text:
Events leading to the attack on Pearl Harbor
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
For more information, see Causes of World War II.
A series of events led to the attack on Pearl Harbor. War between Japan and the United States had been a possibility that each nation's military forces planned for in the 1920s, though real tension did not begin until the 1931 invasion of Manchuria by Japan. Over the next decade, Japan expanded slowly into China, leading to the Second Sino-Japanese war in 1937. In 1940 Japan invaded French Indochina in an effort to embargo all imports into China, including war supplies purchased from the U.S. This move prompted the United States to embargo all oil exports, leading the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) to estimate it had less than two years of bunker oil remaining and to support the existing plans to seize oil resources in the Dutch East Indies. Planning had been underway for some time on an attack on the "Southern Resource Area" to add it to the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere Japan envisioned in the Pacific.
The Philippines, at that time an American territory, were also a Japanese target. The Japanese military concluded an invasion of the Philippines would provoke an American military response. Rather than seize and fortify the islands, and wait for the inevitable U.S. counterattack, Japan's military leaders instead decided on the preventive Pearl Harbor attack, which they assumed would negate the American forces needed for the liberation and reconquest of the islands.
Planning for the attack on Pearl Harbor had begun in very early 1941, by Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto. He finally won assent from the Naval High Command by, among other things, threatening to resign. The attack was approved in the summer at an Imperial Conference and again at a second Conference in the fall. Simultaneously over the year, pilots were trained, and ships prepared for its execution. Authority for the attack was granted at the second Imperial Conference if a diplomatic result satisfactory to Japan was not reached. After final approval by Emperor Hirohito the order to attack was issued at the beginning of December.
Contents
[hide]
1 Background to conflict
2 Breaking off negotiations
2.1 War
2.2 Intelligence gathering
2.3 Planning
2.3.1 Concept of a Japanese invasion of Hawaii
3 Strike force
3.1 Execute order
4 Lack of preparation
5 See also
6 References
Background to conflict[edit]
Tensions between Japan and the prominent Western countries (the United States, France, Britain and the Netherlands) increased significantly during the increasingly militaristic early rule of Emperor Hirohito. Japanese nationalists and military leaders increasingly influenced government policy, promoting a Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere as part of Japan's alleged "divine right" to unify Asia under Hirohito's rule.[1]
Hirohito
During the 1930s, Japan's increasingly expansionist policies brought it into renewed conflict with its neighbors, Russia and China (Japan had fought the First Sino-Japanese War with China in 1894–95 and the Russo-Japanese War with Russia in 1904–05; Japan's imperialist ambitions had a hand in precipitating both conflicts). In March 1933, Japan withdrew from the League of Nations in response to international condemnation of its conquest of Manchuria and subsequent establishment of the Manchukuo puppet government.[2] On January 15, 1936, Japan withdrew from the Second London Naval Disarmament Conference because the United States and Great Britain refused to grant the Japanese Navy parity with theirs.[3] A second war between Japan and China began with the Marco Polo Bridge Incident in July 1937.
Japan's 1937 attack on China was condemned by the U.S. and several members of the League of Nations including Britain, France, Australia and the Netherlands. Japanese atrocities during the conflict, such as the notorious Nanking Massacre that December, served to further complicate relations with the rest of the world. The U.S., Britain, France and the Netherlands each possessed colonies in East and Southeast Asia. Japan's new military power and willingness to use it threatened these Western economic and territorial interests in Asia.
Beginning in 1938, the U.S. adopted a succession of increasingly restrictive trade restrictions with Japan. This included terminating its 1911 commercial treaty with Japan in 1939, further tightened by the Export Control Act of 1940. These efforts failed to deter Japan from continuing its war in China, or from signing the Tripartite Pact in 1940 with Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy, officially forming the Axis Powers.
Japan would take advantage of Hitler's war in Europe to advance its own ambitions in the Far East. The Tripartite Pact guaranteed assistance if a signatory was attacked by any country not already involved in conflict with the signatory; this implicitly meant the U.S. By joining the pact, Japan gained geopolitical power and sent the unmistakable message that any U.S. military intervention risked war on both of her shores[citation needed]—with Germany and Italy on the Atlantic, and with Japan on the Pacific. The Roosevelt administration would not be dissuaded; believing the American way of life would be endangered if Europe and the Far East fell under military dictatorship,[citation needed] it committed to help the British and Chinese through loans of money and materiel, and pledged sufficient continuing aid to ensure their survival. Thus, the United States slowly moved from being a neutral power to one preparing for war.[4]
In mid-1940, Roosevelt moved the U.S. Pacific Fleet to Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, to deter Japan.[5] On October 8, 1940, Admiral James O. Richardson, Commander in Chief, Pacific Fleet, provoked a confrontation with Roosevelt by repeating his earlier arguments to Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Harold R. Stark and Secretary of the Navy Frank Knox that Pearl Harbor was the wrong place for his ships. Roosevelt believed relocating the fleet to Hawaii would exert a "restraining influence" on Japan.[citation needed]
Richardson asked the President if the United States was going to war. Roosevelt's view was:
At least as early as October 8, 1940, ...affairs had reached such a state that the United States would become involved in a war with Japan. ... 'that if the Japanese attacked Thailand, or the Kra Peninsula, or the Dutch East Indies we would not enter the war, that if they even attacked the Philippines he doubted whether we would enter the war, but that they (the Japanese) could not always avoid making mistakes and that as the war continued and that area of operations expanded sooner or later they would make a mistake and we would enter the war.' ... .[6][7]
Japan's 1940 move into Vichy-controlled Indochina further raised tensions. When combined with its war with China, withdrawal from the League of Nations, alliance with Germany and Italy and increasing militarization, the move provoked an attempt to restrain Japan economically. The United States embargoed scrap metal shipments to Japan and closed the Panama Canal to Japanese shipping.[8] This hit Japan's economy particularly hard because 74.1% of Japan's scrap iron came from the United States in 1938. Also, 93% of Japan's copper in 1939 came from the United States.[9] In early 1941, Japan moved into southern Indochina,[10] thereby threatening British Malaya, North Borneo and Brunei.
Japan and the U.S. engaged in negotiations during the course of 1941 in an effort to improve relations. During these negotiations, Japan considered withdrawal from most of China and Indochina after drawing up peace terms with the Chinese. Japan would also adopt an independent interpretation of the Tripartite Pact, and would not discriminate in trade, provided all other countries reciprocated. However, these compromises in China were rejected by General Tojo, then War Minister.[11] Responding to Japanese occupation of key airfields in Indochina (July 24) following an agreement between Japan and Vichy France, the U.S. froze Japanese assets on July 26, 1941, and on August 1 established an embargo on oil and gasoline exports to Japan.[12][13] The oil embargo was an especially strong response because oil was Japan's most crucial import, and more than 80% of Japan's oil at the time came from the United States.[14]
Japanese war planners had long looked south, especially to Brunei for oil and Malaya for rubber and tin. In the autumn of 1940, Japan requested 3.15 million barrels of oil from the Dutch East Indies, but received a counteroffer of only 1.35 million.[15] The Navy was (mistakenly) certain any attempt to seize this region would bring the U.S. into the war,[16][page needed] but the complete U.S. oil embargo removed any hesitancy. Moreover, any southern operation would be vulnerable to attack from the Philippines, then a U.S. commonwealth, so war with the U.S. seemed necessary in any case.[17]
After the embargoes and the asset freezes, the Japanese ambassador to Washington, Kichisaburō Nomura, and U.S. Secretary of State Cordell Hull held multiple meetings in order to resolve Japanese-American relations. No solution could be agreed upon for three key reasons:
Japan honored its alliance to Germany and Italy through the Tripartite Pact.
Japan wanted economic control and responsibility for southeast Asia.
Japan refused to leave mainland China (without Manchoukuo[clarification needed]).[18]
The U.S. embargoes gave Japan a sense of urgency. It would either have to agree to Washington's demands or use force to gain access to the resources it needed.
In their final proposal on November 20, Japan offered to withdraw its forces from southern Indochina and not to launch any attacks in southeast Asia provided the U.S., Britain, and the Netherlands ceased aiding China and lifted their sanctions against Japan.[11] The American counterproposal of November 26 (the Hull note) required Japan to evacuate all of China, without conditions, and to conclude non-aggression pacts with Pacific powers.
Breaking off negotiations[edit]
Part of the Japanese plan for the attack included breaking off negotiations with the United States 30 minutes before the attack began. Diplomats from the Japanese embassy in Washington, including the Japanese ambassador, Admiral Kichisaburō Nomura and special representative Saburō Kurusu, had been conducting extended talks with the State Department regarding the U.S. reactions to the Japanese move into French Indochina in the summer.
In the days before the attack, a long 14-part message was sent to the embassy from the Foreign Office in Tokyo (encrypted with the Type 97 cypher machine, in a cipher named PURPLE by U.S. cryptanalysts), with instructions to deliver it to Secretary of State Cordell Hull at 1:00 p.m. Washington time. The last part arrived late Saturday night (Washington time), but because of decryption and typing delays, as well as Tokyo's failure to stress the crucial necessity of the timing, embassy personnel did not deliver the message to Secretary Hull until several hours after the attack.
The United States had decrypted the 14th part well before the Japanese managed to, and long before embassy staff composed a clean typed copy. The final part, with its instruction for the time of delivery, had been decoded Saturday night but was not acted upon until the next morning (according to Henry Clausen[citation needed]).
Ambassador Nomura asked for an appointment to see Hull at 1:00 p.m., but later asked it be postponed to 1:45 as the ambassador was not quite ready. Nomura and Kurusu arrived at 2:05 p.m. and were received by Hull at 2:20. Nomura apologized for the delay in presenting the message. After Hull had read several pages, he asked Nomura whether the document was presented under instructions of the Japanese government; the Ambassador replied it was. After reading the full document, Hull turned to the ambassador and said:
I must say that in all my conversations with you...during the last nine months I have never uttered one word of untruth. This is borne out absolutely by the record. In all my fifty years of public service I have never seen a document that was more crowded with infamous falsehoods and distortions--infamous falsehoods and distortions on a scale so huge that I never imagined until today that any Government on this planet was capable of uttering them.[19]
Japanese records, admitted into evidence during congressional hearings on the attack after the war, established that Japan had not even written a declaration of war until hearing news of the successful attack. The two-line declaration was finally delivered to U.S. ambassador Grew in Tokyo about ten hours after the completion of the attack. Grew was allowed to transmit it to the United States, where it was received late Monday afternoon (Washington time).
War[edit]
Prime Minister of Japan Hideki Tōjō
In July 1941, IJN headquarters informed Emperor Hirohito its reserve bunker oil would be exhausted within two years if a new source was not found. In August 1941, Japanese prime minister Fumimaro Konoe proposed a summit with President Roosevelt to discuss differences. Roosevelt replied Japan must leave China before a summit meeting could be held.[citation needed] On September 6, 1941, at the second Imperial Conference concerning attacks on the Western colonies in Asia and Hawaii, Japanese leaders met to consider the attack plans prepared by Imperial General Headquarters. The summit occurred one day after the emperor had reprimanded General Hajime Sugiyama, chief of the IJA General Staff, about the lack of success in China and the speculated low chances of victory against the United States, the British Empire and their allies.[20]
Prime Minister Konoe argued for more negotiations and possible concessions to avert war. However, military leaders such as Sugiyama, Minister of War General Hideki Tōjō, and chief of the IJN General Staff Fleet Admiral Osami Nagano asserted time had run out and that additional negotiations would be pointless. They urged swift military actions against all American and European colonies in Southeast Asia and Hawaii. Tōjō argued that yielding to the American demand to withdraw troops would wipe out all the gains of the Second Sino-Japanese War, depress Army morale, endanger Manchukuo and jeopardize control of Korea; hence, doing nothing was the same as defeat and a loss of face.
On October 16, 1941, Konoe resigned and proposed Prince Naruhiko Higashikuni, who was also the choice of the army and navy, as his successor. Hirohito chose Hideki Tōjō instead, worried (as he told Konoe) about having the Imperial House being held responsible for a war against Western powers.[21]
Prince Takamatsu
On November 3, 1941, Nagano presented a complete plan for the attack on Pearl Harbor to Hirohito.[22] At the Imperial Conference on November 5, Hirohito approved the plan for a war against the United States, Great Britain and the Netherlands, scheduled to start at the beginning of December if an acceptable diplomatic settlement were not achieved before then.[23] Over the following weeks, Tōjō's military regime offered a final deal to the United States. They offered to leave only Indochina, but in return for large American economic aid.[citation needed] On November 26, the so-called Hull Memorandum (or Hull Note) rejected the offer and demanded that, in addition to leaving Indochina, the Japanese must leave China (without Manchoukuo) and agree to an Open Door Policy in the Far East.[24]
