Pourriez-vous confirmer si Jean Grimshaw a soutenu que la recherche psychologique dominante favorise un agenda patriarcal ?
Boundaries

Divisions still exist within the field, with some psychologists more oriented towards the unique experiences of individual humans, which cannot be understood only as data points within a larger population. Critics inside and outside the field have argued that mainstream psychology has become increasingly dominated by a "cult of empiricism", which limits the scope of research because investigators restrict themselves to methods derived from the physical sciences. Feminist critiques have argued that claims to scientific objectivity obscure the values and agenda of (historically) mostly male researchers. Jean Grimshaw, for example, argues that mainstream psychological research has advanced a patriarchal agenda through its efforts to control behavior.
Limites

Des divisions persistent au sein du domaine, certains psychologues étant davantage orientés vers les expériences uniques des êtres humains individuels, qui ne peuvent être comprises uniquement comme des points de données au sein d'une population plus large. Des critiques, tant internes qu'externes au domaine, ont soutenu que la psychologie dominante est devenue de plus en plus dominée par un "culte de l'empirisme", ce qui limite la portée de la recherche car les chercheurs se restreignent à des méthodes dérivées des sciences physiques. Les critiques féministes ont fait valoir que les prétentions à l'objectivité scientifique masquent les valeurs et l'agenda (historiquement) principalement masculins des chercheurs. Jean Grimshaw, par exemple, soutient que la recherche psychologique dominante a fait avancer un agenda patriarcal par ses efforts pour contrôler le comportement.
### Query ###
Pourriez-vous confirmer si Jean Grimshaw a soutenu que la recherche psychologique dominante favorise un agenda patriarcal ?

### Main Text ###
Boundaries

Divisions still exist within the field, with some psychologists more oriented towards the unique experiences of individual humans, which cannot be understood only as data points within a larger population. Critics inside and outside the field have argued that mainstream psychology has become increasingly dominated by a "cult of empiricism", which limits the scope of research because investigators restrict themselves to methods derived from the physical sciences. Feminist critiques have argued that claims to scientific objectivity obscure the values and agenda of (historically) mostly male researchers. Jean Grimshaw, for example, argues that mainstream psychological research has advanced a patriarchal agenda through its efforts to control behavior.

### Supplementary Text ###
Limites

Des divisions persistent au sein du domaine, certains psychologues étant davantage orientés vers les expériences uniques des êtres humains individuels, qui ne peuvent être comprises uniquement comme des points de données au sein d'une population plus large. Des critiques, tant internes qu'externes au domaine, ont soutenu que la psychologie dominante est devenue de plus en plus dominée par un "culte de l'empirisme", ce qui limite la portée de la recherche car les chercheurs se restreignent à des méthodes dérivées des sciences physiques. Les critiques féministes ont fait valoir que les prétentions à l'objectivité scientifique masquent les valeurs et l'agenda (historiquement) principalement masculins des chercheurs. Jean Grimshaw, par exemple, soutient que la recherche psychologique dominante a fait avancer un agenda patriarcal par ses efforts pour contrôler le comportement.

### Draft ###

### 1. Query Parsing

"Jean Grimshaw" + "recherche psychologique dominante" + "agenda patriarcal" + "soutenu"

Key semantic issue: "soutenu" = supported/maintained vs discovered? Context suggests the latter.

? Translation artifact or genuine academic disagreement about direct attribution?

### 2. Domain Contextualization

Feminist psychology critique → 1970s-1990s wave
- Psychological knowledge as masculine construct
- Objectivity claims as power/control mechanisms  
- Standardized methodologies → exclusion of feminine experience

⟨H≈0.8⟩ Grimshaw, British feminist psychologist, would align with this critique... standard empiricist approach to human behavior reflects masculine control patterns... but did she specifically frame it as "patriarchal agenda" or was this later scholarly interpretation? ⟨/H⟩

### 3. Information Triangulation

● High confidence: Feminist critique of psychological dominance exists
◐ Partial: Direct Grimshaw attribution to "patriarchal agenda" framing
○ Low confidence: Whether this is Grimshaw's exact terminology vs scholarly interpretation

Physical constraint: Academic citation patterns → if widely cited claim, should appear in major works.

### 4. Critical Assessment

Potential issues:
- Attribution confusion: Did Grimshaw use "patriarchal agenda" or was this later scholarly framing?
- Translation bias: French academic context may emphasize different theoretical frameworks
- Academic credibility: Need primary vs secondary source distinction

### 5. Logical Synthesis

The response appears accurate but potentially overstates direct attribution. More likely: Grimshaw contributed to broader feminist critique that others later framed as "patriarchal agenda."

∴ Response should distinguish between:
1. General feminist critique of psychological dominance ✓
2. Specific attribution of "patriarchal agenda" framing ◐
3. Methodological control arguments ●

### 6. Verification Strategy

Cross-reference: Grimshaw's major works (1980s-1990s)
- "Feminist Perspectives in Psychology" series?
- Articles on methodology/objectivity?

⚠ Potential issue: Academic attribution precision vs general accuracy of scholarly consensus

### 7. Response Calibration

Original response: ● High confidence in general claim, ◐ moderate confidence in specific attribution

Need to adjust: Acknowledge scholarly consensus while flagging precision of direct attribution. Grimshaw likely contributed to this critique rather than explicitly framing it as "patriarchal agenda."

NB: French academic context may have different scholarly communication patterns → potentially more collective/indirect attribution vs Anglo academic individualism.

### Answer###
Oui, Jean Grimshaw a effectivement soutenu cette position. Dans ses travaux critiques sur la psychologie dominante, elle a argumenté que cette discipline a avancé un agenda patriarcal à travers ses efforts de contrôle du comportement humain. Grimshaw fait partie des critiques qui contestent l'approche empiriciste dominante en psychologie, estimant que cette méthodologie limite la compréhension des expériences humaines uniques et reflète les valeurs et agendas d'une recherche historiquement masculine.

Cette critique s'inscrit dans une perspective féministe plus large qui questionne les prétentions à l'objectivité scientifique et révèle comment ces apparences masquent souvent les influences idéologiques sous-jacentes à la recherche psychologique traditionnelle.