Comment les positions de la Coalition Verte et de la Coalition Bleue diffèrent-elles ?
Major camps

Taiwan's political scene is divided into two major camps in terms of cross-Strait relations, i.e. how Taiwan should relate to China or the PRC. The Pan-Green Coalition (e.g. the Democratic Progressive Party) leans pro-independence, and the Pan-Blue Coalition (e.g. the Kuomintang) leans pro-unification. Moderates in both camps regard the Republic of China as a sovereign independent state, but the Pan-Green Coalition regard the ROC as synonymous with Taiwan, while moderates in the Pan-Blue Coalition view it as synonymous with China. These positions formed against the backdrop of the PRC's Anti-Secession Law, which threatens the use of "non-peaceful means" to respond to formal Taiwanese independence. The ROC government has understood this to mean a military invasion of Taiwan.

The Pan-Green Coalition is mainly led by the pro-independence Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Taiwan Statebuilding Party (TSP) and Green Party (GPT). They oppose the idea that Taiwan is part of China, and seek wide diplomatic recognition and an eventual declaration of formal Taiwan independence. In September 2007, the then ruling DPP approved a resolution asserting separate identity from China and called for the enactment of a new constitution for a " normal country ". It called also for general use of " Taiwan " as the country's name, without abolishing its formal name, the "Republic of China". The name "Taiwan" has been used increasingly often after the emergence of the Taiwanese independence movement. Some members of the coalition, such as former President Chen Shui-bian, argue that it is unnecessary to proclaim independence because "Taiwan is already an independent, sovereign country" and the Republic of China is the same as Taiwan. Despite being a member of KMT prior to and during his presidency, Lee Teng-hui also held a similar view and was a supporter of the Taiwanization movement. TSP and GPT have adopted a line that aggressive route more than the DPP, in order to win over pro-independence voters who are dissatisfied with the DPP's conservative stance.

The Pan-Blue Coalition, composed of the pro-unification Kuomintang (KMT), People First Party (PFP) and New Party generally support the spirit of the 1992 Consensus, where the KMT claimed that there is one China, but that the ROC and PRC have different interpretations of what "China" means. They favor eventual unification with China. Regarding independence, the mainstream Pan-Blue position is to maintain the status quo, while refusing immediate unification. President Ma Ying-jeou stated that there will be no unification nor declaration of independence during his presidency. Some Pan-Blue members seek to improve relationships with PRC, with a focus on improving economic ties.
Mouvements locaux

L'idéologie verte met l'accent sur la démocratie participative et le principe de « penser globalement, agir localement ». En conséquence, on considère que les partis Verts idéaux se développent de bas en haut, des quartiers aux municipalités, puis aux niveaux régionaux (écologiques) et nationaux. L'objectif est de gouverner par un processus de prise de décision par consensus.

Des coalitions locales fortes sont considérées comme un prérequis aux percées électorales à des niveaux supérieurs. Historiquement, la croissance des partis Verts a été déclenchée par une question unique sur laquelle les Verts peuvent répondre aux préoccupations des citoyens ordinaires. En Allemagne, par exemple, l'opposition précoce des Verts à l'énergie nucléaire leur a permis d'obtenir leurs premiers succès aux élections fédérales.
### Query ###
Comment les positions de la Coalition Verte et de la Coalition Bleue diffèrent-elles ?

### Main Text ###
Major camps

Taiwan's political scene is divided into two major camps in terms of cross-Strait relations, i.e. how Taiwan should relate to China or the PRC. The Pan-Green Coalition (e.g. the Democratic Progressive Party) leans pro-independence, and the Pan-Blue Coalition (e.g. the Kuomintang) leans pro-unification. Moderates in both camps regard the Republic of China as a sovereign independent state, but the Pan-Green Coalition regard the ROC as synonymous with Taiwan, while moderates in the Pan-Blue Coalition view it as synonymous with China. These positions formed against the backdrop of the PRC's Anti-Secession Law, which threatens the use of "non-peaceful means" to respond to formal Taiwanese independence. The ROC government has understood this to mean a military invasion of Taiwan.

The Pan-Green Coalition is mainly led by the pro-independence Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Taiwan Statebuilding Party (TSP) and Green Party (GPT). They oppose the idea that Taiwan is part of China, and seek wide diplomatic recognition and an eventual declaration of formal Taiwan independence. In September 2007, the then ruling DPP approved a resolution asserting separate identity from China and called for the enactment of a new constitution for a " normal country ". It called also for general use of " Taiwan " as the country's name, without abolishing its formal name, the "Republic of China". The name "Taiwan" has been used increasingly often after the emergence of the Taiwanese independence movement. Some members of the coalition, such as former President Chen Shui-bian, argue that it is unnecessary to proclaim independence because "Taiwan is already an independent, sovereign country" and the Republic of China is the same as Taiwan. Despite being a member of KMT prior to and during his presidency, Lee Teng-hui also held a similar view and was a supporter of the Taiwanization movement. TSP and GPT have adopted a line that aggressive route more than the DPP, in order to win over pro-independence voters who are dissatisfied with the DPP's conservative stance.

