text:
Air pollution in the United States
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Looking down from the Hollywood Hills, with Griffith Observatory on the hill in the foreground, air pollution is visible in downtown Los Angeles on a late afternoon.
Air pollution is the introduction of chemicals, particulate matter, or biological materials that cause harm or discomfort to humans or other living organisms, or damages the natural environment into the atmosphere. Ever since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution in the United States, America has had much trouble with environmental issues, air pollution in particular. According to a 2009 report, around "60 percent of Americans live in areas where air pollution has reached unhealthy levels that can make people sick".[1] Pollution in the United States has plummeted in the recent decade, with pollutants such as nitrogen dioxide decreasing[2] despite the fact the number of vehicles on the road is not. This change is due to better regulations, economic shifts, and technological innovations. With respect to nitrogen dioxide, NASA reported a 32% decrease in New York City and a 42% decrease in Atlanta between the periods of 2005-2007 and 2009-2011. Air pollution can cause a variety of health problems including, but not limited to infections, behavioral changes, cancer, organ failure, and even premature death. These health effects are not equally distributed in terms of race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, education, and more in the United States. California has the worst air quality of any state, and in most surveys the cities in California rank in the top 5 or top 10 of most polluted air in the United States.[3]
Contents
[hide]
1 Clean Air Acts
2 International pollution
3 Health effects
3.1 Asthma
3.1.1 Prenatal Exposure and links to asthma
3.1.2 Exposures to Airborne Particulate Matter Components in New York
3.2 Heart Disease
3.3 Infection and cancer
3.3.1 Infections
3.3.2 Cancer
3.4 Central nervous system
3.4.1 Brain Development
3.4.2 Other health problems
3.4.3 Ozone-Related problems
4 Disparities in the effects of air pollution
4.1 Race and ethnicity
4.1.1 Environmental racism
4.2 Socioeconomic status
4.2.1 Impact of low SES and air pollution on health
4.2.2 Factors of environmental disparities due to low socioeconomic status
4.2.3 Education status
4.3 Environmental Justices and the Trump Administration
4.3.1 Implications on Clean Power Plan
4.3.2 Restrictions on the Environmental Protection Agency
4.3.3 The Paris Agreement
4.3.4 Energy Independence Executive Order
4.3.5 Revival of the Coal Industry
5 Air pollution in California
5.1 Los Angeles air pollution
5.2 Air Pollution and Low SES Communities in California
5.3 Instances of environmental injustice
5.3.1 Diabetes in Los Angeles County Latino children
5.3.2 Proximity of schools to vehicle traffic in Culver City
5.3.3 Fracking violations in Kern County school zones
5.3.4 Inequalities in cumulative environmental burdens among three urbanized counties in California
5.3.5 Proposed coal terminal in West Oakland
6 Pollution level rankings 2013
7 See also
8 References
9 External links
Clean Air Acts[edit]
In the 1960s, 1970s, and 1990s, the United States Congress enacted a series of Clean Air Acts which significantly strengthened regulation of air pollution. Individual U.S. states, some European nations and eventually the European Union followed these initiatives. The Clean Air Act sets numerical limits on the concentrations of a basic group of air pollutants and provide reporting and enforcement mechanisms.
In 1999, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) replaced the Pollution Standards Index (PSI) with the Air Quality Index (AQI) to incorporate new PM2.5 and Ozone standards.
The effects of these laws have been very positive. In the United States between 1970 and 2006, citizens enjoyed the following reductions in annual pollution emissions:[4]
carbon monoxide emissions fell from 197 million tons to 89 million tons
nitrogen oxide emissions fell from 27 million tons to 19 million tons
sulfur dioxide emissions fell from 31 million tons to 15 million tons
particulate emissions fell by 80%
lead emissions fell by more than 98%
In an October 2006 letter to EPA, the agency's independent scientific advisors warned that the ozone smog standard “needs to be substantially reduced” and that there is “no scientific justification” for retaining the current, weaker standard. The scientists unanimously recommended a smog threshold of 60 to 70 ppb after they conducted an extensive review of the evidence.[5]
The EPA has proposed, in June 2007, a new threshold of 75 ppb. This is less strict than the scientific recommendation, but is more strict than the current standard.
Some industries are lobbying to keep the current standards in place. Environmentalists and public health advocates are mobilizing to support the scientific recommendations.[citation needed]
International pollution[edit]
An outpouring of fugitive dust layered with man-made sulfates, smog, industrial fumes, carbon grit, and nitrates is crossing the Pacific Ocean on prevailing winds from booming Asian economies in plumes so vast they alter the climate. Almost a third of the air over Los Angeles and San Francisco can be traced directly to Asia. With it comes up to three-quarters of the black carbon particulate pollution that reaches the West Coast.[6]
In the United States unhealthy levels of pollution are measured by the Environmental Protection Agency and independent researchers or agencies, like the American Lung Association. Federal limits and pollution standards are set by the Clean Air Act.
Health effects[edit]
Due to air pollution causing more than one effect it is hard to attribute a condition only to air pollution or to say how much a given source is responsible. However, it is believed that at least 200 000 human deaths are attributable to air pollution and at least a quarter are due to transportation [7]. This compares with the approximate 33 000 from gun deaths or recent average of 35 000 from motor vehicle collisions . Which are both also attributable to human technology application. There are also significant non-human deaths and effects.
Asthma[edit]
As air pollution increases, symptoms of asthma worsen. Asthma's etiology is poorly understood and currently has no cure. There are many environmental factors that attribute to asthma. The main sources of environmental pollution are the burning of fossil fuels in the combustion engines, dust generated by traffic on road surfaces, and biomass used for cooking and heating. In urban areas, there are high concentrations of particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, and other volatile organic compounds and can make breathing more difficult. The health effects of particulate matters with different diameters are related to the length of those particles staying in the atmosphere and the locations of infection in the respiratory tract [8] Young children who are exposed to air pollution are extremely vulnerable. One reason they are more vulnerable is because the average breathing pattern for an adult is 16 to 20 breaths per minute, while a 1-year-old child has a faster breathing pattern which is 20 to 40 breaths per minute. Therefore, children will be inhaling more pollutants than adults.[9]
Prenatal Exposure and links to asthma[edit]
Prenatal exposures to air pollution have influenced respiratory health starts in utero.[10] Mothers who were exposed to PM2.5 weekly during gestation, were likely to have a child diagnosed with asthma by the age 6 years. Many of the mothers exposed to PM2.5 were ethnic minorities (54% Hispanic, 30% black), had 12 or fewer years of education (66%), and did not smoke in pregnancy (80%).[10] Inner-city children from the age of 5–11 years old were diagnosed with Asthma, due to prenatal exposure to phthalates, butylbenzyl phthalate (BBzP), di-n-butyl phthalate (DnBP), di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), and diethyl phthalate (DEP). These phthalates were detected in urine samples from 300 pregnant women.[11]
Roughly seven million children suffer from asthma, meaning 1 out of every 10 children, and the rates have been steadily increasing. Among African American children, one out of six children suffer from asthma, which has rose from 50% since 2001. This issue of respiratory problems accounts for 88% of premature deaths in low-income to middle-class counties in America.[12] Population-based studies have shown that communities with a high proportion of African Americans and Hispanics experience high rates of asthma.
Exposures to Airborne Particulate Matter Components in New York[edit]
In a study conducted by Yale University, 'Environmental Inequality in Exposures to Airborne Particulate Matter Components in the United States’, Hispanics were exposed to 10 out of the 14 pollutants (e.g., 152% higher than whites for chlorine, 94% higher for aluminum), African Americans were exposed to 13 out of the 14 pollutants (e.g., 43% higher for zinc, 25% for vanadium), and Asians had higher exposures than whites (e.g., 103% for chlorine, 69% for vanadium, 64% for nickel). Some of the pollutants studied have been connected to asthma. In Bronx, New York, 66% of individuals who live in proximity of hazardous industrial facilities and waste sites are likely to be hospitalized for asthma. It has been reported that people who live within 1.86 miles of toxic waste facilities in the United States are people of color and twice as likely as white residents to live within a fence line zone of an industrial facility, contribute to air pollution, safety issues, and health concerns.[13]
Heart Disease[edit]
In the United States, cardiovascular disease kills a person every 40 seconds.[14] While the effects of air pollution on the respiratory diseases are well understood, air pollution also affects the cardiovascular system at the same level as or higher level than the respiratory system,[15] and the adverse cardiovascular health outcomes in both children and adults are high when exposed to air pollution. Carbon monoxide, oxides of nitrogen, sulfur dioxide, ozone, lead, and particulate matter are also associated with increased hospitalization and mortality due to cardiovascular disease. Chromosomal damage is high among African American children and their mothers from Oakland, California who are exposed to traffic and regional ozone levels.[16] Coronary heart disease has been one of the leading cause of death in ethnic groups.[17] One study found that PM2.5 exposure increases the risk of cardiovascular diseases by 13%. Also, those who live in the area of lower socioeconomic status have higher risk of cardiovascular diseases caused by PM2.5 exposure.[18]
Indoor air pollution, caused by kerosene space heaters, cooking, wall paints, second hand smoke and more, are also known to have an association with the cardiovascular diseases.[19][15] This increased risk of cardiovascular diseases by indoor air pollution disproportionately affects the people in the United States. The prevalence of being exposed to secondhand smoke is higher in African American population and lower income population, especially in those who live below the poverty level.[20] On the other hand, the risk of fatal cardiovascular diseases is higher in African American men and women than white men and women. For example, 25% of African American men have 6.67% or greater increased risk of fatal cardiovascular disease while only 10% of the white men have the same level of increased risk.[21] Furthermore, one county-level study found that median income and education level were the most significant factors associated with the cardiovascular diseases mortality disparities in the United States.[22]
Infection and cancer[edit]
Exposure to air pollution increases the risk of developing respiratory infections and cancers. Inhaled air pollutants damage the respiratory system and can lead to infections or cancer. Respiratory infections and cancer are related to each other. Having a respiratory infection raise the risk of cancer and vice versa.[23] Also, studies show that the risk of the respiratory infections and cancers caused by air pollution are not distributed equally in terms of race, class, and geographic placement.
Infections[edit]
Even though the mechanistic association between air pollution and infections is still unclear and require further research,[24] some studies shows that the some air pollutants, including secondhand smoking, ozone (O3), particulate matter (PM), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2), may cause the infections.[24][25] According to the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), children have higher risk of lower respiratory tract infections, such as pneumonia and bronchitis, if their parents smoke. CPSC mentions that 150,000 to 300,000 children (under 18 month) are affected by the lower respiratory tract infections which leads to 7,500 to 15,000 hospitalizations each year based on the EPA estimation. Exposure to higher level NO2 or long term exposure to low level NO2 also leads to higher risk for infections.[26]