Kōichi Kido
On November 30, 1941, Prince Takamatsu warned his brother, Hirohito, the navy felt the Empire could not fight more than two years against the United States and wished to avoid war. After consulting with Kōichi Kido (who advised him to take his time until he was convinced) and Tōjō, the Emperor called Shigetarō Shimada and Nagano, who reassured him that war would be successful.[25] On December 1, Hirohito finally approved a "war against United States, Great Britain and Holland" during another Imperial Conference, to commence with a surprise attack on the U.S. Pacific Fleet at its main forward base at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii.[26]
Intelligence gathering[edit]
Ensign Takeo Yoshikawa, a spy in Pearl Harbor.
On February 3, 1940, Yamamoto briefed Captain Kanji Ogawa of Naval Intelligence on the potential attack plan, asking him to start intelligence gathering on Pearl Harbor. Ogawa already had spies in Hawaii, including Japanese Consular officials with an intelligence remit, and he arranged for help from a German already living in Hawaii who was an Abwehr agent. None had been providing much militarily useful information. He planned to add 29-year-old Ensign Takeo Yoshikawa. By the spring of 1941, Yamamoto officially requested additional Hawaiian intelligence, and Yoshikawa boarded the liner Nitta-maru at Yokohama. He had grown his hair longer than military length, and assumed the cover name Tadashi Morimura.[27]
Yoshikawa began gathering intelligence in earnest by taking auto trips around the main islands, and toured Oahu in a small plane, posing as a tourist. He visited Pearl Harbor frequently, sketching the harbor and location of ships from the crest of a hill. Once, he gained access to Hickam Field in a taxi, memorizing the number of visible planes, pilots, hangars, barracks and soldiers. He was also able to discover that Sunday was the day of the week on which the largest number of ships were likely to be in harbor, that PBY patrol planes went out every morning and evening, and that there was an antisubmarine net in the mouth of the harbor.[28] Information was returned to Japan in coded form in Consular communications, and by direct delivery to intelligence officers aboard Japanese ships calling at Hawaii by consulate staff.
In June 1941, German and Italian consulates were closed, and there were suggestions Japan's should be closed, as well. They were not, because they continued to provide valuable information (via MAGIC) and neither President Roosevelt nor Secretary Hull wanted trouble in the Pacific.[29] Had they been closed, however, it is possible Naval General Staff, which had opposed the attack from the outset, would have called it off, since up-to-date information on the location of the Pacific Fleet, on which Yamamoto's plan depended, would no longer have been available.[30]
Planning[edit]
Main articles: Imperial Japanese Navy and Imperial Japanese Navy Air Service
Commander-in-Chief of the Combined Fleet Fleet Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto
Expecting war, and seeing an opportunity in the forward basing of the U.S. Pacific Fleet in Hawaii, the Japanese began planning in early 1941 for an attack on Pearl Harbor. For the next several months, planning and organizing a simultaneous attack on Pearl Harbor and invasion of British and Dutch colonies to the south occupied much of the Japanese Navy's time and attention. The plans for the Pearl Harbor attack arose out of the Japanese expectation the U.S. would be inevitably drawn into war after a Japanese attack against Malaya and Singapore.[31]
The intent of a preventive strike on Pearl Harbor was to neutralize American naval power in the Pacific, thus removing it from influencing operations against American, British, and Dutch colonies. Successful attacks on colonies were judged to depend on successfully dealing with the Pacific Fleet. Planning[32] had long anticipated a battle in Japanese home waters after the U.S. fleet traveled across the Pacific, under attack by submarines and other forces all the way. The U.S. fleet would be defeated in a "decisive battle", as Russia's Baltic Fleet had been in 1905. A surprise attack posed a twofold difficulty compared to longstanding expectations. First, the Pacific Fleet was a formidable force, and would not be easy to defeat or to surprise. Second, Pearl Harbor's shallow waters made using conventional aerial torpedoes ineffective. On the other hand, Hawaii's distance meant a successful surprise attack could not be blocked or quickly countered by forces from the continental U.S.
Several Japanese naval officers had been impressed by the British action in the Battle of Taranto, in which 21 obsolete Fairey Swordfish disabled half the Regia Marina (Italian Navy). Admiral Yamamoto even dispatched a delegation to Italy, which concluded a larger and better-supported version of Cunningham's strike could force the U.S. Pacific Fleet to retreat to bases in California, thus giving Japan the time necessary to establish a "barrier" defense to protect Japanese control of the Dutch East Indies. The delegation returned to Japan with information about the shallow-running torpedoes Cunningham's engineers had devised.[citation needed]
Japanese strategists were undoubtedly influenced by Admiral Togo's surprise attack on the Russian Pacific Fleet at Port Arthur in 1904. Yamamoto's emphasis on destroying the American battleships was in keeping with the Mahanian doctrine shared by all major navies during this period, including the U.S. Navy and Royal Navy.[33]
Planner Commander Minoru Genda stressed surprise would be critical.
In a letter dated January 7, 1941, Yamamoto finally delivered a rough outline of his plan to Koshiro Oikawa, then Navy Minister, from whom he also requested to be made Commander in Chief of the air fleet to attack Pearl Harbor. A few weeks later, in yet another letter, Yamamoto requested Admiral Takijiro Onishi, chief of staff of the Eleventh Air Fleet, study the technical feasibility of an attack against the American base. Onishi gathered as many facts as possible about Pearl Harbor.
After first consulting with Kosei Maeda, an expert on aerial torpedo warfare, and being told the harbor's shallow waters rendered such an attack almost impossible, Onishi summoned Commander Minoru Genda. After studying the original proposal put forth by Yamamoto, Genda agreed: "[T]he plan is difficult but not impossible".[34] Yamamoto gave the bulk of the planning to Rear Admiral Ryunosuke Kusaka, who was very worried about the area's air defenses. Yamamoto encouraged Kusaka by telling him, "Pearl Harbor is my idea and I need your support."[35] Genda emphasized the attack should be carried out early in the morning and in total secrecy, employing an aircraft carrier force and several types of bombing.[34]
Although attacking the U.S. Pacific Fleet anchor would achieve surprise, it also carried two distinct disadvantages. The targeted ships would be sunk or damaged in very shallow water, meaning it would be quite likely that they could be salvaged and possibly returned to duty (as six of the eight battleships eventually were). Also, most of the crews would survive the attack, since many would be on shore leave or would be rescued from the harbor afterward. Despite these concerns, Yamamoto and Genda pressed ahead.
By April 1941, the Pearl Harbor plan became known as Operation Z, after the famous Z signal given by Admiral Tōgō at Tsushima.[citation needed] Over the summer, pilots trained in earnest near Kagoshima City on Kyūshū. Genda chose it because its geography and infrastructure presented most of the same problems bombers would face at Pearl Harbor. In training, each crew flew over the 5,000 ft (1,500 m) mountain behind Kagoshima and dove into the city, dodging buildings and smokestacks before dropping to 25 ft (7.6 m) at the piers. Bombardiers released torpedoes at a breakwater some 300 yd (270 m) away.[36]
However, even this low-altitude approach would not overcome the problem of torpedoes bottoming in the shallow waters of Pearl Harbor. Japanese weapons engineers created and tested modifications allowing successful shallow water drops. The effort resulted in a heavily modified version of the Type 91 torpedo, which inflicted most of the ship damage during the eventual attack.[citation needed] Japanese weapons technicians also produced special armor-piercing bombs by fitting fins and release shackles to 14- and 16-inch (356- and 406-mm) naval shells. These were able to penetrate the lightly armored decks of the old battleships.
Concept of a Japanese invasion of Hawaii[edit]
At several stages during 1941, Japan's military leaders discussed the possibility of launching an invasion to seize the Hawaiian Islands; this would provide Japan with a strategic base to shield its new empire, deny the United States any bases beyond the West coast and further isolate Australia and New Zealand.
Genda, who saw Hawaii as vital for American operations against Japan after war began, believed Japan must follow any attack on Pearl Harbor with an invasion of Hawaii or risk losing the war. He viewed Hawaii as a base to threaten the west coast of North America, and perhaps as a negotiating tool for ending the war. He believed, following a successful air attack, 10,000-15,000 men could capture Hawaii, and saw the operation as a precursor or alternative to a Japanese invasion of the Philippines. In September 1941, Commander Yasuji Watanabe of the Combined Fleet staff estimated two divisions (30,000 men) and 80 ships, in addition to the carrier strike force, could capture the islands. He identified two possible landing sites, near Haleiwa and Kaneohe Bay, and proposed both be used in an operation that would require up to four weeks with Japanese air superiority.[37]
Although this idea gained some support, it was soon dismissed for several reasons:
Japan's ground forces, logistics, and resources were already fully committed, not only to the Second Sino-Japanese War but also for offensives in Southeast Asia that were planned to occur almost simultaneously with the Pearl Harbor attack.
The Imperial Japanese Army (IJA) insisted it needed to focus on operations in China and Southeast Asia, and refused to provide substantial support elsewhere. Because of a lack of cooperation between the services, the IJN never discussed the Hawaiian invasion proposal with the IJA.[37][38]
Most of the senior officers of the Combined Fleet, in particular Admiral Nagano, believed an invasion of Hawaii was too risky.[39][37]
With an invasion ruled out, it was agreed a massive carrier-based three wave airstrike against Pearl Harbor to destroy the Pacific Fleet would be sufficient. Japanese planners knew that Hawaii, with its strategic location in the Central Pacific, would serve as a critical base from which the United States could extend its military power against Japan. However, the confidence of Japan's leaders that the conflict would be over quickly and that the United States would choose to negotiate a compromise, rather than fight a long, bloody war, overrode this concern.[40][41][42][43]
Watanabe's superior, Captain Kameto Kuroshima, who believed the invasion plan unrealistic, after the war called his rejection of it the "biggest mistake" of his life.[37]
Strike force[edit]
Main articles: 1st Air Fleet (Imperial Japanese Navy) and Attack on Pearl Harbor order of battle
Admiral Chuichi Nagumo
On November 26, 1941, the day the Hull note (which the Japanese leaders saw as an unproductive and old proposal) was received, the carrier force under the command of Vice Admiral Chuichi Nagumo (already assembled in Hitokappu Wan) sortied for Hawaii under strict radio silence.
In 1941, Japan was one of the few countries capable of carrier aviation.[44] The Kido Butai, the Combined Fleet's main carrier force of six aircraft carriers (at the time, the most powerful carrier force with the greatest concentration of air power in the history of naval warfare),[45] embarked 359 airplanes,[46] organized as the First Air Fleet. The carriers Akagi (flag), Kaga, Sōryū, Hiryū, and the newest, Shōkaku and Zuikaku, had 135 Mitsubishi A6M Type 0 fighters (Allied codename "Zeke", commonly called "Zero"), 171 Nakajima B5N Type 97 torpedo bombers (Allied codename "Kate"), and 108 Aichi D3A Type 99 dive bombers (Allied codename "Val") aboard. Two fast battleships, two heavy cruisers, one light cruiser, nine destroyers, and three fleet submarines provided escort and screening. In addition, the Advanced Expeditionary Force included 20 fleet and five two-man Ko-hyoteki-class midget submarines, which were to gather intelligence and sink U.S. vessels attempting to flee Pearl Harbor during or soon after the attack. It also had eight oilers for underway fueling.[47]
Execute order[edit]
Fleet Admiral Osami Nagano
On December 1, 1941, after the striking force was en route, Chief of Staff Nagano gave a verbal directive to the commander of the Combined Fleet, Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, informing him:
Japan has decided to open hostilities against the United States, United Kingdom, and the Netherlands early in December...Should it appear certain that Japanese-American negotiations will reach an amicable settlement prior to the commencement of hostilities, it is understood that all elements of the Combined Fleet are to be assembled and returned to their bases in accordance with separate orders.[48] [The Kido Butai will] proceed to the Hawaiian Area with utmost secrecy and, at the outbreak of the war, will launch a resolute surprise attack on and deal a fatal blow to the enemy fleet in the Hawaiian Area. The initial air attack is scheduled at 0330 hours, X Day.[48]
Upon completion, the force was to return to Japan, re-equip, and re-deploy for "Second Phase Operations".
Finally, Order number 9, issued on 1 December 1941 by Nagano, instructed Yamamoto to crush hostile naval and air forces in Asia, the Pacific and Hawaii, promptly seize the main U.S., British, and Dutch bases in East Asia and "capture and secure the key areas of the southern regions".[48]
On the home leg, the force was ordered to be alert for tracking and counterattacks by the Americans, and to return to the friendly base in the Marshall Islands, rather than the Home Islands.[49]
Lieutenant General Walter C. Short, commanding general of the Army post at Pearl Harbor
Lack of preparation[edit]
