text:
Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is part of a series on the
Constitution of the
United States of America
Preamble and Articles
of the Constitution
Preamble
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
Amendments to the Constitution
Bill of Rights
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
XI
XII
XIII
XIV
XV
XVI
XVII
XVIII
XIX
XX
XXI
XXII
XXIII
XXIV
XXV
XXVI
XXVII
Unratified Amendments
Congressional Apportionment
Titles of Nobility
Corwin
Child Labor
Equal Rights
D.C. Voting Rights
History
Drafting and ratification timeline
Convention
Signing
Federalism
Republicanism
Full text of the Constitution and Amendments
Preamble and Articles I–VII
Amendments I–X
Amendments XI–XXVII
Unratified Amendments
United States portal
U.S. Government portal
Law portal
Wikipedia book
v
t
e
The Thirteenth Amendment (Amendment XIII) to the United States Constitution abolished slavery and involuntary servitude, except as punishment for a crime. In Congress, it was passed by the Senate on April 8, 1864, and by the House on January 31, 1865. The amendment was ratified by the required number of states on December 6, 1865. On December 18, 1865, Secretary of State William H. Seward proclaimed its adoption. It was the first of the three Reconstruction Amendments adopted following the American Civil War.
Since the American Revolution, states had divided into states that allowed and states that prohibited slavery. Slavery was implicitly permitted in the original Constitution through provisions such as Article I, Section 2, Clause 3, commonly known as the Three-Fifths Compromise, which detailed how each slave state's enslaved population would be factored into its total population count for the purposes of apportioning seats in the United States House of Representatives and direct taxes among the states. Though many slaves had been declared free by President Abraham Lincoln's 1863 Emancipation Proclamation, their post-war status was uncertain. On April 8, 1864, the Senate passed an amendment to abolish slavery. After one unsuccessful vote and extensive legislative maneuvering by the Lincoln administration, the House followed suit on January 31, 1865. The measure was swiftly ratified by nearly all Northern states, along with a sufficient number of border and "reconstructed" Southern states, to cause it to be adopted before the end of the year.
Though the amendment formally abolished slavery throughout the United States, factors such as Black Codes, white supremacist violence, and selective enforcement of statutes continued to subject some black Americans to involuntary labor, particularly in the South. In contrast to the other Reconstruction Amendments, the Thirteenth Amendment was rarely cited in later case law, but has been used to strike down peonage and some race-based discrimination as "badges and incidents of slavery". The Thirteenth Amendment applies to the actions of private citizens, while the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments apply only to state actors. The amendment also enables Congress to pass laws against sex trafficking and other modern forms of slavery.
Contents
[hide]
1 Text
2 Slavery in the United States
3 Proposal and ratification
3.1 Crafting the amendment
3.2 Passage by Congress
3.3 Ratification by the states
4 Effects
4.1 Political and economic change in the South
5 Congressional and executive enforcement
5.1 Peonage law
6 Judicial interpretation
6.1 Black slaves and their descendants
6.1.1 Jones and beyond
6.2 Other cases of involuntary servitude
7 Prior proposed Thirteenth Amendments
8 See also
9 References
9.1 Citations
9.2 Bibliography
9.3 Primary sources
10 External links
Text
Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.[1]
Slavery in the United States
Main article: Slavery in the United States
Abolitionist imagery focused on atrocities against slaves[2] (1863 photo of Gordon)
The institution of slavery existed in all of the original thirteen British North American colonies. Prior to the Thirteenth Amendment, the United States Constitution (adopted in 1789) did not expressly use the words slave or slavery but included several provisions about unfree persons. The Three-Fifths Compromise (in Article I, Section 2, Clause 3) allocated Congressional representation based "on the whole Number of free Persons" and "three fifths of all other Persons". This clause was a compromise between Southerners who wished slaves to be counted as 'persons' for congressional representation and northerners rejecting these out of concern of too much power for the South, because representation in the new Congress would be based on population in contrast to the one-vote-for-one-state principle in the earlier Continental Congress.[3] Under the Fugitive Slave Clause (Article IV, Section 2, Clause 3), "No person held to Service or Labour in one State" would be freed by escaping to another. Article I, Section 9, Clause 1 allowed Congress to pass legislation outlawing the "Importation of Persons", but not until 1808. However, for purposes of the Fifth Amendment—which states that, "No person shall... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law"—slaves were understood as property.[4] Although abolitionists used the Fifth Amendment to argue against slavery, it became part of the legal basis in Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) for treating slaves as property.[5]
Stimulated by the philosophy of the Declaration of Independence between 1777 and 1804, every Northern state provided for the immediate or gradual abolition of slavery. Most of the slaves involved were household servants. No Southern state did so, and the slave population of the South continued to grow, peaking at almost 4 million people in 1861. An abolitionist movement headed by such figures as William Lloyd Garrison grew in strength in the North, calling for the end of slavery nationwide and exacerbating tensions between North and South. The American Colonization Society, an alliance between abolitionists who felt the races should be kept separated and slaveholders who feared the presence of freed blacks would encourage slave rebellions, called for the emigration and colonization of both free blacks and slaves to Africa. Its views were endorsed by politicians such as Henry Clay, who feared that the main abolitionist movement would provoke a civil war.[6] Proposals to eliminate slavery by constitutional amendment were introduced by Representative Arthur Livermore in 1818 and by John Quincy Adams in 1839, but failed to gain significant traction.[7]
As the country continued to expand, the issue of slavery in its new territories became the dominant national issue. The Southern position was that slaves were property and therefore could be moved to the territories like all other forms of property.[8] The 1820 Missouri Compromise provided for the admission of Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state, preserving the Senate's equality between the regions. In 1846, the Wilmot Proviso was introduced to a war appropriations bill to ban slavery in all territories acquired in the Mexican–American War; the Proviso repeatedly passed the House, but not the Senate.[8] The Compromise of 1850 temporarily defused the issue by admitting California as a free state, instituting a stronger Fugitive Slave Act, banning the slave trade in Washington, D.C., and allowing New Mexico and Utah self-determination on the slavery issue.[9]
Despite the compromise, tensions between North and South continued to rise over the subsequent decade, inflamed by, amongst other things, the publication of the 1852 anti-slavery novel Uncle Tom's Cabin; fighting between pro-slavery and abolitionist forces in Kansas, beginning in 1854; the 1857 Dred Scott decision, which struck down provisions of the Compromise of 1850; abolitionist John Brown's 1859 attempt to start a slave revolt at Harpers Ferry and the 1860 election of slavery critic Abraham Lincoln to the presidency. The Southern states seceded from the Union in the months following Lincoln's election, forming the Confederate States of America, and beginning the American Civil War.
Proposal and ratification
Crafting the amendment
Representative James Mitchell Ashley proposed an amendment abolishing slavery in 1863.
Acting under presidential war powers, Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863, which proclaimed the freedom of slaves in the ten states that were still in rebellion.[10] However, it did not affect the status of slaves in the border states that had remained loyal to the Union.[11] That December, Lincoln again used his war powers and issued a "Proclamation for Amnesty and Reconstruction", which offered Southern states a chance to peacefully rejoin the Union if they abolished slavery and collected loyalty oaths from 10% of their voting population.[12] Southern states did not readily accept the deal, and the status of slavery remained uncertain.
In the final years of the Civil War, Union lawmakers debated various proposals for Reconstruction.[13] Some of these called for a constitutional amendment to abolish slavery nationally and permanently. On December 14, 1863, a bill proposing such an amendment was introduced by Representative James Mitchell Ashley of Ohio.[14][15] Representative James F. Wilson of Iowa soon followed with a similar proposal. On January 11, 1864, Senator John B. Henderson of Missouri submitted a joint resolution for a constitutional amendment abolishing slavery. The Senate Judiciary Committee, chaired by Lyman Trumbull of Illinois, became involved in merging different proposals for an amendment.
Radical Republicans led by Massachusetts Senator Charles Sumner and Pennsylvania Representative Thaddeus Stevens sought a more expansive version of the amendment.[16] On February 8, 1864, Sumner submitted a constitutional amendment stating:
All persons are equal before the law, so that no person can hold another as a slave; and the Congress shall have power to make all laws necessary and proper to carry this declaration into effect everywhere in the United States.[17][18]
Sumner tried to promote his own more expansive wording by circumventing the Trumbull-controlled Judiciary Committee, but failed.[19] On February 10, the Senate Judiciary Committee presented the Senate with an amendment proposal based on drafts of Ashley, Wilson and Henderson.[20][21]
The Committee's version used text from the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, which stipulates, "There shall be neither slavery nor involuntary servitude in the said territory, otherwise than in the punishment of crimes whereof the party shall have been duly convicted."[22][23]:1786 Though using Henderson's proposed amendment as the basis for its new draft, the Judiciary Committee removed language that would have allowed a constitutional amendment to be adopted with only a majority vote in each House of Congress and ratification by two-thirds of the states (instead of two-thirds and three-fourths, respectively).[24]
Passage by Congress
Further information: 38th United States Congress
The Senate passed the amendment on April 8, 1864, by a vote of 38 to 6; two Democrats, Reverdy Johnson of Maryland and James Nesmith of Oregon voted "aye." However, just over two months later on June 15, the House failed to do so, with 93 in favor and 65 against, thirteen votes short of the two-thirds vote needed for passage; the vote split largely along party lines, with Republicans supporting and Democrats opposing.[25] In the 1864 presidential race, former Free Soil Party candidate John C. Frémont threatened a third-party run opposing Lincoln, this time on a platform endorsing an anti-slavery amendment. The Republican Party platform had, as yet, failed to include a similar plank, though Lincoln endorsed the amendment in a letter accepting his nomination.[26][27] Fremont withdrew from the race on September 22, 1864 and endorsed Lincoln.[28]
With no Southern states represented, few members of Congress pushed moral and religious arguments in favor of slavery. Democrats who opposed the amendment generally made arguments based on federalism and states' rights.[29] Some argued that the proposed change so violated the spirit of the Constitution that it would not be a valid "amendment" but would instead constitute "revolution".[30] Representative White, among other opponents, warned that the amendment would lead to full citizenship for blacks.[31]
Republicans portrayed slavery as uncivilized and argued for abolition as a necessary step in national progress.[32] Amendment supporters also argued that the slave system had negative effects on white people. These included the lower wages resulting from competition with forced labor, as well as repression of abolitionist whites in the South. Advocates said ending slavery would restore the First Amendment and other constitutional rights violated by censorship and intimidation in slave states.[31][33]
White Northern Republicans, and some Democrats, became excited about an abolition amendment, holding meetings and issuing resolutions.[34] Many blacks, particularly in the South, focused more on landownership and education as the key to liberation.[35] As slavery began to seem politically untenable, an array of Northern Democrats successively announced their support for the amendment, including Representative James Brooks,[36] Senator Reverdy Johnson,[37] and Tammany Hall, a powerful New York political machine.[38]
Celebration erupts after the amendment is passed by the House of Representatives.
President Lincoln had had concerns that the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863 might be reversed or found invalid after the war. He saw constitutional amendment as a more permanent solution.[39][40] He had remained outwardly neutral on the amendment because he considered it politically too dangerous.[41] Nonetheless, Lincoln's 1864 party platform resolved to abolish slavery by constitutional amendment.[42][43] After winning reelection in the election of 1864, Lincoln made the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment his top legislative priority, beginning with his efforts in Congress during its "lame duck" session.[44][45] Popular support for the amendment mounted and Lincoln urged Congress on in his December 6, 1864 State of the Union Address: "there is only a question of time as to when the proposed amendment will go to the States for their action. And as it is to so go, at all events, may we not agree that the sooner the better?"[46]
Lincoln instructed Secretary of State William H. Seward, Representative John B. Alley and others to procure votes by any means necessary, and they promised government posts and campaign contributions to outgoing Democrats willing to switch sides.[47][48] Seward had a large fund for direct bribes. Ashley, who reintroduced the measure into the House, also lobbied several Democrats to vote in favor of the measure.[49] Representative Thaddeus Stevens commented later that "the greatest measure of the nineteenth century was passed by corruption, aided and abetted by the purest man in America"; however, Lincoln's precise role in making deals for votes remains unknown.[50]
Republicans in Congress claimed a mandate for abolition, having gained in the elections for Senate and House.[51] The 1864 Democratic vice-presidential nominee, Representative George H. Pendleton, led opposition to the measure.[52] Republicans toned down their language of radical equality in order to broaden the amendment's coalition of supporters.[53] In order to reassure critics worried that the amendment would tear apart the social fabric, some Republicans explicitly promised that the amendment would leave patriarchy intact.[54]
In mid-January 1865, Speaker of the House Schuyler Colfax estimated the amendment to be five votes short of passage. Ashley postponed the vote.[55] At this point, Lincoln intensified his push for the amendment, making direct emotional appeals to particular members of Congress.[56] On January 31, 1865, the House called another vote on the amendment, with neither side being certain of the outcome. With 183 House members present, 122 would have to vote "aye" to secure passage of the resolution; however eight members abstained, reducing the number to 117. Every Republican supported the measure, as well as 16 Democrats, almost all of them lame ducks. The amendment finally passed by a vote of 119 to 56,[57] narrowly reaching the required two-thirds majority.[58] The House exploded into celebration, with some members openly weeping.[59] Black onlookers, who had only been allowed to attend Congressional sessions since the previous year, cheered from the galleries.[60]
While under the Constitution, the President plays no formal role in the amendment process, the joint resolution was sent to Lincoln for his signature.[61] Under the usual signatures of the Speaker of the House and the President of the Senate, President Lincoln wrote the word "Approved" and added his signature to the joint resolution on February 1, 1865.[62] On February 7, Congress passed a resolution affirming that the Presidential signature was unnecessary.[63] The Thirteenth Amendment is the only ratified amendment signed by a President, although James Buchanan had signed the Corwin Amendment that the 36th Congress had adopted and sent to the states in March 1861.[64][65]