Biological air pollution also can lead to the infections. Small, invading organisms in human body, such as bacteria, viruses, fungi, or parasites, can cause infections in the pulmonary system. There are variety of infections because many different organisms can cause the infections.
The prevalence of the bacterial infections is not equally distributed in terms race of and socioeconomic status. In the United States, bacterial pneumonia, caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteria (pneumococcus) which enters human body usually via inhalation,[27] is significantly associated with morbidity and mortality among adults. The risk of being diagnosed with bacterial pneumonia is more than double in African American people compared to white people (RR= 2.40). Also the prevalence of bacterial pneumonia in most impoverished African American census area, 20% or more people in the area live below the federal poverty level, is 4.44 times higher than the least impoverished white census area, less than 5% of the population in the area live below the federal poverty level, and 2.12 time higher than most impoverished white census area.[28]
Cancer[edit]
Many studies found that both indoor and outdoor air pollution can increase the risk of respiratory cancer. Indoor pollution such as tobacco smoking is responsible to lung cancer. Outdoor air pollution also increases the risk of lung cancer.[29] A study found that the combination of formaldehyde and benzene is responsible for 60% of cancer related health problems in the United States. Air pollutants can also cause other types of cancer. Another study found that the hazardous air pollutant (HAP) can cause cervical cancer and the upper aero-digestive tract cancer.[30]
The cancer caused by air pollution is not equally distributed in the United States. Cancer incidence and death rates are higher in African Americans than other races. A study conducted in Greater Houston, Texas shows that Hispanics and African-Americans have higher risks of HAP cancer. People who live near the public transit exhibit have higher HAP cancer risk as well.[31] Furthermore, another study shows that highly segregated metropolitan areas have higher estimated cancer risk caused by the air pollution. This trend was found for all racial groups, but was the strongest for Hispanics.[32]
A study conducted in 2000 used geographic census data and outdoor nitrogen dioxide (NO2) concentration data to examine the disparities of NO2 air pollution across the United States. The study found that there is disproportional disparities in terms of both race and socioeconomic groups. The people of color were exposed to 4.6 ppb more than average NO2 concentrations than white people. Those who live in below poverty level are exposed to 1.2 ppb more. Lower-income Caucasians are exposed to 3.4 ppb higher NO2 concentrations than the higher-income Caucasians. The study also reports disproportional disparities of NO2 concentration exposure by education level; those who without high school education are more likely to be exposed to higher concentrations.[33] Association between NO2 exposure and cancer development has been found in many studies.[34]
The disproportional effects of air pollution on people’s cancer risk is seen not only in race difference. Within a single race community, there is unequal distribution of cancer risks. Among the Hispanic population in Miami, Florida, the traffic-related cancer risks are unequally distributed in terms of socioeconomic levels and country of origin. The Hispanic community with lower incomes are more likely to have higher traffic-related cancer risks. Also, it was found that Hispanics originally from Cuba and Colombia have higher risk of cancer caused by the traffic related toxins.[35]
Central nervous system[edit]
Air pollution is traditionally associated with pulmonary problems, but it also affects the entire body. Nano-sized pollutants can enter the body by penetrating pulmonary tissue after it is inhaled and enter the blood stream via capillaries. Once inside the circulatory system, the heart will spread the pollutants throughout the body. One of the places these pollutants accumulate and affect is the brain and nervous system. The brain is constantly changing and growing throughout a person’s lifetime by reorganizing its synaptic connections in regards to its changing environment.[36] Therefore, presence and buildup of toxic pollutants in the brain can lead to health problems, diseases, and behavior changes[37] and people living in communities with poor air quality, usually low income, and colored communities, have higher chances of becoming ill than wealthy, white communities.
Brain Development[edit]
It is found that children living in areas of high air pollution, particularly high traffic pollution, tend to do worse on standardized testing. Black carbon is very small (PM2.5), very light absorbent pollutant that mostly comes from incomplete combustion of fuels.[38] According to a study in 1986–2001 in Boston, children who were exposed to more black carbon did worse on the standardized tests they were given (Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning and the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test) in all subjects. In the study, there was also association found between increased black carbon levels, worse testing results and children who primarily spoke Spanish at home and have parents with lower education.[39] A similar study conducted was conducted on inner New York City children. This time, the study looked at polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) (PM2.5) which is found in coal, tar, and incomplete combustion emissions. All of the children in the study were African American or Dominican and it was found that they have lower mental development index (MDI) scores and greater chances of having cognitive developmental delay than their Caucasian counterparts living in less polluted parts of the city.[40]
Other health problems[edit]
Air pollution components such as heavy metals and reactive oxygen species can cause central nervous system health problems ranging from neuroinflammation to short-term memory disturbances to Parkinson’s.[37] Particulate matter (PM), especially ultrafine particles (UFPM), that make its way up to and stay around the brain also become pro-inflammatory stimulus. This stimulus also leads to neuroinflammation. Human and animal studies show that neuroinflammation leads to neurodegenerative diseases.[37] A study showed that residents aged 54.7 ± 4.8 years from highly polluted cities have significantly higher gene expression for an inflammatory gene in their brain than residents in the same age group from less polluted cities.[40] Though the mechanisms on how PM causes neuroinflammation, many studies hint that there’s correlation between air pollutant caused neuroinflammation and development of Parkinson’s Disease and Alzheimer Disease.[35]
Ozone-Related problems[edit]
Ozone is produced by naturally and artificially (vehicles, refineries, plants, etc.). It is a very strong oxidizing agent and when inhaled, it attacks tissues by modifying parts of cells and it can create potentially toxic by products.[41] It was found that there is no correlation between ozone effects estimates for mortality and PM readings of an area. In other words, damage done by ozone and by PM cannot be considered the same.[42] Extended periods of inhaling ozone causes neuron damage and death, motor deficits, and memory deficits in humans and animals.[37] Certain groups, such as African Americans, have higher chance of having ozone-caused health issues because of their higher ozone exposure.[43] A study conducted in Los Angeles, CA showed that there is a 12-15% increase in chance for a child to be born with or develop autism if the parents lived in areas with high ozone concentration during the child's gestation period. From the hospital records, it was found that majority of those parents were also Hispanic and were low income families. There were less autistic children born in majority white, highly educated, and high income communities.[42] The same study also found that higher levels of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and nitric oxide (NO), both can undergo chemical reactions to form ozone, also can increase the chance of Autism in a child.
Disparities in the effects of air pollution[edit]
The health consequences of air pollution are often distributed unequally amongst a given area's population, and can disproportionately impact certain groups of people with greater severity than others. Because of this, much research has been devoted to discerning the determinants of increased exposure to pollutants. Three factors strongly correlated with increased risk include: race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and education. The underlying cause of this inequality may involve a multitude of systematic injustices which dictate exposure to harm or access to healthy environmental conditions.[44] This concept is known as environmental justice.
Race and ethnicity[edit]
In particular, people of color can be more vulnerable to the detrimental effects of air pollution.[44] Studies have revealed that people of color experience significant disparities in income distribution than their white counterparts.[45] Therefore, many communities of color reside in impoverished neighborhoods and face unequal access to environmental health services and resources.[46]
Environmental racism[edit]
Main article: Environmental racism
Certain environmental injustices can be viewed as discriminatory towards communities of racial minorities. The study of environmental racism highlights any disproportionate exposure to toxins or inaccessibility to ecological benefits such as clean water, clean air, and natural resources. Also, environmental racism is concerned with situations in which the government and large corporations target minority communities in order to commence environmentally damaging projects. They find that in these communities, there is often much less resistance and pressure to terminate these projects. When these projects are undertaken, nearby households and small businesses in these minority communities are negatively affected, sparking health problems among children and an overall decrease in the standard of living.
According to the 2014 Census, the median household income for both African-Americans and Hispanics was about $43,300. On the other hand, white household income was around $71,300. Also, over 91% of African-Americans and 86% of Hispanics live in urban areas, whereas only about 70% of whites live in urban areas.[47] Furthermore, in April 2017, three environmental groups—Environmental Justice and Health Alliance for Chemical Policy Reform, Coming Clean, and Center for Effective Government—completed a study regarding the disproportionate spread of environmental burdens. They define "fenceline zones" as areas within the vicinity of U.S. chemical facilities that are at of highest risk of death or injury after a potential chemical accident. They found that the 134 million people living in "fenceline zones" are 75% more likely to be African-American, 60% more likely to be Latino, and 50% more likely to be classified as having low socioeconomic status. The study was meant to not underline the idea that the United States government fails to justly protect its communities and but also to push the government to update chemical safety regulations nationwide. These factors greatly contribute to the fact minority exposure to harmful air pollutants ranges from 40% to 60% higher than whites—evan as air quality is slowly improving as a whole.[48]
Socioeconomic status[edit]
Socioeconomic Status (SES) is an individual's or group's sociological and economic status in society.[49] Low socioeconomic status can correlate to a greater risk of exposure to unsafe and unhealthy conditions. People of lower socioeconomic statuses have an unequal access to resources and safety measures while people of higher socioeconomic statuses have a greater access to health and safety resources/measures.[50]
Impact of low SES and air pollution on health[edit]
People of lower socioeconomic status may more frequently have poor health, thus the effects of air pollution can incur additional health risks and shorter lifespans on this population.[51]
