text:
British Raj
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is about the rule of the British Crown from 1858 to 1947 over the Indian subcontinent. For the previous rule of the East India Company which existed from 1757 to 1858, see Company rule in India. For other uses of "British Rule", see British Rule (disambiguation).
"British Empire in India" and "Indian Empire" redirect here. For other uses, see British India (disambiguation). For other Indian empires, see History of India.
India
Imperial political structure comprising
(a) British India (a quasi-federation of
presidencies and provinces directly governed by the
British Crown through
the Viceroy and Governor-General of India);
(b) Princely states, governed by Indian rulers, under the
suzerainty of the British Crown exercised through the
Viceroy and Governor-General of India[1]
1858–1947
Flag
Star of India
Anthem
"God Save the King/Queen"
The British Indian Empire in 1936
Capital
1858–1911 Calcutta
1911–1947 New Delhi
Languages
English
Urdu
Hindi
(official, Urdu from 1857. Hindi added from 1900)
Indian languages
Government Colony
Monarch of the United Kingdom and Emperor/Empressa
• 1858–1901 Victoria
• 1901–1910 Edward VII
• 1910–1936 George V
• 1936 Edward VIII
• 1936–1947 George VI
Viceroy and Governor-Generalc
• 1858–1862 (first) Charles Canning
• 1947 (last) Louis Mountbatten
Secretary of State
• 1858–1859 (first) Edward Stanley
• 1947 (last) William Hare
Legislature Imperial Legislative Council
History
• Battle of Plassey and Indian Rebellion 23 June 1757 and 10 May 1857
• Government of India Act 2 August 1858
• Indian Independence Act 18 July 1947
• Partition of India 15 August 1947
Currency Indian rupee
Preceded by Succeeded by
Company rule in India
Mughal Empire
Emirate of Afghanistan
Dominion of India
Dominion of Pakistan
British rule in Burma
Trucial States
Colony of Aden
Straits Settlements
Today part of Bangladesh
China (disputed)
India
Myanmar
Pakistan
United Arab Emirates
Yemen
a. Title existed 1876–1948
c. Full title was "Viceroy and Governor-General of India"
Part of a series on the
History of India
Ancient[show]
Madrasian Culture
Soanian, c. 500,000 BCE
Neolithic, c. 7600 – c. 3300 BCE
Bhirrana 7570 - 6200 BCE
Jhusi 7106 BCE
Lahuradewa 7000 BCE
Mehrgarh 7000 - 2600 BCE
Indus Valley Civilization, c. 3300 – c. 1700 BCE
Post Indus Valley Period, c. 1700 – c. 1500 BCE
Vedic Civilization, c. 1500 – c. 500 BCE
Early Vedic Period
Rise of Śramaṇa movement
Later Vedic Period
Spread of Jainism - Parshvanatha
Spread of Jainism - Mahavira
Rise of Buddhism
Mahajanapadas, c. 500 – c. 345 BCE
Nanda Dynasty, c. 345 – c. 322 BCE
Classical[show]
Maurya Dynasty, c. 322 – c. 185 BCE
Shunga Dynasty, c. 185 – c. 75 BCE
Kanva Dynasty, c. 75 – c. 30 BCE
Kushan Dynasty, c. 30 – c. 230 CE
Satavahana Dynasty, c. 30 BCE – c. 220 CE
Gupta Dynasty, c. 200 – c. 550 CE
Early medieval[show]
Chalukya Dynasty, c. 543 – c. 753 CE
Harsha's Dynasty, c. 606 CE – c. 647 CE
Karakota Dynasty, c. 724 – c. 760 CE
Arab Invasion, c. 738 CE
Tripartite Struggle, c. 760 – c. 973 CE
Gurjara-Pratihara Dynasty
Rastrakuta Dynasty
Pala Dynasty
Chola Dynasty, c. 848 – c. 1251 CE
2nd Chalukya Dynasty, c. 973 – c. 1187 CE
Late medieval[show]
Delhi Sultanate, c. 1206 – c. 1526 CE
Slave Dynasty
Khalji Dynasty
Tugluq Dynasty
Sayyid Dynasty
Lodhi Dynasty
Pandyan Dynasty, c. 1251 – c. 1323 CE
Vijayanagara, c. 1336 – c. 1646 CE
Bengal Sultanate, c. 1342 – c. 1576 CE
Early modern[show]
Mughal Dynasty, c. 1526 – c. 1540 CE
Suri Dynasty, c. 1540 – c. 1556 CE
Mughal Dynasty, c. 1556 – c. 1857 CE
Bengal Subah, c. 1576 – c. 1757 CE
Maratha Empire, c. 1674 – c. 1818 CE
Company Raj, c. 1757 – c. 1858 CE
Kingdom of Mysore, c. 1760 – c. 1799 CE
Sikh Empire, c. 1799 – c. 1849 CE
Modern[show]
The Great Rebellion, c. 1857 – c. 1858 CE
British Raj, c. 1858 – c. 1947 CE
Independence Movement
Independent India, c. 1947 CE – present
Related articles[show]
Timeline of Indian History
Dynasties in Indian History
Economic History
Demographic History
Linguistic History
Architectural History
Art History
Literary History
Philosophical History
History of Religion
Musical History
Education History
Coinage History
Science and Technology History
List of Inventions and Discoveries
Military History
Naval History
Wars involving India
v
t
e
The British Raj (/rɑːdʒ/; from rāj, literally, "rule" in Hindustani)[2] was the rule by the British Crown in the Indian subcontinent between 1858 and 1947.[3][4][5][6] The rule is also called Crown rule in India,[7] or direct rule in India.[8] The region under British control was commonly called India in contemporaneous usage, and included areas directly administered by the United Kingdom, which were collectively called British India, and those ruled by indigenous rulers, but under British tutelage or paramountcy, and called the princely states. The de facto political amalgamation was also called the Indian Empire and after 1876 issued passports under that name.[9][10] As India, it was a founding member of the League of Nations, a participating nation in the Summer Olympics in 1900, 1920, 1928, 1932, and 1936, and a founding member of the United Nations in San Francisco in 1945.[11]
This system of governance was instituted on 28 June 1858, when, after the Indian Rebellion of 1857, the rule of the British East India Company was transferred to the Crown in the person of Queen Victoria[12] (who, in 1876, was proclaimed Empress of India). It lasted until 1947, when Britain′s Indian Empire was partitioned into two sovereign dominion states: the Dominion of India (later the Republic of India) and the Dominion of Pakistan (later the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, the eastern part of which, still later, became the People's Republic of Bangladesh). At the inception of the Raj in 1858, Lower Burma was already a part of British India; Upper Burma was added in 1886, and the resulting union, Burma, was administered as an autonomous province until 1937, when it became a separate British colony, gaining its own independence in 1948.
Contents
[hide]
1 Geographical extent
2 British India and the Princely States
2.1 Major provinces
2.2 Minor provinces
2.3 Princely states
2.4 Organization
3 Timeline of major events, legislation, public works
4 1858–1914
4.1 Aftermath of the Rebellion of 1857: Indian critiques, British response
4.2 Demographic history
4.3 Legal modernisation
5 Civilising mission
5.1 Education
5.2 Missions
6 Economic history
6.1 Economic trends
6.1.1 Industry
6.1.2 Railways
6.1.3 Irrigation
6.1.4 Policies
6.2 Economic impact
7 Famines, epidemics, public health
8 1860s–1890s: New middle class, Indian National Congress
8.1 1870s–1907: Social reformers, moderates vs. extremists
8.2 Partition of Bengal (1905–1911)
8.3 1906–1909: Muslim League, Minto-Morley reforms
9 1914–1947
9.1 1914–1918: First World War, Lucknow Pact
9.2 1917–1919: Satyagraha, Montagu-Chelmsford reforms, Jallianwalla Bagh
9.3 1920s: Non-cooperation, Khilafat, Simon Commission, Jinnah's fourteen points
9.4 1929–1937: Round Table conferences, Government of India Act
9.5 1938–1941: World War II, Muslim League's Lahore Resolution
9.6 1942–1945: Cripps mission, Quit India Resolution, INA
9.7 1946: Elections, Cabinet mission, Direct Action Day
9.8 1947: Planning for partition
9.9 1947: Violence, partition, independence
10 Ideological impact
11 See also
12 Notes
13 References
14 Bibliography
14.1 Surveys
14.2 Specialised topics
14.3 Economic history
14.4 Historiography and memory
15 Further reading
15.1 Year books and statistical records
Geographical extent[edit]
British India in 1880
The British Raj extended over almost all present-day India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh, except for small holdings by other European nations such as Goa and Pondicherry.[13] This area is very diverse, containing the Himalayan mountains, fertile floodplains, the Indo-Gangetic Plain, a long coastline, tropical dry forests, arid uplands, and the Thar desert.[14] In addition, at various times, it included Aden (from 1858 to 1937),[15] Lower Burma (from 1858 to 1937), Upper Burma (from 1886 to 1937), British Somaliland (briefly from 1884 to 1898), and Singapore (briefly from 1858 to 1867). Burma was separated from India and directly administered by the British Crown from 1937 until its independence in 1948. The Trucial States of the Persian Gulf and the states under the Persian Gulf Residency were theoretically princely states as well as Presidencies and provinces of British India until 1947 and used the rupee as their unit of currency.[16]
Among other countries in the region, Ceylon (now Sri Lanka) was ceded to Britain in 1802 under the Treaty of Amiens. Ceylon was part of Madras Presidency between 1793 and 1798.[17] The kingdoms of Nepal and Bhutan, having fought wars with the British, subsequently signed treaties with them and were recognised by the British as independent states.[18][19] The Kingdom of Sikkim was established as a princely state after the Anglo-Sikkimese Treaty of 1861; however, the issue of sovereignty was left undefined.[20] The Maldive Islands were a British protectorate from 1887 to 1965, but not part of British India.
British India and the Princely States[edit]
Main articles: Presidencies and provinces of British India, Princely state, and Subdivisions of British India
India during the British Raj was made up of two types of territory: British India and the Native States (or Princely States).[21] In its Interpretation Act 1889, the British Parliament adopted the following definitions in Section 18:
(4.) The expression "British India" shall mean all territories and places within Her Majesty's dominions which are for the time being governed by Her Majesty through the Governor-General of India or through any governor or other officer subordinates to the Governor-General of India.
(5.) The expression "India" shall mean British India together with any territories of any native prince or chief under the suzerainty of Her Majesty exercised through the Governor-General of India, or through any governor or other officer subordinates to the Governor-General of India.[1]
In general, the term "British India" had been used (and is still used) to refer also to the regions under the rule of the British East India Company in India from 1600 to 1858.[22] The term has also been used to refer to the "British in India".[23]
The terms "Indian Empire" and "Empire of India" (like the term "British Empire") were not used in legislation. The monarch was known as Empress or Emperor of India and the term was often used in Queen Victoria's Queen's Speeches and Prorogation Speeches. The passports issued by the British Indian government had the words "Indian Empire" on the cover and "Empire of India" on the inside.[24] In addition, an order of knighthood, the Most Eminent Order of the Indian Empire, was set up in 1878.
Suzerainty over 175 princely states, some of the largest and most important, was exercised (in the name of the British Crown) by the central government of British India under the Viceroy; the remaining approximately 500 states were dependents of the provincial governments of British India under a Governor, Lieutenant-Governor, or Chief Commissioner (as the case might have been).[25] A clear distinction between "dominion" and "suzerainty" was supplied by the jurisdiction of the courts of law: the law of British India rested upon the laws passed by the British Parliament and the legislative powers those laws vested in the various governments of British India, both central and local; in contrast, the courts of the Princely States existed under the authority of the respective rulers of those states.[25]
Major provinces[edit]
Colonial India
Imperial entities of India
Dutch India
1605–1825
Danish India
1620–1869
French India
1668–1954
Portuguese India
(1505–1961)
Casa da Índia
1434–1833
Portuguese East India Company
1628–1633
British India
(1612–1947)
East India Company
1612–1757
Company rule in India
1757–1858
British Raj
1858–1947
British rule in Burma
1824–1948
Princely states
1721–1949
Partition of India
1947
v
t
e
Main article: Presidencies and provinces of British India
At the turn of the 20th century, British India consisted of eight provinces that were administered either by a Governor or a Lieutenant-Governor.
Areas and populations (excluding the dependent Native States) c. 1907[26]
Province of British India
(and present day territories)
Total area in km2 (sq mi)
Population in 1901 (in millions)
Chief administrative officer
Assam
(Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland) 7011130000000000000♠130,000
(50,000) 6 Chief Commissioner
Bengal
(Bangladesh, West Bengal, Bihar, Jharkhand and Odisha) 7011390000000000000♠390,000
(150,000) 75 Lieutenant-Governor
Bombay
(Sindh and parts of Maharashtra, Gujarat and Karnataka) 7011320000000000000♠320,000
(120,000) 19 Governor-in-Council
Burma
(Myanmar) 7011440000000000000♠440,000
(170,000) 9 Lieutenant-Governor
Central Provinces and Berar
(Madhya Pradesh and parts of Maharashtra, Chhattisgarh and Odisha) 7011270000000000000♠270,000
(100,000) 13 Chief Commissioner
Madras
(Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and parts of Kerala, Karnataka, Odisha and Telangana) 7011370000000000000♠370,000
(140,000) 38 Governor-in-Council
Punjab
(Punjab Province, Islamabad Capital Territory, Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Chandigarh and the National Capital Territory of Delhi) 7011250000000000000♠250,000
(97,000) 20 Lieutenant-Governor
United Provinces
(Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand) 7011280000000000000♠280,000
(110,000) 48 Lieutenant-Governor
During the partition of Bengal (1905–1913), the new provinces of Assam and East Bengal were created as a Lieutenant-Governorship. In 1911, East Bengal was reunited with Bengal, and the new provinces in the east became: Assam, Bengal, Bihar and Orissa.[26]
Minor provinces[edit]
Outline of South Asian history
Palaeolithic (2,500,000–250,000 BC)[show]
Madrasian Culture
Soanian Culture
Neolithic (10,800–3300 BC)[show]
Bhirrana Culture (7570–6200 BC)
Mehrgarh Culture (7000–3300 BC)
Edakkal Culture (5000–3000 BC)
Chalcolithic (3500–1500 BC)[show]
Ahar-Banas Culture (3000–1500 BC)
Pandu Culture (1600–1500 BC)
Malwa Culture (1600–1300 BC)
Jorwe Culture (1400–700 BC)
Bronze Age (3300–1300 BC)[show]
Indus Valley Civilisation (3300–1300 BC)
– Early Harappan Culture (3300–2600 BC)
– Mature Harappan Culture (2600–1900 BC)
– Late Harappan Culture (1900–1300 BC)
Vedic Civilisation (2000–500 BC)
– Ochre Coloured Pottery culture (2000–1600 BC)
– Swat culture (1600–500 BC)
Iron Age (1500–200 BC)[show]
Vedic Civilisation (1500–500 BC)
– Janapadas (1500–600 BC)
– Black and Red ware culture (1300–1000 BC)
– Painted Grey Ware culture (1200–600 BC)
– Northern Black Polished Ware (700–200 BC)
Pradyota Dynasty (799–684 BC)
Haryanka Dynasty (684–424 BC)
Three Crowned Kingdoms (c. 600 BC–AD 1600)
Maha Janapadas (c. 600–300 BC)
Achaemenid Empire (550–330 BC)
Ror Dynasty (450 BC–AD 489)
Shishunaga Dynasty (424–345 BC)
Nanda Empire (380–321 BC)
Macedonian Empire (330–323 BC)
Maurya Empire (321–184 BC)
Seleucid India (312–303 BC)
Pandya Empire (c. 300 BC–AD 1345)
Chera Kingdom (c. 300 BC-AD 1102)
Chola Empire (c. 300 BC–AD 1279)
Pallava Empire (c. 250 BC–AD 800)
Maha-Megha-Vahana Empire (c. 250 BC–c. AD 500)
Parthian Empire (247 BC– AD 224)
Middle Kingdoms (230 BC– AD 1206)[show]
Satavahana Empire (230 BC–AD 220)
Kuninda Kingdom (200 BC–AD 300)
Mitra Dynasty (c. 150 –c. 50 BC)
Shunga Empire (185–73 BC)
Indo-Greek Kingdom (180 BC–AD 10)
Kanva Empire (75–26 BC)
Indo-Scythian Kingdom (50 BC–AD 400)
Indo-Parthian Kingdom (AD 21–c. 130)
Western Satrap Empire (AD 35–405 )
Kushan Empire (AD 60–240)
Bharshiva Dynasty (170–350)
Nagas of Padmavati (210–340)
Sasanian Empire (224–651)
Indo-Sassanid Kingdom (230–360)
Vakataka Empire (c. 250–c. 500)
Kalabhras Empire (c. 250–c. 600)
Gupta Empire (280–550)
Kadamba Empire (345–525)
Western Ganga Kingdom (350–1000)
Kamarupa Kingdom (350–1100)
Vishnukundina Empire (420–624)
Maitraka Empire (475–767)
Huna Kingdom (475–576)
Rai Kingdom (489–632)
Kabul Shahi Empire (c. 500–1026)
Chalukya Empire (543–753)
Maukhari Empire (c. 550–c. 700)
Harsha Empire (606–647)
Tibetan Empire (618–841)
Eastern Chalukya Kingdom (624–1075)
Rashidun Caliphate (632–661)
Gurjara-Pratihara Empire (650–1036)
Umayyad Caliphate (661–750)
Pala Empire (750–1174)
Rashtrakuta Empire (753–982)
Paramara Kingdom (800–1327)
Yadava Empire (850–1334)
Chaulukya Kingdom (942–1244)
Western Chalukya Empire (973–1189)
Lohara Kingdom (1003–1320)
Hoysala Empire (1040–1346)
Sena Empire (1070–1230)
Eastern Ganga Empire (1078–1434)
Kakatiya Kingdom (1083–1323)
Zamorin Kingdom (1102–1766)
Kalachuris of Tripuri (675-1210)
Kalachuris of Kalyani (1156–1184)
Chutiya Kingdom (1187–1673)
Deva Kingdom (c. 1200–c. 1300)
Late medieval period (1206–1526)[show]
Delhi Sultanate (1206–1526)
– Mamluk Sultanate (1206–1290)
– Khalji Sultanate (1290–1320)
– Tughlaq Sultanate (1320–1414)
– Sayyid Sultanate (1414–1451)
– Lodi Sultanate (1451–1526)
Ahom Kingdom (1228–1826)
Chitradurga Kingdom (1300–1779)
Reddy Kingdom (1325–1448)
Vijayanagara Empire (1336–1646)
Bengal Sultanate (1352–1576)
Garhwal Kingdom (1358–1803)
Mysore Kingdom (1399–1947)
Gajapati Kingdom (1434–1541)
Deccan Sultanates (1490–1596)
– Ahmadnagar Sultanate (1490–1636)
– Berar Sultanate (1490–1574)
– Bidar Sultanate (1492–1619)
– Bijapur Sultanate (1492–1686)
– Golkonda Sultanate (1518–1687)
Keladi Kingdom (1499–1763)
Koch Kingdom (1515–1947)
Early modern period (1526–1858)[show]
Mughal Empire (1526–1858)
Sur Empire (1540–1556)
Madurai Kingdom (1559–1736)
Thanjavur Kingdom (1572–1918)
Bengal Subah (1576–1757)
Marava Kingdom (1600–1750)
Thondaiman Kingdom (1650–1948)
Maratha Empire (1674–1818)
Sikh Confederacy (1707–1799)
Travancore Kingdom (1729–1947)
Sikh Empire (1799–1849)
Colonial states (1510–1961)[show]
Portuguese India (1510–1961)
Dutch India (1605–1825)
Danish India (1620–1869)
French India (1759–1954)
Company Raj (1757–1858)
British Raj (1858–1947)
Periods of Sri Lanka[show]
Prehistory (Until 543 BC)
Early kingdoms period (543 BC–377 BC)
Anuradhapura period (377 BC–AD 1017)
Polonnaruwa period (1056–1232)
Transitional period (1232–1505)
Crisis of the Sixteenth Century (1505–1594)
Kandyan period (1594–1815)
British Ceylon (1815–1948)
Contemporary Sri Lanka (1948–present)
National histories[show]
Afghanistan
Bangladesh
Bhutan
India
Maldives
Nepal
Pakistan
Sri Lanka
Regional histories[show]
Assam
Balochistan
Bengal
Bihar
Gujarat
Himachal Pradesh
Kabul
Kashmir
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
Rajasthan
Maharashtra
Uttar Pradesh
Punjab
Odisha
Sindh
South India
Tamil Nadu
Tibet
Specialised histories[show]
Agriculture
Architecture
Coinage
Demographics
Dynasties
Economy
Education
Indology
Influence on Southeast Asia
Language
Literature
Maritime
Metallurgy
Military
Partition of India
Pakistan studies
Philosophy
Religion
Science & Technology
Timeline
v
t
e
In addition, there were a few minor provinces that were administered by a Chief Commissioner:[27]
Minor province of British India
(and present day territories)
Total area in km2 (sq mi)
Population in 1901 (in thousands)
Chief administrative officer
Ajmer-Merwara
(parts of Rajasthan) 7009700000000000000♠7,000
(2,700) 477 ex officio Chief Commissioner
Andaman and Nicobar Islands
(Andaman and Nicobar Islands) 7010780000000000000♠78,000
(30,000) 25 Chief Commissioner
British Baluchistan
(Balochistan) 7011120000000000000♠120,000
(46,000) 308 ex officio Chief Commissioner
Coorg
(Kodagu district) 7009410000000000000♠4,100
(1,600) 181 ex officio Chief Commissioner
North West Frontier Province
(Khyber Pakhtunkhwa) 7010410000000000000♠41,000
(16,000) 2,125 Chief Commissioner
Princely states[edit]
Main article: Princely state
1909 Map of the British Indian Empire, showing British India in two shades of pink and the princely states in yellow.
A Princely State, also called a Native State or an Indian State, was a British vassal state in India with an indigenous nominal Indian ruler, subject to a subsidiary alliance.[28] There were 565 princely states when India and Pakistan became independent from Britain in August 1947. The princely states did not form a part of British India (i.e. the presidencies and provinces), as they were not directly under British rule. The larger ones had treaties with Britain that specified which rights the princes had; in the smaller ones the princes had few rights. Within the princely states external affairs, defence and most communications were under British control.[29] The British also exercised a general influence over the states' internal politics, in part through the granting or withholding of recognition of individual rulers. Although there were nearly 600 princely states, the great majority were very small and contracted out the business of government to the British. Some two hundred of the states had an area of less than 25 square kilometres (10 square miles).[28]
The states were grouped into Agencies and Residencies.
Organization[edit]
Part of a series on the
History of Pakistan
Timeline
Ancient[show]
Palaeolithic
Soanian Culture, c. 500,000 – 250,000 BCE
Neolithic
Mehrgarh, c. 7000 – c. 3000 BCE
Indus Valley Civilisation, c. 3300 – c. 1700 BCE
Vedic Civilization, c. 1500 – c. 500 BCE
Achaemenid Empire, c. 550 – c. 330 BCE
Gedrosia, c. 542 – c. 330 BCE
Gandhara, c. 518 – c. 330 BCE
Arachosia, c. 518 – c. 330 BCE
Hindush, c. 517 – c. 330 BCE
Sattagydia, c. 516 – c. 330 BCE
Ror Dynasty, c. 489 – c. 450 BCE
Macedonian Empire, c. 329 – c. 323 BCE
Arachosia, c. 323 – c. 312 BCE
Gedrosia, c. 323 – c. 312 BCE
Paropamisadae, c. 323 – c. 312 BCE
Porus, c. 323 – c. 312 BCE
Taxiles, c. 323 – c. 312 BCE
Mauryan Empire, c. 322 – c. 200 BCE
Seleucid Empire, c. 312 – c. 63 BCE
Greco-Bactrian Kingdom, c. 190 – c. 140 BCE
Indo-Greek Kingdom, c. 170 – c. 50 BCE
Indo-Scythian Kingdom, c. 110 BCE – c. 95 CE
Apracharajas, c. 25 BCE – c. 50 CE
Paratarajas, c. 120 – c. 300 CE
Classical[show]
Parthian Empire, c. 90 BCE – c. 25 CE
Indo-Parthian Kingdom, c. 25 – c. 80 CE
Kushan Empire, c. 60 – 345 CE
Sasanian Empire, c. 250 – 655 CE
Indo-Sasanians, c. 240 – 410 CE
Kushano-Sasanian Kingdom, c. 240 – 410 CE
Gupta Empire, c. 345 – c. 455 CE
Rai Dynasty, c. 415 – 644 CE
Hephthalite Empire, c. 450 – 560 CE
Brahman Dynasty, c. 641 – 725 CE
Medieval[show]
Caliphate, c. 643 – 860 CE
Rashidun Caliphate, c. 643 – 661 CE
Umayyad Caliphate, c. 670 – 860 CE
Pala Empire, c. 770 – 850 CE
Habbari Dynasty, c. 841 – 1024 CE
Kabul Shahi, c. 870 – 1010 CE
Samanid Empire, c. 905 – 999 CE
Ghaznavids, c. 999 – 1186 CE
Soomra Dynasty, c. 1024 – 1351 CE
Ghurid Dynasty, c. 1170 – 1215 CE
Delhi Sultanate, c. 1206 – c. 1526 CE
Mamluk Dynasty, c. 1206 – c. 1290 CE
Khalji Dynasty, c. 1290 – c. 1320 CE
Tugluq Dynasty, c. 1320 – c. 1413 CE
Sayyid Dynasty, c. 1414 – c. 1451 CE
Lodhi Dynasty, c. 1451 – c. 1526 CE
Mongol Empire, c. 1221 – c. 1327 CE
Chagatai Khanate, c. 1225 – c. 1485 CE
Ilkhanate, c. 1256 – c. 1353 CE
Raees Dynasty, c. 1320 – 1620 CE
Katoor Dynasty, c. 1570 – c. 1947 CE
Samma Dynasty, c. 1351 – c. 1524 CE
Arghun Dynasty, c. 1520 – c. 1554 CE
Mughal Empire, c. 1526 – c. 1707 CE
Bombay Presidency, c. 1618 – c. 1947 CE
Suri Dynasty, c. 1540 – c. 1556 CE
Tarkhan Dynasty, c. 1554 – 1591 CE
Early modern[show]
Durrani Empire, c. 1747 – c. 1826 CE
Las Bela, c. 1802 – c. 1947 CE
Misl, c. 1716 – c. 1799 CE
Maratha Empire, c. 1758 – c. 1760 CE
Sikh Empire, c. 1799 – c. 1849 CE
British Raj, c. 1858 – c. 1947 CE
Independence Movement
Modern[show]
Pakistan, c. 1947 CE – present
Dominion of Pakistan, c. 1947 – 1956 CE
Islamic Republic, c. 1956 CE – present
History of provinces[show]
Azad Kashmir
Balochistan
East Pakistan
Gilgit-Baltistan
Islamabad Capital Territory
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
Punjab
Sindh
Category
Portal
v
t
e
Sir Charles Wood (1800–1885) was President of the Board of Control of the East India Company from 1852 to 1855; he shaped British education policy in India, and was Secretary of State for India 1859–66.
Lord Canning, the last Governor-General of India under Company rule and the first Viceroy of India under Crown rule.
Lord Salisbury was Secretary of State for India 1874–78.
Following the Indian Rebellion of 1857 (usually called the Indian Mutiny by the British), the Government of India Act 1858 made changes in the governance of India at three levels:
in the imperial government in London,
in the central government in Calcutta, and
in the provincial governments in the presidencies (and later in the provinces).[30]
In London, it provided for a cabinet-level Secretary of State for India and a fifteen-member Council of India, whose members were required, as one prerequisite of membership, to have spent at least ten years in India and to have done so no more than ten years before.[31] Although the Secretary of State formulated the policy instructions to be communicated to India, he was required in most instances to consult the Council, but especially so in matters relating to spending of Indian revenues. The Act envisaged a system of "double government" in which the Council ideally served both as a check on excesses in imperial policy making and as a body of up-to-date expertise on India. However, the Secretary of State also had special emergency powers that allowed him to make unilateral decisions, and, in reality, the Council's expertise was sometimes outdated.[32] From 1858 until 1947, twenty seven individuals served as Secretary of State for India and directed the India Office; these included: Sir Charles Wood (1859–1866), Marquess of Salisbury (1874–1878; later Prime Minister of Britain), John Morley (1905–1910; initiator of the Minto-Morley Reforms), E. S. Montagu (1917–1922; an architect of the Montagu-Chelmsford reforms), and Frederick Pethick-Lawrence (1945–1947; head of the 1946 Cabinet Mission to India). The size of the advisory Council was reduced over the next half-century, but its powers remained unchanged. In 1907, for the first time, two Indians were appointed to the Council.[33] They were K.G. Gupta and Syed Hussain Bilgrami.
In Calcutta, the Governor-General remained head of the Government of India and now was more commonly called the Viceroy on account of his secondary role as the Crown's representative to the nominally sovereign princely states; he was, however, now responsible to the Secretary of State in London and through him to Parliament. A system of "double government" had already been in place during the Company's rule in India from the time of Pitt's India Act of 1784. The Governor-General in the capital, Calcutta, and the Governor in a subordinate presidency (Madras or Bombay) was each required to consult his advisory council; executive orders in Calcutta, for example, were issued in the name of "Governor-General-in-Council" (i.e. the Governor-General with the advice of the Council). The Company's system of "double government" had its critics, since, from the time of the system's inception, there had been intermittent feuding between the Governor-General and his Council; still, the Act of 1858 made no major changes in governance.[34] However, in the years immediately thereafter, which were also the years of post-rebellion reconstruction, Viceroy Lord Canning found the collective decision making of the Council to be too time-consuming for the pressing tasks ahead, so he requested the "portfolio system" of an Executive Council in which the business of each government department (the "portfolio") was assigned to and became the responsibility of a single council member.[33] Routine departmental decisions were made exclusively by the member, but important decisions required the consent of the Governor-General and, in the absence of such consent, required discussion by the entire Executive Council. This innovation in Indian governance was promulgated in the Indian Councils Act 1861.
If the Government of India needed to enact new laws, the Councils Act allowed for a Legislative Council—an expansion of the Executive Council by up to twelve additional members, each appointed to a two-year term—with half the members consisting of British officials of the government (termed official) and allowed to vote, and the other half, comprising Indians and domiciled Britons in India (termed non-official) and serving only in an advisory capacity.[35] All laws enacted by Legislative Councils in India, whether by the Imperial Legislative Council in Calcutta or by the provincial ones in Madras and Bombay, required the final assent of the Secretary of State in London; this prompted Sir Charles Wood, the second Secretary of State, to describe the Government of India as "a despotism controlled from home".[33] Moreover, although the appointment of Indians to the Legislative Council was a response to calls after the 1857 rebellion, most notably by Sayyid Ahmad Khan, for more consultation with Indians, the Indians so appointed were from the landed aristocracy, often chosen for their loyalty, and far from representative.[36] Even so, the "... tiny advances in the practice of representative government were intended to provide safety valves for the expression of public opinion, which had been so badly misjudged before the rebellion".[37] Indian affairs now also came to be more closely examined in the British Parliament and more widely discussed in the British press.[38]
With the promulgation of the Government of India Act 1935, the Council of India was abolished with effect from 1 April 1937 and a modified system of government enacted. The Secretary of State for India represented the Government of India in the UK. He was assisted by a body of advisers numbering from 8–12 individuals, at least half of whom were required to have held office in India for a minimum of 10 years, and had not relinquished office earlier than two years prior to their appointment as advisers to the Secretary of State.[39]
The Viceroy and Governor-General of India, a Crown appointee, typically held office for five years though there was no fixed tenure, and received an annual salary of Rs. 250,800 p.a. (£18,810 p.a.).[39][40] He headed the Viceroy's Executive Council, each member of which had responsibility for a department of the central administration. From 1 April 1937, the position of Governor-General in Council, which the Viceroy and Governor-General concurrently held in the capacity of representing the Crown in relations with the Indian princely states, was replaced by the designation of "HM Representative for the Exercise of the Functions of the Crown in its Relations with the Indian States," or the "Crown Representative." The Executive Council was greatly expanded during the Second World War, and in 1947 comprised 14 Members (Secretaries), each of whom earned a salary of Rs. 66,000 p.a. (£4950 p.a.). The portfolios in 1946–1947 were:
External Affairs and Commonwealth Relations
Home and Information and Broadcasting
Food and transportation
Transport and Railways
Labour
Industries and Supplies,
Works, Mines and Power
Education
Defence
Finance
Commerce
Communications
Health
Law
Until 1946, the Viceroy held the portfolio for External Affairs and Commonwealth Relations, as well as heading the Political Department in his capacity as the Crown Representative. Each department was headed by a Secretary excepting the Railway Department, which was headed by a Chief Commissioner of Railways under a Secretary.[41]
The Viceroy and Governor-General was also the head of the bicameral Indian Legislature, consisting of an upper house (the Council of State) and a lower house (the Legislative Assembly). The Viceroy was the head of the Council of State, while the Legislative Assembly, which was first opened in 1921, was headed by an elected President (appointed by the Viceroy from 1921–1925). The Council of State consisted of 58 members (32 elected, 26 nominated), while the Legislative Assembly comprised 141 members (26 nominated officials, 13 others nominated and 102 elected). The Council of State existed in five-year periods and the Legislative Assembly for three-year periods, though either could be dissolved earlier or later by the Viceroy. The Indian Legislature was empowered to make laws for all persons resident in British India including all British subjects resident in India, and for all British Indian subjects residing outside India. With the assent of the King-Emperor and after copies of a proposed enactment had been submitted to both houses of the British Parliament, the Viceroy could overrule the legislature and directly enact any measures in the perceived interests of British India or its residents if the need arose.[42]
Effective from 1 April 1936, the Government of India Act created the new provinces of Sind (separated from the Bombay Presidency) and Orissa (separated from the Province of Bihar and Orissa). Burma and Aden became separate Crown Colonies under the Act from 1 April 1937, thereby ceasing to be part of the Indian Empire. From 1937 onwards, British India was divided into 17 administrations: the three Presidencies of Madras, Bombay and Bengal, and the 14 provinces of the United Provinces, Punjab, Bihar, the Central Provinces and Berar, Assam, the North-West Frontier Province (NWFP), Orissa, Sind, British Baluchistan, Delhi, Ajmer-Merwara, Coorg, the Andaman and Nicobar Islands and Panth Piploda. The Presidencies and the first eight provinces were each under a Governor, while the latter six provinces were each under a Chief Commissioner. The Viceroy directly governed the Chief Commissioner provinces through each respective Chief Commissioner, while the Presidencies and the provinces under Governors were allowed greater autonomy under the Government of India Act.[43][44] Each Presidency or province headed by a Governor had either a provincial bicameral legislature (in the Presidencies, the United Provinces, Bihar and Assam) or a unicameral legislature (in the Punjab, Central Provinces and Berar, NWFP, Orissa and Sind). The Governor of each presidency or province represented the Crown in his capacity, and was assisted by a ministers appointed from the members of each provincial legislature. Each provincial legislature had a life of five years, barring any special circumstances such as wartime conditions. All bills passed by the provincial legislature were either signed or rejected by the Governor, who could also issue proclamations or promulgate ordinances while the legislature was in recess, as the need arose.[44]
Each province or presidency comprised a number of divisions, each headed by a Commissioner and subdivided into districts, which were the basic administrative units and each headed by a Collector and Magistrate or Deputy Commissioner; in 1947, British India comprised 230 districts.[44]
Timeline of major events, legislation, public works[edit]
The reigning British monarchs during the period of the British Raj, 1858–1947, in silver one rupee coins.
Two silver one rupee coins used in India during the British Raj, showing Victoria, Queen, 1862 (left) and Victoria, Empress, 1886 (right)
Silver one rupee coins showing Edward VII, King-Emperor, 1903 (left) and 1908 (right)
Silver one rupee coins used in India during the British Raj, showing George V, King-Emperor, 1913 (left) and 1919 (right)
One rupee coins showing George VI, King-Emperor, 1940 (left) and just before India's independence in 1947 (right).[a]
Period
Major Events, Legislation, Public Works
Presiding Viceroy
1 November 1858 – 21 March 1862 1858 reorganisation of British Indian Army (contemporaneously and hereafter Indian Army)
Construction begins (1860): University of Bombay, University of Madras, and University of Calcutta
Indian Penal Code passed into law in 1860.
Upper Doab famine of 1860–1861
Indian Councils Act 1861
Establishment of Archaeological Survey of India in 1861
James Wilson, financial member of Council of India reorganises customs, imposes income tax, creates paper currency.
Indian Police Act of 1861, creation of Imperial Police later known as Indian Police Service. The Viscount Canning[45]
21 March 1862–20 November 1863 Vicerory dies prematurely in Dharamsala The Earl of Elgin
12 January 1864 – 12 January 1869 Anglo-Bhutan Duar War (1864–1865)
Orissa famine of 1866
Rajputana famine of 1869
Creation of Department of Irrigation.
Creation of Imperial Forestry Service in 1867 (now Indian Forest Service).
"Nicobar Islands annexed and incorporated into India 1869" Sir John Lawrence, Bt[46]
12 January 1869 – 8 February 1872 Creation of Department of Agriculture (now Ministry of Agriculture)
Major extension of railways, roads, and canals
Indian Councils Act of 1870
Creation of Andaman and Nicobar Islands as a Chief Commissionership (1872).
Assassination of Lord Mayo in the Andamans. The Earl of Mayo[47]
3 May 1872 – 12 April 1876 Mortalities in Bihar famine of 1873–74 prevented by importation of rice from Burma.
Gaikwad of Baroda dethroned for misgovernment; dominions continued to a child ruler.
Indian Councils Act of 1874
Visit of the Prince of Wales, future Edward VII in 1875–76. The Lord Northbrook[47]
12 April 1876 – 8 June 1880 Baluchistan established as a Chief Commissionership
Queen Victoria (in absentia) proclaimed Empress of India at Delhi Durbar of 1877.
Great Famine of 1876–78: 5.25 million dead; reduced relief offered at expense of Rs. 80 million.
Creation of Famine Commission of 1878–80 under Sir Richard Strachey.
Indian Forest Act of 1878
Second Anglo-Afghan War. The Lord Lytton
8 June 1880 – 13 December 1884 End of Second Anglo-Afghan War.
