On peut se demander si la reconnaissance du droit au logement comme droit humain fondamental va s'imposer à plus grande échelle dans les années à venir, vu la dynamique actuelle de définition des sans-abrisme à l'échelle internationale ?
The United Nations definition

In 2004, the United Nations sector of Economic and Social Affairs defined a homeless household as those households without a shelter that would fall within the scope of living quarters due to a lack of a steady income. The affected people carry their few possessions with them, sleeping in the streets, in doorways or on piers, or in another space, on a more or less random basis.

In 2009, at the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Conference of European Statisticians (CES), the Group of Experts on Population and Housing Censuses defined homelessness as:

In its Recommendations for the Censuses of Population and Housing, the CES identifies homeless people under two broad groups:

Article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted 10 December 1948 by the UN General Assembly, contains this text regarding housing and quality of living:

Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing, and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.

The ETHOS Typology of Homelessness and Housing Exclusion was developed as a means of improving the understanding and measurement of homelessness in Europe, and to provide a common "language" for transnational exchanges on homelessness. The ETHOS approach says homelessness is a process (rather than a static phenomenon) that affects many vulnerable households at different points in their lives.

The typology was launched in 2005 and is used for different purposes: as a framework for debate, for data collection purposes, policy purposes, monitoring purposes, and in the media. This typology is an open exercise that makes abstraction of existing legal definitions in the EU member states. It exists in 25 language versions, the translations being provided mainly by volunteer translators.

Many countries and individuals do not consider housing as a human right. Former U.S. President Jimmy Carter addressed this issue in a 2017 interview, saying, "A lot of people don't look at housing as a human right, but it is." His view contrasts with many Americans who do not believe housing is a basic human right.
Logement

Le logement des habitants représente l'un des principaux défis auxquels toutes les villes doivent faire face. Un logement adéquat implique non seulement des abris physiques, mais aussi les systèmes physiques nécessaires au maintien de la vie et de l'activité économique.

La propriété immobilière représente un statut social et une certaine sécurité économique, contrairement à la location qui peut absorber une grande partie du revenu des travailleurs urbains à bas salaire. Le sans-abrisme, ou le manque de logement, est un défi auquel sont confrontées actuellement des millions de personnes dans les pays riches comme dans les pays pauvres. Étant donné que les villes ont généralement une densité de population plus élevée que les zones rurales, les citadins sont plus susceptibles de vivre dans des appartements et moins susceptibles de vivre dans une maison individuelle.
### Query ###
On peut se demander si la reconnaissance du droit au logement comme droit humain fondamental va s'imposer à plus grande échelle dans les années à venir, vu la dynamique actuelle de définition des sans-abrisme à l'échelle internationale ?

### Main Text ###
The United Nations definition

In 2004, the United Nations sector of Economic and Social Affairs defined a homeless household as those households without a shelter that would fall within the scope of living quarters due to a lack of a steady income. The affected people carry their few possessions with them, sleeping in the streets, in doorways or on piers, or in another space, on a more or less random basis.

In 2009, at the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Conference of European Statisticians (CES), the Group of Experts on Population and Housing Censuses defined homelessness as:

In its Recommendations for the Censuses of Population and Housing, the CES identifies homeless people under two broad groups:

Article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted 10 December 1948 by the UN General Assembly, contains this text regarding housing and quality of living:

Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing, and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.

The ETHOS Typology of Homelessness and Housing Exclusion was developed as a means of improving the understanding and measurement of homelessness in Europe, and to provide a common "language" for transnational exchanges on homelessness. The ETHOS approach says homelessness is a process (rather than a static phenomenon) that affects many vulnerable households at different points in their lives.

The typology was launched in 2005 and is used for different purposes: as a framework for debate, for data collection purposes, policy purposes, monitoring purposes, and in the media. This typology is an open exercise that makes abstraction of existing legal definitions in the EU member states. It exists in 25 language versions, the translations being provided mainly by volunteer translators.

Many countries and individuals do not consider housing as a human right. Former U.S. President Jimmy Carter addressed this issue in a 2017 interview, saying, "A lot of people don't look at housing as a human right, but it is." His view contrasts with many Americans who do not believe housing is a basic human right.

### Supplementary Text ###
Logement

Le logement des habitants représente l'un des principaux défis auxquels toutes les villes doivent faire face. Un logement adéquat implique non seulement des abris physiques, mais aussi les systèmes physiques nécessaires au maintien de la vie et de l'activité économique.