In the United States, racial and ethnic minorities, defined as people of color who represent a small portion of the overall population, are socioeconomically disadvantaged, and have a history of past discrimination.[52] There are four recognized minority groups in the United States: Asians and Pacific Islanders, African Americans, Hispanics, and Native Americans. Those of low socioeconomic status and people of color are more vulnerable to the short term and long term effects of air pollution.[53] Short-term health effects of air pollution include but is not limited to bronchitis or pneumonia, frequent headaches, dizziness, and nausea. Some long term health effects are lung cancer and respiratory diseases, heart disease, and organ damage, and irreversible nerve damage.[54]
People of lower socioeconomic status are found to be more vulnerable to air pollutant, PM 2.5, due to their location. PM 2.5 is an air pollutant, arising from the blend of power plants, refineries, and diesel engines, among other sources, and this particle penetrates the lungs.[55] Communities of low socioeconomic statuses are frequently concentrated in areas near highways, busy roads, and refineries. Therefore, limiting one's exposure to air pollution in an impoverished environment is nearly impossible. Communities of low socioeconomic status face an unequal access to environmental health services and resources.[56]
Factors of environmental disparities due to low socioeconomic status[edit]
They generally divide into three categories:
Sociopolitical explanations in which hazardous facilities located in communities where they lack political capital to influence discussions
Market-based explanations in which people who live in polluted areas have lower property value
Racial discrimination in the placement of hazardous facilities.[57]
Education status[edit]
In many ways, the socioeconomic status determines the education level that a person can achieve.[58] According to literature, there is a lower rate for students from low socioeconomic status communities to get access to higher level of education compared to the students from more affluent communities.[59] Further studies have indicated that there is a significant correlation between income and educational attainment.[60] Therefore, even though education may not have a direct correlation with the exposure to the environmental injustice, it can still be an indirect indicator of the disparity in the distribution of environmental burden.[61]
Environmental Justices and the Trump Administration[edit]
Implications on Clean Power Plan[edit]
The Clean Power Plan is a policy designed by the Obama Administration to lower the levels of carbon dioxide emitted by power plants in the United States. The major estimated positive externalities of the plan include the reduction of air pollutants by up to 25% and the elimination of serious health altercations for those who live near factories and chemical facilities that emit carbon dioxide such as a considerable decrease of premature deaths and asthma attacks among children. Also, although steel, cement, and refining production jobs are likely to decrease on a large scale, this is expected to be counteracted by a boom in production and job opportunities in the solar and wind power sectors.
The plan was unveiled on August 3, 2015, but the continuation of the plan is now in question as the Trump Administration is expected to eliminate the policy during Donald Trump’s presidency. On March 28, 2017, President Donald Trump began the first steps to eliminate the Clean Power Plan as he signed an executive order that mandated the Environmental Protection Agency to review the plan and its policies.[62]
Restrictions on the Environmental Protection Agency[edit]
Environmental racism can be defined as any practice of environmental injustice that disproportionately affects minority neighborhoods and communities. Not only is the California population incredibly racially diverse, but because California is the primary air polluter and consequently spends extra time, money and resources to develop technologies that ensure air pollution doesn't become detrimental to the environment, its climate policy is one of the most technologically important in the developed world. As of March 2017, the Trump Administration is expected to withdraw the federal waiver that gives the Environmental Protection Agency and California the power to efficiently monitor and regulate greenhouse-gas pollution from car tailpipes. Environmental agents and environmental rights activists foreshadow that this action will certainly spell trouble for California's important climate policy; as well as further worsen the disproportionate spread of negative environmental health problems to neighborhoods of color throughout counties in California statewide.[63]
The Paris Agreement[edit]
Donald Trump has suggested that the Trump Administration is pushing for the United States to exit the Paris Agreement, which is an agreement created on December 12, 2015 within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change to regulate global climate change as a whole. The Paris Agreement creates policies and regulations for the sustainable development of all regions of the globe with aims of developing technologies that will significantly lower greenhouse gas emissions worldwide as well as increase the ability of all nations to adapt to the multiplying effects of climate change. As of April 2017, 195 countries have signed the agreement and 143 countries have ratified it, already adopting certain policies called upon by the treaty. European Union energy officials are genuinely expressing their concerns that the United States will exit the agreement and are convinced that this action will have substantial negative impacts on the state of the global environment.[64]
Energy Independence Executive Order[edit]
The Energy Independence order was issued by the Trump Administration in order to designed to promote energy resources and economic growth by cutting regulation burdens on energy production such as coal, natural gas, nuclear material, flowing water, and other domestic sources, including renewable sources. To ensure that the Nation's electricity is affordable, reliable, safe, secure, and clean, all agencies are to respect their the proper roles of the Congress and the States concerning these matters in our constitutional republic. Environmental regulations must comply with the law, are of greater benefit than cost for the American people, and are developed through the best available peer-reviewed science and economics.[65]
Revival of the Coal Industry[edit]
Trump promised to revive the coal industry and bring back coal-related jobs.[66] To fulfill his promise, on February 16, 2017, Trump signed a bill undoing the Stream Protection Rule signed during the Obama administration. This bill originally helped prevent coal mining from polluting waterways.[66] Burning coal produces air pollutants such as nitrogen oxides (NOX), sulfur dioxide (SO2), particulate matter (PMX), Black carbon, and smog. Increase of coal usage would greatly increase air pollution especially in areas surrounding the facilities many of which are located in communities of color and low-income.[67]
Environmental Health Education
The education status here does not merely refer to the educational background or the highest degree people have earned, but more importantly, the environmental health education. Generally, the population with less education are more likely to be exposed to the impact of air pollution.[68] For example, in the United States, people with a high school degree had 6.2% higher estimated exposure to PM 2.5 compared to those with a college degree. In addition to PM 2.5, people with a high school degree or lower are estimated to have at least 10% more exposure to Al, Ca, Cl, EC, SI, TI, V, and Zn when compared to people with a college degree.[69] Therefore, environmental health education could be one of the most effective approaches to raise the public awareness of the environmental issues.
Before 2017, the EPA have spent more than $8.7 million on environmental education annually to increase public knowledge and awareness about the current environmental issues and the consequences.[70] They aim to promote the popularization of the necessary skills and knowledge for the public to make decisions and participate in activities that lead to the resolution of environmental challenges.[71]
As of March 2017, the EPA budget have been severely impacted the condition of environmental education.[72] The 2018 United States federal budget cut approximately $2.5 billion from the roughly 8 billion annual budget for EPA, and the budget for environmental education was cut from $8.7 million to $0.555 million, which is reduced by 94%.[73]
Air pollution in California[edit]
See also: Pollution in California
California's air is the most polluted in the U.S.A.[74]
Los Angeles air pollution[edit]
Los Angeles has the most contaminated air in the country. With a population of roughly over 10 million, the Los Angeles area is a large basin with the Pacific Ocean to the west, and several mountain ranges with 11,000-foot peaks to the east and south. Diesel engines, ports, motor vehicles, and industries are main sources of air pollution in Los Angeles. Frequent sunny days and low rainfall contribute to ozone formation, as well as high levels of fine particles and dust.[75] The strong relationship between AQI and ozone levels may be found on air pollution maps.[76]
Air pollution in Los Angeles has caused widespread concerns. In 2011, the Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) Survey on Californians and the Environment showed that 45% of citizens in Los Angeles consider air pollution to be a “big problem”, and 47% believe that the air quality of Los Angeles is worse than it was 10 years ago.[77] In 2013, the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside area ranked the 1st most ozone-polluted city, the 4th most polluted city by annual particle pollution, and the 4th most polluted city by 24-hour particle pollution.[78]
Both ozone and particle pollution are dangerous to human health. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) engaged a panel of expert scientists, the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee, to help them assess the evidence. The EPA released their most recent review of the current research on health threat of ozone and particle pollution.[41][79]
EPA Concludes Ozone Pollution Poses Serious Health Threats
Causes respiratory harm (e.g. worsened asthma, worsened COPD, inflammation)
Likely to cause early death (both short-term and long-term exposure)
Likely to cause cardiovascular harm (e.g. heart attacks, strokes, heart disease, congestive heart failure)
May cause harm to the central nervous system
May cause reproductive and developmental harm
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Integrated Science Assessment for Ozone and Related Photochemical Oxidants, 2013. EPA/600/R-10/076F.
EPA Concludes Fine Particle Pollution Poses Serious Health Threats
Causes early death (both short-term and long-term exposure)
Causes cardiovascular harm (e.g. heart attacks, strokes, heart disease, congestive heart failure)
Likely to cause respiratory harm (e.g. worsened asthma, worsened COPD, inflammation)
May cause cancer
May cause reproductive and developmental harm
-U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Integrated Science Assessment for Particulate Matter, December 2009. EPA 600/R-08/139F.
Helping the area to meet the national air quality standards and improve the health of local residents continues to be a priority for the EPA. One of EPA's highest priorities is to support the reduction of diesel emissions from ships, trucks, locomotives, and other diesel engines.[78] In 2005, Congress authorized funding for the Diesel Emissions Reduction Act (DERA), a grant program, administrated by the EPA, to selectively retrofit or replace the older diesel engines most likely to impact human health. Since 2008, the DERA program has achieved impressive out outcome of improving air quality.[80] The EPA also works with state and local partners to decrease emissions from port operations and to improve the efficient transportation of goods through the region. Both the EPA and the Port of Los Angeles are partners of the San Pedro Bay Ports Clean Air Action Plan, a sweeping plan aimed at significantly reducing the health risks posed by air pollution from port-related ships, trains, trucks, terminal equipment and harbor craft.[75] For environmental justice, air pollution in low-income LA communities has received more attention. In 2011, the “Clean up Green up” campaign was launched to designate four low-income LA communities- Pacoima, Boyle Heights and Wilmington. This campaign aims to push green industries through incentives, including help obtaining permits and tax and utility rebates.[81]
Although Los Angeles air pollution level had declined slightly for the last few decades,[82] citizens in Los Angeles still suffer from high level air pollution[83] and current levels are back to where they were 10 years ago.[84]