Repeal of Vernacular Press Act of 1878. Compromise on the Ilbert Bill.
Local Government Acts extend self-government from towns to country.
University of Punjab established in Lahore in 1882
Famine Code promulgated in 1883 by the Government of India.
Creation of the Education Commission. Creation of indigenous schools, especially for Muslims.
Repeal of import duties on cotton and of most tariffs. Railway extension. The Marquess of Ripon[48]
13 December 1884 – 10 December 1888 Passage of Bengal Tenancy Bill
Third Anglo-Burmese War.
Joint Anglo-Russian Boundary Commission appointed for the Afghan frontier. Russian attack on Afghans at Panjdeh (1885). The Great Game in full play.
Report of Public Services Commission of 1886–87, creation of Imperial Civil Service (later Indian Civil Service (ICS), and today Indian Administrative Service)
University of Allahabad established in 1887
Queen Victoria's Jubilee, 1887. The Earl of Dufferin[49][50]
10 December 1888 – 11 October 1894 Strengthening of NW Frontier defence. Creation of Imperial Service Troops consisting of regiments contributed by the princely states.
Gilgit Agency leased in 1899
British Parliament passes Indian Councils Act 1892, opening the Imperial Legislative Council to Indians.
Revolution in princely state of Manipur and subsequent reinstatement of ruler.
High point of The Great Game. Establishment of the Durand Line between British India and Afghanistan,
Railways, roads, and irrigation works begun in Burma. Border between Burma and Siam finalised in 1893.
Fall of the Rupee, resulting from the steady depreciation of silver currency worldwide (1873–93).
Indian Prisons Act of 1894 The Marquess of Lansdowne[51]
11 October 1894 – 6 January 1899 Reorganisation of Indian Army (from Presidency System to the four Commands).
Pamir agreement Russia, 1895
The Chitral Campaign (1895), the Tirah Campaign (1896–97)
Indian famine of 1896–97 beginning in Bundelkhand.
Bubonic plague in Bombay (1896), Bubonic plague in Calcutta (1898); riots in wake of plague prevention measures.
Establishment of Provincial Legislative Councils in Burma and Punjab; the former a new Lieutenant Governorship. The Earl of Elgin
6 January 1899 – 18 November 1905 Creation of the North West Frontier Province under a Chief Commissioner (1901).
Indian famine of 1899–1900.
Return of the bubonic plague, 1 million deaths
Financial Reform Act of 1899; Gold Reserve Fund created for India.
Punjab Land Alienation Act
Inauguration of Department (now Ministry) of Commerce and Industry.
Death of Queen Victoria (1901); dedication of the Victoria Memorial Hall, Calcutta as a national gallery of Indian antiquities, art, and history.
Coronation Durbar in Delhi (1903); Edward VII (in absentia) proclaimed Emperor of India.
Francis Younghusband's British expedition to Tibet (1903–04)
North-Western Provinces (previously Ceded and Conquered Provinces) and Oudh renamed United Provinces in 1904
Reorganisation of Indian Universities Act (1904).
Systemisation of preservation and restoration of ancient monuments by Archaeological Survey of India with Indian Ancient Monument Preservation Act.
Inauguration of agricultural banking with Cooperative Credit Societies Act of 1904
Partition of Bengal; new province of East Bengal and Assam under a Lieutenant-Governor.
Census of 1901 gives the total population at 294 million, including 62 million in the princely states and 232 million in British India.[52] About 170,000 are Europeans. 15 million men and 1 million women are literate. Of those school-aged, 25% of the boys and 3% of the girls attend. There are 207 million Hindus, and 63x million Muslims, along with 9 million Buddhists (in Burma), 3 million Christians, 2 million Sikhs, 1 million Jains, and 8.4 million who practise animism.[53] The Lord Curzon of Kedleston[54][55]
18 November 1905 – 23 November 1910 Creation of the Railway Board
Anglo-Russian Convention of 1907
Indian Councils Act 1909 (also Minto-Morley Reforms)
Appointment of Indian Factories Commission in 1909.
Establishment of Department of Education in 1910 (now Ministry of Education) The Earl of Minto[56]
23 November 1910 – 4 April 1916 Visit of King George V and Queen Mary in 1911: commemoration as Emperor and Empress of India at last Delhi Durbar
King George V announces creation of new city of New Delhi to replace Calcutta as capital of India.
Indian High Courts Act of 1911
Indian Factories Act of 1911
Construction of New Delhi, 1912–1929
World War I, Indian Army in: Western Front, Belgium, 1914; German East Africa (Battle of Tanga, 1914); Mesopotamian Campaign (Battle of Ctesiphon, 1915; Siege of Kut, 1915–16); Battle of Galliopoli, 1915–16
Passage of Defence of India Act 1915 The Lord Hardinge of Penshurst
4 April 1916 – 2 April 1921 Indian Army in: Mesopotamian Campaign (Fall of Baghdad, 1917); Sinai and Palestine Campaign (Battle of Megiddo, 1918)
Passage of Rowlatt Act, 1919
Government of India Act 1919 (also Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms)
Jallianwala Bagh Massacre, 1919
Third Anglo-Afghan War, 1919
University of Rangoon established in 1920. The Lord Chelmsford
2 April 1921 – 3 April 1926 University of Delhi established in 1922.
Indian Workers Compensation Act of 1923 The Earl of Reading
3 April 1926 – 18 April 1931 Indian Trade Unions Act of 1926, Indian Forest Act, 1927
Appointment of Royal Commission of Indian Labour, 1929
Indian Constitutional Round Table Conferences, London, 1930–32, Gandhi-Irwin Pact, 1931. The Lord Irwin
18 April 1931 – 18 April 1936 New Delhi inaugurated as capital of India, 1931.
Indian Workmen's Compensation Act of 1933
Indian Factories Act of 1934
Royal Indian Air Force created in 1932.
Indian Military Academy established in 1932.
Government of India Act 1935
Creation of Reserve Bank of India The Earl of Willingdon
18 April 1936 – 1 October 1943 Indian Payment of Wages Act of 1936
Burma administered independently after 1937 with creation of new cabinet position Secretary of State for India and Burma, and with the Burma Office separated off from the India Office
Indian Provincial Elections of 1937
Cripps' mission to India, 1942.
Indian Army in Mediterranean, Middle East and African theatres of World War II (North African campaign): (Operation Compass, Operation Crusader, First Battle of El Alamein, Second Battle of El Alamein. East African campaign, 1940, Anglo-Iraqi War, 1941, Syria-Lebanon campaign, 1941, Anglo-Soviet invasion of Iran, 1941)
Indian Army in Battle of Hong Kong, Battle of Malaya, Battle of Singapore
Burma Campaign of World War II begins in 1942. The Marquess of Linlithgow
1 October 1943 – 21 February 1947 Indian Army becomes, at 2.5 million men, the largest all-volunteer force in history.
World War II: Burma Campaign, 1943–45 (Battle of Kohima, Battle of Imphal)
Bengal famine of 1943
Indian Army in Italian campaign (Battle of Monte Cassino)
British Labour Party wins UK General Election of 1945 with Clement Attlee as prime minister.
1946 Cabinet Mission to India
Indian Elections of 1946. The Viscount Wavell
21 February 1947 – 15 August 1947 Indian Independence Act 1947 of the British Parliament enacted on 18 July 1947.
Radcliffe Award, August 1947
Partition of India
India Office and position of Secretary of State for India abolished; ministerial responsibility within the United Kingdom for British relations with India and Pakistan is transferred to the Commonwealth Relations Office. The Viscount Mountbatten of Burma
1858–1914[edit]
Main article: History of the British Raj
Aftermath of the Rebellion of 1857: Indian critiques, British response[edit]
Lakshmibai, The Rani of Jhansi, one of the principal leaders of the Indian Rebellion of 1857, who earlier had lost her kingdom as a result of Lord Dalhousie's Doctrine of Lapse.
Sir Syed Ahmed Khan founder of the Muhammedan Anglo-Oriental College, later the Aligarh Muslim University, wrote one of the early critiques, The Causes of the Indian Mutiny.
An 1887 souvenir portrait of Queen Victoria as Empress of India, 30 years after the war.
Although the rebellion had shaken the British enterprise in India, it had not derailed it. After the war, the British became more circumspect. Much thought was devoted to the causes of the rebellion, and from it three main lessons were drawn. At a more practical level, it was felt that there needed to be more communication and camaraderie between the British and Indians—not just between British army officers and their Indian staff but in civilian life as well.[57] The Indian army was completely reorganised: units composed of the Muslims and Brahmins of the United Provinces of Agra and Oudh, who had formed the core of the rebellion, were disbanded. New regiments, like the Sikhs and Baluchis, composed of Indians who, in British estimation, had demonstrated steadfastness, were formed. From then on, the Indian army was to remain unchanged in its organisation until 1947.[58] The 1861 Census had revealed that the English population in India was 125,945. Of these only about 41,862 were civilians as compared with about 84,083 European officers and men of the Army.[59] In 1880, the standing Indian Army consisted of 66,000 British soldiers, 130,000 Natives, and 350,000 soldiers in the princely armies.[60]
Viceroy Lord Canning meets Maharaja Ranbir Singh of Jammu & Kashmir, 9 March 1860.
It was also felt that both the princes and the large land-holders, by not joining the rebellion, had proved to be, in Lord Canning's words, "breakwaters in a storm".[57] They too were rewarded in the new British Raj by being officially recognised in the treaties each state now signed with the Crown.[61][not in citation given] At the same time, it was felt that the peasants, for whose benefit the large land-reforms of the United Provinces had been undertaken, had shown disloyalty, by, in many cases, fighting for their former landlords against the British. Consequently, no more land reforms were implemented for the next 90 years: Bengal and Bihar were to remain the realms of large land holdings (unlike the Punjab and Uttar Pradesh).[62]
Lastly, the British felt disenchanted with Indian reaction to social change. Until the rebellion, they had enthusiastically pushed through social reform, like the ban on sati by Lord William Bentinck.[63] It was now felt that traditions and customs in India were too strong and too rigid to be changed easily; consequently, no more British social interventions were made, especially in matters dealing with religion,[61] even when the British felt very strongly about the issue (as in the instance of the remarriage of Hindu child widows).[64] This was exemplified further in Queen Victoria's Proclamation released immediately after the rebellion. The proclamation stated that 'We disclaim alike our Right and Desire to impose Our Convictions on any of Our Subjects';[65] demonstrating official British commitment to abstaining from social intervention in India.
Demographic history[edit]
Main articles: Demography of India, Demographics of Burma, Demographics of Pakistan, and Demographics of Bangladesh
The population of the territory that became the British Raj was 100 million by 1600 and remained nearly stationary until the 19th century. The population of the Raj reached 255 million according to the first census taken in 1881 of India.[66][67][68][69]
Studies of India's population since 1881 have focused on such topics as total population, birth and death rates, growth rates, geographic distribution, literacy, the rural and urban divide, cities of a million, and the three cities with populations over eight million: Delhi, Greater Bombay, and Calcutta.[70]
Mortality rates fell in 1920–45 era, primarily due to biological immunisation. Other factors included rising incomes and better living conditions, improved better nutrition, a safer and cleaner environment, and better official health policies and medical care.[71]
Severe overcrowding in the cities caused major public health problems, as noted in an official report from 1938:[72]
In the urban and industrial areas ... cramped sites, the high values of land and the necessity for the worker to live in the vicinity of his work ... all tend to intensify congestion and overcrowding. In the busiest centres houses are built close together, eave touching eave, and frequently back to back .... Space is so valuable that, in place of streets and roads, winding lanes provide the only approach to the houses. Neglect of sanitation is often evidenced by heaps of rotting garbage and pools of sewage, whilst the absence of latrines enhance the general pollution of air and soil.
Legal modernisation[edit]
Elephant Carriage of the Maharaja of Rewa, Delhi Durbar of 1903.
Singha argues that after 1857 the colonial government strengthened and expanded its infrastructure via the court system, legal procedures, and statutes. New legislation merged the Crown and the old East India Company courts and introduced a new penal code as well as new codes of civil and criminal procedure, based largely on English law. In the 1860s–1880s the Raj set up compulsory registration of births, deaths, and marriages, as well as adoptions, property deeds, and wills. The goal was to create a stable, usable public record and verifiable identities. However, there was opposition from both Muslim and Hindu elements who complained that the new procedures for census-taking and registration threatened to uncover female privacy. Purdah rules prohibited women from saying their husband's name or having their photograph taken. An all-India census was conducted between 1868 and 1871, often using total numbers of females in a household rather than individual names. Select groups which the Raj reformers wanted to monitor statistically included those reputed to practice female infanticide, prostitutes, lepers, and eunuchs.[73]
Murshid argues that women were in some ways more restricted by the modernisation of the laws. They remained tied to the strictures of their religion, caste, and customs, but now with an overlay of British Victorian attitudes. Their inheritance rights to own and manage property were curtailed; the new English laws were somewhat harsher. Court rulings restricted the rights of second wives and their children regarding inheritance. A woman had to belong to either a father or a husband to have any rights.[74]
Civilising mission[edit]
University of Lucknow founded by the British in 1867 in India
Thomas Babington Macaulay (1800–1859) presented his Whiggish interpretation of English history as an upward progression always leading to more liberty and more progress. Macaulay simultaneously was a leading reformer involved in transforming the educational system of India. He would base it on the English language so that India could join the mother country in a steady upward progress. Macaulay took Burke's emphasis on moral rule and implemented it in actual school reforms, giving the British Empire a profound moral mission to civilise the natives.
Yale professor Karuna Mantena has argued that the civilising mission did not last long, for she says that benevolent reformers were the losers in key debates, such as those following the 1857 rebellion in India, and the scandal of Governor Edward Eyre's brutal repression of the Morant Bay rebellion in Jamaica in 1865. The rhetoric continued but it became an alibi for British misrule and racism. No longer was it believed that the natives could truly make progress, instead they had to be ruled by heavy hand, with democratic opportunities postponed indefinitely. As a result:
The central tenets of liberal imperialism were challenged as various forms of rebellion, resistance and instability in the colonies precipitated a broad-ranging reassessment....the equation of 'good government' with the reform of native society, which was at the core of the discourse of liberal empire, would be subject to mounting skepticism.[75]
English historian Peter Cain, has challenged Mantena, arguing that the imperialists truly believed that British rule would bring to the subjects the benefits of ‘ordered liberty’, thereby Britain could fulfil its moral duty and achieve its own greatness. Much of the debate took place in Britain itself, and the imperialists worked hard to convince the general population that the civilising mission was well under-way. This campaign served to strengthen imperial support at home, and thus, says Cain, to bolster the moral authority of the gentlemanly elites who ran the Empire.[76]
Education[edit]
Main article: History of education in the Indian subcontinent § Colonial Era
The University of Calcutta, established 1857, is one of the three oldest modern state universities in India.
The British made widespread education in English a high priority.[77] During the time of the East India Company, Thomas Babington Macaulay had made schooling taught in English a priority for the Raj in his famous minute of February 1835 and succeeded in implementing ideas previously put forward by Lord William Bentinck (the governor general between 1828 and 1835). Bentinck favoured the replacement of Persian by English as the official language, the use of English as the medium of instruction, and the training of English-speaking Indians as teachers. He was inspired by utilitarian ideas and called for "useful learning." However, Bentinck's proposals were rejected by London officials.[78][79] Under Macaulay, thousands of elementary and secondary schools were opened; they typically had an all-male student body.
Missionaries opened their own schools that taught Christianity and the three Rs. Bellenoit argues that as civil servants became more isolated and resorted to scientific racism, missionary schools became more engaged with Indians, grew increasingly sympathetic to Indian culture, and adamantly opposed scientific racism.[80]
Universities in Calcutta, Bombay, and Madras were established in 1857, just before the Rebellion. By 1890 some 60,000 Indians had matriculated, chiefly in the liberal arts or law. About a third entered public administration, and another third became lawyers. The result was a very well educated professional state bureaucracy. By 1887 of 21,000 mid-level civil service appointments, 45% were held by Hindus, 7% by Muslims, 19% by Eurasians (European father and Indian mother), and 29% by Europeans. Of the 1000 top-level positions, almost all were held by Britons, typically with an Oxbridge degree.[81] The government, often working with local philanthropists, opened 186 universities and colleges of higher education by 1911; they enrolled 36,000 students (over 90% men). By 1939 the number of institutions had doubled and enrolment reached 145,000. The curriculum followed classical British standards of the sort set by Oxford and Cambridge and stressed English literature and European history. Nevertheless, by the 1920s the student bodies had become hotbeds of Indian nationalism.[82]
Missions[edit]
St. Paul's Cathedral was built in 1847 and served as the chair of the Bishop of Calcutta, who served as the metropolitan of the Church of India, Burma and Ceylon.[83]
Further information: Protestantism in India
As the Anglican Church was the established church of England, "it had an impact on India with the arrival of the British".[84] Citing the Great Commission, Joseph White, a Laudian Professor of Arabic at the University of Oxford, "preached before the university in 1784 on the duty of promoting the universal and progressive message of Christianity 'among our Mahometan and Gentoo Subjects in India'."[85] In 1889, the Prime Minister of Great Britain, Robert Gascoyne-Cecil, 3rd Marquess of Salisbury expressed similar sentiments, stating that "It is not only our duty but is in our interest to promote the diffusion of Christianity as far as possible throughout the length and breadth of India."[86]
The growth of the British Indian Army led to the arrival of many Anglican chaplains in India.[87] Following the arrival of the Church of England's Church Mission Society in 1814, the Diocese of Calcutta of the Church of India, Burma and Ceylon (CIBC) was erected, with its St. Paul's Cathedral being built in 1847.[84] By 1930, the Church of India, Burma and Ceylon had fourteen dioceses across the Indian Empire.[88]
Missionaries from other Christian denominations came to British India as well; Lutheran missionaries, for example, arrived in Calcutta in 1836 and by "the year 1880 there were over 31,200 Lutheran Christians spread out in 1,052 villages".[86] Methodists began arriving in India in 1783 and established missions with a focus on "education, health ministry, and evangelism".[89][90] In the 1790s, Christians from the London Missionary Society and Baptist Missionary Society, began doing missionary work in the Indian Empire.[91] In Neyoor, the London Missionary Society Hospital "pioneered improvements in the public health system for the treatment of diseases even before organized attempts were made by the colonial Madras Presidency, reducing the death rate substantially".[92]
After 1857, the establishment of schools and hospitals by British Christian missionaries became the "a pivotal feature of missionary work and the principal vehicles for conversion".[93][90] Christ Church College (1866) and St. Stephen's College (1881) are two examples of prominent church-affiliated educational institutions founded during the British Raj.[94] Within educational institutions established during the British Raj, Christian texts, especially the Bible, were a part of the curricula.[93] During the British Raj, Christian missionaries developed writing systems for Indian languages that previously did not have one.[95][96] Christian missionaries in India also worked to increase literacy and also engaged in social activism, such as fighting against prostitution, championing the right of widowed women to remarry, and trying to stop early marriages for women.[97] Among British women, zenana missions became a popular method to win converts to Christianity.[93]
Economic history[edit]
One Mohur depicting Queen Victoria (1862).
Further information: Economy of India under the British Raj and Economic history of India
Economic trends[edit]
The Indian economy grew at about 1% per year from 1880 to 1920, and the population also grew at 1%.[98] All three sectors of the economy – agriculture, manufacturing, and services – accelerated in the postcolonial India. In agriculture a "green revolution" took place in the 1970s. The most important difference between colonial and postcolonial India was the utilization of land surplus with productivity-led growth by using high-yielding variety seeds, chemical fertilizers and more intensive application of water. All these three inputs were subsidized by the state.[99] The result was, on average, no long-term change in per capita income levels, though cost of living had grown higher. Agriculture was still dominant, with most peasants at the subsistence level. Extensive irrigation systems were built, providing an impetus for switching to cash crops for export and for raw materials for Indian industry, especially jute, cotton, sugarcane, coffee and tea.[100] India's global share of GDP fell drastically from above 20% to less than 5% in the colonial period.[101] Historians have been bitterly divided on issues of economic history, with the Nationalist school (following Nehru) arguing that India was poorer at the end of British rule than at the beginning and that impoverishment occurred because of the British.[102]
Industry[edit]
The entrepreneur Jamsetji Tata (1839–1904) began his industrial career in 1877 with the Central India Spinning, Weaving, and Manufacturing Company in Bombay. While other Indian mills produced cheap coarse yarn (and later cloth) using local short-staple cotton and cheap machinery imported from Britain, Tata did much better by importing expensive longer-stapled cotton from Egypt and buying more complex ring-spindle machinery from the United States to spin finer yarn that could compete with imports from Britain.[103]
In the 1890s, he launched plans to move into heavy industry using Indian funding. The Raj did not provide capital, but, aware of Britain's declining position against the US and Germany in the steel industry, it wanted steel mills in India. It promised to purchase any surplus steel Tata could not otherwise sell.[104] The Tata Iron and Steel Company (TISCO), now headed by his son Dorabji Tata (1859–1932), opened its plant at Jamshedpur in Bihar in 1908. It used American technology, not British[105] and became the leading iron and steel producer in India, with 120,000 employees in 1945. TISCO became India's proud symbol of technical skill, managerial competence, entrepreneurial flair, and high pay for industrial workers.[106] The Tata family, like most of India's big businessmen, were Indian nationalists but did not trust the Congress because it seemed too aggressively hostile to the Raj, too socialist, and too supportive of trade unions.[107]
Railways[edit]
Extent of Great Indian Peninsular Railway network in 1870. The GIPR was one of the largest rail companies at that time.
The railway network of India in 1909, when it was the fourth largest railway network in the world.
"The most magnificent railway station in the world." says the caption of the stereographic tourist picture of Victoria Terminus, Bombay, which was completed in 1888.
British India built a modern railway system in the late nineteenth century which was the fourth largest in the world. The railways at first were privately owned and operated. It was run by British administrators, engineers and craftsmen. At first, only the unskilled workers were Indians.[108]
The East India Company (and later the colonial government) encouraged new railway companies backed by private investors under a scheme that would provide land and guarantee an annual return of up to five percent during the initial years of operation. The companies were to build and operate the lines under a 99-year lease, with the government having the option to buy them earlier.[109]
Two new railway companies, Great Indian Peninsular Railway (GIPR) and East Indian Railway (EIR) began in 1853–54 to construct and operate lines near Bombay and Calcutta. The first passenger railway line in North India between Allahabad and Kanpur opened in 1859.
In 1854, Governor-General Lord Dalhousie formulated a plan to construct a network of trunk lines connecting the principal regions of India. Encouraged by the government guarantees, investment flowed in and a series of new rail companies were established, leading to rapid expansion of the rail system in India.[110] Soon several large princely states built their own rail systems and the network spread to the regions that became the modern-day states of Assam, Rajasthan and Andhra Pradesh. The route mileage of this network increased from 1,349 kilometres (838 mi) in 1860 to 25,495 kilometres (15,842 mi) in 1880, mostly radiating inland from the three major port cities of Bombay, Madras, and Calcutta.[111]
Most of the railway construction was done by Indian companies supervised by British engineers.[112] The system was heavily built, using a wide gauge, sturdy tracks and strong bridges. By 1900 India had a full range of rail services with diverse ownership and management, operating on broad, metre and narrow gauge networks. In 1900, the government took over the GIPR network, while the company continued to manage it.[112] During the First World War, the railways were used to transport troops and grains to the ports of Bombay and Karachi en route to Britain, Mesopotamia, and East Africa. With shipments of equipment and parts from Britain curtailed, maintenance became much more difficult; critical workers entered the army; workshops were converted to making artillery; some locomotives and cars were shipped to the Middle East. The railways could barely keep up with the increased demand.[113] By the end of the war, the railways had deteriorated for lack of maintenance and were not profitable. In 1923, both GIPR and EIR were nationalised.[114][115]
Headrick shows that until the 1930s, both the Raj lines and the private companies hired only European supervisors, civil engineers, and even operating personnel, such as locomotive engineers. The government's Stores Policy required that bids on railway contracts be made to the India Office in London, shutting out most Indian firms.[115] The railway companies purchased most of their hardware and parts in Britain. There were railway maintenance workshops in India, but they were rarely allowed to manufacture or repair locomotives. TISCO steel could not obtain orders for rails until the war emergency.[116]
The Second World War severely crippled the railways as rolling stock was diverted to the Middle East, and the railway workshops were converted into munitions workshops.[117] After independence in 1947, forty-two separate railway systems, including thirty-two lines owned by the former Indian princely states, were amalgamated to form a single nationalised unit named the Indian Railways.
India provides an example of the British Empire pouring its money and expertise into a very well built system designed for military reasons (after the Mutiny of 1857), with the hope that it would stimulate industry. The system was overbuilt and too expensive for the small amount of freight traffic it carried. Christensen (1996), who looked at colonial purpose, local needs, capital, service, and private-versus-public interests, concluded that making the railways a creature of the state hindered success because railway expenses had to go through the same time-consuming and political budgeting process as did all other state expenses. Railway costs could therefore not be tailored to the timely needs of the railways or their passengers.[118]
Irrigation[edit]
Main article: Irrigation in India
The British Raj invested heavily in infrastructure, including canals and irrigation systems in addition to railways, telegraphy, roads and ports.[119][120][121] The Ganges Canal reached 350 miles from Hardwar to Cawnpore, and supplied thousands of miles of distribution canals. By 1900 the Raj had the largest irrigation system in the world. One success story was Assam, a jungle in 1840 that by 1900 had 4,000,000 acres under cultivation, especially in tea plantations. In all, the amount of irrigated land multiplied by a factor of eight. Historian David Gilmour says:
By the 1870s the peasantry in the districts irrigated by the Ganges Canal were visibly better fed, housed and dressed than before; by the end of the century the new network of canals in the Punjab at producing even more prosperous peasantry there.[122]
Policies[edit]
In the second half of the 19th century, both the direct administration of India by the British Crown and the technological change ushered in by the industrial revolution had the effect of closely intertwining the economies of India and Great Britain.[123] In fact many of the major changes in transport and communications (that are typically associated with Crown Rule of India) had already begun before the Mutiny. Since Dalhousie had embraced the technological revolution underway in Britain, India too saw rapid development of all those technologies. Railways, roads, canals, and bridges were rapidly built in India and telegraph links equally rapidly established in order that raw materials, such as cotton, from India's hinterland could be transported more efficiently to ports, such as Bombay, for subsequent export to England.[124] Likewise, finished goods from England, were transported back, just as efficiently, for sale in the burgeoning Indian markets. Massive railway projects were begun in earnest and government railway jobs and pensions attracted a large number of upper caste Hindus into the civil service for the first time. The Indian Civil Service was prestigious and paid well, but it remained politically neutral.[125] Imports of British cotton covered 55% of the Indian market by 1875.[126] Industrial production as it developed in European factories was unknown until the 1850s when the first cotton mills were opened in Bombay, posing a challenge to the cottage-based home production system based on family labour.[127]
The Queen's Own Madras Sappers and Miners, 1896
Taxes in India decreased during the colonial period for most of India's population; with the land tax revenue claiming 15% of India's national income during Mogul times compared with 1% at the end of the colonial period. The percentage of national income for the village economy increased from 44% during Mogul times to 54% by the end of colonial period. India's per capita GDP decreased from $550[clarification needed] in 1700 to $520 by 1857, although it later increased to $618, by 1947.[128]
Economic impact[edit]
A significant fact which stands out is that those parts of India which have been longest under British rule are the poorest today. Indeed some kind of chart might be drawn up to indicate the close connection between length of British rule and progressive growth of poverty.
— Jawaharlal Nehru, on the economic effects of the British rule, in his book The Discovery of India[129]
Historians continue to debate whether the long-term impact of British rule was to accelerate the economic development of India, or to distort and retard it. In 1780, the conservative British politician Edmund Burke raised the issue of India's position: he vehemently attacked the East India Company, claiming that Warren Hastings and other top officials had ruined the Indian economy and society. Indian historian Rajat Kanta Ray (1998) continues this line of attack, saying the new economy brought by the British in the 18th century was a form of "plunder" and a catastrophe for the traditional economy of the Mughal Empire.[130] Ray accuses the British of depleting the food and money stocks and of imposing high taxes that helped cause the terrible Bengal famine of 1770, which killed a third of the people of Bengal.[131]
P. J. Marshall shows that recent scholarship has reinterpreted the view that the prosperity of the formerly benign Mughal rule gave way to poverty and anarchy.[132] He argues the British takeover did not make any sharp break with the past, which largely delegated control to regional Mughal rulers and sustained a generally prosperous economy for the rest of the 18th century. Marshall notes the British went into partnership with Indian bankers and raised revenue through local tax administrators and kept the old Mughal rates of taxation.
Many historians agree that the East India Company inherited an onerous taxation system that took one-third of the produce of Indian cultivators.[130] Instead of the Indian nationalist account of the British as alien aggressors, seizing power by brute force and impoverishing all of India, Marshall presents the interpretation (supported by many scholars in India and the West) that the British were not in full control but instead were players in what was primarily an Indian play and in which their rise to power depended upon excellent co-operation with Indian elites.[132] Marshall admits that much of his interpretation is still highly controversial among many historians.[133]
Famines, epidemics, public health[edit]
Main articles: Famine in India § British rule, and Timeline of major famines in India during British rule
See also: Category:Famines in British India.
Child who starved to death during the Bengal famine of 1943
According to economist Angus Maddison, "The British contributed to public health by introducing smallpox vaccination, establishing Western medicine and training modern doctors, by killing rats, and establishing quarantine procedures. As a result, the death rate fell and the population of India grew more than two-and-a-half times between 1757 and 1947."[134]
Population growth worsened the plight of the peasantry. As a result of peace and improved sanitation and health, the Indian population rose from perhaps 100 million in 1700 to 300 million by 1920. While encouraging agricultural productivity, the British also provided economic incentives to have more children to help in the fields. Although a similar population increase occurred in Europe at the same time, the growing numbers could be absorbed by industrialisation or emigration to the Americas and Australia. India enjoyed neither an industrial revolution nor an increase in food growing. Moreover, Indian landlords had a stake in the cash crop system and discouraged innovation. As a result, population numbers far outstripped the amount of available food and land, creating dire poverty and widespread hunger.
—  Craig A. Lockard, Societies, Networks, and Transitions[135]
Famines in India (Estimated deaths in millions)
This article duplicates the scope of other articles, specifically, Timeline of major famines in India during British rule. Please discuss this issue on the talk page and edit it to conform with Wikipedia's Manual of Style. (May 2017)
Major famines in India during British rule
Famine
Years
Deaths[b]
Great Bengal Famine 1769–1770 10[136]
Chalisa famine 1783–1784 11[137]
Doji bara famine 1789–1795 11[138]
Agra famine of 1837–38 1837–1838 0.8[139]
Eastern Rajputana 1860–1861 2[139]
Orissa famine of 1866 1865–1867 1[140]
Rajputana famine of 1869 1868–1870 1.5[141]
Bihar famine of 1873–74 1873–1874 0
Great Famine of 1876–78 1876–1878 10.3[142]
Odisha, Bihar 1888–1889 0.15[143]
Indian famine of 1896–97 1896–1897 5[139]
Indian famine of 1899–1900 1899–1900 1[139]
Bombay Presidency 1905–1906 0.23[144]
Bengal famine of 1943 1943–1944 1.5[144]
Total (1765–1947)[145][146][147] 1769–1944 55.48