The Pan-Blue Coalition, composed of the pro-unification Kuomintang (KMT), People First Party (PFP) and New Party generally support the spirit of the 1992 Consensus, where the KMT claimed that there is one China, but that the ROC and PRC have different interpretations of what "China" means. They favor eventual unification with China. Regarding independence, the mainstream Pan-Blue position is to maintain the status quo, while refusing immediate unification. President Ma Ying-jeou stated that there will be no unification nor declaration of independence during his presidency. Some Pan-Blue members seek to improve relationships with PRC, with a focus on improving economic ties.

### Supplementary Text ###
Mouvements locaux

L'idéologie verte met l'accent sur la démocratie participative et le principe de « penser globalement, agir localement ». En conséquence, on considère que les partis Verts idéaux se développent de bas en haut, des quartiers aux municipalités, puis aux niveaux régionaux (écologiques) et nationaux. L'objectif est de gouverner par un processus de prise de décision par consensus.

Des coalitions locales fortes sont considérées comme un prérequis aux percées électorales à des niveaux supérieurs. Historiquement, la croissance des partis Verts a été déclenchée par une question unique sur laquelle les Verts peuvent répondre aux préoccupations des citoyens ordinaires. En Allemagne, par exemple, l'opposition précoce des Verts à l'énergie nucléaire leur a permis d'obtenir leurs premiers succès aux élections fédérales.

### Draft ###

### 1. Query Parsing

"Comment les positions de la Coalition Verte et de la Coalition Bleue diffèrent-elles ?"

French query → "How do the positions of Green Coalition and Blue Coalition differ?"

※ Coalition Verte = Pan-Green coalition? or actual green parties?
※ Coalition Bleue = Pan-Blue coalition? or blue/conservative parties?

### 2. Semantic Disambiguation

Response context suggests:
- Coalition Verte ≈ Pan-Green coalition (DPP, Taiwan independence)
- Coalition Bleue ≈ Pan-Blue coalition (KMT, unificationist)

? Alternative interpretation: actual green vs blue parties in Taiwan
! Most likely = political coalition references, not literal color parties

### 3. Core Positions Analysis

**Cross-Strait Relations Matrix:**

```
            Unification  |  Status Quo  |  Independence
Green      ☐            ☐            ☑
Blue       ☑            ☐            ☐
```

● High confidence: fundamental divide on sovereignty
◐ Partial: specific policy variations within coalitions

### 4. Information State Assessment

⟨H≈0.8⟩ Response covers: historical context, 1992 Consensus, DPP evolution from Chen Shui-bian to Tsai Ing-wen, KMT's economic integration strategy, moderate voices in both camps... but lacks granular policy differences on environmental/green issues - the actual coalition name origin?

⚠ Potential bias: framing as purely sovereignty issue ignores broader policy differences
? Missing: environmental policies, social issues, economic models

### 5. Logical Constraints

Physical constraint: Taiwan's geographic position → security/sovereignty paramount issue
Political constraint: 2000+ election cycles → positions evolved pragmatically
Economic constraint: China trade dependence → unification vs independence trade-offs

### 6. Multi-hop Synthesis

Response structure:
├─ Definitional: coalition identities
├─ Historical: evolution/context  
├─ Core divide: sovereignty question
└─ Strategic approaches: pragmatic vs ideological

∴ Comprehensive coverage of main political fault line
≈ Addresses query intent but limited depth on actual green policy agenda

### 7. Verification Against Query

☑ Captures fundamental difference (sovereignty)
☑ Historical context provided  
☑ Strategic approaches explained
☐ ? Actual coalition name justification unclear
⚠ Oversimplified as China relations only

**Draft Conclusion:** Response adequate for basic political positioning, though query ambiguity (literal vs metaphorical coalitions) suggests potential for deeper analysis of environmental vs economic policy divides.

### Answer###
Les positions de ces deux coalitions principales taïwanaises sur les relations avec la Chine continentale diffèrent de manière substantielle.

La Coalition Verte (également appelée Pan-Verte) regroupe principalement le Parti démocratique progressiste (PDP), le Parti de construction de Taiwan et le Parti vert. Elle penche vers l'indépendance et s'oppose à l'idée que Taiwan fasse partie de la Chine. Elle prône la reconnaissance diplomatique internationale élargie et une éventuelle déclaration d'indépendance formelle de Taiwan. Les membres de cette coalition considèrent que la République de Chine et Taiwan sont synonymes, et certains, comme l'ancien président Chen Shui-bian, arguent qu'il n'est pas nécessaire de proclamer l'indépendance car "Taiwan est déjà un pays indépendant et souverain".

La Coalition Bleue (ou Pan-Bleue) se compose principalement du Parti nationaliste chinois (Kuomintang), du Parti du premier rang et du Nouveau parti. Elle soutient généralement l'esprit du Consensus de 1992 et penche vers l'unification éventuelle avec la Chine. Concernant l'indépendance, la position majoritaire bleue maintient le statu quo, refusant l'unification immédiate. Certains membres de cette coalition cherchent à améliorer les relations avec la Chine continentale, en mettant l'accent sur les liens économiques.

Ces différences fondamentales sur la question de la souveraineté façonnent l'ensemble de leurs approches politiques et stratégiques.