Ratification by the states
Ratified amendment, 1865
Ratified amendment post-enactment, 1865–1870
Ratified amendment after first rejecting amendment, 1866–1995
Territories of the United States in 1865, not yet states
When the Thirteenth Amendment was submitted to the states on February 1, 1865, it was quickly taken up by several legislatures. By the end of the month it had been ratified by eighteen states. Among them were the ex-Confederate states of Virginia and Louisiana, where ratifications were submitted by Reconstruction governments. These, along with subsequent ratifications from Arkansas and Tennessee raised the issues of how many seceded states had legally valid legislatures; and if there were fewer legislatures than states, if Article V required ratification by three-fourths of the states or three-fourths of the legally valid state legislatures.[66] President Lincoln in his last speech, on April 11, 1865, called the question about whether the Southern states were in or out of the Union a "pernicious abstraction." Obviously, he declared, they were not "in their proper practical relation with the Union"; whence everyone's object should be to restore that relation.[67] Lincoln was assassinated three days later.
With Congress out of session, the new President, Andrew Johnson, began a period known as "Presidential Reconstruction", in which he personally oversaw the creation of new state governments throughout the South. He oversaw the convening of state political conventions populated by delegates whom he deemed to be loyal. Three leading issues came before the conventions: secession itself, the abolition of slavery, and the Confederate war debt. Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, and South Carolina held conventions in 1865, while Texas' convention did not organize until March 1866.[68][69][70] Johnson hoped to prevent deliberation over whether to re-admit the Southern states by accomplishing full ratification before Congress reconvened in December. He believed he could silence those who wished to deny the Southern states their place in the Union by pointing to how essential their assent had been to the successful ratification of the Thirteenth Amendment.[71]
Part of a series on
Slavery
Contemporary[show]
Child labour
Conscription
Debt
Forced marriage
Bride buying
Wife selling
Forced prostitution
Human trafficking
Peonage
Penal labour
Sexual slavery
Historical[show]
Antiquity
Ancient Rome
Babylonia
Ancient Greece
Topics and practices
Atlantic slave trade
Middle Passage
Arab slave trade
Ghilman
Mamluk
Saqaliba
Aztec
Blackbirding
Byzantine Empire
Coolie
Corvée labor
Field slaves in the United States
House slaves
Kholop
Medieval Europe
Panyarring
Thrall
Serfs
History
Russia
Slave market
Slave raiding
Naval
Galley slave
Impressment
Pirates
Shanghaiing
Slave ship
By country or region[show]
Sub-Saharan Africa
Contemporary Africa
Slavery on the Barbary Coast
Barbary slave trade
Slave Coast
Angola
Chad
Ethiopia
Mali
Mauritania
Niger
Somalia
South Africa
Sudan
Seychelles
North and South America
Americas indigenous
U.S. Natives
Brazil
Lei Áurea
Canada
Caribbean
Barbados
Code Noir
Cuba
Haiti
revolt
Restavek
Latin America
Puerto Rico
Trinidad
United States
colonial
maps
female
partus
penal labor
Slave codes
interregional
Human Trafficking
Virgin Islands
Central, East, and South Asia
Human trafficking in Southeast Asia
Bhutan
China
Booi Aha
Laogai
India
Debt bondage
Chukri System
Japan
comfort women
South Korea
Yankee princess
North Korea
Vietnam
Australia and Oceania
Blackbirding in Australia
Human trafficking in Australia
Slave raiding in Easter Island
Human trafficking in Papua New Guinea
Blackbirding in Polynesia
Europe and North Asia
Sex trafficking in Europe
British Isles
Denmark
Dutch Republic
Germany in World War II
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Russia
Spain
colonies
Sweden
North Africa and West Asia
Iran
Libya
Human trafficking in the Middle East
Ottoman Empire
Yemen
Religion[show]
Bible
Christianity
Catholicism
Mormonism
Islam
21st century
Judaism
Bahá'í Faith
Opposition and resistance[show]
Timeline
Abolitionism
U.K.
U.S.
Anti-Slavery International
Blockade of Africa
U.K.
U.S.
Compensated emancipation
Freedman
manumission
Freedom suit
Abolitionists
Slave Power
Underground Railroad
songs
Slave rebellion
Slave Trade Acts
International law
13th Amendment to the United States Constitution
Related[show]
Common law
Indentured servant
Unfree labour
Fugitive slaves
laws
Great Dismal Swamp maroons
List of slaves
owners
Slave narrative
films
songs
Slave name
Slave catcher
Slave patrol
Slave Route Project
Treatment in U.S.
breeding
court cases
Washington
Jefferson
Adams
Lincoln
40 acres
Freedmen's Bureau
bit
Wage slavery
Emancipation Day
v
t
e
Direct negotiations between state governments and the Johnson administration ensued. As the summer wore on, administration officials began including assurances of the measure's limited scope with their demands for ratification. Johnson himself suggested directly to the governors of Mississippi and North Carolina that they could proactively control the allocation of rights to freedmen. Though Johnson obviously expected the freed people to enjoy at least some civil rights, including, as he specified, the right to testify in court, he wanted state lawmakers to know that the power to confer such rights would remain with the states.[72] When South Carolina provisional governor Benjamin Franklin Perry objected to the scope of the amendment's enforcement clause, Secretary of State Seward responded by telegraph that in fact the second clause "is really restraining in its effect, instead of enlarging the powers of Congress".[72] White politicians throughout the South were concerned that Congress might cite the amendment's enforcement powers as a way to authorize black suffrage.[73]
When South Carolina ratified the amendment in November 1865, it issued its own interpretive declaration that "any attempt by Congress toward legislating upon the political status of former slaves, or their civil relations, would be contrary to the Constitution of the United States".[23]:1786–1787[74] Alabama and Louisiana also declared that their ratification did not imply federal power to legislate on the status of former slaves.[23]:1787[75] During the first week of December, North Carolina and Georgia gave the amendment the final votes needed for it to become part of the Constitution.
The Thirteenth Amendment became part of the Constitution on December 6, 1865, based on the following ratifications:[76]
Illinois — February 1, 1865
Rhode Island — February 2, 1865
Michigan — February 3, 1865
Maryland — February 3, 1865
New York — February 3, 1865
Pennsylvania — February 3, 1865
West Virginia — February 3, 1865
Missouri — February 6, 1865
Maine — February 7, 1865
Kansas — February 7, 1865
Massachusetts — February 7, 1865
Virginia — February 9, 1865
Ohio — February 10, 1865
Indiana — February 13, 1865
Nevada — February 16, 1865
Louisiana — February 17, 1865
Minnesota — February 23, 1865
Wisconsin — February 24, 1865
Vermont — March 8, 1865
Tennessee — April 7, 1865
Arkansas — April 14, 1865
Connecticut — May 4, 1865
New Hampshire — July 1, 1865
South Carolina — November 13, 1865
Alabama — December 2, 1865
North Carolina — December 4, 1865
Georgia — December 6, 1865
Having been ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several states (27 of the 36 states, including those that had been in rebellion), Secretary of State Seward, on December 18, 1865, certified that the Thirteenth Amendment had become valid, to all intents and purposes, as a part of the Constitution.[77] Included on the enrolled list of ratifying states were the three ex-Confederate states that had given their assent, but with strings attached. Seward accepted their affirmative votes and brushed aside their interpretive declarations without comment, challenge or acknowledgment.[78]
The Thirteenth Amendment was subsequently ratified by:[76]
Oregon — December 8, 1865
California — December 19, 1865
Florida — December 28, 1865 (Reaffirmed – June 9, 1868)
Iowa — January 15, 1866
New Jersey — January 23, 1866 (After rejection – March 16, 1865)
Texas — February 18, 1870
Delaware — February 12, 1901 (After rejection – February 8, 1865)
Kentucky — March 18, 1976[79] (After rejection – February 24, 1865)
Mississippi — March 16, 1995; Certified – February 7, 2013[80] (After rejection – December 5, 1865)
The Thirteenth Amendment became part of the Constitution 61 years after the Twelfth Amendment. This is the longest interval between constitutional amendments.[81]
Effects
Amendment XIII in the National Archives, bearing the signature of Abraham Lincoln
The impact of the abolition of slavery was felt quickly. When the Thirteenth Amendment became operational, the scope of Lincoln's 1863 Emancipation Proclamation was widened to include the entire nation. Although the majority of Kentucky's slaves had been emancipated, 65,000–100,000 people remained to be legally freed when the Amendment went into effect on December 18.[82][83] In Delaware, where a large number of slaves had escaped during the war, nine hundred people became legally free.[83][84]
In addition to abolishing slavery and prohibiting involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime, the Thirteenth Amendment also nullified the Fugitive Slave Clause and the Three-Fifths Compromise. The population of a state originally included (for congressional apportionment purposes) all "free persons", three-fifths of "other persons" (i.e., slaves) and excluded untaxed Native Americans. The Three-Fifths Compromise was a provision in the Constitution that required three-fifths of the population of slaves be counted for purposes of apportionment of seats in the House of Representatives and taxes among the states. This compromise had the effect of increasing the political power of slave-holding states by increasing their share of seats in the House of Representatives, and consequently their share in the Electoral College (where a state's influence over the election of the President is tied to the size of its congressional delegation).[85][86]
Even as the Thirteenth Amendment was working its way through the ratification process, Republicans in Congress grew increasingly concerned about the potential for there to be a large increase in the congressional representation of the Democratic-dominated Southern states. Because the full population of freed slaves would be counted rather than three-fifths, the Southern states would dramatically increase their power in the population-based House of Representatives.[87][88] Republicans hoped to offset this advantage by attracting and protecting votes of the newly enfranchised black population.[87][89][90]
Political and economic change in the South
Southern culture remained deeply racist, and those blacks who remained faced a dangerous situation. J. J. Gries reported to the Joint Committee on Reconstruction: "There is a kind of innate feeling, a lingering hope among many in the South that slavery will be regalvanized in some shape or other. They tried by their laws to make a worse slavery than there was before, for the freedman has not the protection which the master from interest gave him before."[91] W. E. B. Du Bois wrote in 1935:
Slavery was not abolished even after the Thirteenth Amendment. There were four million freedmen and most of them on the same plantation, doing the same work that they did before emancipation, except as their work had been interrupted and changed by the upheaval of war. Moreover, they were getting about the same wages and apparently were going to be subject to slave codes modified only in name. There were among them thousands of fugitives in the camps of the soldiers or on the streets of the cities, homeless, sick, and impoverished. They had been freed practically with no land nor money, and, save in exceptional cases, without legal status, and without protection.[92][93]
Official emancipation did not substantially alter the economic situation of most blacks who remained in the south.[94]
As the amendment still permitted labor as punishment for convicted criminals, Southern states responded with what historian Douglas A. Blackmon called "an array of interlocking laws essentially intended to criminalize black life".[95] These laws, passed or updated after emancipation, were known as Black Codes.[88] Mississippi was the first state to pass such codes, with an 1865 law titled "An Act to confer Civil Rights on Freedmen".[96] The Mississippi law required black workers to contract with white farmers by January 1 of each year or face punishment for vagrancy.[95] Blacks could be sentenced to forced labor for crimes including petty theft, using obscene language, or selling cotton after sunset.[97] States passed new, strict vagrancy laws that were selectively enforced against blacks without white protectors.[95][98] The labor of these convicts was then sold to farms, factories, lumber camps, quarries, and mines.[99]
After its ratification of the Thirteenth Amendment in November 1865, the South Carolina legislature immediately began to legislate Black Codes.[100] The Black Codes created a separate set of laws, punishments, and acceptable behaviors for anyone with more than one black great-grandparent. Under these Codes, Blacks could only work as farmers or servants and had few Constitutional rights.[101] Restrictions on black land ownership threatened to make economic subservience permanent.[35]
Some states mandated indefinitely long periods of child "apprenticeship".[102] Some laws did not target Blacks specifically, but instead affected farm workers, most of whom were Black. At the same time, many states passed laws to actively prevent Blacks from acquiring property.[103]
Congressional and executive enforcement
As its first enforcement legislation, Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1866, guaranteeing black Americans citizenship and equal protection of the law, though not the right to vote. The amendment was also used as authorizing several Freedmen's Bureau bills. President Andrew Johnson vetoed these bills, but Congress overrode his vetoes to pass the Civil Rights Act and the Second Freedmen's Bureau Bill.[104][105]
Proponents of the Act, including Trumbull and Wilson, argued that Section 2 of the Thirteenth Amendment authorized the federal government to legislate civil rights for the States. Others disagreed, maintaining that inequality conditions were distinct from slavery.[23]:1788–1790 Seeking more substantial justification, and fearing that future opponents would again seek to overturn the legislation, Congress and the states added additional protections to the Constitution: the Fourteenth Amendment (1868) defining citizenship and mandating equal protection under the law, and the Fifteenth Amendment (1870) banning racial voting restrictions.[106]
The Freedmen's Bureau enforced the amendment locally, providing a degree of support for people subject to the Black Codes.[107] Reciprocally, the Thirteenth Amendment established the Bureau's legal basis to operate in Kentucky.[108] The Civil Rights Act circumvented racism in local jurisdictions by allowing blacks access to the federal courts. The Enforcement Acts of 1870–1871 and the Civil Rights Act of 1875, in combating the violence and intimidation of white supremacy, were also part of the effort to end slave conditions for Southern blacks.[109] However, the effect of these laws waned as political will diminished and the federal government lost authority in the South, particularly after the Compromise of 1877 ended Reconstruction in exchange for a Republican presidency.[110]
Peonage law
Southern business owners sought to reproduce the profitable arrangement of slavery with a system called peonage, in which disproportionately black workers were entrapped by loans and compelled to work indefinitely because of their debt.[111][112] Peonage continued well through Reconstruction and ensnared a large proportion of black workers in the South.[113] These workers remained destitute and persecuted, forced to work dangerous jobs and further confined legally by the racist Jim Crow laws that governed the South.[112] Peonage differed from chattel slavery because it was not strictly hereditary and did not allow the sale of people in exactly the same fashion. However, a person's debt—and by extension a person—could still be sold, and the system resembled antebellum slavery in many ways.[114]
With the Peonage Act of 1867, Congress abolished "the holding of any person to service or labor under the system known as peonage",[115] specifically banning "the voluntary or involuntary service or labor of any persons as peons, in liquidation of any debt or obligation, or otherwise."[116]
