of the political problems engendered by the bourgeois status-group of the city, without which neither Judaism, nor Christianity, nor the development of Hellenistic thinking are conceivable.
—  Max Weber[121]
Weber argued that Judaism, early Christianity, theology, and later the political party and modern science, were only possible in the urban context that reached a full development in the West alone.[122] He also saw in the history of medieval European cities the rise of a unique form of "non-legitimate domination" that successfully challenged the existing forms of legitimate domination (traditional, charismatic, and rational-legal) that had prevailed until then in the Medieval world.[123] This new domination was based on the great economic and military power wielded by the organised community of city-dwellers ("citizens").
Economics[edit]
Weber regarded himself primarily as a "political economist",[124][125][126] and all of his professorial appointments were in economics, though today his contributions in that field are largely overshadowed by his role as a founder of modern sociology. As an economist, Weber belonged to the "youngest" German historical school of economics.[127] The great differences between that school's interests and methods on the one hand and those of the neoclassical school (from which modern mainstream economics largely derives) on the other, explain why Weber's influence on economics today is hard to discern.[128]
Methodological individualism[edit]
Though his research interests were always in line with those of the German historicists, with a strong emphasis on interpreting economic history, Weber's defence of "methodological individualism" in the social sciences represented an important break with that school and an embracing of many of the arguments that had been made against the historicists by Carl Menger, the founder of the Austrian School of economics, in the context of the academic Methodenstreit ("debate over methods") of the late 19th century.[61] The phrase methodological individualism, which has come into common usage in modern debates about the connection between microeconomics and macroeconomics, was coined by the Austrian-American economist Joseph Schumpeter in 1908 as a way of referring to the views of Weber.[61] According to Weber's theses, social research cannot be fully inductive or descriptive, because understanding some phenomenon implies that the researcher must go beyond mere description and interpret it; interpretation requires classification according to abstract "ideal (pure) types".[127] This, together with his antipositivistic argumentation (see Verstehen), can be taken as a methodological justification for the model of the "rational economic man" (homo economicus), which is at the heart of modern mainstream economics.[61][127]
Marginalism and psychophysics[edit]
Unlike other historicists, Weber also accepted the marginal theory of value (also called "marginalism") and taught it to his students.[60][129] In 1908, Weber published an article in which he drew a sharp methodological distinction between psychology and economics and attacked the claims that the marginal theory of value in economics reflected the form of the psychological response to stimuli as described by the Weber-Fechner law. Max Weber's article has been cited as a definitive refutation of the dependence of the economic theory of value on the laws of psychophysics by Lionel Robbins, George Stigler,[130] and Friedrich Hayek, though the broader issue of the relation between economics and psychology has come back into the academic debate with the development of "behavioral economics".[131]
Economic history[edit]
Weber's best known work in economics concerned the preconditions for capitalist development, particularly the relations between religion and capitalism, which he explored in The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism as well as in his other works on the sociology of religion.[127] He argued that bureaucratic political and economic systems emerging in the Middle Ages were essential in the rise of modern capitalism (including rational book-keeping and organisation of formally free labour), while they were a hindrance in the case of ancient capitalism, which had a different social and political structure based on conquest, slavery, and the coastal city-state.[132] Other contributions include his early work on the economic history of Roman agrarian society (1891) and on the labour relations in Eastern Germany (1892), his analysis of the history of commercial partnerships in the Middle Ages (1889), his critique of Marxism, the discussion of the roles of idealism and materialism in the history of capitalism in his Economy and Society (1922) and his General Economic History (1923), a notable example of the kind of empirical work associated with the German Historical School.[127]
Although today Weber is primarily read by sociologists and social philosophers, Weber's work did have a significant influence on Frank Knight, one of the founders of the neoclassical Chicago school of economics, who translated Weber's General Economic History into English in 1927.[133] Knight also wrote in 1956 that Max Weber was the only economist who dealt with the problem of understanding the emergence of modern capitalism "...from the angle which alone can yield an answer to such questions, that is, the angle of comparative history in the broad sense."[129]
Economic calculation[edit]
Weber, like his colleague Werner Sombart, regarded economic calculation and especially the double-entry bookkeeping method of business accounting, as one of the most important forms of rationalisation associated with the development of modern capitalism.[134] Weber's preoccupation with the importance of economic calculation led him to critique socialism as a system that lacked a mechanism for allocating resources efficiently to satisfy human needs.[135] Socialist intellectuals like Otto Neurath had realised that in a completely socialised economy, prices would not exist and central planners would have to resort to in-kind (rather than monetary) economic calculation.[135][136] According to Weber, this type of coordination would be inefficient, especially because it would be incapable of solving the problem of imputation (i.e. of accurately determining the relative values of capital goods).[135][136] Weber wrote that, under full socialism,
In order to make possible a rational utilisation of the means of production, a system of in-kind accounting would have to determine "value"—indicators of some kind for the individual capital goods which could take over the role of the "prices" used in book valuation in modern business accounting. But it is not at all clear how such indicators could be established and in particular, verified; whether, for instance, they should vary from one production unit to the next (on the basis of economic location), or whether they should be uniform for the entire economy, on the basis of "social utility", that is, of (present and future) consumption requirements [...] Nothing is gained by assuming that, if only the problem of a non-monetary economy were seriously enough attacked, a suitable accounting method would be discovered or invented. The problem is fundamental to any kind of complete socialisation. We cannot speak of a rational "planned economy" so long as in this decisive respect we have no instrument for elaborating a rational "plan".
—  Max Weber[137]
This argument against socialism was made independently, at about the same time, by Ludwig von Mises.[135][138] Weber himself had a significant influence on Mises, whom he had befriended when they were both at the University of Vienna in the spring of 1918,[139] and, through Mises, on several other economists associated with the Austrian School in the 20th century.[140] Friedrich Hayek in particular elaborated the arguments of Weber and Mises about economic calculation into a central part of free market economics's intellectual assault on socialism, as well as into a model for the spontaneous coordination of "dispersed knowledge" in markets.[141][142][143]
Legacy[edit]
The prestige of Max Weber among European social scientists would be difficult to over-estimate. He is widely considered the greatest of German sociologists and ... has become a leading influence in European and American thought.
—  Hans Heinrich Gerth and C. Wright Mills, From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, 1946/1991[7]
Weber's most influential work was on economic sociology, political sociology, and the sociology of religion. Along with Karl Marx and Émile Durkheim,[125] he is commonly regarded as one of the founders of modern sociology. But whereas Durkheim, following Comte, worked in the positivist tradition, Weber was instrumental in developing an antipositivist, hermeneutic, tradition in the social sciences.[144] In this regard he belongs to a similar tradition as his German colleagues Werner Sombart, Georg Simmel, and Wilhelm Dilthey, who stressed the differences between the methodologies appropriate to the social and the natural sciences.[144]
Weber presented sociology as the science of human social action; action that he separated into traditional, affectional, value-rational and instrumental.[145][146]
[Sociology is] the science whose object is to interpret the meaning of social action and thereby give a causal explanation of the way in which the action proceeds and the effects which it produces. By "action" in this definition is meant the human behaviour when and to the extent that the agent or agents see it as subjectively meaningful [...] the meaning to which we refer may be either (a) the meaning actually intended either by an individual agent on a particular historical occasion or by a number of agents on an approximate average in a given set of cases, or (b) the meaning attributed to the agent or agents, as types, in a pure type constructed in the abstract. In neither case is the "meaning" to be thought of as somehow objectively "correct" or "true" by some metaphysical criterion. This is the difference between the empirical sciences of action, such as sociology and history and any kind of a priori discipline, such as jurisprudence, logic, ethics, or aesthetics whose aim is to extract from their subject-matter "correct" or "valid" meaning.[147]