During the British Raj, India experienced some of the worst famines ever recorded, including the Great Famine of 1876–1878, in which 6.1 million to 10.3 million people died[148] and the Indian famine of 1899–1900, in which 1.25 to 10 million people died.[149] Recent research, including work by Mike Davis and Amartya Sen,[150] argue that famines in India were made more severe by British policies in India. An El Niño event caused the Indian famine of 1876–1878.[151]
Having been criticised for the badly bungled relief-effort during the Orissa famine of 1866,[152] British authorities began to discuss famine policy soon afterwards, and in early 1868 Sir William Muir, Lieutenant-Governor of the North Western Provinces, issued a famous order stating that:[153]
... every District officer would be held personally responsible that no deaths occurred from starvation which could have been avoided by any exertion or arrangement on his part or that of his subordinates.
The first cholera pandemic began in Bengal, then spread across India by 1820. Ten thousand British troops and countless Indians died during this pandemic.[154] Estimated deaths in India between 1817 and 1860 exceeded 15 million. Another 23 million died between 1865 and 1917.[155] The Third Pandemic of plague started in China in the middle of the 19th century, spreading disease to all inhabited continents and killing 10 million people in India alone.[156] Waldemar Haffkine, who mainly worked in India, became the first microbiologist to develop and deploy vaccines against cholera and bubonic plague. In 1925 the Plague Laboratory in Bombay was renamed the Haffkine Institute.
Fevers ranked as one of the leading causes of death in India in the 19th century.[157] Britain's Sir Ronald Ross, working in the Presidency General Hospital in Calcutta, finally proved in 1898 that mosquitoes transmit malaria, while on assignment in the Deccan at Secunderabad, where the Centre for Tropical and Communicable Diseases is now named in his honour.[158]
In 1881 there were around 120,000 leprosy patients. The central government passed the Lepers Act of 1898, which provided legal provision for forcible confinement of leprosy sufferers in India.[159] Under the direction of Mountstuart Elphinstone a program was launched to propagate smallpox vaccination.[160] Mass vaccination in India resulted in a major decline in smallpox mortality by the end of the 19th century.[161] In 1849 nearly 13% of all Calcutta deaths were due to smallpox.[162] Between 1868 and 1907, there were approximately 4.7 million deaths from smallpox.[163]
Sir Robert Grant directed his attention to establishing a systematic institution in Bombay for imparting medical knowledge to the natives.[164] In 1860, Grant Medical College became one of the four recognised colleges for teaching courses leading to degrees (alongside Elphinstone College, Deccan College and Government Law College, Mumbai).[132]
1860s–1890s: New middle class, Indian National Congress[edit]
Main article: Indian National Congress
By 1880, a new middle class had arisen in India and spread thinly across the country. Moreover, there was a growing solidarity among its members, created by the "joint stimuli of encouragement and irritation."[165] The encouragement felt by this class came from its success in education and its ability to avail itself of the benefits of that education such as employment in the Indian Civil Service. It came too from Queen Victoria's proclamation of 1858 in which she had declared, "We hold ourselves bound to the natives of our Indian territories by the same obligation of duty which bind us to all our other subjects."[166] Indians were especially encouraged when Canada was granted dominion status in 1867 and established an autonomous democratic constitution.[166] Lastly, the encouragement came from the work of contemporaneous Oriental scholars like Monier Monier-Williams and Max Müller, who in their works had been presenting ancient India as a great civilisation. Irritation, on the other hand, came not just from incidents of racial discrimination at the hands of the British in India, but also from governmental actions like the use of Indian troops in imperial campaigns (e.g. in the Second Anglo-Afghan War) and the attempts to control the vernacular press (e.g. in the Vernacular Press Act of 1878).[167]
It was, however, Viceroy Lord Ripon's partial reversal of the Ilbert Bill (1883), a legislative measure that had proposed putting Indian judges in the Bengal Presidency on equal footing with British ones, that transformed the discontent into political action.[168] On 28 December 1885, professionals and intellectuals from this middle-class—many educated at the new British-founded universities in Bombay, Calcutta, and Madras, and familiar with the ideas of British political philosophers, especially the utilitarians assembled in Bombay. The seventy men founded the Indian National Congress; Womesh Chandra Bonerjee was elected the first president. The membership comprised a westernised elite, and no effort was made at this time to broaden the base.
During its first twenty years, the Congress primarily debated British policy toward India; however, its debates created a new Indian outlook that held Great Britain responsible for draining India of its wealth. Britain did this, the nationalists claimed, by unfair trade, by the restraint on indigenous Indian industry, and by the use of Indian taxes to pay the high salaries of the British civil servants in India.[169]
1870s–1907: Social reformers, moderates vs. extremists[edit]
Thomas Baring served as Viceroy of India 1872–1876. Baring's major accomplishments came as an energetic reformer who was dedicated to upgrading the quality of government in the British Raj. He began large scale famine relief, reduced taxes, and overcame bureaucratic obstacles in an effort to reduce both starvation and widespread social unrest. Although appointed by a Liberal government, his policies were much the same as Viceroys appointed by Conservative governments.[170]
Gopal Krishna Gokhale, a constitutional social reformer and moderate nationalist, was elected president of the Indian National Congress in 1905.
Congress "extremist" Bal Gangadhar Tilak speaking in 1907 as the party split into the Moderates and the Extremists. Seated at the table is Aurobindo Ghosh and to his right (in the chair) is Lala Lajpat Rai, both allies of Tilak.
Social reform was in the air by the 1880s. For example, Pandita Ramabai, poet, Sanskrit scholar, and a champion of the emancipation of Indian women, took up the cause of widow remarriage, especially of Brahamin widows, later converted to Christianity.[171] By 1900 reform movements had taken root within the Indian National Congress. Congress member Gopal Krishna Gokhale founded the Servants of India Society, which lobbied for legislative reform (for example, for a law to permit the remarriage of Hindu child widows), and whose members took vows of poverty, and worked among the untouchable community.[172]
By 1905, a deep gulf opened between the moderates, led by Gokhale, who downplayed public agitation, and the new "extremists" who not only advocated agitation, but also regarded the pursuit of social reform as a distraction from nationalism. Prominent among the extremists was Bal Gangadhar Tilak, who attempted to mobilise Indians by appealing to an explicitly Hindu political identity, displayed, for example, in the annual public Ganapati festivals that he inaugurated in western India.[173]
Partition of Bengal (1905–1911)[edit]
Main articles: Partition of Bengal (1905) and Swadeshi movement
Bal Gangadhar Tilak was the first leader of the Indian Independence Movement and known as Father of Indian Unrest and Maker of Modern India
Viceroy Curzon (1899–1905). He promoted many reforms but his partitioning of Bengal into Muslim and Hindu provinces outraged the people.
Sir Khawaja Salimullah, an influential Bengali aristocrat and British ally, who strongly favoured the creation of Eastern Bengal and Assam
Surendranath Banerjee, a Congress moderate, who led the opposition to the partition of Bengal with the Swadeshi movement to buy Indian-made cloth.
Cover of a 1909 issue of the Tamil magazine Vijaya showing "Mother India" with her diverse progeny and the rallying cry "Vande Mataram".
The Viceroy Lord Curzon (1899–1905) was unusually energetic in pursuit of efficiency and reform.[174] His agenda included the creation of the North-West Frontier Province; small changes in the Civil Service; speeding up the operations of the secretariat; setting up a gold standard to ensure a stable currency; creation of a Railway Board; irrigation reform; reduction of peasant debts; lowering the cost of telegrams; archaeological research and the preservation of antiquities; improvements in the universities; police reforms; upgrading the roles of the Native States; a new Commerce and Industry Department; promotion of industry; revised land revenue policies; lowering taxes; setting up agricultural banks; creating an Agricultural Department; sponsoring agricultural research; establishing an Imperial Library; creating an Imperial Cadet Corps; new famine codes; and, indeed, reducing the smoke nuisance in Calcutta.[175]
Trouble emerged for Curzon when he divided the largest administrative subdivision in British India, the Bengal Province, into the Muslim-majority province of Eastern Bengal and Assam and the Hindu-majority province of West Bengal (present-day Indian states of West Bengal, Bihar, and Odisha). Curzon's act, the Partition of Bengal—which some considered administratively felicitous, communally charged, sowed the seeds of division among Indians in Bengal and, which had been contemplated by various colonial administrations since the time of Lord William Bentinck, but never acted upon—was to transform nationalist politics as nothing else before it. The Hindu elite of Bengal, among them many who owned land in East Bengal that was leased out to Muslim peasants, protested fervidly.[176]
Following the Partition of Bengal, which was a strategy set out by Lord Curzon to weaken the nationalist movement, Tilak encouraged the Swadeshi movement and the Boycott movement.[177] The movement consisted of the boycott of foreign goods and also the social boycott of any Indian who used foreign goods. The Swadeshi movement consisted of the usage of natively produced goods. Once foreign goods were boycotted, there was a gap which had to be filled by the production of those goods in India itself. Bal Gangadhar Tilak said that the Swadeshi and Boycott movements are two sides of the same coin. The large Bengali Hindu middle-class (the Bhadralok), upset at the prospect of Bengalis being outnumbered in the new Bengal province by Biharis and Oriyas, felt that Curzon's act was punishment for their political assertiveness. The pervasive protests against Curzon's decision took the form predominantly of the Swadeshi ("buy Indian") campaign led by two-time Congress president, Surendranath Banerjee, and involved boycott of British goods.[178]
The rallying cry for both types of protest was the slogan Bande Mataram ("Hail to the Mother"), which invoked a mother goddess, who stood variously for Bengal, India, and the Hindu goddess Kali. Sri Aurobindo never went beyond the law when he edited the Bande Mataram magazine; it preached independence but within the bounds of peace as far as possible. Its goal was Passive Resistance.[179] The unrest spread from Calcutta to the surrounding regions of Bengal when students returned home to their villages and towns. Some joined local political youth clubs emerging in Bengal at the time, some engaged in robberies to fund arms, and even attempted to take the lives of Raj officials. However, the conspiracies generally failed in the face of intense police work.[180] The Swadeshi boycott movement cut imports of British textiles by 25%. The swadeshi cloth, although more expensive and somewhat less comfortable than its Lancashire competitor, was worn as a mark of national pride by people all over India.[181]
1906–1909: Muslim League, Minto-Morley reforms[edit]
Main article: All-India Muslim League
1909 Prevailing Religions, Map of British India, 1909, showing the prevailing majority religions based on the Census of 1901.
Hakim Ajmal Khan, a founder of the Muslim League, became the president of the Indian National Congress in 1921.
Lord Minto, the Conservative viceroy met with the Muslim delegation in June 1906. The Minto-Morley Reforms of 1909 called for separate Muslim electorates.
The Hindu protests against the partition of Bengal led the Muslim elite in India to organise in 1906 the All India Muslim League. The League favoured the partition of Bengal, since it gave them a Muslim majority in the eastern half. In 1905, when Tilak and Lajpat Rai attempted to rise to leadership positions in the Congress, and the Congress itself rallied around symbolism of Kali, Muslim fears increased. The Muslim elite, including Dacca Nawab and Khwaja Salimullah, expected that a new province with a Muslim majority would directly benefit Muslims aspiring to political power.[182]
The first steps were taken toward self-government in British India in the late 19th century with the appointment of Indian counsellors to advise the British viceroy and the establishment of provincial councils with Indian members; the British subsequently widened participation in legislative councils with the Indian Councils Act of 1892. Municipal Corporations and District Boards were created for local administration; they included elected Indian members.
The Indian Councils Act 1909, known as the Morley-Minto Reforms (John Morley was the secretary of state for India, and Minto was viceroy) – gave Indians limited roles in the central and provincial legislatures. Upper class Indians, rich landowners and businessmen were favoured. The Muslim community was made a separate electorate and granted double representation. The goals were quite conservative but they did advance the elective principle.[56]
The partition of Bengal was rescinded in 1911 and announced at the Delhi Durbar at which King George V came in person and was crowned Emperor of India. He announced the capital would be moved from Calcutta to Delhi, a Muslim stronghold. Morley was especially vigilant in crushing revolutionary groups.[183]
1914–1947[edit]
1914–1918: First World War, Lucknow Pact[edit]
Indian medical orderlies attending to wounded soldiers with the Mesopotamian Expeditionary Force in Mesopotamia during World War I.
Sepoy Khudadad Khan, the first Indian to be awarded the Victoria Cross, the British Empire's highest war-time medal for gallantry. Khan, from Chakwal District, Punjab (present-day Pakistan) was fighting on the Western Front in 1914.
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi (seated in carriage, on the right, eyes downcast, with black flat-top hat) receives a big welcome in Karachi in 1916 after his return to India from South Africa.
Muhammad Ali Jinnah, seated, third from the left, was a supporter of the Lucknow Pact, which, in 1916, ended the three-way rift between the Extremists, the Moderates and the League.
The First World War would prove to be a watershed in the imperial relationship between Britain and India. Shortly prior to the outbreak of war, the Government of India had indicated that they could furnish two divisions plus a cavalry brigade, with a further division in case of emergency.[184] Some 1.4 million Indian and British soldiers of the British Indian Army took part in the war, primarily in Iraq and the Middle East. Their participation had a wider cultural fallout as news spread how bravely soldiers fought and died alongside British soldiers, as well as soldiers from dominions like Canada and Australia.[185] India's international profile rose during the 1920s, as it became a founding member of the League of Nations in 1920 and participated, under the name, "Les Indes Anglaises" (British India), in the 1920 Summer Olympics in Antwerp.[186] Back in India, especially among the leaders of the Indian National Congress, the war led to calls for greater self-government for Indians.[185]
After the 1906 split between the moderates and the extremists, organised political activity by the Congress had remained fragmented until 1914, when Bal Gangadhar Tilak was released from prison and began to sound out other Congress leaders about possible re-unification. That, however, had to wait until the demise of Tilak's principal moderate opponents, Gopal Krishna Gokhale and Pherozeshah Mehta, in 1915, whereupon an agreement was reached for Tilak's ousted group to re-enter the Congress.[185] In the 1916 Lucknow session of the Congress, Tilak's supporters were able to push through a more radical resolution which asked for the British to declare that it was their, "aim and intention ... to confer self-government on India at an early date."[185] Soon, other such rumblings began to appear in public pronouncements: in 1917, in the Imperial Legislative Council, Madan Mohan Malaviya spoke of the expectations the war had generated in India, "I venture to say that the war has put the clock ... fifty years forward ... (The) reforms after the war will have to be such, ... as will satisfy the aspirations of her (India's) people to take their legitimate part in the administration of their own country."[185]
The 1916 Lucknow Session of the Congress was also the venue of an unanticipated mutual effort by the Congress and the Muslim League, the occasion for which was provided by the wartime partnership between Germany and Turkey. Since the Turkish Sultan, or Khalifah, had also sporadically claimed guardianship of the Islamic holy sites of Mecca, Medina, and Jerusalem, and since the British and their allies were now in conflict with Turkey, doubts began to increase among some Indian Muslims about the "religious neutrality" of the British, doubts that had already surfaced as a result of the reunification of Bengal in 1911, a decision that was seen as ill-disposed to Muslims.[187] In the Lucknow Pact, the League joined the Congress in the proposal for greater self-government that was campaigned for by Tilak and his supporters; in return, the Congress accepted separate electorates for Muslims in the provincial legislatures as well as the Imperial Legislative Council. In 1916, the Muslim League had anywhere between 500 and 800 members and did not yet have its wider following among Indian Muslims of later years; in the League itself, the pact did not have unanimous backing, having largely been negotiated by a group of "Young Party" Muslims from the United Provinces (UP), most prominently, two brothers Mohammad and Shaukat Ali, who had embraced the Pan-Islamic cause;[187] however, it did have the support of a young lawyer from Bombay, Muhammad Ali Jinnah, who was later to rise to leadership roles in both the League and the Indian independence movement. In later years, as the full ramifications of the pact unfolded, it was seen as benefiting the Muslim minority élites of provinces like UP and Bihar more than the Muslim majorities of Punjab and Bengal, nonetheless, at the time, the "Lucknow Pact", was an important milestone in nationalistic agitation and was seen so by the British.[187]
During 1916, two Home Rule Leagues were founded within the Indian National Congress by Tilak and Annie Besant, respectively, to promote Home Rule among Indians, and also to elevate the stature of the founders within the Congress itself.[188] Mrs. Besant, for her part, was also keen to demonstrate the superiority of this new form of organised agitation, which had achieved some success in the Irish home rule movement, to the political violence that had intermittently plagued the subcontinent during the years 1907–1914.[188] The two Leagues focused their attention on complementary geographical regions: Tilak's in western India, in the southern Bombay presidency, and Mrs. Besant's in the rest of the country, but especially in the Madras Presidency and in regions like Sind and Gujarat that had hitherto been considered politically dormant by the Congress.[188] Both leagues rapidly acquired new members – approximately thirty thousand each in a little over a year – and began to publish inexpensive newspapers. Their propaganda also turned to posters, pamphlets, and political-religious songs, and later to mass meetings, which not only attracted greater numbers than in earlier Congress sessions, but also entirely new social groups such as non-Brahmins, traders, farmers, students, and lower-level government workers.[188] Although they did not achieve the magnitude or character of a nationwide mass movement, the Home Rule leagues both deepened and widened organised political agitation for self-rule in India. The British authorities reacted by imposing restrictions on the Leagues, including shutting out students from meetings and banning the two leaders from travelling to certain provinces.[188]
The year 1915 also saw the return of Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi to India. Already known in India as a result of his civil liberties protests on behalf of the Indians in South Africa, Gandhi followed the advice of his mentor Gopal Krishna Gokhale and chose not to make any public pronouncements during the first year of his return, but instead spent the year travelling, observing the country first-hand, and writing.[189] Earlier, during his South Africa sojourn, Gandhi, a lawyer by profession, had represented an Indian community, which, although small, was sufficiently diverse to be a microcosm of India itself. In tackling the challenge of holding this community together and simultaneously confronting the colonial authority, he had created a technique of non-violent resistance, which he labelled Satyagraha (or, Striving for Truth).[190] For Gandhi, Satyagraha was different from "passive resistance", by then a familiar technique of social protest, which he regarded as a practical strategy adopted by the weak in the face of superior force; Satyagraha, on the other hand, was for him the "last resort of those strong enough in their commitment to truth to undergo suffering in its cause."[190] Ahimsa or "non-violence", which formed the underpinning of Satyagraha, came to represent the twin pillar, with Truth, of Gandhi's unorthodox religious outlook on life.[190] During the years 1907–1914, Gandhi tested the technique of Satyagraha in a number of protests on behalf of the Indian community in South Africa against the unjust racial laws.[190]
Also, during his time in South Africa, in his essay, Hind Swaraj, (1909), Gandhi formulated his vision of Swaraj, or "self-rule" for India based on three vital ingredients: solidarity between Indians of different faiths, but most of all between Hindus and Muslims; the removal of untouchability from Indian society; and the exercise of swadeshi – the boycott of manufactured foreign goods and the revival of Indian cottage industry.[189] The first two, he felt, were essential for India to be an egalitarian and tolerant society, one befitting the principles of Truth and Ahimsa, while the last, by making Indians more self-reliant, would break the cycle of dependence that was not only perpetrating the direction and tenor of the British rule in India, but also the British commitment to it.[189] At least until 1920, the British presence itself, was not a stumbling block in Gandhi's conception of swaraj; rather, it was the inability of Indians to create a modern society.[189]
1917–1919: Satyagraha, Montagu-Chelmsford reforms, Jallianwalla Bagh[edit]
Gandhi at the time of the Kheda Satyagraha, 1918
Edwin Montagu, left, the Secretary of State for India, whose report, led to the Government of India Act 1919, also known as the Montford Reforms or the Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms
Headlines about the Rowlatt Bills (1919) from a nationalist newspaper in India. Although all non-official Indians on the Legislative Council voted against the Rowlatt Bills, the government was able to force their passage by using its majority.[191]
The Jallianwalla Bagh in 1919, a few months after the massacre which had occurred on 13 April
Gandhi made his political debut in India in 1917 in Champaran district in Bihar, near the Nepal border, where he was invited by a group of disgruntled tenant farmers who, for many years, had been forced into planting indigo (for dyes) on a portion of their land and then selling it at below-market prices to the British planters who had leased them the land.[192] Upon his arrival in the district, Gandhi was joined by other agitators, including a young Congress leader, Rajendra Prasad, from Bihar, who would become a loyal supporter of Gandhi and go on to play a prominent role in the Indian independence movement. When Gandhi was ordered to leave by the local British authorities, he refused on moral grounds, setting up his refusal as a form of individual Satyagraha. Soon, under pressure from the Viceroy in Delhi who was anxious to maintain domestic peace during wartime, the provincial government rescinded Gandhi's expulsion order, and later agreed to an official enquiry into the case. Although, the British planters eventually gave in, they were not won over to the farmers' cause, and thereby did not produce the optimal outcome of a Satyagraha that Gandhi had hoped for; similarly, the farmers themselves, although pleased at the resolution, responded less than enthusiastically to the concurrent projects of rural empowerment and education that Gandhi had inaugurated in keeping with his ideal of swaraj. The following year Gandhi launched two more Satyagrahas – both in his native Gujarat – one in the rural Kaira district where land-owning farmers were protesting increased land-revenue and the other in the city of Ahmedabad, where workers in an Indian-owned textile mill were distressed about their low wages. The satyagraha in Ahmedabad took the form of Gandhi fasting and supporting the workers in a strike, which eventually led to a settlement. In Kaira, in contrast, although the farmers' cause received publicity from Gandhi's presence, the satyagraha itself, which consisted of the farmers' collective decision to withhold payment, was not immediately successful, as the British authorities refused to back down. The agitation in Kaira gained for Gandhi another lifelong lieutenant in Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, who had organised the farmers, and who too would go on to play a leadership role in the Indian independence movement.[193] Champaran, Kaira, and Ahmedabad were important milestones in the history of Gandhi's new methods of social protest in India.
In 1916, in the face of new strength demonstrated by the nationalists with the signing of the Lucknow Pact and the founding of the Home Rule leagues, and the realisation, after the disaster in the Mesopotamian campaign, that the war would likely last longer, the new Viceroy, Lord Chelmsford, cautioned that the Government of India needed to be more responsive to Indian opinion.[194] Towards the end of the year, after discussions with the government in London, he suggested that the British demonstrate their good faith – in light of the Indian war role – through a number of public actions, including awards of titles and honours to princes, granting of commissions in the army to Indians, and removal of the much-reviled cotton excise duty, but, most importantly, an announcement of Britain's future plans for India and an indication of some concrete steps. After more discussion, in August 1917, the new Liberal Secretary of State for India, Edwin Montagu, announced the British aim of "increasing association of Indians in every branch of the administration, and the gradual development of self-governing institutions, with a view to the progressive realisation of responsible government in India as an integral part of the British Empire."[194] Although the plan envisioned limited self-government at first only in the provinces – with India emphatically within the British Empire – it represented the first British proposal for any form of representative government in a non-white colony.
Earlier, at the onset of World War I, the reassignment of most of the British army in India to Europe and Mesopotamia, had led the previous Viceroy, Lord Harding, to worry about the "risks involved in denuding India of troops."[185] Revolutionary violence had already been a concern in British India; consequently, in 1915, to strengthen its powers during what it saw was a time of increased vulnerability, the Government of India passed the Defence of India Act, which allowed it to intern politically dangerous dissidents without due process, and added to the power it already had – under the 1910 Press Act – both to imprison journalists without trial and to censor the press.[195] It was under the Defence of India act that the Ali brothers were imprisoned in 1916, and Annie Besant, a European woman, and ordinarily more problematic to imprison, in 1917.[195] Now, as constitutional reform began to be discussed in earnest, the British began to consider how new moderate Indians could be brought into the fold of constitutional politics and, simultaneously, how the hand of established constitutionalists could be strengthened. However, since the Government of India wanted to ensure against any sabotage of the reform process by extremists, and since its reform plan was devised during a time when extremist violence had ebbed as a result of increased governmental control, it also began to consider how some of its wartime powers could be extended into peacetime.[195]