Air Pollution and Low SES Communities in California[edit]
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's interactive online map - EJSCREEN - features the low socioeconomic communities across the country that are more vulnerable to air pollution and its associated health risks. As exhibited in this map, Southeast Los Angeles County neighborhoods, primarily impoverished areas in the San Joaquin Valley and Inland Empire, face a higher exposure to air pollution and environmental injustices. In such areas, those in poverty stricken areas have an unequal access to environmental health and safety resources. These poverty-stricken neighborhoods are frequently located in areas that are near freeways, hazardous facilities, and/or rail yards.[85]
Instances of environmental injustice[edit]
Diabetes in Los Angeles County Latino children[edit]
In 2017, researchers found that diabetes in Latino children living in Los Angeles is linked to air quality.[86] A study led by the University of Southern California was the first of its kind to follow the health and residential air pollution levels of the same children over a span of several years. The subjects of the study were overweight Latino children, between the ages of eight and fifteen, residing in areas with elevated particulate matter and nitrogen dioxide levels, air pollutants caused nearby power plants and high-volume vehicle traffic.[86] The results demonstrated that the children possessed significantly increased risk factors for Type 2 diabetes by the time they turned eighteen, such as diminished efficiency in the insulin-secreting cells of the pancreas.[87] The insulin resistance that results from such a condition is a direct cause of diabetes onset.[88]
Diabetes mellitus is a disease that is characterized by the body's inability to properly regulate blood glucose (or blood sugar) levels. Prolonged levels of high blood sugar may lead to severe health complications such as heart disease, nerve damage, kidney failure, blindness, or even early death.[89] As diabetes becomes a rising epidemic, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that up to nearly 8 million U.S. citizens may have undiagnosed diabetes or its precursor.[90] Conventional medical findings suggest that unhealthy or calorie-dense diets, lack of physical activity, and family history are risk factors for developing the disease; however, recent studies are beginning to trace a connection between Type 2 diabetes and the external factor of air pollution.[87] Because socioeconomic status, race, and exposure to air pollution are frequently correlated, the CDC acknowledges certain socioeconomic conditions or races as pre-existing risk factors for Type 2 diabetes, in addition to those previously listed.[86] Statistics suggest that Hispanic people are 50% more likely to die from diabetes than whites, and studies focusing on issues of environmental injustice are able to demonstrate possible reasons for this disparity.[91]
Proximity of schools to vehicle traffic in Culver City[edit]
The spatial arrangement of Californian communities plays a large role in determining exposure to the concentrated air pollution of the state's southern regions. In one suburb of Los Angeles, El Marino Language School sits adjacent to the ten-lane Interstate 405. Students of schools like these, often elementary-aged, are subject to dramatically increased levels of pollution from automobile emissions, including carcinogenic compounds.[92] Health effects of traffic pollution include the onset of cardiovascular disease, asthma, impaired lung function, premature death, and a plethora of other complications.[93] Furthermore, the incomplete development of children's sensitive respiratory systems leads to compounded effects of air pollution when compared with the health effects of the same pollution on adults.[94]
Though the health consequences of vehicle pollution are widely recognized and some legislation has been enacted to reduce its impact, very little tangible action has actually been taken. In 2003, California passed Senate Bill No. 352, which banned the construction of new schools within 500 feet of freeways with certain exceptions.[95] However, the bill remained largely ignored as 1 in 5 schools opened between 2014 and 2015 were still in direct violation of the ban.[92] In 2015, the Environmental Protection Agency released a report titled "Best Practices for Reducing Near-Road Pollution Exposure at Schools", available both online and in-print.[94] However, without any requirements regarding school siting from the U.S. Department of Education, state-funded schools are under no obligation to follow its guidelines. The reluctance of public schools to comply with safety regulations often stems from monetary limitations that encourage the use of cheap land, a dilemma that disproportionately impacts children of poorer areas; the report noted that minority and low-income students have a higher prevalence of attendance in public schools of urban areas, such as the big cities in which busy roads and schools share territory.[92]
Fracking violations in Kern County school zones[edit]
Oil fracking is a process that involves a high pressure injection of fluid into the ground to extract oil.[96] The adverse environmental effects of this natural gas extraction are the subject of much controversy, the primary concerns of which surround the contamination of surrounding water and air sources. These risks result when underground drinking water and surface water are exposed to discharges of the chemically-infused fracking fluid due to faulty construction or operation, disposal leaks, or other unintended byproducts like the release of hazardous volatile compounds into the air.[97] In terms of air pollution, "hydrofracking" causes detriment to both the environment and human health. Enormous quantities of methane, a greenhouse gas, escape into the ozone layer of Earth's atmosphere during the extraction process, where they accelerate the impacts of climate change. Furthermore, air contaminants like nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, formaldehydes, and hydrogen sulfide that are released during drilling have been shown to cause harmful effects ranging from cancer, organ failure, neurological issues, to birth defects.[98]
In 2015, a study revealed that there are forty-five fracking sites within 1.5 miles of one junior high in the town of Shafter, one of California's top ten most polluted communities. The students of this community suffer from the state's decision to allow oil companies to continue hydraulic fracturing within close proximity of their schools. Parents observe severe and unexplainable health complications amongst their children, including asthma and epilepsy, that may be correlated with air toxins from the nearby wells.[99] In all of Kern County, in which Shafter is located, a staggering ten school districts sit within one mile of fracking wells. The situation becomes even more problematic when the fact that Kern County is predominantly Latino in racial/ethnic composition is considered; in fact, 20% or more of its residents are foreign-born emigrants of Asia and Latin America.[98] Some argue that the concentration of fracking sites around the community's population of color is a discriminatory practice in direct violation of California Code 11135, which states that no person shall be unlawfully subjected to discrimination by any state or state-funded agency on the basis of race or ethnic group identification.[100]
Inequalities in cumulative environmental burdens among three urbanized counties in California[edit]
In 2012, this research used the method of cumulative environmental hazard inequality Index (CEHII), which is a model developed to environmental inequality in air pollution hazards., to analyze the environmental inequality in three counties in California: Alameda, San Diego and Los Angeles (Jason et al. 2012). In addition to frequently used air pollution parameter like NO2, PM 2.5 and diesel PM, a metric of heat stress was included for the analysis because excessive heat weather comes to be an environmental problem that can threaten human health.
The result indicated that color community bear greater air pollution including NO2, PM 2.5, PM 10, and heat stress compared to predominantly white and more affluent community. In San Diego County, the relative heat stress inequality was founded to be the highest. Also, significant heat stress inequality was observed in Los Angeles. The result shows that in these two counties, there was a strong positive correlation between the percentage of Non-Whites in the community and heat stress inequality. However, in Alameda county, the result indicated an opposite pattern which indicates. The community with a higher White population experience more extreme temperature exceedances. This might be explained by the fact that White population and the more affluent class in Alameda County mainly lived in the eastern area further away from the coast, which resulted in the higher heat stress exposure.
Also, the research verified that poverty status is consistent with the trend of disproportion burden of the racial-ethnic status. As the analysis was conducted according to the poverty status instead of racial-ethnic status for air pollutants NO2, PM2.5, and diesel PM, the results indicated the similar result as the analysis to heat stress. Furthermore, from our data, we found a strong correlation between poverty and proportion of non-white population (Alameda: r=0.69, Los Angeles: r=0.77). After all, this research demonstrates that the air pollution is disproportionally distributed according to the socioeconomic and racial-ethnic status in the United States.
As a future direction of study, it plans to classify the inequality exists in African American, Hispanic, Asian, and other ethnic groups. Furthermore, the technique used in this research provided a way to assess environmental inequality and the results can be used to assist decision makers in efforts to address environmental inequality issues.[101]
Proposed coal terminal in West Oakland[edit]
In February 2016, the city of Oakland publicly announced construction plans for the Oakland Bulk and Oversized Terminal, a bulk exporting facility in West Oakland. As a predominantly Latino and African-American community, the residents of West Oakland live in a community that suffers from dangerous levels of air pollution. The construction of this port and its proposed partnership with Utah's coal-mining counties would rank the city as the lead coal exporter on the West Coast.[102] To fund such a goliath project in the face of strong resistance from city councils fighting to protect their local communities from drastically increasing pollution emissions, Utah state and county officials arranged a controversial $53 million loan.[103] The fund, composed of taxpayer dollars intended for local projects, would allow for the annual shipping of 9 million tons of coal through Oakland and an increase in national coal exports by 19%.[104] A movement by environmental advocates quickly grew, citing that exposure to toxic coal dust would also subject the city's residents to increased risks of bronchitis, pneumonia, heart disease, emphysema, and more.[102]
In response, thousands of Oakland residents and environmental rights activists worked together to prevent the construction of the coal terminal. In July 2016, Oakland City Council voted to ban coal from being handled and stored in the City of Oakland.[102] The decision marked a large victory for the newly established Department of Race and Equity, an organization designed to protect Oakland's predominantly African-American community from social and racial disparities.[105] According to the "Toxic Wastes and Race in the United States" report issued by the East Bay Community Foundation, those living in West Oakland already encounter five times more toxic pollution per person than residents of the city of Oakland, and children living in West Oakland are seven times more likely to be hospitalized for asthma than the average child in California.[102] The residents of West Oakland are more likely to face both decreased life expectancy and asthma-related emergency room visits.[105] For a city already bearing a disproportionate amount of environmental burdens, the fight for a coal-free Oakland was a success for proponents of environmental justice.
Pollution level rankings 2013[edit]
Most polluted US cities by short-term particulate matter[78]
Rank
City
1 Bakersfield-Delano, CA
2 Fresno-Madera, CA
3 Hanford-Corcoran, CA
4 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA
5 Modesto, CA
6 Salt Lake City-Ogden-Clearfield, UT
7 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA
8 Merced, CA
9 Fairbanks, AK
10 Logan, UT-ID
Most polluted US cities by ozone levels