—  Max Weber, The Nature of Social Action, 1922
In his own time, however, Weber was viewed primarily as a historian and an economist.[125][126] The breadth of Weber's topical interests is apparent in the depth of his social theory:
The affinity between capitalism and Protestantism, the religious origins of the Western world, the force of charisma in religion as well as in politics, the all-embracing process of rationalisation and the bureaucratic price of progress, the role of legitimacy and of violence as the offspring of leadership, the "disenchantment" of the modern world together with the never-ending power of religion, the antagonistic relation between intellectualism and eroticism: all these are key concepts which attest to the enduring fascination of Weber's thinking.
—  Joachim Radkau, Max Weber: A Biography, 2005[148]
Many of Weber's works famous today were collected, revised and published posthumously. Significant interpretations of his writings were produced by such sociological luminaries as Talcott Parsons and C. Wright Mills. Parsons in particular imparted to Weber's works a functionalist, teleological perspective; this personal interpretation has been criticised for a latent conservatism.[149]
Weber has influenced many later social theorists, such as Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer, György Lukács and Jürgen Habermas.[6] Different elements of his thought were emphasised by Carl Schmitt, Joseph Schumpeter, Ludwig Lachmann, Leo Strauss, Hans Morgenthau, and Raymond Aron.[6] According to Austrian economist Ludwig von Mises, who had met Weber during his time at the University of Vienna,
The early death of this genius was a great disaster for Germany. Had Weber lived longer, the German people of today would be able to look to this example of an "Aryan" who would not be broken by National Socialism.
—  Ludwig von Mises, 1940[150]
Weber's friend, the psychiatrist and existentialist philosopher Karl Jaspers, described him as "the greatest German of our era". Weber's untimely death felt to Jaspers "as if the German world had lost its heart".[151] Paul Tillich, University Professor at Harvard, observed about Weber that he was "perhaps the greatest scholar in Germany of the nineteenth century". (Paul Tillich, "A History of Christian Thought", 1968, p. 233)
Critical responses to Weber[edit]
Weber's explanations are highly specific to the historical periods he analysed.[152] Some academics disagree, pointing out that, despite the fact that Weber did write in the early twentieth century, his ideas remain alive and relevant for understanding issues like politics, bureaucracy, and social stratification today.[153]
Many scholars, however, disagree with specific claims in Weber's historical analysis. For example, the economist Joseph Schumpeter argued that capitalism did not begin with the Industrial Revolution but in 14th century Italy.[154] In Milan, Venice and Florence, the small city-state governments led to the development of the earliest forms of capitalism.[155] In the 16th century, Antwerp was a commercial centre of Europe. Also, the predominantly Calvinist country of Scotland did not enjoy the same economic growth as the Netherlands, England and New England. It has been pointed out that the Netherlands, which had a Calvinist majority, industrialised much later in the 19th century than predominantly Catholic Belgium, which was one of the centres of the Industrial Revolution on the European mainland.[156] Emil Kauder expanded Schumpeter's argument by arguing the hypothesis that Calvinism hurt the development of capitalism by leading to the development of the labour theory of value.[157]
Works[edit]
For an extensive list of Max Weber's works, see Max Weber bibliography.
Weber wrote in German. Original titles printed after his death (1920) are most likely compilations of his unfinished works (of the Collected Essays… form). Many translations are made of parts or sections of various German originals and the names of the translations often do not reveal what part of German work they contain. Weber's work is generally quoted according to the critical Max Weber-Gesamtausgabe (Collected Works edition), which is published by Mohr Siebeck in Tübingen.
See also[edit]
Sociology portal
Interpretations of Weber's liberalism
Instrumental and value-rational action
Robert Michels
Sociology of law
Speeches of Max Weber
Weber and German politics
Werturteilsstreit
References[edit]
Jump up ^ Bellamy, Richard (1992), Liberalism and Modern Society, Polity, p. 165 .
Jump up ^ Bendix, Reinhard; Roth, Guenther (1971), Scholarship and Partisanship: Essays on Max Weber, University of California Press, p. 244, ISBN 9780520041714 .
Jump up ^ "Deutsche Biographie" (in German). Retrieved 25 September 2014.
Jump up ^ "Weber". Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary.
Jump up ^ "Max Weber", Encyclopædia Britannica (online ed.), 20 April 2009 .
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al am an ao ap aq ar as at au av aw ax Kim, Sung Ho (24 August 2007). "Max Weber". Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. Stanford. Retrieved 17 February 2010.
^ Jump up to: a b Max Weber; Hans Heinrich Gerth; Bryan S. Turner (7 March 1991). From Max Weber: essays in sociology. Psychology Press. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-415-06056-1. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
Jump up ^ Radkau, Joachim and Patrick Camiller (2009). Max Weber: A Biography. Trans. Patrick Camiller. Polity Press. ISBN 978-0-74564147-8.
Jump up ^ Giddens, Anthony (1971). Capitalism and Modern Social Theory: an Analysis of the Writings of Marx, Durkheim and Max Weber. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-52109785-1.
Jump up ^ Auguste Comte, Marx and Weber: Benton, Ted (1977). Philosophical Foundations of the Three Sociologies. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. ISBN 0-71008593-1.
Jump up ^ Tiryakian, Edward A. (2009). For Durkheim: Essays in Historical and Cultural Sociology. Routledge. p. 321. ISBN 0-75467155-0.
^ Jump up to: a b Habermas, Jürgen, The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity (originally published in German in 1985), Polity Press (1990), ISBN 0-7456-0830-2, p. 2.
Jump up ^ Macionis, John J. (2012). Sociology (14th ed.). Boston: Pearson. p. 88. ISBN 978-0-205-11671-3.
Jump up ^ Weber, Max The Protestant Ethic and "The Spirit of Capitalism" (1905). Transl. by Stephen Kalberg (2002), Roxbury Publ. Co., pp. 19, 35; Weber's references on these pages to "Superstructure" and "base" are unambiguous references to Marxism's base/superstructure theory.
Jump up ^ Sica, Alan (2004). Max Weber and the New Century. London: Transaction Publishers, p. 24. ISBN 0-7658-0190-6.
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g Craig J. Calhoun (2002). Classical sociological theory. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 165. ISBN 978-0-631-21348-2. Retrieved 19 March 2011.
^ Jump up to: a b Dirk Käsler (1988). Max Weber: an introduction to his life and work. University of Chicago Press. p. 2. ISBN 978-0-226-42560-3. Retrieved 24 March 2011.
Jump up ^ McKinnon, AM (2010), "Elective affinities of the Protestant ethic: Weber and the chemistry of capitalism" (PDF), Sociological Theory, ABDN, 28 (1): 108–26, doi:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.01367.x .
^ Jump up to: a b George Ritzer (29 September 2009). Contemporary Sociological Theory and Its Classical Roots: The Basics. McGraw-Hill. p. 32. ISBN 978-0-07-340438-7. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
^ Jump up to: a b c Lutz Kaelber Max Weber's Personal Life, 1886–1893
Jump up ^ Bendix, Reinhard (1 July 1977). Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait. University of California Press. p. 1. ISBN 0-520-03194-6.
^ Jump up to: a b Allan, Kenneth D. (2 November 2005). Explorations in Classical Sociological Theory: Seeing the Social World. Pine Forge Press. p. 146. ISBN 978-1-4129-0572-5.
Jump up ^ Weber, Max. Political Writings. Cambridge University Press, 1994, p. ix.
Jump up ^ Lutz Kaelber, Max Weber's Dissertation
^ Jump up to: a b c d Bendix (1977). Max Weber. p. 2. ISBN 978-0-520-03194-4.
^ Jump up to: a b c d e Ludwig M. Lachmann (1970). The legacy of Max Weber. Ludwig von Mises Institute. p. 143. ISBN 978-1-61016-072-8. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
^ Jump up to: a b Gianfranco Poggi (2006). Weber: a short introduction. Polity. p. 5. ISBN 978-0-7456-3489-0. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
Jump up ^ Wolfgang Justin Mommsen (1984). Max Weber and German Politics, 1890–1920. University of Chicago Press. p. 19. ISBN 0-226-53399-9.
Jump up ^ Wolfgang J. Mommsen; Michael Steinberg (25 July 1990). Max Weber and German Politics, 1890–1920. University of Chicago Press. pp. 54–56. ISBN 978-0-226-53399-5. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
Jump up ^ Eric J. Hobsbawm (1987). The age of empire, 1875–1914. Pantheon Books. p. 152. ISBN 978-0-394-56319-0. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
Jump up ^ Weber, Max. Political Writings. University of Cambridge Press, 1994. pp. 1–28.
Jump up ^ Marianne Weber. Last accessed on 18 September 2006. Based on Lengermann, P.; Niebrugge-Brantley, J. (1998). The Women Founders: Sociology and Social Theory, 1830–1930. Boston: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0-07-037169-5.
Jump up ^ Hartmut Lehmann; Guenther Roth (29 September 1995). Weber's Protestant Ethic: Origins, Evidence, Contexts. Cambridge University Press. p. 95. ISBN 978-0-521-55829-7. Retrieved 24 March 2011.
Jump up ^ Paul Honigsheim; Alan Sica (2003). The unknown Max Weber. Transaction Publishers. p. 86. ISBN 978-0-7658-0953-7. Retrieved 24 March 2011.