In 1939, the Department of Justice created the Civil Rights Section, which focused primarily on First Amendment and labor rights.[117] The increasing scrutiny of totalitarianism in the lead-up to World War II brought increased attention to issues of slavery and involuntary servitude, abroad and at home.[118] The U.S. sought to counter foreign propaganda and increase its credibility on the race issue by combatting the Southern peonage system.[119] Under the leadership of Attorney General Francis Biddle, the Civil Rights Section invoked the constitutional amendments and legislation of the Reconstruction Era as the basis for its actions.[120]
In 1947, the DOJ successfully prosecuted Elizabeth Ingalls for keeping domestic servant Dora L. Jones in conditions of slavery. The court found that Jones "was a person wholly subject to the will of defendant; that she was one who had no freedom of action and whose person and services were wholly under the control of defendant and who was in a state of enforced compulsory service to the defendant."[121] The Thirteenth Amendment enjoyed a swell of attention during this period, but from Brown v. Board (1954) until Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. (1968) it was again eclipsed by the Fourteenth Amendment.[122]
Judicial interpretation
In contrast to the other "Reconstruction Amendments", the Thirteenth Amendment was rarely cited in later case law. As historian Amy Dru Stanley summarizes, "beyond a handful of landmark rulings striking down debt peonage, ﬂagrant involuntary servitude, and some instances of race-based violence and discrimination, the Thirteenth Amendment has never been a potent source of rights claims".[123][124]
Black slaves and their descendants
U. S. v. Rhodes (1866),[125] one of the first Thirteenth Amendment cases, tested the Constitutionality of provisions in the Civil Rights Act of 1866 that granted blacks redress in the federal courts. Kentucky law prohibited blacks from testifying against whites—an arrangement which compromised the ability of Nancy Talbot ("a citizen of the United States of the African race") to reach justice against a white person accused of robbing her. After Talbot attempted to try the case in federal court, the Kentucky Supreme Court ruled this federal option unconstitutional. Noah Swayne (a Supreme Court justice sitting on the Kentucky Circuit Court) overturned the Kentucky decision, holding that without the material enforcement provided by the Civil Rights Act, slavery would not truly be abolished.[126][127] With In Re Turner (1867), Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase ordered freedom for Elizabeth Turner, a former slave in Maryland who became indentured to her former master.[128]
In Blyew v. U.S., (1872)[129] the Supreme Court heard another Civil Rights Act case relating to federal courts in Kentucky. John Blyew and George Kennard were white men visiting the cabin of a black family, the Fosters. Blyew apparently became angry with sixteen-year-old Richard Foster and hit him twice in the head with an ax. Blyew and Kennard killed Richard's parents, Sallie and Jack Foster, and his blind grandmother, Lucy Armstrong. They severely wounded the Fosters' two young daughters. Kentucky courts would not allow the Foster children to testify against Blyew and Kennard. But federal courts, authorized by the Civil Rights Act, found Blyew and Kennard guilty of murder. When the Supreme Court took the case, they ruled (5–2) that the Foster children did not have standing in federal courts because only living people could take advantage of the Act. In doing so, the Courts effectively ruled that Thirteenth Amendment did not permit a federal remedy in murder cases. Swayne and Joseph P. Bradley dissented, maintaining that in order to have meaningful effects, the Thirteenth Amendment would have to address systemic racial oppression.[130]
Though based on a technicality, the Blyew case set a precedent in state and federal courts that led to the erosion of Congress's Thirteenth Amendment powers. The Supreme Court continued along this path in the Slaughter-House Cases (1873), which upheld a state-sanctioned monopoly of white butchers. In United States v. Cruikshank (1876), the Court ignored Thirteenth Amendment dicta from a circuit court decision to exonerate perpetrators of the Colfax massacre and invalidate the Enforcement Act of 1870.[109]
John Marshall Harlan became known as "The Great Dissenter" for his minority opinions favoring powerful Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments.[131]
The Thirteenth Amendment was not solely a ban on chattel slavery, but also covers a much broader array of labor arrangements and social deprivations.[132] As the U.S. Supreme Court explicated in the Slaughter-House Cases (1873) with respect to the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendment and the Thirteenth Amendment in special:
Undoubtedly while negro slavery alone was in the mind of the Congress which proposed the thirteenth article, it forbids any other kind of slavery, now or hereafter. If Mexican peonage or the Chinese coolie labor system shall develop slavery of the Mexican or Chinese race within our territory, this amendment may safely be trusted to make it void. And so if other rights are assailed by the States which properly and necessarily fall within the protection of these articles, that protection will apply, though the party interested may not be of African descent. But what we do say, and what we wish to be understood is, that in any fair and just construction of any section or phrase of these amendments, it is necessary to look to the purpose which we have said was the pervading spirit of them all, the evil which they were designed to remedy, and the process of continued addition to the Constitution, until that purpose was supposed to be accomplished, as far as constitutional law can accomplish it.[133]
In the Civil Rights Cases (1883),[134] the Supreme Court reviewed five consolidated cases dealing with the Civil Rights Act of 1875, which outlawed racial discrimination at "inns, public conveyances on land or water, theaters, and other places of public amusement". The Court ruled that the Thirteenth Amendment did not ban most forms of racial discrimination by non-government actors.[135] In the majority decision, Bradley wrote (again in non-binding dicta) that the Thirteenth Amendment empowered Congress to attack "badges and incidents of slavery". However, he distinguished between "fundamental rights" of citizenship, protected by the Thirteenth Amendment, and the "social rights of men and races in the community".[136] The majority opinion held that "it would be running the slavery argument into the ground to make it apply to every act of discrimination which a person may see fit to make as to guests he will entertain, or as to the people he will take into his coach or cab or car; or admit to his concert or theatre, or deal with in other matters of intercourse or business."[137] In his solitary dissent, John Marshall Harlan (a Kentucky lawyer who changed his mind about civil rights law after witnessing organized racist violence) argued that "such discrimination practiced by corporations and individuals in the exercise of their public or quasi-public functions is a badge of servitude, the imposition of which congress may prevent under its power."[138]
The Court in the Civil Rights Cases also held that appropriate legislation under the amendment could go beyond nullifying state laws establishing or upholding slavery, because the amendment "has a reflex character also, establishing and decreeing universal civil and political freedom throughout the United States" and thus Congress was empowered "to pass all laws necessary and proper for abolishing all badges and incidents of slavery in the United States."[134] The Court stated about the scope the amendment:
This amendment, as well as the Fourteenth, is undoubtedly self-executing, without any ancillary legislation, so far as its terms are applicable to any existing state of circumstances. By its own unaided force and effect, it abolished slavery and established universal freedom. Still, legislation may be necessary and proper to meet all the various cases and circumstances to be affected by it, and to prescribe proper modes of redress for its violation in letter or spirit. And such legislation may be primary and direct in its character, for the amendment is not a mere prohibition of State laws establishing or upholding slavery, but an absolute declaration that slavery or involuntary servitude shall not exist in any part of the United States.[134]
Attorneys in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)[139] argued that racial segregation involved "observances of a servile character coincident with the incidents of slavery", in violation of the Thirteenth Amendment. In their brief to the Supreme Court, Plessy's lawyers wrote that "distinction of race and caste" was inherently unconstitutional.[140] The Supreme Court rejected this reasoning and upheld state laws enforcing segregation under the "separate but equal" doctrine. In the (7–1) majority decision, the Court found that "a statute which implies merely a legal distinction between the white and colored races—a distinction which is founded on the color of the two races and which must always exist so long as white men are distinguished from the other race by color—has no tendency to destroy the legal equality of the two races, or reestablish a state of involuntary servitude."[141] Harlan dissented, writing: "The thin disguise of 'equal' accommodations for passengers in railroad coaches will not mislead any one, nor, atone for the wrong this day done."[142]
In Hodges v. United States (1906),[143] the Court struck down a federal statute providing for the punishment of two or more people who "conspire to injure, oppress, threaten or intimidate any citizen in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States". A group of white men in Arkansas conspired to violently prevent eight black workers from performing their jobs at a lumber mill; the group was convicted by a federal grand jury. The Supreme Court ruled that the federal statute, which outlawed conspiracies to deprive citizens of their liberty, was not authorized by the Thirteenth Amendment. It held that "no mere personal assault or trespass or appropriation operates to reduce the individual to a condition of slavery". Harlan dissented, maintaining his opinion that the Thirteenth Amendment should protect freedom beyond "physical restraint".[144] Corrigan v. Buckley (1922) reaffirmed the interpretation from Hodges, finding that the amendment does not apply to restrictive covenants.
Enforcement of federal civil rights law in the South created numerous peonage cases, which slowly traveled up through the judiciary. The Supreme Court ruled in Clyatt v. United States (1905) that peonage was involuntary servitude. It held that although employers sometimes described their workers' entry into contract as voluntary, the servitude of peonage was always (by definition) involuntary.[145]
In Bailey v. Alabama the U.S. Supreme Court again reaffirmed its holding that Thirteenth Amendment was not solely a ban on chattel slavery, but also covers a much broader array of labor arrangements and social deprivations[132] In addition to the aforesaid the Court also ruled on Congress enforcement power under the Thirteenth Amendment. The Court said:
The plain intention [of the amendment] was to abolish slavery of whatever name and form and all its badges and incidents; to render impossible any state of bondage; to make labor free, by prohibiting that control by which the personal service of one man is disposed of or coerced for another's benefit, which is the essence of involuntary servitude. While the Amendment was self-executing, so far as its terms were applicable to any existing condition, Congress was authorized to secure its complete enforcement by appropriate legislation.[146]
Jones and beyond
Legal histories cite Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. (1968) as a turning point of Thirteen Amendment jurisprudence.[147][148] The Supreme Court confirmed in Jones that Congress may act "rationally" to prevent private actors from imposing "badges and incidents of servitude".[147][149] The Joneses were a black couple in St. Louis County, Missouri who sued a real estate company for refusing to sell them a house. The Court held:
Congress has the power under the Thirteenth Amendment rationally to determine what are the badges and the incidents of slavery, and the authority to translate that determination into effective legislation. [...] this Court recognized long ago that, whatever else they may have encompassed, the badges and incidents of slavery – its "burdens and disabilities" – included restraints upon "those fundamental rights which are the essence of civil freedom, namely, the same right . . . to inherit, purchase, lease, sell and convey property, as is enjoyed by white citizens." Civil Rights Cases, 109 U. S. 3, 109 U. S. 22.[150]
Just as the Black Codes, enacted after the Civil War to restrict the free exercise of those rights, were substitutes for the slave system, so the exclusion of Negroes from white communities became a substitute for the Black Codes. And when racial discrimination herds men into ghettos and makes their ability to buy property turn on the color of their skin, then it too is a relic of slavery.
Negro citizens, North and South, who saw in the Thirteenth Amendment a promise of freedom—freedom to "go and come at pleasure" and to "buy and sell when they please"—would be left with "a mere paper guarantee" if Congress were powerless to assure that a dollar in the hands of a Negro will purchase the same thing as a dollar in the hands of a white man. At the very least, the freedom that Congress is empowered to secure under the Thirteenth Amendment includes the freedom to buy whatever a white man can buy, the right to live wherever a white man can live. If Congress cannot say that being a free man means at least this much, then the Thirteenth Amendment made a promise the Nation cannot keep.[151]
The Court in Jones reopened the issue of linking racism in contemporary society to the history of slavery in the United States.[152]
The Jones precedent has been used to justify Congressional action to protect migrant workers and target sex trafficking.[153] The direct enforcement power found in the Thirteenth Amendment contrasts with that of the Fourteenth, which allows only responses to institutional discrimination of state actors.[154]
Other cases of involuntary servitude
The Supreme Court has taken an especially narrow view of involuntary servitude claims made by people not descended from black (African) slaves. In Robertson v. Baldwin (1897), a group of merchant seamen challenged federal statutes which criminalized a seaman's failure to complete their contractual term of service. The Court ruled that seamen's contracts had been considered unique from time immemorial, and that "the amendment was not intended to introduce any novel doctrine with respect to certain descriptions of service which have always been treated as exceptional." In this case, as in numerous "badges and incidents" cases, Justice Harlan authored a dissent favoring broader Thirteenth Amendment protections.[155]
In Selective Draft Law Cases,[156] the Supreme Court ruled that the military draft was not "involuntary servitude". In United States v. Kozminski,[157] the Supreme Court ruled that the Thirteenth Amendment did not prohibit compulsion of servitude through psychological coercion.[158][159] Kozminski defined involuntary servitude for purposes of criminal prosecution as "a condition of servitude in which the victim is forced to work for the defendant by the use or threat of physical restraint or physical injury or by the use or threat of coercion through law or the legal process. This definition encompasses cases in which the defendant holds the victim in servitude by placing him or her in fear of such physical restraint or injury or legal coercion."[157]
The U.S. Courts of Appeals, in Immediato v. Rye Neck School District, Herndon v. Chapel Hill, and Steirer v. Bethlehem School District, have ruled that the use of community service as a high school graduation requirement did not violate the Thirteenth Amendment.[160]
Prior proposed Thirteenth Amendments
During the six decades following the 1804 ratification of the Twelfth Amendment two proposals to amend the Constitution were adopted by Congress and sent to the states for ratification. Neither has been ratified by the number of states necessary to become part of the Constitution. Commonly known as the Titles of Nobility Amendment and the Corwin Amendment, both are referred to as Article Thirteen, as was the successful Thirteenth Amendment, in the joint resolution passed by Congress.
The Titles of Nobility Amendment (pending before the states since May 1, 1810) would, if ratified, strip citizenship from any United States citizen who accepts a title of nobility or honor from a foreign country without the consent of Congress.[161]