Rank
City
1 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA
2 Visalia-Porterville, CA
3 Bakersfield-Delano, CA
4 Fresno-Madera, CA
5 Hanford-Corcoran, CA
6 Sacramento—Arden-Arcade—Yuba City, CA
7 Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX
8 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX
9 Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA
10 El Centro, CA
Most polluted US cities by year-round particulate matter
Rank
City
1 Bakersfield-Delano, CA
2 Merced, CA
3 Fresno-Madera, CA
4 Hanford-Corcoran, CA
5 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA
6 Modesto, CA
7 Visalia-Porterville, CA
8 Pittsburgh-New Castle, PA
9 El Centro, CA
10 Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington, OH-KY-IN
See also[edit]
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
Spare the Air program (California)
Greenhouse gas emissions by the United States
Climate change in the United States
References[edit]
Jump up ^ "Top Polluted U.S. Cities With the World Air". ABC News.
Jump up ^ Lloret, Javier; Valiela, Ivan (1 August 2016). "Unprecedented decrease in deposition of nitrogen oxides over North America: the relative effects of emission controls and prevailing air-mass trajectories". Biogeochemistry. 129 (1-2): 165–180. doi:10.1007/s10533-016-0225-5. ISSN 0168-2563.
Jump up ^ "Watch: NASA Says U.S. Air Pollution Has Plummeted". TIME.
Jump up ^ Wall Street Journal article, May 23, 2006 on OpinionJournal.com
Jump up ^ American Lung Association, June 2, 2007
Jump up ^ Wall Street Journal article, July 20, 2007
Jump up ^ "Study: Air pollution causes 200,000 early deaths each year in the U.S." MIT news. Retrieved 2018-07-02.
Jump up ^ EPA,OAR, US. "Health and Environmental Effects of Particulate Matter (PM) | US EPA". US EPA. Retrieved 2018-05-04.
Jump up ^ Dixon, Jane (202). "Kids Need Clean Air: Air Pollution and Children's Health".
^ Jump up to: a b Hsu, Hsiao-Hsien Leon; Chiu, Yueh-Hsiu Mathilda; Coull, Brent A.; Kloog, Itai; Schwartz, Joel; Lee, Alison; Wright, Robert O.; Wright, Rosalind J. (2015-11-01). "Prenatal Particulate Air Pollution and Asthma Onset in Urban Children. Identifying Sensitive Windows and Sex Differences". American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 192 (9): 1052–1059. doi:10.1164/rccm.201504-0658OC. ISSN 1535-4970. PMC 4642201  . PMID 26176842.
Jump up ^ "Environmental Health Perspectives – Asthma in Inner-City Children at 5–11 Years of Age and Prenatal Exposure to Phthalates: The Columbia Center for Children's Environmental Health Cohort". ehp.niehs.nih.gov. Retrieved 2017-04-22.
Jump up ^ "5 Things to Know About Communities of Color and Environmental Justice - Center for American Progress". Center for American Progress. 2016-04-25. Retrieved 2017-04-21.
Jump up ^ Bell, Michelle (August 10, 2012). "Environmental Inequality in Exposures to Airborne Particulate Matter Components in the United States" (PDF). doi:10.1289/ehp.1205201.
Jump up ^ EPA, ORD, US. "Linking Air Pollution and Heart Disease". www.epa.gov. Retrieved 2017-04-24.
^ Jump up to: a b Garelnabi, Mahdi; Uzoigwe, JacintaC; Prum, Thavaleak; Bresnahan, Eric (2013). "The emerging role of outdoor and indoor air pollution in cardiovascular disease". North American Journal of Medical Sciences. 5 (8): 445. doi:10.4103/1947-2714.117290.
Jump up ^ "CalNet Central Authentication Service - Single Sign-on". search.proquest.com. Retrieved 2017-04-22.
Jump up ^ Brook, Robert D.; Franklin, Barry; Cascio, Wayne; Hong, Yuling; Howard, George; Lipsett, Michael; Luepker, Russell; Mittleman, Murray; Samet, Jonathan (2004). "Air Pollution and Cardiovascular Disease". Circulation. 109 (21): 2655–2671. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000128587.30041.C8. PMID 15173049.
Jump up ^ Chi, Gloria C.; Hajat, Anjum; Bird, Chloe E.; Cullen, Mark R.; Griffin, Beth Ann; Miller, Kristin A.; Shih, Regina A.; Stefanick, Marcia L.; Vedal, Sverre; Whitsel, Eric A.; Kaufman, Joel D. (2016). "Individual and Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status and the Association between Air Pollution and Cardiovascular Disease". Environmental Health Perspectives. 124 (12). doi:10.1289/EHP199.
Jump up ^ Lee, Byeong-Jae; Kim, Bumseok; Lee, Kyuhong (2014). "Air Pollution Exposure and Cardiovascular Disease". Toxicological Research. 30 (2): 71–75. doi:10.5487/TR.2014.30.2.071. PMC 4112067  .
Jump up ^ Health, CDC's Office on Smoking and. "CDC - Fact Sheet - Secondhand Smoke - Smoking & Tobacco Use". Smoking and Tobacco Use -us. Retrieved 2017-04-24.
Jump up ^ Lu, Yuan; Ezzati, Majid; Rimm, Eric B.; Hajifathalian, Kaveh; Ueda, Peter; Danaei, Goodarz (2016). "Sick Populations and Sick SubpopulationsClinical Perspective". Circulation. 134 (6): 472–485. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018102.
Jump up ^ Patel, Shivani A.; Ali, Mohammed K.; Narayan, K. M. Venkat; Mehta, Neil K. (2016). "County-Level Variation in Cardiovascular Disease Mortality in the United States in 2009–2013: Comparative Assessment of Contributing Factors". American Journal of Epidemiology. 184 (12): 933–942. doi:10.1093/aje/kww081.
Jump up ^ "Can infections cause cancer?". The American Cancer Society. July 11, 2016. Retrieved March 1, 2017.
^ Jump up to: a b Ciencewicki, Jonathan; Jaspers, Ilona (2007). "Air Pollution and Respiratory Viral Infection". Inhalation Toxicology. 19 (14): 1135. doi:10.1080/08958370701665434.
Jump up ^ Chauhan, Anoop J.; Johnston, Sebastian L. (2003). "Air Pollution and Infection in Respiratory Illness". British Medical Bulletin. 68: 95–112. doi:10.1093/bmb/ldg022.
Jump up ^ "The Inside Story: A Guide to Indoor Air Quality". CPSC.gov. 2016-02-24. Retrieved 2017-03-18.
Jump up ^ Division of Public Health-Wisconsin Department of Health Services. "Streptococcus pneumoniae, Invasive (Pneumococcal disease)" (PDF). Retrieved April 23, 2017.
Jump up ^ Burton, Deron C.; Flannery, Brendan; Bennett, Nancy M.; Farley, Monica M.; Gershman, Ken; Harrison, Lee H.; Lynfield, Ruth; et al. (2010). "Socioeconomic and Racial/ethnic Disparities in the Incidence of Bacteremic Pneumonia among US Adults". American Journal of Public Health. 100 (10): 1904–11. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2009.181313. PMC 2936986  . CS1 maint: Explicit use of et al. (link)
Jump up ^ Pope, III; Arden, C; Burnett, Richard T; Thun, Michael J; Calle, Eugenia E; Krewski, Daniel; Thurston, George D (2002). "To Fine Particulate Air Pollution". The Journal of the American Medical Association. 287 (9): 1132–41. doi:10.1001/jama.287.9.1132.
Jump up ^ Josyula, Sowmya; Lin, Juan; Xue, Xiaonan; Rothman, Nathaniel; Lan, Qing; Rohan, Thomas E; Hosgood, H Dean (2015). "Household Air Pollution and Cancers Other than Lung: A Meta-Analysis". Environmental Health : A Global Access Science Source. 14 (1): 24. doi:10.1186/s12940-015-0001-3.
Jump up ^ Collins, Timothy W.; Grineski, Sara E.; Chakraborty, Jayajit; Montgomery, Marilyn C.; Hernandez, Maricarmen (2015). "Downscaling Environmental Justice Analysis: Determinants of Household-Level Hazardous Air Pollutant Exposure in Greater Houston". Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 105 (4): 684–703. doi:10.1080/00045608.2015.1050754.
Jump up ^ Morello-Frosch, Rachel; Jesdale, Bill M. (2006). "Separate and Unequal: Residential Segregation and Estimated Cancer Risks Associated with Ambient Air Toxins in U.S. Metropolitan Areas". Environmental Health Perspectives. 114 (3): 386–93. doi:10.1289/ehp.8500.
Jump up ^ Clark, Lara P.; Millet, Dylan B.; Marshall, Julian D. (2014). "National Patterns in Environmental Injustice and Inequality: Outdoor NO2 Air Pollution in the United States". PLoS ONE. 9: e94431. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094431. .
Jump up ^ Hamra, Ghassan B.; Laden, Francine; Cohen, Aaron J.; Raaschou-Nielsen, Ole; Brauer, Michael; Loomis, Dana (2015). "Lung Cancer and Exposure to Nitrogen Dioxide and Traffic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis". Environmental Health Perspectives. 123 (11): 1107–12. doi:10.1289/ehp.1408882.
^ Jump up to: a b Grineski; Elizabeth, Sara; Collins, Timothy W.; Chakraborty, Jayajit (2013). "Hispanic Heterogeneity and Environmental Injustice: Intra-Ethnic Patterns of Exposure to Cancer Risks from Traffic-Related Air Pollution in Miami". Population and Environment. 35 (1): 26–44. doi:10.1007/s11111-012-0184-2. PMC 3736859  .
Jump up ^ Levesque, Shannon; Surace, Michael J.; McDonald, Jacob; Block, Michelle L. (2011-01-01). "Air pollution & the brain: Subchronic diesel exhaust exposure causes neuroinflammation and elevates early markers of neurodegenerative disease". Journal of Neuroinflammation. 8: 105. doi:10.1186/1742-2094-8-105. ISSN 1742-2094. PMC 3184279  . PMID 21864400.
^ Jump up to: a b c d Block, Michelle L.; Calderón-Garcidueñas, Lilian (2017-04-23). "Air Pollution: Mechanisms of Neuroinflammation & CNS Disease". Trends in Neurosciences. 32 (9): 506–516. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2009.05.009. ISSN 0166-2236. PMC 2743793  . PMID 19716187.
Jump up ^ Standards, US EPA, OAR, Office of Air Quality Planning and. "Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) for Power Plants". www3.epa.gov. Retrieved 2017-04-23.
Jump up ^ Suglia, S. F.; Gryparis, A.; Wright, R. O.; Schwartz, J.; Wright, R. J. (2008-02-01). "Association of Black Carbon with Cognition among Children in a Prospective Birth Cohort Study". American Journal of Epidemiology. 167 (3): 280–286. doi:10.1093/aje/kwm308. ISSN 0002-9262.
^ Jump up to: a b Perera, Frederica P.; Rauh, Virginia; Whyatt, Robin M.; Tsai, Wei-Yann; Tang, Deliang; Diaz, Diurka; Hoepner, Lori; Barr, Dana; Tu, Yi-Hsuan (2017-04-23). "Effect of Prenatal Exposure to Airborne Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons on Neurodevelopment in the First 3 Years of Life among Inner-City Children". Environmental Health Perspectives. 114 (8): 1287–1292. doi:10.1289/ehp.9084. ISSN 0091-6765. PMC 1551985  . PMID 16882541.
^ Jump up to: a b American Lung Association, Ozone Pollution, 2013. http://www.stateoftheair.org/2013/health-risks/health-risks-ozone.html#_edn23