U.S. civil and military intelligence had, amongst them, good information suggesting additional Japanese aggression throughout the summer and fall before the attack. At the time, no reports specifically indicated an attack against Pearl Harbor. Public press reports during summer and fall, including Hawaiian newspapers, contained extensive reports on the growing tension in the Pacific. Late in November, all Pacific commands, including both the Navy and Army in Hawaii, were separately and explicitly warned[50] war with Japan was expected in the very near future, and it was preferred Japan make the first hostile act.[51] It was felt war would most probably start with attacks in the Far East: the Philippines,[52] Indochina, Thailand, or the Russian Far East; Pearl Harbor was never mentioned as a potential target. The warnings were not specific to any area, noting only that war with Japan was expected in the near future and all commands should act accordingly. Had any of these warnings produced an active alert status in Hawaii, the attack might have been resisted more effectively, and perhaps resulted in less death and damage. On the other hand, recall of men on shore leave to the ships in harbor might have led to still more being casualties from bombs and torpedoes, or trapped in capsized ships by shut watertight doors (as the attack alert status would have required),[53] or killed (in their obsolete aircraft) by more experienced Japanese aviators. When the attack actually arrived, Pearl Harbor was effectively unprepared: anti-aircraft weapons not manned, most ammunition locked down, anti-submarine measures not implemented (e.g., no torpedo nets in the harbor), combat air patrol not flying, available scouting aircraft not in the air at first light, Air Corps aircraft parked wingtip to wingtip to reduce sabotage risks (not ready to fly at a moment's warning), and so on.
By 1941, U.S. signals intelligence, through the Army's Signal Intelligence Service and the Office of Naval Intelligence's OP-20-G, had intercepted and decrypted considerable Japanese diplomatic and naval cipher traffic, though nothing actually carrying significant information about Japanese military plans in 1940-41. Decryption and distribution of this intelligence, including such decrypts as were available, was capricious and sporadic, some of which can be accounted for by lack of resources and manpower.[54][page needed] At best, the information available to decision makers in Washington was fragmentary, contradictory, or poorly distributed, and was almost entirely raw, without supporting analysis. It was thus, incompletely understood. Nothing in it pointed directly to an attack at Pearl Harbor,[55] and a lack of awareness of Imperial Navy capabilities led to a widespread underlying belief Pearl Harbor was not a possible attack target. Only one message from the Hawaiian Japanese consulate (sent on 6 December), in a low level consular cipher, included mention of an attack at Pearl; it was not decrypted until 8 December.[56] While the Japanese Diplomatic codes (Purple code) could be read, the current version (JN-25C) of the Japanese Naval code (JN-25) which had replaced JN-25B on 4 December 1941 could not be read until May 1942.
In 1924, General William L. Mitchell produced a 324-page report warning that future wars (including with Japan) would include a new role for aircraft against existing ships and facilities. He even discussed the possibility of an air attack on Pearl Harbor, but his warnings were ignored. Navy Secretary Knox had also appreciated the possibility of an attack at Pearl Harbor in a written analysis shortly after taking office. American commanders had been warned that tests had demonstrated shallow-water aerial torpedo attacks were possible, but no one in charge in Hawaii fully appreciated this. And in a 1932 fleet problem, a surprise airstrike led by Admiral Harry E. Yarnell had been judged a success and to have caused considerable damage, a finding corroborated in a 1938 exercise by Admiral Ernest King.[57]
Nevertheless, because it was believed Pearl Harbor had natural defenses against torpedo attack (e.g., the shallow water), the Navy did not deploy torpedo nets or baffles, which were judged to inconvenience ordinary operations. As a result of limited numbers of long-range aircraft (including Army Air Corps bombers), reconnaissance patrols were not being made as often or as far out as required for adequate coverage against possible surprise attack (they improved considerably, with far fewer remaining planes,[citation needed] after the attack). The Navy had 33 PBYs in the islands, but only three on patrol at the time of the attack.[58] Hawaii was low on the priority list for the B-17s finally becoming available for the Pacific, largely because General MacArthur in the Philippines was successfully demanding as many as could be made available to the Pacific (where they were intended as a deterrent). The British, who had contracted for them, even agreed to accept fewer to facilitate this buildup. At the time of the attack, Army and Navy were both on training status rather than operational alert.[citation needed]
There was also confusion about the Army's readiness status as General Short had changed local alert level designations without clearly informing Washington. Most of the Army's mobile anti-aircraft guns were secured, with ammunition locked down in armories. To avoid upsetting property owners, and in keeping with Washington's admonition not to alarm civil populations (e.g., in the late November war warning messages from the Navy and War Departments), guns were not dispersed around Pearl Harbor (i.e., on private property)[citation needed]. Additionally, aircraft were parked on airfields to lessen the risk of sabotage, not in anticipation of air attack, in keeping with Short's interpretation of the war warnings.
Chester Nimitz said later, "It was God's mercy that our fleet was in Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941." Nimitz believed if Kimmel had discovered the Japanese approach, he would have sortied to meet them. With the American carriers absent and Kimmel's battleships at a severe disadvantage to the Japanese carriers, the likely result would have been the sinking of the American battleships at sea in deep water, where they would have been lost forever with tremendous casualties (as many as twenty thousand dead), instead of in Pearl Harbor, where the crews could easily be rescued, and six battleships ultimately raised.[59]
See also[edit]
World War II portal
Pearl Harbor advance-knowledge conspiracy theory
References[edit]
Jump up ^ The effort to establish the Imperial Way (kōdō) had begun with the Second Sino-Japanese War (called seisen, or "holy war", by Japan). Bix, Herbert, Hirohito and the Making of Modern Japan, 2001, p.326-327.
Jump up ^ "Imperial Rescript to Withdraw from League of Nations". Retrieved 2009-10-24.
Jump up ^ Lester H. Brune and Richard Dean Burns, Chronological History of U.S. Foreign Relations: 1932-1988, 2003, p. 504.
Jump up ^ Parkes, Henry Bamford. Recent America, A History Of The United States Since 1900 (Thomas Y. Crowell Company, 1946)Page. 635-645
Jump up ^ Shift Of Our Fleet To Atlantic Studied, New York Times, June 23, 1940
Jump up ^ Joint Congressional Hearings on the Pearl Harbor Attack, Part 40, ^p.506, "Conclusions Restated With Supporting Evidence".
Jump up ^ Richardson, "On the Treadmill", pp.425 and 434; Baker, "Human Smoke", p.239, ISBN 1-4165-6784-4
Jump up ^ Hsu Long-hsuen and Chang Ming-kai, translated by Wen Ha-hsiung. History of The Sino-Japanese War (1937-1945), 2nd ed. (Taipei, Republic of China: Chung Wu Publishing, 1971), p.317, "Invasion of French Indochina".
Jump up ^ Barnhart, Michael A. (1987). Japan Prepares for Total War: The Search for Economic Security, 1919-1941. Ithaca: Cornell UP. pp. 144–145.
Jump up ^ Bix, Herbert, Hirohito and the Making of Modern Japan, 2001, p.395
^ Jump up to: a b Chapter V: The Decision for War Morton, Louis. Strategy and Command: The First Two Years
Jump up ^ US freezes Japanese assets and why
Jump up ^ Bix, p. 401; Worth, Roland H., Jr., No Choice But War: the United States Embargo Against Japan and the Eruption of War in the Pacific (Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland, 1995). ISBN 0-7864-0141-9
Jump up ^ Yuichi Arima, The Way to Pearl Harbor: U.S. vs Japan, ICE Case Studies Number 118, December, 2003 (accessed April 10, 2006).
Jump up ^ Barnhart, Michael A. (1987). Japan Prepares for Total War: The Search for Economic Security, 1919-1941. Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP. p. 166.
Jump up ^ Peattie, Mark R. & Evans, David C. Kaigun: Strategy, Tactics, and Technology in the Imperial Japanese Navy (Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 1997).
Jump up ^ Evans & Peattie 2012, p. 489.
Jump up ^ La Feber, Walter. Polenberg, Richard The American Century, A History Of The United States Since the 1890s (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.), pp. 243-247
Jump up ^ Memorandum 95 Regarding a Conversation, Between the Secretary of State, the Japanese Ambassador (Nomura), and Mr. Kurusu Peace and War: United States Foreign Policy 1931-1941 (Department of State, Washington, DC 1943)
Jump up ^ Bix, Hirohito, pp.411 & 745.
Jump up ^ Peter Wetzler, Hirohito and War, 1998, p.44
Jump up ^ Wetzler, op.cit., pp.29 & 35
Jump up ^ Wetzler, p.39.[citation not found]
Jump up ^ OUTLINE OF PROPOSED BASIS FOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND JAPAN Peace and War: United States Foreign Policy 1931-1941 (Department of State, Washington, DC 1943)
Jump up ^ Bix, op.cit., pp.430-431
Jump up ^ Wetzler, p. 39
Jump up ^ Toland, John. The Rising Sun: The Decline and Fall of the Japanese Empire 1936-1945 (Random House, 1970), pp.152-53
Jump up ^ Toland, op.cit., p.167
Jump up ^ Prange, Gordon W., Dillon, Katherine V., and Goldstein, Donald M. At Dawn We Slept (New York: Penguin, 1991), p.151.
Jump up ^ Prange et al., At Dawn We Slept, pp.151-2.
Jump up ^ Evans, David C.; Peattie, Mark R. (2012). Kaigun: Strategy, Tactics, and Technology in the Imperial Japanese Navy 1887-1941. Seaforth Publishing. pp. 462. 489. ISBN 978-1-84832-159-5.
Jump up ^ Both U.S. and Japanese, as it turns out. Miller, Edward S. (2007). War Plan Orange: The U.S. Strategy to Defeat Japan, 1897–1945. Annapolis, MD: United States Naval Institute Press. ISBN 1-59114-500-7.
Jump up ^ Willmott, Barrier; Miller, War Plan Orange.; Peattie & Evans, Kaigun; Mahan, The Influence of Sea Power on History.
^ Jump up to: a b Prange, Gordon, At Dawn We Slept, pp.25-27
Jump up ^ Lord, Walter (2012). Day of Infamy. Open Road Media. p. 14. ISBN 1453238425.
Jump up ^ Toland, op.cit., p.160
^ Jump up to: a b c d Caravaggio, Angelo N. (Winter 2014). ""Winning" the Pacific War". Naval War College Review. 67 (1): 85–118. Archived from the original on 2014-07-14.
Jump up ^ It was for these reasons IJA also rejected proposals for an invasion of Australia.
Jump up ^ For a more detailed analysis of whether a Japanese invasion of Hawaii could have been successful, see Invasion: Pearl Harbor! at Combinedfleet.com.
Jump up ^ In late April or early May of 1942, Yamamoto reportedly secured a tentative agreement that an invasion of Hawaii would be launched after military operations in the Western Pacific were completed and additional ground troops and warships were available. By mid-1942, Yamamoto had assembled sufficient forces for an invasion of the Midway Atoll, which was expected to serve as a base for further attacks against Hawaii. However, in the subsequent Battle of Midway, the loss of four of Japan's six largest aircraft carriers made any future air and naval operations (let alone an invasion) against Hawaii impossible.
Jump up ^ Goldstein, Donald M. (1993). The Pearl Harbor Papers: Inside the Japanese Plans. Washington: Brassey's.
Jump up ^ Weinberg, Gerhard L., A World at Arms: A Global History of World War II. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1994), pp. 260, 323, and 329-330.
Jump up ^ Willmott, H.P. The Barrier and the Javelin: Japanese and Allied Strategies, February to June 1942. (United States Naval Institute Press, Annapolis, 1983)[page needed]
Jump up ^ Evans, David C. (1997). Kaigun: Strategy, Tactics, and Technology in the Japanese Imperial Navy, 1887-1941. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute. p. 472.
Jump up ^ US Department of the Navy description of Pearl Harbor Attack
Jump up ^ The figure of 414 includes scout planes operated by escorts, which were not part of the strike force.
Jump up ^ Order of Battle for Pearl Harbor Attack
^ Jump up to: a b c US Army. Japanese monograph #97. Pearl Harbor Operations: General Outline of Orders and Plans, 5 November to 2 December 1941. Washington, D.C.: US dept of the Army.
Jump up ^ Japanese Monograph No. 97
Jump up ^ November 28, 1941, message
Jump up ^ ibiblio.org
Jump up ^ War warning, dated 27 November 1941
Jump up ^ Technically called "Condition Zed". Prange et al. op. cit.
Jump up ^ Kahn, David. The Codebreakers; Prange et al., Peaarl Harbor: The Verdict of History.
Jump up ^ In August 1941 Yugoslav/English agent Dušan Popov submitted a report to the F.B.I. J. Edgar Hoover including a questionnaire about Pearl Harbor from the Japanese.
Jump up ^ Costello, John (1994). Days of Infamy: MacArthur, Roosevelt, Churchill – the Shocking Truth Revealed. New York: Pocket Books. p. 174. ISBN 978-0-671-76985-7.
Jump up ^ Rebekah. "The Day that Will Live in Infamy…but it didn't have to". The USS Flier Project. Retrieved 7 August 2012.
Jump up ^ Naval Air Station, Kanoehe Bay, during the Pearl Harbor Raid Archived 2012-01-07 at the Wayback Machine.
Jump up ^ Gordon William Prange; Donald M. Goldstein; Katherine V. Dillon. Miracle at Midway. McGraw-Hill; 1982. ISBN 978-0-07-050672-5. p. 9.
hide
v
t
e
Pearl Harbor attack
Attack
Events leading to the attack
Order of battle
Present US ships
Battleship Row
Niihau incident
Japanese carriers involved
Akagi
Kaga
Sōryū
Hiryū
Shōkaku
Zuikaku
United States ships sunk
Arizona
salvaged artifacts
California
Oglala
Oklahoma
Shaw
Utah
West Virginia
Aftermath
Consequences
Sleeping giant quote
Infamy Speech
U.S. declaration of war
Roberts Commissions
Remembrance
Remembrance Day
USS Arizona Memorial
Survivors Association
Commemorative Medal
Books
Crisis: The Japanese Attack on Pearl Harbor and Southeast Asia (1992)
Day of Deceit (2001)
Days of Infamy series (2004–05)
Pacific War series (2007–08)
Films
Secret Agent of Japan (1942)
This Is the Army (1943)
December 7th: The Movie (1943)
Task Force (1949)
From Here to Eternity (1953)
The Revolt of Mamie Stover (1956)
In Harm's Way (1965)
Tora! Tora! Tora! (1970)
1941 (1979)
The Final Countdown (1980)
Pearl Harbor (2001)
Other
Advance-knowledge conspiracy theory
In popular culture
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Events_leading_to_the_attack_on_Pearl_Harbor&oldid=842524715"
Categories:
Attack on Pearl Harbor
Hidden categories:
All articles with broken links to citations
Wikipedia articles needing page number citations from July 2015
Webarchive template wayback links
All articles with unsourced statements
Articles with unsourced statements from May 2012
Wikipedia articles needing page number citations from May 2012
Wikipedia articles needing clarification from July 2015
Articles with unsourced statements from July 2015
Articles with unsourced statements from August 2007
Articles with unsourced statements from March 2010
Articles with unsourced statements from December 2013
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
Languages
Català
Čeština
Español
日本語
Edit links
This page was last edited on 23 May 2018, at 01:10.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