The Corwin Amendment (pending before the states since March 2, 1861) would, if ratified, shield "domestic institutions" of the states (in 1861 this was a common euphemism for slavery) from the constitutional amendment process and from abolition or interference by Congress.[162][163]
See also
Crittenden Compromise
National Freedom Day
Slavery Abolition Act 1833
Slave Trade Acts
List of amendments to the United States Constitution
History of unfree labor in the United States
United States labor law
References
Citations
Jump up ^ "13th Amendment". Legal Information Institute. Cornell University Law School. November 20, 2012. Retrieved November 30, 2012.
Jump up ^ Kenneth M. Stampp (1980). The Imperiled Union:Essays on the Background of the Civil War. Oxford University Press. p. 85. ISBN 9780199878529.
Jump up ^ Jean Allain (2012). The Legal Understanding of Slavery: From the Historical to the Contemporary. Oxford University Press. p. 117. ISBN 9780199660469.
Jump up ^ Jean Allain (2012). The Legal Understanding of Slavery: From the Historical to the Contemporary. Oxford University Press. pp. 119–120. ISBN 9780199660469.
Jump up ^ Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (2004), p. 14.
Jump up ^ Foner, 2010, pp. 20–22
Jump up ^ Vile, John R., ed. (2003). "Thirteenth Amendment". Encyclopedia of Constitutional Amendments, Proposed Amendments, and Amending Issues: 1789–2002. ABC-CLIO. pp. 449–52.
^ Jump up to: a b Goodwin, 2005, p. 123
Jump up ^ Foner, 2010, p. 59
Jump up ^ "The Emancipation Proclamation". National Archives and Records Administration. Retrieved 2013-06-27.
Jump up ^ McPherson, 1988, p. 558
Jump up ^ Vorenberg, Final Freedom (2001), p. 47.
Jump up ^ Vorenberg, Final Freedom (2001), p. 48–51.
Jump up ^ Leonard L. Richards, Who Freed the Slaves?: The Fight over the Thirteenth Amendment (2015) excerpt
Jump up ^ "James Ashley". Ohio History Central. Ohio Historical Society.
Jump up ^ Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (2004), (2001), pp. 38–42.
Jump up ^ Stanley, "Instead of Waiting for the Thirteenth Amendment" (2010), pp. 741–742.
Jump up ^ Michigan State Historical Society (1901). Historical collections. Michigan Historical Commission. p. 582. Retrieved December 5, 2012.
Jump up ^ Vorenberg, Final Freedom (2001), pp. 52–53. "Sumner made his intentions clearer on February 8, when he introduced his constitutional amendment to the Senate and asked that it be referred to his new committee. So desperate was he to make his amendment the final version that he challenged the well-accepted custom of sending proposed amendments to the Judiciary Committee. His Republican colleagues would hear nothing of it.
Jump up ^ "Congressional Proposals and Senate Passage" Archived November 7, 2006, at the Wayback Machine., Harpers Weekly, The Creation of the 13th Amendment, Retrieved Feb 15, 2007
Jump up ^ Vorenberg, Final Freedom (2001), p. 53. "It was no coincidence that Trumbull's announcement came only two days after Sumner had proposed his amendment making all persons 'equal before the law.' The Massachusetts senator had spurred the committee into final action."
Jump up ^ "Northwest Ordinance; July 13, 1787". Avalon Project. Lillian Goldman Law Library, Yale Law School. Retrieved February 17, 2014.
^ Jump up to: a b c d McAward, Jennifer Mason (November 2012). "McCulloch and the Thirteenth Amendment". Columbia Law Review. Columbia Law School. 112 (7): 1769–1809. JSTOR 41708164. Pdf.
Jump up ^ Vorenberg, Final Freedom (2001), p. 54. "Although it made Henderson's amendment the foundation of the final amendment, the committee rejected an article in Henderson's version that allowed the amendment to be adopted by the approval of only a simple majority in Congress and the ratification of only two-thirds of the states."
Jump up ^ Goodwin, 2005, p. 686
Jump up ^ Goodwin, 2005, pp. 624–25
Jump up ^ Foner, 2010, p. 299
Jump up ^ Goodwin, 2005, p. 639
Jump up ^ Benedict, "Constitutional Politics, Constitutional Law, and the Thirteenth Amendment" (2012), p. 179.
Jump up ^ Benedict, "Constitutional Politics, Constitutional Law, and the Thirteenth Amendment" (2012), p. 179–180. Benedict quotes Sen. Garrett Davis: "there is a boundary between the power of revolution and the power of amendment, which the latter, as established in our Constitution, cannot pass; and that if the proposed change is revolutionary it would be null and void, notwithstanding it might be formally adopted." The full text of Davis's speech, with comments from others, appears in Great Debates in American History (1918), ed. Marion Mills Miller.
^ Jump up to: a b Colbert, "Liberating the Thirteenth Amendment" (1995), pp. 10–11.
Jump up ^ Benedict, "Constitutional Politics, Constitutional Law, and the Thirteenth Amendment" (2012), p. 182.
Jump up ^ tenBroek, Jacobus (June 1951). "Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States: Consummation to Abolition and Key to the Fourteenth Amendment". California Law Review. California Law Review, Inc. via JSTOR. 39 (2): 180. JSTOR 3478033. doi:10.2307/3478033. It would make it possible for white citizens to exercise their constitutional right under the comity clause to reside in Southern states regardless of their opinions. It would carry out the constitutional declaration "that each citizen of the United States shall have equal privileges in every other state." It would protect citizens in their rights under the First Amendment and comity clause to freedom of speech, freedom of press, freedom of religion and freedom of assembly Preview.
Jump up ^ Vorenberg, Final Freedom (2001), p. 61.
^ Jump up to: a b Trelease, White Terror (1971), p. xvii. "Negroes wanted the same freedom that white men enjoyed, with equal prerogatives and opportunities. The educated black minority emphasized civil and political rights more than the masses, who called most of all for land and schools. In an agrarian society, the only kind most of them knew, landownership was associated with freedom, respectability, and the good life. It was almost universally desired by Southern blacks, as it was by landless peasants the world over. Give us our land and we can take care of ourselves, said a group of South Carolina Negroes to a Northern journalist in 1865; without land the old masters can hire us or starve us as they please."
Jump up ^ Vorenberg, Final Freedom (2001), p. 73. "The first notable convert was Representative James Brooks of New York, who, on the floor of Congress on February 18, 1864, declared that slavery was dying if not already dead, and that his party should stop defending the institution."
Jump up ^ Vorenberg, Final Freedom (2001), p. 74. "The antislavery amendment caught Johnson's eye, however, because it offered an indisputable constitutional solution to the problem of slavery."
Jump up ^ Vorenberg, Final Freedom (2001), p. 203.
Jump up ^ Foner, 2010, pp. 312–14
Jump up ^ Donald, 1996, p. 396
Jump up ^ Vorenberg, Final Freedom (2001), p. 48. "The president worried that an abolition amendment might foul the political waters. The amendments he had recommended in December 1862 had gone nowhere, mainly because they reflected an outdated program of gradual emancipation, which included compensation and colonization. Moreover, Lincoln knew that he did not have to propose amendments because others more devoted to abolition would, especially if he pointed out the vulnerability of existing emancipation legislation. He was also concerned about negative reactions from conservatives, particularly potential new recruits from the Democrats.
Jump up ^ Willis, John C. "Republican Party Platform, 1864". University of the South. Retrieved 2013-06-28. Resolved, That as slavery was the cause, and now constitutes the strength of this Rebellion, and as it must be, always and everywhere, hostile to the principles of Republican Government, justice and the National safety demand its utter and complete extirpation from the soil of the Republic; and that, while we uphold and maintain the acts and proclamations by which the Government, in its own defense, has aimed a deathblow at this gigantic evil, we are in favor, furthermore, of such an amendment to the Constitution, to be made by the people in conformity with its provisions, as shall terminate and forever prohibit the existence of Slavery within the limits of the jurisdiction of the United States.
Jump up ^ "1864: The Civil War Election". Get Out the Vote. Cornell University. 2004. Retrieved 2013-06-28. Despite internal Party conflicts, Republicans rallied around a platform that supported restoration of the Union and the abolition of slavery.
Jump up ^ Goodwin, 2005, pp. 686–87
Jump up ^ Vorenberg, Final Freedom (2001), p. 176–177, 180.
Jump up ^ Vorenberg, Final Freedom (2001), p. 178.
Jump up ^ Foner, 2010, pp. 312–13
Jump up ^ Goodwin, 2005, p. 687
Jump up ^ Goodwin, 2005, pp. 687–689
Jump up ^ Donald, 1996, p. 554
Jump up ^ Vorenberg, Final Freedom (2001), p. 187. "But the clearest sign of the people's voice against slavery, argued amendment supporters, was the recent election. Following Lincoln's lead, Republican representatives like Godlove S. Orth of Indiana claimed that the vote represented a 'popular verdict . . . in unmistakable language' in favor of the amendment."
Jump up ^ Goodwin, 2005, p. 688
Jump up ^ Vorenberg, Final Freedom (2001), p. 191. "The necessity of keeping support for the amendment broad enough to secure its passage created a strange situation. At the moment that Republicans were promoting new, far-reaching legislation for African Americans, they had to keep this legislation detached from the first constitutional amendment dealing exclusively with African American freedom. Republicans thus gave freedom under the antislavery amendment a vague construction: freedom was something more than the absence of chattel slavery but less than absolute equality."
Jump up ^ Vorenberg, Final Freedom (2001), pp. 191–192. "One of the most effective methods used by amendment supporters to convey the measure's conservative character was to proclaim the permanence of patriarchal power within the American family in the face of this or any textual change to the Constitution. In response to Democrats who charged that the antislavery was but the first step in a Republican design to dissolve all of society's foundations, including the hierarchical structure of the family, the Iowa Republican John A. Kasson denied any desire to interfere with 'the rights of a husband to a wife' or 'the right of [a] father to his child."
Jump up ^ Vorenberg, Final Freedom (2001), pp. 197–198.
Jump up ^ Vorenberg, Final Freedom (2001), p. 198. "It was at this point that the president wheeled into action on behalf of the Amendment […] Now he became more forceful. To one representative whose brother had died in the war, Lincoln said, 'your brother died to save the Republic from death by the slaveholders' rebellion. I wish you could see it to be your duty to vote for the Constitutional amendment ending slavery.'"
Jump up ^ "TO PASS S.J. RES. 16. (P. 531-2).". GovTrack.us.
Jump up ^ Foner, 2010, p. 313
Jump up ^ Foner, 2010, p. 314
Jump up ^ McPherson, 1988, p. 840
Jump up ^ Harrison, "Lawfulness of the Reconstruction Amendments" (2001), p. 389. "For reasons that have never been entirely clear, the amendment was presented to the President pursuant to Article I, Section 7, of the Constitution, and signed.
Jump up ^ "Joint Resolution Submitting 13th Amendment to the States; signed by Abraham Lincoln and Congress". The Abraham Lincoln Papers at the Library of Congress: Series 3. General Correspondence. 1837–1897. Library of Congress.
Jump up ^ Thorpe, Constitutional History (1901), p. 154. "But many held that the President's signature was not essential to an act of this kind, and, on the fourth of February, Senator Trumbull offered a resolution, which was agreed to three days later, that the approval was not required by the Constitution; 'that it was contrary to the early decision of the Senate and of the Supreme Court; and that the negative of the President applying only to the ordinary cases of legislation, he had nothing to do with propositions to amend the Constitution'."
Jump up ^ Thorpe, Constitutional History (1901), p. 154. "The President signed the joint resolution on the first of February. Somewhat curiously the signing has only one precedent, and that was in spirit and purpose the complete antithesis of the present act. President Buchanan had signed the proposed amendment of 1861, which would make slavery national and perpetual."
Jump up ^ Lincoln's struggle to get the amendment through Congress, while bringing the war to an end, is portrayed in Lincoln.
Jump up ^ Harrison (2001), Lawfulness of the Reconstruction Amendments, p. 390.
Jump up ^ Samuel Eliot Morison (1965). The Oxford History of the American People. Oxford University Press. p. 710.
Jump up ^ Harrison, "Lawfulness of the Reconstruction Amendments" (2001), pp. 394–397.
Jump up ^ Eric L. McKitrick (1960). Andrew Johnson and Reconstruction. U. Chicago Press. p. 178. ISBN 9780195057072.
Jump up ^ Clara Mildred Thompson (1915). Reconstruction in Georgia: economic, social, political, 1865–1872. Columbia University Press. p. 156.
Jump up ^ Vorenberg (2001), Final Freedom, pp. 227–228.
^ Jump up to: a b Vorenberg (2001), Final Freedom, p. 229.
Jump up ^ Du Bois (1935), Black Reconstruction, p. 208.
Jump up ^ Thorpe (1901), Constitutional History, p. 210.
Jump up ^ Tsesis (2004), The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom, p. 48.
^ Jump up to: a b U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, 112th Congress, 2nd Session, SENATE DOCUMENT No. 112–9 (2013). "THE CONSTITUTION of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION Centennial Edition INTERIM EDITION: ANALYSIS OF CASES DECIDED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES TO JUNE 26, 2013s" (PDF). p. 30. Retrieved February 17, 2014.
Jump up ^ Seward certificate proclaiming the Thirteenth Amendment to have been adopted as part of the Constitution as of December 6, 1865.
Jump up ^ Vorenberg (2001), Final Freedom, p. 232.
Jump up ^ Kocher, Greg (February 23, 2013). "Kentucky supported Lincoln's efforts to abolish slavery – 111 years late". Lexington Herald-Leader. Retrieved February 17, 2014.
Jump up ^ Ben Waldron (February 18, 2013). "Mississippi Officially Abolishes Slavery, Ratifies 13th Amendment". ABC News. Archived from the original on June 4, 2013. Retrieved April 23, 2013.
Jump up ^ "The Constitution of the United States: Amendments 11–27". United States National Archives. United States National Archives. Retrieved 24 February 2014.
Jump up ^ Lowell Harrison & James C. Klotter, A New History of Kentucky, University Press of Kentucky, 1997; p. 180; ISBN 9780813126210
^ Jump up to: a b Forehand, "Striking Resemblance" (1996), p. 82.
Jump up ^ Hornsby, Alan, ed. (2011). "Delaware". Black America: A State-by-State Historical Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. p. 139. ISBN 9781573569767.
Jump up ^ Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (2004), pp. 17 & 34.
Jump up ^ "The Thirteenth Amendment", Primary Documents in American History, Library of Congress. Retrieved Feb 15, 2007
^ Jump up to: a b Goldstone 2011, p. 22.
^ Jump up to: a b Stromberg, "A Plain Folk Perspective" (2002), p. 111.
Jump up ^ Nelson, William E. (1988). The Fourteenth Amendment: From Political Principle to Judicial Doctrine. Harvard University Press. p. 47. ISBN 9780674041424. Retrieved June 6, 2013.
Jump up ^ Stromberg, "A Plain Folk Perspective" (2002), p. 112.
Jump up ^ J. J. Gries to the Joint Committee on Reconstruction, quoted in Du Bois, Black Reconstruction (1935), p. 140.
Jump up ^ Du Bois, Black Reconstruction (1935), p. 188.
Jump up ^ Quoted in Vorenberg, Final Freedom (2001), p. 244.
Jump up ^ Trelease, White Terror (1971), p. xviii. "The truth seems to be that, after a brief exulation with the idea of freedom, Negroes realized that their position was hardly changed; they continued to live and work much as they had before."
^ Jump up to: a b c Blackmon 2008, p. 53.
Jump up ^ Novak, Wheel of Servitude (1978), p. 2.
Jump up ^ Blackmon 2008, p. 100.
Jump up ^ Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (2004), pp. 51–52.
Jump up ^ Blackmon 2008, p. 6.
Jump up ^ Vorenberg, Final Freedom (2001), pp. 230–231. "The black codes were a violation of freedom of contract, one of the civil rights that Republicans expected to flow from the amendment. Because South Carolina and other states anticipated that congressional Republicans would try to use the Thirteenth Amendment to outlaw the codes, they made the preemptive strike of declaring in their ratification resolutions that Congress could not use the amendment's second clause to legislate on freed people's civil rights."
Jump up ^ Benjamin Ginsberg, Moses of South Carolina: A Jewish Scalawag during Radical Reconstruction; Johns Hopkins Press, 2010; pp. 44–46.
Jump up ^ Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (2004), p. 50.