^ Jump up to: a b "Environmental Health Perspectives – Ambient Air Pollution and Autism in Los Angeles County, California". ehp.niehs.nih.gov. Retrieved 2017-04-23.
Jump up ^ Bell, M. L.; Dominici, F. (2008-04-15). "Effect Modification by Community Characteristics on the Short-term Effects of Ozone Exposure and Mortality in 98 US Communities". American Journal of Epidemiology. 167 (8): 986–997. doi:10.1093/aje/kwm396. ISSN 0002-9262. PMC 2430754  . PMID 18303005.
^ Jump up to: a b "Disparities in the Impact of Air Pollution". American Lung Association. Retrieved 2017-04-24.
Jump up ^ "Wealth inequality has widened along racial, ethnic lines since end of Great Recession". Pew Research Center. 2014-12-12. Retrieved 2017-04-24.
Jump up ^ "Ethnic and Racial Minorities & Socioeconomic Status". American Psychological Association. Retrieved November 7, 2017.
Jump up ^ Sexton, Ken (1993). Air Pollution and Health Risks: Do Race and Class Matter?. Princeton Scientific Publishing.
Jump up ^ Halperin, David. "Study: Blacks, Latinos, Low-income Americans Live Closest to Dangerous Chemical Plants". The Huffington Post.
Jump up ^ "Socioeconomic Status". apa.org. Retrieved 2017-04-24.
Jump up ^ "Health, Income, and Inequality". www.nber.org. Retrieved 2017-04-24.
Jump up ^ Filleul, Laurent; Harrabi, Imed (2004-09-01). "Do socioeconomic conditions reflect a high exposure to air pollution or more sensitive health conditions?". Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 58 (9): 802–802. doi:10.1136/jech.2003.015040. ISSN 0143-005X. PMC 1732873  . PMID 15310811.
Jump up ^ keller, colleen (1993). "Coronary heart disease in ethnic minorities". ovid.org.
Jump up ^ "Environmental Health Perspectives – Air Pollution and Individual and Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status: Evidence from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)". ehp.niehs.nih.gov. Retrieved 2017-04-23.
Jump up ^ Society, National Geographic (2011-04-04). "air pollution". National Geographic Society. Retrieved 2017-04-23.
Jump up ^ "Air pollution levels rising in many of the world's poorest cities". World Health Organization. Retrieved 2017-04-23.
Jump up ^ News, Cheryl Katz, Environmental Health. "People in Poor Neighborhoods Breathe More Hazardous Particles". Scientific American. Retrieved 2017-04-23.
Jump up ^ Ash, Michael; Boyce, James K.; Chang, Grace; Scharber, Helen (2012). "Is Environmental Justice Good for White Folks? Industrial Air Toxics Exposure in Urban America". Social Science Quarterly. 94 (3): 616–636. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2012.00874.x.
Jump up ^ "Education & Socioeconomic Status factsheet" (PDF).
Jump up ^ Morgan, Paul (2008). "Risk Factors for Learning-Related Behavior Problems at 24 Months of Age: Population-Based Estimates". J Abnorm Child Psychol. 37 (3): 401–413. doi:10.1007/s10802-008-9279-8.
Jump up ^ Strauss, Steven (Jan 2, 2012). "The Connection Between Education, Income Inequality, and Unemployment".
Jump up ^ Martin Branis n, Martina Linhartova (2012). "Association between unemployment, income, education level, population size and air pollution in Czech cities: Evidence for environmental inequality? A pilot national scale analysis". Health & Place. 18: 1110–1114. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.04.011.
Jump up ^ "EPA Chief: Trump Plans To Kill Obama-era Clean Power Plan". NPR.
Jump up ^ Meyer, Robinson. "Trump's Clean-Air War With California Will Affect Every American". The Atlantic. Retrieved 2017-03-07.
Jump up ^ Ebell, Myron (January 30, 2017). "President Trump Prepares to Withdraw from Groundbreaking Climate Change Agreement, Transition Official Says". Fortune.
Jump up ^ "Presidential Executive Order on Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth". whitehouse.gov. 2017-03-28. Retrieved 2017-04-22.
^ Jump up to: a b "Trump promised to bring back coal jobs. That promise 'will not be kept,' experts say". Washington Post. Retrieved 2017-04-23.
Jump up ^ "The unequal burden of coal plant pollution". Facing South. 2012-11-21. Retrieved 2017-04-23.
Jump up ^ Bin Zou, Fen Peng, Neng Wan, J. Gaines Wilson, Ying Xiong (2014). "Sulfur dioxide exposure and environmental justice: a multi-scale and source–specific perspective". Atmospheric Pollution Research 5. 491Ͳ499. CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
Jump up ^ Bell, Michelle L.;Ebisu, Keita; (2012). "Environmental Inequality in Exposures to Airborne Particulate Matter Components in the United States". Environmental Health Perspectives. 12: 1699–1704. doi:10.1289/ehp.1205201. CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
Jump up ^ Davis, Rob (March 3, 2017). ""Here are 42 of President Donald Trump's planned EPA budget cuts"".
Jump up ^ https://www.epa.gov/education/what-environmental-education. Missing or empty |title= (help)
Jump up ^ ""Trump plans to slash EPA's budget by $1 billion"". Daily news. 2017-01-26. Retrieved 2017-03-16.
Jump up ^ Daily News. March 3, 2017 http://www.oregonlive.com/environment/index.ssf/2017/03/here_are_42_of_president_donal.html. Missing or empty |title= (help)
Jump up ^ project, The World Air Quality Index. "Air Pollution in California: Real-time Air Quality Index Visual Map". aqicn.org. Retrieved 2017-04-04.
^ Jump up to: a b U.S. EPA., 2013. http://www.epa.gov/region9/socal/air/index.html
Jump up ^ "Los Angeles: Maps of air pollution level (AQI, ozone, particle matter)". aerostate.io. Retrieved 15 February 2018.
Jump up ^ PPIC Statewide Survey: Californians and the environment, 2011. http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/survey/S_711MBS.pdf
^ Jump up to: a b c American Lung Association, Most Polluted Cities, 2013. http://www.stateoftheair.org/2013/city-rankings/most-polluted-cities.html
Jump up ^ American Lung Association, Particle Pollution, 2013. http://www.stateoftheair.org/2013/health-risks/health-risks-particle.html#ref64
Jump up ^ U.S. EPA., 2012. http://epa.gov/cleandiesel/documents/420r12031.pdf
Jump up ^ L. A. Times, Jan 21, 2012 http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jan/21/local/la-me-hazards-pacoima-20110121
Jump up ^ Pollack, Ilana; Ryerson, Thomas (13 June 2013). "Trends in ozone, its precursors, and related secondary oxidation products in Los Angeles, California: A synthesis of measurements from 1960 to 2010". Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 118 (11): 5893–5911. doi:10.1002/jgrd.50472.
Jump up ^ Marziali, Carl (4 March 2015). "L.A.'s Environmental Success Story: Cleaner Air, Healthier Kids". USC News. Retrieved 16 March 2015.
Jump up ^ Barboza, Tony (15 November 2017). "Southern California smog worsens for second straight year despite reduced emissions". USC News. Retrieved 15 November 2017.
Jump up ^ EPA, OECA, IO, OEJ, US. "EJSCREEN: Environmental Justice Screening and Mapping Tool". www.epa.gov. Retrieved 2017-04-04. CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
^ Jump up to: a b c "Diabetes in Latino children linked to air pollution ‒ study". RT International. Retrieved 2017-04-04.
^ Jump up to: a b "Air pollution linked to heightened risk of type 2 diabetes in obese Latino children". EurekAlert!. Retrieved 2017-04-04.
Jump up ^ Meo, S. A.; Memon, A. N.; Sheikh, S. A.; Rouq, F. A.; Usmani, A. Mahmood; Hassan, A.; Arian, S. A. (2015-01-01). "Effect of environmental air pollution on type 2 diabetes mellitus". European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences. 19 (1): 123–128. ISSN 2284-0729. PMID 25635985.
Jump up ^ "What is Diabetes? | NIDDK". National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Retrieved 2017-04-24.
Jump up ^ "Diabetes | At A Glance Reports | Publications | Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion | CDC". www.cdc.gov. Retrieved 2017-04-24.
Jump up ^ "Hispanic Diabetes Prevention". Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved 2017-04-24.
^ Jump up to: a b c "The invisible hazard afflicting thousands of schools". Center for Public Integrity. 2017-02-17. Retrieved 2017-04-04.
Jump up ^ "Living Near Highways and Air Pollution". American Lung Association. Retrieved 2017-04-24.
^ Jump up to: a b EPA, OA, OEAEE, OWC, US. "Best Practices for Reducing Near-Road Air Pollution Exposure at Schools". www.epa.gov. Retrieved 2017-04-24. CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
Jump up ^ "Bill Text - SB-352 Schoolsites: sources of pollution". leginfo.legislature.ca.gov. Retrieved 2017-04-24.
Jump up ^ "An overview of hydraulic fracturing and other formation stimulation technologies for shale gas production - Update 2015 - European Commission". ec.europa.eu. Retrieved 2017-04-14.
Jump up ^ EPA, OA, OEAEE, OWC, US. "Natural Gas Extraction - Hydraulic Fracturing". www.epa.gov. Retrieved 2017-04-04. CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
^ Jump up to: a b Funes, Yessenia (2016-09-08). "For Some California Kids, Back-to-School Means Back To The Dangers of Fracking Wells". Colorlines. Retrieved 2017-04-24.
Jump up ^ "There are 45 fracked wells within 2 miles of my daughter's school". The Guardian. 2015-08-20. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2017-04-04.
Jump up ^ "2005 California Government Code Sections 11135-11139.8 :: :: :: Article 9.5. :: Discrimination". Justia Law. Retrieved 2017-04-24.
Jump up ^ Jason G. Su, Michael Jerrett, Rachel Morello-Frosch, Bill M. Jesdale, Amy D. Kyle (2012). ""Inequalities in cumulative environmental burdens among three urbanized counties in California"". Environment International.: 79–87. CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
^ Jump up to: a b c d King, Brittany. "Fight for a Coal-free Oakland". Sierra Club. Retrieved April 11, 2017.
Jump up ^ Yardley, William (2015-12-11). "How Utah quietly made plans to ship coal through California". Los Angeles Times. ISSN 0458-3035. Retrieved 2017-04-24.
Jump up ^ Ayers, Christin. "Proposed Oakland Coal Depot Racing Against The Clock". Retrieved 2017-04-24.
^ Jump up to: a b "Guest commentary: Saying no to coal in Oakland is the right thing to do – East Bay Times". Retrieved 2017-04-24.