key: html

type: local

value: div

attrs: id class

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

value: a

attrs: id class lang

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

attrs: class href

values: mw-jump-link #mw-head

values: mw-jump-link #p-search

attrs: href title

values:
note
hatnote navigation-not-searchable

values:
/wiki/Republic_of_China
mw-redirect
Republic of China

values:
/wiki/Second_Sino-Japanese_war
mw-redirect
Second Sino-Japanese war

values:
/wiki/Invasion_of_French_Indochina
mw-redirect
Invasion of French Indochina

values:
/wiki/Bunker_oil
mw-redirect
Bunker oil

values:
/wiki/Emperor_Sh%C5%8Dwa
mw-redirect
Emperor Shōwa

values:
/wiki/Hakko_ichiu
mw-redirect
Hakko ichiu

values:
/wiki/Emperor_Hirohito
mw-redirect
Emperor Hirohito

values:
/wiki/Puppet_government
mw-redirect
Puppet government

values:
/wiki/Axis_Powers
mw-redirect
Axis Powers

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (May 2012)

values:
noprint Inline-Template Template-Fact
white-space:nowrap;

values:
/wiki/American_way_of_life
mw-redirect
American way of life

values:
/wiki/Neutral_power
mw-redirect
Neutral power

values: This citation requires a reference to the specific page or range of pages in which the material appears. (May 2012)

values: The text near this tag may need clarification or removal of jargon. (July 2015)

values:
noprint Inline-Template
margin-left:0.1em; white-space:nowrap;

values:
/wiki/Purple_(cipher_machine)
mw-redirect
Purple (cipher machine)