Jump up ^ Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (2004), p. 51.
Jump up ^ Vorenberg, Final Freedom (2001), pp. 233–234.
Jump up ^ W. E. B. Du Bois, "The Freedmen's Bureau", The Atlantic, March 1901.
Jump up ^ Goldstone 2011, pp. 23–24.
Jump up ^ Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (2004), pp. 50–51. "Blacks applied to local provost marshalls and Freedmen's Bureau for help against these child abductions, particularly in those cases where children were taken from living parents. Jack Prince asked for help when a woman bound his maternal niece. Sally Hunter requested assistance to obtain the release of her two nieces. Bureau officials finally put an end to the system of indenture in 1867".
Jump up ^ Forehand, "Striking Resemblance" (1996), p. 99–100, 105.
^ Jump up to: a b Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (2004), p. 66–67.
Jump up ^ Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (2004), pp. 56–57, 60–61. "If the Republicans had hoped to gradually use section 2 of the Thirteenth Amendment to pass Reconstruction legislation, they would soon learn that President Johnson, using his veto power, would make increasingly more difficult the passage of any measure augmenting the power of the national government. Further, with time, even leading antislavery Republicans would become less adamant and more willing to reconcile with the South than protect the rights of the newly freed. This was clear by the time Horace Greely accepted the Democratic nomination for president in 1872 and even more when President Rutherford B. Hayes entered the Compromise of 1877, agreeing to withdraw federal troops from the South."
Jump up ^ Wolff, "The Thirteenth Amendment and Slavery in the Global Economy" (2002), p. 981. "Peonage was a system of forced labor that depended upon the indebtedness of a worker, rather than an actual property right in a slave, as the means of compelling work. A prospective employer would offer a laborer a "loan" or "advance" on his wages, typically as a condition of employment, and then use the newly created debt to compel the worker to remain on the job for as long as the employer wished."
^ Jump up to: a b Wolff, "The Thirteenth Amendment and Slavery in the Global Economy" (2002), p. 982. "Not surprisingly, employers used peonage arrangements primarily in industries that involved hazardous working conditions and very low pay. While black workers were not the exclusive victims of peonage arrangements in America, they suffered under its yoke in vastly disproportionate numbers. Along with Jim Crow laws that segregated transportation and public facilities, these laws helped to restrict the movement of freed black workers and thereby keep them in a state of poverty and vulnerability."
Jump up ^ Wolff, "The Thirteenth Amendment and Slavery in the Global Economy" (2002), p. 982. "Legally sanctioned peonage arrangements blossomed in the South following the Civil War and continued into the twentieth century. According to the Professor Jacqueline Jones, 'perhaps as many as one-third of all [sharecropping farmers] in Alabama, Mississippi, and George were being held against their will in 1900."
Jump up ^ Wolff, "The Thirteenth Amendment and Slavery in the Global Economy" (2002), p. 982. "It did not recognize a property right in a human being (a peon could not be sold in the manner of a slave); and the condition of peonage did not work 'corruption of blood' and travel to the children of the worker. Peonage, in short, was not chattel slavery. Yet the practice unquestionably reproduced many of the immediate practical realities of slavery—a vast underclass of laborers, held to their jobs by force of law and threat of imprisonment, with few if any opportunities for escape."
Jump up ^ Goluboff, "Lost Origins of Civil Rights" (2001), p. 1638.
Jump up ^ Soifer, "Prohibition of Voluntary Peonage" (2012), p. 1617.
Jump up ^ Goluboff, "Lost Origins of Civil Rights" (2001), p. 1616.
Jump up ^ Goluboff, "Lost Origins of Civil Rights" (2001), pp. 1619–1621.
Jump up ^ Goluboff, "Lost Origins of Civil Rights" (2001), pp. 1626–1628.
Jump up ^ Goluboff, "Lost Origins of Civil Rights" (2001), pp. 1629, 1635.
Jump up ^ Goluboff, "Lost Origins of Civil Rights" (2001), p. 1668.
Jump up ^ Goluboff, "Lost Origins of Civil Rights", pp. 1680–1683.
Jump up ^ Amy Dru Stanley (June 2010). "Instead of Waiting for the Thirteenth Amendment: The War Power, Slave Marriage, and Inviolate Human Rights". American Historical Review. 115 (3): 735.
Jump up ^ Kenneth L. Karst (January 1, 2000). "Thirteenth Amendment (Judicial Interpretation)". Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. – via HighBeam Research (subscription required). Retrieved June 16, 2013.
Jump up ^ 27 Fed. Cas. 785 (1866)
Jump up ^ Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (2004), pp. 62–63.
Jump up ^ Seth P. Waxman, "orgetown.edu/facpub/287/ Twins at Birth: Civil Rights and the Role of the Solicitor General", Indiana Law Journal 75, 2000; pp. 1302–1303.
Jump up ^ Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (2004), pp. 63–64.
Jump up ^ 80 U.S. 581 (1871)
Jump up ^ Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (2004), pp. 64–66.
Jump up ^ Waskey, Andrew J. "John Marshall Harlan". In Wilson, Steven Harmon. The U.S. Justice System: An Encyclopedia: An Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. p. 547. ISBN 978-1-59884-305-7.
^ Jump up to: a b Maria L. Ontiveros, Professor of Law, University of San Francisco School of Law, and Joshua R. Drexler, J.D. Candidate, May 2008, University of San Francisco School of Law (21 July 2008), The Thirteenth Amendment and Access to Education for Children of Undocumented Workers: A New Look at Plyler v. Doe'; Publisher: University of San Francisco Law Review, Volume 42, Spring 2008, Pages 1045–1076; here page 1058-1059. The article was developed from a working paper prepared for the roundtable, "The Education of All Our Children: The 25th Anniversary of Plyler v. Doe," sponsored by the Chief Justice Earl Warren Institute on Race, Ethnicity & Diversity (University of California, Berkeley, Boalt Hall School of Law), held on May 7, 2007.
Jump up ^ The Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. (36 Wall.), at 72 (1873)
^ Jump up to: a b c Text of Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 (1883) is available from: Findlaw Justia LII
Jump up ^ Goldstone 2011, p. 122.
Jump up ^ Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (2004), p. 70.
Jump up ^ Appleton's Annual Cyclopædia and Register of Important Events of the Year ... D. Appleton & Company. 1888. p. 132. Retrieved June 11, 2013.
Jump up ^ Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (2004), p. 73.
Jump up ^ 163 U.S. 537 (1896)
Jump up ^ Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (2004), p. 76.
Jump up ^ Goldstone 2011, pp. 162, 164–65.
Jump up ^ Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (2004), p. 78.
Jump up ^ 203 U.S. 1 (1906)
Jump up ^ Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (2004), p. 79–80.
Jump up ^ Wolff, "The Thirteenth Amendment and Slavery in the Global Economy" (2002), p. 983.
Jump up ^ Bailey v. Alabama, 219 U.S. 219, 241 (1910).
^ Jump up to: a b Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (2004), p. 3. "After Reconstruction, however, a series of Supreme Court decisions substantially diminished the amendment's significance in achieving genuine liberation. The Court did not revisit the amendment's meaning until 1968, during the heyday of the Civil Rights movement. In Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer, the Court found that the Thirteenth Amendment not only ended unrecompensed, forced labor but that its second section also empowered Congress to develop legislation that is 'rationally' related to ending any remaining 'badges and incidents of servitude'."
Jump up ^ Colbert, "Liberating the Thirteenth Amendment" (1995), p. 2.
Jump up ^ "Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. 392 U.S. 409 (1968)". Legal Information Institute at Cornell University Law Schhool. Retrieved 22 October 2015. Syllabus: "[T]he badges and incidents of slavery that the Thirteenth Amendment empowered Congress to eliminate included restraints upon those fundamental rights which are the essence of civil freedom, namely, the same right . . . to inherit, purchase, lease, sell and convey property, as is enjoyed by white citizens. Civil Rights Cases, 09 U.S. 3, 22. Insofar as Hodges v. United States, 203 U.S. 1, suggests a contrary holding, it is overruled." Footnote 78: "[W]e note that the entire Court [in the Civil Rights Cases; content added] agreed upon at least one proposition: the Thirteenth Amendment authorizes Congress not only to outlaw all forms of slavery and involuntary servitude, but also to eradicate the last vestiges and incidents of a society half slave and half free by securing to all citizens, of every race and color, the same right to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, give evidence, and to inherit, purchase, lease, sell and convey property, as is enjoyed by white citizens. [...] The conclusion of the majority in Hodges rested upon a concept of congressional power under the Thirteenth Amendment irreconcilable with the position taken by every member of this Court in the Civil Rights Cases and incompatible with the history and purpose of the Amendment itself. Insofar as Hodges is inconsistent with our holding today, it is hereby overruled."
Jump up ^ 'Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., 392 U.S. 409 (1968)
Jump up ^ Alison Shay, "Remembering Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. Archived September 28, 2013, at the Wayback Machine.", Publishing the Long Civil Rights Movement, 17 June 2012.
Jump up ^ Colbert, "Liberating the Thirteenth Amendment" (1995), pp. 3–4.
Jump up ^ Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (2004), p. 3. "The Court's holding in Jones enables Congress to pass statutes against present-day human rights violations, such as the trafficking of foreign workers as sex slaves and the exploitation of migrant agricultural workers as peons."
Jump up ^ Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (2004), pp. 112–113. "... the Thirteenth Amendment remains the principal constitutional source requiring the federal government to protect individual liberties against arbitrary private and public infringements that resemble the incidents of involuntary servitude. Moreover, the Thirteenth Amendment is a positive injunction requiring Congress to pass laws to that end, while the Fourteenth Amendment is 'responsive' to 'unconstitutional behavior.'"
Jump up ^ Wolff, "The Thirteenth Amendment and Slavery in the Global Economy" (2002), p. 977.
Jump up ^ 245 U.S. 366 (1918)
^ Jump up to: a b 487 U.S. 931 (1988)
Jump up ^ "Thirteenth Amendment—Slavery and Involuntary Servitude", GPO Access, U.S. Government Printing Office, p. 1557
Jump up ^ Risa Goluboff (2001), "The 13th Amendment and the Lost Origins of Civil Rights," Duke Law Journal, Vol 50, no. 228, p. 1609
Jump up ^ Loupe, Diane (August 2000). "Community Service: Mandatory or Voluntary? – Industry Overview". School Administrator: 8. Archived from the original on May 15, 2011.
Jump up ^ Mark W. Podvia (2009). "Titles of Nobility". In David Andrew Schultz. Encyclopedia of the United States Constitution. Infobase. pp. 738–39. ISBN 9781438126777.
Jump up ^ "Constitutional Amendments Not Ratified". United States House of Representatives. Archived from the original on 2012-07-02. Retrieved 2013-11-21.
Jump up ^ Foner, 2010, p. 158
Bibliography
Belz, Herman (1978). Emancipation and Equal Rights: Politics and Constitutionalism in the Civil War Era. New York: W. W. Norton. Preview.
Benedict, Michael L. (2011). "Constitutional Politics, Constitutional Law, and the Thirteenth Amendment". Maryland Law Review. University of Maryland School of Law. 71 (1): 163–188. Pdf.
Blackmon, Douglas A. (March 25, 2008). Slavery by Another Name: The Re-Enslavement of Black Americans from the Civil War to World War II. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. ISBN 9780385506250. Preview.
Colbert, Douglas L. (Winter 1995). "Liberating the Thirteenth Amendment". Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review. Harvard Law School. 30 (1): 1–55.
Cramer, Clayton E. (1997). Black Demographic Data, 1790–1860: A Sourcebook. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 9780313302435.
Donald, David Herbert (1996). Lincoln. Simon & Schuster. ISBN 9780684825359. Preview.
Du Bois, W.E.B. (1935). Black Reconstruction: An Essay Toward a History of the Part Which Black Folk Played in the Attempt to Reconstruct Democracy in America, 1860–1880'. New York: Russell & Russell. OCLC 317424.
Foner, Eric (2010). The Fiery Trial: Abraham Lincoln and American Slavery. W. W. Norton. ISBN 9780393066180. Preview.
Forehand, Beverly (1996). Striking Resemblance: Kentucky, Tennessee, Black Codes and Readjustment, 1865–1866 (Masters thesis). Western Kentucky University.
Goluboff, Risa L. (April 2001). "The Thirteenth Amendment and the lost origins of civil rights". Duke Law Journal. Duke University School of Law. 50 (6): 1609–1685. JSTOR 1373044. doi:10.2307/1373044. Pdf.
Goldstone, Lawrence (2011). Inherently Unequal: The Betrayal of Equal Rights by the Supreme Court, 1865–1903. Walker & Company. ISBN 9780802717924. Preview.
Goodwin, Doris Kearns (2005). Team of rivals: the political genius of Abraham Lincoln. Simon & Schuster. ISBN 9780743270755. Preview.
Harrison, John (Spring 2001). "The lawfulness of the reconstruction amendments". University of Chicago Law Review. University of Chicago Law School. 68 (2): 375–462. JSTOR 1600377. doi:10.2307/1600377. Pdf.
Kachun, Mitch (2003). Festivals of Freedom: Memory and Meaning in African American Emancipation Celebrations, 1808–1915. Online.
McAward, Jennifer Mason (2010). "The scope of Congress's Thirteenth Amendment enforcement power after City of Boerne v. Flores". Washington University Law Review. Washington University School of Law. 88 (1): 77–147. Pdf.
Response to McAward: Tsesis, Alexander (2011). "Congressional authority to interpret the Thirteenth Amendment". Maryland Law Review. University of Maryland School of Law. 71 (1): 40–59. SSRN 1753224  . Pdf.
Response to Tsesis: McAward, Jennifer Mason (2011). "Congressional authority to interpret the Thirteenth Amendment: a response to Professor Tsesis". Maryland Law Review. University of Maryland School of Law. 71 (1): 60–82. SSRN 2271791  . Pdf.
McConnell, Joyce E. (Spring 1992). "Beyond metaphor: battered women, involuntary servitude and the Thirteenth Amendment". Yale Journal of Law and Feminism. Yale Law School. 4 (2): 207–253. Pdf.
McPherson, James M. (1988). Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195038637. Preview.
Novak, Daniel A. (1978). The Wheel of Servitude: Black Forced Labor after Slavery. Kentucky: University Press of Kentucky. ISBN 0813113717.
Richards, Leonard L. (2015). Who Freed the Slaves?: The Fight over the Thirteenth Amendment. Excerpt. Emphasis on the role of Congressman James Ashley.
Samito, Christian G., Lincoln and the Thirteenth Amendment (Southern Illinois University Press, 2015) xii, 171 pp.
Stanley, Amy Dru (June 2010). "Instead of waiting for the Thirteenth Amendment: the war power, slave marriage, and inviolate human rights". The American Historical Review. Oxford Journals for the American Historical Association via JSTOR. 115 (3): 732–765. JSTOR 10.1086/ahr.115.3.732. doi:10.1086/ahr.115.3.732. Pdf.
Stromberg, Joseph R. (Spring 2002). "A plain folk perspective on reconstruction, state-building, ideology, and economic spoils". Journal of Libertarian Studies. Center for Libertarian Studies, Ludwig von Mises Institute. 16 (2): 103–137. Pdf.
tenBroek, Jacobus (June 1951). "Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States: Consummation to Abolition and Key to the Fourteenth Amendment". California Law Review. California Law Review, Inc. via JSTOR. 39 (2): 171–203. JSTOR 3478033. doi:10.2307/3478033. Pdf.
Thorpe, Francis Newton (1901). "The Constitutional History of the United States, vol. 3: 1861 – 1895". Chicago.
Trelease, Allen W. (1971). White Terror: The Ku Klux Klan Conspiracy and Southern Reconstruction. New York: Harper & Row.
Tsesis, Alexander (2004). The Thirteenth Amendment and American freedom: a legal history. New York: New York University Press. ISBN 0814782760.
Vicino, Thomas J.; Hanlon, Bernadette (2014). Global Migration The Basics. Routledge. ISBN 9781134696871.
Vorenberg, Michael (2001). Final freedom: the Civil War, the abolition of slavery, and the Thirteenth Amendment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781139428002. Preview.
Barrington Wolff, Tobias (May 2002). "The Thirteenth Amendment and slavery in the global economy". Columbia Law Review. Columbia Law School. 102 (4): 973–1050. JSTOR 1123649. doi:10.2307/1123649.
Wood, Gordon S (2010). Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789–1815. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195039146. , Book