External links[edit]
American Lung Association State of the Air 2013
"NATA | National-Scale Air Toxics Assessments | Technology Transfer Network Air Technical Web Site | US EPA". Epa.gov. 2006-06-28. Retrieved 2012-12-11.
show
v
t
e
Pollution
Air pollution
Acid rain
Air quality index
Atmospheric dispersion modeling
Chlorofluorocarbon
Indoor air quality
Global dimming
Global distillation
Global warming
Ozone depletion
Atmospheric particulate matter
Smog
Water pollution
Environmental impact of pharmaceuticals and personal care products
Environmental impact of shipping
Environmental monitoring
Eutrophication
Freshwater environmental quality parameters
Groundwater pollution
Hypoxia
Marine debris
Marine pollution
Nutrient pollution
Ocean acidification
Oil spill
Septic tank
Surface runoff
Thermal pollution
Turbidity
Urban runoff
Wastewater
Water quality
Water stagnation
Waterborne diseases
Soil contamination
Bioremediation
Electrical resistance heating
Herbicide
Open defecation
Pesticide
Phytoremediation
Soil Guideline Values (SGVs)
Radioactive contamination
Actinides in the environment
Bioremediation of radioactive waste
Environmental radioactivity
Fission product
Nuclear fallout
Plutonium in the environment
Radiation poisoning
Radium in the environment
Uranium in the environment
Other types of pollution
Land degradation
Light pollution
Pollution from nanomaterials
Noise pollution
Radio spectrum pollution
Urban heat island
Visual pollution
Inter-government treaties
Basel Convention
CLRTAP
Kyoto Protocol
MARPOL Convention
Montreal Protocol
OSPAR
Rotterdam Convention
Stockholm Convention
Major organizations
Basel Action Network
Central Pollution Control Board (India)
DEFRA
Environment Agency (England and Wales)
Scottish Environment Protection Agency
U.S. EPA
European Environment Agency
Greenpeace
show
v
t
e
Air pollution in North America
Sovereign states
Antigua and Barbuda
Bahamas
Barbados
Belize
Canada
Costa Rica
Cuba
Dominica
Dominican Republic
El Salvador
Grenada
Guatemala
Haiti
Honduras
Jamaica
Mexico
Nicaragua
Panama
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Trinidad and Tobago
United States
Dependencies and
other territories
Anguilla
Aruba
Bermuda
Bonaire
British Virgin Islands
Cayman Islands
Curaçao
Greenland
Guadeloupe
Martinique
Montserrat
Puerto Rico
Saint Barthélemy
Saint Martin
Saint Pierre and Miquelon
Saba
Sint Eustatius
Sint Maarten
Turks and Caicos Islands
United States Virgin Islands
show
v
t
e
Air pollution in the Americas
North America
South America
Sovereign states
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Bahamas
Barbados
Belize
Bolivia
Brazil
Canada
Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Cuba
Dominica
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
El Salvador
Grenada
Guatemala
Guyana
Haiti
Honduras
Jamaica
Mexico
Nicaragua
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Suriname
Trinidad and Tobago
United States
Uruguay
Venezuela
Dependencies and
other territories
Anguilla
Aruba
Bermuda
Bonaire
British Virgin Islands
Cayman Islands
Curaçao
Falkland Islands
French Guiana
Greenland
Guadeloupe
Martinique
Montserrat
Puerto Rico
Saint Barthélemy
Saint Martin
Saint Pierre and Miquelon
Saba
Sint Eustatius
Sint Maarten
South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands
Turks and Caicos Islands
US Virgin Islands
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Air_pollution_in_the_United_States&oldid=848480323"
Categories:
Air pollution in the United States
Hidden categories:
CS1 maint: Explicit use of et al.
CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list
Pages with citations lacking titles
Pages with citations having bare URLs
All articles with unsourced statements
Articles with unsourced statements from August 2007
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
In other projects
Wikimedia Commons
Languages
Add links
This page was last edited on 2 July 2018, at 05:00 (UTC).
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