^ Jump up to: a b c d e Craig J. Calhoun (2002). Classical sociological theory. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 166. ISBN 978-0-631-21348-2. Retrieved 19 March 2011.
Jump up ^ Max Weber; Richard Swedberg (1999). Essays in economic sociology. Princeton University Press. p. 7. ISBN 978-0-691-00906-3. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
Jump up ^ "Why Work? – The New Yorker". newyorker.com. Retrieved 25 September 2014.
^ Jump up to: a b c d e Bendix (1977). Max Weber. p. 3. ISBN 978-0-520-03194-4.
Jump up ^ Roth, Guenther (1979). "History and Sociology in the Work of Max Weber". British Journal of Sociology. 27 (3): 306–18. JSTOR 589618.
^ Jump up to: a b Max Weber; Richard Swedberg (1999). Essays in economic sociology. Princeton University Press. p. 22. ISBN 978-0-691-00906-3. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
Jump up ^ Iannaccone, Laurence (1998). "Introduction to the Economics of Religion". Journal of Economic Literature. 36 (3): 1465–96. JSTOR 2564806.
Jump up ^ Michael Wise, "Max Weber Visits America: A Review of the Video," Sociation Today, volume 4, number 2, Fall 2006.
^ Jump up to: a b c Wolfgang J. Mommsen, The Political and Social Theory of Max Weber, University of Chicago Press, 1992, ISBN 0-226-53400-6, Google Print, p. 81 p. 60, p. 327
^ Jump up to: a b c Kaesler, Dirk (1989). Max Weber: An Introduction to His Life and Work. University of Chicago Press, p. 18. ISBN 0-226-42560-6
Jump up ^ Gerth, H.H; Mills, C. Wright (1948), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, London: Routledge, ISBN 0-415-17503-8 .
Jump up ^ Sven Eliaeson, "Constitutional Caesarism: Weber's Politics in their German Context", in Turner, Stephen (ed) (2000). The Cambridge Companion to Weber. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 142.
Jump up ^ P. G. C. van Schie; Gerrit Voermann (2006). The dividing line between success and failure: a comparison of liberalism in the Netherlands and Germany in the 19th and 20th centuries. LIT Verlag Münster. p. 64. ISBN 978-3-8258-7668-5. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
Jump up ^ Radkau, Joachim (2009), Max Weber, A Biography, New York: Polity Press, p. 209 .
Jump up ^ Waters & Waters 2015, p. 20.
Jump up ^ Waters & Waters 2015, pp. 21, 196.
^ Jump up to: a b c Jeong Chun Hai @Ibrahim, & Nor Fadzlina Nawi. (2012). Principles of Public Administration: Malaysian Perspectives. Kuala Lumpur: Pearson Publishers. ISBN 978-967-349-233-6
Jump up ^ Weber 2015:76, in Weber's Rationalism and Modern Society, Edited and Translated by Tony Waters and Dagmar Waters, New York: Palgrave Macmillan
Jump up ^ Weber 2015:76 in Weber's Rationalism and Modern Society, Edited and Translated by Tony Waters and Dagmar Waters, New York: Palgrave Macmillan
Jump up ^ Weber 2015:76–77 in Weber's Rationalism and Modern Society, Edited and Translated by Tony Waters and Dagmar Waters, New York: Palgrave Macmillan
Jump up ^ James W. Fesler. (1965). "Bureaucratic Phenomena". Administrative Science Quarterly, Volume 10, September 1965, p. 163.
Jump up ^ Frisby, David (2002). Georg Simmel. Key Sociologists (Second ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-28535-6.
Jump up ^ Weber, Max. Political Writings. Cambridge University Press, 1994, p. 288.
Jump up ^ H. H. Gerth and C. W. Mills, "A Biographical View" in From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology.
Jump up ^ Mittleman, Alan (1999). "Leo Strauss and Relativism: the Critique of Max Weber". Religion. 29: 15–27. doi:10.1006/reli.1999.0176.
^ Jump up to: a b Richard Swedberg, "Max Weber as an Economist and as a Sociologist: Towards a Fuller Understanding of Weber's View of Economics – Critical Essay Archived 30 April 2011 at the Wayback Machine.", American Journal of Economics and Sociology, (1999).
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f "Methodological individualism", Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 30 January 2010
Jump up ^ Allan, Kenneth D. (2 November 2005). Explorations in Classical Sociological Theory: Seeing the Social World. Pine Forge Press. p. 144. ISBN 978-1-4129-0572-5.
^ Jump up to: a b c Allan, Kenneth D. (2 November 2005). Explorations in Classical Sociological Theory: Seeing the Social World. Pine Forge Press. p. 148. ISBN 978-1-4129-0572-5.
Jump up ^ Robert B. Denhardt (2 March 2010). Theories of Public Organization. Cengage Learning. p. 27. ISBN 978-1-4390-8623-0. Retrieved 14 April 2011.
^ Jump up to: a b George Ritzer (29 September 2009). Contemporary Sociological Theory and Its Classical Roots: The Basics. McGraw-Hill. p. 31. ISBN 978-0-07-340438-7. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
Jump up ^ Max Weber, Sociological Writings, Excerpts
Jump up ^ Allan, Kenneth D. (2 November 2005). Explorations in Classical Sociological Theory: Seeing the Social World. Pine Forge Press. p. 149. ISBN 978-1-4129-0572-5.
Jump up ^ Quoted in Roth, Guenther and Claus Wittich. 1978. Economy and Society: an outline of interpretive sociology. University of California Press, Google Print, p. xxxiii
^ Jump up to: a b Allan, Kenneth D. (2 November 2005). Explorations in Classical Sociological Theory: Seeing the Social World. Pine Forge Press. p. 153. ISBN 978-1-4129-0572-5.
^ Jump up to: a b Craig J. Calhoun (2002). Classical sociological theory. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 167. ISBN 978-0-631-21348-2. Retrieved 19 March 2011.
Jump up ^ George Ritzer (29 September 2009). Contemporary Sociological Theory and Its Classical Roots: The Basics. McGraw-Hill. p. 30. ISBN 978-0-07-340438-7. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
^ Jump up to: a b Allan, Kenneth D. (2 November 2005). Explorations in Classical Sociological Theory: Seeing the Social World. Pine Forge Press. p. 151. ISBN 978-1-4129-0572-5.
Jump up ^ Basit Bilal Koshul (2005). The postmodern significance of Max Weber's legacy: disenchanting disenchantment. Macmillan. p. 11. ISBN 978-1-4039-6784-8. Retrieved 23 March 2011.
^ Jump up to: a b c Bendix (1977). Max Weber. pp. 60–61. ISBN 978-0-520-03194-4.
^ Jump up to: a b c d Allan, Kenneth D. (2 November 2005). Explorations in Classical Sociological Theory: Seeing the Social World. Pine Forge Press. p. 162. ISBN 978-1-4129-0572-5.
Jump up ^ Andrew J. Weigert (July 1991). Mixed emotions: certain steps toward understanding ambivalence. SUNY Press. p. 110. ISBN 978-0-7914-0600-7. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
^ Jump up to: a b c d e George Ritzer (29 September 2009). Contemporary Sociological Theory and Its Classical Roots: The Basics. McGraw-Hill. pp. 38–42. ISBN 978-0-07-340438-7. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
Jump up ^ Allan, Kenneth D. (2 November 2005). Explorations in Classical Sociological Theory: Seeing the Social World. Pine Forge Press. p. 177. ISBN 978-1-4129-0572-5.
Jump up ^ Allan, Kenneth D. (2 November 2005). Explorations in Classical Sociological Theory: Seeing the Social World. Pine Forge Press. pp. 151–52. ISBN 978-1-4129-0572-5.
Jump up ^ Bendix (1977). Max Weber. p. 285. ISBN 978-0-520-03194-4.
^ Jump up to: a b c d Bendix (1977). "IX: Basic Concepts of Political Sociology". Max Weber. ISBN 978-0-520-03194-4.
Jump up ^ Allan, Kenneth D. (2 November 2005). Explorations in Classical Sociological Theory: Seeing the Social World. Pine Forge Press. p. 154. ISBN 978-1-4129-0572-5.
Jump up ^ Allan, Kenneth D. (2 November 2005). Explorations in Classical Sociological Theory: Seeing the Social World. Pine Forge Press. p. 155. ISBN 978-1-4129-0572-5.
Jump up ^ Allan, Kenneth D. (2 November 2005). Explorations in Classical Sociological Theory: Seeing the Social World. Pine Forge Press. p. 158. ISBN 978-1-4129-0572-5.
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h George Ritzer (29 September 2009). Contemporary Sociological Theory and Its Classical Roots: The Basics. McGraw-Hill. pp. 35–37. ISBN 978-0-07-340438-7. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
Jump up ^ Weber The Protestant Ethic..., pp. 15–16
Jump up ^ Bendix (1977). Max Weber. p. 57. ISBN 978-0-520-03194-4.
Jump up ^ Bendix. Max Weber. p. 54.
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f George Ritzer (29 September 2009). Contemporary Sociological Theory and Its Classical Roots: The Basics. McGraw-Hill. pp. 37–38. ISBN 978-0-07-340438-7. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
Jump up ^ Bendix (1977). Max Weber. p. 49. ISBN 978-0-520-03194-4.
Jump up ^ Richard Swedberg; Ola Agevall (2005). The Max Weber dictionary: key words and central concepts. Stanford University Press. p. 310. ISBN 978-0-8047-5095-0. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
Jump up ^ Max Weber, The Religion of China, New York: Free Press, 1968.
^ Jump up to: a b Bendix (1977). Max Weber. pp. 98–99. ISBN 978-0-520-03194-4.
^ Jump up to: a b c d e Bendix (1977). Max Weber. pp. 135–41. ISBN 978-0-520-03194-4.
Jump up ^ Bendix (1977). Max Weber. pp. 142–58. ISBN 978-0-520-03194-4.
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f Bendix (1977). Max Weber. p. 199. ISBN 978-0-520-03194-4.
Jump up ^ Reinhard Bendix (1977). Max Weber: an intellectual portrait. University of California Press. p. 90. ISBN 978-0-520-03194-4. Retrieved 5 April 2011.
^ Jump up to: a b c Bendix (1977). Max Weber. pp. 200–01. ISBN 978-0-520-03194-4.
Jump up ^ Bendix (1977). Max Weber. pp. 204–05. ISBN 978-0-520-03194-4.
^ Jump up to: a b c Plye, Davidson, Ralph, James. "Stratification". Encyclopedia of Religion and Society. Retrieved 27 May 2012.
^ Jump up to: a b Christiano, Swatos, Kivisto, Kevin, William, Peter (2008). Sociology of Religion. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc. p. 7. ISBN 9780742561113. CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
Jump up ^ Christiano, Swatos, Kivisto, Kevin, William, Peter (2008). Sociology of Religion. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc. p. 142. ISBN 9780742561113. CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