Maryland Law Review, special issue: Symposium – the Maryland Constitutional Law Schmooze
Garber, Mark A. (2011). "Foreword: Plus or minus one: the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments". Maryland Law Review. University of Maryland School of Law. 71 (1): 12–20. Pdf.
Carter Jr., William M. (2011). "The Thirteenth Amendment, interest convergence, and the badges and incidents of slavery". Maryland Law Review. University of Maryland School of Law. 71 (1): 21–39. SSRN 1932762  . Pdf.
Tsesis, Alexander (2011). "Congressional authority to interpret the Thirteenth Amendment". Maryland Law Review. University of Maryland School of Law. 71 (1): 40–59. SSRN 1753224  . Pdf.
McAward, Jennifer Mason (2011). "Congressional authority to interpret the Thirteenth Amendment: a response to Professor Tsesis". Maryland Law Review. University of Maryland School of Law. 71 (1): 60–82. SSRN 2271791  . Pdf.
McClain, Linda C. (2011). "Involuntary servitude, public accommodations laws, and the legacy of Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States". Maryland Law Review. University of Maryland School of Law. 71 (1): 83–162. SSRN 2188939  . Pdf.
Benedict, Michael Les (2011). "Constitutional politics, constitutional law, and the Thirteenth Amendment". Maryland Law Review. University of Maryland School of Law. 71 (1): 163–188. Pdf.
Pope, James Gray (2011). "What's different about the Thirteenth Amendment, and why does it matter?". Maryland Law Review. University of Maryland School of Law. 71 (1): 189–202. SSRN 1894965  . Pdf.
Novkov, Julie (2011). "The Thirteenth Amendment and the meaning of familial bonds". Maryland Law Review. University of Maryland School of Law. 71 (1): 203–228. Pdf.
Kersch, Ken I. (2011). "Beyond originalism: conservative declarationism and constitutional redemption". Maryland Law Review. University of Maryland School of Law. 71 (1): 229–282. Pdf.
Zietlow, Rebecca E. I. (2011). "Conclusion: the political Thirteenth Amendment". Maryland Law Review. University of Maryland School of Law. 71 (1): 283–294. SSRN 2000929  . Pdf.