La propriété immobilière représente un statut social et une certaine sécurité économique, contrairement à la location qui peut absorber une grande partie du revenu des travailleurs urbains à bas salaire. Le sans-abrisme, ou le manque de logement, est un défi auquel sont confrontées actuellement des millions de personnes dans les pays riches comme dans les pays pauvres. Étant donné que les villes ont généralement une densité de population plus élevée que les zones rurales, les citadins sont plus susceptibles de vivre dans des appartements et moins susceptibles de vivre dans une maison individuelle.

### Draft ###

### 1. Query Parsing

"On peut se demander si la reconnaissance du droit au logement comme droit humain fondamental va s'imposer à plus grande échelle"

Key semantic issue: "s'imposer" → implies external pressure/coercion vs. organic development. User wants predictive analysis, not descriptive.

"vu la dynamique actuelle de définition des sans-abrisme à l'échelle internationale"

Translation issue: "sans-abrisme" → homelessness as concept/phenomenon vs. specific condition. Suggests user understands housing rights ≠ just anti-homelessness efforts.

### 2. Domain Contextualization

Legal frameworks involved:
- Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) ●
- International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) ●  
- Regional human rights instruments ◐
- National constitutional provisions ○

Geographic scope: primarily Global North vs. Global South disparities.

Temporal dimension: post-WWII consensus formation → contemporary fragmentation/backlash.

### 3. Current State Analysis

Evidence for expansion:
- UN Habitat III (2016) → renewed housing rights emphasis ●
- SDG 11.1 → "access to adequate, safe and affordable housing and basic services" ●
- Regional courts (European Court of Human Rights) expanding housing jurisprudence ◐

Resistance patterns:
- Economic arguments → housing as "luxury good"
- Fiscal constraints → implementation costs
- Ideological shifts → individual responsibility narratives
- Jurisdictional disputes → state vs. federal authority

### 4. Predictive Factors Assessment

⟨H≈0.8⟩ Momentum indicators... climate displacement accelerating, housing commodification crises, youth homelessness in "developed" nations, informal settlement regularization movements in Latin America... counter-forces too: property rights sacred cows, neoliberal rollback, rural-urban migration patterns shifting, generational wealth transfer dynamics...

Key variables for expansion:
- Climate migration impacts → housing insecurity amplification
- Economic inequality → housing affordability crises  
- Youth demographics → intergenerational justice pressure
- International migration → border/settlement patterns

### 5. Synthesis & Probability Assessment

P(widespread recognition | current trends) ≈ 0.6-0.7

Supporting factors:
- Existing legal foundation ●
- Growing evidence base of housing as public good ●
- Cross-party consensus in many jurisdictions ◐

Limiting factors:
- Implementation costs vs. benefits calculation ○
- Property rights sacrosanctity in many systems ●
- Economic ideology resistance ◐

⟨H≈1.2⟩ But maybe framing wrong... not imposition but crystallization, not revolution but evolution, housing rights emerging from cracks in existing legal fabric like water finding underground springs, Supreme Court decisions accumulating, constitutional provisions expanding, international pressure mounting...

∴ Likely trajectory: gradual legal recognition with significant implementation gaps. Regional variations substantial. 

Key uncertainties:
? Economic crisis impacts on housing policy
? Climate migration scale and speed  
? Generational change in political leadership
? Technology effects on housing/urban systems

NB: Response should emphasize analytical complexity vs. simple prediction. Multiple pathways, contingent outcomes.

### Answer###
La question de l'extension de la reconnaissance du droit au logement comme droit humain fondamental est complexe et mérite une analyse nuancée.

Actuellement, l'article 25 de la Déclaration universelle des droits de l'homme de 1948 reconnaît déjà le droit à un niveau de vie suffisant, incluant le logement, comme un droit fondamental. Cette reconnaissance existe donc depuis plus de 70 ans au niveau international.

Cependant, la réalité pratique révèle des disparités considérables. De nombreux pays et individus ne considèrent pas le logement comme un droit humain fondamental, malgré les définitions et typologies établies par les Nations Unies et les institutions européennes qui classent la condition de sans-abrisme et les formes d'exclusion du logement comme des phénomènes complexes nécessitant une approche structurelle.

La dynamique internationale semble montrer des évolutions divergentes : d'un côté, une reconnaissance croissante du caractère systémique de l'exclusion du logement, de l'autre, des résistances à l'extension formelle de ces droits. Les défis urbains contemporains, notamment l'explosion du sans-abrisme dans les pays riches comme dans les pays pauvres, soulignent l'urgence d'une approche plus globale du droit au logement.

Il est difficile de prédire avec certitude l'évolution future de cette reconnaissance à plus large échelle, car cela dépend de facteurs politiques, économiques et sociaux complexes qui varient selon les régions et les contextes nationaux.