Consequently, in 1917, even as Edwin Montagu, announced the new constitutional reforms, a committee chaired by a British judge, Mr. S. A. T. Rowlatt, was tasked with investigating "revolutionary conspiracies", with the unstated goal of extending the government's wartime powers.[194] The Rowlatt committee presented its report in July 1918 and identified three regions of conspiratorial insurgency: Bengal, the Bombay presidency, and the Punjab.[194] To combat subversive acts in these regions, the committee recommended that the government use emergency powers akin to its wartime authority, which included the ability to try cases of sedition by a panel of three judges and without juries, exaction of securities from suspects, governmental overseeing of residences of suspects,[194] and the power for provincial governments to arrest and detain suspects in short-term detention facilities and without trial.[191]
With the end of World War I, there was also a change in the economic climate. By the end of 1919, 1.5 million Indians had served in the armed services in either combatant or non-combatant roles, and India had provided £146 million in revenue for the war.[196] The increased taxes coupled with disruptions in both domestic and international trade had the effect of approximately doubling the index of overall prices in India between 1914 and 1920.[196] Returning war veterans, especially in the Punjab, created a growing unemployment crisis,[197] and post-war inflation led to food riots in Bombay, Madras, and Bengal provinces,[197] a situation that was made only worse by the failure of the 1918–19 monsoon and by profiteering and speculation.[196] The global influenza epidemic and the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 added to the general jitters; the former among the population already experiencing economic woes,[197] and the latter among government officials, fearing a similar revolution in India.[198]
To combat what it saw as a coming crisis, the government now drafted the Rowlatt committee's recommendations into two Rowlatt Bills.[191] Although the bills were authorised for legislative consideration by Edwin Montagu, they were done so unwillingly, with the accompanying declaration, "I loathe the suggestion at first sight of preserving the Defence of India Act in peacetime to such an extent as Rowlatt and his friends think necessary."[194] In the ensuing discussion and vote in the Imperial Legislative Council, all Indian members voiced opposition to the bills. The Government of India was, nevertheless, able to use of its "official majority" to ensure passage of the bills early in 1919.[194] However, what it passed, in deference to the Indian opposition, was a lesser version of the first bill, which now allowed extrajudicial powers, but for a period of exactly three years and for the prosecution solely of "anarchical and revolutionary movements", dropping entirely the second bill involving modification the Indian Penal Code.[194] Even so, when it was passed, the new Rowlatt Act aroused widespread indignation throughout India, and brought Gandhi to the forefront of the nationalist movement.[191]
Meanwhile, Montagu and Chelmsford themselves finally presented their report in July 1918 after a long fact-finding trip through India the previous winter.[199] After more discussion by the government and parliament in Britain, and another tour by the Franchise and Functions Committee for the purpose of identifying who among the Indian population could vote in future elections, the Government of India Act 1919 (also known as the Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms) was passed in December 1919.[199] The new Act enlarged both the provincial and Imperial legislative councils and repealed the Government of India's recourse to the "official majority" in unfavourable votes.[199] Although departments like defence, foreign affairs, criminal law, communications, and income-tax were retained by the Viceroy and the central government in New Delhi, other departments like public health, education, land-revenue, local self-government were transferred to the provinces.[199] The provinces themselves were now to be administered under a new dyarchical system, whereby some areas like education, agriculture, infrastructure development, and local self-government became the preserve of Indian ministers and legislatures, and ultimately the Indian electorates, while others like irrigation, land-revenue, police, prisons, and control of media remained within the purview of the British governor and his executive council.[199] The new Act also made it easier for Indians to be admitted into the civil service and the army officer corps.
A greater number of Indians were now enfranchised, although, for voting at the national level, they constituted only 10% of the total adult male population, many of whom were still illiterate.[199] In the provincial legislatures, the British continued to exercise some control by setting aside seats for special interests they considered cooperative or useful. In particular, rural candidates, generally sympathetic to British rule and less confrontational, were assigned more seats than their urban counterparts.[199] Seats were also reserved for non-Brahmins, landowners, businessmen, and college graduates. The principal of "communal representation", an integral part of the Minto-Morley Reforms, and more recently of the Congress-Muslim League Lucknow Pact, was reaffirmed, with seats being reserved for Muslims, Sikhs, Indian Christians, Anglo-Indians, and domiciled Europeans, in both provincial and Imperial legislative councils.[199] The Montagu-Chelmsford reforms offered Indians the most significant opportunity yet for exercising legislative power, especially at the provincial level; however, that opportunity was also restricted by the still limited number of eligible voters, by the small budgets available to provincial legislatures, and by the presence of rural and special interest seats that were seen as instruments of British control.[199] Its scope was unsatisfactory to the Indian political leadership, famously expressed by Annie Beasant as something "unworthy of England to offer and India to accept".[200][citation not found]
The Jallianwala Bagh massacre or "Amritsar massacre", took place in the Jallianwala Bagh public garden in the predominantly Sikh northern city of Amritsar. After days of unrest Brigadier-General Reginald E.H. Dyer forbade public meetings and on Sunday 13 April 1919 fifty British Indian Army soldiers commanded by Dyer began shooting at an unarmed gathering of thousands of men, women, and children without warning. Casualty estimates vary widely, with the Government of India reporting 379 dead, with 1,100 wounded.[201] The Indian National Congress estimated three times the number of dead. Dyer was removed from duty but he became a celebrated hero in Britain among people with connections to the Raj.[202] Historians consider the episode was a decisive step towards the end of British rule in India.[203]
1920s: Non-cooperation, Khilafat, Simon Commission, Jinnah's fourteen points[edit]
Mahatma Gandhi with Dr. Annie Besant en route to a meeting in Madras in September 1921. Earlier, in Madurai, on 21 September 1921, Gandhi had adopted the loin-cloth for the first time as a symbol of his identification with India's poor.
An early 1920s poster advertising a Congress non-co-operation "Public Meeting" and a "Bonfire of Foreign Clothes" in Bombay, and expressing support for the "Karachi Khilafat Conference."
Hindus and Muslims, displaying the flags of both the Indian National Congress and the Muslim League, collecting clothes to be later burnt as a part of the non-co-operation movement initiated by Gandhi.
Photograph of the staff and students of the National College, Lahore, founded in 1921 by Lala Lajpat Rai for students preparing for the non-co-operation movement. Standing, fourth from the right, is future revolutionary Bhagat Singh.
In 1920, after the British government refused to back down, Gandhi began his campaign of non-cooperation, prompting many Indians to return British awards and honours, to resign from civil service, and to again boycott British goods. In addition, Gandhi reorganised the Congress, transforming it into a mass movement and opening its membership to even the poorest Indians. Although Gandhi halted the non-cooperation movement in 1922 after the violent incident at Chauri Chaura, the movement revived again, in the mid-1920s.
The visit, in 1928, of the British Simon Commission, charged with instituting constitutional reform in India, resulted in widespread protests throughout the country.[204] Earlier, in 1925, non-violent protests of the Congress had resumed too, this time in Gujarat, and led by Patel, who organised farmers to refuse payment of increased land taxes; the success of this protest, the Bardoli Satyagraha, brought Gandhi back into the fold of active politics.[204]
1929–1937: Round Table conferences, Government of India Act[edit]
Allama Muhammad Iqbal, fifth from left, arriving at the 1930 session of the All India Muslim League, where he delivered his presidential address outlining his plan for a homeland for the Muslims of British India.
British PM Ramsay MacDonald to the right of Gandhi at the 2nd Round Table Conference. Foreground, fourth from left, is B. R. Ambedkar representing the "Depressed Classes."
A second-day cancellation of the series "Inauguration of New Delhi," 27 February 1931, commemorating the new city designed by Sir Edwin Lutyens and Sir Herbert Baker.
The Indian general election, 1934 was the first general election that the INC participated in. The party won a majority of the general seats.
A first-day cover issued on 1 April 1937 commemorating the separation of Burma from the British Indian Empire.
At its annual session in Lahore, the Indian National Congress, under the presidency of Jawaharlal Nehru, issued a demand for Purna Swaraj (Hindustani language: "complete independence"), or Purna Swarajya. The declaration was drafted by the Congress Working Committee, which included Gandhi, Nehru, Patel, and Chakravarthi Rajagopalachari. Gandhi subsequently led an expanded movement of civil disobedience, culminating in 1930 with the Salt Satyagraha, in which thousands of Indians defied the tax on salt, by marching to the sea and making their own salt by evaporating seawater. Although, many, including Gandhi, were arrested, the British government eventually gave in, and in 1931 Gandhi travelled to London to negotiate new reform at the Round Table Conferences.
In local terms, British control rested on the Indian Civil Service, but it faced growing difficulties. Fewer and fewer young men in Britain were interested in joining, and the continuing distrust of Indians resulted in a declining base in terms of quality and quantity. By 1945 Indians were numerically dominant in the ICS and at issue was loyal divided between the Empire and independence.[205] The finances of the Raj depended on land taxes, and these became problematic in the 1930s. Epstein argues that after 1919 it became harder and harder to collect the land revenue. The Raj's suppression of civil disobedience after 1934 temporarily increased the power of the revenue agents but after 1937 they were forced by the new Congress-controlled provincial governments to hand back confiscated land. Again the outbreak of war strengthened them, in the face of the Quit India movement the revenue collectors had to rely on military force and by 1946–47 direct British control was rapidly disappearing in much of the countryside.[206]
In 1935, after the Round Table Conferences, Parliament passed the Government of India Act 1935, which authorised the establishment of independent legislative assemblies in all provinces of British India, the creation of a central government incorporating both the British provinces and the princely states, and the protection of Muslim minorities. The future Constitution of independent India was based on this act.[207] However, it divided the electorate into 19 religious and social categories, e.g., Muslims, Sikhs, Indian Christians, Depressed Classes, Landholders, Commerce and Industry, Europeans, Anglo-Indians, etc., each of which was given separate representation in the Provincial Legislative Assemblies. A voter could cast a vote only for candidates in his own category.
The 1935 Act provided for more autonomy for Indian provinces, with the goal of cooling off nationalist sentiment. The act provided for a national parliament and an executive branch under the purview of the British government, but the rulers of the princely states managed to block its implementation. These states remained under the full control of their hereditary rulers, with no popular government. To prepare for elections Congress built up its grass roots membership from 473,000 in 1935 to 4.5 million in 1939.[208]
In the 1937 elections Congress won victories in seven of the eleven provinces of British India.[209] Congress governments, with wide powers, were formed in these provinces. The widespread voter support for the Indian National Congress surprised Raj officials, who previously had seen the Congress as a small elitist body.[210]
1938–1941: World War II, Muslim League's Lahore Resolution[edit]
Mahatma Gandhi and Rajendra Prasad (left) on their way to meet the viceroy Lord Linlithgow (13 October 1939) after the outbreak of World War II.
A. K. Fazlul Huq, known as the Sher-e-Bangla or Tiger of Bengal, was the first elected Premier of Bengal, leader of the K. P. P. and an important ally of the All India Muslim League
Chaudhari Khaliquzzaman (left) seconding the 1940 Lahore Resolution of the Muslim League with Jinnah (right) presiding, and Liaquat Ali Khan (centre)
Newly arrived Indian troops on the quayside in Singapore, November 1941
Indian Army Sikh troops in action during Operation Crusader in Western Desert Campaign in North Africa in November/December 1941.
While the Muslim League was a small elite group in 1927 with only 1300 members, it grew rapidly once it became an organisation that reached out to the masses, reaching 500,000 members in Bengal in 1944, 200,000 in Punjab, and hundreds of thousands elsewhere.[211] Jinnah now was well positioned to negotiate with the British from a position of power.[212] With the outbreak of World War II in 1939, the viceroy, Lord Linlithgow, declared war on India's behalf without consulting Indian leaders, leading the Congress provincial ministries to resign in protest. The Muslim League, in contrast, supported Britain in the war effort and maintained its control of the government in three major provinces, Bengal, Sind and the Punjab.[213]
Jinnah repeatedly warned that Muslims would be unfairly treated in an independent India dominated by the Congress. On 24 March 1940 in Lahore, the League passed the "Lahore Resolution", demanding that, "the areas in which the Muslims are numerically in majority as in the North-Western and Eastern zones of India should be grouped to constitute independent states in which the constituent units shall be autonomous and sovereign." Although there were other important national Muslim politicians such as Congress leader Ab'ul Kalam Azad, and influential regional Muslim politicians such as A. K. Fazlul Huq of the leftist Krishak Praja Party in Bengal, Sikander Hyat Khan of the landlord-dominated Punjab Unionist Party, and Abd al-Ghaffar Khan of the pro-Congress Khudai Khidmatgar (popularly, "red shirts") in the North West Frontier Province, the British, over the next six years, were to increasingly see the League as the main representative of Muslim India.[214]
The Congress was secular and strongly opposed having any religious state.[211] It insisted there was a natural unity to India, and repeatedly blamed the British for "divide and rule" tactics based on prompting Muslims to think of themselves as alien from Hindus.[citation needed] Jinnah rejected the notion of a united India, and emphasised that religious communities were more basic than an artificial nationalism. He proclaimed the Two-Nation Theory,[215] stating at Lahore on 23 March 1940:
[Islam and Hinduism] are not religions in the strict sense of the word, but are, in fact, different and distinct social orders and it is a dream that the Hindus and Muslims can ever evolve a common nationality ... The Hindu and Muslim belong to two different religions, philosophies, social customs and literature [sic]. They neither intermarry nor interdine together and indeed they belong to two different civilizations which are based mainly on conflicting ideas and conceptions. Their aspects on life and of life are different ... To yoke together two such nations under a single state, one as a numerical minority and the other as a majority must lead to growing discontent and final destruction of any fabric that may be so built up for the government of such a state.[216]
While the regular Indian army in 1939 included about 220,000 native troops, it expanded tenfold during the war[217] and small naval and air force units were created. Over two million Indians volunteered for military service in the British Army. They played a major role in numerous campaigns, especially in the Middle East and North Africa. Casualties were moderate (in terms of the world war), with 24,000 killed; 64,000 wounded; 12,000 missing (probably dead), and 60,000 captured at Singapore in 1942.[218][219]
London paid most of the cost of the Indian Army, which had the effect of erasing India's national debt. It ended the war with a surplus of £1,300 million. In addition, heavy British spending on munitions produced in India (such as uniforms, rifles, machine-guns, field artillery, and ammunition) led to a rapid expansion of industrial output, such as textiles (up 16%), steel (up 18%), chemicals (up 30%). Small warships were built, and an aircraft factory opened in Bangalore. The railway system, with 700,000 employees, was taxed to the limit as demand for transportation soared.[220]
1942–1945: Cripps mission, Quit India Resolution, INA[edit]
Subhas Chandra Bose (second from left) with Heinrich Himmler (right), 1942.
The series of stamps, "Victory," issued by the Government of India to commemorate the allied victory in World War II.
The British government sent the Cripps' mission in 1942 to secure Indian nationalists' co-operation in the war effort in exchange for a promise of independence as soon as the war ended. Top officials in Britain, most notably Prime Minister Winston Churchill, did not support the Cripps Mission and negotiations with the Congress soon broke down.[221]
Congress launched the "Quit India" movement in July 1942 demanding the immediate withdrawal of the British from India or face nationwide civil disobedience. On 8 August the Raj arrested all national, provincial and local Congress leaders, holding tens of thousands of them until 1945. The country erupted in violent demonstrations led by students and later by peasant political groups, especially in Eastern United Provinces, Bihar, and western Bengal. The large wartime British Army presence crushed the movement in a little more than six weeks;[222] nonetheless, a portion of the movement formed for a time an underground provisional government on the border with Nepal.[222] In other parts of India, the movement was less spontaneous and the protest less intensive, however it lasted sporadically into the summer of 1943. It did not slow down the British war effort or recruiting for the army.[223]
Earlier, Subhas Chandra Bose, who had been a leader of the younger, radical, wing of the Indian National Congress in the late 1920s and 1930s, had risen to become Congress President from 1938 to 1939.[224] However, he was ousted from the Congress in 1939 following differences with the high command,[225] and subsequently placed under house arrest by the British before escaping from India in early 1941.[226] He turned to Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan for help in gaining India's independence by force.[227] With Japanese support, he organised the Indian National Army, composed largely of Indian soldiers of the British Indian army who had been captured by the Japanese in the Battle of Singapore. As the war turned against them, the Japanese came to support a number of puppet and provisional governments in the captured regions, including those in Burma, the Philippines and Vietnam, and in addition, the Provisional Government of Azad Hind, presided by Bose.[227]
Bose's effort, however, was short lived. In mid-1944 the British army first halted and then reversed the Japanese U-Go offensive, beginning the successful part of the Burma Campaign. Bose's Indian National Army largely disintegrated during the subsequent fighting in Burma, with its remaining elements surrendering with the recapture of Singapore in September 1945. Bose died in August from third degree burns received after attempting to escape in an overloaded Japanese plane which crashed in Taiwan,[228] which many Indians believe did not happen.[229][230][231] Although Bose was unsuccessful, he roused patriotic feelings in India.[232]
1946: Elections, Cabinet mission, Direct Action Day[edit]
See also: Interim Government of India
Members of the 1946 Cabinet Mission to India meeting Muhammad Ali Jinnah. Far left is Lord Pethick Lawrence; far right is Sir Stafford Cripps.
In January 1946, a number of mutinies broke out in the armed services, starting with that of RAF servicemen frustrated with their slow repatriation to Britain.[233] The mutinies came to a head with mutiny of the Royal Indian Navy in Bombay in February 1946, followed by others in Calcutta, Madras, and Karachi. Although the mutinies were rapidly suppressed, they had the effect of spurring the new Labour government in Britain to action, and leading to the Cabinet Mission to India led by the Secretary of State for India, Lord Pethick Lawrence, and including Sir Stafford Cripps, who had visited four years before.[233]
Also in early 1946, new elections were called in India. Earlier, at the end of the war in 1945, the colonial government had announced the public trial of three senior officers of Bose's defeated Indian National Army who stood accused of treason. Now as the trials began, the Congress leadership, although ambivalent towards the INA, chose to defend the accused officers.[234] The subsequent convictions of the officers, the public outcry against the convictions, and the eventual remission of the sentences, created positive propaganda for the Congress, which only helped in the party's subsequent electoral victories in eight of the eleven provinces.[235] The negotiations between the Congress and the Muslim League, however, stumbled over the issue of the partition. Jinnah proclaimed 16 August 1946, Direct Action Day, with the stated goal of highlighting, peacefully, the demand for a Muslim homeland in British India. The following day Hindu-Muslim riots broke out in Calcutta and quickly spread throughout British India. Although the Government of India and the Congress were both shaken by the course of events, in September, a Congress-led interim government was installed, with Jawaharlal Nehru as united India's prime minister.[236]
1947: Planning for partition[edit]
Percentage of Hindus by district. Map of British Indian Empire, 1909.
Percentage of Muslims by district. Map of British Indian Empire, 1909.
Later that year, the Labour government in Britain, its exchequer exhausted by the recently concluded World War II, and conscious that it had neither the mandate at home, the international support, nor the reliability of native forces for continuing to control an increasingly restless British India,[237]
By the end of 1945, he and the Commander-in-Chief of India, General Auckinleck were advising that there was a real threat in 1946 of large-scale anti-British disorder amounting to even a well-organised rising aiming to expel the British by paralysing the administration.[213][238]
...it was clear to Attlee that everything depended on the spirit and reliability of the Indian Army:
"Provided that they do their duty, armed insurrection in India would not be an insoluble problem.[213] If, however, the Indian Army was to go the other way, the picture would be very different ...
Thus, Wavell concluded, if the army and the police "failed" Britain would be forced to go. In theory, it might be possible to revive and reinvigorate the services, and rule for another fifteen to twenty years, but:
It is a fallacy to suppose that the solution lies in trying to maintain status quo. We have no longer the resources, nor the necessary prestige or confidence in ourselves.[239] decided to end British rule of India, and in early 1947 Britain announced its intention of transferring power no later than June 1948.[213]
As independence approached, the violence between Hindus and Muslims in the provinces of Punjab and Bengal continued unabated. With the British army unprepared for the potential for increased violence, the new viceroy, Louis Mountbatten, advanced the date for the transfer of power, allowing less than six months for a mutually agreed plan for independence.[238] In June 1947, the nationalist leaders, including Sardar Patel, Nehru and Abul Kalam Azad on behalf of the Congress, Jinnah representing the Muslim League, B. R. Ambedkar representing the Untouchable community, and Master Tara Singh representing the Sikhs, agreed to a partition of the country along religious lines in stark opposition to Gandhi's views.[213] The predominantly Hindu and Sikh areas were assigned to the new nation of India and predominantly Muslim areas to the new nation of Pakistan; the plan included a partition of the Muslim-majority provinces of Punjab and Bengal.[240]
1947: Violence, partition, independence[edit]
Main article: Partition of India § Geographic partition, 1947
On 15 August 1947, the new Dominion of Pakistan (later Islamic Republic of Pakistan), with Muhammad Ali Jinnah as the Governor-General; and the Union of India, (later Republic of India) with Jawaharlal Nehru as the prime minister, and the viceroy, Louis Mountbatten, staying on as its first Governor General came into being; with official ceremonies taking place in Karachi on 14 August and New Delhi on 15 August. This was done so that Mountbatten could attend both ceremonies.[241]
The great majority of Indians remained in place with independence, but in border areas millions of people (Muslim, Sikh, and Hindu) relocated across the newly drawn borders. In Punjab, where the new border lines divided the Sikh regions in half, there was much bloodshed; in Bengal and Bihar, where Gandhi's presence assuaged communal tempers, the violence was more limited. In all, somewhere between 250,000 and 500,000 people on both sides of the new borders, among both the refugee and resident populations of the three faiths, died in the violence.[242] Other estimates of the number of deaths are as high as 1,500,000.[243]
Ideological impact[edit]
At independence and after the independence of India, India has maintained such central British institutions as parliamentary government, one-person, one-vote and the rule of law through nonpartisan courts.[130] It retained as well the institutional arrangements of the Raj such as district administration, universities and stock exchanges. One major change was the rejection of its former separate princely states. Metcalf shows that over the course of two centuries, British intellectuals and Indian specialists made the highest priority bringing peace, unity and good government to India.[244] They offered many competing methods to reach the goal. For example, Cornwallis recommended turning Bengali Zamindar into the sort of English landlords that controlled local affairs in England.[244] Munro proposed to deal directly with the peasants. Sir William Jones and the Orientalists promoted Sanskrit, while Macaulay promoted the English language.[245] Zinkin argues that in the long-run, what matters most about the legacy of the Raj is the British political ideologies which the Indians took over after 1947, especially the belief in unity, democracy, the rule of law and a certain equality beyond caste and creed.[244] Zinkin sees this not just in the Congress party but also among Hindu Nationalists in the Bharatiya Janata Party, which specifically emphasises Hindu traditions.[246][247]