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (July 2015)

values:
/wiki/Hideki_T%C5%8Dj%C5%8D
mw-redirect
Hideki Tōjō

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (August 2007)

values:
/wiki/Ministry_of_War_of_Japan
mw-redirect
Ministry of War of Japan

values:
/wiki/Fleet_Admiral
mw-redirect
Fleet Admiral

values:
/wiki/Loss_of_face
mw-redirect
Loss of face

values:
/wiki/Naruhiko_Higashikuni
mw-redirect
Naruhiko Higashikuni

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (March 2010)

values:
/wiki/Prince_Takamatsu
mw-redirect
Prince Takamatsu

values:
/wiki/PBY_Catalina
mw-redirect
PBY Catalina

values:
/wiki/Franklin_Roosevelt
mw-redirect
Franklin Roosevelt

values: Naval General Staff (page does not exist)

values:
/wiki/Heihachiro_Togo
mw-redirect
Heihachiro Togo

values:
/wiki/Russian_Pacific_Fleet
mw-redirect
Russian Pacific Fleet

values:
/wiki/Alfred_Mahan
mw-redirect
Alfred Mahan

values:
/wiki/Koshiro_Oikawa
mw-redirect
Koshiro Oikawa

values:
/wiki/Takijiro_Onishi
mw-redirect
Takijiro Onishi

values: Eleventh Air Fleet (page does not exist)

values:
/wiki/Ryunosuke_Kusaka
mw-redirect
Ryunosuke Kusaka

values:
/wiki/Kagoshima_City
mw-redirect
Kagoshima City

values:
/wiki/Armor-piercing_bomb
mw-redirect
Armor-piercing bomb

values: Edit section: Concept of a Japanese invasion of Hawaii

values:
/wiki/Kaneohe_Bay
mw-redirect
Kaneohe Bay

values:
/wiki/Chuichi_Nagumo
mw-redirect
Chuichi Nagumo

values:
/wiki/Vice_Admiral
mw-redirect
Vice Admiral

values:
/wiki/Carrier_Striking_Task_Force
mw-redirect
Carrier Striking Task Force

values: 1st Air Fleet of the Imperial Japanese Navy

values:
/wiki/Mitsubishi_Zero
mw-redirect
Mitsubishi Zero

values:
/wiki/Ko-hyoteki_class_submarine
mw-redirect
Ko-hyoteki class submarine

values:
/wiki/Japan-United_States_relations
mw-redirect
Japan-United States relations

values:
/wiki/Lieutenant_General
mw-redirect
Lieutenant General

values:
/wiki/Torpedo_nets
mw-redirect
Torpedo nets

values: This citation requires a reference to the specific page or range of pages in which the material appears. (July 2015)

values:
/wiki/Purple_code
mw-redirect
Purple code

values:
/wiki/Billy_Mitchell_(general)
mw-redirect
Billy Mitchell (general)

values:
/wiki/Boeing_B-17
mw-redirect
Boeing B-17

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (December 2013)

values:
/wiki/Chester_Nimitz
mw-redirect
Chester Nimitz

values: display:table-cell;padding:0.2em 0.2em 0.2em 0.3em;vertical-align:middle

values: margin:0.5em 0 0.5em 1em;border:solid #aaa 1px

values: Pearl Harbor advance-knowledge conspiracy theory

values:
/wiki/Bix,_Herbert
mw-redirect
Bix, Herbert

values: Template:Harvard citation documentation#Wikilink to citation does not work (February 2017)

values: Proposed Japanese invasion of Australia during World War II

values:
/wiki/Midway_Islands
mw-redirect
Midway Islands

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.ibiblio.org/pha/monos

values:
nofollow
http://www.ibiblio.org/pha/monos/097/
external text

values:
/wiki/Du%C5%A1an_Popov
mw-redirect
Dušan Popov

values: Order of battle of the Attack on Pearl Harbor

values: List of United States Navy ships present at Pearl Harbor, December 7, 1941

values: Consequences of the attack on Pearl Harbor

values: United States declaration of war on Japan

values: Attack on Pearl Harbor in popular culture

values: nowraplinks collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner mw-collapsible mw-made-collapsible

values: Category:All articles with broken links to citations

values: Category:Wikipedia articles needing page number citations from July 2015

values: Category:Webarchive template wayback links

values: Category:All articles with unsourced statements

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from May 2012

values: Category:Wikipedia articles needing page number citations from May 2012

values: Category:Wikipedia articles needing clarification from July 2015

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from July 2015

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from August 2007

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from March 2010

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from December 2013

values: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

values: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

values: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

values: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

values: Discussion about the content page [ctrl-alt-t]

values: p-namespaces navigation vectorTabs p-namespaces-label

values:
p-variants
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-variants-label

values: Past revisions of this page [ctrl-alt-h]

values: p-views navigation vectorTabs p-views-label

values:
p-cactions
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-cactions-label

values:
mw-wiki-logo
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page

values:
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page [ctrl-alt-z]
z

values: Featured content – the best of Wikipedia

values: Find background information on current events

values:
/wiki/Special:Random
Load a random article [ctrl-alt-x]
x

values: portal navigation p-navigation p-navigation-label

values: Guidance on how to use and edit Wikipedia

values: About the project, what you can do, where to find things

values: A list of recent changes in the wiki [ctrl-alt-r]

values: portal navigation p-interaction p-interaction-label

values: List of all English Wikipedia pages containing links to this page [ctrl-alt-j]

values: Recent changes in pages linked from this page [ctrl-alt-k]

values:
/wiki/Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard
Upload files [ctrl-alt-u]
u

values: A list of all special pages [ctrl-alt-q]

values: Permanent link to this revision of the page

values: Link to connected data repository item [ctrl-alt-g]

values: Printable version of this page [ctrl-alt-p]

values: Esdeveniments que van conduir a l'atac a Pearl Harbor – Catalan

values: Události předcházející útoku na Pearl Harbor – Czech

values: Acontecimientos que condujeron al ataque a Pearl Harbor – Spanish

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-es badge-Q17437796 badge-featuredarticle

values: /static/images/wikimedia-button-1.5x.png 1.5x, /static/images/wikimedia-button-2x.png 2x

values: /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_132x47.png 1.5x, /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_176x62.png 2x

values:
suggestions
display: none; font-size: 13px;

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Events_leading_to_the_attack_on_Pearl_Harbor rootpage-Events_leading_to_the_attack_on_Pearl_Harbor skin-vector action-view