^ Jump up to: a b Christiano, Swatos, Kivisto, Kevin, William, Peter (2008). Sociology of Religion. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc. p. 137. ISBN 9780742561113. CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
Jump up ^ Weber, Max (1919/2015) "Politics as Vocation" in Weber's Rationalism and Modern Society,edited and translated by Tony Waters and Dagmar Waters, pp. 129–98
^ Jump up to: a b Daniel Warner (1991). An ethic of responsibility in international relations. Lynne Rienner Publishers. pp. 9–10. ISBN 978-1-55587-266-3. Retrieved 5 April 2011.
Jump up ^ Phelps, Martha Lizabeth (December 2014). "Doppelgangers of the State: Private Security and Transferable Legitimacy". Politics & Policy. 42 (6): 824–49. doi:10.1111/polp.12100.
^ Jump up to: a b c Randal Marlin (2002). Propaganda and the ethics of persuasion. Broadview Press. p. 155. ISBN 978-1-55111-376-0. Retrieved 5 April 2011.
Jump up ^ Politik als Beruf – Gesinnungsethik vs. Verantwortungsethik (1919)
Jump up ^ pp. 135–36 in "Politics as Vocation" by Max Weber in Weber's Rationalism and Modern Society, edited and translated by Tony Waters and Dagmar Waters. New York: Palgrave MacMillan 21919/2015
Jump up ^ Wolfgang J. Mommsen (1992). The Political and Social Theory of Max Weber: Collected Essays. University of Chicago Press. p. 46. ISBN 978-0-226-53400-8. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
Jump up ^ Bendix (1977). Max Weber. p. 296. ISBN 978-0-520-03194-4.
Jump up ^ Bendix (November 1998). Max Weber. pp. 303–05. ISBN 978-0-415-17453-4.
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f Richard Swedberg; Ola Agevall (2005). The Max Weber dictionary: key words and central concepts. Stanford University Press. pp. 18–21. ISBN 978-0-8047-5095-0. Retrieved 23 March 2011.
Jump up ^ Marshall Sashkin; Molly G. Sashkin (28 January 2003). Leadership that matters: the critical factors for making a difference in people's lives and organisations' success. Berrett-Koehler Publishers. p. 52. ISBN 978-1-57675-193-0. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
^ Jump up to: a b Liesbet Hooghe (2001). The European Commission and the integration of Europe: images of governance. Cambridge University Press. p. 40. ISBN 978-0-521-00143-4. Retrieved 23 March 2011.
^ Jump up to: a b c d Allan, Kenneth D. (2 November 2005). Explorations in Classical Sociological Theory: Seeing the Social World. Pine Forge Press. pp. 172–76. ISBN 978-1-4129-0572-5.
Jump up ^ George Ritzer, Enchanting a Disenchanted World: Revolutionizing the Means of Consumption, Pine Forge Press, 2004, ISBN 0-7619-8819-X, Google Print, p. 55
^ Jump up to: a b Bendix (1977). Max Weber. pp. 85–87. ISBN 978-0-520-03194-4.
Jump up ^ Max Weber, "The Distribution of Power Within the Gemeinschaft: Classes, Staende, Parties" pp. 59–72 in Weber's Rationalism and Modern Society, edited and translated by Tony Waters and Dagmar Waters.
Jump up ^ Waters, Tony (2016). "Are the terms "socio-economic status" and "class status" a warped form of reasoning for Max Weber? Palgrave Communications. http://www.palgrave-journals.com/articles/palcomms20162
Jump up ^ Quoted in Bendix, Reinhard (1 July 1977). Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait. University of California Press. p. 79. ISBN 0-520-03194-6.
Jump up ^ Richard Swedberg; Ola Agevall (2005). The Max Weber dictionary: key words and central concepts. Stanford University Press. p. 283. ISBN 978-0-8047-5095-0. Retrieved 30 October 2011.
Jump up ^ Richard Swedberg; Ola Agevall (2005). The Max Weber dictionary: key words and central concepts. Stanford University Press. pp. 64–65. ISBN 978-0-8047-5095-0. Retrieved 30 October 2011.
Jump up ^ M. Weber, "Science as a Vocation", lecture given in 1918 at Munich University
^ Jump up to: a b c William Petersen, Against the Stream, Transaction Publishers, ISBN 0-7658-0222-8, 2004, Google Print, p. 24
^ Jump up to: a b Peter R. Baehr, Founders Classics Canons, Transaction Publishers, 2002, ISBN 0-7658-0129-9, Google Print, p. 22
^ Jump up to: a b c d e Max Weber, 1864–1920, New School for Social Research
Jump up ^ "The German Historical School" Archived 20 February 2011 at the Wayback Machine., New School for Social Research
^ Jump up to: a b Schweitzer, Arthur (1975). "Frank Knight's Social Economics". History of Political Economics. 7 (3): 279–92. doi:10.1215/00182702-7-3-279.
Jump up ^ Stigler, George (1950). "The Development of Utility Theory. Ii". The Journal of Political Economy. 58 (5): 373. doi:10.1086/256980. JSTOR 1825710.
Jump up ^ Mass, Harro (2009). "Disciplining Boundaries: Lionel Robbins, Max Weber, and the Borderlands of Economics, History, and Psychology". Journal of the History of Economic Thought. 31: 500.
Jump up ^ Weber, Max. Selections in Translation. Trans. Eric Matthews. Ed. W. G. Runciman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. "Urbanisation and Social Structure in the Ancient World", pp. 290–314.
Jump up ^ Ross B. Emmett (2005). Frank Knight and the Chicago School in American Economics. Routledge. pp. 111–23. ISBN 9780415775007. Retrieved 1 April 2011.
Jump up ^ Richard Swedberg; Ola Agevall (2005). The Max Weber dictionary: key words and central concepts. Stanford University Press. pp. 22–23. ISBN 978-0-8047-5095-0. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
^ Jump up to: a b c d Keith Tribe (1995). Strategies of Economic Order: German Economic Discourse, 1750–1950. Cambridge University Press. pp. 140–68. ISBN 978-0-521-61943-1. Retrieved 30 March 2011.
^ Jump up to: a b Jordi Cat, "Political Economy: Theory, Practice, and Philosophical Consequences", supplement to "Otto Neurath", Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2010 Edition).
Jump up ^ Max Weber, Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich, eds. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978), vol. I, ch. 2., sec. 12, pp. 100–03.
Jump up ^ Jörg Guido Hülsmann (1995). Mises: The Last Knight of Liberalism (PDF). Ludwig von Mises Institute. pp. 392–96. ISBN 1-933550-18-X. Retrieved 30 March 2011.
Jump up ^ F. A. Hayek, Introduction to Mises's Memoirs, pp. xvi–xvii (1977).
Jump up ^ "Between Mises and Keynes: An Interview with Gottfried von Haberler (1900–1995), The Austrian Economics Newsletter, 20 (1), 2000. Mises.org
Jump up ^ Friedrich Hayek, "Socialist Calculation", in Individualism and Economic Order, (University of Chicago Press, 1948).
Jump up ^ Interview with F. A. Hayek, 1985
Jump up ^ Press release, Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics for 1974.
^ Jump up to: a b John K. Rhoads, Critical Issues in Social Theory, Penn State Press, 1991, ISBN 0-271-00753-2, Google Print, p. 40
Jump up ^ Joan Ferrante, Sociology: A Global Perspective, Thomson Wadsworth, 2005, ISBN 0-495-00561-4, Google Print, p. 21
Jump up ^ George Ritzer (29 September 2009). Contemporary Sociological Theory and Its Classical Roots: The Basics. McGraw-Hill. p. 33. ISBN 978-0-07-340438-7. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
Jump up ^ Weber, Max The Nature of Social Action, in Runciman, W.G., Weber: Selections in Translation, Cambridge University Press, 1991. p. 7.
Jump up ^ Radkau, Joachim Max Weber: A Biography. 1995. Polity Press. (Inside sleeve)
Jump up ^ Fish, Jonathan S. 2005. Defending the Durkheimian Tradition. Religion, Emotion and Morality Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
Jump up ^ Ludwig von Mises, Memoirs, (Mises Institute, Auburn, AL, 2009), p. 88.
Jump up ^ Quoted in Peter Baehr, "The Grammar of Prudence: Arendt, Jaspers and the Appraisal of Max Weber", in Hannah Arendt in Jerusalem, edited by Steven E. Aschheim (University of California Press, 2001), p. 410.
Jump up ^ Allan, Kenneth D. (2 November 2005). Explorations in Classical Sociological Theory: Seeing the Social World. Pine Forge Press. pp. 150–51. ISBN 978-1-4129-0572-5.
Jump up ^ Waters & Waters 2015, pp. 1–18.
Jump up ^ Schumpeter, Joseph (1954). History of Economic Analysis. Oxford University Press.
Jump up ^ Rothbard, Murray N. (1995). Economic Thought Before Adam Smith. Ludwig von Mises Press. p. 142.
Jump up ^ Evans, Eric J. (1983). The Forging of the Modern State: Early Industrial Britain, 1783–1870. Longman. p. 114. ISBN 0-582-48969-5.
Jump up ^ Kauder, Emil (1953). "The Retarded Acceptance of the Marginal Utility Theory". Quarterly Journal of Economics. 67 (4): 564–75. doi:10.2307/1883602. JSTOR 1883602.
[1]
Sources[edit]
Waters, Tony; Waters, Dagmar (2015), Weber's Rationalism and Modern Society, New York: Palgrave-Macmillan .[1]
Further reading[edit]
Ankerl, Guy (1972). Sociologues allemands. Avec le dictionnaire de "l'Ethique protestante et l'esprit du capitalisme" de Max Weber (in French). Neuchâtel: A la Baconnière.
Bruun, Hans Henrik (2007). Science, values, and politics in Max Weber's methodology. Rethinking classical sociology. Aldershot, Ashgate. p. 298.
Green, Robert, ed. (1959). Problems in European Civilization, Protestantism and Capitalism: The Weber Thesis and Its Critics. Boston: Heath.
Haidenko, Piama; trans. H. Campbell Creighton (1989). "The Sociology of Max Weber". In Kon, Igor. A History of Classical Sociology. Moscow: Progress Publishers. pp. 255–311. ISBN 5-01-001102-6. Archived from the original (DOC, DjVu) on 2011-05-14.
Kemple, Thomas (2014). Intellectual work and the spirit of capitalism : Weber's calling. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 9781137377135.
Kolko, Gabriel (1959). "A Critique of Max Weber's Philosophy of History". Ethics. 70 (1): 21–36. doi:10.1086/291239. JSTOR 2379612. Archived from the original on 2013-05-30.
Korotayev, Andrey; Malkov, A.; Khaltourina, D. (2006). "Chapter 6: Reconsidering Weber: Literacy and "the Spirit of Capitalism"". Introduction to Social Macrodynamics. Moscow: URSS. ISBN 5-484-00414-4. Archived from the original (Google Books) on 30 December 2016.
Marra, Realino (1992), Dalla comunità al diritto moderno. La formazione giuridica di Max Weber. 1882–1889, Giappichelli, Torino
Marra, Realino (1995), La libertà degli ultimi uomini. Studi sul pensiero giuridico e politico di Max Weber, Giappichelli, Torino