See also[edit]
British Empire portal
India portal
List of Governors-General of India
Company rule in India
Legislatures of British India
Indian independence movement
Western imperialism in Asia
Interim Government of India
Colonial India
Glossary of the British Raj (Hindi-Urdu words)
Direct colonial rule
Notes[edit]
Jump up ^ The only other emperor during this period, Edward VIII, 1938, did not issue any Indian currency under his name.
Jump up ^ in millions
References[edit]
^ Jump up to: a b Interpretation Act 1889 (52 & 53 Vict. c. 63), s. 18.
Jump up ^ Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd edition, 1989: from Skr. rāj: to reign, rule; cognate with L. rēx, rēg-is, OIr. rī, rīg king (see 'rich').
Jump up ^ Oxford English Dictionary, 3rd edition (June 2008), on-line edition (September 2011): "spec. In full British Raj. Direct rule in India by the British (1858–1947); this period of dominion."
Jump up ^ Stein, Burton (2010), A History of India, John Wiley & Sons, p. 107, ISBN 978-1-4443-2351-1 Quote: "When the formal rule of the Company was replaced by the direct rule of the British Crown in 1858, ...."
Jump up ^ Lowe, Lisa (2015), The Intimacies of Four Continents, Duke University Press, p. 71, ISBN 978-0-8223-7564-7 Quote: "... Company rule in India lasted effectively from the Battle of Plassey in 1757 until 1858, when following the 1857 Indian Rebellion, the British Crown assumed direct colonial rule of India in the new British Raj."
Jump up ^ Wright, Edmund (2015), A Dictionary of World History, Oxford University Press, p. 537, ISBN 978-0-19-968569-1 Quote:"More than 500 Indian kingdoms and principalities ... existed during the "British Raj" period (1858–1947)"
Jump up ^ Fair, C. Christine (2014), Fighting to the End: The Pakistan Army's Way of War, Oxford University Press, p. 61, ISBN 978-0-19-989270-9 Quote: "... by 1909 the Government of India, reflecting on 50 years of Crown rule after the rebellion, could boast that ..."
Jump up ^ Glanville, Luke (2013), Sovereignty and the Responsibility to Protect: A New History, University of Chicago Press, p. 120, ISBN 978-0-226-07708-6 Quote:"Mill, who was himself employed by the British East India company from the age of seventeen until the British government assumed direct rule over India in 1858."
Jump up ^ Morefield, Jeanne (2014), Empires Without Imperialism: Anglo-American Decline and the Politics of Deflection, Oxford University Press, p. 189, ISBN 978-0-19-938725-0 Quote: "The 'Indian Empire' was a name given to those areas in the Indian subcontinent both directly and indirectly ruled by Britain after the rebellion; the British issued passports after 1876 under that name."
Jump up ^ Bowen, H. V.; Mancke, Elizabeth; Reid, John G. (2012), Britain's Oceanic Empire: Atlantic and Indian Ocean Worlds, C.1550–1850, Cambridge University Press, p. 106, ISBN 978-1-107-02014-6 Quote: "British India, meanwhile, was itself the powerful 'metropolis' of its own colonial empire, 'the Indian empire'."
Jump up ^ Mansergh, Nicholas, Constitutional relations between Britain and India, London: His Majesty's Stationery Office, p. xxx, retrieved 19 September 2013 Quote: India Executive Council: Sir Arcot Ramasamy Mudaliar, Sir Firoz Khan Noon and Sir V. T. Krishnamachari served as India's delegates to the London Commonwealth Meeting, April 1945, and the U.N. San Francisco Conference on International Organisation, April–June 1945."
Jump up ^ Kaul, Chandrika. "From Empire to Independence: The British Raj in India 1858–1947". Retrieved 3 March 2011.
Jump up ^ "The Geography of British India, Political & Physical (1882)". Archive.org. UK Archives. Retrieved 2 August 2014.
Jump up ^ Baten, Jörg (2016). A History of the Global Economy. From 1500 to the Present. Cambridge University Press. p. 247. ISBN 9781107507180.
Jump up ^ Marshall (2001), p. 384
Jump up ^ Subodh Kapoor (January 2002). The Indian encyclopaedia: biographical, historical, religious ..., Volume 6. Cosmo Publications. p. 1599. ISBN 81-7755-257-0.
Jump up ^ Codrington, 1926, Chapter X:Transition to British administration
Jump up ^ [1] Archived 24 November 2015 at the Wayback Machine. Encyclopædia Britannica. 2008.
Jump up ^ "Bhutan." Encyclopædia Britannica. 2008.
Jump up ^ "Sikkim." Encyclopædia Britannica. 2007. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 5 August 2007 <http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-46212>.
Jump up ^ "India". World Digital Library. Retrieved 24 January 2013.
Jump up ^ 1. Imperial Gazetteer of India, volume IV, published under the authority of the Secretary of State for India-in-Council, 1909, Oxford University Press. p. 5. Quote: "The history of British India falls, as observed by Sir C. P. Ilbert in his Government of India, into three periods. From the beginning of the seventeenth century to the middle of the eighteenth century the East India Company is a trading corporation, existing on the sufferance of the native powers and in rivalry with the merchant companies of Holland and France. During the next century, the Company acquires and consolidates its dominion, shares its sovereignty in increasing proportions with the Crown, and gradually loses its mercantile privileges and functions. After the mutiny of 1857 the remaining powers of the Company are transferred to the Crown, and then follows an era of peace in which India awakens to new life and progress." 2. The Statutes: From the Twentieth Year of King Henry the Third to the ... by Robert Harry Drayton, Statutes of the Realm – Law – 1770 p. 211 (3) "Save as otherwise expressly provided in this Act, the law of British India and of the several parts thereof existing immediately before the appointed ..." 3. Edney, Matthew H. (1997). Mapping an Empire: The Geographical Construction of British India, 1765–1843. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-18488-3. 4. Hawes, Christopher J. (1996). Poor Relations: The Making of a Eurasian Community in British India, 1773–1833. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-7007-0425-5.
Jump up ^ Imperial Gazetteer of India vol. II 1908, pp. 463, 470 Quote1: "Before passing on to the political history of British India, which properly begins with the Anglo-French Wars in the Carnatic, ... (p. 463)" Quote2: "The political history of the British in India begins in the eighteenth century with the French Wars in the Carnatic. (p. 471)"
Jump up ^ British Indian Passport of Muhammad Ali Jinnah Archived 10 February 2013 at the Wayback Machine.
^ Jump up to: a b Imperial Gazetteer of India vol. IV 1907, p. 60
^ Jump up to: a b Imperial Gazetteer of India vol. IV 1907, p. 46
Jump up ^ Imperial Gazetteer of India vol. IV 1907, p. 56
^ Jump up to: a b Markovits, Claude (2004). A history of modern India, 1480–1950. Anthem Press. pp. 386–409. ISBN 9781843310044.
Jump up ^ "Provinces of British India". Worldstatesmen.org. Worldstatesmen. Retrieved 2 August 2014.
Jump up ^ Robin J. Moore, "Imperial India, 1858–1914", pp. 422–46
Jump up ^ Moore, "Imperial India, 1858–1914", p. 424
Jump up ^ Brown 1994, p. 96
^ Jump up to: a b c Moore, "Imperial India, 1858–1914", p. 426
Jump up ^ Moore 2001a, p. 426
Jump up ^ Metcalf & Metcalf 2006, p. 104
Jump up ^ Peers 2006, p. 76
Jump up ^ Bayly 1990, p. 195
Jump up ^ Peers 2006, p. 72, Bayly 1990, p. 72
^ Jump up to: a b p. 103–05, "India – Government and Constitution," The Statesman's Year-Book 1947, Steinberg, S.H., Macmillan, New York
Jump up ^ pp. 133–34, "India – Currency, Weights and Measures," The Statesman's Year-Book 1947, Steinberg, S.H., Macmillan, New York
Jump up ^ pp. 106–07, "India – Government and Constitution," The Statesman's Year-Book 1947, Steinberg, S.H., Macmillan, New York
Jump up ^ p. 106–07, "India – Government and Constitution," The Statesman's Year-Book 1947, Steinberg, S.H., Macmillan, New York
Jump up ^ pp. 104–05, "India – Government and Constitution," The Statesman's Year-Book 1947, Steinberg, S.H., Macmillan, New York
^ Jump up to: a b c p. 108, "India – Government and Constitution," The Statesman's Year-Book 1947, Steinberg, S.H., Macmillan, New York
Jump up ^ Michael Maclagan (1963). "Clemency" Canning: Charles John, 1st Earl Canning, Governor-General and Viceroy of India, 1856–1862. Macmillan. p. 212. Retrieved 21 February 2012.
Jump up ^ William Ford (1887). John Laird Mair Lawrence, a viceroy of India, by William St. Clair. pp. 186–253.
^ Jump up to: a b Sir William Wilson Hunter (1876). A life of the Earl of Mayo, fourth viceroy of India. pp. 181–310.
Jump up ^ Sarvepalli Gopal (1953). The viceroyalty of Lord Ripon, 1880–1884. Oxford University Press. Retrieved 21 February 2012.
Jump up ^ Briton Martin, Jr. "The Viceroyalty of Lord Dufferin", History Today, (Dec 1960) 10#12 pp. 821–30, and (Jan 1961) 11#1 pp. 56–64
Jump up ^ Sir Alfred Comyn Lyall (1905). The life of the Marquis of Dufferin and Ava. 2. pp. 72–207.
Jump up ^ Sir George Forrest (1894). The administration of the Marquis of Lansdowne as Viceroy and Governor-general of India, 1888–1894.
Jump up ^ Imperial Gazetteer of India vol. I 1908, p. 449
Jump up ^ Ernest Hullo, "India", in Catholic Encyclopedia (1910) vol. 7 online
Jump up ^ Michael Edwardes, High Noon of Empire: India under Curzon (1965)
Jump up ^ H. Caldwell Lipsett (1903). Lord Curzon in India: 1898–1903. R.A. Everett.
^ Jump up to: a b Manmath Nath Das (1964). India under Morley and Minto: politics behind revolution, repression and reforms. G. Allen and Unwin. Retrieved 21 February 2012.
^ Jump up to: a b Spear 1990, p. 147
Jump up ^ Spear 1990, pp. 145–46: "The army took on the form which survived till independence ... The Bengal army was completely recast ... The Brahmin element from Uttar Pradesh, the core of the original mutiny, was heavily reduced and its place taken by Gurkhas, Sikhs, and Punjabis."
Jump up ^ "European Madness and Gender in Nineteenth-century British India". Social History of Medicine. 9 (3): 357–82. 1996. doi:10.1093/shm/9.3.357.
Jump up ^ Robinson, Ronald Edward, & John Gallagher. 1968. Africa and the Victorians: The Climax of Imperialism. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 February 2009. Retrieved 15 February 2009.
^ Jump up to: a b Spear 1990, pp. 147–48
Jump up ^ Spear 1990, pp. 150–51
Jump up ^ Spear 1990, p. 150
Jump up ^ Spear 1990, p. 151
Jump up ^ http://www.csas.ed.ac.uk/mutiny/confpapers/Queen%27sProclamation.pdf
Jump up ^ Romaniuk, Anatole (2014). "Glimpses of Indian Historical Demography". Canadian Studies in Population. 40 (3–4): 248–51. doi:10.25336/p6hw3r.
Jump up ^ Parameswara Krishnan, Glimpses of Indian Historical Demography (Delhi: B.R. Publishing Corporation 2010) ISBN 978-8176466387
Jump up ^ Kingsley Davis, The Population of India and Pakistan (Princeton University Press, 1951).
Jump up ^ Kingsley Davis (19 April 1943). "The population of India". Far Eastern Survey. Institute of Pacific Relations. 12 (8): 76–79. doi:10.2307/3022159. JSTOR 3022159.
Jump up ^ Khan, J.H. (2004). "Population growth and demographic change in India". Asian Profile. 32 (5): 441–60.
Jump up ^ Klein, Ira (1990). "Population growth and mortality in British India: Part II: The demographic revolution". Indian Economic Social History Review. 27 (1): 33–63. doi:10.1177/001946469002700102.
Jump up ^ Klein, "Population growth and mortality in British India: Part II: The demographic revolution," p. 42
Jump up ^ Radhika Singha, "Colonial Law and Infrastructural Power: Reconstructing Community, Locating the Female Subject", Studies in History, (Feb 2003), 19#1 pp. 87–126 online
Jump up ^ Tazeen M. Murshid, "Law and Female Autonomy in Colonial India", Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bangladesh: Humanities, (June 2002), 47#1 pp. 25–42
Jump up ^ Karuna Mantena, "The Crisis of Liberal Imperialism," Histoire@Politique. Politique, culture, société (2010) #11 online p. 3
Jump up ^ Cain, Peter J. (2012). "Character, 'Ordered Liberty', and the Mission to Civilise: British Moral Justification of Empire, 1870–1914". Journal of Imperial & Commonwealth History. 40 (4): 557–78. doi:10.1080/03086534.2012.724239.
Jump up ^ Ellis, Catriona (2009). "Education for All: Reassessing the Historiography of Education in Colonial India". History Compass. 7 (2): 363–75. doi:10.1111/j.1478-0542.2008.00564.x.
Jump up ^ Suresh Chandra Ghosh, "Bentinck, Macaulay and the introduction of English education in India", History of Education, (March 1995) 24#1 pp. 17–24
Jump up ^ Spear, Percival (1938). "Bentinck and Education". Cambridge Historical Journal. Cambridge University Press. 6 (1): 78–101. JSTOR 3020849.
Jump up ^ Hayden Bellenoit, "Missionary Education, Religion and Knowledge in India, c.1880–1915," Modern Asian Studies 41#2 (2007): 369–94
Jump up ^ Moore, "Imperial India, 1858–1914", p. 431
Jump up ^ Zareer Masani, Indian Tales of the Raj (1988) p. 89
Jump up ^ Buchanan, Colin (22 October 2015). Historical Dictionary of Anglicanism. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. p. 117. ISBN 9781442250161.
^ Jump up to: a b Dalal, Roshen (18 April 2014). The Religions of India. Penguin Books Limited. p. 177. ISBN 9788184753967.
Jump up ^ Marriott, John (19 July 2013). The Other Empire: Metropolis, India and Progress in the Colonial Imagination. Manchester University Press. p. 107. ISBN 9781847795397.
^ Jump up to: a b Kanjamala, Augustine (21 August 2014). The Future of Christian Mission in India. Wipf and Stock Publishers. pp. 117–119. ISBN 9781620323151.
Jump up ^ Tovey, Phillip (30 August 2017). Anglican Baptismal Liturgies. Canterbury Press. p. 197. ISBN 9781786220202. The growth of the army in India also led to many army chaplains. After the change in the Charter in 1813, Anglican missionaries began to work across North India. The missionaries translated the Book of Common Prayer into various Indian languages. The first Anglican diocese was Calcutta in 1813, and bishops from India were at the first Lambeth conference. In 1930 the Church of India, Burma and Ceylon became an independent Province and created its own Book of Common Prayer, which was translated into several languages.
Jump up ^ The Indian Year Book. Bennett, Coleman & Company. 1940. p. 455. The three dioceses thus formed have been repeatedly subdivided, until in 1930 there were fourteen dioceses, the dates of their creation being as follows : Calcutta 1814; Madras 1835; Bombay 1837; Colombo 1845; Lahore 1877; Rangoon 1877; Travancore 1879; Chota Nagpur 1890; Lucknow 1893; Tinnevelly 1896; Nagpur 1903; Dornakal 1912; Assam 1915; Nasik 1929.
Jump up ^ Abraham, William J.; Kirby, James E. (24 September 2009). The Oxford Handbook of Methodist Studies. Oxford University Press. p. 93. ISBN 9780191607431.
^ Jump up to: a b Jr, Charles Yrigoyen (25 September 2014). T&T Clark Companion to Methodism. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 400. ISBN 9780567662460.
Jump up ^ Frykenberg, Robert Eric; Low, Alaine M. (2003). Christians and Missionaries in India: Cross-cultural Communication Since 1500, with Special Reference to Caste, Conversion, and Colonialism. William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. p. 127. ISBN 9780802839565.
Jump up ^ Lucyk, Kelsey; Loewenau, Aleksandra; Stahnisch, Frank W. (6 January 2017). The Proceedings of the 21st Annual History of Medicine Days Conference 2012. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. p. 237. ISBN 9781443869287.
^ Jump up to: a b c Crane, Ralph; Mohanram, Radhika (31 August 2013). Imperialism as Diaspora: Race, Sexuality, and History in Anglo-India. Oxford University Press. p. 86. ISBN 9781781385630.
Jump up ^ Carpenter, Joel; Glanzer, Perry L.; Lantinga, Nicholas S. (7 March 2014). Christian Higher Education. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. p. 103. ISBN 9781467440394.
Jump up ^ Kanjamala, Augustine (21 August 2014). The Future of Christian Mission in India. Wipf and Stock Publishers. p. 120. ISBN 9781630874858.
Jump up ^ Bhaṭṭācāryya, Haridāsa (1969). The Cultural Heritage of India. Ramakrishna Mission Institute of Culture. p. 60. ISBN 9780802849007.
Jump up ^ Mullin, Robert Bruce (12 November 2014). A Short World History of Christianity. Westminster John Knox Press. p. 231. ISBN 9781611645514.
Jump up ^ B. R. Tomlinson, The Economy of Modern India, 1860–1970 (1996) p. 5
Jump up ^ Baten, Jörg (2016). A History of the Global Economy. From 1500 to the Present. Cambridge University Press. p. 267. ISBN 978-1-107-50718-0.
Jump up ^ B. H. Tomlinson, "India and the British Empire, 1880–1935", Indian Economic and Social History Review, (Oct 1975), 12#4 pp. 337–80
Jump up ^ Maddison, Angus (2006). The World Economy Volumes 1–2. OECD Publishing. p. 638. doi:10.1787/456125276116. ISBN 92-64-02261-9.
Jump up ^ Peter Robb (November 1981). "British Rule and Indian "Improvement"". The Economic History Review. Wiley. 34 (4): 507–23. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0289.1981.tb02016.x. JSTOR 2595587.
Jump up ^ F. H. Brown and B. R. Tomlinson, "Tata, Jamshed Nasarwanji (1839–1904)", in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (2004) Retrieved 28 Jan 2012 doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/36421
Jump up ^ Vinay Bahl, "The Emergence of Large-Scale Steel Industry in India Under British Colonial Rule, 1880–1907", Indian Economic and Social History Review, (Oct 1994) 31#4 pp. 413–60
Jump up ^ Daniel R. Headrick, The tentacles of progress: technology transfer in the age of imperialism, 1850–1940, (1988) pp. 291–92
Jump up ^ Vinay Bahl, Making of the Indian Working Class: A Case of the Tata Iron & Steel Company, 1880–1946 (1995) ch 8
Jump up ^ Claude Markovits, Indian Business and Nationalist Politics 1931–39: The Indigenous Capitalist Class and the Rise of the Congress Party (Cambridge University Press, 2002) pp. 160–66
Jump up ^ I. D. Derbyshire (1987). "Economic Change and the Railways in North India, 1860–1914". Modern Asian Studies. Cambridge University Press. 21 (3): 521–45. doi:10.1017/s0026749x00009197. JSTOR 312641.
Jump up ^ R.R. Bhandari (2005). Indian Railways: Glorious 150 years. Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India. pp. 1–19. ISBN 81-230-1254-3.
Jump up ^ Thorner, Daniel (2005). "The pattern of railway development in India". In Kerr, Ian J. Railways in Modern India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. pp. 80–96. ISBN 0-19-567292-5.
Jump up ^ Hurd, John (2005). "Railways". In Kerr, Ian J. Railways in Modern India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. pp. 147–172–96. ISBN 0-19-567292-5.
^ Jump up to: a b "History of Indian Railways". Irfca.org. IRFCA. Retrieved 2 August 2014.
Jump up ^ Daniel R. Headrick, The tentacles of progress: technology transfer in the age of imperialism, 1850–1940, (1988) pp. 78–79
Jump up ^ Appletons' annual cyclopaedia and register of important events of the year: 1862. New York: D. Appleton & Company. 1863. p. 690.
^ Jump up to: a b Khan, Shaheed (18 April 2002). "The great Indian Railway bazaar". The Hindu.
Jump up ^ Headrick, The tentacles of progress: technology transfer in the age of imperialism, 1850–1940, (1988) pp. 81–82, 291.
Jump up ^ Wainwright, A. Marin (1994). Inheritance of Empire. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 48. ISBN 978-0-275-94733-0.
Jump up ^ R. O. Christensen, "The State and Indian Railway Performance, 1870–1920: Part I, Financial Efficiency and Standards of Service", Journal of Transport History (September 1981) 2#2, pp. 1–15.
Jump up ^ Neil Charlesworth, British Rule and the Indian Economy, 1800–1914 (1981) pp. 23–37
Jump up ^ Ian Stone, Canal Irrigation in British India: Perspectives on Technological Change in a Peasant Economy (2002) pp. 278–80
Jump up ^ for the historiography, see Rohan D’Souza, "Water in British India: the making of a ‘colonial hydrology’." History Compass (2006) 4#4 pp. 621–28. online
Jump up ^ David Gilmour (2007). The Ruling Caste: Imperial Lives in the Victorian Raj. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. p. 9. ISBN 9780374530808.
Jump up ^ (Stein 2001, p. 259)
Jump up ^ Laura Bear, Lines of the nation: Indian Railway workers, bureaucracy, and the intimate historical self (2007) – pp. 25–28
Jump up ^ Arudra Burra, "The Indian Civil Service and the nationalist movement: neutrality, politics and continuity", Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, (Nov 2010), 48#4 pp. 404–32
Jump up ^ B. R. Tomlinson, The economy of modern India, 1860–1970 (1996) p. 109
Jump up ^ Judith Brown, Modern India: The Origins of an Asian Democracy (1994) p. 12
Jump up ^ Angus Maddison, The World Economy, pp. 109–12, (2001)
Jump up ^ Nehru 1946, p. 295
^ Jump up to: a b c "Britain in India, Ideology and Economics to 1900". Fsmitha. F. Smith. Retrieved 2 August 2014.
Jump up ^ Rajat Kanta Ray, "Indian Society and the Establishment of British Supremacy, 1765–1818", in The Oxford History of the British Empire: vol. 2, "The Eighteenth Century" ed. by P. J. Marshall, (1998), pp. 508–29
^ Jump up to: a b c "Impact of British Rule on India: Economic, Social and Cultural (1757–1857)" (PDF). Nios.ac.uk. NIOS. Retrieved 2 August 2014.
Jump up ^ P.J. Marshall, "The British in Asia: Trade to Dominion, 1700–1765", in The Oxford History of the British Empire: vol. 2, The Eighteenth Century ed. by P. J. Marshall, (1998), pp. 487–507
Jump up ^ Maddison, Angus (1971). Class Structure and Economic Growth: India and Pakistan Since the Moghuls. Taylor & Francis. p. 53. ISBN 0-415-38259-9.
Jump up ^ Lockard, Craig A. (2010). Societies, Networks, and Transitions, Volume 3. Cengage Learning. ISBN 1-4390-8534-X.
Jump up ^ Desai, Raychaudhuri & Kumar 1983, p. 528.
Jump up ^ Grove 2007, p. 80.
Jump up ^ Grove 2007, p. 83.
^ Jump up to: a b c d Fieldhouse 1996, p. 132.
Jump up ^ Desai, Raychaudhuri & Kumar 1983, p. 529.
Jump up ^ Imperial Gazetteer of India vol. III 1907, p. 488.
Jump up ^ Davis 2001, p. 7.
Jump up ^ Desai, Raychaudhuri & Kumar 1983, pp. 530.
^ Jump up to: a b Desai, Raychaudhuri & Kumar 1983, p. 531.
Jump up ^ Bose 1918, pp. 79–81.
Jump up ^ Rai 2008, pp. 263–281.
Jump up ^ Koomar 2009, pp. 13–14.
Jump up ^ Davis, Mike. Late Victorian Holocausts. 1. Verso, 2000. ISBN 978-1-85984-739-8 p. 7
Jump up ^ Davis, Mike. Late Victorian Holocausts. 1. Verso, 2000. ISBN 978-1-85984-739-8 p. 173
Jump up ^ Sen, Amartya. Development as Freedom. ISBN 978-0-385-72027-4 ch 7
Jump up ^ Ó Gráda, C.: "Famine: A Short History Archived 12 January 2016 at the Wayback Machine.". Princeton University Press.
Jump up ^ Hall-Matthews 2008, p. 1
Jump up ^ Imperial Gazetteer of India vol. III 1907, p. 478
Jump up ^ John Pike (24 July 2011). "Cholera – Biological Weapons". Globalsecurity.org. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
Jump up ^ The 1832 Cholera Epidemic in New York State, By G. William Beardslee
Jump up ^ Infectious Diseases: Plague Through History, sciencemag.org
Jump up ^ Malaria Archived 10 September 2007 at the Wayback Machine. – Medical History of British India, National Library of Scotland 2007
Jump up ^ "Biography of Ronald Ross". The Nobel Foundation. Retrieved 15 June 2007.
Jump up ^ Leprosy – Medical History of British India Archived 10 September 2007 at the Wayback Machine., National Library of Scotland 2007
Jump up ^ "Other histories of smallpox in South Asia". Smallpoxhistory.ucl.ac.uk. 18 July 2006. Archived from the original on 16 April 2012. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
Jump up ^ "Feature Story: Smallpox". Vigyanprasar.gov.in. Archived from the original on 5 March 2012. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
Jump up ^ Rogers, L (January 1945). "Smallpox and Vaccination in British India During the Last Seventy Years" (PDF). Proc. R. Soc. Med. 38: 135–40. PMC 2181657  . PMID 19993010.
Jump up ^ Smallpox – some unknown heroes in smallpox eradication
Jump up ^ "Sir JJ Group of Hospitals". Grantmedicalcollege-jjhospital.org. Archived from the original on 20 April 2012. Retrieved 29 April 2012.
Jump up ^ Spear 1990, p. 169
^ Jump up to: a b Majumdar, Raychaudhuri & Datta 1950, p. 888
Jump up ^ F.H. Hinsley, ed. The New Cambridge Modern History, Vol. 11: Material Progress and World-Wide Problems, 1870–98 (1962) contents pp. 411–36.
Jump up ^ Spear 1990, p. 170
Jump up ^ Bose & Jalal 2003, p. 100
Jump up ^ James S. Olson and Robert S. Shadle, Historical Dictionary of the British Empire (1996) p. 116
Jump up ^ Helen S. Dyer, Pandita Ramabai: the story of her life (1900) online
Jump up ^ David Ludden, India and South Asia: a short history (2002) p.197
Jump up ^ Stanley A. Wolpert, Tilak and Gokhale: revolution and reform in the making of modern India (1962) p 67
Jump up ^ Michael Edwardes, High Noon of Empire: India under Curzon (1965) p. 77
Jump up ^ Moore, "Imperial India, 1858–1914", p. 435
Jump up ^ John R. McLane, "The Decision to Partition Bengal in 1905", Indian Economic and Social History Review, July 1965, 2#3, pp. 221–37
Jump up ^ Ranbir Vohra, The Making of India: A Historical Survey (Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, Inc, 1997), 120
Jump up ^ V. Sankaran Nair, Swadeshi movement: The beginnings of student unrest in South India (1985) excerpt and text search
Jump up ^ Peter Heehs, The lives of Sri Aurobindo (2008) p. 184
Jump up ^ (Bandyopadhyay 2005, p. 260)
Jump up ^ Wolpert, A New History of India, pp. 275–76
Jump up ^ Ludden (2002), pp. 200–201
Jump up ^ (Robb 2004, p. 174)
Jump up ^ India's contribution to the Great War. Calcutta: Govt of India. 1923. p. 74.
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f Brown 1994, pp. 197–98
Jump up ^ Belgium Olympic Committee (1957). "Olympic Games Antwerp. 1920: Official Report" (PDF). LA84 Foundation.
^ Jump up to: a b c Brown 1994, pp. 200–01
^ Jump up to: a b c d e Brown 1994, p. 199
^ Jump up to: a b c d Brown 1994, pp. 214–15
^ Jump up to: a b c d Brown 1994, pp. 210–13
^ Jump up to: a b c d Spear 1990, p. 190
Jump up ^ Brown 1994, pp. 216–17
Jump up ^ Balraj Krishna, India's Bismarck, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (2007) ch. 2
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h Brown 1994, pp. 203–04
^ Jump up to: a b c Brown 1994, pp. 201–02
^ Jump up to: a b c Brown 1994, pp. 195–96
^ Jump up to: a b c Stein 2001, p. 304
Jump up ^ Ludden 2002, p. 208
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h i Brown 1994, pp. 205–07
Jump up ^ Chhabra 2005, p. 2
Jump up ^ Nick Lloyd, The Amritsar Massacre: The Untold Story of One Fateful Day (2011) p. 180
Jump up ^ Derek Sayer, "British Reaction to the Amritsar Massacre 1919–1920", Past & Present, May 1991, Issue 131, pp. 130–64
Jump up ^ Brain Bond, "Amritsar 1919", History Today, Sept 1963, Vol. 13 Issue 10, pp. 666–676
^ Jump up to: a b (Markovits 2004, pp. 373–74)
Jump up ^ David C. Potter, "Manpower Shortage and the End of Colonialism: The Case of Indian Civil Service", Modern Asian Studies, (Jan 1973) 7#1 pp. 47–73
Jump up ^ Simon Epstein, "District Officers in Decline: The Erosion of British Authority in the Bombay Countryside, 1919 to 1947", Modern Asian Studies, (May 1982) 16#3 pp. 493–518
Jump up ^ (Low 1993, pp. 40, 156)
Jump up ^ Piers Brendon, The Decline and Fall of the British Empire: 1781–1997 (2008) p. 394
Jump up ^ (Low 1993, p. 154)
Jump up ^ Andrew Muldoon, "Politics, Intelligence and Elections in Late Colonial India: Congress and the Raj in 1937", Journal of the Canadian Historical Association (2009), 20#2 pp. 160–88; Muldoon, Empire, politics and the creation of the 1935 India Act: last act of the Raj (2009)
^ Jump up to: a b "India and Pakistan win independence". History.com. History. Retrieved 2 August 2014.
Jump up ^ Ramachandra Guha, India After Gandhi: The History of the World's Largest Democracy (2007) p. 43
^ Jump up to: a b c d e Dr Chandrika Kaul (3 March 2011). "From Empire to Independence: The British Raj in India 1858–1947". History. BBC. Retrieved 2 August 2014.
Jump up ^ (Robb 2002, p. 190)
Jump up ^ Stephen P. Cohen (2004). The Idea of Pakistan. Brookings Institution Press. p. 28. ISBN 0-8157-1502-1.
Jump up ^ D. N. Panigrahi (2004). India's partition: the story of imperialism in retreat. Routledge. pp. 151–152. ISBN 978-1-280-04817-3.
Jump up ^ Recruitment was especially active in the Punjab province of British India, under the leadership of Premier Sir Sikandar Hayat Khan, who believed in cooperating with the British to achieve eventual independence for the Indian nation. For details of various recruitment drives by Sir Sikandar between 1939 and 1942, see Tarin, Omer; Dando, Neal (Autumn 2010). "Memoirs of the Second World War: Major Shaukat Hayat Khan". Durbar: Journal of the Indian Military Historical Society (Critique). 27 (3): 136–37.
Jump up ^ Roy, Kaushik (2009). "Military Loyalty in the Colonial Context: A Case Study of the Indian Army during World War II". Journal of Military History. 73 (2).
Jump up ^ Alan Jeffreys, and Patrick Rose, eds. The Indian Army 1939–47: Experience and Development (Farnham: Ashgate, 2012), 244 pp. online review
Jump up ^ John F. Riddick, The history of British India: a chronology (2006) p. 142
Jump up ^ Shyam Ratna Gupta, "New Light on the Cripps Mission", India Quarterly, (Jan 1972), Vol. 28 Issue 1, p. 69–74
^ Jump up to: a b (Metcalf & Metcalf 2006, pp. 206–07)
Jump up ^ Bandyopadhyay 2004, pp. 418–20
Jump up ^ Stein 2010, pp. 305, 325": Jawaharlal Nehru and Subhas Bose were among those who, impatient with Gandhi's programmes and methods, looked upon socialism as an alternative for nationalistic policies capable of meeting the country's economic and social needs, as well as a link to potential international support. (p. 325) (p. 345)"
Jump up ^ Low 2002, p. 297.
Jump up ^ Low 2002, p. 313.
^ Jump up to: a b Low 1993, pp. 31–31.
Jump up ^ Wolpert 2006, p. 69.
Jump up ^ Bandyopadhyay 2004, p. 427.
Jump up ^ Bayly & Harper 2007, p. 2.
Jump up ^ Bose, Sugata (2011), His Majesty's Opponent: Subhas Chandra Bose and India's Struggle against Empire, Harvard University Press, p. 320, ISBN 978-0-674-04754-9, retrieved 21 September 2013
Jump up ^ Stein 2001, p. 345.
^ Jump up to: a b (Judd 2004, pp. 172–73)
Jump up ^ (Judd 2004, pp. 170–71)
Jump up ^ (Judd 2004, p. 172)
Jump up ^ Sarvepalli Gopal (1976). Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography. Harvard University Press. p. 362. ISBN 978-0-674-47310-2. Retrieved 21 February 2012.
Jump up ^ Hyam 2007, p. 106
^ Jump up to: a b "Indian Independence". British Library: Help for Researchers. British Library. Retrieved 2 August 2014. portal to educational sources available in the India Office Records
Jump up ^ Brown 1994, p. 330 Quote: "India had always been a minority interest in British public life; no great body of public opinion now emerged to argue that war-weary and impoverished Britain should send troops and money to hold it against its will in an empire of doubtful value. By late 1946 both Prime Minister and Secretary of State for British India recognised that neither international opinion no their own voters would stand for any reassertion of the raj, even if there had been the men, money, and administrative machinery with which to do so." Sarkar 1983, p. 418 Quote: "With a war weary army and people and a ravaged economy, Britain would have had to retreat; the Labour victory only quickened the process somewhat." Metcalf & Metcalf 2006, p. 212 Quote: "More importantly, though victorious in war, Britain had suffered immensely in the struggle. It simply did not possess the manpower or economic resources required to coerce a restive India."
Jump up ^ "The Road to Partition 1939–1947". Nationalarchives.gov.uk Classroom Resources. National Archives. Retrieved 2 August 2014.
Jump up ^ Ian Talbot and Gurharpal Singh, The Partition of India (2009), passim
Jump up ^ Maria Misra, Vishnu's crowded temple: India since the Great Rebellion (2008) p. 237
Jump up ^ http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/indo-pak-partition2.htm