text:
Make in India
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Make in India
Country
India
Prime Minister(s)
Narendra Modi
Key people
Ministry of Finance
Launched
25 September 2014; 3 years ago (2014-09-25)
Status
Active
Website
http://www.makeinindia.com
Republic of India
This article is part of a series on the
politics and government of
India
Union Government[show]
Constitution of India
Fundamental rights
Executive:
President
Vice President
Prime Minister
Union Council of Ministers
Cabinet Secretary
Secretaries (Defence • Finance • Foreign • Home)
Civil services
All India Services (IAS • IFS/IFoS • IPS)
Parliament:
Rajya Sabha (Chairman)
Lok Sabha (Speaker)
Judiciary:
Supreme Court of India (Chief Justice)
High courts
District Courts
Elections[show]
Election Commission:
Chief Election Commissioner (Election commissioners)
Next general election
State assembly elections
Political parties[show]
National parties
State parties
National coalitions:
National Democratic Alliance (NDA)
United Progressive Alliance (NDA)
Federalism[show]
State governments
Governor
Chief minister
Chief secretary (Principal secretaries)
Legislatures:
Vidhan Sabha
Vidhan Parishad
Local governments:
Divisional commissioners
District magistrates
Sub-divisional magistrates
Rural bodies:
District councils
Block panchayats
Gram Panchayats
Urban bodies:
Municipal corporations
Municipal councils
Nagar panchayats
Other countries
Atlas
v
t
e
Make in India, a type of Swadeshi movement covering 25 sectors of economy,[1] was launched by the Government of India in 2014 to encourage companies to manufacture their products in India. As per the current policy, 100% FDI is permitted in all the 25 sectors, except for space (74%), defence (49%) and news media (26%).[2][3] Japan and India announced a US$12 billion "Japan-India Make-in-India Special Finance Facility" fund.[4]
After the launch, India received ₹16.40 lakh crore (US$250 billion) worth of investment commitments and investment inquiries worth ₹1.5 lakh crore (US$23 billion) between September 2014 to February 2016.[5][6][7] As a result, India emerged as the top destination globally in 2015 for foreign direct investment (FDI), surpassing the USA and China, with US$60.1 billion FDI.[8] Several states launched their own Make in India initiatives, such as Vibrant Gujarat, "Make in Haryana" and "Make in Maharashtra".[9] India received US $60 billion FDI in FY 2016-17.[10]
Combined with other initiatives by the end of 2017, India rose 42 places on Ease of doing business index, 32 places World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Index, and 19 notches in the Logistics Performance Index.[10]
This initiative converges, synergises and enables other important Government of India schemes, such as Bharatmala, Sagarmala, Dedicated Freight Corridors, Industrial corridors, UDAN-RCS, BharatNet and Digital India.
Contents
[hide]
1 The "Make In India" initiative
1.1 Ease of doing business
1.2 Ongoing global campaign
2 Sectors covered
2.1 Automobiles
2.2 Automobile components
2.3 Aviation
2.4 Biotechnology
2.5 Chemicals
2.6 Construction
2.7 Defence manufacturing
2.7.1 Exports
2.8 Electronic systems
2.9 Electrical machinery
2.10 Food processing
2.10.1 Exports
2.11 Information technology and business process management
2.12 Leather
2.13 Media and entertainment
2.14 Mining
2.15 Oil and gas
2.16 Pharmaceuticals
2.17 Ports and shipping
2.18 Railways
2.19 Renewable energy
2.20 Roads and highways
2.21 Space and astronomy
2.22 Thermal power
2.23 Textiles and garments
2.24 Tourism and hospitality
2.25 Wellness
3 References
3.1 See also
3.2 Citations
3.3 External links
The "Make In India" initiative[edit]
Make in India was launched on 25 September 2014[11] with the objective of job creation and skill enhancement in 25 sectors of the economy,[1] by improving the quality standards and minimising the impact on the environment,[12][13] to attract capital and technological investment in India.[1]
Ease of doing business[edit]
India jumped to 100th place out of 190 countries in the World Bank's 2017 ease of doing business index, from 130th in 2016.[14] In February 2017, the government appointed the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the National Productivity Council to "to sensitise actual users and get their feedback on various reform measures".[15] As a result, now there is competition among the states of India to improve their current ranking on the ease of doing business index based on the completion percentage scores on 98-point action plan for business reform under make in India initiative.[16][17][18][19][20][21] Currently Telangana, Haryana, Odisha, Chhattisgarh and West Bengal (44.35%) are top five states (c. Feb 2018).[22]
Ongoing global campaign[edit]
The campaign was designed by Wieden+Kennedy,[23] with the launch a web portal and release of a brochures on the 25 sectors, after foreign equity caps, norms and procedures in various sectors were relaxed, including application of manufacturing application made available online and the validity of licenses was increased to three years.[24]
"Zero Defect Zero Effect" slogan was coined by Prime Minister of India, Narendra Modi, to emphasize on the production mechanism that produces products with no defects with no adverse environmental and ecological effects.[25][26]
"Make in India Week" multi-sectoral industrial event at the MMRDA from 13 February 2016 was attended by 2500+ international and 8000+ domestic, foreign government delegations from 68 countries and business teams from 72 countries and 17 Indian states also held expos. Event received over ₹15.2 lakh crore (US$230 billion) worth of investment commitments and investment inquiries worth ₹1.5 lakh crore (US$23 billion), where Maharashtra led with ₹8 lakh crore (US$120 billion) of investments.[27][28] Previously between September 2014 and November 2015, the government received ₹1.20 lakh crore (US$18 billion) worth of proposals from companies interested in manufacturing electronics in India,[29]
Sectors covered[edit]
See also: Economy of India, Industrial corridor, and List of Geographical Indications in India
Make in India focuses on the following 25 sectors of the economy:
Automobiles[edit]
See also: Automotive industry in India and [[:Electric power industry in India]]
General Motors announced an investment of US$1 billion.[30]
In April 2017, Kia announced that the company would invest over $1.1 billion to build a car manufacturing plant in Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh. The facility is the company's first manufacturing plant in India. Kia stated that it would hire 3,000 employees for the plant, and it would produce 300,000 cars annually. Construction of the plant began in mid-2017, and is expected to be completed by March 2019. The first vehicles are scheduled to roll off production lines in mid-2019. Kia president Han-Woo Park announced that the first model produced at the plant would be an SUV specifically designed for the Indian market.[31][32] Park also added that Kia would invest over $2 billion and create 10,000 jobs in India by 2021.[33][34]
Automobile components[edit]
See also: Automotive Component Manufacturers Association of India
Hitachi an auto-component plant in Chennai by 2016 with the increase in their India employees count from 10,000 to 13,000.[35]
Aviation[edit]
See also: Aviation in India, UDAN-RCS, and List of airports in India
LH Aviation announced a manufacturing plant in India to produce drones.[36]
Biotechnology[edit]
See also: Biotechnology in India
Chemicals[edit]
See also: Chemical industry in India, Indian Chemical Society, and Indian Institute of Chemical Technology
Construction[edit]
See also: Construction industry of India
Defence manufacturing[edit]
See also: Defence industry of India, India and weapons of mass destruction, Guided missiles of India, and Defence Research and Development Organisation
India and Russia have deepened their Make in India defence manufacturing cooperation by signing agreements for the construction of naval frigates, KA-226T twin-engine utility helicopters (joint venture (JV) to make 60 in Russia and 140 in India), Brahmos cruise missile (JV with 50.5% India and 49.5% Russia).[37] A defence deal was signed during Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to Russia in December 2015 which will see the Kamov Ka-226 multi-role helicopter being built in India, was widely seen as the first defence deal to be actually signed under the Make in India campaign.[38][39] In August 2015, Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) began talks with Russia's Irkut Corp to transfer technology of 332 components of the Sukhoi Su-30MKI fighter aircraft under the Make in India program. These components, also called line replacement units (LRUs) refer to both critical and non-critical components and fall into four major heads such as Radio and Radar; Electrical & Electronics System; Mechanical System and Instrument System.[40]
Lockheed Martin announced in February 2016 its plans to manufacture F-16 in India, although it did not announce any time frame.[41] In February 2017, Lockheed stated that it intended to manufacture the F-16 Block-70 aircraft with a local partner in India, if the Indian Air Force agreed to purchase the aircraft.[42]
Boeing announced setting up a factory to assemble fighter planes, either the Apache or Chinook defence helicopter in India,[43] as well as the manufacture of F/A-18 Super Hornet.[44]
Prime minister Narendra Modi launches Make in India.
Exports[edit]
India confirmed that it will upgrade Myanmar's T-72 tanks, supply DRDO's radars to Armenia, Kamov 226 T multi-utility helicopters to Jordan, indigenously developed lightweight torpedoes to Myanmar (previously sold to sold to Srilanka and Vietnam), Astra 70-kilometer range air- to-air missile and 40,000 pieces of a component used in Bofors artillery guns for Rs 322 crore to UAE, and manufacture DRDO weapons in Saudi Arabia by 2018 (Dec 2017 update).[45][46]
Electronic systems[edit]
See also: Electronics and semiconductor manufacturing industry in India
With the demand for electronic hardware expected to rise rapidly to US$400 billion by 2020, India has the potential to become an electronic manufacturing hub and government is targeting to achieve net zero imports of electronics by 2020.[47] After the launch of this project, 24.8% of smartphones sold in India in the April–June quarter of 2015 were made in India, up from 19.9% the previous quarter.[48][49][50]
Various companies pledged investment in India to begin manufacturing
Foxconn: US$5 billion investment over 5 years in research and development and hi-tech semiconductor manufacturing facility in Maharashtra.[51][52]
Huawei: new research and development (R&D) campus in Bengaluru with an investment of US$170 million[53][54] and telecom hardware manufacturing plant in Chennai.[55]
Lenovo: manufacturing of Motorola at Sriperumbudur near Chennai run by Flextronics.[56][57]
Micromax: 3 new manufacturing units in Rajasthan, Telangana and Andhra Pradesh with ₹3 billion (US$46 million) investment).[58][59]
Qualcomm: "Design in India" programme to mentor ten Indian hardware companies with the potential to come up with innovative solutions and help them reach global scale.[60]
Samsung: 10 "MSME-Samsung Technical Schools"[61] and manufacturing of Samsung Z1 in its plant in Noida).[62]
Spice Group: ₹5 billion (US$77 million) mobile phone manufacturing unit in Uttar Pradesh.[63]
Vivo Mobile India began manufacturing smartphones at a plant in Greater Noida with 2,200 employs.[64]
Wistron: Taiwanese manufacturing of Blackberry, HTC and Motorola devices at a new factory in Noida.[65]
Xiaomi: smartphones at a Foxconn-run facility in Sri City made operational operational by producing Xiaomi Redmi 2 Prime.[66][67][68]
Electrical machinery[edit]
See also: Electrical machinery industry in India and Indian Electrical and Electronics Manufacturers Association
Food processing[edit]
See also: Food processing industry in India, Indian cuisine, List of largest producing countries of agricultural commodities, List of world production, and Indian Institute of Food Processing Technology
India is among the largest producers of fruits, vegetables, rice and milk globally with trade surplus in food items export.[69]
Aarisa Pitha of Jharkhand, Gushtaba of Kashmir, Chicken Curry of Punjab, Khakhra and Khandvi of Gujarat, Bamboo Steam Fish, Vada and Medhu Vada of Karnataka, Khaja and Inarsa of Bihar and Kebab of Uttar Pradesh and Puran poli of Maharashtra have been selected as traditional regional food to be promoted in the ongoing campaign.[70]
Marine Products Export Development Authority announced the deal to supply shrimp eggs to farmer in India for eventual exports of shrimp from India to other countries.[71]
Exports[edit]
In December 2017, India announced it will shortly announce a new agricultural exports policy to promote Indian and organic foods, enhance compliance of phytosanitary international food-safety requirements, development of farm-to-port and farm-to-airport cold chain with focus on 25 farm export clusters.[69]
Information technology and business process management[edit]
See also: Information technology in India, Digital India, and BharatNet
Leather[edit]
See also: Indian leather industry, Calcutta Leather Complex, Central Leather Research Institute, and E. I. Leather
Media and entertainment[edit]
See also: Media of India, Entertainment industry in India, and Bollywood
Mining[edit]
See also: Mining in India, List of mines in India, Iron and steel industry in India, Coal mining in India, and Natural resources of India
Oil and gas[edit]
See also: Oil and gas industry in India, List of oil refineries in India, Bharat Petroleum, IOC, ONGC, and Oil India
Pharmaceuticals[edit]
See also: Pharmaceutical industry in India and Indian Drugs and Pharmaceuticals
Ports and shipping[edit]
See also: Sagarmala, Ports in India, and ports in Indian Ocean
Railways[edit]
See also: Dedicated Freight Corridors, Indian Railway, and Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India
Alstom/GE Transportation announced ₹400 billion (US$6.1 billion) locomotive manufacturing factories in Madhepura and Marhaura in Bihar.[72]
Renewable energy[edit]
See also: Renewable energy in India
Roads and highways[edit]
See also: Bharatmala, Indian road network, and National Highway
Space and astronomy[edit]
See also: Space and astronomy industry in India, ISRO, and List of Indian satellites
Thermal power[edit]
See also: Electricity sector in India and List of power stations in India
In May 2017, the Union Cabinet approved the construction of 10 indigenously-built Pressurised Heavy Water Reactors (PHWRs). The contracts for the reactors worth an estimated ₹70,000 crore (US$11 billion) will be awarded to Indian companies. The construction 10 reactors with a combined nuclear capacity of 7 GW is also expected to create 33,400 direct and indirect jobs.[73]
Textiles and garments[edit]
See also: Textile industry in India
Tourism and hospitality[edit]
See also: Tourism in India
Wellness[edit]
See also: Medical tourism in India, Wellness tourism, Ayurveda, and AYUSH

