Comment se fait-il qu'il y ait exactement quatre organes au sein de cette Cour, et pourquoi cette répartition précise ?
Organs

The Court has four organs: the Presidency, the Judicial Division, the Office of the Prosecutor, and the Registry.
Organes

La Cour dispose de quatre organes : la Présidence, la Division judiciaire, le Bureau du procureur et le Greffe.
### Query ###
Comment se fait-il qu'il y ait exactement quatre organes au sein de cette Cour, et pourquoi cette répartition précise ?

### Main Text ###
Organs

The Court has four organs: the Presidency, the Judicial Division, the Office of the Prosecutor, and the Registry.

### Supplementary Text ###
Organes

La Cour dispose de quatre organes : la Présidence, la Division judiciaire, le Bureau du procureur et le Greffe.

### Draft ###

### 1. Query Parsing

"Comment se fait-il qu'il y ait exactement quatre organes" → Why exactly four organs?

Key semantic: "exactement" (exactly) suggests structural necessity, not historical accident.

"répartition précise" → precise distribution/allocation. User wants functional logic behind numbers.

Context: International Criminal Court structure, likely post-Rome Statute (1998). French legal terminology suggests either French legal system or international tribunal with French working language.

### 2. Information Retrieval Constraints

Available data: ● Basic four-organ structure confirmed, ◐ Specific jurisdictional reasons for exactly four unclear, ○ Historical evolution details incomplete.

Physical constraint: Must be ≥2 organs (at least judicial/prosecutorial functions), ≤4 organs (manageable administrative overhead).

Logical constraint: Four allows functional separation while maintaining coordination mechanisms.

### 3. Structural Analysis

Four organs = Presidency + Judicial Division + Prosecutor's Office + Registry.

Each serves distinct function:
- Presidency: administrative leadership, judicial management
- Judicial Division: trial/appellate chambers, pre-trial division  
- Prosecutor: investigation/charging authority
- Registry: administrative support, evidence management

? Why exactly four vs three or five?

### 4. Constraint Reasoning

Three organs → potential overload on single administrative body
Five organs → coordination costs ↑, administrative complexity ↑

∴ Four represents optimal balance between functional specialization and operational efficiency.

### 5. Knowledge Gaps

⚠ Critical limitation: Specific treaty negotiations, jurisdictional precedents, administrative efficiency studies during ICC's establishment (1998-2002) not accessible for verification.

⟨H≈0.8⟩ 
Rome conference delegates... weighing every comma, every organ... four feels right, doesn't it? Like the four chambers of the heart, each pumping different lifeblood through the court's arteries... prosecutorial ambition, judicial restraint, administrative diligence, presidential vision... 

But why not five? Prosecutor needs independence from judges... administrative separation from judicial functions... registry as neutral record-keeper... 

Why not three? Administrative burden too heavy on remaining organs... judicial efficiency suffers without specialized chambers...

Four: the sweet spot where complexity meets manageability, where jurisdictional purity meets practical governance.

⟨H≈0.2⟩

### 6. Synthesis

◐ Available evidence suggests four-organ structure results from:

1. Functional necessity (judicial/prosecutorial/administrative separation)
2. Operational efficiency (manageable coordination)  
3. Jurisdictional clarity (role specialization)

○ But specific historical/legal reasoning behind exactly four vs alternatives remains unclear without access to primary treaty negotiations.

NB: Response acknowledges this limitation rather than speculating on unverified details.

∴ Four organs represents empirically optimal structure given ICC's mandate, but exact reasoning requires deeper archival research into Rome Statute negotiations.

### Answer###
La Cour pénale internationale dispose effectivement de quatre organes distincts : la Présidence, la Division judiciaire, le Bureau du procureur et le Greffe.

Cette structure de quatre organes reflète probablement la nécessité de séparer les différentes fonctions juridictionnelles et administratives essentielles au fonctionnement de la Cour. Chaque organe assume des responsabilités spécifiques : la Présidence assure le leadership administratif et judiciaire, la Division judiciaire gère les procédures judiciaires, le Bureau du procureur mène les enquêtes et les poursuites, et le Greffe fournit le soutien administratif et logistique.

Cependant, je ne dispose pas d'informations précises sur les raisons spécifiques qui ont conduit à cette répartition exacte de quatre organes plutôt qu'un nombre différent. Les considérations qui ont motivé cette structure organisationnelle particulière - qu'il s'agisse d'impératifs juridictionnels, d'efficacité administrative, ou de précédents institutionnels - nécessiteraient une analyse plus approfondie des négociations qui ont abouti au Statut de Rome et à la création de la Cour pénale internationale.