values: mw-jump-link #mw-head

values: mw-jump-link #p-search

values: /wiki/Chemical mw-redirect Chemical

values:
/wiki/Atmospheric_particulate_matter
mw-redirect
Atmospheric particulate matter

values:
/wiki/Earth%27s_atmosphere
mw-redirect
Earth's atmosphere

values: United States Environmental Protection Agency

values:
/wiki/Air_Quality_Index
mw-redirect
Air Quality Index

values:
/wiki/Parts_per_billion
mw-redirect
Parts per billion

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (August 2007)

values:
noprint Inline-Template Template-Fact
white-space:nowrap;

values:
/wiki/Black_carbon_particulate
mw-redirect
Black carbon particulate

values: Motor vehicle fatality rate in U.S. by year

values: Edit section: Prenatal Exposure and links to asthma

values: Edit section: Exposures to Airborne Particulate Matter Components in New York

values: Edit section: Disparities in the effects of air pollution

values: Edit section: Impact of low SES and air pollution on health

values: Edit section: Factors of environmental disparities due to low socioeconomic status

values: Edit section: Environmental Justices and the Trump Administration

values: Edit section: Implications on Clean Power Plan

values: Edit section: Restrictions on the Environmental Protection Agency

values: Edit section: Energy Independence Executive Order

values: Edit section: Revival of the Coal Industry

values: Edit section: Air pollution in California

values:
nofollow
http://www.cleanairactionplan.org/
external text

values:
nofollow
http://cleanupgreenup.wordpress.com/
external text

values: Edit section: Air Pollution and Low SES Communities in California

values:
/wiki/South_East_Lost_Angeles
mw-redirect
South East Lost Angeles

values: Edit section: Instances of environmental injustice

values: Edit section: Diabetes in Los Angeles County Latino children

values:
/wiki/Blood_sugar
mw-redirect
Blood sugar

values: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

values: Edit section: Proximity of schools to vehicle traffic in Culver City

values: Edit section: Fracking violations in Kern County school zones

values: List of additives for hydraulic fracturing

values: Edit section: Inequalities in cumulative environmental burdens among three urbanized counties in California

values: Edit section: Proposed coal terminal in West Oakland

values: Edit section: Pollution level rankings 2013

values: Greenhouse gas emissions by the United States

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/issn/0168-2563

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201504-0658OC

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/issn/1535-4970

values:
/wiki/PubMed_Identifier
mw-redirect
PubMed Identifier

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26176842

values:
nofollow
https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/1307670/
external text

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1205201

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15173049

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1289/EHP199

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.5487/TR.2014.30.2.071

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1093/aje/kww081

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldg022

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.181313

values: Category:CS1 maint: Explicit use of et al.

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.9.1132

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8500

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094431

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408882

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/issn/1742-2094

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21864400

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2009.05.009

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/issn/0166-2236

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19716187

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwm308

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/issn/0002-9262

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9084

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/issn/0091-6765

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16882541

values:
nofollow
https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/1205827/
external text

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwm396

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18303005

values:
nofollow
external text
http://jech.bmj.com/content/58/9/802.2

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1136/jech.2003.015040

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/issn/0143-005X

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15310811

values:
nofollow
https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/1206337/
external text

values: Category:CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50472

values:
nofollow
external text
https://www.epa.gov/ejscreen

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/issn/2284-0729

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25635985

values:
nofollow
external text
https://www.epa.gov/hydraulicfracturing

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/issn/0261-3077

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/issn/0458-3035

values:
nofollow
http://www.stateoftheair.org/2013/
external text

values:
nofollow
http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/natamain/
external text

values: Freshwater environmental quality parameters

values: Electrical resistance heating remediation

values:
/wiki/Soil_Guideline_Values_(SGVs)
mw-redirect
Soil Guideline Values (SGVs)

values:
/wiki/Fission_product
mw-redirect
Fission product

values:
/wiki/Radiation_poisoning
mw-redirect
Radiation poisoning

values:
/wiki/Radium_in_the_environment
mw-redirect
Radium in the environment

values: Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution

values: Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic

values: Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants

values: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

values: nowraplinks collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner mw-collapsible mw-made-collapsible mw-collapsed

values: Air pollution in Antigua and Barbuda (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in the Bahamas (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Barbados (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Belize (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Costa Rica (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Cuba (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Dominica (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in the Dominican Republic (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in El Salvador (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Grenada (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Guatemala (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Haiti (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Honduras (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Jamaica (page does not exist)

values:
/wiki/Air_pollution_in_Mexico
mw-redirect
Air pollution in Mexico

values: Air pollution in Nicaragua (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Panama (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Saint Kitts and Nevis (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Saint Lucia (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Trinidad and Tobago (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Anguilla (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Aruba (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Bermuda (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Bonaire (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in the British Virgin Islands (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in the Cayman Islands (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Curaçao (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Greenland (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Guadeloupe (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Martinique (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Montserrat (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Puerto Rico (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Saint Barthélemy (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in the Collectivity of Saint Martin (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Saint Pierre and Miquelon (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Saba (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Sint Eustatius (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Sint Maarten (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in the Turks and Caicos Islands (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in the United States Virgin Islands (page does not exist)

values: nowraplinks collapsible collapsed navbox-inner mw-collapsible mw-collapsed mw-made-collapsible

values: Air pollution in North America (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in South America (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Argentina (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Bolivia (page does not exist)

values:
/wiki/Air_pollution_in_Brazil
mw-redirect
Air pollution in Brazil

values: Air pollution in Chile (page does not exist)

values:
/wiki/Air_pollution_in_Colombia
mw-redirect
Air pollution in Colombia

values: Air pollution in Ecuador (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Guyana (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Paraguay (page does not exist)

values:
/wiki/Air_pollution_in_Peru
mw-redirect
Air pollution in Peru

values: Air pollution in Suriname (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Uruguay (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Venezuela (page does not exist)

values:
navbox-image
2
width:1px;padding:0px 0px 0px 2px

values:
/wiki/Territory_(subdivision)
mw-redirect
Territory (subdivision)

values: Air pollution in the Falkland Islands (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in French Guiana (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in Saint Martin (France) (page does not exist)

values: Air pollution in South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands (page does not exist)

values: nowraplinks hlist collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner mw-collapsible mw-made-collapsible mw-collapsed

values: Category:Air pollution in the United States

values: Category:Pages with citations lacking titles

values: Category:Pages with citations having bare URLs

values: Category:All articles with unsourced statements

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from August 2007

values: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

values: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

values: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

values: Guidance on how to use and edit Wikipedia

values: About the project, what you can do, where to find things

values: A list of recent changes in the wiki [ctrl-alt-r]

values: portal navigation p-interaction p-interaction-label

values: List of all English Wikipedia pages containing links to this page [ctrl-alt-j]

values: Recent changes in pages linked from this page [ctrl-alt-k]

values:
/wiki/Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard
Upload files [ctrl-alt-u]
u

values: A list of all special pages [ctrl-alt-q]

values: Permanent link to this revision of the page

values: Link to connected data repository item [ctrl-alt-g]

values: Printable version of this page [ctrl-alt-p]

values: /static/images/wikimedia-button-1.5x.png 1.5x, /static/images/wikimedia-button-2x.png 2x

values: /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_132x47.png 1.5x, /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_176x62.png 2x

values:
suggestions
display: none; font-size: 13px;

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Air_pollution_in_the_United_States rootpage-Air_pollution_in_the_United_States skin-vector action-view