Marra, Realino (2002), Capitalismo e anticapitalismo in Max Weber. Storia di Roma e sociologia del diritto nella genesi dell'opera weberiana, il Mulino, Bologna
Mitzman, Arthur (1985) [1970]. The Iron Cage: An Historical Interpretation of Max Weber. New Brunswick NJ: Transaction Books. ISBN 0-87855-984-1.
Quensel, Bernhard K. (2007), Max Webers Konstruktionslogik. Sozialökonomik zwischen Geschichte und Theorie, Nomos, ISBN 978-3-8329-2517-8 [Revisiting Weber's concept of sociology against the background of his juristic and economic provenance within the framework of "social economics"]
Radkau, Joachim (2009) [2005]. Max Weber: a Biography. trans. Camiller. Cambridge: Polity. ISBN 978-0-7456-4147-8. [The most important work on Weber's life and torments since the biography by Marianne Weber]
Rheinstein, Max; Shils, Edward (1954). Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard U.P. ISBN 978-0-674-55651-5. [Translation, with long introduction, of Weber's main writings on law]
Ritzer, George, ed. (1996). "Sociological Theory". Max Weber (fourth ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0-07-114660-1.
Roth, Guenther (2001), Max Webers deutsch-englische Familiengeschichte, J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), ISBN 3-16-147557-7
Lawrence A. Scaff: Max Weber in America, Princeton University Press, Princeton/Oxford, England 2011 ISBN 978-0-691-14779-6
Stapelfeldt, Gerhard (2004). Kritik der ökonomischen Rationalität (in German).
Swatos, William H., ed. (1990). Time, Place, and Circumstance: Neo-Weberian Studies in Comparative Religious History. New York: Greenwood Press. ISBN 0-313-26892-4.
Swedberg, Richard (1998). Max Weber and the Idea of Economic Sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-07013-X.
Swedberg, Richard (October 1999). "Max Weber as an Economist and as a Sociologist". American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 58 (4): 561–82. doi:10.1111/j.1536-7150.1999.tb03385.x. [dead link]
Weber, Marianne (1988) [1926]. Max Weber: a Biography. trans. Harry Zohn. New Brunswick: Transaction Books. ISBN 0-471-92333-8.
Weber, Marianne (1926). Max Weber. Ein Lebensbild (in German). Mohr.
Weber, Marianne (1975). Max Weber. Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-92333-6.
External links[edit]
Library resources about
Max Weber
Resources in your library
Resources in other libraries
By Max Weber
Resources in your library
Resources in other libraries
Find more aboutMax Weberat Wikipedia's sister projects
Media from Wikimedia Commons
Quotations from Wikiquote
Texts from Wikisource
Textbooks from Wikibooks
Texts of his works
Works by or about Max Weber at Internet Archive
Works by Max Weber at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks)
Large collection of the German original texts
A collection of English translations
Max Weber Reference Archive
Max Weber, On Politics (1919)
Large collection of the German original texts
A comprehensive collection of English translations and secondary literature
Notes on several of Weber's works, merged into one text file
Analysis of his works
Protestant Ethic Thesis by the Swatos' Encyclopedia of Religion and Society
Max Weber Studies journal
McKinnon, AM (2010). "Elective affinities of the Protestant ethic: Weber and the chemistry of capitalism" (PDF). Sociological Theory. 28 (1): 108–26. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.01367.x.
Other encyclopedic entries
Sung Ho Kim. "Max Weber". In Zalta, Edward N. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Max Weber (1864–1920). The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics. Library of Economics and Liberty (2nd ed.). Liberty Fund. 2008.
SocioSite: Famous Sociologists – Max Weber Information resources on life, academic work and intellectual influence of Max Weber. Editor: dr. Albert Benschop (University of Amsterdam).
[show]
v
t
e
Max Weber
Books
Roman Agrarian History and its Significance for Public and Private Law (1891)
Condition of Farm Labour in Eastern Germany (1892)
The Stock Exchange (1896)
The Objectivity of the Sociological and Social-Political Knowledge (1904)
The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (1905)
The Religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism (1915)
The Religion of India: The Sociology of Hinduism and Buddhism (1916)
The Rejection and the Meaning of the World (1916)
Sociology of Religion (1920)
Ancient Judaism (1921)
The City (1921)
Economy and Society (1922)
Basic Concepts in Sociology (1922)
The Theory of Social and Economic Organization (1947)
The Three Types of Legitimate Rule (1958)
Sociology of Community
Sociology of Rulership and Religion
Sociology of the World Religions: Introduction
Concepts
Weberian bureaucracy
Disenchantment
Ideal type
Iron cage
Life chances
Methodological individualism
Monopoly on violence
Protestant work ethic
Rationalisation
Social action
Three-component stratification
Tripartite classification of authority
Verstehen
Essays
"The Protestant Sects and the Spirit of Capitalism" (1904)
"Politics as a Vocation" (1919)
Lectures
Science as a Vocation (1918)
Wirtschaftsgeschichte (1923)
Related
Max Weber bibliography
Speeches of Max Weber
Zur Geschichte der Handelsgesellschaften im Mittelalter
People
Max Weber Sr. (father)
Alfred Weber (brother)
Marianne Weber (wife)
[show]
Articles related to Max Weber
[show]
v
t
e
Social and political philosophy
Pre-modern
philosophers
Aquinas
Aristotle
Averroes
Augustine
Chanakya
Cicero
Confucius
Al-Ghazali
Han Fei
Laozi
Marsilius
Mencius
Mozi
Muhammad
Plato
Shang
Socrates
Sun Tzu
Thucydides
Modern
philosophers
Bakunin
Bentham
Bonald
Bosanquet
Burke
Comte
Emerson
Engels
Fourier
Franklin
Grotius
Hegel
Hobbes
Hume
Jefferson
Kant
Kierkegaard
Le Bon
Le Play
Leibniz
Locke
Machiavelli
Maistre
Malebranche
Marx
Mill
Montesquieu
Möser
Nietzsche
Paine
Renan
Rousseau
Royce
Sade
Smith
Spencer
Spinoza
Stirner
Taine
Thoreau
Tocqueville
Vivekananda
Voltaire
20th–21th-century
Philosophers
Ambedkar
Arendt
Aurobindo
Aron
Azurmendi
Badiou
Baudrillard
Bauman
Benoist
Berlin
Judith Butler
Camus
Chomsky
De Beauvoir
Debord
Du Bois
Durkheim
Foucault
Gandhi
Gehlen
Gentile
Gramsci
Habermas
Hayek
Heidegger
Irigaray
Kirk
Kropotkin
Lenin
Luxemburg
Mao
Marcuse
Maritain
Michels
Mises
Negri
Niebuhr
Nozick
Oakeshott
Ortega
Pareto
Pettit
Plamenatz
Polanyi
Popper
Radhakrishnan
Rand
Rawls
Rothbard
Russell
Santayana
Sarkar
Sartre
Schmitt
Searle
Simonović
Skinner
Sombart
Spann
Spirito
Strauss
Sun
Taylor
Walzer
Weber
Žižek
Social theories
Ambedkarism
Anarchism
Authoritarianism
Collectivism
Communism
Communitarianism
Conflict theories
Confucianism
Consensus theory
Conservatism
Contractualism
Cosmopolitanism
Culturalism
Fascism
Feminist political theory
Gandhism
Individualism
Legalism
Liberalism
Libertarianism
Mohism
National liberalism
Republicanism
Social constructionism
Social constructivism
Social Darwinism
Social determinism
Socialism
Utilitarianism
Vaisheshika
Concepts
Civil disobedience
Democracy
Four occupations
Justice
Law
Mandate of Heaven
Peace
Property
Revolution
Rights
Social contract
Society
War
more...
Related articles
Jurisprudence
Philosophy and economics
Philosophy of education
Philosophy of history
Philosophy of love
Philosophy of sex
Philosophy of social science
Political ethics
Social epistemology
Category
Portal
Task Force
[show]
v
t
e
Liberalism
Development
Contributions to liberal theory
History of liberalism
Ideas
Civil and political rights
Cultural liberalism
Democracy
Liberal democracy
Economic liberalism
Egalitarianism
Free market
Free trade
Freedom of the press
Freedom of religion
Freedom of speech
Gender equality
Harm principle
Internationalism
Laissez-faire
Liberty
Market economy
Natural and legal rights
Negative/Positive liberty
Open society
Permissive society
Private property
Rule of law
Secularism
Separation of church and state
Social contract
Welfare state
Schools
Anarcho-capitalism
Civic nationalism
Classical liberalism
Conservative liberalism
Democratic liberalism
Geolibertarianism
Green liberalism
Liberal feminism
Equity feminism
Liberal internationalism
Liberal socialism
Muscular liberalism
Neoliberalism
Ordoliberalism
Libertarianism
Radical centrism
Radicalism
Religious liberalism
Christian
Islamic
Secular liberalism
Social liberalism
Technoliberalism
Key figures
Juan Bautista Alberdi
Jean le Rond d'Alembert
Rifa'a al-Tahtawi
Chu Anping
Matthew Arnold
Raymond Aron
Frédéric Bastiat
Simone de Beauvoir
Jeremy Bentham
Isaiah Berlin
Eduard Bernstein
William Beveridge
Norberto Bobbio
Ludwig Joseph Brentano
John Bright
Edmund Burke
Thomas Carlyle
Anders Chydenius
Richard Cobden
Marquis de Condorcet
Benjamin Constant
Benedetto Croce
Ralf Dahrendorf
John Dewey
Charles Dickens
Denis Diderot
Zhang Dongsun
Ronald Dworkin
Ralph Waldo Emerson
Karl-Hermann Flach
Milton Friedman
John Kenneth Galbraith
William Lloyd Garrison
José Ortega y Gasset
David Lloyd George
William Gladstone
Piero Gobetti
Francisco Luís Gomes
John Gray
Thomas Hill Green
Friedrich Hayek
Auberon Herbert
Thomas Hobbes
Leonard Hobhouse
John A. Hobson
Qin Hui
Wilhelm von Humboldt
Thomas Jefferson
Immanuel Kant
Namık Kemal
John Maynard Keynes
Will Kymlicka
John Locke
Salvador de Madariaga
James Madison
Harriet Martineau
Minoo Masani
James Mill
John Stuart Mill
John Milton
Ludwig von Mises
Donald Barkly Molteno
Leo Chiozza Money
Charles de Montesquieu
José María Luis Mora
Chantal Mouffe
Dadabhai Naoroji
Friedrich Naumann
Robert Nozick
Bertil Ohlin
Thomas Paine
Alan Paton
Karl Popper
Richard Price
Joseph Priestley
Guillermo Prieto
François Quesnay
Ignacio Ramírez
Ayn Rand
Walther Rathenau
John Rawls
Joseph Raz
David Ricardo
Wilhelm Röpke
Richard Rorty
Carlo Rosselli
Murray Rothbard
Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Jean-Baptiste Say
Ahmed Lutfi el-Sayed
Amartya Sen
Li Shenzhi
Hu Shih
Algernon Sidney
Emmanuel Sieyès
İbrahim Şinasi
Adam Smith
Hernando de Soto
Herbert Spencer
Anne Louise Germaine de Staël
William Graham Sumner
R. H. Tawney
Johan Rudolph Thorbecke
Henry David Thoreau