Columbia Law Review, special issue: Symposium: The Thirteenth Amendment: Meaning, Enforcement, and Contemporary Implications
INTRODUCTION
Tsesis, Alexander (November 2012). "Into the light of day: relevance of the Thirteenth Amendment to contemporary law". Columbia Law Review. Columbia Law School. 112 (7): 1447–1458. JSTOR 41708155. Archived from the original on 2015-11-17. Pdf.
PANEL I: THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT IN CONTEXT
Balkin, Jack M.; Levinson, Sanford (November 2012). "The dangerous Thirteenth Amendment". Columbia Law Review. Columbia Law School. 112 (7): 1459–1499. JSTOR 41708156. Archived from the original on 2015-11-17. Pdf.
Graber, Mark A. (November 2012). "Subtraction by addition?: The Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments". Columbia Law Review. Columbia Law School. 112 (7): 1501–1549. JSTOR 41708157. Archived from the original on 2015-11-17. Pdf.
Rutherglen, George (November 2012). "The Thirteenth Amendment, the power of Congress, and the shifting sources of civil rights law". Columbia Law Review. Columbia Law School. 112 (7): 1551–1584. JSTOR 41708158. Archived from the original on 2015-11-17. Pdf.
PANEL II: RECONSTRUCTION REVISITED
Foner, Eric (November 2012). "The Supreme Court and the history of reconstruction – and vice-versa". Columbia Law Review. Columbia Law School. 112 (7): 1585–1606. JSTOR 41708159. Archived from the original on 2015-11-17. Pdf.
Soifer, Aviam (November 2012). "Federal protection, paternalism, and the virtually forgotten prohibition of voluntary peonage". Columbia Law Review. Columbia Law School. 112 (7): 1607–1639. JSTOR 41708160. Archived from the original on 2015-11-17. Pdf.
Tsesis, Alexander (November 2012). "Gender discrimination and the Thirteenth Amendment". Columbia Law Review. Columbia Law School. 112 (7): 1641–1695. JSTOR 41708161. Archived from the original on November 28, 2014. Pdf.
Zietlow, Rebecca E. (November 2012). "James Ashley's Thirteenth Amendment". Columbia Law Review. Columbia Law School. 112 (7): 1697–1731. JSTOR 41708162. Archived from the original on 2015-11-17. Pdf.
PANEL III: THE LIMITS OF AUTHORITY
Greene, Jamal (November 2012). "Thirteenth Amendment optimism". Columbia Law Review. Columbia Law School. 112 (7): 1733–1768. JSTOR 41708163. Archived from the original on 2015-01-07. Pdf.
McAward, Jennifer Mason (November 2012). "McCulloch and the Thirteenth Amendment". Columbia Law Review. Columbia Law School. 112 (7): 1769–1809. JSTOR 41708164. Pdf.
Miller, Darrell A.H. (November 2012). "The Thirteenth Amendment and the regulation of custom". Columbia Law Review. Columbia Law School. 112 (7): 1811–1854. JSTOR 41708165. Archived from the original on 2015-11-17. Pdf.
PANEL IV: CONTEMPORARY IMPLICATIONS
Carter, Jr., William M. (November 2012). "The Thirteenth Amendment and pro-equality speech". Columbia Law Review. Columbia Law School. 112 (7): 1855–1881. JSTOR 41708166. SSRN 2166859  . Pdf.
Delgado, Richard (November 2012). "Four reservations on civil rights reasoning by analogy: the case of Latinos and other Nonblack groups". Columbia Law Review. Columbia Law School. 112 (7): 1883–1915. JSTOR 41708167. Archived from the original on 2013-01-15. Pdf.
Koppelman, Andrew (November 2012). "Originalism, abortion, and the Thirteenth Amendment". Columbia Law Review. Columbia Law School. 112 (7): 1917–1945. JSTOR 41708168. Archived from the original on 2013-01-15. Pdf.
Primary sources
Ripley, C. Peter et al. eds. Witness for Freedom: African American Voices on Race, Slavery, and Emancipation (1993) online
External links
Thirteenth Amendment and related resources at the Library of Congress
National Archives: Thirteenth Amendment
CRS Annotated Constitution: Thirteenth Amendment
Original Document Proposing Abolition of Slavery
Model State Anti-trafficking Criminal Statute – U.S. Dept of Justice
"Abolishing Slavery: The Thirteenth Amendment Signed by Abraham Lincoln"; website of Seth Kaller, a dealer who has sold six Lincoln-signed copies of the Thirteenth Amendment.
Seward certificate announcing the Amendment's passage and affirming the existence of 36 States
Analysis of court decisions giving December 18, 1865, as the date of ratification
[hide]
v
t
e
United States Constitution
Text
(via Wikisource)
Preamble and Articles I–VII
Amendments 1–10
Amendments 11–27
Unsuccessful Proposed Amendments
Debates in State Conventions on the Adoption of the Constitution
Preamble
and articles
Preamble
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
Amendments
Ratified
Bill of Rights
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Others
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Pending
Congressional Apportionment
Titles of Nobility
Corwin Amendment
Child Labor
Repealed
Eighteenth Amendment
Unsuccessful
Equal Rights
District of Columbia Voting Rights
List of Amendments
Bill of Rights (Amendments 1–10)
Reconstruction Amendments (Amendments 13–15)
Amendment proposals in Congress
Convention to propose amendments
State ratifying conventions
Formation
History
Articles of Confederation
Mount Vernon Conference
Annapolis Convention
Philadelphia Convention
Virginia Plan
New Jersey Plan
Connecticut Compromise
Three-Fifths Compromise
Committee of Detail
Signing
Independence Hall
Syng inkstand
The Federalist Papers
Anti-Federalist Papers
Massachusetts Compromise
Virginia Ratifying Convention
Hillsborough Convention
Rhode Island ratification
Drafting and ratification timeline
Clauses
Appointments
Appropriations
Assistance of Counsel
Bill of credit
Case or Controversy
Citizenship
Commerce
Compact
Compulsory Process
Confrontation
Contract
Copyright and Patent
Double Jeopardy
Due Process
Equal Protection
Establishment
Exceptions
Excessive Bail
Ex post facto
Extradition
Free Exercise
Free Speech
Fugitive Slave
Full Faith and Credit
General Welfare
Guarantee
Impeachment
Import-Export
Ineligibility
Militia
Natural-born citizen
Necessary and Proper
New States
No Religious Test
Oath or Affirmation
Origination
Petition
Postal
Presentment
Privileges and Immunities
Privileges or Immunities
Recommendation
Self-Incrimination
Speech or Debate
Speedy Trial
State of the Union
Supremacy
Suspension
Take Care
Takings
Taxing and Spending
Territorial
Title of Nobility
Treaty
Trial by Jury
Vesting
Vicinage
War Powers
List of clauses
Interpretation
Concurrent powers
Congressional enforcement
Constitutional law
Criminal procedure
Criminal sentencing
Dormant Commerce Clause
Enumerated powers
Equal footing
Executive privilege
Incorporation of the Bill of Rights
Judicial review
Nondelegation doctrine
Preemption
Saxbe fix
Separation of church and state
Separation of powers
Taxation power
Unitary executive theory
Display
and legacy
National Archives
Charters of Freedom Rotunda
Independence Mall
Constitution Day
Constitution Gardens
National Constitution Center
Scene at the Signing of the Constitution (painting)
A More Perfect Union (film)
Worldwide influence
US Government Portal • Law Portal • Wikipedia book
[show]
v
t
e
Abraham Lincoln
16th President of the United States (1861–1865)
U.S. Representative from Illinois (1847–1849)
Presidency
First inauguration
Perpetual Union
Lincoln Bible
Second inauguration
Civil War
Confiscation Acts
President Lincoln's 75,000 volunteers
War based income tax
Seaports blockade
RMS Trent Affair
Habeas Corpus suspended
Emancipation Proclamation
West Virginia statehood
Overland Campaign strategy
Hampton Roads Conference
Tour of Richmond
Ten percent plan
Reconstruction
13th Amendment abolishing slavery
Dakota War of 1862
Department of the Northwest
Homestead Act of 1862
National Banking Acts
Thanksgiving Day
Birchard Letter
Bixby letter
National Academy of Sciences
Department of Agriculture
Pardons
State of the Union Address, 1863
1864
Cabinet
Judicial appointments
Assassination
Funeral and burial
Lincoln Catafalque
Speeches
Lyceum address (1838)
Peoria speech (1854)
"Lost Speech" (1856)
House Divided speech (1858)
Lincoln-Douglas debates (1858)
Cooper Union Address (1860)
Farewell Address (1861)
First inaugural address (1861)
Gettysburg Address (1863
event)
Second inaugural address (1865)
Life
and views
Early life and career
Black Hawk War
Matson Trial
Spot Resolutions
Boat lifting patent
Hurd v. Rock Island Bridge Co.
Baltimore Plot
Lincoln's beard
Medical and mental health
Poetry
Religious views
Sexuality
Slavery
Homes
and places
Lincoln Birthplace
Knob Creek Farm
Lincoln Boyhood Memorial
Lincoln State Park
Lincoln Trail Homestead State Memorial
Lincoln's New Salem
Lincoln Home
Lincoln Pioneer Village
Little Pigeon Creek Community
Cottage at the Soldier's Home
Lincoln Bedroom
Lincoln Sitting Room
Ford's Theatre
Petersen House
Lincoln Tomb
Elections
Republican National Convention, 1856
1860
1864
National Union Party
United States presidential election, 1860
1864
1860 campaign song
Legacy
Presidential Library and Museum
Papers
Lincoln/Net
Bibliography
Lincoln Memorial
sculpture
reflecting pool
Mount Rushmore
Lincoln's Birthday
Lincoln, Nebraska
statue
Abraham Lincoln (Healy painting)
Abraham Lincoln sculpture, Washington D.C.
Abraham Lincoln: The Man statue
Lincoln Park
Abraham Lincoln: The Head of State statue
Lincoln Trail State Memorial
Lincoln the Lawyer statue
Kentucky statue
The Peacemakers painting
Lincoln Highway
Other memorials
Photographs
Cultural depictions
films
postage stamps
Lincoln penny
Illinois Centennial half dollar
currency
five-dollar bill
art
Lincoln Prize
Abraham Lincoln Association
White House ghost
Great Moments with Mr. Lincoln
Lincoln–Kennedy coincidences
Aircraft Carrier USS Abraham Lincoln
Family
Family tree
Mary Todd Lincoln (wife)
Robert Todd Lincoln (son)
Edward Baker Lincoln (son)
William Wallace Lincoln (son)
Thomas "Tad" Lincoln (son)
Mary Todd "Mamie" Lincoln (granddaughter)
Abraham Lincoln II (grandson)
Jessie Lincoln (granddaughter)
Thomas Lincoln (father)
Nancy Hanks Lincoln (mother)
Sarah Bush Lincoln (stepmother)
Sarah Lincoln Grigsby (sister)
Abraham Lincoln (paternal grandfather)
Mordecai Lincoln (paternal uncle)
Mary Lincoln Crume (paternal aunt)
John Hanks (maternal cousin)
Joseph Hanks (great-grandfather)
Samuel Lincoln (17th-century ancestor)
Mary Lincoln Beckwith (great-granddaughter)
Robert Todd Lincoln Beckwith (great-grandson)
Timothy Lincoln Beckwith (great-great-grandson)
Old Bob (horse)
← James Buchanan
Andrew Johnson →
Book
Category
Outline
Authority control
WorldCat Identities
VIAF: 183085973
LCCN: n84017503
GND: 4489475-2
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thirteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution&oldid=807267623"
Categories:
1865 in American politics
1865 in American law
Amendments to the United States Constitution
Economic history of the United States
History of the United States (1849–65)
Reconstruction Era
Aftermath of the American Civil War
Unfree labour by country
United States slavery law
1864 in American law
1864 in American politics
Hidden categories:
Webarchive template wayback links
Subscription required using via
Pages containing links to subscription-only content
Wikipedia indefinitely move-protected pages
Good articles
Use mdy dates from June 2013
Wikipedia pages semi-protected against vandalism
Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers
Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers
Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
View source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
Languages
Ænglisc
Беларуская
Català
Deutsch
Español
فارسی
Français
한국어
Bahasa Indonesia
Íslenska
Italiano
עברית
Lietuvių
Nederlands
日本語
Norsk
Polski
Português
Русский
Simple English
Suomi
Українська
中文
Edit links
This page was last edited on 26 October 2017, at 23:09.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