^ Jump up to: a b c "Ideology and Empire in Eighteenth-Century India: the British in Bengal". History.ac.uk. History. Retrieved 2 August 2014.
Jump up ^ Thomas R. Metcalf, The New Cambridge History of India: Ideologies of the Raj (1995), pp. 10–12, 34–35
Jump up ^ Maurice Zinkin, "Legacies of the Raj", Asian Affairs, (Oct 1995, 26#3) online
Jump up ^ Y. K. Malik and V. B. Singh, Hindu Nationalists in India: the rise of the Bharatiya Janata Party (Westview Press, 1994), p. 14
Bibliography[edit]
Media related to British Raj at Wikimedia Commons
British Raj travel guide from Wikivoyage
Surveys[edit]
Allan, J., T. Wolseley Haig, H. H. Dodwell. The Cambridge Shorter History of India (1934) 996 pp. online; at Google
Bandhu, Deep Chand. History of Indian National Congress (2003) 405pp
Bandyopadhyay, Sekhar (2004), From Plassey to Partition: A History of Modern India, New Delhi and London: Orient Longmans. Pp. xx, 548., ISBN 978-81-250-2596-2 .
Bayly, C. A. (1990), Indian Society and the Making of the British Empire (The New Cambridge History of India), Cambridge and London: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 248, ISBN 978-0-521-38650-0 .
Brown, Judith M. (1994), Modern India: The Origins of an Asian Democracy, Oxford University Press. Pp. xiii, 474, ISBN 978-0-19-873113-9 .
Bose, Sugata; Jalal, Ayesha (2003), Modern South Asia: History, Culture, Political Economy, Routledge, ISBN 978-0-415-30787-1
Copland, Ian (2001), India 1885–1947: The Unmaking of an Empire (Seminar Studies in History Series), Harlow and London: Pearson Longmans. Pp. 160, ISBN 978-0-582-38173-5
Coupland, Reginald. India: A Re-Statement (Oxford University Press, 1945), evaluation of the Raj, emphasising government. online edition
Dodwell H. H., ed. The Cambridge History of India. Volume 6: The Indian Empire 1858–1918. With Chapters on the Development of Administration 1818–1858 (1932) 660 pp. online edition; also published as vol 5 of the Cambridge History of the British Empire
Herbertson, A.J. and O.J.R. Howarth. eds. The Oxford Survey Of The British Empire (6 vol 1914) online vol 2 on Asia pp. 1–328 on India
James, Lawrence. Raj: The Making and Unmaking of British India (2000)
Judd, Denis (2004), The Lion and the Tiger: The Rise and Fall of the British Raj, 1600–1947, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. Pp. xiii, 280, ISBN 978-0-19-280358-0 .
Kumar, Dharma, and Meghnad Desai, eds. The Cambridge Economic History of India, Volume 2: c. 1757–2003 (2010), 1114pp; articles by scholars ISBN 978-81-250-2731-7
Louis, William Roger, and Judith M. Brown, eds. The Oxford History of the British Empire (5 vol 1999–2001), with numerous articles on the Raj
Ludden, David. India And South Asia: A Short History (2002)
Majumdar, Ramesh Chandra; Raychaudhuri, Hemchandra; Datta, Kalikinkar (1950), An advanced history of India
Majumdar, R. C. ed. (1970). British paramountcy and Indian renaissance. (The history and culture of the Indian people) Bombay: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan.
Mansingh, Surjit The A to Z of India (2010), a concise historical encyclopaedia
Marshall, P. J. (2001), The Cambridge Illustrated History of the British Empire, 400 pp., Cambridge and London: Cambridge University Press., ISBN 978-0-521-00254-7 .
Markovits, Claude, ed. (2005), A History of Modern India 1480–1950 (Anthem South Asian Studies), Anthem Press. Pp. 607, ISBN 978-1-84331-152-2 .
Metcalf, Barbara (2006), A Concise History of Modern India (Cambridge Concise Histories), Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. Pp. xxxiii, 372, ISBN 978-0-521-68225-1
Moon, Penderel. The British Conquest and Dominion of India (2 vol. 1989) 1235pp; the fullest scholarly history of political and military events from a British top-down perspective;
Panikkar, K. M. (1953). Asia and Western dominance, 1498-1945, by K.M. Panikkar. London: G. Allen and Unwin.
Peers, Douglas M. (2006), India under Colonial Rule 1700–1885, Harlow and London: Pearson Longmans. Pp. xvi, 163, ISBN 0-582-31738-X .
Riddick, John F. The history of British India: a chronology (2006) excerpt and text search, covers 1599–1947
Riddick, John F. Who Was Who in British India (1998), covers 1599–1947
Sarkar, Sumit. Modern India, 1885–1947 (2002)
Smith, Vincent A. (1958) The Oxford History of India (3rd ed.) the Raj section was written by Percival Spear
Somervell, D.C. The Reign of King George V, (1936) covers Raj 1910–35 pp. 80–84, 282–91, 455–64 online free
Spear, Percival (1990) [First published 1965], A History of India, Volume 2, New Delhi and London: Penguin Books. Pp. 298, ISBN 978-0-14-013836-8 .
Stein, Burton (2001), A History of India, New Delhi and Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. xiv, 432, ISBN 978-0-19-565446-2 .
Thompson, Edward, and G.T. Garratt. Rise and Fulfilment of British Rule in India (1934) 690 pages; scholarly survey, 1599–1933 excerpt and text search
Wolpert, Stanley (2003), A New History of India, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. Pp. 544, ISBN 978-0-19-516678-1 .
Wolpert, Stanley, ed. Encyclopedia of India (4 vol. 2005) comprehensive coverage by scholars
Specialised topics[edit]
Baker, David (1993), Colonialism in an Indian Hinterland: The Central Provinces, 1820–1920, Delhi: Oxford University Press. Pp. xiii, 374, ISBN 978-0-19-563049-7
Bayly, C. A. (2000), Empire and Information: Intelligence Gathering and Social Communication in India, 1780–1870 (Cambridge Studies in Indian History and Society), Cambridge and London: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 426, ISBN 978-0-521-66360-1
Bayly, Christopher; Harper, Timothy (2007), Forgotten Wars: Freedom and Revolution in Southeast Asia, Harvard University Press, ISBN 978-0-674-02153-2, retrieved 21 September 2013
Bayly, Christopher; Harper, Timothy (2005), Forgotten Armies: The Fall of British Asia, 1941–1945, Harvard University Press, ISBN 978-0-674-01748-1, retrieved 22 September 2013
Brown, Judith M. Gandhi: Prisoner of Hope (1991), scholarly biography
Brown, Judith M.; Louis, Wm. Roger, eds. (2001), Oxford History of the British Empire: The Twentieth Century, Oxford University Press. pp. 800, ISBN 978-0-19-924679-3
Buckland, C.E. Dictionary of Indian Biography (1906) 495 pp. full text
Carrington, Michael. Officers, Gentlemen, and Murderers: Lord Curzon's campaign against "collisions" between Indians and Europeans, 1899–1905, Modern Asian Studies / Volume 47 / Issue 03 / May 2013, pp. 780–819.
Chandavarkar, Rajnarayan (1998), Imperial Power and Popular Politics: Class, Resistance and the State in India, 1850–1950, (Cambridge Studies in Indian History & Society). Cambridge University Press. Pp. 400, ISBN 978-0-521-59692-3 .
Chatterji, Joya (1993), Bengal Divided: Hindu Communalism and Partition, 1932–1947, Cambridge University Press. Pp. 323, ISBN 978-0-521-52328-8 .
Copland, Ian (2002), Princes of India in the Endgame of Empire, 1917–1947, (Cambridge Studies in Indian History & Society). Cambridge University Press. Pp. 316, ISBN 978-0-521-89436-4 .
Manmath Nath Das (1964). India under Morley and Minto: politics behind revolution, repression and reforms. G. Allen and Unwin.
Dewey, Clive. Anglo-Indian Attitudes: The Mind of the Indian Civil Service (2003)
Ewing, Ann. "Administering India: The Indian Civil Service", History Today, June 1982, 32#6 pp. 43–48, covers 1858–1947
Gilmartin, David. 1988. Empire and Islam: Punjab and the Making of Pakistan. University of California Press. 258 pages. ISBN 978-0-520-06249-8.
Gilmour, David. The Ruling Caste: Imperial Lives in the Victorian Raj (2007) Excerpt and text search
Gilmour, David. Curzon: Imperial Statesman (2006) excerpt and text search
Gopal, Sarvepalli (1 January 1976). Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography. Harvard U. Press. ISBN 978-0-674-47310-2. Retrieved 21 February 2012.
Sarvepalli Gopal (1953). The viceroyalty of Lord Ripon, 1880–1884. Oxford U. Press. Retrieved 21 February 2012.
Gould, William (2004), Hindu Nationalism and the Language of Politics in Late Colonial India, Cambridge U. Press. Pp. 320 .
Gopal, Sarvepalli. British Policy in India 1858–1905 (2008)
Gopal, Sarvepalli. Viceroyalty of Lord Irwin 1926–1931 (1957)
Jalal, Ayesha (1993), The Sole Spokesman: Jinnah, the Muslim League and the Demand for Pakistan, Cambridge U. Press, 334 pages .
Kaminsky, Arnold P. The India Office, 1880–1910 (1986) excerpt and text search, focus on officials in London
Khan, Yasmin. India At War: The Subcontinent and the Second World War (2015), wide-ranging scholarly survey excerpt; also published as Khan, Yasmin. The Raj At War: A People's History Of India's Second World War (2015) a major, comprehensive scholarly study
Khan, Yasmin (2007), The Great Partition: The Making of India and Pakistan, Yale U. Press, 250 pages, ISBN 978-0-300-12078-3
Klein, Ira (July 2000), "Materialism, Mutiny and Modernization in British India", Modern Asian Studies, Cambridge University Press, 34 (3): 545–80, JSTOR 313141
Kumar, Deepak. Science and the Raj: A Study of British India (2006)
Low, D. A. (2002), Britain and Indian Nationalism: The Imprint of Ambiguity 1929–1942, Cambridge University Press. Pp. 374, ISBN 978-0-521-89261-2 .
Lipsett, Chaldwell. Lord Curzon in India 1898–1903 (1903) excerpt and text search 128pp
MacMillan, Margaret. Women of the Raj: The Mothers, Wives, and Daughters of the British Empire in India (2007)
Metcalf, Thomas R. (1991), The Aftermath of Revolt: India, 1857–1870, Riverdale Co. Pub. Pp. 352, ISBN 978-81-85054-99-5
Metcalf, Thomas R. (1997), Ideologies of the Raj, Cambridge University Press, Pp. 256, ISBN 978-0-521-58937-6
Moore, Robin J. "Imperial India, 1858–1914", in Porter, ed. Oxford History of the British Empire: The Nineteenth Century, (2001a), pp. 422–46
Moore, Robin J. "India in the 1940s", in Robin Winks, ed. Oxford History of the British Empire: Historiography, (2001b), pp. 231–42
Porter, Andrew, ed. (2001), Oxford History of the British Empire: Nineteenth Century, Oxford University Press. Pp. 800, ISBN 978-0-19-924678-6
Masood Ashraf Raja. Constructing Pakistan: Foundational Texts and the Rise of Muslim National Identity, 1857–1947, Oxford 2010, ISBN 978-0-19-547811-2
Ramusack, Barbara (2004), The Indian Princes and their States (The New Cambridge History of India), Cambridge University Press. Pp. 324, ISBN 978-0-521-03989-5
Moore, Robin J. "India in the 1940s", in Robin Winks, ed. Oxford History of the British Empire: Historiography (2001), pp. 231–42
Raghavan, Srinath. India's War: World War II and the Making of Modern South Asia (2016). wide-ranging scholarly survey excerpt
Read, Anthony, and David Fisher; The Proudest Day: India's Long Road to Independence (W. W. Norton, 1999) online edition; detailed scholarly history of 1940–47
Riddick, John F. The History of British India: A Chronology (2006) excerpt
Riddick, John F. Who Was Who in British India (1998); 5000 entries excerpt
Shaikh, Farzana (1989), Community and Consensus in Islam: Muslim Representation in Colonial India, 1860—1947, Cambridge University Press. Pp. 272., ISBN 978-0-521-36328-0 .
Talbot, Ian; Singh, Gurharpal, eds. (1999), Region and Partition: Bengal, Punjab and the Partition of the Subcontinent, Oxford University Press. Pp. 420, ISBN 978-0-19-579051-1 .
Thatcher, Mary. Respected Memsahibs: an Anthology (Hardinge Simpole, 2008)
Tinker, Hugh (1968), "India in the First World War and after" Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 3, No. 4, 1918–19: From War to Peace. (Oct. 1968), pp. 89–107, ISSN 0022-0094 .
Voigt, Johannes. India in The Second World War (1988)
Wainwright, A. Martin (1993), Inheritance of Empire: Britain, India, and the Balance of Power in Asia, 1938–55, Praeger Publishers. Pp. xvi, 256, ISBN 978-0-275-94733-0 .
Wolpert, Stanley A. Jinnah of Pakistan (2005)
Wolpert, Stanley (2007), "India: British Imperial Power 1858–1947 (Indian nationalism and the British response, 1885–1920; Prelude to Independence, 1920–1947)", Encyclopædia Britannica .
Wolpert, Stanley A. Tilak and Gokhale: revolution and reform in the making of modern India (1962) full text online
Economic history[edit]
Anstey, Vera. The economic development of India (4th ed. 1952), 677pp; thorough scholarly coverage; focus on 20th century down to 1939
Chaudhary, Latika, et al. eds. A New Economic History of Colonial India (2015)
Derbyshire, I. D. (1987), "Economic Change and the Railways in North India, 1860–1914", Population Studies, Cambridge University Press, 21 (3): 521–45, doi:10.1017/s0026749x00009197, JSTOR 312641
Dutt, Romesh C. The Economic History of India under early British Rule, first published 1902, 2001 edition by Routledge, ISBN 978-0-415-24493-0
Kumar, Dharma, ed. Cambridge Economic History of India: Vol. 2, 1757–2003 (2nd ed. 2005); 1150pp; comprehensive coverage by international scholars
Lockwood, David. The Indian Bourgeoisie: A Political History of the Indian Capitalist Class in the Early Twentieth Century (I.B. Tauris, 2012) 315 pages; focus on Indian entrepreneurs who benefited from the Raj, but ultimately sided with the Indian National Congress.
Roy, Tirthankar (Summer 2002), "Economic History and Modern India: Redefining the Link", The Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, 16 (3): 109–30, doi:10.1257/089533002760278749, JSTOR 3216953
Sarkar, J. (2013, reprint). Economics of British India ... Third edition. Enlarged and partly rewritten. Calcutta: M.C. Sarkar & Sons.
Simmons, Colin (1985), "'De-Industrialization', Industrialization and the Indian Economy, c. 1850–1947", Modern Asian Studies, Cambridge University Press, 19 (3): 593–622, doi:10.1017/s0026749x00007745, JSTOR 312453
Tirthankar, Roy. "Financing the Raj: the City of London and colonial India 1858–1940." Business History 56#6 (2014): 1024–1026.
Tomlinson, B. R. The Economy of Modern India, 1860–1970 (The New Cambridge History of India) (1996) excerpt and text search
Tomlinson, B. H. "India and the British Empire, 1880–1935", Indian Economic and Social History Review, (Oct 1975), 12#4 pp. 337–380
Historiography and memory[edit]
Andrews, C.F. (2017). India and the Simon Report. Routledge reprint of 1930 first edition. p. 11. ISBN 9781315444987.
Durant, Will (2011, reprint). The case for India. New York, N.Y: Simon and Schuster.
Ellis, Catriona (2009). "Education for All: Reassessing the Historiography of Education in Colonial India". History Compass. 7 (2): 363–75. doi:10.1111/j.1478-0542.2008.00564.x.
Gilmartin, David (2015). "The Historiography of India's Partition: Between Civilization and Modernity". The Journal of Asian Studies. 74 (1): 23–41. doi:10.1017/s0021911814001685.
Major, Andrea (2011). "Tall tales and true: India, historiography and British imperial imaginings". Contemporary South Asia. 19 (3): 331–32. doi:10.1080/09584935.2011.594257.
Mantena, Rama Sundari. The Origins of Modern Historiography in India: Antiquarianism and Philology (2012)
Moor-Gilbert, Bart. Writing India, 1757–1990: The Literature of British India (1996) on fiction written in English
Mukherjee, Soumyen. "Origins of Indian Nationalism: Some Questions on the Historiography of Modern India." Sydney Studies in Society and Culture 13 (2014). online
Parkash, Jai. "Major trends of historiography of revolutionary movement in India-Phase II." (PhD dissertation, Maharshi Dayanand University, 2013). online
Philips, Cyril H. ed. Historians of India, Pakistan and Ceylon (1961), reviews the older scholarship
Stern, Philip J (2009). "History and Historiography of the English East India Company: Past, Present, and Future". History Compass. 7 (4): 1146–80. doi:10.1111/j.1478-0542.2009.00617.x.
Whitehead, Clive. "The historiography of British imperial education policy, Part I: India." History of Education 34#3 (2005): 315–329.
Winks, Robin, ed. Historiography (1999) vol. 5 in William Roger Louis, eds. The Oxford History of the British Empire, chapters 11–15, online
Winks, Robin W. The Historiography of the British Empire-Commonwealth: Trends, Interpretations and Resources (1966); this book is by a different set of authors from the previous 1999 entry online
Young, Richard Fox, ed., Indian Christian Historiography from Below, from Above, and in Between India and the Indianness of Christianity: Essays on Understanding—Historical, Theological, and Bibliographical—in Honor of Robert Eric Frykenberg (2009)
Further reading[edit]
Simon Report (1930) vol 1, wide-ranging survey of conditions
Keith, Arthur Berriedale (1912). Responsible government in the dominions. The Clarendon press. , major primary source
Year books and statistical records[edit]
Indian Year-book for 1862: A review of social, intellectual, and religious progress in India and Ceylon (1863), ed. by John Murdoch online edition 1861 edition
The Year-book of the Imperial Institute of the United Kingdom, the colonies and India: a statistical record of the resources and trade of the colonial and Indian possessions of the British Empire (2nd. ed.), India, 1893, pp. 375–462 – via Google Books
The Imperial Gazetteer of India (26 vol, 1908–31), highly detailed description of all of India in 1901. online edition
Statistical abstract relating to British India, from 1895–96 to 1904–05 (London, 1906) full text online,
The Cyclopedia of India: biographical, historical, administrative, commercial (1908) business history, biographies, illustrations
The Indian year book: 1914 (1914) snippets
The Indian Annual Register: A digest of public affairs of India regarding the nation's activities in the matters, political, economic, industrial, educational, etc. during the period 1919–1947 online
1930 edition
1921 edition
1919–1947 editions
[show]
v
t
e
Indian Independence Movement
History
Colonisation
Porto Grande de Bengala
Dutch Bengal
East India Company
British Raj
French India
Portuguese India
Battle of Plassey
Battle of Buxar
Anglo-Mysore Wars
First
Second
Third
Fourth
Anglo-Maratha Wars
First
Second
Third
Polygar Wars
Vellore Mutiny
First Anglo-Sikh War
Second Anglo-Sikh War
Sannyasi Rebellion
Rebellion of 1857
Radcliffe Line
more
Philosophies
and ideologies
Ambedkarism
Gandhism
Hindu nationalism
Indian nationalism
Khilafat Movement
Muslim nationalism in South Asia
Satyagraha
Socialism
Swadeshi movement
Swaraj
Events and
movements
Partition of Bengal (1905)
Partition of Bengal (1947)
Revolutionaries
Direct Action Day
Delhi-Lahore Conspiracy
The Indian Sociologist
Singapore Mutiny
Hindu–German Conspiracy
Champaran Satyagraha
Kheda Satyagraha
Rowlatt Committee
Rowlatt Bills
Jallianwala Bagh massacre
Noakhali riots
Non-Cooperation Movement
Christmas Day Plot
Coolie-Begar Movement
Chauri Chaura incident, 1922
Kakori conspiracy
Qissa Khwani Bazaar massacre
Flag Satyagraha
Bardoli
1928 Protests
Nehru Report
Fourteen Points of Jinnah
Purna Swaraj
Salt March
Dharasana Satyagraha
Vedaranyam March
Chittagong armoury raid
Gandhi–Irwin Pact
Round table conferences
Act of 1935
Aundh Experiment
Indische Legion
Cripps' mission
Quit India
Bombay Mutiny
Coup d'état of Yanaon
Provisional Government of India
Independence Day
Organisations
All India Kisan Sabha
All-India Muslim League
Anushilan Samiti
Arya Samaj
Azad Hind
Berlin Committee
Ghadar Party
Hindustan Socialist Republican Association
Indian National Congress
India House
Indian Home Rule movement
Indian Independence League
Indian National Army
Jugantar
Khaksar Tehrik
Khudai Khidmatgar
Swaraj Party
more
Social
reformers
A. Vaidyanatha Iyer
Ayya Vaikundar
Ayyankali
B. R. Ambedkar
Baba Amte
Bal Gangadhar Tilak
Dayananda Saraswati
Dhondo Keshav Karve
G. Subramania Iyer
Gazulu Lakshminarasu Chetty
Gopal Ganesh Agarkar
Gopal Hari Deshmukh
Gopaldas Ambaidas Desai
Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar
J. B. Kripalani
Jyotirao Phule
Kandukuri Veeresalingam
Mahadev Govind Ranade
Mahatma Gandhi
Muthulakshmi Reddi
Narayana Guru
Niralamba Swami
Pandita Ramabai
Periyar E. V. Ramasamy
Ram Mohan Roy
Rettamalai Srinivasan
Sahajanand Saraswati
Savitribai Phule
Shahu
Sister Nivedita
Sri Aurobindo
Syed Ahmad Khan
Vakkom Moulavi
Vinayak Damodar Savarkar
Vinoba Bhave
Vitthal Ramji Shinde
Vivekananda
Independence
activists
Abul Kalam Azad
Accamma Cherian
Achyut Patwardhan
A. K. Fazlul Huq
Alluri Sitarama Raju
Annapurna Maharana
Annie Besant
Ashfaqulla Khan
Babu Kunwar Singh
Bagha Jatin
Bahadur Shah II
Bakht Khan
Bal Gangadhar Tilak
Basawon Singh
Begum Hazrat Mahal
Bhagat Singh
Bharathidasan
Bhavabhushan Mitra
Bhikaiji Cama
Bhupendra Kumar Datta
Bidhan Chandra Roy
Bipin Chandra Pal
C. Rajagopalachari
Chandra Shekhar Azad
Chetram Jatav
Chittaranjan Das
Dadabhai Naoroji
Dayananda Saraswati
Dhan Singh
Dukkipati Nageswara Rao
Gopal Krishna Gokhale
Govind Ballabh Pant
Har Dayal
Hemu Kalani
Inayatullah Khan Mashriqi
Jatindra Mohan Sengupta
Jatindra Nath Das
Jawaharlal Nehru
K. Kamaraj
Kanaiyalal Maneklal Munshi
Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan
Khudiram Bose
Shri Krishna Singh
Lala Lajpat Rai
M. Bhaktavatsalam
M. N. Roy
Mahadaji Shinde
Mahatma Gandhi
Mangal Pandey
Mir Qasim
Mithuben Petit
Muhammad Ali Jauhar
Muhammad Ali Jinnah
Muhammad Mian Mansoor Ansari
Nagnath Naikwadi
Nana Fadnavis
Nana Sahib
P. Kakkan
Prafulla Chaki
Pritilata Waddedar
Pritilata Waddedar
Purushottam Das Tandon
R. Venkataraman
Rahul Sankrityayan
Rajendra Prasad
Ram Prasad Bismil
Rani Lakshmibai
Rash Behari Bose
Sahajanand Saraswati
Sangolli Rayanna
Sarojini Naidu
Satyapal Dang
Shuja-ud-Daula
Shyamji Krishna Varma
Sibghatullah Shah Rashidi
Siraj ud-Daulah
Subhas Chandra Bose
Subramania Bharati
Subramaniya Siva
Surya Sen
Syama Prasad Mukherjee
Tara Rani Srivastava
Tarak Nath Das
Tatya Tope
Tiruppur Kumaran
Ubaidullah Sindhi
V O Chidamabaram
V. K. Krishna Menon
Vallabhbhai Patel
Vanchinathan
Veeran Sundaralingam
Vinayak Damodar Savarkar
Virendranath Chattopadhyaya
Yashwantrao Holkar
Yogendra Shukla
more
British leaders
Wavell
Canning
Cornwallis
Irwin
Chelmsford
Curzon
Ripon
Minto
Dalhousie
Bentinck
Mountbatten
Wellesley
Lytton
Clive
Outram
Cripps
Linlithgow
Hastings
Independence
Cabinet Mission
Annexation of French colonies in India
Constitution
Republic of India
Indian annexation of Goa
Indian Independence Act
Partition of India
Political integration
Simla Conference
[show]
v
t
e
British Empire
Legend
Current territory
Former territory
* Now a Commonwealth realm
Now a member of the Commonwealth of Nations
Historical flags of the British Empire
[show]
Europe
1542–1800 Ireland (integrated into UK)
1708–1757, 1763–1782 and 1798–1802 Minorca
Since 1713 Gibraltar
1800–1813 Malta (Protectorate)
1813–1964 Malta (Colony)
1807–1890 Heligoland
1809–1864 Ionian Islands
1878–1960 Cyprus
1921–1937 Irish Free State
[show]
North America
17th century and before 18th century 19th and 20th century
1579 New Albion
1583–1907 Newfoundland
1605–1979 *Saint Lucia
1607–1776 Virginia
Since 1619 Bermuda
1620–1691 Plymouth
1623–1883 Saint Kitts
1624–1966 *Barbados
1625–1650 Saint Croix
1627–1979 *Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
1628–1883 Nevis
1629–1691 Massachusetts Bay
1632–1776 Maryland
since 1632 Montserrat
1632–1860 Antigua
1635–1644 Saybrook
1636–1776 Connecticut
1636–1776 Rhode Island
1637–1662 New Haven
1643–1860 Bay Islands
Since 1650 Anguilla
1655–1850 Mosquito Coast
1655–1962 *Jamaica
1663–1712 Carolina
1664–1776 New York
1665–1674 and 1702–1776 New Jersey
Since 1666 Virgin Islands
Since 1670 Cayman Islands
1670–1973 *Bahamas
1670–1870 Rupert's Land
1671–1816 Leeward Islands
1674–1702 East Jersey
1674–1702 West Jersey
1680–1776 New Hampshire
1681–1776 Pennsylvania
1686–1689 New England
1691–1776 Massachusetts Bay
1701–1776 Delaware
1712–1776 North Carolina
1712–1776 South Carolina
1713–1867 Nova Scotia
1733–1776 Georgia
1754–1820 Cape Breton Island
1762–1974 *Grenada
1763–1978 Dominica
1763–1873 Prince Edward Island
1763–1791 Quebec
1763–1783 East Florida
1763–1783 West Florida
1784–1867 New Brunswick
1791–1841 Lower Canada
1791–1841 Upper Canada
Since 1799 Turks and Caicos Islands
1818–1846 Columbia District/Oregon Country1
1833–1960 Windward Islands
1833–1960 Leeward Islands
1841–1867 Canada
1849–1866 Vancouver Island
1853–1863 Queen Charlotte Islands
1858–1866 British Columbia
1859–1870 North-Western Territory
1860–1981 *British Antigua and Barbuda
1862–1863 Stickeen
1866–1871 British Columbia
1867–1931 *Dominion of Canada2
1871–1964 Honduras
1882–1983 *Saint Kitts and Nevis
1889–1962 Trinidad and Tobago
1907–1949 Newfoundland3
1958–1962 West Indies Federation
1. Occupied jointly with the United States.
2. In 1931, Canada and other British dominions obtained self-government through the Statute of Westminster. See Name of Canada.
3. Gave up self-rule in 1934, but remained a de jure Dominion until it joined Canada in 1949.
[show]
South America
1631–1641 Providence Island
1651–1667 Willoughbyland
1670–1688 Saint Andrew and Providence Islands4
1831–1966 Guiana
Since 1833 Falkland Islands5
Since 1908 South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands5
4. Now a department of Colombia.
5. Occupied by Argentina during the Falklands War of April–June 1982.
[show]
Africa
17th and 18th centuries 19th century 20th century
Since 1658 Saint Helena14
1792–1961 Sierra Leone
1795–1803 Cape Colony
Since 1815 Ascension Island14
Since 1816 Tristan da Cunha14
1806–1910 Cape of Good Hope
1807–1808 Madeira
1810–1968 Mauritius
1816–1965 The Gambia
1856–1910 Natal
1862–1906 Lagos
1868–1966 Basutoland
1874–1957 Gold Coast
1882–1922 Egypt
1884–1900 Niger Coast
1884–1966 Bechuanaland
1884–1960 Somaliland
1887–1897 Zululand
1890–1962 Uganda
1890–1963 Zanzibar
1891–1964 Nyasaland
1891–1907 Central Africa
1893–1968 Swaziland
1895–1920 East Africa
1899–1956 Sudan
1900–1914 Northern Nigeria
1900–1914 Southern Nigeria
1900–1910 Orange River
1900–1910 Transvaal
1903–1976 Seychelles
1910–1931 South Africa
1914–1960 Nigeria
1915–1931 South-West Africa
1919–1961 Cameroons6
1920–1963 Kenya
1922–1961 Tanganyika6
1923–1965 and 1979–1980 Southern Rhodesia7
1924–1964 Northern Rhodesia
6. League of Nations mandate.
7. Self-governing Southern Rhodesia unilaterally declared independence in 1965 (as Rhodesia) and continued as an unrecognised state until the 1979 Lancaster House Agreement. After recognised independence in 1980, Zimbabwe was a member of the Commonwealth until it withdrew in 2003.
[show]
Asia
17th and 18th century 19th century 20th century
1685–1824 Bencoolen
1702–1705 Pulo Condore
1757–1947 Bengal
1762–1764 Manila and Cavite
1781–1784 and 1795–1819 Padang
1786–1946 Penang
1795–1948 Ceylon
1796–1965 Maldives
1811–1816 Java
1812–1824 Banka and Billiton
1819–1826 Malaya
1824–1948 Burma
1826–1946 Straits Settlements
1839–1967 Aden
1839–1842 Afghanistan
1841–1997 Hong Kong
1841–1946 Sarawak
1848–1946 Labuan
1858–1947 India
1874–1963 Borneo
1879–1919 Afghanistan (protectorate)
1882–1963 North Borneo
1885–1946 Unfederated Malay States
1888–1984 Brunei
1891–1971 Muscat and Oman
1892–1971 Trucial States
1895–1946 Federated Malay States
1898–1930 Weihai
1878–1960 Cyprus
1907–1949 Bhutan (protectorate)
1918–1961 Kuwait
1920–1932 Mesopotamia8
1921–1946 Transjordan8
1923–1948 Palestine8
1945–1946 South Vietnam
1946–1963 North Borneo
1946–1963 Sarawak
1946–1963 Singapore
1946–1948 Malayan Union
1948–1957 Federation of Malaya
Since 1960 Akrotiri and Dhekelia (before as part of Cyprus)
Since 1965 British Indian Ocean Territory (before as part of Mauritius and the Seychelles)
8 League of Nations mandate. Iraq's mandate was not enacted and replaced by the Anglo-Iraqi Treaty
[show]
Oceania
18th and 19th centuries 20th century
1788–1901 New South Wales
1803–1901 Van Diemen's Land/Tasmania
1807–1863 Auckland Islands9
1824–1980 New Hebrides
1824–1901 Queensland
1829–1901 Swan River/Western Australia
1836–1901 South Australia
since 1838 Pitcairn Islands
1841–1907 New Zealand
1851–1901 Victoria
1874–1970 Fiji10
1877–1976 Western Pacific Territories
1884–1949 Papua
1888–1901 Rarotonga/Cook Islands9
1889–1948 Union Islands9
1892–1979 Gilbert and Ellice Islands11
1893–1978 Solomon Islands12
1900–1970 Tonga
1900–1974 Niue9
1901–1942 *Australia
1907–1947 *New Zealand
1919–1942 and 1945–1968 Nauru
1919–1949 New Guinea
1949–1975 Papua and New Guinea13
9. Now part of the *Realm of New Zealand.
10. Suspended member.
11. Now Kiribati and *Tuvalu.
12. Now the *Solomon Islands.
13. Now *Papua New Guinea.
[show]
Antarctica and South Atlantic
Since 1658 Saint Helena14
Since 1815 Ascension Island14
Since 1816 Tristan da Cunha14
Since 1908 British Antarctic Territory15
1841–1933 Australian Antarctic Territory (transferred to the Commonwealth of Australia)
1841–1947 Ross Dependency (transferred to the Realm of New Zealand)
14. Since 2009 part of Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha; Ascension Island (1922–) and Tristan da Cunha (1938–) were previously dependencies of Saint Helena.
15. Both claimed in 1908; territories formed in 1962 (British Antarctic Territory) and 1985 (South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands).
[show]
v
t
e
Former monarchies
List of monarchs who lost their thrones in the 20th and 21st centuries
List of monarchs who lost their thrones in the 19th century
Africa
Ethiopia
Libya
Tunisia
Egypt
Madagascar
South Africa
Burundi
Central Africa
Zanzibar
Ghana
Nigeria
Sierra Leone
Tanganyika
Uganda
Kenya
Rhodesia
The Gambia
Mauritius
Wituland
Asia
China
Korea
Vietnam
Georgia
India
Manchukuo
Iran
Iraq
Syria
Yemen
Afghanistan
Turkey
Pakistan
Sri Lanka
Tibet
Nepal
Mongolia
Europe
Germany
Bavaria
Prussia
Saxony
Württemberg
Austria-Hungary
Russia
France
Portugal
Italy
Two Sicilies
Hungary
Bulgaria
Romania
Yugoslavia
Serbia
Montenegro
Greece
Albania
Lithuania
Hanover
Iceland
Tuscany
Polish-Lithuania
Malta
Papal States
Finland
Oceania
Bora Bora
Fiji
Hawaii
Rarotonga
Tahiti
Americas
Brazil
Mexico
Haiti
Trinidad and Tobago
Guyana
Suriname
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=British_Raj&oldid=833564510"
Categories:
Former countries in Asia
States and territories established in 1858
States and territories disestablished in 1947
Hawaii templates
British India
Former British colonies and protectorates in Asia
1858 establishments in British India
1858 establishments in India
1947 disestablishments in British India
1947 disestablishments in India
Bangladesh and the Commonwealth of Nations
Former polities of the Cold War
India and the Commonwealth of Nations
Pakistan and the Commonwealth of Nations
Hidden categories:
Webarchive template wayback links
Use dmy dates from August 2014
EngvarB from August 2014
Former country articles requiring maintenance
Pages using infobox country or infobox former country with the symbol caption or type parameters
All articles with failed verification
Articles with failed verification from July 2016
Wikipedia articles needing clarification from October 2014
Duplicate articles
All articles with broken links to citations
All articles with unsourced statements
Articles with unsourced statements from January 2018
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
In other projects
Wikimedia Commons
Wikiquote
Wikivoyage
Languages
Afrikaans
Ænglisc
العربية
Asturianu
Azərbaycanca
تۆرکجه
বাংলা
Bân-lâm-gú
Башҡортса
Беларуская
Беларуская (тарашкевіца)
भोजपुरी
Български
Català
Čeština
Dansk
Deutsch
Ελληνικά
Español
Esperanto
Euskara
فارسی
Français
Frysk
Gaeilge
Galego
한국어
Հայերեն
हिन्दी
Hrvatski
Bahasa Indonesia
Íslenska
Italiano
עברית
ქართული
Kiswahili
Latviešu
Lietuvių
Magyar
मैथिली
മലയാളം
मराठी
Bahasa Melayu
Nederlands
नेपाली
日本語
Norsk
Norsk nynorsk
Occitan
ਪੰਜਾਬੀ
پنجابی
Polski
Português
Română
Русский
Scots
Simple English
Slovenčina
Slovenščina
Српски / srpski
Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски
Suomi
Svenska
Tagalog
தமிழ்
Татарча/tatarça
తెలుగు
ไทย
Türkçe
Українська
اردو
Tiếng Việt
Võro
吴语
粵語
Zazaki
中文
68 more
Edit links
This page was last edited on 1 April 2018, at 10:37.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