Alexis de Tocqueville
Antoine Destutt de Tracy
Anne Robert Jacques Turgot
Voltaire
Lester Frank Ward
Max Weber
Mary Wollstonecraft
Tao Xingzhi
Gu Zhun
Regional variants
Africa
Egypt
Nigeria
Senegal
South Africa
Tunisia
Zimbabwe
Asia
China
Hong Kong
India
Iran
Israel
Japan
South Korea
Philippines
Taiwan
Thailand
Turkey
Europe
Albania
Armenia
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech lands
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macedonia
Moldova
Montenegro
Netherlands
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Russia
Serbia
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Ukraine
United Kingdom
Latin America and the Caribbean
Bolivia
Brazil
Chile
Colombia
Cuba
Ecuador
Honduras
Mexico
Nicaragua
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Uruguay
North America
Canada
United States
Modern liberalism
Oceania
Australia
New Zealand
Organisations
Liberal parties
Africa Liberal Network (ALN)
Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe (ALDE)
Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Party (ALDEP)
Arab Liberal Federation
Council of Asian Liberals and Democrats (CALD)
European Democratic Party (EDP)
European Liberal Youth (LYMEC)
International Federation of Liberal Youth (IFLRY)
Liberal International
Liberal Network for Latin America (Relial)
Liberal South East European Network (LIBSEEN)
Related topics
Liberal bias in academia
Liberal conservatism
Liberal socialism
National liberalism
Regressive left
Liberalism portal
Politics portal
[show]
v
t
e
Jurisprudence
Legal theory
Critical legal studies
Comparative law
Economic analysis
International legal theory
Legal history
Philosophy of law
Sociology of law
Philosophers
Alexy
Allan
Aquinas
Aristotle
Austin
Beccaria
Bentham
Betti
Bickel
Blackstone
Bobbio
Bork
Brożek
Cardozo
Castanheira Neves
Chafee
Coleman
Del Vecchio
Durkheim
Dworkin
Ehrlich
Feinberg
Fineman
Finnis
Frank
Fuller
Gardner
George
Green
Grisez
Grotius
Gurvitch
Habermas
Han
Hart
Hegel
Hobbes
Hohfeld
Hägerström
Jellinek
Jhering
Kant
Kelsen
Köchler
Kramer
Llewellyn
Lombardía
Luhmann
Lundstedt
Lyons
MacCormick
Marx
Nussbaum
Olivecrona
Pashukanis
Perelman
Petrazycki
Pontes de Miranda
Posner
Pound
Puchta
Radbruch
Rawls
Raz
Reale
Reinach
Renner
Ross
Rumi
Savigny
Scaevola
Schmitt
Shang
Simmonds
Somló
Suárez
Tribe
Unger
Voegelin
Waldron
Walzer
Weber
Theories
Analytical jurisprudence
Deontological ethics
Interpretivism
Legalism
Legal moralism
Legal positivism
Legal realism
Libertarian theories of law
Natural law
Paternalism
Utilitarianism
Virtue jurisprudence
Concepts
Dharma
Fa
Judicial interpretation
Justice
Legal system
Li
Rational-legal authority
Related articles
Law
Political philosophy
more...
Category
Law portal
Philosophy portal
WikiProject Law
WikiProject Philosophy
changes
[show]
v
t
e
Economists of the Historical School
Economists
Karl Bücher
Johann Gustav Droysen
Bruno Hildebrand
Georg Friedrich Knapp
Karl Knies
Étienne Laspeyres
Friedrich List
Karl Polanyi
Leopold von Ranke
Wilhelm Roscher
Friedrich Schelling
Gustav von Schmoller
Joseph Schumpeter
Werner Sombart
Heinrich von Treitschke
Adolph Wagner
Max Weber
Contributions
Creative destruction
Cyclical theory
Disenchantment
Double Movement
Economistic fallacy
Embeddedness
Enlightened absolutism
Fictitious commodities
Ideal type
Innovation economics
Iron cage
Laspeyres price index
Life chances
Methodenstreit
Methodological individualism
Monopoly on violence
National innovation system
Philosophy of identity
Protestant work ethic
Rationalization
Schumpeterian rent
Social actions
Substantivism
Theory of Bureaucracy
Theory of business cycles
Three-component theory of stratification
Tripartite classification of authority
Verstehen
Wagner's law
Werturteilsstreit
[show]
v
t
e
Positivism
Perspectives
Antihumanism
Empiricism
Rationalism
Scientism
Declinations
Legal positivism
Logical positivism / analytic philosophy
Positivist school
Postpositivism
Sociological positivism
Machian positivism (empiriocriticism)
Rankean historical positivism
Polish positivism
Russian positivism (empiriomonism)
Principal concepts
Consilience
Demarcation
Evidence
Induction
Justificationism
Pseudoscience
Critique of metaphysics
Unity of science
Verificationism
Antitheses
Antipositivism
Confirmation holism
Critical theory
Falsifiability
Geisteswissenschaft
Hermeneutics
Historicism
Historism
Human science
Humanities
Problem of induction
Reflectivism
Related paradigm shifts
in the history of science
Non-Euclidean geometry (1830s)
Heisenberg uncertainty principle (1927)
Related topics
Behavioralism
Critical rationalism
Criticism of science
Epistemological idealism
Epistemology
Holism in anthropology
Instrumentalism
Modernism
Naturalism in literature
Nomothetic–idiographic distinction
Objectivity in science
Operationalism
Phenomenalism
Philosophy of science
Deductive-nomological model
Ramsey sentence
Sense-data theory
Qualitative research
Relationship between religion and science
Sociology
Social science (Philosophy)
Structural functionalism
Structuralism
Structuration theory
[show]
Positivist-related debate
Method
1890s Methodenstreit (economics)
1909–1959 Werturteilsstreit
1960s Positivismusstreit
1980s Fourth Great Debate in international relations
1990s Science Wars
Contributions
1830 The Course in Positive Philosophy
1848 A General View of Positivism
1869 Critical History of Philosophy
1879 Idealism and Positivism
1886 The Analysis of Sensations
1927 The Logic of Modern Physics
1936 Language, Truth, and Logic
1959 The Two Cultures
2001 The Universe in a Nutshell
Proponents
Richard Avenarius
A. J. Ayer
Auguste Comte
Eugen Dühring
Émile Durkheim
Ernst Laas
Ernst Mach
Berlin Circle
Vienna Circle
Criticism
1909 Materialism and Empirio-criticism
1923 History and Class Consciousness
1934 The Logic of Scientific Discovery
1936 The Poverty of Historicism
1942 World Hypotheses
1951 Two Dogmas of Empiricism
1960 Truth and Method
1962 The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
1963 Conjectures and Refutations
1964 One-Dimensional Man
1968 Knowledge and Human Interests
1978 The Poverty of Theory
1980 The Scientific Image
1986 The Rhetoric of Economics
Critics
Theodor W. Adorno
Gaston Bachelard
Mario Bunge
Wilhelm Dilthey
Paul Feyerabend
Hans-Georg Gadamer
Thomas Kuhn
György Lukács
Karl Popper
Willard Van Orman Quine
Max Weber
Concepts in contention
Knowledge
Phronesis
Truth
Verstehen
Category
Authority control
WorldCat Identities
VIAF: 100180950
LCCN: n79043351
ISNI: 0000 0001 2145 101X
GND: 118629743
SELIBR: 206862
SUDOC: 027194035
BNF: cb11928969n (data)
BIBSYS: 90051997
NLA: 35595835
NDL: 00460377
NKC: jn19990008962
ICCU: IT\ICCU\CFIV\006392
RLS: 000080980
BNE: XX970929
SNAC: w6qz2hbf
Jump up ^ name= "what is calvinism">CARM, [2],
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Max_Weber&oldid=834044466"
Categories:
Max Weber
1864 births
1920 deaths
19th-century German writers
19th-century German philosophers
20th-century German philosophers
Alldeutscher Verband members
Deaths from the 1918 flu pandemic
Economic historians
German Democratic Party politicians
German economists
German people of Huguenot descent
German Protestants
German sociologists
Heidelberg University alumni
Heidelberg University faculty
Historical school economists
Humboldt University of Berlin alumni
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich faculty
Members of the Bavarian Academy of Sciences
National-Social Association politicians
People from Erfurt
People from the Province of Saxony
Philosophers of history
Philosophers of social science
Protestant philosophers
Rationality theorists
Sociologists of religion
University of Freiburg faculty
University of Göttingen alumni
Hidden categories:
CS1 German-language sources (de)
Webarchive template wayback links
CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list
Good articles
Use British English from April 2011
Use dmy dates from April 2013
Articles with hCards
Pages using infobox scientist with unknown parameters
Interlanguage link template link number
Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from October 2016
CS1 French-language sources (fr)
All articles with dead external links
Articles with dead external links from September 2016
Articles with Internet Archive links
Articles with LibriVox links
AC with 15 elements
Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers
Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers
Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers
Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers
Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers
Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers
Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers
Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers
Wikipedia articles with SBN identifiers
Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
In other projects
Wikimedia Commons
Wikiquote
Wikisource
Languages
Afrikaans
Alemannisch
አማርኛ
العربية
Aragonés
Asturianu
Azərbaycanca
تۆرکجه
বাংলা
Bân-lâm-gú
Башҡортса
Беларуская
Беларуская (тарашкевіца)
Български
Bosanski
Brezhoneg
Буряад
Català
Čeština
Cymraeg
Dansk
Deutsch
Eesti
Ελληνικά
Español
Esperanto
Euskara
فارسی
Fiji Hindi
Français
Frysk
Galego
贛語
한국어
Հայերեն
हिन्दी
Hrvatski
Ido
Ilokano
Bahasa Indonesia
Interlingua
Íslenska
Italiano
עברית
ಕನ್ನಡ
ქართული
Қазақша
Kernowek
Kiswahili
Kurdî
Кыргызча
Latina
Latviešu
Lëtzebuergesch
Lietuvių
Limburgs
Magyar
Malagasy
മലയാളം
मराठी
მარგალური
Bahasa Melayu
Монгол
Nederlands
日本語
Нохчийн
Norsk
Norsk nynorsk
Novial
Occitan
Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча
ਪੰਜਾਬੀ
پنجابی
Patois
Piemontèis
Polski
Português
Română
Русиньскый
Русский
Scots
Shqip
Sicilianu
සිංහල
Simple English
Slovenčina
Slovenščina
کوردی
Српски / srpski
Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски
Suomi
Svenska
Tagalog
தமிழ்
Татарча/tatarça
ไทย
Türkçe
Українська
اردو
Vèneto
Tiếng Việt
Winaray
ייִדיש
Yorùbá
粵語
Zazaki
Žemaitėška
中文
Kabɩyɛ
100 more
Edit links
This page was last edited on 3 April 2018, at 17:12.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