values: This is a good article. Click here for more information.

values: mw-indicator-good-star mw-indicator

values: This article is semi-protected due to vandalism

values: mw-indicator-pp-default mw-indicator

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

values: jump-to-nav mw-jump

values: Greater coat of arms of the United States.svg

values: Preamble to the United States Constitution

values: Article One of the United States Constitution

values: Article Two of the United States Constitution

values: Article Three of the United States Constitution

values: Article Four of the United States Constitution

values: Article Five of the United States Constitution

values: Article Six of the United States Constitution

values: Article Seven of the United States Constitution

values: List of amendments to the United States Constitution

values: First Amendment to the United States Constitution

values: Second Amendment to the United States Constitution

values: Third Amendment to the United States Constitution

values: Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution

values: Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution

values: Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution

values: Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution

values: Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution

values: Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution

values: Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

values: Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution

values: Twelfth Amendment to the United States Constitution

values: Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

values: Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

values: Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

values: Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

values: Eighteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

values: Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

values: Twentieth Amendment to the United States Constitution

values: Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution

values: Twenty-second Amendment to the United States Constitution

values: Twenty-third Amendment to the United States Constitution

values: Twenty-fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution

values: Twenty-fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution

values: Twenty-sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution

values: Twenty-seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution

values: District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment

values: History of the United States Constitution

values: Timeline of drafting and ratification of the United States Constitution

values: Constitutional Convention (United States)

values: Signing of the United States Constitution

values: s:Constitution of the United States of America

values: s:Additional amendments to the United States Constitution

values: s:Portal:Unsuccessful attempts to amend the United States Constitution

values: padding:0.3em 0.4em 0.3em;font-weight:bold;border-top:1px #aaa solid; border-bottom:1px #aaa solid;

values: Template talk:US Constitution article series

values: float:right;clear:right;width:22.0em;margin:0 0 1.0em 1.0em;background:#f9f9f9;border:1px solid #aaa;padding:0.2em;border-spacing:0.4em 0;text-align:center;line-height:1.4em;font-size:88%

values:
/wiki/U.S._states
mw-redirect
U.S. states

values:
/wiki/Slave_and_free_states
mw-redirect
Slave and free states

values: United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary

values:
/wiki/Radical_Republicans
mw-redirect
Radical Republicans

values: United States presidential election, 1864

values: United States House of Representatives elections, 1864

values: display:inline-block; width:1.5em; height:1.5em; margin:1px 0; border:1px solid black; background-color: #0050ff; color:black; font-size:100%; text-align:center;

values: -webkit-column-break-inside: avoid;page-break-inside: avoid;break-inside: avoid-column

values: display:inline-block; width:1.5em; height:1.5em; margin:1px 0; border:1px solid black; background-color: #00ff74; color:black; font-size:100%; text-align:center;

values: display:inline-block; width:1.5em; height:1.5em; margin:1px 0; border:1px solid black; background-color: #d500ff; color:black; font-size:100%; text-align:center;

values: display:inline-block; width:1.5em; height:1.5em; margin:1px 0; border:1px solid black; background-color: #b8b8b8; color:black; font-size:100%; text-align:center;

values: IJzeren voetring voor gevangenen transparent background.png

values: font-size: 105%; padding: 0.2em 0px 0.4em; text-align: center; display: none;

values:
/wiki/Slavery_in_Chad
mw-redirect
Slavery in Chad

values:
/wiki/Slavery_in_the_Americas
mw-redirect
Slavery in the Americas

values: Slavery among the indigenous peoples of the Americas

values: Slavery among Native Americans in the United States

values: Slavery in the British and French Caribbean

values: Prostitutes in South Korea for the U.S. military

values:
/wiki/Slavery_in_Oceania
mw-redirect
Slavery in Oceania

values:
/wiki/Slavery_in_the_British_Isles
mw-redirect
Slavery in the British Isles

values: Forced labour under German rule during World War II

values:
/wiki/Slavery_in_Norway
mw-redirect
Slavery in Norway

values: Slavery in the Spanish New World colonies

values:
/wiki/Abolition_of_slavery_timeline
mw-redirect
Abolition of slavery timeline

values:
/wiki/Indentured_servant
mw-redirect
Indentured servant

values: Treatment of slaves in the United States

values: National Archives and Records Administration

values:
/wiki/United_States_Electoral_College
mw-redirect
United States Electoral College

values:
/wiki/Joint_Committee_on_Reconstruction
mw-redirect
Joint Committee on Reconstruction

values:
/wiki/Brown_v._Board
mw-redirect
Brown v. Board

values:
/wiki/Noah_Swayne
mw-redirect
Noah Swayne

values:
/wiki/Restrictive_covenant
mw-redirect
Restrictive covenant

values:
/wiki/Citizenship_in_the_United_States
mw-redirect
Citizenship in the United States

values: History of unfree labor in the United States

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/41708164

values:
nofollow
external text
https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3478033

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/3478033

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.2307%2F3478033

values:
/wiki/Lincoln_(2012_film)
mw-redirect
Lincoln (2012 film)

values: font-size:0.95em; font-size: 90%; color: #555

values:
nofollow
http://scholarship.law.ge/
external text

values: List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 163

values: List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 245

values: List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 487

values: -moz-column-width: 30em; -webkit-column-width: 30em; column-width: 30em; list-style-type: decimal;

values:
nofollow
http://harvardcrcl.org/archive/
external text

values: Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/317424

values:
nofollow
external text
https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1373044

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/1373044

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.2307%2F1373044

values:
nofollow
external text
https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1600377

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/1600377

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.2307%2F1600377

values:
nofollow
external text
//ssrn.com/abstract=1753224

values:
nofollow
external text
//ssrn.com/abstract=2271791

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1086%2Fahr.115.3.732

values:
nofollow
external text
https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1123649

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/1123649

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.2307%2F1123649

values:
nofollow
external text
//ssrn.com/abstract=1932762

values:
nofollow
external text
//ssrn.com/abstract=2188939

values:
nofollow
external text
//ssrn.com/abstract=1894965

values:
nofollow
external text
//ssrn.com/abstract=2000929

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/41708155

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/41708156

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/41708157

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/41708158

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/41708159

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/41708160

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/41708161

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/41708162

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/41708163

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/41708165

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/41708166

values:
nofollow
external text
//ssrn.com/abstract=2166859

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/41708167

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/41708168

values: s:Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution

values: List of proposed amendments to the United States Constitution

values: Convention to propose amendments to the United States Constitution

values: Ratification of the United States Constitution by Rhode Island

values:
/wiki/Guarantee_Clause
mw-redirect
Guarantee Clause

values: Oath of office of the President of the United States

values: List of clauses of the United States Constitution

values: United States constitutional criminal procedure

values: United States constitutional sentencing law

values: Separation of church and state in the United States

values: Separation of powers under the United States Constitution

values: Scene at the Signing of the Constitution of the United States

values: United States Constitution and worldwide influence

values: nowraplinks collapsible expanded navbox-inner

values: List of people pardoned or granted clemency by the President of the United States

values: List of federal judges appointed by Abraham Lincoln

values: Abraham Lincoln's first inaugural address

values: Consecration of the National Cemetery at Gettysburg

values: Abraham Lincoln's second inaugural address

values: Early life and career of Abraham Lincoln

values: Medical and mental health of Abraham Lincoln

values: Abraham Lincoln Birthplace National Historical Park

values: President Lincoln's Cottage at the Soldiers' Home

values: United States presidential election, 1860

values: Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library and Museum

values: Category:Depictions of Abraham Lincoln on film

values: Presidents of the United States on U.S. postage stamps

values: List of United States Presidents on currency

values: Lincoln–Kennedy coincidences urban legend

values: nowraplinks hlist collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner

values:
nofollow
external text
https://viaf.org/viaf/183085973

values:
nofollow
external text
http://d-nb.info/gnd/4489475-2

values: Category:Amendments to the United States Constitution

values: Category:Economic history of the United States

values: Category:History of the United States (1849–65)

values: Category:Aftermath of the American Civil War

values: Category:Webarchive template wayback links

values: Category:Subscription required using via

values: Category:Pages containing links to subscription-only content

values: Category:Wikipedia indefinitely move-protected pages

values: Category:Wikipedia pages semi-protected against vandalism

values: Category:Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers

values: Category:Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers

values: Category:Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers

values: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

values: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

values: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

values: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

values: Discussion about the content page [ctrl-alt-t]

values: p-namespaces navigation vectorTabs p-namespaces-label

values:
p-variants
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-variants-label

values:
This page is protected.
You can view its source [ctrl-alt-e]

values: Past revisions of this page [ctrl-alt-h]

values: p-views navigation vectorTabs p-views-label

values:
p-cactions
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-cactions-label

values:
mw-wiki-logo
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page

values:
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page [ctrl-alt-z]
z

values: Featured content – the best of Wikipedia

values: Find background information on current events

values:
/wiki/Special:Random
Load a random article [ctrl-alt-x]
x

values: portal navigation p-navigation p-navigation-label

values: Guidance on how to use and edit Wikipedia

values: About the project, what you can do, where to find things

values: A list of recent changes in the wiki [ctrl-alt-r]

values: portal navigation p-interaction p-interaction-label

values: List of all English Wikipedia pages containing links to this page [ctrl-alt-j]

values: Recent changes in pages linked from this page [ctrl-alt-k]

values:
/wiki/Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard
Upload files [ctrl-alt-u]
u

values: A list of all special pages [ctrl-alt-q]

values: Permanent link to this revision of the page

values: Link to connected data repository item [ctrl-alt-g]

values: Printable version of this page [ctrl-alt-p]

values:
uls-settings-trigger
Language settings
0
button
true

values: Þrēotēoþa Gebētung þære Grundgesetnesse þāra Geānedra Rīca American – Old English

values: Трынаццатая папраўка да Канстытуцыі ЗША – Belarusian

values: Tretzena esmena de la Constitució dels Estats Units – Catalan

values: 13. Zusatzartikel zur Verfassung der Vereinigten Staaten – German

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-de badge-Q17437798 badge-goodarticle

values: Decimotercera Enmienda a la Constitución de los Estados Unidos – Spanish

values: متمم سیزدهم قانون اساسی ایالات متحده آمریکا – Persian

values: Treizième amendement de la Constitution des États-Unis – French

values: 미국 수정 헌법 제13조 – Korean

values: Amendemen ke-13 Konstitusi Amerika Serikat – Indonesian

values: Þrettándi viðauki stjórnarskrár Bandaríkjanna – Icelandic

values: XIII emendamento della Costituzione degli Stati Uniti d'America – Italian

values: התיקון ה-13 לחוקת ארצות הברית – Hebrew

values: Tryliktoji JAV Konstitucijos pataisa – Lithuanian

values: Dertiende amendement van de grondwet van de Verenigde Staten – Dutch

values: アメリカ合衆国憲法修正第13条 – Japanese

values: 13. poprawka do Konstytucji Stanów Zjednoczonych – Polish

values: Décima Terceira Emenda à Constituição dos Estados Unidos – Portuguese

values: Тринадцатая поправка к Конституции США – Russian

values: Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution – Simple English

values: Yhdysvaltain perustuslain 13. lisäys – Finnish

values: Тринадцята поправка до Конституції США – Ukrainian

values: 美利坚合众国宪法第十三条修正案 – Chinese

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-zh badge-Q17437798 badge-goodarticle

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Thirteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution rootpage-Thirteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution vector-experimental-print-styles vector-nav-directionality skin-vector action-view