key: html

type: local

value: div

attrs: id class

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

value: a

attrs: id class lang

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

values: jump-to-nav mw-jump

attrs: href title

attrs: href class title

values:
/wiki/British_Rule_(disambiguation)
mw-disambig
British Rule (disambiguation)

attrs: role class

values:
note
hatnote navigation-not-searchable

values:
/wiki/British_India_(disambiguation)
mw-disambig
British India (disambiguation)

value: li

value: ul

value: td

values: text-align:center; line-height:1.2em; font-size:135%; font-weight:bold;

value: tr

values:
/wiki/British_India
mw-redirect
British India

values: Presidencies and provinces of British India

values: width:50px; border:0; vertical-align:middle; font-size:30%; line-height:105%;

values: vertical-align:middle; text-align:center; font-size:115%; border:0;

values: width:50px; border:0; vertical-align:middle; text-align:right; line-height:105%; font-size:30%;

values: width:100%; text-align:center; margin:0 auto; background:transparent;

values: vertical-align:middle; text-align:center; border-top:solid 1px #aaa; padding:0.2em 0em 0.2em 0em;

attrs: alt src width height class srcset data-file-width data-file-height

values: display:table-cell; width:58%; vertical-align:middle; padding-left:5px;

attrs: alt src width height srcset data-file-width data-file-height

values: display:table-cell; vertical-align:middle; padding: 0px 5px;

values: position: absolute; top: 0px; left: 110px; right: 0px; bottom: 0px; height: 0px; width: 0px;

values: left: 50%; top: 50%; margin-left: -35px; margin-top: -27.5px;

values: mediaContainer mwPlayerContainer k-player videoHolder

values: width:220px width: 220px; position: relative;

values: text-align:center; font-size:95%; padding:0.6em 0em 0.6em 0em;

values: Louis Mountbatten, 1st Earl Mountbatten of Burma

values: border:0; padding:0; vertical-align:middle; text-align:left;

attrs: alt src width height data-file-width data-file-height

values: width:100%; background: transparent; text-align:center; margin:0 auto; border:0;

values: border:0; padding:0; vertical-align:middle; text-align:right;

values: width:92%; background:transparent; text-align:center; margin:0 auto; border:0;

values: width:95%; background: transparent; text-align:center; margin:0 auto;

values: margin: -0.2em 0; font-size:65%; font-weight:normal;

values: background: none; font-size: 145%;padding: 0.15em 0.1em;line-height: 1.2em;

values: Satavahana gateway at Sanchi, 1st century CE

values: padding: 0.2em; border-bottom: 1px solid #ccc;