key: html

type: local

value: div

attrs: id class

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

value: a

attrs: alt src width height srcset data-file-width data-file-height

values: This is a good article. Follow the link for more information.

attrs: href title

attrs: class id

attrs: id class lang

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

values: jump-to-nav mw-jump

attrs: href class title

values:
/wiki/Max_Weber_(disambiguation)
mw-disambig
Max Weber (disambiguation)

attrs: role class

values:
note
hatnote navigation-not-searchable

value: span

value: th

attrs: colspan style

value: tr

value: td

values:
/wiki/University_of_Berlin
mw-redirect
University of Berlin

values:
/wiki/University_of_Heidelberg
mw-redirect
University of Heidelberg

values:
/wiki/Weberian_bureaucracy
mw-redirect
Weberian bureaucracy

values:
/wiki/Social_action
mw-redirect
Social action

values: Three-component theory of stratification

values:
/wiki/University_of_Munich
mw-redirect
University of Munich

values: Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)

values:
/wiki/Rationalisation_(sociology)
mw-redirect
Rationalisation (sociology)

values: The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism

values: The Religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism

values: The Religion of India: The Sociology of Hinduism and Buddhism

values:
/wiki/First_World_War
mw-redirect
First World War

values: Edit section: Early life and family background

attrs: alt src width height class srcset data-file-width data-file-height

values: The history of commercial partnerships in the Middle Ages

values: Roman Agrarian History and its Significance for Public and Private Law (book)

values:
/wiki/Alldeutscher_Verband
mw-redirect
Alldeutscher Verband

values: Germanisation of Poles during the Partitions

values: Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik

values:
noprint
font-size:85%; font-style: normal;

values:
/wiki/World%27s_Fair
mw-redirect
World's Fair

values:
/wiki/St._Louis,_Missouri
mw-redirect
St. Louis, Missouri

values:
/wiki/Versailles_Treaty
mw-redirect
Versailles Treaty

values: Edit section: Max Weber's bureaucratic model (rational-legal model)

values:
/wiki/Structure_and_action
mw-redirect
Structure and action

values:
/wiki/Natural_sciences
mw-redirect
Natural sciences

values:
/wiki/Calling_(religious)
mw-redirect
Calling (religious)

values: Edit section: The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism

values: The material near this tag may use weasel words or too-vague attribution. (October 2016)

values: Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch

values:
/wiki/Protestant_Reformation
mw-redirect
Protestant Reformation

values:
/wiki/Protestant_ethic
mw-redirect
Protestant ethic

values: Edit section: The Religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism

values:
/wiki/Philosophy_in_China
mw-redirect
Philosophy in China

values: Edit section: The Religion of India: The Sociology of Hinduism and Buddhism

values:
/wiki/Soul_(spirit)
mw-redirect
Soul (spirit)

values:
/wiki/Messianic_prophecy
mw-redirect
Messianic prophecy

values:
/wiki/Ethical_prophecy
mw-redirect
Ethical prophecy

values:
/wiki/Exemplary_prophecy
mw-redirect
Exemplary prophecy

values: Johannes Wincklemann (page does not exist)

values: Edit section: Theodicy of fortune and misfortune

values: Monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force

values:
/wiki/Charismatic_domination
mw-redirect
Charismatic domination

values:
/wiki/Religion_and_politics
mw-redirect
Religion and politics

values:
/wiki/Traditional_domination
mw-redirect
Traditional domination

values:
/wiki/Legal_domination
mw-redirect
Legal domination

values:
/wiki/Social_evolutionism
mw-redirect
Social evolutionism

values:
/wiki/Monetary_economy
mw-redirect
Monetary economy

values: Information and communications technology

values: Edit section: Methodological individualism

values:
/wiki/Induction_(philosophy)
mw-redirect
Induction (philosophy)

values:
/wiki/Rational_economic_man
mw-redirect
Rational economic man

values: Edit section: Marginalism and psychophysics

values:
/wiki/Weber-Fechner_law
mw-redirect
Weber-Fechner law

values:
/wiki/Ancient_world
mw-redirect
Ancient world

values: Die Römische Agrargeschichte in ihrer Bedeutung für das Staats- und Privatrecht

values: Condition of Farm Labour in Eastern Germany

values: Zur Geschichte der Handelsgesellschaften im Mittelalter

values:
/wiki/Cost-benefit_analysis
mw-redirect
Cost-benefit analysis

values:
/wiki/Imputation_(economics)
mw-redirect
Imputation (economics)

values: Hans Heinrich Gerth (page does not exist)

values:
/wiki/Sociological_positivism
mw-redirect
Sociological positivism

values:
/wiki/Social_sciences
mw-redirect
Social sciences

values:
/wiki/Traditional_action
mw-redirect
Traditional action

values:
/wiki/Value-rational_action
mw-redirect
Value-rational action

values:
/wiki/Instrumental_action
mw-redirect
Instrumental action

values:
/wiki/Posthumous_work
mw-redirect
Posthumous work

values:
/wiki/Theodor_Adorno
mw-redirect
Theodor Adorno

values: Edit section: Critical responses to Weber

values:
/wiki/Labour_theory_of_value
mw-redirect
Labour theory of value

values: display:table-cell;padding:0.2em 0.2em 0.2em 0.3em;vertical-align:middle

values: margin:0.5em 0 0.5em 1em;border:solid #aaa 1px

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/weber

values: Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary

values: The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity

values:
/wiki/Portable_document_format
mw-redirect
Portable document format

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/589618

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/2564806

values:
/wiki/Wolfgang_J._Mommsen
mw-redirect
Wolfgang J. Mommsen

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1006%2Freli.1999.0176

values: Category:CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1111%2Fpolp.12100

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.textlog.de/2296.html

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1086%2F256980

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/1825710

values:
nofollow
external text
https://mises.org/books/lastknight.pdf

values:
nofollow
external text
http://vimeo.com/4063439

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.2307%2F1883602

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/1883602

values: -moz-column-width: 30em; -webkit-column-width: 30em; column-width: 30em; list-style-type: decimal;

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1086%2F291239

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/2379612

values:
plainlist
padding:0 0.1em 0.4em;text-align:left;

values: float:right;clear:right;width:auto;margin:0 0 1.0em 1.0em;background:#f9f9f9;border:1px solid #aaa;padding:0.2em;border-spacing:0.4em 0;text-align:center;line-height:1.4em;font-size:88%

values: padding-bottom: 0.75em; text-align: center;

attrs: alt src width height style srcset data-file-width data-file-height

values: display: inline-block; width: 31px; line-height: 31px; vertical-align: middle; text-align: center;

values: display: inline-block; margin-left: 4px; width: 182px; vertical-align: middle;

values: border-top:1px solid #aaa; padding-top: 0.75em;

values: metadata plainlinks plainlist mbox-small

values: border:1px solid #aaa; padding:0.75em; background:#f9f9f9;

values:
nofollow
external text
https://librivox.org/author/663

values:
nofollow
http://mws.quotus.org/
external text

values:
/wiki/Library_of_Economics_and_Liberty
mw-redirect
Library of Economics and Liberty

values: Roman Agrarian History and its Significance for Public and Private Law

values: The Objectivity of the Sociological and Social-Political Knowledge

values: The Rejection and the Meaning of the World

values: The Theory of Social and Economic Organization

values: Sociology of the World Religions: Introduction

values: The Protestant Sects and the Spirit of Capitalism

values: nowraplinks collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner

values: Template:Social and political philosophy

values: Template talk:Social and political philosophy

values: List of social and political philosophers

values: Index of social and political philosophy articles

values: Wikipedia:WikiProject Philosophy/Social and political

values: nowraplinks hlist collapsible collapsed navbox-inner

values: background:white; -moz-box-shadow: inset 1px 1px 0 #FFBF00, inset -1px -1px 0 #FFBF00; -webkit-box-shadow: inset 1px 1px 0 #FFBF00, inset -1px -1px 0 #FFBF00; box-shadow: inset 1px 1px 0 #FFBF00, inset -1px -1px 0 #FFBF00;;colour:black; background-color:#FFBF00;;background:none transparent;border:none;-moz-box-shadow:none;-webkit-box-shadow:none;box-shadow:none;