References[edit]
See also[edit]
Manufacturing
Citations[edit]
^ Jump up to: a b c "Focus on 'Make In India'". Business Standard. 25 September 2014. Retrieved 27 February 2015.
Jump up ^ "Sectors". Make In India. Archived from the original on 14 August 2015. Retrieved 1 October 2015.
Jump up ^ "PM Modi's 'Make in India' turns one: All you need to know about the initiative". dna. 25 September 2015.
Jump up ^ "Japan's $12 billion 'Make in India' fund to push investments", timesofindia-economictimes
Jump up ^ "Modi's 'Make In India' racks up $222 billion in investment pledges", Reuters, 18 February 2016
Jump up ^ "'Make in India Week' gets Rs 15.2 lakh crore investment commitments", The Economic Times, 18 February 2016
Jump up ^ "Make in India: Centre gets Rs 1.20 lakh crore worth investment proposals in electronics sector". timesofindia-economictimes.
Jump up ^ "India replaces China as top FDI destination in 2015: Report - The Economic Times", The Economic Times, retrieved 2017-01-14
Jump up ^ "Make-in-Maharashtra mission to generate 20 lakh jobs", The Times of India
^ Jump up to: a b New India visible across nation: PM Modi, Times of India, 10 Jan 2018.
Jump up ^ "Look East, Link West, says PM Modi at Make in India launch". Hindustan Times. 25 September 2014.
Jump up ^ "7 facts not known about PM Modi's Make In India". Newsroom Post. 27 May 2015. Retrieved 27 May 2015.
Jump up ^ "Modi for 'zero defect' Make in India products". The Hindu Business Line. 29 December 2014. Retrieved 27 February 2015.
Jump up ^ "Ease of Doing Business in India". www.doingbusiness.org. Retrieved 25 April 2016.
Jump up ^ "On ease of doing business Narendra Modi govt does a first, to improve India's World Bank ranking". The Financial Express. 18 February 2017.
Jump up ^ Andhra Pradesh, Telengana set to top the charts for ease of doing business, Business Standard, 31 Oct 2016.
Jump up ^ OECD Economic Surveys: India 2017, Page 123.
Jump up ^ Centre to announce ‘Ease of Doing Business’ ranking for states, Live Mint, 15 Aug 2015.
Jump up ^ Ease of doing 98-point action plan
Jump up ^ "Business Reforms Action Plan". eodb.dipp.gov.in. Retrieved 2017-06-23.
Jump up ^ "2015 Rankings DIPP" (PDF).
Jump up ^ Telangana leads state-wise ease of doing business ranking, The Hindu, 9 Nov 2017.
Jump up ^ "Revealed: Man behind PM's Make in India campaign". DNA India. 18 November 2014. Retrieved 27 February 2015.
Jump up ^ "Modi Launches 'Make in India' Campaign, Portal and Logo". The New Indian Express. 26 September 2014. Retrieved 27 February 2015.
Jump up ^ "Ecologists cheer Modi's 'zero defect, zero effect' slogan". The Times of India.
Jump up ^ Mahajan, Neha (15 August 2014). "'Zero defect, zero effect' to 'Make in India': Modi's jugglery with words". hindustantimes.com. Retrieved 20 April 2015.
Jump up ^ "Modi's 'Make In India' racks up $222 billion in investment pledges", Reuters, 18 February 2016
Jump up ^ "'Make in India Week' gets Rs 15.2 lakh crore investment commitments", The Economic Times, 18 February 2016
Jump up ^ "Make in India: Centre gets Rs 1.20 lakh crore worth investment proposals in electronics sector". timesofindia-economictimes.
Jump up ^ "Boost for 'Make in India': Foxconn to invest $5 billion in Maharashtra", The Times of India
Jump up ^ "Kia Motors targets annual car sales of 300,000 in India from 2021". Reuters. 2018. Retrieved 22 February 2018.
Jump up ^ "Kia India to commence production mid-2019 with the SP SUV - Autocar India". Autocar India. Retrieved 22 February 2018.
Jump up ^ "Kia's first India model to hit roads by mid-2019". The Economic Times. 22 February 2018. Retrieved 22 February 2018.
Jump up ^ "Kia Motors Increases Investment In India To $2 Billion - NDTV CarAndBike". CarAndBike. Retrieved 22 February 2018.
Jump up ^ "Hitachi keen to push 'Make in India' programme", The Hindu, 16 February 2015
Jump up ^ "French drone maker LH Aviation to Make in India now | business", Hindustan Times, 19 June 2015
Jump up ^ Deeper defence & security cooperation with Russia enhances India's strategic choices, Economic Times, 21 dec 2017.
Jump up ^ Pubby, Manu, "Make in India: Russia ties up with Reliance Defence to manufacture Kamov 226T choppers", The Economic Times (28 August 2015)
Jump up ^ Farchy, Jack; Kazmin, Amy (25 December 2015), "Russia and India sign new defence deals", CNBC
Jump up ^ "India sees opportunity in manufacturing Sukhoi parts", The Times of India
Jump up ^ http://www.msn.com/en-in/news/newsindia/lockheed-martin-ready-to-manufacture-f-16-jets-in-india/
Jump up ^ "Lockheed says US may take 'fresh look' at its India F-16 plan". Business Today. Retrieved 18 February 2017.
Jump up ^ Boeing boost for Make in India, New Delhi: The Times of India, TNN, 17 October 2015
Jump up ^ "Boeing all for made-in-India F-18s fighter jets for IAF", hindustantimes.com
Jump up ^ India to seek supply of radars, missiles by 2018, Hindustan Times, 21 Dec 2017.
Jump up ^ http://www.livemint.com/Industry/Ujng65JNmdIJKyZR7F2LDI/India-looking-to-scale-up-military-hardware-exports.html
Jump up ^ "Digital India Initiative To Transform Country, Says Ravi Shankar Prasad", NDTV, 16 February 2016
Jump up ^ Press Trust of India (24 August 2015). "Global Electronics Manufacturers Propose Rs 90,000 Crore Investment In India". Huffingtonpost.in. Retrieved 1 October 2015.
Jump up ^ "Make in India: Govt receives proposals worth Rs 90,000 crore from global electronics companies". Dnaindia.com. 24 August 2015. Retrieved 1 October 2015.
Jump up ^ "E-boost for Make in India: Global electronic companies line up Rs 90,000 cr for India plants". Firstpost. Retrieved 1 October 2015.
Jump up ^ Rai, Saritha, "Foxconn Could Make India Its Next Manufacturing Base After China, Investments Suggest", Forbes
Jump up ^ "PM Narendra Modi urged to make reality match 'Make in India' hype", The Economic Times, 14 February 2016
Jump up ^ "China's Huawei makes $170 million "Make in India" investment", Reuters, 5 February 2015
Jump up ^ "Huawei India opens new R&D campus in Bengaluru", Deccan Herald, 5 February 2015
Jump up ^ Aman Sharma, ET Bureau 14 July 2015, 06.08PM IST, Make in India: Chinese telecom giant Huawei to set up a unit in Tamil Nadu - timesofindia-economictimes, Articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
Jump up ^ "Make In India: Lenovo-Motorola starts making smartphones at Chennai plant", Economictimes.indiatimes.com
Jump up ^ "Lenovo starts manufacturing smartphones in India", Livemint
Jump up ^ PTI, "Make in India: Micromax to invest Rs 300 cr", The Hindu Business Line
Jump up ^ "Micromax to invest Rs 300 cr for 'Make in India'", timesofindia-economictimes
Jump up ^ "Qualcomm announces 'Design In India' challenge as promised to PM Modi", The Indian Express, 2 December 2015
Jump up ^ "MSME-Samsung Technical School to promote 'Make in India'", Business Standard, 15 January 2015
Jump up ^ "Samsung launches new 4G phones, says still on top in India", The Indian Express, 17 February 2015
Jump up ^ "Spice Group announces Rs 500 crore investment to build mobile manufacturing unit in UP", DNA India, 28 January 2015
Jump up ^ "#MakeInIndia: Vivo inaugurates its first manufacturing unit in Greater Noida", The Indian Express, 22 December 2015
Jump up ^ "After Foxconn, Taiwanese contract manufacturing major Wistron to Make in India", The Times of India
Jump up ^ #MakeInIndia: Xiaomi launches Redmi 2 Prime which is made in Andhra Pradesh, The Indian Express, 11 August 2015
Jump up ^ "Make In India Project – All You Need to Know About It". 25 January 2016.
Jump up ^ https://www.cnbc.com/2015/11/24/modis-make-in-india-wins-with-xiaomi-but-fdi-infrastructure-a-problem.html
^ Jump up to: a b Agriculture reforms: To stem falling prices, govt looks at new farm exports policy, Hindustan Times, 21 Dec 2017.
Jump up ^ Singha, Minati (2 August 2015). "Mudhi to be a part of global 'Make in India' campaign". Times of India. Retrieved 4 August 2015.
Jump up ^ "MPEDA keen on producing 'Make in India' shrimp seed", The Hindu, 1 February 2015
Jump up ^ "In boost for 'Make in India', railways inks pacts with Alstom and GE Transport", timesofindia-economictimes
Jump up ^ "7,000 MW 'Make in India' nuclear projects to create 33,400 jobs: Govt". Business Today. Retrieved 18 May 2017.
External links[edit]
Official website
[show]
v
t
e
Economy of India
Companies
BSE SENSEX
CNX Nifty
Government-owned companies
List of companies
Governance
Ministry of Finance
Finance ministers
Ministry of Commerce and Industry
Commerce ministers
Finance Commission
Economic Advisory Council
Central Statistical Office
Securities and Exchange Board of India
Enforcement Directorate
Foreign trade
Foreign direct investment
Foreign exchange reserves
Remittances
Taxation
Subsidies
Industrial licensing
Voluntary guidelines
NITI Aayog
Make in India
Currency
Indian rupee
History
Historical exchange rates
Coinage
Reserve Bank of India
Governors
India Government Mint
Financial services
Banking
Banks
Insurance
Bombay Stock Exchange
National Stock Exchange
Multi Commodity Exchange
Bullion
Black money
Stock exchanges
History
Economic development
Economic liberalisation
Licence Raj
Green revolution
Government initiatives
Numbering system
People
Billionaires
Businesspeople
Demography
Income
Poverty
Labour law
Pensions
EPFO
NPS
PPF
States
Andhra Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu and Kashmir
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Mizoram
Odisha
Punjab
Rajasthan
Tamil Nadu
Telangana
Uttarakhand
Uttar Pradesh
West Bengal
Sectors
Agriculture
Livestock
Fishing
Automotive
Defence
Construction
Education
Energy
Nuclear
Solar
Wind
Entertainment
Forestry
Gambling
Healthcare
Information technology
Media
Cinema
Television
Printing
Mining
Coal
Iron and Steel
Pharmaceuticals
Retail
Science and technology
Biotechnology
Telecommunications
Textiles
Tourism
Transport
Aviation
Civil
Ports
Rail
Utilities
Electricity
Water
Category
Commons
Wikiquotes
[show]
v
t
e
Government schemes in India
Active
Schemes
Antyodaya Anna Yojana
Atal Pension Yojana
Beti Bachao, Beti Padhao Yojana
CGHS
DAY
DBT
DDUGJY
DDU-GKY
DELP
HRIDAY
Housing for All
ICDS
Income declaration scheme, 2016
JAM Yojana
KVPY
Midday Meal Scheme
NSAP
NSS
POPSK
PMAGY
PMAY
PMGSY
PMJDY
Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana
PMKSY
Pradhan Mantri Bhartiya Jan Aushadhi Yojana Kendra
PMMVY
PMMY
Pradhan Mantri Jeevan Jyoti Bima Yojana
Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana
Pradhan Mantri Suraksha Bima Yojana
Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana
Rashtriya Krishi Vikas Yojana
SAGY
SGSY
Swasth Jeevan Sewa Guarantee Yojana
Soil Health Card Scheme
UDAY
UDAN
Missions
AMRUT
Mission Indradhanush
NICRA
National Mission for Manuscripts
NRHM
ASHA
National Translation Mission
Providing Urban Amenities to Rural Areas
Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan
Rashtriya Uchchatar Shiksha Abhiyan
Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan
National Solar Mission
Smart Cities Mission
TB-Mission 2020
Projects
Bharatmala
Indian Rivers Inter-link
Sagar Mala project
Setu Bharatam
Urja Ganga Gas Pipeline Project
Campaigns
Accessible India Campaign
Digital India
Make in India
Skill India
Standup India
Startup India
Swachh Bharat Abhiyan
Unnat Bharat Abhiyan
IDs
Aadhaar
Business identification number
Indian passport
Permanent account number
Ration card (India)
Unorganised Workers' Identification Number
Voter ID (India)
State
Bhamashah Yojana
Biju Krushak Kalyan Yojana
Invest Madhya Pradesh
Jyotigram Yojana
Make in Maharashtra
Rajiv Gandhi Jeevandayee Arogya Yojana
Vibrant Gujarat
Closed
Schemes
Bharat Nirman
JSY
JnNURM
Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalaya
MPLADS
NLM
NPS
NRLM
Pooled Finance Development Fund Scheme
RNTCP
RSBY
Rural Landless Employment Guarantee Programme
Saakshar Bharat
Sampoorna Grameen Rozgar Yojana
Swabhimaan (campaign)
Swavalamban
Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Make_in_India&oldid=828081408"
Categories:
Manufacturing in India
Advertising in India
Entrepreneurship in India
Slogans
Modi administration initiatives
Economic history of India (1991–present)
Hidden categories:
CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list
Use Indian English from May 2013
All Wikipedia articles written in Indian English
Use dmy dates from March 2017
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
Languages
অসমীয়া
বাংলা
हिन्दी
മലയാളം
ଓଡ଼ିଆ
ਪੰਜਾਬੀ
संस्कृतम्
Svenska
اردو
Edit links
This page was last edited on 28 February 2018, at 13:08.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