values:
/wiki/Madrasian_Culture
mw-redirect
Madrasian Culture

values:
/wiki/Indus_Valley_Civilization
mw-redirect
Indus Valley Civilization

values:
/wiki/Vedic_Period
mw-redirect
Vedic Period

values: font-size: 105%; padding: 0.2em 0px 0.4em; text-align: left; display: none;

values:
/wiki/Classical_India
mw-redirect
Classical India

values:
/wiki/Mauryan_Empire
mw-redirect
Mauryan Empire

values:
/wiki/Chalukya_Dynasty
mw-redirect
Chalukya Dynasty

values:
/wiki/Karkota_Empire
mw-redirect
Karkota Empire

values:
/wiki/Caliphate_campaigns_in_India
mw-redirect
Caliphate campaigns in India

values:
/wiki/Mamluk_Dynasty_(Delhi)
mw-redirect
Mamluk Dynasty (Delhi)

values: Linguistic history of the Indian subcontinent

values: History of education in the Indian subcontinent

values: History of science and technology in the Indian subcontinent

values: List of Indian inventions and discoveries

values:
/wiki/Template:Part_of_History_of_India
mw-redirect
Template:Part of History of India

values: float:right;clear:right;width:22.0em;margin:0 0 1.0em 1.0em;background:#f9f9f9;border:1px solid #aaa;padding:0.2em;border-spacing:0.4em 0;text-align:center;line-height:1.4em;font-size:88%

values: United Nations Conference on International Organization

values:
/wiki/People%27s_Republic_of_Bangladesh
mw-redirect
People's Republic of Bangladesh

values: Edit section: British India and the Princely States

values:
/wiki/Princely_State
mw-redirect
Princely State

values:
/wiki/Chivalric_order
mw-redirect
Chivalric order

values:
headerSort
0
columnheader button
Sort ascending

values:
/wiki/List_of_Governors_of_Assam
mw-redirect
List of Governors of Assam

values:
/wiki/Orissa,_India
mw-redirect
Orissa, India

values:
/wiki/List_of_Governors_of_Bengal
mw-redirect
List of Governors of Bengal

values:
/wiki/List_of_Governors_of_Bombay
mw-redirect
List of Governors of Bombay

values: List of Governors of the Central Provinces and Berar

values: List of colonial Governors and Presidents of Madras

values:
/wiki/Punjab_(British_India)
mw-redirect
Punjab (British India)

values:
/wiki/Punjab_Province_(Pakistan)
mw-redirect
Punjab Province (Pakistan)

values: List of Governors of Punjab (British India)

values: List of Governors of the United Provinces

values: padding:0.2em 0.4em 0.2em;font-size:145%;line-height:1.2em;padding-bottom:0.5em; font-size:130%;

values: font-size: 105%; padding: 0.2em 0px 0.4em; text-align: center; display: none;

values:
/wiki/South_Asian_Bronze_Age
mw-redirect
South Asian Bronze Age

values:
/wiki/Iron_Age_India
mw-redirect
Iron Age India

values:
/wiki/Pandyan_Dynasty
mw-redirect
Pandyan Dynasty

values:
/wiki/Seuna_dynasty
mw-redirect
Seuna dynasty

values:
/wiki/Bijapur_Sultanate
mw-redirect
Bijapur Sultanate

values:
/wiki/Golkonda_Sultanate
mw-redirect
Golkonda Sultanate

values: Crisis of the Sixteenth Century (page does not exist)

values:
/wiki/Kandyan_period
mw-redirect
Kandyan period

values:
/wiki/History_of_Kabul
mw-redirect
History of Kabul

values: History of agriculture in the Indian subcontinent

values: History of Indian influence on Southeast Asia

values: History of science and technology in South Asia

values: Baluchistan (Chief Commissioner's Province)

values: North-West Frontier Province (1901–1955)

values: Statue of an Indus priest or king found in Mohenjodaro, 1927

values:
/wiki/Macedonian_Empire
mw-redirect
Macedonian Empire

values:
/wiki/Pakistan_movement
mw-redirect
Pakistan movement

values: History of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan

attrs: alt src title width height srcset data-file-width data-file-height

values: padding:0.3em 0.4em 0.3em;font-weight:bold;border-top: 1px solid #aaa; border-bottom: 1px solid #aaa;font-weight:bold;

values: min-height:6.1em;width:187px;line-height:1.3em;padding:2px 6px 1px 6px;margin:0px;border:none;border-width:0px

values:
/wiki/Lord_Canning
mw-redirect
Lord Canning

values:
/wiki/Viceroy_of_India
mw-redirect
Viceroy of India

values: Lord Salisbury was Secretary of State for India 1874–78.

values: Robert Gascoyne-Cecil, 3rd Marquess of Salisbury

values: Robert Arthur Talbot Gascoyne-Cecil, 3rd Marquess of Salisbury

values:
/wiki/Minto-Morley_Reforms
mw-redirect
Minto-Morley Reforms

values:
/wiki/Montagu-Chelmsford_reforms
mw-redirect
Montagu-Chelmsford reforms

values:
/wiki/Frederick_Pethick-Lawrence
mw-redirect
Frederick Pethick-Lawrence

values: Executive Council (Commonwealth countries)

values:
/wiki/Sayyid_Ahmad_Khan
mw-redirect
Sayyid Ahmad Khan

values: Edit section: Timeline of major events, legislation, public works

values:
/wiki/University_of_Bombay
mw-redirect
University of Bombay

values:
/wiki/James_Wilson_(UK_politician)
mw-redirect
James Wilson (UK politician)

values:
/wiki/Paper_currency
mw-redirect
Paper currency

values:
/wiki/Imperial_Police
mw-redirect
Imperial Police

values:
/wiki/Dharamsala,_Himachal_Pradesh
mw-redirect
Dharamsala, Himachal Pradesh

values:
/wiki/Imperial_Forestry_Service
mw-redirect
Imperial Forestry Service

values:
/wiki/Ministry_of_Agriculture_(India)
mw-redirect
Ministry of Agriculture (India)

values:
/wiki/Chief_Commissioner
mw-redirect
Chief Commissioner

values: Baluchistan (Chief Commissioners Province)

values:
/wiki/Empress_of_India
mw-redirect
Empress of India

values: Robert Bulwer-Lytton, 1st Earl of Lytton

values:
/wiki/University_of_Punjab
mw-redirect
University of Punjab

values:
/wiki/Indian_Civil_Service
mw-redirect
Indian Civil Service

values: Frederick Hamilton-Temple-Blackwood, 1st Marquess of Dufferin and Ava

values:
/wiki/Princely_states
mw-redirect
Princely states

values: Henry Petty-Fitzmaurice, 5th Marquess of Lansdowne

values: Ministry of Commerce and Industry (India)

values:
/wiki/Victoria_Memorial_(India)
mw-redirect
Victoria Memorial (India)

values:
/wiki/East_Bengal_and_Assam
mw-redirect
East Bengal and Assam

values: George Curzon, 1st Marquess Curzon of Kedleston

values:
/wiki/Anglo-Russian_Convention_of_1907
mw-redirect
Anglo-Russian Convention of 1907

values:
/wiki/Ministry_of_Education_(India)
mw-redirect
Ministry of Education (India)

values: Gilbert Elliot-Murray-Kynynmound, 4th Earl of Minto

values:
/wiki/George_V_of_the_United_Kingdom
mw-redirect
George V of the United Kingdom

values:
/wiki/Mesopotamian_Campaign
mw-redirect
Mesopotamian Campaign

values:
/wiki/Battle_of_Gallipoli
mw-redirect
Battle of Gallipoli

values: Charles Hardinge, 1st Baron Hardinge of Penshurst

values:
/wiki/Government_of_India_Act_1919
mw-redirect
Government of India Act 1919

values:
/wiki/University_of_Rangoon
mw-redirect
University of Rangoon

values: Frederic Thesiger, 1st Viscount Chelmsford

values:
/wiki/Gandhi-Irwin_Pact
mw-redirect
Gandhi-Irwin Pact

values:
/wiki/Royal_Indian_Air_Force
mw-redirect
Royal Indian Air Force

values:
/wiki/Government_of_India_Act_1935
mw-redirect
Government of India Act 1935

values: Freeman Freeman-Thomas, 1st Marquess of Willingdon

values: Mediterranean, Middle East and African theatres of World War II

values:
/wiki/North_African_campaign
mw-redirect
North African campaign

values:
/wiki/Syria-Lebanon_campaign
mw-redirect
Syria-Lebanon campaign

values:
/wiki/Battle_of_Malaya
mw-redirect
Battle of Malaya

values:
/wiki/British_Labour_Party
mw-redirect
British Labour Party

values:
/wiki/Radcliffe_Award
mw-redirect
Radcliffe Award

values:
/wiki/Commonwealth_Relations_Office
mw-redirect
Commonwealth Relations Office

values: Edit section: Aftermath of the Rebellion of 1857: Indian critiques, British response

values:
/wiki/Rani_Lakshmibai
mw-redirect
Rani Lakshmibai

values: James Broun-Ramsay, 1st Marquess of Dalhousie

values:
/wiki/Doctrine_of_Lapse
mw-redirect
Doctrine of Lapse

values:
/wiki/Sir_Syed_Ahmed_Khan
mw-redirect
Sir Syed Ahmed Khan

values: Muhammedan Anglo-Oriental College (page does not exist)

values:
/wiki/Indian_rebellion_of_1857
mw-redirect
Indian rebellion of 1857

values: The material near this tag failed verification of its source citation(s). (July 2016)

values:
/wiki/Demography_of_India
mw-redirect
Demography of India

values:
/wiki/Demographics_of_Burma
mw-redirect
Demographics of Burma

values: Thomas Babington Macaulay, 1st Baron Macaulay

values:
/wiki/Established_church
mw-redirect
Established church

values: Diocese of Calcutta of the Church of North India

values:
/wiki/Christian_denominations
mw-redirect
Christian denominations

values:
/wiki/Baptist_Missionary_Society
mw-redirect
Baptist Missionary Society

values:
/wiki/Christian_Bible
mw-redirect
Christian Bible

values:
/wiki/Green_revolution
mw-redirect
Green revolution

values:
/wiki/Great_Indian_Peninsular_Railway
mw-redirect
Great Indian Peninsular Railway

values:
/wiki/Victoria_Terminus
mw-redirect
Victoria Terminus

values:
/wiki/East_Indian_Railway
mw-redirect
East Indian Railway

values:
/wiki/Lord_Dalhousie
mw-redirect
Lord Dalhousie

values:
/wiki/Narrow_gauge
mw-redirect
Narrow gauge

values:
/wiki/British_Crown
mw-redirect
British Crown

values: The text near this tag may need clarification or removal of jargon. (October 2014)

values:
noprint Inline-Template
margin-left:0.1em; white-space:nowrap;

values: float: right; clear: right; margin: 0.5em 0 0.8em 1.4em; width:30em; padding: 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa; font-size: 88%; background-color: WhiteSmoke;

values:
/wiki/Bengal_famine_of_1770
mw-redirect
Bengal famine of 1770

values: Edit section: Famines, epidemics, public health

values: Timeline of major famines in India during British rule

values:
plainlinks metadata ambox ambox-style
presentation

values: padding:0.2em; background:WHITE; border #FF9933; text-align:center; margin-bottom:5px;

values:
/wiki/Great_Famine_of_1876%E2%80%931878
mw-redirect
Great Famine of 1876–1878

values:
/wiki/North_Western_Provinces
mw-redirect
North Western Provinces

values:
/wiki/First_cholera_pandemic
mw-redirect
First cholera pandemic

values:
/wiki/Presidency_General_Hospital
mw-redirect
Presidency General Hospital

values: Centre for Tropical and Communicable Diseases (page does not exist)

values:
/wiki/Smallpox_vaccination
mw-redirect
Smallpox vaccination

values:
/wiki/Grant_Medical_College
mw-redirect
Grant Medical College

values:
/wiki/Deccan_College_(Pune)
mw-redirect
Deccan College (Pune)

values: Edit section: 1860s–1890s: New middle class, Indian National Congress

values:
/wiki/Womesh_Chandra_Bonerjee
mw-redirect
Womesh Chandra Bonerjee

values: Edit section: 1870s–1907: Social reformers, moderates vs. extremists

values:
/wiki/Aurobindo_Ghosh
mw-redirect
Aurobindo Ghosh

values: Edit section: Partition of Bengal (1905–1911)

values:
/wiki/Indian_Independence_Movement
mw-redirect
Indian Independence Movement

values:
/wiki/George_Nathaniel_Curzon
mw-redirect
George Nathaniel Curzon

values:
/wiki/Lord_Curzon
mw-redirect
Lord Curzon

values:
/wiki/Bande_Mataram
mw-redirect
Bande Mataram

values:
/wiki/Anushilan_samiti
mw-redirect
Anushilan samiti

values: Edit section: 1906–1909: Muslim League, Minto-Morley reforms

values:
/wiki/All_India_Muslim_League
mw-redirect
All India Muslim League

values:
/wiki/Dhaka_Nawab_Family
mw-redirect
Dhaka Nawab Family

values:
/wiki/Municipal_Corporation
mw-redirect
Municipal Corporation

values: Gilbert John Elliot-Murray-Kynynmound, 4th Earl of Minto

values: Revolutionary movement for Indian independence

values: Edit section: 1914–1918: First World War, Lucknow Pact

values:
/wiki/Mohandas_Karamchand_Gandhi
mw-redirect
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi

values:
/wiki/First_World_War
mw-redirect
First World War

values:
/wiki/Maulana_Mohammad_Ali
mw-redirect
Maulana Mohammad Ali

values:
/wiki/Maulana_Shaukat_Ali
mw-redirect
Maulana Shaukat Ali

values:
/wiki/Home_Rule_Movement
mw-redirect
Home Rule Movement

values:
/wiki/Home_Rule#Irish_home_rule
mw-redirect
Home Rule

values:
/wiki/Bombay_presidency#Geography
mw-redirect
Bombay presidency

values:
/wiki/Passive_resistance
mw-redirect
Passive resistance

values:
/wiki/Cottage_industry
mw-redirect
Cottage industry

values: Edit section: 1917–1919: Satyagraha, Montagu-Chelmsford reforms, Jallianwalla Bagh

values:
/wiki/Edwin_Montagu
mw-redirect
Edwin Montagu

values:
/wiki/Sardar_Vallabhbhai_Patel
mw-redirect
Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel

values:
/wiki/Bombay_presidency
mw-redirect
Bombay presidency

values:
/wiki/Bolshevik_Revolution
mw-redirect
Bolshevik Revolution

values:
/wiki/Rowlatt_Acts
mw-redirect
Rowlatt Acts

values:
/wiki/Montagu-Chelmsford_Reforms
mw-redirect
Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms

values:
/wiki/Annie_Beasant
mw-redirect
Annie Beasant

values: Template:Harvard citation documentation#Wikilink to citation does not work

values: Edit section: 1920s: Non-cooperation, Khilafat, Simon Commission, Jinnah's fourteen points

values:
/wiki/Non-co-operation_movement
mw-redirect
Non-co-operation movement

values: Edit section: 1929–1937: Round Table conferences, Government of India Act

values:
/wiki/Allama_Muhammad_Iqbal
mw-redirect
Allama Muhammad Iqbal

values:
/wiki/Chakravarthi_Rajagopalachari
mw-redirect
Chakravarthi Rajagopalachari

values:
/wiki/Salt_Satyagraha
mw-redirect
Salt Satyagraha

values:
/wiki/Round_Table_Conferences
mw-redirect
Round Table Conferences

values:
/wiki/Indian_Provincial_Elections,_1937
mw-redirect
Indian Provincial Elections, 1937

values: Edit section: 1938–1941: World War II, Muslim League's Lahore Resolution

values:
/wiki/Krishak_Praja_Party
mw-redirect
Krishak Praja Party

values:
/wiki/Chaudhari_Khaliquzzaman
mw-redirect
Chaudhari Khaliquzzaman

values: Newly arrived Indian troops on the quayside in Singapore, November 1941

values:
/wiki/Ab%27ul_Kalam_Azad
mw-redirect
Ab'ul Kalam Azad

values:
/wiki/Sikander_Hyat_Khan
mw-redirect
Sikander Hyat Khan

values:
/wiki/Unionist_Muslim_League
mw-redirect
Unionist Muslim League

values:
/wiki/Abdul_Ghaffar_Khan
mw-redirect
Abdul Ghaffar Khan

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (January 2018)

values:
noprint Inline-Template Template-Fact
white-space:nowrap;

values:
/wiki/Two-Nation_Theory
mw-redirect
Two-Nation Theory

values: Edit section: 1942–1945: Cripps mission, Quit India Resolution, INA

values:
/wiki/Quit_India_movement
mw-redirect
Quit India movement

values:
/wiki/Axis_powers_of_World_War_II
mw-redirect
Axis powers of World War II

values: Edit section: 1946: Elections, Cabinet mission, Direct Action Day

values: Frederick Pethick-Lawrence, 1st Baron Pethick-Lawrence

values:
/wiki/The_Royal_Indian_Navy_Mutiny
mw-redirect
The Royal Indian Navy Mutiny

values: Edit section: 1947: Planning for partition

values:
/wiki/Louis_Mountbatten
mw-redirect
Louis Mountbatten

values:
/wiki/Master_Tara_Singh
mw-redirect
Master Tara Singh

values: Edit section: 1947: Violence, partition, independence

values:
/wiki/Islamic_Republic_of_Pakistan
mw-redirect
Islamic Republic of Pakistan

values:
/wiki/Union_of_India
mw-redirect
Union of India

values:
/wiki/Republic_of_India
mw-redirect
Republic of India

values: Charles Cornwallis, 1st Marquess Cornwallis

values: display:table-cell;padding:0.2em 0.2em 0.2em 0.3em;vertical-align:middle

values: margin:0.5em 0 0.5em 1em;border:solid #aaa 1px

values: -moz-column-width: 30em; -webkit-column-width: 30em; column-width: 30em; list-style-type: lower-alpha;

values:
/wiki/Firoz_Khan_Noon
mw-redirect
Firoz Khan Noon

values:
nofollow
http://www.wdl.org/en/item/388/
external text

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1093%2Fshm%2F9.3.357

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.25336%2Fp6hw3r

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.2307%2F3022159

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/3022159

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/3020849

values:
/wiki/Rowman_%26_Littlefield_Publishers
mw-redirect
Rowman & Littlefield Publishers

values:
/wiki/Wipf_and_Stock_Publishers
mw-redirect
Wipf and Stock Publishers

values: Ramakrishna Mission Institute of Culture

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1787%2F456125276116

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/2595587

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1017%2Fs0026749x00009197

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/312641

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.fsmitha.com/h3/h50imp2.htm

values:
/wiki/PubMed_Identifier
mw-redirect
PubMed Identifier

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19993010

values: Indian Economic and Social History Review

values:
/wiki/Sir_Sikandar_Hayat_Khan
mw-redirect
Sir Sikandar Hayat Khan

values: -moz-column-width: 30em; -webkit-column-width: 30em; column-width: 30em; list-style-type: decimal;

values:
/wiki/Christopher_Alan_Bayly
mw-redirect
Christopher Alan Bayly

values: The History and Culture of the Indian People

values: -moz-column-width: 30em; -webkit-column-width: 30em; column-width: 30em;

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/313141

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/issn/0022-0094

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/3216953

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1017%2Fs0026749x00007745

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/312453

values: Edit section: Year books and statistical records

values: Template talk:Indian Independence Movement

values:
/wiki/Vellore_Mutiny
mw-redirect
Vellore Mutiny

values:
/wiki/Sannyasi_Rebellion
mw-redirect
Sannyasi Rebellion

values:
/wiki/Kheda_Satyagraha
mw-redirect
Kheda Satyagraha

values:
/wiki/Indische_Legion
mw-redirect
Indische Legion

values: Hindustan Socialist Republican Association

values:
/wiki/Babu_Kunwar_Singh
mw-redirect
Babu Kunwar Singh

values:
/wiki/Bahadur_Shah_II
mw-redirect
Bahadur Shah II

values:
/wiki/Khan_Abdul_Ghaffar_Khan
mw-redirect
Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan

values:
/wiki/Muhammad_Ali_Jauhar
mw-redirect
Muhammad Ali Jauhar

values:
/wiki/V_O_Chidambaram_Pillai
mw-redirect
V O Chidambaram Pillai

values: Gilbert Elliot-Murray-Kynynmound, 1st Earl of Minto

values: Richard Wellesley, 1st Marquess Wellesley

values: Causes for liberation of French colonies in India

values:
/wiki/Indian_annexation_of_Goa
mw-redirect
Indian annexation of Goa

values: nowraplinks collapsible collapsed navbox-inner

values: Template talk:British overseas territories

values: nowraplinks collapsible autocollapse navbox-subgroup

values:
/wiki/British_Saint_Lucia
mw-redirect
British Saint Lucia

values: History of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

values: Colony of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations

values: Archipelago of San Andrés, Providencia and Santa Catalina

values: South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands

values:
/wiki/South-West_Africa
mw-redirect
South-West Africa

values: Rhodesia's Unilateral Declaration of Independence

values:
/wiki/British_invasion_of_Manila
mw-redirect
British invasion of Manila

values:
/wiki/Java_Island
mw-redirect
Java Island

values: British Mandate for Mesopotamia (legal instrument)

values:
/wiki/Colony_of_Western_Australia
mw-redirect
Colony of Western Australia

values:
/wiki/Colony_of_South_Australia
mw-redirect
Colony of South Australia

values:
/wiki/Colony_of_Victoria
mw-redirect
Colony of Victoria

values:
/wiki/Union_Islands
mw-redirect
Union Islands

values:
/wiki/Commonwealth_of_Australia
mw-redirect
Commonwealth of Australia

values: Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha

values: nowraplinks plainlist collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner

values: Template talk:Former Monarchies (page does not exist)

values: List of monarchs who lost their thrones in the 20th and 21st centuries

values: List of monarchs who lost their thrones in the 19th century

values:
/wiki/Qing_Dynasty
mw-redirect
Qing Dynasty

values:
/wiki/Kingdom_of_Syria
mw-redirect
Kingdom of Syria

values:
/wiki/Kingdom_of_Yemen
mw-redirect
Kingdom of Yemen

values:
/wiki/Austro-Hungarian_Empire
mw-redirect
Austro-Hungarian Empire

values:
/wiki/Kingdom_of_Hungary_(1920-46)
mw-redirect
Kingdom of Hungary (1920-46)

values: nowraplinks hlist collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner

values: Category:States and territories established in 1858

values: Category:States and territories disestablished in 1947

values: Category:Former British colonies and protectorates in Asia

values: Category:1858 establishments in British India

values: Category:1947 disestablishments in British India

values: Category:1947 disestablishments in India

values: Category:Bangladesh and the Commonwealth of Nations

values: Category:Former polities of the Cold War

values: Category:India and the Commonwealth of Nations

values: Category:Pakistan and the Commonwealth of Nations

values: Category:Webarchive template wayback links

values: Category:Former country articles requiring maintenance

values: Category:Pages using infobox country or infobox former country with the symbol caption or type parameters

values: Category:All articles with failed verification

values: Category:Articles with failed verification from July 2016

values: Category:Wikipedia articles needing clarification from October 2014

values: Category:All articles with broken links to citations

values: Category:All articles with unsourced statements

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from January 2018

values: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

values: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

values: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

values: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

values:
/wiki/British_Raj
View the content page [ctrl-alt-c]
c

values:
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page [ctrl-alt-z]
z

values: Featured content – the best of Wikipedia

values: Find background information on current events

values:
/wiki/Special:Random
Load a random article [ctrl-alt-x]
x

values: portal navigation p-navigation p-navigation-label

values: Guidance on how to use and edit Wikipedia

values: About the project, what you can do, where to find things

values: A list of recent changes in the wiki [ctrl-alt-r]

values: portal navigation p-interaction p-interaction-label

values: List of all English Wikipedia pages containing links to this page [ctrl-alt-j]

values: Recent changes in pages linked from this page [ctrl-alt-k]

values:
/wiki/Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard
Upload files [ctrl-alt-u]
u

values: portal navigation p-wikibase-otherprojects p-wikibase-otherprojects-label

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-af
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ang
display: none;

values: الراج البريطاني – Arabic

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ast
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-az
display: none;

values: بریتانیا هیندوستانی – South Azerbaijani

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-azb
display: none;

values: ব্রিটিশ ভারত – Bangla

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-bn
display: none;

values: Eng-kok léng Ìn-tō͘ Tè-kok – Chinese (Min Nan)

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-zh-min-nan
display: none;

values: Британия Һиндостаны – Bashkir

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ba
display: none;

values: Брытанская Індыя – Belarusian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-be
display: none;

values: Брытанская Індыя – Belarusian (Taraškievica orthography)

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-be-x-old
display: none;

values: ब्रिटिश राज – Bhojpuri

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-bh
display: none;

values: Британска Индия – Bulgarian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-bg
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ca
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-cs
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-da
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-de
display: none;

values: Βρετανικές Ινδίες – Greek

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-el
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-eo
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-eu
display: none;

values: راج بریتانیا – Persian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-fa
display: none;

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-fr badge-Q17437798 badge-goodarticle

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-fy
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ga
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-gl
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ko
display: none;

values: Բրիտանական Հնդկաստան – Armenian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-hy
display: none;

values: ब्रिटिश राज – Hindi

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-hr
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-is
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-it
display: none;

values: הראג' הבריטי – Hebrew

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-he
display: none;

values: ბრიტანეთის ინდოეთი – Georgian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ka
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sw
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-lv
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-lt
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-hu
display: none;

values: ब्रिटिश राज – Maithili

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-mai
display: none;

values: ബ്രിട്ടീഷ് രാജ് – Malayalam

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ml
display: none;

values: ब्रिटिश भारत – Marathi

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-mr
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ms
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-nl
display: none;

values: ब्रिटिश राज – Nepali

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ne
display: none;

values: イギリス領インド帝国 – Japanese

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-ja badge-Q17437798 badge-goodarticle

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-no
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-nn
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-oc
display: none;

values: ਬਰਤਾਨਵੀ ਰਾਜ – Punjabi

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-pa
display: none;

values: برطانوی راج (پاک و ہند) – Western Punjabi

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-pnb
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-pl
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-pt
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ro
display: none;

values: Британская Индия – Russian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sco
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-simple
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sk
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sl
display: none;

values: Британска Индија – Serbian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sr
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sh
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-fi
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sv
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-tl
display: none;

values: பிரித்தானியாவின் இந்தியப் பேரரசு – Tamil

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ta
display: none;

values: Британия Һиндстаны – Tatar

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-tt
display: none;

values: భారతదేశంలో బ్రిటిషు పాలన – Telugu

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-te
display: none;

values: บริติชราช – Thai

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-th
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-tr
display: none;

values: Британська Індія – Ukrainian

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-uk
display: none;

values: برطانوی راج – Urdu

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-vi
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-fiu-vro
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-wuu
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-zh-yue
display: none;

values:
interlanguage-link interwiki-diq
display: none;

values: All languages (initial selection from common choices by you and others)

values: /static/images/wikimedia-button-1.5x.png 1.5x, /static/images/wikimedia-button-2x.png 2x

values: /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_132x47.png 1.5x, /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_176x62.png 2x

values:
suggestions
display: none; font-size: 13px;

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-British_Raj rootpage-British_Raj skin-vector action-view