values: background:white; -moz-box-shadow: inset 1px 1px 0 #FFBF00, inset -1px -1px 0 #FFBF00; -webkit-box-shadow: inset 1px 1px 0 #FFBF00, inset -1px -1px 0 #FFBF00; box-shadow: inset 1px 1px 0 #FFBF00, inset -1px -1px 0 #FFBF00;;width:1%

values: Liberalism and progressivism within Islam

values:
/wiki/Liberalism_in_the_Philippines
mw-redirect
Liberalism in the Philippines

values: Liberalism and radicalism in Switzerland

values: Liberalism and conservatism in Latin America

values: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe

values: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Party

values: International Federation of Liberal Youth

values: nowraplinks hlist collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner

values:
/wiki/Legal_theory
mw-redirect
Legal theory

values:
/wiki/International_legal_theory
mw-redirect
International legal theory

values:
/wiki/Martha_Fineman
mw-redirect
Martha Fineman

values:
/wiki/Jerome_N._Frank
mw-redirect
Jerome N. Frank

values:
/wiki/John_Gardner_(lawyer)
mw-redirect
John Gardner (lawyer)

values:
/wiki/List_of_country_legal_systems
mw-redirect
List of country legal systems

attrs: alt src title width height srcset data-file-width data-file-height

values: navigation navbox Jurisprudence padding:3px

values: Template talk:Historical school economists

values: Relationship between religion and science

values: nowraplinks collapsible autocollapse navbox-subgroup

values: nowraplinks collapsible collapsed navbox-inner

values: navigation navbox Positivism padding:3px

values:
nofollow
external text
https://viaf.org/viaf/100180950

values:
nofollow
external text
http://isni.org/isni/000000012145101X

values:
nofollow
external text
https://d-nb.info/gnd/118629743

values:
nofollow
external text
https://libris.kb.se/auth/206862

values:
nofollow
external text
https://www.idref.fr/027194035

values:
nofollow
external text
https://nla.gov.au/anbd.aut-an35595835

values:
nofollow
external autonumber
https://carm.org/what-is-calvinism

values: Category:Deaths from the 1918 flu pandemic

values: Category:German Democratic Party politicians

values: Category:German people of Huguenot descent

values: Category:Humboldt University of Berlin alumni

values: Category:Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich faculty

values: Category:Members of the Bavarian Academy of Sciences

values: Category:People from the Province of Saxony

values: Category:CS1 German-language sources (de)

values: Category:Webarchive template wayback links

values: Category:Use British English from April 2011

values: Category:Pages using infobox scientist with unknown parameters

values: Category:Interlanguage link template link number

values: Category:Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from October 2016

values: Category:CS1 French-language sources (fr)

values: Category:All articles with dead external links

values: Category:Articles with dead external links from September 2016

values: Category:Articles with Internet Archive links

values: Category:Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers

values: Category:Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers

values: Category:Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers

values: Category:Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers

values: Category:Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers

values: Category:Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers

values: Category:Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers

values: Category:Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers

values: Category:Wikipedia articles with SBN identifiers

values: Category:Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers

values: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

values: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

values: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

values: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

values:
/wiki/Max_Weber
View the content page [ctrl-alt-c]
c

values: Discussion about the content page [ctrl-alt-t]

values: p-namespaces navigation vectorTabs p-namespaces-label

values:
p-variants
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-variants-label

values: Past revisions of this page [ctrl-alt-h]

values: p-views navigation vectorTabs p-views-label

values:
p-cactions
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-cactions-label

values:
mw-wiki-logo
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page

values:
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page [ctrl-alt-z]
z

values: Featured content – the best of Wikipedia

values: Find background information on current events

values:
/wiki/Special:Random
Load a random article [ctrl-alt-x]
x

values: portal navigation p-navigation p-navigation-label

values: Guidance on how to use and edit Wikipedia

values: About the project, what you can do, where to find things

values: portal navigation p-wikibase-otherprojects p-wikibase-otherprojects-label

values:
https://af.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Afrikaans
af
af
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-af
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-als
display: none;

values: ማክስ ቬበር – Amharic

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-am
display: none;

values: ماكس فيبر – Arabic

values:
https://an.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Aragonese
an
an
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-an
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ast
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-az
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-azb
display: none;

values: মাক্স ভেবার – Bangla

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-bn
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-zh-min-nan
display: none;

values: Макс Вебер – Bashkir

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ba
display: none;

values: Макс Вебер – Belarusian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-be
display: none;

values: Макс Вэбэр – Belarusian (Taraškievica orthography)

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-be-x-old
display: none;

values: Макс Вебер – Bulgarian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-bg
display: none;

values:
https://bs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Bosnian
bs
bs
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-bs
display: none;

values:
https://br.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Breton
br
br
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-br
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-bxr
display: none;

values:
https://ca.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Catalan
ca
ca
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ca
display: none;

values:
https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Czech
cs
cs
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-cs
display: none;

values:
https://cy.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Welsh
cy
cy
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-cy
display: none;

values:
https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Danish
da
da
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-da
display: none;

values:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – German
de
de
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-de
display: none;

values:
https://et.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Estonian
et
et
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-et
display: none;

values: Μαξ Βέμπερ – Greek

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-el
display: none;

values:
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Spanish
es
es
interlanguage-link-target

values:
https://eo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Esperanto
eo
eo
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-eo
display: none;

values:
https://eu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Basque
eu
eu
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-eu
display: none;

values: ماکس وبر – Persian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-fa
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-hif
display: none;

values:
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – French
fr
fr
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-fr
display: none;

values:
https://fy.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Western Frisian
fy
fy
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-fy
display: none;

values:
https://gl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Galician
gl
gl
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-gl
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-gan
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ko
display: none;

values: Մաքս Վեբեր – Armenian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-hy
display: none;

values: मैक्स वेबर – Hindi

values:
https://hr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Croatian
hr
hr
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-hr
display: none;

values:
https://io.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Ido
io
io
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-io
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ilo
display: none;

values:
https://ia.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Interlingua
ia
ia
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ia
display: none;

values:
https://is.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Icelandic
is
is
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-is
display: none;

values:
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Italian
it
it
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-it
display: none;

values: מקס ובר – Hebrew

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-he
display: none;

values: ಮ್ಯಾಕ್ಸ್ ವೆಬರ್ – Kannada

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-kn
display: none;

values: მაქს ვებერი – Georgian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ka
display: none;

values: Макс Вебер – Kazakh

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-kk
display: none;

values:
https://kw.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Cornish
kw
kw
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-kw
display: none;

values:
https://sw.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Swahili
sw
sw
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sw
display: none;

values:
https://ku.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Kurdish
ku
ku
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ku
display: none;

values: Макс Вебер – Kyrgyz

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ky
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-la
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-lv
display: none;

values:
https://lb.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Luxembourgish
lb
lb
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-lb
display: none;

values:
https://lt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Lithuanian
lt
lt
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-lt
display: none;

values:
https://li.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Limburgish
li
li
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-li
display: none;

values:
https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Hungarian
hu
hu
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-hu
display: none;

values:
https://mg.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Malagasy
mg
mg
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-mg
display: none;

values: മാക്സ് വെബർ – Malayalam

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ml
display: none;

values: मॅक्स वेबर – Marathi

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-mr
display: none;

values: მაქს ვებერი – Mingrelian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-xmf
display: none;

values:
https://ms.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Malay
ms
ms
interlanguage-link-target

values: Макс Вебер – Mongolian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-mn
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-nl
display: none;

values: マックス・ヴェーバー – Japanese

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ja
display: none;

values: Вебер, Макс – Chechen

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ce
display: none;

values:
https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Norwegian
no
no
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-no
display: none;

values:
https://nn.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Norwegian Nynorsk
nn
nn
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-nn
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-nov
display: none;

values:
https://oc.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Occitan
oc
oc
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-oc
display: none;

values:
https://uz.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Uzbek
uz
uz
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-uz
display: none;

values: ਮੈਕਸ ਵੈਬਰ – Punjabi

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-pa
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-pnb
display: none;

values:
https://jam.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weba
Max Weba – Jamaican Creole English
jam
jam
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-jam
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-pms
display: none;

values:
https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Polish
pl
pl
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-pl
display: none;

values:
https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Portuguese
pt
pt
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-pt
display: none;

values:
https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Romanian
ro
ro
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ro
display: none;

values: Макс Вебер – Rusyn

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-rue
display: none;

values: Вебер, Макс – Russian

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-ru badge-Q17437798 badge-goodarticle

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sco
display: none;

values:
https://sq.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Albanian
sq
sq
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sq
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-scn
display: none;

values: මැක්ස් වෙබර් – Sinhala

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-si
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-simple
display: none;

values:
https://sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Slovak
sk
sk
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sk
display: none;

values:
https://sl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Slovenian
sl
sl
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sl
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ckb
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sr
display: none;

values:
https://sh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Serbo-Croatian
sh
sh
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sh
display: none;

values:
https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Finnish
fi
fi
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-fi
display: none;

values:
https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Swedish
sv
sv
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sv
display: none;

values:
https://tl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Tagalog
tl
tl
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-tl
display: none;

values: மக்ஸ் வெபர் – Tamil

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ta
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-tt
display: none;

values: มักซ์ เวเบอร์ – Thai

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-th
display: none;

values:
https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Turkish
tr
tr
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-tr
display: none;

values: Макс Вебер – Ukrainian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-uk
display: none;

values: میکس ویبر – Urdu

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-vec
display: none;

values:
https://vi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Vietnamese
vi
vi
interlanguage-link-target

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-vi badge-Q17437796 badge-featuredarticle

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-war
display: none;

values: מאקס וועבער – Yiddish

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-yi
display: none;

values:
https://yo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber
Max Weber – Yoruba
yo
yo
interlanguage-link-target

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-yo
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-zh-yue
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-diq
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-bat-smg
display: none;

values: 马克斯·韦伯 – Chinese

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-zh badge-Q17437798 badge-goodarticle

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-kbp
display: none;

values: All languages (initial selection from common choices by you and others)

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Max_Weber rootpage-Max_Weber skin-vector action-view