values: jump-to-nav mw-jump

value: th

attrs: colspan class style

value: tr

value: img

attrs: alt src width height srcset data-file-width data-file-height

attrs: href class

value: td

attrs: colspan style

values:
nofollow
external free
http://www.makeinindia.com

values:
/wiki/Republic_of_India
mw-redirect
Republic of India

values:
/wiki/Fundamental_Rights_in_India
mw-redirect
Fundamental Rights in India

values:
/wiki/Vice-President_of_India
mw-redirect
Vice-President of India

values:
/wiki/Chairman_of_Rajya_Sabha
mw-redirect
Chairman of Rajya Sabha

values:
/wiki/High_Courts_of_India
mw-redirect
High Courts of India

values: font-size: 105%; padding: 0.2em 0px 0.4em; text-align: center; display: none;

values: Governors and Lieutenant-Governors of states of India

values:
/wiki/Divisional_Commissioner
mw-redirect
Divisional Commissioner

values:
/wiki/District_Magistrate
mw-redirect
District Magistrate

values:
/wiki/Panchayat_Samiti_(Block)
mw-redirect
Panchayat Samiti (Block)

values:
/wiki/Gram_Panchayats
mw-redirect
Gram Panchayats

values:
/wiki/Nagar_Palika_(Municipality)
mw-redirect
Nagar Palika (Municipality)

values:
/wiki/Nagar_Panchayat
mw-redirect
Nagar Panchayat

values: padding:0.3em 0.4em 0.3em;font-weight:bold;border-top: 1px solid #aaa; border-bottom: 1px solid #aaa;

values: Template:Politics and Government of India (page does not exist)

values: Template talk:Politics and Government of India (page does not exist)

values: float:right;clear:right;width:22.0em;margin:0 0 1.0em 1.0em;background:#f9f9f9;border:1px solid #aaa;padding:0.2em;border-spacing:0.4em 0;text-align:center;line-height:1.4em;font-size:88%;width: auto;

values:
/wiki/Defence_industry
mw-redirect
Defence industry

values:
/wiki/United_States_of_America
mw-redirect
United States of America

values:
/wiki/People%27s_Republic_of_China
mw-redirect
People's Republic of China

values:
/wiki/Global_Competitiveness_Index
mw-redirect
Global Competitiveness Index

values: Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India

values: Edit section: The "Make In India" initiative

values:
/wiki/National_Productivity_Council
mw-redirect
National Productivity Council

values: Ease of doing business ranking of states of India (page does not exist)

values: Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority

values: List of Geographical Indications in India

values: Chemical industry in India (page does not exist)

values: Defence Research and Development Organisation

attrs: alt src width height class srcset data-file-width data-file-height

values: Electrical machinery industry in India (page does not exist)

values: Food processing industry in India (page does not exist)

values: Indian Institute of Food Processing Technology

values: Marine Products Export Development Authority

values: Sanitary and phytosanitary measures and agreements

values: Edit section: Information technology and business process management

values: Indian leather industry (page does not exist)

values: List of ports and harbours of the Indian Ocean

values:
/wiki/Indian_Railway
mw-redirect
Indian Railway

values: Space and astronomy industry in India (page does not exist)

values:
nofollow
http://www.makeinindia.com/sectors/
external text

values:
/wiki/The_Hindu_Business_Line
mw-redirect
The Hindu Business Line

values: Category:CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list

values: -moz-column-width: 30em; -webkit-column-width: 30em; column-width: 30em; list-style-type: decimal;

values:
nofollow
external text
http://makeinindia.com

values: Category:Government-owned companies of India

values: Ministry of Commerce and Industry (India)

values: Minister of Commerce and Industry (India)

values:
/wiki/Finance_Commission_of_India
mw-redirect
Finance Commission of India

values: National Voluntary Guidelines on Social, Environmental and Economic Responsibilities of Business

values: List of Governors of Reserve Bank of India

values: List of Indian government initiatives focusing on economic development

values: Employees' Provident Fund Organisation of India

values:
/wiki/National_Pension_Scheme
mw-redirect
National Pension Scheme

values: Category:Economy of India by state or union territory

values:
/wiki/Economy_of_Goa
mw-redirect
Economy of Goa

values:
/wiki/Economy_of_Jammu_and_Kashmir
mw-redirect
Economy of Jammu and Kashmir

values:
/wiki/Civil_Aviation_in_India
mw-redirect
Civil Aviation in India

attrs: alt src title width height srcset data-file-width data-file-height

values: nowraplinks hlist collapsible collapsed navbox-inner

values: Template talk:Government Schemes in India

values: Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Grameen Kaushalya Yojana

values: Heritage City Development and Augmentation Yojana

values:
/wiki/Indira_Awaas_Yojana
mw-redirect
Indira Awaas Yojana

values: Pradhan Mantri Bhartiya Jan Aushadhi Yojana Kendra

values: The Indira Gandhi Matritva Sahyog Yojana (IGMSY)

values:
/wiki/Pradhan_Mantri_Mudra_Yojana
mw-redirect
Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana

values:
/wiki/Pradhan_Mantri_Ujjwala_Yojana
mw-redirect
Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana

values: Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation

values: National Initiative on Climate Resilient Agriculture

values: Providing Urban Amenities to Rural Areas

values: Unorganised Workers' Identification Number

values:
/wiki/Global_Investors_Summit,_Indore
mw-redirect
Global Investors Summit, Indore

values:
/wiki/Make_in_Maharashtra
mw-redirect
Make in Maharashtra

values: Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission

values: Members of Parliament Local Area Development Scheme

values: Revised National Tuberculosis Control Program

values: Rural Landless Employment Guarantee Programme

values: nowraplinks hlist collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner

values: Category:Economic history of India (1991–present)

values: Category:Use Indian English from May 2013

values: Category:All Wikipedia articles written in Indian English

values: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

values: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

values: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

values: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

values:
/wiki/Make_in_India
View the content page [ctrl-alt-c]
c

values: Discussion about the content page [ctrl-alt-t]

values: p-namespaces navigation vectorTabs p-namespaces-label

values:
p-variants
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-variants-label

values: Past revisions of this page [ctrl-alt-h]

values: p-views navigation vectorTabs p-views-label

values:
p-cactions
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-cactions-label

values:
mw-wiki-logo
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page

values:
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page [ctrl-alt-z]
z

values: Featured content – the best of Wikipedia

values: Find background information on current events

values:
/wiki/Special:Random
Load a random article [ctrl-alt-x]
x

values: portal navigation p-navigation p-navigation-label

values: Guidance on how to use and edit Wikipedia

values: About the project, what you can do, where to find things

values: A list of recent changes in the wiki [ctrl-alt-r]

values: মে'ক ইন ইণ্ডিয়া – Assamese

values: মেক ইন ইন্ডিয়া – Bangla

values: मेक इन इंडिया – Hindi

values: മേക്ക് ഇൻ ഇൻഡ്യ – Malayalam

values: ମେକ୍ ଇନ୍ ଇଣ୍ଡିଆ – Odia

values: ਮੇਕ ਇਨ ਇੰਡੀਆ – Punjabi

values: भारते निर्मीयन्ताम् – Sanskrit

values: میک ان انڈیا – Urdu

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Make_in_India rootpage-Make_in_India skin-vector action-view